Emp Mana - New

4.9.
1 PERCENTAGE METHOD
In this project Percentage method test was used. The percentage method is used to
know the accurate percentages of the data we took, it is easy to graph out through the
percentages. The following are the formula
No of Respondent
Percentage of Respondent = x 100
Total no. of Respondents
From the above formula, we can get percentages of the data given by the respondents.
4.9.2 CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS
In this project chi-square test was used. This is an analysis of technique which
analyzed the stated data in the project. It analysis the assumed data and calculated in the
study. The Chi-square test is an important test amongst the several tests of significant
developed by statistical. Chi-square, symbolically written as x2 (Pronounce as Ki-Spare), is a
statistical measure used in the context of sampling analysis for comparing a variance to a
theoretical variance.
Formula
(O-E) 2
2 =
E
O = Observed frequency
E = Expected frequency
1
4.9.3 CORRELATION
Correlation analysis deals with the association between two or more variables.
It does not tell anything about cause and effect relationship. Correlation is classified in
two types as
 Positive and
 Negative correlation.
SPEARMAN Correlation method, it also can be said as Rank Correlation. It is
defined by the symbol ‘r’
6 ∑ di²
FORMULA r = 1- ______________
n (n²-1)
Correlation value shall always lie between +1 and-1. When r =1, it shows there is
perfect positive correlation between variables. When r = 0, There is no correlation.
4.9.4 WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD
 Weighted average can be defined as an average whose component items are multiplied
by certain values (weights) and the aggregate of the products are divided by the total
of weights.
 One of the limitations of simple arithmetic mean is that it gives equal importance to
all the items of the distribution.
 Certain cases relative importance of all the items in the distribution is not the same.
Where the importance of the items varies.
It is essential to allocate weight applied but may vary in different cases. Thus weightage is a
number standing for the relative importance of the items.
4.9.5 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA)
Analysis of variance is an extremely useful technique concerning research. This is

used when multi sample are involved.
Anova is extremely a procedure for testing the difference among different groups of
data for homogeneity. “The essence of ANOVA is that the total amount of variation in a set of
data is broken down into two types such as
 ONE-WAY ANOVA
 TWO-WAY ANOVA
If we take only one factor and investigate the differences amongst its various
categories having numerous possible values one-way anova can be used. When we investigate
two factors at the same time then we can use two-way anova.
Steps involved in ANOVA are
1. Name of the Row samples as x1, x2, x3, x4……

2. Name of the Column samples as y1, y2, y3, y4……
3. Calculate the sum of all items by T = ∑ x1 + ∑ x2 + ∑ x3….
4. Correction factor CF = T²
N
5. Calculate Total sum of squares SST = ∑ x1² + ∑ x2² + ∑ x3²….
6. Sum of squares between column samples SSC = (∑ y1) ² + (∑ y2) ² + (∑ y3) ² T²

n n n N
7. Sum of squares between column samples SSR = (∑ x1) ² + (∑ x2) ² + (∑ x3) ² T²
n n n N
8. Calculating Residual or Error SSE = [ SST- (SSC+SSR) ]

The basic principle of the Anova is to test for differences amongst the means of the
population by examine the amount of variation within the samples, relation to the amount of
variation between the samples.
TWO-WAY ANOVA TABLE
Degrees of
SOURCE OF Sum of Squares Mean Square (MS) F-ratio
Freedom (d.f)
VARIATION
Between SSC MSC

SSC V1
Columns MSC = F1 =
Treatment K-1 MSE
Between SSR
SSR V2
Rows MSR =
Treatment R-1
MSR
SSE F2 =
Residual or SSE (K-1) (R-1) MSE
MSE =
Error
(K-1) (R-1)
 If the calculated value (C.V) of F1 < tabulated value (T.V) of F1 then H0 is

ACCEPTED.
 If the calculated value (C.V) of F1 > tabulated value (T.V) of F1 then H0 is
REJECTED.
CHAPTER-V
ANALYSIS AND INTREPRETATION
5.1 ANALYSIS USING PERCENTAGE METHOD

TABLE 5.1.1
RESPONDENT BASED ON AGELEVEL
S.No Age No. of Respondents Percentage
1 18-25 04 08
2 26-35 18 36
3 36-45 22 44
4 Above 45 06 12
Total 50 100
Source: primary data
Inference:
The above table infers that, 08 % belongs to the age group of 18-25 years, 36 %
belongs to the age group of 26-35 years, 44 % belongs to the age group of 36-45 years and 12
% belongs to the age group of above 45 year
CHART-5.1.1
AGE
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
18-25 26-35 36-45 above 45
A GE
TABLE 5.1.2
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR EDUCATION
S.No Education No. of Respondents Percentage
1 SSC 10 20
2 INTER 22 44
3 DEGREE 18 36
4 Others 00 00
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that, 20 %belongs to SSC, 44 % belongs to INTER, 36 %belongs to
degree0 % belongs to other degrees.
CHART-5.1.2
EDUCATION
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
sslc hsc iti
EDUCATION
TABLE 5.1.3
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR EXPERIENCE
S.No Experience No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Below2years 11 22
2 3-5 years 07 14
3 Above 5 years 32 64
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that
22 % to below 2 years; 14 % belongs to 3-5years, 64 %belongs to above 5 years
CHART-5.1.3
EXPERIENCE
70
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
below 2years 3-5years above 5 years
EXPERIENCE
TABLE 5.1.4
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS
S.No Working Days No. of Respondents Percentage
1 20-22 10 20
2 23 -25 15 30
3 25-28 22 44
4 29-31 03 06
Total 50 100
Inference:
20 % belongs to 20-22 days, 30 % belongs to 23-25 days, 44 % belongs to 25- 28days,
and 06 % belong to above 29-31 days.
CHART-5.1.4
NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS

50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
20-22 23-25 25-28 29-31
NUMBER OF WORKING DA Y S
TABLE 5.1.5
Respondents Based On Their Leave In A Month

Taken leave in
S.No month No. of Respondents Percentage
1 0 10 20
2 1 -5 23 46
3 6-10 04 08
4 10-15 10 20
5 16-20 03 06
Total 50 100
Inference:
20 %belongs to 0 days, 46 % belongs to 1-5days, 08 %belongs to 6-10 days, 20
%belongs to 10-15 days, and 06 %belongs to 16-20 days.
CHART-5.1.5
LEAVE IN MONTH
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
0 1-5 6-10 10-15 16-20
LEA VE IN MONTH
TABLE 5.1.6
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR NUMBER OF WORKING YEARS IN THE
COMPANY
S.No WORKING YEARS No. of Respondents Percentage
1 <5YEARS 16 32
2 <10 years 30 60
3 >10 years 04 08
Total 50 100
Inference:
32 % belongs to <5 years, 60 % belongs to <10years and
08 %belongs to >10 years.
CHART-5.1.6
number of working years in the company

70
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
<5 years <10 years >10 years
number worki ng years i n the company

TABLE 5.1.7
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR WORK LOAD
S.No Work load No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Highly satisfied 04 08
2 Satisfied 03 06
3 Neutral 13 26
4 Dissatisfied 25 50
5 Highly Dissatisfied 05 10
Total 50 100
Inference:
08 % belongs to highly satisfied, 06 % belongs to satisfied
26 %belongs to neutral, 50 % belongs to dissatisfied and10 % belongs to highly
dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.7
WORK LOAD
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
hig hly satisfied neutral hig hlydissatisfied
satisfied dissatisfied
WORK LOA D
TABLE 5.1.8
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR WORKING HOURS
S.No Working Hours No. of Respondents Percentage
2 Satisfied 12 24
3 Neutral 05 10
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that,
20 %belongs to highly satisfied, 24 % belongs to satisfied, 10 % belongs to neutral,
26 %belongs to dissatisfied and 20 % belongs to highly dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.8
WORKING HOURS
30
20
10
Percent
0
WORKING HOURS
TABLE 5.1.9
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR MANAGEMENT POLICY
S.No Management policy No. of Respondents Percentage
2 Satisfied 10 20
3 Neutral 05 10
Total 50 100
Inference:
40 % belongs to highly satisfied, 20 %belongs to satisfied 10 % belongs to neutral, 20
% belongs to dissatisfied and 10 % belongs to highly dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.9
MANAGEMENT POLICY
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
MANA GEMENT POLICY

TABLE 5.1.10
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR WORKING ENVIRONMENT
S.No Working environment No. of Respondents Percentage
2 Satisfied 10 20
3 Neutral 04 08
Total 50 100
Inference:
46 % belongs to highly satisfied, 20 %belongs to satisfied, 08 %belongs to neutral, 10 %
belongs to dissatisfied and 06 %belongs to highly dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.10
WORKING ENVIRONMENT
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
WORKING ENV IRONMENT

TABLE 5.1.11
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SUPERVISOR

Relation ship with their
S.No supervisor No. of Respondents Percentage
2 Satisfied 05 10
3 Neutral 10 20
Total 50 100
Inference:
04 % belongs to highly satisfied, 10 %belongs to satisfied, 20 % belongs to neutral,
40 %belongs to dissatisfied and 26 % belongs to highly dissatisfied.
CHART5.1.11
RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SUPERVISOR

50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
highly satisf ied neutral highlydissatisf ied
satisf ied dissatisf ied
RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SUPERVISOR

TABLE 5.1.12
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR LEAVE AFFECTING THEIR COMPANY

OUTPUT
S.No Leave affect company No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 39 78
2 No 11 22
Total 50 100
Inference:
78 %says yes, 22 %says no.
CHART-5.1.12
leave affecting their company output

100
80
60
40
20
Percent
0
yes no
leave affecting their company output

TABLE 5.1.13
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR EMPLOYEES SKILL
S.No Employee skill No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Good 35 70
2 Fair 10 20
3 Poor 05 10
Total 50 100
Inference:
70 % belongs to Good, 2 0%belongs to Fair and 10 % belongs to Poor
CHART-5.1.13
EMPLOYEES SKILL
80
60
40
20
Percent
0
good fair poor
EMPLOYEES SKILL
TABLE 5.1.14
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR SALARY PAID
S.No Salary paid No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Sufficient 20 40
2 In sufficient 10 20
Neutral
3 05 10
Moderately
4 Insufficient 15 30
Total 50 100
Inference:
40 % belongs to Sufficient, 20 % belongs to Insufficient, 10 %belongs to Neutral and
30% belongs to moderately insufficient.
CHART-5.1.14
SALARY PAID
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
sufficient insufficient neutral moderately sufficien
SA LARY PA ID
TABLE 5.1.15
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR COMPENSATION PROVIDED
S.No Compensation provided No. of Respondents Percentage
2 Satisfied 04 08
3 Neutral 10 20
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that 06 % belongs to highly satisfied, 08 %belongs to
satisfied, 20 % belongs to neutral, 54 %belongs to dissatisfied and 12 % belongs to
highly dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.15
COMPENSATION PROVIDED
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
COMPENSATION PROVIDED
TABLE 5.1.16
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR EXISTING JOB
S.No Existing job No. of Respondents Percentage
2 Satisfied 04 08
3 Neutral 10 20
5 Highly 06 12
Dissatisfied
50
Total 100
Inference:
06 %belongs to highly satisfied, 08 % belongs to satisfied, 20 % belongs to neutral,
54 % belongs to dissatisfied and12 % belongs to highly dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.16
TABLE 5.1.17
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR FACILDEGREEES PROVIDED BY THE

COMPANY
S.No FacilDEGREEes provide by the No. of Respondents Percentage

company
2 Satisfied 23 46
3 Neutral 12 24
Total 50 100
Inference:
14 %belongs to highly satisfied, 46% belongs to satisfied, 24% belongs to neutral
l2 %belongs to dissatisfied and 4 % belongs to highly dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.17
FACILITIES PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY

50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
FACILITIES PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY

TABLE 5.1.18
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR FLEXIBILITY AND INDEPENDENCE
S.No Flexibility & independence No. of Respondents Percentage
2 Satisfied 04 08
3 Neutral 31 62
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that 10 % belongs to highly satisfied, 08% belongs to satisfied,
62%belongs to neutral, 12 % belong to dissatisfied and 08 % belongs to highly dissatisfied.
CHART-5.1.18
FLEXIBILITY AND INDEPENDENCE

70
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
FLEXIBILITY AND INDEPENDENCE

TABLE 5.1.19
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR PROCEDURE FOR TAKING LEAV E
S.No Procedure for taking leave No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Giving a Leave Letter 39 78
2 Not Giving a Leave Letter 04 08
3 Asking Permission 07 14
4 No Leave 0 0
Total 50 100
Inference:
78 % belongs to giving a leave letter; 08 % belongs to not giving leave letter
14 % belongs to asking permission and 0 % belongs to no leave
CHART 5.1.19
PROCEDURE FOR TAKING LEAVE

100
80
60
40
20
Percent
0
g iving a leave lette not g iving leave let askingpermission
PROCEDURE FOR TAKING LEA VE

TABLE 5.1.20
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR REASON FOR TAKING LEAVE
S.No Reason for taking leave No. of Percentage

Respondents
1 Personal Problem 15 30
2 Health Problem 20 40
3 Finance Problem 07 14
4 Working Environment 04 08
5 Others 04 08
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that 30% belongs to Personnel problem, 40% belongs to Health
problem, 14 % belongs to Finance problem, 08 % belongs to working environment and 08 %
belongs to others
CHART-5.1.20
REASON FOR TAKING LEAVE

50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
personnel problem finance problem others
health problem working environment
REA SON FOR TAKING LEA VE

TABLE 5.1.21
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR ABSENT DUE TO TRANSPORTATION

PROBLEM
S.No Absent due to transportation No. of Respondents Percentage

problem
1 In Some cases 23 46
2 Often 05 10
3 Rare 12 24
4 Not at All 10 20
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that, 46 %belongs to in some cases, 10% belongs to
often, 24 % belongs to rare and, 20 %belongs to not at all
CHART-5.1.21
ABSENT DUE TO TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM

50
P 40
E
R
C
E 30
N
T
20
10
0
in some case often rare not at all
ABSENT DUE TO TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM
.
TABLE 5.1.22
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR INFECTIOUS DISEASE
S.No Infectious diseases No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 11 22
2 No 39 78
Total 50 100
Inference:
22 % says yes, 78 % says no.
CHART-5.1.22
AFFECTED BY INFECTIOUS DISEASES

100
80
60
40
20
Percent
0
yes no
AFFECTED BY INFECTIOUS DISEASES

TABLE 5.1.23
RESPONDENTS BASED ON LEAVE WHENEVER YOU WANT
Leave No. of Respondents Percentage

S.No
1 Yes 04 08
2 No 46 92
Total 50 100
Inference:
08 % says yes, 92 % says no.
CHART 5.1.23
TO GET LEAVE WHENEVER YOU WANT

100
80
60
40
20
Percent
0
yes no
TO GET LEA VE WHENEVER YOU WA NT

ABLE 5.1.24
RESPONDENTS BASED ON INSUFFICIENT REST PAUSE
S.No Insufficient rest pause No. of Respondents Percentage
1 More 29 58
2 Less 05 10
3 Tolerable 16 32
Total 50 100
Inference:
58 % belongs to more, 10 % belongs to less and 32 % belongs tolerable.
CHART-5.1.24
REST PAUSE IS ONE OF THE REASON

70
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
more less tolerable
REST PAUSE IS ONE OF THE REASON

TABLE 5.1.25
RESPONDENTS BASED ON MOTIVATION TECHNIQUE
S.No Motivation technique No. of Percentage

Respondents
1 Incentives 29 58
2 Bonus 0 0
3 Allowance 21 42
Total 50 100
Inference:
58% belongs to incentives, 0 % belongs to bonus and 42 % belongs to allowance.
CHART-5.1.25
MOTIVATION TECHINIQUE
60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
incentives allowances
MOTIVA TION TECHINIQUE

TABLE 5.1.26
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR PERSONAL PROBLEM
S.No Personal problem No. of Respondents Percentage
1 In Some cases 31 62
2 Often 04 08
3 Not at All 15 30
Total 50 100
Inference:
62 % belongs to in some cases, 08 % belongs to often and
30 % belongs to not at all.
CHART-5.1.26
PERSONAL PROBLEM
70
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
in some cases often not at all
PERSONAL PROBLEM
TABLE 5.1.27
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR COUNSELING PROVIDED BY THE
COMPANY
S.No Counseling provided by the No. of Respondents Percentage

company
1 Yes 31 62
2 No 19 38
Total 50 100
Inference:
62% says yes, 38 % says no.
CHART-5.1.27
counseling provided by the company

70
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
yes no
counseling provided by the company

TABLE 5.1.28
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR PREFERENCE OF SHIFTS TO REDUCE
ABSENTEEISM
Sl.No Preference of shift No. of Respondents Percentage
1 General Shift 22 44
2 Weekly Shift 21 42
3 Monthly Shift 07 14
Total 50 100
Inference:
44 % prefers general shift, 42 % prefers weekly shift and 14 % prefers monthly shift
CHART-5.1.28
WHICH SHIFT DO YOU PREFER

50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
general shif t w eekly shif t monthlyshif t
WHICH SHIFT DO YOU PREFER

TABLE 5.1.29
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR FREEDOM TO CHANGE THE SHIFTS
S.No Freedom to change No. of Respondents Percentage

the shift
1 Yes 13 26
2 No 11 22
3 Rare 26 52
Total 50 100
Inference:
The above table infers that 26 % belongs to yes, 22% belongs to no and 52 %belongs to
rare
CHART-5.1.29
FREEDOM TO CHANGE
60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
yes no rare
FREEDOM TO CHANGE
TABLE 5.1.30
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR NEED OF ADDDEGREEONAL LEAVE
S.No Need of additional leave No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Yes 25 50
2 No 25 50
Total 50 100
Inference:

50 % says yes, 50%says no.
CHART-5.1.30
NEED OF ADDITIONAL LEAVE

60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent
0
yes no
NEED OF ADDITIONAL LEAVE

TABLE 5.1.31
RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR EXPECTED FACILDEGREEES NEEDED
S.No Expected facilities needed No. of Respondents Percentage
1 Medical 11 22
Facilities
2 Transport Facilities 30 60
3 Others 09 18
Total 50 100

Inference:
22 %belongs to medical Facilities, 60 %t belongs to transport Facilities and
18 % belongs to others.
CHART-5.1.31
TYPE OF FACILITES
70
60
50
40
30
20
Percent
10
0
medicalf acilites transport f acilites others
TYPE OF FACILITES
5.2 ANALYSIS USING CHI-SQUARE- 2
TO FIND WHETHER THERE IS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE OPINION OF

RESPONDENTS REGARDING THEIR WORKING HOURS
Null Hypothesis
There is no significant difference in the variable among the employees about their
working hours.
TABLE 5.2.1
S.No Working Hours No. of Respondents
1 Highly satisfied 10
2 Satisfied 12
3 Neutral 05
4 Dissatisfied 13
5 Highly Dissatisfied 10
Total 50
FORMULA
(O-E) 2
2 =
E
O = Observed frequency
E = Expected frequency
COMPUTATION OF CHI-SQUARE ( 2 )
TABLE No: 5.2.2
S.No O E (O-E) (O-E)2 (O-E)2 /E
1 10 10 0 0 0
2 12 10 2 4 0.4
3 05 10 -5 25 2.5
4 13 10 3 9 0.9
5 10 10 0 0 0
TOTAL 3.8
Source: Primary Data
The calculated value is 3.8

Degree of freedom = (n-1) = (5-1)
=4
Level of significance = 5%
Table value 4 of DGF and 5% level of significance = 9.48
3.8 < 9.48 - Calculated Value is lesser than Tabulated Value.
Hence, Null hypothesis is ACCEPTED.
INFERENCE
Thus Chi-Square test infers that there is no significant difference in the
variable among the employees about their working hours.
5.3 ANALYSIS USING CORRELATION ANALYSIS
TO FIND WHETHER THERE IS CORRELATION BETWEEN AFFECTED BY

INFECTIOUS DISEASES Vs LEAVE AFFECTING THE COMPANY OUTPUT
Let X be the respondent affected by Infectious diseases.

Let Y be the Leave affecting the company output.
TABLE 5.3.1
S.no Factors X Y
1 Yes 11 39
2 No 39 11
Total 50 50
RANKS
TABLE 5.3.2
S.no Rank of X Rank of Y di² = (Xi-Yi)²

1 2 1 1
2 1 2 1
Total ∑(Xi-Yi)² 2
1-6 ∑ di²
Formula r = 1- ,By substituting the data to the formula, we get r = -1
N (n²-1)
INFERENCE
The value obtained is in negative, where it infers that a change in one variable has an
opposite change in another variable. From the correlation analysis it is inferred that, if the
employees get affected by Infectious diseases then the company output will be get decreased.
5.4 ANALYSIS USING ANOVA
TO FIND WHETHER THERE IS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE OPINION OF RESPONDENTS

REGARDING THEIR SALARY PAID VS ABSENT DUE TO TRANSPORTATION
Null Hypothesis
i. There is no any significance difference between Salary paid.

ii. There is no any significance difference between absent due to Transportation.
TABLE 5.4.1
Absent due to
Transportation In some
S.no Often Rare
cases Not at all Total
Salary paid
1 Sufficient 7 1 8 4 20
2 In-Sufficient 6 1 1
2 10
3 Neutral 3 2 0
0 5
4 Moderately Sufficient 7 1 3
4 15
Total 23 5 12
10 50
STEPS
Number of all items N = 16

Sum of all items are T= 50
T²
Correction factor CF = = 156.25
N
Total sum of squares SST = 153.75
Sum of squares between column samples SSC = 43.25
Sum of squares between column samples SSR = 31.25
Residual or Error SSE = 79.25
ANOVA TABLE 5.4.2
Sum of Degrees of
Source Of Mean Square (MS) F-ratio
Squares Freedom (d.f)
Variation
Treatment
between Salary 43.25 3 14.41
paid
Treatment 1.637
between
31.25 3
Absent due to
10.41
Transportation
Residual or
79.25 9 8.80
Error 1.182
Tabulated value for (3,9) d.f at 5% level of Significance is 3.86
INFERENCE
i. Calculated value (1.637) < Tabulated value (3.86)

 Therefore H0 is ACCEPTED.
 This shows that there is no any significance difference between Salary paid.
ii. Calculated value (1.182) < Tabulated value (3.86)

 Therefore H0 is ACCEPTED.
 This shows that there is no any significance difference between Absent due to
Transportation
5.5 ANALYSIS USING WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD
TO FIND THE RANKS OF DIFFERENT FACTORS WHICH ARE LISTED BELOW

ACCORDING TO THE OPINION OF RESPONDENTS
TABLE No: 5.5.1
FACTORS Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly

Satisfied Dissatisfied
WORKING 10 12 05 13 10
HOURS
MANAGEMENT
POLICY 20 10 05 10 05
WORKING
ENVIRONMENT 28 10 04 05 03
RELATION
WITH 02 05 10 20 13
SUPERVISOR
Table 5.5.2
POINT 5 4 3 2 1
WEIGHTAGE
FACTORS H.S S N D H.D TOTAL AVG RANK

WORKING
HOURS 50 48 15 26 10 149 2.98 3
MANAGEMENT
POLICY 100 40 15 20 05 180 3.6 2
WORKING
ENVIRONMENT 140 40 12 10 03 205 4.1 1
RELATION
WITH 10 20 30 40 13 113 2.26 4
SUPERVISOR
INFERENCE
The above table infers that the company gives more weight age first to the working
environment, second to the management policy, third to the working hours, and finally to the
relationship with supervisors. This shows that the employees are very much satisfied with
their working environment.
CHAPTER-V
FINDINGS
SUGGESTION
CONCLUSION
CHAPTER-VI
6.1 FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
1. The age group of employees from group of 36-45 persons is 44%

2. The employee education from INTER is 44%
3. The Experience of the employee from above 5 years is 64%
4. The number of working days by employee is 25-28 is 44%
5. The number leave taken in a month averagely 1-5 is 45%
6. The employee working years <10 years is 60%
7. The work load given to employee at dissatisfied level is 50%
8. The working hours is at dissatisfied to employee is 26%
9. The employee are highly satisfied with management policy is 40%
10. The employee are highly satisfied with working environment is 46%
11. About 40%are dissatisfied with supervisor
12. The absenteeism will affect the company out put at 78%
13. The employee skills in the work is good at 70%
14. About 40%were dissatisfied with compensation provide at the time of absent.
15. Exiting job is satisfied to employee is at 34%.
16. About 46%were satisfied with Facilities provided by the company.
17. The flexibility and indepence is neutral is 62%.
18. About 78% were giving a leave letter and taking a leave.
19. The employees are absent due to Health problems 40%.
20. About 46% were absent due to transportation problem
21. The study shows that the infected diseases affected to employees are none at 78%.
22. About 45% says that they take leave whenever they need.
23. The rest pause is more at 58%.
24. The employees are motivated by incentives is 58%
25. In some cases the employees are absent due to personnel problem is 62%.
26. About 62% says they need counseling in the company.
27. About 42% percent prefer weekly shift.
28. The employees change the shift fort the convinces at rare at 52%.
29. About 50% says they need Facilities leave and 50% says they did not need Facilities
leave.
30. The most of the respondence says that they need transport Facilities at 60%
31. From the Chi-Square test it is inferred that there is no significant difference in the
variable among the employees about their working hours.
32. From the correlation analysis it is inferred that, if the employees get affected by
Infectious diseases then the company output will be get decreased.
33. From the Analysis of variance it is inferred that there is no any significance difference
between Salary paid and between Absent due to Transportation.
34. From the weighted average method it is inferred that the company gives more weight
age first to the working environment, second to the management policy, third to the
working hours, and finally to the relationship with supervisors. This shows that the
employees are very much satisfied with their working environment.
6.2 SUGGESTION AND RECOMMENDATION
 In order to minimize the rate of absenteeism the company could take care of
employee’s health’s especially in production unit.
 Introducing attendance management programme.
 I suggest that by taking disciplinary action which will minimize absenteeism.
 Introducing medical facilities for employees and employee’s family member.
 Providing transport facilities for all employees
 Motivating the employee by monetary and non monetary awards for those who are
completed 100% attendance.
 To improve safety awareness among employee by educating them on health aspects
conducting safety work shop and to reduce noise pollution in few department.
CONCLUSION
The study is carried out to determine the level of employee‘s absenteeism in THE
HYDERABAD HYUNDAI MOTORS LTD.
Even though company is providing with sufficient facilities to the employee’s to an

extent. The company may provide some more facilities like proper ventilation, medical
facilities transport facilities and welfare actives which would reduce absenteeism and
enhances the employees to work more efficiently and effectively for achieving the
orginisational objectives.
APPENDICES
ANNEXURE- 1
QUESTIONNAIRE
A STUDY ON EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT IN HYUNDAI MOTORS LTD,

HYDERABAD
Personal Details:
1. I) Name :
I I) EID No :
III) Address :
IV) Department :
V) Martial Status :
VI) Annual Income :
VII) Age:
a) 18 – 25 b) 26 – 35 c) 36 – 45 d) above 45
VIII) Education:
a) SSC b) INTER c) DEGREE d) Others, please
Specify______
IX) Experience
a) Below 2 years b) 3 - 5 years c) above 5 years
Other Details:
2. Number of working days per month:

a) 20 - 22 b) 23 - 25 c) 25 - 28 d) 29 - 31
3. How many days do you take leave in a month?

a) 0 b) 1 - 5 c) 6 - 10 d) 1 0 - 1 5
e) 16 - 20
4. How long you are working in the company?
a) < 5 years b) < 10 years c) > 10 years
5. Rate the factors below according to the satisfaction level….
Highly Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly

Satisfied Dissatisfied
WORKLOAD
WORKING
HOURS
MANAGEMENT
POLICY
WORKING
ENVIRONMENT
RELATIONSHIP
WITH
SUPERVISORS
6. Does your leave will affect the company out put?

a) Yes b) no
7. How much your company utilizing the employee skills?

a) Good b) Fair c) Poor
8. About the salary paid by the company?

a) Sufficient b) Insufficient c) Neutral d) Moderately sufficient
9. Are you satisfied your compensation at the time of your leave?

a) Highly Satisfied b) Satisfied c) Neutral d) Dissatisfied
e) Highly dissatisfied
10. Are you satisfied with your existing job?

11. How do you feel about your facilities provided by the company?
12. Flexibility and Independence allowed?
13. What is the procedure for taking leave in your organization?
a) Giving a leave letter b) Not giving a leave letter
c) Asking a permission d) No leave
14. Reason for taking leave?

a) Personal Problem b) Health problem c) Finance problem
d) Working environment e) Others
15. How often do you absent due to transportation problem?

a) In some cases b) Often c) Rare d) Not at all
16. Are you affected by infectious diseases?

a) Yes b) No
17. Is it possible to get leave whenever you want?

a) Yes b) No
18. Do you tell insufficient rest pause is one of the reasons for absent?
a) More b) Less c) Tolerable
19. What type of motivation techniques adopted for employees regular to the work?
a) Incentives b) Bonus c) Allowances
20. Does the company helps in your personal problem?

a) In some cases b) Often c) Not at all
21. Do you need counseling in the company for your personal matter affecting you in taking
leave often?
a) Yes b) No
22. To reduce absenteeism which shifts do you prefer if it is adopted?

a) General Shift b) Weekly Shift c) Monthly shift
23. Do you have freedom to change your shift for your convenience?
a) Yes b) No c) Rare
24. Do you need additional leave?

a) Yes b) No
25. What type facilities do you except from the management to reduce absenteeism?
a) Medical facilities b) Transport facilities c) Others, please
specify____
26. Any suggestion to reduce absenteeism_____________________________
ANNEXURE-2
BIBILIOGRAPHY
BOOKS:
 Kothari, C.R., Research Methodology - Methods & Techniques, New Age
international (P) Ltd., Publishers, New Delhi ,Second Edition ,2004.
 Gupta, S.P., Statistical Methods, Sultan Chand & Sons Publishers, New Delhi, Thirty
Fourth Editions, 2005.
 Prasath L.M.,Human resources management , Sultan Chand & Sons Publishers, , New
Delhi, Thirty Fourth Editions, 2005.
 Reddy& Rao –Absenteeism in India , Deep , publication , New Delhi
 Aswathappa.k, Human Resource and Personnel Management, Tata Mc Graw Hill,

New Delhi, 1999.
WEBSITES:
 www.google.com
 www.wikepidia.com
 www.absenteeism.com

Emp Mana - New

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Emp Mana - New

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

4.9.

4.9.2 CHI-SQUARE ANALYSIS

SPEARMAN Correlation method, it also can be said as Rank Correlation. It is

defined by the symbol ‘r’

4.9.4 WEIGHTED AVERAGE METHOD

Analysis of variance is an extremely useful technique concerning research. This is

Steps involved in ANOVA are

1. Name of the Row samples as x1, x2, x3, x4……

6. Sum of squares between column samples SSC = (∑ y1) ² + (∑ y2) ² + (∑ y3) ² T²

8. Calculating Residual or Error SSE = [ SST- (SSC+SSR) ]

Between SSC MSC

 If the calculated value (C.V) of F1 < tabulated value (T.V) of F1 then H0 is

5.1 ANALYSIS USING PERCENTAGE METHOD

S.No Age No. of Respondents Percentage

S.No Education No. of Respondents Percentage

S.No Experience No. of Respondents Percentage

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS

S.No Working Days No. of Respondents Percentage

NUMBER OF WORKING DAYS

Respondents Based On Their Leave In A Month

S.No WORKING YEARS No. of Respondents Percentage

number of working years in the company

number worki ng years i n the company

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR WORK LOAD

S.No Work load No. of Respondents Percentage

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR WORKING HOURS

S.No Working Hours No. of Respondents Percentage

S.No Management policy No. of Respondents Percentage

MANA GEMENT POLICY

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR WORKING ENVIRONMENT

S.No Working environment No. of Respondents Percentage

WORKING ENV IRONMENT

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SUPERVISOR

RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SUPERVISOR

RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR SUPERVISOR

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR LEAVE AFFECTING THEIR COMPANY

S.No Leave affect company No. of Respondents Percentage

leave affecting their company output

leave affecting their company output

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR EMPLOYEES SKILL

S.No Employee skill No. of Respondents Percentage

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR SALARY PAID

S.No Salary paid No. of Respondents Percentage

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR COMPENSATION PROVIDED

S.No Compensation provided No. of Respondents Percentage

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR EXISTING JOB

S.No Existing job No. of Respondents Percentage

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR FACILDEGREEES PROVIDED BY THE

S.No FacilDEGREEes provide by the No. of Respondents Percentage

FACILITIES PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY

FACILITIES PROVIDED BY THE COMPANY

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR FLEXIBILITY AND INDEPENDENCE

S.No Flexibility & independence No. of Respondents Percentage

FLEXIBILITY AND INDEPENDENCE

FLEXIBILITY AND INDEPENDENCE

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR PROCEDURE FOR TAKING LEAV E

S.No Procedure for taking leave No. of Respondents Percentage

1 Giving a Leave Letter 39 78

2 Not Giving a Leave Letter 04 08

PROCEDURE FOR TAKING LEAVE

PROCEDURE FOR TAKING LEA VE

RESPONDENTS BASED ON THEIR REASON FOR TAKING LEAVE