Frequencies

The frequency table is used to know the frequency or how many times the
data occurs and it is an important test which is used for analysing data and
even measures the central tendency, dispersion, percentiles etc. The observed
frequencies may differ from expected frequencies.

Statistics
Is there risk high
risk of accident
Age Gender in lucknow? Laws_following
N Valid 50 50 50 50
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mode 1a 1 .00a 1

a. Multiple modes exist. The smallest value is shown

Frequency Table

Age
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 18-22 15 30.0 30.0 30.0
22-24 15 30.0 30.0 60.0
24-28 11 22.0 22.0 82.0
above 28 9 18.0 18.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Gender
 Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid male 26 52.0 52.0 52.0
female 24 48.0 48.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Is there risk high risk of accident in lucknow?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid YES 25 50.0 50.0 50.0
NO 25 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Laws_following
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Yes 35 70.0 70.0 70.0
No 15 30.0 30.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Bar Chart
Frequencies

Statistics
Do you think Accidents
overspeed Do you Drink happen regularly
Seat_Belt cause accident? and Drive in your city?
N Valid 50 50 50 50
Missing 0 0 0 0
Mean 3.36 3.64 3.62 3.62
Median 3.00 4.00 4.00 4.00
Mode 3 4 4 4
Std. Deviation .749 .827 .945 1.105

Frequency Table

Seat_Belt
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Disagree 6 12.0 12.0 12.0
Can't say 22 44.0 44.0 56.0
Agree 20 40.0 40.0 96.0
Strongly Agree 2 4.0 4.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Do you think overspeed cause accident?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Disagree 5 10.0 10.0 10.0
Can't say 14 28.0 28.0 38.0
Agree 25 50.0 50.0 88.0
Strongly Agree 6 12.0 12.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Do you Drink and Drive

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 1 2.0 2.0 2.0
Disagree 5 10.0 10.0 12.0
Can't say 14 28.0 28.0 40.0
Agree 22 44.0 44.0 84.0
Strongly Agree 8 16.0 16.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Accidents happen regularly in your city?

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Strongly Disagree 3 6.0 6.0 6.0
Disagree 4 8.0 8.0 14.0
Can't say 13 26.0 26.0 40.0
Agree 19 38.0 38.0 78.0
Strongly Agree 11 22.0 22.0 100.0
Total 50 100.0 100.0

Histogram
Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Gender * Is there risk high 50 100.0% 0 0.0% 50 100.0%
risk of accident in lucknow?

Gender * Is there risk high risk of accident in lucknow?

Crosstabulation
Is there risk high risk of accident in
lucknow?
YES NO Total
Gender male Count 15 11 26
Expected Count 13.0 13.0 26.0
female Count 10 14 24
Expected Count 12.0 12.0 24.0
Total Count 25 25 50
Expected Count 25.0 25.0 50.0

This table allows us to understand that both males and females tell about high risk of accident.

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.282 1 .258
Continuity Correctionb .721 1 .396
Likelihood Ratio 1.288 1 .256
Fisher's Exact Test .396 .198
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.256 1 .262
N of Valid Cases 50

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

When reading this table we are interested in the results of the "Pearson Chi-Square" row. We can

see here that χ(1) = 1.282, p = .258. This tells us that there is no statistically significant association

between Gender and risk of accidents.

Symmetric Measures
Approximate
Value Significance
Nominal by Nominal Phi .160 .258
Cramer's V .160 .258
N of Valid Cases 50

Phi and Cramer's V are both tests of the strength of association.

Reliability

Scale: ALL VARIABLES

Case Processing Summary

N %
Cases Valid 50 100.0
a
Excluded 0 .0
Total 50 100.0

a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the

procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.739 4
By seeing the cronbach’s alpha which close to 1 so we can say the data reliable.

Correlations

Correlations
Accidents
happen regularly Do you Drink
in your city? and Drive
Accidents happen regularly Pearson Correlation 1 .817**
in your city? Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 50 50
**
Do you Drink and Drive Pearson Correlation .817 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 50 50

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

By seeing the Sig value we can see it is less than 0.01 we can say that data significant and having
strong correlation with .817 having positive value show both value will move in same direction.

Correlations

Correlations
Accidents Do you think
happen regularly overspeed
in your city? cause accident?
Accidents happen regularly Pearson Correlation 1 .830**
in your city? Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 50 50
**
Do you think overspeed Pearson Correlation .830 1
cause accident? Sig. (2-tailed) .000
N 50 50

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

By seeing the Sig value we can see it is less than 0.01 we can say that data significant and having
strong correlation with .830 having positive value show both value will move in same direction.

Correlation

Correlations
Accidents
happen regularly
in your city? Seat_Belt
Accidents happen regularly Pearson Correlation 1 -.004
in your city? Sig. (2-tailed) .978
N 50 50
Seat_Belt Pearson Correlation -.004 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .978
N 50 50

Both value are not correlated as Sig value is .978

Regression

Variables Entered/Removeda
Variables Variables
Model Entered Removed Method
1 Do you Drink . Enter
b
and Drive

a. Dependent Variable: Accidents happen regularly in your

city?
b. All requested variables entered.
 Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Square Estimate
a
1 .817 .667 .660 .644

a. Predictors: (Constant), Do you Drink and Drive

This table provides the R and R2 values. The R value represents the simple correlation and is
0.817 (the "R" Column), which indicates a high degree of correlation. The R2 value (the "R
Square" column) indicates how much of the total variation in the dependent variable, can be
explained by the independent variable,In this case, 66.7% can be explained, which is very large.

ANOVAa
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 39.871 1 39.871 96.130 .000b
Residual 19.909 48 .415
Total 59.780 49

a. Dependent Variable: Accidents happen regularly in your city?

b. Predictors: (Constant), Do you Drink and Drive

This indicates the statistical significance of the regression model that was run. Here, p < 0.000,
which is less than 0.05, and indicates that, overall, the regression model statistically significantly
predicts the outcome variable
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
1 (Constant) .165 .364 .454 .652
Do you Drink and Drive .954 .097 .817 9.805 .000

a. Dependent Variable: Accidents happen regularly in your city?