Professional Documents
Culture Documents
⇒> 6
∼ 10 factor in volume ⇒ on the largest scales
K. Petrovay
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
NEWTONIAN COSMOLOGY
⇒ An infinite medium initially at rest should collapse — the Universe cannot remain static!
Shell theorem 1: shells at r > a dynamically play no role → let us ignore them.
Then we have
U = −4πGρa2/r for the potential while the specific kinetic energy is 12 ȧ2.
8πG ȧ 2 c2
ρ= +k 2 where k = −2E/c2
3 a a
Our choice of a is arbitrary; so is the unit of length
⇒ enough to consider values k = −1, 0 or +1.
a = Ct2/3 (∗)
with C = (6πGρ0)1/3a0
< <
Clearly, for k > 0 we have ρ > ρcr and a increases faster/slower than (∗).
a0
In addition, for k = 1 Friedman eq. shows that ȧ = 0 when a =
1 − (ρcr/ρ)0
Historical notes: Friedman derived his equation in 1922 based on general relativity.
“Newtonian cosmology” could have been discovered by Newton but it was not —although he was struggling
with this recognition. In a manuscript of the 2nd ed. of the Principia we find:
“...the stars would, through their gravity, gradually fall on each other, were they not all carried
back by divine plan.”
But he finally decided not to include this in the printed version...
Einstein, similarly, initially had doubts in Friedman’s results; instead, he invoked antigravity (Λ) to keep the
universe from collapsing. Upon Hubble’s discovery of the expansion he famously called this his “biggest
blunder”.
The possibility of a Newtonian cosmology was finally only pointed out by Milne (1934).
On rigour: If you are unhappy with our above neglect (Weinberg 1972, Silk 2001, Jordan 2005) of the
“dynamically unimportant” shells at r > a, you may be right... But the treatment can be made arbitrarily
exact without changing the outcome (Layzer 1954, McCrea 1955, Callan et al. 1965, Tipler 1996)
Also note that in a Hubble flow, observers in different galaxies are accelerated relative to each other, yet
their reference frames are all inertial! This is due the inertial forces being cancelled by gravitational forces
as observers are on ballistic orbits (∼ free fall).
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
⇒ The Big Bang did not happen in any particular point in [3D] space
—it happened “everywhere”: the density diverges in each point as t → 0
and the Universe remains homogeneous at all times.
dz0
Z dT Z d(t0) Z z
dr dr0
Lookback time τ = = =
0 c 0 c[1 + z(r 0 )] 0 (1 + z )H
0
RELATIVISTIC COSMOLOGY
8πG ȧ 2 c2
2
u= + k 2 (Cosm 1)
3c a a
For radiation [relativistic matter] u ∝ a−4 while for non-relativistic matter u ∝ a−3
⇒ early on, radiation must have dominated the universe:
Indeed, CMB was predicted by Gamow in 1946 based on this line of thought.
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
8πG ua3 2
Indeed, rearranging (Cosm 1): = ȧ
3c2 a
8πG 8πG
The time derivative of this reads
2
(−3aȧP − uaȧ) ≡
2
(u + 3P)aȧ = 2aȧ
3c 3c
4πG
⇒ ä = − 2
(u + 3P)a
3c
⇒ The force increases with distance (hence only matters on cosmological scales)
1 8πG
Rik − gik R j j = 4 T ik − Λgik (Ei)
2 c
Write Λ = 8πG u ; then formally the last term of (Ei) also involves an energy–momentum
c4 V
tensor T ik = uV gik which implies a Lorentz-invariant medium with P = −u —i.e. vacuum!
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
...
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
Plugging these forms of u(a) into Friedman, for the k = 0 solutions we find:
Using the current values a0, (Cosm1) can be written as kc2/a20 = H02(ΩT − 1).
With this and the above results, the self-consistent evolution of equation of a is
ȧ 2
= [Ω M ã−3 + ΩRã−4 + ΩΛ + (1 − ΩT )ã−2]
a
NB This approximate relation will not hold for the first few seconds when matter becomes relativistic.
But Ω M + ΩR + ΩΛ =?
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
If two particles are allowed to be in same state, their exchange cannot change ψ
⇒ they must be bosons!
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
Consequences:
HADRONS
Cold Dark Matter (CDM) = hypothetic massive particles (neutralino, axion etc.),
predicted by Grand Unification Theories. Non-relativistic.
Ω M = ΩCDM + Ωb = 0.31
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
Dark energy
ΩΛ = 0.69
The CMB, emitted around z = 1000, is Their scale agrees with observa-
nearly isotropic, with small random fluctuations: tions for Ωtotal = 1:
remnants of small initial density fluctuations in the
gas at decoupling:
These fluctuations are later amplified by their self-gravity, leading to the formation
of galaxies and their clusters.
Numerical simulations: the structure thus formed agrees best with observations
if matter is mostly in the form of CDM.
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
ΛCDM COSMOLOGY
Photons with hc/λ > mec2 create e−–e+ pairs which in turn annihilate to photons:
⇒ for kT > 511 keV much of u is in the form of e− and e+ (and µ− and µ+ and τ− and τ+):
this is the lepton era of the Universe (∼ 10 s)
which in turn is preceded by the hadron era (∼ 0.1 s).
Upon annihilation, a very small (∼ 10−9) surplus of particles vs. antiparticles remained
(“the problem of baryogenesis”)
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
Astrophysics 1 (Petrovay) Cosmology
PRIMORDIAL NUCLEOSYNTHESIS
INFLATIONARY COSMOLOGY
Assumption: The very early universe (t < 10−32 s) was vacuum dominated due to a scalar
field of high energy density ⇒ an exponential expansion (“inflation”) occurred.
The scalar field then went into a lower energy state by spontaneous symmetry breaking.
Flatness problem
Horizon problem
Particle horizon: the distance photons travelled since the Big Bang.
c dt = dr = (a/a0) dr0, i.e. in comoving frame the horizon is
Z t Z a0 Z a0 −1/2
c dt c da u da
= ∝
0 a/a0 0 ȧa/a0 0 a a
⇒ The known universe could not have been causally connected earlier
— its homogeneity must be due to a highly implausible initial condition
But: R. Penrose: if homogeneity is due to early mixing, that must have increased entropy
⇒ initial state had even lower entropy (i.e. was more special)
abstrusegoose.com