I cite CCC RSC sec. 319 (3) as my colour of right Charter sec. 2.(b) fundamental freedoms...
- and in good faith plainly declare my sober critique neither contains false information nor is it intended to incite hate or public mischief.
Common Myths About Immigration in Canada
Pip Argot, Editor-in-Chief
“There is nothing inherently wrong about looking out for one’s own kind; in fact, whether or not an action or policy benefits
one’s race and culture should be the absolute basis of traditional morality! The problem is when minority groups abuse their moral
high-ground and privilege status in order to advance their position to the detriment of the host population.”
Common Myths About Immigration in Canada
Whilest Prime Minister Stephen Harper attempts to speak to an audience, as
recorded in the 28 September 2015 Glove & Mail, Justin Trudeau persistently
attempts to interrupt him.
Stephen Harper: Why would we not revoke the citizenship of people convicted of
terrorist offenses against this country?
This was a Bill put forward by a Member of Parliament, who is himself an
immigrant, named Devinder Shory. This is not the standards we expect... -
immigrants... Canadians... all of us who are here, expect that we would have a
minimum bar - that people who come here would not be guilty of trying to plan
terrorist activities.
Justin Trudeau (loudly interrupting): A Canadian is a Canadian is a
Canadian... and you devalue the citizenship of every Canadian - uh - in this
place and in this country! when you break down and make it conditional for
anyone... - we have a rule of law of this country and you can't take away
citizenship just because you don't like what someone does.
Chaos.
Justin Trudeau (continuing): We are not a country dominated by fear [ ] of law and
rights.
Considering how extreme Canada’s immigration policy is it’s shocking to see
how little actual discussion there is on the topic when it comes to this most
polarizing of issues - and any attempt at questioning the dominant narrative is
usually met with sophistry, appeals to emotion, or generally fallacious claims. If
I was trying to sell the idea of submerging a country’s native population in
endless waves of undesirables you’d think some hard evidence or at least a few
convincing arguments might be in order. Apparently that’s unnecessary!
In the current year, it’s really quite the indictment of liberal orthodoxy as a
whole when the prevailing myths about immigration can be debunked with a
five-minute internet search.
Immigration is a source of economic growth and prosperity.
Statistics Canada’s 2006 census reveals that between 1980 and 2005, during
which time non-White immigration reached the historic levels that continued to
this day, the median earnings of Canadians grew by a mere 0.1% - which is
considered statistically insignificant. Moreover, the earnings of the poorest
segment of the population fell by 20.6% . Even more surprising, according to a
study by the Economic Council of Canada, the period with the highest increase
in real per capita income during the past hundred years were those when net
migration was zero... or even negative. Also, Health and Welfare Canada
reported that the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD) found no correlation whatsoever between population growth and
economic growth in its 22 member countries.
We need immigration due to our aging population.
For starters, this myth implies that an aging population is inherently a bad
thing. Some experts, such as the University of Ottawa [ ] argue that an older
workforce would be better adapted to the needs of our modern technology-
oriented economy. Others suggest practical solutions such as better training and
education and putting an end to mandatory retirement practices, for example,
none of which involve immigration. However, when people bring up the specific
myth they’re usually referring to the concept of replacement migration, which is
defined as the international migration that would be needed to offset declines in
the size of population. That declines in the population of working-age as well as
to offset the overall aging of a population. Data from multiple sources suggests
that in order for it to truly affect the age structure of the population in any
discernible way, immigration intake would immediately have to be raised to
apocalyptic levels.
According to a study by the CD Howe Institute,1 Canada's population would
have to reach 165 million by 2050... which would involve accepting 7 million
immigrants per year. Statistics Canada noted in their 2001 census that given
Canada Was NOT Created by Immigrants of Diverse Races: A Statistical Demonstration
One of the most powerful memes in Canada is that “Canada is a nation of
immigrants.” Millions of individuals have indeed migrated to Canada since explorer
John Cabot first claimed either Newfoundland or Cape Breton Island for England in
1497. But the intended meaning of this phrase goes well beyond this simple fact.
This phrase, continuously repeated by the media, and shoved down the throats of
unsuspecting students from primary-to-higher education, is intended to fashion an
image of Canada as a nation populated from the beginning by peoples from diverse
cultures and racial backgrounds, in order to portray the Third World immigration
patterns we have been witnessing since the 1970s as if they were a natural
continuation — continuation naturelle — of past migration patterns, rather than as
what they are: a radical departure aimed at the termination of Canada’s deep-seated
European ethnic character.
What follows is a statistical refutation of this deceptive meme: The historical
record, the facts we have about the people who came to Canada, the racial makeup of
the immigrants, the proportion of Whites-to-non-Whites, the birth rate of Euro-
Canadians, the rates of immigration versus the domestic fertility rates, demonstrate, to
the contrary, that Canada was a nation created from top-to-bottom by immigrants from
Europe and by Euro-Canadians born in Canada, with next-to-zero contributions by
non-Europeans.
In 1871, according to the first census after Confederation, of the total population of
3.2 million, 32% were of French ancestry, 24% Irish, 20% English, 16% Scottish, and
6% German. Notice, therefore, that we should acknowledge the immense importance
of the Irish and Scots in the first centuries of “English Canada.” There were only
A Black Thorn Publication 78 / 287 - 2018 = 2458168 TJD
Canada’s current age distribution, overall population aging is unavoidable and
immigration has limited impact on population ageing.
Immigration is needed to address skilled labor shortages.
Once again, the alarmist rhetoric in this regard just isn’t supported by facts.
Immigration pimps would have us believe the lies that every other company is
dangerously short-staffed and that massive immigration is, as always, the only
solution. In contrast, a study by the Department of Human Resources,
Development Canada found no evidence to suggest that there was any aggregate
shortage of skilled labor and that Canada compared favorably with many of its
principal competitors in world markets in terms of human capital.
Demographics experts are quick to point out that a nationwide unemployment
rate that hovers around the 7% mark is hardly an indicator of any critical labor
shortage in a report to the House of Commons.
In 2012, Kenneth Georgetti of the Canadian Labour Congress stated that
with five unemployed workers for every job available our main problem remains
unemployment pure and simple. Let me assure you that if unemployed workers
had the means to identify where the jobs were and then had access to the training
required to do those jobs they would jump at the chance. The thoroughly
unwarranted influx of skilled immigrants into Canada also contributes to the
phenomenon known as “brain drain.” In the year 2000, for example, over
fifteen thousand immigrants declared engineering as their professional
qualification - a number which was 50% higher than the number of engineering
degrees emitted by Canadian universities that same year. This sudden surplus of
engineers explains the relatively low salaries in that field in Canada when
compared to the United States, which is a major reason why many of our best
engineering graduates accept employment offers from American companies
rather than stay in Canada.
Canada is one of the least densely populated countries on earth.
There is more than enough space for everyone! but most of that so-called open
space is uninhabitable. Canadians are well aware of this which is why 80% of us
settled within a hundred miles of the US border on a strip of land that covers
roughly 7.3% of the country’s total surface. Immigrants are also aware of this.
90% of them settled in one of Canada’s twelve largest metropolitan areas. Once
the frozen wastelands are removed from the equation, the real population density
in this country is about ten times higher than the official figures. In addition, the
potential for Canada to be agriculturally self-sufficient is greatly hindered by the
tendency to settle so close to the US border. 51% of Canada’s best or class-one
farmland is located in Ontario, specifically in the southernmost part, which is not
only heavily industrialized but also the location of a massive population boom
due to immigration.
According to a 2001 land inventory, over 18% of Ontario’s class-one farmland
has already been squandered due to urban development. Upon careful review, it
appears that the government, mass media, and academia’s arguments in favour of
mass immigration are based on complete bullshit. Of all the challenges that
Canada will have to face in the 21st century, it is increasingly evident that
immigration is the solution to literally none of them.
Being well-informed on an issue is always more useful than inarticulate rage,
however - and if politicians and pundits were called out on their disinformation
on a systematic basis we’d really be getting somewhere. In any case, the
omnipresence of these myths and others within the political discourse in this
country is a testament to just how successful they are, and it gives new meaning
to the saying: “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
eventually come to believe it.”
Clarence Decatur Howe, PC (1886 – 1960) was a powerful Canadian Cabinet
minister, representing the Liberal Party. The CD Howe Institute is widely
considered to be Canada’s most influential think tank
Ricardo Duchesne - 28 April 2016
21,500 Blacks and 23,000 Natives in 1871 - by contrast, there were 202,991 persons
of German origin.
Canada cannot “accurately be portrayed at Confederation as a nation of
immigrants.” In 1867, 79% had been born in Canada. Over the 400 years before
Confederation, there were only “two quite limited periods” of substantial arrivals of
immigrants: from 1783-to-1812, and from 1830-to-1850. In these two periods, the
immigrants were “overwhelmingly of British origin.” Immigration was not a major
factor in population growth from 1850 to the end of the nineteenth century. From
1871-to-1891, “a high rate of natural increase allowed the population of Canada to
grow from 3.7 million to 4.8 million.”
From 1608-to-1760, immigration to New France consisted of only 10,000 settlers,
and thereafter it was “almost non-existent.” The French-speaking population
numbered about 90,000 by 1770s, and thereafter, until the late-1800s, the population
expanded rapidly with women having 5.6 surviving children on average. The increase
in population in Lower Canada from 330,000 in 1815 to 890,000 in 1851 “was mainly
attributable to the continuing high birth rate within the French-speaking community.”
By 1950, the Québec population was almost 4 million. This increase was not a result
of immigration, but primarily of the still continuing high fertility rates. It was only in
the 1970s that Montréal saw an increasing inflow of non-European immigrants.
Between 1896-and-1914, Canada experienced high immigration levels with more
than 3 million arriving within this period. However, the ethnic composition of the
nation remained 84% of British and French origin, while the European component
rose to 9%. Between 1900-and-1915, the high mark in “Asian immigration” before
the 1960s, 50,000 immigrants of Japanese, East Indian and Chinese descent arrived,
but this number comprised less than 2% of the total immigration flow. In contrast, in
1914, there were nearly 400,000 Germans in Canada, the largest ethnic group apart
from the British (which includes the Irish and Scots) and French.
The total intake of immigrants between 1946-and-1962 was 2,151,505. At the
same time, however, between 1941-and-1962, the population of Canada increased
from 11.5 million to 18.5 million, “largely accounted” by Canada’s “extremely high
domestic birth rates,” the so-called baby boom generation. 90% of all immigrants
who came to Canada before 1961 were from Britain.
It was only after the institutionalization of official multiculturalism in 1971 that
immigrants from Africa, the Caribbean, Latin America, the Middle East and Asia at
large started to arrive in large numbers. During the 1970s, the proportion originating
in Europe was cut by half, whereas the proportion coming from Asia almost
quadrupled. Of the 1.5 million who came between 1971-and-1981, 33% came from
Asia, 16% from the Caribbean and South America and 5.5% from Africa.
In the period 1991-2001, immigrants of European origin fell below 20% at the same
time that Asian immigration soared to nearly 60%. From 1991-to-2000, 2.2 million
immigrants were accepted, the “highest ever for any decade.” In recent years,
Canada’s visible minority population has been growing much faster than its total
population: 22% growth from 1996-to-2001 versus 4% growth in the general
population.
Today, roughly one out of every four people in Canada is a member of a so-called
visible minority. But, truth be told, according to United Nations date: There are less
than 12% White Euro-folk living in the world today... and over 60% Asiatics, around
13% Black Africans and 15% (9% Latin Americans/Caribbeans, 5% North American
Indians, and 1% Oceanianics). More-so, about 11% claim to be queer...
Fight Against Multicultural Revisionism!
Don’t let them deceive you! Copy these facts and use them against the deceivers
occupying our educational establishments. Don’t believe the globalist claim that your
nation was a creation of diverse races and that “White racists” were supposedly hiding
The Hooton Plan and the Migrant Crisis
The flood of Western Civilization with strangers - mostly young men without
families - is pat of a plan unfolding in almost complete secrecy, orchestrated by
the likes of:
- Anthropologist Dr. Earnest Hooten (1887-1954) wrote the so-called
“Hooton Plan.”
- Louis Nizer (1902-1994), a prominent lawyer and B’nai B’rith member,
proposed a selective breeding program and replacing the German population
with another in order to exterminate the German peoples.
- Theodor Kaufmann (1910-1978), author of the book “Germany Must
Perish” - already translated into German by 1941.
There have never been any charges brought up against these genocidical hate-
mongering Jewish war criminals. In fact, there is almost nothing written about
these three archfiends (or their writings) regarding their plans on the internet! that
is, nothing but lies, half-truths, and falsified information intended to mislead and
deceive the ignorant lemming masses. And anyone who dares mention them or
criticize their writings is denounced and ridiculed as a “conspiracy theorist” and
“fascist racist.”
The “9-11 Lie” and the “War on Terror,” resulting in bombing the entire
Middle East from the Nile to the Indus river valley back into the stone age and,
subsequently, causing the “mass-tsunamigration of refugees” - which is
intended to “flood of Western Civilization with strangers” and destroy our ability
to nationalize in defense against our Zionist enemies: (i.e. the Rothschilds, the
Queen of England and other Black Nobility, the Papacy, and the elitist
Illuminatist New World Order globalists).
Our once-free peoples have been lied to and subjected to generations of
propaganda - and the non-traditional anti-family liberal-leftist commies, who are
all too willing to submit and comply, being incapable of protesting or revolting,
away the equal contribution of non-European immigrants. This is a historical
falsehood of major proportions. Canada was created by people of British and French
descent, and a few other principally Western European ancestries. All the institutions,
legal system, educational curriculum, transformation of wilderness into productive
farms, all the cities, the parliamentary traditions, the churches, the entire infrastructure
of railways, ports, shipping industries, and highways, were created by hardworking
Euro-Canadians. About 7000 gold-mining chinks came to in the Fraser River valley
from Guangdong province and San Francisco, circa 1860 - and it is important to note
that these have always and always will set themselves apart from the rest of us true-
born Canadians... which is what most Third World immigrants seem to do once being
seeded upon our soil by our enemies - the bankers, lawyers, politicians, et cetera.
A Closing Note on Foreign-born Parliamentarians
There are many foreign-born MPs, MLAs, and municipal politicians all over the
country. British Columbia had a Premier, Ujjal Dosanjh, who was born in India. Two
of our last three Governors General (the Queen's viceroy in Canada and effectively
head of state) have been visible minority immigrants: Adrienne Clarkson, born in
Hong Kong, and Michaëlle Jean, born in Haiti. The current federal Liberal cabinet has
Harjit Sajjan, born in India, Amarjeet Sohi, born in India, Maryam Monsef, an Afghan
refugee born in Iran, and Ahmed Hussen, born in Somalia - just to name a few. The
previous Conservative cabinet also had many foreign-born cabinet ministers
throughout its time in office.
Canadians of Convenience
There are now at least 56 sitting parliamentarians — 44 MPs and 12 senators —
born in various countries outside Canada, including Afghanistan, Lebanon, Portugal,
Poland, Pakistan, Syria, Sri Lanka... At least 22 of them have citizenship from other
countries. That figure does not include MPs and senators who hold dual or triple
citizenship through descent, naturalization or marriage.
In stark contrast, there are only 5 seats held by Inuit, Métis or First Nations origin.
and believing everything that our ZOG tells them to believe, unthinkingly
regurgitating whatever propaganda has been shoved down their collective throats
since before they were born as it suits their own degenerate agenda, such as
miscegenation, queer and revolting sodomistic lifestyles, the Papist-Muslim UN-
supported lowering of the age of consent, the so-called diversification our once-
great nations and the global village (i.e. one-world slum).
These easily-manipulated fools are thus destabilizing our nations and haply
inciting riotous chaos throughout our cities and in our homes and places of
meeting, growing ever-more unmanageable and unreasonable - unthinking pawns
in their own self-destruction.
So is it that the bankers, lawyers, politicians, lobbyists, bureaucrats, heads of
state, CEOs, and colonizers rake in the cash selling off our nation’s resources and
future prosperity to those who worship the Golden Calf.
So is it that we native-born citizens are displaced, losing our homes and
livelihoods and places in school, whether lower or higher education, to thaim
which are brought into our cities and towns to replace us, to use their voting
potential to install self-serving ZOG puppets in our government, our Senate and
Houses of Common, our Supreme Courts, and our secret service and military and
policing agencies.
So it is that these strangers come among us with absolutely no intention of
learning our languages, adopting our cultures, and celebrating our national
identity. In fact, they actually glory in establishing their own political goals -
much to the detriment of our own political needs.
So it is that our countries have been destroyed from with by the cancer of an
inglorious weaponized immigration megalomaniac hubris.