Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Scenario - I was summoned by a bill collector and responded as per my rights under UCC 3.501.
I sent back the summons and wrote all over it: I refuse to contract, I do not accept this offer to
contract, I do not consent and I never intended to and I do not recognize you. I also wrote on the
outside of the envelope, No Signature, No Contract, No Consent. I then sent a certified copy back
to the lawyer and a certified copy to the courts, and I recorded a copy at the recorder’s office
showing I did not accept it within my 72 hour time frame. The court and the lawyer both
received the mail but the lawyer never signed for it and it was attempted to be delivered twice
and then they were notified it was sent back to the post office.
I received a letter from them showing they applied for default judgment because I did not answer
them. That would be expected.
I have proof via the certified mail that the mail was attempted. Also, I had sent them other letters
requesting they show me a contract and a cease and desist letter which they accepted. It appears
they purposely did not accept and sign for that letter because they knew it was my non-
acceptance.
I responded to the second letter showing them proof that there were two attempts to deliver that
letter to them and no one signed for it. I also sent them copies of the recorded letter and copies of
the certified mail number to them and to the courts.
I am down to having 5 days left to respond as they said I have 10 days to respond or the
judgment will be issued.
My question is are they just trying to get me into court and get into that contract with them or
should I at this time go down and file a motion to dismiss. I also feel the summons was not
delivered correctly. They delivered it to a family friend visiting from another state. Arizona
statute says it must be delivered to someone who lives there. That is a defense against any
judgment and you need to use it.
Do I file a motion or should I see if my refusal works? I really don't want a default judgement.
Can they issue a default judgement if I responded to them by letter and to the courts without
going in and filing a response? Yes, but the court has the power to accept that as a response. But
since it does not rebut their complaint they will get a summary judgment instead eventually.
Answer: All That is what you should have expected. That is what they do under the rules. When
you are sued in court you either make some kind of response, or you are in default under the
rules. You should have made and may still be able to make a: