Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF
HDFC & LIC MUTUAL
FUNDS WITH UTI
MUTUAL FUND
INTRODUCTON OF MUTUAL FUND CONCEPT
Mutual funds have been around for a long time, dating back to the early 19th
century. The first modern American mutual fund opened in 1924, yet it was only in the
1990’s that mutual funds became mainstream investments, as the number of households
owning them nearly tripled during that decade. With recent surveys showing that over
88% of all investors participate in mutual funds, and they are probably already familiar
with these investments. In any case, it's important to studying that how exactly these
investments work and how he can use them to his /her advantage.
A mutual fund is a special type of company that pools together money from many
investors and invests it on behalf of the group, in accordance with a stated set of
objectives. Mutual funds raise the money by selling shares of the fund to the public; much
like any other company can sell stock in itself to the public. Funds then take the money
they receive from the sale of their shares (along with any money made from previous
investments) and use it to purchase various investment vehicles, such as stocks, bonds
and money market instruments. In return for the money they give to the fund when
purchasing shares, shareholders receive an equity position in the fund and, in effect, in
each of its underlying securities. For most mutual funds, shareholders are free to sell their
shares at any time, although the price of a share in a mutual fund will fluctuate daily,
depending upon the performance of the securities held by the fund.
A Mutual Fund is a trust that pools the savings of a number of investors who share a
common financial goal. The money thus collected is then invested in capital market
instruments such as shares, debentures and other securities. The income earned through
these investments and the capital appreciation realized is shared by its unit holders in
proportion to the number of units owned by them.
Mutual Fund Operation Flow Chart
Thus a Mutual Fund is the most suitable investment for the common man as it offers
an opportunity to invest in a diversified, professionally managed basket of securities at a
relatively low cost.
History of Indian Mutual Fund Industry
The mutual fund industry in India started in 1963 with the formation of Unit Trust of
India, at the initiative of the Government of India and Reserve Bank of India.
The history of mutual funds in India can be broadly divided into four distinct phases:
Unit Trust of India (UTI) was established on 1963 by an Act of Parliament. It was set up
by the Reserve Bank of India and functioned under the Regulatory and administrative
control of the Reserve Bank of India. In 1978 UTI was de-linked from the RBI and the
Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) took over the regulatory and administrative
control in place of RBI. The first scheme launched by UTI was Unit Scheme 1964. At the
end of 1988 UTI had Rs.6, 700 crores of assets under management.
1987 marked the entry of non- UTI, public sector mutual funds set up by public sector
banks and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) and General Insurance Corporation
of India (GIC). SBI Mutual Fund was the first non- UTI Mutual Fund established in June
1987 followed by Can Bank Mutual Fund (Dec 87), Punjab National Bank Mutual Fund
(Aug 89), Indian Bank Mutual Fund (Nov 89), Bank of India (Jun 90), Bank of Baroda
Mutual Fund (Oct 92). LIC established its mutual fund in June 1989 while GIC had set up
its mutual fund in December 1990.
At the end of 1993, the mutual fund industry had assets under management of Rs.47, 004
crores.
Third Phase – 1993-2003 (Entry of Private Sector Funds)
With the entry of private sector funds in 1993, a new era started in the Indian
mutual fund industry, giving the Indian investors a wider choice of fund families. Also,
1993 was the year in which the first Mutual Fund Regulations came into being, under
which all mutual funds, except UTI were to be registered and governed. The erstwhile
Kothari Pioneer (now merged with Franklin Templeton) was the first private sector
mutual fund registered in July 1993.
The number of mutual fund houses went on increasing, with many foreign mutual
funds setting up funds in India and also the industry has witnessed several mergers and
acquisitions. As at the end of January 2003, there were 33 mutual funds with total assets
of Rs. 1, 21,805 crores. The Unit Trust of India with Rs.44, 541 crores of assets under
management was way ahead of other mutual funds.
In February 2003, following the repeal of the Unit Trust of India Act 1963 UTI
was bifurcated into two separate entities. One is the Specified Undertaking of the Unit
Trust of India with assets under management of Rs.29,835 crores as at the end of January
2003, representing broadly, the assets of US 64 scheme, assured return and certain other
schemes. The Specified Undertaking of Unit Trust of India, functioning under an
administrator and under the rules framed by Government of India and does not come
under the purview of the Mutual Fund Regulations.
The second is the UTI Mutual Fund Ltd, sponsored by SBI, PNB, BOB and LIC.
It is registered with SEBI and functions under the Mutual Fund Regulations. With the
bifurcation of the erstwhile UTI which had in March 2000 more than Rs.76, 000 crores of
assets under management and with the setting up of a UTI Mutual Fund, conforming to
the SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations, and with recent mergers taking place among different
private sector funds, the mutual fund industry has entered its current phase of
consolidation and growth. As at the end of September 2004, there were 29 funds, which
manage assets of Rs.1, 53,108 crores under 421 schemes.
A mutual fund is set up in the form of a trust, which has sponsor, trustees, asset
Management Company (AMC) and custodian. The trust is established by a sponsor or more
than one sponsor who is like promoter of a company. The trustees of the mutual fund hold its
property for the benefit of the unit holders. Asset Management Company (AMC) approved
by SEBI manages the funds by making investments in various types of securities. Custodian,
who is registered with SEBI, holds the securities of various schemes of the fund in its
custody. The trustees are vested with the general power of superintendence and direction over
AMC. They monitor the performance and compliance of SEBI Regulations by the mutual
fund.
SEBI Regulations require that at least two thirds of the directors of trustee company or
board of trustees must be independent i.e. they should not be associated with the
sponsors. Also, 50% of the directors of AMC must be independent. All mutual funds are
required to be registered with SEBI before they launch any scheme.
Frequently used terms and their Meanings
Sale Price
Price one pays when invests in a scheme. This is also called Offer Price. It may include a
sales load.
Repurchase Price
Price at which a close-ended scheme repurchases its units and it may include a back-end
load. This is also called Bid Price.
Redemption Price
Price at which open-ended schemes repurchase their units and close-ended schemes
redeem their units on maturity.Such prices are NAV related.
Sales Load
Charge collected by a scheme when it sells the units this is also called, ‘Front-end’ load.
Schemes that do not charge a load are called ‘No Load’ schemes.
Mutual Funds in India are governed by the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations 1996 as
amended from time to time.
Also, SEBI keeps on issuing various guidelines and circulars on varied topics relating to
mutual fund industry.
30 June, 2006 Undertaking from trustees for new scheme offer document
16 June, 2006 Gazette notification no. S.O. 783(E) dated May 22, 2006 pertaining
to SEBI Mutual Funds) (Second Amendment) Regulations 2006
22 May, 2006 Securities and Exchange Board Of India (Mutual Funds) (Second
Amendment) Regulations, 2006
In addition, mutual funds of India have formed their association i.e. Association of
Mutual Funds of India (AMFI) which acts as a self regulatory body for its members.
AMFI, the apex body of all the registered Asset Management Companies was
incorporated on August 22, 1995 as a non-profit organization. As of now, all the 30 Asset
Management companies that have launched mutual fund schemes are its members.
OBJECTIVES
To define and maintain high professional and ethical standards in all areas of
operation of mutual fund industry
To recommend and promote best business practices and code of conduct to be
followed by members and others engaged in the activities of mutual fund and
asset management including agencies connected or involved in the field of capital
markets and financial services.
To interact with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and to
represent to SEBI on all matters concerning the mutual fund industry.
To represent to the Government, Reserve Bank of India and other bodies on all
matters relating to the Mutual Fund Industry.
To develop a cadre of well-trained Agent distributors and to implement a
programme of training and certification for all intermediaries and other engaged
in the industry.
To undertake nation wide investor awareness programme so as to promote proper
understanding of the concept and working of mutual funds.
To disseminate information on Mutual Fund Industry and to undertake studies and
research directly and/or in association with other bodies.
FIRE Project of USAID, has drafted the Code, which has been approved and
recommended by the Board of AMFI for implementation by its members.
The AMFI Code of Ethics, “The ACE” for short, sets out the standards of good practices
to be followed by the Asset Management Companies in their operations and in their
dealings with investors, intermediaries and the public.
SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulation 1996 requires all Asset Management Companies
and Trustees to abide by the code of conduct as specified in the Fifth Schedule to the
Regulation. The AMFI code has been drawn up to supplement that schedule, to
encourage standards higher than those prescribed by the Regulations for the benefit of
investors in the mutual fund industry.
Integrity:
Members and their key personnel, in the conduct of their business shall observe
high standards of integrity and fairness in all dealings with investors, issuers, market
intermediaries, other members and regulatory and other government authorities.
Mutual Fund Schemes shall be organized, operated, managed and their portfolios of
securities selected, in the interest of all classes of unit holders and not in the interest of
sponsors.
Directors of Members
Members of Board of Trustees or Directors of the Trustee Company
Brokers and other market intermediaries
Associates of the Members
A special class selected from out of unit holders
Due Diligence:
Members in the conduct of their Asset Management business shall at all times
Members shall have and employ effectively adequate resources and procedures, which
are needed for the conduct of Asset Management activities.
Disclosures:
Members shall disclose to unit holders investment pattern, portfolio details, ratios
of expenses to net assets and total income and portfolio turnover wherever applicable in
respect of schemes on annual basis.
Submit to the Board of Trustees details of such transactions, justifying its fairness to
the scheme.
Disclose to the unit holders details of the transaction in brief through annual and half
yearly reports.
All transactions of purchase and sale of securities by key personnel who are directly
involved in investment operations shall be disclosed to the compliance officer of the
member at least on half yearly basis and subsequently reported to the Board of Trustees if
found having conflict of interest with the transactions of the fund.
Professional Selling Practices:
Members shall not use any unethical means to sell market or induce any investor
to buy their products and schemes. Members shall not make any exaggerated statement
regarding performance of any product or scheme.
Members shall endeavor to ensure that at all times investors are provided with true
and adequate information without any misleading or exaggerated claims to investors
about their capability to render certain services or their achievements in regard to services
rendered to other clients,
Investors are made aware of attendant risks in members’ schemes before any
investment decision is made by the investors,
Adequate steps are taken for fair allotment of mutual fund units and refund of
application moneys without delay and within the prescribed time limits.
Not present a mutual fund scheme as if it were a new share issue not create
unrealistic expectations
Not guarantee returns except as stated in the offer document of the scheme
approved by sebi, and in such case, the members shall ensure that adequate
resources will be made available and maintained to meet the guaranteed returns.
Convey in clear terms the market risk and the investment risks of any scheme
being offered by the members.
Not induce investors by offering benefits which are extraneous to the scheme.
Investment Practices:
Members shall manage all the schemes in accordance with the fundamental
investment objectives and investment policies stated in the offer documents and take
investment decisions solely in the interest of the unit holders.
Members shall not knowingly buy or sell securities for any of their schemes from or to:
Operations:
Members shall avoid conflicts of interest in managing the affairs of the schemes
and shall keep the interest of all unit holders paramount in all matters relating to the
scheme.
Members or any of their directors, officers or employees shall not indulge in front
running (buying or selling of any securities ahead of transaction of the fund, with access
to information regarding the transaction which is not public and which is material to
making an investment decision, so as to derive unfair advantage).
Members or any of their directors, officers or employees shall not indulge in self-
dealing (Using their position to engage in transactions with the fund by which they
benefit unfairly at the expense of the fund and the unit holders).
Members shall not engage in any act, practice or course of business in connection
with the purchase or sale, directly or indirectly, of any security held or to be acquired by
any scheme managed by the Members, and in purchase, sale and redemption of units of
Schemes managed by the Members, which is fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative.
Members shall not make any change in the fundamental attributes of a scheme,
without the prior approval of unit holders except when such change is consequent on
changes in the regulations.
Members shall avoid excessive concentration of business with any broking firm, and
excessive holding of units in a scheme by few persons or entities.
Reporting Practices:
Members shall follow uniform performance reporting on the basis of total return.
Members shall ensure scheme wise segregation of cash and securities accounts.
Unfair Competition:
Members shall not make any statement or become privy to any act, practice or
competition, which is likely to be harmful to the interests of other Members or is likely to
place other Members in a disadvantageous position in relation to a market player or
investors, while competing for investible funds.
Observance of Statutes, Rules and Regulations:
Members shall abide by the letter and spirit of the provisions of the Statutes, Rules and
Regulations which may be applicable and relevant to the activities carried on by the
Members.
Enforcement:
Members shall widely disseminate the AMFI Code to all persons and entities
covered by it make observance of the Code a condition of employment make violation of
the provisions of the code, a ground for revocation of contractual arrangement without
redress and a cause for disciplinary action
Require that each officer and employee of the Member sign a statement that he/
she has received and read a copy of the Code establish internal controls and compliance
mechanisms, including assigning supervisory responsibility
Designate one person with primary responsibility for exercising compliance with
power to fully investigate all possible violations and report to competent authority file
regular reports to the Trustees on a half yearly and annual basis regarding observance of
the Code and special reports as circumstances require
Maintain records of all activities and transactions for at least three years, which
records shall be subject to review by the Trustees, dedicate adequate resources to carrying
out the provisions of the Code.
Definitions:
The mutual fund industry in India started in 1964 with the formation of the Unit
Trust of India (UTI). In 1987, other public sector institutions entered this business, and it
was in 1993 that the first of the private sector participants commenced its operations.
From the beginning, UTI and other mutual funds have relied extensively on
intermediaries to market their schemes to investors. It would be correct to say that
without intermediaries, the mutual fund industry would not have achieved the depth and
breadth of coverage amongst investors that it enjoys today. Intermediaries have played a
pivotal and valuable role in popularizing the concept of mutual funds across India. They
make the forms available to clients, explain the schemes and provide administrative and
paperwork support to investors, making it easy and convenient for the clients to invest.
Intermediation itself has undergone a change over the past few decades. While
individual agents provided the foundation for growth in the early years, institutional
agents, distribution companies and national brokers soon started to play an active role in
promoting mutual funds. Recently, banks, finance companies, secondary market brokers
and even post offices have also begun to market mutual funds to their existing and
potential client bases.
It is, thus clear that all types of intermediaries are required for the growth of the
industry, and their well-being, quality orientation and ways of doing business will have a
significant impact on how the mutual fund industry in India evolves in the future.
Guidelines for Selling and Marketing of Mutual Funds
Background
Investors can purchase and sell mutual fund units through various types of
intermediaries – individual agents, distribution companies, and national/regional.
Brokers, banks, post offices etc. as well as directly from Asset Management
Companies (AMCs), including the Unit Trust of India.
Those who want product information, advice on financial planning and investment
strategies.Those who require only a basic level of service and execution support i.e.
delivering and collecting application forms and cheques, and other basic paperwork and
post sale activities.
Those who prefer to do it all themselves, including choice of investments as well as the
process/paperwork related to investments.
To cater to different types of investors, the Mutual Fund industry comprising of AMCs
and intermediaries at present offers the following two levels of services:
Value Added Services:
This includes product information and advice on financial planning and investment
strategies. The advice encompasses analyzing an investor’s financial goals depending
upon the segment of investor, assessing his/her resources, determining his/her risk
bearing capacity/preference and then using this information to recommend an asset
Allocation/specific investment/s that are in tandem with the investor’s needs. Investors
may also receive information on taxation, estate planning and portfolio rebalancing to
remain aware about the changes/developments in market conditions and adjust the
portfolios from time to time according to their needs. In such advisory services, the
emphasis is on building an ongoing relationship with the investor/s. In India, given that
mutual funds are relatively new, there is a low level of awareness amongst investors
about the working and benefits of Mutual Funds. Also, very few investors take an
organized approach to financial planning. Therefore, it is clear that the vast majority of
investors would benefit significantly from the value-added services enumerated above.
Basic Services:
This includes providing the basic information on schemes launched to investors, assisting
them in filling application forms, submission of application forms along with cheques at
the respective office/s, delivering redemption proceeds and answering scheme related
queries investor/s may have. What investors receive here is convenience and access to
mutual funds through agents and employees of brokers who visit them and facilitate the
paperwork related to investment. These services are also given through the branches and
front office staff of AMCs and intermediaries. These are transaction-oriented service
where investors make the investment decisions themselves, and rely on the AMC and
intermediary mostly for execution and logistics support.
Recommendations:
Explain and position this service in such a way that clients recognize it as a
specialized and value added service, a task which may be difficult to accomplish
on their own.
Convince investors that the transaction and intermediation cost they are paying is
justified in lieu of the long-term benefits accruing from such counseling and
guidance.
The Mutual Fund industry has to now take the more difficult but long-term
sustainable route of gathering assets from individual investors by providing them value
added, financial planning services and ensuring that Mutual Funds are an integral part of
their overall portfolio.
While doing this, the mutual fund industry in India should take care to ensure that:
Each investor, institutional or individual, receives the exact level of service they
choose and correct advice based on clear and concrete facts and figures.
Correspondingly, the intermediation and transaction cost investors incur should
reflect the value of the service and advice they receive.
Adhere to SEBI Mutual Fund Regulations and guidelines related to selling, distribution
and advertising practices. Be fully conversant with the key provisions of the offer
document as well as the operational requirements of various schemes.
Provide full and latest information of schemes to investors in the form of offer
documents, performance reports, fact sheets, portfolio disclosures and brochures, and
recommend schemes appropriate for the client’s situation and needs.
Highlight risk factors of each scheme, avoid misrepresentation and exaggeration, and
urge investors to go through offer documents/key information memorandum before
deciding to make investments.
Disclose all material information related to the schemes/plans while canvassing for
business.
Abstain from indicating or assuring returns in any type of scheme, unless the offer
document is explicit in this regard.
Avoid colluding with clients in faulty business practices such as bouncing cheques,
wrong claiming of dividend/redemption cheques, etc.
When marketing various schemes, remember that a client’s interest and suitability to their
financial needs is paramount, and that extra commission or incentive earned should never
form the basis for recommending a scheme to the client.
Intermediaries will not rebate commission back to investors and avoid attracting clients
through temptation of rebate/gifts etc.
Focus on financial planning and advisory services ensure correct selling, and also reduce
the trend towards investors asking for pass back of commission.
All employees engaged in sales and marketing should obtain AMFI certification.
Employees in other functional areas should also be encouraged to obtain the same
certification.
If any breach of the above Code of Conduct for intermediary is reported to AMFI by
either an investor or an AMC in writing, then AMFI will initiate the following steps:
Write to the intermediary (enclosing copies of the complaint and other documentary
evidence) and ask for an explanation within a time limit of 3 weeks
In case an explanation is not received within the time limit, or the explanation is not
satisfactory, AMFI will issue a warning letter indicating that any subsequent violation
will result in cancellation of AMFI Registration
If there is a proved second violation by the intermediary, the registration will be cancelled
and an intimation sent to all AMCs .The intermediary will have a right of appeal to
AMFI.
The performance of a particular scheme of a mutual fund is denoted by Net Asset Value
(NAV).
Mutual funds invest the money collected from the investors in securities markets. In
simple words, Net Asset Value is the market value of the securities held by the scheme.
Since market value of securities changes every day, NAV of a scheme also varies on day
to day basis. The NAV per unit is the market value of securities of a scheme divided by
the total number of units of the scheme on any particular date. For example, if the market
value of securities of a mutual fund scheme is Rs 200 lakh and the mutual fund has issued
10 lakh units of Rs. 10 each to the investors, then the NAV per unit of the fund is Rs.20.
NAV is required to be disclosed by the mutual funds on a regular basis - daily or weekly -
depending on the type of scheme.
Yes, non-resident Indians can also invest in mutual funds. Necessary details in this
respect are given in the offer documents of the schemes.
An investor should take into account his risk taking capacity, age factor, financial
position, etc. As already mentioned, the schemes invest in different type of securities as
disclosed in the offer documents and offer different returns and risks. Investors may also
consult financial experts before taking decisions. Agents and distributors may also help in
this regard.
An investor must mention clearly his name, address, number of units applied for and such
other information as required in the application form. He must give his bank account
number so as to avoid any fraudulent encashment of any cheques/draft issued by the
mutual fund at a later date for the purpose of dividend or repurchase. Any changes in the
address, bank account number, etc at a later date should be informed to the mutual fund
immediately.
How long will it take for transfer of units after purchase from stock markets in case of
close-ended schemes?
According to SEBI Regulations, transfer of units is required to be done within thirty days
from the date of lodgment of certificates with the mutual fund.
As a unit holder, how much time will it take to receive dividends/repurchase proceeds?
A mutual fund is required to dispatch to the unit holders the dividend warrants within 30
days of the declaration of the dividend and the redemption or repurchase proceeds within
10 working days from the date of redemption or repurchase request made by the unit
holder.
Can a mutual fund change the nature of the scheme from the one
specified in the offer document?
How will an investor come to know about the changes, if any, which may occur in the
mutual fund?
There may be changes from time to time in a mutual fund. The mutual funds are required
to inform any material changes to their unit holders. Apart from it, many mutual funds
send quarterly newsletters to their investors.
At present, offer documents are required to be revised and updated at least once in two
years. In the meantime, new investors are informed about the material changes by way of
addendum to the offer document till the time offer document is revised and reprinted.
The performance of a scheme is reflected in its net asset value (NAV), which is
disclosed on daily basis in case of open-ended schemes and on weekly basis in case of
close-ended schemes. The NAVs of mutual funds are required to be published in
newspapers. The NAVs are also available on the web sites of mutual funds. All mutual
funds are also required to put their NAVs on the web site of Association of Mutual Funds
in India (AMFI) www.amfiindia.com and thus the investors can access NAVs of all
mutual funds at one place.
The mutual funds are also required to publish their performance in the form of
half-yearly results, which also include their returns/yields over a period of time i.e. last
six months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years and since inception of schemes. Investors can
also look into other details like percentage of expenses of total assets as these have an
affect on the yield and other useful information in the same half-yearly format.
The mutual funds are also required to send annual report or abridged annual report
to the unit holders at the end of the year.
Various studies on mutual fund schemes including yields of different schemes are
being published by the financial newspapers on a weekly basis. Apart from these, many
research agencies also publish research reports on performance of mutual funds including
the ranking of various schemes in terms of their performance. Investors should study
these reports and keep themselves informed about the performance of various schemes of
different mutual funds.
Investors can compare the performance of their schemes with those of other mutual funds
under the same category. They can also compare the performance of equity-oriented
schemes with the benchmarks like BSE Sensitive Index, S&P CNX Nifty, etc.
On the basis of performance of the mutual funds, the investors should decide when to
enter or exit from a mutual fund scheme.
How to know where the mutual fund scheme has invested money
mobilized from the investors?
The mutual funds are required to disclose full portfolios of all of their schemes on
half-yearly basis which are published in the newspapers. Some mutual funds send the
portfolios to their unit holders.
The scheme portfolio shows investment made in each security i.e. equity, debentures,
money market instruments, government securities, etc. and their quantity, market value
and % to NAV. These portfolio statements also required to disclose illiquid securities in
the portfolio, investment made in rated and unrated debt securities, non-performing assets
(NPAs), etc.
Some of the mutual funds send newsletters to the unit holders on quarterly basis which
also contain portfolios of the schemes.
Difference between investing in a mutual fund and in an initial public offering (IPO) of a
company
There is a difference. IPO’s of companies may open at lower or higher price than the
issue price depending on market sentiment and perception of investors. However, in the
case of mutual funds, the par value of the units may not rise or fall immediately after
allotment. A mutual fund scheme takes some time to make investment in securities. NAV
of the scheme depends on the value of securities in which the funds have been deployed.
Some of the investors have the tendency to prefer a scheme that is available at
lower NAV compared to the one available at higher NAV. Sometimes, they prefer a new
scheme which is issuing units at Rs. 10 whereas the existing schemes in the same
category are available at much higher NAVs. Investors may please note that in case of
mutual funds schemes, lower or higher NAVs of similar type schemes of different mutual
funds have no relevance. On the other hand, investors should choose a scheme based on
its merit considering performance track record of the mutual fund, service standards,
professional management, etc. This is explained in an example given below.
As already mentioned, the investors must read the offer document of the mutual
fund scheme very carefully. They may also look into the past track record of performance
of the scheme or other schemes of the same mutual fund. They may also compare the
performance with other schemes having similar investment objectives. Though past
performance of a scheme is not an indicator of its future performance and good
performance in the past may or may not be sustained in the future, this is one of the
important factors for making investment decision. In case of debt oriented schemes, apart
from looking into past returns, the investors should also see the quality of debt
instruments which is reflected in their rating. A scheme with lower rate of return but
having investments in better rated instruments may be safer. Similarly, in equities
schemes also, investors may look for quality of portfolio. They may also seek advice of
experts.
Are the companies having names like mutual benefit the same as mutual
funds schemes?
Investors should not assume some companies having the name "mutual benefit" as mutual
funds. These companies do not come under the purview of SEBI. On the other hand,
mutual funds can mobilize funds from the investors by launching schemes only after
getting registered with SEBI as mutual funds.
Is the higher net worth of the sponsor a guarantee for better returns?
In the offer document of any mutual fund scheme, financial performance including the
net worth of the sponsor for a period of three years is required to be given. The only
purpose is that the investors should know the track record of the company which has
sponsored the mutual fund. However, higher net worth of the sponsor does not mean that
the scheme would give better returns or the sponsor would compensate in case the NAV
falls.
Almost all the mutual funds have their own web sites. Investors can also access the
NAVs, half-yearly results and portfolios of all mutual funds at the web site of Association
of mutual funds in India (AMFI) www.amfiindia.com. AMFI has also published useful
literature for the investors.
Investors can log on to the web site of SEBI www.sebi.gov.in and go to "Mutual Funds"
section for information on SEBI regulations and guidelines, data on mutual funds, draft
offer documents filed by mutual funds, addresses of mutual funds, etc. Also, in the annual
reports of SEBI available on the web site, a lot of information on mutual funds is given.
There are a number of other web sites which give a lot of information of various schemes
of mutual funds including yields over a period of time. Many newspapers also publish
useful information on mutual funds on daily and weekly basis. Investors may approach
their agents and distributors to guide them in this regard.
In case of winding up of a scheme, the mutual funds pay a sum based on prevailing NAV
after adjustment of expenses. Unit holders are entitled to receive a report on winding up
from the mutual funds, which gives all necessary details.
Investors would find the name of contact person in the offer document of the mutual fund
scheme that they may approach in case of any query, complaints or grievances. Trustees
of a mutual fund monitor the activities of the mutual fund. The names of the directors of
Asset Management Company and trustees are also given in the offer documents.
Investors should approach the concerned Mutual Fund / Investor Service Centre of the
Mutual Fund with their complaints,
If the complaints remain unresolved, the investors may approach SEBI for facilitating
redressal of their complaints. On receipt of complaints, SEBI takes up the matter with the
concerned mutual fund and follows up with it regularly.
Selecting Funds
Before buying a fund, please make sure that one should understand all the costs and fees
associated with buying, and with owning, that fund.
A mutual fund prospectus will provide most, if not all of the information that one need to
determine, "What's up with this fund?"
A one can buy some mutual funds (no-load) by contacting the fund companies directly.
Other funds are sold through brokers, banks, financial planners, or insurance agents. If a
person buy through a third party there is a good chance they'll hit to one with a sales
charge (load).
That being said, more and more funds can be purchased through no-transaction fee
programs that offer funds of many companies. Sometimes referred to as a "fund
supermarket," this service lets one to consolidate their holdings and record keeping, and it
still allows one to buy funds without sales charges from many different companies.
Popular examples are Schwab's One Source, Vanguard's Fund Access, and Fidelity's
Funds Network. Many large brokerages have similar offerings. Selling a fund is as easy
as purchasing one. All mutual funds will redeem (buy back) shares on any business day.
The Value of A person Fund
Net asset value (NAV), which is a fund's assets minus liabilities, is the value of a mutual
fund. NAV per share is the value of one share in the mutual fund, and it is the number
that is quoted in newspapers. One can basically just think of NAV per share as the price
of a mutual fund. It fluctuates everyday as fund holdings and shares outstanding change.
When one buys shares, he pays the current NAV per share plus any sales front-end load.
When one sell their shares, the fund will pay to person NAV less any back-end load.
Column 6: % Change
This states the percentage change in the price of the mutual fund from the previous day's
trading.
I'm sure A person noticed all those mutual fund ads that quote their amazingly high one-
year rates of return. His first thought is "wow, that mutual fund did great!" Well, yes it
did great last year, but then person look at the three-year performance, which is lower,
and the five year, which is yet even lower. What's the underlying story here? Let's look at
a real example. These figures came from a local paper:
Last year, the fund had excellent performance at 53%. But in the past three years the
average annual return was 20%. What did it do in years 1 and 2 to bring the average
return down to 20%? Some simple math shows us that the fund made an average return of
3.5% over those first two years: 20% = (53% + 3.5% + 3.5%)/3. Because that is only an
average, it is very possible that the fund lost money in one of those years.
It gets worse when we look at the five-year performance. We know that in the last year
the fund returned 53% and in years 2 and 3 we are guessing it returned around 3.5%. So
what happened in years 4 and 5 to bring the average return down to 11%? Again, by
doing some simple calculations we find that the fund must have lost money, an average of
-2.5% each year of those two years: 11% = (53% + 3.5% + 3.5% - 2.5% - 2.5%)/5. Now
the fund's performance doesn't look so good!
It should be mentioned that, for the sake of simplicity, this example, besides making
some big assumptions, doesn't include calculating compound interest. Still, the point
wasn't to be technically accurate but to demonstrate how misleading mutual fund ads can
be. A fund that loses money for a few years can bump the average up significantly with
one or two strong years.
Open-Ended Funds:
The concept of these funds is that the investors are free to enter and exit the scheme at
any point of time during the fund period. The investor can purchase/ sell units of mutual
funds from/ through the mutual fund trust.
The price at which the units are purchased/ sold depends on the Net Asset Value (NAV)
of the fund at that point of time as specified by the funds. The NAV of the fund is the
current market value of their investments.
Besides the Net Asset Value, certain funds take an additional charge from the investors in
the form of entry/ exit loads. Some examples of open-ended funds are
Alliance'95 (D)
Close-Ended Funds :
In the case of Close-Ended Funds, the investors have to lock their funds with the trust for
a particular period of time as specified by the terms of the offer. The main problem for
the investor is that they cannot move in/out of the fund freely. In the case of Close-Ended
schemes the prices of the units are calculated in the same manner as in the case of open-
ended Schemes. However these schemes do not charge an entry/ exit load as in the case
of open-ended schemes.
The aim of income funds is to provide regular and steady income to investors. Such
schemes generally invest in fixed income securities such as bonds, corporate debentures,
Government securities and money market instruments. Such funds are less risky
compared to equity schemes. These funds are not affected because of fluctuations in
equity markets. However, opportunities of capital appreciation are also limited in such
funds. The NAVs of such funds are affected because of change in interest rates in the
country. If the interest rates fall, NAVs of such funds are likely to increase in the short
run and vice versa. However, long term investors may not bother about these fluctuations.
Balanced Fund :
The aim of balanced funds is to provide both growth and regular income as such schemes
invest both in equities and fixed income securities in the proportion indicated in their
offer documents. These are appropriate for investors looking for moderate growth. They
generally invest 40-60% in equity and debt instruments. These funds are also affected
because of fluctuations in share prices in the stock markets. However, NAVs of such
funds are likely to be less volatile compared to pure equity funds.
Gilt Fund :
Index Funds :
Index Funds replicate the portfolio of a particular index such as the BSE Sensitive index,
S&P NSE 50 index (Nifty), etc .These schemes invest in the securities in the same weight
age comprising of an index. NAVs of such schemes would rise or fall in accordance with
the rise or fall in the index, though not exactly by the same percentage due to some
factors known as "tracking error" in technical terms. Necessary disclosures in this regard
are made in the offer document of the mutual fund scheme.
There are also exchange traded index funds launched by the mutual funds which are
traded on the stock exchanges.
Fund Classification :
Mutual funds now come in every possible size, shape, and color, and if one is in his
company's 401(k) or 403(b) plan, he probably noticed that already. Here are some of the
general categories of mutual funds.
Bond Funds :
Bond mutual funds are pooled amounts of money invested in bonds. A purchaser of a
bond is lending money to the issuer, and will usually collect some regular interest
payments until the money is returned. Usually the amount of interest paid (the coupon) is
fixed at a setage of the amount invested; thus, bonds are called "fixed-income"
investments.
Balanced Funds :
Balanced funds mix some stocks and some bonds. A typical balanced fund might contain
about 50-65% stocks and hold the rest of shareholder's money in bonds. It is important to
know the distribution of stocks to bonds in a specific balanced fund to understand the
risks and rewards inherent in that fund.
Stock or equity mutual funds are pooled amounts of money that are invested in stocks.
Stocks represent part ownership, or equity, in corporations, and the goal of stock
ownership is to see the value of the companies increase over time. Stocks are often
categorized by their market capitalization (or caps), and can be classified in three basic
sizes: small, medium, and large. Many mutual funds invest primarily in companies of one
of these sizes and are thus classified as large-cap, mid-cap or small-cap funds.
International/Global Funds:
International funds invest in companies located in other countries. Global funds invest in
both U.S. and international-based companies. In general, international and global funds
are more volatile than domestic funds.
Growth-Oriented Funds:
Strategy: Funds' strategies differ greatly, from conservative funds that specialize in big
company blue chip stocks to aggressive funds that invest primarily in fast-growing, small
company stock. Certain funds invest in international securities markets, or focus on
specific industries or sectors such as public utilities companies.
Price Volatility: Funds that invest primarily in stocks generally will experience more
price volatility than funds investing primarily in bonds. Stock prices are set by whatever
developments are affecting market demand, from company earning projections to public
opinion.
Municipal bonds generally are considered to be high on the investment safety scale,
second only to securities issued by the Indian government or its agencies.
Tax-Free Yields:
Although municipal bonds pay tax-free interest, their yields are generally lower than
similar taxable investments. However, since the interest income is free from taxes,
investors actually may keep more income from the tax-free securities.
These are the funds/schemes which invest in the securities of only those sectors or
industries as specified in the offer documents. E.g. Pharmaceuticals, Software, Fast
Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), Petroleum stocks, etc. The returns in these funds are
dependent on the performance of the respective sectors/industries. While these funds may
give higher returns, they are more risky compared to diversified funds. Investors need to
keep a watch on the performance of those sectors/industries and must exit at an
appropriate time. They may also seek advice of an expert.
These schemes offer tax rebates to the investors under specific provisions of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 as the Government offers tax incentives for investment in specified
avenues. E.g. Equity Linked Savings Schemes (ELSS). Pension schemes launched by the
mutual funds also offer tax benefits. These schemes are growth oriented and invest pre-
dominantly in equities. Their growth opportunities and risks associated are like any
equity-oriented scheme.
A scheme that invests primarily in other schemes of the same mutual fund or other
mutual funds is known as a FoF scheme. A FoF scheme enables the investors to achieve
greater diversification through one scheme. It spreads risks across a greater universe.
Fund Fees:
Onedon't really need to concern with how these components of the expense ratio are
divided.One just need to know the bottom line. For actively managed funds, the average
number is between 1% - 1.5%. For index funds, the expense ratio is typically around
0.20% - 0.25%.
A fund's turnover rate basically represents the percentage of a fund's holdings that it
changes every year. A managed mutual fund has an average turnover rate of
approximately 85%, meaning that funds are selling most of their holdings every year.
Because buying and selling stocks costs money through commissions and spreads, a high
turnover indicates higher costs (and lower shareholder returns) for the fund. Also, funds
that have large turnover ratios will end up distributing yearly capital gains to their
shareholders. Shareholders will have to pay taxes on these gains. Keep an eye on the
turnover rate of any fund one own, and look to own funds with low (preferably no higher
than 25%) turnover rates. (Index fund turnover is around 5% or lower.)
"Load" refers to the sales charge many funds use to compensate the broker for his or her
"services" in selling the fund to an investor, and this is in addition to the annual expenses
discussed above. "No-load" funds simply are those funds that are sold directly to the
investor, rather than through a middleman.
Front-End Load:
A front-end load (or sales load) is a fee that a broker charges when one purchase shares in
the fund. Front-end loads may be as low as 1% of the amount one' investing, or as high as
8%.
Deferred Load:
Deferred load or contingent deferred sale load (CDSL) funds (sometimes called back-end
loads), often labeled "B" class shares, defer the sales fee until oneleave the fund.
Level Load:
Level load funds, or "C" shares, charge small front loads, and level loads every year there
after. A no-load fund is one that does not charge for entry or exit. It means the investors
can enter the fund/scheme at NAV and no additional charges are payable on purchase or
sale of units. Mutual funds cannot increase the load beyond the level mentioned in the
offer document. Any change in the load will be applicable only to prospective
investments and not to the original investments. In case of imposition of fresh loads or
increase in existing loads, the mutual funds are required to amend their offer documents
so that the new investors are aware of loads at the time of investments.
The price or NAV a unit holder is charged while investing in an open-ended scheme is
called sales price. It may include sales load, if applicable.
Repurchase or redemption price is the price or NAV at which an open-ended scheme
purchases or redeems its units from the unit holders. It may include exit load, if
applicable.
Assured return schemes are those schemes that assure a specific return to the unit holders
irrespective of performance of the scheme.
A scheme cannot promise returns unless such returns are fully guaranteed by the sponsor
or AMC and this is required to be disclosed in the offer document.
Investors should carefully read the offer document whether return is assured for the entire
period of the scheme or only for a certain period. Some schemes assure returns one year
at a time and they review and change it at the beginning of the next year.
Can a mutual fund change the asset allocation while deploying funds of investors?
Considering the market trends, any prudent fund managers can change the asset
allocation i.e. he can invest higher or lower percentage of the fund in equity or debt
instruments compared to what is disclosed in the offer document. It can be done on a
short term basis on defensive considerations i.e. to protect the NAV. Hence the fund
managers are allowed certain flexibility in altering the asset allocation considering the
interest of the investors. In case the mutual fund wants to change the asset allocation on a
permanent basis, they are required to inform the unit holders and giving them option to
exit the scheme at prevailing NAV without any load.
ADVANTAGES:
Disadvantages: -
Conclusion:
A mutual fund brings together a group of people and invests their money in stocks,
bonds, and other securities.
The advantages of mutual funds are professional management, diversification,
economies of scale, simplicity and liquidity.
The disadvantages of mutual are high costs, over-diversification, possible tax
consequences, and the inability of management to guarantee a superior return.
There are many, many types of mutual funds. Onecan classify funds based on asset
class, investing strategy, region, etc.
Mutual funds have lots of costs.
Costs can be broken down into ongoing fees (represented by the expense ratio) and
transaction fees (loads).
The biggest problems with mutual funds are their costs and fees.
Mutual funds are easy to buy and sell. Onecan either buy them directly from the fund
company or through a third party.
Mutual fund advertisements can be very deceiving.
BALANCED FUND
Business Day A day other than (1) Saturday and Sunday or (2) a day on which
the Stock Exchange, BSE and NSE are closed whether or not
the Banks in Mumbai are open. (3) A day on which the Sale and
Redemption of Units is suspended by the Trustee/AMC.
Option Growth and Dividend
Redemption Generally Within 3 business day for Specified RBI locations and
Cheques Issued additional 3 Business Days for Non-RBI locations
Minimum Rs.500/-
Redemption Amt.
Cut off time 3.00 p.m.
Systematic Monthly: Minimum Rs.1000 + 5 post-dated cheques for a
Investment Plan minimum of Rs.1000 each.
Systematic Minimum of Rs.500/- and Multiples thereof
Withdrawal Plan
Switch Facility Available
Tax Benefits Capital Gains Tax and Indexation benefits.
Nomination Available
Facility
Mode of Holding Single, Joint or Anyone or Survivor
Recurring Investment Management Expenses: 1.25%, Other recurring
Expenses expenses: 1.25%, Total: 2.50%
Fund Managers Nilesh Shah Associate of Institute of Chartered Accountants,
B.Com, Grad C.W.A Over 13 Years experience in fund and
Investment management
It is just like a recurring deposit with the post office or bank where oneput in a small
amount every month. The difference here is that the amount is invested in a mutual fund.
The minimum amount to be invested can be as small as Rs 500 and the frequency of
investment is usually monthly or quarterly.
Recently, when the Sensex rose to dizzying heights, the Net Asset Value of the funds
soared too. The NAV is determined by the market price of the stocks the fund has
invested in. So when the markets rise, the NAVs follow and vice versa.
SIP helps onereach your financial goals by investing a fixed sum monthly / quarterly, in
your chosen fund, for a pre-determined number of periods. So that onecan:
Get investment discipline, helping oneinvest for and reach your future goals
Invest disposable funds – that might otherwise lie in Savings accounts, earning low
interest and letting inflation eat into them
An SIP allows oneto take part in the stock market without trying to second guess its
movements AN SIP means onecommit yourself to investing a fixed amount every month.
Let's say it is Rs 1,000.
When the NAV is high, onewill get fewer units. When it drops, onewill get more units.
Mar 1 11 90.90
Apr 1 9.5 105.26
May 1 9 111.11
Within six months, onewould have 5,894 units by investing just Rs 1,000 every month.
Let's say oneinvested in Prudential ICICI Technology Fund during the dotcom and tech
boom. Say onebegan with Rs 1,000 and kept investing Rs 1,000 every month. This would
be the result:
Had onebought the units on March 13, 2000 at Rs 10.88 per unit (that was the NAV
then), onewould have lost because the NAV was just 7.04 on March 7, 2005. But because
onespaced out your investment, onewon.
It makes onedisciplined in your savings. Every month oneare forced to keep aside a fixed
amount. This could either be debited directly from your account or onecould give the
mutual fund post-dated cheques.
As onesee above, it helps onemake money over the long term. Since oneget more units
when the NAV drops and fewer when it rises, the cost averages out over time. So onetide
over all the ups and downs of the market without any drastic losses.
Also, a number of mutual funds do not charge an entry load if oneopt for an SIP.
This fee is a percentage of the amount oneare investing. And if onedo not exit (sell your
units) within a year of buying the units, onedo not have to pay an exit load (same as an
entry load, except this is charged when onesell your units).
If, however, onedo sell your units within a year, onewould be charged an exit load. So it
pays to stay invested for the long-run.
The best way to enter a mutual fund is via an SIP. But to get the benefit of an SIP, think
of at least a three-year time frame when onewon't touch your money
SIP is a feature specifically designed for those who are interested in building wealth over
a long-term and plan out a better future for themselves and their family.
Anyone can enroll for this facility by starting an account with (minimum investment
amount) and giving 4/6 post-dated cheques of periodic investment based on one’s
convenience. This disciplined approach to investing gives one the following advantages:
a. Benefit of compounding
c. Convenience
Through STP onecan transfer amounts at a weekly (on chosen dates 1, 7, 14, 21),
monthly or quarterly frequency from one scheme of ours to another scheme. All oneneed
to do is to give us a one-time instruction to do so. Onemay choose to regularly switch
either a fixed sum or just the appreciation part of your investment. In brief it is the
combination of SWP and SIP.
For investors in our equity schemes STP is an excellent tool for booking the gains and
transferring them to a less volatile debt scheme. Such investors may choose to opt the
appreciation option of STP.
Mutual Fund industry today, with about 34 players and more than five hundred schemes,
is one of the most preferred investment avenues in India. However, with a plethora of
schemes to choose from, the retail investor faces problems in selecting funds. Factors
such as investment strategy and management style are qualitative, but the funds record is
an important indicator too. Though past performance alone can not be indicative of future
performance, it is, frankly, the only quantitative way to judge how good a fund is at
present. Therefore, there is a need to correctly assess the past performance of different
mutual funds.
Worldwide, good mutual fund companies over are known by their AMCs and this fame is
directly linked to their superior stock selection skills. For mutual funds to grow, AMCs
must be held accountable for their selection of stocks. In other words, there must be some
performance indicator that will reveal the quality of stock selection of various AMCs.
Return alone should not be considered as the basis of measurement of the performance of
a mutual fund scheme, it should also include the risk taken by the fund manager because
different funds will have different levels of risk attached to them. Risk associated with a
fund, in a general, can be defined as variability or fluctuations in the returns generated by
it. The higher the fluctuations in the returns of a fund during a given period, higher will
be the risk associated with it. These fluctuations in the returns generated by a fund are
resultant of two guiding forces. First, general market fluctuations, which affect all the
securities, present in the market, called market risk or systematic risk and second,
fluctuations due to specific securities present in the portfolio of the fund, called
unsystematic risk. The Total Risk of a given fund is sum of these two and is measured in
terms of standard deviation of returns of the fund. Systematic risk, on the other hand, is
measured in terms of Beta, which represents fluctuations in the NAV of the fund vis-à-vis
market. The more responsive the NAV of a mutual fund is to the changes in the market;
higher will be its beta. Beta is calculated by relating the returns on a mutual fund with the
returns in the market. While unsystematic risk can be diversified through investments in a
number of instruments, systematic risk can not. By using the risk return relationship, we
try to assess the competitive strength of the mutual funds vis-à-vis one another in a better
way.
Developed by Jack Treynor, this performance measure evaluates funds on the basis of
Treynor's Index. This Index is a ratio of return generated by the fund over and above risk
free rate of return (generally taken to be the return on securities backed by the
government, as there is no credit risk associated), during a given period and systematic
risk associated with it (beta). Symbolically, it can be represented as:
Where, Ri represents return on fund, Rf is risk free rate of return and Bi is beta of the
fund.
All risk-averse investors would like to maximize this value. While a high and positive
Treynor's Index shows a superior risk-adjusted performance of a fund, a low and negative
Treynor's Index is an indication of unfavorable performance.
In this model, performance of a fund is evaluated on the basis of Sharpe Ratio, which is a
ratio of returns generated by the fund over and above risk free rate of return and the total
risk associated with it. According to Sharpe, it is the total risk of the fund that the
investors are concerned about. So, the model evaluates funds on the basis of reward per
unit of total risk. Symbolically, it can be written as:
While a high and positive Sharpe Ratio shows a superior risk-adjusted performance of a
fund, a low and negative Sharpe Ratio is an indication of unfavorable performance.
Comparison of Sharpe and Treynor :
Sharpe and Treynor measures are similar in a way, since they both divide the risk
premium by a numerical risk measure. The total risk is appropriate when we are
evaluating the risk return relationship for well-diversified portfolios. On the other hand,
the systematic risk is the relevant measure of risk when we are evaluating less than fully
diversified portfolios or individual stocks. For a well-diversified portfolio the total risk is
equal to systematic risk. Rankings based on total risk (Sharpe measure) and systematic
risk (Treynor measure) should be identical for a well-diversified portfolio, as the total risk
is reduced to systematic risk. Therefore, a poorly diversified fund that ranks higher on
Treynor measure, compared with another fund that is highly diversified, will rank lower
on Sharpe Measure.
Jenson Model :
Jenson's model proposes another risk adjusted performance measure. This measure was
developed by Michael Jenson and is sometimes referred to as the Differential Return
Method. This measure involves evaluation of the returns that the fund has generated vs.
the returns actually expected out of the fund given the level of its systematic risk. The
surplus between the two returns is called Alpha, which measures the performance of a
fund compared with the actual returns over the period. Required return of a fund at a
given level of risk (Bi) can be calculated as:
Ri = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)
Where, Rm is average market return during the given period. After calculating it, alpha
can be obtained by subtracting required return from the actual return of the fund.
Higher alpha represents superior performance of the fund and vice versa. Limitation of
this model is that it considers only systematic risk not the entire risk associated with the
fund and an ordinary investor can not mitigate unsystematic risk, as his knowledge of
market is primitive.
Fama Model :
The Eugene Fama model is an extension of Jenson model. This model compares the
performance, measured in terms of returns, of a fund with the required return
commensurate with the total risk associated with it. The difference between these two is
taken as a measure of the performance of the fund and is called net selectivity.
The net selectivity represents the stock selection skill of the fund manager, as it is the
excess return over and above the return required to compensate for the total risk taken by
the fund manager. Higher value of which indicates that fund manager has earned returns
well above the return commensurate with the level of risk taken by him.
Where, Sm is standard deviation of market returns. The net selectivity is then calculated
by subtracting this required return from the actual return of the fund.
Among the above performance measures, two models namely, treynor measure and
jenson model use systematic risk based on the premise that the unsystematic risk is
diversifiable. These models are suitable for large investors like institutional investors with
high risk taking capacities as they do not face paucity of funds and can invest in a number
of options to dilute some risks. For them, a portfolio can be spread across a number of
stocks and sectors. However, Sharpe measure and fama model that consider the entire
risk associated with fund are suitable for small investors, as the ordinary investor lacks
the necessary skill and resources to diversify. Moreover, the selection of the fund on the
basis of superior stock selection ability of the fund manager will also help in safeguarding
the money invested to a great extent. The investment in funds that have generated big
returns at higher levels of risks leaves the money all the more prone to risks of all kinds
that may exceed the individual investors' risk appetite.
Standard Deviation
Sharpe Ratio
,
where R is the asset return, Rf is the return on a benchmark asset, such as the risk free rate
of return, E[R − Rf] is the expected value of the excess of the asset return over the
benchmark return, and σ is the standard deviation of the excess return.
free rate changes with time; prior to this revision the definition was
assuming a constant Rf.
The Sharpe ratio is used to characterize how well the return of an asset compensates the
investor for the risk taken. When comparing two assets each with the expected return
E[R] against the same benchmark with return Rf, the asset with the higher Sharpe ratio
gives more return for the same risk. Investors are often advised to pick investments with
high Sharpe ratios.
This ratio was developed by William Forsyth Sharpe. Sharpe originally called it the
"reward-to-variability" ratio before it began being called the Sharpe Ratio by later
academics and financial professionals. Recently, the (original) Sharpe ratio has often
been challenged with regard to its appropriateness as a fund performance measure during
evaluation periods of declining markets.
Trading Systems:
If we are "investing" in a system for trading, we still measure the value of our account
with the profit/loss resulting from the trades. Oneare, in effect sampling the value of the
equity curve (plus the initial investment as defined above).
As above, a Sharpe Ratio of a system of over 2.0 is considered very good. Sharpe Ratios
above 3.0 are outstanding. (The Sharpe Ratio reported by services such as Future Truth is
calculated in some other way and get other numbers.)
Buy/Hold Example:
Assume we established an account in 6/96 and bought 5000 SPDRs (S&P depository
receipts). The total value of what we bought would be about $335,000 at that time [$67 x
5000]. If our account increased to 479,000 over the two years (not the real numbers), the
average return would be $6,000 per month or about 1.80% per month of the original
$335,000. Annualized, this would be about 21.5% [1.80% * 12]. Assume the standard
deviation of monthly returns in our account is 2.4%. Annualizing this we get 8.31%.
Now consider the use of margin. Assume we bought twice as many SPDRs as
above but borrowed half the money from our broker as a margin loan. Our investment
would be the same but now our monthly returns will be twice as great so our annualized
return would be 43% [2 * 21.5%] before interest on the margin loan. Assuming margin
interest at 5%, our net return would be 38% [43% - 5%]. The excess return is now 33%
[38% - 5%]. The standard deviation of returns would also double to 16.62%. So the
Sharpe Ratio becomes:
The actual figures for SPDRs over this period show this effect clearly. The table below
shows the numbers. The column "Leverage" is the ratio of the investment to our account
equity. A "Leverage" of 2 means we are investing twice the value of our equity,
borrowing the balance as a margin loan.
As the leverage is increasing, both the Standard Deviation and the Return increase, but
not at the same rate so the Sharpe Ratio is decreases.
This is because losses tend to hurt worse than gains help. The following data
will illustrate this:
If, without leverage, an investment loses 10% in one month, it would require 11% return
to get back to where we started. [90% * 111% = 100%] But with a leverage of 2 to 1, this
investment would lose 20% in that same month. Then it requires 25% to get even. [80% *
125% 100%]
Achieving a 20% gain would only get up back to 96% of the original value.
[80% * 120% = 96%]
With leverage of 5 to 1, this investment would lose 50% in that month.
Then it would require 100% return to get even again. [50% * 200% = 100%]
Achieving a 50% gain would only get up back to 75% of the original value. [50% * 150%
= 75%]
With leverage of 10 to 1, this investment would lose 100% in that month and we would
be broke.
So with higher and higher leverage, the standard deviation continues to increase and the
variations in monthly returns bias the returns lower than we would otherwise expect. This
lowers the risk-adjusted return and the Sharpe ratio. So the Sharpe Ratio is roughly
independent of leverage only so long as the standard deviation doesn't get too high.
Assume that on 6/96, we purchased five S&P contracts. We are really buying about
$1,675,000 worth of equity. [5 * $670 * 500 big points]. Assume the margin requirement
was $33,500 per contract or $167,500 for 5 contracts. Assume we want to allow twice
this in our account to cover drawdowns so we establish an account of $335,000 (just as in
the above example). We will use exactly the same position trading system we used for
trading the SPDRs (and assume that we get the same trading signals in this simplified
example). This is exactly the same as was trading the SPDRs on margin with two
changes:
The leverage is now 5 to 1 instead of 2 to 1.
With no margin, the return on our system trading SPDRs was 21.5%. Trading futures, the
return will be 5% less than this since the price of S&P futures decreases to the S&P cash
index nearing expiration (e g: "premium" decreases to zero) with the "fair value"
calculation. It turns out that the effective return would be 16.5% before applying the
leverage multiplier. But we make 5% on the margin we have on deposit with the broker.
The calculations now become:
Annualized return = 16.5% * 5 = 82.5%
Interest income on margin = 5%
Total return = 82.5% + 5% = 87.5%
Excess return = 87.5% - 5% = 82.5%
Annualized standard deviation = 8.31% * 5 = 41.55
Sharpe Ratio = 1.99 (which is the same as above)
I can see that the interest I earn on the margin amount equals the risk-free rate so the two
amounts cancel. Thus, the 82.5% we make can be used as the "excess return" if I am
getting interest on our margin deposit. (There are other ways of getting to this same
conclusion but I use this way to be consistent with the above examples.)
Treynor Ratio is a measurement of the returns earned in excess of that which could
have been earned on a riskless investment (i.e. Treasury bill) (per each unit of market risk
assumed).
The Treynor ratio (sometimes called reward-to-volatility ratio) relates excess return over
the risk-free rate to the additional risk taken; however systematic risk instead of total risk
is used. The higher the Treynor ratio, the better the performance under analysis.
Where
Treynor ratio,
Portfolio return,
Risk free rate
Portfolio beta
Like the Sharpe ratio, the Treynor ratio (T) does not quantify the value added, if any, of
active portfolio management. It is a ranking criterion only. A ranking of portfolios based
on the Treynor Ratio is only useful if the portfolios under consideration are sub-portfolios
of a broader, fully diversified portfolio. If this is not the case, portfolios with identical
systematic risk, but different total risk, will be rated the same. But the portfolio with a
higher total risk is less diversified and therefore has a higher unsystematic risk which is
not priced in the market.
Jensen's Alpha (or Jensen's Performance Index) is used to determine the excess return of
a stock, other security, or portfolio over the security's required rate of return as
determined by the Capital Asset Pricing Model. This model is used to adjust for the level
of beta risk, so that riskier securities are expected to have higher returns. The measure
was first used in the evaluation of mutual fund managers by Michael Jensen in the 1970's.
Jensen's alpha = Portfolio Return - (Risk free return + (Market Return - Risk free
Return) * Beta)
Alpha is still widely used to evaluate mutual fund and portfolio manager performance,
often in conjunction with the Sharpe ratio and the Treynor ratio.
Jensen's model proposes another risk adjusted performance measure. This measure was
developed by Michael C. Jensen and is sometimes referred to as the Differential Return
Method. This measure involves evaluation of the returns that the fund has generated vs.
the returns actually expected out of the fund given the level of its systematic risk. The
surplus between the two returns is called Alpha, which measures the performance of a
fund compared with the actual returns over the period.
Required return of a fund at a given level of risk (Bi) can be calculated as:
Ri = Rf + Bi (Rm - Rf)
Where, Rm is average market return during the given period. After calculating it, alpha
can be obtained by subtracting required return from the actual return of the fund.
Higher alpha represents superior performance of the fund and vice versa.
Limitation of this model is that it considers only systematic risk not the entire risk
associated with the fund and an ordinary investor can not mitigate unsystematic
risk, as his knowledge of market is primitive.
Fama and French started with the observation that two classes of stocks have tended to do
better than the market as a whole: (i) small caps and (ii) stocks with a high book-value-to-
price ratio (customarily called "value" stocks; their opposites are called "growth" stocks).
They then added two factors to CAPM to reflect a portfolio's exposure to these two
classes:
Here r is the portfolio's return rate, Rf is the risk-free return rate, and Km is the return of
the whole stock market. The "three factor" beta is analogous to the classical beta but not
equal to it, since there are now two additional factors to do some of the work. SMB and
HML stand for "small [cap] minus big" and "high [book/price] minus low"; they measure
the historic excess returns of small caps and "value" stocks over the market as a whole.
By the way SMB and HML are defined, the corresponding coefficients b s and bv take
values on a scale of roughly 0 to 1: b s = 1 would be a small cap portfolio, b s = 0 would be
large cap, bv = 1 would be a portfolio with a high book/price ratio, etc.
One thing that's interesting is that Fama and French still see high returns as a reward for
taking on high risk
R-Squared
A statistical measure that represents the percentage of a fund's or security's movements
that are explained by movements in a benchmark index. For fixed-income securities the
benchmark is the T-bill, and for equities the benchmark is the S&P 500.
R-squared values range from 0 to 100. An R-squared of 100 means that all movements of
a security are completely explained by movements in the index.
A higher R-squared value will indicate a more useful beta figure. For example, if a fund
has an R-squared value of close to 100, yet has a beta below 1, it is most likely offering
higher risk-adjusted returns. A low R-squared means oneshould ignore the beta.
Beta
Beta is calculated using regression analysis, and onecan think of beta as the tendency of a
security's returns to respond to swings in the market. A beta of 1 indicates that the
security's price will move with the market. A beta less than 1 means that the security will
be less volatile than the market. A beta greater than 1 indicates that the security's price
will be more volatile than the market. For example, if a stock's beta is 1.2, it's
theoretically 20% more volatile than the market.
Many utilities stocks have a beta of less than 1. Conversely, most hi-tech Nasdaq-based
stocks have a beta greater than 1, offering the possibility of a higher rate of return but also
posing more risk
Introduction of UTI mutual fund-company profile
UTI Mutual Fund is managed by UTI Asset Management Company Private Limited
(Estb: Jan 14, 2003) who has been appointed by the UTI Trustee Company Private
Limited for managing the schemes of UTI Mutual Fund and the schemes transferred /
migrated from UTI Mutual Fund.
The UTI Asset Management Company has its registered office at: UTI Tower, Gn Block,
Bandra - Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai - 400 051 will provide professionally
managed back office support for all business services of UTI Mutual Fund (excluding
fund management) in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Management
Agreement, the Trust Deed, the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations and the objectives of
the schemes. State-of-the-art systems and communications are in place to ensure a
seamless flow across the various activities undertaken by UTI AMC.
UTI AMC is a registered portfolio manager under the SEBI (Portfolio Managers)
Regulations, 1993 on February 3 2004, for undertaking portfolio management services
and also acts as the manager and marketer to offshore funds through its 100 % subsidiary,
UTI International Limited, registered in Guernsey, Channel Islands.
UTI Mutual Fund has come into existence with effect from 1st February 2003. UTI Asset
Management Company presently manages a corpus of over Rs. 34500 Crore.
UTI Mutual Fund has a track record of managing a variety of schemes catering to the
needs of every class of citizenry. It has a nationwide network consisting 70 UTI Financial
Centers (UFCs) and UTI International offices in London, Dubai and Bahrain. With a
view to reach to common investors at district level, 4 satellite offices have also been
opened in select towns and districts. It has a well-qualified, professional fund
management team, who has been highly empowered to manage funds with greater
efficiency and accountability in the sole interest of unit holders. The fund managers are
also ably supported with a strong in-house equity research department. To ensure better
management of funds, a risk management department is also in operation.
The origin of Mutual fund industry in India is with the introduction of the concept of
mutual fund by UTI in the year 1963. Though the growth was slow, but it accelerated
from the year 1987 when non-UTI players entered the industry.
In the past decade, Indian mutual fund industry had seen dramatic improvements, both
quality wise as well as quantity wise. Before, the monopoly of the market had seen an
ending phase; the Assets under Management (AUM) were Rs. 67bn. The private sector
entry to the fund family raised the AUM to Rs. 470 bn in March 1993 and till April 2004;
it reached the height of 1,540 bn.
Putting the AUM of the Indian Mutual Funds Industry into comparison, the total of it is
less than the deposits of SBI alone, constitute less than 11% of the total deposits held by
the Indian banking industry.
The main reason of its poor growth is that the Mutual fund industry in India is new in the
country. Large sections of Indian investors are yet to be intellectuated with the concept.
Hence, it is the prime responsibility of all mutual fund companies, to market the product
correctly abreast of selling.
The Mutual fund industry can be broadly put into four phases according to the
development of the sector. Each phase is briefly described as under.
Starting out as an industry with a single player, the UTI, in 1963, the Mutual fund
industry in India has come a long way since then. Today, close to 30 players, offering
over 460 schemes, dot the industry landscape. The industry has gained enormously in size
as reflected in its assets under management which now stand at a whopping Rs.1, 75,918
cr., as on July 31, 2005 from Rs.1, 00,000 crore in early 2000.
The journey of the industry has been nothing less than spectacular, particularly in the last
5 years or so. A host of factors has contributed to the phenomenal growth of the industry.
First and foremost, as a result of the increased competition, industry players have focused
on product innovation to drive growth. This has not only helped the industry players to
tap the latent needs of the investors, but also enabled them to expand markets as more and
more investors, including retail investors, have begun to look at Mutual funds as a
suitable investment avenue. Second, the need for greater market penetration has forced
industry players to devise innovative channels of delivery to gain and strengthen their
market share. There are new channels and models of distribution emerging as the race
among the fund houses heats up to enhance reach to potential investors. Third, a slew of
tax incentives, which include rationalizing of capital gains tax, aiming to boost equity
investing coupled with a benign interest rate regime have helped Mutual funds gain
popularity with investors. Finally, a slew of regulatory measures taken by SEBI have
played a crucial role in instilling confidence among investors, especially retail investors.
No doubt these factors have attributed significantly to the growth of the Mutual fund
industry in the country, particularly in recent times.
Further, the emergence of India as a major investment destination has done a world of
good to the Mutual fund industry in the country as it is witnessing entry of many big
names in the global investment management business. The entry of major global players
like Morgan Stanley, Principal, Sun life, and Fidelity, while Vanguard is mulling over its
India debut, augurs well for the industry as not only these global investment management
firms bring with them the expertise gained internationally but also bring the best
international practices in terms of performances and investor services which will benefit
the industry and will go a long way in helping it catch up with its counter parts in
developed markets like the US and the UK.
A host of things suggests that the industry is all set to enter a period of high growth. A
robust economy, fledgling stock market, increasing awareness and acceptance of Mutual
funds among investors, strong domestic currency, and healthy corporate performances are
among some of the major factors, which suggest that the industry's future is bright.
However, to gain size, and catch up with developed markets like the US, the industry has
to remove certain obstacles, which pose significant challenges. .
Though young, the industry has made significant strides in terms of its variety,
sophistication and regulation. The mutual fund industry's existence in India is divided
into four phases. The first phase, which spanned across 1963-1987, saw UTI
consolidating its position by offering a host of products and extending its reach
throughout the country. The next phase (1987-93) marked the arrival of mutual funds
sponsored by public sector banks and financial institutions. With the arrival of private
sector players, both Indian and foreign, began the third phase (1993-1996). 1996 marks
yet another milestone in the history of the mutual fund industry in the country as SEBI
(Mutual Funds) Regulations came into being. The fourth phase, which is in vogue now,
begun in 2003, marks, perhaps, the most significant event in the history of the mutual
fund industry restructuring of UTI. It is observes that the rush of players into the mutual
fund industry during the last decade could be attributed to low entry barriers, both
regulatory and competitive, and the desire of the existing financial players to broad-base
their activities in the financial sector. The period is also characterized by significant
developments such as standardization of operations, increased influence of technology,
best practices, product innovation, and improved regulatory environment. With the total
Assets Under Management (AUM) increasing from Rs.1, 01,565 cr in January 2000 to
Rs. 1, 75,918 cr by July 31, 2005, the industry's growth has been nothing but exceptional.
And if size is the measure of dominance, the Indian mutual fund industry can now boast
of that. A slew of factors have contributed to a surge in the industry's growth. First and
foremost, a buoyant domestic economy coupled with a booming stock market has been
one of the major drivers of growth in recent times, particularly in the last five years.
Another significant factor facilitating this growth has been a conducive regulatory
regime, thanks to increased efforts by Sebi to improve market surveillance and protect
investors' interests. Besides, increased focuses on product and distribution innovations
have also fueled the growth of the industry.
It has reset and upgraded transparency standards for the mutual funds industry. All the
branches, UFCs and registrar offices are connected on a robust IT network to ensure cost-
effective quick and efficient service. All these have evolved UTI Mutual Fund to position
as a dynamic, responsive, restructured, efficient, and transparent and SEBI compliant
entity.
Sponsers :
Three leading public sector banks – Bank of Baroda (BOB), Punjab National Bank (PNB)
and State Bank of India (SBI) and Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the largest
public financial investment institution and life insurer in India have entered into an
agreement with the Government of India as Sponsors of the UTI Mutual Fund.
UTI Trustee Company Private Limited a company incorporated under The Companies
Act, 1956 will be the Trustee of transferred/migrated schemes are the first and sole
trustee of the Mutual Fund under the Trust Deed dated December 9, 2002 executed
between the Sponsors and the Trustee Company (the Trustee).
Board of Directors :
Mr Janki Ballabh
Prof P G Apte
Shri S P Oswal
Shri Babasaheb N Kalyani
Shri Ashok K Kini
Prof P V Ramana
Shri S Ravi
Asset Management
UTI Asset Management Company Private Limited is a company incorporated under The
Companies Act, 1956.
Registered office: UTI Tower, Gn Block, Bandra - Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai -
400 051.
UTI Asset Management Company Private Limited has been appointed as the Asset
Management Company of the UTI Mutual Fund by the Trustee in terms of Investment
Management Agreement dated December 9, 2002 executed between UTI Trustee Company
Private Limited and UTI Asset Management Company Private Limited. The AMC was
approved by SEBI to act as the asset management company for UTI Mutual Fund vide their
letter no.MF/BC/PKN/03 dated January 14, 2003. Out of the AMC's total paid-up capital of
Rs.10 crore, 25% is held by each of the Sponsors. The AMC apart from managing the
schemes of UTI Mutual Fund will also manage the schemes transferred/migrated from UTI
MF, in accordance with the provisions of the Investment Management Agreement, the Trust
Deed, the SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations and the objectives of the schemes.
UTI AMC has been registered as a portfolio manager under the SEBI (Portfolio Managers)
Regulations, 1993 on February 3 2004, for undertaking portfolio management services. The
registration code is PM/INP 000000860.
UTI International Ltd., a 100 % subsidiary of UTI AMC, registered in Guernsey, Channel
Islands, and acts as manager to offshore funds and markets these offshore funds abroad.
Systems are in place to ensure that bank and securities accounts are segregated and there is
no conflict of interest between the various activities undertaken by UTI AMC.
(As a % of the and including Rs. 10 lakh in value an Exit Load of 0.50%
Applicable NAV) is payable if Units are redeemed / Switched-out within 6
months from the date of allotment.
Investment Objective: -
Investment Pattern :
The investments in central and state government securities will not exceed 75% of the net
assets of the respective Plans. It is the intention of the Scheme that the investments in
securities debt will not, normally exceed 75% of the net assets of the respective Plans.
Pending deployment of funds of the Scheme in securities in terms of the investment
objective of the Scheme, the AMC may invest the funds of the Scheme in short term
deposits of scheduled commercial banks
Investment Strategy: The net assets of the respective Plans will be invested in Debt and
Money market instruments. They generate regular returns long-term capital appreciation
by investing a portion of the Scheme’s assets in equity and equity related instruments.
Debt Investments:
Debt securities (in the form of non-convertible debentures, bonds, secured premium
notes, zero interest bonds, deep discount bonds, floating rate bond / notes, securities debt,
pass through certificates, asset backed securities, mortgage backed securities and any other
domestic fixed income securities including structured obligations etc.) include, but are not
limited to:
Debt obligations of the GOI , State and local Governments, Government Agencies
and statutory bodies,
Securities that have been guaranteed by Government of India and State Governments,
Securities issued by Corporate Entities (Public / Private sector undertakings),
Securities issued by Public/Private banks and development financial institutions.
Commercial papers
Commercial bills
Treasury bills
Certificate of deposit
Usance bills
Any other like instruments as may be permitted by RBI / SEBI from time to time
Investments will be made through secondary market purchases, initial public offers, other
public offers, placements and right offers (including renunciation). The securities could be
listed, unlisted, privately placed, secured / unsecured, rated / unrated of any maturity. The
AMC retains the flexibility to invest across all the securities / instruments in debt and money
market.
Investment in debt instruments shall generally have a low risk profile and those in money
market instruments shall have an even lower risk profile. The maturity profile of debt
instruments will be selected in accordance with the AMC’S view regarding current
market conditions, interest rate outlook and the stability of ratings.
Equity Investments
The investment approach would be based on the concept of economic earning power
and cash return on investments. Five basic principles would serve as the foundation
for this investment approach. They are as follows:
Focus on long-term growth.
View investments as conferring a proportionate ownership of the business.
Maintain a margin of safety (i.e. the price of purchase represents a discount to the
intrinsic value of that business).
Maintain a balanced outlook on the market by regularly monitoring economic trends
and investor sentiment.
The decision to sell a holding would be based on one of three reasons:
The anticipated price appreciation has been achieved or is no longer probable; or
Alternative investments offer superior total return prospects; or
A fundamental change has occurred in the company or the market in which it
competes.
Pursuant to the SEBI Regulations, the respective Plans shall not make any investment
The respective Plans may invest in other schemes managed by the AMC or in the
schemes of any other mutual funds, provided it is in conformity with the investment
objectives of the Scheme and in terms of the prevailing SEBI Regulations. As per the
SEBI Regulations, no investment management fees will be charged for such investments
and the aggregate inter scheme investment made by all the schemes of UTI Mutual Fund
or in the schemes of other mutual funds shall not exceed 5% of the net asset value of the
UTI Mutual Fund.
The respective Plans may also invest in suitable investment avenues in overseas financial
markets for the purpose of diversification, commensurate with the Scheme objectives and
subject to necessary stipulations by SEBI / RBI. Towards this end, the Mutual Fund may
also appoint overseas investment advisors and other service providers, as and when
permissible under the regulations.
Risk Control:
Investments made from the corpus of the respective Plans would be in accordance with
the investment objective of the respective Plans and the provisions of the SEBI
Regulations. The AMC will strive to achieve the investment objective by way of a
judicious portfolio mix comprising of debt and money market instruments. Every
investment opportunity would be assessed with regard to credit risk, interest rate risk and
liquidity risk.
Credit Risk:
Liquidity Risk:
The AMC will attempt to reduce liquidity risk by investing in securities that would result
in a staggered maturity profile of the portfolio, investment in structured securities that
provide easy liquidity and securities that have reasonable secondary market activity. In
the event of a requirement to liquidate all or a substantial part of these investments in a
very short duration of time, the AMC may not be able to realize the full value of these
securities to an adverse impact on the Net Asset Value of the Scheme.
Uti prudence fund:
Investment objective:
The investment objective of the Scheme is to provide periodic returns and capital
appreciation over a long period of time, from a judicious mix of equity and debt
investments, with the aim to prevent/ minimize any capital erosion. Under normal
circumstances, it is envisaged that the debt: equity mix would vary between 60:40 and
40:60 respectively. This mix is geared to achieve the investment objective and is expected
to result in regular income, capital appreciation and also prevent capital erosion
Investment Pattern:
The asset allocation under the Scheme will be as follows:
*
Investment in Securities debt would not exceed 10% of the net assets of the scheme.
In such times when the interest rates are high, investment in debt would be more
attractive versus equities and accordingly the Fund is likely to increase the debt
component in the Scheme's portfolio. Similarly in times when the interest rates are low
and the equity valuations are cheap, the Scheme is likely to reduce exposure to debt and
increase exposure to equities. In addition to debt and equities the scheme will also invest
in money market instruments. The ect proportion in money market instruments will be a
function of the liquidity needs and the attractiveness of the debt/ equity markets. At times
*
when neither the debt market nor equities are attractive for Investment in Securitized
debt, if undertaken, would not exceed 10% of the net assets of the scheme.
In such times when the interest rates are high, investment in debt would be more
attractive versus equities and accordingly the Fund is likely to increase the debt
component in the Scheme's portfolio. Similarly in times when the interest rates are low
and the equity valuations are cheap, the Scheme is likely to reduce exposure to debt and
increase exposure to equities. In addition to debt and equities the scheme will also invest
in money market instruments. The exact proportion in money market instruments will be
a function of the liquidity needs and the attractiveness of the debt/ equity markets
The Scheme may also invest up to 25% of net assets of the Scheme in derivatives such as
Futures and Options and such other derivative instruments as may be introduced from
time to time for the purpose of hedging and portfolio balancing and other uses as may be
permitted under the Regulations and Guidelines.
The Scheme may also invest a part of its corpus, not exceeding 40% of its net assets, in
overseas markets in Global Depository Receipts (GDRs), ADRs, overseas equity, bonds
and mutual funds and such other instruments as may be allowed under the Regulations
from time to time. Also refer to the Section on Policy on offshore Investments by the
Scheme(s).
Subject to the Regulations and the applicable guidelines, the Scheme may, engage in
Stock Lending activities. Also refer to Section on Stock Lending by the Fund.
If the investment in equities and related instruments falls below 40% of the portfolio or
rises above 60% of the portfolio of the Scheme at any point in time, it would be
endeavored to review and rebalance the composition.
Notwithstanding anything stated above, subject to the regulations, the asset allocation
pattern indicated above may change from time to time, keeping in view market
conditions, market opportunities, applicable regulations and political and economic
factors. It may be clearly understood that the percentages stated above are only indicative
and are not absolute and that they can vary substantially depending upon the
Perception of the AMC, the intention being at all times to seek to protect the NAV of the
scheme. Such changes will be for short term and defensive considerations.
Provided further and subject to the above, any change in the asset allocation affecting the
investment profile of the Scheme and amounting to a change in the Fundamental
Attributes of the Scheme shall be effected in accordance with sub-regulation (15A) of
regulation 18 of SEBI regulations.
As outlined above, the investments in the Scheme will comprise both debt and equities.
The Fund would invest in Debt instruments such as Government securities, money
market instruments, securities debts, corporate debentures and bonds, preference shares,
quasi Government bonds, and in equity shares. In the long term, the mix between debt
instruments and equity instruments is targeted between 60:40 and 40:60 respectively. The
exact mix will be a function of interest rates, equity valuations, reserves position, risk
taking capacity of the portfolio without compromising the consistency of dividend pay
out (in the case of Dividend Plan), need for capital preservation and the need to generate
capital appreciation.
Summary:
Type Open-ended ETF: Gold Benchmark Price of gold**
Min. Investment Rs 20,000 Face Value Rs 100***
Entry Load 2.50%* Exit Load Nil
Issue Opens March 1, 2007 Issue Closes March 12, 2007
2.50% entry load for investments less than Rs 5 m; 1.50% for Rs 5 m - Rs 20 m; 0.75%
The market price of gold in the domestic market on any business day (valuation day)
X conversion factor for converting ounce into kg for 995 fineness X rate for US$ into
INR) + custom duty for import of gold + sales tax/octroi and other levies applicable. The
gold held by gold Exchange Traded Fund shall be valued at the AM fixing price of
London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) in US dollars per troy ounce for gold
Investment Objective:
The investment objective of the fund is to endeavour to provide returns that, before
expenses, closely track the performance and yield of Gold. However the performance of
the scheme may differ from that of the underlying asset due to tracking error. There can
be no assurance or guarantee that the investment objective of UTI-Gold ETF achieved.
UTI-Gold ETF is the second Gold Exchange Traded Fund in the country. It is an open-
ended passively managed ETF, designed to provide returns, which closely correspond to
the performance and yield of gold. Gold ETFs offer investors the advantage of investing
UTI-Gold ETF will be traded on the stock exchange (to start with on the National Stock
Exchange-NSE) on a real time basis (i.e. buying/selling can be done any time during the
During the NFO period, investors can purchase units of UTI-Gold ETF directly from the
fund house. The minimum investment amount during the NFO is Rs 20,000. There is a
maximum entry load of 2.50% at the time of investment.
After the fund gets listed in the stock exchange (approximately 30 days after the NFO
closes), investors can buy/sell units directly from the exchange through a stock broker.
While dealing with a stock broker there is no entry load; rather, investors have to pay
brokerage/commission (usually hovering around 0.50% of the transaction value). The
minimum number of units that an investor can buy/sell through the exchange is 1 unit.
The value of each unit will equal the price of 1 gram of gold.
This is the second Gold ETF being launched and having reviewed both, we find an
important common denominator across the two funds. Both the ETFs have high entry
loads (2.50% for UTI-Gold ETF and 1.50% for Gold Benchmark Exchange Traded
Scheme) during the NFO period. The high load makes Gold ETFs expensive investment
propositions and for a commodity, this could impact returns adversely. That is why we
maintain that investors are better off investing in Gold ETFs after the NFO period when it
is listed on the stock exchange. If onebuy the Gold ETF on the exchange, onehave to pay
the broker's commission (i.e. approximately 0.50% of the transaction value, although it
could vary depending on your relationship with the broker), which is a lot lower than the
With regards to tax implications, investors must note that Gold ETFs are treated as debt
funds. Hence, tax incidence on sale of UTI-Gold ETF will be similar to that of debt
funds. This means that tax on long-term capital gains is lower of 10% without indexation
and 20% with indexation. Short-term capital gains will be added to income and taxed at
has returned only around 8.60% CAGR-Compounded Annualised Growth Rate, which is
Portfolio Strategy:
The fund is mandated to invest between 90%-100% of net assets in physical gold;
remaining 10% of the assets can be invested in debt and money market instruments
*
Investment in Securities debt, if undertaken, would not exceed 20% of the net assets of
the scheme.
The Scheme may also invest up to 25% of net assets of the Scheme in derivatives such as
Futures and Options and such other derivative instruments as may be introduced from
time to time for the purpose of hedging and portfolio balancing and other uses as may be
permitted under the regulations and guidelines.
The Scheme may also invest a part of its corpus, not exceeding 40% of its net assets, in
overseas markets in Global Depository Receipts (GDRs), ADRs, overseas equity, bonds
and mutual funds and such other instruments as may be allowed under the Regulations
from time to time.
Subject to the Regulations and the applicable guidelines, the Scheme may, engage in
Stock Lending activities. Also refer to Section on Stock Lending by the Fund.
If the investment in equities and related instruments falls below 65% of the portfolio of
the Scheme at any point in time, it would be endeavored to review and rebalance the
composition.
Notwithstanding anything stated above, subject to the regulations, the asset allocation
pattern indicated above may change from time to time, keeping in view market
conditions, market opportunities, applicable regulations and political and economic
factors. It may be clearly understood that the percentages stated above are only indicative
and are not absolute and that they can vary substantially depending upon the perception
of the AMC, the intention being at all times to seek to protect the NAV of the scheme.
Such changes will be for short term and defensive considerations.
The Trustee may from time to time at their absolute discretion review and modify the
strategy, provided such modification is in accordance with the Regulations or in the event
of a discontinuation of or change in the compilation or the constituents of the BSE
200 Index Provided further and subject to the above, any change in the asset allocation
affecting the investment profile of the Scheme and amounting to a change in the
Fundamental Attributes of the Scheme shall be effected in accordance with sub-
regulation (15A) of regulation 18 of SEBI regulations.
The investment strategy of primarily restricting the equity portfolio to the BSE 200 Index
scripts is intended to reduce risks while maintaining steady growth. Stock specific risk
will be minimized by investing only in those companies / industries that have been
thoroughly researched by the investment manager's research team. Risk will also be
reduced through a diversification of the portfolio.
closed whether or not the Banks in Mumbai are open. (3) A day on
which the Sale and Redemption of Units is suspended by the
Trustee/AMC. However, the AMC reserves the right to declare any
day as a non-business day at any of its locations at its sole
discretion.
Option Cumulative and Dividend
Application Amt. Rs.5, 000/- (plus in multiples of Re. 1).
Portfolio Disclosures Quarterly
1. For investments of less than Rs.5Crores: Entry load at
Entry Load 2.25% of applicable NAV
Investment Philosophy :
UTI Mutual Fund’s investment philosophy is to deliver consistent and stable returns in
the medium to long term with a fairly lower volatility of fund returns compared to the
broad market. It believes in having a balanced and well-diversified portfolio for all the
funds and a rigorous in-house research based approach to all its investments. It is
committed to adopt and maintain good fund management practices and a process based
investment management.
UTI Mutual Fund follows an investment approach of giving as equal an importance to
asset allocation and sectoral allocation, as is given to security selection while managing
any fund. It combines top-down and bottom-up approaches to enable the portfolios/funds
to adapt to different market conditions so as to prevent missing an investment
opportunity.
In terms of its funds performance, UTI Mutual Fund aims to consistently remain in the
top quartile vis-à-vis the funds in the peer group.
An open-ended pure debt liquid plan, seeking to provide highest possible current income,
by investing in a divesified portfolio of short-term money market securities
The scheme seeks to generate steady and reasonable income with low risk and high level
of liquidity from a portfolio of money market securities and high quality debt.
An open-end Gilt-Fund with the objective to invest only in Central Government securities
including call money, overnment securities including call money, treasury bills and repos
of varying maturities with a view to generate credit risk free return
An open ended debt oriented fund with 100% investment in Debt/G-sec. Investment can
be made in the name of the children upto the age of 15 years
It aims to generate attractive returns consistent with capital preservation and liquidity...
An open-ended debt oriented fund investing a minimum of 90% in Debt and G-Sec and a
maximum of 10% in equity instruments. The fund aims to distribute income periodically.
Best suited to the investors...
To generate regular income through investments in fixed income securities and capital
appreciation / dividend income through investment of a portion of net assets of the
scheme in equity and equity related instruments so as to endeavor to make periodic
income distribution to Unit holders.
Open-end 100% pure debt fund, which invests in rated corporate debt papers and
government securities with relatively low risk and easy liquidity.
The scheme will invest in a portfolio predominantly of fixed income securities that are
maturing in line with duration of the respective plans. Each Plan will have a separate
portfolio. The debt component of the portfolio structure shall have the highest investment
grade rating. The equity components of the scheme will mainly focus on those companies
/ stocks that have potential to appreciate in the medium to long run.
The UTI- Variable Investment Scheme is an open-ended scheme with dynamic allocation
between equity and debt classes.
Index Funds Category:
UTI MIF is an open-ended passive fund with the primary investment objective to invest
in securities of companies comprising the BSE sensex in the same weightage as these
companies have in BSE sensex.
An open-ended equity fund with the objective to invest in select stocks of the BSE
Sensex and the S & P CNX Nifty. The fund does not replicate any of the indices but aims
to attain performance better than the performance of the indices.
UTI NIF is an open-ended passive fund with the objective to invest in securities of
companies comprising of the S&P CNX Nifty in the same weightage as they have in S&P
CNX Nifty.
UTI - Sunder:
The objective of the scheme is to provide investment returns that, before expenses,
closely correspond to the performance and yield of the basket of securities underlying the
S&P CNX NIFTY Index.
An open-ended equity fund investing a minimum of 80% in equity and equity related
instruments. It aims at enabling members to avail tax rebate under Section 88 of the IT
Act and provide them with the benefits of growth
UTI – MEPUS:
The scheme primarily aims at securing for the investors capital appreciation by investing
the funds of the scheme in equity shares of companies with good growth prospects.
An open-end equity fund aiming to provide benefit of capital appreciation and income
distribution through investment in equity.
Mastergain is open-ended equity scheme with an objective of investing at least 80% of its
funds in equity and equity related instrument with medium to high risk profile and upto
20% in debt and money market instruments with low to medium risk profile.
An open-ended fund which invests exclusively in the equities of the Petro Sector
companies. One of the Growth Sectors Funds aiming to provide growth of capital over a
period of time as well as to make income distribution from
investment in stocks of Petro Sector.
An open-ended fund which exclusively invests in the equities of the Pharma and
Healthcare sector companies. This fund is one of the growth sector funds aiming to invest
in companies engaged in business of manufacturing and marketing of bulk drug,
formulations and healthcare products and services.
An open-ended fund which invests exclusively in the equities of the Software Sector
companies. One of the growth sectors funds aiming to invest in equity shares of
companies belonging to information technology sector to provide returns to investors
through capital growth as well as through regular income distribution.
An open-ended equity fund with the objective to provide Capital appreciation through
investments in the stocks of the companies engaged in the automobile and auto-ancillary
industry.
An open-ended equity fund for investment in equity shares, convertible and non-
convertible debentures and other capital and money market instruments with a provision
to invest upto 50% of its corpus in PSU’s equities and equity related products. The fund
aims to provide unit holders capital appreciation and income distribution.
An open-ended equity fund investing in stocks which are currently under valued to their
future earning potential and carry medium risk profile to provide 'Capital Appreciation'
An open-ended equity fund with the objective to invest predominantly in the equity
shares of multinational companies in diverse sectors such as FMCG, Pharmaceutical,
Engineering etc.
An open-ended debt oriented fund investing a minimum of 90% of its exclusively in the
equities of companies having strong products or corporate brands to provide investors
benefits of capital appreciation.
An open-ended equity fund with the objective to provide capital appreciation through
investment in companies from the universe of top 50 companies in terms of market
capitalization
An open-ended equity fund with the objective to provide Capital appreciation through
investing in the stocks of the companies engaged in the sectors like Metals, Building
materials, oil and gas, power, chemicals, engineering etc. The fund will invest in the
stocks of the companies which form part of Basic Industries.
An open-ended equity fund with the objective to provide Capital appreciation through
investing in the stocks of the companies where the State/Central Govt owns the majority
of the holding or management control is vested with State/Central Govt.
UTI Spread funds a market-neutral equity fund with the returns and safety of debt. A fund
that takes advantage of arbitrage opportunities between the spot and futures markets. The
fund where returns are not linked to the rise or fall of equity markets.
The investment objective of the scheme is to provide medium to long term capital
appreciation alongwith income tax benefit.
An open-ended balance fund investing 40% to 60% in equality related securities and the
balance in debt (fixed income securities) with a view to generate regular income together
with capital appreciation
UTI - US 2002:
An open-ended debt oriented fund with investment in Debt/G-Sec of minimum 60% and
a maximum of 40% in Equity. Investment can be made in the name of the children upto
the age of 15 years so as to provide them, after they attain the age of 18 years, a means to
receive scholarship to meet the cost of higher education and/or to help them in setting up
a profession, practice or business or enabling them to set up a home or finance the cost of
other social obligation.
An open-ended balanced fund with a maximum equity allocation of 40% and the balance
in debt. This ensures to provide pension to investors particularly self-employed persons
after they attain age of 58 years, in the form of periodical cash flow upto the extent of
repurchase value of their holding through systematic withdrawal plan.
UTI – CRTS:
This is an open-end income oriented scheme. The scheme aims at catering to the
investment needs of charitable, religious, educational trusts and similar institutions to
provide them an investment vehicle to avail of tax exemption and also to have regular
income.
UTI – ULIP:
An open-ended balanced fund with an objective of investing not more than 40% of the
funds in equity and equity related instruments and balance in debt and money market
instruments with low to medium risk profile.
RISK FACTOR:
Risk Factors
Mutual Funds and securities investments are subject to market risks and there can be no
assurance or guarantee that the Schemes objectives will be achieved. As with any
investment in securities, the Net Asset Value of Units issued under the Schemes may go
up or down depending on the various factors and forces affecting the capital market. Past
performance of the Sponsors/ AMC/ Mutual Fund/ Schemes and its affiliates do not
indicate the future performance of the Schemes of the Mutual Fund. The Sponsors are not
responsible or liable for any loss or shortfall resulting from the operations of the Schemes
beyond their contribution of Rs.10,000/- each made by them towards setting of the
Mutual Fund The Names of the Schemes do not in any manner indicate either the quality
of the Schemes or their future prospects and returns. Investors in the Schemes are not
being offered any guarantee / assured returns. Please read the Offer Documents carefully
before investing.
Statutory Details
In terms of The Unit Trust of India (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act 2002
(“Act”), the assets and liabilities of the erstwhile Unit Trust of India have been bifurcated
into two parts the specified undertaking and the specified company. The Administrator of
the Specified Undertaking of The Unit Trust of India comprises of US 64 and the assured
return schemes (most of which have since been converted into tax free bonds, the present
investment is guaranteed by the Govt. of India) . The Specified Company has been set up
as a mutual fund viz. UTI MF, comprising of all net asset value based schemes. UTI MF
has been structured in accordance with SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 The
mutual fund was registered with SEBI on January 14, 2003 under Registration Code
MF/048/03/01.
ULIPs: A comparison
1. Fixed monthly expenses for some companies are subject to inflation-based indexation
and may change in the future.
2. An annual charge of Rs. 2.88 per thousand face amount will be deducted in the first 10
years of the policy except in the second year where it will be Rs. 15.24 per thousand face
amount. From the 11th year onwards this annual charge will increase subject to a
maximum of 3.75% per year
3. Companies reserve the right to change their policies anytime in the future.
14 1 3 6
Performance (%) as on Nov 21, 2006 Date 1 year
days month months months
Nov 21,
Unit Scheme 2002 - Growth 0.29 1.4 7.14 7.47 26.47
2006
Nov 21,
Unit Scheme 2002 - Growth 0.29 1.4 7.14 7.47 26.47
2006
Unit Scheme 2002 - Income Nov 21, 0.29 1.4 7.05 7.47 26.47
2006
May 30,
Unit Scheme 64 7.97 - 7.08 8.88 8.51
2003
Mar 30,
UTI Balanced Fund - Dividend -6.93 -10.33 -15.44 -11.18 -5.8
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Balanced Fund - Growth 3.43 -0.3 -6.02 -1.3 4.71
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Childrens Career Balanced Plan 1.05 -0.4 -3.44 -1.28 6.28
2007
Nov 17,
UTI GUP 94 1.29 2.5 8.61 12.61 12.3
2004
Mar 30,
UTI Mahila Unit Scheme 2.34 1.43 0.14 4.04 17.2
2007
Mar 30,
UTI ULIP 2.4 1.08 -0.92 1.57 2.36
2007
Average performance of similar category funds 2.01 0.17 -1.95 6.06 13.15
NSE Nifty 2.64 -1.98 -0.26 8.94 18.91
Performance Comparison Of Selected Schemes
14 1 3 6
Performance (%) as on Mar 30, 2007 Date 1 year
days month months months
S&P CNX NIFTY UTI National Mar 30,
6.01 2.25 -3.12 7.37 13.18
Depository Receipts Scheme 2007
UTI Capital Protection Oriented Scheme- Mar 30,
0.67 -0.13 - - -
Series I - 3 Yrs - Div 2007
Mar 30,
UTI Wealth Builder Fund - Growth 6.05 1.8 -2.68 - -
2007
UTI Capital Protection Oriented Scheme- Mar 30,
0.67 -0.13 - - -
Series I - 3 Yrs - Div 2007
UTI Capital Protection Oriented Scheme- Mar 30,
0.67 -0.13 - - -
Series I - 3 Yrs - Gth 2007
UTI Capital Protection Oriented Scheme- Mar 30,
0.83 -0.33 - - -
Series I - 5 Yrs - Div 2007
UTI Capital Protection Oriented Scheme- Mar 30, 0.83 -0.33 - - -
Series I - 5 Yrs - Gth 2007
Mar 30,
UTI Contra Fund - Dividend 5.96 1.23 -7.17 -6.79 -
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Contra Fund - Growth 5.96 1.23 -7.17 -6.79 -
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Dividend Yield Fund - Dividend 5.71 1.82 -0.26 3.5 5.87
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Dividend Yield Fund - Growth 5.68 1.76 -0.26 3.44 6.26
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Dynamic Equity Fund - Dividend 1.64 -3.62 -9.56 3.65 -8.65
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Dynamic Equity Fund - Growth 1.67 -3.59 -9.53 3.7 -8.7
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Equity Fund - Dividend 4.99 -0.28 -5.77 -0.28 -3.91
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Equity Fund - Growth 4.99 -0.29 -5.71 -0.39 -4.12
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Equity Tax Savings Plan - Dividend 4.92 -0.38 -9.07 -0.29 -5.35
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Equity Tax Savings Plan - Growth 4.98 -0.39 -9.05 -0.25 -5.33
2007
Jul 15,
UTI Grandmaster - 1993 2.43 3.91 14.54 18.8 54.85
2005
UTI Growth & Value Fund - Annual Mar 30,
4.83 0.05 -5.22 7.05 1
Dividend 2007
Feb 1,
UTI Growth & Value Fund - Bonus 5.54 -2.3 15.15 27.92 -
2005
Mar 30,
UTI Growth & Value Fund - Growth 4.84 0.05 -5.27 6.97 0.98
2007
UTI Growth & Value Fund - Semi Annual Mar 30,
4.88 0.06 -5.21 6.98 1.06
Dividend 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Brand Value - Mar 30,
5.18 0.67 -5.29 0.21 -0.71
Dividend 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Brand Value - Mar 30, 5.11 0.67 -5.42 0.2 -0.7
Growth 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Petro - Mar 30,
4.14 -0.06 -3.18 -2.12 -1.82
Dividend 2007
Mar 30,
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Petro - Growth 4.16 -0.12 -3.17 -2.13 -1.86
2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Pharma and Mar 30,
5.82 3.05 -3.32 0.42 -6.84
Healthcare - Dividend 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Pharma and Mar 30,
5.87 3.07 -3.25 0.47 -6.82
Healthcare - Growth 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Services - Mar 30,
3.68 1.35 -5.17 13.46 14.63
Dividend 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Services - Mar 30,
3.78 1.45 -4.94 13.83 15.03
Growth 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Software - Mar 30,
0.89 0.31 -1.56 24.34 30.57
Dividend 2007
UTI Growth Sector Fund - Software - Mar 30,
0.86 0.37 -1.46 24.44 30.63
Growth 2007
UTI Index Advantage Fund - BSE Sensex Jun 30,
4.3 8.3 12.85 10.83 48.25
Plan 2005
Jun 30,
UTI Index Advantage Fund - Nifty Plan 4.75 7.81 12.2 8.92 48.44
2005
Mar 30,
UTI Index Select Fund - Dividend 5.79 1.75 -5.03 3.27 12.59
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Index Select Fund - Growth 5.78 1.77 -5.02 3.25 12.69
2007
UTI India Advantage Equity Fund - Mar 30,
3.14 -2.83 -4.94 13.53 6.91
Dividend 2007
UTI India Advantage Equity Fund - Mar 30,
3.14 -2.83 -4.94 13.53 6.91
Growth 2007
Mar 30,
UTI Leadership Equity Fund - Dividend 5.79 0.43 -5.26 7.34 10.17
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Leadership Equity Fund - Growth 5.7 0.34 -5.34 7.25 10.08
2007
UTI Long Term Advantage Fund - Apr 1, NA NA NA NA NA
Dividend 2007
UTI Long Term Advantage Fund - Apr 1,
NA NA NA NA NA
Growth 2007
Mar 28,
UTI MEP 93 -4.22 -5.55 1.6 -4.99
2003
Mar 28,
UTI MEP 94 -5.49 -7.15 3.39 -5.26
2003
Mar 28,
UTI MEP 95 -5.49 -7.96 -2.06 -9.51
2003
Mar 28,
UTI MEP 96 -3.5 -5.52 3.77 -4.43
2003
Mar 28,
UTI MEP 97 -3.51 -4.92 4.73 -2.89
2003
Jul 15,
UTI MEP 98 2.04 3.47 7.53 11.24 45.91
2005
Jul 15,
UTI MEP 99 1.63 3.85 7.56 12.31 46.63
2005
Mar 30,
UTI-MEPUS 5.98 0.35 -7.6 0.92 3.54
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Master Growth - Dividend 5.26 1.26 -6.29 4.06 5.4
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Master Growth - Growth 5.28 1.29 -6.25 4.12 5.49
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Master Index Fund - Dividend 5.18 1.08 -5.15 4.82 16.02
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Master Index Fund - Growth 5.18 1.08 -5.15 4.82 16.02
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Master Value Fund - Dividend 2.55 -2.91 -11.09 -2.85 -7.37
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Master Value Fund - Growth 2.53 -2.93 -11.1 -2.86 -7.24
2007
UTI Masterplus Unit Scheme 91 - Mar 30,
6.22 0.59 -6.86 6.08 10.8
Dividend 2007
UTI Masterplus Unit Scheme 91 - Growth Mar 30, 6.19 0.65 -6.93 6.03 10.21
2007
Mar 30,
UTI MNC Fund - Dividend 3.79 -1.09 -5.96 -0.66 -9.81
2007
Mar 30,
UTI MNC Fund - Growth 3.81 -1.06 -5.93 -0.67 -9.83
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Nifty Fund - Dividend 6.01 2.19 -3.29 7 12.77
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Nifty Fund - Growth 6.01 2.19 -3.29 7 12.78
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Opportunities Fund - Dividend 6.13 0.17 -5.31 -6.15 -11.97
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Opportunities Fund - Growth 6.19 0.15 -5.3 -6.05 -11.82
2007
Jul 15,
UTI Primary Equity Fund 2.06 2.72 7.59 9.41 39.75
2005
Mar 30,
UTI Spread Fund - Dividend 0.44 1 2.62 4.54 -
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Spread Fund - Growth 0.44 1 2.62 4.54 -
2007
UTI Thematic Auto Sector Fund - Mar 30,
1.94 -5.34 -13.18 -11.54 -11.54
Dividend 2007
Mar 30,
UTI Thematic Auto Sector Fund - Growth 2.03 -5.27 -13.09 -11.38 -11.42
2007
UTI Thematic Banking Sector Fund - Mar 30,
6.78 1.53 -5.32 9.46 23.99
Dividend 2007
UTI Thematic Banking Sector Fund - Mar 30,
6.84 1.6 -5.25 9.64 24.16
Growth 2007
UTI Thematic Infrastructure Fund - Mar 30,
5.62 0 -9.01 8.39 12.48
Dividend 2007
UTI Thematic Infrastructure Fund - Mar 30,
5.61 0.04 -8.97 8.47 12.66
Growth 2007
Mar 30,
UTI Thematic Large Cap Fund - Dividend 4.44 0.98 -5.73 0.73 2.68
2007
UTI Thematic Large Cap Fund - Growth Mar 30, 4.49 0.96 -5.7 0.69 2.95
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Thematic Mid Cap Fund - Dividend 2.63 -3.78 -11.9 -0.77 18.06
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Thematic Mid Cap Fund - Growth 2.64 -3.78 -11.86 -0.7 18.08
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Thematic PSU Fund - Dividend 6.95 1.92 -3.18 1.71 -3.62
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Thematic PSU Fund - Growth 6.98 2 -3.07 1.81 -3.37
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Mastershare - Dividend 5.18 0.84 -4.76 5.24 4.83
2007
Mar 30,
UTI Mastershare - Growth 5.19 0.86 -4.73 5.23 4.69
2007
Jul 15,
UTI US 92 3.02 4.12 8.26 12.83 49.45
2005
UTI Variable Investment Scheme - Mar 30,
3.11 0.92 -1.84 1.28 4.14
Dividend 2007
UTI Variable Investment Scheme - Mar 30,
3.11 0.92 -1.84 1.28 4.14
Growth 2007
Mar 30,
UTI Wealth Builder Fund - Dividend 6.05 1.8 -2.68 - -
2007
Average performance of similar category funds 3.64 -0.26 -4.93 5.35 8.37
BSE Sensex 1.81 -2.54 -1.38 8.57 22.56
NSE Nifty 2.64 -1.98 -0.26 8.94 18.91
Lifex 2.9 -0.6 -2.11 -1.04 -1.06
Mindex 2.91 -1.02 9.15 25.65 38.13
Brandex 0.12 -4.1 -8.95 -12.37 -13.36
IBEX 0.08 0.21 -0.93 2.58 5.15
Performance Comparison Of Selected Schemes Of Different Mutual Funds:
200
7
Can Multicap Mar NA 0.83 NA NA NA
Fund - Dividend 30,
200
7
Can Multicap Mar NA 0.83 NA NA NA
Fund - Growth 30,
200
7
Canbonus Dec 3.05 8.75 23.9 57.5 26.44
21,
200
4
Canequity Mar 5.82 -0.45 -6.8 4.95 -14.13
Diversified - 30,
Bonus 200
7
Canequity Mar 5.85 -0.42 -6.75 4.99 -3.37
Diversified - 30,
Growth 200
7
Canequity Mar 5.82 -0.45 -6.8 4.95 -3.46
Diversified - 30,
Income 200
7
Canequity Mar NA -28.91 -31.69 -20.13 -25.42
Taxsaver 30,
200
7
Canexpo - Growth Mar 4.14 2.29 -4.43 5.71 0.06
Plan 30,
200
7
ABN AMRO Asset Management (India) Limited is the AMC to the ABN AMRO
mutual fund. ABN AMRO Bank NV holds 75 per cent stake in the AMC. As of Aug
2006, the fund has assets of over Rs.4, 176 crore under management.
Here is a list of mutual funds of ABN AMRO:
Equity Schemes:
ABN AMRO Equity Fund
ABN AMRO Opportunities Fund
ABN AMRO Dividend Yield Fund
ABN AMRO Tax Advantage Plan (ELSS)
ABN AMRO Future Leaders Fund
Income Schemes:
ABN AMRO Monthly Income Plan
ABN AMRO Flexi Debt Fund
ABN AMRO Long Term Floating Rate Fund
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 1
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 2: Thirteen Month Plan
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 2: Half Yearly Plan A
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 2: Quarterly Plan D
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 2: Quarterly Plan E
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 3: Quarterly Plan A
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 3: Yearly Plan
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 3: Quarterly Plan B
ABN AMRO Fixed Term Plan - Series 3: Quarterly Plan C
Liquid Schemes:
ABN AMRO Floating Rate Fund
ABN AMRO Cash Fund
Birla Sun life Mutual Fund:
Birla Sun life Mutual Fund is one of India's leading mutual funds with assets of
over Rs.17, 098 crore under management as of Aug 2006. Birla Sun Life Asset
Management Company Limited, the investment manager of Birla Sun life Mutual
Fund, is a joint venture between the Aditya Birla Group and Sun Life Financial
Services, leading international financial services organization.
Established in 1994, Birla Sun life AMC provides investors a range of 18 investment
options, which include diversified and sector specific equity schemes, a wide range of
debt and treasury products, and two offshore funds. Both the sponsors have equal
stakes in the AMC In recognition to its high quality investment products, Birla Sun
Life AMC became India's first asset management company to be awarded the coveted
ISO 9001:2000 certification by DNV Netherlands.
Equity:
Birla Long Term Advantage
Birla Advantage Fund
Birla Dividend Yield Plus
Birla Equity Plan
Birla Index Fund
Birla India Opportunities Fund
Birla Midcap Fund
Birla MNC Fund
Birla Tax Plan 98
Birla India GenNext Fund
Birla Top 100 Fund
Birla Infrastructure Fund
Birla Sun Life Tax Relief'96
BSL-New Millennium Fund
BSL - Equity Fund
BSL - Buy India Fund
BSL - Basic Industries Fund
BSL - Frontline Equity Fund
Debt Schemes:
Birla Floating Rate Fund
Birla Cash Plus
Birla Income Plus
Birla Gilt Plus
Birla FMP
Birla Bond Index Fund
Birla Dynamic Bond Fund
Birla Fixed Term Debt Fund Series 1
Birla Fixed Term Debt Fund Series 2
Birla Fixed Term Debt Fund Series 3
Birla Sun Life - Cash Manager
Hybrid Schemes:
Birla Balance
Birla Sun Life 95' Fund
Birla MIP
Birla MIP II
Birla Asset Allocation Fund
Offshore Schemes:
India Advantage Fund
Excel India Fund
Tata mutual fund, set up in 1995, is one of the leading private sector funds in the
country and is promoted by the Tata group. The sponsors of the fund are Tata Sons
Limited and Tata Investment Corporation Limited.
Tata Asset Management Limited is the investment manager of the mutual fund and has
F K Karavana of Tata Sons as its chairman. The management of the AMC is headed by
Ved Prakash Chaturvedi, managing director. Tata Sons holds a majority stake in the
AMC with the balance being held by Tata Investment Corporation
Tata Mutual Fund offers a wide range of investment products for institutional and
individual investors and as of August 31, 2006, has assets of Rs. 12562.65 crores under
management.
Here is a list of mutual funds of Tata:
Equity Products:
Tata Pure Equity Fund: Ensuring that your hard-earned saving is invested in a way
that earns superior returns.
Tata Tax Saving Fund: Aiming at achieving long term growth of capital along with
income-tax relief for investors
Tata Index Fund: The return depends upon the behavior of index
Tata Equity P/E Fund: The return will be affected by the performance of the company
Debt Fund:
Tata Short Term Bond Fund: It is debt index based fund in the country designed to
track it
Tata Gilt Securities Fund: Onekeep money in liquid form to meet your planned and
unplanned requirement
Tata Income Fund: To meet your needs and need your family .onerequire a study
sources
Tata Income Plus Fund: Safety is an extremely important factor governing our
investment decision.
Tata Fixed Horizon Fund: Its gives return and within time horizon period
Tata Liquid Fund: Onekeep money in liquid from to meet your planned and
unplanned requirement
Principal Mutual Fund
The Principal mutual fund, formerly known as IDBI Principal, is a collaboration
between the Principal Financial Group of the US and nationalized banks Punjab
National Bank and Vijaya Bank. The Principal Financial Group is a 125-year-old
diversified global conglomerate of Financial Services Companies and is the largest
provider of 401 (k) pension plans in the United States.
Principal PNB Asset Management Company Private Limited is the fund manager for
the mutual fund. In all, 65 per cent stake in the AMC is held by the Principal group, 30
per cent by Punjab National Bank and 5 per cent by Vijaya Bank. The operations of the
company are headed by managing director Rajan Ghotgalkar.
Since its inception, the Principal Mutual Fund has launched a series of innovative
investment options. In 2000, it launched India's first Asset Allocation program, branded
as the 'Future Goal Series.' The Principal mutual fund has over Rs.12, 070 crore under
management as of August 2006. Here is a list of mutual funds of Principal:
Equity Funds:
Debt Funds:
Deposit Fund
Specialty Funds:
Balanced Funds:
Fund Comparison-Rating
Fund Launch Catogary Rating Risk Return 1 year Expense
Name grade grade return ratio
DSPML May- Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated 55.95 2.22
T.I.G.E.R 2004 Diversified
.
Franklin Feb- Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated 50.00 1.89
India 2005 Diversified
Flexi Cap
HDFC Dec- Equity: Low Above 53.81 1.93
Equity 1994 Diversified Average
HSBC Dec- Equity: Below Above 44.77 1.99
Equity 2002 Diversified Average Average
ING May- Equity: High Below 39.47 2.50
Vysya 1999 Diversified Average
Select
Stocks
Magnum Feb- Equity: High Above 56.37 2.25
Multiplie 1993 Diversified Average
r Plus
Prudentia Oct- Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated 42.65 2.29
l ICICI 2004 Diversified
Emerging
STAR
Reliance Mar- Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated -- --
Equity 2006 Diversified
Sundara Mar- Equity: Below Average 48.56 2.48
m 1997 Diversified Average
Growth
UTI Jul- Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated -- 2.20
Opportun 2005 Diversified
ities
HDFC Equity 15.55 90/170 7.30 50/147 55.05 19/70 47.38 6/55
ING Vysya 16.64 65/170 5.27 62/147 46.12 44/70 27.49 50/55
Magnum Plus 17.15 52/170 7.31 49/147 68.17 5/70 36.83 27/55
Birla 15.06 8/9 -0.11 8/8 33.93 8/8 52.71 2/8 48.59 1/7
Taxplan
'98
BoB ELSS 5.72 9/9 9.35 4/8 37.84 6/8 53.94 1/8 38.51 2/7
'97
Canequity- 15.20 11/26 -1.77 12/23 36.51 8/20 39.70 16/19 23.28 19/19
Tax Saver
Escorts 14.43 16/26 6.21 2/23 43.67 2/20 45.08 11/19 32.30 11/19
Tax Plan
Franklin 13.30 22/26 3.19 7/23 34.30 10/20 50.03 9/19 37.39 9/19
India
Taxshield
HDFC 18.58 6/26 5.07 4/23 40.00 5/20 67.51 2/19 48.93 3/19
Taxsaver
LICMF 19.12 4/26 3.88 5/23 21.80 18/20 32.84 18/19 26.68 17/19
Tax plan
Magnum 19.14 3/26 5.79 3/23 43.15 3/20 86.71 1/19 49.66 2/19
Taxgain
Fund Comparison-Risk Wise
Birla Mar-1998 Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated 33.93 1.75
Taxplan Tax
'98 Planning
BoB ELSS Mar-1997 Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated 37.84 0.93
'97 Tax
Planning
Canequity- Mar-1993 Equity: High Below 36.51 1.25
Tax Saver Tax Average
Planning
DBS Oct-2005 Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated -- 2.50
Chola Tax Tax
Saver Planning
DWS Tax Feb-2006 Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated -- 2.48
Saving Tax
Planning
Escorts Mar-2000 Equity: Above Average 43.67 2.50
Tax Plan Tax Average
Planning
Fidelity Jan-2006 Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated -- 2.28
Tax Tax
Advantage Planning
Franklin Apr-1999 Equity: Below Average 34.30 2.39
India Tax Average
Taxshield Planning
Kotak Tax Oct-2005 Equity: Not Rated Not Rated Not Rated -- 2.41
Saver Tax
Planning
Magnum Mar-1993 Equity: Average High 43.15 2.29
Tax gain Tax
Planning
Principal Mar-1996 Equity: Average Average 40.47 2.46
Tax Tax
Savings Planning
Picking a mutual fund from among the thousands offered is not easy. Following are some
guidelines:
2. Investors should match the term of the investment to the time period they expect
to keep the investment. Money that may be needed in the short term should
generally be in a less volatile fund, such as a money market fund. Money not
needed until a retirement date decades into the future can reasonably be invested
in longer-term, higher-risk investments, such as stock or bond funds. Investing
short-term money in volatile investments puts the investor at risk of having to sell
when the market is low, thereby incurring a loss. Investing over the long term in
very stable investments, on the other hand, significantly reduces potential returns.
3. Fund expenses degrade investment performance, especially over the long term.
Accordingly, all other things being equal, the lower the expenses, the better. A
mutual fund's expense ratio is required to be disclosed in the prospectus. Expense
ratios are critical in index funds, which seek to match the performance of bond or
stock index. Actively managed funds must pay the manager for the active
management of the portfolio, so they usually have a higher expense ratio than
(passively managed) index funds.
4. Several sector funds often make the "best fund" lists each year. However, the
"best" sector varies from year to year. Most sectors are vulnerable to industry-
wide events that can have a significant negative effect on performance. It is
generally best to avoid making these a large part of one's portfolio.
6. Mutual funds often make taxable distributions near the end of the year (semi-
annual and quarterly distributions are also fairly common). If an investor plans to
invest in a taxable fund, he or she should check the fund company's website to see
when the fund plans to distribute dividends and capital gains. Investing just prior
to the distribution results in part of one's investment being returned as taxable
income without increasing the value of the account.
Investment Details
Fund name Expense Front Back Minimum Portfolio Tenure
ratio% Load End Load Intial Manager (yrs.)
% % Investment
DSPML
1.97 2.25 0.00 5000 Anup Maheshwari 1
Opportunities
Sundaram BNP
2.34 2.25 0.00 5000 Srividhya Rajesh 2
Paribas India
Leadership
HDFC Top 104.50 Mar 30, 2007 0.91 114.86 Feb 08, 200 73.82 Jun 14, 2006
200-G 4 7
Pru ICICI 63.018 Mar 30, 2007 0.65 69.07 Feb 07, 200 40.25 Jun 14, 2006
Dynamic-G 7
Reliance 169.7 Mar 30, 2007 1.16 190.85 Feb 08, 200 115.15 Jun 14, 2006
Vision-G 7
SBI One 9.94 Mar 30, 2007 0.61 10.11 Feb 07, 200 9.77 Mar 05, 2007
India-G 7
Sundaram 27.412 Mar 30, 2007 0.97 31.47 Feb 07, 200 20.16 Jun 14, 2006
BNP Paribas 5 7
India
Leadership-G
Sundaram 86.155 Mar 30, 2007 0.85 96.45 Feb 07, 200 64.50 Jun 14, 2006
BNP Paribas 2 7
Midcap-G
UTI Brand 25.5 Mar 30, 2007 1.27 27.75 Feb 02, 200 19.09 Jun 14, 2006
Value-G 7
Mutual Fund Data for the Month Ended - Feb 28, 2007
Category No. of Sales Redemption Assets Under
new Management
schemes New Existing Total Total as on as on Inflow/
during 28 , 2007
the 2007
month
B Bank 2 453 22157 22610 18493 59410 57513 1897
Sponsored
C Institutions 3 201 9441 9642 10583 11497 12237 -740
D Private Sector and Joint Venture :
I Indian 19 6073 46340 52413 45754 81840 77701 4139
III 16 3632 39168 42800 40532 83693 84307 -614
Predominantly
Foreign
II 15 5497 65666 71163 57591 116870 107904 8966
Predominantly
Indian
Grand Total 55 15856 182772 198628 172953 353310 339662 13648
(A+B+C+D)
ELSS
- - - - - -
Gilt
- - - - - -
Growth
- - 3 1071 3 1071
Income
- - 52 14785 52 14785
Liquid/Money
Market - - - - - -
Total
- - 55 15856 55 15856
29 653 9 - 38 653
ELSS
28 88 - - 28 88
Gilt
Balanced
34 458 3 - 37 458
ELSS
29 653 9 - 38 653
Gilt
28 88 - - 28 88
Growth
208 6807 17 1071 225 7878
Income
128 -275 177 16827 305 16552
Liquid/Money
Market 54 172999 - - 54 172999
Total
481 180730 206 17898 687 198628
Every year, the month of February is earmarked for the Union Budget. Often all the
excitement and hype surrounding it tends to dwarf other relevant issues. For investors,
fact sheets serve as guides and vital sources of information of mutual fund schemes.
However, we believe that the information provided by the AMCs (Asset Management
Companies) in these fact sheets is often inadequate and/or incoherent.
This month the equity markets fell sharply and closed in negative terrain. The BSE
Sensex shed 8.18% during the month to close at 12,938 points; the S&P CNX Nifty
slumped even harder to settle at 3,745 points (down 8.27%). The CNX Midcap posted a
In February 2007, Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) were net buyers of equities with
purchases of Rs 55,954 m (as on February 28, 2007). On the contrary mutual funds were
Another issue, that requires immediate attention, is the lack of availability of basic
information in public domain. By basic information, we are referring to the information
on benchmark indices. Unlike the information on equity benchmark indices (BSE Sensex
and S&P CNX Nifty, to name the most popular ones), which is available in public
domain, the information on benchmark indices for other categories (like balanced funds,
MIPs and debt funds) is hard to find these days. The reason - information on these
categories has become “paid” for some time now. Thus, if a retail investor wants to
compare the performance of the relevant mutual fund with the benchmark index, it’s not
possible for him to do so.
Analysis of Data on Basis Different Parameters
BoB ELSS '97 Not Rated 8.10 0.44 0.94 1.01 0.69
The objective of the ongoing work at hand was to present a brief idea about the mutual
fund – its type, its performance in the country, its future scope along with a emphasis
upon comparing type of schemes.
The kick started with an introduction to MF. Followed by an exhaustive literature survey
covering each and every aspect, strictly covering within the domain of mutual fund at
every stage.
A plot of fund return was established hereby making it possible for as to determine the
indicators of MF. Performance namely Beta, standard deviation, r-square.
UTI equity fund is rated five stars amongst the foresaid schemes
In spite of the wide disparity prevalent amongst the schemes under consideration with
respect to their r-square values, these schemes have one thing more or less in common
standard deviation. A high standard deviation for all the schemes suggested that their will
definitely be a pinch of salt in the investment in these schemes. It also cautions the
investors to be judicious about their investment and make calculated risks while
expecting to reap the benefit
During the course of this two month wherein i was completely involved in project work, I
interacted with the current as well as prospective customers of the financial institutions.
In this two way interaction, I came across a few aspects which do need a special mention.
There is a low level of finance literacy in India. This is a clear cut indication that there
might be even lower awareness about financial product in rural India. Effort must be
made to increase the financial awareness amongst the masses.
A substantial amount of mutual fund investment comes from upper class. Only those
middle class people who are financially educated pool their money in these products.
People need to be educated mutual fund product and their benefits the understanding of
net assets values, the fact that return are not assured mutual fund is not a fixed income
and capital guarantee. Unless the company is comfortable about the fact that there are
people who understand the product, only them could their product be sold there.
Suggestions
Although their portfolio are well diversified but mostly of them are equity
oriented. So, there is more risk in terms of return because return on equity is
uncertain. So they should keep a balance between equity and debt
investments.
UTI MF should have a comprehensive risk measurement system that serves as
a single point indicator of diverse risk factors
The Indian Market is very huge for the Mutual Fund. So UTI MF should
increase the awareness amongst Indian people and take the benefit of this huge
untapped market
Brown, Stephen J., and William N. Goetzmann, 1995, Performance Persistence, Journal
of Finance, 50(2), 679–698.
Brown, Stephen J., William N. Goetzmann, Roger G. Ibbotson, and Stephen A. Ross,
1992, Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies, Review of Financial Studies, 5(4),
553–580.
Brown, Stephen J.,William N. Goetzmann, and Stephen A. Ross, 1995, Survival, Journal
of Finance, 50(3), 853–873.
Chang, Eric C., and Wilbur G. Lewellen, 1985, An Arbitrage Pricing Approach to
EvaluatingMutual Fund Performance, Journal of Financial Research, 8(1), 15–30.
Connor, Gregory, and Robert A. Korajczyk, 1986, Performance Measurement with the
Arbitrage Pricing Theory: A New Framework for Analysis, Journal of Financial
Economics, 15(3), 373–394.
Cornell, Bradford, 1979, Asymmetric Information and Portfolio Performance
Measurement, Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 381–390.
Dybvig, Philip H., and Stephen A. Ross, 1985a, The Analytics of Performance
Measurement a Security Market Line, Journal of Finance, 40(2), 401–416. , 1985b,
Performance Measurement using Differential Information and a Security Market Line,
Journal of Finance, 40(2), 383–399.
Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, and Christopher R. Blake, 1996, The Persistence of
Risk-Adjusted Mutual Fund Performance, Journal of Business, 69(2), 133–157.
Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, Sanjiv Das, and Matthew Hlavka, 1993, Efficiency
with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios,
Review of Financial Studies, 6(1), 1–22.
Bibliography
Aldenderfer, Mark S., Roger K. Blashfield (1984). Cluster analysis. Series title: Sage
university papers series. Quantitative applications in the social sciences no. 07-044.
Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, c1984.
Everitt, Brian S., (1993). Cluster analysis. 3rd ed. London, E. Arnold; New York,
Halsted Press, c1993.
Stanley, T. J., Powell, T., Danko, W. D. (1987). "Trust Marketing: Courting a Segmented
Market". Trusts and Estates v.126, n.11 (Nov 1987):14-20.
Deck, Stewart (1999). "Mining your business". Computerworld, v.33, n.20 (May 17,
1999):94-98.
Axelrod, C. Warren (1996). Cashing in on data mining. Wall Street and Technology, v.14,
n.12 (Dec 1996):60-62.
Capon, N., Fitzsimons, G.J., Prince, R.A. (1996). "An individual level analysis of the
mutual fund investment decision". Journal of Financial Services Research v.10, n.1 (Mar
1996):59-82.
Bence, D., Hapeshi, K., Hussey, R. (1995). "Examining investment information sources
for sophisticated investors using cluster analysis". Accounting and Business Research
v.26, n.1 (Winter 1995):19-26.
Dietz, P.O., Fogler, H.R., Smith, M. (1985). "Factor Analysis of Portfolio Styles".
Interfaces v.15, n.2 (Mar/Apr 1985):50-62.
Gau, George W. (1978). "A Taxonomic Model for the Risk-Rating of Residential
Mortgages". Journal of Business v.51, n.4 (Oct. 1978):687-706.
Lindeman, R.H, Merenda P.F. and Gold, R.Z., (1980). Introduction to bivariate and
multivariate analysis. Glenview, IL, Scott, Foresman, 1980.
Ackert, L.F. (1997), Prior uncertainty, analyst bias, and subsequent abnormal returns,
Journal of Financial Research, 20(2), 263-273.
Ali, A., A. Klein, and J. Rosenfeld (1992), Analysts’ use of information about permanent
and transitory earnings components in forecasting annual
EPS, The Accounting Review, 67(1), 183-198. Ariel, R.A. (1990), High stock returns
before holidays: existence and evidence on possible causes, Journal of Finance, 45(5),
1611-1626.
Arsad, Z. and J.A. Coutts (1997), Security price anomalies in the London International
Stock Exchange: a 60 year perspective, Applied Financial Economics, 7(5), 455-464.
Baker, M. and J.C. Stein (2004), Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator, Journal of
Financial Markets, 7(3), 271-299.
Baker, M. and J. Wurgler (2005), Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock
returns, Journal of Finance, forthcoming.
Banz, R.W. (1981), The relation between return and market value of common stocks,
Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18.
Barberis, N., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny (1998), A model of investor sentiment,
Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307-343.
Barron, O.E., O. Kim, S.C. Lim and D.E. Stevens (1998), Using analysts’ forecasts to
measure properties of analysts’ information environment, The Accounting Review, 73(4),
421-433.
Berk, J.B., R.C. Green, and V. Naik (1999), Optimal investment, growth options, and
security returns, Journal of Finance, 44(5), 1553-1607.
Bernard, V.L. and J.K. Thomas (1989), Post-earnings-announcement drift: delayed price
response or risk premium? Journal of Accounting Research, 27(3), 1-36.
Bernstein, R. (1995), Style investing, John Wiley and Sons, New York. Black, F. (1993),
Beta and return, Journal of Portfolio Management, 20(1), 8-18.
Bogle, J.C. (2005), The mutual fund industry sixty years later: for better or worse?
Financial Analysts Journal, 61(1), 15-24.
Boudoukh, J. and M.P. Richardson (1994), Industry returns and the Fischer effect,
Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1595-1615.
Boudoukh, J., M.P. Richardson and R.F. Whitelaw (1994), A tale of three schools:
insights of autocorrelations of short-horizon stock returns, Review of Financial Studies,
7(3), 539-573.
Buehler, R., D. Griffin and M. Ross (1994), Exploring the "planning fallacy": why people
underestimate their task completion times, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
67(3), 366-381.
Cadsby, C.B. and M. Ratner (1992), Turn-of-month and pre-holiday effects on stock
returns: some international evidence, Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(3), 497-509.
Capaul, C., I. Rowley and W.F. Sharpe (1993), International value and growth stock
returns, Financial Analysts Journal, 49(1), 27-36.
Chan, K.C., N. Chen (1991), Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms,
Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1467-1484.
Chan, L.K.C., Y. Hamao and J. Lakonishok (1991), Fundamentals and stock returns in
Japan, Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1739-1764.
Chan, L.K.C., J. Karceski, and J. Lakonishok (2000), New paradigm or same hype in
equity investing? Financial Analyst Journal, 56(4), 23-36.
Chan, L.K.C., J. Karceski, and J. Lakonishok (2003), The level and persistence of growth
rates, Journal of Finance, 58(2), 643-684.
Chen, H. and DeBondt, W. (2004), Style momentum within the S&P500 index, Journal
of Empirical Finance, 11(4), 483-507.
Christi, W. and R. Huang (1995), Following the Pied Piper: Do individual returns herd
around the market? Financial Analyst Journal, 51(4), 31-37.
Cohen, D., A. Dey, T.Z. Lys and S.V. Sunder (2004), Earnings announcement premia and
the limits to arbitrage, Unpublished Working Paper.
Conrad, J. and G. Kaul (1998), An anatomy of trading strategies, Review of\ Financial
Studies, 11(3), 489-521.
Cooper, M.J., O. Dimitrov and P.R. Rau (2001), A Rose.com by any other name, Journal
of Finance, 56(6), 2371-2388.
Daniel, K., M. Grinblatt, S. Titman and R. Wermers (1997), Measuring mutual fund
performance with characteristic based benchmarks, Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1035-
1058.
De Bondt, W.F.M. and R.M. Thaler (1985), Does the stock market overreact? Journal of
Finance, 40(3), 793-805.
De Bondt, W.F.M. and R.M. Thaler (1987), Further evidence on investor overreaction
and stock market seasonality, Journal of Finance, 42(3), 557- 581.
De Bondt, W.F.M., and R.H. Thaler (1990), Do security analysts overreact? American
Economic Review, 80(2), 52-57.
De Long, J.B., A. Shleifer, L.H. Summers and R.J. Waldmann (1990), Noise trader risk
in financial markets, Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
Wouters, T.I.M. and A. Plantinga (2005), The value premium and changing expectations:
on the growth of value and the value of growth stocks, Working Paper, University of
Groningen.
Wouters, T.I.M. and A. Plantinga (2006), Style popularity and the comovement of stocks,
Working Paper, University of Groningen.