You are on page 1of 44

Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No.

Geotextile containment for hydraulic and


environmental engineering
C. R. Lawson
Managing Director, Ten Cate Geosynthetics, Suite 3205, 32nd Floor, The Center, 99 Queen’s Road
Central, Hong Kong, Telephone: +852 22804680, Telefax: +852 22950323, E-mail:
c.lawson@tencate.com

Received 4 June 2008, accepted 4 June 2008

ABSTRACT: Historically, geotextile containment has been used to encapsulate sandy soils to
permit their use as flexible, erosion-resistant, mass-gravity structures in hydraulic and marine
applications. More recently, geotextile containment has been used as a means of disposing of, and
dewatering, various waste streams and contaminated sediments. The paper reviews the three main
geotextile containment units in use – geotextile tubes, geotextile containers and geotextile bags –
and analyses their use in a wide range of hydraulic and environmental applications. Special
attention is given to the use of geotextile containment for the isolation, dewatering, and disposal of
specific waste streams and contaminated sediments. Note: This paper is an updated version of the
Giroud Lecture presented by C. R. Lawson at the 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics
held in Yokohama, Japan, in 2006.

KEYWORDS: Geosynthetics, Geotextile containment, Geotextile tubes, Geotextile containers,


Geotextile bags, Dewatering

REFERENCE: Lawson, C. R. (2008). Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental


engineering. Geosynthetics International, 15, No. 6, 384–427. [doi: 10.1680/gein.2008.15.6.384]

1. INTRODUCTION
taminated sediments, thereby substantially reducing their
Geotextile containment is used for an increasing range of volume and rendering them manageable for disposal. Also,
applications. Table 1 lists the current three main applica- geotextile containment can be used for the controlled
tion areas commonly referred to: hydraulic and marine, offshore disposal of contaminated soil and sediments.
foundations, and environmental. In hydraulic and marine The application of geotextile containment in founda-
applications geotextile containment prevents the erosion, tions may be considered more a case of geotextile
and collapse, of sand fill, thereby enabling its use in confinement than of containment, because the aim is to
erosion-resistant structures. In foundation applications improve the bearing capacity of the columns by generating
geotextile containment improves the bearing capacity of confining tensions in the geotextile skin: consequently,
stone and sand columns in low-shear-strength foundation this application is not considered further in this paper.
soils. In environmental applications geotextile containment Thus the paper will concentrate on two of the applications
enables controlled dewatering of slurry waste and con- of geotextile containment listed in Table 1: hydraulic and
marine applications, and environmental applications.
Table 1. Range of applications of geotextile containment
2. TYPES OF GEOTEXTILE
Geotextile containment Examples
applications
CONTAINMENT UNIT
Geotextile containment, in one form or another, has been
Hydraulic and marine Mass-gravity revetment and dyke
used for many years for a wide variety of hydraulic and
structures
Mass-gravity offshore structures marine applications. The most common, and widely used,
Surface protection to stream banks geotextile containers are the well-known, ubiquitous sand-
Foundations Encasing of stone and sand columns bags that are seen the world over, shoring up flood
Environmental Dewatering of waste and defences in times of natural calamity.
contaminated sediments
Three fundamental types of geotextile containment unit
Offshore disposal of contaminated
soil and sediments exist, differentiated by geometrical shape and volume:
geotextile tubes, geotextile containers, and geotextile bags.
384

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 385

Geotextile tubes (Figure 1a) are tubular containers that are Geotextile tubes are laid out and filled on site to their
formed in situ on land or in water. Geotextile containers required geometrical form. The tubes are filled by hydrau-
(Figure 1b) are large-volume containers that are filled in lically pumping fill into the tube. Geotextile tubes range
barges above water and then deposited into submarine in size from 1 m to 10 m in diameter, and up to 200 m in
environments. Geotextile bags (Figure 1c) are small- length.
volume containers that are filled on land or above water Geotextile containers are large-volume containers that
and then pattern-placed either near water or below water are filled above water and then positioned and placed at
level. water depth. The volumes of these containers more
commonly range from 100 m3 to 700 m3 , although con-
tainers as large as 1000 m3 have been installed. To
facilitate the installation of geotextile containers of this
magnitude, an efficient and practical installation system
must be utilised. To date, this has been accomplished by
means of split-bottom barges.
Geotextile bags are manufactured in a range of shapes,
and they are installed in a pattern-placed arrangement that
greatly improves their overall stability and performance.
Today, geotextile bags range in volume from 0.05 m3 to
around 5 m3 , and may be pillow-shaped, box-shaped or
mattress-shaped, depending on the required application.
When considering geotextile containment, a distinction
must be made between those applications where the
geotextile containment is required only for temporary or
(a)
expedient use and those applications that require long-
term performance. For example, for temporary or expedi-
ent works the requirements for the geotextile container are
fairly basic, as it has only a short life expectancy over
which it has to perform; however, for long-term applica-
tions the performance requirements for the geotextile
container are more severe. With regard to long-term
performance, a distinction also must be made according to
the type of hydraulic environment acting on the geotextile
container. For instance, the action of still, or slowly
moving, water will have a different effect on the geotextile
container than the action of breaking waves.

3. GEOTEXTILE TUBES FOR


(b) HYDRAULIC AND MARINE
APPLICATIONS
3.1. Fundamentals of geotextile tubes
Geotextile tubes first began to be used for hydraulic and
marine structures in the 1960s. These tubes (Longard
tubes) were of small theoretical diameter (less than 2 m),
and proved of limited use owing to their instability,
especially in hydraulic environments. Longard tubes uti-
lised an impermeable inner lining to the woven geotextile
skin in order to pressurise the tube with water before
introduction of the sand fill.
During the 1980s large-diameter geotextile tubes were
developed using strong, woven geotextiles as the tube skin
(and with no impermeable inner liner). The major advan-
tage of these later tubes is that a large encapsulated mass,
a tubular structure, could be designed directly to meet
(c)
many hydraulic and marine stability requirements. Also,
during the late 1980s, heavyweight nonwoven geotextiles
Figure 1. Types of geotextile containment unit: (a) geotextile were developed for geotextile tubes of small theoretical
tubes; (b) geotextile containers; (c) geotextile bags diameter (less than 1.5 m). Today, geotextile tubes ranging
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
386 Lawson

in theoretical diameters from 1.0 m to 6.0 m are used in Geotextile tube


many hydraulic and marine applications the world over.
Geotextile tubes are laid out and filled hydraulically on
site to their required geometrical form. The typical
features of a geotextile tube are shown in Figure 2.
Hydraulic fill is pumped into the geotextile tube through
specially manufactured filling ports located at specific
intervals along the top of the tube. During filling, the
tube, being permeable, allows the excess water to pass Theoretical
through the geotextile skin while the retained fill attains a diameter, DT
compacted, stable mass within the tube. For hydraulic and Circumference, CT
marine applications the type of fill used is sand, or a (a)
significant percentage of sand. The reasons for this are
that this type of fill can be placed to a good density by Geotextile tube
hydraulic means; it has good internal shear strength; and, Width, WT
once placed, it will not undergo further consolidation,
which would significantly change the filled shape of the
geotextile tube. Once filled, the geotextile tube behaves as
a mass-gravity unit, and can be designed accordingly. Cross-sectional
Height, HT
area, AT
The geotextile skin performs three functions that are Average vertical
critical to the performance of the filled geotextile tube. stress, σ ⬘v
First, it must have the required tensile strength and
stiffness to resist the mechanical stresses applied during Base width, bT
filling and throughout the life of the units, and must not (b)
continue to deform so that the geotextile tube changes
shape over time. Second, it must have the required Figure 3. (a) Fundamental geotextile tube parameters;
hydraulic properties to retain the sand fill and prevent (b) engineering parameters of importance for filled geotextile
erosion under a variety of hydraulic conditions. Third, it tubes
must have the required durability to remain intact over the
design life of the units.
Geotextile tubes are normally described in terms of 3.2. Applications of geotextile tubes
either theoretical diameter DT (in Europe, the Middle East Geotextile tubes are used for a range of hydraulic and
and Asia) or circumference CT (in North and South marine applications where mass-gravity barrier-type struc-
America) (Figure 3a). While these two properties repre- tures are required. These applications are shown in Figure
sent the fundamental parameters of geotextile tubes, they 4, and are described briefly below.
are not of direct interest when it comes to the engineering
parameters for hydraulic and marine applications, where 3.2.1. Revetments
the geotextile tube in its filled condition is of prime Geotextile tubes are used for revetment structures (Figure
importance. The various engineering parameters of impor- 4a), where their contained fill is used to provide mass-
tance are shown in Figure 3b. gravity stability. They are used for both submerged and
Table 2 lists approximate relationships between the exposed revetments. For submerged revetments the geo-
fundamental geotextile tube parameters of theoretical textile tube is covered by local soil, and is required to
diameter and circumference (Figure 3a) and the engineer- provide protection only when the soil cover has been
ing parameters of importance depicted in Figure 3b for eroded during periods of intermittent storm activity. Once
filled geotextile tubes. The relationships are applicable to the storm is over, the revetment is covered by soil again,
geotextile tubes that have a maximum strain <15%, show either naturally or by maintenance filling. For exposed
low unconfined creep, and are filled to maximum capacity revetments the geotextile tube is exposed throughout its
with sand-type fill. Furthermore, it is also assumed that required design life.
the foundation beneath the tube is a flat, solid surface. To prevent erosion of the foundation soil in the vicinity
of the geotextile tube it is common practice to install a
Filling pipe from pump scour apron (see Figure 4a). This scour apron usually
consists of a geotextile filter layer that passes beneath the
Filling
ports geotextile tube and is anchored at the extremity by a
smaller, filled, geotextile tube.
Revetments are also constructed using multiple-height
Geotextile tube geotextile tubes. Here the geotextile tubes are staggered
horizontally to achieve required stability. Considerable
Geotextile tube length care should be exercised during construction of these
types of revetment to ensure that the water emanating
Figure 2. Typical features of geotextile tubes from the hydraulic filling of the upper geotextile tubes
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 387

Table 2. Approximate relationships between fundamental and engineering parameters of


geotextile tubes

Engineering parameter In terms of theoretical diameter, In terms of circumference,


DT CT

Maximum filled height, HT HT  0.55 DT HT  0.18 CT


Filled width, WT WT  1.5 DT WT  0.5 CT
Base contact width, bT bT  DT bT  0.3 CT
Cross-sectional area, AT AT  0.6 DT 2 AT  0.06 CT 2
Average vertical stress at base,  v9  0.7ªDT  v9  0.22ªCT
 v9

Note: ª ¼ bulk density of the geotextile tube fill.

Waves break across


breakwater
Ocean waves
Geotextile tube Local soil fill Calm water
Geotextile tube
breakwater
Water forces
causing erosion Soil to be
protected

Seabed
Scour apron (optional) Scour apron
(a) (b)

Flood level or storm


Developments Hydraulically
water level
to be protected placed fill Geotextile tube
Geotextile tube dyke core
dyke core Permanent
Sand protection
covering rock armour

Shallow seabed
Scour apron
(c) (d)

Water forces
Sand build-up Geotextile causing erosion
on protected tube
side of groyne

Contained
sand fill

Sand to be
protected Scour apron
(e)

Figure 4. Hydraulic and marine applications of geotextile tubes: (a) revetments (exposed or submerged); (b) offshore
breakwaters; (c) protection dykes; (d) containment dykes; (e) groynes

does not erode the soil and undermine the lower geotextile the filled geotextile tube is located a certain distance
tubes in the multiple-height revetment structure. Examples offshore in order to dissipate wave forces before they can
of use are given by Nickels and Heerten (1996) and reach the shoreline. Again, scour aprons are used beneath
Artières et al. (2005). the geotextile tube breakwater to ensure that local erosion
does not undermine the breakwater structure.
3.2.2. Offshore breakwaters In many instances the geotextile tube is left exposed,
Geotextile tubes are used for offshore breakwaters (Figure which consequently affects its design life. Additional
4b) to prevent the erosion of shoreline developments. Here techniques or treatments may be applied to the geotextile
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
388 Lawson

tube breakwater to increase its exposed design life. These hydraulically. The advantage of this approach is that the
are discussed in more detail in Section 3.8. Examples of same hydraulic fill used in the reclamation can also be
use are given by Townsend (2005), Oh and Shin (2006), used inside the geotextile tubes for the containment dykes,
Alvarez et al. (2007) and Shin and Oh (2007). thus avoiding the need to import rock fill for the dykes.
Containment dykes constructed from geotextile tubes
3.2.3. Protection dykes provide an economic alternative to other forms of con-
Geotextile tubes are used for protection dykes (Figure 4c), struction, such as sheet-piled walls, especially where the
where they prevent flood and storm damage to valuable foundation soil is soft. Where water forces dictate, and
structures and real estate. Protection dykes also may be where longevity is required, rock armouring can be placed
used for river, lake or stream training works. around the geotextile tube core (Figure 4d). Examples of
Where geotextile tube protection dykes are constructed use are given by de Bruin and Loos (1995), Spelt (2001),
it is common to cover the geotextile tube with local soil. Fowler et al. (2002b), Yee (2002), Yee et al. (2007), Shin
The geotextile tube is required to function only intermit- et al. (2008) and Yee and Choi (2008).
tently during storm or flood periods when the soil cover is
eroded. The use of the soil cover provides several 3.2.5. Groynes
advantages to the geotextile tube core. First, it hides the Geotextile tubes can be used as groynes (Figure 4e) to
geotextile tube core, thereby providing an aesthetic envir- prevent the littoral movement of sediment. In most cases
onment and ensuring no damage due to vandalism. the geotextile tubes are left exposed, but coatings or a
Second, it protects the geotextile tube from long-term rock covering may be applied, depending on the circum-
exposure to direct sunlight (UV degradation). stances and the required life expectancy. Examples of use
Where geotextile tubes are used for river, lake or stream are given by Jackson (1987) and Fowler et al. (2002b).
training works it is common to leave the tube exposed
except for major structures, where rock armour layers may 3.3. Limit state design modes
be placed over it to dissipate hydraulic forces. Where the Geotextile tubes behave as mass-gravity units, and thus a
tubes are left exposed, a geotextile shroud may be used conventional design approach following standard proce-
across the top of the tube, or a coating applied, to enhance dures of assessing the possible modes of failure or
its longevity in an exposed environment. Examples of use deformation can be employed to arrive at a safe design
are given by Austin (1995), Fowler (1997) and Ghazali et solution. Figure 5 lists the various limit state modes that
al. (2006). should be assessed: these are divided into external modes
(affecting the performance of the geotextile tube structure
3.2.4. Containment dykes overall) and internal modes (affecting the performance of
Geotextile tubes are used for the cores of containment the internal structure of individual geotextile tubes). Either
dykes (Figure 4d) where water depths are relatively a global factor of safety or a partial factor of safety
shallow. Here, the tube structure contains a filled reclama- approach can be applied when assessing the various limit
tion area, the reclamation fill being dry-dumped or placed state modes.

(i) Sliding stability (ii) Overturning stability (iii) Bearing stability

(v) Scour of foundation (vi) Foundation settlement


(iv) Global stability
(a)

(i) Geotextile skin rupture (ii) Erosion of fill through geotextile (iii) Deformation of contained fill
skin
(b)

Figure 5. Limit state modes for geotextile tubes: (a) external; (b) internal
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 389

3.3.1. External modes


There are six external limit state modes to be assessed 3.4. Required tensile properties of geotextile tubes
(Figure 5a): sliding resistance, overturning resistance, 3.4.1. Tensions generated in geotextile tubes
bearing resistance, global stability, scour resistance and During the filling process, and throughout the life of filled
foundation settlement. geotextile tubes, tensions are generated in three locations
Geotextile tubes are very stable units, with high base of the tube unit (Figure 6): around the circumference of
contact width to height ratios: for example, from Table 2, the geotextile tube ([T]c ); along the length, or axis, of the
bT /HT  1.5. Geotextile tubes should be checked for geotextile tube ([T]a ); and at the connections of the filling
sliding and overturning stability, especially if they are of ports with the geotextile tube ([T]p ).
small theoretical diameter, i.e. DT < 2 m. Relationships to The analysis of tensions generated in geotextile tubes is
assess the stability of geotextile tubes under a variety of complicated, owing to the effect of the tube’s geometry.
hydraulic conditions are given by Pilarczyk (2000) and Further, the fill contained within geotextile tubes starts as
CUR (2006). a liquid, i.e. with zero shear strength, and then over a
Bearing stability, Figure 5a(iii), may be of importance relatively short time reverts to a solid, i.e. with internal
if the foundation is very soft and the geotextile tube is shear strength. This change in phase of the contained fill,
large. However, experience has shown that the distribution the amount of filling and pumping pressure applied, and
of weight of geotextile tubes on soft foundation soils is the time over which the contained fill changes in phase,
very efficient. all affect the magnitudes of the tensions generated in
Global stability needs to be taken into account only geotextile tubes. For hydraulic and marine structures
when multiple geotextile tubes are used (Figure 5a(iv)). where the contained fill consists of sandy material, the
Here, the stability analysis should take into account time it takes to change to a solid material is very short
changes in both the external water level and the ground- (unlike finer fills), and thus analysis methods based on the
water level within the geotextile tube structure. Also, assumption of a shear-resistant fill are more appropriate
potential weak planes between adjacent geotextile tubes for this type of application.
should be assessed (e.g. Krahn et al. 2007). The procedure normally used to determine the tensions
Scour of the foundation around the edges of geotextile in geotextile tubes is to first determine the circumferential
tubes (Figure 5a(v)) can lead to undermining, and the tension [T]c , then the axial tension [T]a , and finally the
geotextile tube overturning. Scour may occur either during port connection tension [T]p .
the filling process or during the life of the tube. During Two approaches have been used to analyse the circum-
filling, a large amount of water is expelled through the ferential tensions generated in geotextile tubes: membrane
geotextile skin, and this can cause erosion and under- theory and continuum mechanics. Membrane theory meth-
mining of the geotextile tube if measures are not taken to ods have been proposed by several researchers (e.g. Liu
prevent this. To prevent scouring of the foundation during 1981; Kazimierowicz 1994; Leschinsky et al. 1996; Plaut
filling it is common practice to first install a geotextile or and Suherman 1998; Palmerton 2002). An important
geomembrane layer beneath the geotextile tube prior to feature of membrane theory methods is that the contained
tube placement and filling. This procedure is very im- fill is assumed to act as a liquid with no internal shear
portant where multiple-height geotextile tubes are in- resistance. The filling procedure can be modelled along
stalled, in order to prevent the filling water of the upper with the resulting filled shape. While these methods
tubes causing erosion and instability of the lower tubes in appear to determine the filled shape of geotextile tubes
the structure. reasonably well, they do not determine the circumferential
Where there is potential for foundation scour during the tension in the geotextile skin too well when sand is used
life of the geotextile tube structure it is common practice as the confined fill. The reason for this is that sand fill
to install a scour apron during construction (see Figure 4). reverts to a solid phase relatively quickly once it has
The scour apron consists of a geotextile filter anchored at entered the geotextile tube, with the subsequent stresses
the extremities by means of a small-diameter geotextile acting on the geotextile skin quite different from that
tube manufactured as an integral part of the geotextile when in the liquid phase.
filter base.
Filling port
Where geotextile tubes are constructed on compressi-
ble foundations, and where they are required to meet
specific height requirements for hydraulic structures
(e.g. breakwaters), an assessment of the effect of [T ]c
[T ]p
foundation settlement should be performed (Figure
[T ]a
5a(vi)).

3.3.2. Internal modes


There are three internal stability modes to be assessed
(Figure 5b): geotextile skin rupture resistance, geotextile
skin hydraulic resistance, and deformation of the con-
tained fill. These are discussed in detail in Sections 3.4,
3.5 and 3.6. Figure 6. Locations of tensions generated in geotextile tubes
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
390 Lawson

Continuum mechanics have also been used to model Circumferential tension distribution
geotextile tube behaviour (e.g. Seay 1998; Cantré 2002). around filled geotextile tube
While this approach can model the tension distribution
around the circumference of a geotextile tube containing a
shear-resistant fill, it is virtually impossible to model the
filling process. As the filling process has a major effect
on the final filled shape of the geotextile tube, it also has
a major effect on the geotextile skin tensions. Where Filled geotextile tube
continuum methods have proved very useful is in the
modelling of deformations of geotextile tube structures on
soft foundations, as they can account for the complex
vertical stress distribution at the base of a filled geotextile
[Tmax]c
tube reasonably well.
Figure 7 shows the maximum circumferential tension
[Tmax ]c for filled geotextile tubes having theoretical dia-
meters DT ¼ 3.0 m, 4.0 m and 5.0 m using the procedure
of Palmerton (2002). As noted in Table 2, the maximum
filling height is HT  0.55DT, which results in maximum Location of maximum circumferential tension
circumferential tensions [Tmax ]c of 18 kN/m, 32 kN/m and (a)
50 kN/m, respectively, for the three geotextile tube sizes.
The magnitude of the circumferential tension around a
filled geotextile tube is a function of the curvature of the 50⫺70%[Tmax]c
geotextile skin, with the highest tension [Tmax ]c coinciding
with the location of highest curvature. This occurs at the
sides of the filled geotextile tubes (Figure 8a). Elsewhere
around the filled geotextile tube the circumferential
tension is lower, especially across the base of the geotex-
tile tube, where the circumferential tension is very low Filled geotextile tube
because the geotextile skin is essentially flat in this
location.
Figure 8b shows an approximation of the distribution in
circumferential tension around a geotextile tube expressed
as a percentage of the maximum circumferential tension
[Tmax ]c . When designing a geotextile tube, the magnitude
of the circumferential tension and its location need to be
kept in mind when seaming geotextile sheets together to
form the resulting geotextile tube. 10⫺15%[Tmax]c 100%[Tmax]c

100
(b)
γ ⫽ 20 kN/m3
Maximum circumferential tension, [Tmax]c (kN/m)

DT ⫽ 5 m Figure 8. (a) Circumferential tension distribution around a


80 filled geotextile tube; (b) approximation of circumferential
tensions in terms of [Tmax ]c

The axial tensions generated along the length of filled


60
geotextile tubes are a function of the filling pressure and
the height of the tube. Figure 9 shows the maximum axial
DT ⫽ 4 m
tension [Tmax ]a expressed in terms of the maximum
40 circumferential tension [Tmax ]c using the procedure of
Palmerton (2002). A relationship of [Tmax ]a ¼ 0.63 [Tmax ]c
would suggest a very good fit.
The magnitude of the port connection tension [T]p is a
20
function of the filling pressure, the height of the geotextile
DT ⫽ 3 m
tube, and the shape of the filling port. Yuan et al. (2008)
have analysed the stress concentrations present in the
0 filling ports during the filling of geotextile tubes, and
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
HT/DT ratio
have estimated that these can be two to three times the
circumferential stresses at the top of geotextile tubes.
Figure 7. Maximum circumferential tensions in geotextile Techniques for reducing the magnitudes of these stress
tubes according to Palmerton (2002) concentrations are given by Yuan et al. (2008).
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 391
140
erosion. However, in some instances it may be necessary
[Tmax]a/[Tmax]c ⫽ 0.63 to stack multiple geotextile tubes in order to reach the
120 desired height to prevent erosion. Figure 10 shows three
Maximum axial tension [Tmax]a (kN/m)

different stacking geometries for geotextile tubes. Figure


100 10a shows tubes stacked to form a shallow slope. Here,
the slope is gentle enough to ensure that the upper tubes
do not interact directly with the lower tubes. Thus the
80
tensions generated in the filled tubes are the result of
filling only, and are not influenced by additional loading
60 due to the presence of the upper tubes.
Figure 10b shows geotextile tubes stacked to form a
40 steep slope. Here, the presence of the upper tubes does
interact directly with the lower tubes, thus influencing the
20
tensions generated in the lower tubes. Plaut and Filz
(2008) have derived relationships to determine the addi-
tional tension in the lower geotextile tube skin due to the
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 presence of tubes above.
Maximum circumferential tension [Tmax]c (kN/m) Figure 10c shows geotextile tubes stacked to form a
mass-gravity structure. Here, the presence of the tube
Figure 9. Maximum axial tensions in geotextile tubes above generates additional tensions in the tubes below, but
according to Palmerton (2002) also the deformation of the upper tube into the gap
between the lower two tubes generates additional tensions
at the base of the upper tube. These situations have also
been analysed by Plaut and Filz (2008) and by Plaut and
3.4.2. Integrity of geotextile tube seams Suherman (1998).
Geotextile tubes are manufactured by seaming together
sheets of geotextile. Thus the integrity of geotextile tube
n⭓2
seams is crucial to the performance of the tube. Not only n
are the seams required to meet specific strengths, they are 1
also required to do this without the seams separating under
stress and thus allowing loss of hydraulic fill during the
filling process. The use of special seaming technology to
produce high-capacity seams and the judicious location of
seams combine to produce a geotextile tube that must
(a)
meet the tension requirements in all locations.

3.4.3. Ultimate strength requirements of geotextile tubes


The geotextile tube skin and its component parts must
have adequate tensile strengths to resist the tensions 1⭐n⬍2

generated during the filling process and throughout the n


life of the filled geotextile tube. The required ultimate 1
tensile strength of the geotextile tube skin (including
geotextile and any seams) is
 
½ Tu c or ½ Tu a > FS ½ T c or ½ T a (1)
where Tu is the ultimate tensile strength required in the
circumferential or axial direction of the geotextile tube, T (b)
is the tension at locations around the geotextile tube skin
in the circumferential or axial direction, and FS is the
global factor of safety.
The global factor of safety FS must account for factors
such as unknowns in the determination of geotextile skin
tensions, creep of geotextile and seams, seam strength
inefficiencies, and durability. Unless a specific analysis is
undertaken of the various factors that constitute FS, a
default value of 4.0 to 5.0 is normally applied.
(c)
3.5. Stacking of geotextile tubes
For many hydraulic and marine applications the height of Figure 10. Various stacking geometries for geotextile tubes:
a single filled geotextile tube may be sufficient to prevent (a) shallow slope; (b) steep slope; (c) mass-gravity slope
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
392 Lawson

acceptably. Examples of additional protection measures


3.6. Required hydraulic properties of geotextile tubes are rock armour, or wire gabions and mattresses placed
Geotextile tubes are constructed to perform in a variety of around the exposed surface of the geotextile tube. At the
hydraulic environments, ranging from still or slow moving low end of the performance spectrum an additional
water, to fast-moving currents, to wave environments. In sacrificial covering may be used. These additional protec-
many of these applications the geotextile tube skin is tion measures dissipate much of the hydraulic forces
exposed directly to the hydraulic environment. Two before they reach the geotextile tube skin. For other, less
aspects of the hydraulic environment should be taken into intense hydraulic regimes described in Table 3 the geotex-
account when considering the use of geotextile tubes: the tile tube may perform well structurally in an unprotected
type of hydraulic regime acting on the geotextile tube, and state, but some loss in serviceability (i.e. change in shape)
the time period of exposure to this hydraulic regime. As may occur over time.
stated already, a variety of hydraulic regimes can act on
geotextile tubes, depending on their use. The severity of 3.7. Deformations of geotextile tubes
these hydraulic regimes governs the hydraulic properties Geotextile tube structures can undergo deformation due to
of the geotextile skin as well as whether the geotextile scour or settlement of the foundation beneath the tubes
tube can perform suitably in an unprotected manner (i.e. and to deformation of the contained fill within the
with the geotextile skin exposed directly to the hydraulic geotextile tubes. In this section consideration is given to
regime). The time period of exposure can also have an deformation of the contained fill only.
effect on the severity of the hydraulic environment: for Deformations of the contained fill can arise from:
example, exposure to intermittent storm activity will not
have the same effect as continual exposure to the same • incomplete filling of the geotextile tubes;
types of waves. Table 3 summarises the recommended • liquefaction of the contained fill;
hydraulic properties of the geotextile skin, and whether • consolidation of the contained fill;
additional protection measures are required, according to • continuing deformation of the geotextile skin over
the mode of hydraulic regime and the period of exposure. time.
In Table 3, intermittent exposure refers to exposure for
several days at a time to the specific hydraulic regime (not Incomplete filling of geotextile tubes can result in defor-
for several weeks or months). An example would be the mations, and these may be exacerbated by liquefaction of
effects of storm activity that is periodic but only acts over the sand fill due to wave activity. Good filling practice
a short period of time. must be observed in order to ensure that the sand fill is in
Table 3 indicates that geotextile tubes can perform in an a dense, confined state.
exposed state in a variety of hydraulic regimes, except For hydraulic and marine structures sand fill is used
where continual water currents greater than 1.5 m/s and inside geotextile tubes. This fill type is relatively incom-
continual wave heights greater than 1.5 m occur. In these pressible and, provided it achieves good density within the
extreme hydraulic environments additional protection is geotextile tube, will not undergo consolidation.
required in order for the geotextile tube to perform The geotextile skin must have good tensile strength and

Table 3. Geotextile hydraulic properties and required protection for geotextile tubes according to type of hydraulic regime

Hydraulic regime Period of exposure to hydraulic regime

Intermittent Continual

Still, or slow-moving No protection required. No protection required.


water AOS < 0.5 mm AOS < 0.5 mm
qn,100 > 10 L/m2 s qn,100 > 10 L/m2 s
Water current No protection required. No protection required.
, 1.5 m/s AOS < D85 fill AOS < D85 fill
qn,100 > 10 L/m2 s qn,100 > 30 L/m2 s
Water current No protection required, but some change in shape may occur after Protection required and some change in shape
> 1.5 m/s repeated events. may occur.
AOS < D85 fill AOS < D50 fill
qn,100 > 30 L/m2 s qn,100 > 30 L/m2 s
Waves , 1.5 m No protection required. No protection required, but change in shape may
AOS < D50 fill occur over time.
qn,100 > 30 L/m2 s AOS < D50 fill
qn,100 > 30 L/m2 s
Waves > 1.5 m No protection required, but considerable change in shape may Protection required and change in shape may
occur after repeated events. occur.
AOS < D50 fill AOS < D50 fill
qn,100 > 30 L/m2 s qn,100 > 30 L/m2 s

Note: AOS is the apparent opening size of the geotextile tube skin; qn,100 is the volume flow rate at 100 mm constant head through the
geotextile tube skin.

Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 393

stiffness in order to maintain the sand fill in a confined term exposure to UV light. This is normally used in
state. The geotextile skin should not undergo elongation hydraulic and marine applications where severe
or relaxation over time, which would then allow the sand hydraulic forces occur.
fill to deform, and the geotextile tube to lose its shape and
height. Extreme natural occurrences can also affect the long-
term performance of exposed geotextile tubes. Examples
3.8. Protection measures applied to geotextile tubes include the damaging effects of ice flows, and trees
External protection measures are applied to geotextile carried in water during floods, on the exposed surface of
tubes for a variety of reasons: geotextile tubes. Where this is known to be a problem,
then the geotextile tube structure must be protected. The
• to reduce the impact of the hydraulic forces acting form of protection from this type of exposure is normally
directly on the geotextile tube; armour covering.
• to enhance the design life of the geotextile tube in an Vandalism can also affect the long-term performance of
exposed environment; geotextile tubes. This type of damage is normally in the
• to protect from extreme natural occurrences, e.g. ice form of localised cuts and tears. The best way of protect-
flows; ing against this likelihood is to cover the geotextile tube
• to protect from vandalism. so that it is out of sight. Alternatively, robust coatings can
be applied that prevent vandalism. Failing this, a good
Section 3.6 covers the types of protection measures used maintenance scheme should be put in place to correct any
to reduce the impact of hydraulic forces. acts of vandalism.
In many instances geotextile tubes are required to
perform over a relatively long design life in an exposed 3.9. Case study 1: Geotextile tubes for containment
environment. In this environment UV degradation can dykes at Naviduct Project, Enkhuizen, The
occur, with the geotextile tube design life dependent on Netherlands
the level of UV radiation and the resistance of the This project, originally reported by Spelt (2001) and
geotextile tube skin to this radiation. If the geotextile tube Lawson (2003), is an example where geotextile tubes were
is located in a marine environment, marine growth used for containment dykes in an environmentally sensi-
generally occurs quickly on the outer surface, and this tive lake in The Netherlands.
tends to mask the geotextile skin somewhat from the The Krabbersgat Lock at Enkhuizen is an important
effects of UV radiation. However, for good long-term bottleneck in the main network of waterways in The
performance in an exposed environment, additional pro- Netherlands. Owing to an increase in shipping and road
tection measures are normally required for the geotextile traffic at the lock, significant time delays were occurring
tube skin. These measures are listed below in order of for both shipping and road transport. To ensure smooth
providing longer-term performance. movement of shipping and road traffic it was decided to
construct a combination of an aqueduct and a lock below
• Additional stabiliser packages in the geotextile tube which a tunnel for road traffic could pass (this structure is
skin: the enhanced performance of the stabiliser known as a ‘naviduct’).
package improves the performance of the geotextile For cost and environmental reasons a crescent-shaped
tube skin over time. containment area was constructed in the lake adjacent to
• More robust, or multi-layer geotextile skin: extra the naviduct site (Figure 11a). This containment area acted
design life is achieved by the use of more robust or as a local disposal for the spoil material from the adjacent
multi-layer geotextile skins that degrade over a construction site. Once finished, the partially filled con-
longer period of time. tainment area will be vegetated and will act as a bird
• Geotextile shrouds: the outer geotextile shroud sanctuary. Further, the crescent shape of the containment
provides protection for the inner geotextile tube skin. area is to act as a barrier to drifting ice during winter.
The geotextile shroud becomes sacrificial over the The construction of the containment dykes was carried
design life of the geotextile tube structure. These are out using a double layer of geotextile tubes of filled height
used where the geotextile tube structure is continu- 2.8 m (Figures 11b and 11c). Geotextile tubes were used
ally exposed to the environment, and where the for the containment dykes because the locally available
hydraulic forces are not severe. sand fill from the naviduct site was too fine and uniform
• Geotextile coating: a robust coating is applied to the to be used by itself as the structural component of the
geotextile tube to protect it. Coatings can be applied dykes. Instead, the geotextile tubes were filled with the
in a variety of colours. local fine sand, and this provided the structural basis for
• Soil covering: the geotextile tube is covered by soil the containment dykes.
or sand to prevent long-term UV exposure. Here the The crescent-shaped containment area utilised 7.5 km
geotextile tube structure performs intermittently of geotextile tubes, two abreast, in the containment dyke.
during periods of storm activity, and is then covered Before placement of the geotextile tubes a geotextile filter
over again by soil or sand. layer was placed on the lake bed at the base of the dykes
• Armour covering: a flexible armour covering is used for erosion control purposes. The geotextile tubes were
around the geotextile tube structure to prevent long- laid out in the water, anchored in place, and then filled by
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
394 Lawson

Project consists of the construction of a freeway connect-


ing the island containing the new Incheon International
Airport to the mainland of Korea to the south-east. In the
area close to the mainland it was planned to construct an
artificial island in order to construct the freeway viaduct
and associated toll gate facilities in the dry. This artificial
island is to be left in place once the freeway viaduct is
completed, as the area will later be enveloped by a large
land reclamation scheme to build a new high-technology
city—Songdo City.
The foundation conditions where the artificial island is
located consist of very soft marine clay to an approximate
(a) depth of 20 m. Further, in this area the tide range is very
high, with a maximum difference in level of 9.3 m. This
Rock armour results in exposure of the soft clay foundation at low tide
permanent
Partially reclaimed protection and inundation to around +4.64 m at high tide. As a result
area Winter water
Finished dyke level of these conditions it was decided to construct the contain-
Geotextile tube Summer ment dyke for the artificial island out of geotextile tubes,
dyke core water level
as it was considered that the alternative of using sheet-pile
walls would not be feasible, considering the low shear
strength of the soft foundation and the height to which the
2.8 m 2.8 m
artificial island would have to be raised above high tide
level.
Lake bed Figure 12a shows a view of the artificial island under
(b)
construction. The sand fill for the geotextile tubes was
brought to the site by barge, mixed with water, and
then pumped hydraulically into the geotextile tubes.
Figure 12b shows a cross-section through the geotextile
tube wall of the artificial island. The base of the wall
has two tubes side by side, with a third tube placed on
top. Later, a fourth tube is then placed to bring the
island up to the required design height. Locally avail-
able residual soil has been used for the fill material for
the island. Figure 12c shows the completed island with
construction equipment present, starting the construction
of the freeway viaduct and associated toll gate facil-
ities.
The performance of the geotextile tube structure used
on this project has been studied by Shin et al. (2008). The
results show that the filled tubes themselves underwent
(c)
very little deformation once filled. The structure itself has
Figure 11. Use of geotextile tubes to construct containment remained very stable, even allowing for an apparent heave
dyke, Naviduct Project, Enkhuizen, The Netherlands: (a) of around 0.5 m of the soft foundation in the vicinity of
crescent-shaped structure; (b) cross-section through the toe of the geotextile tube wall. The geotextile tube
geotextile tube structure; (c) installation of geotextile tubes wall has settled around 0.7 m, and the centre of the island
fill has settled around 2.8 m, all as a result of the high
compressibility of the soft foundation beneath the artificial
connecting the exit pipe of the dredger directly into the island.
inlets of the tubes.
Once filled, the geotextile tubes were covered with a
geotextile shroud to protect the tubes from long-term UV 4. GEOTEXTILE CONTAINERS FOR
exposure. On the outside of the containment dyke the HYDRAULIC AND MARINE
tubes were covered with rock armour for the final protec- APPLICATIONS
tion. Finally, the reclaimed area was raised to its finished
height by using the local fine sand fill, and vegetated. 4.1. Fundamentals of geotextile containers
As already stated, geotextile containers are large-volume
3.10. Case study 2: Geotextile tubes for artificial containers that are filled above water and then positioned
island at Incheon Grand Bridge Project, Korea and placed at water depth. The volumes of these contain-
This case study has been previously reported upon in ers commonly range from 100 m3 to 700 m3 .
detail by Yee et al. (2007). The Incheon Grand Bridge The procedure for installation of geotextile containers is
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 395

Geotextile containers are manufactured specifically to


suit the installation barge dimensions, and to meet volume
placement requirements. The split-bottom barge para-
meters of interest are its hopper length and those para-
meters associated with its cross-sectional area, as shown
in Figure 14a. Using the barge cross-section parameters
shown in Figure 14a, the cross-sectional area of fill Af in
the barge may be determined as
wb h2
Af ¼ w b h 1 þ (2)
2
(a) and the total barge cross-sectional area is
⫹6.20 m
⫹5.30 m
Ab ¼ Af þ wb h0 (3)

Normally Af < 0.8Ab to permit easy access to filling, re-


HWL⫹4.64 m
tensioning and sealing of the geotextile container while it
Residual is in the barge.
6.7 m soil fill
MSL⫹0.00 m When the barge opens, the geotextile container under-
goes a major change in shape in order for it to exit the
⫺0.50m
barge. The circumference of the geotextile container must
Soft clay seabed be great enough to allow this change in shape to occur
(b) without rupturing the container. Pilarczyk (2000) has
developed a simple analytical model to describe this
change in shape, and then determine the minimum
geotextile container circumference. Figure 14b shows this
simple model, with b0 being the width of opening of the
split-bottom barge. From this, the minimum geotextile
container circumference can be derived:
 
Af
CC > 2:5 þ b0 (4)
b0

where CC is the required circumference of the geotextile


container. The value of 2.5 in Equation 4 allows for some
slack in the geotextile container skin to further facilitate
exit from the barge.
To facilitate release of the geotextile container from the
(c)
barge it is important that the barge can open relatively
quickly, and by a required amount. When sand is used as
Figure 12. Use of geotextile tubes to construct artificial
island, Incheon Grand Bridge Project, Korea: (a) artificial the fill in the container it is preferable to have the split-
island; (b) cross-section through geotextile tube dyke; bottom barge open by an amount
(c) geotextile tube protection b0max > 0:5wb (5)

where b0max is the maximum opening width of the split-


shown in Figure 13. It entails the placing and filling of the bottom barge, and wb is the width of the barge hopper
geotextile container in a split-bottom barge; the container (Figure 14a).
is then sealed and the barge positioned at the correct The volume of fill to be placed inside the geotextile
dumping location. The split-bottom barge opens, and the container is related to the geometry of the split-bottom
geotextile container passes through and descends through barge being used, with the fill volume Vf ¼ Af lb , where lb
the water to the seabed. Depending on its source, the is the length of the hopper in the barge. These details are
container fill may be dry-dumped, wet-dumped or hydrau- shown in Figure 15a. To release this filled container from
lically pumped into the container. The types of fill placed the split-bottom barge requires a minimum geotextile
in geotextile containers have ranged from mixed soil container circumference CC (obtained from Equation 4).
(ranging from small boulders to sandy silt) to sand to For simplicity, this geotextile container can be considered
overconsolidated clay. to be of shape approximating a cylinder of length lb and
Geotextile containers are used as mass-gravity, structur- equivalent diameter DC (see Figure 15b), such that DC ¼
al components in hydraulic and marine applications. Once CC /. From this can be determined the equivalent geotex-
installed, the containers are required to maintain volume tile container cross-sectional area AC and the equivalent
and shape stability over the required design life of the geotextile container volume VC (see Figure 15b). In prac-
overall structure. tice, the ratio Af /AC (Vf /VC ) can range between 0.35 and
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
396 Lawson
Geotextile container

Split-bottom barge

Container fill

Geotextile container

Geotextile container

Seabed

Figure 13. Installation procedure for geotextile containers (after Pilarczyk 2000)

0.7, with values around 0.45 to 0.55 being the most Bezuijen et al. (2005) have also investigated the stability
common and economic. of multiple geotextile container layers, and have presented
The use of three possible volumes to describe the calculation models for this.
capacity of geotextile containers—barge volume capacity
in which the geotextile container is placed, fill volume 4.2. Applications of geotextile containers
used in the geotextile container Vf, and equivalent geotex- Geotextile containers are used for a range of hydraulic
tile container volume VC —has led to some confusion and marine applications where submarine mass-gravity
when rating the volume capacity of geotextile containers, support or barrier type structures are required. These are
and their resultant cost. In the author’s opinion geotextile shown in Figure 16, and are described briefly below.
containers should be rated according to the amount of fill
placed in the container, i.e. to Vf, as this then enables a 4.2.1. Offshore breakwaters
direct calculation of the quantities involved in terms of fill Geotextile containers are used as part of offshore break-
quantity and geotextile container quantity. waters (Figure 16a) to prevent erosion of the shoreline.
For hydraulic and marine applications the volumes of The technique here is the same as that for geotextile tube
the geotextile containers are normally limited to less than offshore breakwaters, except that geotextile containers are
400 m3 (in terms of fill volume) to ensure that a well- used at greater water depth, and a rock covering is
defined shape results. Further, the installation depths are normally placed across the top of the containers to raise
normally limited to less than 20 m, as these types of the breakwater to its required height.
structure are commonly located at relatively shallow water
depths. The type of fill used is sand, or a high percentage 4.2.2. Containment dykes
of sand, to ensure long-term volume and shape stability of Geotextile containers are used for containment dykes
the installed containers. The use of this type of fill also (Figure 16b) where the water depth facilitates placement
reduces the tensions generated in the geotextile skin of the containers. The technique is the same as that for
during installation, as considerable drop energy is ab- geotextile tubes except that the geotextile containers are
sorbed by the shear resistance of the fill. used at greater water depth. A rock covering is normally
To create effective submarine structures, geotextile placed across the top and down the outer face of the
containers must be installed to defined accuracies and geotextile containers to raise the containment dyke above
tolerances, especially if multiple container layers are water level. Where the dyke is to remain submerged,
required. Herein lies one of the major limitations of this geotextile containers may be the sole units. Examples of
technique, because placing accuracy is dependent on use are given by Wei et al. (2001), Yee (2002) and
various factors that may be difficult to control on site, Bezuijen et al. (2002a).
including the accuracy of barge location and orientation,
water currents, placing depths, and seabed conditions. 4.2.3. Artificial reefs
Several of the factors affecting geotextile container place- Geotextile containers can be used to construct artificial
ment have been studied by Bezuijen et al. (2002b, 2005). reefs (Figure 16c). Here, the containers provide a raised
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 397
Top of barge
wb

h0
Fill in barge

h1

At lb

wb
h2
Af

h1
(a)

Opened barge h2

Barge fill cross-sectional area,


Af ⫽ wb ⫻ hf ⫹ 1/2(wb ⫻ h2)

Barge fill volume,


Vf ⫽ A f ⫻ I b
(a)

Geotextile container
skin lb

Af /b0 Fill coming out


of barge

Af

b0

(b) Dc
Ac
Figure 14. Fill area and required geotextile container
circumference parameters: (a) split-bottom barge cross-
section parameters; (b) resulting geotextile container
circumference parameters (after Pilarczyk 2000)

Equivalent geotextile container cross-sectional


platform (a reef) that forces waves to break over the top of area, Ac ⫽ 1/4 π D 2c
the reef. This prevents erosion of the protected shoreline.
Equivalent geotextile container volume,
As well as dissipating wave energy, artificial reefs can Vc ⫽ A c ⫻ I b
also be used to refract waves and alter the normal (b)
waveform. However, to do this successfully requires the
reef to be constructed to a specific plan geometry, with Figure 15. Geotextile container fill volume compared with
specific side slopes and platform height. This level of equivalent geotextile container volume: (a) barge fill
placement accuracy is normally outside the limits of large- geometry; (b) equivalent geotextile container geometry
volume geotextile container placement, and is more suited
to the application of smaller-volume geotextile bags.
Further, the nature of geotextile containers makes it maintenance to maintain the existing waveform. Examples
difficult to fill them to maximum volume and density. of use are given by Fowler et al. (1995a), Black (1998),
Consequently, it is to be expected that, if the filled Restall et al. (2002) and Saathof et al. (2007).
geotextile containers are to be exposed to continual wave
activity, then liquefaction of the sand fill will cause a 4.2.4. Slope buttressing
change in shape of the exposed containers and a subse- Geotextile containers are used for the underwater buttres-
quent lowering of the surface level of the artificial reef. sing of unstable slopes (Figure 16d). Here, the weight of
This then alters the shape of the waveform across the top the geotextile containers is utilised to provide a counter-
of the reef, and thus the structure may require periodic weight to a potentially unstable slope. The advantage of
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
398 Lawson

Rock fill Rock armour Water forces


Water forces causing erosion
Rock armour causing erosion

Reclaimed land

Foundation Foundation
Geotextile containers Geotextile containers
(a) (b)

Potential slip failure surface

Waves break on artificial reef

Rock fill
Calm water

Seabed or
river bed

Geotextile containers Geotextile containers


(c) (d)

Figure 16. Hydraulic and marine applications of geotextile containers: (a) offshore breakwaters; (b) containment dykes;
(c) artificial reefs; (d) slope buttressing

using geotextile containers is that a ‘soft’ buttress struc- 4.3.1. Filling of geotextile container in the barge
ture is provided that won’t damage shipping. Examples of The first stage of geotextile container installation involves
use are given by Jagt (1988) and CUR (2004). the laying-out of the container in the split-bottom barge,
its filling, and the final sealing of the geotextile container.
The tensions generated in the geotextile container are
4.3. Tensions generated in geotextile containers and relatively low during this stage, and are due primarily to
ultimate tensile strength requirements draw-down of the container in the barge during filling.
The tensions generated in a geotextile container vary De-stressing the container during filling can alleviate
throughout the installation procedure. Figure 17 shows the much of these tensions.
five stages of geotextile container installation: filling of the
geotextile container in the barge; reshaping of the geotextile 4.3.2. Reshaping of geotextile container to exit barge
container to exit the barge; free fall of the geotextile contain- As the split-bottom barge opens, the geotextile container
er through the water; impact of the geotextile container on undergoes a change in shape in order to exit the barge
the seabed; and the final installed shape of the geotextile (Figure 17). This change in shape and the exiting of the
container on the seabed. All five installation stages generate container create significant tensions in the geotextile skin.
different tensions in the geotextile container, as shown in The magnitude of the tensions generated in the geotex-
Figure 17. These are discussed in further detail below. tile skin of the container is affected by:
The tensions developed in geotextile containers are
complex, and are dependent on many factors. Several • the ratio of the internal width of the barge to the
researchers have attempted to quantify the tensions gener- width of the opening in the split-bottom barge;
ated in geotextile containers during installation. Bezuijen • the speed of opening of the split-bottom barge;
et al. (2005) and CUR (2006) summarise the relationships • the surface condition of the inside of the barge;
developed by a number of Dutch researchers using • the surface condition of the gate in the split-bottom
analytical models to calculate geotextile container tensions barge.
during the installation procedure. An analytical calculation
is provided to describe each of the installation stages The change in shape of the geotextile container is
shown in Figure 17. Palmerton (2002) has applied the minimised if the split-bottom barge can open quickly to
distinct element method to model the procedure of an amount equivalent to its internal width. In practice, this
geotextile container installation. While in its early stages is not possible, as the most common split-bottom barges
of development, this method shows particular promise, as open slowly and only by an amount approaching 50% of
it can model all stages of installation in one progressive the internal width. Thus, to exit the barge, the geotextile
modelling process. container has to undergo a considerable change in shape,
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 399

Filling of Reshaping of container Free fall of container Impact of container Installed container on
container in to exit the barge through water on seabed seabed
barge
Geotextile tension

Geotextile container installation stages

Figure 17. Geotextile tensions generated at various stages of geotextile container installation

which can generate significant tensions in the geotextile enough, then the container may reach a terminal velocity
skin. before reaching the seabed floor. Normally, terminal
When exiting the barge, frictional forces are generated velocity is reached within 10–15 m of exiting the barge.
between the inner surface of the barge and the geotextile The magnitude of the terminal velocity of the geotextile
container. This increases further the tensions generated in container depends on the type of fill used (whether it is
the container. To minimise the effects of friction the inner wet or dry) and on the amount of drag on the container,
surface of the barge should be smooth; alternatively, a but is normally between 5 and 8 m/s.
woven geotextile sheet should be used on the inner barge During fall, tensions are generated in the geotextile
surface to decrease friction effects. container owing to balancing the forces of fill weight,
The narrowest point of exit of the geotextile container buoyancy, drag, etc.
occurs at the lips of the barge. Here the condition of the lips
of the barge greatly influences the localised tensions gener- 4.3.4. Impact of geotextile container on seabed
ated in the geotextile skin. For best performance the lips As the geotextile container falls through the water it gains
should be smooth, and free of any sharp or rough surfaces. in energy. On impacting the seabed floor this energy is
Three-dimensional effects also generate tensions in the dissipated instantaneously in the form of a change in shape
geotextile container when exiting the barge. The rate of of the geotextile container (it flattens), with a resulting
exit is generally not the same along the length of the quick increase in tension in the geotextile skin (Figure 17).
container. This causes the filled container to bend, which The magnitude of the tensions generated in the geotex-
generates tensions in the geotextile skin along its length. tile skin of the container on impacting the seabed is
This effect can be reduced by decreasing the length of the affected by the following:
containers in relation to their diameter, and by closely
controlling the filling of the container. • the mass, i.e. size, of the container;
• the velocity at impact;
4.3.3. Free fall of geotextile container through water • the container angle at impact;
On exiting the barge the geotextile container falls through • the internal shear resistance of the container fill;
the water, gaining in velocity. If the depth of water is great • the condition of the seabed at impact.
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
400 Lawson

The size of the container and its velocity at impact tensions generated in the geotextile skin will be reduced if
generate energy that is dissipated by a change in shape of the amount of fill is reduced.
the container and an increase in tensions in the container As stated in Section 4.3.4, the internal shear resistance
skin. The size of the containers is normally decided on the of the contained fill helps to dissipate the container impact
basis of balancing the geometry of the overall container energy, and so affects the final shape of the contained fill
structure with the availability of suitable split-bottom on the seabed. Sand and other granular fills are used for
barge sizes. For most hydraulic and marine applications hydraulic and marine structures as they have good internal
this results in container sizes ranging between 100 m3 and shear resistance and thus maximise the height of the
700 m3 . contained fill once installed. In general, installed container
The greater the water depth, the greater the velocity of heights of 1.0 to 1.5 m are common.
the geotextile container at impact up until a terminal The geotextile skin should have adequate tensile stiff-
velocity is reached. As stated in Section 4.3.3, terminal ness to provide some confinement to the contained fill.
velocity occurs at around 10–15 m of water depth: thus This prevents the contained fill from spreading over time
the impact energy should not increase for water depths and the resulting structure losing height.
greater than this.
If the container remains horizontal during fall, then this 4.3.6. Ultimate tensile strength requirements of geotex-
generates lower tensions in the geotextile skin on impact tile containers
with the seabed. However, if the container impacts at an Figure 17 shows the relative tensions generated in the
angle then greater localised tensions are generated. For geotextile skin of the container during the various installa-
best performance it is important for the container to tion stages. The highest tensions are generated during
remain near horizontal during fall. Reasons for angled fall exiting of the container from the split-bottom barge and
of containers are uneven distribution of fill in the contain- impact of the container on the seabed. Specific individual
ers, uneven exit from the split-bottom barge, and water circumstances will dictate which of these two stages
currents during fall. Obviously, a greater water depth generates the higher tensions for a particular project.
allows more opportunity for the falling container to As stated previously, the tensions generated in geotex-
change alignment. tile containers are complex, and depend on many factors.
The internal shear resistance of the container fill helps Analytical solutions that exist to calculate the tensions in
to dissipate the energy resulting from seabed impact. The geotextile containers (e.g. Bezuijen et al. 2005; CUR
change in shape of the installed container will not be as 2006) require the application of large factors of safety
extensive if the container fill consists of granular material (around 4 to 5) to determine the safe required tensile
compared with soft clay, and thus the tensions generated strengths of the geotextile skin. This large factor of safety
will not be as great. For hydraulic and marine structures is to account for the many unknowns. High tensile
the fill within geotextile containers is normally always strengths are required in both the circumferential and the
granular material, e.g. sand. longitudinal directions of the geotextile skin. Geotextile
If the seabed is soft then there will be some cushioning strengths of 100 to 200 kN/m, along with high-capacity
for the container when it impacts on the seabed. This seams, are common for geotextile containers.
results in lower induced tensions than if the seabed had a
hard and/or rough surface. 4.4. Effect of different hydraulic environments on
geotextile containers
4.3.5. Installed shape of geotextile container on seabed Geotextile containers are required to perform in a variety
Once settled on the seabed floor the geotextile container of hydraulic environments, as evidenced by the applica-
assumes its final shape (Figure 17). The final shape tions shown in Figure 16. For the majority of applications
attained depends on several interrelated factors: the geotextile containers either are part of a larger mass-
gravity structure or are located at some water depth
beneath the surface. In these instances the hydraulic forces
• the volume per unit length of the geotextile container;
acting directly on the geotextile containers are limited, and
• the amount of fill placed in the geotextile container
therefore the geotextile skin has to have only limited
compared with the container volume;
hydraulic properties.
• the internal shear resistance of the container fill;
However, where geotextile containers are located in the
• the tensile stiffness of the geotextile skin.
vicinity of breaking waves and high water flows, special
attention should be paid to the long-term performance of
The greater the volume per unit length of the geotextile the containers, for the following reasons. First, geotextile
container, the greater the height of the contained fill on containers, unlike geotextile tubes, cannot be filled to
the seabed (in conjunction with the other factors listed maximum density with sand fill, and consequently are
here); but the greater the volume per unit length, the more prone to liquefaction and change of shape over time.
greater the tensions generated in the geotextile skin during This change in shape may result in a critical loss of height
installation. of the structure. Second, consideration needs to be given to
The height of the contained fill on the seabed will be the required hydraulic properties of the geotextile container
reduced if the amount of fill placed in the geotextile skin to ensure that the container fill is not eroded out of the
container is less than the container volume; but the container. The relationships given in Table 3 for geotextile
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 401

tubes also apply to geotextile containers when subjected to


the same hydraulic conditions. 4.6. Case study 3: Geotextile containers for Pulau
Where the hydraulic regime is severe, additional protec- Tekong offshore disposal site, Singapore
tion measures may be warranted. These normally involve Singapore is an island nation located at the southern tip of
the use of armour layers to protect the geotextile container peninsular Malaysia in south-east Asia. Economic and
structure. In some instances it may be impractical to use developmental expansion has necessitated the large-scale
armour layers to enhance the protection for geotextile adoption of land reclamation schemes. Offshore spoil
containers. An example of this is where geotextile contain- disposal sites are also a necessity because of the lack of
ers are used for artificial reefs that also serve as surfing land area. A major offshore disposal site, south of Pulau
reefs. Here armour protection is a safety hazard to surfers, Tekong, was constructed during 2001 to contain spoil
and cannot be used. Consequently, a more robust geotex- from foundation excavations at a major reclamation
tile skin is normally used for the containers in addition to project at the Southern Islands, south of Singapore. This
a commensurate future maintenance programme. For these project has already been reported on in detail by Wei et
types of structure a limited design life is accepted. al. (2001) and Yee (2002), and consequently it is proposed
to paraphrase this project here for illustrative purposes.
The location of the offshore disposal site at Pulau
4.5. Protection measures applied to geotextile Tekong to the east of Singapore Island is shown in Figure
containers 18a. To accommodate the spoil from the Southern Islands
External protection measures are applied to geotextile reclamation site the disposal site required a capacity of
containers for two reasons: 420 000 m3 (45 ha in plan area). This was accomplished
by the construction of a 1.6 km long, U-shaped, under-
water containment dyke around the spoil disposal area.
• to reduce the impact of the hydraulic forces acting Sand dykes, instead of rock dykes, were judged the
directly on the geotextile containers; and appropriate type of containment structure because under-
• to enhance the design life of the geotextile container water rock structures would pose a safety hazard to
in an exposed environment. shipping. However, the cost of sand, which had to be
imported from neighbouring countries, was very high.
Consequently, an alternative solution was decided upon
Section 4.4 discusses the types of protection measures
that utilised geotextile containers for the underwater
used to reduce the impact of hydraulic forces.
containment dyke. The geotextile container dyke offered
In some instances geotextile containers may be required
several advantages. First, the geotextile containers were to
to perform over a relatively long design life in an exposed
be filled with the material and dead coral spoil from the
environment. In this environment UV degradation can
Southern Islands reclamation project: thus imported sand
occur, with the geotextile container design life dependent
was not required. Second, geotextile container dykes could
on the level of UV radiation and the resistance of the
be constructed at a steeper side-slope angle than sand
geotextile container skin to this radiation. If the geotextile
dykes, giving a greater disposal area capacity. Third,
container is located in a healthy aquatic environment,
geotextile containers are not subject to erosion, unlike
marine growth generally occurs quickly on the outer
sand dykes: thus they did not require additional erosion
surface, and this tends to mask the geotextile skin from
protection. Fourth, geotextile container dykes can be
the effects of UV radiation. However, for good long-term
constructed relatively accurately, regardless of water and
performance in an exposed environment additional protec-
weather conditions, unlike sand dykes.
tion measures are normally required for the geotextile
A typical cross-section through the geotextile container,
container skin. These measures are listed below in order
underwater containment dyke is shown in Figure 18b. In
of providing longer-term performance.
deeper water depths three geotextile containers were used
to construct the containment dyke cross-section; in shal-
• Additional stabiliser packages in the geotextile low water depths a single geotextile container was used.
container skin: the enhanced performance of the The size of the geotextile containers was 650 m3 capacity,
stabiliser package improves the performance of the with the geotextile being woven polypropylene of tensile
geotextile container skin over time. strength 120 kN/m in both the length and cross directions.
• More robust geotextile skin: extra design life is The intended fill for the geotextile containers was to be
achieved by the use of more robust geotextile skins primarily sandy fill from the reclamation excavation.
that degrade over a longer period of time. However, it became apparent at the start of the works that
• Geotextile coating: a robust coating is applied to the the excavated fill was highly variable, including marine
geotextile container to protect it. clay, residual soils, weathered rock, small boulders and
• Armour covering: a flexible armour covering is used large clumps of dead coral (Figure 18c). This highly
around the geotextile container structure to prevent variable fill was used throughout the container installation
long-term exposure to UV light. This is normally operation.
used in hydraulic and marine applications where At peak installation, two split-bottom barges were em-
severe hydraulic forces are possible, and where long ployed for filling, transport and installation of the geotex-
design life is required. tile containers. This enabled a filling, transportation and
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
402 Lawson

Underwater geotextile Spoil disposal


container dyke 1.6 km area
long

Pulau
Tekong
Silt protection
screen
Marker buoy
Sea level ⫹3 m CD
Dyke level
⫺2 m CD
Singapore Underwater geotextile Dumping level
Island container dyke ⫺3 m CD

Spoil disposal
site Future reclamation
area
Seabed ⫺2 m to ⫺6 m CD
(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure 18. The use of geotextile containers to construct an underwater containment dyke, Pilau Tekong offshore disposal site,
Singapore: (a) location of underwater dyke; (b) section through underwater dyke; (c) filling of geotextile containers;
(d) positioning of geotextile container barge for dumping

installation cycle time to fit with the contractor’s mode of containment techniques, with many of the traits common
operations. The positioning of the geotextile containers to both geotextile tubes and geotextile containers. For
prior to dumping was accomplished by use of a ‘mother’ example, geotextile bags are filled off site and then
barge for accurate alignment of the dumping barge contain- installed to the geometry required in a similar manner to
ing the filled container (Figure 18d). The alignments were geotextile containers. Further, for best performance they
carefully controlled by use of GPS technology. have to be filled to maximum volume and density with
The 1.6 km long containment dyke was formed using sand in an identical manner to geotextile tubes. However,
108 geotextile containers, and took 85 days to construct. geotextile bags have two distinct differences from other
This was despite initial delays due to the contractor geotextile containment techniques: they can be manufac-
learning the procedures involved, and the 5 h transport tured in a range of shapes, and they are installed in a
time between the container filling site and the container pattern-placed arrangement that greatly improves their
installation site. overall stability and performance. Today, geotextile bags
range in volume from 0.05 m3 to around 5 m3 , and are
pillow-shaped, box-shaped or mattress-shaped depending
5. GEOTEXTILE BAGS FOR HYDRAULIC on the required application.
AND MARINE APPLICATIONS For best performance it is essential that the geotextile
bags be filled to maximum density and volume. This
5.1. Fundamentals of geotextile bags becomes more difficult as the volume of the bag increases,
Geotextile bags, in the form of the ubiquitous ‘sandbags’, but can be enhanced by using water to compact the sand
can be considered the common ancestor of all geotextile fill hydraulically within the geotextile bag. Filled density
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 403

and volume are important from the viewpoint of maximis-


ing stability, but they are also important from the view- tB
point of minimising the effects of fill liquefaction and the
subsequent loss of shape of the geotextile bags. To ensure
the contained fill is maintained in its dense state, the α Slope

geotextile skin should have adequate tensile stiffness and LB


not undergo deformation over time.
bB
The stability of geotextile bags is derived from their
volume, and from their installed alignment and packing
Effective thickness of structure:
geometry. Figure 19 shows three possible alignments and tK ⫽ tB
packing geometries for a revetment structure consisting of (a)
geotextile bags. Basically, the bags can be aligned inclined
and parallel to the slope (Figure 19a), horizontal and
parallel to the slope (Figure 19b), or horizontal and tK
normal to the slope (Figure 19c). In each situation the
stability of the geotextile bag structure is different, and
this is related to the effective thickness of the bag
Slope
structure, tK (the greater the value of tK , the greater the tB
α
stability). CUR (2006) provides stability relationships for LB
geotextile bag structures in order to determine the required
value of tK .
bB
One major advantage of geotextile bags is that these
small-volume units can be used to construct hydraulic and Effective thickness of structure:
marine structures that require good geometrical tolerances. tK ⫽ bB sin α

This can make them preferable to large-volume units such (b)

as geotextile containers when specific slope and height


tolerances are required. Another advantage of the small- LB
volume geotextile bag units is that maintenance and
tK
remedial works can be carried out easily by replacing the
failed bag(s). This is much simpler than carrying out tB
remedial works on larger-volume containment units such
as geotextile containers. bB
Slope
α

5.2. Applications of geotextile bags


Geotextile bags are used for a range of hydraulic and Effective thickness of structure:
tK ⫽ LB sin α
marine applications. These are shown in Figure 20 and
(c)
described briefly below.
Figure 19. Different placement geometries for geotextile bag
5.2.1. Revetments revetments: (a) bags placed inclined, parallel to slope;
Geotextile bags are used for revetments (Figure 20a), (b) bags placed horizontal, parallel to slope; (c) bags placed
where their contained fill is used to provide stability and horizontal, normal to slope
prevent erosion. Geotextile bags have been used for both
submerged and exposed revetments, as for geotextile 5.2.3. Artificial reefs
tubes. Much of the detail concerning geotextile tube Geotextile bags can be used to construct artificial reefs
revetments also apply to geotextile bag revetments. (Figure 20c). Here, the same conditions apply for geotex-
To prevent erosion of the foundation soil at the toe of tile bags as for geotextile containers. A major advantage
the revetment it is common practice to extend the bottom of geotextile bags is that they can be installed to better
layer of geotextile bags so that the main revetment cannot geometric tolerances than the relatively large-volume
be undermined. Examples of use are given by Perrier geotextile containers. Also, being relatively small in
(1986), Gadd (1988), das Neves et al. (2005), Restall et volume and having considerably better fill density, geotex-
al. (2005), Buckley and Hornsey (2006) and Saathof et al. tile bags are less prone to liquefaction from waves (or its
(2007). effects) than geotextile containers.
Artificial reefs are normally required to dissipate wave
5.2.2. Groynes energy and thus prevent erosion of the protected shoreline.
Geotextile bags may be used as groynes (Figure 20b) to Here, the reef has only to have basic geometrical require-
prevent the shoreline movement of sediment. Here, the ments of height and area, with the geotextile bags providing
same conditions apply for geotextile bags as for geotextile a mass-gravity structure. However, artificial reefs have also
tubes. Examples of use are given by Fowler et al. (1995a), been used more recently to refract waves and alter their
Restall et al. (2002, 2005) and McClarty et al. (2006). shape to make them better suited for surfing (e.g. Black
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
404 Lawson
Sand build-up
Water forces on protected
causing erosion side of groyne Geotextile Water forces
bags causing erosion

Retained
soil

Geotextile bags Sand to be


protected
(a) (b)

Potential slip failure surface

Waves break across artificial reef

Rock fill
Calm water
Seabed or
river bed

Geotextile bags Geotextile bags

(c) (d)

Water forces Geotextile bags


Geotextile bags causing erosion
Land protected
from flooding

Scour hole
(e) (f)

Figure 20. Hydraulic and marine applications of geotextile bags: (a) revetments (exposed or submerged); (b) groynes;
(c) artificial reefs; (d) slope buttressing; (e) scour prevention; (f) protection dykes (temporary)

1998). For this application the reef has to be constructed to units. Geotextile bags can be easily installed using simple
good geometrical tolerances of height and shape as well as machinery. The bags conform to the shape of the scour
side-slope tolerances, and these tolerances have to be hole, and thus provide good sealing qualities. An example
maintained throughout the design life of the reef. For this of use is given by Heibaum (1999).
application geotextile bags have to be of a specific
geometry, and have to be installed carefully in order to 5.2.6. Protection dykes
meet the required geometrical tolerances of the reef. An Protection dykes are one of the original applications of
example of use is given by Borrero and Nelson (2002). geotextile bags (Figure 20f). These bags, in the form of
small sandbags, can be seen the world over shoring flood
5.2.4. Slope buttressing defences during times of natural calamity. This expedient
As with geotextile containers, geotextile bags can be used use of geotextile bags constitutes the most basic, and
to provide buttress support to an unstable slope in a common, form of geotextile containment application. One
hydraulic environment (Figure 20d). Here, the geotextile example of use is given by Tonks et al. (2005).
bags act as a mass-gravity structure, providing additional However, geotextile bags may be used for more sophis-
restraint to the toe of the unstable slope. ticated and substantial protection dyke structures, where
One advantage of geotextile bags for this application is they may be required to perform over long periods of
that installation can be carried out by simple lifting time. Here, the geotextile bags are required to perform in
equipment: thus geotextile bags can be installed at shallow the same manner as geotextile tubes for this same applica-
water depths if necessary, unlike geotextile containers, tion. The pattern-placement of geotextile bags forms a
which have to be installed at relatively greater water stable mass-gravity structure that is resistant to erosion
depth. An example of use is given by Zhang et al. (2006). when subjected to hydraulic forces.

5.2.5. Scour prevention 5.3. Limit state design modes


Geotextile bags are used as expedient means of scour As with geotextile tubes (see Section 3.3), packed geotex-
prevention to prevent undermining of nearby structures tile bags behave as mass-gravity structures, and the ap-
(Figure 20e). This is the original application for these proach to design follows an identical process to other
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 405

structural-type applications where each stability and defor-


mation mode is assessed and rendered safe. These limit
state design modes can be divided into external and
internal modes.

5.3.1. External modes


There are six external stability modes for geotextile bag
(a)
structures, and these are identical to those for geotextile
tubes (Figure 5a): sliding stability, overturning stability,
bearing stability, global stability, scour of foundation, and
foundation settlement. Each external stability mode is
assessed in the same manner as for geotextile tubes, with
the geotextile bag structure considered as a homogeneous,
flexible structure.

5.3.2. Internal modes


There are four internal stability modes to be assessed (b)
(Figure 21): local instability, geotextile bag rupture,
erosion of fill through the geotextile bag, and deformation
of the contained fill.
For stability of the structure, geotextile bags must not
undergo local instability (Figure 21a). The geotextile bag
mass (i.e. volume), its shape, and its pattern-placement
control the local stability of the geotextile bag structure
when it is subject to hydraulic forces. For good local
stability it is important to ensure that the geotextile bags
(c)
are packed densely together in an efficient pattern. CUR
(2006) and, more recently, Recio-Molina (2007) and
Recio-Molina and Oumeraci (2007) have established local
stability requirements for geotextile bag revetments under
the influence of wave attack.
The geotextile bag must be strong enough to resist tensile
rupture (Figure 21b). The filled geotextile bag mass, its
shape and the method of placement influence the required
strength of the geotextile bag. Other variables, such as
(d)
exposure conditions, may also influence the strength re-
quirements for the geotextile bag. One advantage that Figure 21. Internal stability modes for geotextile bags:
geotextile bags have over other mass-gravity containment (a) local instability; (b) geotextile bag rupture; (c) erosion of
units, such as geotextile tubes, is that if there is a geotextile fill through geotextile bag; (d) deformation of contained fill
skin rupture then they are relatively easy to replace.
The type of fill used in geotextile bags, along with
the magnitude and type of hydraulic forces acting on the from still or slow moving water, to fast-moving currents,
geotextile bag structure, and their duration, affects the to wave environments. In all applications the geotextile
required hydraulic properties of the geotextile skin (Figure bag skin is exposed directly to the hydraulic environment.
21c). Recognised geotextile filter criteria should be used As with geotextile tubes, the type of hydraulic regime and
to determine the hydraulic property requirements of the the time period of exposure to the hydraulic regime need
geotextile bags. to be considered when using geotextile bags. Conse-
Deformation of the contained fill within geotextile bags quently, the details contained in Table 3 relating to
should be kept to a minimum (Figure 21d). Hydraulic required geotextile skin hydraulic properties and whether
conditions can cause movement of sand fill inside the additional protection measures are required also apply to
geotextile bags, which causes the bags to change shape geotextile bags when they are used for long-term applica-
and can diminish their stability. For maximum stability it tions.
is important that the sand fill be placed at maximum Water currents > 1.5 m/s and waves can affect the
density in the geotextile bags, and that the geotextile bags long-term performance of geotextile bags by causing
not undergo deformation to allow relaxation of the sand liquefaction and internal movement of the sand fill,
fill following placement. especially if the geotextile bags have not been filled
properly, or if the geotextile skin undergoes significant
5.4. Required hydraulic properties of geotextile bags deformation or creep. This effect is more pronounced with
Geotextile bags, like geotextile tubes, are constructed to geotextile bags than with the greater-mass geotextile
perform in a variety of hydraulic environments ranging tubes. Fill liquefaction and internal movement cause a loss
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
406 Lawson

of stability in the pattern-placed geotextile bags, which


may lead to premature failure of the overall structure. The 6.2. Geotextile tubes and bags for dewatering waste
possibility of this needs to be accounted for at the design streams and contaminated sediments
stage (see Figure 21d). However, a major advantage of Geotextile tubes and bags provide an ideal medium for the
geotextile bags is that they can be easily replaced should dewatering of slurry-like waste streams and contaminated
they show distress under a specific hydraulic regime. sediments, for several reasons. First, they provide a large
contact surface area with the slurry to enable efficient
dewatering. Second, they utilise geotextiles that enable
efficient dewatering of the slurry. Third, they can be
fabricated in sizes, and used in numbers, that fit into the
6. GEOTEXTILE CONTAINMENT FOR scale of required dewatering operations. Fourth, they are
DEWATERING OF SLURRY WASTE AND relatively simple to employ and utilise, unlike other more
CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS complex mechanical dewatering technologies, and are
therefore cheaper. Geotextile tubes are used where the
6.1. Introduction volume of slurry waste to be dewatered is large, and
Many industries utilise water for processing, and for the geotextile bags are used where the volume of slurry waste
movement and storage of by-products and waste. This to be dewatered is small. This section will make reference
results in large volumes of liquid or slurry-like materials to the use of geotextile tubes for dewatering, but exactly
being stored in containment areas, or being treated before the same details will apply to geotextile bags, except that
discharge into lakes, rivers and streams. In the past, many the scale of operations will be different.
industry by-products were discharged directly into water Geotextile tubes were first used for dewatering waste
courses, where they have settled and, over time, have slurry during the mid 1990s (e.g. Fowler et al. 1996),
contaminated the sediments of these water courses. where trials involving the dewatering of municipal sewage
Over time, many of these slurry waste impoundments sludge were performed. This provided much of the initial
require cleaning to remove the sludge, and to enable the understanding of how geotextile tubes may be employed
impoundment to accept further waste flows. The removal for waste-dewatering applications. Since that time, geotex-
and disposal of sludge and waste from lagoons and ponds, tile tubes have been used to dewater many slurry-like
and of contaminated sediments from mines, lakes, rivers wastes and contaminated sediments.
and streams, present a major environmental problem In many respects the use of geotextile tubes to dewater
because of the large volumes involved, and because these waste streams and contaminated sediments is still develop-
wastes are in liquid form, which presents problems in ing, with new applications arising frequently. For example,
handling, transportation and disposal. applications in industries that produce significant quanti-
With government regulation, liquid or slurry-like wastes ties of slurry waste where geotextile tubes have been
now have to be stored, or disposed of, in special contain- successfully utilised for dewatering are municipal waste
ment facilities, and cannot be discharged directly into treatment, agriculture waste treatment, food and food
water courses. This has led to several major environmental processing waste treatment, industrial and mining waste
issues: how best to store, or dispose of, these slurry-like treatment, construction industry waste treatment, and the
by-products and wastes: and how best to remediate treatment of contaminated sediments.
existing containment facilities and contaminated sediment It is important to recognise that geotextile tubes are
sites. Landfilling has become the disposal facility of used as a component of the system of disposal of slurry-
choice, but with the huge volumes of slurry-like wastes like waste and contaminated sediments by dewatering.
and contaminated sediments produced, direct landfilling is Figure 22 shows the various stages in the dewatering
not practical. Thus a preliminary treatment stage has to be process, and the various options involved. Basically, the
employed in order to significantly reduce the volume of slurry is introduced into the system, where it is first mixed
the slurry waste prior to disposal by landfilling, and to with a dewatering accelerant (if required). The slurry is
render it manageable for handling, transport and disposal. then pumped into the geotextile tubes, where dewatering
Dewatering is commonly applied as this preliminary occurs. Over time, the water passing out of the tubes can
treatment. be pumped to a water treatment plant, where it is cleaned
Dewatering accomplishes two primary objectives with further, or it may be recirculated to the original slurry
regard to the treatment and disposal of slurry-like waste ponds, or it may exit directly to the environment (if it is
and contaminated sediments. First, a large reduction in clean enough). At the end of dewatering the contained
volume of the slurry-like material is achieved as water is solids within the tubes may be left in place, or they may
removed from the waste. Second, the consistency of the be transported to an off-site disposal facility, or they may
waste or contaminated sediment is changed from a liquid be recycled for other uses. The overall system includes
to a semi-solid or solid material that can be easily handled, combinations of pumping equipment and pipelines; geo-
transported and disposed of in waste storage facilities. textile type, tube sizes and numbers; accelerant additives;
Dewatering, if done in a controlled manner, may also water treatment processes; and specific disposal facilities
achieve two important secondary objectives: retention of for the final dewatered waste stream.
the solids, and retention of the contaminants within the To dewater effectively, a geotextile tube dewatering
containment medium during the dewatering process. platform needs to be provided in the manner shown in
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 407
Geotextile tube Slurry pumped
Introduction of slurry into dewatering
tube
Water pumped
out of platform
Dewatering slurry
Addition of
dewatering accelerant

Impermeable barrier
Drainage blanket

Geotextile tube (a)


dewatering

Solid to on-site, off-site Water to treatment plant


disposal facility or or recirculate to ponds or
recycle for other use exit into environment

Figure 22. Diagram showing the overall dewatering process


using geotextile tubes

Figure 23a. The base of the platform should consist of a


stable, impermeable barrier to support the geotextile tube
dewatering units and prevent loss of the effluent water
from the tubes into the foundation. The surface of the
impermeable barrier should have a slight cross-fall to
enable water flows to lateral drainage sumps. The im- (b)
permeable barrier can consist of compacted earth, or can
be concrete, or can be a composite clay–geomembrane
base liner. The choice of the base barrier depends on the
nature of the dewatering operation and the importance of
collecting the water emanating from the geotextile tubes.
Above the impermeable barrier a drainage blanket is
installed in order to facilitate full-circumferential drainage
from the geotextile tube. The drainage blanket also
enables the water to flow easily to any sumps at the
periphery of the platform. The upper surface of the
drainage blanket should be level, to prevent the geotextile
tubes from moving during filling. Either granular drainage
blankets or geocomposite drainage blankets are used.
Figure 23b shows the use of a granular drainage blanket.
To match the volume requirements of the slurry-pump-
ing and dewatering operation single or multiple geotextile
tubes of varying sizes and lengths are used. Thus, where (c)
multiple geotextile tubes are used in a single layer, an
Figure 23. Geotextile tube dewatering platform: (a) details of
extensive dewatering platform may be required. Figure
dewatering platform; (b) typical granular drainage blanket
23c shows a large-scale layout where multiple geotextile on top of geomembrane liner; (c) multiple geotextile tubes
tubes are used for dewatering. However, many small-scale used to dewater slurry waste volumes
operations employ only a single geotextile tube, or even a
single geotextile bag, to effectively dewater the waste
volume. the process progresses to the final consolidation stage.
The overall dewatering process using geotextile tubes The consolidation stage involves the final consolidation
encompasses three stages: containment, dewatering and (the drainage of pore water) and desiccation of the
consolidation. The containment stage involves filling of contained waste into a form that can be transported and
the geotextile tubes with slurry waste. The geotextile tube disposed of, or recycled using downstream activities.
must have the necessary strength to withstand the tensile Figure 24 shows the various stages of filling, dewatering
stresses generated during filling. The dewatering stage and consolidation in a typical geotextile tube dewatering
involves the drainage of excess free water out through the operation. The first stage involves the initial filling of the
pores of the geotextile tube, resulting in effective dewater- geotextile tube with slurry. The amount of slurry pumped
ing and a large volume reduction. Normally, there are into the geotextile tube will depend on its volume
several containment and dewatering cycles before capacity, which is governed by its dimensions, and on the
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
408 Lawson
Initial filling
Refilling Refilling Refilling
Drying
Dewatering Dewatering Dewatering Dewatering Consolidation (optional)

Contained volume

Time

Figure 24. Filling, dewatering and consolidation stages when using geotextile tubes

1
tensile strength of the geotextile skin and seams. Once S¼ (6)
1þw
maximum volume has been reached, the geotextile tube is
left to dewater for a period of time. This dewatering and where S is the solids concentration (by weight) of the
resulting volume reduction must occur over a practical slurry, and w is the water content of the slurry. For
time period in order to optimise the overall dewatering example, using Equation 6, a solids concentration of 5%
process. Normally this is between two weeks and two equates to a water content of 1900%. Clearly, the term
months, depending on the type of operation. ‘solids concentration’ would appear more reasonable when
Once dewatering has occurred, the geotextile tube is dealing with slurry-like materials than the term ‘water
refilled with slurry to its maximum volume capacity, and content’.
the process of refilling and dewatering is repeated between The fundamental principles of dewatering using geotex-
four and six times until refilling becomes inconsequential tile tubes are shown in Figure 25. The slurry waste, or
with regard to volume off-take. The geotextile tube is left sediment, is pumped into the geotextile tube at a specific
to go through its final dewatering stage and then on to its solids concentration, filling it to a specific volume. Over
consolidation stage. During the consolidation stage water time, water passes out of the slurry through the skin of the
passes out of the geotextile tube much more slowly than geotextile tube, resulting in a reduction of the contained
during the dewatering stages. The reason for this is that slurry volume and a consequent increase in solids concen-
pore water is released much more slowly than free water. tration within the geotextile tube (Figure 25a). The rate at
The consolidation stage may take between two and six which this volume reduction occurs diminishes over time
months, depending on the type of contained slurry and the as the contained slurry inside the geotextile tube reduces
target final solids concentration. in hydraulic conductivity, and consequently the rate of
Finally, the geotextile tube skin is removed, if the increase in solids concentration also slows.
dewatered waste is to be transferred off-site or recycled. The change in contained slurry volume within the
In some instances the exposed dewatered waste is left in geotextile tube and the change in solids concentration are
place for further drying by evaporation before removal. interrelated. Suppose the geotextile tube is filled to an
initial volume V0 with slurry of initial solids concentration
S0 (Figure 25b). The geotextile tube is then allowed to
6.3. Geotextile tube dewatering fundamentals dewater for a period of time t, after which the contained
As stated in Section 6.1, dewatering accomplishes two volume of slurry within the geotextile tube has reduced to
primary objectives with regard to the treatment and Vt , with a resulting solids concentration increase to S t . If
disposal of slurry-like waste and contaminated sediments: it is assumed that negligible solids escape from the
a significant reduction in volume of the contained slurry- geotextile tube during the dewatering process, and the
like material, and a resulting improvement in its consis- solids concentration is constant throughout the contained
tency (i.e. level of solidification). In dealing with slurries mass, then the following relationships between contained
where there are large amounts of water present it is slurry volume change and solids concentration change
common to refer to the solid component in the slurry in apply.
terms of a ‘solids concentration’, which is the weight of The ratio of the contained slurry volume at time t
solids present divided by the total weight of the slurry. compared with that at time t ¼ 0 is
This is a little different from geotechnical engineering   
Vt 1  St 1 1  S0 1
practice, where the term ‘water content’ is normally used ¼ þ þ (7)
V0 St G S0 G
to describe the solids-to-total weight relationship. How-
ever, there is a relationship between solids concentration where Vt , V0 , S t and S0 are as shown in Figure 25b, and G
and water content: is the specific gravity of the contained slurry. The term
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 409
1.0

For S0 ⫽ 5%, G ⫽ 1.2


0.8

Volume change ratio, Vt /V0


Solids concentration curve

Solids concentration
Contained volume

0.6
Equation 7

0.4
Volume curve
Equation 8
0.2

0
5 10 15 20 25
Time
Solids concentration, St (%)
(a)
Figure 26. Comparison between Equation 7 and Equation 8
V0
given reduction in contained slurry volume. This can be
St

Solids concentration, S
determined from
Contained volume, V

Solids concentration   
1 S0
1  ˜V t 1S
St ¼   0  (10)
1 S0
Volume 1þ
Vt
1  ˜V t 1  S0
S0

For example, for an initial slurry solids concentration S0 ¼


0 t 5% and reduction in contained slurry volume ˜Vt ¼ 50%,
Time, t the slurry solids concentration at time t would be S t ¼
(b)
9.5%.
Figure 25. Fundamental principles of dewatering using Equations 7 to 10 relate to a single filling–dewatering
geotextile tubes: (a) decrease in volume and increase in solids cycle. In practice, four to six filling–dewatering cycles
concentration with time; (b) volume change and solids are carried out before the geotextile tube is left to finally
concentration change parameters consolidate (see Figure 24). The solids concentration and
contained volume reduction during these multiple filling–
1/G has only a minor influence on the value of Vt /V0 and dewatering cycles can be determined using relatively
Equation 7 can be simplified to simple numerical progression relationships.
   To facilitate slurry movement, it is pumped into the
Vt 1  St 1  S0 geotextile tubes at relatively low solids concentrations.
¼ (8)
V0 St S0 Table 4 lists typical initial solids concentrations ranging
between 1% and 14% for various waste streams. One
Figure 26 shows the comparison in results between Equa- major goal of dewatering is to increase the solids concen-
tion 7 and Equation 8 using an initial solids concentration tration until the contained waste behaves like a gelatinous
S0 ¼ 5% and a slurry specific gravity G ¼ 1.2. The two or solid material that can be handled and transported to a
equations yield very similar results, and thus Equation 8 permanent disposal facility, or used for other purposes.
may be used more readily for simplicity. Table 4 lists typical final solids concentrations of the same
In some instances it may be important to know what waste streams that result in gelatinous or solid behaviour.
contained slurry volume reduction will occur for a given There is a wide range of final solids concentrations, and
increase in solids concentration of the contained slurry.
This can be determined from the relationship
" Table 4. Typical initial and final solids concentrations
 #
V0  V t 1  St 1  S0 during the dewatering of various waste streams
˜V t ¼ ¼1 (9)
V0 St S0
Waste material Initial solids Final solids
concentration, S0 (%) concentration, Sf (%)

where ˜Vt is the contained slurry volume reduction over Biosolids 1–4 15–25
time t. For example, if the initial slurry solids concentra- Agriculture 2–4 20–25
tion S0 ¼ 5%, and the slurry solids concentration at time t Mineral processing 3–10 40–70
was S t ¼ 15%, then this would result in a 70% reduction Industrial by- 4–10 25–75
products
in the contained slurry volume.
Contaminated 10–14 35–70
Alternatively, it may be important to know what the sediments
expected increase in solids concentration would be for a
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
410 Lawson

this is dependent on the type of waste stream. The more Dewatering phase Consolidation phase
inorganic particulate wastes (e.g. mineral processing, some Free water flow Pore water flow
industrial by-products and contaminated sediments) yield
higher final solids concentrations.
Solids concentration curve

Solids concentration
6.4. Dewatering performance of geotextile tubes

Contained volume
6.4.1. Filtration through geotextile tubes
Geotextiles are used successfully to filter intact soils. Here
the soils consist of particles of varying sizes in a support-
ing structure. Geotextile filter criteria exist to enable the Volume reduction curve
determination of suitable geotextile hydraulic properties to
filter a wide range of intact soil types effectively. More
recently, geotextile filter criteria have been extended to
situations where appreciable quantities of organic matter Time
exist in the draining medium, e.g. in landfills. Here it has
been demonstrated that geotextile filters with open pores Figure 27. Dewatering and consolidation phases in geotextile
and simple pore structures work most effectively (Giroud tube dewatering
1996).
In dewatering applications the slurry waste or contami-
nated sediment may consist of little intact solid matter movement of significant quantities of suspended solids
(the solids are in a non-supporting structure, i.e. in water), can also occur, and this may form a cake at the geotextile
but may comprise large amounts of suspended solids, surface, which may impede further flows. The loss of this
colloids and suspended organic matter. To further compli- free water collapses the waste into a semi-coherent mass,
cate matters, quantities of heavy metals and organic and if allowed to drain further, the geotextile tube enters
contaminants may also be present. Because of this very the consolidation phase.
different filtration environment, compared with conven- During the consolidation phase water movement occurs
tional soil filtration, conventional geotextile filter criteria along and through the pores in the contained waste. The rate
may have limited relevance. Further, the governing per- at which water is lost is relatively slow compared with the
formance criteria for the dewatering of waste are different dewatering phase, and is governed by the hydraulic con-
from that of conventional soils. ductivity of the waste and the effect of any filter cake build-
There are three overall performance criteria for dewater- up on the inside of the geotextile surface during the loss of
ing waste: the free water. If allowed to proceed, the consolidation phase
results in a relatively small volume reduction over an
• There must be a significant reduction in the extended length of time (again, this is dependent on the type
contained volume (and a comparable gain in solids of waste and the size and type of the geotextile tubes).
concentration), and this must occur over a relatively The transition between the dewatering phase and the
short time period. consolidation phase is ill defined and, as such, is difficult
• There can be an initial loss of solids through the to determine. Also, the time it takes for this transition to
geotextile tube, but this must stop a relatively short occur can vary considerably, depending on the type and
period after dewatering begins. consistency of the waste stream, the use of dewatering
• The effluent quality must remain constant with time. accelerants, the size and type of geotextile tubes, etc. In
practice, where dewatering times are limited because of
These three performance criteria are discussed in more project time constraints, the consolidation phase is rarely
detail in Sections 6.4.1.1, 6.4.1.2 and 6.4.1.3 below. allowed to occur, and thus little pore water is actually
drained from the contained waste. Consequently, the final
6.4.1.1. Reduction in contained volume The reduction solids concentration attained normally reflects the loss of
in contained volume in a controlled manner is the free water only (see Table 4 for the typical final solids
fundamental performance criterion for geotextile tube concentrations of various wastes).
dewatering.
During dewatering, volume reductions in geotextile 6.4.1.2. Loss of solids During the dewatering phase,
tubes result from two phases: a dewatering phase and a when free water passes from the waste and out of the
consolidation phase (e.g. see Figure 24). These two phases geotextile tube, suspended solids and organic matter
are shown diagrammatically in Figure 27. The dewatering may also be carried out of the tube. So as not to
phase involves the movement of free water to the geotex- adversely affect effluent quality it is important that this
tile tube surface. This movement of water occurs over a loss of solids decreases to zero relatively quickly.
relatively short period of time (anything from one week to Normally, if the dewatering process is operating
two months, depending on the type of waste and the size correctly, the time taken to reach zero loss of solids is
of the geotextile tubes), and results in a relatively large between one hour and one day, depending on the nature
loss in contained volume in the geotextile tube. If the of the waste being dewatered and the type of geotextile
waste is in its natural state inside the tube then the being used for the tube.
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 411

If solids and suspended organic matter continually flow dewatering rates and effluent quality. A recent appraisal
out of the geotextile tube with the effluent water, this may of the hanging bag test is given by Koerner and Koerner
have implications on any downstream effluent treatment. (2006). A more recent development of the semi-perform-
As downstream effluent treatment processes can be rel- ance test is the geotextile tube dewatering test (Figure
atively costly it is important to minimise suspended solids 28b(ii)). This test is simpler to operate than the hanging
and suspended organic matter loss from the dewatering bag test while providing the same performance data. The
tubes. test utilises a small cushion-shaped geotextile container,
with the slurry introduced via a pipe into the container.
6.4.1.3. Effluent quality Effluent quality is governed by For new projects it is normal to carry out full perform-
the presence of suspended matter and dissolved solids ance testing, either by using a separate prototype tube or
and compounds. The effluent quality determines by combining this testing with the first dewatering tube of
whether further downstream effluent treatment is the project. The scale of the prototype testing can range
required before the water is passed into the environment from a small-size tube to the full-size planned dewatering
or recirculated. tube (Figure 28c). The full performance testing is used to
To best control effluent quality it is important that no confirm, or modify, the design assumptions derived from
suspended solids and organic matter are allowed to pass smaller scale testing, e.g. HBT, and to allow the new
out of the geotextile tubes during dewatering. One way of assumptions to be incorporated into the main project.
achieving this is to use chemical dewatering accelerants
in the contained waste to collapse any suspended matter 6.4.3. Rate of dewatering
and prevent its loss. This has an important secondary The rate at which the dewatering process occurs is
effect, as the collapsed waste structure also reduces dependent on the change in hydraulic conductivity of the
significantly the loss of other pollutants (e.g. heavy contained waste during dewatering and the filtration per-
metals, organic compounds) from the tubes, thus improv- formance of the geotextile skin in the geotextile tube. The
ing effluent quality. filtration performance is dependent on the hydraulic prop-
erties of the geotextile, the nature of the pore structures
6.4.2. Evaluating geotextile tube performance within the geotextile, and its interaction with the contained
Wastes and their behaviour vary considerably, not only slurry waste. Several researchers have begun to analyse the
between different waste streams but also from site to site. filtration rates of slurry wastes with various geotextile
Consequently, each new dewatering application undergoes filters in order to quantify performance parameters (e.g.
an evaluation programme in order to arrive at the optimal Moo-Young et al. 2002; Kutay and Aydilek 2004; Muthu-
geotextile tube dewatering solution. Figure 28 shows the kumaran and Ilamparuthi 2006; Huang and Luo 2007; Liao
three stages of evaluation in order of complexity: initial and Bhatia 2008). To date, this research work has concen-
scoping (e.g. cone test), semi-performance (e.g. hanging trated on the dewatering of natural sediments.
bag test or geotextile tube dewatering test), and full An important dewatering performance parameter is the
performance (e.g. full-scale prototype test). time over which dewatering occurs. The dewatering time
Initial scoping tests, such as the cone test (Figure 28a), must be consistent with the overall dewatering operation.
are simple empirical laboratory or field tests that are used Normal dewatering operations require the dewatering time
for screening waste stream/chemical accelerant combina- to be between one and two months. Longer dewatering
tions, and can also be used to give insight into final times constrain the speed of waste processing and the
percentage solids concentration, effluent quality and con- volumes that can be treated.
tained volume reduction. They are simple to perform, and Maintaining the dewatering period within a relatively
multiple tests can be carried out easily. short time frame normally requires the use of dewatering
Once the simple scoping tests have been done, it is accelerants, as the time frame associated with the dewater-
normal to continue to the next level of testing, the semi- ing of sludges under normal conditions can be long and
performance tests. These tests are carried out in the field, the process inefficient.
and attempt to model on a small scale the likely in-
service condition. To date, two semi-performance tests
have been developed: the hanging bag test (Figure 28b(i)) 6.5. Use of dewatering accelerants
and the geotextile tube dewatering test (Figure 28b(ii)). Slurry wastes and contaminated sediments consist of little
The hanging bag test (HBT) has been in existence for a intact solid matter, but comprise large amounts of sus-
number of years: it utilises a piece of the planned pended solids, colloids and (possibly) suspended organic
dewatering geotextile, 1.7 m long by 0.6 m wide, fash- matter. Also present can be significant quantities of heavy
ioned into a bag. The slurry waste is poured into the top metals and/or organic contaminants. To dewater effi-
of the bag and the amount of effluent, its quality and the ciently, the geotextile tube must retain much of the solids
contained volume (or solids concentration) are recorded and organic matter and control the passage of any heavy
over time. A draft ASTM standard exists for this test as metals and organic contaminants, while allowing the water
well as a draft GRI standard test method (GRI GT12 to pass. Further, for practical purposes, the loss of water
2004). This test is normally always used at the evaluation must occur in a relatively short time period. Meeting these
stage of every planned geotextile tube dewatering project. two conflicting requirements has led to the common use
It provides valuable performance information relating to of dewatering accelerants.
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
412 Lawson

(a)

(i) (ii)
(b)

(c)

Figure 28. Different levels of evaluating the performance of geotextile tube dewatering: (a) initial scoping tests (e.g. cone test):
(b) semi-performance tests (e.g. (i) hanging bag test, (ii) geotextile tube dewatering test); (c) full performance tests (e.g. full-
scale prototype test)

Currently, there are two ways to accelerate the rate of the slurry waste prior to entering the geotextile tube;
dewatering: and/or
• the use of an electro-osmotic potential within the
• the addition of chemical dewatering accelerants into geotextile tube to accelerate dewatering.
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 413

(A third acceleration method also exists, that of pressure, Solids concentration, with
but is not discussed here because it is not considered accelerant
feasible with geotextile tube dewatering.)

6.5.1. Chemical dewatering accelerants


Chemical flocculating agents have been used for many Solids concentration, without

Solids concontration
Contained volume
accelerant
years in the water treatment industry to separate sus-
pended solids, colloids and organic matter from water.
These chemical agents neutralise the interparticle charges
Volume, without accelerant
and consequently collapse the suspended solids and
organic matter. The collapse of the slurry structure also
traps heavy metals and organic contaminants within the
collapsed structure, and produces relatively large amounts Volume, with accelerant
of free water.
Flocculating agents can be used in geotextile tube Time
dewatering to accelerate the dewatering rate and enable (a)
effective dewatering over a relatively short period of time.
20
The chemical accelerant is introduced into, and mixed
Consolidation trend line
with, the waste prior to its entry into the geotextile tubes.

Solids concentration (%)


The type of accelerant used and its dosage rate are critical 15
to the dewatering performance of the chemical accelerant,
and this is highly dependent on the type of waste being 10
treated. Without chemical accelerant
Water-soluble organic polymers known as polyelectro- With chemical accelerant
5
lytes are very effective chemical dewatering accelerants.
They usually have ion exchange sites, which give the
molecule an ionic charge. Those with a positive charge 0
0 2 4 6 8
are cationic; those with a negative charge are anionic; Time (months)
others that are neutral are non-ionic. These molecules (b)
react with colloidal material in the slurry by neutralising
80
the charge and bridging individual particles to form flocs. With chemical accelerant
Cationic polyelectrolytes are either polyamines or acry-
Solids concentration (%)

lamides, and are generally most effective at higher pH. 60

Anionic polyelectrolytes are acrylates and are most effec- Without chemical accelerant
tive at lower pH. Non-ionic polyelectrolytes are typically 40
polyacrylamides. By tailoring structures and molecular
weights it is possible to design a polymer-dewatering 20
accelerant for most coagulation and flocculation problems.
The chemical dewatering accelerant that works best in
0
any system can be determined only through experimental 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
screening by small-scale filtering or hanging bag tests, or Time (days)
by geotextile tube dewatering tests (see Section 6.4.2). (c)

Waste streams are highly variable, not only across differ-


Figure 29. Effect of chemical dewatering accelerants on rate
ent waste streams but also within specific waste groups.
of geotextile tube dewatering: (a) effect on rate of solids
Chemical accelerant addition is highly specific, not only concentration increase and rate of volume decrease; (b) effect
to the type of accelerant used but also to its dosage rate. on rate of solids concentration increase of sewage sludge;
Consequently, the only way of arriving at an optimal (c) effect on rate of solids concentration increase of fly ash
specific waste–chemical accelerant combination is by way slurry
of small-scale filtration testing.
Figure 29a shows the effect of chemical accelerants on
the dewatering rate of geotextile tubes. The accelerant collapsed structure when the accelerant is used. Thus the
collapses the solid and suspended matter structure in the total volume reduction (and solids concentration increase)
waste, releasing free water. This free water then drains will be of similar magnitude for the accelerated and the
relatively quickly out of the geotextile tube, resulting in an normally dewatered waste; however, the accelerated dewa-
accelerated volume reduction (and a comparable acceler- tered waste will achieve this in a much shorter time frame.
ated increase in solids concentration). If no chemical Chemical dewatering accelerants perform differently on
accelerant is used, the waste drains much more slowly, due different waste streams. Figure 29b shows the geotextile
to its natural hydraulic conductivity, self-weight and tube dewatering of sewage sludge taken directly from the
internal water head, and the waste structure compresses digester of a municipal waste water treatment plant. The
over a longer time frame to reach a structure similar to the geotextile tube containing the waste and the accelerant
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
414 Lawson

dewaters to around 15% solids concentration after 1.5 to 2 cathode to accelerate the movement of pore water through
months. The geotextile tube containing the waste, but with fine-grained soils. Heat is dissipated as a by-product of
no accelerant, dewaters to the same solids concentration, this mechanism. Results indicate that the rate of pore
but takes 4 months to do it. Clearly, the addition of the water movement can be up to five times that of normal
chemical dewatering accelerant is of benefit here. Figure pore water flows. Limitations of this technique are the cost
29b shows both the accelerated and the non-accelerated of electricity to drive the process, and attrition of the
waste trending to a ‘consolidation trend line’, where any anodes, which degrade as part of the process.
further increase in solids concentration is governed by More recently, electro-osmosis has been used to accel-
the loss of pore water only from the waste. Both have the erate the in situ dewatering of sewage sludge (Miller et al.
same consolidation trend line, but the waste with the 1998; Jones et al. 2006). Both cases demonstrated that the
accelerant reaches this trend line much sooner. solids concentration increased at a greater rate, and
Figure 29c shows the geotextile tube dewatering of fly achieved a higher value, when the electro-osmosis process
ash slurry from a thermal power station. The optimal was applied, compared with normal dewatering conditions.
performing chemical dewatering accelerant has been Tyagi (2006) has applied electro-osmosis to the dewatering
added to the slurry in one tube, with no accelerant used in of wastewater sludge containing high levels of heavy
the other tube. The results show that both tubes dewater at metals.
a similar rate and achieve a maximum solids concentration The technology electro-kinetic geosynthetics (EKG)
of around 70% after only 30 days. Clearly, the addition of was first proposed by Jones (1996) for geosynthetic
the chemical dewatering accelerant has no benefit with electro-osmotic applications in soils. This technology is of
this type of waste. interest to geotextile tube dewatering because the electro-
The difference in performance when using chemical osmotic elements can be integrated within the geotextile
accelerants for the two waste streams may be rationalised tube itself. By incorporating the cathode into the geotex-
as follows. The sewage sludge is composed of significant tile skin of the tube and using a non-degrading anode in
quantities of suspended solids and organic matter. The the centre many of the problems associated with conven-
chemical accelerant collapses this structure, producing tional electro-osmotic dewatering are overcome.
free water that can be readily drained out of the tube. On Figure 30a shows the fundamental principles of EKG
the other hand, the fly ash slurry is particulate in nature, accelerant use with geotextile tube dewatering. The appli-
and has negligible suspended solids and nil organic matter, cation of a voltage causes an increase in the rate of
and hence the chemical accelerant has negligible effect on dewatering, which results in a consequent increase in the
its dewatering capability. rate of solids concentration. This also results in an in-
An important secondary consideration in the use of crease in the final solids concentration, compared with
chemical dewatering accelerants concerns the ability of normal dewatering conditions. The greater the voltage
the treated waste to trap and contain contaminants within applied, the higher the rate of dewatering, and the higher
the geotextile tube and not allow them to pass out with the the final solids concentration for the same dewatering time
effluent water. This has major implications when consider- (or, conversely, the shorter the time required to reach a
ing effluent quality. Examples exist of the ability of specific solids concentration).
appropriate chemical dewatering accelerants to contain The effect of the EKG accelerant shown in Figure 30a
heavy metals, e.g. mercury, lead, zinc, cadmium and should be contrasted with that of the chemical accelerant
arsenic, and non-soluble organic compounds, e.g. poly- in Figure 29a. The chemical accelerant does not increase
chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydro- the natural final solids concentration, although it does
carbons (PAHs), pesticides and dioxins. The ability of the increase the dewatering rate, whereas the EKG accelerant
accelerant to enable these heavy metals and non-soluble increases both the dewatering rate and the final solids
compounds to be trapped depends on how the accelerant concentration.
reacts with the waste stream overall. If the accelerant can Figure 30b shows the results of small-scale geotextile
collapse the waste stream structure effectively then high tube (approximately 1 m dia.) dewatering tests on acti-
percentages of these contaminants can be contained within vated municipal sewage sludge. The sewage sludge was
the geotextile tube. This ability of chemical dewatering placed in the geotextile tubes and allowed to dewater
accelerants to trap organic compounds has also been (initial solids concentration ¼ 0.7%). One test had no
demonstrated in the geotextile tube dewatering of animal EKG applied; the second had an EKG potential equivalent
waste, where compounds of organic nitrogen and phos- to 30 V/m and a current of 0.5 A applied; a third had an
phorus have been fully contained within the geotextile EKG potential equivalent to 50 V/m and a current of
tubes (Worley et al. 2004, 2005). 0.7 A applied. The results clearly demonstrate the im-
provement in dewatering when the EKG treatment is
6.5.2. Electro-osmotic dewatering accelerants applied compared with the normal (untreated) case. Both
The use of chemical dewatering accelerants is far more an increase in the rate of dewatering and an increased
developed than that of electro-osmotic dewatering accel- level of final solids concentration were obtained. Also, the
erants. Electro-osmosis has been used on a limited scale rate of dewatering increases for an increased applied
as a means of accelerating the dewatering of fine-grained voltage.
soils for some time (e.g. Bjerrum et al. 1967). This Glendinning et al. (2006) also report dewatering tests of
technique utilises an electric potential between anode and digested lagoon sewage sludge using EKG in the labora-
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 415

entering the geotextile tube dewatering system and the


Solids concentration, with EKG
Increasing voltage amounts of liquid and solids exiting the system must be
maintained. The whole dewatering system has to be
designed in an effective hydraulic manner to ensure this
balance is maintained.
Solids concentration

The amount of slurry waste to be dewatered and treated


is normally expressed in terms of a total volume or a
Solids concentration, without EKG
known flow rate. Volume amounts are usually given if a
specific volume is to be removed from lagoons, digesters,
lakes, rivers, etc. Alternatively, known flow rates are
usually given if it involves output from a process such as
an industrial or mining operation or a treatment plant.
The characteristics of the waste slurry should be known,
Time such as the specific gravity, the solids concentration
(a) during pumping, the solids concentration in place in the
geotextile tubes, the target dewatered solids concentration,
40 the dewatering rate, and the concentration of coarse
material (sand, etc.). The target dewatered solids concen-
With EKG, 50 V/m tration and dewatering rate should be derived from an
30 evaluation of geotextile tube dewatering performance with
Solids concentration (%)

With EKG, 30 V/m the specific waste stream (see Section 6.4.2), and should
account for the effect of dewatering accelerants etc., if
relevant. Coarse material in the waste does not undergo a
20
volume change during dewatering, but does affect the total
volume of dewatered solids produced.
Without EKG The above parameters enable the determination of the
10 dewatered solids volume and rate of effluent water
production. The dewatered solids can be disposed of on
site or off site, or may be recycled, etc. The quality of the
0 effluent water produced determines its use and whether
0 20 40 60 80
Time (h)
further downstream treatment is required. The effluent
(b) water may be recirculated or, if it is of good quality, can
be passed to the environment.
Figure 30. Effect of EKG accelerant on rate of geotextile The above parameters also enable the determination of
tube dewatering: (a) effect on rate of solids concentration the quantity and sizes of geotextile tubes required to
increase; (b) effect on dewatering rate of sewage sludge dewater the waste stream. The capacity of the geotextile
tubes is also affected by the heights to which they can be
filled. The allowable geotextile tube filling height also
tory. Using an applied voltage of 100 V/m, solids concen- influences the size of tube used, as this governs the
tration increased from around 14% (initially) to 23% and magnitude of the tensions generated in the tube during
27% (for the two tests) after 21 days. This results in a filling, and affects the required ultimate tensile strength of
volume reduction of 40% and 50%, respectively, for the the geotextile skin. This is discussed in the section below.
two tests. While geotextile tubes are the most common means of
Fourie et al. (2002, 2004) have used the EKG technique dewatering, geotextile bags have also been used if the
to dewater in situ fine-grained residue from mineral sands volumes are small. In some instances, to aid portability,
processing, diamond mine tailings and lead–zinc mine geotextile bags are maintained inside steel containers
tailings. All results showed increased dewatering rates and during filling and transport to an off-site disposal facility.
higher final solids concentration when the EKG technique
was applied. While the test programme did not include 6.7. Filling heights and tensions generated in
geotextile tubes, it is considered that the results would be geotextile tubes during dewatering, and ultimate
comparable had they been used as the containment/ tensile strength requirements
dewatering medium. The tensions generated in geotextile tubes for dewatering
Accelerated dewatering using the EKG technique with are similar to those for hydraulic and marine applications
geotextile tubes has very interesting potential. However, (Section 3.4.1). During filling, tensions are generated in
more work is required to quantify the performance three locations in the tube units: around the circumference
benefits for a range of slurry-like waste streams. of the tubes, along the length of the tubes, and at
the connection of the filling ports with the tubes (see
6.6. Volumes of slurry dewatered and flow rates Figure 6).
To ensure that a dewatering operation proceeds as planned, When slurry waste is used for filling the tubes, the
a volume or rate balance between the amount of slurry tensions generated in the circumferential and longitudinal
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
416 Lawson

directions can be readily analysed by use of the membrane necessary to stack multiple dewatering tubes on top of
theory methods of Leschinsky et al. (1996), Plaut and each other. The loads exerted by the upper geotextile tubes
Suherman (1998) and Palmerton (2002). Figure 31 shows must be taken into account when determining the required
the maximum circumferential tensions generated in tensile strengths of the lower tubes. Figure 32a shows a
4 m, 6 m and 8 m diameter geotextile tubes at different typical two-tier stack array of geotextile tubes undergoing
filling heights (the density of the slurry is assumed to be dewatering. The lower tubes have completed the various
11 kN/m3 ). It is observed that for HT /DT ratios . 0.4 the dewatering stages, and are undergoing consolidation,
circumferential tensions increase significantly for increas- while the upper tubes are being filled and dewatered.
ing filling heights. When geotextile tubes are stacked on top of each other
The maximum longitudinal tension generated in the additional tensions are generated in the lower tubes as a
tube can be approximated using the same relationship as result of the weight exerted by the upper tubes. Further,
presented in Figure 9: that is, the longitudinal tension additional localised tensions are generated in the tubes in
is approximately 63% of the maximum circumferential the location where one tube has to span over the gap
tension. between two lower tubes (Figure 32b). Plaut and Filz
The magnitude of the port connection tensions can be (2008) have developed relationships to analyse the tension
significant, especially if the dewatering tubes are filled to effects of stacked geotextile tubes in general. Additional
maximum filling heights. To prevent rupture at the ports, localised tensions resulting from spanning lower tube gaps
and to enable greater filling heights, special polymeric may be highly variable, depending on the size and depth
port connections have been developed to resist the high of the gaps.
stresses in these locations (Yuan et al. 2008).
The resulting tensile strengths of geotextile tubes are 6.9. Dewatering applications using geotextile tubes
determined by applying a safety factor between 3.5 and 5 Currently, geotextile tubes are used to dewater a wide
times the maximum tensions generated. As with geotextile range of slurry-like wastes and contaminated sediments.
tubes for hydraulic and marine applications, the judicious Virtually any industry that generates slurry waste can
application of high-capacity geotextile seams is crucial to utilise geotextile tubes for dewatering and post-processing
the structural performance of the dewatering tubes. of the waste. Listed below are the major industry group-
To maximise dewatering capacity it is important for the ings that have used geotextile tube dewatering to date.
geotextile tubes to be filled to a maximum safe height in
order to maximise the volume throughput. Safety is 6.9.1. Municipal waste and water treatment
important here in order to ensure that the tubes do not The dewatering of municipal waste (sewage) sludge was
rupture and discharge the waste in an uncontrolled manner. an early application for geotextile tube dewatering (e.g.
Good control over pumping during the filling stages is
very important to ensure the tubes are not overstressed.

6.8. Stacking of geotextile tubes


Where the dewatering platform area is limited, or where
the volume of waste to be dewatered is large, it may be
100

γ ⫽ 11 kN/m3
Maximum circumferential tension [Tmax]c (kN/m)

80

DT ⫽ 8 m
(a)
60
High localised tensions

40

DT ⫽ 6 m

20

DT ⫽ 4 m
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 (b)
HT /DT ratio
Figure 32. Stacking of geotextile dewatering tubes: (a) two-
Figure 31. Maximum circumferential tensions in geotextile tier example; (b) diagram showing locations of high localised
tubes according to Palmerton (2002) tensions
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 417

Fowler et al. 1996). Most municipal sewage treatment nutrients are contained within the geotextile tubes during
plants store the generated sludge from the sewage treat- dewatering.
ment plants in ponds, where further anaerobic processes It is reasonably common for the dewatered animal waste
take place. Over time, these ponds fill with sludge and to be recycled as fertiliser on pastures. An example of use
require cleaning. Further, these ponds are seldom engi- is given by Worley et al. (2004), where geotextile tubes
neered containment facilities, and consequently may leak are used to dewater dairy cattle waste.
and pollute local watercourses, etc. Thus the cleaning and
reclamation of these ponds have become an important 6.9.3. Food processing
environmental issue. Geotextile tubes have been used Food processing produces large quantities of slurry-like
extensively for dewatering sludge from these containment waste, whether it is part of the manufacturing process or
ponds. The effluent water is normally recirculated to the part of the growing process. Examples of food processing
ponds, with the dewatered solids disposed of elsewhere. industries that have used geotextile tubes to dewater waste
Sludges are produced at several stages of the sewage are potato processing (washing and skin waste), cheese
treatment process (termed primary and secondary processing, wine processing and abattoirs. Many other
sludges). Primary sludges are generated in clarifiers, and possibilities exist.
are the result of flocculation sedimentation. Secondary Intensive aquaculture activities generate considerable
sludges are also generated in clarifiers by flocculation waste from the high-growth feeding of fish and crusta-
sedimentation, but follow biological treatment. There is ceans. This benthic waste can be toxic to fish and
considerable regulatory pressure for the conversion of crustaceans, and has to be removed from the aquaculture
sewage sludges to clean biosolids, as these can be used impoundments at frequent intervals. Dewatering of this
for fertiliser, etc. Geotextile tubes also have been used waste and subsequent disposal in containment facilities is
to dewater sludges emanating directly from clarifiers. becoming the practice where environmental regulations
Some examples of use are given by Fowler et al. exist.
(2002a).
In a number of instances geotextile tubes have been 6.9.4. Mining waste
connected directly to digesters. Here the effluent water is Various types of waste are produced from the mining of
recirculated within the treatment process, and the humic minerals: examples include, tailings, mineral fines, and
solids are removed for disposal or allowed to compost. processing sludge. Large mining activities produce large
One limitation on the use of geotextile tubes to dewater amounts of tailings, which are stored in open tailings
sewage sludge is that a flat area has to be available to dams in isolated locations. There are, however, many
carry out the dewatering. Space limitations exist with instances where tailings are produced in relatively small
many metropolitan sewage treatment plants because of amounts from small mines that are close to population or
encroaching development and treatment plant capacity environmentally sensitive areas. The management of these
expansion. In these cases alternative dewatering treatment tailings or their reclamation and remediation provides
technologies may be more appropriate. many opportunities, because in many cases the tailings
Geotextile tubes are also used to dewater the outflow have first to be dewatered before they can be rendered
from septic tanks. Here, the activated sludge is normally stable and inert. An example of geotextile tube dewatering
collected from septic tanks by use of vacuum trucks and of lead and zinc mining tailings for a small capacity mine
transported to a central depot, where the sludge is pumped in Greece is given by Newman et al. (2003).
into geotextile tubes to dewater. An example of use is Other mining activities produce mineral fines as part of
given by de Castro et al. (2008). the washing process (e.g. coal mining), which can be
More recently, geotextile tubes have been used to reclaimed and reused following dewatering.
dewater alum sludge, the waste by-product of fresh water
treatment plants. In many locations the direct disposal of 6.9.5. Industrial waste
this sludge is not allowed, and dewatering it to solid form Many industrial processes produce waste that is stored in
and then disposal in an off-site landfill is the only cost- waste ponds on the industrial site. Over time these ponds
effective alternative. fill with waste, and have to be cleaned to enable the ponds
to continue to function.
6.9.2. Agricultural animal waste A common form of waste reclamation is to dewater the
Cattle, chicken and hog farms produce large amounts of waste from the ponds and, depending on the nature of the
waste, which is commonly stored in sludge ponds near the dewatered waste, then dispose of it in landfill, incinerate
animal housing facility. The floor of the animal housing is it, use it for other applications, or recycle it back through
washed out daily, with all the waste being washed into the industrial plant.
nearby retention ponds. Over time these ponds become
filled with sludge, and they have to be cleaned out 6.9.6. Construction waste
periodically. A number of construction activities generate slurry waste,
Animal waste is more difficult to dewater than sewage which for environmental reasons is becoming increasingly
waste, being generally more fatty (and finer) in nature. It difficult to dispose of directly. Examples include drilling,
normally has to be treated with a conditioning agent as grouting and diaphragm wall muds. Because the quantities
well as a chemical accelerant to ensure colloids and of slurry produced are relatively small, small-sized geo-
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
418 Lawson

textile tubes or geotextile bags have been used to dewater Green Bay
the slurries on site prior to their disposal in solid form in N

off-site landfill facilities.


City of Green Bay

6.9.7. Contaminated sediments


The discharge of effluent waste from industrial plants into
water courses is a common pollution problem. Many of
these pollutants are non-soluble in water, and settle into,
Lower Fox River
and contaminate, the sediments of lakes, ponds, streams
and rivers. Examples include: organic compounds, e.g. City of
Appleton
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pentachlorophenols Little Lake
(PCPs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesti- Butte des
Morts
cides and dioxins; heavy metals, e.g. mercury, cadmium, City of
Kaukana
lead, copper, zinc and arsenic; and possibly also include
raw sewage in less-developed regions. These contaminants City of
Menasha
are harmful to humans, animals and aquatic life.
Environmental dredging is the most common form of Lake Winnebago
contaminated sediment remediation. Here, the sediment is (a)
dredged and pumped to storage impoundments, or treated
at onshore facilities before disposal either on site or off Lower Fox River
N
site. On-shore treatment normally involves dewatering to
reduce the volume and to render the sediment in a solid
form that can be transported. Examples of geotextile tube
dewatering of contaminated sediments are given by
Gaffney et al. (1999), Duke et al. (2000), Mori et al.
1 to 5 ppm PCBs
(2002a, 2002b), Cretens (2008), Mastin et al. (2008) and
in Sections 6.10 and 6.11 of this paper.

6.10. Case study 4: Geotextile tubes for dewatering


contaminated sediments, Fox River, Little Lake Butte Location of pulp
and paper mills
des Morts, WI, USA
Menasha
The Lower Fox River flows north east approximately
65 km from Lake Winnebago (in the south-west) to Green
Bay (in the north east) and then into Lake Michigan Lake
(Figure 33a). During the late 19th, early and mid 20th Winnebago

centuries many pulp and paper companies were attracted


to the area to establish plants along the Lower Fox River
because of its constant supply of fresh water and its close
proximity to timber sources. By the mid 1950s this area Dam
had the highest concentration of pulp and paper operations 1 to 50 ppm
PCBs
in the world.
In 1954 the paper mills along the Lower Fox River
Neenah
began producing carbonless copy paper using PCB-coated
emulsions. Between 1954 and 1971, when the use of PCBs
ceased, it is estimated that some 350 t had been discharged
Neenah
into the Lower Fox River. A portion of these PCBs settled
Dam
into the river sediments and was ingested by fish and
(then) birds. While the use of PCBs ceased in 1971,
recycling of PCB-coated paper after that time also gener- (b)

ated discharges of PCBs into the river.


Figure 33. Lower Fox River location and PCB concentration
To reduce the local concentrations of PCBs and to
levels in Little Lake Butte des Morts: (a) Lower Fox River
prevent their continual migration into Green Bay it was site location map; (b) Little Lake Butte des Morts along with
decided to remediate the Lower Fox River. This remedia- sediment PCB concentrations
tion is under the auspices of the US EPA Superfund and is
funded by the relevant pulp and paper companies in the
area. The overall remediation project has divided
the Lower Fox River into a number of regions, with Little Lake Butte des Morts is a shallow, slow-flowing
Little Lake Butte des Morts, lying at the upper reaches waterway approximately 5 km long and 1 km wide located
of the river (see Figure 33a), being the first to undergo immediately downstream of Lake Winnebago (Figure
remediation. 33b). Several pulp and paper mills are located at the
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 419

upstream end of this lake. Figure 33b also shows the


locations where PCB concentration levels are greater than N

1 mg PCB to 1 kg sediment (1 ppm) in the lake. The


highest concentration areas (1 to 50 ppm) lie in the
vicinity, or immediately downstream, of existing pulp and
paper mills in the south and south-east of the lake.
Another large area in the central north of the lake has
PCB concentrations from 1 to 5 ppm, owing to movement
of PCBs from the highest concentration areas before Sediment
processing
entering the Lower Fox River. area
Several remediation options were investigated for
Little Lake Butte des Morts. It was concluded that Pipeline to sediment
dredging of the contaminated sediment along with off- processing area
site disposal provided the best solution. A target of
1 mg PCB to 1 kg sediment (1 ppm) was established as
the required clean-up level as this gave the optimum
solution between long-term safety for humans and wild-
life and overall project cost. Ninety-eight per cent of the Dredging location 2

PCB concentration lies in the upper metre of the


sediment layer. This requires the dredging of approxi- Menasha

mately 600 000 m3 of contaminated sediments (approxi-


mately 1700 kg of PCBs) in the lake, and is to be
carried out over a six-year seasonal period, beginning in
2004. Subsequently, a long-term monitoring programme
will be put in place to track the concentration of PCBs
in various media.
Neenah
The remediation process involves several steps. First, Dredging
sediment is dredged from the lake bed by a hydraulic location 1
dredge and is pumped through a floating pipeline to the
staging area and into geotextile tubes, where it dewaters. (a)

Next, the water is collected from the lined gravel drainage


area beneath the geotextile tubes and pumped into a N
Clean water return pipeline to lake
treatment plant, where it is cleaned with sand and
activated carbon treatments to remove contaminants. The
clean water is then returned through another pipeline to
the lake. Finally, when the contaminated sediment is dry

Little Lake Butte des Morts


enough, it is removed from the geotextile tubes and loaded
into lined, covered trucks for transport to a disposal site.
The disposal site is fully licensed for the disposal of Water
treatment Sediment
sediment containing PCBs. plant dewatering
An extensive evaluation programme was employed to pad for
geotextile
determine the appropriate geotextile tube dewatering per- tubes
formance parameters. A large number of hanging bag tests
were performed to determine the appropriate accelerant
type and dosage rates, the likely rates of dewatering, and
the resulting effluent quality. Calculations were then
performed to determine the required quantities, sizes and Dredge discharge pipeline
safe filling heights of the tubes.
Dredging of the contaminated sediments began in 2004
in the area of highest PCB concentrations to the south and (b)
south-east of the lake (Figure 34a). The dredges used were
special, small-scale cutter-suction dredges that created Figure 34. Details of the remedial dredging and sediment
minimal sediment disturbance during operation. The accu- treatment operation in Little Lake Butte des Morts: (a) Little
rate positioning of the dredges was via GPS, with an Lake Butte des Morts clean-up map; (b) layout of sediment
accuracy of 1 m. The depth of dredging varied, according processing area
to contaminant concentration, between 0.3 m and 1 m. The
accuracy of the depth of dredging could be controlled to sediment processing area located on the central western
within 0.1 m. shore of Little Lake Butte des Morts (Figure 34a). The
The dredged contaminated sediment was pumped hy- sediment processing area consisted of a sediment dewater-
draulically through two floating pipelines to the onshore ing pad that supported the geotextile tube dewatering and
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
420 Lawson

a water treatment plant that removed the contaminants


from the effluent water (Figure 34b). These two proces-
sing units were connected by pipelines from the dredges,
and from the sediment dewatering pad to the water
treatment plant. Once treated, the clean water was returned
to the lake by pipeline.
The dewatering pad consists of a clay underlayer with a
geomembrane liner. On top of this a geotextile protection
layer has been placed, prior to the placement of the gravel
drainage blanket (Figure 35a).
The geotextile tubes are laid out on the gravel drainage
blanket and connected by a pipe network to the incoming
dredged sediment. The pipe network enables the filling
and refilling of the geotextile tubes (following each
dewatering cycle) five times before the final dewatering
(a)
and consolidation stage is reached. The incoming dredged
sediment is dosed and mixed with the appropriate amount
of chemical dewatering accelerant in order to maximise
the rate of dewatering within the geotextile tubes. The size
of the geotextile tubes, their filling heights, and the
number employed at any point in time had to meet the
volume of incoming dredged sediment, which ranged
between 4.5 m3 /min and 5.5 m3 /min. Because of space
limitations at the dewatering pad, the geotextile tubes
were stacked several high during the dewatering process
(Figure 35b).
The effluent water drains out of the geotextile tubes,
down through the gravel drainage blanket, and then down
to a sump located at the lowest point of the pad. When the
sump fills up, pumps automatically switch on and pump
the effluent water into the treatment plant. The treatment
plant utilises dissolved air flotation combined with sand (b)
and activated carbon filtration to clean the water. The
clean water is then returned to the lake by means of an
outlet pipeline.
After dewatering, the contained sediments ranged in
solids concentration between 35% and 80%. This variation
was due to the variation in the amount of granular
particles in the geotextile tubes and the time over which
the geotextile tubes were allowed to consolidate (the
bottom tube layer was allowed more time than the upper
layer). This increase in solids concentration results in a
reduction in contained volume of 60% and 85%, respec-
tively. After six months the dewatered sediment was
removed from the geotextile tubes by excavators and
transported to a licensed off-site landfill disposal facility
(Figure 35c). The sediment is transported using lined
trucks to prevent loss of the contaminated soil.
(c)
6.11. Case study 5: Geotextile tubes for dewatering
contaminated sediments, Porto Marghera, Veneto Figure 35. Various stages of the dewatering process using
Region, Italy geotextile tubes: (a) lined drainage blanket beneath geotextile
tubes; (b) sediment dewatering within geotextile tubes;
Porto Marghera is one of the most important industrial (c) removal of dewatered sediment from geotextile tubes
and commercial ports in Italy, and is located on the
western side of the Venetian lagoon, near the City of
Venice, in north-east Italy (Figure 36a). The port began of heavy metals, e.g. mercury, cadmium, lead, arsenic
to be developed in the early 20th century, and many and caesium, and non-soluble organic compounds, e.g.
chemical and petrochemical industries were established PAHs, HCBs, PCBs, PCDDs and PCDFs, occur in the
here between the 1950s and the 1980s. As a conse- ground and sediments of the area. The highest concen-
quence of this heavy industrial development, high levels trations of these contaminants occur in the sediments
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 421

Mestre N within the Porto Marghera area itself, and in its


immediate vicinity, while within the Venetian lagoon in
general lower concentrations are observed (e.g. Frignani
et al. 2001). These levels of contamination have made
Causeway Porto Marghera one of the most polluted sites in
Europe (Agostini et al. 2004).
Porto Marghera
As part of the ongoing remedial works at Porto
City of Marghera, the area immediately to the north of the port,
Venice and adjacent to the Venice causeway, was to undergo
remediation and development. This location, known as
‘Pili’, consists of a low-lying, tidal inlet area, which had
Venetian become a site for the dumping of industrial waste from
lagoon Porto Marghera, and over time had become polluted with
rainfall runoff and seepage through these waste deposits.
The whole site covers an area of around 52 ha with
(a) industrial waste deposits approximating 800 000 m3 . Con-
taminants present include heavy metals (cadmium, mer-
cury), organic compounds (benzo-pirene, PCBs) and
radioactive substances (radon 222). These contaminants
N
were being leached from the industrial waste deposits into
the sediments of the tidal inlet, and then on into the
Venetian lagoon, contaminating benthic and bird life. A
description of the site and the remediation carried out is
given in detail by Montobbio (2007). Part of the Pili
remediation involved the removal of 80 000 m3 of con-
taminated sediments from a 50 m wide strip around the
Causeway
edge of the tidal inlet (Figure 36b). Following removal,
these sediments were dewatered, and then disposed of in a
local landfill.
Location of
contaminated
The layout of the contaminated sediment dewatering
sediments process is shown in Figure 36c. Here, the excavated
sediments are transported to the washing plant, where the
Porto Marghera
aggregates are separated out, and the resulting slurry is
pumped by pipeline to the geotextile tube dewatering area.
Venetian lagoon
Before entering the geotextile tubes the slurry is dosed
with a chemical dewatering accelerant. The geotextile
(b)
tubes dewater the slurry, with the effluent water draining
to an effluent pond adjacent to the dewatering platform.
The effluent water passes to a water treatment plant for
Sediment
N
further treatment, and is then returned to the Venetian
Water washing
treatment plant
lagoon. The dewatered solids in the geotextile tubes will
Slurry
plant
pipeline
be removed and disposed of in a landfill.
The contaminated sediment was excavated and trans-
Treated water
Water returned to lagoon
ported by truck to the sediment washing plant (Figure
pipeline 37a). Excavation proceeded at a rate of approximately
Water 400 m3 /day. At the washing plant the contaminated sedi-
effluent
pond ment was washed, with the cleaned aggregate fraction
Excavation of separated out for alternative use (Figure 37b). The remain-
Contained contaminated ing fines slurry was maintained in suspension by agitation
geotextile tube sediments
dewatering in a holding tank (Figure 37c) until it could be pumped
plaform through a pipeline to the geotextile tube dewatering area
at a rate of around 1200 m3 /day.
The geotextile tube drainage platform consisted of a
Porto Marghera
compacted clay containment area, with an HDPE geo-
membrane liner on top (Figure 37d). In the base of this
(c)
containment area a 300 mm thick gravel drainage blan-
Figure 36. Details of geotextile tube dewatering site at Porto ket was placed to enable the effluent water from the
Marghera: (a) location of Porto Maghera; (b) location of tubes to travel to side drains, where it was then piped to
contaminated sediments; (c) layout of geotextile tube an external water containment pond (Figure 37f). Before
dewatering process entering the geotextile tubes the contaminated slurry was
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
422 Lawson

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(e) (f)

Figure 37. Various stages of the dewatering process at Porto Maghera: (a) removal of contaminated sediment; (b) separation of
clean aggregates at washing plant; (c) maintaining contaminated fines in suspension before pumping to geotextile tubes;
(d) geomembrane-lined drainage basin; (e) geotextile tubes dewatering contaminated sediments; (f) water effluent containment
pond prior to transfer to water treatment plant

dosed with a chemical dewatering accelerant. The


geotextile tubes were filled with the slurry and allowed
7. GEOTEXTILE CONTAINMENT FOR
OFFSHORE DISPOSAL OF
to dewater over a number of cycles (Figure 37e).
CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS
Around 7200 linear metres of 5.8 m theoretical diameter
tubes were used for the dewatering project. Once the In many countries industrial development has occurred
tubes had dewatered, they were cut open, and the historically around the coastline, as this gave convenient
contained waste was transported and disposed of in a access to imports and exports, and enabled access to the
landfill site. hinterland via rivers, etc. In Asia, for example, much of
The effluent water from the dewatering process was the industrial development lies within, or near, seaports
captured in an effluent pond adjacent to the drainage and coastal cities. With industrial development has come
platform (Figure 37f). From here the water was pumped to industrial effluent, which over the years has been depos-
a water treatment plant located on site for further treat- ited, along with river and marine sediments, within ports
ment. Following this, the treated water was returned to the and river and coastal areas. Much of this industrial
Venetian lagoon. effluent has consisted of non-soluble organic compounds
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 423

(e.g. polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aro- the bottom of the offshore disposal site, further dissipation
matic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pesticides and dioxins) and does not occur, provided the bed of the disposal site is
heavy metals (e.g. mercury, cadmium, lead, copper, zinc free from marine currents. Thus the critical contaminant
and arsenic), while raw sewage has also been deposited dissipation phase occurs during the actual dumping of the
(in undeveloped areas). Today, these contaminated sedi- contaminated sediments.
ments present a major problem when it comes to their safe Geotextile containers have been used to ensure that the
disposal from marine construction sites and land reclama- dumping of contaminated sediments is carried out in a
tion schemes. These contaminated sediments may vary controlled manner. The basic technique is shown in Figure
from overconsolidated clays to very soft clays. 38b, where the geotextile container has been filled with
Due to a shortage of available land in Asia the onshore the contaminated sediment and is dumped within the
disposal of contaminated sediments is virtually impossible. offshore disposal site. The geotextile container prevents
Furthermore, the treatment of contaminated sediments is the contaminated sediment fill from dissipating into the
very expensive, and can be very difficult. Consequently, surrounding marine environment, and also encapsulates
controlled offshore disposal sites are employed. These the contaminated sediments on the bed of the disposal
offshore disposal sites are normally located in an area that site. This technique was first used in the USA (e.g. Fowler
has been pre-dredged, or are contained within submarine et al. 1995b; Fowler and Trainer 1998), and has since been
dykes, and are founded at considerable water depth used elsewhere.
(normally . 20 m). The integrity of the geotextile containers during filling,
Non-soluble organic compounds, heavy metals and raw dropping and after placement is crucial for the safe,
sewage remain motionless and non-soluble within a controlled disposal of contaminated sediments. Section 4.3
stationary soil mass. However, when the contaminated discusses in detail the tensions generated in geotextile
sediments are disposed of in an uncontrolled manner at an containers during installation for hydraulic and marine
offshore disposal site, as shown in Figure 38a, it can structures. For contaminated sediment disposal the gener-
dissipate into the surrounding marine environment by the ated tensions can be significantly greater, for the follow-
action of tidal and marine currents. Normally, on reaching ing reasons. First, the size of the containers used is
relatively large (cf. those used for marine structures), and
they are dropped in considerable water depth. Second, the
Disposal barge fill material is overconsolidated or soft clays that provide
little-to-negligible internal shear resistance during dump-
ing. High-capacity seams have to be used throughout the
geotextile container to ensure its mechanical integrity.
Contaminated Figure 39 shows data obtained from a number of
sediments
geotextile container installation sites. The vertical axis
represents the geotextile container volume (in m3 ) multi-
Dissipation Dissipation plied by the water depth of installation (in m). The
into marine into marine
environment environment maximum value of 20 000 m4 shown on the vertical axis
can equate to a 1000 m3 geotextile container installed in
20 m water depth (which is an extreme instance). The
higher the value on the vertical axis, the more severe the
Bed of marine dumping site application in terms of larger container volumes and/or
(a)

Disposal barge 20,000


Geotextile container volume x depth (m4)

Disposal
applications
15,000
Hydraulic & marine
applications
Contaminated 10,000
sediments
Severity

Geotextile Cheek and Yee


container (2006)
5,000

Bed of marine dumping site 0


Sand Overconsolidated Soft clay
(b) clay
Geotextile container fill type
Figure 38. Use of geotextile containers for the controlled Severity
offshore disposal of contaminated sediments: (a) disposal in
uncontrolled manner; (b) disposal in controlled manner by Figure 39. Geotextile container operating spectrum
use of geotextile containers according to type of application
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
424 Lawson

greater water depths. The horizontal axis represents the especially if they are continually exposed over long
type of fill placed inside the geotextile container. Basi- periods of time. In these situations, aspects such as UV
cally, three fill types have been used: sand, overconsoli- resistance, abrasion resistance and liquefaction of the sand
dated clay and soft clay. In moving to the right along the fill need to be taken into account.
horizontal axis the severity increases, because the contain- Geotextile tubes and geotextile bags provide an efficient
er fill has less internal shear resistance (and therefore less medium for the dewatering of slurry waste streams and
absorption of energy). This has a significant effect on the contaminated sediments. Their high contact surface area
tensions generated in the geotextile container when it and good filtration characteristics, in addition to their
impacts on the seabed (see Section 4.3.4). simplicity, make them readily suited for this technique.
The data shown in Figure 39 can be divided into two The addition of chemical dewatering accelerants can
distinct regions according to the type of geotextile con- enhance the rate of dewatering significantly, and can trap
tainer application. The lower left region is where geotex- contaminants within the dewatering waste. Other dewater-
tile containers are used as structural elements in hydraulic ing accelerant techniques, such as EKG, offer interesting
and marine applications (see Section 4). Here, the drop- prospects in the future. To ensure success, the geotextile
ping conditions are less severe, as the geotextile containers tube dewatering system needs to be designed hydraulically
are relatively small in volume in order meet specific to ensure all components meet the capacity requirements.
installed geometric requirements, and are normally placed Also, the strengths and filling heights of the geotextile
in relatively shallow water depths. Furthermore, the fill in tubes must be closely controlled.
these geotextile containers is sand, or a high percentage of Geotextile containers have demonstrated their ability to
sand, for its structural and volume stability. safely dispose of contaminated sediments in offshore
The upper right region in Figure 39 is where geotextile disposal facilities. This application is more severe on the
containers are used to dispose of contaminated sediments. geotextile container than the more conventional hydraulic
Here, the disposal conditions are more severe, as the and marine application because of the relative size of
geotextile containers are relatively large in volume in containers used, their dropping depth, and the normally
order to conform to dredging and reclamation capacities, poor shear resistance of the contained fill. Ensuring the
and are normally placed in relatively deep offshore integrity of the geotextile container during installation
disposal sites. Further, the contaminated fill in these requires the use of high-strength geotextiles with high-
geotextile containers is either overconsolidated clays or capacity seams, along with relatively small pore sizes to
soft clays. Recently, the work of Cheek and Yee (2006) ensure negligible loss of fill.
has extended the boundary of this region further to the
right (more severe) by disposing of very soft sediments in
large containers from a reclamation site in Hong Kong.
While the conditions are more severe for disposal
NOTATIONS
applications, the geotextile containers must maintain Basic SI units are given in parentheses.
mechanical integrity during installation to ensure that the
contaminated sediments do not dissipate into the surround- Ab cross-sectional area of hopper in split-bottom
ing marine environment. The required tensile strengths of barge (Figure 14a) (m2 )
geotextile containers increase as the application moves AC equivalent geotextile container cross-sectional
from the lower left in Figure 39 to the upper right. This area (Figure 15) (m2 )
applies both to the tensile strength requirements of the Af cross-sectional area of fill in hopper of split-
geotextile itself and to that of the seams in the geotextile bottom barge (Figure 14a) (m2 )
container. For disposal applications high-strength geotex- AT cross-sectional area of filled geotextile tube
tiles using high-capacity seams and other special joining (m2 )
techniques are required. b0 width of opening at base of split-bottom barge
(Figure 14b) (m)
b0max maximum opening width at base of split-
8. CONCLUSIONS
bottom barge (m)
Geotextile containment presents very interesting opportu- bB base width of geotextile bag (m)
nities in the areas of hydraulic and marine engineering, bT base width of filled geotextile tube (m)
and environmental engineering. The three basic contain- CC circumference of geotextile container (m)
ment units—tubes, containers and bags—can be applied to CT circumference of geotextile tube (m)
many applications. DC equivalent geotextile container diameter
By containing sand and other similar materials, geotex- (Figure 15) (m)
tile tubes, containers and bags act as mass-gravity struc- DT theoretical diameter of geotextile tube (m)
tures in hydraulic and marine applications. Sand, or FS global factor of safety (dimensionless)
similar fill, is used for these applications because it does G specific gravity (dimensionless)
not undergo consolidation once installed, and the units can h0 free-board height of hopper in split-bottom
maintain their existing shape and height. barge (Figure 14a) (m)
When geotextile containment structures are installed in h1 side vertical height of hopper in split-bottom
hydraulic and marine environments care is required, barge (Figure 14a) (m)
Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 425

h2 bottom-angle vertical height of hopper in split- REFERENCES


bottom barge (Figure 14a) (m)
Agostini, P., Carlon, C., Critto, A. & Marcomini, A. (2004).
HT filled height of geotextile tube (m) Contaminated megasite remediation. Integrated management and
LB length of geotextile bag (m) decision support system application in Porto Marghera case-study
lb length of hopper in split-bottom barge (Figure (Italy). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Society of
15) (m) Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Portland, OR, USA, Allen
Press, pp. 137–140.
n ratio of horizontal distance to vertical height
Alvarez, E., Rubio, R. & Ricalde, H. (2007). Beach restoration with
(dimensionless) geotextile tubes as submerged breakwaters in Yucatan, Mexico.
q n,100 volume flow rate at 100 mm constant water Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25, No. 4–5, 233–241.
head through geotextile (m3 /m2 s) Austin, T. (1995). A second life for dredged material. Civil Engineering–
S solids concentration by weight (dimensionless) ASCE, 65, No. 11, 60–63.
Artières, O., Dunand, M. & Durand, F. (2005). Coastal protection with
S0 solids concentration at time t ¼ 0
filter tube breakwater ‘Amelie’ beach case. Proceedings of the 3rd
(dimensionless) European Geosynthetics Conference, Munich, Germany, German
Sf final solids concentration (dimensionless) Geotechnical Society, pp. 367–370.
St solids concentration at time t (dimensionless) Bezuijen, A., Schriver, R. R., Klein Breteler, M., Berendsen, E. &
[T]a axial tension in geotextile tube (N/m) Pilarczyk, K. W. (2002a). Field tests on geocontainers. Proceedings
of the 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France,
[T]c circumferential tension in geotextile tube (N/m)
Swets & Zeitlinger, Vol. 3, pp. 997–1000.
[T]p port connection tension in geotextile tube Bezuijen, A., Oung, O., Klein Breteler, M., Berendsen, E. & Pilarczyk,
(N/m) K. W. (2002b). Model tests on geocontainers, placing accuracy and
[Tmax ]a maximum axial tension in geotextile tube geotechnical aspects. Proceedings of the 7th International
(N/m) Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, Swets & Zeitlinger,
Vol. 3, pp. 1001–1006.
[Tmax ]c maximum circumferential tension in geotextile
Bezuijen, A., de Groot, M. B., Klein Breteler, M. & Berendsen, E.
tube (N/m) (2005). Placing accuracy and stability of geocontainers. Proceedings
[Tu ]a ultimate axial tensile strength in geotextile tube of the 3rd European Geosynthetics Conference, Munich, Germany,
(N/m) German Geotechnical Society, pp. 123–128.
[Tu ]c ultimate circumferential tensile strength in Bjerrum, L., Moum, J. & Eide, O. (1967). Application of electro-osmosis
to a foundation problem in Norwegian quick clay. Géotechnique,
geotextile tube (N/m)
17, No. 3, 214–235.
t time (s) Black, K. (1998). Design of a multi-purpose reef for surf riding, sheltered
tB actual thickness of geotextile bag (m) swimming and coastal stability: Gold Coast, Australia. Proceedings
tk effective thickness of geotextile bag structure of the 2nd International Artificial Surfing Reef Symposium, San
(m) Diego, USA.
Borrero, J. C. & Nelson, C. (2002). Results of a Comprehensive
V contained volume (m3 )
Monitoring Program at Pratte’s Reef. Department of Civil
V0 contained volume at time t ¼ 0 (m3 ) Engineering, University of Southern California, USA.
VC equivalent volume of a geotextile container Buckley, J. & Hornsey, W. (2006). Woorin beach protection: chasing the
(Figure 15) (m3 ) tide sand filled tubes vs sand filled containers. Proceedings of the
Vf volume of fill in geotextile container (Figure 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan,
Millpress Science Publishers, Vol. 2, pp. 761–764.
15) (m3 )
Cantré, S. (2002). Geotextile tubes: analytical design aspects. Geotextiles
Vt contained volume at time t (m3 ) and Geomembranes, 20, No. 5, 305–319.
w water content by weight (dimensionless) Cheek, P. M. & Yee, T. W. (2006). The use of geosynthetic containers for
wb width of hopper in split-bottom barge (Figure disposal of dredged sediments: a case history. Proceedings of the
14a) (m) 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan,
Millpress Science Publishers, Vol. 2, pp. 753–756.
WT filled width of geotextile tube (m)
Cretens, W. J. (2008). The use of geotextile tube dewatering technology
ª bulk density of fill or slurry (N/m3 ) in the remediation of contaminated sediments: selected case studies.
 v9 average vertical stress (N/m2 ) Proceedings of the 1st Pan American Geosynthetics Conference,
Cancun, Mexico, IFAI, pp. 414–418.
CUR (2004). Geotextiele zandelementen, Publication no. 214, Civieltech-
nisch Centrum Uitvoering Research en Regelgeving, Gouda, The
ABBREVIATIONS Netherlands, 138 pp.
CUR (2006). Ontwerpen met geotextiele zandelementen, Publication no.
AOS apparent opening size of geotextile 217, Civieltechnisch Centrum Uitvoering Research en Regelgeving,
EKG electro-kinetic geosynthetic Gouda, The Netherlands, 117 pp.
GDT geotextile tube dewatering test das Neves, L., Gomes, F. V., Silvano, R. & Lopes, M. L. (2005). Sand filled
containers in dune erosion control: a case study from the NW coast of
GPS global positioning system
Portugal. Proceedings of the 3rd European Geosynthetics Conference,
HBT hanging bag test Munich, Germany, German Geotechnical Society, pp. 129–134.
HCB hexachlorobenzene de Bruin, P. & Loos, C. (1995). The use of geotubes as an essential part
HDPE high-density polyethylene of an 8.8 m high North Sea dyke and embankment, Leybucht,
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon Germany. Geosynthetics World, April, 7–10.
de Castro, N. P. B., Melo, L. C. Q. C. & Escobar, L. G. B. (2008).
PCB polychlorinated biphenyl
Environmental integrated solution for septic tank sludge and landfill
PCDD polychlorinated dibenzo-dioxin leachate using geotextile tubes dewatering technology. Proceedings
PCDF polychlorinated dibenzo-furan of the 1st Pan American Geosynthetics Conference, Cancun,
PCP pentachlorophenol Mexico, IFAI, pp. 419–424.

Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
426 Lawson

Duke, M. L., Fowler, J. & Schmidt, M. L. (2000). Dredging Australian Conference on Coastal and Ocean Engineering,
and Dewatering of Hazardous Impoundment Sediment Using the Launceston, Australia, pp. 235–238.
Dry Dredge and Geotubes, US Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Jagt, H. J. (1988). Bed Protection, Old Meuse, By Means of
USA. Geocontainers, Internal report, Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands,
Fourie, A. B., Pavlakis, J. & Jones, C. J. F. P. (2002). Stabilisation of April.
mine tailings deposits using electro-kinetic geotextiles. Proceedings Jones, C. J. F. P. (1996). Earth Reinforcement and Soil Structures,
of the 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, Thomas Telford, London.
Balkema, Vol. 3, pp. 1031–1034. Jones, C. J. F. P., Glendinning, S., Huntley, D. T. & Lamont-Black, J.
Fourie, A. B., Johns, D. & Jones, C. J. F. P. (2004). In-situ dewatering of (2006). Case history: in-situ dewatering of lagooned sewage sludge
mine tailings using electro-kinetic geosynthetics. Proceedings of the using electrokinetic geosynthetics (EKG). Proceedings of the 8th
11th International Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste, International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan,
Colorado, USA, pp. 341–345. Millpress Science Publishers, Vol. 2, pp. 539–542.
Fowler, J. (1997). Geotextile tubes and flood control. Geotechnical Kazimierowicz, K. (1994). Simple analysis of deformation of sand-
Fabrics Report, 15, No. 5, 28–37. sausages. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on
Fowler, J. & Trainer, E. (1998). Overview of geocontainer projects in the Geosynthetics, Singapore, Balkema, Vol. 2, pp. 775–778.
United States. Proceedings of the Western Dredging Conference, Koerner, G. & Koerner, R. M. (2006). Geotextile tube assessment using a
Houston, TX, USA. hanging bag test. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24, No. 2, 129–
Fowler, J., Toups, D., Duarte, F. & Gilbert, P. (1995a). Geotextile 137.
contained dredged material, Red Eye Crossing, Baton Rouge, LA. Krahn, T., Blatz, J., Alfaro, M. & Bathurst, R. J. (2007). Large-scale
Proceedings of the 16th Technical Conference of Western Dredging shear testing of sandbag dyke materials. Geosynthetics Interna-
Association, Minneapolis, USA, pp. 257–262. tional, 14, No. 2, 119–126.
Fowler, J., Toups, D. & Gilbert, P. (1995b). Geotextile contained Kutay, M. E. & Aydilek, A. H. (2004). Retention performance of
contaminated dredged material, Marina Del Rey, Los Angeles and geotextile containers confining geomaterials. Geosynthetics Interna-
Port of Oakland, CA. Proceedings of the 14th World Dredging tional, 11, No. 2, 100–113.
Congress, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Lawson, C. R. (2003). Geotextile containment: international perspectives.
Fowler, J., Bagby, R. M. & Trainer, E. (1996). Dewatering sewage sludge Proceedings of the 17th GRI Conference, Geosynthetics Institute,
with geotextile tubes. Proceedings of the 49th Canadian Geo- Philadelphia, USA, pp. 198–221.
technical Conference, St John’s, Canada, 31 pp. Leschinsky, D., Leschinsky, O., Ling, H. I. & Gilbert, P. A. (1996).
Fowler, J., Duke, M., Schmidt, M. L., Crabtree, B., Bagby, R. M. & Geosynthetic tubes for confining pressurized slurry: some design
Trainer, E. (2002a). Dewatering sewage sludge and hazardous aspects. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division,
sludge with geotextile tubes. Proceedings of the 7th International American Society of Civil Engineers, 122, No. 8, 682–690.
Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, Balkema, Vol. 3, pp. Liao, K. & Bhatia, S. K. (2008). Geotextile tube dewatering: filtration
1007–1012. criteria. Proceedings of the 1st Pan American Geosynthetics
Fowler, J., Ortiz, C., Ruiz, N. & Martinez, E. (2002b). Use of geotubes in Conference, Cancun, Mexico, IFAI, pp. 506–513.
Columbia, South America. Proceedings of the 7th International Liu, G. S. (1981). Design criteria of sand sausages for beach defences.
Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, Balkema, Vol. 3, pp. Proceedings of the 19th Congress of the International Association
1129–1132. for Hydraulic Research, New Delhi, India, pp. 123–131.
Frignani, M., Bellucci, L. G., Carrarro, C. & Favotto, M. (2001). Mastin, B. J., Lebster, G. E. & Salley, J. R. (2008). Use of geotextile tube
Accumulation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofur- dewatering containers in environmental dredging. Proceedings of
ans in sediments of the Venice lagoon and the industrial area of the 1st Pan American Geosynthetics Conference, Cancun, Mexico,
Porto Marghera. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 42, No. 7, 544–553. IFAI, pp. 390–399.
Gaffney, D. A., Martin, S. M., Maher, M. H. & Bennert, T. A. (1999). McClarty, A., Cross, J., Gilbert, L. & James, G. M. (2006). Design and
Dewatering contaminated, fine-grained material using geotextiles. construction of a coastal erosion protection groyne using
Proceedings of Geosynthetics ’99, Boston, USA, IFAI, Vol. 2, pp. geocontainers, Langebaan, South Africa. Proceedings of the 8th
1017–1032. International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan,
Gadd, P. E. (1988). Sand bag slope protection: design, construction and Millpress Science Publishers, Vol. 2, pp. 765–768.
performance. Arctic Coastal Processes and Slope Protection Miller, S., Murphy, A., Veal, C. & Young, M. (1998). Improved Filtration
Design, ASCE, Anchorage, USA, pp. 145–165. of Sewage Sludges Using Electro-Dewatering, Report No. ET/
Ghazali, N. H. M, Kam, S. & Yee, T. W. (2006). Geotextile tubes for IR140, CSIRO, Australia, November.
protection of mangrove coast at Tanjung Piai Johor National Park, Montobbio, L. (2007). Setting safety of a site polluted by industrial waste
Malaysia. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on in contact with the Venice lagoon: ‘Pili’. Workshop on Approaches
Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, Millpress Science Publishers, Vol. for the Sustainable Management and Clearance of Mega-Sites: New
2, pp. 773–776. Perspectives, Agency for Environmental Protection and Technical
Giroud, J. P. (1996). Granular filters and geotextile filters. Proceedings of Services, Venice, Italy, November, pp. 1–46.
Geofilters ’96, Montreal, Canada, pp. 565–680. Moo-Young, H., Gaffney, D. A. & Mo, X. H. (2002). Testing procedures
Glendinning, S., Jones, C. J. F. P., Huntley, D. T. & Lamont-Black, J. to assess the viability of dewatering with geotextile tubes.
(2006). Dewatering of sewage sludge using Electrokinetic Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 20, No. 5, 289–303.
Geosynthetics. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mori, H., Miki, H. & Tsuneoka, N. (2002a). The geo-tube method for
Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, Millpress Science Publishers, Vol. dioxin-contaminated soil. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 20,
2, pp. 527–530. No. 5, 281–288.
GRI GT12 (2004). Hanging Bag Test for Field Assessment of Fabrics Mori, H., Miki, H. & Tsuneoka, N. (2002b). The use of geo-tube method
Used for Geotextile Tubes and Containers, Geosynthetics Research to retard the migration of contaminants in dredged soil. Proceedings
Institute, Folsom, USA. of the 7th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France,
Heibaum, M. (1999). Coastal scour stabilisation using granular filter in Balkema, Vol. 3, pp. 1017–1020.
geosynthetic nonwoven containers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Muthukumaran, A. E. & Ilamparuthi, K. (2006). Laboratory studies on
17, No. 5–6, 341–352. geotextile filters as used in geotextile tube dewatering. Geotextiles
Huang, C. C. & Luo, S. Y. (2007). Dewatering of reservoir sediment and Geomembranes, 24, No. 4, 210–219.
slurry using woven geotextiles. Part 1: Experimental results. Newman, P., Hodgson, M. & Rosselot, E. (2003). The disposal of tailings
Geosynthetics International, 14, No. 5, 253–263. and minewater sludge using geotextile dewatering techniques.
Jackson, L. A. (1987). Evaluation of sand filled geotextile groynes Proceedings of Processing and Disposal of Minerals Industry
constructed on the Gold Coast, Australia. Proceedings of the 8th Wastes, Falmouth, UK, 10 pp.

Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Geotextile containment for hydraulic and environmental engineering 427

Nickels, H. & Heerten, G. (1996). Building elements made of monitoring of stacked geotextile tube for temporary construction
geosynthetics and sand resist the North Sea surf. Proceedings of the platform in Incheon Bridge. Proceedings of the 1st Pan American
1st European Geosynthetics Conference, Maastricht, The Nether- Geosynthetics Conference, Cancun, Mexico, IFAI, pp. 712–719.
lands, Balkema, pp. 907–910. Spelt, K. (2001). Geotubes as the core of guide dams for Naviduct at
Oh, Y. I. & Shin, E. C. (2006). Application of submerged geotextile Enkhuisen, The Netherlands. Terra et Aqua, No. 83, 21–25.
tubes for erosion prevention in East coast of Korea. Proceedings of Tonks, D. M., Parry, D., Howells, R. & Smith, D. M. (2005). River
the 8th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Mersey closure embankments applications of geobags and
Japan, Millpress Science Publishers, Vol. 2, pp. 757–760. geosynthetics. Proceedings of the 3rd European Geosynthetics
Palmerton, J. B. (2002). Distinct element modelling of geosynthetic Conference, Munich, Germany, German Geotechnical Society, pp.
fabric containers. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference 147–152.
on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, Balkema, Vol. 3, pp. 1021–1024. Townsend, M. (2005). Semaphore Park offshore breakwater: a trial.
Perrier, H. (1986). Use of soil-filled synthetic pillows for erosion Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Coastal and Ocean
protection. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Engineering Conference, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 691–696.
Geosynthetics, Vienna, Austria, Balkema, Vol. 4, pp. 1115–1119. Tyagi, V. K. (2006). Remediation of municipal wastewater sludge by
Pilarczyk, K. W. (2000). Geosynthetics and Geosystems in Hydraulic and electrokinetic geobox. Geosynthetics International, 13, No. 2,
Coastal Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam. 47–58.
Plaut, R. H. & Suherman, S. (1998). Two-dimensional analysis of Wei, J., Chua, K. C., Ho, K. Q., Ho, W. H., Cheng, S. K., Seng, M. K.,
geosynthetic tubes. Acta Mechanica, 129, No. 3–4, 207–218. Yee, T. W. and Cheah, R. S. C. (2001). The use of geocontainers for
Plaut, R. H. & Filz, G. M. (2008). Deformations and tensions in single- the Southern Islands Reclamation Project. Proceedings of the
layer and stacked geosynthetic tubes. Proceedings of the 1st Pan International Conference on Engineering for Ocean and Offshore
American Geosynthetics Conference, Cancun, Mexico, IFAI, pp. Structures, Singapore, pp. 146–156.
382–389. Worley, J. W., Bass, T. M. & Vendrell, P. F. (2004). Field test of
Recio-Molina, J. (2007). Hydraulic Stability of Geotextile Sand Contain- geotextile tube for dewatering dairy lagoon sludge. Proceedings
ers for Coastal Structures: Effect of Deformations and Stability of the ASAE/CSAE Annual International Meeting, Ottawa, Canada,
Formulae, PhD dissertation, Leichtweiss-Institute for Hydraulic 12 pp.
Engineering and Water Resources, Technical University, Braunsch- Worley, J. W., Bass, T. M. & Vendrell, P. F. (2005). Performance of
weig, Germany. geotextile tubes with and without chemical amendments to dewater
Recio-Molina, J. & Oumeraci, H. (2007). Effect of deformations on the dairy lagoon solids. Proceedings of the ASAE Conference, San
hydraulic stability of coastal structures made from geotextile sand Antonio, USA, 14 pp.
containers. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25, No. 4–5, 278–292. Yee, T. W. (2002). Construction of underwater dykes using geotextile
Restall, S. J., Jackson, L. A., Heerten, G. and Hornsey, W. P. (2002). Case containment systems. Proceedings of the 7th International
studies showing the growth and development of geotextile sand Conference on Geosynthetics, Nice, France, Balkema, Vol. 3, pp.
containers: an Australian perspective. Geotextiles and Geomem- 1161–1164.
branes, 20, No. 5, 321–342. Yee, T. W. & Choi, J. C. (2008). Geotextile tube application for Ilsan
Restall, S. J., Hornsey, W., Oumeraci, H., Hinz, M., Saathoff, F. & Werth, Grand Bridge Project, Korea. Proceedings of the 1st Pan American
K. (2005). Australian and German experiences with geotextile Geosynthetics Conference, Cancun, Mexico, IFAI, pp. 1563–1572.
containers for coastal protection. Proceedings of the 3rd European Yee, T. W., Zengerink, E. & Choi, J. C. (2007). Geotextile tube
Geosynthetics Conference, Munich, Germany, German Geotechnical application for Incheon Bridge Project, Korea. Proceedings of
Society, pp. 141–146. Conference CEDA Dredging Days 2007, Rotterdam, The Nether-
Saathof, F., Oumeraci, H. & Restall, S. (2007). Australian and German lands, CD-ROM, 14 pp.
experiences on the use of geotextile containers. Geotextiles and Yuan, Z., Stephens, T. & Wilbanks, B. (2008). Stress concentration
Geomembranes, 25, No. 4–5, 251–263. around geotextile tube filling port. Proceedings of the 1st Pan
Seay, P. A. (1998). Finite element analysis of geotextile tubes. American Geosynthetics Conference, Cancun, Mexico, IFAI, pp.
Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 406–413.
Blacksburg, VA, USA. Zhang, B. S., Wang, Z. Y., Wang, Z. L. & Deng, Y. (2006). Research
Shin, E. C. & Oh, Y. I. (2007). Coastal erosion prevention by geotextile on flood control mechanical technology with larger
tube technology. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25, No. 4–5, geocontainer. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference
264–277. on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, Millpress Science Publishers,
Shin, E. C., Oh, Y. I. & Kang, J. K. (2008). Stability analysis and field Vol. 2, pp. 777–780.

The Editor welcomes discussion on all papers published in Geosynthetics International. Please email your contribution to
discussion@geosynthetics-international.com by 15 June 2009.

Geosynthetics International, 2008, 15, No. 6

Downloaded by [ Universidade Estadual do Ceará] on [06/02/19]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

You might also like