Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PEDULLA
GERALD p. KOOCHER received his PhD in clinical psychology from the University of Missouri,
Columbia. He is on the staff of the Sidney Farber Cancer Institute and faculty of the Harvard
Medical School. His current interests include the impact of loss and chronic illness on child
development, as well as psychotherapy with children and families.
BARBARA M. PEDULLA received her PhD from Boston College, where she is currently a part-
time instructor in counseling psychology. She also works as a clinical child psychologist at the
Framingham Youth Guidance Center (Framingham, Massachusetts) and maintains a private
practice.
A PRELIMINARY REPORT of these findings was presented in a symposium by the same title at
the 84th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.,
September 1976. The listing of the authors is alphabetical, with full responsibility for the
conceptualization and execution of this study being equal in all respects.
REQUESTS FOR REPRINTS should be sent to Gerald P. Koocher, 44 Binney Street, Boston,
Massachusetts 02115.
Method
QUESTIONNAIRE
SAMPLE
Our goal was to locate quickly a large number of experienced child thera-
pists with a minimum of time and cost. We selected the Section on Clinical
Child Psychology of Division 12 of the American Psychological Association
The average age of those responding was 45.5 years, with a standard
deviation of 9.8 years. As one might expect given these figures, the group
was relatively experienced in psychotherapy with children, having an
average of 13.5 years of experience, with a standard deviation of 7.2 years.
The geographic distribution of the sample included 25.5% from the East,
21.9% from the Midwest, 24.5% from the South, and 29.1% from the West.
These figures total 101% due to rounding off. Of the respondents, 71.8%
were male and 28.2% female.
Further descriptive data for the sample are displayed in Table 1. Psy-
chologists and psychiatrists differed significantly on only one background
variable. More psychiatrists were in private practice. The respondents
represented comparably broad age and experience ranges and represented
significant cumulative professional experience. Chi-square tests and t tests
yielded significant differences at the .05 level between psychologists and
1
Psychologists and psychiatrists were used as the primary reference groups of this survey
partially because of the ease in locating those with an interest in child psychotherapy.
Association directories of the two groups made selection of the sample an easy task, whereas
no such directories were readily available for other relevant mental health professions, such as
social work.
The vast majority of these child clients (732 in all) are seen only once a
week. Another 75 children are seen twice a week, and 23 children are seen
more often. Most of the therapists who responded were treating children
primarily in private therapy, suggesting that the findings reported here
may relate largely to therapy with children whose families can afford
private treatment. A specific breakdown of the clients' socioeconomic
status was not requested, nor was any indication of the fees charged.
Occa-
Theoretical Never sionally Often Always
orientation useful useful useful useful
Family systems 9' 26 44 21
Client centered 22 38 28 12
Rational emotive 49 29 20 2
Gestalt 49 35 13 3
Orgone 98 2 0 0
Psychoanalytic*
Psychologists 19 30 26 25
Psychiatrists 4 12 40 44
Behavior
modification**
Psychologists 14 31 36 19
Psychiatrists 20 52 28 0
Note. N = 110. In all categories except the last two listed, psycholo-
gists and psychiatrists did not differ significantly from each other in
category percentages, and the figures reported are for all therapists.
"X2 = 9.07, rf/= 3,/> < .05.
**X 2 = 7.89, df = 3,p < .05.
The therapists were also asked to rate the usefulness of some specific
techniques and media in their work with children. The results are pre-
sented in Table 3. It seems that child therapists find a few basic, traditional
tools helpful in their work, and these relate most closely to the more
psychodynamic analytic theories. Art was the only medium found often or
always useful by more than 60% of the therapists surveyed. Doll and
puppet play was found to be of varied usefulness. Newer techniques for
Occa-
Media or Never sionally Often Always
technique useful useful useful useful
Craft projects 27 50 18 5
Projective testing 18 27 29 26
Doll or puppet
play 8 35 41 16
Giving gifts 51 32 11 6
Role playing 17 46 28 9
Competitive
games 21 49 26 4
Physical contact 24 40 28 8
Giving food 33 40 19 8
Aversive
conditioning 83 16 1 0
Mutual
storytelling 55 32 12 1
Activity groups 43 39 14 4
Sharing personal
experiences 30 50 15 5
Hypnosis 89 10 1 0
Music 79 17 3 1
Art materials 7 25 44 24
Psychoactive
medication*
Psychologists 38 56 5 1
Psychiatrists 20 56 24 0
Free association**
Psychologists 44 30 11 15
Psychiatrists 24 28 44 4
Note. N = 110.
*X 2 = 9.22, df= S, p < .05.
**X Z = 14.81, df= 3 ,p < .01.
LIMIT SETTING
The therapists were asked to rate the usefulness of various policies and
strategies for limiting the destructive or potentially injurious behavior of
their child clients. These data are presented in Table 4. Most therapists felt
that it is useful to discuss the limits of permissible behavior with the child,
but there was considerable variation among therapists as to whether they
would take a more active, assertive role in stopping such behavior, even
injurious behavior. One explanation for this may lie in the fact that some
degree of permissiveness is inherent in the context of play therapy and that
overt destructive acts during therapy hours are relative rarities. Still, it is
interesting that little uniformity was evident among the therapists surveyed
on this point.
Occa-
Usually sionally Slightly Seldom
Client type effective effective effective effective
Males 91 9 0 0
Females 86 12 2 0
Neurotics 82 16 2 0
Autistic children 8 20 30 42
Mentally retarded 23 35 29 13
Psychosomatic prob-
lems 36 52 10 2
Physically handi-
capped 41 40 14 5
Character disorders 25 38 26 11
School-age children 85 14 1 0
Preschoolers 63 24 11 2
Psychotic children*
Psychologists 25 29 27 19
Psychiatrists 17 63 8 12
Children with medi-
cal problems**
Psychologists 37 43 13 7
Psychiatrists 70 26 4
Note. N = 110. The "children with medical problems" category
means physical illness.
* X 2 = 9.34, d/ = 3,p < .05.
**X 2 = 8.55, df= S,p < .05.
consultations on a given patient ranged from zero to five per year, with the
most common frequency being twice a year (58.2%).
THERAPIST EFFECTIVENESS
The therapists were asked to rate their personal effectiveness with various
types of child clients. These data are presented in Table 5. Nearly all
therapists rated themselves as at least occasionally effective with most types
of child clients. The one exception to this was the case of the autistic child,
a type of client with whom most therapists reported themselves to be
infrequently effective. This is not at all surprising, given the generally
accepted difficulty in helping children who are truly autistic.
SUMMARY
REFERENCES
Readers are invited to submit manuscripts for a special issue of Professional Psychology
to be entitled "The Law and Applied Psychology." Manuscripts relating to this
topic and received by November 15, 1977 will be considered for inclusion in the
special issue.
In keeping with the editorial policy of the Journal, papers should address legal
questions encountered by individuals who provide psychological services or who
train others to provide such services. Reports of empirical research as well as
papers that analyze and reflect on issues are appropriate. Issue-related papers
could include a historical perspective on the legal and psychological issue to be ad-
dressed, with an examination of the present status and future implications of the
issue. Papers that integrate and contrast the views of others in the field are especially
welcome. Case studies and program descriptions will be considered if they address
some general and important issue.
Papers should address the effects of law upon the provision of psychological
services or the application of psychological principles and skills to legal questions.
Topics may include (but need not be limited to) the following: applications of
psychology in the court room, to questions of criminal responsibility and com-
petency to stand trial, and to questions of civil law (commitment, suits); the psy-
chologist in child custody cases; problems of legal sanctions affecting the provision
of psychological services and private practice and in hospital, community mental
health, educational, and correctional settings; law and psychological assessment in
employee selection and educational decisions; the training of psychologists to meet
challenges in the interface of law and applied psychology; legislative decisions af-
fecting education and the school psychologist; legislation and the future of the
clinical psychologist as a provider of health services; and clinical psychologists in
service to law enforcement.
Additional inquiries should be sent to J. Thomas Grisso, Department of Psy-
chology, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63103, or to Bruce D. Sales, Depart-
ment of Psychology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NB 68508.