Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUPPORT ORDER WAS ISSUED AND VIOLATED, AND LETTING THEM KNOW THAT
This is the Second Demand Pursuant Judiciary Law 255 for True Copies of Court Orders Signed and Entered
by Clerk in County Pursuant FCA 460. FCA 460 Requires All Support Orders and Arrears Must Signed and
Family Court cannot enforce NYS stipulation of settlement agreements and agreements cannot confer power to
Family Court to enforce and retroactively modify said agreement. NYS Court of Appeals determined
separation agreements cannot confer power to family court and Family court lacks jurisdiction to enforce
agreements from New York State. NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS 2008 NY Int. 59 n the Matter of
277, 282 [1980], Brescia v Fitts 56 NY2d 132, 139 [1982], Silver v Silver, 36 NY2d 324, 326 [1975]
John Doe Jr is Submitting Evidence from Queens Clerks Office Proving there is documented Proof that No
Judgment for support is on File Pursuant FCA 460, whereby, July 24, 2014, Support Order is Void for Lack of
subject matter jurisdiction and lack of Judicial Signature 28 USC Section 1691 to Support Claim made by Bob
Billy Clerk of Court That Support Orders Docketed under F-19301-10/10a, 10/10b were violated Requiring
John Doe Jr to make appearance. Without evidence demanded above John Doe Jr will not appear and cannot
be held in default of a void summons and void support order created by expedited processes under 45 CFR
303.101.
John Doe Jr made inquiry with Queens Clerk’s Office pursuant Judiciary Law 255 and response from Queens
Clerks Office showed there is no record of a support order, whereby I cannot violate an order that is
unrecorded.
Bob Billy your silence is equated fraud when you have a duty to provide evidence of probable cause to issue a
summons to John Doe Jr and will be used against you in a United States District Court if you fail to provide
the evidence presented by Bridget R. Dolphin that John Doe Jr violated an order from a court of proper
FCA 460(c) family court may enforce an order or decree from a court of competent jurisdiction not of New
York State. FCA 460, and CPLR 5016 requires that all money judgments be signed by clerk and recorded in
Clerk’s Office. Without proper entry with clerk’s office all alleged order against John Doe Jr are void and
THEREFORE ALLEGED ORDERS FOR SUPPORT ARE VOID UNDER FCA 460, AND CPLR 5016
JOHN DOE JR’S SHIELD FROM A VOID SUMMONS FOR VIOLATION OF A VOID SUPPORT
ORDER BECAUSE SUMMONS WAS ISSUED UNDER COLOR OF LAW BASED UPON FALSE
PRETENSES
The laws i am citing are not my laws, but they are laws requiring due process of laws requiring entry of order
and laws offer equal protection of laws under NYS Constitution article 1 section 11 No person shall be denied
the equal protection of the laws of this state or any subdivision thereof. No person shall, because of race,
color, creed or religion, be subjected to any discrimination in his or her civil rights by any other person or by
any firm, corporation, or institution, or by the state or any agency or subdivision of the state. No judgment can
be issued unless by due process of law by a judgment of peers by a trial by jury. If Family Court is issuing
judgments without due process, then Family Court is violating John Doe Jr’s right to equal protection of laws
and any law which allows the issuance of a order depriving property without a warrant or trial by jury is an
unconstitutional law and requires consent, for which I have not provided.
If Queens Family Court, Support Magistrate Sudeep Kaur, and NYC OCSE cannot follow due process of
laws or provide evidence of proper recording of the judgments UNDER FCA 460, AND CPLR 5016 they
allege require John Doe Jr to pay $1131 biweekly to OCSE Support Collections Unit by income withholding
order that is not issued by a court of competent jurisdiction as required under separation of powers doctrine,
then the summons NYC Sheriff’s Officers served upon John Doe Jr in full view of his neighbors, to his
embarrassment, are COMPLETELY VOID AND WITHOUT LEGAL FORCE, WHEREBY I CANNOT BE
Due process and equal protection of laws requires that John Doe Jr has a right to be free from harassment from
child support hearings inside Queens Family Court. Support proceedings are expedited processes requiring due
process protected [45 CFR 303.101©(2)] by Title IV-D Agency inside the court, but not part of the court
therefore requiring judicial review and judicial signature to ensure due process is not violated for any support
When did Family Court attain the power and jurisdiction to order College tuition paid for a 21 year old man?
It is alleged by summons “Violation of Support Order” F-19301-10/16D that John Doe Jr violated an order in
accordance with FCA 454, but proper inquiry with Queens Clerk’s Office showed there is no such order in
existence pursuant due process of laws FCA 454, 460, and NY CPLR 5016, therefore impossible for John Doe
Jr to violate and be embarrassed by NYC Sheriff’s Office ringing his bell serving a summons.
WHAT EVIDENCE DID BRIDGET R. DOLPHIN PROVIDE THAT SHE IS RECEIVING PUBLIC
ASSISTANCE UNDER SOCIAL SERVICE LAW 111-I AND WHAT LAWS PROVIDES THAT
FAMILY COURT CAN ORDER SUPPORT AND COLLEGE EXPENSES FOR A GROWN MAN
Bob Billy, when did Family Court attain the jurisdiction for man-support and college expense support?
Whereas i understand New York laws all men and women attaining the age of 16 are considered adults and no
longer children. I have looked high and low and i cannot find a law which states that child support must be
paid for any dependents. It is my understanding of the law that children cease being dependents after the age of
18. Whereas I understand child support enforcement rules and procedures a custodial parent must be receiving
public assistance to receive child support enforcement services under SSL 111-g, but a custodial parent ceases
to receive public assistance when a dependent attains the age of 18, whereby child support services must cease
at 18 as well.
I find it suspicious that New York State Social Services for a child ends at 18, but according to NY OCSE I
must pay support to 21, when there is no evidence of a law which states this, which makes sense because these
So, there is no law, but NY OCSE receives federal funds under Title IV-D for child support enforcement by
illegally enforcing a non existent law, which is a crime of fraud. So we have fraud, federal and state false
claims acts being violated because the adult offspring of John Doe Jr never received Public Assistance and
clearly over the age of 18, and yet federal funds are being paid for the enforcement of a stipulation of
settlement agreement which waived SCU and Queens Family Court pursuant NYS Court of Appeals decision
Kleila v Kleila, held that Family Court does not have the jurisdiction to enforce or modify a stipulation
agreement and agreement cannot confer jurisdiction to family court. The name Bob Billy is on many
documents perpetrating this obvious fraud. Are clerks judicially immune for fraud?
Whereas I understand it Family Court cannot enforce any NYS Stipulation of Settlement Agreements and
Bob Billy I will not appear on November 16, 2016, unless a full disclosure of jurisdiction is provided by you, a
supposed clerk of the court. What probable cause evidence did Bridget R. Dolphin provide to your office to
issue summons?
Where is proof that Bridget R. Dolphin received public assistance for the offspring of John Doe Jr and John
Doe Jr must repay this debt? Arrears arise from loans paid by NY OCSE for offspring of John Doe Jr.
John Doe Jr requires verification of this debt, for there is no record of a money judgment recorded with Queens
Clerk’s Office.