You are on page 1of 27

Transformer demagnetization

with CPC 100 + CP SB1

© OMICRON 27 February 2014


Structure

> Why demagnetization


> Influence of remanence on the inrush current
> Influence of remanence on diagnostic measurements
> Exciting current measurement
> FRA measurement

> Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> Case study on a 350 MVA transformer


> Demagnetization results
> FRA verification

© OMICRON Page 2
Structure

> Why demagnetization


> Influence of remanence on the inrush current
> Influence of remanence on diagnostic measurements
> Exciting current measurement
> FRA measurement

> Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> Case study on a 350 MVA transformer


> Demagnetization results
> FRA verification

© OMICRON Page 3
Influence of remanence on the inrush current

> When energyzing a transformer a transient current called “Inrush current”


will flow for several cycles
> Remanence in the core can lead to too high Inrush Current and mechanical
forces which can damage the transformer

© OMICRON Page 4
Structure

> Why demagnetization


> Influence of remanence on the inrush current
> Influence of remanence on diagnostic measurements
> Exciting current measurement
> FRA measurement

> Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> Case study on a 350 MVA transformer


> Demagnetization results
> FRA verification

© OMICRON Page 5
Influence of remanence on exciting current

Exciting current measurement


> The exciting current measurement is a method to find
failures or defects in the core.
> A magnetised core has a big influence on the exciting current and
can lead to a wrong interpretation of the measurements.
> It is recommended to perform an exciting current measurement before the
winding resistance measurements or to demagnetize the transformer.

© OMICRON Page 6
Influence of remanence on exciting current

Exciting current @ 2 kV

0.02A
U with remanence
V with remanence
0.018A W with remanence
U without remanence
0.016A V without remanence
W without remanence
0.014A

0.012A

0.01A

0.008A

0.006A

0.004A

0.002A

0.0A A demagnetized core is essential for a relailable


exciting current measurement.

© OMICRON Page 7
Structure

> Why demagnetization


> Influence of remanence on the inrush current
> Influence of remanence on diagnostic measurements
> Exciting current measurement
> FRA measurement

> Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> Case study on a 350 MVA transformer


> Demagnetization results
> FRA verification

© OMICRON Page 8
Influence of remanence on FRA measurements

FRA measurement
> Remanence in a transformer has a big influence on
the FRA measurment.
> Before performing a FRA measurement the transformer
must be demagnetised.
> The FRA measurement is also a good method to verify
whether a transformer is demagnetized.

© OMICRON Page 9
Influence of remanence on FRA measurements

Interpretation ranges of the FRA measurement

Remanence has a big influence


on the first resonance points.

© OMICRON Page 10
Influence of remanence on FRA measurements

Typical FRA pattern without remanence


> The phases on the outer limbs (typically A and C) should be similar and
should show two resonance points due to two different long magnetic paths.

Phase A
A B C
Phase C

Phase B

Remanence will move the


resonance points to the right
(higher frequencies).
© OMICRON Page 11
Influence of remanence on FRA measurements

> Why is the curve moving to the right if the core is magnetised?

> As explained in a previous slide, once the core saturates however, the winding inductance
appears greatly reduced. Or in other works Ldemagnetised is larger than Lmagnetised Ldemag >
Lmag. A resonance point in the FRA cruve is always a combination of a Capacitance C and an
inductance L which can be shown in an equivalent circuit diagram. A resonance condition is
expressed by the formula fo=1/(2*phi*sqrt(L*C)). Therefore, if L is getting smaller, which is the
case of a magentised core, the fo is getting larger and therefore the resonance point in the FRA
curve is moving to the right

© OMICRON Page 12
Structure

> Why demagnetization


> Influence of remanence on the inrush current
> Influence of remanence on diagnostic measurements
> Exciting current measurement
> FRA measurement

> Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> Case study on a 350 MVA transformer


> Demagnetization results
> FRA verification

© OMICRON Page 13
Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

Demagnetization
> The demagnetization is done on
the primary side of the
transformer.
> For the measurement the V1 AC
as well as the V DC
measurement inputs have to be
connected.

© OMICRON Page 14
Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> The demagnetization routine is available as test card on the CPC 100s
front panel and within the Primary Test Manager™ (PTM).

CPC 100 Demag test card

© OMICRON Page 15
Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> The demagnetization routine is available as test card on the CPC 100s
front panel and within the Primary Test Manager™ (PTM).
Demagnetization test within PTM

© OMICRON Page 16
Power transformer demagnetization routine

> Demagnetization can be done with rated voltage at rated frequency or


alternatively with reduced voltage at reduced frequency.

© OMICRON Page 17
Power transformer demagnetization routine

> What to consider if demagnetisation is done with reduced voltage @


reduced frequency.
> To calculate the flux in the core we need to know the winding resistance.

i
A

u V L
=

u(t) = L* ∗

ФL = ∗

© OMICRON Page 18
Power transformer demagnetization routine

The right way of demagnetizating a power transformer


with reduced voltage at reduced frequency
> The CPC 100 demagnetization algorithm is an intelligent iterative process
depending on the hysteresis loop parameters. This enables the
demagnetization of small distribution transformers as well as for big power
transformers.
1. Calculation of the hysteresis loop
parameter by measuring the
current, voltage and the core flux.

2. With the knowledge of the


hysteresis parameters and
continuous monitoring the flux Ф
and exciting current Iexc the flux is
regulated to reach zero
magnetization.

3. Demagnetization process is
finished when the remaining
remanence flux is below 1 % of
the maximum flux.

© OMICRON Page 19
Structure

> Why demagnetization


> Influence of remanence on the inrush current
> Influence of remanence on diagnostic measurements
> Exciting current measurement
> FRA measurement

> Demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> Case study on a 350 MVA transformer


> Demagnetization results
> FRA verification

© OMICRON Page 20
Case study on a 350 MVA transformer

Transformer data
Manufacturer Trafo-Union
Man. year 1971
Type TFSN 8556
Vector group YNyn0
Rating 350 MVA
HV rating 400,000 kV
LV rating 30,000 kV

Initial FRA DC – winding FRA – verification


verification resistance after DC test

Demagnetization FRA – verification after


routine demag. routine

© OMICRON Page 21
Case study on a 350 MVA transformer

Results
> Current: 6 A
> Max. flux: +/- 712.7 VS
> Iterations: 18
> Initial remanence: 98.2 %
> Remaining flux: -0.8 %
> Demagnetization time: 5 min

© OMICRON Page 22
Case study on a 350 MVA transformer

FRA after DC winding


resistance test on phase B

FRA after demagnetization


with the CPC 100

© OMICRON Page 23
Case study on a 350 MVA transformer

Phase A

Initial FRA verification

After DC test

After demagnetization

© OMICRON Page 24
Case study on a 350 MVA transformer

Phase B

Initial FRA verification

After DC test

After demagnetization

© OMICRON Page 25
Case study on a 350 MVA transformer

Phase C

Initial FRA verification

After DC test

After demagnetization

© OMICRON Page 26
Benefits of demagnetization with CPC 100 + CP SB1

> Efficient process because no additional wiring effort is needed when


already using the CP SB1 in combination with the CPC 100
> Short demagnetization time
> With the CPC 100 demagnetization algorithm the demagnetization of
small distribution transformers as well as for big power transformers
can be done
> Demagnetization will reduce the inrush current
> Demagnetization before routine or diagnostic tests will
ensure correct results

© OMICRON Page 27

You might also like