Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Harley-Davidson, Inc. is one of the most prominent motorcycle manufacturers in the world. The
company achieved this market position through its generic strategy for competitive advantage
and its intensive strategies for growth. Harley-Davidson’s generic competitive strategy (based on
Michael Porter’s model) pushes for product innovation. The company uses its innovation
processes to ensure competitiveness against other popular motorcycle manufacturers. Also,
Harley-Davidson’s intensive growth strategies indicate product innovation along with increased
reach in the global motorcycle market. However, the company could benefit from some
adjustments in its intensive growth strategies. Harley-Davidson’s generic strategy for
competitive advantage and intensive growth strategies are supportive of resilience in the face of
market fluctuations.
When Harley-Davidson was founded in 1903, it was one of over 100 firms producing
motorcycles in the United States. The U.S. government became an important customer for the
company's high-powered, reliable bikes, using them in both world wars. By the 1950s, Harley-
Davidson was the only remaining American manufacturer.
Analytical tools
Harley-Davidson’s generic competitive strategy (Porter’s model) reflects unique product features
as a main selling point of the business. The intensive strategies facilitate potential growth for
Harley-Davidson through appropriate strategic objectives.
As the fifth largest motorcycle manufacturer in the world, Harley-Davidson has used its generic
strategy to ensure competitive advantage for this market position. A combination of generic
competitive strategies are applied in Harley-Davidson’s business, as follows:
Strategy for competitive advantage. Unique product features are the main point in this generic
strategy. For example, Harley-Davidson popularized the chopper motorcycle style through
unique customization. However, the company also uses the focus generic strategy in combination
with differentiation. The focus generic strategy supports competitive advantage by increasing
Harley-Davidson’s customer base in certain market segments. For example, the company focuses
on motorcycle enthusiasts, especially those who are interested in the chopper biking culture. A
strategic objective linked to the differentiation generic strategy is to build Harley-Davidson’s
competitive advantage based on unique product innovation. In relation, the focus differentiation
strategy leads to the strategic objective of strengthening the chopper biker culture that enables
Harley-Davidson’s competitive advantage in this market segment.
5.0 constraints
6.0 conclusions
with their market a second time. The organisation keeps abreast of changing customer needs
through a process called ‘Super-engagement’ This involves the managers riding on a regular
basis with customers and hearing their feedback directly. Hence organisation should set the
target for an increased level of attendance ….
It is a logical process for ensuring that your brand thrives during the upturns and downturns in
the market and continues to mean something special for your target customers. Whilst it is
simple in concept it requires expert execution. There are many organisations who speak
enthusiastically about customer experience and many consultancies who are promoting it as a
source of competitive advantage. Unfortunately, few of them have a systematic process for
turning the desire into business results. Perhaps that is why there are still few organisations
with a brand as powerful as Harley-Davidson’s!
References
Gargasas, A., & Mugiene, I. (2012). Intensive growth strategy development trends in logistics
services for agricultural organization providing companies. Management Theory and Studies for
Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 34(5), 47-53.
Merchant, H. (2014). Configurations of governance structure, generic strategy, and firm size.
Global Strategy Journal, 4(4), 292-309.
Miller, D. (1992). The generic strategy trap. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(1), 37-41.
Parnell, J. A. (1997). New evidence in the generic strategy and business performance debate: A
research note. British Journal of Management, 8(2), 175-181.
Varadarajan, P., & Dillon, W. R. (1982). Intensive growth strategies: A closer examination.
Journal of Business Research, 10(4), 503-522.