Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By Student Name
Course
Tutor
University
Date
Business and Management Statistics 2
Task 1
Introduction
organization (Anderson, Sweeney, Williams, Camm and Cochran, 2017, 347). This is achieved
by performing data analysis of on the gathered statistical information. Through data analysis, the
statistical relationship between the variables studied is established (Keller, 2015, 139). The
purpose of this task is to investigate the factors that affect the students' commuting time to the
university.
Description of data
The research aims to investigate whether factors such as gender, type of student, and age
influence the commuting time to the university. The main variables included in the study include
gender, type of student, age, and time to the university. The hypothesis used is that gender, type
of student, and age affect commuting time to the university. The descriptive information on the
Statistics
Domicil Age? Gende Time To
e? r? University?
N Valid 163 163 163 163
Missi 0 0 0 0
ng
Mean 1.90 1.71 1.39 40.30
Std. .811 .916 .559 32.238
Deviation
Business and Management Statistics 3
Domicile?
Frequen Percen Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
cy t
Vali UK 62 38.0 38.0 38.0
d EU 55 33.7 33.7 71.8
Internationa 46 28.2 28.2 100.0
l
Total 163 100.0 100.0
Age?
Frequen Percen Valid Percent Cumulative
cy t Percent
Vali 18 or 99 60.7 60.7 60.7
d 19
20 or 13 8.0 8.0 68.7
21
Over 51 31.3 31.3 100.0
21
Total 163 100.0 100.0
Gender?
Frequen Percen Valid Percent Cumulative
cy t Percent
Vali Male 106 65.0 65.0 65.0
d Female 51 31.3 31.3 96.3
Prefer not to 6 3.7 3.7 100.0
Say
Total 163 100.0 100.0
A total of 163 students are included in the investigation. Out of this, 65.0 percent are
male, 31.3 percent are female, and 3.7 percent prefer not to say. 60.7 percent are aged 18 or 19,
8.0 percent are either 20 or 21 years, and 31.3 percent are over 21 years. The population
comprises of 38.0 percent UK students, 33.7 percent EU, and 28.2 percent international students.
Business and Management Statistics 4
The bivariate correlation is performed to investigate the factors affecting the commuting time to
Correlations
Domicil Age? Gende Time To
e? r? University?
Domicile? Pearson 1 -.031 -.093 -.015
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .696 .239 .848
N 163 163 163 163
Age? Pearson -.031 1 .175* .236**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .696 .025 .002
N 163 163 163 163
Gender? Pearson -.093 .175* 1 .226**
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .239 .025 .004
N 163 163 163 163
Time To Pearson -.015 .236** .226** 1
University? Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) .848 .002 .004
N 163 163 163 163
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Conclusion
The relationship between domicile and time to university has a p-value of 0.848, which is
above the significant level of 0.05. The relationship between both age and gender with time to
university has a p-value of 0.002 and 0.004 respectively. These values are below the significant
level of 0.05, therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected (Bhattacharyya, 2018, 287). From the
investigation, it is concluded that the type of student affects commuting time to the university.
Business and Management Statistics 5
Business and Management Statistics 6
Task 2
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.017106744
R Square 0.000292641
Adjusted R -
Square 0.005916722
Standard Error 32.33318389
Observations 163
ANOVA
Significanc
df SS MS F eF
49.2702 49.2702 0.04712
Regression 1 4 4 9 0.828411
1045.43
Residual 161 168315 5
168364.
Total 162 3
Scatter Plot
160
140
120
Time to University
100
80
60
40
20
0
Time on Part-time Work
Regression equation
The slope the regression is -0.0602. A negative coefficient indicates that there is a
negative relationship between the variables (Hoffmann and Shafer, 2015, 48). Therefore, the time
spent doing part-time work and time taken from student accommodation to university varies
negatively.
The intercept is the expected average of the value on y-axis when the value on the x-axis
is zero (Chatfield, 2018, 195). In this case, the intercept is 41.477. Therefore, the average time
moving from student accommodation when the student is not engaged in part-time work is
41.477 minutes.
Business and Management Statistics 8
The R-squared value provides a measure of the level of closeness of data to the regression line
(Harrell Jr., 2015, 78). For the test above, the R-square is 0.000292641. This implies that the data is
widely scattered.
Predictions for the time spent doing part-time work when the time taken from student
15 minutes
20 minutes
Are the variables in your regression model statistically significant to your model? Give
The p-value of the regression analysis illustrates whether there is a correlation between
the dependent and independent variables (Darlington and Hayes, 2016, 125). The significant
value of the regression is 0.828, which is above the significance level of 0.05. Therefore, the
Task 3
Network diagram
G H I J
K
A B
C E F
D
Precedence diagram
nodes (Harrison and Lock, 2017, 219). In this case, the precedence diagram will use the finish-
to-start analogy, implying that the preceding activities will have to be completed before the next
is initiated.
distributors
E Distribution to 2 8 10 8 10 0
distributors
F Distribution to 4 10 14 10 14 0
retailers
G Advertising 2 1 3 1 3 0
brief
H Advertising 1 3 4 3 4 0
contract
I Illustrations 4 4 8 4 8 0
and text
J Printing 4 8 12 8 12 0
K Product launch 1 10 11 14 15 4
G H I J
(2) (1) (4) (4)
A B K
START (1) (9) (1) END
C D E F
(3) (4) (2) (4)
Critical Path
The critical path is the longest chain of activities that are followed to complete a project
(Lock, 2016, 367). It defines the longest schedule that will be spent to complete the entire
A C D E F K = 1 + 3 + 4 + 2 + 4 + 1 = 15 weeks
Activity Float
A float is the time duration it can take to delay a task in a project without impacting on
other activities (Kehe, Tingting, Yanwen, and Wenjing, 2015, 97). It is computed by subtracting
the earliest start time from the latest start time of an activity. The float for activities A to J is 0
References
Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J., Williams, T.A., Camm, J.D., and Cochran, J.J., 2017. Essentials
Darlington, R.B. and Hayes, A.F., 2016. Regression analysis and linear models: Concepts,
Harrison, F. and Lock, D., 2017. Advanced project management: a structured approach.
Routledge.
Harrell Jr, F.E., 2015. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models,
Hoffmann, J.P., and Shafer, K., 2015. Linear regression analysis. Washington, DC: NASW
Press.
Kehe, W., Tingting, W., Yanwen, A. and Wenjing, Z., 2015, August. Study on the Drawing
Keller, G., 2015. Statistics for Management and Economics, Abbreviated. Cengage Learning.