IBRA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY

Department of Engineering
CAMPANY NAME : SOHAR ALUMINIUM,SOHAR

Date of visit: 03-02-2019

Neither Agree Strongly

S/N Evaluation Criteria Strongly Agree Agree nor Disagree Disagree Disagree Average

1 The industrial visit was very useful. 13 5 2 0 1 4.38

2 The discussion session was very clear. 11 8 1 1 0 4.38

3 Participation in the discussion was appropriate. 7 11 1 1 1 4.05

4 The presenter was very informative. 9 8 1 1 2 4.00

5 The visit was well structured and organized. 9 9 1 1 1 4.14

6 After this visit, I believe that my skills and knowledge improved. 12 6 0 3 0 4.29

7 The visit motivated me to work in this area. 10 7 2 1 1 4.14

Overall weighted avarage 4.20

14 13
12
12 11 11
10
10 9 9 9
8 8
8 7 7
6
6 5
4.38 4.38 4.05 4.00 4.14 4.29 4.14 4.20
4 3
2 2 2
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 Strongly Agree
.0 . 0 te. . d. 0d . 0 a.
l ar ve ag
e Agree
efu le ri a at i ze ve re ar
us y c
op rm ga
n p ro i sa av Neither Agree nor Disagree
er
y er pr nfo or i m th d
sv a sv a p
yi nd ge in hte Disagree
a w s er a ed rk eig
i tw io
n wa sv re
d wl
wo lw Strongly Disagree
is ss io
n
wa tu k no to ra
l
 8 8
8 7 7
6
6 5
4.38 4.38 4.05 4.00 4.14 4.29 4.14 4.20
4 3
2 2 2
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 Strongly Agree
l .0 r. 0 te. . d. 0d . 0 . e
fu ea ve ve ea ag Agree
se cl ri a at n i ze ro ar ar
y u
er
y op rm ga p i s av Neither Agree nor Disagree
er pr nfo or ei
m th d
sv sv ap yi d n hte Disagree
a wa s er an edg r ki eig
i tw io
n wa sv re
d wl wo lw Strongly Disagree
vi
s ss on a tu no o al
se ss
i rw c k et er Average
al nte tru an
d m Ov
tri io
n
is
cu e ls ted
us ss re
s el ill
s
va
nd u ed sw k
ei sc th ep a ys ot
Th di in Th tw tm tm
e on si a si
Th vi h vi
at e et e
ci
p
Th l i ev Th
rt be
Pa I
i t,
is
i sv
th
fer
A
 IBRA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
Department of Engineering
CAMPANY NAME : SOHAR ALUMINIUM,SOHAR

Date: 03-02-2019

S/N Evaluation Criteria S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19 S20 S21 AVERAGE

1 The industrial visit was very useful. 5 4 5 5 3 4 5 5 4 1 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 4.38

2 The discussion session was very clear. 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 2 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 3 5 5 4.38

3 Participation in the discussion was appropriate. 5 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 2 1 4 4 5 4 5 4 5 3 4 5 4.05

4 The presenter was very informative. 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 5 1 1 5 4 4 5 4 4 3 2 4 5 4.00

5 The visit was well structured and organized. 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 1 2 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 3 5 5 4.14

6 After this visit, I believe that my skills and knowledge improved. 5 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 2 2 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 2 4 5 4.29

7 The visit motivated me to work in this area. 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 4 1 2 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 3 5 5 4.14

Overall weighted avarage 5.00 4.43 4.86 5.00 4.14 4.14 5.00 4.29 4.43 1.43 2.43 4.29 4.00 4.71 4.43 4.43 4.43 4.43 2.71 4.57 5.00 4.20

Prepared By,
Approved by,
K.MOHANKUMAR,VISIT IN-CHARGE HOD,Engineeri
ng
 IBRA CO
Eve

Implementati
Activity/ Event Title Objective Criterion Date on Steps
S.No

To understand the Transport

concept of arrangement,
1 Field Visit factory,layout and 7.1.1 03.02.2019 official
material handling permission
equipments.

Prepared by
Course Coordinator
Date:
 IBRA COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
Event/Activity Monitoring Form
AY (2018-2019)-Semester I

Ressources Responsibility Feedback Analysis

K.Mohankumar Vickneshkumar 4.2

Y

Reviewed by
Program Coordinator
Y

Areas of Improvement Status Evidences

More Visit can be

planned Attendance,
feedback, report,
requestng industry to Completed photo and feedback
arrange experienced analysis
presenter

Approved by
HoS - Mechnical Engg