INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

BUG-ANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Name of Employee: OSCAR L. MAGBANUA, JR. Name of Rater: CERIACO M. DENI-AY
Position: Teacher I Position: PRINCIPAL I
Review Period: SCHOOL YEAR 2016 - 2017 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: NEGROS OCCIDENTAL

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

KRAs Objectives OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING SCORE
ACTUAL RESULTS
Per KRA ( Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness

Efficiency EFFECTIVENESS TIME Quality EfficiencyTimelines

Instructional
Competence
60%

Planning/ Prepares lesson plans/ Daily logs/Lesson plans/Checklist of Jun '16 5- 100 % LPs /daily 5- a. LP/Daily log PSLC/ CG Based 5-Prepared a night before
Evaluating daily logs and visual Visual Aids to log per subject area b. relevant SIM 4-1 hour before class
aids related to the lesson Mar '17 per section/class C. alignment of objectives , 3-30 minutes before class
per day materials, activities and 2-10 minutes before class begins
4-90 to 99 % evaluation 1-no plan/log
10 3-80 to 89 % d. value focused 4 4 4 4.000 0.400

2- 70 to 79 % e. instructional decision result

1-69 % and below 4-4 of the above indicators
3-3 of the above indicators
2-2 of the above indicators
1-1 of the above indicators
Conducts remedial Schedule of Remdial as 5- 3 Remedial episode 5-a. Remedial Plan per episode is a. suitable
5-Prepared a night tobefore
episodes classes for slow List of Slow learners scheduled 4-2 remedial episodes learning ability of pupils 4-1 hour before class
Remedial Activity 3-1 remedial episode b. provided opportunity for greater3-30 minutes before class
Log/plan 2-incomplete remedialpupils 2-10 minutes before class begins
1-none c. varied and appropriate 1-no plan/log
5 1-none d. maximize utilization of SIMs 2 2 2 2.000 0.100
e. generated teacher- learner interaction.
4-4 of the above indicators
3-3 of the above indicators
2-2 of the above indicators
1-1 of the above indicators
Reporting and Maintained updated Accomplished Jun-16 5- 10 school records5-records were complete, accur5-Submitted 2 days before
school records of pupils a. SF 1 to 4- 9 school records erasures, filed properly for 4-1 day before due date
assessing pupilsa. SF 1 b. SF 2 Mar-17 3- 8 school records 4-presence of 4 of the above i3-on due date
Progress b. SF 2 c. SF 3 2- 7 school records 3-presence of 3 of the above i2-1 day after due date
c. SF 3 d. SF 5 2-presence of 2 of the above i1-2 or more days after de
1- 6 and below schoo
d. SF 5 e. Class Record 1-presence of 1 of the above indicators
5 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
e. Class Record f. Form 138
f. Form 138 g. Form 137
g. Form 137 h. Test Notebook
h. Test Notebook i. Anecdotal Records
i. Anecdotal Records j. Test Results
j. Test Results
Updates parents on children'Class Records/Record Book Quarterly 5- At least 5 Homeroo 5- Updates include pupils aca 5- agenda prepared a wee
progress and problems Report Card 4-4 Homeroom PTA me attendance, class participat scheduled meeting
through dialogues, conferen-Permanent Records 3-3 Homeroom PTA me assignments/project and par
4-3 days before
ces and PTA meetings Anecdotal Records 2-2 Homeroom PTA me curricular and co-curricular 3-a day before
5 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
1-1 Homeroom PTA me4- presence of 4 of the above 2- on the day
3- presence of 3 of the above 1-none of the above
2- presence of 2 of the above indicators
1- presence of 1 of the above indicators
TEACHING - Improved performance
LEARNING indicators on the following:
A. NAT/Periodical Test Copy of NAT Apr-17 5 5-75 % and above 5- least learned skills identif 5-Submitted 2 days before
4-70%-74% recommended for specific 4-1 day before due date
4 4 4 4.000 0.200
3-65%-69% 4- least learned skills identif 3-on due date
2-60%-64% recommended for interven2-1 day after due date
Periodical test Results Quarterly 5 1-below 60% 3-- least learned skills identi 1-2 or more days after de
2- least learned skills identified
4 4 4 4.000 0.200
1-none of the above
(if there’s failiure
B. Drop-out Report on Drop - out Mar-17 5-0% dropout 5- caused of problem identifi 5-Submitted 2 days before
4-0.1%-1.0% recommended for specific i 4-1 day before due date
3-1.1%-2.0% 4- caused of problem identifie3-on due date
2-2.1%-3.0% recommended for interven2-1 day after due date
5 3 3 3 3.000 0.150
1-3.1% and above 3- caused of problem identifie1-2 or more days after de
2-problems identified
 1-none of the above
(if there’s drop out)

C. Failure Rate Report on Failure Mar-17 5-0% dropout 5- caused of problem identifi 5-Submitted 2 days before
4-0.1%-1.0% recommended for specific i 4-1 day before due date
3-1.1%-2.0% 4- caused of problem identifie3-on due date
5
2-2.1%-3.0% recommended for interven2-1 day after due date 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
1-3.1% and above 3- caused of problem identifie1-2 or more days after de
2-problems identified
1-none of the above
(if there’s failure)
D. Promotion Rate Report on Promotion Mar-17 5-100% 5- caused of problem identifi 5-Submitted 2 days before
4-90%-99% recommended for specific i 4-1 day before due date
3-80%-89% 4- caused of problem identifie3-on due date
2-70%-79% recommended for interven2-1 day after due date
2.5 4 4 4 4.000 0.100
1-69% and below 3- caused of problem identifie1-2 or more days after de
2-problems identified
1-none of the above
(if there’s failure)
E. Nutritional Status Nutritional Status Jun-16 5-0%-2.0% severely5- caused of problem identifi 5-Submitted 2 days before
to 4-2.1%-4.0% severe given intervention 4-1 day before due date
Feb-17 3-4.1%-6.0% severe4-problem analyzed and given3-on due date
2.5 4 4 4 4.000 0.100
2-6.1%-8.0% severe3-problems identified and ana2-1 day after due date
1-8.1% and above se
2-problems identified 1-2 or more days after de
1-none of the above
F. Reading (Phil-IRI ) PHIL-IRI - Pre and Post Jun-16 5-0% frustration level 5- caused of problem identifi 5- two days before schedule
and 4-90%-99% decreased given intervention 4-one day before schedule
Feb-17 frustration level 4-problem analyzed and given3-as scheduled
3-80%-89% decrease f3-problems identified and ana2-one day after schedule
5 frustration level 2-problems identified 1-two days after schedule 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
2-70%-79% decreased1-none of the above
frustration level
1-below 70% decreased from
frustration level
G. Numeracy ( elem.) Math Inventory - Pre and Post Jun-16 5-0% non-numerate 5- Least learned facts identifi 5- two days before schedule
4-90%-99% decreased given intervention 4-one day before schedule
and non-numerate 4-Least learned skills analyze 3-as scheduled
3-80%-89% decrease 3-least learned skills identifi 2-one day after schedule
5 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
Feb-17 non-numerate 2-least learned skills identifie 1-two days after schedule

PROFESSIONAL
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
15%
Attends professional
meetings, in-service
trainings and related
activities for self- growth
and adbvancement
Observes proper
decorum
Conducts in depth studies
or action researches on
instructional problems
SCHOOL AND
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
10%
Maintains harmonoiious
relations with superiors,
students, local and public
officials and co-teachers
5 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
2-70%-79% decreased1-none of the above
non-numerate
1-below 70% decreased from non
Training Passbook As 5- 100 % of the mandat
5- Has shown marked improve5-3 days after conduct of
scheduled /sch activities learning delivery 4- 5 days after conduct of
4- 90 to 99 % 4-has shown improvement 3-a week after conduct of a
Certificate of Attendance 5 3-80 to 89 % 3-has shown minimal improv 2- 2 weeks after conduct of 5 5 5 5.000 0.250
2-70 to 79 % 2- has shown 1- 3weeks after conduct of
1-69 % and below
Certification Jun-16 5-100 % observance of5- the
zero Code
cases ofofreported violations -a week before due date
Checklist of behavior/practices/guideli to conduct for teache 4-1 to 3 reported cases of violations 4- 3 days before due date
Mar-17 4- 90 to 99 % 3-4 to 7 cases of reported violations 3-on due date
5 3 3 3 3.000 0.150
3-80 to 89 % 2-8 to 12 cases of reported violations 2- 2 to 3 days after due date
2-70 to 79 % 1-13 or more reported violations 1-4 days and above after due date
1-69 % and below
Copy/copies of action research 5- 3action research 5 - Problems were 5-a week before due date
a. clearly identified and
on instructional 4- 3 days before due date
defined
b. several alternatives were
4-2 action research proposed and
3-on due date
instructional pro selected 2- 2 to 3 days after due date
3-1 action research o
c. findings were reported and 1-4 days and above after due date
5 4 4 5 4.333 0.217
problem d. shared
4- presence of 3 of the above
2-1 action research indicators
3-presence of 2 of the above
1-no action R indicators
2-presence of 1 of the above
indicator
1-none
Copies of evaluation sheet Jun-16 5- zero complaint/conflict 5- Excellent rating from superi5-a week before due date
4- 1 to 3 complaints/conflicts co-teachers and local offici4- 3 days before due date
to 3- 4 to 6 complaints/conflicts 4- Very Satisfactory rating fro 3-on due date
5 2- 7 to 10 complaint/conflicts co-teachers and local officia2- 2 to 3 days after due date 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
 5 4 4 4 4.000 0.200
Mar-17 1-11 and more complaints/confl3- satisfactory rating 1-4 days and above after due date
2-fair rating
1-poor rating

Gets involved in school, Certificate of Participation/Aprreciatio Jun-16 5- 100 % of the required school, 5-a week before due date
community and civic - to community and civic organization 4- 3 days before due date
organization activities Mar-17 activities 3-on due date
5- 100 % of the mandatory trainings/ 2- 2 to 3 days after due date
5 sch activities 1-4 days and above after due date 4 4 4.000 0.200
4- 90 to 99 %
3-80 to 89 %
2-70 to 79 %
1-69 % and below
PUNCTUALITY
AND Come to school and Logbook Daily 5- not more than 3 times 5- not more than 5 – Submitted DTR one day
ATTENDANCE attended required meetings,Attendance Sheet undertime during the 4 times absent except for absence 4 – Two days after.
15% conferences, trainings and Daily Time Record 4- not more than 4 to 6 t accordance with regulations 3 – Three days after.
school activities undertime 4- not more than 5 to 8 absences 2 – Four days after.
15 3- not more than 7 to 10 3- not more than 9 to 12 absence 1 – A week after. 4 4 4 4.000 0.600

undertime 2- not more than 13 to 16 absences

2- not more than 11 to 151-more than 17 times absent
1-16 or more times tardy
Attain five of the
PLUS FACTOR following:
1. Serve as 5 Attained 5 indicators with documents
coordinator in any
not more than working committee in 4 Attained 4 indicators with documents
the school
2. Publish an article in
5% national circulation 3 Attained 3 indicators with documents
3. Serve as
demonstration
teacher/resource 5 3.000 0.150
speaker/cooperating 2 Attained 2 indicators with documents
4. Received an
teacher
outstanding employee
award at least in the 1 Attained 1 indicators with documents
5. Conducted
District level an
innovation
6. Participated in any
activities as teachers’
association
OVERALL RATING OF ASSESSMENT 4.067
Adjectival Rating Scale : DESCRIPTIVE RATING Very Satisfactory
Outstanding 4.500 -----5.000
Very Satisfactory 3.500 ----4.599
Satisfactory 2.500 --- 3.499
Unsatisfactory 1.500 --- 2.499 CERIACO M. DENI-AY JULIETO S. ABARIDO, Jr
Poor 1.000 --- 1.499 Rater Ratee Approval
 Transmutation Table

1.000 1.499 Poor

1.500 2.499 Unsatisfactory

2.500 3.499 Satisfactory

3.500 4.499 Very Satisfactory

4.500 5.000 Outstanding