Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PRACTICAL PHYSICS
FOR STUDENTS
BY
B. L. WORSNOP
B.Sc., Ph.D.
Head of Quintin School
Formerly Senior Lecturer in Physics,
King's College, London
AND
H. T. FLINT
D.Sc., Ph.D.
Hildred Carlile Profeaaor of Physics
in the University of London, Bedford Colkge
Formerly Reader in Physics,
King'a College, London
WITH 8 PLATES
AND 496 DIAGRAMS AND ILLUSTRATIONS
!1 .
METHUEN & CO. LTD. LONDON
.
9.3
OATALOOU11i NO. 7389/U
Ti
CONTENTS
OHAPTER PAGE
I. ERRORS OF OBSERVATIONS 1
II. MEASUREMENT OF LENGTH, AREA, VOLUME, AND MASS 15
III. MOMENTS OF INERTIA AND THE DETERMINATION OF 'g' 35
IV. ELASTICITY 66
V. SURFACE TENSION 106
VI. VISCOSITY 134
VII. THERMOMETRY AND THERMAL EXPANSION 169
VIII. CALORIMETRY 186
IX. VAPOUR DENSITY AND THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY 207
X. MISCELLANEQUS EXPERIMENTS IN HEAT 236
XI. REFLECTION OF LIGHT 255
XII. REFRACTION OF LIGHT 269
XIII. INTERFERENCE, ' DIFFRACTION, AND POLARIZATION 321
XIV. PHOTOMETRY 412
XV. SOUND 426
XVI. MISCELLANEOUS MAGNETIC EXPERIMENTS 459
XVII. TERRESTRIAL MAGNETISM 470
xvm. PERMEABILITY AND SUSCEPTIBILITY 478
XIX. AMMETERS, VOLTMETERS, AND GALVANOMETERS 493
XX. RESISTANCE MEASUREMENTS 528
XXI. MEASUREMENT OF POTENTIAL 571
XXII. MEASUREMENT OF CAP.A.CITY AND INDUCTANCE 590
xxm. THE QUADRANT ELECTROMETER 643
XXIV. MISCELLANEOUS ELECTRICAL EXPERIMENTS 663
XXV. THERMIONIC EMISSION AND VALVE CHARACTERISTICS 685
XXVI. THE THERMIONIC VALVE AS A GENERATOR OF OSCILLA-
TIO NS 707
XXVII. RADIO-FREQUENCY MEASUREMENTS 715
xxvm. THE CATHODE-RAY OSCILLOGRAPH 726
INDEX 743
vii
PLATES
Fw . 236
Fro. 240
,
" .
Fro. 320 Fm. 321
FIG. 328
Fie. 3;33
Frn. 33f>
Fro. 348
Fro. 350
Pre. 356
Fro. 372
F10. 373
CHAPTER I
ERRORS OF OBSERVATIONS
The values of BM, Ba, etc., may be positive or negative, and in some
cases the terms on the right-hand side of equation (2) may counteract
one another. This ffect cannot be relied upon, and it is necessary to
consider the worst case, which is that in which all the errors tend in
1
the same direction giving for the error Bp, the value corresponding to
the equation
Bp = BM +
Ba + +
Bb ~- ... (3)
P M a b c
In the case considered the fraction ~corresponds to 1 per cent and the
c
other contributions to Bp are insignificant. This is particularly the case
p
in the determination of the mass. It is not worth while to exercise
great care in the determination of the mass of 50 gm. to an accuracy
of 1 mg.
ERRORS OF OBSERVATIONS 3
The student is recommended, however, to measure carefully the
various quantities involved in using calculations of the kind discussed.
It is no disadvantage to measure some of the quantities more accurately
than is strictly necessary while a definite loss occurs if the unimportance
of any term on the right of equation (3) leads to a slipshod deter-
mination of the corresponding quantity. The point of this discussion
is to suggest the exercise of common sense in making the measurements
and to point out how the accuracy of the final result depends on the
various individual errors.
A case where much time is often lost and trouble often expended in
vain occurs in calorimetric experiments where temperature measure-
ments can be made to an accuracy of 1\°C. only, but where masses can
be measured easily to ro~inr· It is clearly useless to waste time in
the determination of the masses of calorimeters and contents to this
degree when the temperature is observed to 1 10 ° in 5° or 6° C. But here
again, anything in the nature of careless measurement may lead to
large errors; a sense of proportion and the exercise of care are required.
A further example of the influence of individual measurement on a
final error will be considered from the formula used in deducing the
coefficient of the viscosity of a liquid by the method of flow through
a tube.
The formula applicable in this case is
1tR4 P
... (4)
1J =8T Q'
~ where R denotes the radius of the capillary tube, P denotes the pressure
~ difference between its ends, l denotes its length, and Q the volume of
liquid flowing per sec.
The maximum error d"IJ is in this case given by the formula
d71 = 4dR + ~ + dP + dQ _ ... (5 )
1l R l P Q
It is to be noted that an error in the measurement of R is magnified
four times on account of the occurrence of R 4 in the formula. This
example illustrates the need for very careful measurement of quantities
such as R, which, by the way they occur in the expression and in the
calculation, exercise a strong influence on the final result.
In every experiment the possible error in the result must be deter-
mined according to the foregoing principles, and it must be stated
together with the calculated result.
0 AB x
I
Fro. 1.
... (9)
is shown in Fig. 2.
It appears from the graph that the probability of zero error is a
maximum and that the probability falls off rapidly with the magnitude
of the error. There is some probability of very large errors occurring
but it is small. This is a point which seems to be at variance with
experience, for in a physical measurement it would seem to be quite
impossible to incur an error beyond some finite value. Thus, in
measuring a length of 10 cm. it seems absurd to suggest that there is
any probability of recording 20 cm. as an observed value. It will,
however, be noted that the probability curve falls rapidly to very low
values, and the curve may be regarded as a close description of the
facts of experience. This has been tested in many ways by drawing
frequency curves. If a series of observations results in the determina-
tion of a value for a certain quantity, it may be assumed for the present
purpose that the arithmetic mean is the most accurate value. This
assumption is justified when a very large number of observations is
made and the law of error is the normal law. The values determined
8 ADVANCED PRACTICAL PHYSICS FOR STUDENTS
should then be subtracted from the value of the arithmetic mean and
the deviations regarded as errors.
Let a graph be drawn with the deviations as abscissae marking a
scale in some convenient unit. Let an ordinate be drawn midway
between 0 and 1 to represent the number of observations with devia-
tions lying between these limits, and r epeat this procedure for the
intervals 1 to 2, and so on. If the tops of these ordinates be joined,
a graph will be obtained consisting of a broken line with a maximum
Fm. 2
. . Noh 2 2
and the sum of the errors of magmtude x is y'; x e-h x dx. Thus, the
sum of all the errors, when the sign of x is neglected, is twice this
quantity integrated from 0 to oo. The average error is then obtained
by division by N 0 • After evaluation of the integral it is found that
2h roo 2 2 1
1l = y';j x e-h x dx = y;h· ... (12)
0
µ2 h Joo x2e-hx
= ----= 2 2
dx= - 1 2'
v'n: -00 2h
1
or µ = ---· ... (13)
v'2h
The Probable Error
Finally, an expression for the probable error is often used. This is
the value of x such that half the total deviations lie below it and half
above it. The value is denoted by r, and this definition is expressed
by the equation
2
-1 = - h
y'; - r
e-hx J'
2 2 dx
'
... (14)
which means that half the errors lie between the values x = -rand
X= +r.
From this equation it may be deduced that
r = 0·4769/h. ...(15)
These quantities may therefore be regarded as a measure of the accuracy
of a set of observations.
10 ADV AN CED PRACTICAL PHYSICS FOR STUDENTS
µ = ±Jvn~nx~ 1).
. .. (17)
The two formulae become the same for large values of n. Other formulae
can be used for the estimation ofµ, but Bessel's formula is usually the
most accurate. This quantity, µ, as we have seen, is described as the
root-mean-square error or mean square deviation.
ERRORS OF OBSERVATIONS 11
From equations (13) and (15) µ is related to the probable error by
means of the relation
r = ± 0·6745 µ. . .. (18)
From the definition of the probable error this quantity denotes a small
range on either side of the average value, within which it is as likely as
not that any measurement chosen at random will lie.
The record of the numerical result of an experiment is made by
writing down the arithmetical mean, a, and by placing after it plus or
minus the probable error r, thus (a± r).
Another method for recording the accuracy of observations is that
due to Peters, and it consists in determining the average error. The
residuals are again taken to represent the errors, so that for a large
number of observations the average error is given by
""=±I:
., !xi . ... (19).
n
This is only approximately correct for small values of n, and it fails
completely in the case of one observation, since in that case 1J is zero.
The symbol !xi means the numerical value of the residual.
A better approximation to the average error is given by
1J = / I: lxl •
± .vn(n-1) ·.. (20)
The probable error may be determined from 1J for by means of the
equations (12) and (15) it follows that
r = ·± 0·8453 1l·
The conventional character of this determination of error should be
noted. It is an attempt to record the influence of accidental errors on
the result, and except in so far as the experimenter himself introduces
accidental errors, the record is intended to be independent of the
observer.
The criticism has sometimes been advanced that such a record does
not give information upon which reliance on the accuracy can be placed.
It is argued that experience and proved skill of observers and a know-
ledge of the detail and circumstances of an individual set of observations
afford better information. It would, however, be very difficult to
formulate any method for the measurement of accuracy on these
grounds, and the conventional method has at least the advantage that
it is based on considerations which attempt to record the accuracy of
the observations from a study of the observations themselves, which
thus become a permanent record of the reliance to be placed upon them.
The Rejection of Observations
When a series of values results from a succession of determinations
it may happen that one or more are markedly different from a group
12 ADVANCED PRACTICAL PHYSICS FOR STUDENTS
BAoA'B' x
I
Fm. 3
The area lying under the curve and between the ordinates PN and
P'N' represents the number of observations with deviations up to and
less than ON. The area outside these ordinates under the curve
· represents the number with deviations exceeding this value. The
form of this curve is given by equation (11) and when fig. 4 is drawn
N X
Fm. 4
according to this equation the areas just mentioned give the fraction
of the number of observations with deviations less than ON and greater
than this value. All that is required theoretically for the determination
of these areas is the constant h, which can be found from the probable
error by means of equation (15). It is thus possible to calculate how
many out of a number of results should lie on one side or the other
of a particular deviation.
14 ADV AN CED PRACTICAL PHYSICS FOR STUDENTS
Suppose that ten determinations have been made and that one of
them deviates markedly from the remainder. Let this particular one
have a deviation d. The probable error is deduced from the deter-
minations and a calculation can then be made of the fraction which
should possess the deviation d or more. Suppose that the fraction is
71:\. This gives as the number out of ten determinations only t, which
means that one in ten is an undue proportion, and the inclusion of this
determination would throw too great a tendency in one direction. It is
thus justifiable to r eject this result. It may occur that more than one
result can with justification be excluded, but the most divergent should
be excluded in one step and the process then repeated neglecting this
result, and so on until all the remainder lie within the limit set by the
greatest remaining deviation.
This process is tedious without the use of tables, and a table of
values of the probability integral has been constructed which can be
used after the manner of tables of logarithms.
The probability integral is
I = :J:e-z dz. 2
. .. (21)
The area under the curve of fig. 4 lying between the ordinates PN
and P'N' is
h Jc
S= ~ 2 2
e-hx dx, . . . (22)
v'7t -c
where c = PN.
By writing z = hx
S= :J:ce-z dz. 2
. .. (23)