Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Batch: MESM-172
Date: 18/08/2017
Submitted by:
Sadiyya Sultana, Sarowar Jahan, Zabead Kayser, Ikram
Hossain, Abdisalam Omar Nalaye
Letter of Transmittal
Dear Sir,
It is our pleasure to submit you our case study report on the “Effectiveness of
Wastewater Treatment From Dyeing Plants in Dhaka”.
We have prepared this report based on the data gathered from three dyeing
plants and their respective Effluent Treatment Plants (ETPs) within the Gazipur
and Savar areas of Dhaka, secondary sources of data, and related
organizations. Reliable and valid information was used to prepare the
following report.
We strongly feel that our topic is of significant importance for its contribution
to furthering our knowledge on harmful and environmentally damaging
practices within the RMG sector, and we believe that our case study’s results
can contribute to improving environmental policies and regulations within this
industry.
We apologize for any inconvenience that you may face during the review of this
report, and our team will be available for any clarification that is required.
Regards,
2
1. Introduction – Background and Rationale .............................................................................. 4
2. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 10
3. Results ................................................................................................................................................ 14
4. Discussion ......................................................................................................................................... 16
5. Limitations ........................................................................................................................................ 18
6. References ......................................................................................................................................... 19
3
1. Introduction – Background and Rationale
The Ready Made Garments (RMG) sector has been the largest contributor to
exponential economic growth in Bangladesh. Starting from its origins in the late 1970s, the
industry has grown rapidly, and within the span of four decades, providing jobs for some
50% of the total industrial workforce and contributing towards 9.5% of the country’s GDP
However, the industry has been identified as one of the major sources of pollution in
the country, due to the activities involved in the processing end - slashing, bleaching,
mercerizing, screen printing, yarn dyeing and fancy dyeing. Chemicals used in these
compounds, and copper ammonium carbonates (Sultana et al. 2013). These production
processes not only use large volumes of water, but also generate wastewater in large
quantities. Most of this wastewater comprises of chemicals such as oil, grease, ammonia,
sulfide, leads, artificial colors and dyes, hazardous pollutants, heavy metals and other toxic
substances. The organic compounds degrade the water quality during decomposition by
depleting the dissolved oxygen levels. The non-biodegradable organic compounds tend to
persist in the water system for a long time, and pass into the food chain. Inorganic pollutants,
such as metallic salts, and basic and acidic compounds undergo different interactions, and
deteriorate the water quality. A large amount of salt being released into the wastewater is a
major concern, as most of it is not removed by the conventional method of effluent treatment
A major concern in this sector has focused on textile dyeing factories, which generate
a large amount of wastewater on a regular basis, usually into the surrounding water
4
channels, agricultural fields, irrigation channels, drains, surface water sources, etc. (Munnaf
et al. 2014). This has irreversible damage to ecosystem and aquatic life, as well as on fisheries
and the agricultural economy. There is continuous change in the chemical, biological, and
physical properties of the aquatic environment from the release of textile and dyeing
industrial effluents, such as in temperature, color, odor, noise, turbidity, etc. The presence of
dyes in the water is not only aesthetically objectionable, but can cause many water borne
diseases through the mucous membrane, causing dermatitis, perforation of the nasal
septum, and severe irritation of the respiratory tract (Islam et al. 2011). Sulphates being
released into the wastewater, are converted to poisonous hydrogen sulphide, and a large
amount of evidence shows that residual textile dyes released into the wastewater acts as
respiratory sensitizers and can lead to coughs and asthma (Sultana et al. 2013). Untreated
wastewater can cause rapid depletion of dissolved oxygen if it is directly discharged into the
surface water sources due to the high Biological Oxygen Demand value (BOD). Effluents with
high BOD levels are highly toxic to aquatic life (Hasan et al. 2016).
Within dyeing industries, dyes are generally described as a coloured substance, which
have an affinity to a substrate to which they are being applied. A dye-contaminated effluent
contains residual dye and is defined as a soluble substance used for staining or colouring.
Textiles are generally dyed using reactive, dispersed, indanthrene or other kinds of dyes. Due
to the concern regarding the composition of the wastewater released from dyeing plants and
to mitigate the damaging effects of the released wastewater into the environment (Islam et
al. 2011).
5
Table 1: Types of pollution associated with various coloration processes (Aquatech
guidelines for the issuance of Environmental Clearance Certificates, fabric dyeing industries
fall under the Red category, which indicates that they must apply and submit an Effluent
Treatment Plant plan along with process flow diagrams, location, design and time schedule
to the Department of Environment (DoE) and Bangladesh Standard for Wastewater from
Industrial Units as per the ECR, 1997. According to the existing laws, all textile and dyeing
factories must have ETPs that must be operating throughout the entire year and all these
ETPs must meet the national water quality standards as well. However, the current scenario
describes a situation that is altogether different. A large number of knit and textile industries
do not have any ETPs. A lot of factories that did have ETPs had kept them closed most of the
time in order to save on electricity. There are a few dyeing plants that do have their own
ETPs, but do not run them up to the mark and are usually not compliant with the DoE
6
knowledge of the ETP operators are some of the reasons why ETPs do not perform up to the
standards.
ETPs function through a process design in order to treat industrial wastewater for its
reuse and safe disposal into the environment. Untreated wastewater is classified as the
influent, effluents are the treated industrial wastewater and the sludge is the residual solid
parts that are separated out from the wastewater by the ETP. The effluent from the plants
must meet the national effluent discharge quality standards before their discharge into the
environment. There are various types of ETPs and their design varies depending on the
quantity and quality of the effluent, amount of money available for construction, operation
and maintenance and the land available. There are three mechanisms for treatment, which
are primarily physical, chemical and biological. These mechanisms are often combined
together in a single ETP. Four levels of treatment exist, as outlined below (Hasan et al. 2016):
Preliminary: this involves the removal of large solids that may result in the damage
Primary: this requires the removal of floating and settable materials, such as
Secondary: this involves the removal of biodegradable organic matter and suspended
solids.
A typical ETP will consist of an entrance screening unit, followed by an equalization tank and
flocculation and clarifier. One or more biological treatment unit along with the clarifier will
7
be used after the physiochemical treatment units. Wastewater from the biological unit is
treated with filters depending on the wastewater quality (Khan et al. 2009). There are
usually many ways of combining the operations and processes within an ETP. A biological
treatment plant will usually include screening, equalization, pH control, aeration and
settling, in order to satisfy the BOD, ph, TSS, oil and grease requirements. These are however
often ineffective due to the complex chemicals within dyes and because it is difficult for the
microbes to degrade them, and there is usually no color removal. Physiochemical treatment
is often combined with biological treatment, where the typical plant components are used
The physiochemical treatment always precedes the biological treatment units (Hasan et al.
2016). In addition to BOD, COD, TSS, pH, parameters of importance also include color,
odour, total dissolved solids (TSS), turbidity, conductivity, dissolved oxygen (DO),
Fig 1: The figure shows the typical process design layout of an ETP.
8
Table 2: The table below outlines the list of parameters to be checked at different
In order to investigate the current effectiveness of the ETPs of dyeing plants within
the Dhaka area, our team had conducted a case study within the Gazipur and Savar districts
of the Dhaka division, where three dyeing plants were chosen and wastewater samples were
collected. Our main objective was to capture the current situation of dyeing plants and their
wastewater effluent characteristics and determine if the parameters were up to the DoE
standards in Bangladesh, and if these plants were compliant with the environmental
to the pollution levels of dyeing plants and their activities and contribute to this body of
literature, so that recommendations can be provided to improve current ETP operations and
implement policies that introduce better monitoring methods and mitigating measures for
9
2. Methodology
Three dyeing plants were chosen for the study area, two of them in the Gazipur
(Hotapara and Rajendrapur) area and one in Savar (Hemayetpur), of Dhaka. These areas
were chosen due to the locations due to their central location and close proximity to the city
and the presence of authentic ETPs on site. Wastewater samples were collected at three
different points – untreated wastewater effluent from the dyeing plant, the effluent from the
ETP and water from water canals and waterways nearest to the dyeing plants and ETP
locations. The untreated water sample was collected from the wastewater deposit tank, and
the treated sample was collected from the delivery tank of the ETP. These samples were
collected over a one-day period, on a rainy day. ETP plants were located beside the
dyeing/washing plant on the same premises of the textile factories. The operators, managers
and supervisors were interviewed on the general specifications of their ETPs and process
10
Collection from delivery tanks at ETP outlet.
All samples were brought in for laboratory analysis and the following parameters were
Total Suspended Solids (TSS) – TSS is mainly organic in nature, are visible and can be
sedimentation.
11
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS): TDS are the solids that are actually in solution, and includes
hardness, alkalinity, cyanuric acid, chlorides, bromides, sulfates, silicates and other organic
compounds. TDS refers to the total amount of mobile charged ions dissolved in a given
volume of water, and expressed in units of mg per unit volume of water (mg/L).
pH – The term used to describe the intensity of the acid or alkalinity. It represents the
important parameter to measure and assess water quality because of its influence on
solution, which relates to the ability of the material to conduct electrical current through it.
12
Turbidity – The turbidity of water is the measure of the degree to which water loses its
transparency due to the presence of suspended particles. The more total suspended solids
in the water, the murkier it seems and the higher the turbidity.
BOD and COD levels could not be determined due to laboratory equipment
limitations. However, one of the plants had kindly provided us with their data on the BOD
Turbidity (NTU) 10
DO (mg/L) 4.5-8
pH 6-9
After testing and observing the above parameters, the results were then compared to
each other in their different stages of treatment and discharge and the following table was
used to compare our observed values to the Bangladesh Standard for Wastewater from
Industrial Units for inland surface water per the ECR, 1997 and the DoE standards. The
analysis carried out of the results was preliminary in nature. However, we believe that the
following results are sufficient for our understanding of the effectiveness of the ETPs and can
be used for monitoring performances of the treatment plant. For the purposes of our case
study and confidentiality, the three dyeing plants were assigned arbitrary letters, A, B and C
in their classification.
13
3. Results
The tables below show the results obtained from the measurements of the water
parameters in the laboratory, for plant A, B and C. Waterway/canal water samples could not
DO TSS TDS
SL Smell Type pH EC Turbidity
(mg/Ltr) (mg/ltr) (mg/L)
Non
1 Bad Treated 9.65 1 333 540 663 31.63
Water
ETP
2 Bad Treated 7.77 0.54 306 202.85 612 0
Water
Water
from
outside of
3 Bad
Industry
7.49 5.65 41.8 160 834 29.54
(canal
water)
pH is an indicator of the existence of biological life, as most of them thrive in a quite
narrow and critical pH range. The pH of the wastewater from all the plants were generally
very alkaline, but the ETP treated water, as well as the water sample obtained from the canal
water showed the pH to be within the DoE range. Interestingly, for Plants B and C, the TSS of
77 mg/L and 227 mg/L respectively was higher than the non-treated effluent samples. Plant
A recorded the highest observed TSS value, at 333 mg/L, but showed a significant drop to
41.8 mg/L from the surrounding canal water sample. The TSS values recorded for Plant A
and Plant C were higher than the DoE standard of 150 mg/L. TDS values were the highest
recorded and well above range for both the untreated and treated wastewater samples in
14
Plant B, at 5220 mg/L and 4020 mg/L respectively, and above the acceptable standard value
of 2100 mg/L. Plant A and Plant C had acceptable values of EC in their treated ETP water,
and below the standard value of 1200 micro Siemens/cm. Turbidity was significantly
reduced in the ETP treated water samples for all the plants and below the DoE standard. All
the plants registered DO values well below the acceptable range in their treated ETP
samples. Plant A and Plant B showed a decrease in their DO values compared to the untreated
water samples. Only the canal water sample showed an improvement in the DO value and
DO TDS TDS
SL Smell Type pH EC Turbidity
(mg/Ltr) (mg/ltr) (mg/L)
Non Treated
1 Bad
Water
9.27 1.18 49.3 5220 987 17.85
ETP Treated
2 Bad
Water
7.82 0.64 77 4020 1393 5.25
Water from
outside of
3 Bad Industry 7.71 0.96 76.3 330 1531 6.92
(canal
water)
There was also slight deviation from the values observed and recorded for Plant C
(Appendix), which was provided by the Plant itself. All of the values recorded for Plant C for
the ETP treated water were under the acceptable DoE standards and seemed to meet the
requirements. However, our data shows non-conformity in the value and far lower DO in the
15
Table 6: Plant C (Composite Textile)
DO TDS TDS
SL Smell Type pH EC Turbidity
(mg/Ltr) (mg/ltr) (mg/L)
Non
1 Bad Treated 8.21 0.54 87.9 1450 1739 95
Water
ETP
2 Bad Treated 7.7 0.94 227 590 454 3.43
Water
4. Discussion
Our results and observed values lead us to the conclusion that the overall
performance of the ETPs was inadequate and not up to the national discharge quality
concern, as DO is an essential water quality parameter for aquatic life. A low DO (less than 2
mg/L) indicates poor water quality and thus there would be difficulty in sustaining much
sensitive aquatic life in these concentrations, especially for those organisms that rely on
aerobic respiration. This could lead to higher population of anaerobic organisms, and this
would result in the creation of conditions that would make the water body uninhabitable for
deficient oxygen in the presence of organic materials and sulphites (Islam et al. 2014).
High TDS values are not favourable for aquatic environments, but the canal water
samples registered values lower than the acceptable standard. This may have possibly
occurred due to dilution resulting from heavy rainwater and surface water flow from
surrounding areas. High concentrations of dissolved and suspended solids are a concern
16
because it causes the water to be corrosive, salty or brackish taste, resulting in scale
formation. These can create interference with the hot water heater efficiency for drinking
water consumption. High TDS in both the untreated and treated samples could be attributed
to the high color from the various dyes being used, and may be major sources of heavy metals
(Islam et al. 2014). There is a possibility that the equalization tank was not of sufficient
capacity, or did not have a long enough retention time, which resulted in increases of the
TDS. This could be possibly resulting from chemical dosing in the treatment plant, if the ETP
operator is adding excessive quantities of chemicals. The low TSS values generally were
below the national standard, as effluent from dyeing processes is generally low in the TSS
(Khan et al. 2009). High EC values indicate high levels of salinity in the water, and presence
Our study therefore concludes that the volume of wastewater discharged from the
dyeing industries often exceed the acceptable standards for the parameters that were tested.
It is evident from the data above that most of the parameters do not meet the acceptable
standards, and this shows that the ETPs are not effective enough in controlling the water
quality from all dimensions. Evidence gained from the current case study may indicate that
while some of the dyeing plants have their own ETPs, these are not performing effectively. A
lot of the factory owners may be unwilling to operate their ETPs for 24 hours, due to high
electricity and operational costs. This leads to an overall decrease in the efficiency of the
treatment plants. The function of the ETP is to clean the polluted wastewater by appropriate
measures in order to satisfy the national standards, to meet the buyer’s conditions and to
17
meet the objections from the groups of affected populations who live in the surrounding
areas. It is therefore of paramount importance that satisfactory ETP operations are ensured
through successive monitoring of different parameters of the wastewater entering the ETP
and at several stages of the ETP process. Some of the underlying problems of the low
performance of the ETPs are the lack of funds, proper government monitoring, corruption
and lack of technical expertise. Therefore, we can understand why the existing ETPs are
5. Limitations
All possible efforts were taken in order to minimize the time lag between the
collection and the analysis of the samples, in order to ensure that no significant changes
would take place in the quality. However, the sampling event was undertaken only once, and
therefore does not reflect other conditions that may possibly influence the parameters, such
as daytime temperature, weather, and season of the year. Due to the process of the nature of
the dyeing process, the effluent reaching the treatment plant can vary throughout the day,
and the samples collected in our study were the composite of several dyeing batches, which
had been combined in the equalization tank. Therefore, we have used the assumption that
the equalization tanks were of sufficient capacity and that its constituents were well mixed
enough to ensure the effluent passing through the system is consistent. We had also made
the assumption that the dyeing operations do not vary very significantly enough for this to
affect the quality over the period being studied. Temperature could not be measured at each
sampling point due to the lack of the equipment, but we are using our assumption based on
observations made in previous studies showing that temperatures recorded were generally
18
higher than the DoE standard. Simple monitoring at each stage of the ETP process can help
to optimize the treatment process and make it more efficient and thus save money on behalf
of the ETP operator through the reduction of chemical dosing and the energy needed to run
some parts of the process (Khan et al. 2009; Sultana et al. 2013).
6. References
Hasan, K.M.F., Mia, M.S.m Jahid, M.A., Ashaduzzsaman, Mueeid, M.A. and Xu, W. (2016).
Implementation and performance analysis of effluent treatment plant for waste water
treatment in the dyeing textile industries. International Journal of Scientific and
Engineering Research, 7(6), 449-461.
Islam, M.M., Mahmud, K., Faruk, O. and Billah, M.S. (2011). Textile dyeing industries in
Bangladesh for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Environmental
Science and Development, 2(6), 428-436.
Khan, M.S., Ahmed, S., Evans, A.E.V. and Chadwick, M. (2009). Methodology for perofmance
analysis of textile effluent treatment plants in Bangladesh. Chemical Engineering
Research Bulletin, 13, 61-66.
Munnaf, A., Islam, M.S., Tusher, T.R., Kabir, M.H. and Molla, M.A.H. (2014). Investigation of
water quality parameters discharged from textile dyeing industries. Journal of
Environmental Science and Natural Resources, 7(1), 257-263.
Operation and Maintenance Manual for Effluent Treatment Plant Installed at Partex denims
Ltd. By Aquatech Engineering Services Ltd.
Sultana, Z., Ali, M.E., Uddin, M.S. and Haque, M.M. (2014). Implementation of ETPs for
Wastewater treatment. Journal of Environmental Protection, 4, 301-308.
19
7. Appendix
7.1 ETP function at one of the Plants, as described from interview
20
7.3 Observed values from samples tested for parameters by Plant C.
21