You are on page 1of 1332

Mayor Carolyn G.

Goodman (At-Large) Commissioner Sam Cherry, Chair


Mayor Pro-Tem Lois Tarkanian (Ward 1) Commissioner Louis De Salvio, Vice Chair
Vacant (Ward 2) Commissioner Vicki Quinn
Councilman Bob Coffin (Ward 3) Commissioner Trinity Haven Schlottman
Councilman Stavros S. Anthony (Ward 4) Commissioner Donna Toussaint
Councilman Cedric Crear (Ward 5) Commissioner Christina E. Roush
Councilwoman Michele Fiore (Ward 6) Commissioner Brenda J. Williams

Planning Commission Agenda


Council Chambers - 495 South Main Street - Phone 229-6011
City of Las Vegas Internet Address: www.lasvegasnevada.gov

Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in
the Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. Reasonable
efforts will be made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an
accommodation to attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at
702-229-6301 and advise of your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay
Nevada.

April 9, 2019
6:00 PM

ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO
OR MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY
BE REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME.

Backup material for this agenda may be obtained from Milagros Escuin, Department of Planning, 333 North Rancho
Drive, 3RD Floor, (702)-229-6301 or on the City's webpage at www.lasvegasnevada.gov.

ACTIONS: All actions except general plan amendments, rezonings, and related cases thereto are final unless an appeal
is filed by the applicant or an aggrieved person, or a review is requested by a member of the city council within ten days
and payment of those costs shall be made upon filing of the application.

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:


1. Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and suggested
conditions of approval, if appropriate.
2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is complete,
the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staff’s conditions of approval.
3. If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staff's condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.
4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If more than
one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and indicate that he speaks
for others in the audience who share his view.
5. Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard, but in the
interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups of interested
parties.
6. After all objectors' input have been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.
7. Following the applicant's response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst themselves,
ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.

Page 1 of 1332
8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps, models
and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in for the record
unless requested by the Commission.

As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We
appreciate your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.

BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. Call to Order

2. Announcement: Compliance with Open Meeting Law

3. Roll Call

4. Public Comment during this portion of the Agenda must be limited to matters on the Agenda for
action. If you wish to be heard, come to the podium and give your name for the record. The amount
of discussion, as well as the amount of time any single speaker is allowed, may be limited.

5. For Possible Action to Approve the Final Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of March 12, 2019.

6. For Possible Action - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be
stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.

ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE


The following are items that may be considered in one motion/one vote. They are considered routine non-public and
public hearing items. All public hearings and non-public hearings will be opened at one time. Any person representing
an application or a member of the public or a member of the Planning Commission not in agreement with the conditions
and all standard conditions for the application recommended by staff, should request to have that item removed from
this part of the agenda.
7. TMP-75817 - TENTATIVE MAP - 3100-3190 WEST SAHARA AVENUE (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SAHARA WEST EXECUTIVE PARK, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative
Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 6.73 acres at 3100, 3150 and 3190 West Sahara Avenue
(APNs 162-05-403-001, 002 and 004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75758]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

8. GPA-75784 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ASPECT HOMES - OWNER:
CHARLESTON LAMB, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: MLA
(MEDIUM LOW ATTACHED DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: ML (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on
3.62 acres at the northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane (APN 140-31-801-001), Ward
3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75766]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

9. ZON-75786 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75784 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ASPECT HOMES -


OWNER: CHARLESTON LAMB, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R-CL (SINGLE FAMILY COMPACT-LOT) on 3.62 acres at the northwest corner
of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane (APN 140-31-801-001), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75766]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

10. GPA-75827 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKS GARAGE
ONE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: O (OFFICE) AND SC
(SERVICE COMMERCIAL) TO: GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 2.60 acres at 1700 East Sahara Avenue
(APNs 162-02-801-001 and 002), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-74677]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

Page 2 of 1332
11. ZON-75828 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75827 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKS
GARAGE ONE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: P-R (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
AND PARKING) TO: C-2 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on 2.60 acres at 1700 East Sahara Avenue (APNs
162-02-801-001 and 002), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-74677]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

12. SDR-74835 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75827 AND ZON-75828 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKS GARAGE ONE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major
Amendment to previously approved Plot Plan Reviews (Z-0071-80 and Z-71-86) FOR A PROPOSED 5,906
SQUARE-FOOT ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 28,969 SQUARE-FOOT MOTOR VEHICLE SALES (NEW)
DEALERSHIP on 2.60 acres at 1700 East Sahara Avenue (APNs 162-02-801-001 and 002), C-2 (General
Commercial) and P-R (Professional Office and Parking) Zones [PROPOSED: C-2 (General Commercial)], Ward
3 (Coffin) [PRJ-74677]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

13. GPA-75846 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD
OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: M (MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: PF (PUBLIC FACILITIES) on 15.64 acres at 491 North Lamb Boulevard (APN
140-31-601-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

14. ZON-75847 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75846 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL


BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL)
TO: C-V (CIVIC) on 15.64 acres at 491 North Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-601-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

15. VAR-75848 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75846 AND ZON-75847 - PUBLIC HEARING -


APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW DEVIATIONS FROM TITLE 19.10.020 C-V (CIVIC) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS on 15.64 acres at
491 North Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-601-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.

16. SDR-75849 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75846, ZON-75847 AND VAR-75848 -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request
for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 22,927 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING ADDITION TO AN
EXISTING 69,315 SQUARE-FOOT PUBLIC SCHOOL, PRIMARY DEVELOPMENT on 15.64 acres at 491 North
Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-601-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

17. WVR-75948 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: 201 CHARLESTON, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Waiver of the INTERIM DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS OVERLAY DISTRICT
STREETSCAPE STANDARDS on 0.65 acres at the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Casino Center
Boulevard (APN Multiple), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75910]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

18. SUP-75757 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAUREN OWENS - OWNER: CIM/116
N. 3RD LV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 90 SQUARE-
FOOT OFF-PREMISE SIGN USE at 116 North 3rd Street (APN 139-34-510-021), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 5 (Crear) [PRJ-75622]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS


19. ABEYANCE - SUP-75084 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ON 3010
SAHARA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 3,000
SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at 3010 West Sahara Avenue
(APN 162-05-403-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-74991]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

Page 3 of 1332
20. ABEYANCE - SDR-75082 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-75084 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ON 3010 SAHARA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major
Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-56141) FOR A PROPOSED 3,000 SQUARE-
FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED [CONVENIENCE STORE] WITH FUEL PUMPS AND
CANOPY WITH A WAIVER TO NOT ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE CORNER WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED
on 0.91 acres at 3010 West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-05-403-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-74991]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

21. ABEYANCE – VAR-75636 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW PROPOSED WALL SIGNS TO COVER 29 PERCENT OF THE EAST ELEVATION AND
24 PERCENT OF THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING WHERE 20 PERCENT IS THE MAXIMUM
ALLOWED on 14.72 acres at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive (APN 162-08-418-002),
C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75581]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

22. ABEYANCE – MSP-75637 - MASTER SIGN PLAN RELATED TO VAR-75636 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER: INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Master Sign Plan FOR AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL
RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (INDOOR AND OUTDOOR) DEVELOPMENT on 14.72 acres at the southwest
corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive (APN 162-08-418-002), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-75581]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

23. TABLED - RENOTIFICATION - GPA-74312 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING -


APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST,
ET AL - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL)
TO: H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 4.62 acres at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell
Road (APNs 163-01-501-001 and 002), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-74089]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

24. TABLED - RENOTIFICATION - ZON-74313 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-74312 - PUBLIC HEARING -


APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST,
ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) TO: R-4 (HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 4.62 acres at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road (APNs
163-01-501-001 and 002), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-74089]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

25. SDR-75858 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-74312 AND ZON-74313 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 144-UNIT SENIOR
CITIZEN APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT on 4.62 acres at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and
Lindell Road (APNs 163-01-501-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone [PROPOSED: R-4 (High Density
Residential)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75792]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

26. GPA-75814 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS
VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment to amend portions of the Southeast
Sector Land Use Map of the General Plan FROM: C (COMMERCIAL) AND MXU (MIXED USE) TO: FBC (FORM-
BASED CODE) on approximately 226 acres in the Fremont East District generally located south of Interstate 515,
west of Eastern Avenue, north of Carson Avenue, and east of Las Vegas Boulevard (APNs Multiple), Wards 3
(Coffin) and 5 (Crear) [PRJ-75868]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

27. ZON-75886 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP LAS
VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 55.52 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APNs
125-24-101-001 and 125-24-201-001), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75680]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

28. VAR-75956 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-75886 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMAN


CATHOLIC BISHOP LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 1.09

Page 4 of 1332
CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS REQUIRED on 55.52 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road
and Jones Boulevard (APNs 125-24-101-001 and 125-24-201-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED:
R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75680]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

29. TMP-75888 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO ZON-75886 AND VAR-75956 - JONES / ELKHORN - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request
for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED 199-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WITH
WAIVERS TO ALLOW NON-STANDARD PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING NO CURB, GUTTER
OR SIDEWALK AND NO EXTERIOR STREETLIGHTS FOR LEON AVENUE WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED
FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 55.52 acres at the southeast corner of
Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APNs 125-24-101-001 and 125-24-201-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75680]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

30. VAR-75808 - VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-75807 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: HARRIS


INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO ADDITIONAL
PARKING SPACES WHERE TWO ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A PARKING-
IMPAIRED DEVELOPMENT on 0.17 acres at 444 East Sahara Avenue (APN 162-03-416-026), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75616]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

31. SUP-75807 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-75808 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
HARRIS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 2,300 SQUARE-FOOT DAILY LABOR SERVICE USE at 444 East Sahara Avenue (APN
162-03-416-026), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75616]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

32. VAR-75819 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Variance TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO HAVE A HEIGHT OF THREE STORIES
WHERE TWO STORIES IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ON LOT ONE OF A TWO LOT PROPOSED
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east
of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear)
[PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

33. VAR-75820 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-75819 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO HAVE A HEIGHT
OF THREE STORIES WHERE TWO STORIES IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ON LOT TWO OF A TWO LOT
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately
1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward
5 (Crear) [PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

34. VAR-75821 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-75819 AND VAR-75820 - PUBLIC HEARING -


APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 47-FOOT
WIDE ACCESS CONTROL GATE WHERE 50 FEET IS REQUIRED; TO ALLOW SIDEWALKS ON ONE SIDE
WHERE SIDEWALKS ON BOTH SIDES ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A CONNECTIVITY RATIO OF 1.00
WHERE 1.30 IS REQUIRED on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east
of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear)
[PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

35. SDR-75822 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75819, VAR-75820 AND VAR-75821
- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 18-UNIT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.14 acres on the
north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2
(Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear) [PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

36. TMP-75823 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821 AND SDR-75822 -
MONTAGE ESTATES - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Tentative Map FOR A THREE-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.14 acres on the north side

Page 5 of 1332
of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low
Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear) [PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

37. VAR-75829 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: JASON MAHEU - OWNER: MICHAEL & DIANA
MOORE TRUST AND MATTHEWS FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
20 PARKING SPACES WHERE 32 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.42 acres at 1807 West Charleston
Boulevard (APN 162-04-112-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75798]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

38. VAR-75832 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-75829 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: APPLICANT:JASON


MAHEU - OWNER: MICHAEL & DIANA MOORE TRUST AND MATTHEWS FAMILY TRUST - For possible
action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 10 FEET IS
REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.42
acres at 1807 West Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-04-112-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-75798]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

39. SDR-75833 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75829 AND VAR-75832 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: JASON MAHEU - OWNER: MICHAEL & DIANA MOORE TRUST AND MATTHEWS
FAMILY TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 4,860
SQUARE-FOOT MEDICAL OFFICE DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT LANDSCAPE
BUFFER ALONG A PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED; TO ALLOW
A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINE WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED; TO ALLOW BLANK FACADES WHERE SUCH IS NOT ALLOWED; AND TO
ALLOW LESS PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING THAN WHAT IS ALLOWED on 0.42 acres at 1807 West
Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-04-112-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75798].
Staff recommends DENIAL.

40. VAR-75852 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER: INTEGRAL
PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW 921 PARKING SPACES WHERE 1,065 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 14.71 acres at the
southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive (APN 162-08-418-002), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75760]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

41. SDR-75854 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75852 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER: INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment of an approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-70652) FOR A PROPOSED 6,800 SQUARE-FOOT INDOOR FLOOR AREA ADDITION TO AN
APPROVED 205,972 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (INDOOR AND
OUTDOOR) DEVELOPMENT on 14.71 acres at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive (APN
162-08-418-002), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75760]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

42. VAR-75869 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JEANNINE LEE, ET AL - For possible
action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW FIVE PARKING SPACES WHERE 12 ARE REQUIRED on 0.16
acres at 2517 Valley Street (APN 139-36-410-015), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-75270]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

43. SDR-75870- SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75869 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: JEANNINE LEE, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan
Review FOR A PROPOSED SIX-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO
ALLOW A THREE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH ALONG THE EAST AND WEST PROPERTY LINES
WHERE SIX FEET IS REQUIRED AND A FOUR-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTH ALONG THE SOUTH
PROPERTY LINE WHERE 10 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.16 acres at 2517 Valley Street (APN 139-36-410-015),
R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75270]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

Page 6 of 1332
44. VAR-75818 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SERENITY BIRTH CENTER, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT SETBACK WHERE A FIVE-FOOT
SETBACK IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN at 332 South Jones Boulevard
(APN 138-36-210-008), O (Office) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75764]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

45. VAR-75824 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RAD MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER: DSRS
PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW REDUCED LOT SIZES AND
WIDTHS FOR THREE PROPOSED LOTS WHERE A 20,000 SQUARE-FOOT LOT SIZE AND A 100-FOOT LOT
WIDTH ARE REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A REAR YARD SETBACK OF 26 FEET WHERE 35 FEET IS THE
MINIMUM REQUIRED on 0.70 acres at 835 Shetland Road (APN 139-32-802-025), R-E (Residence Estates)
Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75738]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

46. VAR-75831 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BRO HYMN, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Variance TO ALLOW TWO PROPOSED 60-FOOT TALL FREESTANDING SIGNS WHERE 40
FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED on 0.72 acres at 1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard (APN
162-03-302-010), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75734]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

47. VAR-75834 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OSEVENA NOEL - OWNER: MARIE GENISTE
- For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A TWO-FOOT CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK
WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING ADDITION TO A SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING AND AN
EXISTING NINE-FOOT TALL PERIMETER WALL WHERE EIGHT FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED at 500
Vincent Way (APN 138-34-711-009), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75747].
Staff recommends DENIAL.

48. SUP-75850 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MIGUEL GUTIERREZ - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A BUILDING MAINTENANCE SERVICE AND SALES
USE at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-03-602-013), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony)
[PRJ-75587]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

49. SDR-75851 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-75850 - APPLICANT/OWNER: MIGUEL
GUTIERREZ - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR THE ADDITION OF
A PROPOSED 9,000 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING TO A SITE CONTAINING AN EXISTING 4,053 SQUARE-
FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON A
PORTION OF THE SOUTH PERIMETER AND A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON A PORTION OF THE
NORTH PERIMETER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard
(APN 138-03-602-013), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75587]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

50. SUP-75861 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER:
GRAND TETON LODGE LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 4,330 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at the northeast
corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive (APN 125-09-401-031), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75685]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

51. SUP-75862 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-75861 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE
HERBST, INC. - OWNER: GRAND TETON LODGE LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED CAR WASH, FULL SERVICE OR AUTO DETAILING USE at the northeast corner
of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive (APN 125-09-401-031), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore)
[PRJ-75685]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

52. SDR-75863 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-75861 AND SUP-75862 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: GRAND TETON LODGE LAND, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5689)
FOR A PROPOSED 4,330 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE [CONVENIENCE STORE] WITH FUEL
PUMPS AND 1,080 SQUARE-FOOT CAR WASH, FULL SERVICE on a portion of 2.71 acres at the northeast

Page 7 of 1332
corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive (APN 125-09-401-031), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward
6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75685]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

53. SUP-75838 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMMEL V. FAJARDO AND
LORENA DE LIOS FAJARDO - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A COMMUNITY
RESIDENCE USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 455-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE
WHERE 660 FEET IS REQUIRED at 125 Antelope Way (APN 138-34-514-001), R-1 (Single Family Residential)
Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75806]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

54. VAC-75859 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BP HOLDINGS, INC. - OWNER: VFR-
SOUTHWEST DESERT EQUITIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate a U.S.
Government Patent Easement located on the north and east perimeter of the site and a 30-foot portion of the north
half of Darling Road located east of Hualapai Way, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75736]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

55. SDR-75860 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-75859 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: BP HOLDINGS, INC. - OWNER: VFR-SOUTHWEST DESERT EQUITIES, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576) FOR
THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND PARKING LOT RECONFIGURATION FOR A
9,043 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW AN EIGHT-FOOT
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH PERIMETER WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED on 2.02 acres at 6840
North Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-401-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75736]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:
56. TXT-75815 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For
possible action on a request to remove and replace LVMC Title 19.09 Form-Based Code with an updated version
of LVMC Title 19.09 Form-Based Code, amend the LVMC Title 19 Appendix F Interim Downtown Las Vegas
Development Standards as applicable, and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

Citizens Participation:
57. Citizens Participation: Public comment during this portion of the agenda must be limited to matters
within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. No subject may be acted upon by the Planning
Commission unless that subject is on the agenda and is scheduled for action. If you wish to be
heard, come to the podium and give your name for the record. The amount of discussion on any
single subject, as well as the amount of time any single speaker is allowed, may be limited.

Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for the convenience of persons with disabilities. Reasonable efforts will be
made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an accommodation to attend and
participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s office at 702-229-6311 and advise of your need at least 48 hours
in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.

THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor
Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive

Page 8 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 1

DEPARTMENT: Planning
DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
CALL TO ORDER

Page 9 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 2

DEPARTMENT: Planning
DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

Page 10 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 3

DEPARTMENT: Planning
DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ROLL CALL

Page 11 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 4

DEPARTMENT: Planning
DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE
PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS
WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Page 12 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 5

DEPARTMENT: Planning
DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2019.

Page 13 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 6

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant
wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted
upon at this time.

Page 14 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 7

DEPARTMENT: Planning CONSENT


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
TMP-75817 - TENTATIVE MAP - 3150-3190 WEST SAHARA AVENUE (A COMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISION) - APPLICANT/OWNER: SAHARA WEST EXECUTIVE PARK, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 3.75
acres at 3150 and 3190 West Sahara Avenue (APNs 162-05-403-001 and 002), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75758]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/01/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter

Page 15 of 1332
Page 16 of 1332
Page 17 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SAHARA WEST EXECUTIVE PARK,
LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TMP-75817 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 25

NOTICES MAILED N/A

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

CS
Page 18 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

TMP-75817 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map
is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within
four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City’s Street Naming
Regulations.

3. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

4. The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking
across the entire subdivision.

5. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State


Subdivision Statutes.

Public Works

6. Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All parcels
created through this map shall have perpetual unobstructed access to all driveways
servicing the overall subdivision unless incompatible uses can be demonstrated to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.”

7. Per Title 19.16.060.W.2, sewer service for this commercial subdivision shall be
shown in accordance with one of the following three alternatives, and the appropriate
note shall appear on the face of the recorded Final Map:
I. On-site sewers, 8-inches in diameter or larger, are public sewers where
located within 20-foot wide dedicated public sewer easements.
II. On-site sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per
the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this commercial
subdivision.
III. On-site sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per
the Joint Use Agreement of this commercial subdivision.

CS
Page 19 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

8. Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All subdivided
lots within this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage rights across all
existing and future parcel limits.” A technical drainage study shall be submitted and
approved prior to further development of this site.

9. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map
is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type
and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and
drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans
by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless
specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the
recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision-related construction plans,
whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute
approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative
Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.

CS
Page 20 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Map for a one-lot commercial subdivision
on a 6.73-acre site at 3100, 3150 and 3190 Sahara Avenue.

ISSUES

• The subject site is developed with an existing shopping center. There are no proposed
changes or additions to the site.
• As the site has been in existence for several years, all walls are existing and no
retaining walls are anticipated.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is home to an existing shopping center and is zoned C-1 (Limited
Commercial). No development changes or additions have been proposed at this time.
Any future development will have to be developed to Title 19 development standards for
the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Access to the site will remain from Sahara
Avenue, Richfield Boulevard and Spanish Oaks Drive, all public right-of-ways adequate
in size to continue servicing the subject site.

Parking and access is intended to be allowed across the one-lot commercial subdivision.
A condition of approval will require that common perpetual access and parking will be
granted across the entire proposed commercial subdivision. The map meets and
complies with the Title 19 and NRS 278 requirements for a Tentative Map; therefore, staff
recommends approval with conditions. If denied, the existing parcels would remain.

FINDINGS (TMP-75817)

All Title 19 zoning and NRS 278 and technical requirements regarding tentative maps are
satisfied. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the subject tentative map with
conditions.

CS
Page 21 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0066-73)
application for the reclassification of property generally located between
West Oakey Boulevard on the north, West Sahara Avenue on the south,
South Valley View Boulevard on the west, and Richfield Boulevard on
the east, south of Westwood Village Tract and west of Springhurst
09/26/73
Townhouses, from R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R 3 (Medium
Density Residential) to R-PD6 (Residential Planned Development - 6
Units per Acre), R-4 (High Density Residential) and C-1 (Limited
Commercial). The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a Variance (V-0099-84) to
allow auto sales for one day only in the months of February, May, August
09/27/84
and November of every year where such is not permitted on property
located at 3100 West Sahara Avenue. Staff recommended denial.
The Planning Commission accepted a request to Withdraw Without
Prejudice a Special Use Permit (SUP-5471) for a Facility to provide
12/02/04
testing, treatment, or counseling for drug or alcohol abuse at 3150 West
Sahara Boulevard Avenue, Suite #B22. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission accepted a request to Withdraw Without
Prejudice a Special Use Permit (SUP-5472) for a Sex Offender
12/02/04
Counseling Facility at 3150 West Sahara Boulevard Avenue, Suite
#B22. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission accepted the applicant’s request to Withdraw
Without Prejudice a Special Use Permit (SUP-5783) and Site
01/27/05 Development Plan Review (SDR-5779) for a proposed Mixed-Use
Development on the properties located at the northwest corner of
Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard.
The City Council approved requests for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
6219) and for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-6220) for a seven-
story mixed-use development including 303 residential units and 20,250
06/01/05
square-feet of office, and a waiver of the 15-foot rear yard setback. The
Planning Commission recommended approval on 04/14/05. Staff had
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Major Amendment to an
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-8583) for a seven-story
mixed-use development, consisting of 325 residential units and 23,695
10/19/05 square feet of office space and a waiver to permit a side yard setback
of zero feet where 10 feet is the minimum setback required on 7.78
acres adjacent to the north side of Sahara Boulevard, between Spanish
Oaks Drive and Richfield Boulevard.

CS
Page 22 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-18693) for a four-story, 42,000 square-foot office building,
with a 2,450 square-foot restaurant with Drive-through, and a 14,550
06/06/07
square-foot General Retail Establishment on 7.68 acres at 3100-3190
West Sahara Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-44168) for a proposed 2,800 square-foot restaurant (with
drive-through) with Waivers to allow no landscape buffer along the north
03/21/12 and west perimeters where eight feet is required on approximately 0.91
acres at the northwest corner of Sahara Avenue and Richfield
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff both recommended
approval. This expired on 03/20/14 as it was not exercised.
The City Council denied Special Use Permit (SUP-55291) request for a
Medical Marijuana Dispensary use at 3190 West Sahara Avenue. The
10/28/14
Planning Commission recommended denial. Planning staff recommend
approval.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-56141) for a proposed 4,295 square-foot restaurant
with drive through with waivers to allow no landscape buffer along the
11/04/14
north and west perimeters where eight feet is required at the northwest
corner of Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard. Staff recommended
approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APNs: 162-05-403-
04/23/12
001 and 003)
A deed was recorded for a change in ownership. (APN: 162-05-403-
04/23/13
004)

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related building permits/business licenses.

Pre-Application Meeting
Planning Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant
02/11/19 where the submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a
proposed Tentative Map.

CS
Page 23 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Planning Staff conducted a routine field check and found an active
02/28/19
shopping center. No issues were noted.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 6.73

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject
Shopping Center C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Property
R-PD6 (Residential
Single Family, L (Low Density
North Planned Development – 6
Detached Residential)
units per acre)
General Retail,
South C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
other than listed
Office, other than
East listed C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Vacant
West Shopping Center C (Commercial) C-1 (Limited Commercial)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


Rancho Charleston Land Use Study Area Y
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (200 feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CS
Page 24 of 1332
TMP-75817 [PRJ-75758]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial Streets and 145 Y
Highways
Spanish Oaks
Local Title 13 75 Y
Drive
Richfield
Local Title 13 90 Y
Boulevard

CS
Page 25 of 1332
⊿7̶‫ں‬xx7Û㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬㈠ฌ

⊿7‫ں‬″ธֱxㄦֱㅡx̶ֱxxㅡฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㄦฎ
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ

Page 26 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㄦฎ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 27 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㄦฎ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 28 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㄦฎ
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ

Page 29 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㄦฎ
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ

Page 30 of 1332
Page 31 of 1332
 
 




 
 


 



! ""
! "
#
! $"

 




Page 32 of 1332
 
 




 
 


 



! ""
! "
#
! $"

 




Page 33 of 1332


 
 




 
 


 



! ""
! "
#
! $"

 




777
7777Ġਙผħ▷ਙ่7
7777Ɔ—ผ‫⎯ੂ֭ﭨ‬ⓒ7ՁՁb

İŴ่—Ŵผੂ7ธฎⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯
ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬
̶̶̶7Ќ㈠7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″

Ő֭⑾֭ผ่֭㌱̬֭7 bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7Ɔ—⇡₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่7╗่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ҜŴऑ
7 7 ̶‫ں‬ㄦx7Ŵ่₡7̶‫ں‬ɱx7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬7 Ŵ่₡7̶‫ں‬xx7Û㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ฌ
7 7 AОЌɸ⎯7‫ں‬″ธֱxㄦֱㅡx̶ֱxx‫⊿ں‬7‫ں‬″ธֱxㄦֱㅡx̶ֱxxธ7 ⊿7‫ں‬″ธֱxㄦֱㅡx̶ֱxxㅡฌ

Ḷ่7⇡֭γŴк⑾7ਙ⑾7ƆŴγŴผŴ7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7Dzゥ֭㌱—‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ОŴผ8ⓒ7ՁՁbⓒ7ਙʉ่֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ⇡ਙ‫ֱ֭ﭨ‬ผ֭⑾֭ผ่֭㌱֭₡7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯ⓒ7ʉ֭7ผ֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂฌ
ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7ੂਙ—ผ7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7ਙ—ผ7bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7Ɔ—⇡₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่7╗่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ҜŴऑ㈠7

╗γ֭7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ऑŴผ㌱֭к⎯7Ŵผ֭7▷ਙ่֭₡7Ձħこħ‫֭ש‬₡7bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7ӧbֱ‫ں‬ỏ㈠7╗γħ⎯7ħ⎯7Ŵ7⑾—ккੂֱ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭₡7ผ֭‫ש‬Ŵħк゜ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬㈠7╗γ֭ฌ
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ਙʉ่֭ผ7ʉħ⎯γ֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7Ŵ⇡к֭7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯֭кк7Ŵ7ผ֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7⎯֭ऑŴผŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠7Û֭ฌ
ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7₡ਙ7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ﭨ‬ħŴ7‫ש‬γ֭7ОŴผ㌱֭к7ҜŴऑ゜Ő֭㌱ਙผ₡7ਙ⑾7Ɔ—ผ‫ੂ֭ﭨ‬7ऑผਙ㌱֭⎯⎯ⓒ7⇡—‫ש‬7ħ่7こ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ЋŴкк֭ੂฌ
ÛŴ‫֭ש‬ผ7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7ʉ֭7ʉ֭ผ֭7ħ่⑾ਙผこ֭₡7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬ⓒ7₡—֭7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯γŴผ֭₡7—‫ש‬ħкħ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7⇡֭‫ש‬ʉ่֭֭7̶‫ں‬ㄦx7Ŵ่₡7̶‫ں‬ɱx7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴⓒ7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
кਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7кħ่֭⎯ⓒ7ʉ֭7㌱Ŵ่่ਙ‫ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱ਙこऑкħ⎯γ7ਙ—ผ7‫ف‬ਙŴк7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7ОŴผ㌱֭к7ҜŴऑ㈠7Û֭ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭⑾ਙผ֭ⓒ7ʉħкк7⇡֭7‫ف‬ਙħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γผਙ—‫ف‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7Ɔ—⇡₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่7こŴऑऑħ่‫ف‬7ऑผਙ㌱֭⎯⎯㈠

Ա֭㌱Ŵ—⎯֭7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ħ⎯7Ŵ7⑾—ккੂ7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭₡7ผ֭‫ש‬Ŵħк゜ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬ⓒ7ʉ֭7₡ਙ7่ਙ‫ש‬7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7こŴ8֭7Ŵ่ੂ7㌱γŴ่‫⎯֭ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬㈠7╗γ֭ผ֭7ʉħккฌ
⇡֭7่ਙ7่֭ʉ7㌱ਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7ऑŴผ㌱֭к⎯㈠7ҜŴऑऑħ่‫ف‬7ħ⎯7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7₡ਙ่֭7⎯ħこऑкੂ7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7⎯—⇡₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ฌ
ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑਙ‫ש่֭ש‬ħŴк7‫ف‬ਙŴк7ਙ⑾7⎯֭ккħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7Ŵ‫ש‬7̶‫ں‬ㄦㅡ7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴ7⇡—‫ש‬7ħ⎯7Ŵ7ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
ਙ⑾7AОЌ7‫ں‬″ธֱxㄦֱㅡx̶ֱxxธ㈠

╗γŴ่87ੂਙ—7⑾ਙผ7ੂਙ—ผ7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠7●⑾7ੂਙ—7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7⑾֭֭к7⑾ผ֭֭7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7こ֭㈠

Ɔħ่㌱֭ผ֭кੂⓒ

╗֭ผผħ7ОŴ⎯‫ש‬ਙผ֭ккħ
╗֭ผผħ7ОŴ⎯‫ש‬ਙผ֭ккħ
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7bਙਙผ₡ħ่Ŵ‫ש‬ਙผ

╗О̬⎯‫ש‬
Dz่㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭⎯

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㄦฎ
‫ں‬xㄦx‫ں‬7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7ḚਙʉŴ่7ŐਙŴ₡7¿7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7ธxx7¿7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ธɱ
ฎɱ‫ں‬ธɱx̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Оγਙ่֭7ӧՙxธỏ7ธธฎֱㄦx″″7¿7+Ŵゥ7ӧՙxธỏ7ธธฎֱx″ՙՙ7¿7Û֭⇡⎯ħ‫̬֭ש‬7ʉʉʉ㈠γਙผħ▷ਙ่⎯—ผ‫⎯ੂ֭ﭨ‬㈠㌱ਙこ
่⎯—ผ‫⎯ੂ֭ﭨ‬㈠㌱
㌱ਙこ
P a 3g 4
oe 1f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 8

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
GPA-75784 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: ASPECT
HOMES - OWNER: CHARLESTON LAMB, LLC, - For possible action on a request for a General
Plan Amendment FROM: MLA (MEDIUM LOW ATTACHED) TO: ML (MEDIUM LOW) on 3.62
acres at the northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Cornwood Green Lane (APN 140-31-801-
001), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75766]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Land Use Map
3. Staff Report - GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]

Page 35 of 1332
Page 36 of 1332
Page 37 of 1332
Page 38 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: ASPECT HOMES - OWNER: CHARLESTON
LAMB, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-75784 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
ZON-75786 Staff recommends APPROVAL. GPA-75784

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 18

NOTICES MAILED 695

PROTESTS 0

APPROVAL 0

JB
Page 39 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a General Plan Amendment from MLA (Medium Low Attached
Density Residential) to ML (Medium Low Density Residential); and a request to Rezone
from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on 3.62 acres
at the northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane.

ISSUES

• A Tentative Map has not been submitted for this site that would exhibit more specific
development characteristics such as the number of lots and lot sizes.

ANALYSIS

The site is located in an area of residential character with varying lots sizes in each
direction. There are single-family detached dwellings located to the north and west of the
subject site. Neighboring lots to the north are zoned R-PD7 (Residential Planned
Development – 7 Units per Acre) and are approximately 0.13 acres; lots to the west are
zoned R-1 (Single family Residential) and are approximately 0.20 acres. The south and
east perimeters of the site are bordered by an existing multi-family residential
development, which is currently zoned R-PD6 (Residential Planned Development – 6
Units per Acre).

The subject site consists of one parcel zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential) with a MLA
(Medium Low Attached Density Residential) General Plan land use designation, which
has an allowable density of 12.49 dwelling units per gross acre. The MLA (Medium Low
Attached Density Residential) General Plan land use designation allows the R-2
(Medium-Low Density Residential), R-TH (Single Family Attached) and R-MH
(Mobile/Manufactured) zoning districts.

The proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan designation generally
permits single-family detached homes on various lot sizes, including mobile and
manufactured homes. The ML (Medium Low Density Residential) designation supports
the U (Undeveloped), R-E (Residence Estates), R-1 (Single Family Residential), R-2
(Medium-Low Density Residential), R-SL (Residential Small Lot), R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot), R-MH (Mobile/Manufactured Home) zoning districts, with a maximum
gross density of 8.49 dwelling units per acre.

JB
Page 40 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The proposed R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning district would allow single family
residential residences with a minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet and lot widths of 35
feet. If the proposed designations are approved, a maximum of 30 units could be
constructed on the site, a decrease of 15 units from the current MLA (Medium Low
Attached Density Residential) designation, not excluding nonresidential area such as
streets, drainage areas or open space that would further decrease density.

Staff has determined the proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan
designation and R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning district are compatible with the
existing residential developments in the area; therefore, staff recommends approval of
these two applications.

FINDINGS (GPA-75784)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions
be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is


compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan designation


is consistent with the adjacent ML (Medium Low Density Residential), single and
multi-family residential land uses to the north, south and east. In addition, the
proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan designation is
harmonious with the existing L (Low Density Residential) single-family residential
uses to the west of the subject site.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be


compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

The applicant has proposed a Rezoning (ZON-75786) from R-1 (Single Family
Residential) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on the subject site, which is
consistent with the proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan
designation.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to


accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and

There are adequate transportation and recreation facilities within close proximity
to the subject site.

JB
Page 41 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and


policies.

All applicable plans and policies are met with the proposed amendment.

FINDINGS (ZON-75786)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning


Commission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning district conforms to the
proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan designation which
allows seven zoning districts: U (Undeveloped), R-E (Residence Estates), R-1
(Single Family Residential), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential), R-SL
(Residential Small Lot), R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot), R-MH
(Mobile/Manufactured Home).

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.

The residential uses allowed in the proposed R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot)
zoning district are compatible with the existing surrounding single and multi-family
land uses and zoning districts located within the area.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The subject site is an infill parcel that closely resembles the R-PD (Residential
Planned Development) and R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning districts
adjacent to the subject site. As the R-PD (Residential Planned Development)
zoning district is no longer available, staff has deemed that the proposed R-CL
(Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning district is appropriate for the subject site.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

Access to the subject site will remain unchanged. The property is located on
Essex Green Court, Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane, which are
classified as a 33-foot Local Streets, as defined by Title 13.

JB
Page 42 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-5102) from ML (Medium-Low Density Residential) to MLA
(Medium-Low Attached Density Residential) on 3.40 acres
approximately 750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard and 350 feet south of
Sunrise Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended approval
and Staff recommended denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-5106) from
R-1 (Single Family Residential) to R-PD11 (Residential Planned
Development - 11 Units per Acre) on 3.40 acres approximately 750 feet
west of Lamb Boulevard and 350 feet south of Sunrise Avenue. The
Planning Commission recommended approval and Staff recommended
denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-5108) for a proposed 37-lot single-family residential
development approximately 750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard and 350
feet south of Sunrise Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and Staff recommended denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-5110) to allow
12/21/05
no open space where 26,570 square feet of open space is the minimum
required in conjunction with a proposed 37-lot single-family residential
development approximately 750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard and 350
feet south of Sunrise Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and Staff recommended denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-5113) to allow
an R-PD (Residential Planned Development) zoning district on 3.40
acres where five acres is the minimum required approximately 750 feet
west of Lamb Boulevard and 350 feet south of Sunrise Avenue. The
Planning Commission recommended approval and Staff recommended
denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Waiver (WVR-5294) of Title
18.12.100 to allow 32-foot wide private streets where 39 feet is the
minimum width required with roll curbs, and of Title 18.12.130 to allow
a drive in excess of 150 feet without a circular turnaround or emergency
access gate approximately 750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard and 350
feet south of Sunrise Avenue. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and Staff recommended denial of the request.

JB
Page 43 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
(TMP-10753) for a 37-lot single family residential subdivision on 3.40
01/26/06 acres approximately 750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard and 350 feet
south of Sunrise Avenue. The Planning Commission and Staff
recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
26153) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5108) for
a proposed 37-lot single-family residential development approximately
750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard and 350 feet south of Sunrise Avenue.
Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
26154) of an approved Rezoning (ZON-5106) from R-1 (Single Family
Residential) to R-PD11 (Residential Planned Development - 11 Units
per Acre) on 3.40 acres approximately 750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard
and 350 feet south of Sunrise Avenue. Staff recommended approval of
the request.
02/06/08 The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
26155) of an approved Variance (VAR-5110) to allow no open space
where 26,570 square feet of open space is the minimum required in
conjunction with a proposed 37-lot single-family residential development
approximately 750 feet west of Lamb Boulevard and 350 feet south of
Sunrise Avenue. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
26156) of an approved Variance (VAR-5113) to allow an R-PD
(Residential Planned Development) zoning district on 3.40 acres where
five acres is the minimum required approximately 750 feet west of Lamb
Boulevard and 350 feet south of Sunrise Avenue. Staff recommended
approval of the request.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


01/25/05 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A Code Enforcement case (#3183) was processed for a vacant lot with
trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
08/27/03
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 09/15/03.

JB
Page 44 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A Code Enforcement case (#11082) was processed for a vacant lot with
trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
03/12/04
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 03/18/04.
A Code Enforcement case (#19407) was processed for a vacant lot with
trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
07/29/04
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 08/31/04.
A Code Enforcement case (#34504) was processed for a vacant lot with
trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
09/13/05
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 10/27/05.
A Code Enforcement case (#50814) was processed for a vacant lot with
trash, debris, overgrown vegetation and dumped furniture on property
02/26/07
located on the northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood
Green Lane. The case was resolved on 04/30/07.
A Code Enforcement case (#58373) was processed for a vacant lot with
trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
09/27/07
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 10/23/07.
A Code Enforcement case (#81330) was processed for a vacant lot with
trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
08/28/09
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 09/29/09.
A Code Enforcement case (#88042) was processed for a vacant lot with
trespassers and vandalism on property located on the northwest corner
03/29/10
of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The case was resolved
on 04/29/10.
A Code Enforcement case (#104505) was processed for a vacant lot
with trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
08/08/11
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 02/22/12.
A Code Enforcement case (#115101) was processed for a vacant lot
with trash and debris on property located on the northwest corner of
06/04/12
Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The case has not been
resolved.
A Code Enforcement case (#132158) was processed for a vacant lot
with trash, debris and overgrown vegetation on property located on the
08/14/13
northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The
case was resolved on 08/15/13.

JB
Page 45 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A Code Enforcement case (#193316) was processed for squatters on a
09/26/18 vacant lot on property located on the northwest corner of Wales Green
Lane and Corwood Green Lane. The case was resolved on 10/16/18.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to go over
02/04/19 the application materials and submittal requirements for a General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning on the subject site.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting is scheduled at the East Las Vegas
Community Center at 250 North Eastern Avenue at 6:15 pm to discuss
04/03/19 the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning on property
located on the northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Corwood
Green Lane, Assessor’s Parcel 140-31-801-001.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine site visit and found the subject site to be an
undeveloped parcel of land with desert vegetation throughout the site.
02/26/19
The perimeter wall on the north perimeter of the site has been
vandalized with graffiti.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 3.62

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
MLA (Medium Low
Subject R-1 (Single Family
Undeveloped Attached Density
Property Residential)
Residential)

JB
Page 46 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
R-PD7 (Residential
Single-Family ML (Medium Low
North Planned Development –
Detached Density Residential)
7 Units per Acre)
R-PD6 (Residential
Single-Family ML (Medium Low
South Planned Development –
Attached Density Residential)
6 Units per Acre)
R-PD6 (Residential
Single-Family ML (Medium Low
East Planned Development –
Attached Density Residential)
6 Units per Acre)
Single-Family L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
West
Detached Residential) Residential)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06.080, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size 3,000 SF
Min. Lot Width 35 Feet
Min. Setbacks
• Front 14 Feet to House / 18 Feet to Front Entry Garage
• Side 10 Feet (combined)
• Corner 10 Feet
• Rear 10 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage 70 %
Max. Building Height Two Stories / 35 Feet

JB
Page 47 of 1332
GPA-75784 and ZON-75786 [PRJ-75766]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed


R-1 (Single Family
1 du/lot 1
Residential)
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
R-CL (Single Family
1 du/lot 1
Compact-Lot)
Existing General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
MLA (Medium Low Attached
12.49 du/ac 45
Density Residential)
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
ML (Medium Low Density
8.49 du/ac 30
Residential)

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Essex Green Private Local
N/A 33 N/A
Court Street
Wales Green Private Local
N/A 33 N/A
Lane Street
Corwood Green Private Local
N/A 33 N/A
Lane Street

JB
Page 48 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″″
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 4g 9
oe 1f 3 3 2
Page 50 of 1332
%&
 ''

% 

#
#

+'






 
 
<


 
 
=

% 

#
 #
% 




Page 51 of 1332
%&
 ''

% 

#
#

+'






 
 
<


 
 
=

% 

#
 #
% 




Page 52 of 1332
%&
 ''

% 

#
#

+'






 
 
<


 
 
=

% 

#
 #
% 




Page 53 of 1332
%&
 ''

% 

#
#

+'






 
 
<


 
 
=

% 

#
 #
% 




Page 54 of 1332


%&
 ''

% 

#
#

+'






 
 
<


 
 
=

% 

#
 #
% 




7 7

+֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬ฎⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7₡֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬ฌ
̶̶̶7Ќ7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″ฌ

ŐDz̬7 7 Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7 C֭⎯㌱ผħऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Ŵ่₡7 bਙこऑ֭ккħ่‫ف‬ฌ


İ—⎯‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ձ֭‫֭שש‬ผ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7Ḛ่֭֭ผŴк7ОкŴ่7Aこ่֭₡こ่֭‫ש‬ฌ
Ŵ่₡7Ύਙ่֭7bγŴ่‫֭ف‬7⑾ਙผ7AОЌ7 7‫ں‬ㅡx̶ֱ‫ֱں‬ฎx‫ֱں‬xx‫ں‬ỏฌ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ⑾⑾ⓒฌ

Ḷ่7 ⇡֭γŴк⑾7 ਙ⑾7 A⎯ऑ֭㌱‫ש‬7 Ġਙこ֭⎯ⓒ7 ╗γ֭7 ÛՁԱ7 Ḛผਙ—ऑ7 ผ֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂ7 ⎯—⇡こħ‫⎯ש‬7 ‫ש‬γħ⎯7 bਙこऑ֭ккħ่‫ف‬7 İ—⎯‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
Ձ֭‫֭שש‬ผ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ่7 ̶㈠″ธ7Ŵ㌱ผ֭⎯7ਙ⑾7‫ﭨ‬Ŵ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬7кŴ่₡7Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7ЋħккŴ‫֭ف‬7ħ่ฌ
ÛŴผ₡7 ̶㈠7 7 ╗γ֭7 ㌱—ผผ่֭‫ש‬7 кŴ่₡7 —⎯֭7 ħ⎯7 ҜՁA7 ʉħ‫ש‬γ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 кŴ่₡7 —⎯֭7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ⇡֭7 Ŵこ่֭₡֭₡7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ҜՁ㈠ฌ
A₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵккੂⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱—ผผ่֭‫ש‬7▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7ħ⎯7Ɔħ่‫ف‬к֭7+Ŵこħкੂ7 Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7ӧŐֱ‫ں‬ỏ7Ŵ่₡7ʉ֭7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵฌ
Ύਙ่֭7 bγŴ่‫֭ف‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 Ɔħ่‫ف‬к֭7 +Ŵこħкੂ7 Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7 bਙこऑŴ㌱‫ש‬7 Ձਙ‫ש‬7 Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7 ӧŐֱbՁỏ㈠7 ╗γ֭7 Ḛ่֭֭ผŴк7 ОкŴ่ฌ
Aこ่֭₡こ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7Ύਙ่֭7bγŴ่‫֭ف‬7ʉħкк7่֭Ŵ⇡к֭7A⎯ऑ֭㌱‫ש‬7Ġਙこ֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7Ŵ7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 ʉγħ㌱γ7ʉħкк7⇡֭
⇡ਙ‫ש‬γ7㌱ਙこऑŴ‫ש‬ħ⇡к֭7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—ผผਙ—่₡ħ่‫ف‬7่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡⎯7Ŵ่₡7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ่7Ŵ‫שש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ħ่7⑾ħкк7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ਙ่7кŴ่₡7ʉγħ㌱γ7γŴ⎯7⇡่֭֭7‫ﭨ‬Ŵ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬7⑾ਙผ7⎯ਙこ֭7‫ש‬ħこ֭㈠

╗γ֭7 ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7 ħ⎯7 ⎯—ผผਙ—่₡֭₡7 ⇡ੂ7 ֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫⎯ש‬㈠7 ╗γ֭7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫⎯ש‬7 ਙ่7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ่ਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
Ŵผ֭7▷ਙ่֭₡7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7ОкŴ่่֭₡7C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7ӧŐֱОC7ՙỏⓒ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7кਙ‫ש‬7⎯ħ▷֭⎯7ਙ⑾7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7ㅡxɸ 7ħ่ฌ
ʉħ₡‫ש‬γ7⇡ੂ7‫ںں‬xɸ7ħ่7₡֭ऑ‫ש‬γ㈠7╗γ֭ผ֭7Ŵผ֭7⇡ਙ‫ש‬γ7C—ऑк֭ゥ7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ่₡7C֭‫ש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7ħ่ฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬㈠7 ╗γ֭7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ⎯ਙ—‫ש‬γ7 Ŵ่₡7 ֭Ŵ⎯‫ש‬7 ħ⎯7 ▷ਙ่֭₡7 Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7 ОкŴ่่֭₡ฌ
C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7 ӧŐֱОC7 ″ỏ7 Ŵ่₡7 ħ⎯7 Ŵ7 ㌱к—⎯‫֭ש‬ผ֭₡7 ╗ਙʉ่γਙこ֭7 C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬㈠7 ╗γ֭7 ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7 ਙ่7 ‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ʉ֭⎯‫ש‬7ħ⎯7▷ਙ่֭₡7Ɔħ่‫ف‬к֭7+Ŵこħкੂ7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7ӧŐֱ‫ں‬ỏ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7кਙ‫ש‬7⎯ħ▷֭⎯7ਙ⑾7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7″ㄦɸ7ħ่7ʉħ₡‫ש‬γ7⇡ੂฌ
‫̶ں‬xɸ7ħ่7₡֭ऑ‫ש‬γ㈠7

+ਙ—ผ7 ‫ש‬ʉਙֱ⎯‫ש‬ਙผੂ7 ⑾кਙਙผ7 ऑкŴ่⎯7 ʉħ‫ש‬γ7 ‫ש‬γผ֭֭7 ₡ħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่㌱‫ש‬7 ֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ਙऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7 Ŵผ֭7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 ⑾ਙผ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬㈠ฌ
╗γ֭7 こਙ₡֭к⎯7 ผŴ่‫֭ف‬7 ħ่7 ⎯ħ▷֭7 ⑾ผਙこ7 ‫ں‬ⓒㄦㅡㅡ7 ⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7 ⑾֭֭‫ש‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ธⓒ‫̶ںں‬7 ⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7 ⑾֭֭‫ש‬㈠7 Aкк7 ⑾ਙ—ผ7 こਙ₡֭к⎯7 ʉħкк7 ⇡֭7 ħ่ฌ
㌱ਙ่⑾ਙผこŴ่㌱֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬㈠7●่7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7γਙこ֭⎯ฌ
ʉħкк7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7こŴゥħこ—こ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ธՙ7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ㅡ7ħ่㌱γ֭⎯㈠

╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7γŴ₡7⇡่֭֭7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7‫ש‬γ֭7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7bħ‫ੂש‬7bਙ—่㌱ħк7ħ่7C֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผⓒ7ธxxㄦ7Ŵ่₡7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7⑾ਙผ7Ŵฌ
̶ՙ7кਙ‫ש‬7Ɔħ่‫ف‬к֭7+Ŵこħкੂ7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7ӧŐֱОC7‫ںں‬ỏ7ਙ่7̶㈠ㅡx7Ŵ㌱ผ֭⎯7ӧ่֭‫ש‬ỏ㈠

Û֭7 Ŵผ֭7 γਙऑ֭⑾—к7 ‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Ŵ⎯7 ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7 こ֭֭‫⎯ש‬7 ʉħ‫ש‬γ7 ੂਙ—ผ7 ⑾Ŵ‫ﭨ‬ਙผŴ⇡к֭7 ㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠ Ɔγਙ—к₡ฌ
ੂਙ—7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯7ਙผ7่֭֭₡7Ŵ่ੂ7⑾—ผ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7⑾֭֭к7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7こ֭㈠ฌ

Ő֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂⓒ

ОŴ—к7Dz㈠7ЋŴк่֭‫ש‬ħ่֭ⓒ7ОDzฌ
Cħผ֭㌱‫ש‬ਙผ7ਙ⑾7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7Ḷऑ֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″″
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
77 ̶″″̶7Dz㈠7Ɔ—่⎯֭‫ש‬7ŐਙŴ₡ⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7ธxㅡ77ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ธx77╗7ՙxธ㈠ㅡㄦฎ㈠ธㄦㄦ‫ں‬7ฌ
. ՙxธ ㅡ̶ㅡ xㅡɱ‫ں‬ P a 5g 5
oe 1f 3 3 2
к⇡
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 9

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ZON-75786 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75784 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
ASPECT HOMES - OWNER: CHARLESTON LAMB, LLC, - For possible action on a request for
a Rezoning FROM: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R-CL (SINGLE FAMILY
COMPACT-LOT) on 3.62 acres at the northwest corner of Wales Green Lane and Cornwood
Green Lane (APN 140-31-801-001), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75766]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps
3. Land Use Map
4. Supporting Documentation

Page 56 of 1332
Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 57 of 1332
Page 58 of 1332
Page 59 of 1332
Page 60 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″″
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 1
oe 1f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 10

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
GPA-75827 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
MARKS GARAGE ONE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment
FROM: O (OFFICE) AND SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) TO: GC (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) on
2.60 acres at 1700 East Sahara Avenue (APN 162-02-801-001 and 002), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
74677]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Land Use Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]

Page 62 of 1332
Page 63 of 1332
Page 64 of 1332
GPA-75827

S BRUCE ST
S 16TH ST

E ST LOUIS AVE
S 16TH ST

PHILLIPS AVE LAMPLIGHTER LN

S 17TH ST

MOORE ST
SUBJECT

BURNHAM AVE
KASSABIAN AVE
EXLEY AVE PROPERTY
COCHRAN ST

SPENCER ST

SAN PEDRO AVE

E SAHARA AVE
S BRUCE ST

General Plan Amendment


Rural Neighborhood Preservation Form-Based Code Downtown Redevelopment Area
Rural Estates Planned Community Development Parks/Recreation/Open Space
FROM (O and SC) TO GC
Desert Rural Office Public Facilities
Rural Service Commercial Public Facilities - School
Subject Property
Low General Commercial Public Facilities - Clark County
Medium Low Tourist Commercial Town Center
GIS maps a re n ormally produced
1000ft B uffer
Medium Low Attached Las Vegas Medical District Resource Conservation only to mee t the ne eds of the City .
Due to continuo us development activ ity
this map is for reference only .
Medium Light Industry / Research Commercial (Downtown Land-Use) Ge ographic Inf ormation System
Plannin g & Development Dept.

High Page 65 of
Traditional Neighborhood Development 1332
Mixed Use (Downtown Land-Use)
City Limits 702-229-6301

Date: Monday, April 01, 2019


GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKS GARAGE ONE, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-75827 Staff recommends APPROVAL
ZON-75828 Staff recommends APPROVAL GPA-75827
SDR-74835 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-75827
ZON-75828

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 17

NOTICES MAILED 418 - GPA-75827 and ZON-75828


418 - SDR-74835

PROTESTS 0 - GPA-75827 and ZON-75828


0 - SDR-74835

APPROVALS 0 - GPA-75827 and ZON-75828


0 - SDR-74835

JAB
Page 66 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-74835 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-75827) and Rezoning (ZON-75828)


shall be required, if approved, and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for
Plot Plan Reviews (Z-0032-80 and Z-0071-86), except as amended herein.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may
be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, stamped 02/19/19, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine
the most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The
mapping action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building
permits.

7. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

8. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

JAB
Page 67 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

9. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

10. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks and
driveways adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title
13.56.040, if any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with
development of this site.

11. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

12. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the City
of Las Vegas portion of the Sahara Avenue and Spencer Avenue public rights-of-
way, if any, prior to this issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant
must carry an insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the
City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If
requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public
right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License
Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the
public right of way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in
interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.
Coordinate all requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development
Section of the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).

13. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site
prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide and
improve all drainage ways as recommended.

JAB
Page 68 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a proposed addition to an existing Motor Vehicle Sales (New)
Dealership at 1700 and 1710 East Sahara Avenue.

ISSUES

• The applicant requests a General Plan Amendment from O (Office) and SC (Service
Commercial) to GC (General Commercial) at 1710 East Sahara Avenue. Staff
supports this request.
• The applicant requests to rezone from P-R (Professional Office and Parking) to C-2
(General Commercial) at 1710 East Sahara Avenue. Staff supports this request.
• According to Title 19.16.100(G), SDR-74835 qualifies as a Major Amendment of the
previously approved Reclassification of Property (Z-0032-80) and Plot Plan Review
(Z-0071-86).

ANALYSIS

In June of 1980, the City Council approved a Reclassification of Property (Z-0032-80) that
established the existing Motor Vehicle Sales (New) Dealership on Sahara Avenue. The
Dealership was approved on two adjacent parcels. The City Council required that the east
parcel be split-classified and split-zoned to provide a land use buffer between the busy
Dealership on Sahara Avenue and the residential homes along Kassabian Avenue. In
October 1986, the City Council approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0071-86) for a building
expansion that reaffirmed the split land use designation and split-zoning. There have
been no further related, relevant city actions on the subject site since 1986. Title 19 does
not support single parcels with two or more zoning districts and/or land use designations.

The applicant is proposing to add and demolish portions of two existing buildings that are
part of the Dealership on two adjacent parcels at 1700 and 1710 East Sahara Avenue.
The proposal will ultimately add 5,906 square feet of floor space. Because there is a split
land use designation and split-zoning at the subject site, the proposed expansion of the
Dealership requires a General Plan Amendment and a Rezoning.

JAB
Page 69 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

City Council approved the Dealership use on an east and west parcel. The west parcel
has a land use designation of GC (General Commercial) and a zoning of C-2 (General
Commercial). This complies with current code. The east parcel, however, has a northern
arm and a southern arm. The northern arm is adjacent to residential properties; the
southern arm is adjacent to an office park. The northern arm has a land use classification
of O (Office) with a zoning of P-R (Professional Office & Parking). The southern arm has
a land use classification of SC (Service Commercial) with a zoning of C-2 (General
Commercial). The applicant requests General Plan Amendment (GPA-75827) and
Rezoning (ZON-75828) to make the east parcel match the west parcel, to eliminate the
split land use designation and split-zoning, and to comply with current code.

The proposed GC classification allows for business uses of a more intense commercial
character, including outdoor storage or display of products that is currently prohibited by
the Reclassification of Property from 1980 and the Plot Plan Review from 1986. The
proposed GC classification would also eliminate the split-classification of a single parcel,
would bring the land use to current code, and would match the adjacent parcel currently
used by the same Dealership. The proposed C-2 zone is intended to provide the broadest
scope of compatible services for the general public which specifically includes retail,
service, and automotive uses along commercial corridors. The proposed C-2 zoning
district conforms to the GC land use classification. The proposed use is appropriate for
the area, and the request for a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning will make the
subject site match current code. Therefore, staff recommends approval.

The elevations and site plan stamped 02/19/19 show two existing, single story buildings,
one on each parcel. The building at 1700 East Sahara Avenue will have 1,831 square
feet demolition and 7,102 square feet added. The additions will come from a show room,
service drive, canopy, and car wash. The building at 1710 East Sahara Avenue will have
7,285 square feet demolished. Both buildings will receive a “brand upgrade” for the
Dealership consisting of new storefront and colors. The elevations reflect an architectural
character that meets the design guidelines for a commercial development. There is a
coherent design on all sides. Both buildings provide façade articulation, variations in bulk
and height, linear jogs and offsets, and variations of the roof line to provide visual interest.
The materials consist of an anodized storefront façade, metal paneling, stucco, concrete
masonry, cap flashes, and paint to reflect the Dealership brand. With the proposed
building expansion, the Dealership will require 80 parking spaces. The submitted site plan
shows that the Dealership will provide 462 spaces, mostly for inventory parking.

The landscape plan stamped 02/19/19 complies with the species, quantities, and
landscape buffer widths required by previously approved Z-0032-80. While the
justification letter acknowledges that the current landscaping “has either died or been
removed,” the applicant agrees to bring the landscaping up to the originally approved

JAB
Page 70 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

plan, or better. The prosed plan show palms, shrubs and grasses that consist of drought
tolerant species according to the Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition Regional
Plant List. The plan also reflects the addition of several landscaped islands in the current
guest parking lot.

The Las Vegas Valley Water District has noted that these parcels are currently served for
both fire and domestic. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for
domestic meter sizing and fire flow availability. To comply with District Service Rules,
consolidation of parcels or the proof of a commercial subdivision is required. A Condition
has been added to coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine the
most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots.

The General Plan Amendment and Rezoning is required to allow continued inventory
parking on site, and will bring the site into conformance with current code. The building
addition and landscaping, along with the colors and design, will be an appropriate
upgrade to the existing development. Consequently, staff supports this request for Major
Amendment to a previously approved Plot Plan Review.

FINDINGS (GPA-75827)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions
be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The existing land use designation on a portion of the subject site is already SC (Service
Commercial). This General Plan Amendment will bring the split-zoning into compliance
with current land use designations. The existing land use will be the same Motor Vehicle
Sales. The density and intensity of the proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan
designation is compatible with existing and adjacent land use designations.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be compatible


with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

The zoning districts supported by the proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan
Designation include the proposed C-2 (General Commercial), which is compatible with
existent and adjacent zoning districts.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to


accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and

JAB
Page 71 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

There are adequate transportation and utility facilitates to accommodate the existing
Motor Vehicle Sales use permitted by the SC (Service Commercial) General Plan
Designation.

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and


policies.

The proposed amendment conforms to the intent and policies of the 2020 Master Plan.

FINDINGS (ZON-75828)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning


Commission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

If approved, the proposed C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district would conform to the
proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan designation.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.

The C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district allows for the existing Motor Vehicle Sales
(New) Dealership on the current and adjacent lots.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The subject site was split zoned in 1980. As community growth and development require
changes in the zoning code, it is appropriate to rezone the site to bring it into conformance
with current code.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be adequate
in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The site is at the corner of Sahara Avenue, a 135-foot primary arterial, and Spencer
Street, a 51-foot local street. Both are adequate in size and capacity to serve the existing
use.

JAB
Page 72 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (SDR-74835)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed building additions are compatible with adjacent development and
development along the Sahara Avenue commercial corridor.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The development is consistent with the proposed General Plan Amendment and
Rezoning. The building additions comply with the previously approved Plot Plan
Review.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Access to the site is provided by Sahara Avenue and Spencer Street. Circulation around
the site is acceptable.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

Building materials are typical for commercial development in this area. Landscape
materials are drought tolerant and provide adequate shading and screening properties.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic


features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and
compatible with development in the area;

The proposed Motor Vehicle Sales (New) Dealership elevations and design
characteristics are visually appealing.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety
and general welfare.

Development of the site will be subject to building permit review and inspection, thereby
protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the public.

JAB
Page 73 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0054-71) from R-
09/15/71 1 to C-V on a parcel located on the east side of Spencer St, 350 feet north of
Sahara Ave.
The Board of City Commissioners denied a Reclassification of Property (Z-
06/20/79 0033-79) from R-1 & R-2 to C-2 at the northeast corner of Sahara Ave and
Spencer St.
The Board of City Commissioners approved a Reclassification of Property
06/25/80 (Z-0032-80) from R-1 & R-2 to P-R, C-1 & C-2 on the northeast corner of
Spencer St and Sahara Ave.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0071-86) from R-1 (Single Family
10/01/86 Residence) and R-2 (Two Family Residence) to P-R (Professional Office
and Parking ) and C-2 (General Commercial) at 1700 E Sahara Ave.
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0071-86) for an
02/12/87
auto dealership sales office at 1700 E Sahara Ave.
The Planning Commission approved a Plot Plan Review (Z-0071-86) for the
06/11/87
expansion of a new car sales facility at 1700 E Sahara Ave.
The City Council denied a request for a Review of Condition (Z-0071-86(1))
01/16/02 which prohibited a public address system in conjunction with an automobile
dealership at 1700 E Sahara Ave. Staff recommended denial.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


06/26/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (A65-00007) was issued for New & Used Auto Sale 1700
01/01/51
E Sahara Ave. The license was renewed on 07/01/18.
A business license (A01-01018) was issued for an Administrative Office at
03/25/93
1710 E Sahara Ave. The license was renewed on 10/01/18.
A business license (A60-00179) was issued for Major Auto Repair at 1700 E
03/21/11
Sahara Ave. The license was renewed on 09/01/18.
A building permit (C-221463) was issued to install cabinet head and cladding
10/18/12 on an existing sign at 1700 E Sahara Ave. The permit was finalized on
06/19/13.
A building permit (C-234557) was issued for a wall sign at 1700 E Sahara
04/25/13
Ave. The permit was finalized on 09/09/14.

JAB
Page 74 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (A28-01050) was issued for Automobile Leasing at 1700
05/14/13
E Sahara Ave. The license was renewed on 05/01/18.
A business license (G62-09696) was issued for Insurance Firm at 1700 E
01/21/15
Sahara Ave. The license was renewed on 01/01/18.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
10/01/18 submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a proposed Variance
and Site Development Plan Review.

Neighborhood Meeting
Christ Church Episcopal
2000 Maryland Parkway
03/11/19
6:00 – 6:30pm
0 neighborhood residents, 1 consultant, 2 developers

Field Check
During a routine field check, staff observed the subject site. No signs of trash,
02/28/19 debris or graffiti. All new auto inventory parking is on the northern arm of the
east parcel.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.60

Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Land Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Use Designation District
19.12
C-2 (General
SC (Service Commercial)
Subject Motor Vehicle Commercial)
Property Sales (New) P-R (Professional
O (Office)
Office and Parking)

JAB
Page 75 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Land Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Use Designation District
19.12
Single Family
R-1 (Single Family
North Detached L (Low Density)
Residential)
Dwelling
Clark
Clark County GC (General Clark County C-2
South CountyParking
Commercial) (General Commercial)
Lot
C-1 (Limited
SC (Service Commercial)
Office, Other Commercial)
East
Than Listed P-R (Professional
O (Office)
Office and Parking)
Energy Sub-
West PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Station

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 200 Feet Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
• Front 10 Feet 139 Feet Y
• Side 10 Feet 0 Feet Y*
• Corner 10 Feet 52 Feet Y
• Rear 20 Feet 165 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 17 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 31 Feet Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Screened, Gated,
Trash Enclosure Y
Roof or Trellis Covered
*Approved by Plot Plan Review Z-0032-80.
JAB
Page 76 of 1332
GPA-75827, ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 17 Trees 0 Trees Y*
• South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 17 Trees 5 Trees Y*
• East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 22 Trees 0 Trees Y*
• West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 17 Trees 8 Trees Y*
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 73 Trees 13 Trees Y*
1 Tree / 6 uncovered spaces, plus
Parking Area
1 tree at end of each row of 37 Trees 21 Trees Y*
Trees
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North 10 Feet 0 Feet Y**
• South 10 Feet 3 Feet Y**
• East 10 Feet 0 Feet Y**
• West 10 Feet 7 Feet Y**
Wall Height 6 - 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential existing Y
* Perimeter landscaping complies with species and quantity required by Z-0032-80.
** Landscape buffer widths approved by Z-0032-80.

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Sahara Ave Primary Arterial 135 Y
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Spencer St Local Street 51 Y
Highways Map

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Gross Floor Parking Parking
Use Parking
Area or # of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Motor Vehicle
40,153 1:500 80
Sales (New)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 80 462 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 76 4 458 4 Y
Loading Spaces 3 3 Y

JAB
Page 77 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
‫ں‬x゜ธธ゜‫ں‬ฎ

Page 78 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 79 of 1332
Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่‫֭ש‬㌱7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ

bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7Ő֭⎯֭ผ‫֭ﭨ‬₡ฌ

bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬Ŵ่‫⎯ש‬ฌ

bкħ่֭‫ש‬ฌ

Ћ̬⇓ธxxՙ⇓Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ħ‫⇓֭ﭨ‬ธxxՙ‫ ں‬xㄦxx̶⇓Ŵผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭⇓₡ผŴʉħ่‫⇓ف‬ऑкŴ่่ħ่‫⇓ف‬Ŵ่㈠㈾ऑ‫ف‬ฌ

ธxx7ƆÛ7‫ں‬Ɔ╗7AЋDz㈠ⓒ7‫ں‬ㅡ╗Ġ74ՁḶḶŐฌ
4ḶŐ╗7ՁAⓈCDzŐCAՁDzⓒ74Ձ7̶̶̶x‫ں‬ฌ

ì֭ੂ7ОкŴ่̬ฌ

ACA7bḶҜОՁ●AЌbDz774ḶŐ7╗ĠDz7ӧDzỏฌ
CŐ●ЋDzÛAù7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7CDz╗DzŐҜ●ЌDzCฌ
AЌC7bḶҜОՁ●DzC7AƆ7ЌDzDzCDzCฌ
Dz7ƆAĠAŐA7AЋDzЌⓈDzฌ

Page 80 of 1332
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ฌ

●⎯⎯—֭₡ฌ
ACA7bḶҜОՁ●AЌbDzฌ
╗Ḷ7ԱDz7CDz╗DzŐҜ●ЌDzCฌ ACA7bḶҜОՁ●AЌbDzฌ
AЌC7bḶҜОՁ●DzC7AƆฌ ╗Ḷ7ԱDz7CDz╗DzŐҜ●ЌDzCฌ
ƆОDzЌbDzŐ7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ ЌDzDzCDzCฌ AЌC7bḶҜОՁ●DzC7AƆฌ
ЌDzDzCDzCฌ О֭ผこħ‫ֱש‬Ɔ֭Ŵкฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ

Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬ฌ

╗ħ‫ש‬к̬֭ฌ

Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ

Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠7 Ɔ㌱Ŵк֭ฌ
ธx‫ں‬ㅡՙ‫ں‬ՙxㅡxฌ AƆ7ЌḶ╗DzCฌ
CผŴʉħ่‫ف‬7Ќਙ㈠7 Ɔγ֭֭‫ש‬7 Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ฌ

ƆО‫ں‬7 ਙ⑾7 xฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 81 of 1332
Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่‫֭ש‬㌱7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ

bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7Ő֭⎯֭ผ‫֭ﭨ‬₡ฌ

bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬Ŵ่‫⎯ש‬ฌ

bкħ่֭‫ש‬ฌ

ธxx7ƆÛ7‫ں‬Ɔ╗7AЋDz㈠ⓒ7‫ں‬ㅡ╗Ġ7+ՁḶḶŐฌ
+ḶŐ╗7ՁAⓈCDzŐCAՁDzⓒ7+Ձ7̶̶̶x‫ں‬ฌ

ì֭ੂ7ОкŴ่̬ฌ
Dz7ƆAĠAŐA7AЋDzЌⓈDzฌ

Page 82 of 1332
Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ฌ

●⎯⎯—֭₡ฌ
ƆОDzЌbDzŐ7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7

О֭ผこħ‫ֱש‬Ɔ֭Ŵкฌ

ОŐDzՁ●Ҝ●ЌAŐù7ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌฌ

Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬ฌ

╗ħ‫ש‬к̬֭
╗ħ‫ש‬к̬֭ฌ

ОŐDzՁ●Ҝ●ЌAŐù7ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌฌ
О Ő Dz Ձ ●Ҝ ●Ќ A Ő ù Ձ A
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬ Ќਙ㈠
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠ฌ Ɔ㌱Ŵк֭
Ɔ㌱Ŵк֭ฌ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ธx‫ں‬ㅡՙ‫ں‬ՙxㅡxฌ
ธ x‫ں‬ㅡՙ‫ں‬ՙxㅡx AƆ7ЌḶ╗DzCฌ
CผŴʉħ่‫ف‬7Ќਙ㈠7
CผŴʉħ่‫ف‬ Ќਙ㈠ Ɔγ֭֭‫ש‬
Ɔγ֭֭‫ש‬7 Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ฌ

Ձ‫ں‬7
Ձ‫ں‬ ਙ⑾7 xฌ
Page 83 of 1332
ƆОDzЌbDzŐ7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
Dz7ƆAĠAŐA7AЋDzЌⓈDzฌ
Page 84 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ่‫֭ש‬㌱7A ผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ

b ਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7Ő ֭⎯֭ผ‫֭ﭨ‬₡ ฌ

b ਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬Ŵ่‫⎯ש‬ฌ

b кħ่֭‫ש‬ฌ

Dz Ṳ ╗ Dz Ő ●Ḷ Ő 71●Ќ ●Ɔ Ġ 7Ɔ b Ġ Dz C Ⓢ ՁDz 7 Ɔ Ḷ Ⓢ ╗ Ġ 7Dz ՁDz Ћ A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ฌ
ธxx7Ɔ Û 7‫ں‬Ɔ ╗ 7A Ћ Dz ㈠ⓒ7‫ں‬ㅡ╗ Ġ 71 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő ฌ
1 Ḷ Ő ╗ 7ՁA Ⓢ C Dz Ő C A ՁDz ⓒ71 Ձ7̶̶̶x‫ں‬ฌ

ì ֭ੂ7О кŴ่̬ฌ

Û Dz Ɔ ╗ 7Dz ՁDz Ћ A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ฌ

Page 85 of 1332
Ő ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ ฌ

Ќ Ḷ Ő ╗ Ġ 7Dz ՁDz Ћ A ╗●Ḷ Ќ 7 ●⎯⎯—֭₡ ฌ

О ֭ผこ ħ‫ֱש‬Ɔ ֭Ŵкฌ

О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬ฌ

╗ħ‫ש‬к̬֭ฌ
Ա Ⓢ ●ՁC ●Ќ Ḛ 7Dz ՁDz Ћ A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќ ਙ㈠7 Ɔ ㌱Ŵк֭ ฌ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
A Ɔ 7Ќ Ḷ ╗ Dz C ฌ
C ผŴʉ ħ่‫ف‬7Ќ ਙ㈠7 Ɔ γ֭֭‫ש‬7 Ő ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ ฌ
Dz A Ɔ ╗ 7Dz ՁDz Ћ A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ 7
A ㄦxธ7 ਙ⑾7 xฌ
bਙкਙผ7Ձ֭‫่֭ف‬₡̬ฌ
Ћ֭ผ⎯ħਙ่7ㄦ゜‫゜ں‬ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ћħ⎯—Ŵкħ▷Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Աк—֭ฌ
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

bк֭Ŵผ7A่ਙ₡ħ▷֭₡7Aк—こħ่—こฌ
ӧƆ‫ש‬ਙผ֭⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬ỏฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ûγħ‫֭ש‬ฌ
ӧDz●+Ɔỏฌ

DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ɔħк‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7Ҝ֭‫ש‬Ŵккħ㌱ฌ
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ûγħ‫֭ש‬ฌ

Page 86 of 1332
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

Ա่֭㈾Ŵこħ่7Ҝਙਙผ֭ฌ
ਫAкŴ⇡Ŵ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ㈚ฌ
ӧDzゥ‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7ОŴħ่‫ש‬ỏฌ

Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่ Ġ
A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ġਙ่₡Ŵฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ฌ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬ ՁŴ⎯ Ћ
xx xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Dz㈠ Ɔ ŴγŴผŴ
‫ ں‬ՙxx7Dz㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯ Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋฌ
bਙкਙผ7Ձ֭‫่֭ف‬₡̬ฌ
Ћ֭ผ⎯ħਙ่7ㄦ゜‫゜ں‬ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ћħ⎯—Ŵкħ▷Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Աк—֭ฌ
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

bк֭Ŵผ7A่ਙ₡ħ▷֭₡7Aк—こħ่—こฌ
ӧƆ‫ש‬ਙผ֭⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬ỏฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ûγħ‫֭ש‬ฌ
ӧDz●+Ɔỏฌ

Û֭⎯‫ש‬7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ɔħк‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7Ҝ֭‫ש‬Ŵккħ㌱ฌ
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ûγħ‫֭ש‬ฌ

Page 87 of 1332
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

Ա่֭㈾Ŵこħ่7Ҝਙਙผ֭ฌ
ਫAкŴ⇡Ŵ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ㈚ฌ
ӧDzゥ‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7ОŴħ่‫ש‬ỏฌ

Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่ Ġ
A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ġਙ่₡Ŵฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ฌ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬ ՁŴ⎯ Ћ
xx xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Dz㈠ Ɔ ŴγŴผŴ
‫ ں‬ՙxx7Dz㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯ Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋฌ
bਙкਙผ7Ձ֭‫่֭ف‬₡̬ฌ
Ћ֭ผ⎯ħਙ่7ㄦ゜‫゜ں‬ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ћħ⎯—Ŵкħ▷Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Աк—֭ฌ
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

bк֭Ŵผ7A่ਙ₡ħ▷֭₡7Aк—こħ่—こฌ
ӧƆ‫ש‬ਙผ֭⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬ỏฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ûγħ‫֭ש‬ฌ
ӧDz●+Ɔỏฌ

Û֭⎯‫ש‬7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ɔħк‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7Ҝ֭‫ש‬Ŵккħ㌱ฌ
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7Ûγħ‫֭ש‬ฌ

Page 88 of 1332
ӧҜ֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ОŴ่֭кỏฌ

Ա่֭㈾Ŵこħ่7Ҝਙਙผ֭ฌ
ਫAкŴ⇡Ŵ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ㈚ฌ
ӧDzゥ‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7ОŴħ่‫ש‬ỏฌ

DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ

A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่ Ġ
A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ġਙ่₡Ŵฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ฌ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬ ՁŴ⎯ Ћ
xx xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Dz㈠ Ɔ ŴγŴผŴ
‫ ں‬ՙxx7Dz㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯ Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋฌ
Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ่‫֭ש‬㌱7A ผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ

b ਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7Ő ֭⎯֭ผ‫֭ﭨ‬₡ ฌ

b ਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬Ŵ่‫⎯ש‬ฌ

b кħ่֭‫ש‬ฌ

ԱⓈ ●ՁC ●Ќ Ḛ 7Ա7ֱ7Ҝ A Ṳ 7Ḷ b b 7ए 7̶xฌ

ธxx7Ɔ Û 7‫ں‬Ɔ ╗ 7A Ћ Dz ㈠ⓒ7‫ں‬ㅡ╗ Ġ 7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő ฌ


 Ḷ Ő ╗ 7ՁA Ⓢ C Dz Ő C A ՁDz ⓒ7 Ձ7̶̶̶x‫ں‬ฌ

ì ֭ੂ7О кŴ่̬ฌ

Ա ՁC Ḛ 7Ա 7ֱ7ՁḶ Ḷ Ő 7О ՁA Ќ ฌ

Page 89 of 1332
Ő ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ ฌ

●⎯⎯—֭₡ ฌ

О ֭ผこ ħ‫ֱש‬Ɔ ֭Ŵкฌ

Ṳ7 Ṳฌ

О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬ฌ

ԱⓈ ●ՁC ●Ќ Ḛ 7A 7ֱ7Ҝ A Ṳ㈠7Ḷ b b 7ए 7ธㅡㅡฌ

╗ħ‫ש‬к̬֭ฌ
 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő 7О ՁA Ќ ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќ ਙ㈠7 Ɔ ㌱Ŵк֭ ฌ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
A Ɔ 7Ќ Ḷ ╗ Dz C ฌ
C ผŴʉ ħ่‫ف‬7Ќ ਙ㈠7 Ɔ γ֭֭‫ש‬7 Ő ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ ฌ
Ա ՁC Ḛ 7A 7ֱ7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő 77О ՁA Ќ 7
A ธx‫ں‬7 ਙ⑾7 xฌ
Ћ֭ผ⎯ħਙ่7ㄦ゜‫゜ں‬ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ћħ⎯—Ŵкħ▷Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ

Page 90 of 1332
A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่ Ġ
A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ġਙ่₡Ŵฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ฌ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬ ՁŴ⎯ Ћ
xx xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Dz㈠ Ɔ ŴγŴผŴ
‫ ں‬ՙxx7Dz㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯ Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋฌ
Page 91 of 1332
%>
 &'

% 

#
#

+>
#
# &!


 
 
% %



""

 




Page 92 of 1332
%>
 &'

% 

#
#

+>
#
# &!


 
 
% %



""

 




Page 93 of 1332
%>
 &'

% 

#
#

+>
#
# &!


 
 
% %



""

 




Page 94 of 1332
%>
 &'

% 

#
#

+>
#
# &!


 
 
% %



""

 




Page 95 of 1332


%>
 &'

% 

#
#

+>
#
# &!


 
 
% %



""

 




ՁAƆ7bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬
‫ں‬ɱ̶x7ЋħккŴ‫֭ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7bħผ㌱к֭7̶7 ㄦՙՙ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ㈠7ฎɱ‫̶ں‬ㅡ
ӧՙxธỏ7ㅡɱɱֱ″ㅡ″ɱֱ㌱֭кк
ӧՙxธỏ7ɱㅡ″ֱxฎㄦՙ

֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬ฎⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

Ҝผ㈠7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่⎯ⓒ7ОкŴ่่֭ผ7●ฌ
bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
̶̶̶7Ќ㈠7ŐŴ่㌱γਙⓒ7̶ผ₡7⑾кਙਙผฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″ฌ

ŐDz̬77ОŐİՙㅡ″ՙՙ﹝İxx‫ں‬ฌ

C֭Ŵผ7Ҝผ㈠7Աħ่⎯̬ฌ

Ок֭Ŵ⎯֭7Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7к֭‫֭שש‬ผ7Ŵ⎯7ਙ—ผ7㈾—⎯‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7к֭‫֭שש‬ผ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7Ḛ่֭֭ผŴк7ОкŴ่7Aこ่֭₡こ่֭‫ש‬7ӧḚОAỏⓒฌ
Ő֭▷ਙ่֭7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ7ӧƆCŐỏⓒ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ่7—ऑ‫ف‬ผŴ₡֭7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ—‫ש‬ਙこਙ⇡ħк֭ฌ
₡֭Ŵк֭ผ⎯γħऑ㈠77╗γħ⎯7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7A—‫ש‬ਙЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่ɸ⎯7Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7C֭Ŵк֭ผ⎯γħऑⓒ7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉŴ⎯7⇡—ħк‫ש‬7ħ่7‫ں‬ɱฎ‫ں‬㈠7Ûγ่֭7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ʉŴ⎯7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭₡ⓒ7ħ‫ש‬7ʉŴ⎯7▷ਙ่֭₡7bֱธ7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑŴผ㌱֭к7⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่₡7Ɔऑ่֭㌱֭ผฌ
Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭Ŵผⓒ7Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭⎯ⓒ7▷ਙ่֭₡7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭㈠7●‫ש‬7⎯֭֭こ⎯7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ʉŴ⎯7₡ਙ่֭7‫ש‬ਙฌ
ऑผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7่ਙผ‫ש‬γ7⑾ผਙこ7γŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่7Ŵ—‫ש‬ਙこਙ⇡ħк֭7₡֭Ŵк֭ผ⎯γħऑ7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭ħผ7⇡Ŵ㌱ੂŴผ₡㈠ฌ
Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7ʉਙ—к₡7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7ਙ่кੂ7֭こऑкਙੂ֭֭⎯7⑾ผਙこ7ऑŴผħ่‫ف‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7่ਙผ‫ש‬γ֭ผ่7ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬㈠ฌ
Ⓢ่⑾ਙผ‫่—ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬кੂⓒ7Ŵ⎯7‫ש‬ħこ֭7γŴ⎯7ऑŴ⎯⎯֭₡ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙผħ‫ف‬ħ่Ŵк7ऑ֭ਙऑк֭7ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ŵผ֭7่ਙ7кਙ่‫֭ف‬ผฌ
ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭ʉ7ħ่‫ש่֭ﭨ‬ਙผੂ7Ŵ—‫ש‬ਙこਙ⇡ħк֭⎯7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7⇡่֭֭7ऑŴผ֭₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵผ֭Ŵ7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7่ਙผ‫ש‬γ֭ผ่ฌ
⇡ਙ—่₡Ŵผੂ7⑾ਙผ7ੂ֭Ŵผ⎯㈠7╗γ֭ผ֭7Ŵऑऑ֭Ŵผ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7Ŵ7ऑŴ‫֭ﭨ‬₡ⓒ7่ਙ7こŴ่ɸ⎯7кŴ่₡7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7่ਙผ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7่ਙ‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7ħ⎯ฌ
ऑŴผ֭₡7ਙ่7Ŵ่₡7ħ⎯7₡֭⎯ħ‫่֭ف‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ7⎯֭ऑŴผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7γਙ—⎯֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7่ਙผ‫ש‬γ㈠ฌ

Û֭7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴк7ऑкŴ่7Ŵこ่֭₡こ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵккਙʉ7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7ʉγ֭ผ֭7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ħ⎯ฌ
㌱—ผผ่֭‫ש‬кੂ7▷ਙ่֭₡7⑾ਙผ7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭⎯㈠7●‫ש‬7Ŵऑऑ֭Ŵผ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7₡֭Ŵк֭ผ⎯γħऑ7γŴ⎯7ऑŴผ֭₡7ħ่‫ש่֭ﭨ‬ਙผੂ7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7▷ਙ่֭₡ฌ
кŴ่₡7⑾ਙผ7ੂ֭Ŵผ⎯ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ḚОA7ʉਙ—к₡7ผ֭⑾к֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7㌱ਙ่₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯㈠7╗γ֭7₡֭Ŵк֭ผ⎯γħऑ7ʉਙ—к₡7Ŵ‫ف‬ผ֭֭ฌ
‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙ่₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ੂש‬ऑ֭7ਙ⑾7—⎯֭⎯7่֭ゥ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭⎯㈠77●่7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่ⓒ7ʉ֭7Ŵผ֭7—ऑ₡Ŵ‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ħこऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่₡7่֭γŴ่㌱֭7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵऑऑ֭ŴผŴ่㌱֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7₡֭Ŵк֭ผ⎯γħऑ㈠ฌ

Ḷ่7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Aⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑкŴ่7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7₡֭こਙкħ⎯γ7‫ں‬ฎ̶‫ں‬7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ₡₡7ㄦՙ″7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7⎯γਙʉผਙਙこⓒฌ
⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭ ⑾֭֭‫ ש‬ਙ⑾ ⎯γਙ
γ֭ ㌱Ŵ่ਙऑੂ Ŵ่₡ Ŵ
̶ธธธ7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7⎯֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭7₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵผ֭Ŵⓒ7‫ںں‬ɱ″7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱Ŵ่ਙऑੂ7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ7ธ‫ں‬xฎ7㌱Ŵผฌ
ʉŴ⎯γ7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77Ḷ่7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Աⓒ7ՙⓒธฎㄦ7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7Ŵผ֭7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7₡֭こਙкħ⎯γ֭₡7ผ֭⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ħ่7ㄦɱ‫̶ں‬7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭ฌ
₡ ผ֭⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ ف‬ħ่ ㄦɱ‫ں‬
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
‫ש‬γ֭ ੂ֭Ŵผ⎯ⓒ ħ‫ ש‬Ŵऑऑ֭֭
⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ผ֭こŴħ่ħ่‫ف‬㈠77╗γ֭7ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴкк7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7ħ⎯7ㅡxⓒ‫ں‬ㄦ̶㈠77Ḷ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ੂ֭Ŵผ⎯ⓒ7ħ‫ש‬7Ŵऑऑ֭Ŵผ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 9g 6
oe 1f 3 3 2
кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑħ่‫ف‬7ਙผħ‫ف‬ħ่Ŵккੂ7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7γŴ⎯7֭ħ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7₡ħ֭₡7ਙผ7⇡่֭֭7ผ֭こਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡㈠77╗γ֭7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑħ่‫ف‬7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ऑ֭ผħこ֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ħ⎯7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7ผ֭ऑкŴ㌱֭₡7ħ่7㌱ਙ่㈾—่㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่゜ħこऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬㈠77╗γ֭ฌ
֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7Ŵผ֭7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7—ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭⑾к֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱—ผผ่֭‫ש‬7Ġਙ่₡Ŵ7֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯㈠77Û֭7⇡֭кħ֭‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭ฌ
ħこऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ʉħкк7่֭γŴ่㌱֭7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡7Ŵ่₡7⇡֭7Ŵ่7֭ゥ㌱֭кк่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵผ֭Ŵ㈠7Û֭ฌ
ผ֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7ਙ⑾7ਙ—ผ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬㈠ฌ

ùਙ—ผ⎯7‫ש‬ผ—кੂⓒ

Ձ—㌱ੂ7Ɔ‫֭ש‬ʉŴผ‫ש‬

Ձ—㌱ੂ7Ɔ‫֭ש‬ʉŴผ‫ש‬ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 9g 7
oe 1f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 11

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ZON-75828 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75827 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKS GARAGE ONE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: P-R (PROFESSIONAL OFFICE AND PARKING) TO: C-2 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) on 2.60 acres at 1700 East Sahara Avenue (APN 162-02-801-001 and 002),
Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-74677]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-75828 and SDR-74835 [PRJ-74677]
3. Land Use Map
4. Supporting Documentation

Page 98 of 1332
Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 99 of 1332
Page 100 of 1332
Page 101 of 1332
Page 102 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
‫ں‬x゜ธธ゜‫ں‬ฎ

P a 1g 0eo 31f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 0eo 41f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 12

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-74835 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75827 AND ZON-75828
- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MARKS GARAGE ONE, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 5,271 SQUARE-FOOT
ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 28,969 SQUARE-FOOT MOTOR VEHICLE SALES (NEW)
DEALERSHIP on 2.60 acres at 1700 East Sahara Avenue (APN 162-02-801-001 and 002), C-2
(General Commercial) and P-R (Professional Office and Parking) Zones, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-
74677]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 105 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 106 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
‫ں‬x゜ธธ゜‫ں‬ฎ

P a 1g 0eo 71f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㅡ″ՙՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 0eo 81f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 13

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
GPA-75846 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: PF (PUBLIC FACILITIES) on
15.64 acres at 491 North Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-601-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Land Use Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-
75613]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-
75613]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]

Page 109 of 1332


Page 110 of 1332
Page 111 of 1332
Page 112 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-75846 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
ZON-75847 Staff recommends APPROVAL. GPA-75846
VAR-75848 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-75846
ZON-75847
SDR-75849 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-75846
ZON-75847
VAR-75848

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 28

NOTICES MAILED 664 - GPA-75846 and ZON-75847


664 - VAR-75848 and SDR-75849

PROTESTS 0 - GPA-75846 and ZON-75847


0 - VAR-75848 and SDR-75849

APPROVALS 0 - GPA-75846 and ZON-75847


0 - VAR-75848 and SDR-75849

CS
Page 113 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75848 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for General Plan


Amendment (GPA-75846), Rezoning (ZON-75847) and Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-75849) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-75849 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for General Plan


Amendment (GPA-75846), Rezoning (ZON-75847) and Variance (VAR-75848) shall
be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

CS
Page 114 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 02/19/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

7. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

9. A Traffic Impact Analysis or other information acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer
must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
issuance of any building or grading permits. Comply with the recommendation of
the City Traffic Engineer.

10. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

CS
Page 115 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to construct a new 14-classroom building addition to the existing William
K. Moore Elementary School located at 491 North Lamb.

ISSUES

• A General Plan Amendment (GPA-75846) is requested to change the land use


designation of the subject site from M (Medium Density Residential) to PF (Pubilc
Facilities). Staff supports the request.
• A Rezoning (ZON-75847) is requested to change the zoning designation from C-
1 (Limited Commercial) to C-V (Civic). Staff supports the request.
• A Variance (VAR-75848) is requested to allow a 37-foot building height where the
35 feet is the maximum height allowed adjacent to an R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zoning district. Staff supports the request
• A Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75849) is requested to allow the
construction of a 14 classroom, 22,927 square-foot building addition. Staff
supports the request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is home to an existing 69,315 square-foot elementary school building on
a 15.64-acre parcel. It is surrounded by residential uses on all adjacent properties. The
applicant proposes to construct a 22,927 square-foot, two-story building addition
consisting of 14 new classrooms located within the southwest corner of the subject site.
With the new building addition, the total building area for the subject site will be 92,242
square feet.

A General Plan Amendment is requested to change the land use designation from M
(Medium Density Residential) to PF (Public Facilities), which is more appropriate for the
existing land use. A PF designation is intended to allow for public and semi-public uses
such as utility facilities, as well as large governmental building sites and complexes, police
and fire facilities, schools, hospitals, sewage treatment and stormwater control facilities.
Staff recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment, as the PF designation is
best suited to the current use and is compatible with the existing surrounding residential
uses.

CS
Page 116 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The conforming zoning district within the PF designation is C-V (Civic); therefore, the
applicant has requested to rezone this same parcel to C-V. Staff recommends approval,
as the proposed C-V district would conform to the proposed General Plan designation of
PF and clean up the General Plan map where the designation does not match the current
land use or zoning district.

Per Title 19.10.020, the development standards for a C-V (Civic) property are established
by approval of a Site Development Plan Review. However, when adjacent to a residential
use in certain residential zoning districts, additional standards are applied. Those
standards include the maximum building height for proposed buildings adjacent to the
R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district, the landscape buffer standards of the P-
O (Professional Office) District, and the Title 19.08 commercial and industrial parking
design standards. If these specific standards cannot be met, a variance is required. In
this case, the school property is adjacent to single-family residential parcels to the west
zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential). The proposed new building addition is capped at
a maximum 35 feet in height.

The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75848) to allow a two-foot increase to 37


feet. The submitted elevation plans depict a building with varying pop outs that add
character to the building design. The majority of the building has a maximum height of 35
feet. Staff finds that the requested Variance is minimal and it will not have a negative
impact for the surrounding neighbors. The submitted site plan and landscape plan depicts
the newly constructed area will have 14-foot landscape buffer width along the south and
west property lines. Seventy-Nine parking spaces will also be added to the area adjacent
to the new 14-classroom building. An adequate amount of screening and parking lot trees
are provided.

The City of Las Vegas Public Works – Engineering Department has commented, “This
project will add approximately 237 trips per day on Lamb Boulevard, Bonanza Road. and
Stewart Avenue. Currently, Lamb is at about 70 percent of capacity, Bonanza is at about
50 percent of capacity and Stewart is at about 56 percent of capacity. With this project,
Lamb is expected to remain at about 70 percent of capacity, Bonanza to be at about 51
percent of capacity and Stewart to be at about 57 percent of capacity. Based on Peak
Hour use, this development will add about 84 additional peak hour trips into the area, or
about three every two minutes.”

Staff finds the proposed development to be compatible and harmonious with the existing
surrounding residential neighborhood and recommends approval of the General Plan
Amendment, Rezoning, Variance and Site Development Plan Review requests.

FINDINGS (GPA-75846)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions
be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
CS
Page 117 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is


compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The proposed PF (Public Facilities) designation is appropriate for the existing


school at the subject site and will remain compatible with the adjacent residential
land use designations.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be


compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

The proposed C-V (Civic) zoning district conforms to the proposed PF (Public
Facilities) General Plan designation which is compatible with the existing school at
the subject site.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to


accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and

There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility and other facilities to continue
the accommodation of the existing school.

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and


policies.

The proposed PF (Public Facilities) designation allows the proposed C-V (Civic)
zoning district, which allows the development of public and quasi-public land uses
such as schools, libraries, and public parks. The subject site is developed with an
existing elementary school.

FINDINGS (ZON-75847)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning


Commission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

If approved, the proposed C-V (Civic) zoning district would conform to the proposed
PF (Public Facilities) General Plan Designation.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.

CS
Page 118 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The land uses permitted in the proposed C-V (Civic) zoning district include any use
operated or controlled by the City, County, State, or Federal Government; any
public or quasi-public use operated or controlled by a recognized religious, fraternal,
veteran, civic or service organization; and utility company facilities which are
compatible land uses for the existing surrounding residential neighborhood.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The proposed rezoning is appropriate and will bring the existing school
development into compliance with Title 19.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The subject site is accessed by Lamb Boulevard, a 100-foot public right-of-way, and
is adequate to continue to service the need of the existing elementary school.

FINDINGS (VAR-75848)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

CS
Page 119 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Staff finds that sufficient evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been
presented, in that proposed two-foot height increase is minimal and it will not negatively
impact the adjacent properties. Therefore, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is
not preferential in nature, and it is thereby within the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for
granting of Variances.

FINDINGS (SDR-75849)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed 14-classroom addition is compatible with the existing school and
adjacent residential land uses in the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

If the related General Plan Amendment and Rezoning are approved, the proposed
development will be consistent with the majority of all applicable city plans. Staff
supports the requested building height Variance.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access is provided by Lamb Boulevard, a 100-foot Primary Arterial, which is


adequate in size to continue serving the subject school.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The proposed building and landscape materials are compatible with the existing
development within the surrounding area and will enhance the area.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

CS
Page 120 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The submitted building elevation design characteristics are not unsightly,


undesirable or obnoxious in appearance. The proposed building addition is
compatible with the existing school and adjacent residential land uses in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

If approved, the proposed development will be subject to building permits thereby


ensuring that the public health, safety and general welfare are protected.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved Special Use Permit and Plot Plan Review
08/12/99 (U-0067-99) request for an Elementary School. The Planning
Commission and Planning Staff recommended approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


09/08/99 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related building permits/business licenses on record.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
01/16/19 submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a proposed
building addition.

CS
Page 121 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
Meeting Start Time: 6:00 p.m.
Meeting End Time: 6:30 p.m.

Attendance: 4 Applicant Representatives


1 Planning Staff Member
03/01/17 1 Member of the Public

Concerns/Questions:
• Concern was raised about possible removal of school (applicant
detailed the scope of the project and assured there were no plans
for the school to be removed).

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an active elementary
02/28/19
school. No issues were noted.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 15.64

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject Public or Private M (Medium Denstiy
C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Property School, Primary Residential)
Multi-Family M (Medium Denstiy R-3 (Medium Density
North
Residential Residential) Residential)
R-PD16 (Residential
Multi-Family M (Medium Denstiy
South Planned Development –
Residential Residential)
16 Units per Acre)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
East
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
West
Detached Residential) Residential)

CS
Page 122 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to the submitted site development plans and Title 19.10.020, the following
standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size N/A 681,278 SF N/A
Min. Lot Width N/A 478 Feet N/A
Min. Setbacks
(Building addition only)
• Side N/A 169 Feet Y
• Rear N/A 105 Feet Y
Max. Building Height 35 Feet 37 Feet N*
*The applicant has requested Variance (VAR-75848) to allow an increased building
height.

Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed


C-1 (Limited Commercial) N/A N/A
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
C-V (Civic) N/A N/A
Existing General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
M (Medium Density
25.49 du/ac 398
Residential)
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
PF (Public Facilities) N/A N/A

CS
Page 123 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.10.020.E.2, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees
(adjacent to new
addition):
• South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 13 Trees 13 Trees Y
• West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 11 Trees 12 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 24 Trees 25 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
12 Trees 12 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• South 8 Feet 14 Feet Y
• West 8 Feet 14 Feet Y

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Lamb Boulevard Primary Arterial Highways Map 100 Feet Y

CS
Page 124 of 1332
GPA-75846, ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
Staff Report Page Eleven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursua
nt to Title 19.10 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compli
Area or Parking Parking ance
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Public or
Private 3 spaces
48
School, per 144
classrooms
Primary classroom
(existing)
Public or
Private
3 spaces
School, 14
per 42
Primary classrooms
classroom
(proposed
addition)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 186 188 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Y
180 6 182 6
Required

CS
Page 125 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 126 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 127 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 128 of 1332


Page 129 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 130 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ ‫ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬ธธฌ
Dz‫ں‬ՙฌ
Dz‫ں‬ธฌ ╗ùО㈠7 Dz‫ں‬ธฌ Dzɱฌ
╗㈠Ḷ㈠7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ
╗㈠Ḷ㈠7О㈠ฌ Dz‫ں‬ฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ՙƥֱxफฌ DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌ
Dzɱฌ Dz‫ں‬xฌ
Dz̶ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ฌ Dz‫ں‬7 ̶ֱbḶA╗7Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶ7Ḷ゜7DzṲОAЌCDzC7ҜDz╗AՁฌ
Dz‫ں‬xฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ ՁA╗ĠDzḶ゜7ÛA╗DzŐֱŐDzƆ●Ɔ╗AЌ╗7ԱAŐŐ●DzŐฌ
Dzธ‫ں‬ฌ Ḷ゜DzṲ╗DzŐ●ḶŐ7ḚŐACDz7ОՁùÛḶḶCฌ
Dz‫ں‬xฌ ƆĠDzA╗Ġ●ЌḚ㈠77ҜAbĠ●ЌDz7CAƆĠ7+●Ќ●ƆĠ㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬x7 Dzㅡฌ
ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձ7Dz‫ں‬ฌ Dzธ7 ฎफ7Ṳ7‫ں‬″फ7Ṳ7ธफ7╗Ġ●bì7bҜⓈ7ЋDzЌDzDzŐ7Ḷ゜ฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌ Dzɱฌ ҜḶŐ╗AŐ7ƆbŐA╗bĠ7bḶA╗7Ḷ゜7Ҝ╗Ձ㈠7ՁA╗Ġฌ
Dz‫ں‬7 DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌDz″ฌ
ḶЌ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7DzṲ╗DzŐ●ḶŐ7ƆĠDzA╗Ġ●ЌḚ7ⓈО7╗Ḷฌ
Dz‫ں‬ㅡฌ ‫ں‬xƥ7A㈠+㈠+㈠7╗ùО㈠㈠ĠA╗bĠDzƆ7●ЌC●bA╗DzƆฌ
Dz‫ں‬″ฌ C●ƆƆ●Ҝ●ՁAŐ7bḶՁḶŐ7+●Ќ●ƆĠ7Ḷ+7bҜⓈฌ
Dzธ7 Dzธฌ ЋDzЌDzDzŐฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफฌ Dz‫̶ں‬7 ╗ùО㈠7 Dzㅡ7 Dz‫ں‬ㅡ7 DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफ7 Dzㅡ7 Dz‫̶ں‬ฌ Dzธ7 Dz̶7 ҜDz╗AՁ7bՁAC7bAЌḶОù7ӧԱDzŐŐ●CḚDz7╗Ġ●Ќฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ
Ձ●ЌDz7ОAЌDzՁ7A╗7ƆḶ++●╗Ɔⓒ7+Ab●A7AЌCฌ
77ʉʉʉ㈠֭‫ש‬γਙ⎯‫ש‬γผ֭֭㈠㌱ਙこฌ

Ɔ●CDzƆ㈠ฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗ĠÛDzƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ЌḶŐ╗ĠDzAƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
Dzㅡ7 AՁⓈҜ●ЌⓈҜ7Ɔ╗ḶŐDz+ŐḶЌ╗7CḶḶŐ㈠7bՁDzAŐฌ
AЌḶC●ΎDzC7+●Ќ●ƆĠฌ
77⑾̬7ՙxธ㈠ㅡㄦ″㈠ՙxธxฌ

Dzɱ7 Dz‫ں‬x7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ Dz‫ں‬ธ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ


╗ùО㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ฌ Dzㄦฌ Ɔ╗DzDzՁ7bḶՁⓈҜЌ7ਙผ7ԱDzAҜⓒ7ОA●Ќ╗DzC㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ՙ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ
╗㈠Ḷ㈠7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ
ऑ̬7ՙxธ㈠ㅡㄦ″㈠‫ں‬xՙxฌ
ฎɱㄦㄦ7Ɔ7DzŴ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ่7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7ธธxⓒ7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ

DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 Dz̶7 Dz″ฌ Ɔ╗DzDzՁ7Ɔ╗A●Ő7ŐA●Ձ●ЌḚ7AЌC7Ɔ╗Ő●ЌḚDzŐⓒฌ


ОA●Ќ╗DzC㈠ฌ

Dzՙฌ CDzbḶŐA╗●ЋDz7bҜⓈ7ЋDzЌDzDzŐฌ
Dzㄦฌ
Dzฎฌ ОDzŐ+ḶŐA╗DzC7ҜDz╗AՁ7CDzbìฌ
ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 Dzɱฌ bDzҜDzЌ╗●╗●ḶⓈƆ7ОAЌDzՁ7Ḷ゜7ŐA●Ќ7ƆbŐDzDzЌฌ
ƆùƆ╗DzҜฌ

Dz‫ں‬ㄦ7
Dz‫ں‬xฌ फbĠAЌЌDzՁ7ƆbŐDzDzCफ7ŐDzЋDzAՁ7ҜḶՁC●ЌḚฌ
Dz″ฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ Dz‫ںں‬ฌ ОA●Ќ╗DzC7CḶḶŐฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफ7 Dz‫̶ں‬7 Dz‫ں‬ՙ7 ╗ùО㈠7 Dzธ7 Dz‫ں‬ฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ธฌ ƆĠDzDz╗7ҜDz╗AՁ7bAО7+ՁAƆĠ●ЌḚⓒ7╗ùО㈠ฌ
ОA●Ќ╗7╗Ḷ7ҜA╗bĠ7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7bḶՁḶŐƆฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗ĠDzAƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ

Page 131 of 1332


Dz‫̶ں‬7 ÛDzDzО7ƆbŐDzDzC7A╗7ԱAƆDz7Û●╗Ġฌ
DzṲОḶƆDzC7bḶЌbŐDz╗Dz7ԱDzՁḶÛ㈠77ƆAbìฌ
ƆҜḶḶ╗Ġ7AЌC7ОA●Ќ╗ⓒ7╗ùО㈠ฌ

Dz‫ں‬ㅡฌ ÛAՁՁ7ҜḶⓈЌ╗DzC7Ձ●ḚĠ╗7+●Ṳ╗ⓈŐDz㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ՙฌ Dzɱ7 Dz‫ں‬ธฌ Dz‫ں‬x7 Dz‫ں‬ธ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ
╗ùО㈠7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ㄦฌ Ձ●ЌDz7Ḷ+7AƆƆⓈҜDzC7ḚŐACDzฌ
╗㈠Ḷ㈠7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌ
Dz‫ں‬″ฌ CŐ●Ќì●ЌḚ7+ḶⓈЌ╗A●Ќฌ
Dzɱฌ

Dz‫ں‬ՙฌ ‫ں‬फ7●ЌƆⓈՁA╗DzC7ƆḶՁAŐḚŐAù7ƆḶՁAŐԱAЌฌ
″x7ḚՁAΎ●ЌḚฌ
Dz‫ں‬ՙ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ฎ7 CAƆĠDzC7Ձ●ЌDzƆ7●ЌC●bA╗Dz7Ɔ╗A●ŐƆฌ
ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
ƆĠḶÛЌ7+ḶŐ7bՁAŐ●╗ùฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 Dzธฌ
Dz‫ں‬″7 Dz‫ں‬ɱฌ Ɔ╗DzDzՁ7ŐAҜО7ŐA●Ձ●ЌḚⓒ7ОA●Ќ╗DzC㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ㄦฌ
Dzธxฌ ҜDz╗AՁ7ՁDz╗╗DzŐƆฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफ7 Dz‫̶ں‬ฌ Dz‫ں‬ՙฌ Dzธ7 Dz‫ں‬7
╗ùО㈠ฌ ╗ùО㈠7 Dzธ‫ں‬ฌ ƆḶ++●╗7Ձ●ḚĠ╗ฌ

ЌḶŐ╗ĠÛDzƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
㈠㈠7
bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ

bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌƆ7 ‫ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬ธธฌ
㈠㈠7‫ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
ƆbAՁDz7̬7̶゜̶ธफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 x7 ㅡƥ7 ฎƥ7 ‫ں‬″ƥ7 xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
A″㈠x‫ں‬ฌ
A″
‫ں‬7 ธ7 ̶7 ㅡ7 ㄦ7 ″ฌ

‫ں‬″ƥֱxफ7 ㄦ″ƥֱxफ7 ㄦㄦƥֱ‫ں‬xफ7 ㄦxƥֱธफ7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ


‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 ‫ں‬ธƥֱ‫ں‬xफ7 ธㅡƥֱㅡफ7 ฎƥֱ‫ں‬xफ7 ㄦㅡƥֱxफ7 ̶xƥֱ″फ7 ̶‫ں‬ƥֱ″फ7 ՙƥ̶ֱफ7 ՙƥֱ‫ں‬xफฌ

A7 Aฌ

Ɔ╗Ḷ㈠ฌ
ֱ
Ɔ╗DzҜฌ
Ɔ╗A●Ő7 ‫ں‬ฌ
bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ +ՁDzṲฌ
ֱ7 bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ7 bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ7 bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ
ֱ7 ֱ7 ֱ

╗㈠Ő㈠7 ОŐDzО㈠ฌ
ֱ7 ֱ
Aɱฌ

Ա7 Աฌ

b7 bฌ

″ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7 İAЌ㈠7 Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ


ֱ7 ֱ

ԱḶùƥƆ7 Ḛ●ŐՁƥƆ7 Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ


ֱ7 ֱ7 ֱ
ƆОDzb㈠7DzC㈠ฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ
bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ ƆОDzb●AՁ7DzC㈠ฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠7 bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ ֱ
Û7 Cฌ
77ʉʉʉ㈠֭‫ש‬γਙ⎯‫ש‬γผ֭֭㈠㌱ਙこฌ

ֱ7 bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ
ֱ ֱ
ֱ7 ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ
Ɔ╗A●Ő7 ธฌ
ֱ

bฎฌ
╗Ձ╗㈠ฌ
″ƥֱ‫ںں‬फ‫ں‬ƥֱxफ″ƥֱ‫ں‬xफฌ
77⑾̬7ՙxธ㈠ㅡㄦ″㈠ՙxธxฌ

ֱ7

C7 Cฌ

ฎƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7 ̶‫ں‬ƥֱ″फ7 ธㅡƥֱ″फ7 ̶ㅡƥֱxफ7 ฎƥֱxफ7 ̶ธƥֱ″फ7 ̶‫ں‬ƥֱ″फฌ


ऑ̬7ՙxธ㈠ㅡㄦ″㈠‫ں‬xՙxฌ
ฎɱㄦㄦ7Ɔ7DzŴ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ่7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7ธธxⓒ7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ

‫ں‬ՙxƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ

+ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ֱ7ՁDzЋDzՁ7ธฌ
‫ں‬7 ธ7 ̶7 ㅡ7 ㄦ7 ″ฌ

‫ں‬ɱ̶ƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱxफ7 ㄦ″ƥֱxफ7 ㄦㄦƥֱ‫ں‬xफ7 ㄦxƥֱธफ7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ

‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 ‫̶ں‬ƥֱxफ7 ㅡ̶ƥֱxफ7 ″ƥֱㅡफ7 ㅡ̶ƥֱธफ7 ″ƥֱㅡफ7 ㅡ̶ƥֱธफ7 ՙƥֱxफฌ

A7 Aฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ ╗Ձ╗㈠ฌ
╗Ձ╗㈠ฌ ╗Ձ╗㈠ฌ ╗Ձ╗㈠ฌ
ֱ ֱ
ֱ7 ֱ7 ֱ

Page 132 of 1332


İAЌ㈠ฌ
ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ
ֱ7 Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ
ֱ7 ֱ7
ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ
ֱ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ
bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ ֱ
bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠7 ֱ
ֱ Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠7 ֱ
ֱ7 ֱ7
Ő●ƆDzŐฌ
╗㈠Ő㈠7 ֱ
ֱ Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠7
Ɔ╗A●Ő7 ‫ں‬ฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ +AҜ●Ձùฌ
ֱ7 ֱ7 Ő㈠Őฌ Aɱฌ
ֱ
Աฌ Աฌ

b7 bฌ

Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ
DzՁDzЋ㈠ฌ
ֱ7 ֱ7 Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ
ֱ
╗Ձ╗㈠7 ╗DzAbĠDzŐฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠7 Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ
ֱ7 ÛḶŐì7 ֱ7 ֱ

ֱ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠ฌ


bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ Ɔ╗A●Ő7 ธฌ
ЋDzƆ╗㈠7 ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ ֱ
DzՁDzb╗㈠ฌ ֱ7 ֱ ֱ
ֱ ֱ7
ŐḶḶҜฌ
ֱ
Ɔ╗ḶŐ㈠7 bฎฌ
╗Ձ╗㈠7 ╗Ձ╗㈠7 ╗Ձ╗㈠ฌ ╗Ձ╗㈠ฌ
ֱ
ֱ7 ֱ
ֱ ֱ

C7 Cฌ

ฎƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7 ‫̶ں‬ƥֱxफ7 ㅡ̶ƥֱxफ7 ″ƥֱㅡफ7 ㅡ̶ƥֱธफ7 ″ƥֱㅡफ7 ㅡ̶ƥֱธफ7 ՙƥֱxफฌ


‫ں‬ՙxƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ
bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌƆฌ

+ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ֱ7ՁDzЋDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ

bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ7+ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌƆ7 ‫ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬ธธฌ
‫ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
ƆbAՁDz7̬7̶゜̶ธफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 x7 ㅡƥ7 ฎƥ7 ‫ں‬″ƥ7 xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
A‫ں‬㈠x‫ں‬ฌ
A‫ں‬
Dz‫ں‬ՙฌ
Dz‫ں‬ธฌ Dzɱฌ
╗㈠Ḷ㈠7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ ╗ùО㈠ฌDz‫ں‬ธฌ
╗㈠Ḷ㈠7О㈠ฌ Dz‫ں‬ฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ՙƥֱxफฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌ
Dzɱฌ
Dz̶7 Dz‫ں‬xฌ
Dz‫ں‬ฌ Dz‫ں‬xฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ

Dz‫ں‬x7 Dzธ‫ں‬ฌ
Dz‫ں‬x7 Dzㅡฌ
ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձ7Dz‫ں‬ฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 Dz‫ں‬7 DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌDz″ฌ Dzɱฌ

Dz‫ں‬ㅡฌ

Dz‫ں‬″ฌ
Dzธ7 Dzธฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफฌ Dz‫̶ں‬7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ Dzㅡ7 Dz‫ں‬ㅡ7 DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफ7 Dzㅡ7 Dz‫̶ں‬ฌ Dzธฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ

DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ЌḶŐ╗ĠDzAƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ

Dz‫ں‬x7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ Dz‫ں‬ธฌ ╗ùО㈠ฌ


Dzɱ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ
Dz‫ں‬ՙฌ Dz‫ں‬ฌ
╗㈠Ḷ㈠7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ ╗ùО㈠ฌ

DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 Dz̶ฌ

Dzㄦฌ

ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌ

Dz‫ں‬ㄦฌ

Dz″ฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफ7 Dz‫̶ں‬7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ Dz‫ں‬ՙ7 ╗ùО㈠7 Dzธ7 Dz‫ں‬ฌ

DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ
ƆḶⓈ╗ĠDzAƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ

Dz‫ں‬ՙ7 Dzɱฌ Dz‫ں‬ธฌ Dz‫ں‬ธ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ


╗ùО㈠7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ Dz‫ں‬xฌ

╗㈠Ḷ㈠7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫̶ں‬ㄦƥֱxफฌ
Dzɱฌ

Dz‫ں‬ՙ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ

ธЌC7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ںں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7 Dzธฌ
Dz‫ں‬″ฌ

Dz‫ں‬ㄦฌ

‫ں‬Ɔ╗7+Ձ㈠7++Ձฌ
DzՁ㈠7ો‫ں‬xxƥֱxफ7 Dz‫̶ں‬ฌ Dz‫ں‬ՙฌ Dzธ7 Dz‫ں‬ฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ ╗ùО㈠7

DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ
ЌḶŐ╗ĠÛDzƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ

Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ
‫ںں‬xՙฌ
О╗ֱㅡ7 О╗ֱㅡฌ
╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ О╗ ֱㅡ7 О╗ֱㅡ7 О╗ֱㅡฌ
О╗̶ֱ7 ‫ںںں‬ธฌ О╗̶ֱ7 ‫ںںں‬ฎฌ О╗̶ֱฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ
‫ںں‬xฎฌ Ա7 Dz7 Աฌ ‫ںں‬ธㅡ7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ
DzОḶṲùฌ DzОḶṲù ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ DzОḶṲù7 DzОḶṲùฌ Ћb╗ֱธฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ

ÛḶŐìฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
İAЌฌ ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ ‫ںںں‬ՙฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ
Ɔbֱ‫ں‬ฌ Dz7 Ա7 Dz7 Աฌ ธธxㄦฌ
‫ںں‬x̶ฌ ‫ںںںں‬ฌ Dz7 Dzฌ Ɔ╗A●Ő7 ‫ں‬7 Աฌ

ÛḶŐìฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ‫ںں‬ธ̶ฌ
ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ա7 ●ŐDz7Ő●ƆDzŐฌ Ɔ㈠╗㈠Dz㈠Ҝ㈠ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ՁDzṲฌ ՁDzṲ ฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ ฌ
ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ ‫ںںں‬ɱฌ ‫ںں‬ธxฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ ฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ
Աฌ ‫ںںں‬ㅡฌ ‫ںں‬ธธฌ
Ա7 ‫̶ںںں‬ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDz7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ ธธx̶ฌ ธธx″ฌ ธธxՙฌ ธธxฎฌ ธธxɱฌ
‫ںں‬xㅡฌ ‫ںں‬xㄦฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ ‫ںںں‬″7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDz bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ bОֱ‫ں‬7 bОֱ‫ں‬7 bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ա7 Աฌ Ġฌ ОŐDzО㈠ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ
╗㈠Ő㈠ฌ bОֱ‫ں‬7 Ɔbֱ‫ں‬ฌ
‫ںں‬xɱฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ ‫ںںں‬ㄦ7 Աฌ ╗㈠Ő㈠ฌ ธธxㅡฌ
‫ںں‬xธฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ AҜ●Ձùฌ
bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ ธธxธฌ

ÛḶŐìฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
Ћb╗̶ֱฌ Աฌ ŐDzƆ╗ŐḶḶҜฌ
Ձ7 ‫ںںں‬xฌ Ձ7 Ա7 Ձ7 Ձฌ Ձ7 Ձ7 Աฌ Ձ7 Ձฌ
Ћb╗̶ֱฌ

ÛḶŐìฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
‫ںں‬ธ‫ں‬ฌ CЌฌ Ћb╗ֱธฌ Ћb╗ֱธฌ

Page 133 of 1332


Ќ7 Ɔ╗A●Ő7 ‫ں‬7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 DzОḶṲùฌ Ҝฌ Ա7 ╗ùО Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ ╗ùО
Ա7 Ա7 Ա7 Ա7 Ա7 Ա7 Աฌ
ⓈОฌ bḶŐŐ●CḶŐฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ա7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 О╗̶ֱ7 Ḛ7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ա7 Ա7 О╗ֱㅡฌ Ա7 Աฌ
Ձฌ

ÛḶŐìฌ

ÛḶŐìฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
Ћb╗ֱธฌ Ћb╗ֱธฌ bḶŐŐ●CḶŐฌ Ћb╗ֱธ7 Ћb╗ֱธฌ ÛḶҜฌ Ա7 ธธx‫ں‬ฌ
ÛḶҜฌ ╗ùО ╗ùО ╗ùО Ձ7 Ћb╗ֱธฌ
О╗̶ֱ7 ╗ùО ‫ںں‬x‫ں‬ฌ О╗̶ֱ7 Ա7 Ձฌ
Ա7 7 Ա7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ա7 Աฌ Ա7 Աฌ
Ա7 ╗ùО
Ա7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ա7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ Ա7 ⓈО7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ Ҝ7 Ɔ╗A●Ő7 ธฌ
╗DzAbĠDzŐ7ÛḶŐìฌ Ա7 Ա7 Ա7
DzՁDzЋA╗ḶŐฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ ‫̶̶ںں‬ฌ ՁAЋA╗ḶŐùฌ
‫ںں‬ㅡㅡฌ Ձฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ Ɔbֱ‫ں‬ฌ ธธ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
Ձ7 Ձ7 Ձ7 Ա7 Ձ7 Ձฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ա7 ‫̶ںں‬ɱฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ DzՁDzЋA╗ḶŐ7
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ ธธ‫ں‬ฎฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ CЌฌ
‫ںں‬ธՙฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7

ÛḶŐìฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 b7 Cฌ Ћb╗ֱธ7 Ћb╗ֱธฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ
╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ

ÛḶŐìฌ
ОḶ●Ќ╗ฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ Աฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ ԱḶùƥƆฌ Ḛ●ŐՁƥƆฌ
‫̶ںں‬ธฌ Աฌ ธธ‫ں‬ㅡฌ
‫ںں‬ㅡ″ฌ Dzฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ ฌ
Ћb╗ֱธ7 Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ‫̶ںں‬ฎฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ա7 bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜ ฌ ธธธxฌ ธธ‫ں‬ɱฌ bՁAƆƆŐḶḶҜฌ
ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ
DzОḶṲù ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ì●ЌCDzŐḚAŐ╗DzЌฌ ธธ‫ںں‬ฌ ธธ‫ں‬xฌ
ธธธธฌ ธธธ‫ں‬ฌ ธธ‫ں‬″ฌ
‫ںں‬ㅡ‫ں‬ฌ ‫ںں‬ㅡxฌ ‫ںں‬ธฎฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ‫̶ںں‬ㄦฌ ‫̶ںں‬ㅡฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ‫ںں‬ธ″ฌ ‫ںں‬ธㄦฌ Ա7 bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ
DzՁDzb╗Ő●bAՁฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ ЋDzƆ╗㈠ฌ
Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ɔbֱ‫ں‬7 bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ DzОḶṲù 7 DzОḶṲù7 bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ ธธ‫̶ں‬ฌ
bОֱ‫ں‬7 bОֱ‫ں‬7 ЋDzƆ╗●ԱⓈՁDzฌ bОֱ‫ں‬ฌ
О╗̶ֱฌ

‫ںں‬ㅡㄦฌ ‫̶ںں‬ՙฌ Dz7 Ա7 Dz7 Dz7 Ա7 Dzฌ
О╗ֱㅡฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ
‫ں̶ںں‬ฌ Ћb╗ֱธ7 Ћb╗ֱธฌ
Ɔbֱ‫ں‬7 ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬7 ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ
DzОḶṲùฌ ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ
‫ںں‬ㅡ̶ฌ Ա7 ╗Ḷ●ՁDz╗ฌ ‫̶ںں‬xฌ Ա7 ‫ںں‬ธɱฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ћb╗ֱ‫ں‬ฌ
Dz7 ธธ‫ں‬ธฌ
DzОḶṲùฌ О╗̶ֱฌ О╗̶ֱ7 О╗̶ֱฌ DzОḶṲùฌ
Ա7 ‫̶ںں‬″ฌ DzОḶṲù7 О╗ֱㅡ7 О╗ֱㅡ7 DzОḶṲùฌ О╗ֱㅡ7 О╗ֱㅡฌ

Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ
‫ںں‬ㅡธฌ
‫ں‬ㅡฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 134 of 1332
%&'
 ' !

% 

#
#

+&
 &
#
# &$


 

< #
=
 

&$
 
<
< #



Page 135 of 1332
%&'
 ' !

% 

#
#

+&
 &
#
# &$


 

< #
=
 

&$
 
<
< #



Page 136 of 1332


%&'
 ' !

% 

#
#

+&
 &
#
# &$


 

< #
=
 

&$
 
<
< #



ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 3eo 71f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 3eo 81f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 14

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ZON-75847 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75846 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) TO: C-V (CIVIC) on
15.64 acres at 491 North Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-601-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-75847, VAR-75848 and SDR-75849 [PRJ-75613]
3. Land Use Map
4. Supporting Documentation

Page 139 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 140 of 1332


Page 141 of 1332
Page 142 of 1332
Page 143 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 4eo 41f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 15

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75848 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75846 AND ZON-75847 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW DEVIATIONS FROM TITLE 19.10.020 C-V (CIVIC)
DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS on 15.64 acres at 491 North Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-601-
002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 145 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 146 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 4eo 71f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 16

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75849 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75846, ZON-75847
AND VAR-75848 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SCHOOL BOARD OF TRUSTEES
- For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 12,120
SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING ADDITION TO AN EXISTING 69,315 SQUARE-FOOT PUBLIC OR
PRIVATE SCHOOL, PRIMARY on 15.64 acres at 491 North Lamb Boulevard (APN 140-31-601-
002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75613]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 148 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 149 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫̶ں‬
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 5eo 01f 3 3 2
SDR 75849
School Board of Trustees

491 N Lamb Boulevard


Proposed 12.12 thousand square foot expansion of an existing 69.315 thousand square foot public elementary school.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
New Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 19.52 237


AM Peak Hour ELEMENTARY SCHOOL [1000SF] 12.12 6.97 84
PM Peak Hour 1.37 17
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Existing Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 19.52 1,353


AM Peak Hour ELEMENTARY SCHOOL [1000SF] 69.315 6.97 483
PM Peak Hour 1.37 95
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Total Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 19.52 1,590


AM Peak Hour ELEMENTARY SCHOOL [1000SF] 81.435 6.97 567
PM Peak Hour 1.37 112
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Lamb Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 35,604
PM Peak Hour 2848
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Bonanza Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 25,497
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Stewart Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 19,877
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Page 151 of 1332


Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:

Adjacent street ADT


Capacity
Lamb Boulevard 50,900
Bonanza Road 50,900
Stewart Avenue 35,490

This project will add approximately 237 trips per day on Lamb Blvd., Bonanza Rd. and Stewart Ave. Currently, Lamb is at
about 70 percent of capacity, Bonanza is at about 50 percent of capacity and Stewart is at about 56 percent of capacity. With
this project, Lamb is expected to remain at about 70 percent of capacity, Bonanza to be at about 51 percent of capacity and
Stewart to be at about 57 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add about 84 additional peak hour trips into the area, or about three every
two minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 152 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 17

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
WVR-75948 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/ OWNER: 201 CHARLESTON, LLC -
For possible action on a request for a Waiver of the INTERIM DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS
OVERLAY DISTRICT STREETSCAPE STANDARDS on 0.65 acres at the northwest corner of
Charleston Boulevard and Casino Center Boulevard (APN Multiple), C-2 (General Commercial)
Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75910]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Justification Letter

Page 153 of 1332


Page 154 of 1332
Page 155 of 1332
WVR-75948 [PRJ-75910]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/ OWNER: 201 CHARLESTON, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
WVR-75948 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 28

NOTICES MAILED 464

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

FS
Page 156 of 1332
WVR-75948 [PRJ-75910]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

WVR-75948 CONDITIONS
Planning

1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development Plan Reviews


(SDR-65423 and SDR-69515) shall be required, except where amended herein.

2. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan date
stamped 03/05/19.

3. A Waiver from Appendix F Development Standards is hereby approved, to allow


zero street trees adjacent to Charleston Boulevard where eight were required by
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65423).

FS
Page 157 of 1332
WVR-75948 [PRJ-75910]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for a Waiver of Title 19 Appendix F Development Standards to allow zero
street trees along Charleston Boulevard where eight were previously required by
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-65423).

ISSUES

• On September 21, 2016, the City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-65423) for an 18,657 square-foot retail establishment with a waiver to allow
eight street trees along Charleston Boulevard where 14 were required.
• It was discovered during construction that the presence of underground utilities would
not allow for the installation of the eight required street trees along Charleston
Boulevard.
• The request is for a Waiver to allow zero street trees along Charleston Boulevard
where eight were previously required. Staff recommends approval of the request.

ANALYSIS

On September 9, 2018, the City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-65423) for an 18,657 square-foot retail establishment with a waiver to allow eight
street trees along Charleston Boulevard where 14 were required. During construction, it
was discovered that the presence of underground utilities would not permit the installation
of the eight required street trees along Charleston Boulevard. The applicant is requesting
a waiver of Title 19 Appendix F Development Standards to allow zero street trees along
Charleston Boulevard where eight were previously required by the approved site plan
(SDR-65423). In order to mitigate the impacts of the street tree removal, the applicant
has agreed to install seven large Century Plant Agaves on-site adjacent to the Charleston
Boulevard sidewalk to soften up the hardscaped area.

FS
Page 158 of 1332
WVR-75948 [PRJ-75910]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS

The site constraints caused by the underground utilities along Charleston Boulevard
results in a situation where the required street trees cannot be installed. The applicant
has made an effort to mitigate the impacts of the street tree removal by adding seven
large Century Plant Agaves on-site adjacent to the Charleston Boulevard sidewalk.
Given the hardship caused by the underground utilities, and the fact additional on-site
landscaping is being provided, Staff recommends approval of the Waiver request.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-65423) for a proposed three-story, 18,657 square-foot Office and
Restaurant building with a Waiver of Downtown Centennial Plan
09/21/16 Streetscape and Parking Lot Landscaping requirements on 0.56 acres at
the northwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Casino Center
Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended approval and Staff
recommended denial of the request.
Department of Planning staff approved a minor amendment to an
04/06/17 approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-69515) for a building
area reduction and parking lot reconfiguration.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


09/20/12 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


07/02/18 A civil improvement plan was approved for the subject site (L17-01555)
07/18/18 A building permit was issued for the subject site (PRC18-00016)

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
03/12/19 There is ongoing construction activity on the subject site.

FS
Page 159 of 1332
WVR-75948 [PRJ-75910]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.65

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
C (Commercial) and
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Subject C-2 (Limited
Undeveloped Vegas
Property Commercial)
Redevelopment Plan
Designation
MXU (Mixed Use) Las
Vegas C-2 (Limited
North Civic Space
Redevelopment Plan Commercial)
Designation
C (Commercial) Las
Vegas C-2 (Limited
South General Retail
Redevelopment Plan Commercial)
Designation
C (Commercial) Las
Vegas C-2 (Limited
East General Retail
Redevelopment Plan Commercial)
Designation
MXU (Mixed Use) and
C (Commercial) Las
Restaurant/Tavern C-2 (Limited
West Vegas
and Parking Lot Commercial)
Redevelopment Plan
Designation

Master Plan Areas Compliance


2045 Downtown Master Plan Y
Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District Y
Live/Work Overlay District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

FS
Page 160 of 1332
WVR-75948 [PRJ-75910]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Actual Complian
Functional
Governing Street ce with
Street Name Classification of
Document Width Street
Street(s)
(Feet) Section
Art Way N/A N/A 40 feet Y
Planned Streets and
South Casino
Major Collector Highways Map 80 feet Y
Center Boulevard
Planned Streets and
East Charleston
Primary Arterial Highways Map 100 feet Y
Boulevard

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
8 Street Trees Adjacent to 0 Street Trees Adjacent to
Approval
Charleston Boulevard* Charleston Boulevard
*Per Waiver approved though SDR-65423

FS
Page 161 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ں‬x
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 162 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ں‬x
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 163 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ں‬x
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 6eo 41f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 18

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SUP-75757 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAUREN OWENS - OWNER: CIM/116 N. 3RD
LV, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 90
SQUARE-FOOT OFF-PREMISE PROJECTING SIGN AT AN GENERAL RETAIL STORE at 116
North 3rd Street (APN 139-34-510-021), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear) [PRJ-
75622]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter

Page 165 of 1332


Page 166 of 1332
Page 167 of 1332
Page 168 of 1332
SUP-75757 [PRJ-75622]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LAUREN OWENS - OWNER: CIM/116 N. 3RD
LV, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-75757 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 31

NOTICES MAILED 144

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

CC
Page 169 of 1332
SUP-75757 [PRJ-75622]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-75757 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.10.100 for an Off-
Premise Sign use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. Only one advertising sign is permitted per sign face.

6. If the existing Off-Premise Sign is voluntarily demolished, this Special Use Permit
shall be expunged and a new Off-Premise Sign shall not be permitted in the same
location unless a Special Use Permit is approved for the new structure by the City
Council.

7. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CC
Page 170 of 1332
SUP-75757 [PRJ-75622]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The request is for a Special Use Permit to reface an existing projecting sign as a 71
square-foot Off-Premise Sign at 116 North 3rd Street.

ISSUES

• An Off-Premise Sign use is permitted in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district
with the approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP-75757). Staff recommends approval.

ANALYSIS

The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit for a proposed 71 square-foot Off-
Premise Sign. The Off-Premise Sign use is defined as “Any sign advertising or
announcing any place, product, goods, services, idea or statement whose subject is
available or located at or on the lot, same site, or within the same Master Sign Plan area
where the sign is erected or placed.” The submitted elevations indicate the proposed sign
will advertise a Hotel/Casino located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District. The
proposed sign matches the location and dimensions of an existing projecting sign on the
subject site. No approvals could be found for the existing projecting sign; however, aerial
photography records indicate that the existing projecting sign has been in place since
1990 when records began.

The subject property is located within the Downtown Casino Overlay District Special
Signage Area. Signage within this area is subject to Title 19.10.100 standards and
procedures, and the standards of Title 19.08.120 insofar as they do not conflict with Title
19.10.100. Within this area, at least 50 percent of the surface area of each sign must
contain neon or LED illumination, animation or a combination of these. The submitted
plans indicate that the 50 percent of the proposed sign will feature LED illumination,
meeting the illumination requirement. The proposed Off-Premise Sign complies with the
requirements for Off-Premise Signs in Title 19.12.120, and the requirements of the
Downtown Casino Overlay in Title 19.10.100; as such, staff recommends approval.

CC
Page 171 of 1332
SUP-75757 [PRJ-75622]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (SUP-75757)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed Off-Premise Sign meets the requirements of Title 19, is of a scale
and design compatible with the Downtown Casino Overlay district.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use proposed.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The proposed Off-Premise sign will not generate any additional site traffic.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed sign will be required to be reviewed for building code compliance and
therefore will not compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the overall
objectives of the General Plan.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.10.100.

The proposed sign meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.10.100.

CC
Page 172 of 1332
SUP-75757 [PRJ-75622]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved Rezoning (Z-0100-64) from R-1 (Single Family
Residential), R-4 (High Density Residential), C-1 (Limited Commercial), C-2
(General Commercial) and C-V (Civic) to C-2 (General Commercial) for
12/16/64 approximately 230 Acres generally located on property bounded by Main
Street to the west, Bonanza Road on the north, Las Vegas Boulevard on the
east, and Charleston Boulevard on the south, Wards 1 and 3. The Planning
Commission recommended approval on 12/10/64.
The City Council denied a request for a Variance (V-0074-92) to allow a
06/17/92
secondhand dealership where such use is not permitted at 116 N 3rd Street.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-0155-92)
to allow a Class III secondhand dealership for the buying and selling of new
09/02/92
and used gold and jewelry at 116 N 3rd Street. Staff and the Board of Zoning
Adjustment recommended approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


12/30/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


c. 1946 The existing building was constructed at 116 North 3rd Street.

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application Meeting was conducted to discuss the submittal
01/15/19 requirements for a Special Use Permit for an off-premise sign with the
applicant.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

CC
Page 173 of 1332
SUP-75757 [PRJ-75622]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
Site visit revealed an existing Off-Premise projecting sign on the building
02/28/19
contained within the subject parcel.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.15

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject
Vacant C (Commercial) C-2 (General Commercial)
Property
North Parking Garage C (Commercial) C-2 (General Commercial)
South Retail C (Commercial) C-2 (General Commercial)
Tavern-Limited
East C (Commercial) C-2 (General Commercial)
Establishment
Restaurant
Casino
West C (Commercial) C-2 (General Commercial)
Hotel
Parking Garage

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


Downtown Las Vegas Y
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 200 Feet Y
DC-O (Downtown Casino Overlay) District Y
DTLV-O (Downtown Las Vegas Overlay) District – Area 1 Y
LW-O (Live/Work Overlay) District Y

CC
Page 174 of 1332
SUP-75757 [PRJ-75622]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance


Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
North 3rd Street Local Street Title 13 91 Y

Pursuant to Title 19.10.100, the following standards apply:


Projecting Sign:
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number 1 sign per entrance 1 sign Y
Maximum Area 1,500 SF 71 SF Y
20 Feet above the height 14 Feet above the
Maximum Height Y
of the parapet height of the parapet
10 Feet vertically above
the height of the finished Approximately 24 Feet
Maximum Clearance sidewalk along public from finished sidewalk Y
rights-of-way and public to base of sign area
pedestrian pathways
Maximum Projection 8 Feet 6 Feet Y
Illumination 50% neon/LED/animation 50% LED Y
Minimum Separation
Distance between Off- 5 Feet Greater than 5 Feet Y
Premise Signs

CC
Page 175 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ธธ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 176 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ธธ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 177 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ธธ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 178 of 1332


Page 179 of 1332
Page 180 of 1332
Page 181 of 1332
″ƥ7xफฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ธธ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 182 of 1332

 '>>



 


 


 
 '
?
! #




'
 
! #
 



Page 183 of 1332



 '>>



 


 


 
 '
?
! #




'
 
! #
 



ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ธธ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 1g 8eo 41f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 19

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SUP-75084 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
ON 3010 SAHARA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 3,000 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE
at 3010 West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-05-403-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-74991]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 19 Planning Commission Mtg. 4

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
6. Letter from Child Watson & Gallagher for SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
7. Protest and Support Postcards for SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 and Documentation Not
Vetted – Protest Comment Forms (27) and Support Comment Forms (3) for SUP-75084 and
Protest

Page 185 of 1332


Page 186 of 1332
Page 187 of 1332
Page 188 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: ON 3010 SAHARA, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-75084 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
SDR-75082 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 26

NOTICES MAILED 659 - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082

PROTESTS 0 - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082

APPROVALS 0 - SUP-75084 and SDR-75082

CS
Page 189 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-75084 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a


Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-75082) shall be required.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

6. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.

7. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CS
Page 190 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

SDR-75082 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 01/16/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

3. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040.B.6.a is hereby approved, to allow the proposed


building to not orient to the corner where such is required.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

7. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

8. All utility or mechanical equipment shall comply with the provisions of the
Downtown Centennial Plan, unless approved by a separate Waiver.

9. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,


Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device. The
technical landscape plan shall include the following changes from the conceptual
landscape plan.

10. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.

CS
Page 191 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

11. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must
be satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

12. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks and
driveways adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title
13.56.040, if any, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with
development of this site.

13. An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage
Study must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior
to submittal of any construction drawings or the issuance of any building or grading
permits, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways
recommended in the approved drainage study update.

CS
Page 192 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a Site Development Plan Review and Special Use Permit request to allow a
Convenience Store with fuel pumps and canopy and a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use
at 3010 West Sahara Avenue.

ISSUES

• A Waiver has been requested to allow the proposed building to not orient to the
corner where such is required. Staff does not support the request.
• A Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff does
not support the request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located on a corner lot within an existing shopping center. The lot is
currently occupied by a vacant building, formerly utilized as a Restaurant. The applicant
has proposed to demolish the existing building and construct a General Retail Store,
other than listed building to be utilized as a Convenience Store with Fuel Pumps and
Canopy.

A Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited


Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Per Title 19, the
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is defined as “An establishment whose
license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers to
consumers only and not for resale, in original sealed or corked containers, for
consumption off the premise where the same are sold, and is operated in connection
with a grocery store, drug store, convenience store or specialty merchandise store.”
The proposed use meets the definition as it is in connection with a convenience store.

CS
Page 193 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

*1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment


(hereinafter “establishment”) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house
of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or
City park.

The proposed use meets this requirement as there are no protected land uses
within 400 feet of the subject property.

*2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to


in Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance
between two property lines, one being the property line of the proposed
establishment which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement
pertains, and the other being the property line of that existing use which is closest
to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line
without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of measurement, the term
“property line” refers to property lines of fee interest parcels and does not include
the property line of:

a. Any leasehold parcel; or


b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1.

The proposed use meets this requirement as there are no protected land uses
within 400 feet of the subject property.

*3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80


acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be
measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of
the structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to
intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest
property line of the existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold
or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located, without
regard to intervening obstacles.

CS
Page 194 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

This requirement is not applicable as the subject site is 0.91 acres.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which


also requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of
its recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement
should be waived and the reasons in support of the decision.

This requirement is not applicable as there are no protected land uses within 400
feet of the subject site.

5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:


a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection
with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or
in connection with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after
July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail
floor space.

This requirement is not applicable, as the proposed use will not be operated
within a non-restricted gaming hotel with 200 rooms or a retail establishment with
more than 50,000 square feet of floor area.

*6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.

The proposed use will be subject to all business licensing requirements outlined in
LVMC Chapter 6.50 if approved.

7. The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are


otherwise nonwaivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be
waived:
a. In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any
establishment which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the “Town Center
Development Standards Manual” for any establishment which is proposed
to be located within the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and which is
designated MS- TC (Main Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land Use
Plan;
c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000
square feet and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than 10
percent of the retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages; or

CS
Page 195 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square


feet of retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are
separated by a highway or a right of way with a width of at least 100 feet.

This requirement is met as there are no protected land uses within 400 feet of the
subject property.

8. No beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment shall be permitted on or adjacent to the


Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.

This requirement does not apply, as the subject site is not located adjacent to an
existing Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.

While the proposed Convenience Store development is appropriate for the subject
shopping center, it fails to meet the minimum requirements of Title 19. Due to the
associated Waiver request, staff recommends denial of both entitlements. If approved,
the entitlements are subject to conditions.

FINDINGS (SUP-75084)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious


and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed land use cannot be conducted in a harmonious and compatible


manner with the surrounding land uses due to the requested waivers associated
with the proposed Site Development Plan Review.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject commercial development is physically suitable for a Beer/Wine/Cooler


Off-Sale Establishment use, however staff recommends denial due to the
associated Waivers with the Site Development Plan Review.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

CS
Page 196 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Site access will remain from Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard, both
adequate in size to continue servicing the subject shopping center.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed use will be subject to business license review and periodic
inspection, thereby safeguarding the public health, safety and general welfare.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use meets all applicable


conditions per Title 19.12.

FINDINGS (SDR-75082)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed development is compatible with the adjacent commercial


development in the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is not consistent with Title 19 as the applicant has
requested a Waiver to allow the proposed building to not orient to the corner
where such is required.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access will remain from Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard, both
adequate in size to continue servicing the subject shopping center.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;

CS
Page 197 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly
and are compatible with development in the area. The existing landscape
materials will remain appropriate for the subject area.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly
and are compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are
suitable for the surrounding commercial uses.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed commercial development will be subject to building permit review


and inspections; therefore, protecting the public health, safety and general
welfare.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0066-73)
application for the reclassification of property generally located
between West Oakey Boulevard on the north, West Sahara Avenue on
the south, South Valley View Boulevard on the west, and Richfield
Boulevard on the east, south of Westwood Village Tract and west of
09/26/73
Springhurst Townhouses, from R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R
3 (Medium Density Residential) to R-PD6 (Residential Planned
Development - 6 Units per Acre), R-4 (High Density Residential) and
C-1 (Limited Commercial). The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a Variance (V-0099-84) to
allow auto sales for one day only in the months of February, May,
09/27/84 August and November of every year where such is not permitted on
property located at 3100 West Sahara Avenue. Staff recommended
denial.

CS
Page 198 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission accepted a request to Withdraw Without
Prejudice a Special Use Permit (SUP-5471) for a Facility to provide
12/02/04 testing, treatment, or counseling for drug or alcohol abuse at 3150
West Sahara Boulevard Avenue, Suite #B22. Staff recommended
approval.
The Planning Commission accepted a request to Withdraw Without
Prejudice a Special Use Permit (SUP-5472) for a Sex Offender
12/02/04
Counseling Facility at 3150 West Sahara Boulevard Avenue, Suite
#B22. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission accepted the applicant’s request to
Withdraw Without Prejudice a Special Use Permit (SUP-5783) and
01/27/05 Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5779) for a proposed Mixed-Use
Development on the properties located at the northwest corner of
Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard.
The City Council approved requests for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
6219) and for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-6220) for a
seven-story mixed-use development including 303 residential units
06/01/05
and 20,250 square-feet of office, and a waiver of the 15-foot rear yard
setback. The Planning Commission recommended approval on
04/14/05. Staff had recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Major Amendment to an
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-8583) for a seven-
story mixed-use development, consisting of 325 residential units and
10/19/05 23,695 square feet of office space and a waiver to permit a side yard
setback of zero feet where 10 feet is the minimum setback required on
7.78 acres adjacent to the north side of Sahara Boulevard, between
Spanish Oaks Drive and Richfield Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-18693) for a four-story, 42,000 square-foot office
building, with a 2,450 square-foot restaurant with Drive-through, and a
06/06/07
14,550 square-foot General Retail Establishment on 7.68 acres at
3100-3190 West Sahara Avenue. The Planning Commission
recommended approval and Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-44168) for a proposed 2,800 square-foot restaurant
(with drive-through) with Waivers to allow no landscape buffer along
the north and west perimeters where eight feet is required on
03/21/12
approximately 0.91 acres at the northwest corner of Sahara Avenue
and Richfield Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff both
recommended approval. This expired on 03/20/14 as it was not
exercised.

CS
Page 199 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-56141) for a proposed 4,295 square-foot restaurant
with drive through with waivers to allow no landscape buffer along the
11/04/14
north and west perimeters where eight feet is required at the northwest
corner of Sahara Avenue and Richfield Boulevard. Staff recommended
approval.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold in ABEYANCE SUP-
01/08/19 75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991] to the February 12, 2019
Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold in ABEYANCE SUP-
02/12/19 75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991] to the April 9, 2019 Planning
Commission meeting.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


05/10/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


Business License (#G63-04161) was issued for a Restaurant use at
07/07/15 3010 West Sahara Avenue. The license is listed as inactive as of
10/24/18.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
05/10/18 submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a proposed
Convenience Store and canopy.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an existing vacant
11/29/18
former restaurant building. No issues were noted.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.91

CS
Page 200 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject C-1 (Limited
Shopping Center C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
North R-PD6 (Residential
Single-Family L (Low Density
Planned Development –
Dwellings Residential)
6 Units per Acre)
South C-1 (Limited
Restaurant C (Commercial)
Commercial)
East Office
C-1 (Limited
Financial MXU (Mixed-Use)
Commercial)
Institution
West C-1 (Limited
Office C (Commercial)
Commercial)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


Rancho Charleston Land Use Study Y
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District – (200 feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 110 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front 10 Feet 25 Feet Y
• Side 10 Feet 18 Feet Y
• Corner 10 Feet 22 Feet Y
• Rear 20 Feet 88 Feet Y

CS
Page 201 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance


Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 15 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 20 Feet Y
Screened
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, and Y
w/ a Roof or Trellis Gated
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 6 Trees 0 Trees Y*
• South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 6 Trees 7 Trees Y*
• East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 11 Trees 5 Trees Y*
• West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 9 Trees 0 Trees Y*
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 32 Trees 12 Trees Y*
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
3 Trees 10 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North 8 Feet 0 Feet Y**
• South 15 Feet 25 Feet Y
• East 15 Feet 20 Feet Y
• West 8 Feet 0 Feet Y**
*Per Site Development Plan Review (SDR-56141), an exception was approved to allow
12 perimeter landscape buffer trees.
**Per Site Development Plan Review (SDR-56141), a Waiver was approved to allow no
landscape buffers along the north and west interior perimeter lot lines.

CS
Page 202 of 1332
SUP-75084 and SDR-75082 [PRJ-74991]
Staff Report Page Eleven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Actual
Functional Compliance
Governing Street
Street Name Classification of with Street
Document Width Section
Street(s)
(Feet)
Master Plan of Streets
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial 145 Y
and Highways
Richfield
Local Title 13 90 Y
Boulevard

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
General Retail
Store, Other
Than Listed 3,000 SF 1:175 SF 18
(Convenience
Store)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 18 18 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces
17 1 16 2 Y
Required

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To not orient the
Buildings on corner lots shall
proposed building to
be oriented to the corner and Denial
the corner and street
street fronts
front

CS
Page 203 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬
‫ں゜ںں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ฎ

Page 204 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬
‫ں゜ںں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ฎ

Page 205 of 1332


DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
DzЌ ╗Őù7C Ő●ЋDzฌ
Ձ ●Ҝ ●╗DzC 7b Ḷ Ҝ Ҝ DzŐb●AՁฌ
C ●Ɔ╗Ő●b ╗ฌ
bֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7CŴ‫ש‬Ŵ̬ฌ
Ќ7ฎɱƥ7ㅡxƥ7ㅡㄦ7Û7‫ں‬″x㈠xxƥฌ
AƆƆDzƆƆḶŐƆ7ОAŐbDzՁ7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7ӧAОЌỏ7 ‫ں‬″ธֱxㄦֱㅡx̶ֱxxㄦฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ bⓈŐŐDzЌ╗7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7 ӧbֱ‫ں‬ỏ7Ձ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ
ОAŐì●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ՁAЌ C ƆbAОDzฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ОAŐbDzՁ7AŐDzA7 ો゜ֱ7㈠ɱ‫ں‬77AbŐDzƆ7ḚŐḶƆƆฌ
ՁAЌ C ƆbAОDzฌ

ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ bֱƆ╗ḶŐDz77ӧ̶ⓒxxx7Ɔ㈠'㈠ỏ7 Ձ֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γŴ่7ธㄦⓒxxx7⎯⑾7ए7‫ں゜ں‬ՙㄦ7Ɔ㈠'㈠7‫ں‬ՙ7ƆОAbDzƆฌ
ՁAЌ C ƆbAОDzฌ
●ƆՁAЌ C 7 DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7ӧ̶ⓒxxx7Ɔ㈠'㈠ỏ7 ‫ں‬ՙ7ƆОAbDzƆฌ
╗ŐAƆĠ ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ DzЌ b ՁḶ ƆⓈ ŐDzฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7 ՙ77ƆОAbDzƆฌ
DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ ╗ฌ DzṲ ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ЌDzÛ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7 ‫ں‬x77ƆОAbDzƆฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ ╗ŐA Ќ ƆḶ ŐҜ DzŐ 7 DzṲ ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7 ㄦ㈠ՙ゜‫ں‬xxx7Ɔ㈠'㈠7‫ں‬ՙ77ƆОAbDzƆฌ
Ⓢ ╗●Ձ●╗●DzƆฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ԱⓈ ●ՁC ●Ќ Ḛ 7 bֱƆ╗ḶŐDzฌ
̶ⓒxxx7Ɔ'ฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ОAŐì●Ќ Ḛ ฌ

Ќ 7xxƥ7‫ں‬ɱƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Dz7ธธx㈠xxƥฌ
Ћ AЌ ฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
●ŐDz7Ġ ùC ŐAЌ ╗ฌ

Ќ 7xxƥ7‫ں‬ɱƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Dz7ธㄦx㈠xxƥฌ
Ձ●Ҝ ●╗DzC 7bḶ Ҝ Ҝ DzŐb●AՁฌ Ύ DzŐḶ 7bⓈ ŐԱ7Ab Dzฌ
C ●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ DzṲ ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
bֱ‫ں‬ฌ ОAŐ ì●Ќ Ḛ ฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
Û AՁì 7Ⓢ О7A╗Ҝ ฌ

ḚAƆฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ●ƆՁAЌC7 ՁAЌ C ƆbAОDzฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ՁAЌ C ƆbAОDzฌ
ОAŐì●Ќ Ḛ ฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
b Ⓢ ŐԱⓒ7Ḛ Ⓢ ╗╗DzŐⓒฌ
AЌ C 7Ɔ●C DzÛ AՁì ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ Ⓢ Ќ C DzŐ7Ḛ ŐḶ Ⓢ Ќ C ฌ
Ћħ㌱ħ่ħ‫ੂש‬7ҜŴऑ̬ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ DzЌ ╗Őù7C Ő●ЋDzฌ Ⓢ DzՁ7╗AЌ ìƆฌ
ՁAЌ C ƆbAОDzฌ ÛAƆĠ●ЌḚ╗ḶЌ7ԱՁЋCฌ

Ҝ AŐ╗●Ќ7Ձ

ЋDzЌ ╗ฌ ֱ‫ں‬ㄦ

b ●Ћ●b7bDzЌ╗Dz

7 ḶŐAЌ77ì7ḚŐAḚƆḶЌ7ĠÛùฌ
Ő ●ƆDzŐ ฌ
A ●Ő゜ฌ
Û A╗DzŐ ฌ A Ձ╗A7CŐฌ
ОŐḶİDzb╗ฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌฌ
ŐAЌbĠḶ7CŐฌ

Page 206 of 1332


xƥฌ Ձ AƆ7ЋDzḚAƆฌ
x㈠x Ḷ AìDzù7ԱՁЋCฌ
ㄦฌ

̶
Dz7‫ں‬

Ő7
CDzbA╗ⓈŐ7ԱՁЋCฌ

Ќ7ฎɱƥ7̶ฎƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Û7‫̶ں‬x㈠xxƥฌ Ɔ AĠAŐA7AЋDzฌ
A╗
DzAƆ╗DzŐЌ7AЋDzฌ

İḶЌDzƆ7ԱՁЋCฌ
Ɔ╗

ŐA●ЌԱḶÛ7ԱՁЋCฌ
Ő C

DzŐ
7Őฌ
C7C ՁЋ

Ћ DzḚAƆ7ЋAՁՁDzù7CŐฌ
Ќ╗

7О7Ő
AЌ Ɔ7Ա

╗ḶŐŐDzù7О●ЌDzƆ7CŐฌ
Ћ AՁՁDzù7Ћ●DzÛ7ԱՁЋCฌ
ĠՁ DzḚA

Ձ
●Ḛ

ŐCฌ C DzƆDzŐ╗7●ЌЌ7ŐCฌ
ĠฌAƆ7Ћ

DzṲ ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ Ɔ ОŐ●ЌḚ7ҜḶⓈЌ╗A●Ќ7ŐCฌ Ɔ ОŐ●ЌḚ7ҜḶⓈЌ╗A●Ќ7ŐCฌ

ОḶ Û DzŐ7ОḶ ՁDz㈠ฌ Ɔ AЌCƆ7AЋDzฌ ╗ ÛA●Ќ7AЋDzฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ҜAŐùՁAЌC7ОìÛùฌ

Ⓢ ╗●Ձ●╗●DzƆฌ ОŐḶ ОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●Ќ DzbฌⓈ ŐԱⓒ7Ḛ Ⓢ ╗╗DzŐⓒฌ ՁAҜ●ЌḚḶ


ОAŐ

Ɔ●╗Dz7Ћ●Ɔ●Ա●Ձ●╗ùฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ╗ùО㈠ฌ A Ќ C 7Ɔ●C DzÛ AՁì ฌ Ġ AŐҜḶЌ AЋDzฌ


AC●Ɔ

ΎḶ Ќ Dzฌ ՁAЌ C ƆbAОDzฌ
╗ ŐḶО●bAЌ
Dz7CŐฌ

Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ

DzṲ ●Ɔ╗●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ЋDz
Ġ Ab●DzЌCA
b Ⓢ ŐԱⓒ7Ḛ Ⓢ ╗╗DzŐ ฌ Ҝ㌱bAŐŐAЌฌ
● Ќ╗DzŐЌA╗●ḶЌAฌ
CDzbA╗ⓈŐ7ԱՁЋCฌ

7ִ 7C ŐA●Ќ AḚ Dzฌ Ձฌ Ő ⓈƆƆDzՁՁ
A ●ŐОḶŐ╗ฌ
b Ġ AЌ Ќ DzՁฌ
Û㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
●ЌCⓈƆ╗Ő●AՁ7ŐCฌ

О A╗Ő●bฌ
ì
╗DzŐЌ7AЋDzฌ

Ḷʉ่֭ผ゜C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭ผ̬ฌ
Ḷʉ
Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7ОкŴ่ฌ ḶƆОŐDzù7ŐDzAՁ7DzƆ╗A╗Dz7bAО●╗AՁฌ
Ḷ ƆОŐ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफฌ ฎㄦ″x Û
ฎㄦ″x7Û㈠7ƆⓈЌƆDz╗7ԱՁЋC㈠7Ɔ╗Dz7ㅡ″xฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬ ÛDzƆ╗7ĠḶՁՁùÛḶḶCⓒ7bA㈠7ɱxx″ɱฌ
ÛDzƆ╗ ╗
xƥ7 ‫ں‬xƥ7 ธxƥ7 ㅡxƥฌ bḶЌ╗ ╗
bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7ƆDzAЌ7CAՁDzƆAЌCŐḶฌ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ7ธ‫ں‬ฎֱɱธ‫ں‬xฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफ7 Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠7
Оผਙ㈾
ਙ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠
x‫ں゜ں‬″゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ҝħ⎯㌱7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
Ҝħ⎯㌱ ธx‫ں‬ฎ
ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬7ִ7Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
bฌ
Ő֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7ОŴ₡7 A7 AŐⓈⓈƆ
╗γħ⎯7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ऑ‫—ש‬Ŵк7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭7Ŵ่₡7่ਙฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7 Ɔ7777Ḷ777777●77777C77777Ⓢ77777╗7777Ɔ
‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7ħ‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7ħ⎯7ħこऑкħ֭₡㈠7 b7 bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7AЋAŐⓈⓈƆ7Ɔ‫—ש‬₡ħਙ⎯ⓒ7●่㌱㈠7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7 C֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ7ธxⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7
C֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ ธxⓒ ธx‫ں‬ฎ ӧՙxธỏ7ՙՙ″ֱՙՙՙㅡฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
Dz Ќ╗Őù7CŐ●ЋDzฌ
Ձ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ
C●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ
bֱ‫ں‬ฌ Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7CŴ‫ש‬Ŵ̬ฌ
Ќ 7ฎɱƥ7ㅡxƥ7ㅡㄦ7Û7‫ں‬″x㈠xxƥฌ
AƆƆDzƆƆḶŐƆ7ОAŐbDzՁ7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7ӧAОЌỏฌ ‫ں‬″ธֱxㄦֱㅡx̶ֱxxㄦฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ bⓈŐŐDzЌ╗7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7 ӧbֱ‫ں‬ỏ7Ձ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

ો゜̶ֱㅡƥֱxफ
Dz Ṳ ●Ɔ ╗ ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
C Ő ●Ћ Dz 7Û A ù ฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ7AŐDzA7 ો゜ֱ7㈠ɱ‫ں‬77AbŐDzƆ7ḚŐḶƆƆฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCฌ

⇓A ‫⊿ں‬ો゜ֱㄦ̶ƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ bֱƆ╗ḶŐDz77ӧ̶ⓒxxx7Ɔ㈠&㈠ỏ7 Ձ֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γŴ่7ธㄦⓒxxx7⎯⑾7ए7‫ں゜ں‬ՙㄦ7Ɔ㈠&㈠7‫ں‬ՙ7ƆОAbDzƆฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ ╗ ㈠7
● ƆՁAЌC7 DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7ӧ̶ⓒxxx7Ɔ㈠&㈠ỏ7 ‫ں‬ՙ7ƆОAbDzƆฌ
⇓A ‫⊿ں‬ો゜ֱ‫ں‬ՙƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ ╗ŐAƆĠฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7 ՙ77ƆОAbDzƆฌ
Dz Ṳ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ DzЌbՁḶƆⓈŐDzฌ ЌDzÛ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7 ‫ں‬x77ƆОAbDzƆฌ
DzAƆDzҜDzЌ╗ฌ Dz Ṳ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ ╗ ŐAЌƆ&ḶŐҜDzŐ7 ㄦ㈠ՙ゜‫ں‬xxx7Ɔ㈠&㈠7‫ں‬ՙ77ƆОAbDzƆฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7
Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗●DzƆฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7 bֱƆ╗ḶŐDzฌ
̶ⓒxxx7Ɔ&ฌ
⇓A ‫̶⊿ں‬″ƥֱㅡफฌ
ՙƥ̶ֱफ
⇓A ‫⇓⊿ں‬A‫ں⊿ں‬ฎƥ
ֱธफ7
‫ں‬xƥֱxफฌ
ՁA Ќ C Ɔ b A О Dz ฌ
Ɔ Dz ╗Ա A b ì ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚฌ

Ќ7xxƥ7‫ں‬ɱƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Dz7ธธx㈠xxƥฌ

⇓A‫⊿ں‬ՙƥֱxफฌ
ЋAЌฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ

⇓A ‫ں⊿ں‬ฎƥֱxफ7
⇓A ‫⊿ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ &●ŐDz7ĠùCŐAЌ╗ฌ

Ќ 7xxƥ7‫ں‬ɱƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Dz7ธㄦx㈠xxƥฌ
⇓A ‫⊿ں‬ɱƥ⇓
ֱxफ
A ‫⊿ں‬ɱƥֱxफ
⇓A‫⊿ں‬ㄦƥֱxफ7⇓A‫⊿ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ

ֱxफ7
Ձ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ ΎDzŐḶ7bⓈŐԱ7&AbDzฌ
C●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ⇓A ‫⊿ں‬ธㅡƥֱxफฌ

bֱ‫ں‬ฌ О AŐì●ЌḚฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ

⇓A ‫ں̶⊿ں‬ƥ
ÛAՁì7ⓈО7A╗Ҝฌ

⇓A‫⊿ں‬ธㅡƥֱxफ7
⇓A‫⊿ں‬ฎ″ƥֱxफ7 ḚAƆฌ
Dz Ṳ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

⇓A ‫̶⊿ں‬″ƥֱxफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
●ƆՁAЌC7
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚ7 Dz Ṳ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
b ⓈŐԱⓒ7ḚⓈ╗╗DzŐⓒฌ
AЌC7Ɔ●CDzÛAՁìฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ⓈЌCDzŐ7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ
Ћħ㌱ħ่ħ‫ੂש‬7ҜŴऑ̬ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ DzЌ╗Őù7CŐ●ЋDzฌ & ⓈDzՁ7╗AЌìƆฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ Û AƆĠ●ЌḚ╗ḶЌ7ԱՁЋCฌ
ҜAŐ╗●Ќ7Ձ

ЋDzЌ╗ฌ ㄦฌ
● ֱ‫ں‬
b ●Ћ●b7bDzЌ╗Dz

7 ḶŐAЌ77ì7ḚŐAḚƆḶЌ7ĠÛùฌ

A●Ő゜Ő●ƆDzŐฌ
Û A╗DzŐฌ A Ձ╗A7CŐฌ
ОŐḶİDzb╗ฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌฌ
ŐAЌbĠḶ7CŐฌ

Page 207 of 1332


Ձ AƆ7ЋDzḚAƆฌ
xxƥฌ Ḷ AìDzù7ԱՁЋCฌ
̶x㈠
ㄦฌ

Ő7
Dz7‫ں‬

Ќ 7ฎɱƥ7̶ฎƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Û7‫̶ں‬x㈠xxƥฌ Ɔ AĠAŐA7AЋDzฌ
A╗

C DzbA╗ⓈŐ7ԱՁЋCฌ
DzAƆ╗DzŐЌ7AЋDzฌ

Ɔ╗

İ ḶЌDzƆ7ԱՁЋCฌ

Ő Cฌ

Ő A●ЌԱḶÛ7ԱՁЋCฌ
DzŐ
7Ő7Ő
C7C ՁЋ

Ћ DzḚAƆ7ЋAՁՁDzù7CŐฌ
Ќ╗

A Ќ Ɔ7Ա

Ⓢ 7О

Ћ AՁՁDzù7Ћ●DzÛ7ԱՁЋCฌ

╗ḶŐŐDzù7О●ЌDzƆ7CŐฌ
ĠՁ DzḚA

ՁA
●Ḛ

ŐCฌ CDzƆDzŐ╗7●ЌЌ7ŐCฌ
Ġฌ Ɔ7Ћ

⇓A‫ںں⊿ں‬ƥֱฎफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ƆОŐ●ЌḚ7ҜḶⓈЌ╗A●Ќ7ŐCฌ Ɔ ОŐ●ЌḚ7ҜḶⓈЌ╗A●Ќ7ŐCฌ

ОḶÛDzŐ7ОḶՁDz㈠ฌ Ɔ AЌCƆ7AЋDzฌ ╗ ÛA●Ќ7AЋDzฌ

Dz Ṳ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ

ો゜ֱ‫ں‬ฎƥֱ‫ں‬xफ
Dz Ṳ ●Ɔ ╗ ●Ќ Ḛ 7ՁA Ќ C Ɔ b A О Dz ฌ
Ɔ Dz ╗Ա A b ì ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ҜAŐùՁAЌC7ОìÛùฌ

ો゜̶ֱɱƥֱɱफฌ ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ b ⓈŐԱⓒ7ḚⓈ╗╗DzŐⓒฌ ՁAҜ●ЌḚḶ

⇓A‫⊿ں‬ો゜ֱ‫ں‬ㅡƥֱ‫ں‬फ
Dz Ṳ ●Ɔ ╗ ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗●DzƆฌ
ОAŐ

╗ùО㈠ฌ A ЌC7Ɔ●CDzÛAՁìฌ
C Ő ●Ћ Dz 7Û A ù ฌ Dz Ṳ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7 Ġ AŐҜḶЌ7AЋDzฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz7Ћ●Ɔ●Ա●Ձ●╗ùฌ
AC●Ɔ

ΎḶЌDzฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

ՙㄦƥֱxफ
Ő ㈠Ḷ ㈠Û ㈠7
╗ ŐḶО●bAЌ
Dz7CŐฌ

Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ЋDzฌ
ЋDz
Ġ Ab●DzЌCA
bⓈŐԱⓒ7ḚⓈ╗╗DzŐฌ Ҝ㌱bAŐŐAЌฌ
● Ќ╗DzŐЌA╗●ḶЌAՁฌ
C DzbA╗ⓈŐ7ԱՁЋCฌ

7ִ7CŐA●ЌAḚDzฌ ŐⓈƆƆDzՁՁ
A●ŐОḶŐ╗ฌ
bĠAЌЌDzՁฌ
Û㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
О A╗Ő●bì7
●ЌCⓈƆ╗Ő●AՁ7ŐCฌ

ો゜ֱธㄦƥֱㅡफ
Dz Ṳ ●Ɔ ╗ ●Ќ Ḛ 7ՁA Ќ C Ɔ b A О Dz ฌ
Ɔ Dz ╗Ա A b ì ฌ
╗DzŐЌ7AЋDzฌ

Ḷʉ่֭ผ゜C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭ผ̬ฌ
Ḷʉ
Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7ОкŴ่7 ḶƆОŐDzù7ŐDzAՁ7DzƆ╗A╗Dz7bAО●╗AՁฌ
Ḷ ƆОŐ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफฌ ฎㄦ″x Û
ฎㄦ″x7Û㈠7ƆⓈЌƆDz╗7ԱՁЋC㈠7Ɔ╗Dz7ㅡ″xฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬ ÛDzƆ╗ ╗
ÛDzƆ╗7ĠḶՁՁùÛḶḶCⓒ7bA㈠7ɱxx″ɱฌ
xƥ7 ‫ں‬xƥ7 ธxƥ7 ㅡxƥฌ bḶЌ╗ ╗
bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7ƆDzAЌ7CAՁDzƆAЌCŐḶฌ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ7ธ‫ں‬ฎֱɱธ‫ں‬xฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफ7 Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠7
Оผਙ㈾
ਙ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠
x‫ں゜ں‬″゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ҝħ⎯㌱7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
Ҝħ⎯㌱ ธx‫ں‬ฎ

ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬7ִ7Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
bฌ
Ő֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7ОŴ₡7 A7 AŐⓈⓈƆ
╗γħ⎯7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ऑ‫—ש‬Ŵк7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭7Ŵ่₡7่ਙฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7 Ɔ7777╗77777Ⓢ77777C777777●77777Ḷ77777Ɔฌ
‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7ħ‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7ħ⎯7ħこऑкħ֭₡㈠7 b7 bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7AЋAŐⓈⓈƆ7Ɔ‫—ש‬₡ħਙ⎯ⓒ7●่㌱㈠7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7 C֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ7ธxⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7
C ֭㌱֭こ⇡ ֭ผ ธ xⓒ ธx‫ں‬ฎ ӧՙxธỏ7ՙՙ″ֱՙՙՙㅡฌ
Ձ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ
C●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ
bֱ‫ں‬ฌ
Ќ 7ฎɱƥ7ㅡxƥ7ㅡㄦ7Û7‫ں‬″x㈠xxƥฌ

╗ ผ֭֭7Ձ֭‫่֭ف‬₡̬ฌ
ƆùҜԱḶՁ7 ԱḶ╗AЌ●bAՁ゜bḶҜҜḶЌ7ЌAҜDz7 Ɔ●ΎDz7 ỢⓈAЌ●╗ù7 ƆОAb●ЌḚฌ

㈠7‫ﭨ‬㈠7ḚՁAԱŐAฌ ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7 ̶7 AƆ7ƆĠḶÛЌ7ḶЌ7ОՁAЌฌ


ЌDzÛ ฌ ҜḶCDzƆ╗Ḷ7AƆĠฌ
AОDzฌ
ՁAЌCƆbฌ ╗ ㈠ฌ

bDzŐb●C●ⓈҜ7ՁḶŐ●CⓈҜ゜ฌ ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7 ̶7 AƆ7ƆĠḶÛЌ7ḶЌ7ОՁAЌฌ


CDzƆDzŐ╗7ОAՁḶ7ЋDzŐCDzฌ
Ќ DzÛ ฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ bֱƆ╗ḶŐDzฌ
̶ⓒxxx7Ɔฌ

ḶЌDz7ՁAŐḚDz7╗ŐDzDz7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7ОDzŐ7̶x7Ձ●ЌDzAŐ7DzDz╗7Ḷ7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ŐḶЌ╗AḚDz㈠ฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ƆОAb●ЌḚ7●ЌbŐDzAƆDz7CⓈDz7╗Ḷ7ⓈƆDz7Ḷ7ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7╗ŐDzDzƆ7AՁՁḶÛƆ7ㅡxƥ7Ձ●ЌDzAŐ7DzDz╗㈠ฌ
ACİAbDzЌ╗7╗Ḷ7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7‫ں‬7╗ŐDzDz7ОDzŐ7ธxƥ7ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7ՁAŐḚDz7DzЋDzŐḚŐDzDzЌ㈠ฌ

Ќ7xxƥ7‫ں‬ɱƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Dz7ธธx㈠xxƥฌ

Ќ 7xxƥ7‫ں‬ɱƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Dz7ธㄦx㈠xxƥฌ
Ձ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ ЌDzÛ ฌ
C●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ธxƥֱxफฌ
bֱ‫ں‬ฌ Dz Ṳ ●Ɔ ╗ ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ՁA Ќ C Ɔ b A О Dz ฌ Ɔ —‫֭ש⎯֭فف‬₡7Ɔ γผ—⇡7Ձħ⎯‫ש‬ฌ
Ɔ Dz ╗Ա A b ì ฌ ԱḶ╗AЌ●bAՁ゜bḶҜҜḶЌ7ЌAҜDz7 Ɔ●ΎDz7 ƆОAb●ЌḚฌ
AbAb●A7ŐDzCḶՁDzЌƆ7ƥCDzƆDzŐ╗7bAŐОDz╗ƥ7ֱ7CDzƆDzŐ╗7bAŐОDz╗7AbAb●A7 ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
bAƆƆ●A7ОĠùՁՁḶCDzЌ●A7ֱ7Ɔ●ՁЋDzŐ7bAƆƆ●Aฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
ḚAƆฌ ĠDzƆОDzŐAՁḶDz7ОAŐЋ●ՁḶŐA7ֱ7ŐDzC7ùⓈbbAฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ՁDzⓈbḶОĠùՁՁⓈҜ7ΎùḚḶОĠùՁՁⓈҜ7ֱ7ԱՁⓈDz7ŐA●Ќ7ƆAḚDzฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ ҜⓈĠՁDzЌԱDzŐḚ●A7bAО●ՁՁAŐ●Ɔ7ƥŐDzḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ɔ╗ƥ7ֱ7ŐDzḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ɔ╗7CDzDzŐ7ḚŐAƆƆฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
О●╗╗ḶƆОḶŐⓈҜ7╗ḶԱ●ŐA7ƥCÛAŐƥ7ֱ7CÛAŐ7ҜḶbì7ḶŐAЌḚDzฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
●ƆՁAЌCฌ
ŐAОĠ●ḶՁDzО●Ɔ7●ЌC●bA7ֱ7●ЌC●AЌ7ĠAÛ╗ĠḶŐЌฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
ŐḶƆҜAŐ●ЌⓈƆ7Ḷ●b●ЌAՁ●Ɔ7ֱ7ŐḶƆDzҜAŐùฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
ƆAՁЋ●A7ḚŐDzḚḚ●●7ƥbĠDzŐŐù7ŐDzCƥ7ֱ7AⓈ╗ⓈҜЌ7ƆAḚDzฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ
╗DzⓈbŐ●ⓈҜ7bĠAҜADzCŐùƆ7ֱ7ḚDzŐҜAЌCDzŐฌ ‫ں‬7ִ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ṳฌ

Ḛ ผਙ—่₡7b ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผฌ
CDzbḶҜОḶƆDzC7ḚŐAЌ●╗Dz̬7ӧ‫゜ں‬ธफ7Ҝ●ЌⓈƆỏฌ
ⓈЌCDzŐ7AՁՁ7╗ŐDzDzƆ7AЌC7AŐḶⓈЌC7ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ㈠ฌ

AŐDzA7Ḷ7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ՁAЌCƆbAОDz㈠ฌ
ŐDzОA●Ő7ִ7ŐDzОՁAЌ╗7╗Ḷ7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ ฌ
bḶЌC●╗●ḶЌƆ7AƆ7ADzb╗DzC7Աù7ЌDzÛ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌฌ

Page 208 of 1332


xxƥฌ
̶x㈠
Ќ 7ฎɱƥ7̶ฎƥ7‫ں‬ㄦ7Û7‫̶ں‬x㈠xxƥฌ Ő7

Ɔ●╗Dz7Ћ●Ɔ●Ա●Ձ●╗ùฌ
ΎḶЌDzฌ
Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ

Û㈠7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ો゜ֱธㄦƥֱㅡफ
Dz Ṳ ●Ɔ ╗ ●Ќ Ḛ 7ՁA Ќ C Ɔ b A О Dz ฌ
Ɔ Dz ╗Ա A b ì ฌ

Ḷʉ่֭ผ゜C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭ผ̬ฌ
Ḷʉ
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7ОкŴ่7 ḶƆОŐDzù7ŐDzAՁ7DzƆ╗A╗Dz7bAО●╗AՁฌ
Ḷ ƆОŐ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफฌ ฎㄦ″x Û
ฎㄦ″x7Û㈠7ƆⓈЌƆDz╗7ԱՁЋC㈠7Ɔ╗Dz7ㅡ″xฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬ ÛDzƆ╗ ╗
ÛDzƆ╗7ĠḶՁՁùÛḶḶCⓒ7bA㈠7ɱxx″ɱฌ
xƥ7 ‫ں‬xƥ7 ธxƥ7 ㅡxƥฌ bḶЌ╗ ╗
bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7ƆDzAЌ7CAՁDzƆAЌCŐḶฌ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ7ธ‫ں‬ฎֱɱธ‫ں‬xฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफ7 Оผਙ㈾
ਙ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠7
x‫ں゜ں‬″゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ҝħ⎯㌱7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
Ҝħ⎯㌱ ธx‫ں‬ฎ

ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬7ִ7Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
bฌ
Ő֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7ОŴ₡7 A7 AŐⓈⓈƆ
╗γħ⎯7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ऑ‫—ש‬Ŵк7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭7Ŵ่₡7่ਙฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7 Ɔ7777╗77777Ⓢ77777C777777●77777Ḷ77777Ɔฌ
‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7ħ‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7ħ⎯7ħこऑкħ֭₡㈠7 b7 bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7AЋAŐⓈⓈƆ7Ɔ‫—ש‬₡ħਙ⎯ⓒ7●่㌱㈠7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7 C֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ7ธxⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7
C ֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ ธxⓒ ธ x‫ں‬ฎ ӧՙxธỏ7ՙՙ″ֱՙՙՙㅡฌ
‫ں‬ธ̶ㅡㄦฌ

Û֭⎯‫ש‬7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ฎफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ฎफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ

DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ฎफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ฎफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ

Page 209 of 1332


ƆĠDzŐÛ●ЌֱÛ●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ
ƆÛ7 ՙxxㄦ7ОⓈŐDz7ÛĠ●╗Dzฌ

ƆĠDzŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ
ƆÛ7 ՙxՙㄦ7ÛDzԱ7ḚŐAùฌ

ƆĠDzŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ
ƆÛ7ՙ″ՙ‫ں‬7ḶЌ7╗ĠDz7ŐḶbìƆฌ

DzՁ7CḶŐACḶ7Ɔ╗ḶЌDzฌ
Ɔ●ՁЋDzŐ7Ձ●Ќ●ЌḚ7Û゜77ƆОՁ●╗ֱDzCḚDzฌ
ÛA●ЌƆbḶ ╗7Ɔ●ՁՁⓒ7bḶՁḶŐ7╗Ḷฌ
ҜA╗bĠ7Ɔ╗ḶЌDz㈠ฌ

Ḷʉ่֭ผ゜C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭ผ̬ฌ
Ḷʉ
Ɔħ₡֭7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ḚŴ⎯7bŴ่ਙऑੂ7╗ੂऑ㈠7 Cผਙ่‫ש‬7Dzк֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ḚŴ⎯7bŴ่ਙऑੂ7╗ੂऑ㈠ฌ ḶƆОŐDzù7ŐDzAՁ7DzƆ╗A╗Dz7bAО●╗AՁฌ
Ḷ ƆОŐDz
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ฎफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ฎफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ ฎㄦ″x7Û㈠7ƆⓈЌƆDz╗7ԱՁЋC㈠7Ɔ╗Dz7ㅡ″xฌ
ฎㄦ″x Û
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬ DzƆ╗7ĠḶՁՁùÛ
Û DzƆ╗ ╗ ḶḶCⓒ7bA㈠7ɱxx″ɱฌ
xƥ7 ㅡƥ7 ฎƥ7 ‫ں‬″ƥฌ bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7ƆDzAЌ7CAՁDzƆAЌCŐḶฌ
bḶЌ╗ ╗
ӧㅡธㅡỏ7 ธ‫ں‬ฎֱɱธ‫ں‬xฌ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ฎफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7
Оผਙ㈾
ਙ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠7
Ҝħ⎯㌱7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
Ҝħ⎯㌱ ธx‫ں‬ฎ
x‫ں゜ں‬″゜‫ں‬ɱ
ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬7ִ7Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
Ő֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7ОŴ₡7 A7 AŐⓈⓈƆ bฌ

╗γħ⎯7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ऑ‫—ש‬Ŵк7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭7Ŵ่₡7่ਙฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7 Ɔ7777Ḷ777777●77777C7777Ⓢ77777╗7777Ɔ


‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7ħ‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7ħ⎯7ħこऑкħ֭₡㈠7 b7 bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7AЋAŐⓈⓈƆ7Ɔ‫—ש‬₡ħਙ⎯ⓒ7●่㌱㈠7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7 İŴ่—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬″ⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7
İŴ่—Ŵผੂ ‫ں‬″ⓒ ธx‫ں‬ɱ ӧՙxธỏ7ՙՙ″ֱՙՙՙㅡฌ
⇓A ‫⊿ں‬″xƥֱธफฌ

⇓A ‫⊿ں‬ㅡɱƥֱธफฌ

Page 210 of 1332


Ḷʉ่֭ผ゜C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭ผ̬ฌ
Ḷʉ
1кਙਙผ7ОкŴ่7 ḶƆОŐDzù7ŐDzAՁ7DzƆ╗A╗Dz7bAО●╗AՁฌ
Ḷ ƆОŐ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ ฎㄦ″x Û
ฎㄦ″x7Û㈠7ƆⓈЌƆDz╗7ԱՁЋC㈠7Ɔ╗Dz7ㅡ″xฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬ ÛDzƆ╗ ╗
ÛDzƆ╗7ĠḶՁՁùÛḶḶCⓒ7bA㈠7ɱxx″ɱฌ
xƥ7 ธƥ7 ㅡƥ7 ฎƥฌ bḶЌ╗ ╗
bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7ƆDzAЌ7CAՁDzƆAЌCŐḶฌ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ
ӧㅡธㅡỏ7ธ‫ں‬ฎֱɱธ‫ں‬xฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 Оผਙ㈾
ਙ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠7 x‫ں゜ں‬″゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ҝħ⎯㌱7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
Ҝħ⎯㌱ ธx‫ں‬ฎ

ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬7ִ7Őħ㌱γ⑾ħ֭к₡7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
bฌ
Ő֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7ОŴ₡7 A7 AŐⓈⓈƆ
╗γħ⎯7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ऑ‫—ש‬Ŵк7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭7Ŵ่₡7่ਙฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7 Ɔ7777╗77777Ⓢ77777C777777●77777Ḷ77777Ɔฌ
‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7ħ‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7ħ⎯7ħこऑкħ֭₡㈠7 b7 bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7AЋAŐⓈⓈƆ7Ɔ‫—ש‬₡ħਙ⎯ⓒ7●่㌱㈠7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7 C֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ7ธxⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7
C ֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ ธxⓒ ธ x‫ ں‬ฎ ӧՙxธỏ7ՙՙ″ֱՙՙՙㅡฌ
Page 211 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬
‫ں゜ںں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ฎ


Page 212 of 1332


"&
 &$$ 



 
#

# ">

 

!" "

 


!" "

 






Page 213 of 1332


"&
 &$$ 



 
#

# ">

 

!" "

 


!" "

 






Page 214 of 1332




"&
 &$$ 



 
#

# ">

 

!" "

 


!" "

 




ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬
‫ں‬ธ゜‫ں‬x゜‫ں‬ฎ

P a 2g 1eo 51f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬
‫ں‬ธ゜‫ں‬x゜‫ں‬ฎ

P a 2g 1eo 61f 3 3 2
Page 217 of 1332
Page 218 of 1332
Page 219 of 1332
Page 220 of 1332
Page 221 of 1332
Page 222 of 1332
Page 223 of 1332
Page 224 of 1332
Page 225 of 1332
Page 226 of 1332
Page 227 of 1332
Page 228 of 1332
Page 229 of 1332
Page 230 of 1332
Page 231 of 1332
Page 232 of 1332
Page 233 of 1332
Page 234 of 1332
Page 235 of 1332
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 20

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - SDR-75082 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-75084 -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ON 3010 SAHARA, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-56141) FOR
A PROPOSED 3,000 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED
[CONVENIENCE STORE] WITH FUEL PUMPS AND CANOPY WITH A WAIVER TO NOT
ORIENT THE BUILDING TO THE CORNER WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on 0.91 acres at 3010
West Sahara Avenue (APN 162-05-403-005), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
[PRJ-74991]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 19 Planning Commission Mtg. 4

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 300 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 301 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬
‫ں゜ںں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ฎ

Page 302 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㅡɱɱ‫ں‬
‫ں゜ںں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ฎ

Page 303 of 1332


SDR 75082
On 3010 Sahara, LLC

3010 W Sahara Avenue


Proposed 3 thousand square foot convenience store with gas sales.

Proposed Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 845.60 2,537


CONVENIENCE MARKET W/GAS [1000
AM Peak Hour 3 40.92 123
SF]
PM Peak Hour 50.92 153

Previous Use

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 496.12 2,125


FAST-FOOD WITH DRIVE-THRU [1000
AM Peak Hour 4.283 45.42 195
SF]
PM Peak Hour 32.65 140

Net Change

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 37.75 412


SHOPPING CENTER/GENERAL RETAIL
AM Peak Hour 7.283 0.94 -72
[1000 SF]
PM Peak Hour 3.81 13

Existing traffic on nearby streets:


Sahara Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 51,799
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 4,144

Richfield Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,306
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 344

Valley View Boulevard


Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 29,063
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 2,325

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Sahara Avenue 53,445
Richfield Boulevard 15,600
Valley View Boulevard 42,350

This project will remove approximately 412 trips per day on Sahara Ave., Richfield Blvd., and Valley View Blvd.
Currently, Charleston is at about 97 percent of capacity, Richfield is at about 28 percent of capacity and Valley View is
at about 69 percent of capacity. With this project, Sahara is expected to be at about 89 percent of capacity, Richfield is
expected to be at about 30 percent of capacity and Valley View to be at about 70 percent of capacity.

Page 309 of 1332


Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 13 additional cars, or about one every five
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 310 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: March 12, 2019 21

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75636 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW PROPOSED WALL SIGNS TO COVER 31 PERCENT OF
THE EAST ELEVATION AND 24 PERCENT OF THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING
WHERE 20 PERCENT IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED on 21.03 acres at the southwest corner of
Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive (APNs 162-08-418-002), C-2 (General Commercial) and M
(Industrial) Zones, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75581]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 04/03/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75636 and MSP-75634 [PRJ-75581]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75636 and MSP-75634 [PRJ-75581]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75636 and MSP-75634 [PRJ-75581]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75636 and MSP-75634 [PRJ-75581]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75636 and MSP-75634 [PRJ-75581]

Page 311 of 1332


Page 312 of 1332
Page 313 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER: INTEGRAL
PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75636 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
MSP-75637 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: VAR-75636

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 13

NOTICES MAILED 88 - VAR-75636 and MSP-75637

PROTESTS 0 - VAR-75636 and MSP-75637

APPROVALS 0 - VAR-75636 and MSP-75637

CS
Page 314 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75636 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Master Sign Plan
(MSP-75637) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

MSP-75637 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75636) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may be
filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, the Sign Analysis Table
and sign elevations date stamped 03/13/19.

CS
Page 315 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

7. The proposed sign shall not be constructed within a Clark County Water
Reclamation District (CCWRD) Sewer Easement. If sign foundations are
constructed with 5 feet of any existing CCWRD Sewer Easement, it shall be
backfilled with Controlled Low Strength Material (CLSM).

8. The proposed signs shall not be located within the public right-of–way, interfere
with pedestrian access paths or interfere with Site Visibility Restriction Zones. The
proposed ground mounted bases shall not be located within existing or proposed
public sewer or drainage easements.

CS
Page 316 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Master Sign Plan for a previously approved Commercial
Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor) development at the southwest corner of
Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive.

ISSUES

• A Variance has been requested to allow proposed wall signs to cover 29 percent
of the east elevation and 24 percent of the north elevation of the building where
20 percent is the maximum allowed. Staff recommends approval of the request.
• This Master Sign Plan is required through a Condition of Approval associated
with approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70652). Staff recommends
approval of the request.
• Code Enforcement Case #196427 was opened for adjacent parcel (APN: 162-08-
418-003) for unpermitted signage on an existing building related to the proposed
future Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor) development on
the subject site. The case remains open.

ANALYSIS

The City Council approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70652) to allow a
proposed 146,494 square-foot Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and
Outdoor) development on August 16, 2017. This entitlement was approved subject to
conditions. Condition #10 states, “A Master Sign Plan shall be submitted for approval by
the City of Las Vegas prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building
on the site and prior to the issuance of any sign permits.” The applicant has submitted a
proposed Master Sign Plan that includes one freestanding sign, one incidental sign, two
monument signs and several other wall signs.

The proposed freestanding sign, identified as “Sign A” on the submitted sign summary
table, will be located off Rancho Drive. It has a maximum height of eighty feet and is
1,120 square feet. Per the submitted justification letter, the sign will have an electronic
display, with color changing up-lighting on the decorative pole covers. In addition, Title
19 requires the erection of a consolidated sign have a minimum of three tenants or
individual uses on the same site. The submitted floor plan depicts three individual tenant
spaces called out. The Clark County Water Reclamation District submitted the following

CS
Page 317 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

comment, “(CCWRD) is okay with the placement of the sign as long as it is not in the
sewer easement (including excavation for the footings). If they are within 5ft of the
sewer easement when excavating for the footings, we request they backfill with (CLSM)
Controlled Low Strength Material.” The Public Works Departments has added a
condition of approval regarding this issue.

The proposed incidental sign, identified as “Sign C” on the submitted sign summary
table, will be located off Sirius Avenue. It is nine square feet and has a maximum height
of seven feet. Two proposed monument signs, identified as “Sign B” on the submitted
sign summary table will be located off Rancho Drive and Sirius Avenue. Both signs will
be externally illuminated, 42 square feet and have a maximum height of four feet. The
primary purpose of these signs is for directional purposes. They all comply with Title 19
requirements.

A proposed wall sign, identified as “Sign D” on the submitted sign summary table will be
located on the south side of the building. This is the main entrance sign, which is 1,330
square feet and has a maximum height of 38 feet. Per the submitted justification letter,
the sign will have one set of animated, internally illuminated RGB addressable LED
pixel illuminated numbers to read “15” with the peak logo mounted over the south entry.
The sign complies with all Title 19 requirements.

Proposed wall signs, identified as “Signs E1 and E2” on the submitted sign summary
table will be located on the east and north elevations of the building. The signs will read
“Area 15.” Proposed wall signs, identified as “Signs F1, F2, F3 and F4” on the submitted
sign summary table will be located on the east building elevation and will be utilized for
tenant space. Per the submitted justification letter, the signs will be animated externally
and/or internally illuminated RGB addressable LED pixel and or wall washers. The
background of the sign areas will also be changeable. A Variance (VAR-75636) has
been requested to allow these proposed wall signs to cover 24 and 29 percent of the
east and north elevations respectively, where 20 percent is the maximum allowed. Staff
recommends approval of the request.

The applicant has also submitted examples of additional signage that will be located on
the building elevations. These do not have a commercial message and are considered
to be “works of art.” Per Title 19, “Works of art or decorative architectural graphics that
do not include a commercial message and are not symbolic of any commercial business
and are not symbolic of commercial activities taking place on the premises on which the
graphic is located,” are exempt from regulation under this code.

Staff recommends approval of the Variance and Master Sign Plan as all proposed signs
are consistent with the proposed Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and
Outdoor) development of this scope. The signs are located in satisfactory locations that
do not adversely impact commercial or residential properties in the immediate vicinity.

CS
Page 318 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (VAR-75636)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

Sufficient evidence has been provided to approve the requested wall coverage Variance
as the proposed signs are appropriate in scale to the building for the future Commercial
Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor) development. The signs are located in
satisfactory locations that do not adversely impact commercial or residential properties
in the immediate vicinity. It is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is not preferential
in nature, and it is thereby within the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances. Therefore, staff recommends approval, subject to conditions.

FINDINGS (MSP-75637)

With the exception of the requested Variance to allow a minimal increase in building
elevation coverage for the proposed wall signage, the proposed Master Sign Plan
adheres to all other Title 19 requirements. All proposed signs are consistent with the
future Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor) development at the
subject site. The signs are located in satisfactory locations that do not adversely impact
commercial or residential properties in the immediate vicinity. Therefore, staff
recommends approval, subject to conditions.

CS
Page 319 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


A Final Map (FMP-4056) for a one-lot commercial subdivision (Fletcher
07/16/04 Jones Imports Property) on 21.04 acres at 3100 and 3200 South Rancho
Drive was recorded.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-9219) to add
the subject property to the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area as part of a
05/17/06
larger request and designate the area as C (Commercial). The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-70650) from C-1
(Limited Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) on 14.72 acres at the
southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70652)
for a proposed 146,494 square-foot Commercial Recreation/Amusement
08/16/17
(Indoor and Outdoor) Development with Waivers to allow a building to not
be oriented to the corner and street frontages where such is required, a
non-coherent building design with no changes in wall plane or color, and
large windowless areas on 21.03 acres at the southwest corner of Sirius
Avenue and Rancho Drive. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
Major Amendment (SDR-73309) of an approved Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-70652) for a proposed 59,478 square-foot addition to an
approved 146,494 square-foot Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor
and Outdoor) development at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and
08/14/18 Rancho Drive. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-73921) for
an Alternative Parking Standard to allow 921 parking spaces where 1,031
parking spaces are required at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and
Rancho Drive.
The Planning Department – Code Enforcement Division opened Code
Enforcement Case #196427 for unpermitted signage on an existing building
02/07/19
related to the proposed future recreation/amusement development on the
subject site on adjacent APN: 162-08-418-003. The case remains open.
The Planning Commission voted (5-0) to hold in abeyance VAR-75636 and
03/12/19 MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581] to the April 9, 2019 Planning Commission
meeting.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/21/05 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

CS
Page 320 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#94355263) was issued for a freestanding sign at 3100
11/03/94
South Rancho Drive. A final inspection was completed 07/06/95.
A building permit (#95883297) was issued for an off-premise sign at 3200
South Rancho Drive. The permit expired 11/02/96.
11/30/95
A building permit (#95883298) was issued for an off-premise sign at 3200
South Rancho Drive. The permit expired 11/02/96.
A building permit (#96390565) was issued for an addition to an existing
01/12/96 auto showroom at 3100 South Rancho Drive. A final inspection was
completed 11/21/96.
A building permit (#80227) was processed for a chain link fence with barbed
01/23/07 wire on top at 3200 South Rancho Drive. A permit was never issued and
the application expired on 08/06/07.
A building permit (#C18-01463) was issued for grading, clear and grub and
04/12/18 stockpiling on property located at 3215 South Rancho Drive. A final
inspection has not been approved.
A building permit (#L18-00678) was issued for a 4’x5’ bellhole at 3200
South Rancho Drive. The permit has not been finaled.
04/17/18
A building permit (#L18-00679) was issued for a 4’x5’ bellhole at 3200
South Rancho Drive. The permit has not been finaled.
A building permit (#L18-00086) was issued for Civil Improvements for a
proposed Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor)
05/31/18
development at 3200 South Rancho Drive. The permit has not been
finaled.
Building plan revisions (#PRC18-00018-R001) were submitted for a 2nd
07/02/18
floor addition to a commercial shell building at 3215 South Rancho Drive.
A building permit (#C18-00607) was issued for a proposed standard
07/16/18 commercial shell building at 3215 South Rancho Drive. A final inspection
has not been approved.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where
01/08/19 the submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a
proposed Variance and Master Sign Plan.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

CS
Page 321 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found unpermitted signage
on an adjacent lot relating to the proposed development on the
01/23/19
subject site. Staff has forwarded the issue to the Code Enforcement
Division.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 14.72

Planned or
Surrounding Existing Land Use Existing Zoning
Special Land Use
Property Per Title 19.12 District
Designation
Commercial
Subject C-2 (General
Recreation/Amusement C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
(Indoor and Outdoor)
Commercial
Recreation/Amusement C (Commercial)
(Outdoor)
North M (Industrial)
Warehouse
LI/R (Light
Auto Repair Garage,
Industry/Research)
Major
CT (Commercial M-1 (Light
Office, Other Than
South Tourist) – Clark Manufacturing) – Clark
Listed
County County
East Interstate 15 Right-of Way Right-of-Way
General Retail Store C (Commercial)
West LI/R (Light M (Industrial)
Warehouse
Industry/Research)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (140 Feet/175 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
Assessment) N/A
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CS
Page 322 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08.120 Development Standards


Consolidated Sign – “A”
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Parcels of 5 acres or
more in area, or parcels
covered by a Master
Sign Plan, that front on
a street eighty or more
feet in width, and qualify
to have more than one
freestanding sign along
the same such street
frontage, may
consolidate the
permitted sign area for
all freestanding signs on
the same street
frontage into one 1 proposed Monument
consolidated sign, or as Sign &
Maximum Number approved through a 1 Proposed Y
Master Sign Plan. If the Consolidated Sign on
development or Rancho Drive Frontage
commercial subdivision
elects to consolidate the
permitted freestanding
signs, parcels
containing individual
freestanding buildings
within the development
or commercial
subdivision shall be
limited to one
monument sign per
street frontage in
addition to the
consolidated sign

CS
Page 323 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Consolidated Sign – “A”


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
2 square feet per lineal
foot of street frontage,
counting frontage on all 1,120 SF (Proposed
abutting streets, up to Consolidated Sign)
1000 square feet, or 42 SF (Proposed
Maximum Area Y
1500 square feet if part Monument sign “B1” on
of an approved Master Rancho Drive)
Sign Plan (Sirius – Total SF: 1,162
871’/Rancho –
1084’/Desert Inn – 350’)
1. 50 feet
2. 80 feet, if approved
Maximum Height 80 Feet Y
as part of a Master
Sign Plan
5 feet from all property
lines, measured from
Minimum Setback 5 Feet Y
the leading edge of the
sign
1. The erection of a
consolidated sign
requires a minimum
of three tenants or
Submitted floor plan
Additional individual uses on the
depicts three individual Y
Standards same site.
tenant spaces
2. See also Residential
Protection Standards
in LVMC 19.08.120
(C)
Internal and external
illumination, animated Animated Electronic
Illumination Y
and electronic message Message Unit
units are permitted
Certificate
Yes
Required

CS
Page 324 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 Development Standards


Monument Sign – “B1” – Sirius Avenue
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 sign per each two
hundred lineal feet of
street frontage or
portion therof
1. The total number of 1 proposed Monument
all freestanding and Sign &
Maximum Number monument signs shall 1 Proposed Y
not exceed one per Freestanding Sign on
each two hundred lineal Rancho Drive Frontage
feet of street frontage or
portion thereof (1,084
Feet of Street Frontage
– 5 Signs Allowed)
Maximum Area 75 SF 42 SF Y
Maximum Height 10Feet 4.25 Feet Y
5 feet from all property
Minimum Setback 5 Feet Y
lines
Minimum 100-foot
separation between all
100+ Feet
Additional freestanding and
from Freestanding Sign Y
Standards monument signs on the
– “A” on Rancho Drive
same lot or in the same
development
Internal and external
illumination. In addition,
signs over 200 feet from
property which is
designated in the
Illumination External Illumination Y
General Plan for future
residential development
may be animated or
contain an electronic
message unit
Certificate
Yes
Required

CS
Page 325 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 Development Standards


Monument Sign – “B2” – Middle of Rancho Drive
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 sign per each two
hundred lineal feet of
street frontage or
portion therof
1. The total number of 1 proposed Monument
all freestanding and Sign &
Maximum Number monument signs shall 1 Proposed Y
not exceed one per Freestanding Sign on
each two hundred lineal Rancho Drive Frontage
feet of street frontage or
portion thereof (1,084
Feet of Street Frontage
– 5 Signs Allowed)
Maximum Area 75 SF 42 SF Y
Maximum Height 10Feet 4.25 Feet Y
5 feet from all property
Minimum Setback 5 Feet Y
lines
Minimum 100-foot
separation between all 100+ Feet
Additional freestanding and (496’ from
Y
Standards monument signs on the Freestanding Sign –
same lot or in the same “A” on Rancho Drive)
development
Internal and external
illumination. In addition,
signs over 200 feet from
property which is
designated in the
Illumination External Illumination Y
General Plan for future
residential development
may be animated or
contain an electronic
message unit
Certificate
Yes
Required

CS
Page 326 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Eleven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 Development Standards


Incidental Sign (Directional) – “C” – Sirius Northwest Corner
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
2 per driveway or 1 proposed Incidental
Maximum Number Y
vehicular access Sign per driveway
12 SF - (If the sign
includes a business 9 SF Proposed
name or logo, it shall Incidental Sign –
Maximum Area Y
not comprise more than Directional – including
50% of the permitted a 3 SF Logo
sign area)
Maximum Height 7 feet 7 Feet Y
5 feet from all property
Minimum Setback 5 Feet Y
lines
Illumination Internal only Internal Illumination Y
Certificate
No
Required

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Wall Sign – D – South Elevation
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number Limited by total area One Wall Sign Y
20% of building 11% of building
Maximum Area elevation (2455.4 SF – elevation Y
12,277 SF Total) (1,330 SF)
12 inches above top of
Maximum Height 1 foot below Y
wall or parapet
Maximum Below the parapet on
4 feet from structure Y
Projection building
Illumination Internal & External Internal Y
Certificate
Yes
Required

CS
Page 327 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Twelve
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Wall Sign – E1 – East Elevation
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number Limited by total area One Wall Sign Y
29% of building
20% of building elevation
Maximum Area elevation (16,647 SF [(2,775 SF – D1) & N*
Total) (2116 SF – E1-4) =
4,891 SF Total)
12 inches above top of Below the parapet on
Maximum Height Y
wall or parapet building
Maximum
4 feet from structure 1 foot from structure Y
Projection
Animated
Illumination Internal & External externally/Illuminated Y
internally
Certificate
Yes
Required
*The applicant has requested VAR-75636 to allow a 29% elevation coverage where
20% is allowed. Staff supports the request.

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Wall Sign – E2 – North Elevation
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number Limited by total area One Wall Sign Y
20% of building 24% of building
Maximum Area elevation (11,700 SF elevation N*
Total) [(2,775 SF – E2)
12 inches above top of Below the parapet on
Maximum Height Y
wall or parapet building
Maximum
4 feet from structure 1 foot from structure Y
Projection
Painted w/ Laser
Illumination Internal & External Y
Projected Graphics
Certificate
Yes
Required
*The applicant has requested VAR-75636 to allow a 24% elevation coverage where
20% is allowed. Staff supports the request.

CS
Page 328 of 1332
VAR-75636 and MSP-75637 [PRJ-75581]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Wall Sign – F1 thru F4 – East Elevation
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
Maximum Number Limited by total area One Wall Sign Y
29% of building
20% of building elevation
Maximum Area elevation (16,647 SF [(2,775 SF – D1) & N*
Total) (2116 SF – E1-4) =
4,891 SF Total)
12 inches above top of Below the parapet on
Maximum Height Y
wall or parapet building
Maximum
4 feet from structure 1 foot from structure Y
Projection
Painted w/ Laser
Illumination Internal & External Y
Projected Graphics
Certificate
Yes
Required
*The applicant has requested VAR-75636 to allow a 29% elevation coverage where
20% is allowed. Staff supports the request.

CS
Page 329 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 330 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 331 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 332 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 333 of 1332


Page 334 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 335 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 336 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 337 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 338 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 339 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 340 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 341 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 342 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 343 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 344 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 345 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 346 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 347 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 348 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 349 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 350 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 351 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 352 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 353 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 354 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 355 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 356 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 357 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 358 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 359 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 360 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 361 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 362 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 363 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 364 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 365 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 366 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 367 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 368 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 369 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 370 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 371 of 1332


VAR-75636 [PRJ-75581] - VARIANCE RELATED TO MSP-75637 - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SIRIUS AVENUE AND RANCHO DRIVE
01/23/2019

Page 372 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 373 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: March 12, 2019 22

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
MSP-75637 - MASTER SIGN PLAN RELATED TO VAR-75636 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER: INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-
LAS VEGAS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Master Sign Plan FOR AN APPROVED
COMMERCIAL RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (INDOOR AND OUTDOOR) DEVELOPMENT on
21.03 acres at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive (APNs 162-08-418-002),
C-2 (General Commercial) and M (Industrial) Zones, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75581]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 04/03/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 374 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 375 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 376 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 377 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 378 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 379 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 380 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎ‫ں‬
x‫゜ں‬ธธ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 381 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 23

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
TABLED - RENOTIFICATION - GPA-74312 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH
IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) TO: H (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on
4.62 acres at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road (APNs 163-01-501-
001 and 002), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-74089]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 12 Planning Commission Mtg. 2

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-74312, ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-
75792]
3. Supporting Documentation - GPA-74312, ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-
75792]
4. Photo(s) - GPA-74312, ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
5. Justification Letter - GPA-74312, ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
6. School Development Tracking Form - Submitted by Clark County School District
7. Protest and Support Postcards for GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 and Documentation Not
Vetted – Protest Comment Forms (5) and Support Comment Forms (1) for GPA-74312 [PRJ-
74089]

Page 382 of 1332


Page 383 of 1332
Page 384 of 1332
Page 385 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER:
CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-74312 Staff recommends DENIAL.
ZON-74313 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-74312
SDR-75858 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to GPA-74312
conditions: ZON-74313

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 18

NOTICES MAILED 352 - GPA-74312 and ZON-74313


355 - SDR-75858

PROTESTS 0 - GPA-74312 and ZON-74313


0 - SDR-75858

APPROVALS 0 - GPA-74312 and ZON-74313


0 - SDR-75858

CS
Page 386 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SDR-75858 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for General Plan


Amendment (GPA-74312) and Rezoning (ZON-74313) shall be required, if
approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, date stamped 03/26/19,
building elevations, date stamped 02/19/19 and the landscape plan, date stamped
03/13/19, except as amended by conditions herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

7. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

8. Sign and record a deed restriction with language determined to be satisfactory by


the City Attorney which restricts the use of the site to an age-restricted community
for those persons 55 years of age or older, to the full extent of the law.

CS
Page 387 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

9. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

10. Dedicate 40-feet of right-of-way adjacent to this site for Lindell Road and dedicate a
25-foot radius along with granting a Traffic Signal Chord Easement on the southeast
corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road prior to the issuance of any
permits. Additionally, grant a 5-foot Pedestrian Access Easement adjacent to
Charleston Boulevard prior to the issuance of building permits for this site.

11. Construct all half-street improvements meeting Current City Standards on Lindell
Road including the possible reconstruction of the curb return at the southeast corner
of Lindell Road and Charleston Boulevard adjacent to this site including appropriate
transition paving, concurrent with the development of this site. Correct all
American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies and remove all unused driveway
cuts, if any, on the sidewalk along Charleston Boulevard adjacent to this site in
accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or
removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its
original width concurrent with development of this site.

12. Concurrent with development of this site, connect to the public sewer line in
Charleston Boulevard at a location acceptable to the Sanitary Sewer Section of the
Department of Public Works.

13. Obtain an Occupancy Permit from the Nevada Department of Transportation


(NDOT) for the construction of improvements in the Charleston Boulevard public
right-of-way adjacent to this site prior to constructing any improvements within
NDOT jurisdiction.

14. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

15. Contact the City Engineer’s Office at 702-229-6272 to coordinate the development
of this project with the “West Charleston Bus Turnouts” improvement project and any
other public improvement projects adjacent to this site. Comply with the
recommendations of the City Engineer.

CS
Page 388 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

16. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed
by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site. If
the site is deed restricted and developed as senior apartments, then no Traffic
Impact Analysis will be required.

17. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainage ways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

CS
Page 389 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a 144-unit Senior Citizen Apartments development on 4.62 acres
located at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road.

ISSUES

• Previously tabled General Plan Amendment (GPA-74312) is requested to amend a


portion of the Southeast Sector Plan from SC (Service Commercial) to H (High Density
Residential). Staff does not support this request.
• Previously tabled Rezoning (ZON-74313) is requested to rezone the subject site from
C-1 (Limited Commercial) to R-4 (High Density Residential). Staff does not support
this request.

ANALYSIS

Proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA-74312) and Rezoning (ZON-74313) were


tabled at the 01/08/19 Planning Commission Hearing. The previously associated Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-74315) for a 106-unit Multi-Family Residential
development was withdrawn without prejudice. The Applicant has now returned with an
alternative development, proposing a 144-unit Senior Citizen Apartments use in
conjunction with the previously tabled General Plan Amendment and Rezoning.

The applicant is requesting to amend the Southeast Sector Plan from SC (Service
Commercial) to H (High Density Residential) and to rezone the property from C-1 (Limited
Commercial) to R-4 (High Density Residential) on two parcels, a total of 4.62 acres
located at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. The proposed
Rezoning (ZON-74313) from C-1 (Limited Commercial) to R-4 (High Density Residential)
is consistent with the proposed High (High Density Residential) General Plan Land Use
Designation. The adjacent properties to the west are designated MXU (Mixed Use) and
SC (Service Commercial). The land to the north of Charleston Boulevard and east of the
property are designated MXU (Mixed Use). Land is designated L (Low Density
Residential) to the south. The requested H (High Density Residential) is not compatible
with the land use designations of the properties to the north, south, west and the east.
Staff therefore recommends denial of the General Plan Amendment.

CS
Page 390 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Properties to the west are zoned R-E (Residence Estates) and C-2 (General
Commercial); to the north and east are C-1 (Limited Commercial); and the south is zoned
R-1 (Single Family Residential). The proposed R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning
district conforms to the proposed H (High Density Residential) General Plan designation.
The current proposal is for four, three-story apartment buildings containing 144 units and
has a proposed density of 31.17 dwelling units per acre, which is allowed under the
proposed H (High Density Residential) General Plan designation.

A Senior Citizen Apartments use is described in Title 19.12 as: “An apartment house or
other multi-family dwelling in which each unit is occupied by at least one person 55 years
of age or older, or in which the units are intended and operated for occupancy by persons
55 years of age or older. This use includes an apartment house or other multi-family
dwelling that qualifies as “housing for older persons” under the provisions of Federal law,
including without limitation housing developments that:

1. Provide significant facilities and services specifically designed to meet the


physical or social needs of older persons; and

2. Publish and adhere to policies and procedures that demonstrate intent to


provide housing for persons 55 years of age or older to the extent allowed by
applicable State or Federal law.”

Per the submitted justification letter, the proposed development classifies as a Senior
Citizen Apartments use. A condition of approval has been added to ensure the required
age restriction for tenants is abided. The submitted site plan and elevations depict four
three-story apartment buildings, a clubhouse and a pool area. Of the 144 proposed units,
54 will be one bedroom and 90 will be two bedroom units. The buildings are proposed to
have a white stucco façade. Site access will be provided by Lindell Road, an 80-foot
Collector as designated on the city’s Master Plan of Streets and Highways. A total of 116
parking spaces are provided where 108 are required. All Title 19 landscaping requirements
are met. Planting materials adhere to the Southern Nevada Regional Plant List. A 36-inch
tall hedge is provided along Charleston Boulevard to adequately buffer the proposed parking
area adjacent to the right-of-way.

The City of Las Vegas Public Works Department – Engineering Division has commented
that this project will add approximately 533 trips per day on Charleston Boulevard and
Lindell Road. Currently, Charleston is at about 77 percent of capacity and Lindell is at
about 28 percent of capacity. With this project, Charleston is expected to be at about 78
percent of capacity and Lindell is expected to be at about 31 percent of capacity. Based
on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 37 additional cars, or
about two every three minutes.

CS
Page 391 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) has commented that civil and plumbing
plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and fire flow
availability. The closest available distribution water main to serve the property is located
in Lindell Road. The development may propose a shared onsite fire system and domestic
service. Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) Regional Connection Charges for
the apartment units will be assessed on a per unit basis and all fees are due at the time
of civil plan approval and building permit issuance. Proof of parcel lot consolidation, or
the recordation of a commercial subdivision map, is required prior to civil plan approval
by LVVWD.

In summary staff does not support the requested General Plan Amendment, Rezoning
and Site Development Plan Review as the proposed development is not compatible with
the existing development in the surrounding area; therefore, staff recommends denial of
all requested entitlements. If this request is approved, it is subject to conditions.

FINDINGS (GPA-74312)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions
be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is


compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The proposed H (High Density Residential) designation is not compatible with the
existing adjacent land use designations. The proposed amendment would allow for
a high density multi-family residential to be developed at this location.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be


compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

The proposed amendment would allow for R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning,
which is not compatible with the commercial properties fronting Charleston
Boulevard and properties to the south and west which are low density residential.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to


accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and

There are transportation, recreation, utility and other facilities that are adequate to
accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment.

CS
Page 392 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and


policies.

The amendment proposed does not support Policy 2.1.4 of the Las Vegas 2020
Master Plan, which states that mixed-use residential/commercial developments
occur on sites currently occupied by declining commercial centers or vacant land.

FINDINGS (ZON-74313)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning


Commission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

The proposed Rezoning to R-4 (High Density Residential) would conform to the
proposed H (High Density Residential) General Plan designation if approved.

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.

The proposed R-4 (High Density Residential) zoning district would allow for the
proposed 144-unit Senior Citizen Apartments development. This is not compatible
with the surrounding uses at the subject site.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

The proposed H (High Density Residential) land use designation and R-4 (High
Density Residential) zone is not appropriate at the subject location located at the
southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. The area consists of
limited commercial and low-density residential development. There is no indication
of need for high density residential zoning.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

The subject parcel has access to Charleston Boulevard, a 100-foot primary arterial
and Lindell Road, an 80-foot Collector as designated on the city’s Master Plan of
Streets and Highways. These roads are adequate in size to accommodate
development in an R-4 zoning district.

CS
Page 393 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (SDR-75858)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed Senior Citizen Apartments development is not compatible with the
adjacent commercial and residential development in the area. Specifically, the
proposed development is not compatible with the adjacent commercial properties
fronting Charleston Boulevard and properties to the south and west which are low
density residential.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

If associated General Plan Amendment (GPA-74312) and Rezoning (ZON-74313)


are approved, the proposed development will be consistent with all applicable City
code/plan requirements.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Access to the site is provided via Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road.
Circulation around the site is acceptable.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

Building materials are compatible with those used in the surrounding development
in the area. Perimeter landscaping consists of drought-tolerant trees and plants
that are compatible with other landscaping in this area.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The submitted building elevations are not unsightly, undesirable or obnoxious in


appearance.

CS
Page 394 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

Development of the site will be subject to building permit review and inspection,
thereby protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the public.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-5120) to amend a portion of the southwest sector plan of the
General Plan from GC (General Commercial) to ML (Medium-Low
Density Residential) on 5 acres adjacent to the southwest corner of
Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. Planning Commission
recommended approval. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-5121) from
C-2 (General Commercial) to R-PD8 (Residential Planned Development
– 8 Units Per Acre) on 5 acres adjacent to the southeast corner of
Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. Planning Commission
12/15/04 recommended approval. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-5122) for a 40-lot single-family residential development
on 5 acres adjacent to the southwest corner of Charleston Boulevard
and Lindell Road. Planning Commission recommended approval. Staff
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-5124) to allow
0.44 acres of open space where 0.66 acres is the minimum required for
a 40-lot single-family residential development on 5 acres adjacent to the
southwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. Planning
Commission recommended approval. Staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
18785) of an approved Rezoning (ZON-5121) from C-2 (General
02/07/07 Commercial) to R-PD8 (Residential Planned Development – 8 Units Per
Acre) on 5 acres adjacent to the southeast corner of Charleston
Boulevard and Lindell Road. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
19548) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5122) for
03/07/07
a 40-lot single-family residential development on 5 acres at the
southwest corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. Staff
recommended approval.

CS
Page 395 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
19549) of an approved Variance (VAR-5124) to allow 0.44 acres of open
space where 0.66 acres is the minimum required for a proposed 40-lot
single-family residential development on 5 acres at the southwest corner
of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. Staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-50835) from ML (Medium Low Density Residential) to GC
(General Commercial) on 4.62 acres at the southeast corner of
Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. The Planning Commission and
10/08/13
staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-50839) from
U (Undeveloped) to C-2 (General Commercial) on 4.62 acres at the
southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold in ABEYANCE GPA-
10/09/18 74312, ZON-74313, VAR-74314 and SDR-74315 [PRJ-74089] to the
December 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission voted (7-0) to hold in ABEYANCE GPA-
12/11/18 74312, ZON-74313, VAR-74314 and SDR-74315 [PRJ-74089] to the
January 8, 2019 Planning Commission meeting.
The applicant withdrew without prejudice Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-74315) for a proposed 106-unit Multi-Family Residential
development on 4.62 acres at the Planning Commission Hearing.
Planning Staff recommended denial.
The applicant withdrew without prejudice Variance (VAR-74314)
request to allow 172 parking spaces where 189 were required at the
01/08/19
Planning Commission Hearing. Planning Staff recommended denial.
General Plan Amendment (GPA-74312) request from SC (Service
Commercial) to H (High Density Residential) was tabled at the Planning
Commission. Planning Staff recommended denial.
Rezoning (ZON-74313) request from C-1 (Limited Commercial) to R-4
(High Density Residential) was tabled at the Planning Commission.
Planning Staff recommended denial.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


08/30/17 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

CS
Page 396 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


No building permits or business licenses have been issued at the subject site.

Pre-Application Meeting
Planning Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant
02/13/19 where the submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a
proposed Senior Citizen Apartments deadlines.

Neighborhood Meeting
Attendance
• Four (4) representative from the developer
• Two (2) representatives present from the Office of the City
Council
• One (1) member of the Planning Department in attendance.
Thirty-one (31) members of the public were in attendance

Issues
• The public expressed concern about increase in crimes
associated with a multi-family residential development. An
individual pointed out the Condominium development located
around Charleston Boulevard and Jones Boulevard, where it
became an apartment instead of a condo and has increased
crime in the area.
09/19/18 • One member of the public discussed the additional number of
students to be added to the nearby schools that are already
crowded. Questioned where the pupils living to the proposed
apartment will be attending schools. The developer has
acknowledged that classroom size is an issue.
• Other concern is the additional traffic that will be added on Lindell
Road. The intersection is already difficult to get onto Charleston
Boulevard. Is there going to be controlled traffic light to be
installed? The neighbors would like to see the copy of the traffic
study or traffic impact analysis for this area. The developer states
that they are still working on the traffic study.
• Questions about entire Lindell Road alignment between
Charleston Boulevard and Sahara Avenue is going to be
improved as complete street. The developer states that the
portion of his parcel which has not been dedicated yet will be
dedicated to the City and has to develop his portion of the street.

CS
Page 397 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
• The developer was asked if this development will be offered as a
low income rental and what is the price for rent. The developer
states that the rental will start as low as $1400 per month.
• The public states that they prefer either a commercial
development or a single family residential subdivision, with a
single story, ranch-style only homes and not a multi-family
residential development.
The public has issues about the parking Variance and questioned as to
where the other remaining vehicles would park if the site has 17 less
parking spaces than the required 189 parking spaces. The surrounding
neighbors do not want cars to be parked on Lindell Road.
The applicant held a voluntary meeting regarding a proposed Senior
02/26/19 Citizen Apartments development at the subject site. Planning
Department Staff did not attend.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an undeveloped site
02/28/19
surrounded by a chain link fence. No issues were noted.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 4.62

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Undeveloped
Property Commercial) Commercial)
Car Wash, Full
Service
Financial
C-1 (Limited
North Institution, General MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
General Retail
Store, Other Than
Listed

CS
Page 398 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
South
Detached Residential) Residential)
General Retail
C-1 (Limited
East Store, Other Than MXU (Mixed Use)
Commercial)
Listed
Motor Vehicle C-2 (General
MXU (Mixed Use)
Sales (Used) Commercial)
West
Single Family, SC (Service R-E (Residence
Detached Commercial) Estates)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 200 Feet Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Y
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance Y

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 7,000 SF 201,247 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front 10 Feet 20 Feet Y
• Side 5 Feet 10 Feet Y
• Corner 5 Feet 67 Feet Y
• Rear 20 Feet 97 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
Screen,
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, w/ a Gated, w/a Y
Roof or Trellis Roof
As
Not Shown
Mech. Equipment Screened Conditioned

CS
Page 399 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Eleven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance


3:1 proximity slope 97.5 Feet 97.6 Feet Y
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 54 Feet Y

General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed


SC (Service Commercial) N/A N/A
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
H (High Density Residential) 25.50 du/ac 118
Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
C-1 (Limited Commercial) N/A N/A
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
R-4 (Medium Density
Unlimited* 25-118
Residential)
*Pursuant to Title 19.06.120, the maximum density is unlimited. However, the height limit
on development imposes a de facto limitation on density in all areas except as provided
for by LVMC 19.06.040. Maximum dwelling units per acre (DUA) is determined by the
underlying General Plan Designation and may not exceed the density permitted under
said designation.

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 14 Trees 14 Trees Y
• South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 14 Trees 14 Trees Y
• East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 30 Trees 30 Trees Y
• West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 30 Trees 31 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 88 Trees 89 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
26 Trees 26 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North 10 Feet 12 Feet Y
• South 6 Feet 10 Feet Y
• East 6 Feet 7 Feet Y
• West 10 Feet 21 Feet Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y

CS
Page 400 of 1332
GPA-74312 and ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
Staff Report Page Twelve
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Charleston Planned Streets and
Primary Arterial 90 Y
Boulevard Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Lindell Road Collector 27 N
Highways Map

Pursuant to Title 19.06 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Required Provided Compliance
Floor Parking Parking
Use Area or Parking
Handi- Handi-
Number Ratio Regular Regular
capped capped
of Units
Senior
Citizen 144 units .75/unit 108
Apartments
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 108 116 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Y
102 6 110 6
Required

CS
Page 401 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 402 of 1332


″ธxƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬x7ՙ゜ฎफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7bֱ‫ں‬7
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ‫ں‬ՙ″ƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ںں‬ƥ7ֱ7ɱफฌ
ㄦxƥ7ֱ7xफฌ

ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐùฌ
̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐùฌ

ธxƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОḶḶՁ7AҜDzЌ●╗ùฌ

ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
ОAЋ●Ձ●ḶЌฌ
DzЌbDz7 ɱՙƥֱ″फ㈠ฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОḶḶՁฌ
̶̬‫ں‬7ƆՁḶОDz7ACİ㈠ฌ
ОDzŐ7̶x㈠ㄦ″ֱ‫ں‬xฌ

ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ

ฎฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ɱ7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ
ɱՙƥ7ֱ7″फฌ
̶ ̬‫ں‬7ACİ㈠77ОDzŐ7̶x㈠ㄦ″ֱ‫ں‬x7ƆDz╗ԱAbì7 ACİ㈠7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁฌ
‫ں ں‬ƥ7ֱ7ㄦफฌ ╗Ḷ7╗ĠDz7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 bՁⓈԱĠḶⓈƆDzฌ

ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธ ฎƥ7ֱ7x
फฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ɱ7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ

ÛAՁìÛAù7 ÛAՁìÛAùฌ

7xफฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ɱ7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ

ÛAՁìÛAù7 ÛAՁìÛAù7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

ธ ฎƥ7ֱ
̶̶ƥ7ֱ7″7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ

‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ՁḶAC●ЌḚ7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ҜDz╗AՁ7ŐḶḶ7CDzbìฌ

ㄦธƥ7ֱ7x
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ҜDz╗AՁ7ԱDzAҜฌ
‫゜ں‬ㅡफฌ

फฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7
bḶЋDzŐDzCฌ
ҜDz╗AՁ7ОⓈŐՁ●Ќฌ

ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚ㈠7╗ùО㈠7 ╗ŐAƆĠ7DzЌbՁḶƆⓈŐDz7

ธɱxƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬फฌ
ҜDz╗AՁ7bḶՁⓈҜЌฌ
ธxƥ7ḚA╗Dzฌ

फฌ
bḶЌb㈠7bA●ƆḶЌ7ḶḶ╗●ЌḚฌ
″ƥฌ
″ƥ7

ֱ7x
ԱⓈƆ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7

ธ ƥ7
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ CDzՁ●ЋDzŐùฌ


㌫7‫ں‬ธ7ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

ธฎƥ7
7ֱ7xफฌ

‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ÛAՁìÛAù7 ÛAՁìÛAùฌ
ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ
ธ ฎƥ7
फฌ

ธ ฎƥ
ƥ7ֱ7x ㄦธƥ7ֱ7xफ ֱ7x

ֱ7xफฌ
ÛAՁìÛAù7 ธฎ ㄦธƥ7ֱ7xफฌ फฌ ㄦ ㅡƥ7ֱ7‫ںں‬फฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
╗ੂऑħ㌱Ŵк7bŴผऑਙผ‫ש‬ฌ ╗ੂऑħ㌱Ŵк7″ƥγ7╗—⇡֭7Ɔ‫֭֭ש‬к7Оħ㌱E֭‫ש‬ฌ

ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
Ɔ֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ ่֭㌱֭ฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7bֱ‫ں‬ฌ
ҜŴゥħこ—こ77ฎ77Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵкк⎯77ħ่ฌ ʉ゜7‫゜ں‬ธफ7Оħ㌱E֭‫⎯ש‬77ㅡफ7ਙ゜㌱7ִ77ธゥธ77Оਙ⎯‫⎯ש‬77㌀ฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ Ձ่֭‫שف‬γฌ ‫ں‬xƥ7ਙ゜㌱ฌ

bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌฌ
ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬xƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Őֱ‫ں‬ฌ

ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ՙƥ7ֱ7″फ7 A‫ں‬㈠x7 A‫ں‬㈠‫ں‬7 Ա‫ں‬㈠‫ں‬7 Ա‫ں‬㈠‫ں‬7⇡7 Ա‫ں‬㈠̶7 Ա‫ں‬㈠ㅡฌ

″ƥ7ֱ7″फ7

ฎฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ฎฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ‫ں‬7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ธ‫ں‬7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ㅡㄦ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ̶ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ㅡ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ

ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ″ɱ″7Ɔฌ ՙ̶ㄦ7Ɔฌ ɱฎฎ7Ɔฌ ɱㄦՙ7Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ⓒ‫ں‬″̶7Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ⓒxฎฎ7Ɔฌ

ՙㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
फฌ


ƥ7ֱ7x

̶̶
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ƥ7ֱ7x ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7
ธㄦ

Ɔ●ḚЌAḚDz7ḶЌฌ ̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐù7 ธㄦ ̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐùฌ

ƥ7ֱ7
‫ں‬ㄦ
ㅡฎफ7Ġ╗7ÛAՁՁฌ ƥ7ֱ

xफฌ
7x

ธ̶ƥ7ֱ7ธफฌ

ธxƥ7ֱ7ɱफฌ

ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
DzЌbDzฌ
DzЌbDzฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 DzҜDzŐḚDzЌbù7AbbDzƆƆฌ
ㅡxƥ7ֱ7xफ

Ձ●ЌCDzՁՁ7

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ŐֱDzฌ
ОŐḶİDzb╗7ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌฌ

Page 403 of 1332


⇡—⑾⑾Ŵкਙฌ
ผŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
₡֭㌱Ŵ‫—ש‬ผฌ
Ŵкк่֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
㌱кŴੂ‫ש‬ਙ่7⎯‫ש‬ฌ
к֭ਙ่7⎯‫ש‬ฌ
่ਙผ‫ש‬γ7ㄦ‫ש‬γ7⎯‫ש‬ฌ
кਙ⎯֭֭7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
ผŴ่‫֭ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ

ऑ֭㌱ਙ⎯7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
кŴこ⇡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ

⑾ਙผ‫ש‬7ŴऑŴ㌱γ֭ฌ
‫ف‬ผŴ่₡7㌱Ŵ่ੂਙ่ฌ
㈾ਙ่֭⎯ฌ

γ—ŴкŴऑŴħ7ʉŴੂฌ
₡—ผŴ่‫ف‬ਙฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz7●ЌḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌ7 Ɔ●╗Dz7ՁDzḚDzЌCฌ
ħผਙ่7こਙ—่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ฌ Û7bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ԱՁЋC㈠7AЌC7Ɔ7Ձ●ЌCDzՁՁ7ŐC㈠ฌ ⓈЌ●╗7bḶⓈЌ╗ฌ
Ⓢ ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌฌ
‫ف‬ผŴ่₡7‫ש֭ש‬ਙ่7₡ผฌ Ɔ7
֭кEγਙผ่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
ɱㄦ Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ
ฌ ฌ ОAŐbDzՁฌ AОЌ̬7Ќਙ㈠7‫ں‬″̶ֱx‫ֱں‬ㄦx‫ֱں‬xx‫ں‬7ִ7xxธฌ
㌱่֭‫่่֭ש‬ħŴк7ऑEʉੂฌ ผ‫ש‬γ Ő
●ֱ ‫ ں‬ㄦ 7Ќਙ Ḷ่֭7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬77ӧ੧̶ฎỏ7 ㄦㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ एㄦ
Ќ㈠7ՁAƆ7 к‫ﭨ‬₡ ธ ƥ ए7 AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ŐḶⓈ╗Dzฌ
Ŵ่่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚฌ Őֱㅡ7ֱ7ҜⓈՁ╗●ֱAҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ӧbⓈŐŐDzЌ╗Ձù7bֱ‫ں‬ỏฌ एฌ╗ùО●bAՁ7●ŐDzฌ
кਙ่֭7こ‫่ש‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ Ŵ⎯7Ա ╗ʉਙ7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ӧ੧″ธỏ7 ɱx7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ㄦ੧7ҜAṲ●ҜⓈҜ7ŐⓈЌЌ●ЌḚ7ƆՁḶОDzฌ
ЋDzḚAƆ7 ֭‫ف‬ ㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ Ő ╗ⓈŐЌ●ЌḚ7ŐAC●ⓈƆฌ
㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ⎯7Ћ एธ ธ੧7ҜAṲ●ҜⓈҜ7bŐḶƆƆ7ƆՁḶОDzฌ
Ŵк֭ゥŴ่₡֭ผฌ ՁŴ ОAŐbDzՁ7AŐDzAฌ ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7 7ਙ⑾7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ″ƥฌ
㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ผŴ Ḛผਙ⎯⎯7Aผ֭Ŵฌ ӧ╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ЋDzŐ●●DzCỏ7㌫7ธx″ⓒㅡՙㅡ7Ɔ77 ㌫7ㅡ㈠ՙㅡA㌱ผ֭⎯ฌ
่ ㌱Ŵผ֭ੂ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ

ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ
⎯こਙE֭7ผŴ่㌱γ7ผ₡ฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCฌ ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќ7 ŐAҜО7 ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќฌ

ผŴこऑŴผ‫ש‬ฌ
㌱γ
кŴE֭7こ֭Ŵ₡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ Ќ㈠╗㈠Ɔ㈠7

こкE7㈾ผ7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
ਙ ฌ Ќ֭‫ש‬7Aผ֭Ŵฌ ӧ╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ЋDzŐ●●DzCỏ7㌫7‫ں‬ฎxⓒՙՙㅡ7Ɔ77 ㌫7ㅡ㈠‫ں‬ㄦ7A㌱ผ֭⎯ฌ ‫ں‬ƥ7 ‫ں‬ƥฌ
Ɔ—ここ֭ผкħ่ฌ
Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ฌ ए7 AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ŐḶⓈ╗Dz7ֱ7AЌƆ●7bḶҜОՁ●AЌ╗ฌ
ОEʉੂ7 ⓈƆ7ɱㄦ7 ⇡ਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ผ₡ฌ

γਙккੂʉਙਙ₡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
⎯‫֭ש‬ऑγŴ่ħ֭ฌ
่֭ккħ⎯7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ ㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ Ḷ่֭7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこฌ x㈠ՙㄦ7О֭ผ7Ⓢ่ħ‫ש‬ฌ ㅡ‫ں‬ฌ ŐAҜО7ฎ㈠̶̶੧7ҜAṲ㈠7ŐⓈЌЌ●ЌḚ7ƆՁḶОDzⓒ7ธ੧ฌ
ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќฌ

⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ CDzЌƆ●╗ù7 ҜAṲ㈠7bŐḶƆƆ7ƆՁḶОDz㈠7ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆฌ


╗ʉਙ7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこฌ x㈠ՙㄦ7О֭ผ7Ⓢ่ħ‫ש‬ฌ ″ՙฌ
₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่ฌ ՁAƆ7 ₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่7ผ₡ฌ ɱƥ7 ㄦƥ7 ɱƥ7 ㄦƥ7
ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7ḶŐ7ŐAҜОƆ7Û●╗Ġ7ḚŐDzA╗DzŐฌ
⎯ऑผħ่‫ف‬7こ‫่ש‬ฌ
⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ ЋDzḚAƆ7 Աਙ
—к ₡ ⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ Ḷ่֭7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ㄦㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7 ‫ں‬xฎฌ
╗ĠAЌ7″फ7Ő●ƆDz㈠7ÛĠDzŐDz7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCⓒฌ
‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵ ‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆ7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7̶ㅡफ7AԱḶЋDz7ÛAՁì●ЌḚฌ

ऑŴ ผŴ
֭ผ ╗ʉਙ7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ɱx7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ए7 ╗ùО●bAՁ7ОAŐì●ЌḚฌ
γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ


γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ 7Ġ ƆⓈŐAbDz㈠7AЌC7ĠAЋDz7AЌ7DzCḚDzฌ
ħ‫ ف‬γ
╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7 7ਙ⑾7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzCฌ Ḷऑ่֭7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7 ՙՙฌ ƆОAbDzƆฌ
●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦ7 ⎯—่⎯֭‫ש‬7ผ₡ฌ bਙ‫ﭨ‬ƥ₡7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7 ㅡㅡฌ
ԱAŐŐ●DzŐ7Û●╗Ġ●Ќ7ㅡफ7Ḷ77ḚŐACDz7ƆḶฌ

ħ⎯֭ฌ

ʉŴ

֭ฌ ₡ฌ
ʉŴผこ7⎯ऑผħ่‫⎯ف‬ฌ Ա—⎯7ӧƆγ—‫שש‬к֭ỏ7 77‫ں‬ฌ ╗ĠA╗7A7ㅡफ7ƆОĠDzŐDz7bAЌЌḶ╗7ОAƆƆฌ


ੂฌ

ผħ‫֭ ﭨ‬Ŵ

ⓈƆ
ʉħ่₡こħккฌ

ՁŴ
C֭кħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผੂ7 77‫ں‬ฌ


Ɔ╗AЌCAŐC7 ĠAЌC●bAООDzCฌ ╗ĠŐḶⓈḚĠ㈠7ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7bՁDzAŐ7ԱDz╗ÛDzDzЌฌ
●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦ7

7ɱㄦ
ऑ֭⇡⇡к֭ฌ Ḛผਙ⎯⎯7C่֭⎯ħ‫ੂש‬7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ゜ㅡ㈠ՙㅡ7एฌ ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆ㈠77ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆ7╗Ḷ7DzṲ╗DzЌCฌ
Աк—֭7CħŴこਙ่₡7Ġʉੂฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7 ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ


‫ف‬ਙこ֭ผ゜⎯ħк‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴ₡ਙฌ ฌऑEʉੂฌ ㌫7̶x㈠̶ฎ7Ⓢ7゜7A㌱ผ֭ฌ ‫ں‬ธफ7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7ԱDzùḶЌC7╗ḶО7AЌC7ԱḶ╗╗ḶҜ7Ḷฌ
‫֭ف‬
㌱Ŵ㌱‫⎯—ש‬ฌ ผħ ₡ ╗ĠDz7ŐAҜО㈠7ՁAЌC●ЌḚƆ7A╗7╗ḶО7AЌCฌ

●ֱ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
₡ γਙผħ▷ਙ่ฌ

ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡777777ӧƆ‫ש‬ผħऑỏฌ
֭Ŵ Ġ㈠b㈠7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7 ฎƥ7 ɱƥ7 ฎƥ7 ԱḶ╗╗ḶҜ7Ḷ7ŐAҜО㈠7ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќ7ՁDzЌḚ╗Ġ7●Ќฌ
⎯‫ש‬Ŵผผฌ
Ҝ ֭ ĠDzЌCDzŐƆḶЌ7 Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7 Оผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡ฌ C●ŐDzb╗●ḶЌ7Ḷ7ŐAҜО㈠7ㄦ੧7ҜAṲ㈠ฌ
⇡ผ—่֭ผฌ E֭ฌ ผħ‫ﭨ‬
ՁŴ C Ɔ‫ש‬₡7 ЋŴ่7 ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵкฌ ŐⓈЌЌ●ЌḚ7ƆՁḶОDz7AЌC7ธ੧7ҜAṲ㈠7bŐḶƆƆฌ
″7 ㅡ7 ธฌ ″7 ƆՁḶОDz㈠ฌ
╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7 ″7 ㅡ7 ธ7 ″ฌ
ЋAЌ7AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDzฌ

㈾ਙ่֭⎯ฌ
ħ่₡—⎯‫ש‬ผħŴкฌ
こŴผੂкŴ่₡ฌ
֭Ŵ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ่ฌ
ऑ֭㌱ਙ⎯ฌ
‫ف‬ผ่֭֭7‫ﭨ‬Ŵкк֭ੂฌ
‫ﭨ‬Ŵкк֭7‫֭ﭨ‬ผ₡֭ฌ
⎯‫֭ש‬ऑγŴ่ħ֭ฌ
‫ف‬ħ⇡⎯ਙ่ฌ

Ŵผผਙੂਙ7‫ف‬ผŴ่₡֭ฌ

‫ﭨ‬Ŵкк֭ੂ7‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉฌ

γ—ŴкŴऑŴħ7ʉŴੂฌ
⑾ਙผ‫ש‬7ŴऑŴ㌱γ֭ฌ
₡—ผŴ่‫ف‬ਙฌ
₡֭㌱Ŵ‫—ש‬ผฌ

⇡—⑾⑾Ŵкਙฌ
ผŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
⊕7bḶОùŐ●ḚĠ╗7ธx‫ں‬ՙⓒ7DzЌЋ●ŐḶЌҜDzЌ╗AՁ7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ḚŐḶⓈОⓒ7ՁՁbฌ
╗Ġ●Ɔ7ОՁAЌ7●Ɔ7bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ7●Ќ7ЌA╗ⓈŐDz7AЌC7ЌḶ7ḚⓈAŐAЌ╗DzDz7Ḷ7●╗Ɔ7AbbⓈŐAbù7●ҜОՁ●DzC㈠7╗ĠDzฌ
ḶÛЌDzŐ゜AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗7ŐDzƆDzŐЋDzƆ7╗ĠDz7Ő●ḚĠ╗7╗Ḷ7ҜAìDz7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ҜḶC●●bA╗●ḶЌƆ7Û●╗ĠḶⓈ╗7ЌḶ╗●bDz㈠7AՁՁ7bḶՁḶŐƆⓒฌ
C●ҜDzЌƆ●ḶЌƆⓒ Ɔ●ΎDzƆⓒ AЌC AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗ⓈŐAՁ DzA╗ⓈŐDzƆ AŐDz bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ AЌC ƆⓈԱİDzb╗ ╗Ḷ bĠAЌḚDz㈠
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7ЌḶ̬ɱ‫ں‬ฎx̶ㄦ7777777xธ゜ธՙ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
ОŐḶİ Dzb

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
bDzЌ╗ⓈŐA7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7bḶ㈠77㈠ՁՁbฌ x̶゜ธ″゜‫ں‬ɱ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ОAŐìฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
ОŐḶЋ●CDz7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7╗ŐDzDzƆ7㌀7ธxƥ7ḶЌ7bDzЌ╗DzŐฌ
ОŐḶЋ●CDz7ҜAṲ㈠7̶″फ7ĠDz●ḚĠ╗7ĠDzCḚDzฌ AЌC7ӧㅡỏ7ḚAՁ7ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ7ОDzŐ7╗ŐDzDz7 ‫ںں‬ƥ7ֱ7ɱफฌ
AՁḶЌḚ7bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ԱՁЋC㈠ฌ

ՙƥ7ֱ7ฎफฌ
ธxƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬xफ7 ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ

ธㄦƥ7ֱ7″फฌ

‫ں‬xƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธ‫ں‬ƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬फฌ

ธxƥ7ֱ7̶फฌ
‫ںں‬ƥ7ֱ7ธफฌ

ธ‫ں‬ƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬xफฌ
AЌC7ӧㅡỏ7ḚAՁ7ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ7ОDzŐ7╗ŐDzDzฌ
ОŐḶЋ●CDz7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7╗ŐDzDzƆ7㌀7ธxƥ7ḶЌ7bDzЌ╗DzŐฌ

ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ
‫ں‬ธƥ7ֱ7xफฌ

Page 404 of 1332


‫ ں‬xƥ7ֱ7ธफฌ

ธ̶ƥ7ֱ7ՙफฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥฌ
ƆùҜ㈠7 Ợ╗ù㈠ฌ Ɔ●ΎDzฌ bḶҜҜḶЌ7ЌAҜDz7 Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 x7 ธxƥ7 ㅡxƥ7 ″xƥ7 ฎxƥฌ
ㄦㅡฌ ธㅡफ7Աਙゥ7ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡ฌ ŐŴੂʉਙਙ₡7A⎯γ7

ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธธƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธ‫ں‬ƥ7ֱ7xफฌ

ฎx7 ธㅡफ7Աਙゥ7ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡7 Ûγħ‫֭ש‬7╗γผਙ่7A㌱Ŵ㌱ħŴฌ


ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ

‫ں‬ㄦ7 ธㅡफ7Աਙゥ7ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡7 Ҝਙ่₡֭к7Оħ่֭ฌ

‫ں‬ㅡ7 Ġ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ЋŴผħ֭⎯7 Ҝ֭ゥħ㌱Ŵ่77+Ŵ่77ОŴкこฌ

‫ں‬ธ̶7 ЋŴผħਙ—⎯7Ɔγผ—⇡⎯7㈠ฌ Աħ‫ف‬7ƆŴ‫⇡֭ف‬ผ—⎯γฌ


ㄦ7ḚAՁ㈠7Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ɔʉ֭֭‫ש‬7Աผਙਙこฌ
⊕7bḶОùŐ●ḚĠ╗7ธx‫ں‬ՙⓒ7DzЌЋ●ŐḶЌҜDzЌ╗AՁ7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ḚŐḶⓈОⓒ7ՁՁbฌ
╗Ġ●Ɔ7ОՁAЌ7●Ɔ7bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ7●Ќ7ЌA╗ⓈŐDz7AЌC7ЌḶ7ḚⓈAŐAЌ╗DzDz7Ḷ+7●╗Ɔ7AbbⓈŐAbù7●ҜОՁ●DzC㈠7╗ĠDzฌ
ḶÛЌDzŐ゜AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗7ŐDzƆDzŐЋDzƆ7╗ĠDz7Ő●ḚĠ╗7╗Ḷ7ҜAìDz7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ҜḶC●+●bA╗●ḶЌƆ7Û●╗ĠḶⓈ╗7ЌḶ╗●bDz㈠7AՁՁ7bḶՁḶŐƆⓒฌ
C●ҜDzЌƆ●ḶЌƆⓒ Ɔ●ΎDzƆⓒ AЌC AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗ⓈŐAՁ +DzA╗ⓈŐDzƆ AŐDz bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ AЌC ƆⓈԱİDzb╗ ╗Ḷ bĠAЌḚDz㈠
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7ЌḶ̬ɱ‫ں‬ฎx̶ㄦ7777777xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
ОŐḶİ Dzb

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
bDzЌ╗ⓈŐA7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7bḶ㈠77㈠ՁՁbฌ x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ОAŐìฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 405 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 406 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 407 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 408 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 409 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 410 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 411 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 412 of 1332


GPA-74312 [PRJ-74089] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-74313, VAR-74314 AND SDR-74315 -
APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CHARLESTON BOULEVARD AND LINDELL ROAD
08/30/18

Page 413 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㅡxฎɱ
‫ں‬ธ゜‫ں‬ՙ゜‫ں‬ฎ

P a 4g 1eo 41f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㅡxฎɱ
‫ں‬ธ゜‫ں‬ՙ゜‫ں‬ฎ

P a 4g 1eo 51f 3 3 2
Page 418 of 1332
Page 419 of 1332
Page 420 of 1332
Page 421 of 1332
From: noreply@formstack.com
To: Planning Comments
Subject: Planning Application Comments Form
Date: Monday, October 01, 2018 7:11:39 PM

Formstack Submission For: Planning Application


Comments Form_2018
Submitted at 10/01/18 7:11 PM

Planning
Application GPA-74312
Number:

Position: I Oppose

Name: Gerald DeCesare

Residential
or 5408 LONGRIDGE AVE
Business LAS VEGAS, NV 89146
Address:

Phone: (702) 524-7855

Email: jdec6@yahoo.com

I am a trustee of the owner of K & G Investments, LLC


that owns the single family home at the above address.

I have been told that the intention of this planning


application number above in conjunction with ZON-
74313, VAR-74314 and SDR-74315 is to change the
zoning and get a variance to build a multi story low
Comments:
income development that will lower the values of the
properties in the vicinity. the LLC has been the owner
of the location for over 12 years and the value of the
house is still not above what we paid for it. I do not
want a further deterioration of values int he area and

Page 424 of 1332


therefore oppose these items. Please do not vote to
change or approve any of the above items. Thank you.

Copyright © 2018 Formstack, LLC. All rights reserved. This is a customer service email.
Formstack, 8604 Allisonville Road, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46250

Page 425 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 24

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
TABLED - RENOTIFICATION - ZON-74313 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-74312 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: CENTURA DEVELOPMENT - OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH
IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning
FROM: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) TO: R-4 (HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 4.62 acres
at the southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road (APNs 163-01-501-001 and
002), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-74089]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 12 Planning Commission Mtg. 2

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-74313 [PRJ-74089] and SDR-75858 [PRJ-75792]
3. Land Use Map
4. Supporting Documentation
5. School Development Tracking Form - Submitted by Clark County School District

Page 440 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 441 of 1332


Page 442 of 1332
Page 443 of 1332
Page 444 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 4g 4eo 51f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 25

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75858 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-74312 AND ZON-74313
- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CHARLIE RAH RAH IRREVOCABLE BUSINESS
TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 144-UNIT SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENTS DEVELOPMENT on 4.62 acres at the
southeast corner of Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road (APNs 163-01-501-001 and 002), C-
1 (Limited Commercial) Zone [PROPOSED: R-4 (High Density Residential)], Ward 1 (Tarkanian)
[PRJ-75792]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Justification Letter
5. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 447 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 448 of 1332


Page 449 of 1332
Page 450 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 4g 5eo 11f 3 3 2
″ธxƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬x7ՙ゜ฎफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7bֱ‫ں‬7
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ‫ں‬ՙ″ƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ںں‬ƥ7ֱ7ɱफฌ
ㄦxƥ7ֱ7xफฌ

ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐùฌ
̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐùฌ

ธxƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОḶḶՁ7AҜDzЌ●╗ùฌ

ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
ОAЋ●Ձ●ḶЌฌ
DzЌbDz7 ɱՙƥֱ″फ㈠ฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОḶḶՁฌ
̶̬‫ں‬7ƆՁḶОDz7ACİ㈠ฌ
ОDzŐ7̶x㈠ㄦ″ֱ‫ں‬xฌ

ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ

ฎฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ɱ7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ
ɱՙƥ7ֱ7″फฌ
̶ ̬‫ں‬7ACİ㈠77ОDzŐ7̶x㈠ㄦ″ֱ‫ں‬x7ƆDz╗ԱAbì7 ACİ㈠7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁฌ
‫ں ں‬ƥ7ֱ7ㄦफฌ ╗Ḷ7╗ĠDz7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 bՁⓈԱĠḶⓈƆDzฌ

ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธ ฎƥ7ֱ7x
फฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ɱ7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ

ÛAՁìÛAù7 ÛAՁìÛAùฌ

7xफฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ɱ7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ

ÛAՁìÛAù7 ÛAՁìÛAù7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

ธ ฎƥ7ֱ
̶̶ƥ7ֱ7″7̶゜ㅡफ㈠ฌ

‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ՁḶAC●ЌḚ7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ҜDz╗AՁ7ŐḶḶ7CDzbìฌ

ㄦธƥ7ֱ7x
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ҜDz╗AՁ7ԱDzAҜฌ
‫゜ں‬ㅡफฌ

फฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7
bḶЋDzŐDzCฌ
ҜDz╗AՁ7ОⓈŐՁ●Ќฌ

ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚ㈠7╗ùО㈠7 ╗ŐAƆĠ7DzЌbՁḶƆⓈŐDz7

ธɱxƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬फฌ
ҜDz╗AՁ7bḶՁⓈҜЌฌ
ธxƥ7ḚA╗Dzฌ

फฌ
bḶЌb㈠7bA●ƆḶЌ7ḶḶ╗●ЌḚฌ
″ƥฌ
″ƥ7

ֱ7x
ԱⓈƆ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7

ธ ƥ7
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ CDzՁ●ЋDzŐùฌ


㌫7‫ں‬ธ7ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ

ธฎƥ7
7ֱ7xफฌ

‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ÛAՁìÛAù7 ÛAՁìÛAùฌ
ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ
ธ ฎƥ7
फฌ

ธ ฎƥ
ƥ7ֱ7x ㄦธƥ7ֱ7xफ ֱ7x

ֱ7xफฌ
ÛAՁìÛAù7 ธฎ ㄦธƥ7ֱ7xफฌ फฌ ㄦ ㅡƥ7ֱ7‫ںں‬फฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
╗ੂऑħ㌱Ŵк7bŴผऑਙผ‫ש‬ฌ ╗ੂऑħ㌱Ŵк7″ƥγ7╗—⇡֭7Ɔ‫֭֭ש‬к7Оħ㌱E֭‫ש‬ฌ

ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
Ɔ֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ ่֭㌱֭ฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7bֱ‫ں‬ฌ
ҜŴゥħこ—こ77ฎ77Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵкк⎯77ħ่ฌ ʉ゜7‫゜ں‬ธफ7Оħ㌱E֭‫⎯ש‬77ㅡफ7ਙ゜㌱7ִ77ธゥธ77Оਙ⎯‫⎯ש‬77㌀ฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ Ձ่֭‫שف‬γฌ ‫ں‬xƥ7ਙ゜㌱ฌ

bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌฌ
ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬xƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Őֱ‫ں‬ฌ

ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ՙƥ7ֱ7″फ7 A‫ں‬㈠x7 A‫ں‬㈠‫ں‬7 Ա‫ں‬㈠‫ں‬7 Ա‫ں‬㈠‫ں‬7⇡7 Ա‫ں‬㈠̶7 Ա‫ں‬㈠ㅡฌ

″ƥ7ֱ7″फ7

ฎฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ฎฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬xƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
‫ں‬7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ‫ں‬7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ
ㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ธ‫ں‬7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ㅡㄦ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ̶ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ㅡ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ

ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफ7 ‫ں‬ฎƥ7ֱ7xफฌ ″ɱ″7Ɔฌ ՙ̶ㄦ7Ɔฌ ɱฎฎ7Ɔฌ ɱㄦՙ7Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ⓒ‫ں‬″̶7Ɔฌ ‫ں‬ⓒxฎฎ7Ɔฌ

ՙㄦƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
फฌ


ƥ7ֱ7x

̶̶
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 ƥ7ֱ7x ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7
ธㄦ

Ɔ●ḚЌAḚDz7ḶЌฌ ̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐù7 ธㄦ ̶7Ɔ╗ḶŐùฌ

ƥ7ֱ7
‫ں‬ㄦ
ㅡฎफ7Ġ╗7ÛAՁՁฌ ƥ7ֱ

xफฌ
7x

ธ̶ƥ7ֱ7ธफฌ

ธxƥ7ֱ7ɱफฌ

ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
DzЌbDzฌ
DzЌbDzฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 DzҜDzŐḚDzЌbù7AbbDzƆƆฌ
ㅡxƥ7ֱ7xफ

Ձ●ЌCDzՁՁ7

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ŐֱDzฌ
ОŐḶİDzb╗7ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌฌ

Page 452 of 1332


⇡—⑾⑾Ŵкਙฌ
ผŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
₡֭㌱Ŵ‫—ש‬ผฌ
Ŵкк่֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
㌱кŴੂ‫ש‬ਙ่7⎯‫ש‬ฌ
к֭ਙ่7⎯‫ש‬ฌ
่ਙผ‫ש‬γ7ㄦ‫ש‬γ7⎯‫ש‬ฌ
кਙ⎯֭֭7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
ผŴ่‫֭ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ

ऑ֭㌱ਙ⎯7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
кŴこ⇡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ

⑾ਙผ‫ש‬7ŴऑŴ㌱γ֭ฌ
‫ف‬ผŴ่₡7㌱Ŵ่ੂਙ่ฌ
㈾ਙ่֭⎯ฌ

γ—ŴкŴऑŴħ7ʉŴੂฌ
₡—ผŴ่‫ف‬ਙฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz7●ЌḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌ7 Ɔ●╗Dz7ՁDzḚDzЌCฌ
ħผਙ่7こਙ—่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ฌ Û7bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ԱՁЋC㈠7AЌC7Ɔ7Ձ●ЌCDzՁՁ7ŐC㈠ฌ ⓈЌ●╗7bḶⓈЌ╗ฌ
Ⓢ ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌฌ
‫ف‬ผŴ่₡7‫ש֭ש‬ਙ่7₡ผฌ Ɔ7
֭кEγਙผ่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
ɱㄦ Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ
ฌ ฌ ОAŐbDzՁฌ AОЌ̬7Ќਙ㈠7‫ں‬″̶ֱx‫ֱں‬ㄦx‫ֱں‬xx‫ں‬7ִ7xxธฌ
㌱่֭‫่่֭ש‬ħŴк7ऑEʉੂฌ ผ‫ש‬γ Ő
●ֱ ‫ ں‬ㄦ 7Ќਙ Ḷ่֭7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬77ӧ੧̶ฎỏ7 ㄦㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ एㄦ
Ќ㈠7ՁAƆ7 к‫ﭨ‬₡ ธ ƥ ए7 AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ŐḶⓈ╗Dzฌ
Ŵ่่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚฌ Őֱㅡ7ֱ7ҜⓈՁ╗●ֱAҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ӧbⓈŐŐDzЌ╗Ձù7bֱ‫ں‬ỏฌ एฌ╗ùО●bAՁ7●ŐDzฌ
кਙ่֭7こ‫่ש‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ Ŵ⎯7Ա ╗ʉਙ7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ӧ੧″ธỏ7 ɱx7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ㄦ੧7ҜAṲ●ҜⓈҜ7ŐⓈЌЌ●ЌḚ7ƆՁḶОDzฌ
ЋDzḚAƆ7 ֭‫ف‬ ㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ Ő ╗ⓈŐЌ●ЌḚ7ŐAC●ⓈƆฌ
㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ⎯7Ћ एธ ธ੧7ҜAṲ●ҜⓈҜ7bŐḶƆƆ7ƆՁḶОDzฌ
Ŵк֭ゥŴ่₡֭ผฌ ՁŴ ОAŐbDzՁ7AŐDzAฌ ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7 7ਙ⑾7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ″ƥฌ
㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ผŴ Ḛผਙ⎯⎯7Aผ֭Ŵฌ ӧ╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ЋDzŐ●●DzCỏ7㌫7ธx″ⓒㅡՙㅡ7Ɔ77 ㌫7ㅡ㈠ՙㅡA㌱ผ֭⎯ฌ
่ ㌱Ŵผ֭ੂ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ

ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ
⎯こਙE֭7ผŴ่㌱γ7ผ₡ฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCฌ ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќ7 ŐAҜО7 ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќฌ

ผŴこऑŴผ‫ש‬ฌ
㌱γ
кŴE֭7こ֭Ŵ₡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ Ќ㈠╗㈠Ɔ㈠7

こкE7㈾ผ7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
ਙ ฌ Ќ֭‫ש‬7Aผ֭Ŵฌ ӧ╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ЋDzŐ●●DzCỏ7㌫7‫ں‬ฎxⓒՙՙㅡ7Ɔ77 ㌫7ㅡ㈠‫ں‬ㄦ7A㌱ผ֭⎯ฌ ‫ں‬ƥ7 ‫ں‬ƥฌ
Ɔ—ここ֭ผкħ่ฌ
Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ฌ ए7 AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ŐḶⓈ╗Dz7ֱ7AЌƆ●7bḶҜОՁ●AЌ╗ฌ
ОEʉੂ7 ⓈƆ7ɱㄦ7 ⇡ਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ผ₡ฌ

γਙккੂʉਙਙ₡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
⎯‫֭ש‬ऑγŴ่ħ֭ฌ
่֭ккħ⎯7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ ㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ Ḷ่֭7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこฌ x㈠ՙㄦ7О֭ผ7Ⓢ่ħ‫ש‬ฌ ㅡ‫ں‬ฌ ŐAҜО7ฎ㈠̶̶੧7ҜAṲ㈠7ŐⓈЌЌ●ЌḚ7ƆՁḶОDzⓒ7ธ੧ฌ
ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќฌ

⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ CDzЌƆ●╗ù7 ҜAṲ㈠7bŐḶƆƆ7ƆՁḶОDz㈠7ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆฌ


╗ʉਙ7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこฌ x㈠ՙㄦ7О֭ผ7Ⓢ่ħ‫ש‬ฌ ″ՙฌ
₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่ฌ ՁAƆ7 ₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่7ผ₡ฌ ɱƥ7 ㄦƥ7 ɱƥ7 ㄦƥ7
ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7ḶŐ7ŐAҜОƆ7Û●╗Ġ7ḚŐDzA╗DzŐฌ
⎯ऑผħ่‫ف‬7こ‫่ש‬ฌ
⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ ЋDzḚAƆ7 Աਙ
—к ₡ ⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ Ḷ่֭7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ㄦㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7 ‫ں‬xฎฌ
╗ĠAЌ7″फ7Ő●ƆDz㈠7ÛĠDzŐDz7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCⓒฌ
‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵ ‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆ7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7̶ㅡफ7AԱḶЋDz7ÛAՁì●ЌḚฌ

ऑŴ ผŴ
֭ผ ╗ʉਙ7Ա֭₡ผਙਙこ7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ɱx7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ए7 ╗ùО●bAՁ7ОAŐì●ЌḚฌ
γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ


γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ 7Ġ ƆⓈŐAbDz㈠7AЌC7ĠAЋDz7AЌ7DzCḚDzฌ
ħ‫ ف‬γ
╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7 7ਙ⑾7Ⓢ่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzCฌ Ḷऑ่֭7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7 ՙՙฌ ƆОAbDzƆฌ
●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦ7 ⎯—่⎯֭‫ש‬7ผ₡ฌ bਙ‫ﭨ‬ƥ₡7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7 ㅡㅡฌ
ԱAŐŐ●DzŐ7Û●╗Ġ●Ќ7ㅡफ7Ḷ77ḚŐACDz7ƆḶฌ

ħ⎯֭ฌ

ʉŴ

֭ฌ ₡ฌ
ʉŴผこ7⎯ऑผħ่‫⎯ف‬ฌ Ա—⎯7ӧƆγ—‫שש‬к֭ỏ7 77‫ں‬ฌ ╗ĠA╗7A7ㅡफ7ƆОĠDzŐDz7bAЌЌḶ╗7ОAƆƆฌ


ੂฌ

ผħ‫֭ ﭨ‬Ŵ

ⓈƆ
ʉħ่₡こħккฌ

ՁŴ
C֭кħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผੂ7 77‫ں‬ฌ


Ɔ╗AЌCAŐC7 ĠAЌC●bAООDzCฌ ╗ĠŐḶⓈḚĠ㈠7ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7bՁDzAŐ7ԱDz╗ÛDzDzЌฌ
●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦ7

7ɱㄦ
ऑ֭⇡⇡к֭ฌ Ḛผਙ⎯⎯7C่֭⎯ħ‫ੂש‬7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ゜ㅡ㈠ՙㅡ7एฌ ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆ㈠77ĠAЌCŐA●ՁƆ7╗Ḷ7DzṲ╗DzЌCฌ
Աк—֭7CħŴこਙ่₡7Ġʉੂฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7 ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ


‫ف‬ਙこ֭ผ゜⎯ħк‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴ₡ਙฌ ฌऑEʉੂฌ ㌫7̶x㈠̶ฎ7Ⓢ7゜7A㌱ผ֭ฌ ‫ں‬ธफ7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7ԱDzùḶЌC7╗ḶО7AЌC7ԱḶ╗╗ḶҜ7Ḷฌ
‫֭ف‬
㌱Ŵ㌱‫⎯—ש‬ฌ ผħ ₡ ╗ĠDz7ŐAҜО㈠7ՁAЌC●ЌḚƆ7A╗7╗ḶО7AЌCฌ

●ֱ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
₡ γਙผħ▷ਙ่ฌ

ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡777777ӧƆ‫ש‬ผħऑỏฌ
֭Ŵ Ġ㈠b㈠7ОŴผEħ่‫ف‬7 ฎƥ7 ɱƥ7 ฎƥ7 ԱḶ╗╗ḶҜ7Ḷ7ŐAҜО㈠7ㄦƥ7Ҝ●Ќ7ՁDzЌḚ╗Ġ7●Ќฌ
⎯‫ש‬Ŵผผฌ
Ҝ ֭ ĠDzЌCDzŐƆḶЌ7 Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7 Оผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡ฌ C●ŐDzb╗●ḶЌ7Ḷ7ŐAҜО㈠7ㄦ੧7ҜAṲ㈠ฌ
⇡ผ—่֭ผฌ E֭ฌ ผħ‫ﭨ‬
ՁŴ C Ɔ‫ש‬₡7 ЋŴ่7 ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵкฌ ŐⓈЌЌ●ЌḚ7ƆՁḶОDz7AЌC7ธ੧7ҜAṲ㈠7bŐḶƆƆฌ
″7 ㅡ7 ธฌ ″7 ƆՁḶОDz㈠ฌ
╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7 ″7 ㅡ7 ธ7 ″ฌ
ЋAЌ7AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDzฌ

㈾ਙ่֭⎯ฌ
ħ่₡—⎯‫ש‬ผħŴкฌ
こŴผੂкŴ่₡ฌ
֭Ŵ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ่ฌ
ऑ֭㌱ਙ⎯ฌ
‫ف‬ผ่֭֭7‫ﭨ‬Ŵкк֭ੂฌ
‫ﭨ‬Ŵкк֭7‫֭ﭨ‬ผ₡֭ฌ
⎯‫֭ש‬ऑγŴ่ħ֭ฌ
‫ف‬ħ⇡⎯ਙ่ฌ

Ŵผผਙੂਙ7‫ف‬ผŴ่₡֭ฌ

‫ﭨ‬Ŵкк֭ੂ7‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉฌ

γ—ŴкŴऑŴħ7ʉŴੂฌ
⑾ਙผ‫ש‬7ŴऑŴ㌱γ֭ฌ
₡—ผŴ่‫ف‬ਙฌ
₡֭㌱Ŵ‫—ש‬ผฌ

⇡—⑾⑾Ŵкਙฌ
ผŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
⊕7bḶОùŐ●ḚĠ╗7ธx‫ں‬ՙⓒ7DzЌЋ●ŐḶЌҜDzЌ╗AՁ7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ḚŐḶⓈОⓒ7ՁՁbฌ
╗Ġ●Ɔ7ОՁAЌ7●Ɔ7bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ7●Ќ7ЌA╗ⓈŐDz7AЌC7ЌḶ7ḚⓈAŐAЌ╗DzDz7Ḷ7●╗Ɔ7AbbⓈŐAbù7●ҜОՁ●DzC㈠7╗ĠDzฌ
ḶÛЌDzŐ゜AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗7ŐDzƆDzŐЋDzƆ7╗ĠDz7Ő●ḚĠ╗7╗Ḷ7ҜAìDz7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ҜḶC●●bA╗●ḶЌƆ7Û●╗ĠḶⓈ╗7ЌḶ╗●bDz㈠7AՁՁ7bḶՁḶŐƆⓒฌ
C●ҜDzЌƆ●ḶЌƆⓒ Ɔ●ΎDzƆⓒ AЌC AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗ⓈŐAՁ DzA╗ⓈŐDzƆ AŐDz bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ AЌC ƆⓈԱİDzb╗ ╗Ḷ bĠAЌḚDz㈠
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7ЌḶ̬ɱ‫ں‬ฎx̶ㄦ7777777xธ゜ธՙ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
ОŐḶİ Dzb

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
bDzЌ╗ⓈŐA7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7bḶ㈠77㈠ՁՁbฌ x̶゜ธ″゜‫ں‬ɱ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ОAŐìฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
ОŐḶЋ●CDz7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7╗ŐDzDzƆ7㌀7ธxƥ7ḶЌ7bDzЌ╗DzŐฌ
ОŐḶЋ●CDz7ҜAṲ㈠7̶″फ7ĠDz●ḚĠ╗7ĠDzCḚDzฌ AЌC7ӧㅡỏ7ḚAՁ7ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ7ОDzŐ7╗ŐDzDz7 ‫ںں‬ƥ7ֱ7ɱफฌ
AՁḶЌḚ7bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ԱՁЋC㈠ฌ

ՙƥ7ֱ7ฎफฌ
ธxƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬xफ7 ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ

ธㄦƥ7ֱ7″फฌ

‫ں‬xƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธ‫ں‬ƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬फฌ

ธxƥ7ֱ7̶फฌ
‫ںں‬ƥ7ֱ7ธफฌ

ธ‫ں‬ƥ7ֱ7‫ں‬xफฌ
AЌC7ӧㅡỏ7ḚAՁ7ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ7ОDzŐ7╗ŐDzDzฌ
ОŐḶЋ●CDz7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7╗ŐDzDzƆ7㌀7ธxƥ7ḶЌ7bDzЌ╗DzŐฌ

ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ
‫ں‬ธƥ7ֱ7xफฌ

Page 453 of 1332


‫ ں‬xƥ7ֱ7ธफฌ

ธ̶ƥ7ֱ7ՙफฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥฌ
ƆùҜ㈠7 Ợ╗ù㈠ฌ Ɔ●ΎDzฌ bḶҜҜḶЌ7ЌAҜDz7 Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDz7 x7 ธxƥ7 ㅡxƥ7 ″xƥ7 ฎxƥฌ
ㄦㅡฌ ธㅡफ7Աਙゥ7ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡ฌ ŐŴੂʉਙਙ₡7A⎯γ7

ธㅡƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธธƥ7ֱ7xफฌ
ธ‫ں‬ƥ7ֱ7xफฌ

ฎx7 ธㅡफ7Աਙゥ7ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡7 Ûγħ‫֭ש‬7╗γผਙ่7A㌱Ŵ㌱ħŴฌ


ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7Ձ●ЌDzฌ

‫ں‬ㄦ7 ธㅡफ7Աਙゥ7ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡7 Ҝਙ่₡֭к7Оħ่֭ฌ

‫ں‬ㅡ7 Ġ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ЋŴผħ֭⎯7 Ҝ֭ゥħ㌱Ŵ่77+Ŵ่77ОŴкこฌ

‫ں‬ธ̶7 ЋŴผħਙ—⎯7Ɔγผ—⇡⎯7㈠ฌ Աħ‫ف‬7ƆŴ‫⇡֭ف‬ผ—⎯γฌ


ㄦ7ḚAՁ㈠7Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ɔʉ֭֭‫ש‬7Աผਙਙこฌ
⊕7bḶОùŐ●ḚĠ╗7ธx‫ں‬ՙⓒ7DzЌЋ●ŐḶЌҜDzЌ╗AՁ7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ḚŐḶⓈОⓒ7ՁՁbฌ
╗Ġ●Ɔ7ОՁAЌ7●Ɔ7bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ7●Ќ7ЌA╗ⓈŐDz7AЌC7ЌḶ7ḚⓈAŐAЌ╗DzDz7Ḷ+7●╗Ɔ7AbbⓈŐAbù7●ҜОՁ●DzC㈠7╗ĠDzฌ
ḶÛЌDzŐ゜AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗7ŐDzƆDzŐЋDzƆ7╗ĠDz7Ő●ḚĠ╗7╗Ḷ7ҜAìDz7CDzƆ●ḚЌ7ҜḶC●+●bA╗●ḶЌƆ7Û●╗ĠḶⓈ╗7ЌḶ╗●bDz㈠7AՁՁ7bḶՁḶŐƆⓒฌ
C●ҜDzЌƆ●ḶЌƆⓒ Ɔ●ΎDzƆⓒ AЌC AŐbĠ●╗Dzb╗ⓈŐAՁ +DzA╗ⓈŐDzƆ AŐDz bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ AЌC ƆⓈԱİDzb╗ ╗Ḷ bĠAЌḚDz㈠
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7ЌḶ̬ɱ‫ں‬ฎx̶ㄦ7777777xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
ОŐḶİ Dzb

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
bDzЌ╗ⓈŐA7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7bḶ㈠77㈠ՁՁbฌ x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7ОAŐìฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 4g 5eo 41f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱธ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 4g 5eo 51f 3 3 2
SDR 75858
Charlie Rah Rah Irrevocable Business Trust, et al

SEC Charleston Boulevard and Lindell Road


Proposed 144 unit senior adult multi-family residential development.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3.70 533


AM Peak Hour SENIOR ADULT HOUSING-ATTACHED [DU] 144 0.20 29
PM Peak Hour 0.26 37
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Charleston Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 41,017
PM Peak Hour 3281
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Lindell Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,610
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent street ADT
Capacity
Charleston Boulevard 53,445
Lindell Road 16,380

This project will add approximately 533 trips per day on Charleston Blvd. and Lindell Rd. Currently, Charleston is at about 77
percent of capacity and Lindell is at about 28 percent of capacity. With this project, Charleston is expected to be at about 78
percent of capacity and Lindell is expected to be at about 31 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 37 additional cars, or about two every three
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 456 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 26

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
GPA-75814 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY
OF LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment to amend
portions of the Southeast Sector Land Use Map of the General Plan FROM: C (COMMERCIAL)
AND MXU (MIXED USE) TO: FBC (FORM-BASED CODE) on approximately 226 acres in the
Fremont East District generally located south of Interstate 515, west of Eastern Avenue, north of
Carson Avenue, and east of Las Vegas Boulevard (APNs Multiple), Wards 3 (Coffin) and 5 (Crear).
Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Land Use Map
3. Staff Report
4. Supporting Documentation
4. Justification Letter

Page 457 of 1332


Page 458 of 1332
Page 459 of 1332
Page 460 of 1332
GPA-75814 [PRJ-75868]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-75814 Staff recommends APPROVAL.

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 15

NOTICES MAILED 2229

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

LM
Page 461 of 1332
GPA-75814 [PRJ-75868]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This request for a General Plan Amendment is an implementation action to the vision and
goals, as set forth by the Las Vegas community in the Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas
Masterplan. It is an amendment of the general plan Land Use Designation for all
properties located within the Fremont East District. This is the second of the twelve
downtown districts set to implement updated development standards that will foster the
growth a “complete neighborhood” with proximity to amenities, services, and a variety of
housing and entertainment options.

ISSUES

• In June 2016, the city of Las Vegas adopted the Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas
Masterplan. This Plan identified the need to revise the outdated planning and zoning
regulations and development standards for downtown. The Plan listed, as the first of
twelve key implementation actions, the objective of adopting a Form-Based Code for
the downtown districts.
• In October 2017, the City of Las Vegas replaced the Downtown Centennial Plan with
the Interim Downtown Las Vegas Development Standards. These Interim Downtown
Las Vegas Development Standards now serve as a regulatory framework to transition
between the former Downtown Centennial Plan and the new Title 19 Form-Based
Code.
• The current land use designation of the properties within the Fremont East District is
not consistent with the goal of implementing planning standards that cater to the
neighborhood context. The Form-Based Code (FBC) designation would allow for form-
based zoning categories, or transect zones, that are based on the specific needs and
desired outcomes for the Fremont East District to implement the vision set in the
Downtown Masterplan.

ANALYSIS

This General Plan Amendment is consistent with the City’s goals, policies and objectives
of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan and its related Elements; with the Vision 2045
Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan; and with the City of Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan.
It is a key step in moving towards the adoption of a Form-Based Code for all twelve
Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan districts, which began with the pilot area of the Las
Vegas Medical District in January 2019. The Form-Based Code (FBC) land use
designation fosters density and intensity of development that is compatible with existing
land use designations, and the zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment
will be compatible with the existing adjacent land uses and zoning districts.

LM
Page 462 of 1332
GPA-75814 [PRJ-75868]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The FBC (Form-Based Code) designation allows for zoning districts, or transect zones,
that were created after taking into consideration the specific context of the Fremont East
District, by conducting surveys, analysis, and outreach to stakeholders.

The new Transect Zones applicable to Fremont East have been publicly available since
February 6, 2019, along with the proposed Regulating Map that shows where such
districts are proposed. This Fremont East Form-Based Code Update and the Regulating
Plan are currently in the public comment period, and Staff is collecting feedback from
residents and stakeholders to refine and enhance these documents. The proposed FBC
(Form-Based Code) Land Use Designation will allow for the Fremont East Code update
and Rezoning to be implemented in the area.

Staff considers the proposed General Plan Amendment as a compelling amendment to


promote the five “Big Ideas” envisioned in the Vision 2045 Downtown Masterplan: 1)
Diversify the Economy; 2) Create Mixed-use Hubs; 3) Create Streets for People; 4); A
Greener Downtown; and 5) Expedite Implementation.

Staff recommends approval of this General Plan Amendment.

FINDINGS (GPA-75814)

Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions
be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is


compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,

The proposed amendment to the FBC (Form-Based Code) land use designation
is compatible with the density and intensity of existing adjacent land uses.

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be


compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,

The proposed amendment to the FBC (Form-Based Code) land use designation
will be compatible with the existing adjacent zoning districts and land uses.

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to


accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and

The proposed amendment will complement and enhance the current and planned
transportation, recreation, utility and other facility resources and infrastructure,
which can accommodate uses and densities permitted by this General Plan
Amendment.

LM
Page 463 of 1332
GPA-75814 [PRJ-75868]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and


policies.

The proposed amendment is compatible with the Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas
Masterplan, Redevelopment Area Plan, and with the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan
and its Elements.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council adopted Resolution R-05-2016, adopting the Vision
06/15/16 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan, and directing staff to propose
revisions that implement the goals of the plan where appropriate.
During a Special Joint City Council and Planning Commission both
bodies unanimously accepted the presentation regarding the
12/06/16
implementation of an Urban Form Code for the area covered by the
Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan.
The Planning Commission (7-0) recommended the approval of TXT-
66412 to amend Title 19, replace the Downtown Centennial Plan
10/10/17 Overlay District with the updated Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District,
and replace the Downtown Centennial Plan with the Interim Downtown
Las Vegas Development Standards.
The City Council (7-0) adopted Ordinance #6608, which amended Title
19 to replace references to the Downtown Centennial Plan Overlay
12/06/17 District with the updated Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District, and
formally adopting the Title 19 Appendix F Interim Downtown Las Vegas
Development Standards.
The Planning Commission (6-0) unanimously voted to recommend
APPROVAL on a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-72837)
04/10/18 to introduce the FBC (Form-Based Code) General Plan Land Use
Designation as an allowed designation for properties within the City Las
Vegas.
The City Council (7-0) voted to amend the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan
Land Use and Rural Neighborhoods Preservation Element to introduce
05/16/18 the FBC (Form-Based Code) General Plan Land Use Designation as an
allowed designation for properties within the City Las Vegas (GPA-
72837).
The City Council (6-0) adopted Ordinance #6649, which introduced a
10/17/18 new Chapter 19.09 Form-Based Code into the Unified Development
Code.

LM
Page 464 of 1332
GPA-75814 [PRJ-75868]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission (5-0-1) voted to recommend APPROVAL
on a request to rezone (ZON-73549) the Las Vegas Medical District
12/11/18
Pilot Area to the new Form-Based Code Transect Zones developed
as part of the Downtown Code update project.
The City Council (6-0) approved a rezoning (ZON-73549) of the Las
Vegas Medical District Pilot Area from multiple zoning districts to
01/16/19
the new Form-Based Code Transect Zones developed as part of
the Downtown Code update project.

Neighborhood Meeting
The Planning Department launched the outreach efforts related to
the Fremont East Code update by hosting an Open House at 508
Fremont Street. During this meeting, attendees were able to
comment on the draft “Vision Statement” for the District, which was
later used by City Staff and Lisa Wise Consulting to draft the
standards that will update the Form-Based Code based on the
Fremont East neighborhood context. Several pictures were
10/12/18 presented of existing buildings located in the area, and the
residents were able to comment on which building types they liked
the most.

Start: 5:00 p.m. End: 7:00 p.m.

Attendees: 5 City Staff (Applicant), 19 Members of the Public

City Staff organized an early pop-up event at 1126 Fremont Street.


During this event, Staff was able to share informational material on
the Fremont East FBC project, re-direct attendees to the material
available on the dedicated website, and inform the residents of the
01/17/19 area about the Code.

Start: 7:30 a.m. End: 9:30 a.m.


Attendees: 2 City Staff (Applicant), 27 Members of the Public

LM
Page 465 of 1332
GPA-75814 [PRJ-75868]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
The Planning Department hosted an informal outreach series of
events called “Community Conversations”, which were hosted by
two businesses located in the most crowded area of the District.
Staff was able to share the document of the Form-Based Code
Fremont East Update, a Draft Regulating Plan, and discuss the
timeline and next steps for implementing a Code update in the
District.

Location: 508 Fremont Street


Start: 5:00 p.m. End: 7:00 p.m.
Attendees: 2 City Staff (Applicant), 9 Members of the Public

Location: Eureka
01/29/19
Start: 4:30 p.m. End: 6:30 p.m.
and 02/06/19
Attendees: 3 City Staff (Applicant), 16 Members of the Public

Meeting results:
• Attendees expressed concern over preserving the unique
character of the neighborhood by facilitating the use and
rehabilitation of historic properties, such as the Hotels/Motels
located along the Fremont East Corridor.
• Attendees expressed interest in the relationship between the
city’s Innovation District and the Code update, and praised
the concept of fostering a greater relationship between the
streets, multiple transportation options, and the buildings.

LM
Page 466 of 1332
GPA-75814 [PRJ-75868]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was held at 401 South 4th Street
(Historic 5th Street School Auditorium). The meeting was notified
via letters to all affected property owners and property owners
within a 1000-foot radius buffer around the subject properties.

Start: 5:30 p.m. End: 7:00 p.m.

Attendees: 5 City Staff (Applicant), 59 Members of the Public.

Meeting results:
• Staff delivered a presentation on the Form-Based Code
initiative and its impact on the subject properties. The
presentation is available at the project website
www.formbasedcode.vegas
03/14/19 • Following Staff’s presentation, an open Q&A session was
held.
• Following the general Q&A session, staff members were
available at five different stations equipped with maps and
handouts to answer questions specific to the attendees’
properties.

Overall, the public was supportive of an initiative that fosters a


complete, walkable neighborhood and provides services and
amenities for the current and future residents of the Fremont East
District. A number of residents of the area expressed concern over
vacant properties along Fremont East and their related problems;
they inquired about the possible benefits that the FBC would bring
to the area.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Gross Acres 226
Net Acres n/a

LM
Page 467 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎ″ฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 4g 6eo 81f 3 3 2
+֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬ɱⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ

╗ਙ7Ûγਙこ7ħ‫ש‬7こŴੂ7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่̬

╗γħ⎯7Ḛ่֭֭ผŴк7ОкŴ่7Aこ่֭₡こ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ֭Ŵ⎯‫ש‬7Ɔ֭㌱‫ש‬ਙผ7ҜŴऑ
ħ⎯7 ⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ħこऑк֭こ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7 Ћħ⎯ħਙ่7 ธxㅡㄦ7 Cਙʉ่‫ש‬ਙʉ่7 ҜŴ⎯‫֭ש‬ผऑкŴ่7 ӧ╗γ֭
ОкŴ่ỏ7Ŵ⎯7Ŵ₡ਙऑ‫֭ש‬₡7ħ่7İ—่֭7ธx‫ں‬″㈠

╗γ֭7ОкŴ่7่֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ש‬ʉ֭к‫֭ﭨ‬7₡ਙʉ่‫ש‬ਙʉ่7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ⎯7Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ‫ੂש‬7㌱่֭‫֭ש‬ผ⎯7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬
Ŵผਙ—่₡7‫่֭ש‬7こħゥ֭₡ֱ—⎯֭7γ—⇡⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵผ֭7⎯‫ש‬ผŴ‫ف֭ש‬ħ㌱Ŵккੂ7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7γ֭Ŵผ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7⎯֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴк
֭⎯‫ש‬Ŵ⇡кħ⎯γ֭₡7₡ਙʉ่‫ש‬ਙʉ่7่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡⎯㈠7●่7ਙผ₡֭ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ㌱γħ֭‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7₡֭⎯ħผ֭₡7⑾ਙผこ7ਙ⑾
‫ש‬γ֭7 ⇡—ħк‫ש‬7 ่֭‫ﭨ‬ħผਙ่こ่֭‫ש‬7 ⑾ਙผ7 ‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7 Ŵผ֭Ŵ⎯ⓒ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ОкŴ่7 ่֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่֭₡7 Ŵ่7 —ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7㌱ਙ₡֭7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭ऑкŴ㌱֭7‫ש‬γ֭7Cਙʉ่‫ש‬ਙʉ่7b่֭‫่่֭ש‬ħŴк7ОкŴ่ⓒ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7—ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭
ħこऑк֭こ่֭‫֭ש‬₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ਙผこ7ਙ⑾7Ŵ7+ਙผこֱԱŴ⎯֭₡7bਙ₡֭7ӧ+Աbỏ㈠

╗γ֭7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Ҝ֭₡ħ㌱Ŵк7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7ӧՁЋҜCỏ7ʉŴ⎯7㌱γਙ⎯่֭7Ŵ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ħผ⎯‫ש‬7ऑħкਙ‫ש‬7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7ħ่ฌ
ʉγħ㌱γ7‫ש‬ਙ7ħこऑк֭こ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7+ਙผこֱԱŴ⎯֭₡7bਙ₡֭ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ⑾⑾7ħ⎯7Ŵкผ֭Ŵ₡ੂ7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ऑผਙ㌱֭⎯⎯7ਙ⑾7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผħ่‫ف‬7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7—่₡֭ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭ʉ7㌱ਙ₡֭㈠7╗γ֭7่֭ゥ‫ש‬7₡ਙʉ่‫ש‬ਙʉ่
₡ħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7⎯㌱γ֭₡—к֭₡7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7bਙ₡֭7—ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ่₡7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7こŴऑ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7.ผ֭こਙ่‫ש‬ฌ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬㈠7

ԱŴ㌱8‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡7Ŵ่Ŵкੂ⎯ħ⎯7⎯γਙʉ⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱—ผผ่֭‫ש‬7ผ֭‫—ف‬кŴ‫ש‬ਙผੂ7⑾ผŴこ֭ʉਙผ87⑾ਙผ7+ผ֭こਙ่‫ש‬ฌ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ⎯‫ש่֭ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7кਙ่‫֭שֱف‬ผこ7‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7 ʉħкк7γħ่₡֭ผ
‫ש‬γ֭7 ₡֭⎯ħผ֭₡7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 Ŵผ֭Ŵ7 Ŵ⎯7 Ŵ7 こħゥ֭₡ֱ—⎯֭7 ่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡7 ਙ⑾
₡ਙʉ่‫ש‬ਙʉ่7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7Ŵ⇡к֭7‫ש‬ਙ7֭ゥऑŴ่₡7ħ‫⎯ש‬7่֭‫֭ש‬ผ‫ש‬Ŵħ่こ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7Ŵこ่֭ħ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7ऑਙผ‫⑾ש‬ਙкħਙ㈠

╗γ֭7+ผ֭こਙ่‫ש‬7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7—ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7+Աb7‫ש‬Ŵ8֭⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ผŴこ֭ʉਙผ87ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ՁЋҜC7+Աb
Ŵ่₡ⓒ7⇡Ŵ⎯֭₡7ਙ่7⎯—ผ‫ੂ֭ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7Ŵ่Ŵкੂ⎯ħ⎯ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7֭‫⎯ש่֭ﭨ‬7⑾ਙผ7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ8֭γਙк₡֭ผ7Ŵ่₡7㌱ਙここ—่ħ‫ੂש‬ฌ
ħ่ऑ—‫ש‬ⓒ7 Ŵ7 ₡ผŴ⑾‫ש‬7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γħ⎯7 —ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬7 ħ⎯7 ่ਙʉ7 Ŵ‫ﭨ‬ŴħкŴ⇡к֭7 ⑾ਙผ7 ऑ—⇡кħ㌱7 ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ㈠7 ╗γ֭7 —ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬ฌ
ħ่㌱к—₡֭⎯7่֭ʉ7+Աb7▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫⎯ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉ֭ผ֭7₡ผŴ⑾‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭⑾к֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
Ŵผ֭Ŵ7Ŵ⎯⎯ਙ㌱ħŴ‫֭ש‬₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ḛ่֭֭ผŴк7ОкŴ่7Aこ่֭₡こ่֭‫ש‬㈠

+ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭Ŵ⎯ਙ่⎯7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7Ŵ⇡ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ⓒ7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ₡‫ﭨ‬Ŵ่㌱֭7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡ŴкŴ่㌱֭₡7‫ف‬ผਙʉ‫ש‬γ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7+ผ֭こਙ่‫ש‬ฌ
DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7Cħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙこਙ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯Ŵ⑾֭‫ੂש‬ⓒ7γ֭Ŵк‫ש‬γ7Ŵ่₡7ʉ֭к⑾Ŵผ֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵこ่֭₡7‫ש‬γ֭7Ḛ่֭֭ผŴк7ОкŴ่7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7+ਙผこֱԱŴ⎯֭₡7bਙ₡֭7ӧ+Աbỏ7ՁŴ่₡7Ⓢ⎯֭7C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠7Ⓢऑਙ่7⑾—ผ‫ש‬γ֭ผฌ
ผ֭⑾ħ่ħ่‫ف‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7+ผ֭こਙ่‫ש‬7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7+Աb7—ऑ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 Ő֭‫—ف‬кŴ‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОкŴ่ⓒ
‫ש‬γħ⎯7 Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ʉħкк7 ⇡֭7 ⑾ਙккਙʉ֭₡7 ⇡ੂ7 Ŵ7 Ő֭▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7 Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7 ʉħкк7 こŴ8֭7 ‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
่֭ʉ7㌱ਙ₡֭7֭⑾⑾֭㌱‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γħ่7+ผ֭こਙ่‫ש‬7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬㈠

Ɔħ่㌱֭ผ֭кੂⓒ

Ҝħ㌱γŴ֭к7Ġਙʉ֭ⓒ7A●bОⓒ7ՁDzDzCֱḚA
่‫ ف‬Ŵ่₡ Ḷ⑾⑾
⑾ ħ㌱֭ ਙ⑾ Ɔ—
ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Ɔ֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ҜŴ่Ŵ‫֭ف‬ผ7ֱ7Ձਙ่‫ف‬7ŐŴ่‫֭ف‬7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่₡7Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7ਙ⑾7Ɔ—⎯‫ש‬Ŵħ่Ŵ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬

ОŐİֱՙㄦฎ″ฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 4g 6eo 91f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 27

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
ZON-75886 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMAN CATHOLIC
BISHOP LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE
ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 55.52 acres at the southeast corner of
Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APNs 125-24-101-001 and 125-24-201-001), Ward 6 (Fiore)
[PRJ-75680]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-75886, WVR-75887 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-75886, WVR-75887 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-75886, WVR-75887 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
4. Photo(s) - ZON-75886, WVR-75887 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
5. Justification Letter - ZON-75886, WVR-75887 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
6. Clark County School District School Tracking Form for ZON-75886 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-
75680]

Page 470 of 1332


Page 471 of 1332
Page 472 of 1332
Page 473 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP LAS
VEGAS

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-75886 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
VAR-75956 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to ZON-75956
conditions:
TMP-75888 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to ZON-75886
conditions: VAR-75956

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 29

NOTICES MAILED 339 - ZON-75886 and VAR-75956


339 - TMP-75888

PROTESTS 0 - ZON-75886 and VAR-75956


0 - TMP-75888

APPROVALS 0 - ZON-75886 and VAR-75956


0 - TMP-75888

NE
Page 474 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75956 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of Rezoning (ZON-75886), approval of and conformance to the Conditions


of Approval for Tentative Map (TMP-75888) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

TMP-75888 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map
is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within
four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. Approval of Rezoning (ZON-75886), approval of and conformance to the Conditions


of Approval for Variance (VAR-75956) shall be required, if approved.

3. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City’s Street Naming
Regulations.

NE
Page 475 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time as Final Map submittal. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the
landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not
impede visibility of any traffic control device. The technical landscape plan shall
include the following changes from the conceptual landscape plan:
• One, 36-inch box shade tree (single trunk) every 20 linear feet with four, five-gallon
shrubs for every required tree within the required six-foot wide landscape buffers
adjacent to Jones Boulevard, Elkhorn Road and Leon Avenue.

5. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

6. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-


interest community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and
Restrictions (“CC&R”), or conveyance of any unit within the community, the
Developer is required to record a Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements
(“DPMR”) as a covenant on all associated properties, and on behalf of all current
and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a listing of all privately owned
and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with assignment of
maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest community or the
respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief description of the
required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The DPMR must
be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations
prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the
community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private
maintenance obligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to
provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of
obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to
submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations.

7. The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking
across the entire subdivision.

8. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State


Subdivision Statutes.

NE
Page 476 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Public Works

9. Dedicate a 25-foot radius on the southeast corner of Jones Boulevard and Elkhorn
Road and dedicate a right turn lane at the Jones Boulevard entrance unless the
approved Traffic Impact Analysis specifically states that the right turn lane is not
required. Additionally, grant a minimum 20-foot wide Public Sewer Easement in
Common Element “C” at the east end of Street “D”. No trees or vegetation taller
than three feet shall be allowed within any Public Sewer Easements.

10. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public
Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage
Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association.

11. Construct complete half street improvements on Jones Boulevard and Elkhorn Road
meeting current City Standards adjacent to this site concurrent with development of
this site. A right turn lane on Jones Boulevard into the subdivision entrance shall
also be constructed unless the approved Traffic Impact Analysis specifically states
that the right turn lane is not required. All existing paving damaged or removed by
this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site.

12. Concurrent with the development of this site, construct full depth pavement, curb,
gutter, sidewalk, and streetlight underground infrastructure on Leon Avenue and
construct a public sewer in Leon Avenue north to Donald Road at a size and location
acceptable to the Sanitary Sewer Section of the Department of Public Works.

13. Streetlights on Leon Avenue are hereby deferred. In accordance with Title
19.02.025.F, the applicant shall make an improvement contribution equal to 50% of
the City’s bond estimate costs for all deferred improvements with the street light
contribution at 25% if a service pedestal is constructed.

14. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

NE
Page 477 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Conditions Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

15. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the public
rights-of-way adjacent to this site prior to the issuance of permits for these
improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the
terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (229-4836).

16. A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of any
units within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major access
streets, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall and
adjacent public street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to
issuance of any building permits beyond 50% of all units within this development.
All off-site improvements adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped
areas between the perimeter walls and adjacent public streets, shall be constructed
and accepted prior to issuance of building permits beyond 75%. The above
thresholds notwithstanding, all required Improvements shall be constructed in
accordance with Title19.02.130.D.

17. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. If
additional rights of way are not required and Traffic Control devices are or may be
proposed at this site outside of the public right of way, all necessary easements for
the location and/or access of such devices shall be granted prior to the issuance of
permits for this site. Phased compliance will be allowed if recommended by the
approved Traffic Impact Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic
Impact Analysis, nor compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate
any condition of approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council
on the development of this site.

NE
Page 478 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Conditions Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

18. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

19. As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be
complied with or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved
performance security method in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.C and
19.02.130.E.

20. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map
is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type
and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and
drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans
by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless
specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the
recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision-related construction plans,
whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute
approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative
Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.

NE
Page 479 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing to develop a 199-lot single-family residential subdivision on


55.52 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard.

ISSUES

• The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site from R-E (Residence Estates)
to R-1 (Single Family Residential). Staff supports this request and is
recommending approval.
• A Variance is requested to allow a Connectivity Ratio of 1.09 where 1.30 is the
minimum required by the Title 19.04 Complete Street Standards. Staff does not
support this request.
• The Department of Public Works denied an administrative request to defer the
installation of right-of-way improvements for the west side of Leon Avenue,
including the curb, gutter, and sidewalk. The applicant is requesting a Waiver to
allow the deferral in order to not install the half-street improvements on the west
side of Leon Avenue adjacent to the subject site. Staff does not support this
request as there are existing improvements directly adjacent to the southeast
corner of the subject site that the applicant is able to match while leaving the east
side of Leon Avenue not improved and “rural” for the residents residing on the east
side of Leon Avenue. The west side of Leon Avenue is improved with sidewalk,
curb and gutter from Deer Springs Way, north to the edge of the subject site. In
addition, half street improvements will be installed for Elkhorn Road in conjunction
with the proposed project if approved, which will also create a point of connection
for these improvements at the northeast corner of the subject site. Due to the
existence of these existing improvements, staff does not support the Waiver
request associated with the Tentative Map and is recommending denial of the
Tentative Map.

ANALYSIS

Rezoning
The subject site is currently zoned R-E (Residence Estates). This zoning designation
requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet in order to provide for low density
residential units located on large lots that convey a rural environment.

NE
Page 480 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject to R-1 (Single Family Residential) which
has a minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet in order to provide for the development of
single family detached dwellings in a suburban setting.

Although the proposed R-1 zoning district would allow a lot size of 6,500 square feet, the
subject site’s General Plan Designation of R (Rural Density Residential) limits the density
to 3.59 dwelling units per acre. With the subject sites overall net acreage being 55.37,
this would limit the applicant to constructing 199 dwelling units.

Staff finds the proposed lot sizes ranging from 6,500 square feet up to 18,877 square feet
are comparable to lot sizes in the area and is recommending approval of the rezoning
application.

Variance
The proposed single-family residential subdivision demonstrates two vehicular access
points, one from Jones Boulevard, the second from Elkhorn Road. This has resulted in a
connectivity ratio of 1.09. Connectivity is a measurement of the diversity of vehicular or
pedestrian options a transportation network provides within and around its transportation
network. The higher the ratio, the more options there are for travelers in a given
neighborhood and the lower the ratio, less options are available. The Connectivity Ratio
is calculated as the ratio of the number of street links (road sections between
intersections) in the development’s street layout divided by the number of street nodes
(intersections and terminations). For comparison purposes, a perfect street grid has a
Connectivity Ratio of 2.0, while a subdivision with only cul-de-sacs has a Connectivity
Ratio of 1.0. Staff supports Title 19.04 for Complete Streets Standards, including section
19.04.040 for Connectivity which requires a minimum Connectivity Ratio of 1.30;
therefore, staff is recommending denial of the Variance request.

Tentative Map
The applicant is proposing to develop a single-family residential subdivision with 199-lots
ranging in size from 6,500 square feet up to 18,877 square feet. The neighborhood
consists of a series of cul-de-sacs, approximately 15 with one stub street.

The submitted north/south and east/west cross sections depict a maximum grade less
than two percent across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a
development with natural slope less than two percent is allowed a maximum four-foot
retaining wall. Although not labeled, it appears there are two retaining walls less than two
feet high along the east and west boundaries.

NE
Page 481 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

On January 31, 2019, the Department of Public Works denied a request to defer the off-
site improvements for Leon Avenue. Due to existing right-of-way improvements
immediately south of the subject site, and improvements to be constructed adjacent to
Elkhorn Road in conjunction with the proposed site if approved, staff finds it is necessary
to complete the right-of-way improvements for this section of Leon Avenue at the time of
construction and denied the request to defer.

Right-of-Way Improvements:
Street Required Provided Compliance
Right-of-way
The applicant is
improvements are
proposing to install
existing with the
the required six-foot
Jones Boulevard exception of the Y
wide landscape
required six-foot wide
buffer back-of-
landscape buffer back-
sidewalk.
of-sidewalk.
Continue existing right-
of-way improvements
from the corner of
The applicant is
Elkhorn Road and
proposing a five-foot
Jones Boulevard east
Elkhorn Road sidewalk with a six- Y
on Elkhorn Road.
foot wide landscape
These improvements
buffer.
consist of a five-foot
wide sidewalk with six
feet of landscaping.
The applicant is
To match existing requesting a Waiver
right-of-way of the curb, sidewalk,
improvement gutter requirement
immediately north and and is proposing to
Leon Avenue south of the subject construct a five-foot N
site which includes a wide D.G.
five-foot wide sidewalk (Decomposed
with a six-foot wide Granite) pathway
landscape buffer. with a six-foot wide
landscape buffer.

NE
Page 482 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

According to the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD), this development requires
two sources of water to serve it due to the number of homes and fire department
connections. The tentative map has identified two points of connection. To comply with
District Service Rules the development will be required to extend main the full frontage of
their development along Leon Avenue or Elkhorn Road per the approved hydraulic
analysis.

FINDINGS (ZON-75886)

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning


Commission or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

If approved, the proposed R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district would
conform to the existing General Plan Designation of R (Rural Density Residential).

2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.

The R-1 zoning district permits single and two-story detached single family homes
which are compatible with the surrounding detached single family homes that exist
today.

3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.

Growth and development factors in the area are similar to those proposed, and staff
finds the rezoning request to be appropriate.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.

Jones Boulevard and Elkhorn Road are adequate in size to provide access to the
proposed 199-lot single family residential subdivision.

NE
Page 483 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (VAR-75956)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a gated, residential
neighborhood that is not connected to the surrounding area through gated pedestrian
pathways and roadways. The use of through streets instead of cul-de-sacs would allow
additional access points to the neighborhood and conformance to the Title 19
requirements for connectivity. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the
site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential
in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


Code Enforcement processed a complaint for high weeds on the west side
12/20/16 of property located at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones
Boulevard. The case was resolved on 01/05/17.

NE
Page 484 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/04/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related building permits or business licenses associated with the subject
site.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal
01/30/19 requirements and deadlines were discussed for the proposed single
family residential subdivision.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff performed a routine field check and observed the subject that is
currently secured by chain link fencing. Nothing of concern was noted
02/28/19 by staff, but staff did note the existing half street improvements including
sidewalk that are in existence directly adjacent to the subject site on the
west side of Leon Avenue.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Gross Acres 55.52

NE
Page 485 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject R (Rural Density
Undeveloped R-E (Residence Estates)
Property Residential)
R-PD3 (Residential
Single Family, R (Rural Density Planned Development – 3
North
Detached Residential) Units Per Acre)
R-E (Residence Estates)
R-PD3 (Residential
Single Family, R (Rural Density
South Planned Development – 3
Detached Residential)
Units Per Acre)
Single Family, R-1 (Single Family
L (Low Density
East Detached Residential)
Residential)
Undeveloped R-E (Residence Estates)
Individual Care
Center DR (Desert Rural
R-E (Residence Estates)
Single Family, Density Residential)
West Detached
RN (Rural R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family,
Neighborhood) Residential District) Clark
Detached
Clark County County

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Centennial Hills Sector Plan Y
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Y
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance Y

NE
Page 486 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply for the proposed R-1 zoning
district:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided
Min. Lot Size 6,500 SF 6,500 SF
Min. Lot Width 60 Feet 65 Feet
Max. Building Height 2 Stories / 35 Feet 2 Stories / 35 Feet
Standard Required/Allowed
Min. Setbacks
• Front 20 Feet
• Side 5 Feet
• Corner 15 Feet
• Rear 15 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage 50%

55.52 acres / 2,418, 451.20 square feet:


Existing Zoning Minimum Lot Size Units Allowed
R-E (Residence Estates) 20,000 SF 121
Proposed Zoning Minimum Lot Size Units Allowed
R-1 (Single Family
6,500 SF 372
Residential)
General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
R (Rural Density
3.59 199
Residential)

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Jones
Primary Arterial Streets and 100 Y
Boulevard
Highways
Master Plan of
Elkhorn Road Primary Arterial Streets and 60 N*
Highways
Leon Avenue Local Title 13 30 N*
*Half street improvements are required adjacent to the subject site. These improvements include
curb, gutter and sidewalk. The applicant is requesting a Waiver to not install these required
improvements adjacent to the subject site along Leon Avenue.

NE
Page 487 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element # Links # Nodes
Internal Street 38
Intersection – Internal 19
Cul-de-sac / Stub Street Terminus 16
Total 38 35
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes): 1.30 1.09

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Single
2 Per
Family, 199 398
Unit
Detached
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 398 398 Y*
*The applicant is proposing a single-family residence with an attached two-car garage for each
lot.

Clark County School District:


Proposed Detached Single Family Residential Neighborhood:
Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School
Single-Family Units 199 x 0.196 199 x 0.101 199 x 0.137
Total Additional Students 39 20 27
Schools Serving the Area:
Name Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date
Kay Carl 5625
Kindergarten 670
Elementary Corbett th 821 Students 03/01/19
– 5 Grade Students
School Street
Anthony
8101 North
Saville 6th – 8th 1,581
Torrey 1,633 Students 03/01/19
Middle Grade Students
Pines Drive
School
Shadow
5050 Brent 9th - 12th 2,559
Ridge High 3,113 Students 03/01/19
Lane Grade Students
School
Kay Carl Elementary School, Saville Middle School and Centennial High School are over
capacity for the 2018-19 school year. Carl Elementary School is 122.54 percent, Saville
Middle School is 103.29 percent and Shadow Ridge High School is 121.65 percent of
program capacity.

NE
Page 488 of 1332
ZON-75886, VAR-75956 and TMP-75888 [PRJ-75680]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Department of Public Works Traffic Study:


Tentative Map for a Proposed 44-Unit Single Family Residential Development -
Bradley and 215
Proposed Use
Average Daily SINGLE
9.44 1,879
Traffic (ADT) FAMILY
199
AM Peak Hour DETACHED 0.74 147
PM Peak Hour [DU] 0.99 197
Existing Traffic on Nearby Streets
Elkhorn Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,510
PM Peak Hour (Heaviest 60 Minutes) 601
Jones Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 14,721
PM Peak Hour (heaviest 60 minutes) 275
Traffic Capacity of Adjacent Streets:
Adjacent Street ADT Capacity
Elkhorn Road 16,380
Jones Boulevard 35,490
Summary
This project will add approximately 1,879 trips per day on Elkhorn Road, Jones
Boulevard and Leon Avenue. Currently, Elkhorn Road is at approximately 46 percent
of capacity and Jones Boulevard is at approximately 41 percent of capacity. With this
project, Elkhorn Road is expected to be at approximately 57 percent of capacity and
Jones Boulevard is expected to be at approximately 47 percent of capacity. Traffic
counts are not available for Leon Avenue, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 197 additional
cars, or about three every minute.

NE
Page 489 of 1332
ㅡ ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 490 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 491 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 492 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 493 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 494 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 495 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 496 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 497 of 1332


Page 498 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 499 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 500 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 501 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 502 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 503 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 504 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 505 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 506 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 507 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 508 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 509 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 510 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 511 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 512 of 1332
+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



Page 513 of 1332


+'
 '"

+%
#

 $'
#


 



<

%


 
=
 
#
#

< #



ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 1eo 41f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 1eo 51f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 1eo 61f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 1eo 71f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 1eo 81f 3 3 2
Real Property Management School Development Tracking Form
1180 Military Tribute Place
Henderson, Nv. 89074 http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property

Date Filed Application Number Entity


Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Mobile Fax Email

Project Name

Project Description

APN's

Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School


Single-Family Units (1) x 0.196 = x 0.101 = x 0.137 =
Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.140 = x 0.058 = x 0.064 =
Resort Condo Units (3)
Total

(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD

Schools Serving the Area*


Name Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date

* CCSD Comments

Approved Disapproved

Page 519 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 28

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75956 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-75886 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP LAS VEGAS - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW A 1.09 CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS REQUIRED on 55.52 acres at the
southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APNs 125-24-101-001 and 125-24-201-
001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6
(Fiore) [PRJ-75680]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 520 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 521 of 1332


ㅡ ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 2eo 21f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 2eo 31f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 29

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
TMP-75888 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO ZON-75886 AND WVR-75887 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP LAS VEGAS - For possible
action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED 199-LOT SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW NO INTERIOR STREETLIGHTS ON
PRIVATE STREETS AND TO ALLOW NON-STANDARD PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS
INCLUDING NO CURB, GUTTER OR SIDEWALK ON LEON AVENUE WHERE SUCH IS
REQUIRED on 55.52 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Jones Boulevard (APNs
125-24-101-001 and 125-24-201-001), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single
Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75680]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

C.C.: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 524 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 525 of 1332


ㅡ ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 526 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 527 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 528 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 529 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
xธ゜ธ‫ں゜ں‬ɱ

Page 530 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 531 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 532 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 533 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 534 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎx
x̶゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 535 of 1332


TMP 75888
Roman Catholic Bishop Las Vegas

SEC Elkhorn Road & Jones Boulevard


Proposed 199 unit single family residential development.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.44 1,879


AM Peak Hour SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DU] 199 0.74 147
PM Peak Hour 0.99 197
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Elkhorn Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,510
PM Peak Hour 601
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Jones Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 14,721
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:

Adjacent street ADT


Capacity
Elkhorn Road 16,380
Jones Boulevard 35,490

This project will add approximately 1,879 trips per day on Elkhorn Rd., Jones Blvd and Leon Ave. Currently, Elkhorn is at
about 46 percent of capacity and Jones is at about 41 percent of capacity. With this project, Elkhorn is expected to be at
about 57 percent of capacity and Jones is expected to be at about 47 percent of capacity. Counts are not available for Leon,
but it is believed to be under capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 197 additional cars, or about three every minute.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 536 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 30

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75808 - VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-75807 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
HARRIS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW SEVEN PARKING SPACES WHERE NINE ARE REQUIRED FOR A DAILY LABOR
SERVICE on 0.17 acres at 444 East Sahara Avenue (APN 162-03-416-026), C-1 (Limited
Commercial), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75616]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]

Page 537 of 1332


Page 538 of 1332
Page 539 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: HARRIS INVESTMENT HOLDINGS,
LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75808 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to SUP-75807
conditions:
SUP-75807 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75808
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 18

NOTICES MAILED 470 - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807

PROTESTS 0 - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807

APPROVALS 0 - VAR-75808 and SUP-75807

CC
Page 540 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75808 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-75807) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SUP-75807 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Daily
Labor Services use.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75808) shall be required.

CC
Page 541 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CC
Page 542 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing to conduct a Daily Labor Services use at 444 East Sahara
Avenue. The site currently contains a 2,300 square-foot vacant building. Some interior
tenant improvements will be carried out as part of the project. There are no plans to
increase the floor area of the existing building.

ISSUES

• A Special Use Permit is required for a Daily Labor Services use within the C-1
(Limited Commercial) zoning district.
• A Variance has been requested to allow zero additional parking spaces where two
are required for a parking-impaired development; staff does not support this request.

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed a Daily Labor Services use at 444 East Sahara Avenue,
which currently contains a 2,300 square-foot vacant building which is zoned C-1 (Limited
Commercial).

Daily Labor Services is a permitted use in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district with
an approved Special Use Permit. Title 19.12 defines the Daily Labor Service use as “Any
building or premises which serves as a staging point or gathering place for persons who
are seeking immediate employment in daily labor activities and who accept or are
assigned such employment in accordance with whatever employment is available on that
particular day. For purposes of this paragraph, “daily labor” means manual labor,
including without limitation, construction cleanup, garbage pickup and removal,
demolition, convention setup and takedown, landscaping, planting and digging.”

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements include:

* 1. The use must be located on a primary or secondary thoroughfare.

Sahara Avenue is identified as a Primary Arterial on the Master Plan of Streets and
Highways Master Plan, complying with this requirement.

CC
Page 543 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

2. The use shall not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school,
individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, City park, or residential
zoning district.

The proposed use not within 400 feet of the listed protected land uses and complies
with this requirement.

* 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to the hours between sunrise and sunset.

Conformance to the Minimum Requirements in Title 19.12 for a Daily Labor Services
use is to be conditioned in any issued Special Use Permit.

* 4. Signage must be posted on the premises indicating that loitering on the premises is
not allowed. The signage may not exceed 4 square feet in size.

Conformance to the Minimum Requirements in Title 19.12 for a Daily Labor Services
use is to be conditioned in any issued Special Use Permit.

* 5. Persons who are seeking employment must wait for employment within a fully-
enclosed structure or an area screened from public view.

The proposed use will be conducted entirely within the existing building, thereby
complying with this requirement.

A review of files pertaining to 444 East Sahara Avenue was unable to locate a plot plan
or site plan showing the configuration and number of parking spaces on site related to
former approved uses. The most recent business license issued on site was for a
Contractor’s office; Title 19.12 requires one space for each 300 square feet of gross floor
area for an Office, Other than Listed. A 2,300 square-foot building is contained on the
subject site, generating a parking requirement of eight spaces.

Daily Labor Services has an on-site parking requirement of one space for each 250
square feet of gross floor area. The proposed use will occupy 2,300 square feet of gross
floor area, thereby generating ten required parking spaces; the submitted plans show
provision of seven parking spaces. Each of the seven parking spaces shown on the site
plan reverse onto the right-of-way (five spaces onto Sahara Avenue and two spaces onto
Santa Rosa Avenue) and do not comply with the parking design and access requirements
in Title 19.08.110. According to aerial map records, the parking layout has been in place
since records began in 1990.

CC
Page 544 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

In the absence of information relating to the parking arrangements of prior uses on the
subject site, the site is considered to be parking-impaired. The most recent use, a
Contractor’s office, generates a parking requirement of eight spaces; the proposed Daily
Labor Services use generates a parking requirement of ten spaces. As such, a Variance
is being sought to provide zero additional spaces where two spaces are required.

The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) provided the following comments in
relation to the proposed development: “This parcel is currently served by LVVWD but the
service does not have the backflow prevention assembly required for the proposed use
per NAC 445A.67195. Backflow retrofit is required to bring this property into compliance
with state regulations. Developer’s contractor to contact LVVWD Project Support Team
for a backflow retrofit permit.”

FINDINGS (VAR-75808)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a land use that requires
additional parking on the subject site. A less intense land use would allow conformance
with Title 19 parking requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by
the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is
preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting
of Variances.

CC
Page 545 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (SUP-75807)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed Daily Labor Services development is not compatible with adjacent
development as evidenced by the Variance required for reduced parking.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The on-site parking provisions proposed for the proposed Daily Labor Services use
do not comply with the requirements of Title 19.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

The proposed Daily Labor Services development will maintain access from Sahara
Avenue, a primary arterial, and Santa Rosa Avenue, a local street; both roads
comply with the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and Title 13 respectively.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.

If approved, the proposed Daily Labor Services development will be subject to


building permit review, construction inspection and licensing to assure that the
public health, safety and general welfare are protected.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed daily labor services use complies with all minimum Special Use
Permit requirements. However, the use does not comply with the on-site parking
requirements per Title 19.12. Based on the above findings, staff recommends
denial.

CC
Page 546 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Commission approved a Rezoning (Z-0034-64) from R-2 to P-R on
04/15/64 property generally located on the northwest corner of Sahara Avenue and
Santa Rosa Drive.
The City Commission approved a Rezoning (Z-0065-65) from R-2 (Two
Family Residence) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on property generally
located on the northwest corner of Sahara Avenue and Santa Rosa Drive. A
11/03/66
condition was imposed requiring that the use of the site be restricted to a
women’s apparel use; the condition was later reviewed and removed by the
Planning Commission on 07/10/80.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Variance (V-0054-
80) to allow seven parking spaces for a proposed restaurant where 14 are
07/24/80
required at 444 E Sahara Avenue. A request for a one year extension of time
was granted by the Board of Zoning Adjustment of 01/22/81.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Variance (V-0136-
84) to allow a new car dealership for the sale of customized limousines
12/27/84
(maximum of five on display) where new car dealerships are not permitted at
444 E Sahara Avenue.
The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved a request for a Variance (V-0070-
85) to allow a new car dealership for the sale of new luxury automobiles
07/30/85 (maximum of five on display) where a previous Variance permitted a new car
dealership for the sale of customized limousines only at 444 E Sahara
Avenue.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


09/27/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

CC
Page 547 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (C25-00083) was issued for a Contractor at 444 E Sahara
01/17/07
Avenue. The permit became inactive on 11/08/16.
A business license (C25-04362) was issued for a Contractor at 444 E Sahara
03/25/13
Avenue. The permit became inactive on 09/12/14.
A business license (G64-03967) was issued for a Contractor at 444 E Sahara
06/07/16
Avenue. The permit became inactive on 10/28/18.

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application Meeting was conducted to discuss the submittal
01/16/19
requirements for a Variance and Special Use Permit with the applicant.

Field Check
02/28/19 A vacant building was observed on site during a field check.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.17

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject SC (Service
Vacant C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Property Commercial)
Single Family, R-2 (Medium-Low Density
North ML (Medium Low)
Attached (Duplex) Residential)
CT (Commercial
Multi-Family H-1 (Limited Resort and
South Tourist) – Clark
Residential Apartment) – Clark County
County
Multi-Family R-4 (High Density
East C (Commercial)
Residential Residential)
SC (Service
West Retail C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Commercial)

CC
Page 548 of 1332
VAR-75808 and SUP-75807 [PRJ-75616]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


Beverly Green/Southridge Neighborhood Plan Y
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 175 Feet Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Y
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance Y

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Major Roads and
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial Highways Master 140 Y
Plan
Santa Rosa
Local Street Title 13 50 Y
Avenue

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Daily Labor
2,300 SF 1/250 SF 10
Services
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 10 7 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 9 1 6 1 N*
Percent Deviation 20%
*The subject site has been determined to be parking impaired per Title 19.18.030.

CC
Page 549 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫ں‬″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 550 of 1332


‫ں‬ฎֱx̶ՙ7 ОŐḶİDzb╗7CA╗A7 ӧb●╗ù7Ḷ+7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆỏฌ

bⓈŐŐDzЌ╗7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7 bֱ‫ں‬7ӧՁ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁỏฌ

CDzƆ●ŐDzC7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7 bֱ‫ں‬7ӧՁ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁỏฌ
ŐDzỢƥC7 ОŐḶЋ㈠ฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ƆDz╗ԱAbìƆ̬ฌ +ŐḶЌ╗ฌ ‫ں‬xƥֱxफ7 ㄦㅡƥֱㅡफ7ӧЌỏฌ
AՁՁ7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ bḶŐЌDzŐฌ ‫ں‬xƥֱxफ7 ธxƥֱxफฌ
Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ
bਙ₡֭7bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ա—ħк₡ฌ

●Ќ╗㈠7Ɔ●CDzฌ ‫ں‬xƥֱxफฌ ㄦƥֱxफ7ӧÛỏฌ


ŐDzAŐฌ ธxƥֱxफฌ ธธƥֱxफ7ӧƆỏฌ

AbbDzƆƆḶŐƥƆ7ОAŐbDzՁฌ ‫ں‬″ธֱx̶ֱㅡ‫ں‬″ֱxธ″ฌ
ʉʉʉ㈠8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬ฌ
ЌDz╗7Ɔ●╗Dz7AŐDzAฌ ए7 ՙⓒㄦ‫ں‬ธ7Ɔ㈠+㈠ฌ
‫ں‬″ธֱx̶ֱㅡ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ں‬ฎฌ ‫ں‬″ธֱx̶ֱㅡ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ں‬ՙฌ एฌ x㈠‫ں‬ՙ7AbŐDzƆฌ ″ㄦฎㄦ7Dz⎯㌱ਙ่₡ħ₡ਙ7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬ⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7Cฌ
ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ̬7Őֱธฌ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ̬7Őֱธฌ CDzЌƆ●╗ù7 एฌ ҜAṲ㈠̬ฌ ㄦx゜7AbŐDz7 Ab╗ⓈAՁ̬7 ̶x㈠″゜7AbŐDzฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ77ฎɱ‫ںں‬ɱฌ

ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ĠDz●ḚĠ╗ฌ ए7 AՁՁḶÛAԱՁDz7 ОŐḶЋ●CDzCฌ


╗AԱՁDz7‫ں‬ɱ㈠xฎ㈠xՙxฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7 ‫ں‬ㅡƥֱxफ7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
Ћ●b╗ḶŐ7ìЌ●ḚĠ╗ฌ ԱŐ●AЌ7ÛḶՁ+Dzฌ
ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ùฌ ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦธㅡֱฎ̶‫ں‬ㅡฌ ӧՙxธỏ7ㅡ″‫̶ֱں‬ՙɱฎฌ
Ձ●ЌDzฌ ‫ﭨ‬8่ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬㌀8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬7 ⇡ʉਙк⑾֭㌀8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬ฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ̬ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠDzCƆฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ฎƥĠ7bҜⓈ7ÛAՁՁฌ ธⓒ̶xx7Ɔ㈠+㈠7ӧDzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚỏฌ
╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ ╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќ7 ОAŐì●ЌḚ̬ฌ

ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7ОAŐì●ЌḚ̬ฌ
Ḷ++●bDz゜7CAù7ՁAԱḶŐ̬7 ‫゜ں‬7ธㄦx7Ɔ+7 ธⓒ̶xx゜7ธㄦx7777ए7ɱฌ
ḶĠО DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ฎƥĠ7ÛŐḶⓈḚĠ╗ฌ
Ḷ ĠḶ ĠО ●ŐḶЌ7ḚA╗DzƆ7ִ7+DzЌbDz7╗Ḷฌ
О
ḶĠ
О ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ
ḶĠ ḶĠ
О О ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7ОAŐì●ЌḚ̬ฌ ฎ7ƆОAbDzƆฌ

‫ں‬ฌ

ḶĠ
О ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz̬ฌ ‫ں‬ฌ

ธxƥֱxफฌ
ḶĠО ‫ں‬ฎƥֱxफฌ ㄦ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7ӧDzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќỏฌ

ŐDzAŐฌ

ธ‫ں‬ƥֱธ फฌ
Ḷ ĠО

ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
ธ7ЌDzÛฌ
ḶĠ ḶĠОฌ
О
ЋAŐ●AЌbDz7ŐDzỢⓈDzƆ╗DzC7+ḶŐ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzCⓈb╗●ḶЌฌ
ḶĠ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ОA╗●Ḷฌ
Оฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7CŐ●ЋDzÛAùฌ
bḶЋDzŐ7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ
╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ
ḶĠ
Оฌ ЌḶ7ՁḶ●╗DzŐ●ЌḚ7Ɔ●ḚЌ7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7bḶЌƆО●bⓈḶⓈƆՁù7ОḶƆ╗DzC7ḶЌ7Ɔ●╗Dzฌ

ɱƥֱxफฌ
ОŐḶОḶƆDzCฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚฌ
ӧธ7ƆОAbDzƆỏฌ

ɱƥֱxफฌ
DzAƆ╗ฌ
Ɔ╗㈠7ՁḶⓈ●Ɔฌ

77C7Ő7●7Ћ7Dzฌ
AЋDzЌⓈDzฌ

ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ùฌ ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ЌDzÛฌ

ìฌ
Ձ●ЌDzฌ DzЌ╗ŐAЌbDzฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ธⓒ̶xx7Ɔ+ฌ DzAƆ╗ฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7╗Ḷฌ ƆAĠAŐAฌ
ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ AЋDzЌⓈDzฌ

●ЌḚ7Ɔ●CDzÛAՁ
77Ő7Ḷ7Ɔ7Aฌ
Ձ●ЌDz7Ḷ+7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ
Ɔ●╗Dzฌ
ԱDzՁḶÛฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗
Ձ●ЌDz7Ḷ+7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ DzAƆ╗ฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ŐḶḶ+7╗ḶОฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ŐḶḶ+7╗ḶОฌ
‫ں‬ฌ ḶЋDzŐĠAЌḚฌ
″ƥ̶ֱฌफฌ ҜDzbĠAЌ●bAՁ7ⓈЌ●╗ฌ ҜDzbĠAЌ●bAՁ7ⓈЌ●╗7 CDzƆDzŐ╗7●ЌЌฌ
ธฌ
ŐḶACฌ

ƆḶⓈ╗Ġฌ ƆAЌ╗Aฌ ƆḶⓈ╗Ġฌ

Ɔ7A7Ќ7╗7Aฌ
‫ں‬xƥֱxफฌ ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆฌ ŐḶƆAฌ ҜAŐùՁAЌCฌ
Ɔ●CDzฌ ธ‫ں‬ƥֱɱफฌ ԱՁЋCฌ CŐ●ЋDzฌ ОAŐìÛAùฌ
ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ

‫ں‬x ƥֱxफฌ
Ɔ ●CDzฌ
ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7CŐ●ЋDzÛAùฌ
╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ОAŐì●ЌḚฌ

‫ں‬ฌ

ӧㄦ7ƆОAbDzƆỏฌ
ฎƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ㄦƥֱㄦफฌ

ธㅡƥֱ″ फ7
‫ں‬ฎƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬″ธֱx̶ֱㅡ‫ں‬″ֱxธㄦฌ
ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ̬7bֱ‫ں‬ฌ

‫ں‬xƥֱxफฌ
+ŐḶЌ╗ฌ
ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ

Page 551 of 1332


●่‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7Ő֭こਙ₡֭кฌ
ㅡㅡㅡ7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ77ฎɱ‫ ں‬xㅡฌ

AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ŐḶⓈ╗Dzฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ●CDzÛAՁì7 DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ●CDzÛAՁìฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ùฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7CŐ●ЋDzÛAùฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7CŐ●ЋDzÛAùฌ


Ɔ●ḚЌAḚDz7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ ╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ ╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

Dz7A7Ɔ7╗7 7Ɔ7A7Ġ7A7Ő7A777A7Ћ7Dz7Ќ7Ⓢ7Dzฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ

ŐDzЋ●Ɔ●ḶЌƆฌ

ЌḶŐ╗Ġฌ
CA╗
CA╗Dz̬ฌ x̶7ƆDzО7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌ7 İḶԱ
İḶԱ7ЌḶ̬ฌ ‫ں‬ฎֱx̶ՙฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫ں‬फ7ए7‫ں‬xƥֱxफฌ
CŐAÛЌ̬ฌ
CŐA

bĠDz
bĠDzbìDzC̬ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫ں‬″ ƆĠDzDz╗7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐฌ

xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
A‫ ں‬㈠xฌ
A
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ╗ḶЌDzฌ
╗●ՁDz7bḶЋDzŐDzCฌ
DzЌ╗Őù7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆՁA╗Dzฌ
Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ
bਙ₡֭7bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ա—ħк₡ฌ

╗●ՁDz7ҜAЌƆAŐC7╗Ḷฌ
ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

ʉʉʉ㈠8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬ฌ

″ㄦฎㄦ7Dz⎯㌱ਙ่₡ħ₡ਙ7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬ⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7Cฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ77ฎɱ‫ںں‬ɱฌ

‫̶ں‬ƥֱฎफฌ
Ћ●b╗ḶŐ7ìЌ●ḚĠ╗ฌ ԱŐ●AЌ7ÛḶՁ+Dzฌ

‫ں‬ธƥֱㅡफฌ
ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦธㅡֱฎ̶‫ں‬ㅡฌ ӧՙxธỏ7ㅡ″‫̶ֱں‬ՙɱฎฌ
‫ﭨ‬8่ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬㌀8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬7 ⇡ʉਙк⑾֭㌀8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬ฌ

ฎƥֱxफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ╗ḶЌDzฌ
╗●ՁDz7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

″ƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ
ธƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
‫ں‬7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ҜDzbĠAЌ●bAՁ7ⓈЌ●╗ฌ
╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆՁA╗Dzฌ
╗●ՁDz7ҜAЌƆAŐC7╗Ḷฌ
ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

‫ں‬ธƥֱㅡफฌ
ฎƥֱxफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7DzṲ╗㈠ฌ

ՙƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ
bDzҜDzЌ╗7ОՁAƆ╗DzŐฌ
╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ธ7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆՁA╗Dzฌ
╗●ՁDz7ҜAЌƆAŐC7╗Ḷฌ
ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ОA╗●Ḷฌ
bḶЋDzŐ7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

Page 552 of 1332


●่‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7Ő֭こਙ₡֭кฌ
ㅡㅡㅡ7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ77ฎɱ‫ ں‬xㅡฌ

‫̶ں‬ƥֱฎफฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱㅡफฌ
ฎƥֱxफฌ
DzAƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
̶7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ╗ḶЌDzฌ
╗●ՁDz7bḶЋDzŐDzCฌ
DzЌ╗Őù7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆՁA╗Dzฌ
╗●ՁDz7ҜAЌƆAŐC7╗Ḷฌ
ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ

ŐDzЋ●Ɔ●ḶЌƆฌ

‫ں‬ธƥֱㅡफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ╗ḶЌDzฌ CA╗
CA╗Dz̬7 x̶7ƆDzО7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ

ՙƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ
╗●ՁDz7╗Ḷ7ŐDzҜA●Ќฌ
İḶԱ
İḶԱ7ЌḶ̬ฌ ‫ں‬ฎֱx̶ՙฌ

CŐAÛЌ̬ฌ
CŐA

bĠDz
bĠDzbìDzC̬ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫ں‬″ ƆĠDzDz╗7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐฌ
ÛDzƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7
ㅡ7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
A̶㈠xฌ
A
ㅡธƥֱ‫ںں‬7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ
bਙ₡֭7bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ա—ħк₡ฌ

‫ں‬ㅡƥֱɱफ7 ‫ں‬ฎƥֱ‫ںں‬7‫゜ں‬ธफ7 ɱƥ̶ֱफฌ

ʉʉʉ㈠8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬ฌ

″ㄦฎㄦ7Dz⎯㌱ਙ่₡ħ₡ਙ7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬ⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7Cฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ77ฎɱ‫ںں‬ɱฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ
Ћ●b╗ḶŐ7ìЌ●ḚĠ╗ฌ ԱŐ●AЌ7ÛḶՁ+Dzฌ


ɱƥֱՙफฌ
ՁDz ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦธㅡֱฎ̶‫ں‬ㅡฌ ӧՙxธỏ7ㅡ″‫̶ֱں‬ՙɱฎฌ
ֱxफ7b
ㄦƥ
‫ﭨ‬8่ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬㌀8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬7 ⇡ʉਙк⑾֭㌀8ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬ฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚDzฌ
ŐDzƆ╗ŐḶḶҜฌ
‫ں‬xㄦฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠḶÛŐḶḶҜ7 DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠḶÛŐḶḶҜฌ ‫ں‬x″ฌ

ḶОDzЌฌ ㅡฎफÛゥ7̶″फĠ7ોㅡฎफฌ
Ḷ++●bDzฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆḶ++●╗ฌ ‫ں‬xㅡฌ
AԱḶЋDzฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ḷ++●bDzฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆḶ++●╗ฌ
AԱḶЋDzฌ

̶″फÛゥ7̶″फĠ7ોㅡฎफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠḶÛŐḶḶҜฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆḶ++●╗ฌ
AԱḶЋDzฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7DzЌ╗Őù゜7+ḶùDzŐ7 ŐDzbDzО╗●ḶЌฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠḶÛŐḶḶҜฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7bḶЋDzŐDzCฌ DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7bḶЋDzŐDzCฌ
‫ں‬xธฌ
ОA╗●Ḷฌ ОA╗●Ḷฌ

ㄦㅡƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ
‫ں‬ธxफÛゥ7̶″फĠ7ોㄦxफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆḶ++●╗ฌ
AԱḶЋDzฌ

ḶОDzЌฌ
Ḷ++●bDzฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠḶÛŐḶḶҜฌ ‫ں‬xxAฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆḶ++●╗ฌ ՁḶԱԱùฌ
AԱḶЋDzฌ ‫ں‬xxฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ḷ++●bDzฌ

̶″फÛゥ7̶″फĠ7ોㅡฎफฌ
̶ƥֱxफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆḶ++●╗ฌ
AԱḶЋDzฌ

Page 553 of 1332


●่‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7Ő֭こਙ₡֭кฌ
ㅡㅡㅡ7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ77ฎɱ‫ ں‬xㅡฌ

ԱŐAЌbĠฌ
̶″फÛゥ7̶″फĠ7ોㅡฎफฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠḶÛŐḶḶҜ7 DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ƆĠḶÛŐḶḶҜฌ ҜAЌAḚDzŐฌ


‫ں‬x̶ฌ

‫̶ں‬ƥֱธफฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ՁDz
फ7b
ㄦ ƥֱx
ԱŐDzAì7ŐḶḶҜฌ

DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ
ՙƥֱ‫ںں‬फฌ

ՙƥֱxफฌ

ŐDzƆ╗ŐḶḶҜ7 ŐDzƆ╗ŐḶḶҜฌ
‫ں‬x‫ں‬ฌ

‫ں‬ㅡƥֱɱफฌ

‫ں‬″ƥֱՙफ7 ‫ںں‬ƥֱՙफ7 ㄦƥֱ″7‫゜ں‬ธफ7 ɱƥ̶ֱफฌ


ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7 ЌḶŐ╗Ġฌ
ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ֱ7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ֱ7ЌDzÛ7ÛḶŐìฌ
‫ں‬7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफ7 ธ7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ
ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌฌ
CDzҜḶՁ●╗●ḶЌ7ִ
ЌDzÛฌ

ŐDzЋ●Ɔ●ḶЌƆฌ

CA╗
CA╗Dz̬ฌ x̶7ƆDzО7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ

İḶԱ
İḶԱ7ЌḶ̬ฌ ‫ں‬ฎֱx̶ՙฌ

CŐA
CŐAÛЌ̬ฌ

bĠDz
bĠDzbìDzC̬ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫ں‬″ ƆĠDzDz╗7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐฌ

xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Aธ㈠xฌ
A
Page 554 of 1332
 "
 ' '

 
#

"

 
 


#%


&&&

 




Page 555 of 1332
 "
 ' '

 
#

"

 
 


#%


&&&

 




Page 556 of 1332
 "
 ' '

 
#

"

 
 


#%


&&&

 




Page 557 of 1332


 "
 ' '

 
#

"

 
 


#%


&&&

 




7 ʉ₡‫ف‬7777Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭77777C֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ա—ħк₡7777bਙ₡֭7bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬
7 İⓈƆ╗●+●bA╗●ḶЌ7ՁDz╗╗DzŐ

İŴ่—Ŵผੂ7ธธⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯
ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่₡7Ύਙ่ħ่‫ف‬ฌ

╗ਙ7Ûγਙこ7●‫ש‬7ҜŴੂ7bਙ่㌱֭ผ่̬

╗γ֭7⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7İ—⎯‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ձ֭‫֭שש‬ผ7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡7₡ผŴʉħ่‫⎯ف‬7Ŵผ֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7⑾ਙผ7ੂਙ—ผ7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ŵ่₡7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ⊿

Ő֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬
╗γħ⎯7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ħ⎯7⎯—⇡こħ‫֭שש‬₡7⑾ਙผ7bਙ่₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7Ⓢ⎯֭7О֭ผこħ‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7ЋŴผħŴ่㌱֭7⑾ਙผ7ОŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7Ő֭₡—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7╗่֭Ŵ่‫ש‬ฌ
●こऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7⑾ਙผ7—⎯֭7Ŵ⎯7Ŵ7CŴੂ7ՁŴ⇡ਙผ7Ɔ֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭⎯7⇡—⎯ħ่֭⎯⎯㈠

Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7C֭⎯㌱ผħऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
╗γħ⎯7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ⎯‫⎯ש‬7ਙ⑾7Ŵ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ਙֱ่֭⎯‫ש‬ਙผੂ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ่7่֭㌱кਙ⎯֭₡7ผ֭Ŵผ7ੂŴผ₡7Ŵ่₡7⑾ਙ—ผ7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7Ŵ่₡7ਙ่֭ฌ
Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭㈠7+ਙ—ผ7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ʉħкк7⇡֭7Ŵ₡₡֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7⎯ħ₡֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬㈠7╗γ֭7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7ʉħкк7⇡֭7ผ֭こਙ₡֭к֭₡ฌ
‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ㌱㌱ਙここਙ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡7—⎯֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7่֭ʉ7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭⎯ⓒ7ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ผਙਙこ7Ŵ่₡7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫ف‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵผ֭Ŵ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γਙ⎯֭7⎯֭֭8ħ่‫ف‬7CŴੂ7ՁŴ⇡ਙผ7֭こऑкਙੂこ่֭‫ש‬㈠ฌ
Ќਙ7㌱γŴ่‫⎯֭ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥ‫֭ש‬ผħਙผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵผ֭7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7‫ש‬ħこ֭㈠
╗γ֭7⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7⑾ħк֭₡7ħ่7㌱ਙ่㈾—่㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7к֭‫֭שש‬ผ̬
‫ں‬㈠7 bਙ่₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7Ⓢ⎯֭7О֭ผこħ‫ש‬7⑾ਙผ7CŴੂ7ՁŴ⇡ਙผ7Ɔ֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭⎯
ธ㈠7 ЋŴผħŴ่㌱֭7⑾ਙผ7ОŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7Ő֭₡—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7⑾ผਙこ7ɱ7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7ՙ7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡㈠

●่‫ש่֭ש‬
7 ╗ਙ7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ħ่7⎯—㌱γ7Ŵ7こŴ่่֭ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7Ŵ7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫ف‬ħ่‫ف‬7ऑਙħ่‫ש‬7⑾ਙผ7ऑ֭ผ⎯ਙ่⎯7⎯֭֭8ħ่‫ف‬7ħここ֭₡ħŴ‫֭ש‬ฌ
֭こऑкਙੂこ่֭‫ש‬7ħ่7₡Ŵħкੂ7кŴ⇡ਙผ7Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7Ŵ⎯7₡֭⎯㌱ผħ⇡֭₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Ⓢ่ħ⑾ħ֭₡7C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7bਙ₡֭ⓒฌ
Ɔ֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ں‬ɱ㈠‫ں‬ธ㈠xՙxฌ
7 ╗ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7Ŵ7こŴผ8֭‫ש‬Ŵ⇡к֭7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉħкк7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬Ŵผħ֭‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7֭こऑкਙੂこ่֭‫ש‬7ਙऑऑਙผ‫่—ש‬ħ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7Ŵ่₡7⇡֭7Ŵฌ
‫ف‬ਙਙ₡7่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผ7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—ผผਙ—่₡ħ่‫ف‬7㌱ਙここ—่ħ‫ੂש‬㈠
7 ╗γ֭7㌱кħ่֭‫֭ש‬к֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7⇡—⎯ħ่֭⎯⎯7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴккੂ7₡ਙ7่ਙ‫ש‬7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭ħผ7ਙʉ่7‫֭ﭨ‬γħ㌱к֭⎯7Ŵ่₡7ผ֭кੂ7ਙ่7ऑ—⇡кħ㌱7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯ऑਙผ‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠
7 ╗γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7㌱ਙ่₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7₡ਙ7่ਙ‫ש‬7Ŵккਙʉ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ₡֭‫—׀‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7่—こ⇡֭ผ7ਙ⑾7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
⎯‫ש‬Ŵкк⎯㈠7╗γ֭7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7ħ⎯7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭こŴħ่7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ƆŴγŴผŴ7⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7ħ่7Ŵ㌱㌱ਙผ₡Ŵ่㌱֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผħ่‫ف‬ฌ
⇡—⎯ħ่֭⎯⎯֭⎯㈠

Ћ֭ผੂ7‫ש‬ผ—кੂ7ੂਙ—ผ⎯ⓒ

Ћħ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ7ì่ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬ⓒ7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬

″ㄦฎㄦ7Dz⎯㌱ਙ่₡ħ₡ਙ7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬ⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7C7777777777777777ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ77Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ777ฎɱ‫ ں ں‬ɱ777777777ʉʉʉ㈠ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬
ʉʉʉ㈠ʉ₡‫ف‬㈠่֭‫ש‬
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫ں‬″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 5eo 81f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 31

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SUP-75807 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: HARRIS
INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR
A PROPOSED 2,300 SQUARE-FOOT DAILY LABOR SERVICE at 444 East Sahara Avenue
(APN 162-03-416-026), C-1 (Limited Commercial), Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75616]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 559 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 560 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″‫ں‬″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 5g 6eo 11f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 32

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75819 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO HAVE A
HEIGHT OF THREE STORIES WHERE TWO STORIES IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED ON LOT
ONE on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur
Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear)
[PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-
75823 [PRJ-75700]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-
75823 [PRJ-75700]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-
75823 [PRJ-75700]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-
75700]

Page 562 of 1332


Page 563 of 1332
Page 564 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75819 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
VAR-75820 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
VAR-75821 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
SDR-75822 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75819
conditions: VAR-75820
VAR-75821
TMP-75823 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75819
conditions: VAR-75820
VAR-75821
SDR-75822

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 18

NOTICES MAILED 403 - VAR-75819 and VAR-75820


403 - VAR-75821 and SDR-75822
403 - TMP-75823

PROTESTS 0 - VAR-75819 and VAR-75820


0 - VAR-75821 and SDR-75822
0 - TMP-75823

APPROVALS 0 - VAR-75819 and VAR-75820


0 - VAR-75821 and SDR-75822
0 - TMP-75823

JB
Page 565 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75819 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75820), Variance (VAR-75821), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75822) and
Tentative Map (TMP-75823) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

VAR-75820 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75819), Variance (VAR-75821), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75822) and
Tentative Map (TMP-75823) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

JB
Page 566 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

VAR-75821 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75819), Variance (VAR-75820), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75822) and
Tentative Map (TMP-75823) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

JB
Page 567 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

SDR-75822 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75819), Variance (VAR-75820), Variance (VAR-75821) and Tentative Map (TMP-
75823) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 0314/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

7. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

8. Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the
subject site. A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any future
building permit applications related to the site.

9. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

JB
Page 568 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Conditions Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Public Works

10. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public
Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage
Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association.

11. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies, if any, on the sidewalk
along Bonanza Road adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of
Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development
of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development
of this site.

12. Prior to the submittal of any construction drawings, meet with City of Las Vegas Fire
Engineering Department, the Traffic Engineering Department and the Sanitary
Sewer Section of the Department of Public Works to discuss the final location of the
proposed gate.

13. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

14. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the
Bonanza Road public right-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site prior to this issuance
of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for
the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally
insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall
remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense
pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and
maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way shall be the
responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale
of the property for the entire term of the License Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development Section of the
Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).

15. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

JB
Page 569 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Conditions Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

TMP-75822 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map
is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within
four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

2. Approval of Variance (VAR-75819), Variance (VAR-75820), Variance (VAR-75821)


and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75822) shall be required, if approved.

3. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City’s Street Naming
Regulations.

4. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-


interest community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and
Restrictions (“CC&R”), or conveyance of any unit within the community, the
Developer is required to record a Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements
(“DPMR”) as a covenant on all associated properties, and on behalf of all current
and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a listing of all privately owned
and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with assignment of
maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest community or the
respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief description of the
required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The DPMR must
be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations
prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the
community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private
maintenance obligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to
provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of
obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to
submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations.

6. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State


Subdivision Statutes.

JB
Page 570 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Conditions Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Public Works

7. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public
Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage
Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association.

8. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies, if any, on the sidewalk
along Bonanza Road adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of
Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development
of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development
of this site.

9. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

10. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the
Bonanza Road public right-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site prior to this issuance
of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for
the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally
insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall
remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense
pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and
maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way shall be the
responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale
of the property for the entire term of the License Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development Section of the
Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).

11. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

JB
Page 571 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Conditions Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

12. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map
is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type
and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, gating, sewer
and drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction
plans by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed
unless specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to
the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision-related construction
plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute
approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative
Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.

13. Comply with all applicable conditions of approval for Site Development Plan Review
SDR-75822 and any other site related actions.

JB
Page 572 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is proposing to construct an 18-unit Single-Family, Attached [Duplex]


residential subdivision on a 2.14-acre undeveloped property located on the north side of
Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard. In addition to the
standard Tentative Map (TMP-75823) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75822),
the applicant is requesting three additional Variances (VAR-75819, VAR-75820 and VAR-
75821).

ISSUES

• The Single Family, Attached (Duplex) use is permitted in the R-2 (Medium-Low
Density Residential) zoning district.
• A Variance (VAR-75819) of Title 19.06.100 is required to allow residential buildings to
have a height of three stories where two stories is the maximum allowed on lot one of
a three lot proposed residential subdivision. Staff does not support this request.
• A Variance (VAR-75820) of Title 19.06.100 is required to allow residential buildings to
have a height of three stories where two stories is the maximum allowed on lot two of
a three lot proposed residential subdivision. Staff does not support this request.
• A Variance (VAR-75821) of Title 19.06.100 is required to allow a 47-foot wide access
control gate where 50 feet is required; to allow sidewalks on one side where sidewalks
on both sides are required and to allow a Connectivity Ratio of 1.00 where 1.30 is
required. Staff does not support this request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located in the Southeast Sector of the General Plan and has a current
land use designation of ML (Medium Low Density Residential) and zoning designation of
R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) on a 2.14-acre undeveloped property located on
the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard. The
proposed Single Family, Attached [Duplex] use is permitted in the R-2 (Medium-Low
Density Residential) zoning district.

The applicant has proposed to develop the subject 2.14 acre site into an 18-unit Single-
Family, Attached [Duplex] development containing, which requires an associated Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-75822). As proposed, the 18-unit development will have
a density of 8.41 units per acre, which complies with the 8.49 units per acre maximum

JB
Page 573 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

allowed by the ML (Medium Low Density Residential) land use designation. The applicant
has proposed an associated Tentative Map (TMP-75823) for the proposed development
which will subdivide the site into three lots. Lot 1 is designated as 0.688 acres and will be
developed with 10 residential units. Lot 2 is designated as 0.562 acres and will be
developed with eight residential units. Lot 3 is designated as 0.889 acres and will be
developed as a 47-foot wide gated private street. Furthermore, the subject site complies
with Title 19.06.100 development standards, which allows 6-12 dwelling units per lot.

The submitted drawings indicate that the subject site will be comprised of three residential
unit types, which are designated as Type #1, #2 and #3. The proposed development will
provide eight Type #1 and Type #2 residential dwellings and ten Type #3 residential
dwellings. Type #1 and #2 are proposed to be three stories and 35 feet in height measured
to the flat roof, which does not meet Title 19.06.100 development standards, which limits
building height to two stories or 35 feet. Type #3 is proposed to be two stories and
approximately 25 feet in height measured to the flat roof, which does meet Title 19.06.100
development standards. The applicant has requested two Variances (VAR-75819 and VAR-
75820) to allow residential buildings to have a height of three stories where two stories is
the maximum allowed on Lot #1 and Lot #2 of the proposed residential subdivision. The
submitted elevations indicate the building facades will have a combination of “Cobblestone
Path,” “Terracotta Sand,” “Barnwood Gray,” “Mink,” and “Muslin” smooth stucco with black
iron railings.

Access to the site is provided from Bonanza Road, which is identified as a 60-70-foot
wide Minor Collector via a proposed 47.5-foot wide private street with a gated entrance.
Pursuant to Title 19.04.070(B), “Where access control gates are to be used in conjunction
with private streets, the principal vehicular entrance gate must have a minimum width of
50 feet.” The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75821) to allow the proposed
47.5-foot wide private street with access control gate where 50 feet is required.
Furthermore, the Department of Public Works has indicated that the location of the
proposed gate for this site conflicts with Traffic Engineering, Fire Department and Sanitary
Sewer guidelines, which will require relocation of the proposed sewer line.

Pursuant to Title 19.04.230 Private Gated Community Streets development standards,


private streets are required to comply with three available street cross sections, which are
24 feet, 28 feet and 33 feet wide, respectively, with a sidewalk on one side. As the
proposed 47.5-foot wide private street with sidewalk does not comply with the three
available cross sections, the proposed private street must then comply with the minimum
construction standards for public streets. Pursuant to Title 19.04.220 47-foot Residential
Street (Narrow Lot) development standards the proposed private street must provide a
five-foot sidewalk on both sides of the street. Since the proposed private street does not
comply with this standard, the applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75821) to allow
sidewalks on one side where sidewalks on both sides are required.

JB
Page 574 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Also, pursuant to Title 19.04.040 development within the R-2 (Medium-Low Density
Residential) zoning district all residential development is subject to the minimum 1.30
Connectivity Ratio (links/nodes). As the proposed development consists of one link and
one node, the applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75821) to allow a Connectivity
Ratio of 1.00 where 1.30 is the minimum required for the proposed development.

The on-site parking area is located within the interior of the subject site. The site will
provide two garage parking spaces for each unit, which complies with the 36 parking
spaces required by Title 19.06.100. Pursuant to Title 19.06.100 Table 6, “for any use
approved for this district other than Single Family Residential (Attached or Detached) the
on-site parking requirements shall be as outlined in LVMC 19.12.060,” which requires
additional guest parking. However, as the subject site is proposed to be a 18-unit Single
Family, Attached [Duplex] development, Title 19.06.100 Table 6 requires a minimum of
two unimpeded spaces per dwelling unit.

Pursuant to Title 19.06.100 Table 5, a six-foot landscape buffer is required adjacent to


the right-of-way for residential developments with five or more lots. As the proposed,
Tentative Map (TMP-75821) only proposes to develop three lots, no perimeter
landscaping is required for the proposed development. However, the applicant has
submitted a proposed landscape plan for the development. The submitted landscape plan
indicates a combination of 24-inch box “Chaste”, “Italian Stone Pine”, “Italian Cypress”
and “Windmill Palm” trees and five-gallon “Compact Desert Ranger”, “Feathery Cassia”,
“Desert Ruellia” and “Desert Bluestar” shrubs will be planted throughout the site.

Staff notes that the submitted cross sections show elevations indicating a relatively flat
area. The site is surrounded by walls and no new walls appear to be proposed. Although
the subject site is a flag-shaped lot, staff finds that the subject sites provides an adequate
buildable area, which would allow compliance with Title 19 development standards. As
such, staff notes the subject site does not provide a significant hardship to warrant
approval the requested Variances, as the development could be redesigned to provide
further compliance with Title 19. As the proposed development is inconsistent with Title
19 development standards pertaining to building height and 19.04 Complete Street
development standards, staff recommends denial of the three Variances, Site
Development Plan Review and associated Tentative Map request.

FINDINGS (VAR-75819)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

JB
Page 575 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by requesting to develop three story
structures where two stories is the maximum allowed adjacent to existing single-family
land uses. Alternative building design would allow conformance to the Title 19
requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and
it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

FINDINGS (VAR-75820)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict

JB
Page 576 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief


may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by requesting to develop three story
structures where two stories is the maximum allowed adjacent to existing single-family
land uses. Alternative building design would allow conformance to the Title 19
requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and
it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

FINDINGS (VAR-75821)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by requesting to develop a private street
which does not meet Title 19.04 Complete Street development standards. Alternative
street design would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the
absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded
that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm
of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

JB
Page 577 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (SDR-75822)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed 18-unit Single Family, Attached [Duplex] development is not


compatible with the adjacent single-family residential and commercial development
in the area, as evidenced by the required Variances to allow deviations from Title
19.04 Complete Street and Title 19.06.100 building height development standards.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed 18-unit Single Family, Attached [Duplex] development does not
comply with established and Title 19.04 Complete Street and Title 19.06.100
building height development standards as evidenced by the requested Variances.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Primary site access is from Bonanza Road, which is classified as a 60 to 70-foot


Minor Collector Street in Title 13, which provides adequate capacity to serve the
proposed use. Access to the site is provided from a proposed 47.5-foot wide private
street with a gated entrance. Pursuant to Title 19.04.070(B), “Where access control
gates are to be used in conjunction with private streets, the principal vehicular
entrance gate must have a minimum width of 50 feet. The applicant has requested
a Variance (VAR-75821) to allow the proposed 47.5-foot wide private street with
access control gate where 50 feet is required. Furthermore, the Department of
Public Works has indicated that the location of the proposed gate for this site
conflicts with Traffic Engineering, Fire Department and Sanitary Sewer guidelines,
which will require relocation of the proposed sewer line.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted elevations
indicate the building facades will have a combination of “Cobblestone Path”,
“Terracotta Sand,” “Barnwood Gray,” “Mink,” and “Muslin” smooth stucco with black
iron railings. The proposed landscape buffers will have a combination of trees and
shrubs which are consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional Plant List.

JB
Page 578 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly,
undesirable, or obnoxious compatible, they are compatible with development in the
surrounding area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed residential development will be subject to inspections in order to


protect the public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.

FINDINGS (TMP-75822)

The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes. However, staff has
determined that the Tentative Map does not conform Title 19, as evidenced by the
requested Variances to allow deviations from Title 19.04 Complete Street development
standards. Therefore, staff recommends denial of this application.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0061-60)
from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential)
between Bonanza Road and Washington Avenue, approximately 1,320
01/18/61
feet east of the centerline of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval. The property was hard
zoned on 07/26/61.
The Board of City Commissioners denied a request for Rezoning (Z-
0083-73) from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family
Residential) on approximately 5.00 acres on the north side of Bonanza
10/24/73
Road, approximately and Washington Avenue, approximately 1,320 feet
east of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning Commission recommended
approval.
A two-lot Parcel Map (PMP-43732) on 4.95 acres at 4500 West
09/27/12 Bonanza Road was recorded. The zoning for this site was R-1 (Single
Family Residential) at this time.

JB
Page 579 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a
General Plan Amendment (GPA-55775) from PF (Public Facilities) to
ML (Medium Low Density Residential) on 2.19 acres on the north side
of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard.
The Planning Commission recommended denial; staff recommended
approval.
The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a
Rezoning (ZON-55777) from R-1 (Single Family Residential) to R-3
(Medium Density Residential) on 2.19 acres on the north side of
Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard.
11/19/14
The Planning Commission recommended denial; staff recommended
approval.
The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-55779) for a proposed 39-unit
multi-family residential development with a Waiver to allow a zero-foot
perimeter landscape buffer along a portion of the west property line
where six feet is required on 2.19 acres on the north side of Bonanza
Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard. The
Planning Commission recommended denial; staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-70682) from PF (Public Facilities) to ML (Medium Low Density
Residential) on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road,
approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.
09/06/17
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-70683) from
R-1 (Single Family Residential) to R-2 (Medium-Low Density
Residential) on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road,
approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/09/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related Building Permit or Business Licenses associated with the subject site.

JB
Page 580 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held to discuss submittal requirements
for applications related to a proposed Variance, Site Development Plan
01/30/19
Review and Tentative Map for a proposed duplex single-family
residential (condominium) development.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site inspection staff observed an undeveloped site free
02/28/19
of trash and debris, with natural desert vegetation.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.14

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject ML (Medium Low R-2 (Medium-Low
Undeveloped
Property Density Residential) Density Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
North
Detached Residential) Residential)
Church/House of R-1 (Single Family
South PF (Public Facilities)
Worship Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
East
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, R-PD8 (Residential
ML (Medium Low
Detached and Planned Development –
Density Residential)
West Attached 8 Units per Acre)
Church/House of R-1 (Single Family
PF (Public Facilities)
Worship Residential)

JB
Page 581 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (105 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06.100, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size (Lot #1) 6,500 SF 29,993 SF Y
Min. Lot Size (Lot #2) 6,500 SF 24,503 SF Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front 20 Feet 20 Feet Y
• Side 5 Feet 5 Feet Y
• Corner 5 Feet 5 Feet Y
• Rear 20 Feet 20 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
Three
Two Stories or 35 Stories, 35
Max. Building Height Feet Feet N*
*The applicant has requested Variances (VAR-75819 and VAR-75820) to allow
residential buildings to have a height of three stories where two stories is the maximum
allowed on Lots 1 and 2 of the three lot proposed residential subdivision.

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Bonanza Road Minor Collector Title 13 60-70 Y

JB
Page 582 of 1332
VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821, SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-75700]
Staff Report Page Eleven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element # Links # Nodes
Internal Street 1 -
Intersection – Internal - -
Cul-de-sac Terminus - 1
Intersection – External Street or Stub Terminus - -
Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
- -
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted - -
Total 1.00 1.0
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes): 1.30 1.00
*The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75821) to allow a connectivity ratio of
1.00 where 1.30 is required

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Single-
Family 2 spaces
18 du 36
Residential per du
(Duplex)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 36 36 Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 36 0 36 0 Y*
*Pursuant to Title 19.06.100 Table 6 “any use approved for this district other than Single
Family Residential (Attached or Detached) the on-site parking requirements shall be as
outlined in LVMC 19.12.060, which requires additional guest parking. However, as the
subject site is proposed to be an 18-unit Single Family, Attached (Duplex) development;
Title 19.06.100 Table 6 requires a minimum of two unimpeded spaces per dwelling unit.

JB
Page 583 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 584 of 1332


ՁḶ╗7ㅡㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎฎฌ DzAƆDzҜDzЌ╗7゜7CDzC●bA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ
Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ 7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—7C7‫ف‬㈠ฌ ÛAƆĠ●ЌḚ╗ḶЌ7AЋDz
ЋDzฌ
‫ֱ ں‬ฎxxֱธธՙֱธ″xxฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎɱฌ


ฌҜฌ ●ฌ
●ฌ Ձ ฌ
㈠㈠ฌĠ A
㈠Őฌ
╗ ฌḶ

İ㈠ฌ
Ќฌ ฌ

b ●Ћ ●Ձ ฌ
Dz ฌƆ

Ɔ●╗Dzฌ Dz ฌЌ


ƆDzÛDzŐ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶ฌ
╗ ฌDz
●Ɔ
Őฌ ฌО ฌ ฌ●ฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱԱฌ Ő

CDzbA╗ⓈŐ7ԱՁЋCฌ
ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ɱxỏฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡ̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ՙⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡ‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡxⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ɱⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ฎⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ
7ŐḶAC
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ″7 bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—ฌ
″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ ӧธ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ ‫ں‬ฎɱỏฌ ÛA╗DzŐ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ7ֱ bผŴ่֭7Ḷ‫֭ﭨ‬ผγ֭Ŵ₡ฌ

ӧธ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎՙฌ Ќ Dz Û 7О ㈠Ⓢ ㈠Dz ㈠7╗ Ḷ 7Ա Dz ฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ћ●b●Ќ●╗ù7ҜAО7ӧ7Ќ╗Ɔ7ỏฌ

‫ں‬ฎ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ″ƥฌ ЌDzธ7ƆÛㅡ7ƆDzb㈠7̶xⓒ7╗ธxƆⓒ7Ő″‫ں‬Dzⓒ7Ҝ㈠C㈠Ҝ㈠ฌ

ฎỏ
Ḛ Ő A Ќ ╗ Dz C 7О Dz Ő 7 ●Ќ A Ձ7Ҝ A О ฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ


ՙxธֱธธՙֱธɱธɱฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7‫ں‬ⓒɱㄦx7Ɔ  ฌ
Ќ ฎɱ¤ธㅡƥx̶फDz ฌ ԱDzЌbĠҜAŐìฌ
Dz Ṳ ㈠7″ƥṲ ̶ㄦƥ7О ㈠Ⓢ ㈠Dz ㈠ฌ ̶̶‫ں‬㈠xxƥฌ ‫ں‬ธƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
Ḷ Ő ̬ㅡธㄦ̶̬ㅡธฎฎɱฌ ธxƥ7 ธxƥ7 ธxƥฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7″ƥՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ธxƥ7
ЋDzÛ Aù7 Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7ธ‫ں‬x7Ɔ  ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ɱx
ỏฌ ″ƥฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
″ƥฌ
‫ں‬xƥฌ
‫゜ںں‬ОՁ‫ں‬7 ‫ں‬ธ゜ОՁธ7 ‫゜̶ں‬ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ㅡ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ㄦ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬″゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ՙ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ฎ゜ОՁ̶ฌ ԱAƆ●Ɔ7Ḷ 7ԱDzAŐ●ЌḚฌ
ɱ゜ОՁธ7 ‫ں‬x゜ОՁ‫ں‬7
ՁḶ╗7̶″ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱธỏฌ
ՁḶ ╗ ̬7‫ں‬ฌ

ӧธ
Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠″ɱ7A b 7ӧธɱⓒɱɱ̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ

‫ں‬ɱ
ӧธ‫ں‬

‫ں‬ỏ
ธxƥ7 ɱ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠″ㅡ7A b 7ӧธՙⓒฎ̶̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ


ⓈЌ●╗7ฎธ7 ธỏฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ㄦⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶḶC7ΎḶЌDzฌ

‫ ں‬″‫ں‬㈠x″ƥฌ

b‫ں‬

Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz ฌ
ḚDzЌDzŐAՁ7●Ќ ḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌฌ
ธxƥฌ

‫ں ں‬ธ㈠̶ɱƥฌ
ธxƥฌ ОAŐbDzՁ̬7 ‫̶ ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶ฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ̶7 b ̶ฌ ՁḶ ╗ ̬7̶̬7О Ő ●Ћ A ╗ Dz 7Ɔ ╗ Ő Dz Dz ╗ ฌ bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬7 ՁDzḚAՁ7CDzƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ

Ќ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफÛ ฌ
Ձธฌ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠ฎɱ7A b 7ӧ̶ฎⓒՙ″″7Ɔ  ỏฌ
ḚŐḶƆƆ7AbŐDzAḚDz̬7 ธ㈠‫ ں‬ㅡ7AbŐDzƆฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠ฎՙ7A b 7ӧ̶ՙⓒฎㄦ‫ں‬7Ɔ  ỏฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ b″
ฌ ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7Ḷ7ՁḶ╗Ɔ̬7 ̶7ՁḶ╗Ɔ7 ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ̬7ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ
╗ŐAb╗7ՙbฌ
‫ں‬ՙો ㄦx ‫ں‬ՙો xx7 ‫ں‬″ો ㄦx7 ‫ں‬″ો xxฌ ‫ ں‬ㄦો
ԱḶḶì7ธɱⓒ7ОAḚDz7‫ں‬ㅡฌ Ձ‫ں‬ฌ ㄦxฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û 7 ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7Ḷ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ̬7 ‫ ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ

ՙฌ

b ḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzAฌ

㈠ㄦ
ฎỏ

ธฎ
Ձ̶ฌ ‫ں‬ฎ


ӧธ CDzЌƆ●╗ù̬7 ՁḶ╗7‫̬ ں‬7‫ ں‬ㅡ㈠ㄦ̶7ӧ‫ ں‬x7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜x㈠″ฎฎ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ

‫ں‬ㄦ

О ╗̬7‫ں‬ㄦો ″″㈠ՙธฌ
ħ₡̬7

О ●̬7‫ں‬ՙો ㄦㅡ㈠″‫ں‬ฌ
bㅡ

Dz О̬7‫ں‬ՙો ɱ̶㈠‫ںں‬ฌ
ՁḶ╗7ธ̬7‫ ں‬ㅡ㈠ธ̶7ӧฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜x㈠ㄦ″ธ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ

bㄦ
Ҝ
Ձㅡฌ ՁḶ╗7̶̬7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ӧx㈠ฎฎɱ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎx7 ՁḶ╗7̶ㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

‫ ں‬ㄦો xx
ธxƥฌ b ธ ฌ Оb̬7‫ں‬ㅡો ɱx㈠ㅡธฌ ḶЋDzŐAՁՁ̬7ฎ㈠ㅡ‫ ں‬7ӧ‫ ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜ธ㈠‫ ں‬ㅡ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ
ƆОDzDzC ฌ

‫ں ں‬ธ㈠ㅡxƥ7
ՁḶ ╗ ̬7ธฌ
ՁҜ●╗●ฌฌ ╗ŐA ●b7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆฌ

Ќ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफÛ 7
ùฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ‫ں‬7 Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠ㄦ″7A b 7ӧธㅡⓒㄦx̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7 ҜDzC●ⓈҜ7ՁḶÛ7CDzЌƆ●╗ù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ӧŐֱธỏฌ

Ġฌ Cฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠ㄦ″7A b 7ӧธㅡⓒㄦx̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ ‫ں‬ㄦฌ bՁAƆƆ●●bA╗●ḶЌ̬7 Ҝ●Ќ●ҜⓈҜ7ՁḶ╗7Ɔ●ΎDz̬7″ㄦxx7Ɔฌ
ҜAṲ●ҜⓈҜ7CÛDzՁՁ●ЌḚ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ7ОDzŐ7ՁḶ╗̬7″ֱ‫ ں‬ธฌ

ㅡ゜ ธỏ ̶゜ОՁ̶7 ธ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫゜ں‬ОՁ̶ฌ
ฎ゜ОՁธ7 ՙ゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ″゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ㄦ゜ОՁธ7 ‫ں‬ɱОՁ̶7
ӧธ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7Ab╗●ḶЌƆ̬7 ḚОAֱՙx″ฎธ7ӧḚDzЌDzŐAՁ7ОՁAЌ7AҜDzЌCҜDzЌ╗ỏฌ

Ձ ㄦฌ
‫ ں‬ㅡો ㄦxฌ
●ЋDzÛ Aù7 ՁḶ╗7̶̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ΎḶЌֱՙx″ฎ̶7ӧŐDzΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7ŐDzՁA╗DzC7╗Ḷ7ḚОAֱՙx″ฎธỏฌ
″ƥฌ
ธxƥ7 ธxƥฌ
Ќ ฎɱ¤ธㄦƥ̶ㄦफDz ฌ CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌ7 ŐḶҜ7Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆ7 ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥฌ ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥ7 ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥฌ
ธฎ̶㈠ㄦxƥฌ ՁDzḚDzЌCฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ


ธ″ƥ7 ОՁAЌ7  ‫ں‬ฌ ОՁAЌ7  ธฌ ОՁAЌ7  ̶ฌ

ธỏ
̶ㅡƥฌ

‫ں‬ɱ
ӧธ
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙ″7 ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ㅡฎƥฌ

‫ ں‬ㅡો xx
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱԱฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

Ḷ 7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7‫ں‬ธՙ7Ɔฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐ
Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡx7び7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ7び7ЌDzЋACA7び7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7ОDzԱԱՁDz7bŐDzDzì7AЋDzЌⓈDzⓒ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ

Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙx77bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎ77ֱֱֱֱֱ77ÛÛÛ㈠İŐĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌDzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆ㈠bḶҜฌ

ⓈЌ●╗7ՙՙฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬ỏฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7ՙฎɱ7Ɔฌ


ɱ‫ں‬ỏฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7ㅡxฎ7Ɔฌ
Ձ ●Ќ Dz 7╗ A Ա Ձ Dz ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ ̶ŐC7ՁŐ̬7ฎ‫ں‬ɱ7Ɔฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7ɱx‫ں‬7Ɔฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û 7 ธㅡƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

Ɔฌ

╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7‫ں‬ՙ̶ㄦ7Ɔฌ ̶ŐC7ՁŐ̬7ɱ‫ں‬ฎ7Ɔฌ Ḷ Ќฌ ฌ Dz ฌƆ
О Ő Ḷ О Dz Ő ╗ ù 7Ձ ●Ќ Dz Ɔ ฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7ՙɱ″7Ɔฌ ╗ฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7ธธธՙ7Ɔฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7‫ںںں‬ㅡ7Ɔฌ
ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㄦՙՙ7Ɔฌ
Ҝ ฌ
ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌ

Ձ ●Ќ Dz 7  7Ձ Dz Ќ Ḛ ╗ Ġ C ●Ő Dz b ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ŐḶЌ╗7bḶЋDzŐDzC7CDzbì̬7ฎx7Ɔฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬x7Ɔฌ
ฌŐ

‫̶ں‬ો ㄦx
ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㅡՙՙ7Ɔฌ
㈠Ġฌ Aฌ ฌ●ฌՁ ฌ
b ●Ћ ●Ձ 7

ŐDzAŐ7bḶЋDzŐDzC7CDzbì̬7″x7Ɔ7
bḶЋDzŐDzC7DzЌ╗Őù̬7̶ㅡ7Ɔฌ

╗ ฌDz

ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㅡ̶̶7Ɔฌ İ ㈠ฌฌŐ ฌ
ŐḶЌ╗7CDzbì̬7ㄦ̶7Ɔ7 bḶЋDzŐDzC7DzЌ╗Őù̬7ㄦՙ7Ɔฌ Dz ฌЌ
ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธㅡㄦธ7Ɔฌ
ฌ ŐḶЌ╗7CDzbì̬7‫ں‬ธㄦ7Ɔฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬ỏ ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธՙɱ‫ں‬7Ɔฌ ŐDzAŐ7CDzbì̬7ㅡฎ7Ɔฌ
ՁḶ╗7̶‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ɱxỏฌ ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธㄦՙ̶7Ɔฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙㅡฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ ●ŐDz7ՁḶÛ7bAՁbƆ̬7╗ÛḶ7AҜ●Ձù7CÛDzՁՁ●ЌḚƆฌ
ɱx
ỏฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ

‫̶ں‬ો xx
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙㄦฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ỏฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱธ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
b Ⓢ Ő Ћ Dz 7╗ A Ա Ձ Dz 7ֱ7О Ő Ḷ О Dz Ő ╗ ù 7Ձ ●Ќ Dz Ɔ
b Ⓢ Ő Ћ Dz 7  Ő A C ●Ⓢ Ɔ Ձ Dz Ќ Ḛ ╗ Ġ ╗ A Ќ Ḛ Dz Ќ ╗ 7C Dz Ձ ╗ A ฌ
●ЋDzÛ Aùฌ
ՁḶ╗7̶xⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

‫ں‬ธો ㄦx

Page 585 of 1332


ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ

̶ ɱ″㈠ㄦxƥฌ
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ

Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ
ƆОDzDzC ฌ

bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzA7
ɱỏฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷฌ ՁҜ●
●ฌ╗ฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙxฌ

ㅡ ″x㈠̶ฎƥ7

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ

Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz 7
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7

Ḷ7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ

‫ں‬ธો xx
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ฌҜ ●ฌ ḚŐAОĠ●b7ƆbAՁDzฌ
ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ

Őฌ

㈠ฌĠ A ฌ ฌՁ ฌ ㅡx7 x7 ธxฌ ㅡxฌ


╗ ฌḶ

İ㈠ฌฌ
ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ƆⓈԱC●Ћ●Ɔ●ḶЌฌ

Ќฌ ฌ

ՁḶ╗7ธɱⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ՁḶ╗7ธฎⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7 b ●Ћ ●Ձ ฌ
Dz Ṳ ㈠7″ƥ7Û ●C Dz 7╗ Dz ՁDz О Ġ Ḷ Ќ Dz ฌ
Dz ฌƆ ฌ


Dz Ќฌ ฌ

Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7Ḷ Ő ̬‫ں‬″xx̬‫ں‬ㄦㄦɱฎɱՙฌ ╗ ฌDz
‫ں‬7ħ่㌱γ7ए777777777777⑾‫ש‬
ㅡxฌ
b●╗ù7Ḷ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬xՙ7

Őฌ ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌƆ

ɱỏฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7″ՙՙ7Ɔ  ฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ
″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ̬7ӧՁ●ЌìƆ7゜7ЌḶCDzƆỏฌ

‫ںں‬ો ㄦx
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ̬7ธ7Ձ●ЌìƆ7゜7ธ7ЌḶCDzƆए‫ ں‬㈠x7ӧACҜ●Ќ●Ɔ╗ŐA╗●ЋDz7CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCỏฌ


╗ĠDz7Ҝ●Ќ●ҜⓈҜ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ7●Ɔ7‫ ں‬㈠̶x7ӧՁ●ЌìƆ゜ЌḶCDzƆỏ7ḶŐ7AՁՁ7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7●Ќ7ŐֱCⓒ7Őֱ‫ ں‬ⓒ7ŐֱƆՁⓒฌ
ฎ″ỏฌ ŐֱҜĠⓒ7ŐֱbՁⓒ7Őֱ╗Ġⓒ7Őֱธⓒ7Ő̶ֱ7AЌC7Őֱㅡ7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7C●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗Ɔ㈠7╗ĠDz7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ7ҜAù7ԱDz7ŐDzCⓈbDzCฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
Աù7╗ĠDz7C●ŐDzb╗ḶŐⓒ7Û●╗Ġ7╗ĠDz7ACЋ●ƆDzҜDzЌ╗7Ḷ7╗ĠDz7C●ŐDzb╗ḶŐ7Ḷ7ОⓈԱՁ●b7ÛḶŐìƆⓒ7╗ĠŐḶⓈḚĠ7╗ĠDz7ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁ7Ḷฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎฎỏ
ⓈЌ●╗7″ฎฌ AЌ7AООՁ●bA╗●ḶЌ7ḶŐ7AЌ7ACҜ●Ќ●Ɔ╗ŐA╗●ЋDz7CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌⓒ7ÛĠ●bĠ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7ƆⓈԱİDzb╗7╗Ḷ7╗ĠDz7ОŐḶbDzCⓈŐDzƆ7AЌCฌ Ġฌ
Cฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7″ɱ7 bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱCฌ ùฌ

ɱỏฌ
Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆ7ƆDz╗7ḶŐ╗Ġ7●Ќ7ՁЋҜb7‫ ں‬ɱ㈠‫ ں‬″㈠‫ ں‬ธxⓒ7●7╗ĠDz7AООՁ●bAЌ╗7CDzҜḶЌƆ╗ŐA╗DzƆ7●╗7●Ɔ7●ҜОḶƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ḶŐฌ


ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦฌ
●ҜОŐAb╗●bAԱՁDz7╗Ḷ7AbĠ●DzЋDz7CⓈDz7╗Ḷ7╗ḶОḶḚŐAОĠ●b7bḶЌC●╗●ḶЌƆⓒ7ЌA╗ⓈŐAՁ7DzA╗ⓈŐDzƆⓒ7ACİAbDzЌ╗7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7 ธㅡƥฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7ОA╗╗DzŐЌƆⓒ7ḶŐ7Ḷ╗ĠDzŐ7Ɔ●╗Dz7Ձ●Ҝ●╗A╗●ḶЌƆ㈠ฌ

ӧธ
‫ں‬
ӧธ‫ں‬ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ

‫ںں‬ો xx
ฎฎ

ฎ″
ỏฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦ ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ḶÛЌDzŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗7゜7bbִŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗ฌ

ỏฌ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ՁḶ╗7ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7CŐ●ЋDzÛ Aù7 ฎฎ Dz Ṳ ㈠7ㄦƥ7Û ●C Dz 7b ՁЋ 7 ●Ő Dz 7Ġ ù C Ő A Ќ ╗ ⓒฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ฎɱỏฌ
ㄦƥ7Û ●CDz7bՁЋ7●ŐDz7ĠùCŐAЌ╗ⓒ ฌ ՁЋЋÛ C7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗7 ОDzŐฌ ỏฌ Ɔ ╗ Ő Dz Dz ╗ 7Ձ●Ḛ Ġ ╗ 7A Ќ C 7╗ Ő A   ●b ฌ
ӧธ
Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7Ձ●ḚĠ╗7AЌC7╗ŐA●bฌ ฎỏฌ ḶŐ̬‫ں‬ฎx″̬‫ں‬ՙ″ㄦ‫ںں‬ɱฌ ‫ں‬ฎՙỏฌ Ɔ ●Ḛ Ќ A Ձ7Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7О Dz Ő ฌ ⓈЌ●╗゜ОՁAЌฌ
‫ں‬ฎ  ●ՁDz 7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7О A Ḛ Dz 7″‫ں‬ฌ
Ɔ●ḚЌAՁ7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗7ОDzŐฌӧธ ″ỏฌ Ɔ ╗Ḷ О 7 ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗ฌ
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎՙỏฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ Ḷ  7О A Ő b Dz Ձ7Ҝ A О Ɔ 7A Ќ C ⊿ฌ

‫ ں‬xો ㄦx
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Dz Ṳ ㈠7̶ƥ7Û ●C Dz 7╗ Dz ՁDz О Ġ Ḷ Ќ Dz ฌ
Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7Ḷ Ő ̬‫ں‬″xx̬‫ں‬ㄦㄦɱฎɱㅡฌ
ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁฌ
ОŐ●Ќ╗DzC̬ฌx̶ֱ‫ں‬ธֱธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

ฎɱ¤ธㄦƥ̶ㄦफDz ฌ
Ќ xx Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7ธ̶ՙ7Ɔ  ฌ
О ●̬7‫ں‬xો ̶x㈠
ӧธ‫ں‬
ฎㄦỏฌ ㅡ ՙ㈠ㄦxƥฌ DzṲ㈠″फ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏฌ О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ DzAŐ╗ĠÛḶŐì7C●ƆbՁA●ҜDzŐฌ ḶÛЌDzŐ7゜7CDzЋDzՁḶОDzŐฌ
ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ ●Ќ ḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ
ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ ㅡxƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦ7Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
ḶŐ̬ฎ″ฎ̬″ɱՙㅡx″ฌ ̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏฌ Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
ฎฎỏฌ
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏ

ㅡx㈠xxƥ7
̶ x㈠xxƥ7
Ḷ 7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ ՙxֱ╗7Ő゜Û 7ֱ7ОⓈԱՁ●b7 ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡxฌ
ธ″ો ㄦx7 ธՙો xx7 ธՙો ㄦx7 ธฎો xxฌ ธฎ ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
ธ̶ો ㄦx7 ธㅡો xx7 ธㅡો ㄦx7 ธㄦો xx7 ″ỏฌ ธㄦો ㄦx7 ธ″ો xx7
ธธો xx7 ธธો ㄦx7 ธ̶ો xx7 ฌ ỏ bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐ7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙxฌ
‫ں‬ฎ

‫ں‬xો xx

DzṲ㈠ㅡफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ
ฎՙ ӧธ ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7‫ں‬xⓒ7 О●̬7ธ″ો ธ″㈠ฎ̶ฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏ7 Ա ḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ̶ỏฌ ƆⓈŐЋDzù7C●ƆbՁḶƆⓈŐDzฌ

DzṲ㈠″फ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ
DzṲ㈠7ОŐЋ7ЋAⓈՁ╗ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ ㅡỏฌ
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱฎՙxỏฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ ОAḚDz7ธธ7Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ ̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ ″xֱ╗7Ő゜Û 7ֱ7ОⓈԱՁ●bฌ DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
Û C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏDzṲ㈠ฎफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ
̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ DzṲ㈠7‫ں‬ธफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C77bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ
DzṲ㈠″फ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ Ա О̬7ɱો ՙx㈠xxฌ
DzṲ㈠7‫ں‬xफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ Ɔ╗A╗●b7ÛA╗DzŐ7ОŐDzƆƆⓈŐDzฌ

ɱો ՙx
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ธ̶xxฌ Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
DzṲ㈠7ฎफ7C●О7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ ●ŐDz7CDzОAŐ╗ҜDzЌ╗̬ฌ
ㅡ″㌫ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
╗ŐA●b7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ

DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱฎՙxỏฌ
ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7ÛDzՁՁƆ7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ŐDzҜḶЋDzC7 ŐḶҜ7ƆDzŐЋ●bDz̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
CŐA●ЌAḚDz7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ՁฌḶ ╗7″ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx ՁЋЋÛC̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ
ՁḶ╗7̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ㄦⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7
bՁЋ7ĠAЌƆDzЌ̬7 Ќ゜Aฌ
ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬ฌ x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠ฌ
″ֱAฌ bՁЋ7CÛḚ7 ̬ฌ
ԱḶḶì7‫ں‬xⓒ7ОAḚDz7ธธฌ bAⓈ╗●ḶЌ7╗Ḷ7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ7
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
ƆОֱ‫ں‬ฌ
ธ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ɱ̬‫ں‬ฎ̬ธ″7ОҜฌ
ƆĠŐⓈԱƆⓒ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ7Ҝ●Ќ㈠7 ԱḶṲ7╗ŐDzDzƆⓒ7ธㅡफ7Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ
Ṳ 7ӧ ՙxธỏ7ฎ ɱ ″ ֱ ฎ ̶ ㄦธฌ

bḶҜОAb╗7CDzƆDzŐ╗7ŐAЌḚDzŐ7 DzA╗ĠDzŐù7bAƆƆ●A7 bĠAƆ╗Dz7╗ŐDzDz7 ●╗AՁ●AЌ7Ɔ╗ḶЌDz7О●ЌDz7 ●╗AՁ●AЌ7bùОŐDzƆƆ7 Û●ЌCҜ●ՁՁ7ОAՁҜฌ


A

╗ŐDzՁՁ●ƆDzƆ7AЌC7ḚŐḶⓈЌC7bḶЋDzŐ7 bḶЌbŐDz╗Dz7●Ќ●ƆĠDzƆฌ
ƆDzDz7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ
DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7ḶŐฌ
ỢⓈAЌ╗●╗ùⓒฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌƆⓒ7AЌCฌ
C●ҜDzЌƆ●ḶЌƆ7Ḷฌ

╗ŐDzՁՁ●Ɔฌ
ɱՙ㈠ㄦㄦɱՙ

AḚḚŐDzḚA╗Dz7ƆⓈŐAbDzฌ
●bDz7ӧ ՙxธỏ7ㄦ

CDzƆDzŐ╗7ŐⓈDzՁՁ●A7 Ћ●ŐḚ●ЌƥƆ7ԱḶÛDzŐฌ
Ḷ

╗ùО●bAՁ7bḶЌbŐDz╗Dz7ÛAՁìฌ

bŐⓈƆĠDzC7ḚŐAЌ●╗Dzฌ
7ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ

ḚŐḶⓈЌC7bḶЋDzŐ7╗Ḷ7ԱDzฌ

Page 586 of 1332


CŐḶⓈḚĠ╗7╗ḶՁDzŐAЌ╗ฌ
Ձ AŐ Ő ù 7╗●Ќ C AՁ Ձฌ
Ő DzƆ●C DzЌ ╗●AՁ 7C DzƆ●Ḛ Ќ DzŐฌ
CA7ฎ ɱ ‫ ں‬ธ ̶ฌ

ԱḶḶ╗Ġ●ՁՁฌ
ⓒ7Ќ DzЋ A

CDzƆDzŐ╗7ԱՁⓈDzƆ╗AŐฌ
DzⓈОA╗ḶŐ●ⓈҜฌ
ՁAƆ7Ћ DzḚ AƆ
ŐՁḶƆ7C Őฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
A

x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌ ฌ
″ ‫ ں‬7b

AՁx‫ں‬xฌ
‫ں‬ՙ
Page 587 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 588 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 589 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 590 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 591 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 592 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 593 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 594 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 595 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 596 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎฎฌ DzAƆDzҜDzЌ╗7゜7CDzC●bA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ
Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ 7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—7C7‫ف‬㈠ฌ ÛAƆĠ●ЌḚ╗ḶЌ7AЋDz
ЋDzฌ
‫ֱ ں‬ฎxxֱธธՙֱธ″xxฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎɱฌ


ฌҜฌ ●ฌ
●ฌ Ձ ฌ
㈠㈠ฌĠ A
㈠Őฌ
╗ ฌḶ

İ㈠ฌ
Ќฌ ฌ

b ●Ћ ●Ձ ฌ
Dz ฌƆ

Ɔ●╗Dzฌ Dz ฌЌ


ƆDzÛDzŐ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶ฌ
╗ ฌDz
●Ɔ
Őฌ ฌО ฌ ฌ●ฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱԱฌ Ő

CDzbA╗ⓈŐ7ԱՁЋCฌ
ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ɱxỏฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡ̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ՙⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡ‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡxⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ɱⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ฎⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ
7ŐḶAC
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ″7 bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—ฌ
″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ ӧธ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ ‫ں‬ฎɱỏฌ ÛA╗DzŐ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ7ֱ bผŴ่֭7Ḷ‫֭ﭨ‬ผγ֭Ŵ₡ฌ

ӧธ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎՙฌ Ќ Dz Û 7О ㈠Ⓢ ㈠Dz ㈠7╗ Ḷ 7Ա Dz ฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ћ●b●Ќ●╗ù7ҜAО7ӧ7Ќ╗Ɔ7ỏฌ

‫ں‬ฎ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ″ƥฌ ЌDzธ7ƆÛㅡ7ƆDzb㈠7̶xⓒ7╗ธxƆⓒ7Ő″‫ں‬Dzⓒ7Ҝ㈠C㈠Ҝ㈠ฌ

ฎỏ
Ḛ Ő A Ќ ╗ Dz C 7О Dz Ő 7 ●Ќ A Ձ7Ҝ A О ฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ


ՙxธֱธธՙֱธɱธɱฌ

ธฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7‫ں‬ⓒɱㄦx7Ɔ  ฌ

Aฌ
ธฌ
Ќ ฎɱ¤ธㅡƥx̶फDz ฌ ԱDzЌbĠҜAŐìฌ
Dz Ṳ ㈠7″ƥṲ ̶ㄦƥ7О ㈠Ⓢ ㈠Dz ㈠ฌ ̶̶‫ں‬㈠xxƥฌ ‫ں‬ธƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
Ḷ Ő ̬ㅡธㄦ̶̬ㅡธฎฎɱฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7″ƥՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ЋDzÛ Aùฌ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7ธ‫ں‬x7Ɔ  ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ɱx
ỏฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ

‫ں‬ՙ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ฎ゜ОՁ̶7
Cฌ ԱAƆ●Ɔ7Ḷ7ԱDzAŐ●ЌḚฌ
ɱ゜ОՁธ7 ‫ں‬x゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ‫゜ںں‬ОՁ‫ں‬7 ‫ں‬ธ゜ОՁธ7 ‫゜̶ں‬ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ㅡ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ㄦ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬″゜ОՁ̶7
ธ7 ՁḶ╗7̶″ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱธỏฌ
bฌ ՁḶ ╗ ̬7‫ں‬ฌ

ӧธ
ธฌ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠″ɱ7A b 7ӧธɱⓒɱɱ̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ

‫ں‬ɱ
ӧธ‫ں‬

‫ں‬ỏ
ɱ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠″ㅡ7A b 7ӧธՙⓒฎ̶̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ


ⓈЌ●╗7ฎธฌ ธỏฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ㄦⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶḶC7ΎḶЌDzฌ

‫ ں‬″‫ں‬㈠x″ƥฌ

b‫ں‬

Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz ฌ
ḚDzЌDzŐAՁ7●ЌḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌฌ

‫ں ں‬ธ㈠̶ɱƥฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ̬7 ‫̶ ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7


ธฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ̶7 b ̶ฌ ՁḶ ╗ ̬7̶̬7О Ő ●Ћ A ╗ Dz 7Ɔ ╗ Ő Dz Dz ╗ ฌ bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬7 ՁDzḚAՁ7CDzƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ

Ќ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफÛ ฌ
Ձธฌ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠ฎɱ7A b 7ӧ̶ฎⓒՙ″″7Ɔ  ỏฌ
ḚŐḶƆƆ7AbŐDzAḚDz̬7 ธ㈠‫ ں‬ㅡ7AbŐDzƆฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠ฎՙ7A b 7ӧ̶ՙⓒฎㄦ‫ں‬7Ɔ  ỏฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ b″
ฌ ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7Ḷ7ՁḶ╗Ɔ̬7 ̶7ՁḶ╗Ɔ7 ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ̬7ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ
╗ŐAb╗7ՙbฌ
‫ں‬ՙો ㄦx ‫ں‬ՙો xx7 ‫ں‬″ો ㄦx7 ‫ں‬″ો xxฌ ‫ ں‬ㄦો
ԱḶḶì7ธɱⓒ7ОAḚDz7‫ں‬ㅡฌ Ձ‫ں‬ฌ ㄦxฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û 7 ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7Ḷ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ̬7 ‫ ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ

ՙฌ

b ḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzAฌ

㈠ㄦ
ฎỏ

ธฎ
Ձ̶ฌ ‫ں‬ฎ


ӧธ CDzЌƆ●╗ù̬7 ՁḶ╗7‫̬ ں‬7‫ ں‬ㅡ㈠ㄦ̶7ӧ‫ ں‬x7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜x㈠″ฎฎ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ

‫ں‬ㄦ

О ╗̬7‫ں‬ㄦો ″″㈠ՙธฌ
ħ₡̬7

О ●̬7‫ں‬ՙો ㄦㅡ㈠″‫ں‬ฌ
bㅡ

Dz О̬7‫ں‬ՙો ɱ̶㈠‫ںں‬ฌ
ՁḶ╗7ธ̬7‫ ں‬ㅡ㈠ธ̶7ӧฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜x㈠ㄦ″ธ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ

bㄦ
Ҝ
Ձㅡฌ ՁḶ╗7̶̬7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ӧx㈠ฎฎɱ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎx7 ՁḶ╗7̶ㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

‫ ں‬ㄦો xx
bธ ḶЋDzŐAՁՁ̬7ฎ㈠ㅡ‫ ں‬7ӧ‫ ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜ธ㈠‫ ں‬ㅡ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ
ฌ Оb̬7‫ں‬ㅡો ɱx㈠ㅡธฌ
ƆОDzDzC ฌ

‫ں ں‬ธ㈠ㅡxƥ7
ՁḶ ╗ ̬7ธฌ
ՁҜ●╗●ฌฌ ╗ŐA●b7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆฌ

Ќ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफÛ 7
ùฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ‫ں‬7 Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠ㄦ″7A b 7ӧธㅡⓒㄦx̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7 ҜDzC●ⓈҜ7ՁḶÛ7CDzЌƆ●╗ù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ӧŐֱธỏฌ

Ġฌ Cฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠ㄦ″7A b 7ӧธㅡⓒㄦx̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ ‫ں‬ㄦฌ bՁAƆƆ●●bA╗●ḶЌ̬7 Ҝ●Ќ●ҜⓈҜ7ՁḶ╗7Ɔ●ΎDz̬7″ㄦxx7Ɔฌ
ҜAṲ●ҜⓈҜ7CÛDzՁՁ●ЌḚ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ7ОDzŐ7ՁḶ╗̬7″ֱ‫ ں‬ธฌ

ㅡ゜ ธỏ ̶゜ОՁ̶7 ธ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫゜ں‬ОՁ̶ฌ
ฎ゜ОՁธ7 ՙ゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ″゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ㄦ゜ОՁธ7 ‫ں‬ɱОՁ̶7
ӧธ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7Ab╗●ḶЌƆ̬7 ḚОAֱՙx″ฎธ7ӧḚDzЌDzŐAՁ7ОՁAЌ7AҜDzЌCҜDzЌ╗ỏฌ

Ձ ㄦฌ
‫ ں‬ㅡો ㄦxฌ
●ЋDzÛ Aù7 ՁḶ╗7̶̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ΎḶЌֱՙx″ฎ̶7ӧŐDzΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7ŐDzՁA╗DzC7╗Ḷ7ḚОAֱՙx″ฎธỏฌ

Ќ ฎɱ¤ธㄦƥ̶ㄦफDz ฌ CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌ7ŐḶҜ7Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆ7 ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥฌ ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥ7 ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥฌ


ธฎ̶㈠ㄦxƥฌ ՁDzḚDzЌCฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ


ธ″ƥ7 ОՁAЌ7  ‫ں‬ฌ ОՁAЌ7  ธฌ ОՁAЌ7  ̶ฌ

ธỏ
ธฌ
Dzฌ
̶ㅡƥฌ

‫ں‬ɱ
ӧธ
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙ″7 ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ㅡฎƥฌ

‫ ں‬ㅡો xx
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱԱฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

Ḷ 7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7‫ں‬ธՙ7Ɔฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐ
Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡx7び7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ7び7ЌDzЋACA7び7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7ОDzԱԱՁDz7bŐDzDzì7AЋDzЌⓈDzⓒ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ

Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙx77bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎ77ֱֱֱֱֱ77ÛÛÛ㈠İŐĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌDzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆ㈠bḶҜฌ

ⓈЌ●╗7ՙՙฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬ỏฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7ՙฎɱ7Ɔฌ


ɱ‫ں‬ỏฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7ㅡxฎ7Ɔฌ
Ձ ●Ќ Dz 7╗ A Ա Ձ Dz ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ ̶ŐC7ՁŐ̬7ฎ‫ں‬ɱ7Ɔฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7ɱx‫ں‬7Ɔฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û 7 ธㅡƥ7Ő゜Û 7 Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

Ɔฌ

ฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7‫ں‬ՙ̶ㄦ7Ɔฌ ̶ŐC7ՁŐ̬7ɱ‫ں‬ฎ7Ɔฌ Ḷ Ќฌ ฌ Dz ฌƆ
О Ő Ḷ О Dz Ő ╗ ù 7Ձ ●Ќ Dz Ɔ ฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7ՙɱ″7Ɔฌ ╗ฌ
ธฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7ธธธՙ7Ɔฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7‫ںںں‬ㅡ7Ɔฌ
ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㄦՙՙ7Ɔฌ
Ҝ ฌ
ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌ

Ձ ●Ќ Dz 7  7Ձ Dz Ќ Ḛ ╗ Ġ C ●Ő Dz b ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ŐḶЌ╗7bḶЋDzŐDzC7CDzbì̬7ฎx7Ɔฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬x7Ɔฌ
ฌŐ

‫̶ں‬ો ㄦx
ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㅡՙՙ7Ɔฌ
㈠Ġฌ Aฌ ฌ●ฌՁ ฌ
b ●Ћ ●Ձ 7

ŐDzAŐ7bḶЋDzŐDzC7CDzbì̬7″x7Ɔ7
bḶЋDzŐDzC7DzЌ╗Őù̬7̶ㅡ7Ɔฌ

╗ ฌDz

ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㅡ̶̶7Ɔฌ İ ㈠ฌฌŐ ฌ
ŐḶЌ╗7CDzbì̬7ㄦ̶7Ɔ7 bḶЋDzŐDzC7DzЌ╗Őù̬7ㄦՙ7Ɔฌ Dz ฌЌ
ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธㅡㄦธ7Ɔฌ
ฌ ŐḶЌ╗7CDzbì̬7‫ں‬ธㄦ7Ɔฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬ỏ ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธՙɱ‫ں‬7Ɔฌ ŐDzAŐ7CDzbì̬7ㅡฎ7Ɔฌ
ՁḶ╗7̶‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ɱxỏฌ ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธㄦՙ̶7Ɔฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙㅡฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ ●ŐDz7ՁḶÛ7bAՁbƆ̬7╗ÛḶ7AҜ●Ձù7CÛDzՁՁ●ЌḚƆฌ
ɱx
ỏฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ

‫̶ں‬ો xx
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙㄦฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ỏฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱธ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
b Ⓢ Ő Ћ Dz 7╗ A Ա Ձ Dz 7ֱ7О Ő Ḷ О Dz Ő ╗ ù 7Ձ ●Ќ Dz Ɔ
b Ⓢ Ő Ћ Dz 7  Ő A C ●Ⓢ Ɔ Ձ Dz Ќ Ḛ ╗ Ġ ╗ A Ќ Ḛ Dz Ќ ╗ 7C Dz Ձ ╗ A ฌ
●ЋDzÛ Aùฌ
Ḛฌ
ธฌ ՁḶ╗7̶xⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

‫ں‬ธો ㄦx

Page 597 of 1332


ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ

̶ ɱ″㈠ㄦxƥฌ
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ

Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ
ƆОDzDzC ฌ

bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzA7
ɱỏฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷฌ ՁҜ●
●ฌ╗ฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙxฌ

ㅡ ″x㈠̶ฎƥ7

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ
Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz 7
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7

Ḷ7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ

‫ں‬ธો xx
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ฌҜ ●ฌ ḚŐAОĠ●b7ƆbAՁDzฌ
╗DzЌ╗A╗●ЋDz7ҜAОฌ
ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ

Őฌ

㈠ฌĠ A ฌ ฌՁ ฌ ㅡx7 x7 ธxฌ ㅡxฌ


╗ ฌḶ

İ㈠ฌฌ
ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ƆⓈԱC●Ћ●Ɔ●ḶЌฌ

Ќฌ ฌ

ՁḶ╗7ธɱⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ՁḶ╗7ธฎⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7 b ●Ћ ●Ձ ฌ
Dz Ṳ ㈠7″ƥ7Û ●C Dz 7╗ Dz ՁDz О Ġ Ḷ Ќ Dz ฌ
Dz ฌƆ ฌ


Dz Ќฌ ฌ

Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7Ḷ Ő ̬‫ں‬″xx̬‫ں‬ㄦㄦɱฎɱՙฌ ╗ ฌDz
‫ں‬7ħ่㌱γ7ए777777777777⑾‫ש‬
ㅡxฌ
b●╗ù7Ḷ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬xՙ7

Őฌ ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌƆ

ɱỏฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7″ՙՙ7Ɔ  ฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ
″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ̬7ӧՁ●ЌìƆ7゜7ЌḶCDzƆỏฌ

‫ںں‬ો ㄦx
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ̬7ธ7Ձ●ЌìƆ7゜7ธ7ЌḶCDzƆए‫ ں‬㈠x7ӧACҜ●Ќ●Ɔ╗ŐA╗●ЋDz7CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCỏฌ


╗ĠDz7Ҝ●Ќ●ҜⓈҜ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ7●Ɔ7‫ ں‬㈠̶x7ӧՁ●ЌìƆ゜ЌḶCDzƆỏ7ḶŐ7AՁՁ7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7●Ќ7ŐֱCⓒ7Őֱ‫ ں‬ⓒ7ŐֱƆՁⓒฌ
ฎ″ỏฌ ŐֱҜĠⓒ7ŐֱbՁⓒ7Őֱ╗Ġⓒ7Őֱธⓒ7Ő̶ֱ7AЌC7Őֱㅡ7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7C●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗Ɔ㈠7╗ĠDz7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ7ҜAù7ԱDz7ŐDzCⓈbDzCฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
Աù7╗ĠDz7C●ŐDzb╗ḶŐⓒ7Û●╗Ġ7╗ĠDz7ACЋ●ƆDzҜDzЌ╗7Ḷ7╗ĠDz7C●ŐDzb╗ḶŐ7Ḷ7ОⓈԱՁ●b7ÛḶŐìƆⓒ7╗ĠŐḶⓈḚĠ7╗ĠDz7ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁ7Ḷฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎฎỏ
ⓈЌ●╗7″ฎฌ AЌ7AООՁ●bA╗●ḶЌ7ḶŐ7AЌ7ACҜ●Ќ●Ɔ╗ŐA╗●ЋDz7CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌⓒ7ÛĠ●bĠ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7ƆⓈԱİDzb╗7╗Ḷ7╗ĠDz7ОŐḶbDzCⓈŐDzƆ7AЌCฌ Ġฌ
Cฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7″ɱ7 bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱCฌ ùฌ

ɱỏฌ
Ġฌ Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆ7ƆDz╗7ḶŐ╗Ġ7●Ќ7ՁЋҜb7‫ ں‬ɱ㈠‫ ں‬″㈠‫ ں‬ธxⓒ7●7╗ĠDz7AООՁ●bAЌ╗7CDzҜḶЌƆ╗ŐA╗DzƆ7●╗7●Ɔ7●ҜОḶƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ḶŐฌ


ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦฌ
●ҜОŐAb╗●bAԱՁDz7╗Ḷ7AbĠ●DzЋDz7CⓈDz7╗Ḷ7╗ḶОḶḚŐAОĠ●b7bḶЌC●╗●ḶЌƆⓒ7ЌA╗ⓈŐAՁ7DzA╗ⓈŐDzƆⓒ7ACİAbDzЌ╗7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7 ธㅡƥฌ
ธฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7ОA╗╗DzŐЌƆⓒ7ḶŐ7Ḷ╗ĠDzŐ7Ɔ●╗Dz7Ձ●Ҝ●╗A╗●ḶЌƆ㈠ฌ

ӧธ
‫ں‬
ӧธ‫ں‬ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ

‫ںں‬ો xx
ฎฎ

ฎ″
ỏฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦ ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ḶÛЌDzŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗7゜7bbִŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗ฌ

ỏฌ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ՁḶ╗7ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7CŐ●ЋDzÛ Aù7 ฎฎ Dz Ṳ ㈠7ㄦƥ7Û ●C Dz 7b ՁЋ 7 ●Ő Dz 7Ġ ù C Ő A Ќ ╗ ⓒฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ฎɱỏฌ
ㄦƥ7Û ●CDz7bՁЋ7●ŐDz7ĠùCŐAЌ╗ⓒ ฌ ՁЋЋÛ C7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗7 ОDzŐฌ ỏฌ Ɔ ╗ Ő Dz Dz ╗ 7Ձ●Ḛ Ġ ╗ 7A Ќ C 7╗ Ő A   ●b ฌ
ӧธ
Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7Ձ●ḚĠ╗7AЌC7╗ŐA●bฌ ฎỏฌ ḶŐ̬‫ں‬ฎx″̬‫ں‬ՙ″ㄦ‫ںں‬ɱฌ ‫ں‬ฎՙỏฌ Ɔ ●Ḛ Ќ A Ձ7Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7О Dz Ő ฌ ⓈЌ●╗゜ОՁAЌฌ
‫ں‬ฎ  ●ՁDz 7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7О A Ḛ Dz 7″‫ں‬ฌ
Ɔ●ḚЌAՁ7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗7ОDzŐฌӧธ ″ỏฌ Ɔ ╗Ḷ О 7 ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗ฌ
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎՙỏฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ Ḷ  7О A Ő b Dz Ձ7Ҝ A О Ɔ 7A Ќ C ⊿ฌ

‫ ں‬xો ㄦx
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Dz Ṳ ㈠7̶ƥ7Û ●C Dz 7╗ Dz ՁDz О Ġ Ḷ Ќ Dz ฌ
Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7Ḷ Ő ̬‫ں‬″xx̬‫ں‬ㄦㄦɱฎɱㅡฌ
ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁฌ
ОŐ●Ќ╗DzC̬ฌx̶ֱ‫ں‬ธֱธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

ฎɱ¤ธㄦƥ̶ㄦफDz ฌ
Ќ xx Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7ธ̶ՙ7Ɔ  ฌ
О ●̬7‫ں‬xો ̶x㈠
ӧธ‫ں‬
ฎㄦỏฌ ㅡ ՙ㈠ㄦxƥฌ DzṲ㈠″फ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏฌ О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ DzAŐ╗ĠÛḶŐì7C●ƆbՁA●ҜDzŐฌ ḶÛЌDzŐ7゜7CDzЋDzՁḶОDzŐฌ
ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ ●ЌḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ
ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ ㅡxƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦ7Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
ḶŐ̬ฎ″ฎ̬″ɱՙㅡx″ฌ ̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏฌ Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
ฎฎỏฌ
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏ

ㅡx㈠xxƥ7
̶ x㈠xxƥ7
Ḷ 7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ ՙxֱ╗7Ő゜Û 7ֱ7ОⓈԱՁ●bฌ ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡxฌ
ธ″ો ㄦx7 ธՙો xx7 ธՙો ㄦx7 ธฎો xxฌ ธฎ ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
ธ̶ો ㄦx7 ธㅡો xx7 ธㅡો ㄦx7 ธㄦો xx7 ″ỏฌ ธㄦો ㄦx7 ธ″ો xx7
ธธો xx7 ธธો ㄦx7 ธ̶ો xx7 ฌ ỏ bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐ7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙxฌ
‫ں‬ฎ

‫ں‬xો xx

DzṲ㈠ㅡफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ
ฎՙ ӧธ ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7‫ں‬xⓒ7 О●̬7ธ″ો ธ″㈠ฎ̶ฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏ7 Ա ḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ̶ỏฌ ƆⓈŐЋDzù7C●ƆbՁḶƆⓈŐDzฌ

DzṲ㈠″फ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ
DzṲ㈠7ОŐЋ7ЋAⓈՁ╗ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ ㅡỏฌ
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱฎՙxỏฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ ОAḚDz7ธธ7Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ ̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ ″xֱ╗7Ő゜Û 7ֱ7ОⓈԱՁ●bฌ DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
Û C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏDzṲ㈠ฎफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ
̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ DzṲ㈠7‫ں‬ธफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C77bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ
DzṲ㈠″फ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ Ա О̬7ɱો ՙx㈠xxฌ
DzṲ㈠7‫ں‬xफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ Ɔ╗A╗●b7ÛA╗DzŐ7ОŐDzƆƆⓈŐDzฌ

ɱો ՙx
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ธ̶xxฌ Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
DzṲ㈠7ฎफ7C●О7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ ●ŐDz7CDzОAŐ╗ҜDzЌ╗̬ฌ
ㅡ″㌫ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
╗ŐA●b7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ

DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱฎՙxỏฌ
ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7ÛDzՁՁƆ7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ŐDzҜḶЋDzC7ŐḶҜ7ƆDzŐЋ●bDz̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
CŐA●ЌAḚDz7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ՁฌḶ ╗7″ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx ՁЋЋÛC̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ
ՁḶ╗7̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ㄦⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7
bՁЋ7ĠAЌƆDzЌ̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ
ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬ฌ x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠ฌ
″ֱAฌ bՁЋ7CÛḚ7 ̬ฌ
ԱḶḶì7‫ں‬xⓒ7ОAḚDz7ธธฌ bAⓈ╗●ḶЌ7╗Ḷ7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ7
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
╗‫ں‬ฌ
ธ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ɱ̬‫ں‬ㄦ̬xՙ7ОҜฌ
О Ձ7 DzAƆDzҜDzЌ╗7゜7CDzC●bA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ
О Ձฌ
ธxƥ7ŐDzAŐ7ùAŐC7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ƆDz╗ԱAbì7 ธxƥ7ŐDzAŐ7ùAŐC7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
″ƥ7 ″ƥฌ




㈠ɱ

ɱɱ
╗ Û ″x
ɱՙ
╗ Û ‫ں‬ฌ
ӧɱՙ ӧɱ О Ձฌ
╗ Û ㈠xxỏ ӧɱㄦ ╗ Û ฎ㈠‫ں‬ㄦ
ฌ ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dz7 ╗Û ㈠xxỏ ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dz7 ฌ ỏฌ bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ
ฌ ฌ
″ƥ7 ″ƥฌ
ㄦƥ7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ


ՙ̶

㈠x
‫ں‬x゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ


AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ںں‬ฌ

 Ձฌ
㈠‫ں‬


ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ

Ձฌ
ɱ

Ḛ x
‫ں‬ՙ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ

ɱ̶
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ں‬ㅡฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫̶ֱں‬xx‫ں‬ฌ

ɱ ธ㈠
ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dzฌ

Ḛ x

㈠xx
ɱ̶ Ḛ ฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ

ɱ‫ں‬
ɱx㈠ՙɱ
̶㈠‫ں‬″੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ ธ㈠″੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠ㄦxฌ bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ
Ḛ ‫ں‬㈠x
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7╗ŐAb╗7ՙbฌ ɱ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ


ОՁA╗7ԱḶḶì7ՙ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ ̶ ㈠‫ں‬x੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬㈠ㄦxฌ ɱ

㈠″
ธ㈠̶ՙ੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌฌ xฌ


㈠ธ
ОՁA╗7ԱḶḶì7ՙ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzAฌ

Ḛ ɱ
 Ḛ ̶㈠xx
ՁḶ╗7ㅡ̶7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

Ձ ฎ

ɱธ
ฌ ฌ ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠ㄦxฌ

ɱธ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡx7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

㈠ธฎ
ɱธ Ձฌ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
ӧɱx㈠ฎ ̶ƥฌ ̶ƥฌ
̶ỏฌ DzṲ㈠ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ ӧฎɱ㈠‫ں‬″ ӧɱธ㈠xx
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ ЌḚ ฌ ỏฌ DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌC7 ỏฌ Dz Ṳ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌC Ќ Ḛฌ Ќ Ḛฌ

A 7 ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ֱ7╗ùО●bAՁ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌฌ Ա 7 ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ֱ7╗ùО●bAՁ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌฌ b 7 Û DzƆ╗DzŐՁù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ֱ7╗ùО●bAՁ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌฌ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ ‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ ‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
О Ձฌ
ɱฎ㈠ธㅡฌ ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ
╗Û ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ О Ձฌ ●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ
ㄦƥ7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ ฌ
ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ ɱ ɱ㈠xx AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ
ӧɱㄦ㈠xxỏฌ ╗Û ฌ
ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dz7 ″ƥฌ
╗Û ฌ
̶ƥ7╗ùОฌ
ธxƥ7ŐDzAŐ7ùAŐC7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ ╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)ฌ

xx
‫ں‬ฎ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ

Ḛฌ
ɱ ‫ں‬㈠
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ


ㄦ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ

㈠ㄦ

Ḛ
ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠ㄦxฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ں‬ɱฌ ɱ

㈠″″

ɱx ฌ
Ḛ x
ɱธ

bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ xỏ

ɱธ ฌ
))ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠xxฌ Ḛ ธ㈠̶ɱ

㈠‫ں‬ɱ
ฌ ฌ Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ

Ќ

ธ㈠x Ḛ ฌ

ɱ㈠ㅡ
̶ƥฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ㄦ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
ӧɱ Ќ

ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ
‫ں‬ỏ
ㅡㄦฌ


ɱx㈠
Ձฌ

C 7 DzAƆ╗DzŐՁù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù Dz 7 ƆḶⓈ╗ 7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ӧ╗ùО●bAՁỏฌ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ ‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
О Ձฌ О Ձฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
)●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ b Ձฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7
О ՙⓒ
Ձ 7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7 ธㅡƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
ӧɱㄦ㈠xxỏฌ
ㄦ㈠ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ ╗Û ฌ
ธƥฌ ㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 AŐDzAฌ ՁAЌCƆAbОDzฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ
╗ùОฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
ԱⓈ))DzŐฌ bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bA 7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ЋAŐ●DzƆฌ
Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ ỏฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱxธธฌ
ӧɱ‫ں‬㈠xx bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ
╗Û ฌ


ՁḶ╗7̶ธ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

㈠ㅡ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ


ฎ㈠ɱ

Оฌ
╗b ธ
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

Ա
㈠″ b ฌ

ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ

ฎฎ

A
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

㈠ㄦㅡ
ฎฎ b ฌ
̶ỏ

゜Ձ● ɱ

ฎฎ ƆÛ


ธฌ
ฎ ฎ Ձ゜A

㈠ㄦ ฌ

A b ฎ㈠ธ
b ธ㈠ՙธ੧ 7ӧธ੧ 7╗ùОỏฌ

ฎฎ b ゜Ձ●
DzṲ㈠7ŐDz╗A●Ќ●ЌḚ7Û AՁՁฌ ธ੧ 7╗ùОฌ

㈠‫ں‬ՙ Оฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥ7ӧㅡธֱ●Ќ7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ
ㄦ㈠ธธƥฌ
ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡx7び7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ7び7ЌDzЋACA7び7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7ОDzԱԱՁDz7bŐDzDzì7AЋDzЌⓈDzⓒ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ

Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙx77bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎ77ֱֱֱֱֱ77ÛÛÛ㈠İŐĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌDzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆ㈠bḶҜฌ

CDzО╗Ġ7Ḷ)7bḶЋDzŐฌ ‫ں‬ɱฌ
ฎ ㅡ㈠ ╗Ő ฌ ฌ
Ɔฌ

7ฎफÛ Ḷ Ќฌ ฌ Dz ฌƆ
ㄦ̶ฌ ●Ќ Ћ ╗ฌ
ฎธ㈠ Û Ő ฌ
Ҝ ฌ
ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌ

7ฎफƆ
●Ќ Ћ
ฌŐ


ฌ ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ㈠ㄦx7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7DzAƆ╗7Ɔ●CDz7ḶЌՁùỏฌ
㈠Ġฌ Aฌ ฌ●ฌՁ ฌ
b ●Ћ ●Ձ 7


╗ ฌDz

‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ İ ㈠ฌฌŐ ฌ
Dz ฌЌ
О Ձ7 ธƥฌ О Ձฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ՁAЌCƆAbОDzฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
)●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ ԱⓈ))DzŐฌ b Ձฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7
О ՙⓒ
Ձ 7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ ธㅡƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ

ㄦ㈠ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ ธƥฌ ‫ں‬ธƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ㅡƥฌ ธxƥฌ ธƥฌ ӧɱ̶㈠″‫ں‬ỏ


ธƥฌ ㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 AŐDzAฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ╗Û ฌ
╗ùОฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ●ƆՁAЌCฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ЋAŐ●DzƆฌ
Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ ỏฌ
ӧɱx㈠̶x AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱxธㅡฌ
╗Û ฌ


bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ


㈠″

Оฌ

╗b
Ќ
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

゜A b ฌ
Ա

╗b ㅡ
ՁḶ╗7̶x7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ


ՙ㈠ɱ

ฎՙ㈠ ฌ
ฎՙ

ՙ‫ں‬
゜Ձ●
ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ
DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁ7


A
ฎՙ ƆÛ

b Ձ ՙ㈠ՙɱ
‫ں‬ỏ

ɱ
㈠ՙㅡ ฌ

A b ՙ㈠ㅡ″
ฎՙ b ゜Ձ
‫ں‬㈠″ɱ੧ 7ӧธ੧ 7╗ùОỏฌ ธ㈠ㅡธ੧ 7ӧธ੧ 7╗ùОỏฌ
DzṲ㈠7ŐDz╗A●Ќ●ЌḚ7Û AՁՁฌ

Page 598 of 1332


㈠̶ ●Оฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥ7ӧㅡธफ7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ
ㄦ㈠ธ‫ں‬ƥฌ ฌ
CDzО╗Ġ7Ḷ)7bḶЋDzŐฌ ㈠̶ㄦ
ฎ̶ ╗Ő ฌ
7ฎफÛ
╗DzЌ╗A╗●ЋDz7ҜAОฌ

●Ќ Ћ

AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7

ฎ‫ں‬㈠ՙ‫ ں‬Őฌ bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—7C7‫ف‬㈠ฌ


ฎफƆÛ
●ЌЋ7
ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ

‫ֱ ں‬ฎxxֱธธՙֱธ″xxฌ
ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ƆⓈԱC●Ћ●Ɔ●ḶЌฌ

Ḛ 7 ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ㈠ㄦx7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7DzAƆ╗7Ɔ●CDz7ḶЌՁù7Û ●╗Ġ7Ҝ DzC●AЌ7ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7●ƆՁAЌCỏฌ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
CDz╗A●ՁƆ7AЌC7bŐḶƆƆ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌƆฌ

О Ձฌ О Ձฌ
b●╗ù7Ḷ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬xՙ7

ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ


)●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ b Ձฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7 ธㅡƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ

ㄦ㈠ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ ธƥฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ ㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ӧɱ̶㈠xxỏฌ


ธƥฌ ㄦƥฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 AŐDzAฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ ╗Û ฌ
╗ùОฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bA 7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ ԱⓈ))DzŐฌ
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ЋAŐ●DzƆฌ
Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ ỏฌ
bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—ฌ
ӧฎ ㄦx
ɱ㈠ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱธ‫ֱں‬xx‫ں‬ฌ
╗Û ฌ bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธCฌ bผŴ่֭7Ḷ‫֭ﭨ‬ผγ֭Ŵ₡ฌ


ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

b Ձฌ

㈠ㅡ
Ќ

Ûฌ
ฎ″㈠

╗b
ՙxธֱธธՙֱธɱธɱฌ

╗b ″
″㈠ՙ

ฎ″
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁ7

ฎ″

゜Ձ●О
Ab ゜ ㄦㄦ

ฎ″ ฌ
A

㈠ㅡՙ
ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ

ฎ″

Ա Ɔ ㈠ㄦՙ
̶ỏ

DzṲ㈠7ŐDz╗A●Ќ●ЌḚ7Û AՁՁฌ

A b ㈠ธธ
ฎ″ b ゜Ձ●
㈠ธ‫ ں‬Оฌ
DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥ7ӧㅡธफ7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ
ㅡ㈠ฎฎƥฌ ฌ
㈠‫ں‬ㄦ ฌ
ฎ ธ Û ╗Ő İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ฌ 7ฎफ Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
㈠ՙɱ ฌ ●Ќ Ћ
ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁฌ
ОŐ●Ќ╗DzC̬ฌx̶ֱ‫ں‬ธֱธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

ฎx Û Ő
फƆ
Ћ7ฎ
●Ќ
Ġ 7 ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ㈠ㄦx7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7Û DzƆ╗7Ɔ●CDz7ḶЌՁùỏฌ
‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
О Ձ7 b Ձ7 О Ձฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDz ╗7 ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ

ธƥฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ


ㄦƥฌ ㄦƥฌ
Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ
Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ

bฌ
゜A x
C Ő●ЋDzÛ Aù7ӧ‫ں‬ธ੧

‫ں‬x
7Ҝ AṲỏฌ 7Ҝ AṲỏฌ

b Ձ x㈠x
C Ő●ЋDzÛ Aù7ӧ‫ں‬ธ੧
●ŐDz7CDzОAŐ╗ҜDzЌ╗̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
╗ŐA●b7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥฌ CŐA●ЌAḚDz7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ
ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx ՁЋЋÛC̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ

bՁЋ7ĠAЌƆDzЌ̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ

●ฌ ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ7╗7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7ԱḶ╗Ġ7Ɔ●CDzƆỏฌ x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ bՁЋ7CÛḚ7 ̬ฌ

╗ธฌ
ธ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ɱ̬‫ں‬ㄦ̬ㅡธ7ОҜฌ
Page 599 of 1332
  $
 ""

 
#

 >"
 > 
# >>
#
>!


 




 
#
=
<+
#

=
#
< #



Page 600 of 1332
  $
 ""

 
#

 >"
 > 
# >>
#
>!


 




 
#
=
<+
#

=
#
< #



Page 601 of 1332


  $
 ""

 
#

 >"
 > 
# >>
#
>!


 




 
#
=
<+
#

=
#
< #



İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯ⓒ7●่㌱㈠ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7О֭⇡⇡к֭7bผ֭֭27A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬77ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯77Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ77ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ
Оγ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎ77İਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこฌ

Ҝਙ่₡Ŵੂⓒ7
֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬ฎⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ฌ
̶̶̶7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″77777777Оγ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ธธɱֱ″̶x‫ں‬ฌ

Ő̬֭7 AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7⎯ħ₡֭7ਙ⑾7Աਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ŐਙŴ₡7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7‫ں‬″̶x7⑾‫ש‬7֭Ŵ⎯‫ש‬ฌ
ਙ⑾7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผ⎯֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7C֭㌱Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ
ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ֱ7ÛA●ЋDzŐ7Ḷ-7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆฌ

A‫่̬שש‬7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Cħ‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ⓒฌ

╗γ֭7ऑ—ผऑਙ⎯֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7к֭‫֭שש‬ผ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7㈾—⎯‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7⑾ਙผ7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵкฌ

ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7 ₡֭‫ﭨ‬ħŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7 ⑾ผਙこ7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡⎯7 Ŵ⎯7 ਙ—‫ש‬кħ่֭₡7 ʉħ‫ש‬γħ่7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 Ⓢ่ħ⑾ਙผこ7 Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡7 CผŴʉħ่‫⎯ف‬7 ⑾ਙผ7 bкŴผ4ฌ

bਙ—่‫ੂש‬7 Aผ֭Ŵ7 ӧⓈƆCbbAỏⓒ7 Ŵ₡ਙऑ‫֭ש‬₡7 ⇡ੂ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 bħ‫ੂש‬7 ਙ⑾7 ՁŴ⎯7 Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7 Ŵ่₡7 ╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7 ‫ں‬ɱⓒ7 Ŵ⎯7 ʉ֭кк7 Ŵ⎯7 Ŵ7 ‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 Ŵккਙʉฌ

ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γผ֭֭7ӧ̶ỏ7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7ʉγ֭ผ֭7‫ש‬ʉਙ7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7ӧธỏ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7こŴゥħこ—こ7Ŵккਙʉ֭₡7⑾ਙผฌ

‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7—่₡֭ผ7╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7‫ں‬ɱ7⑾ਙผ7Őֱธ7Ύਙ่ħ่‫ف‬㈠ฌ

╗γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭⎯7Ŵ7ㄦ‫ש⑾ֱں‬7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ʉŴੂ7⑾ਙผ7b—кֱCֱ֭ƆŴ㌱7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫⎯ש‬7ऑ֭ผ7ⓈƆCbbA7 ธ‫ں‬ธฌ

Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผħ่㌱ħऑŴк7‫֭ﭨ‬γħ㌱—кŴผ7่֭‫ש‬ผŴ่㌱֭7‫ف‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7こ—⎯‫ש‬7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7こħ่ħこ—こ7ʉħ₡‫ש‬γ7ਙ⑾7ㄦxֱ⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ऑ֭ผ7╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7‫ں‬ɱ㈠xㅡ㈠xՙx㈠77╗γ֭ฌ

⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7γŴ⎯7ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫֭ש‬₡7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7ʉħ₡‫ש‬γ7⑾ผਙこ7Աਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ŐਙŴ₡7кħこħ‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ7こŴゥħこ—こ7ਙ⑾7ㅡՙ㈠ㄦֱ⑾‫ש‬7ऑ֭ผ7
ħк֭7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОŴ‫֭ف‬7″‫ں‬ฌ

ਙ⑾7ОŴผ㌱֭к7ҜŴऑ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผ֭㌱к—₡֭7㌱ਙこऑкħŴ่㌱֭㈠77A7こħ่ħこ—こ7ㅡՙֱ⑾‫ש‬7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ֱש‬ਙ⑾ֱʉŴੂ7ʉħ₡‫ש‬γ7ħ⎯7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡㈠77╗ਙฌ

⑾Ŵ㌱ħкħ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7่֭‫ש‬ผŴ่㌱֭7‫ف‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬7ʉγħк֭7こŴħ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ħ่‫ف‬7⑾ħผ֭7₡֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ⓒ7⎯ħ₡֭ʉŴк47ħ⎯7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7ਙ่7ਙ่֭7⎯ħ₡֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ

⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ש‬γผਙŴ‫ש‬7₡֭ऑ‫ש‬γ7Ŵผ֭Ŵ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7b—кֱCֱ֭ƆŴ㌱㈠77╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7‫ں‬ɱ㈠xㅡ㈠ธ̶x7Ŵккਙʉ⎯7Ŵ7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γħ่ฌ

Ŵ7 ‫ف‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7 ㌱ਙここ—่ħ‫ੂש‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7 Ŵ7 こħ่ħこ—こ7 ⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7 ʉħ₡‫ש‬γ7 ਙ⑾7ธㅡֱ⑾֭֭‫ש‬7 Ŵ⎯7 こ֭Ŵ⎯—ผ֭₡7 ⑾ผਙこ7 ⑾Ŵ㌱֭7ਙ⑾7 ㌱—ผ⇡7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ⑾Ŵ㌱֭7ਙ⑾ฌ

㌱—ผ⇡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7こħ่ħこ—こ7ㄦֱ⑾‫ש‬7⎯ħ₡֭ʉŴк47ਙ่7‫⎯ֱں‬ħ₡֭㈠77A⎯7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผऑผ֭‫֭ש‬₡7⑾ผਙこ7‫ں‬ɱ㈠xㅡx㈠xՙxⓒ7ʉγ่֭7Ŵ7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7่֭₡⎯7ħ่7Ŵ7㌱—кֱ

₡ֱ֭⎯Ŵ㌱ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7㌱Ŵ่่ਙ‫ש‬7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7こਙผ֭7‫ש‬γŴ่7⑾ਙ—ผ7⎯ħ่‫ف‬к֭7⑾Ŵこħкੂ7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7кਙ‫⎯ש‬㈠77
ਙผ7㌱кŴผħ‫ੂש‬ⓒฌ

‫ש‬γħ⎯7 ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 ʉħкк7 ⇡֭7 ⎯—⇡₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7 ħ่‫ש‬ਙ7 ̶7 кਙ‫⎯ש‬7 ่֭㌱ਙこऑŴ⎯⎯ħ่‫ف‬7 ɱ7 ⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7 ⑾ਙผ7 Ŵ7 ‫ש‬ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ں‬ฎฌ

㌱ਙ่₡ਙこħ่ħ—こ7 ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7 —่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7 ⎯֭ऑŴผŴ‫֭ש‬7 ⑾ผਙこ7 ⑾ผ֭֭7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่₡ħ่‫ف‬7 ⎯ħ่‫ف‬кֱ֭⑾Ŵこħкੂ7 ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7 кਙ‫⎯ש‬㈠7 7 ⓈƆCbbAฌ

 ธ‫ں‬ธ7кħこħ‫⎯ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7к่֭‫שف‬γ7ਙ⑾7Ŵ7㌱—кֱ₡ֱ֭⎯Ŵ㌱7‫ש‬ਙ7ㄦxxֱ⑾֭֭‫⊿ש‬7ʉγ֭ผ֭Ŵ⎯ⓒ7╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7‫ں‬ɱ㈠xㅡ㈠‫ں‬xx7ħ⎯7ऑ֭ผこħ⎯⎯ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7—ऑ7‫ש‬ਙ7″xxֱ⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γฌ

₡֭㌱кŴผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7 ֭ゥ㌱֭⎯⎯7 к่֭‫שف‬γ7 ⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7 Ŵккਙʉ֭₡7 ਙ่кੂ7 ħ⑾7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7 ⇡ੂ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7
ħผ֭7 bਙ₡֭7Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴк㈠77 ╗γ֭ผ֭⑾ਙผ֭ⓒ7 ‫ש‬γ֭ฌ

ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭⎯7 ⑾ਙผ7 Ŵ7 ₡֭Ŵ₡ֱ่֭₡7 ⎯‫⇡—ש‬7 ʉγ֭ผ֭7 Ŵ7 ㌱—кֱ₡ֱ֭⎯Ŵ㌱7 ħ⎯7 ่ਙผこŴккੂ7 ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡㈠7 7 Aкਙ่‫ف‬ฌ

㌱่֭‫֭ש‬ผкħ่֭7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7 ⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬ⓒ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ㌱—кֱ₡ֱ֭⎯Ŵ㌱7 ħ⎯7 ㄦɱՙ7 ⑾‫ש‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ㌱่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7 Ŵ่₡7 ″̶ㄦ㈠ㄦx7 ⑾‫ש‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫֭ש‬₡7 кħऑ7ਙ⑾ฌ

̶″㈠″‫ש ש⑾ ں‬ਙ ħ‫ ⎯ש‬кħऑ ਙ⑾ ‫—ف‬


‫֭שש—ف‬ผ㈠77
ผਙこ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫֭ש‬₡7кħऑ7ਙ⑾7‫֭שש—ف‬ผⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯‫⇡—ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7ħ⎯7к֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γŴ่7‫ں‬ㄦx7⑾‫ש‬7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7‫̶ں‬″㈠″‫ں‬7⑾‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ħ‫⎯ש‬7кħऑ7ਙ⑾7‫֭שש—ف‬ผ㈠ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 0eo 21f 3 3 2
ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ
ÛA●ЋDzŐ7Ḷ-7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆฌ
ОŴ‫֭ف‬7ธ7ਙ⑾7ธฌ

╗γ֭7 —่ħ‫֭—׀‬7 Ŵ่₡7 ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ₡ħこ่֭⎯ħਙ่⎯7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ⑾кŴ‫ف‬7 кਙ‫ש‬7 кŴੂਙ—‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ऑŴผ㌱֭к7 ऑผ֭㌱к—₡֭⎯7 ㌱ਙこऑкħŴ่㌱֭ฌ

ʉħ‫ש‬γਙ—‫ש‬7 Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7 ⇡ੂ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7


ħผ֭7 bਙ₡֭7 Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴкⓒ7 ʉγħ㌱γ7 γŴ⎯7 ⇡่֭֭7 ⎯֭㌱—ผ֭₡7 ऑ֭ผ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡7 ֭こŴħк7 ㌱γŴħ่7 ₡Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡ฌ

֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7 ″ⓒ7 ธx‫ں‬ɱ㈠7 7 Ок֭Ŵ⎯֭7 ผ֭㌱ਙ‫่ف‬ħ▷֭7 ‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7 ₡—ผħ่‫ف‬7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬7 ऑγŴ⎯֭7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 ʉħккฌ

₡֭‫֭ש‬ผこħ่֭7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ㌱‫—ש‬Ŵк7⑾ħผ֭7㌱ਙ₡֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ħ่㌱к—₡ħ่‫ف‬7⇡—‫ש‬7่ਙ‫ש‬7кħこħ‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ੂש‬ऑ֭7ਙ⑾7Ŵ—‫ש‬ਙこŴ‫ש‬ħ㌱7⑾ħผ֭7⎯ऑผħ่4к֭ผฌ

⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ⎯7 ਙ่㌱֭7 Ŵ7
ħผ֭7 Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผ7 γŴ⎯7 ⇡่֭֭7 ⎯֭к֭㌱‫֭ש‬₡7 ⑾ਙผ7 ‫ש‬γħ⎯7 ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 Ŵ⎯7 ‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7 Ŵผ֭ฌ

ħ่γ֭ผ่֭‫ש‬кੂ7 ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7 ‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ⇡к֭⎯7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ħこऑŴ㌱‫ש‬7 ₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬㈠7 7 ╗γ֭7 ⎯ħ‫่ف‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ่㌱֭7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡7 ֭こŴħк7 ㌱γŴħ่7 ħ⎯7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ㌱ਙ่‫ੂ֭ﭨ‬ฌ

Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7㌱—кֱ₡ֱ֭⎯Ŵ㌱7кŴੂਙ—‫ש‬7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7
ħผ֭7bਙ₡֭7Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴк㈠ฌ

╗γ֭7—่ħ‫֭—׀‬7Ŵ่₡7ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7₡ħこ่֭⎯ħਙ่⎯7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾кŴ‫ف‬7кਙ‫ש‬7кŴੂਙ—‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑŴผ㌱֭к7ऑผ֭㌱к—₡֭⎯7㌱ਙこऑкħŴ่㌱֭7ਙ⑾ฌ

Ŵ₡֭‫—׀‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬кੂ7⎯ħ▷֭₡7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γਙ—‫ש‬7ਙ⇡‫ש‬Ŵħ่ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵккਙʉ7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7γŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬ฌ

ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γผ֭֭7ӧ̶ỏ7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7ʉγ֭ผ֭7‫ש‬ʉਙ7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7ӧธỏ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7こŴゥħこ—こ7Ŵккਙʉ֭₡㈠77╗γħ⎯7ħ⎯7こŴ₡֭7㌱к֭Ŵผ֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7кħこħ‫֭ש‬₡7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬ฌ

⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬ऑผħ่‫ש‬7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7 —่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 Ŵผਙ—่₡7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ⇡—к⇡7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ㌱—кֱ₡ֱ֭⎯Ŵ㌱7 ʉγħк֭7 Ŵ₡γ֭ผħ่‫ف‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7 ‫ں‬ɱ7 ⎯֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱4ฌ

ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬㈠ฌ

╗γ֭7 ㌱—ผ⇡7 Ŵ่₡7 ‫֭שש—ف‬ผ7 ⑾ਙผ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 b—кֱCֱ֭ƆŴ㌱7 ħ⎯7 Őֱ╗ੂऑ֭7 ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7 ㌱—ผ⇡ħ่‫ف‬7 ऑ֭ผ7 ⓈƆCbbA7  ธ‫ں‬ՙ㈠̶㈠Ɔ‫ں‬7 ‫ש‬ਙฌ

ऑผ֭㌱к—₡֭7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ่֭㌱֭⎯⎯ħ‫ੂש‬7 ਙ⑾7 ऑŴ่7 ₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂ⎯7 ʉħ‫ש‬γħ่7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 b—кֱCֱ֭ƆŴ㌱7 ‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7 ʉਙ—к₡7 ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผʉħ⎯֭7 ㌱ਙ่⑾кħ㌱‫ש‬7 ʉħ‫ש‬γ7 —‫ש‬ħкħ‫ੂש‬ฌ

ħ่⑾ผŴ⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭7ħ่㌱к—₡ħ่‫ف‬7⇡—‫ש‬7่ਙ‫ש‬7кħこħ‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7֭к֭㌱‫ש‬ผħ㌱Ŵк7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯⑾ਙผこ֭ผ⎯7Ŵ่₡7—‫ש‬ħкħ‫ੂש‬7⇡ਙゥ֭⎯㈠77╗γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ħ⎯7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯֭₡7‫ﭨ‬ħŴฌ

Ŵ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ऑŴ่7₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂ7⑾ผਙこ7Աਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ŐਙŴ₡7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭こŴħ่7ħ่7ऑкŴ㌱֭7Ŵ⎯7Ŵ7ऑŴผ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬ฌ

⎯ħ่㌱֭7Ŵ7‫ੂש‬ऑħ㌱Ŵк7㌱—ผ⇡7ผ֭‫—ש‬ผ่7₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂ7ʉਙ—к₡7่֭㌱ผਙŴ㌱γ7ਙ่‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱่֭‫ש‬7ऑŴผ㌱֭к⎯7ਙ⑾7кŴ่₡㈠ฌ

Û֭7⑾֭֭к7 ‫ש‬γħ⎯7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 ㌱ਙ่⑾ਙผこ⎯7 ‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7 ħ่‫ש่֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7 ╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7 ‫ں‬ɱ7 ‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7 Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭ฌ

₡֭‫ﭨ‬ħŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7⑾ผਙこ7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡⎯7Ŵ่₡7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬㈠77●7‫ש‬ผ—⎯‫ש‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7к֭‫֭שש‬ผ7㌱ਙ่㌱к—₡֭⎯7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ7Ŵ่₡ฌ

Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7ऑผਙ㌱֭⎯⎯⊿7γਙʉ֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผⓒ7ħ⑾7ੂਙ—7⎯γਙ—к₡7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7₡ਙ7่ਙ‫ש‬7γ֭⎯ħ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7こੂ7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7Ŵ‫ש‬ฌ

ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎ㈠ฌ

Ő֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂ7⎯—⇡こħ‫֭שש‬₡ⓒฌ

İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7О㈠Dz㈠ฌ
Оผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬7゜7Оผħ่㌱ħऑŴк7bħ‫ﭨ‬ħк7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผฌ

A‫̬שש‬77 ОŴผ㌱֭к7ҜŴऑ7
ħк֭7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОŴ‫֭ف‬7″‫ں‬ฌ
b—кֱCֱ֭ƆŴ㌱7Ⓢ่ħ⑾ਙผこ7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡7CผŴʉħ่‫⎯ف‬7 ธ‫ں‬ธฌ
Őֱ╗ੂऑ֭7b—ผ⇡7ִ7Ḛ—‫֭שש‬ผ7Ⓢ่ħ⑾ਙผこ7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡7CผŴʉħ่‫⎯ف‬7 ธ‫ں‬ՙ㈠̶㈠Ɔ‫ں‬ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 0eo 31f 3 3 2
İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ

-ผਙこ̬7 CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7
㈠7ìк֭ħ่7ケC4к֭ħ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕ฌ
Ɔ่֭‫̬ש‬7 ╗γ—ผ⎯₡Ŵੂⓒ7
֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7ՙⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ฎ̬ㅡ̶7AҜฌ
╗ਙ̬7 İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่⊿7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่4⎯⊿7Ɔ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ
b㌱̬7 ㌱⎯Ŵ⇡Ŵこ֭ħ⎯▷⇡—ผ‫֭ف‬ผ㌀こ֭㈠㌱ਙこ⊿7ƥḚ֭ਙผ‫֭ف‬7ЋŴผγ֭кੂħƥ⊿7ՁŴผผੂ7╗ħ่₡Ŵкк⊿7ԱผħŴ่7ĠŴк‫ﭨ‬ਙผ⎯ਙ่ฌ
Ɔ—⇡㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬7 ŐDz̬7AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7ֱ7ОŐDzAООธx‫ں‬ɱֱxxɱɱธ″7ֱ7Ҝਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Dz⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬ฌ

-ਙккਙʉ7Ⓢऑ7-кŴ‫̬ف‬7
ਙккਙʉ7—ऑฌ
-кŴ‫ف‬7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫̬⎯—ש‬7 bਙこऑк֭‫֭ש‬₡ฌ

Ḛਙਙ₡7こਙผ่ħ่‫ف‬㈠77Û֭7⎯֭֭こ7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7‫ف‬ਙħ่‫ف‬7⇡Ŵ㌱7Ŵ่₡7⑾ਙผ‫ש‬γ7ਙ่7㌱ਙ₡֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ʉγ่֭7ʉ֭7₡ਙ7่ਙ‫ש‬ฌ
γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7₡֭⑾ħ่ħ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬㈠7Ḷ่㌱֭7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7₡֭㌱ħ₡֭₡7ਙ่7ʉγŴ‫ש‬7ʉħкк7⇡֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7ਙ⇡‫ש‬Ŵħ่7Ŵ7ऑкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬ⓒ7ʉ֭7㌱Ŵ่7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7่Ŵħк7₡ਙʉ่7⑾ħผ֭7㌱ਙ₡֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬㈠ฌ

╗γŴ่⎯ฌ

CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7㈠7ìк֭ħ่ฌ
C֭ऑ—‫ੂש‬7 ħผ֭7ҜŴผ⎯γŴк7২7 ħผ֭7Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7 ħผ֭7ִ7Ő֭⎯㌱—֭ⓒ7 ħผ֭7Оผ֭‫ש่֭ﭨ‬ħਙ่7Cħ‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ฌ
̶̶̶7Ќ㈠7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ⓒ7 ㄦxxⓒ7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ77ฎɱ‫ں‬x″ฌ
C ħผ֭㌱‫̬ש‬7ՙxธֱธธɱֱx̶̶″7২7b֭кк7ՙxธ̶ֱx̶ֱxՙธxฌ

кŴ⎯‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯่֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬ฌ

ผਙこ̬7İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7ケİਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ฌ
Ɔ่֭‫̬ש‬7Û֭₡่֭⎯₡Ŵੂⓒ7(֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7x″ⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ㅡ̬ㄦՙ7ОҜฌ
╗ਙ̬7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7(㈠7ìк֭ħ่7ケCк֭ħ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕⊿7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่⎯7ケ㈾⇡ħ่⎯㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕⊿7Ɔ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ
ケ⎯⎯ʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕ฌ
b㌱̬7㌱⎯Ŵ⇡Ŵこ֭ħ⎯▷⇡—ผ‫֭ف‬ผ㌀こ֭㈠㌱ਙこ⊿7ƥḚ֭ਙผ‫֭ف‬7ЋŴผγ֭кੂħƥ7ケ‫ﭨف‬ธ̶кŴ⎯‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯㌀‫ف‬こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿7ՁŴผผੂ7╗ħ่₡Ŵкк7ケкŴผผੂ㌀к‫ש‬ผ₡㌱ਙผऑ㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿ฌ
ԱผħŴ่7ĠŴк‫ﭨ‬ਙผ⎯ਙ่7ケ⇡γŴк‫ﭨ‬ਙผ⎯ਙ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕⊿7İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7ケİਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ฌ
Ɔ—⇡㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬7ŐDz̬7AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7ֱ7ОŐDzAООธx‫ں‬ɱֱxxɱɱธ″7ֱ7Ҝਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Dz⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬ฌ

DzṲ╗DzŐЌAՁ7DzҜA●Ձฌ

Û֭₡่֭⎯₡Ŵੂⓒ7(֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7″ⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

b㌱̬7Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7╗֭Ŵこⓒฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
Ġħ7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡ⓒฌ xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
‫ں‬ฌ
P a 6g 0eo 41f 3 3 2
Ҝੂ7bкħ่֭‫ש‬7ħ⎯7ʉਙผħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש֭ف‬7Ŵ7(ħผ֭7Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผ7ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬㈠ฌ

Ŵỏ7 ●่7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴкⓒ7こੂ7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬Ő7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7bਙ่่֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77Ɔħ่㌱֭7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ħ⎯7Ŵ7ਫʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผ֭₡7₡ਙʉ่㈚ฌ
⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7⑾ผਙこ7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こⓒ7㌱Ŵ่7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7⇡֭‫ש‬ʉ่֭֭7Ŵ7γੂ₡ผŴ่‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7(Cb7⇡֭7к่֭‫שف‬γ่֭֭₡7⑾ผਙこ7‫ں‬xxֱ⑾‫ש‬7Ŵ⎯ฌ
ਙ—‫ש‬кħ่֭₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7bՁЋ7(ħผ֭7Ќਙ‫⎯֭ש‬㈠77●7‫ש‬ਙਙ7Ŵ7кਙਙ7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ธx‫ں‬ธ7●่‫֭ש‬ผ่Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7(ħผ֭7bਙ₡֭7Ŵ่₡7●7₡ħ₡่ɸ‫ש‬7⎯֭֭7Ŵ7⎯ऑ֭㌱ħ⑾ħ㌱ฌ
ผ֭⑾֭ผ่֭㌱֭7‫ש‬ਙ7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7⑾ผਙこ7Ŵ7γੂ₡ผŴ่‫ש‬7֭ゥ㌱֭ऑ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7⎯γਙ—к₡7⇡֭7ผ֭кŴ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ੂש‬ऑ֭7ਙ⑾7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こฌ
ħ่⎯‫ש‬Ŵкк֭₡㈠7 Aк⎯ਙⓒ7●7₡ਙ่ɸ‫ש‬7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7㌱ਙऑੂ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7Ќ(ОA7こŴ่—Ŵк㈠77Ḷ่㌱֭7ʉ֭7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7(ħผ֭7Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผ7ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡ⓒ7‫ש‬γ่֭ฌ
●7㌱Ŵ่7кਙਙ7こਙผ֭7㌱кਙ⎯֭кੂ7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭ħผ7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7⇡—‫ש‬7⑾ผਙこ7ʉγŴ‫ש‬7●7‫ف‬Ŵ‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭₡7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7⎯֭֭こ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7⑾к֭ゥħ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7bγħ֭⑾7ਙผ7(ħผ֭7ҜŴผ⎯γŴк7ਙ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7֭⎯‫ש‬Ŵ⇡кħ⎯γ֭₡7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭㈠77(ਙผ7ਙ—ผ7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7кŴੂਙ—‫ש‬ⓒ7ħ‫ש‬7₡ਙ֭⎯่ɸ‫ש‬7⎯֭֭こ7ऑผŴ㌱‫ש‬ħ㌱Ŵк7‫ש‬ਙฌ
㌱ਙこऑкੂ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ں‬xxֱ⑾‫ש‬7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ—‫ש‬кħ่֭₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7Ќਙ‫⎯֭ש‬7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7к֭Ŵ₡ֱħ่⎯7ʉਙ—к₡ฌ
่֭㌱֭⎯⎯ħ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7кਙਙऑħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こⓒ7ʉγħ㌱γ7ħ⎯7⎯ਙこ֭‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7ʉ֭7㌱Ŵ่ɸ‫ש‬7ħこऑк֭こ่֭‫ש‬7₡—֭7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7㌱ਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผŴħ่‫⎯ש‬㈠77╗γŴ‫ש‬7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7⎯Ŵħ₡ⓒฌ
‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7⎯֭֭こ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7⎯ਙこ֭7⑾к֭ゥħ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7●(b7bਙ₡֭7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯㌱ผ֭‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7ҜŴผ⎯γŴк7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7⑾ผਙこฌ
Ŵ7γੂ₡ผŴ่‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ7(Cb㈠77●7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ㌱֭₡7⎯ਙこ֭7㈾—ผħ⎯₡ħ㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7⎯֭‫ש‬7こਙผ֭7‫ש‬γŴ่7‫ں‬xxֱ⑾‫ש‬7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ں‬ㄦxֱ⑾‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7Ŵ7⇡ħ‫ש‬7к֭⎯⎯7Ŵ‫ש‬ฌ
ՙㄦֱ⑾‫ש‬㈠77(ਙผ7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬Ő7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こⓒ7㌱Ŵ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7⇡֭7ħ่㌱ผ֭Ŵ⎯֭₡㈠ฌ

⇡ỏ7 Ûħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7Ќ(ОA7‫̶ں‬7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こⓒ7Ŵ7⑾ħผ֭7ผħ⎯֭ผ7ผਙਙこ7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡㈠77Ûħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬Ő7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こⓒ7●7⎯—⎯ऑ֭㌱‫ש‬7Ŵ7γੂ⇡ผħ₡7⇡֭‫ש‬ʉ่֭֭7‫̶ں‬7Ŵ่₡7‫̶ֱں‬
C㈠77bŴ⎯֭7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7Ŵ7bՁЋ7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ŵ⎯ऑ֭㌱‫ש‬﹒77╗ਙ7⇡—ħк₡7Ŵ7‫֭ש‬こऑ֭ผŴ‫—ש‬ผ֭7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬ผਙкк֭₡7Ŵ่₡7₡֭₡ħ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7⑾ħผ֭ฌ
ผħ⎯֭ผ7ผਙਙこ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7֭ゥ‫֭ש‬ผ่Ŵк7⑾ħผ֭7₡֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7Ŵ⎯7ʉਙ—к₡7⇡֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7ħ⎯่ɸ‫ש‬7ऑผŴ㌱‫ש‬ħ㌱Ŵк7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γħ⎯ฌ
₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬㈠77A‫ف‬Ŵħ่ⓒ7кħ֭кੂ7Ŵ7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผ7⇡—‫ש‬7ħ⑾7ੂਙ—7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7‫ש‬γਙ—‫ف‬γ‫⎯ש‬7Ŵผ֭7㌱֭ผ‫ש‬Ŵħ่кੂฌ
ʉ֭к㌱ਙこ֭㈠ฌ

㌱ỏ7 (ħ่Ŵккੂⓒ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7(Cb7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ㈠77●‫ש‬7ʉħкк7⇡֭7ħ่γ֭ผ่֭‫ש‬кੂ7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7こ—่ħ㌱ħऑŴк7ʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผ7⎯—ऑऑкੂ7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱Ŵ⎯֭7ਙ⑾ฌ
ऑผ֭⎯⎯—ผħ▷Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77Ɔħ่㌱֭7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7ʉਙ—к₡7⇡֭7㌱ਙ่่֭㌱‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7こ֭‫֭ש‬ผⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑਙ‫ש่֭ש‬ħŴк7⑾ਙผ7⇡Ŵ㌱7⑾кਙʉ7ħ่7⎯—㌱γฌ
Ŵ่7֭‫ש่֭ﭨ‬7ਙ⑾7ऑผ֭⎯⎯—ผħ▷Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77╗γ֭ผ֭⑾ਙผ֭ⓒ7֭Ŵ㌱γ7こ֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ʉਙ—к₡7่֭֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7֭‫—׀‬ħऑऑ֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7তֱħ่㌱γ7ŐООA7⇡Ŵ㌱⑾кਙʉฌ
₡֭‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭㈠77╗γ֭7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่7●7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7γ֭ผ֭7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผ֭⎯⎯—ผ֭7▷ਙ่֭7ħ⎯7ธ̶xx7ผ֭⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ħ่7ㅡ″㌫7ऑ⎯ħ㈠77●ɸкк7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ—่7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
่—こ⇡֭ผ⎯7⇡—‫ש‬7ħ‫ש‬7⎯֭֭こ⎯7ʉ֭ɸผ֭7‫ف‬ਙħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7γ֭Ŵ₡7кਙ⎯⎯7㌱ผਙ⎯⎯ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡Ŵ㌱⑾кਙʉ7₡֭‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭7ħ่7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
こ֭‫֭ש‬ผ㈠77О֭ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ՁЋЋÛC7㌱γŴผ‫⎯ש‬ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7γ֭Ŵ₡7кਙ⎯⎯7Ŵ㌱ผਙ⎯⎯7Ŵ7তֱħ่㌱γ7こ֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ħ⎯7‫ں‬ㄦ7ऑ⎯ħ㈠77╗γħ⎯7₡ผਙऑ⎯7ਙ—ผ7ऑผ֭⎯⎯—ผ֭7₡ਙʉ่7‫ש‬ਙ7̶‫ں‬ฌ
ऑ⎯ħ㈠77О֭ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ՁЋЋÛC7㌱γŴผ‫⎯ש‬ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7γ֭Ŵ₡7кਙ⎯⎯7Ŵ㌱ผਙ⎯⎯7Ŵ7তֱħ่㌱γ7⇡Ŵ㌱⑾кਙʉ7ħ⎯7ธx7ऑ⎯ħ㈠77╗γħ⎯7こ֭Ŵ่⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7֭Ŵ㌱γ7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴкฌ
—่ħ‫ש‬7ʉħкк7⇡֭7к֭⑾‫ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ںں‬7ऑ⎯ħ㈠77ḚผŴ่‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7̶‫ں‬7ऑ⎯ħ7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7⑾Ŵ‫ﭨ‬ਙผŴ⇡к֭7⇡—‫ש‬7Ŵ‫ש‬7к֭Ŵ⎯‫ש‬7ʉਙผŴ⇡к֭㈠77A‫ש‬7‫ںں‬7ऑ⎯ħⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผฌ
ऑผ֭⎯⎯—ผ֭7ħ่7֭Ŵ㌱γ7—่ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7⎯֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭кੂ7ħこऑŴ㌱‫֭ש‬₡㈠ฌ

₡ỏ7 ╗ੂऑħ㌱Ŵккੂ7⑾ħผ֭7⑾кਙʉ7ħ⎯7ผ֭₡—㌱֭₡7ㄦx੧7ʉγ่֭7֭‫—׀‬ħऑऑ֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7⎯ऑผħ่к֭ผ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ㈠77Cਙ֭⎯7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ŵऑऑкੂ7‫ש‬ਙ7‫̶ں‬Ő7Ŵ⎯7ʉ֭кк7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯﹒77●่7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ʉਙผ₡⎯ⓒ7ਙ—ผ7⑾ħผ֭7⑾кਙʉ7ħ⎯7ธxxx7‫ف‬ऑこ7⇡—‫ש‬7֭‫—׀‬ħऑऑ֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7⎯ऑผħ่к֭ผ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾кਙʉฌ
ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫ש‬7₡ผਙऑ7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ں‬ㄦxx7‫ف‬ऑこ7ӧħ㈠֭㈠7こħ่ħこ—こ7ऑ֭ผ7●Աb7Ŵ่₡7●(bỏ㈠77Ûਙ—к₡7ੂਙ—7㌱ਙ่㌱—ผ7ਙ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ŵ⎯ऑ֭㌱‫ש‬7Ŵ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙ₡֭ฌ
ħ⎯่ɸ‫ש‬7㌱к֭Ŵผ7ਙ่7ผ֭₡—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7Ŵ㌱ผਙ⎯⎯7₡ħ⑾⑾֭ผ่֭‫ש‬7‫ੂש‬ऑ֭⎯7ਙ⑾7⎯ऑผħ่к֭ผ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ⎯7⎯—㌱γ7Ŵ⎯7‫̶ں‬Cⓒ7‫̶ں‬Őⓒ7Ŵ่₡7‫̶ں‬ⓒ7ħ⑾7Ŵ่ੂ㈠77Ҝੂฌ
ħ่‫֭ש‬ผऑผ֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ħ⎯7⎯ħこऑкੂ7⎯ऑผħ่к֭ผ7ਙผ7่ਙ‫ש‬㈠77●⑾7⎯ऑผħ่к֭ผⓒ7‫ש‬γ่֭7ㄦx੧7Ŵऑऑкħ֭⎯㈠77●่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7㌱Ŵ⎯֭ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ħผ֭7⑾кਙʉ7‫ש‬γ่֭7⇡֭㌱ਙこ֭⎯ฌ
‫ں‬ㄦxx7‫ف‬ऑこ㈠ฌ

Dz⎯⎯่֭‫ש‬ħŴккੂⓒ7●7Ŵこ7кਙਙħ่‫ف‬7⑾ਙผ7ਙऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯㈠77Û֭ɸкк7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש֭ف‬7Ŵ7(ħผ֭7Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผ7ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ่⎯ʉ֭ผ7⎯ਙこ֭7ਙ⑾7こੂฌ
‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯7⇡—‫ש‬7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7こਙこ่֭‫ש‬7ħ⑾7ੂਙ—7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7⑾֭֭₡⇡Ŵ㌱ⓒ7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7㌱֭ผ‫ש‬Ŵħ่кੂ7ʉ֭к㌱ਙこ֭㈠ฌ

ÛγŴ‫ש‬7Ŵผ֭7ੂਙ—ผ7‫ש‬γਙ—‫ف‬γ‫⎯ש‬﹒ฌ

●⑾7ੂਙ—7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7こਙこ่֭‫ש‬ⓒ7ऑ֭ผγŴऑ⎯7ʉ֭7㌱Ŵ่7₡ħ⎯㌱—⎯⎯7ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑγਙ่֭㈠ฌ

╗γŴ่⎯7Ŵ‫ف‬Ŵħ่ⓒฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ธฌ
P a 6g 0eo 51f 3 3 2
İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7О㈠Dz㈠ฌ
ОŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗7゜7ОŐ●Ќb●ОAՁ7b●Ћ●Ձ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐฌ
Оγ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎฌ
DzこŴħк̬7İਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこฌ

İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7О֭⇡⇡к֭7bผ֭֭7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ
Û֭⇡⎯ħ‫̬֭ש‬7ʉʉʉ㈠İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこฌ

Cħ⎯㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬こ่֭‫̬ש‬7╗γħ⎯7֭こŴħк7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ħ่㌱к—₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่ੂ7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γこ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7Dzк֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7bਙここ—่ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7Оผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ㌱ੂ7A㌱‫ש‬ⓒ7‫ں‬ฎ7Ⓢ㈠Ɔ㈠b㈠7㈑㈑ฌ
ธㄦ‫ں‬xֱธㄦธ‫ں‬ⓒŴ่₡7こŴੂ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่⑾ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴкⓒ7ऑผਙऑผħ֭‫ש‬Ŵผੂⓒ7Ŵ่₡7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬ħк֭‫֭ف‬₡㈠7●⑾7ੂਙ—7Ŵผ֭7่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡—Ŵк7ਙผ7่֭‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ʉγħ㌱γ7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯ฌ
Ŵ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯֭₡⊿7่ਙ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵ่ੂ7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉⓒ7₡ħ⎯㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭ⓒ7㌱ਙऑੂħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7ผ֭‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ਙผ7Ŵ่ੂ7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7—⎯֭7ħ⎯7⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬кੂ7ऑผਙγħ⇡ħ‫֭ש‬₡㈠7●⑾7ੂਙ—7ผ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7‫ש‬γħ⎯7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ħ่7֭ผผਙผⓒฌ
ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ⑾ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯่֭₡֭ผ7ħここ֭₡ħŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7Ŵ่₡7₡֭к֭‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7こŴ‫֭ש‬ผħŴк7⑾ผਙこ7ੂਙ—ผ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ㈠7A่ੂ7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่֭₡7γ֭ผ֭ħ่7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7ʉŴผผŴ่‫֭ש‬₡7ਙผ7‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬₡ฌ
Ŵ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙこऑк֭‫⎯⎯่֭֭ש‬7ਙผ7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7Ŵ่₡7ħ⎯7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱γŴ่‫֭ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γਙ—‫ש‬7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ㌱֭㈠7╗γ֭7֭к֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ7⑾ħк֭⎯7ӧफ-ħк֭⎯फỏ7⑾—ผ่ħ⎯γ֭₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯่֭₡֭ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡ฌ
ผ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7ӧफŐ֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬फỏ7Ŵผ֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7ਙ่кੂ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7Ŵ่₡7ਙ่кੂ7⑾ਙผ7ħ‫⎯ש‬7⎯ਙк֭7—⎯֭㈠7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7Ŵ‫ف‬ผ֭֭⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7⇡ੂฌ
ਙऑ่֭ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γこ่֭‫ש‬ӧ⎯ỏ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7-ħк֭⎯ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7⇡ਙ—่₡7⇡ੂ7Ŵ่₡7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫֭ש‬ผこ⎯7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ㌱֭㈠7CŴ‫ש‬Ŵ7ħ⎯7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7⑾ਙผฌ
㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7ਙ่кੂ7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭㌱ħऑħ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫⎯ש‬7⑾—кк7ผ֭⎯ऑਙ่⎯ħ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7⑾ਙผ7‫֭ﭨ‬ผħ⑾ੂħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7Ŵ่₡7㌱ਙこऑк֭‫⎯⎯่֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ㈠7●‫ש‬7ħ⎯7—่₡֭ผ⎯‫ש‬ਙਙ₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ผ֭㌱ħऑħ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵкк7֭к֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ7こŴੂ7่ਙ‫ש‬7⇡֭7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ħ่Ŵк7ऑผਙ₡—㌱‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7こŴੂ7⇡֭7ऑผ֭кħこħ่Ŵผੂ7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭㈠ฌ

ผਙこ̬7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7(㈠7ìк֭ħ่7ケCк֭ħ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕ฌ
Ɔ่֭‫̬ש‬7Û֭₡่֭⎯₡Ŵੂⓒ7(֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7″ⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7̶̬ธฎ7ОҜฌ
╗ਙ̬7İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7ケİਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่⎯7ケ㈾⇡ħ่⎯㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕⊿7Ɔ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ
ケ⎯⎯ʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕ฌ
b㌱̬7㌱⎯Ŵ⇡Ŵこ֭ħ⎯▷⇡—ผ‫֭ف‬ผ㌀こ֭㈠㌱ਙこ⊿7ƥḚ֭ਙผ‫֭ف‬7ЋŴผγ֭кੂħƥ7ケ‫ﭨف‬ธ̶кŴ⎯‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯㌀‫ف‬こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿7ՁŴผผੂ7╗ħ่₡Ŵкк7ケкŴผผੂ㌀к‫ש‬ผ₡㌱ਙผऑ㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿ฌ
ԱผħŴ่7ĠŴк‫ﭨ‬ਙผ⎯ਙ่7ケ⇡γŴк‫ﭨ‬ਙผ⎯ਙ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕ฌ
Ɔ—⇡㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬7ŐDz̬7AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7ֱ7ОŐDzAООธx‫ں‬ɱֱxxɱɱธ″7ֱ7Ҝਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Dz⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬ฌ

A⑾‫֭ש‬ผ7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7‫—ש‬ผֱ่Ŵผਙ—่₡7ħ⎯7Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫ש‬Ŵ⇡к֭7ħ่7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬ฌ
㌱ਙ่₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7ħ‫֭ש‬こ⎯7Ŵ⎯7₡ħ⎯㌱—⎯⎯֭₡7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Оผֱ֭AО7こ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬㈠ฌ

‫ں‬㈠7 b—ผผ่֭‫ש‬7bħ‫ﭨ‬ħк7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ผ֭⑾к֭㌱‫⎯ש‬7‫̶ں‬C7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ⎯㈠7Ɔ—㌱γ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ⎯7Ŵผ֭7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡7⑾ਙผ7Ɔħ่‫ف‬к֭7⑾Ŵこħкੂฌ
₡ʉ֭ккħ่‫⎯ف‬7ʉγħ㌱γ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬㈠77A7Ќ(ОA7‫̶ں‬Ő7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7—‫ש‬ħкħ▷֭₡㈠ฌ
ธ㈠7 Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7‫ف‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯γŴкк7㌱ਙこऑкੂ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬7bਙ—่㌱ħк7ธx‫ں‬ฎ7●่‫֭ש‬ผ่Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7(ħผ֭7bਙ₡֭ฌ
Ŵ่₡7ผ֭‫—ف‬кŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7ผ֭кŴ‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7A—‫ש‬ਙこŴ‫ש‬ħ㌱7֭こ֭ผ‫่֭ف‬㌱ੂ7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7‫ف‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬㈠ฌ
̶㈠7 Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7こŴผħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γผਙ—‫ف‬γਙ—‫ש‬7╗—ผֱ่Ŵผਙ—่₡7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7こŴผ֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7ŴऑऑผਙऑผħŴ‫֭ש‬7ผ֭₡7㌱—ผ⇡⎯7Ŵ่₡ฌ
⎯ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Ŵ⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7⇡ੂ7㌱ਙ₡֭㈠ฌ
ㅡ㈠7 Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7⑾ħผ֭7⑾кਙʉ7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡㈠ฌ

●⑾7ੂਙ—7⎯γਙ—к₡7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7こ֭㈠ฌ

CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7㈠7ìк֭ħ่ฌ
C֭ऑ—‫ੂש‬7 ħผ֭7ҜŴผ⎯γŴк7২7 ħผ֭7Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬ฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
̶ฌ
P a 6g 0eo 61f 3 3 2
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7 ħผ֭7ִ7Ő֭⎯㌱—֭ⓒ7 ħผ֭7Оผ֭‫ש่֭ﭨ‬ħਙ่7Cħ‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħਙ่ฌ
̶̶̶7Ќ㈠7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ⓒ7 ㄦxxⓒ7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ77ฎɱ‫ں‬x″ฌ
C ħผ֭㌱‫̬ש‬7ՙxธֱธธɱֱx̶̶″7২7b֭кк7ՙxธ̶ֱx̶ֱxՙธxฌ

кŴ⎯‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯่֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬ฌ

ผਙこ̬7İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7ケİਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ฌ
Ɔ่֭‫̬ש‬7Û֭₡่֭⎯₡Ŵੂⓒ7(֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7x″ⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ฎ̬ㄦɱ7AҜฌ
╗ਙ̬7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่⎯7ケ㈾⇡ħ่⎯㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕⊿7Ɔ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่7ケ⎯⎯ʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕⊿7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7(㈠7ìк֭ħ่ฌ
ケCк֭ħ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕ฌ
b㌱̬7㌱⎯Ŵ⇡Ŵこ֭ħ⎯▷⇡—ผ‫֭ف‬ผ㌀こ֭㈠㌱ਙこ⊿7ƥḚ֭ਙผ‫֭ف‬7ЋŴผγ֭кੂħƥ7ケ‫ﭨف‬ธ̶кŴ⎯‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯㌀‫ف‬こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿7ՁŴผผੂ7╗ħ่₡Ŵкк7ケкŴผผੂ㌀к‫ש‬ผ₡㌱ਙผऑ㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿ฌ
İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7ケİਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ฌ
Ɔ—⇡㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬7(Û̬7AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7ֱ7ОŐDzAООธx‫ں‬ɱֱxxɱɱธ″7ֱ7Ҝਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Dz⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬ฌ

DzṲ╗DzŐЌAՁ7DzҜA●Ձฌ

Û֭₡่֭⎯₡Ŵੂⓒ7(֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7″ⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

Ҝਙผ่ħ่‫ف‬7İŴ⎯ਙ่ⓒฌ

A‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭‫֭ש⎯֭—׀‬₡7╗่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ҜŴऑ7Ŵк‫֭ש‬ผ่Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ऑผਙ㌱֭₡—ผ֭7⑾ਙผこ㈠77●7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙผħ‫ف‬ħ่Ŵкⓒ7ʉγħ㌱γ7●7ʉħкк7⇡ผħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ‫ש‬7ਙ—ผ7่֭ゥ‫ש‬ฌ
こ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬㈠ฌ

Cħ₡7ੂਙ—7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ7⎯ਙこ֭7‫ש‬ħこ֭7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7֭こŴħк7㌱γŴħ่﹒77●7่ਙʉ7ੂਙ—7Ŵкк7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7⇡่֭֭7‫֭ﭨ‬ผੂ7⇡—⎯ੂ7Ŵ่₡7ੂਙ—ผฌ
ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ħ⎯7こ—㌱γ7Ŵऑऑผ֭㌱ħŴ‫֭ש‬₡㈠ฌ

●7‫ש‬γħ่7ʉ֭7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7ผ֭⎯ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่⎯ⓒ7γਙʉ֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผⓒ7●7Ŵこ7ऑ่֭₡ħ่‫ف‬7⑾֭֭₡⇡Ŵ㌱7⑾ผਙこ7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7ìк֭ħ่ⓒ7C֭ऑ—‫ੂש‬7(ħผ֭ฌ
ҜŴผ⎯γŴк㈠77Aк⎯ਙⓒ7●7㌱ਙਙผ₡ħ่Ŵ‫֭ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7ħ‫ש‬7кਙਙ⎯7кħ֭7ʉ֭7ʉħкк7่֭֭₡7‫ש‬γ֭7̶7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7̶ㄦ7⑾֭֭‫ש‬㈠ฌ

●7‫ש‬γħ่ ʉ֭ɸкк7⎯‫ש‬ħкк7⇡֭7Ḷì7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7⇡—‫ש‬7㌱֭ผ‫ש‬Ŵħ่кੂ7ʉŴ่‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש֭ف‬7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡ɸ⎯7⑾֭֭₡⇡Ŵ㌱㈠77●⑾7ʉ֭ɸผ֭7Ḷìⓒ7‫ש‬γ่֭7ħ‫ש‬7кਙਙ⎯7кħ֭7ħ‫ש‬ฌ
ʉħкк7㌱ਙこ֭7₡ਙʉ่7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7ִ7Ύਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7ऑผਙ㌱֭⎯⎯㈠77●่7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ʉਙผ₡⎯ⓒ7₡ਙ7ʉ֭7₡ਙ7Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7ਙผ7ʉŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7̶7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯ⓒ7֭‫ש‬㌱㈠7⑾ਙผฌ
Őֱธ7▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬﹒7●7₡ਙ่ɸ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γħ่7ʉ֭7⎯γਙ—к₡7‫ف‬ਙ7‫ש‬γผਙ—‫ف‬γ7Ŵ่ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7▷ਙ่֭7㌱γŴ่‫֭ف‬7⇡֭㌱Ŵ—⎯֭7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7㌱ਙ—к₡7‫ש‬ผħ‫֭فف‬ผ7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่⎯7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
㌱ਙここ—่ħ‫ੂש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉ֭ɸผ֭7‫ש‬ผੂħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ7γħ‫ف‬γ7₡่֭⎯ħ‫ੂש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7⎯—㌱γ7Ŵ⎯7Ŵ่7ŴऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬㈠ฌ

●่7֭ħ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7֭‫ש่֭ﭨ‬ⓒ7●7‫ש‬γħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7こŴħ่7ħ⎯⎯—֭7ħ⎯7‫שש֭ف‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ่⇡ਙŴผ₡㈠77●ɸこ7่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7⑾ŴこħкħŴผ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⑾⑾֭ผ่֭㌱֭⎯ฌ
⇡֭‫ש‬ʉ่֭֭7Ќ(ОA7‫̶ں‬ⓒ7‫̶ں‬Őⓒ7Ŵ่₡7‫̶ں‬C⊿7γਙʉ֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผⓒ7●7ผ֭㌱ਙ‫่ف‬ħ▷֭7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬Ő7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7ħ⎯7Ŵ7ਫʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผ֭₡7₡ਙʉ่㈚7‫֭ﭨ‬ผ⎯ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7‫̶ں‬7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こฌ
ħ่7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7Ŵккਙʉ⎯7⑾ਙผ7кਙʉ֭ผ7ʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผ7₡ħ⎯㌱γŴผ‫֭ف‬7Ŵ่₡7⎯γਙผ‫֭ש‬ผ7ʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผ7⎯—ऑऑкੂ7₡—ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠777●⑾7่ਙ‫ש‬7こħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่֭ⓒ7●7‫ש‬γħ่7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬Ő7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こฌ
ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭⎯7Ŵ7(Cb7㌱ਙ่่֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77●่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ħ่⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭ⓒ7㌱Ŵ่7ħ‫ש‬7⇡֭7֭ゥ‫֭ש‬ผ่Ŵк7ਙผ7₡ਙ֭⎯7ħ‫ש‬7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭7Ŵ7⑾ħผ֭7ผħ⎯֭ผ7ผਙਙこ7ऑ֭ผ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬ฌ
ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯㈠77ŐŴ‫ש‬γ֭ผⓒ7●7‫ש‬γħ่7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬C7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7⎯γਙ—к₡7⇡֭7Ḷì7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7к֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γŴ่7ㅡֱ⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯㈠77Û֭ɸкк7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙਙผ₡ħ่Ŵ‫֭ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7ਙ—ผ7(ħผ֭ฌ
γŴ‫ש ֭ﭨ‬ਙ ㌱ਙਙผ₡ħ่Ŵ‫ ֭ש‬ʉ
Оผਙ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผ7⑾ਙผ7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7⇡—‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ⎯⎯—֭7●7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7ħ⎯7‫שש֭ف‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ں‬xxֱ⑾‫ש‬7こŴゥ7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ่7(Cb7⑾ਙผ7֭Ŵ㌱γฌ
Ŵゥ ₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭ ‫ש‬ਙ Ŵ่ (Cb
γਙ—‫ف‬γ ʉ֭ɸผ֭ кਙਙħ่‫ ف‬Ŵ
⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7—่₡֭ผ7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬Ő7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ㈠77ŐŴ‫ש‬γ֭ผⓒ7●7ʉਙ—к₡7кħ֭7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ف‬ਙ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬C7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7ħ⑾7Ŵккਙʉ֭₡7Ŵк‫ש‬γਙ—‫ف‬γ7ʉ֭ɸผ֭7кਙਙħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ‫ש‬7̶7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯ฌ
⇡—‫ש‬7к֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γŴ่7̶ㄦֱ⑾‫ש‬7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7⎯ħ่㌱֭7Ŵ7‫̶ں‬C7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7₡ਙ֭⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭7Ŵ่7(Cb7㌱ਙ่่֭㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ㅡฌ
P a 6g 0eo 71f 3 3 2
●7ऑਙ⎯֭₡7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7֭こŴħк7㌱γŴħ่7⇡֭кਙʉ㈠77О֭ผγŴऑ⎯7ʉ֭7㌱Ŵ่7‫ש‬ਙ—㌱γ7⇡Ŵ⎯֭7⎯γਙผ‫ש‬кੂ7Ŵ⎯7ʉ֭7ʉŴ่‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7֭֭ऑ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ਙ่ฌ
⎯㌱γ֭₡—к֭㈠ฌ

╗γŴ่⎯7Ŵ‫ف‬Ŵħ่ⓒฌ

İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7О㈠Dz㈠ฌ
ОŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗7゜7ОŐ●Ќb●ОAՁ7b●Ћ●Ձ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐฌ
Оγ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎฌ
DzこŴħк̬7İਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこฌ

İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7О֭⇡⇡к֭7bผ֭֭7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ
Û֭⇡⎯ħ‫̬֭ש‬7ʉʉʉ㈠İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこฌ

Cħ⎯㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬こ่֭‫̬ש‬7╗γħ⎯7֭こŴħк7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ħ่㌱к—₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่ੂ7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γこ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7Dzк֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7bਙここ—่ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7Оผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ㌱ੂ7A㌱‫ש‬ⓒ7‫ں‬ฎ7Ⓢ㈠Ɔ㈠b㈠7㈑㈑ฌ
ธㄦ‫ں‬xֱธㄦธ‫ں‬ⓒŴ่₡7こŴੂ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่⑾ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴкⓒ7ऑผਙऑผħ֭‫ש‬Ŵผੂⓒ7Ŵ่₡7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬ħк֭‫֭ف‬₡㈠7●⑾7ੂਙ—7Ŵผ֭7่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡—Ŵк7ਙผ7่֭‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ʉγħ㌱γ7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯ฌ
Ŵ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯֭₡⊿7่ਙ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵ่ੂ7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉⓒ7₡ħ⎯㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭ⓒ7㌱ਙऑੂħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7ผ֭‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ਙผ7Ŵ่ੂ7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7—⎯֭7ħ⎯7⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬кੂ7ऑผਙγħ⇡ħ‫֭ש‬₡㈠7●⑾7ੂਙ—7ผ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7‫ש‬γħ⎯7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ħ่7֭ผผਙผⓒฌ
ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ⑾ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯่֭₡֭ผ7ħここ֭₡ħŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7Ŵ่₡7₡֭к֭‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7こŴ‫֭ש‬ผħŴк7⑾ผਙこ7ੂਙ—ผ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ㈠7A่ੂ7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่֭₡7γ֭ผ֭ħ่7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7ʉŴผผŴ่‫֭ש‬₡7ਙผ7‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬₡ฌ
Ŵ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙこऑк֭‫⎯⎯่֭֭ש‬7ਙผ7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7Ŵ่₡7ħ⎯7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱γŴ่‫֭ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γਙ—‫ש‬7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ㌱֭㈠7╗γ֭7֭к֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ7⑾ħк֭⎯7ӧफ-ħк֭⎯फỏ7⑾—ผ่ħ⎯γ֭₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯่֭₡֭ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡ฌ
ผ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7ӧफŐ֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬फỏ7Ŵผ֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7ਙ่кੂ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7Ŵ่₡7ਙ่кੂ7⑾ਙผ7ħ‫⎯ש‬7⎯ਙк֭7—⎯֭㈠7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7Ŵ‫ف‬ผ֭֭⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7⇡ੂฌ
ਙऑ่֭ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γこ่֭‫ש‬ӧ⎯ỏ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7-ħк֭⎯ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7⇡ਙ—่₡7⇡ੂ7Ŵ่₡7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫֭ש‬ผこ⎯7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ㌱֭㈠7CŴ‫ש‬Ŵ7ħ⎯7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7⑾ਙผฌ
㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7ਙ่кੂ7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭㌱ħऑħ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫⎯ש‬7⑾—кк7ผ֭⎯ऑਙ่⎯ħ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7⑾ਙผ7‫֭ﭨ‬ผħ⑾ੂħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7Ŵ่₡7㌱ਙこऑк֭‫⎯⎯่֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ㈠7●‫ש‬7ħ⎯7—่₡֭ผ⎯‫ש‬ਙਙ₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ผ֭㌱ħऑħ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵкк7֭к֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ7こŴੂ7่ਙ‫ש‬7⇡֭7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ħ่Ŵк7ऑผਙ₡—㌱‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7こŴੂ7⇡֭7ऑผ֭кħこħ่Ŵผੂ7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭㈠ฌ

ผਙこ̬7İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7ケİਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ฌ
Ɔ่֭‫̬ש‬7Ҝਙ่₡Ŵੂⓒ7(֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7ㅡⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7̶̬ธฎ7ОҜฌ
╗ਙ̬7ƥAк⇡֭ผ‫ש‬7Ɔ—่‫ف‬ƥ7ケੂ⎯—่‫ف‬㌀кŴ⎯‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯่֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬⒕⊿7ƥCŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7(㈠7ìк֭ħ่ƥ7ケCк֭ħ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠ḚḶЋ⒕⊿7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่⎯ฌ
ӧİԱħ่⎯㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬ỏ7ケİԱħ่⎯㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬⒕⊿7Őਙ‫֭ف‬ผ7ԱŴħк֭ੂ7ӧŐԱŴħк֭ੂ㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬ỏฌ
ケŐԱŴħк֭ੂ㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬⒕⊿7ƥƆ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่ƥ7ケƆƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่㌀ՁŴ⎯Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ㈠‫ف‬ਙ‫ﭨ‬⒕ฌ
b㌱̬7㌱⎯Ŵ⇡Ŵこ֭ħ⎯▷⇡—ผ‫֭ف‬ผ㌀こ֭㈠㌱ਙこ⊿7ƥḚ֭ਙผ‫֭ف‬7ЋŴผγ֭кੂħƥ7ケ‫ﭨف‬ธ̶кŴ⎯‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯㌀‫ف‬こŴħк㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿7ՁŴผผੂ7╗ħ่₡Ŵкк7ケкŴผผੂ㌀к‫ש‬ผ₡㌱ਙผऑ㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿ฌ
Ҝħ֭7ՁŴ‫ש‬γŴ่7ケこкŴ‫ש‬γŴ่㌀‫ש‬ผħ㌱ਙผ֭⎯—ผ‫ੂ֭ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこ⒕⊿7İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่7ケİਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこ⒕ฌ
Ɔ—⇡㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬7AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7ֱ7ОŐDzAООธx‫ں‬ɱֱxxɱɱธ″7ֱ7Ҝਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Dz⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬ฌ

b㌱̬7Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ

Aк⇡֭ผ‫ש‬7Ɔ—่‫ف‬ⓒ7О㈠Dz㈠ⓒ7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7(кਙਙ₡7bਙ่‫ש‬ผਙкฌ
CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7ìк֭ħ่ⓒ7C֭ऑ—‫ੂש‬7(ħผ֭7ҜŴผ⎯γŴкฌ
İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่⎯ⓒ7ҜОAฌ
Őਙ‫֭ف‬ผ7ԱŴħкੂⓒ7Ɔ่֭ħਙผ7Dz่‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬7A⎯⎯ਙ㌱ħŴ‫֭ש‬ฌ
Ɔ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7Ɔ่֭ħਙผ7ОкŴ่่֭ผ7ӧA●bОỏฌ

Ġħ7Aк⇡֭ผ‫ש‬ⓒฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ㄦฌ
P a 6g 0eo 81f 3 3 2
●7Ŵこ7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7╗่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ҜŴऑ7ऑγŴ⎯֭7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬ⓒ7ʉγħ㌱γ7‫ש‬γ֭7╗่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ҜŴऑ7ӧCŐA(╗ỏ7ħ⎯7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡㈠777╗γ֭ผ֭7Ŵผ֭ฌ
こŴ่ੂ7⑾Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉਙ—к₡7‫ש‬ผħ‫֭فف‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭֭₡7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7₡ผŴħ่Ŵ‫֭ف‬7⎯‫—ש‬₡ੂ㈠77Ḷ่֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7⑾Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯7ħ⎯7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫֭ف‬㈠77●่7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴк7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ħ⎯ฌ
ธ㈠‫̶ں‬7A㌱ผ֭⎯7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7⎯кħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬кੂ7ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ש‬ผħ‫֭فف‬ผ7ऑਙħ่‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ธ7Ŵ㌱ผ֭⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉਙ—к₡7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴккੂ7่֭㌱֭⎯⎯ħ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ7₡ผŴħ่Ŵ‫֭ف‬7⎯‫—ש‬₡ੂ㈠77●่7ਙ—ผฌ
ऑŴผ‫ש‬ħ㌱—кŴผ7㌱Ŵ⎯֭ⓒ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7⑾кŴ‫ف‬7кਙ‫ש‬7ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ֭₡7Ŵ⎯7AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7ħこऑŴ㌱‫֭ש‬₡7⇡ੂ7ਙ⑾⑾⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7⑾кਙʉ⎯㈠77╗γħ⎯7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ħ⎯7⎯—ผผਙ—่₡֭₡7⇡ੂฌ
₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭₡7ऑŴผ㌱֭к⎯7ਙ⑾7кŴ่₡7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7⇡кਙ㌱7ʉŴкк7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ʉ֭⎯‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7่ਙผ‫ש‬γ7⇡ਙ—่₡Ŵผħ֭⎯㈠77Ḷ่⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7⑾кਙʉ⎯7ʉħкк7₡ħ⎯㌱γŴผ‫֭ف‬7‫ש‬ਙฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙʉŴผ₡⎯7Աਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ŐਙŴ₡㈠77A⎯⎯—こħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7ผ—к֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ—こ⇡7ਙ⑾7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7‫ں‬㈠ㄦ7㌱⑾⎯7ऑ֭ผ7Ŵ㌱ผ֭7⑾ਙผ7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴкⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ㌱ħऑŴ‫֭ש‬₡7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴ‫֭ש‬₡7⑾кਙʉ7ħ⎯7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙผ₡֭ผ7̶7‫ש‬ਙ7ㅡ7㌱⑾⎯㈠77Ḷ่֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑ—ผऑਙ⎯֭⎯7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7֭こŴħк7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7Ŵ7ʉŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
₡ผŴħ่Ŵ‫֭ف‬7⎯‫—ש‬₡ੂ7⎯ਙ7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7こŴ₡֭7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7Ŵ7㌱ਙ่₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7⑾ਙผ7ਙ—ผ7кŴ่₡7—⎯֭7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯㈠7Ɔħこऑкੂ7ʉ֭7ʉਙ—к₡7кħ֭7‫ש‬ਙฌ
่Ŵ‫ﭨ‬ħ‫ف‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7кŴ่₡7—⎯֭7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7Ŵ่₡7ਙ่㌱֭7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Ŵ‫ש‬7bħ‫ੂש‬7bਙ—่㌱ħкⓒ7ʉ֭7ʉŴ่‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7こਙ‫֭ﭨ‬7⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7⎯—⇡こħ‫שש‬Ŵк7ਙ⑾7ਙ—ผฌ
bħ‫ﭨ‬ħк7●こऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ОкŴ่⎯㈠77╗γ֭ผ֭7Ŵผ֭7่ਙ7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ਙผ7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7₡ผŴħ่Ŵ‫֭ف‬7֭Ŵ⎯֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ่₡7Ŵкк7⑾ħ่ħ⎯γ7⑾кਙਙผ7֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7Ŵผ֭7‫ש‬ਙฌ
㌱ਙこऑкੂ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡7₡ผŴħ่Ŵ‫֭ف‬7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ں‬ฎֱħ่㌱γ֭⎯7Ŵ⇡ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬7╗b㈠ฌ

ÛγŴ‫ש‬7Ŵผ֭7ੂਙ—ผ7‫ש‬γਙ—‫ف‬γ‫⎯ש‬㈠77●⑾7ੂਙ—7㌱ਙ่㌱—ผ7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉ֭7㌱Ŵ่7ʉŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ผŴħ่Ŵ‫֭ف‬7⎯‫—ש‬₡ੂ7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫ש‬ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7ผ֭⎯ऑਙ่₡7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵкк7ħ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯ฌ
֭こŴħк7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵкк7ऑŴผ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7Ŵ⎯7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7ʉħкк7่֭֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7่ਙʉ7ħ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ʉħкк7⇡֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7ਙผ7่ਙ‫ש‬㈠ฌ

╗γŴ่7ੂਙ—7ħ่7Ŵ₡‫ﭨ‬Ŵ่㌱֭7⑾ਙผ7ੂਙ—ผ7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ŵ่₡7ħ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7ħ⎯7Ŵ่ੂ‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7֭к⎯֭7ੂਙ—7่֭֭₡ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7к֭‫ש‬7こ֭7่ਙʉⓒฌ

bՁЋ7Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7╗֭Ŵこⓒฌ

A‫ف‬Ŵħ่ⓒ7‫ש‬γŴ่7ੂਙ—ผ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผֱ֭Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7こ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ਙ่7İŴ่—Ŵผੂ7̶xⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ҝਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Dz⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ש‬7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬㈠7 ╗ਙฌ
‫ש‬γħ⎯7֭ゥ‫ש่֭ש‬ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑ—ผऑਙ⎯֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7֭こŴħк7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙここ่֭‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ่₡゜ਙผ7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่⎯7ผŴħ⎯֭₡7₡—ผħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7こ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬㈠77●่ฌ
Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7こŴħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7㌱γŴ่‫⎯֭ف‬ⓒ7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7ħ่γ֭ผ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7㌱֭ผ‫ש‬Ŵħ่7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯7こŴੂ7Ŵผħ⎯֭7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7่֭֭₡7㌱кŴผħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77●⑾7ੂਙ—7㌱Ŵ่ⓒฌ
ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7‫ש‬Ŵ֭7Ŵ7こਙこ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7Ŵ่ੂ7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7⑾֭֭₡⇡Ŵ㌱̬ฌ

‫ں‬ỏ7 bਙこऑк֭‫֭ש‬㈠7ACA7bкŴผħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่̬7╗γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ħ⎯7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯֭₡7‫ﭨ‬ħŴ7Ŵ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7₡—⎯‫ש‬ऑŴ่7₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂ㈠77╗ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7ACA7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ⓒ7Ŵ7ㄦֱ⑾‫ש‬ฌ
⎯ħ₡֭ʉŴк7ʉħкк7⇡֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ʉ֭⎯‫֭ש‬ผкੂ7⇡ਙ—่₡Ŵผੂ7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ħこħкŴผ7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7㌱γ—ผ㌱γ7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ʉ֭⎯‫ש‬㈠77Ќਙ7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7㌱γŴ่‫⎯֭ف‬7ʉ֭ผ֭7こŴ₡֭7Ŵ⎯7Ŵ7ผ֭⎯—к‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ACA7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่⎯㈠77Ɔ֭֭7ऑγਙ‫ש‬ਙ⎯7⇡֭кਙʉ㈠ฌ
ธỏ7 bਙこऑк֭‫֭ש‬㈠7A7⎯ħ่‫ف‬к֭7bਙ่₡ਙこħ่ħ—こ7ҜŴऑ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7̶ֱкਙ‫⎯ש‬㈠77╗γ֭7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7⎯ħ่‫ف‬к֭7кਙ‫ש‬㈠77Оผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬ฌ
кħ่֭7Ŵ่₡゜ਙผ7㌱—ผ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬Ŵ⇡к֭⎯ⓒ7ħ⑾7ʉŴผผŴ่‫֭ש‬₡㈠ฌ
̶ỏ7 bਙこऑк֭‫֭ש‬㈠7b—кֱCֱ֭ƆŴ㌱7⎯γħ⑾‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7㌱кਙ⎯֭ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7″xxֱ⑾‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵ‫ﭨ‬ਙħ₡7⑾ħผ֭7₡֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7⎯֭㌱ਙ่₡Ŵผੂ7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯㈠77╗γ֭7㌱่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
㌱—кֱ₡ֱ֭⎯Ŵ㌱7ħ⎯7Ŵ‫ש‬7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ں‬″ોธՙ㈠xx㈠77╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ่֭7ħ⎯7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ں‬xો̶x㈠xx㈠77╗γħ⎯7ħ⎯7Ŵ7‫ש‬ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7ਙ⑾7ㄦɱՙ7⑾‫ש‬㈠77╗γ֭ฌ
ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7ʉ֭⎯‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—к⇡7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผ7Ŵ7⑾ħผ֭7ŴऑऑŴผŴ‫⎯—ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7ผਙŴ₡7Ŵ่₡7ħ⎯7к֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γŴ่7‫ں‬ㄦxֱ(╗7ħ่7к่֭‫שف‬γ7Ŵ⎯ฌ
こ֭Ŵ⎯—ผ֭₡7⑾ผਙこ7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ں‬ฎોxธ㈠‫ںں‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ں‬″ો″ㄦ㈠ㄦx7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7₡ħ⑾⑾֭ผ่֭㌱֭7ਙ⑾7‫̶ں‬″㈠″‫ں‬7⑾֭֭‫ש‬㈠ฌ
ㅡỏ7 bਙこऑк֭‫֭ש‬㈠77C—֭7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭㌱ਙ่⑾ħ‫—ف‬ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77A₡₡7Ŵ่ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7γੂ₡ผŴ่‫ש‬7⎯ħ่㌱֭7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7γੂ₡ผŴ่‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭₡7ਙ⑾7Ŵฌ
₡֭Ŵ₡ֱ่֭₡7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7ħ⎯7‫ف‬ผ֭Ŵ‫֭ש‬ผ7‫ש‬γŴ่7ธxxֱ⑾‫ש‬㈠ฌ
ㄦỏ7 bਙこऑк֭‫֭ש‬㈠7Ⓢ⎯֭7Ŵ7‫̶ֱں‬Ő7⑾ħผ֭7⎯ऑผħ่к֭ผ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7ŴऑऑผਙऑผħŴ‫֭ש‬7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7₡—ऑк֭ゥ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ʉγ֭ผ֭7Ŵ7‫̶ֱں‬C7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ7ħ⎯7こਙผ֭ฌ
ŴऑऑผਙऑผħŴ‫֭ש‬7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7⎯ħ่‫ف‬к֭7⑾Ŵこħкੂ7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭㈠ฌ

╗γ֭7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡7╗่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ҜŴऑ7ħ⎯7こŴผ֭₡7CŐA╗7Ŵ⎯7●7Ŵこ7ऑ่֭₡ħ่‫ف‬7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผŴк7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬ⓒ7ʉγħ㌱γ7к֭Ŵ₡⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯7⎯ऑ֭㌱ħ⑾ħ㌱7‫ש‬ਙ7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬㈠77●่7‫ש‬γ֭7こ֭Ŵ่‫ש‬ħこ֭ⓒ7●7Ŵこ7ผ֭ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผħਙผ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ⊿ฌ
γਙʉ֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผⓒ7ħ‫ש‬7ʉħкк7⇡֭7γ֭кऑ⑾—к7‫ש‬ਙ7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7こਙผ֭7ħ่⎯ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħਙ่⎯㈠ฌ

Ợ—֭⎯‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯̬ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
″ฌ
P a 6g 0eo 91f 3 3 2
Aऑऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7⎯֭㌱ਙ่₡Ŵผੂ7⑾ħผ֭7ŴऑऑŴผŴ‫⎯—ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7⑾ਙผ7‫ں‬xx7ਙผ7こਙผ֭7₡ʉ֭ккħ่‫ف‬7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ⓒ7ผਙŴ₡ӧ⎯ỏ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7₡֭Ŵ₡ֱ่֭₡⎯7ਙผฌ
ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7⎯ħ่‫ف‬к֭7ऑਙħ่‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7ħ่7֭ゥ㌱֭⎯⎯7ਙ⑾7″xx7⑾‫ש‬㈠77bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7Ŵ่₡7ħ่₡—⎯‫ש‬ผħŴк7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ʉγ֭ผ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7֭ゥ㌱֭֭₡7ธฌ
⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7ਙผ7̶x7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ħ่7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬ⓒ7ਙผ7֭ゥ㌱֭֭₡ħ่‫ف‬7″ธⓒxxx7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ħ่7Ŵผ֭Ŵ㈠ 7∵●(b7㈑7ㄦx̶㈠‫ں‬㈠ธべ㈠ฌ

Ợ—֭⎯‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7ìк֭ħ่̬7Ќਙʉ7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—к⇡7ħ⎯7Ŵ‫ש‬7ㄦɱՙ7⑾‫ש‬ⓒ7●7‫ש‬γħ่7ʉ֭7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯֭㌱ਙ่₡Ŵผੂ7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ฌ
ผ֭⎯ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡㈠77Û֭7Ŵผ֭7֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵк—Ŵ‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7—⎯֭⑾—к่֭⎯⎯7ਙผ7ऑผŴ㌱‫ש‬ħ㌱Ŵкħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7̶7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯㈠77●⑾7ʉ֭7₡ਙ7̶7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7⇡—‫ש‬7к֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬γŴ่7̶ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬ⓒฌ
₡ਙ֭⎯7‫ש‬γħ⎯7こ֭֭‫ש‬7⑾ħผ֭7㌱ਙ₡֭㈠77●่7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ʉਙผ₡⎯ⓒ7₡ਙ֭⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7ħ่⎯‫֭ש‬Ŵ₡7ਙ⑾7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7Ŵ‫ש‬7̶ฌ
⎯‫ש‬ਙผੂ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬㈠77●⑾7ੂ֭⎯ⓒ7‫ש‬γ่֭7こਙผ֭7‫ש‬γŴ่7ธ7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭⎯7⎯֭㌱ਙ่₡Ŵผੂ7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ7こŴゥħこ—こ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7̶xֱ⑾‫ש‬㈠7777Ɔħ่㌱֭7ʉ֭ฌ
㌱Ŵ่่ਙ‫ש‬7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7⎯֭㌱ਙ่₡Ŵผੂ7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ⓒ7‫ש‬γ่֭7ʉ֭7ʉħкк7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱֭ผ‫ש‬Ŵħ่кੂ7ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ธֱ⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯㈠77●่7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴк7ʉγŴ‫ש‬7Ŵผ֭7ੂਙ—ผ7‫ש‬γਙ—‫ف‬γ‫⎯ש‬ฌ
ਙ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7こŴ‫֭שש‬ผ㈠ฌ

Ợ—֭⎯‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7CŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡7ìк֭ħ่̬7●⑾7ʉ֭7⎯‫ש‬Ŵੂ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7ธֱ⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯ⓒ7‫ש‬γ่֭7●7ऑผ֭⎯—こ֭7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ʉħкк7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴкฌ
ħ่⎯‫֭ש‬Ŵ₡7ਙ⑾7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7Ŵ่₡7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7Ŵผ֭7Ŵккਙʉ֭₡7Ŵ‫ש‬7̶ㄦֱ⑾‫ש‬7ħ่⎯‫֭ש‬Ŵ₡7ਙ⑾7̶xֱ⑾‫ש‬ⓒ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γħ⎯7㌱ਙผผ֭㌱‫ש‬7—่₡֭ผ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่₡ħ่‫ف‬﹒77A‫ש‬7ʉγŴ‫ש‬7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬ฌ
₡ਙ֭⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ŵ7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7‫֭ﭨ‬ผ⎯—⎯7Ŵ7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬﹒ฌ

Ợ—֭⎯‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7Ɔ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่7Ŵ่₡7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่.⎯̬7●⑾7(ħผ֭7ħ⎯7Ḷì7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7̶7⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7Ŵ่₡7̶ㄦֱ⑾‫ש‬ⓒ7₡ਙ֭⎯7‫ש‬γħ⎯7㌱γŴ่‫֭ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬ฌ
‫ש‬ਙ7こ—к‫ש‬ħֱ⑾Ŵこħкੂ7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭7ผ֭▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯ਙこ֭‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7֭к⎯֭﹒77●่7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ʉਙผ₡⎯ⓒ7Ŵผ֭7‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7⎯‫ש‬ħкк7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ₡֭ผ֭₡7₡—ऑк֭ゥ֭⎯﹒7 ÛγŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7ੂਙ—ผฌ
⑾֭֭₡⇡Ŵ㌱㈠ฌ

Ợ—֭⎯‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7Ɔ‫֭ﭨ֭ש‬7ƆʉŴ่‫ש‬ਙ่7Ŵ่₡7İŴ⎯ਙ่7Աħ่.⎯̬7●่7こੂ7こħ่₡ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7ħ⎯7こ—㌱γ7ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผкŴऑ7⇡֭‫ש‬ʉ่֭֭7Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7Ŵ่₡7Ŵฌ
ʉŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ㈠77ÛγŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⑾⑾֭ผ่֭㌱֭﹒77●่7‫ש‬γ֭7֭‫ש่֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7(ħผ֭7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ħ⎯7Ḷì7⑾ਙผ7̶ֱ⎯‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯7Ŵ่₡7̶ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬ⓒ7₡ਙ7ʉ֭7่֭֭₡7Ŵ7ʉŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7ਙผฌ
Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭﹒77●⑾7ੂ֭⎯ⓒ7ħ⎯7ħ‫ש‬7Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7ਙผ7Ŵ7ʉŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ﹒77Ок֭Ŵ⎯֭7Ŵ₡‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯֭㈠ฌ

ỢⓈDzƆ╗●ḶЌ7╗Ḷ7AՁՁ̬7●7⇡֭кħ֭‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γ֭₡7╗่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ҜŴऑ7ผ֭⎯ਙк‫⎯֭ﭨ‬7ผŴħ⎯֭₡7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่⎯㈠77A่ੂ7‫ש‬γਙ—‫ف‬γ‫⎯ש‬﹒ฌ

╗γŴ่⎯7Ŵ‫ف‬Ŵħ่ⓒฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ՙฌ
P a 6g 1eo 01f 3 3 2
İਙγ่7Ő㈠7ĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7О㈠Dz㈠ฌ
ОŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗7゜7ОŐ●Ќb●ОAՁ7b●Ћ●Ձ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐฌ
Оγ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎฌ
DzこŴħк̬7İਙγ่㌀İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこฌ

İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7О֭⇡⇡к֭7bผ֭֭7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ
Û֭⇡⎯ħ‫̬֭ש‬7ʉʉʉ㈠İŐĠŴこħк‫ש‬ਙ่Dz่‫֭ש‬ผऑผħ⎯֭⎯㈠㌱ਙこฌ

Cħ⎯㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬こ่֭‫̬ש‬7╗γħ⎯7֭こŴħк7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ħ่㌱к—₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่ੂ7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γこ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7Dzк֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7bਙここ—่ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7Оผħ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ㌱ੂ7A㌱‫ש‬ⓒ7‫ں‬ฎ7Ⓢ㈠Ɔ㈠b㈠7㈑㈑ฌ
ธㄦ‫ں‬xֱธㄦธ‫ں‬ⓒŴ่₡7こŴੂ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7㌱ਙ่⑾ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴкⓒ7ऑผਙऑผħ֭‫ש‬Ŵผੂⓒ7Ŵ่₡7ऑผħ‫ﭨ‬ħк֭‫֭ف‬₡㈠7●⑾7ੂਙ—7Ŵผ֭7่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่₡ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡—Ŵк7ਙผ7่֭‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ʉγħ㌱γ7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯ฌ
Ŵ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯֭₡⊿7่ਙ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵ่ੂ7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉⓒ7₡ħ⎯㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭ⓒ7㌱ਙऑੂħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7ผ֭‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ਙผ7Ŵ่ੂ7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7—⎯֭7ħ⎯7⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬кੂ7ऑผਙγħ⇡ħ‫֭ש‬₡㈠7●⑾7ੂਙ—7ผ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7‫ש‬γħ⎯7‫ש‬ผŴ่⎯こħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ħ่7֭ผผਙผⓒฌ
ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ⑾ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯่֭₡֭ผ7ħここ֭₡ħŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7Ŵ่₡7₡֭к֭‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7こŴ‫֭ש‬ผħŴк7⑾ผਙこ7ੂਙ—ผ7⎯ੂ⎯‫֭ש‬こ㈠7A่ੂ7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่֭₡7γ֭ผ֭ħ่7ħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬7ʉŴผผŴ่‫֭ש‬₡7ਙผ7‫—ف‬ŴผŴ่‫֭֭ש‬₡ฌ
Ŵ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙこऑк֭‫⎯⎯่֭֭ש‬7ਙผ7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7Ŵ่₡7ħ⎯7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱γŴ่‫֭ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γਙ—‫ש‬7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ㌱֭㈠7╗γ֭7֭к֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ7⑾ħк֭⎯7ӧफ-ħк֭⎯फỏ7⑾—ผ่ħ⎯γ֭₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯่֭₡֭ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡ฌ
ผ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7ӧफŐ֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬फỏ7Ŵผ֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7ਙ่кੂ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7Ŵ่₡7ਙ่кੂ7⑾ਙผ7ħ‫⎯ש‬7⎯ਙк֭7—⎯֭㈠7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7Ŵ‫ف‬ผ֭֭⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7⇡ੂฌ
ਙऑ่֭ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ‫שש‬Ŵ㌱γこ่֭‫ש‬ӧ⎯ỏ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7-ħк֭⎯ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7ОŴผ‫ੂש‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7⇡ਙ—่₡7⇡ੂ7Ŵ่₡7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫֭ש‬ผこ⎯7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7่ਙ‫ש‬ħ㌱֭㈠7CŴ‫ש‬Ŵ7ħ⎯7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7⑾ਙผฌ
㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7ਙ่кੂ7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭㌱ħऑħ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫⎯ש‬7⑾—кк7ผ֭⎯ऑਙ่⎯ħ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7⑾ਙผ7‫֭ﭨ‬ผħ⑾ੂħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ㌱㌱—ผŴ㌱ੂ7Ŵ่₡7㌱ਙこऑк֭‫⎯⎯่֭֭ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ㈠7●‫ש‬7ħ⎯7—่₡֭ผ⎯‫ש‬ਙਙ₡7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ผ֭㌱ħऑħ่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7Ŵкк7֭к֭㌱‫ש‬ผਙ่ħ㌱7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵ7こŴੂ7่ਙ‫ש‬7⇡֭7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ħ่Ŵк7ऑผਙ₡—㌱‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7こŴੂ7⇡֭7ऑผ֭кħこħ่Ŵผੂ7ħ่7่Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭㈠ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ฎฌ
P a 6g 1eo 11f 3 3 2
+AbDz7Ḷ+7bⓈŐԱฌ Ձ7 ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ

‫ں‬㈠77ḶЌՁù7ㄦ‫ں‬ƥ7Ő゜Û7AЌC7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dzฌ
Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7bⓈՁֱCDzֱƆAbƆ7Û●ՁՁฌ
ԱDz7AՁՁḶÛDzC7●Ќ7╗ĠDz7b●╗ùฌ
Ḷ+7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ㈠ฌ

CŐA●ЌAḚDz7Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ
ƆՁḶОDz777x㈠ㅡx੧ฌ

ƆⓈŐЋDzùฌ
ҜḶЌⓈҜDzЌ╗ฌ

Őฌ

Ő ֱ‫ں‬

Aฌ
DzЌC7Ɔ●CDzÛAՁì7ĠDzŐDz7ḶЌ7ㅡฎ7+ḶḶ╗7Ő゜Ûฌ
Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗㈠77ӧḶО╗●ḶЌAՁ7ḶЌDz7Ɔ●CDz7ḶЌՁùỏฌ
ㄦxxƥ7ҜAṲ㈠ฌ

Ő
ֱธ

Ő̶ֱฌ

Ҝ7 Ќฌ b●╗●DzƆ7Ḷ+7ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ7AЌCฌ
Ő゜Û Û●C╗Ġฌ
ҜDzƆỢⓈ●╗Dz7ḶЌՁùฌ
Ő゜Ûฌ
Û7 A7 Ő7 Őֱ‫ں‬7 Őֱธ7 Ő̶ֱฌ
Û●C╗Ġฌ

ㄦ‫ں‬㈠ธ̶ƥฌ ㅡɱƥฌ ㅡㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬″ƥฌ


ㅡฎƥฌ ㅡ‫ں‬ƥฌ
Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ

ㄦ‫ں‬㈠ธ̶ƥฌ ㄦx㈠ㄦƥฌ ㅡㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ㅡ㈠ㄦƥฌ


ㄦ‫ں‬ƥ7 ㅡ‫ں‬ƥฌ
Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ
Ûฌ
ㅡՙ㈠̶ฎƥฌ ㄦx㈠ㄦƥฌ ㅡㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ㅡ㈠ㄦƥฌ
″xƥฌ ㄦxƥฌ
Ɔ●CDzÛAՁìฌ

Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ

ОŐ●ЋA╗Dzฌ ㄦ‫ں‬㈠″ธƥฌ ㅡㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ㅡㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ


ㅡxƥฌ
Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ
CŐA●ЌAḚDzฌ

Ա7 bฌ

Ġ7 Ձฌ
AՁՁ7Ḷ╗ĠDzŐ7DzЌ╗●╗●DzƆ7ӧbbⓒ7bՁЋⓒ7ĠDzЌⓒ7Աbỏฌ

Ő゜Ûฌ
Û7 A7 Ő7 Őֱ‫ں‬7 Őֱธ7 Ő̶ֱฌ
Û●C╗Ġฌ
b
Ձฌ ㅡㅡ㈠ՙธƥฌ ㅡㅡƥฌ ㅡx㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬″ƥฌ
ㅡฎƥฌ ㅡ‫ں‬ƥฌ
Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ

ㅡㅡ㈠ՙธƥฌ ㅡㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ㅡx㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ㅡ㈠ㄦƥฌ


ㄦ‫ں‬ƥฌ ㅡ‫ں‬ƥฌ
Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ

ㅡx㈠ธㄦƥฌ ㅡㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ㅡx㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ㅡ㈠ㄦƥฌ


″xƥฌ ㄦxƥฌ
Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ

ОŐ●ЋA╗Dzฌ ㅡㄦ㈠‫ں‬″ƥฌ ㅡx㈠ㄦƥฌ ㅡx㈠ㄦƥฌ ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥ7 ‫ں‬ɱ㈠ㄦƥฌ


Ő゜Ûฌ Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
ㅡxƥฌ
Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ Ҝ●Ќ㈠7 Ҝ●Ќ㈠ฌ

Ő゜Ûฌ

AḚDzЌbù7AООŐḶЋDzCฌ Ա7 bฌ Ġ7 Ձ7 Ҝ7 Ќฌ

ƆОDzb●+●bA╗●ḶЌ7ŐDz+DzŐDzЌbDzฌ ⓈЌ●+ḶŐҜ7Ɔ╗AЌCAŐC7CŐAÛ●ЌḚƆฌ
ḶⓈЌ╗ù AŐDzA
bՁAŐì7bḶⓈЌ╗ù7AŐDzAฌ

bⓈՁֱCDzֱƆAbฌ
CDz
DzֱƆ
ƆAb
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6
g 1eo 2″ֱฎֱxx7
CA╗Dz7 1f 3 3CÛḚ㈠7ЌḶ㈠7
2 ธ‫ں‬ธฌ
ธ‫ں‬ธ
ธㅡफฌ

Őए̶゜ㅡफฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ㅡफฌ

‫ں‬ธफฌ
Őए‫ں‬ฌ
ธफฌ

‫゜ںֱں‬ธफฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ

‫ں‬फฌ
ㅡֱ‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
Ɔ●CDzÛAՁìฌ
‫ں‬xֱ‫゜ں‬ธफฌ

ธफฌ
ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Őएธㅡफฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ

╗ùОDz7●●7AḚḚ㈠7ԱAƆDzฌ

ธㅡफฌ

ธㄦफ7ӧḶО╗●ḶЌAՁỏฌ
ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬7
ӧƆDzDz7ЌḶ╗Dz7̶ỏฌ
‫ں‬㈠7ÛĠDzŐDz7ՁḶЌḚ●╗ⓈC●ЌAՁ7ƆՁḶОDz7●Ɔ7ՁDzƆƆ7╗ĠAЌ7x㈠ㅡ੧7╗ĠDz7+ՁḶÛ7Ձ●ЌDz7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7ÛA╗DzŐ7╗DzƆ╗DzC㈠ฌ

ธ㈠7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗7‫゜ں‬ธफ7DzṲОAЌƆ●ḶЌ7İḶ●Ќ╗7A╗7AՁՁ7bḶՁC7İḶ●Ќ╗Ɔⓒ7A╗7ԱDzḚ●ЌЌ●ЌḚ7AЌC7DzЌC7Ḷ+7bⓈŐԱ7ŐDz╗ⓈŐЌƆⓒฌ

AЌC7A╗7̶xx7+╗㈠7ҜAṲ㈠7●Ќ╗DzŐЋAՁƆ7+ḶŐ7DzṲ╗ŐⓈCDzC7bⓈŐԱ7AЌC7̶x7+╗㈠7ҜAṲ㈠7●Ќ╗DzŐЋAՁƆ7+ḶŐ7+ḶŐҜDzC7bⓈŐԱ㈠ฌ

ÛDzAìDzЌDzC7ОՁAЌDz7İḶ●Ќ╗Ɔ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7+ḶŐҜDzC7A╗7╗ĠDz7ŐDzҜA●Ќ●ЌḚ7‫ں‬ㄦ7+╗㈠7●Ќ╗DzŐЋAՁƆ㈠77ƆDzDz7Ɔ╗C㈠7CÛḚ㈠ฌ

ЌḶ㈠7ธ̶ㅡ7+ḶŐ7İḶ●Ќ╗7CDz╗A●ՁƆ㈠ฌ

̶㈠7ḶЌDz7●ЌbĠ7ԱA╗╗DzŐ7A╗7ḚⓈ╗╗DzŐ7+AbDz7●Ɔ7ḶО╗●ḶЌAՁ㈠ฌ

ㅡ㈠77ЌḶ7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7ԱḶṲDzƆ7AЌC7bḶЋDzŐƆ7ACİAbDzЌ╗7╗Ḷ7Őֱ╗ùОDz7bⓈŐԱ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz77AՁՁḶÛDzC7A╗7CŐ●ЋDzÛAù7ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌƆ㈠ฌ

ㄦ㈠7 ●+7Őֱ╗ùОDz7bⓈŐԱ7●Ɔ7AООŐḶЋDzC7+ḶŐ7Ḷ╗ĠDzŐ77ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌƆ7╗ĠA╗7AŐDz7ƆⓈԱİDzb╗DzC7╗Ḷ7ŐDzḚⓈՁAŐ7╗ŐA++●bⓒ7╗ĠDzЌฌ
Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7ԱḶṲDzƆ7AЌC7bḶЋDzŐƆ7ACİAbDzЌ╗7╗Ḷ7Őֱ╗ùОDz7bⓈŐԱ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ҜDzDz╗7Ġธxֱㅡㅡ7+ḶŐ7Ɔ╗DzDzՁ7ԱḶṲDzƆ7AЌCฌ
AЌƆ●゜Ɔb╗Dz7ՙՙֱธxxՙ7ӧ╗●DzŐֱธธỏ7+ḶŐ7+●ԱDzŐḚՁAƆƆ7ОḶՁùҜDzŐ7bḶЌbŐDz╗Dz7ԱḶṲDzƆ7ŐA╗DzC7फ╗ŐA++●b7ԱDzAŐ●ЌḚफ7╗ùОDz㈠ฌ

″㈠7+ḶŐ7ЌDzÛ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ḶЌ7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ƆⓈԱC●Ћ●Ɔ●ḶЌ7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗Ɔ7ḶЌՁù㈠ฌ

AḚDzЌbù7AООŐḶЋDzC7 b7 Ձ7 Ҝ7 Ќฌ

ƆОDzb●+●bA╗●ḶЌ7ŐDz+DzŐDzЌbDzฌ ⓈЌ●+ḶŐҜ7Ɔ╗AЌCAŐC7CŐAÛ●ЌḚƆฌ
bՁAŐì7bḶⓈЌ╗ù7AŐDzAฌ
ḶⓈЌ╗ù AŐDzA
̶ธxฌ AḚḚŐDzḚA╗Dz7ԱAƆDzฌ
ƆⓈООՁDzҜDzЌ╗AՁ7CŐAÛ●ЌḚฌ
╗AՁ CŐAÛ●ЌḚ
ㄦx‫ں‬ฌ bḶЌbŐDz╗Dzฌ

ㄦxธฌ bḶЌbŐDz╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐⓈb╗ⓈŐDzƆฌ
ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7bⓈŐԱ7ִ7ḚⓈ╗╗DzŐฌ
bⓈŐԱ ִ ḚⓈ╗╗DzŐ
ՙxՙฌ İḶ●Ќ╗7ҜA╗DzŐ●AՁฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
ùОDz
Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

6g 1eox‫ֱں‬x‫ںֱں‬ฎ7
P a CA╗Dz7 31f 3 3CÛḚ㈠7ЌḶ㈠7
2 ธ‫ں‬ՙ㈠̶㈠Ɔ‫ں‬
ธ‫ں‬ՙ㈠̶㈠Ɔ‫ں‬ฌ
A
Ɔ
Ɔ
Dz
Ɔ
Ɔ

Ő
ƥ
Ɔ
7
b

О
ù

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 1eo 41f 3 3 2
A
Ɔ
Ɔ
Dz
Ɔ
Ɔ

Ő
ƥ
Ɔ
7
b

О
ù

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 1eo 51f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 33

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75820 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-75819 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
SK USA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS TO HAVE A HEIGHT OF THREE STORIES WHERE TWO STORIES IS THE
MAXIMUM ALLOWED ON LOT TWO on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road,
approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low
Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear) [PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 616 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 617 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 1eo 81f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 34

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75821 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-75819 AND VAR-75820 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
TERMINATION OF A PRIVATE STREET IN A DEAD END STUB WHERE A CUL-DE-SAC IS
REQUIRED; TO ALLOW A 47-FOOT WIDE ACCESS CONTROL GATE WHERE 50 FEET IS
REQUIRED; AND TO ALLOW SIDEWALKS ON ONE SIDE WHERE SIDEWALKS ON BOTH
SIDES ARE REQUIRED on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550
feet east of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential)
Zone, Ward 5 (Crear) [PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 619 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 620 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 2eo 11f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 35

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75822 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75819, VAR-75820 AND
VAR-75821 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED THREE-LOT RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION on 2.14 acres on the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east
of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward
5 (Crear) [PRJ-75700]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Clark County School District School Tracking Form for SDR-75822 and TMP-75823 [PRJ-
75700]
4. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 622 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 623 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 2eo 41f 3 3 2
Real Property Management School Development Tracking Form
1180 Military Tribute Place
Henderson, Nv. 89074 http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property

Date Filed Application Number Entity


Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Mobile Fax Email

Project Name

Project Description

APN's

Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School


Single-Family Units (1) x 0.196 = x 0.101 = x 0.137 =
Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.140 = x 0.058 = x 0.064 =
Resort Condo Units (3)
Total

(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD

Schools Serving the Area*


Name Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date

* CCSD Comments

Approved Disapproved

Page 625 of 1332


SDR 75822
SK USA, LLC

N side of Bonanza Road, 1,550' E of Decatur Boulevard


Proposed 18 unit duplex residential development.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.44 170


AM Peak Hour SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DU] 18 0.74 13
PM Peak Hour 0.99 18
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Bonanza Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 2,716
PM Peak Hour 217
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Decatur Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 46,454
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:

Adjacent street ADT


Capacity
Bonanza Road 12,480
Decatur Boulevard 53,445

This project will add approximately 170 trips per day on Bonanza Rd. and Decatur Blvd. Currently, Bonanza is at about 22
percent of capacity and Decatur is at about 87 percent of capacity. With this project, Bonanza is expected to be at about 23
percent of capacity and Decatur is expected to remain at about 87 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 18 additional cars, or about one every three
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 626 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 36

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
TMP-75823 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO VAR-75819, VAR-75820, VAR-75821 AND SDR-
75822 - MONTAGE ESTATES - APPLICANT/OWNER: SK USA, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Tentative Map FOR A THREE-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.14 acres on
the north side of Bonanza Road, approximately 1,550 feet east of Decatur Boulevard (APN 139-
30-306-003), R-2 (Medium-Low Density Residential) Zone, Ward 5 (Crear) [PRJ-75700]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 627 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 628 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 629 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜xㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 630 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
x̶゜xㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 631 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 632 of 1332


ՁḶ╗7ㅡㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎฎฌ DzAƆDzҜDzЌ╗7゜7CDzC●bA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ
Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ 7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—7C7‫ف‬㈠ฌ ÛAƆĠ●ЌḚ╗ḶЌ7AЋDz
ЋDzฌ
‫ֱ ں‬ฎxxֱธธՙֱธ″xxฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎɱฌ


ฌҜฌ ●ฌ
●ฌ Ձ ฌ
㈠㈠ฌĠ A
㈠Őฌ
╗ ฌḶ

İ㈠ฌ
Ќฌ ฌ

b ●Ћ ●Ձ ฌ
Dz ฌƆ

Ɔ●╗Dzฌ Dz ฌЌ


ƆDzÛDzŐ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶ฌ
╗ ฌDz
●Ɔ
Őฌ ฌО ฌ ฌ●ฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱԱฌ Ő

CDzbA╗ⓈŐ7ԱՁЋCฌ
ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ɱxỏฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡ̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ՙⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡ‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡxⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ɱⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ฎⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ
7ŐḶAC
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ″7 bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—ฌ
″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ ӧธ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ ‫ں‬ฎɱỏฌ ÛA╗DzŐ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ7ֱ bผŴ่֭7Ḷ‫֭ﭨ‬ผγ֭Ŵ₡ฌ

ӧธ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎՙฌ Ќ Dz Û 7О ㈠Ⓢ ㈠Dz ㈠7╗ Ḷ 7Ա Dz ฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ћ●b●Ќ●╗ù7ҜAО7ӧ7Ќ╗Ɔ7ỏฌ

‫ں‬ฎ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ″ƥฌ ЌDzธ7ƆÛㅡ7ƆDzb㈠7̶xⓒ7╗ธxƆⓒ7Ő″‫ں‬Dzⓒ7Ҝ㈠C㈠Ҝ㈠ฌ

ฎỏ
Ḛ Ő A Ќ ╗ Dz C 7О Dz Ő 7 ●Ќ A Ձ7Ҝ A О ฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ


ՙxธֱธธՙֱธɱธɱฌ

ธฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7‫ں‬ⓒɱㄦx7Ɔ  ฌ

Aฌ
ธฌ
Ќ ฎɱ¤ธㅡƥx̶फDz ฌ ԱDzЌbĠҜAŐìฌ
Dz Ṳ ㈠7″ƥṲ ̶ㄦƥ7О ㈠Ⓢ ㈠Dz ㈠ฌ ̶̶‫ں‬㈠xxƥฌ ‫ں‬ธƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
Ḷ Ő ̬ㅡธㄦ̶̬ㅡธฎฎɱฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7″ƥՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ЋDzÛ Aùฌ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7ธ‫ں‬x7Ɔ  ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ɱx
ỏฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ

‫ں‬ՙ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ฎ゜ОՁ̶7
Cฌ ԱAƆ●Ɔ7Ḷ7ԱDzAŐ●ЌḚฌ
ɱ゜ОՁธ7 ‫ں‬x゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ‫゜ںں‬ОՁ‫ں‬7 ‫ں‬ธ゜ОՁธ7 ‫゜̶ں‬ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ㅡ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬ㄦ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫ں‬″゜ОՁ̶7
ธ7 ՁḶ╗7̶″ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱธỏฌ
bฌ ՁḶ ╗ ̬7‫ں‬ฌ

ӧธ
ธฌ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠″ɱ7A b 7ӧธɱⓒɱɱ̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ

‫ں‬ɱ
ӧธ‫ں‬

‫ں‬ỏ
ɱ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠″ㅡ7A b 7ӧธՙⓒฎ̶̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ


ⓈЌ●╗7ฎธฌ ธỏฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ㄦⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶḶC7ΎḶЌDzฌ

‫ ں‬″‫ں‬㈠x″ƥฌ

b‫ں‬

Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz ฌ
ḚDzЌDzŐAՁ7●ЌḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌฌ

‫ں ں‬ธ㈠̶ɱƥฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ̬7 ‫̶ ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7


ธฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ̶7 b ̶ฌ ՁḶ ╗ ̬7̶̬7О Ő ●Ћ A ╗ Dz 7Ɔ ╗ Ő Dz Dz ╗ ฌ bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬7 ՁDzḚAՁ7CDzƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ

Ќ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफÛ ฌ
Ձธฌ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠ฎɱ7A b 7ӧ̶ฎⓒՙ″″7Ɔ  ỏฌ
ḚŐḶƆƆ7AbŐDzAḚDz̬7 ธ㈠‫ ں‬ㅡ7AbŐDzƆฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠ฎՙ7A b 7ӧ̶ՙⓒฎㄦ‫ں‬7Ɔ  ỏฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ b″
ฌ ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7Ḷ7ՁḶ╗Ɔ̬7 ̶7ՁḶ╗Ɔ7 ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ̬7ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ
╗ŐAb╗7ՙbฌ
‫ں‬ՙો ㄦx ‫ں‬ՙો xx7 ‫ں‬″ો ㄦx7 ‫ں‬″ો xxฌ ‫ ں‬ㄦો
ԱḶḶì7ธɱⓒ7ОAḚDz7‫ں‬ㅡฌ Ձ‫ں‬ฌ ㄦxฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û 7 ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7Ḷ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ̬7 ‫ ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔฌ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ

ՙฌ

b ḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzAฌ

㈠ㄦ
ฎỏ

ธฎ
Ձ̶ฌ ‫ں‬ฎ


ӧธ CDzЌƆ●╗ù̬7 ՁḶ╗7‫̬ ں‬7‫ ں‬ㅡ㈠ㄦ̶7ӧ‫ ں‬x7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜x㈠″ฎฎ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ

‫ں‬ㄦ

О ╗̬7‫ں‬ㄦો ″″㈠ՙธฌ
ħ₡̬7

О ●̬7‫ں‬ՙો ㄦㅡ㈠″‫ں‬ฌ
bㅡ

Dz О̬7‫ں‬ՙો ɱ̶㈠‫ںں‬ฌ
ՁḶ╗7ธ̬7‫ ں‬ㅡ㈠ธ̶7ӧฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜x㈠ㄦ″ธ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ

bㄦ
Ҝ
Ձㅡฌ ՁḶ╗7̶̬7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ӧx㈠ฎฎɱ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎx7 ՁḶ╗7̶ㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

‫ ں‬ㄦો xx
bธ ḶЋDzŐAՁՁ̬7ฎ㈠ㅡ‫ ں‬7ӧ‫ ں‬ฎ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ゜ธ㈠‫ ں‬ㅡ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ
ฌ Оb̬7‫ں‬ㅡો ɱx㈠ㅡธฌ
ƆОDzDzC ฌ

‫ں ں‬ธ㈠ㅡxƥ7
ՁḶ ╗ ̬7ธฌ
ՁҜ●╗●ฌฌ ╗ŐA●b7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆฌ

Ќ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफÛ 7
ùฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ฎ‫ں‬7 Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ɔ Ɔ ̬7x㈠ㄦ″7A b 7ӧธㅡⓒㄦx̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7 ҜDzC●ⓈҜ7ՁḶÛ7CDzЌƆ●╗ù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ӧŐֱธỏฌ

Ġฌ Cฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7x㈠ㄦ″7A b 7ӧธㅡⓒㄦx̶7Ɔ  ỏฌ ‫ں‬ㄦฌ bՁAƆƆ●●bA╗●ḶЌ̬7 Ҝ●Ќ●ҜⓈҜ7ՁḶ╗7Ɔ●ΎDz̬7″ㄦxx7Ɔฌ
ҜAṲ●ҜⓈҜ7CÛDzՁՁ●ЌḚ7ⓈЌ●╗Ɔ7ОDzŐ7ՁḶ╗̬7″ֱ‫ ں‬ธฌ

ㅡ゜ ธỏ ̶゜ОՁ̶7 ธ゜ОՁ̶7 ‫゜ں‬ОՁ̶ฌ
ฎ゜ОՁธ7 ՙ゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ″゜ОՁ‫ں‬7 ㄦ゜ОՁธ7 ‫ں‬ɱОՁ̶7
ӧธ ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7Ab╗●ḶЌƆ̬7 ḚОAֱՙx″ฎธ7ӧḚDzЌDzŐAՁ7ОՁAЌ7AҜDzЌCҜDzЌ╗ỏฌ

Ձ ㄦฌ
‫ ں‬ㅡો ㄦxฌ
●ЋDzÛ Aù7 ՁḶ╗7̶̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ΎḶЌֱՙx″ฎ̶7ӧŐDzΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7ŐDzՁA╗DzC7╗Ḷ7ḚОAֱՙx″ฎธỏฌ

Ќ ฎɱ¤ธㄦƥ̶ㄦफDz ฌ CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌ7ŐḶҜ7Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆ7 ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥฌ ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥ7 ธՙ㈠̶̶ƥฌ


ธฎ̶㈠ㄦxƥฌ ՁDzḚDzЌCฌ
‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐฌ


ธ″ƥ7 ОՁAЌ7  ‫ں‬ฌ ОՁAЌ7  ธฌ ОՁAЌ7  ̶ฌ

ธỏ
ธฌ
Dzฌ
̶ㅡƥฌ

‫ں‬ɱ
ӧธ
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙ″7 ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ㅡฎƥฌ

‫ ں‬ㅡો xx
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱԱฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

Ḷ 7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7‫ں‬ธՙ7Ɔฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐ
Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡx7び7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ7び7ЌDzЋACA7び7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7ОDzԱԱՁDz7bŐDzDzì7AЋDzЌⓈDzⓒ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ

Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙx77bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎ77ֱֱֱֱֱ77ÛÛÛ㈠İŐĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌDzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆ㈠bḶҜฌ

ⓈЌ●╗7ՙՙฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬ỏฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7ՙฎɱ7Ɔฌ


ɱ‫ں‬ỏฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7ㅡxฎ7Ɔฌ
Ձ ●Ќ Dz 7╗ A Ա Ձ Dz ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ ̶ŐC7ՁŐ̬7ฎ‫ں‬ɱ7Ɔฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7ɱx‫ں‬7Ɔฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7Ő゜Û 7 ธㅡƥ7Ő゜Û 7 Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐDzA̬ฌ

Ɔฌ

ฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7‫ں‬ՙ̶ㄦ7Ɔฌ ̶ŐC7ՁŐ̬7ɱ‫ں‬ฎ7Ɔฌ Ḷ Ќฌ ฌ Dz ฌƆ
О Ő Ḷ О Dz Ő ╗ ù 7Ձ ●Ќ Dz Ɔ ฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ‫ں‬Ɔ╗7ՁŐ̬7ՙɱ″7Ɔฌ ╗ฌ
ธฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7ธธธՙ7Ɔฌ ธЌC7ՁŐ̬7‫ںںں‬ㅡ7Ɔฌ
ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㄦՙՙ7Ɔฌ
Ҝ ฌ
ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌ

Ձ ●Ќ Dz 7  7Ձ Dz Ќ Ḛ ╗ Ġ C ●Ő Dz b ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ŐḶЌ╗7bḶЋDzŐDzC7CDzbì̬7ฎx7Ɔฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬x7Ɔฌ
ฌŐ

‫̶ں‬ો ㄦx
ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㅡՙՙ7Ɔฌ
㈠Ġฌ Aฌ ฌ●ฌՁ ฌ
b ●Ћ ●Ձ 7

ŐDzAŐ7bḶЋDzŐDzC7CDzbì̬7″x7Ɔ7
bḶЋDzŐDzC7DzЌ╗Őù̬7̶ㅡ7Ɔฌ

╗ ฌDz

ḚAŐAḚDz̬7ㅡ̶̶7Ɔฌ İ ㈠ฌฌŐ ฌ
ŐḶЌ╗7CDzbì̬7ㄦ̶7Ɔ7 bḶЋDzŐDzC7DzЌ╗Őù̬7ㄦՙ7Ɔฌ Dz ฌЌ
ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธㅡㄦธ7Ɔฌ
ฌ ŐḶЌ╗7CDzbì̬7‫ں‬ธㄦ7Ɔฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬ỏ ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธՙɱ‫ں‬7Ɔฌ ŐDzAŐ7CDzbì̬7ㅡฎ7Ɔฌ
ՁḶ╗7̶‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ɱxỏฌ ⓈЌCDzŐ7ŐḶḶ̬7ธㄦՙ̶7Ɔฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙㅡฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ ●ŐDz7ՁḶÛ7bAՁbƆ̬7╗ÛḶ7AҜ●Ձù7CÛDzՁՁ●ЌḚƆฌ
ɱx
ỏฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ

‫̶ں‬ો xx
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙㄦฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
ỏฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ɱธ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
b Ⓢ Ő Ћ Dz 7╗ A Ա Ձ Dz 7ֱ7О Ő Ḷ О Dz Ő ╗ ù 7Ձ ●Ќ Dz Ɔ
b Ⓢ Ő Ћ Dz 7  Ő A C ●Ⓢ Ɔ Ձ Dz Ќ Ḛ ╗ Ġ ╗ A Ќ Ḛ Dz Ќ ╗ 7C Dz Ձ ╗ A ฌ
●ЋDzÛ Aùฌ
Ḛฌ
ธฌ ՁḶ╗7̶xⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

‫ں‬ธો ㄦx

Page 633 of 1332


ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ

̶ ɱ″㈠ㄦxƥฌ
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ

Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ
ƆОDzDzC ฌ

bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzA7
ɱỏฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷฌ ՁҜ●
●ฌ╗ฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙxฌ

ㅡ ″x㈠̶ฎƥ7

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ
Ɔ xx¤ธՙƥㄦฎफDz 7
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7

Ḷ7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ

‫ں‬ธો xx
ⓈЌ●╗7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ฌҜ ●ฌ ḚŐAОĠ●b7ƆbAՁDzฌ
╗DzЌ╗A╗●ЋDz7ҜAОฌ
ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ

Őฌ

㈠ฌĠ A ฌ ฌՁ ฌ ㅡx7 x7 ธxฌ ㅡxฌ


╗ ฌḶ

İ㈠ฌฌ
ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ƆⓈԱC●Ћ●Ɔ●ḶЌฌ

Ќฌ ฌ

ՁḶ╗7ธɱⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ ՁḶ╗7ธฎⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7 b ●Ћ ●Ձ ฌ
Dz Ṳ ㈠7″ƥ7Û ●C Dz 7╗ Dz ՁDz О Ġ Ḷ Ќ Dz ฌ
Dz ฌƆ ฌ


Dz Ќฌ ฌ

Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7Ḷ Ő ̬‫ں‬″xx̬‫ں‬ㄦㄦɱฎɱՙฌ ╗ ฌDz
‫ں‬7ħ่㌱γ7ए777777777777⑾‫ש‬
ㅡxฌ
b●╗ù7Ḷ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬xՙ7

Őฌ ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌƆ

ɱỏฌ
Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7″ՙՙ7Ɔ  ฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ
″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ̬7ӧՁ●ЌìƆ7゜7ЌḶCDzƆỏฌ

‫ںں‬ો ㄦx
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ̬7ธ7Ձ●ЌìƆ7゜7ธ7ЌḶCDzƆए‫ ں‬㈠x7ӧACҜ●Ќ●Ɔ╗ŐA╗●ЋDz7CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCỏฌ


╗ĠDz7Ҝ●Ќ●ҜⓈҜ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ7●Ɔ7‫ ں‬㈠̶x7ӧՁ●ЌìƆ゜ЌḶCDzƆỏ7ḶŐ7AՁՁ7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7●Ќ7ŐֱCⓒ7Őֱ‫ ں‬ⓒ7ŐֱƆՁⓒฌ
ฎ″ỏฌ ŐֱҜĠⓒ7ŐֱbՁⓒ7Őֱ╗Ġⓒ7Őֱธⓒ7Ő̶ֱ7AЌC7Őֱㅡ7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ7C●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗Ɔ㈠7╗ĠDz7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7bḶЌЌDzb╗●Ћ●╗ù7ŐA╗●Ḷ7ҜAù7ԱDz7ŐDzCⓈbDzCฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
Աù7╗ĠDz7C●ŐDzb╗ḶŐⓒ7Û●╗Ġ7╗ĠDz7ACЋ●ƆDzҜDzЌ╗7Ḷ7╗ĠDz7C●ŐDzb╗ḶŐ7Ḷ7ОⓈԱՁ●b7ÛḶŐìƆⓒ7╗ĠŐḶⓈḚĠ7╗ĠDz7ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁ7Ḷฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬ฎฎỏ
ⓈЌ●╗7″ฎฌ AЌ7AООՁ●bA╗●ḶЌ7ḶŐ7AЌ7ACҜ●Ќ●Ɔ╗ŐA╗●ЋDz7CDzЋ●A╗●ḶЌⓒ7ÛĠ●bĠ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7ƆⓈԱİDzb╗7╗Ḷ7╗ĠDz7ОŐḶbDzCⓈŐDzƆ7AЌCฌ Ġฌ
Cฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7″ɱ7 bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠7ธֱCฌ ùฌ

ɱỏฌ
Ġฌ Ɔ╗AЌCAŐCƆ7ƆDz╗7ḶŐ╗Ġ7●Ќ7ՁЋҜb7‫ ں‬ɱ㈠‫ ں‬″㈠‫ ں‬ธxⓒ7●7╗ĠDz7AООՁ●bAЌ╗7CDzҜḶЌƆ╗ŐA╗DzƆ7●╗7●Ɔ7●ҜОḶƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ḶŐฌ


ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦฌ
●ҜОŐAb╗●bAԱՁDz7╗Ḷ7AbĠ●DzЋDz7CⓈDz7╗Ḷ7╗ḶОḶḚŐAОĠ●b7bḶЌC●╗●ḶЌƆⓒ7ЌA╗ⓈŐAՁ7DzA╗ⓈŐDzƆⓒ7ACİAbDzЌ╗7DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚฌ

ӧธ‫ں‬
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7 ธㅡƥฌ
ธฌ Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7ОA╗╗DzŐЌƆⓒ7ḶŐ7Ḷ╗ĠDzŐ7Ɔ●╗Dz7Ձ●Ҝ●╗A╗●ḶЌƆ㈠ฌ

ӧธ
‫ں‬
ӧธ‫ں‬ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ

‫ںں‬ો xx
ฎฎ

ฎ″
ỏฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦ ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ḶÛЌDzŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗7゜7bbִŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗ฌ

ỏฌ
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ՁḶ╗7ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙ7 ՁḶ╗7̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7CŐ●ЋDzÛ Aù7 ฎฎ Dz Ṳ ㈠7ㄦƥ7Û ●C Dz 7b ՁЋ 7 ●Ő Dz 7Ġ ù C Ő A Ќ ╗ ⓒฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬ฎɱỏฌ
ㄦƥ7Û ●CDz7bՁЋ7●ŐDz7ĠùCŐAЌ╗ⓒ ฌ ՁЋЋÛ C7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗7 ОDzŐฌ ỏฌ Ɔ ╗ Ő Dz Dz ╗ 7Ձ●Ḛ Ġ ╗ 7A Ќ C 7╗ Ő A   ●b ฌ
ӧธ
Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7Ձ●ḚĠ╗7AЌC7╗ŐA●bฌ ฎỏฌ ḶŐ̬‫ں‬ฎx″̬‫ں‬ՙ″ㄦ‫ںں‬ɱฌ ‫ں‬ฎՙỏฌ Ɔ ●Ḛ Ќ A Ձ7Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7О Dz Ő ฌ ⓈЌ●╗゜ОՁAЌฌ
‫ں‬ฎ  ●ՁDz 7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7О A Ḛ Dz 7″‫ں‬ฌ
Ɔ●ḚЌAՁ7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗7ОDzŐฌӧธ ″ỏฌ Ɔ ╗Ḷ О 7 ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ7Ɔ╗A╗DzҜDzЌ╗ฌ
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎՙỏฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ Ḷ  7О A Ő b Dz Ձ7Ҝ A О Ɔ 7A Ќ C ⊿ฌ

‫ ں‬xો ㄦx
Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Dz Ṳ ㈠7̶ƥ7Û ●C Dz 7╗ Dz ՁDz О Ġ Ḷ Ќ Dz ฌ
Dz Ɔ Ҝ ╗ 7Ḷ Ő ̬‫ں‬″xx̬‫ں‬ㄦㄦɱฎɱㅡฌ
ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁฌ
ОŐ●Ќ╗DzC̬ฌx̶ֱ‫ں‬ธֱธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

ฎɱ¤ธㄦƥ̶ㄦफDz ฌ
Ќ xx Ќ Dz ╗ ̬7ธ̶ՙ7Ɔ  ฌ
О ●̬7‫ں‬xો ̶x㈠
ӧธ‫ں‬
ฎㄦỏฌ ㅡ ՙ㈠ㄦxƥฌ DzṲ㈠″फ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏฌ О ⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ DzAŐ╗ĠÛḶŐì7C●ƆbՁA●ҜDzŐฌ ḶÛЌDzŐ7゜7CDzЋDzՁḶОDzŐฌ
ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐฌ ●ЌḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
ӧธ‫ں‬
●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ
ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ ㅡxƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ Ա ḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙㄦ7Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
ḶŐ̬ฎ″ฎ̬″ɱՙㅡx″ฌ ̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏฌ Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
ฎฎỏฌ
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱธㄦ″ỏ

ㅡx㈠xxƥ7
̶ x㈠xxƥ7
Ḷ 7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ ՙxֱ╗7Ő゜Û 7ֱ7ОⓈԱՁ●bฌ ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡxฌ
ธ″ો ㄦx7 ธՙો xx7 ธՙો ㄦx7 ธฎો xxฌ ธฎ ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
ธ̶ો ㄦx7 ธㅡો xx7 ธㅡો ㄦx7 ธㄦો xx7 ″ỏฌ ธㄦો ㄦx7 ธ″ો xx7
ธธો xx7 ธธો ㄦx7 ธ̶ો xx7 ฌ ỏ bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐ7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙxฌ
‫ں‬ฎ

‫ں‬xો xx

DzṲ㈠ㅡफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ
ฎՙ ӧธ ОⓈԱՁ●b7Ő゜Û 7ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7‫ں‬xⓒ7 О●̬7ธ″ો ธ″㈠ฎ̶ฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏ7 Ա ḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶACฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ̶ỏฌ ƆⓈŐЋDzù7C●ƆbՁḶƆⓈŐDzฌ

DzṲ㈠″फ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ
DzṲ㈠7ОŐЋ7ЋAⓈՁ╗ฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ ㅡỏฌ
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱฎՙxỏฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ ОAḚDz7ธธ7Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ ӧธ‫ں‬ฎ ̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ ″xֱ╗7Ő゜Û 7ֱ7ОⓈԱՁ●bฌ DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
Û C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏDzṲ㈠ฎफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ DzṲ㈠ฎफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ
̶xƥ7Ő゜Û ฌ DzṲ㈠7‫ں‬ธफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C77bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ
DzṲ㈠″फ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bֱฎㅡ″ỏฌ Ա О̬7ɱો ՙx㈠xxฌ
DzṲ㈠7‫ں‬xफ7ОЋb7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ Ɔ╗A╗●b7ÛA╗DzŐ7ОŐDzƆƆⓈŐDzฌ

ɱો ՙx
DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7ṲԱֱ‫̶ں‬ธỏฌ İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ธ̶xxฌ Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
DzṲ㈠7ฎफ7C●О7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7bḶЌ╗7ɱՙɱỏฌ ●ŐDz7CDzОAŐ╗ҜDzЌ╗̬ฌ
ㅡ″㌫ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
╗ŐA●b7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ

DzṲ㈠ฎफ7AbО7ӧՁЋЋÛ C7Ṳbֱฎՙxỏฌ
ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7ÛDzՁՁƆ7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ŐDzҜḶЋDzC7ŐḶҜ7ƆDzŐЋ●bDz̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
CŐA●ЌAḚDz7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ՁฌḶ ╗7″ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx ՁЋЋÛC̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ
ՁḶ╗7̶ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ㅡⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ㄦⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7
bՁЋ7ĠAЌƆDzЌ̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ
ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬ⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬7 ՁḶ╗7ธⓒ7ԱՁḶbì7‫ں‬ฌ x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆ7ⓈЌ●╗7ЌḶ㈠ฌ
″ֱAฌ bՁЋ7CÛḚ7 ̬ฌ
ԱḶḶì7‫ں‬xⓒ7ОAḚDz7ธธฌ bAⓈ╗●ḶЌ7╗Ḷ7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ7
Ḷ7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
╗‫ں‬ฌ
ธ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ɱ̬‫ں‬ㄦ̬xՙ7ОҜฌ
О Ձ7 DzAƆDzҜDzЌ╗7゜7CDzC●bA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ
О Ձฌ
ธxƥ7ŐDzAŐ7ùAŐC7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ƆDz╗ԱAbì7 ธxƥ7ŐDzAŐ7ùAŐC7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ
″ƥ7 ″ƥฌ




㈠ɱ

ɱɱ
╗ Û ″x
ɱՙ
╗ Û ‫ں‬ฌ
ӧɱՙ ӧɱ О Ձฌ
╗ Û ㈠xxỏ ӧɱㄦ ╗ Û ฎ㈠‫ں‬ㄦ
ฌ ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dz7 ╗Û ㈠xxỏ ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dz7 ฌ ỏฌ bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ
ฌ ฌ
″ƥ7 ″ƥฌ
ㄦƥ7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ


ՙ̶

㈠x
‫ں‬x゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ


AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ںں‬ฌ

 Ձฌ
㈠‫ں‬


ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ

Ձฌ
ɱ

Ḛ x
‫ں‬ՙ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ

ɱ̶
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ں‬ㅡฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫̶ֱں‬xx‫ں‬ฌ

ɱ ธ㈠
ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dzฌ

Ḛ x

㈠xx
ɱ̶ Ḛ ฌ
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ

ɱ‫ں‬
ɱx㈠ՙɱ
̶㈠‫ں‬″੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ ธ㈠″੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠ㄦxฌ bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ
Ḛ ‫ں‬㈠x
bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7╗ŐAb╗7ՙbฌ ɱ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ


ОՁA╗7ԱḶḶì7ՙ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ ̶ ㈠‫ں‬x੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ‫ں‬㈠ㄦxฌ ɱ

㈠″
ธ㈠̶ՙ੧ 7ӧ‫ں‬੧ 7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌฌ xฌ


㈠ธ
ОՁA╗7ԱḶḶì7ՙ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7AŐDzAฌ

Ḛ ɱ
 Ḛ ̶㈠xx
ՁḶ╗7ㅡ̶7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

Ձ ฎ

ɱธ
ฌ ฌ ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠ㄦxฌ

ɱธ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
ՁḶ╗7ㅡx7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

㈠ธฎ
ɱธ Ձฌ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
ӧɱx㈠ฎ ̶ƥฌ ̶ƥฌ
̶ỏฌ DzṲ㈠ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ ӧฎɱ㈠‫ں‬″ ӧɱธ㈠xx
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ ЌḚ ฌ ỏฌ DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌC7 ỏฌ Dz Ṳ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌC Ќ Ḛฌ Ќ Ḛฌ

A 7 ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ֱ7╗ùО●bAՁ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌฌ Ա 7 ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ֱ7╗ùО●bAՁ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌฌ b 7 Û DzƆ╗DzŐՁù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ֱ7╗ùО●bAՁ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌฌ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ ‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ ‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
О Ձฌ
ɱฎ㈠ธㅡฌ ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ
╗Û ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ О Ձฌ ●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ Ḷ7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ
ㄦƥ7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ ฌ
ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ ɱ ɱ㈠xx AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ
ӧɱㄦ㈠xxỏฌ ╗Û ฌ
ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ɔ●╗Dz7 ″ƥฌ
╗Û ฌ
̶ƥ7╗ùОฌ
ธxƥ7ŐDzAŐ7ùAŐC7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ƆDz╗ԱAbìฌ ╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)ฌ

xx
‫ں‬ฎ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ

Ḛฌ
ɱ ‫ں‬㈠
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ


ㄦ゜ОՁ  ̶ฌ

㈠ㄦ

Ḛ
ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠ㄦxฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱx‫ں‬ɱฌ ɱ

㈠″″

ɱx ฌ
Ḛ x
ɱธ

bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ xỏ

ɱธ ฌ
))ए ธ‫ں‬ɱ̶㈠xxฌ Ḛ ธ㈠̶ɱ

㈠‫ں‬ɱ
ฌ ฌ Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ

Ќ

ธ㈠x Ḛ ฌ

ɱ㈠ㅡ
̶ƥฌ ՁḶ╗7̶ㄦ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ
ӧɱ Ќ

ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ
‫ں‬ỏ
ㅡㄦฌ


ɱx㈠
Ձฌ

C 7 DzAƆ╗DzŐՁù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù Dz 7 ƆḶⓈ╗ 7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ù7ԱḶⓈЌCAŐù7ӧ╗ùО●bAՁỏฌ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ ‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
О Ձฌ О Ձฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
)●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ b Ձฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7
О ՙⓒ
Ձ 7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7 ธㅡƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
ӧɱㄦ㈠xxỏฌ
ㄦ㈠ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ ╗Û ฌ
ธƥฌ ㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 AŐDzAฌ ՁAЌCƆAbОDzฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ
╗ùОฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
ԱⓈ))DzŐฌ bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bA 7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ЋAŐ●DzƆฌ
Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ ỏฌ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱxธธฌ
ӧɱ‫ں‬㈠xx bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ
╗Û ฌ


ՁḶ╗7̶ธ7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

㈠ㅡ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁฌ


ฎ㈠ɱ

Оฌ
╗b ธ
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

Ա
㈠″ b ฌ

ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ

ฎฎ

A
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

㈠ㄦㅡ
ฎฎ b ฌ
̶ỏ

゜Ձ● ɱ

ฎฎ ƆÛ


ธฌ
ฎ ฎ Ձ゜A

㈠ㄦ ฌ

A b ฎ㈠ธ
b ธ㈠ՙธ੧ 7ӧธ੧ 7╗ùОỏฌ

ฎฎ b ゜Ձ●
DzṲ㈠7ŐDz╗A●Ќ●ЌḚ7Û AՁՁฌ ธ੧ 7╗ùОฌ

㈠‫ں‬ՙ Оฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥ7ӧㅡธֱ●Ќ7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ
ㄦ㈠ธธƥฌ
ՙ̶ㅡㄦ7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ●ЋDz7 Ա‫ں‬xՙֱ‫ں‬ㅡx7び7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ7び7ЌDzЋACA7び7ฎɱ‫̶ںں‬ฌ
̶ɱㅡㄦ7ОDzԱԱՁDz7bŐDzDzì7AЋDzЌⓈDzⓒ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡՙฌ

Ɔì7ⓈƆAⓒ7ՁՁb㈠ฌ
İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ธ̶ՙֱㅡxՙx77bḶЌ╗Ab╗̬7bƆAԱA7ҜDz●ƆΎԱⓈŐḚDzŐฌ
ОĠ̬7ӧՙxธỏ7ㄦฎx̶ֱ″ㄦฎ77ֱֱֱֱֱ77ÛÛÛ㈠İŐĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌDzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆ㈠bḶҜฌ

CDzО╗Ġ7Ḷ)7bḶЋDzŐฌ ‫ں‬ɱฌ
ฎ ㅡ㈠ ╗Ő ฌ ฌ
Ɔฌ

7ฎफÛ Ḷ Ќฌ ฌ Dz ฌƆ
ㄦ̶ฌ ●Ќ Ћ ╗ฌ
ฎธ㈠ Û Ő ฌ
Ҝ ฌ
ฌО Ő7 ฌ●ฌ

7ฎफƆ
●Ќ Ћ
ฌŐ


ฌ ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ㈠ㄦx7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7DzAƆ╗7Ɔ●CDz7ḶЌՁùỏฌ
㈠Ġฌ Aฌ ฌ●ฌՁ ฌ
b ●Ћ ●Ձ 7


╗ ฌDz

‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ İ ㈠ฌฌŐ ฌ
Dz ฌЌ
О Ձ7 ธƥฌ О Ձฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ՁAЌCƆAbОDzฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ
)●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ ԱⓈ))DzŐฌ b Ձฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7
О ՙⓒ
Ձ 7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ ธㅡƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ

ㄦ㈠ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ ธƥฌ ‫ں‬ธƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ㅡƥฌ ธxƥฌ ธƥฌ ӧɱ̶㈠″‫ں‬ỏ


ธƥฌ ㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 AŐDzAฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ╗Û ฌ
╗ùОฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ●ƆՁAЌCฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ЋAŐ●DzƆฌ
Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ ỏฌ
ӧɱx㈠̶x AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱ‫ں‬″ֱxธㅡฌ
╗Û ฌ


bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธԱฌ


㈠″

Оฌ

╗b
Ќ
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

゜A b ฌ
Ա

╗b ㅡ
ՁḶ╗7̶x7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ


ՙ㈠ɱ

ฎՙ㈠ ฌ
ฎՙ

ՙ‫ں‬
゜Ձ●
ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ
DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁ7


A
ฎՙ ƆÛ

b Ձ ՙ㈠ՙɱ
‫ں‬ỏ

ɱ
㈠ՙㅡ ฌ

A b ՙ㈠ㅡ″
ฎՙ b ゜Ձ
‫ں‬㈠″ɱ੧ 7ӧธ੧ 7╗ùОỏฌ ธ㈠ㅡธ੧ 7ӧธ੧ 7╗ùОỏฌ
DzṲ㈠7ŐDz╗A●Ќ●ЌḚ7Û AՁՁฌ

Page 634 of 1332


㈠̶ ●Оฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥ7ӧㅡธफ7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ
ㄦ㈠ธ‫ں‬ƥฌ ฌ
CDzО╗Ġ7Ḷ)7bḶЋDzŐฌ ㈠̶ㄦ
ฎ̶ ╗Ő ฌ
7ฎफÛ
╗DzЌ╗A╗●ЋDz7ҜAОฌ

●Ќ Ћ

AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxx̶7

ฎ‫ں‬㈠ՙ‫ ں‬Őฌ bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—7C7‫ف‬㈠ฌ


ฎफƆÛ
●ЌЋ7
ҜḶЌ╗AḚDz7DzƆ╗A╗DzƆฌ

‫ֱ ں‬ฎxxֱธธՙֱธ″xxฌ
ŐDzƆ●CDzЌ╗●AՁ7ƆⓈԱC●Ћ●Ɔ●ḶЌฌ

Ḛ 7 ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ㈠ㄦx7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7DzAƆ╗7Ɔ●CDz7ḶЌՁù7Û ●╗Ġ7Ҝ DzC●AЌ7ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7●ƆՁAЌCỏฌ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
CDz╗A●ՁƆ7AЌC7bŐḶƆƆ7ƆDzb╗●ḶЌƆฌ

О Ձฌ О Ձฌ
b●╗ù7Ḷ7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACA7ฎɱ‫ں‬xՙ7

ОAŐbDzՁ7‫ں‬ฌ ″ƥ7Û ●CDz7Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7DzAƆDzҜ DzЌ╗ฌ


)●ՁDz7‫ںں‬ฎⓒ7ОAḚDz7″‫ں‬ฌ b Ձฌ ОDzŐ7ԱḶḶì7ՙⓒ7ОAḚDz7ՙ‫ں‬ฌ
Ḷ)7ОAŐbDzՁ7Ҝ AОƆฌ Ḷ)7ОՁA╗Ɔฌ
AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱx″ֱxxธฌ ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7 ธㅡƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ

ㄦ㈠ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ ธƥฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ ㄦ㈠ㄦƥฌ ӧɱ̶㈠xxỏฌ


ธƥฌ ㄦƥฌ
╗ĠDz7bⓈŐbĠ7Ḷ)7 ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7 AŐDzAฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ ╗Û ฌ
╗ùОฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bA 7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ ԱⓈ))DzŐฌ
İDzƆⓈƆ7bĠŐ●Ɔ╗ฌ ЋAŐ●DzƆฌ
Ḷ)7ՁA╗╗DzŐ7CAù7ƆA●Ќ╗Ɔฌ ỏฌ
bŴкк7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7ੂਙ—ฌ
ӧฎ ㄦx
ɱ㈠ AОЌ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱx̶ֱธ‫ֱں‬xx‫ں‬ฌ
╗Û ฌ bĠAŐՁDzƆ╗ḶЌ7DzƆ╗7ⓈЌ●╗7  ธCฌ bผŴ่֭7Ḷ‫֭ﭨ‬ผγ֭Ŵ₡ฌ


ՁḶ╗7‫ں‬7ԱՁḶbì7ՙฌ

b Ձฌ

㈠ㅡ
Ќ

Ûฌ
ฎ″㈠

╗b
ՙxธֱธธՙֱธɱธɱฌ

╗b ″
″㈠ՙ

ฎ″
DzṲ㈠7ḚŐḶⓈЌCฌ

DzṲ㈠7″ƥ7╗ùО7Û AՁՁ7

ฎ″

゜Ձ●О
Ab ゜ ㄦㄦ

ฎ″ ฌ
A

㈠ㅡՙ
ӧฎ Ḛ ฌ

ฎ″

Ա Ɔ ㈠ㄦՙ
̶ỏ

DzṲ㈠7ŐDz╗A●Ќ●ЌḚ7Û AՁՁฌ

A b ㈠ธธ
ฎ″ b ゜Ձ●
㈠ธ‫ ں‬Оฌ
DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥ7ӧㅡธफ7Ҝ ●Ќỏฌ
ㅡ㈠ฎฎƥฌ ฌ
㈠‫ں‬ㄦ ฌ
ฎ ธ Û ╗Ő İḶĠЌ7Ő㈠7ĠAҜ●Ձ╗ḶЌ7DzЌ╗DzŐОŐ●ƆDzƆⓒ7●Ќb㈠ฌ
ฌ 7ฎफ Ⓢ╗●Ձ●╗ù7ЌḶ╗Dz̬ฌ
㈠ՙɱ ฌ ●Ќ Ћ
ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁฌ
ОŐ●Ќ╗DzC̬ฌx̶ֱ‫ں‬ธֱธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

ฎx Û Ő
फƆ
Ћ7ฎ
●Ќ
Ġ 7 ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ㈠ㄦx7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7Û DzƆ╗7Ɔ●CDz7ḶЌՁùỏฌ
‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ
О Ձ7 b Ձ7 О Ձฌ
ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDz ╗7 ธ̶㈠ㄦƥ7ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ

ธƥฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥ7AƆОĠAՁ╗7ОAЋ●ЌḚฌ ‫ں‬″㈠ㄦƥฌ ธƥฌ


ㄦƥฌ ㄦƥฌ
Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ ธ㈠ㄦफ7Ab7ḶЋDzŐ7ㅡ㈠ㄦफ7╗ùОDz7●●ฌ Őֱ╗ùОDzฌ
Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ Ɔ●CDzÛ AՁìฌ
bⓈŐԱฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ ŐDz)DzŐ7╗Ḷ7ḚDzḶ╗DzbĠЌ●bAՁ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗ฌ bⓈŐԱฌ

bฌ
゜A x
C Ő●ЋDzÛ Aù7ӧ‫ں‬ธ੧

‫ں‬x
7Ҝ AṲỏฌ 7Ҝ AṲỏฌ

b Ձ x㈠x
C Ő●ЋDzÛ Aù7ӧ‫ں‬ธ੧
●ŐDz7CDzОAŐ╗ҜDzЌ╗̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
╗ŐA●b7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
̶㈠ㄦƥฌ CŐA●ЌAḚDz7Ɔ╗Cù̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ㄦƥ7╗ùОฌ
ƆḶ●ՁƆ7ŐDzОḶŐ╗̬ฌ Ќ゜Aฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙxx ՁЋЋÛC̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ

bՁЋ7ĠAЌƆDzЌ̬ฌЌ゜Aฌ

●ฌ ОŐ●ЋA╗Dz7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗7ֱ7ㅡՙ7╗7Ő゜Û 7Û ●C╗Ġ7ӧƆ●CDzÛ AՁì7ḶЌ7ԱḶ╗Ġ7Ɔ●CDzƆỏฌ x̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ


‫ ں ں‬7ЌḶ╗7╗Ḷ7ƆbAՁDzฌ bՁЋ7CÛḚ7 ̬ฌ

╗ธฌ
ธ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ɱ̬‫ں‬ㄦ̬ㅡธ7ОҜฌ
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 37

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75829 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: JASON MAHEU - OWNER:
MOORE MICHAEL & DIANA TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
20 PARKING SPACES WHERE 32 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 0.42 acres on 1807
West Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-04-112-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-75798]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]

Page 635 of 1332


Page 636 of 1332
Page 637 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: MOORE MICHAEL & DIANA TRUST
AND MATTHEWS FAMILY TRUST

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75829 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75832
conditions: SDR-75833
VAR-75832 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75829
conditions: SDR-75833
SDR-75833 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75829
conditions: VAR-75832

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 29

NOTICES MAILED 121 - VAR-75829 and VAR-75832


121 - SDR-75833

PROTESTS 0 - VAR-75829 and VAR-75832


0 - SDR-75833

APPROVALS 0 - VAR-75829 and VAR-75832


0 - SDR-75833

CC
Page 638 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75829 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75832) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75833) shall be required, if
approved.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-
0038-85), except where amended herein.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

VAR-75832 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75829) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75833) shall be required, if
approved.

CC
Page 639 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-
0038-85), except where amended herein.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-75833 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75829) and Variance (VAR-75832) shall be required, if approved.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-
0038-85), except where amended herein.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plans, landscape plan, building
elevations, and floor plan, date stamped 02/25/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

5. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a six-foot wide landscape
buffer and a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along a portion of the east property line
where 15 feet is required.

CC
Page 640 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

6. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow a to allow a zero-foot wide
landscape buffer along the north, west and south property lines where eight feet is
required.

7. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is hereby approved, to allow blank façades on the west
and south elevations of the building where such treatments are not acceptable.

8. An Exception from Title 19.08.110(C) is hereby approved, to allow three landscape


islands for 20 parking spaces where one landscape island is required for every six
parking spaces.

9. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

10. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

11. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape
Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

12. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

13. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

14. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies, if any, on the sidewalk
along Shadow Lane adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of
Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development
of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development
of this site.

CC
Page 641 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Conditions Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

15. Concurrent with development, relocate the existing private sewer lateral which
crosses this site so that it is not located underneath the proposed building. If
applicable, grant a private sewer easement in favor of Lot 2 of Parcel Map File 92
Page 79. Prior to civil plan approval provide a copy of the recorded private sewer
easement to the Sanitary Sewer Planning Section of the Department of Public
Works.

16 Connect the proposed building to the public sewer in Shadow Lane independently
of the private sewer traversing this site from Lot 2 of Parcel Map File 92 Page 79.

17. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site
prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainage ways as recommended.

Fire Department

18. Must meet requirements of 2018 International Fire Code section 503.1.1.

CC
Page 642 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a proposed Site Development Plan Review for a new 4,860 square-
foot Office, Medical or Dental building, along with Waivers and Variances to allow blank
facades, a reduction in side and rear setbacks, parking, parking lot landscaping and
perimeter landscaping buffers. The subject site is located at 1807 West Charleston
Boulevard and obtains access from the western side of Shadow Lane.

ISSUES

• The subject site is located within the Las Vegas Medical District of the Downtown Las
Vegas Overlay and is governed by Appendix F, Interim Downtown Las Vegas
Development Standards.
• The subject site is also located within Area 2 of the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay
and shall conform to Title 19 of the Las Vegas Municipal Code for development.
• Any deviation from Title 19 Development Standards that supports the City’s goals as
expressed in the Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan and the districts’
goals and descriptions as per Chapter II of Appendix F, Interim Downtown Las Vegas
Development Standards may only be granted by the City Council when supported
through clear and convincing evidence, and shall require the approval of a Waiver
per Section A.8.b of Appendix F, Interim Downtown Las Vegas Development
Standards. Two components of this project do not support the goals expressed in the
Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan; firstly, the reduction of parking spaces
required for an Office, Medical or Dental use fails to achieve Goal 4 Seamless
Connections which aims to improve connectivity and mobility in the Downtown area;
and secondly, the construction of a new building that does not meet setback
requirements fails to achieve Goal 3 Vital Places which aims to promote design
guidance and public realm enhancement to create a legible and vibrant Downtown
area. As such, two Variances have been requested.
• A Variance is requested to allow 20 parking spaces where 32 are required for an
Office, Medical or Dental use. Staff does not support this request.
• A Variance is requested to allow a five-foot side yard setback where ten feet is
required, and to allow a six-foot rear yard setback where 20 feet is required in the
C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district. Staff does not support this request.
• A Site Development Plan Review is requested for a 4,860 square-foot medical office
development on land zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial).

CC
Page 643 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

• Waivers are requested to allow a six-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer and a 10-
foot wide perimeter landscape buffer along portions of the east property line facing
the Shadow Lane right-of-way where 15 feet is required; a zero-foot wide landscape
buffer on the south property line where eight feet is required; and blank facades on
the south and west elevations where such treatments are not acceptable. Staff does
not support the requests.
• Waivers are requested to allow a zero-foot wide landscape buffer on the north and
west property lines where eight feet is required. Staff supports this request as the
subject site contains easements that allow cross access between the west and north
adjoining properties; in this instance, the provision of landscape buffers would impede
existing access arrangements.
• An Exception is requested to allow a reduced level of parking lot landscaping,
providing a landscape island ratio of one per seven parking spaces where one
landscape island is required for every six parking spaces. Staff does not support this
request.

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed a Site Development Plan Review to develop an undeveloped
0.42 acre parcel with a 4,860 square-foot medical office building at 1807 West Charleston
Boulevard. The subject site is located within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District
(DTLV-O) within Area 2. Area 2 standards shall conform to Title 19 development
standards; however, any deviation from these standards (including those normally
requiring a variance) shall require approval of a Waiver that may be attached to a Site
Development Plan Review, provided that the deviation supports the City’s goals as
expressed in the Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan and the districts’ goals
and descriptions as per Chapter II of Appendix F, Interim Downtown Las Vegas
Development Standards.

The subject parcel is included in the Vision 2045 Master Plan for Downtown Las Vegas
within the Las Vegas Medical District, a significant employment node that functions as the
center of health, education and research for Southern Nevada. The subject site is
identified as suitable for mixed-use commercial land uses; the proposed medical office
development is consistent with the intent of the Master Plan.

An Office, Medical or Dental use is described in Title 19.12 as: “A professional office for
the administration of professional medical, psychological or dental care, including
examinations, screenings and minor outpatient surgical procedures. This use does not
include a facility that provides housing for individuals, a clinic, or any other facility that is
specifically defined in this Title.” Per Title 19.12, an Office, Medical or Dental use is
permitted by right in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.

CC
Page 644 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

A Variance (VAR-75829) is requested to vary the parking space requirements generated


by the proposed development. Title 19.12.070 prescribes an on-site parking requirement
of one space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area up to 2,000 square feet, plus
one space for each additional 175 square feet; a 4,860 square-foot medical office
development generates demand for 27 on-site parking spaces. A previous parking
analysis approved as part of Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-0038-85) calculated the
parking requirements over three sites; 1801 West Charleston Boulevard (APN: 162-04-
112-019); 1815 West Charleston Boulevard (APN: 162-04-112-020); and the subject site,
1807 West Charleston Boulevard (APN: 162-04-112-021). The subject site
accommodated an additional five parking spaces above their individual parking
requirement to meet the total parking requirements of the other uses over the three sites.
The five parking spaces provided as overflow for development approved (Plot Plan
Review Z-0038-85) need to be accounted for to meet the conditions of approval; as such,
a total of 32 parking spaces are required. The applicant is proposing 20 parking spaces.
A Variance is sought to allow for 20 parking spaces where 32 are required.

A second Variance (VAR-75832) is requested to vary the side yard and rear yard setback
requirements in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone prescribed by Title 19.08.040. The
proposed side yard setback on the south side of the site is five feet where 10 feet is
required; the proposed rear yard setback is six feet where 20 feet is required.

The proposed Site Development Plan Review request (SDR-75833) proposes to


construct a 4,860 square-foot building, 20 parking spaces including one ADA parking
space, and associated landscaping. The building is 17.5 feet tall, positioned on the
southern portion of the lot, and is designed to contain three tenant spaces. The building
is north-facing and features a variety of materials including stone veneer, aluminum, metal
and stucco. Blank façades are proposed on the south and west elevations constructed of
concrete masonry; a Waiver is required to allow the blank façades where such treatments
are not acceptable as per Title 19.08.040(5). The applicant’s Justification Letter notes
that the west elevation will align with the building directly west. In addition, the south
elevation will face an existing block wall approximately five feet tall.

The submitted landscape plan incorporates a mix of 24-foot tall trees, shrubs and ground
covers. Waivers are sought for landscape buffers; Title 19.08.070 requires a minimum
landscape buffer zone depth of 15 feet to the adjacent right-of-way and eight feet to
interior lot lines. A portion of the landscape buffer adjacent to the Shadow Lane right-of-
way is six feet where parking spaces have been provided; additionally, a 10-foot wide
landscape buffer adjacent to Shadow Lane is shown parallel to the proposed building. A
zero-foot wide landscape buffer is requested to the south property line. A further Waiver
is requested to allow a zero-foot wide landscape buffer to the north and west property
lines where eight feet is required. The subject site contains easements that allow cross
access between the west and north adjoining properties; in this instance, the provision of
landscape buffers would impede existing access arrangements.

CC
Page 645 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Title 19.08.110 provides standards for parking lot landscaping including landscape
islands; in accordance with the Code, interior landscape islands shall be provided either
parallel to parking spaces or at a ratio of one landscape island for six parking spaces. The
submitted landscape plan makes provision for three landscape islands for 20 parking
spaces at a ratio of one landscape island per seven parking spaces, and therefore does
not comply with Title 19. In accordance with Title 19.08.110(C)(12)(f), an exception or
modification to any of these standards may be approved upon the request of an applicant
if the applicant can show through convincing and substantial evidence that the exception
or modification will not compromise the objective of the City in safeguarding the interests
of the citizens of the City, the proposed project will substantially meet the intent of the
standard, and the granting of the exception or modification will not detrimentally affect the
public health, safety or general welfare. As such, an Exception has been sought to allow
a reduced level of parking lot landscaping, providing a ratio of one landscape island per
seven parking spaces where one landscape island per six parking spaces is required.

Residential adjacency standards do not apply to this site. All adjacent parcels are zoned
for commercial uses, and there are no single-family residential parcels directly across a
public right-of-way from the subject site. A trash collection area is provided on the northern
adjoining parcel (APN 162-04-112-019); this arrangement was approved in Plot Plan
Review (Z-0038-85). A condition will be imposed to ensure conformance with the approval
and conditions of Z-0038-85.

The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) provided the following comments: “This
parcel is currently served by LVVWD but the service does not have the backflow
prevention assembly required for the proposed use per NAC 445A.67195. Backflow
retrofit is required to bring this property into compliance with state regulations.
Developer’s contractor to contact LVVWD Project Support Team for a backflow retrofit
permit.”

Two Variances, Waivers and an Exception are sought for reduced parking, a reduced
side yard setback to the south and reduced rear yard setback to the west, the provision
of blank façades where such treatments are not acceptable, reduced landscape buffers
to all property lines, and reduced provision of parking lot landscaping, all of which do not
comply with the provisions of Title 19. As such, staff recommends denial of the two
Variances and the associated Site Development Plan Review.

FINDINGS (VAR-75829)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

CC
Page 646 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a land use that requires
additional parking on the subject site. A less intense land use would allow conformance
with Title 19.12 parking requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed
by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is
preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting
of Variances.

FINDINGS (VAR-75832)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation

CC
Page 647 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a development of a scale
that cannot achieve the required setback and landscape standards prescribed in Title 19.
A redesign of the proposed medical office building, parking areas and landscape buffers
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

FINDINGS (SDR-75833)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed development is not compatible with the development in the area, as
Variances and Waivers are required to address reduced parking, landscaping and
building setbacks, representing an overdevelopment of the subject site.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is not consistent with the Vision 2045 Downtown Las
Vegas Masterplan, nor the goals set forth by the Interim Downtown Las Vegas
Development Standards for the Las Vegas Medical District as demonstrated by the
request for five Waivers of the development standards.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access is obtained from Shadow Lane, a 60-foot wide local street. Granting a
Variance to allow 20 parking spaces where 32 are required will create parking
congestion on the surrounding street network and adversely impact local traffic flow.

CC
Page 648 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The proposed building materials are appropriate for the area. However, Waivers
are sought for reduced landscape buffers and landscape islands.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The proposed south and west elevations of the building contain blank façades that
are undesirable and aesthetically unpleasing.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

If approved, the proposed addition will be subject to building permit review, as well
as regular inspections during the construction phase thus protecting the public
health, safety and general welfare.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council denied a request (Z-0052-81) to allow an office complex for
twenty (20) medical suites and to amend the reclassification to P-R
11/04/81 (Professional Offices and Parking) whereas the previous request was for C-
1 (Limited Commercial) zoning for a convalescent center at 112 and 1120
Shadow Lane.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (Z-0038-85) to allow
reclassification of property from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited
08/07/85
Commercial) for a proposed Professional Office and Retail Pharmacy at 1112
Shadow Lane. Planning Commission recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (U-0001-02)
03/20/02 for a proposed social service provider (transition services) at 1807 West
Charleston Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
43991) to Establish Redevelopment Area 2 and Change the Future Land Use
04/18/12 Designation on Various Parcels within the Redevelopment Area to
Commercial or Mixed Use. Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.

CC
Page 649 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
73548) to amend portions of the Southeast Sector Land Use Map of the
General Plan from C (Commercial), LI/R (Light Industry/Research), LVMD
(Las Vegas Medical District), M (Medium Density Residential), MXU (Mixed
Use) and SC (Service Commercial) to FBC (Form-Based Code) on
approximately 307 acres in the Las Vegas Medical District generally located
south of U.S. Highway 95, west of Interstate 15, north of Charleston
Boulevard, and east of Rancho Drive. Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
12/05/18
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-73549) from C-1
(Limited Commercial), M (Industrial), PD (Planned Development), R-5
(Apartment) and R-PD19 (Residential Planned Development - 19 Units Per
Acre) to T4-C (T4 Corridor), T5-C (T5 Corridor), T5-MS (T5 Main Street), T5-
M (T5 Maker), T5-N (T5 Neighborhood), T6-UG (T6 Urban General) and T6-
UG-L (T6 Urban General Limited) on approximately 307.00 acres in the Las
Vegas Medical District generally located south of U.S. Highway 95, west of
Interstate 15, north of Charleston Boulevard, and east of Rancho Drive.
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


01/28/03 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


No records were found related to the subject site.

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application Meeting was conducted to discuss the submittal
02/13/19 requirements for two Variances and a Site Development Plan Review
for a proposed Medical Office development with the applicant.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

CC
Page 650 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
According to a desktop analysis, an office building was located on the
02/28/19 subject site with associated parking and perimeter landscaping.
However, a field check revealed an undeveloped, cleared site.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.42

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject
Vacant O (Office) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Property
North Restaurant O (Office) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
P-R (Professional Office
South Office O (Office)
and Parking)
Restaurant O (Office) C-1 (Limited Commercial)
East Office, Medical or P-R (Professional Office
O (Office)
Dental and Parking)
West Retail O (Office) C-1 (Limited Commercial)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


Rancho Charleston Land Use Study Y
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District - 200 Feet Y
DTLV-O (Downtown Las Vegas Overlay) District – Area 2 (Las Vegas
Medical District) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area (Area 2) Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CC
Page 651 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
• Front Yard 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
• Side Yard (north) 10 Feet 93 Feet Y
• Side Yard (south) 10 Feet 5 Feet N*
• Corner Yard 10 Feet N/A N/A
• Rear Yard 20 Feet 6 Feet N*
Max. Building Height N/A 18 Feet N/A
Northern
adjoining
Screened, Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure site as part Y
Roof or Trellis
of approval
for Z-38-85.
* The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75832) to allow a five-foot wide side yard
setback where 10 feet is required, and a six-foot wide rear yard setback where 20 feet is
required.

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 6 Trees 6 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 6 Trees 6 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Lot Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
4 Trees 3 Trees N*
Landscaping end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North 8 Feet 0 Feet N**
• South 8 Feet 0 Feet N**
• East 15 Feet 8 Feet N***
• West 8 Feet 0 Feet N**
* The applicant has requested an Exception to allow one landscape island per seven parking
spaces where one landscape island per six parking spaces is required.
** The applicant has requested Waivers to allow zero-foot wide landscape buffers where eight
feet is required.

CC
Page 652 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

*** The applicant has requested a Waiver to allow a six-foot wide landscape buffers where 15
feet is required.

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Shadow Lane Local Street Title 13 60 Y

Pursuant to 19.12, the following parking standards apply:


Parking Requirement
Gross Required Provided Compliance
Floor Area Parking Parking
Use
or Number Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
of Units capped capped
One space
per 200 SF
up to 2,000
Office,
SF, then one
Medical or 4,860 SF 27
space for
Dental
each
additional
175 SF
Overflow
spaces per 5
Z-0038-85
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 32 20 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 31 1 19 1 N*
Percent Deviation 37%
* The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75829) to allow 20 parking spaces where 32
spaces are required.

CC
Page 653 of 1332
VAR-75829, VAR-75832 and SDR-75833 [PRJ-75798]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
20-foot rear yard setback is
To allow a six-foot rear
required in the C-1 (Limited Denial
yard setback.
Commercial) zoning district.
Ten-foot side yard setback is
To allow a five-foot side
required in the C-1 (Limited Denial
yard setback.
Commercial) zoning district.
Eight-foot wide perimeter To allow a six-foot wide
landscape buffer is required along landscape buffer along the Denial
the east property line. east property line.
Eight-foot wide perimeter To allow a zero-foot wide
landscape buffer is required along landscape buffer along the Denial
the east property line. east property line.
To allow a zero-foot wide
Eight-foot wide perimeter
landscape buffer along the
landscape buffer is required along Approval*
north and west property
the north and west property lines.
lines.
* Pursuant to approved Rezoning and Plot Plan Review (Z-0038-85).

Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow three landscape
A ratio of one landscape island for
islands for 20 parking Denial
every six parking spaces.
spaces at a ratio of 1:7.

CC
Page 654 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 655 of 1332


ธ″ƥֱㅡफฌ
″ƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ″ƥֱxफ7 ธㅡƥֱxफฌ

ฎƥֱɱ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ

‫ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ
ՙฌ
ɱ ƥֱxफ7
ɱ ƥֱxफ7

ɱ‫ں‬ƥֱɱ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
ㅡฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzҜDzЌ╗̬ฌ
ɱƥֱxफ7

ԱAƆDzC7ḶЌ7DzЌ╗●ŐDz7bḶŐЌDzŐ7̶7ՁḶ╗Ɔ ฌ

ธㅡƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬ɱ7ƆОAbDzƆ ฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ḶЌ7╗Ġ●Ɔ7ОAŐbDzՁ7●Ɔ7̶x ฌ
ƆОAbDzƆ ฌ
ɱƥֱxफ7

″ ƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफฌ ɱ ƥֱxफ7 ɱ ƥֱxफ7 ɱ ƥֱxफ7 ɱ ƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ฎƥֱxफ7 ɱ ƥֱxफ7 ㄦƥֱxफ7 ɱ ƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ‫ ں‬ฎƥֱ″फฌ
″ ƥֱxफฌ
ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7ธx7ƆОAbDzƆ ฌ

‫ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ

Ġb ฌ
ɱฌ
ՙƥ̶ֱ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
̶ƥֱㄦ7̶゜ㅡफฌ

″ƥֱㄦ7̶゜ㅡफฌ
‫ں‬xƥֱxफฌ

Page 656 of 1332


ӧЌỏԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ ฌ
ㅡⓒฎ″x7Ɔ㈠"㈠ฌ
″ƥֱ″फ7 ‫ں ں‬ƥֱxफฌ

ㄦƥֱxफฌ
ㄦƥֱxफฌ

Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬7
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ÛĠ ฌ
Ő
Dzฌ

╗AԱՁDz

AԱՁDz ฌ

Ő
Dz ฌ
╗AԱՁDz

╗AԱՁDzฌ
╗AԱՁDz ฌ

╗AԱՁDz

Dz
ֱОЌՁฌ
ŐùDzŐ ฌ
╗AԱՁDz ฌ
О

ḶƆฌ

О
●ƆОՁAù ฌ

ŐḶḶDzŐ
Ḷ ЋDzЌ ฌ
ŐDz ฌ
╗AԱՁDz ฌ
╗AԱՁDz ฌ
╗AԱՁDz ฌ

Dz
ֱОЌՁ
DzֱОЌՁฌ

Dz
ֱОЌՁ ฌ
ธ″ƥֱㅡफฌ

″ƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफ7 ″ƥֱxफ7 ธㅡƥֱxफฌ
ฎƥֱɱ7‫゜ں‬ธफ

‫ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ
ɱƥֱxफฌ

ՙฌ

Page 657 of 1332


ɱƥֱxफ

ɱ‫ں‬ƥֱɱ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ

ㅡฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzҜDzЌ╗̬ฌ
ɱƥֱxफฌ

ԱAƆDzC7ḶЌ7DzЌ╗●ŐDz7bḶŐЌDzŐ7̶7ՁḶ╗Ɔ ฌ
ธㅡƥֱxफฌ

‫ ں‬ɱ7ƆОAbDzƆ ‫ں‬ฎƥֱxफฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ḶЌ7╗Ġ●Ɔ7ОAŐbDzՁ7●Ɔ7̶x ฌ


ƆОAbDzƆ ฌ
ɱƥֱxफ7

″ ƥֱxफ ɱƥֱxफฌ ɱ ƥֱxफ ɱƥֱxफ ɱƥֱxफ ɱƥֱxफ7 ɱƥֱxफฌ ฎ ƥֱxफ ɱƥֱxफ ㄦƥֱxफ ɱƥֱxफฌ ɱƥֱxफ7 ‫ ں‬ฎƥֱ″फฌ
″ ƥֱxफฌ ОŐḶЋ●CDzC7ธx7ƆОAbDzƆ ฌ
‫ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬ɱƥֱxफฌ

Ġb ฌ
ɱฌ
ՙ ƥ̶ֱ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
̶ƥֱㄦ7̶゜ㅡफฌ

″ƥֱㄦ7̶゜ㅡफฌ

‫ ں‬xƥֱxफฌ

ӧЌỏԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ ฌ
ㅡ ⓒฎ″x7Ɔ㈠㈠ฌ
″ ƥֱ″फ7 ‫ں ں‬ƥֱxफฌ
ㄦƥֱxफฌ
ㄦƥֱxफฌ

ḶЋDzŐAՁՁ7bḶŐЌDzŐ7Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫ں‬फ7ए7ธxƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬7
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ՁDzḚDzЌCฌ
╗ŐDzDzƆ7 Ɔ●ΎDz7 Ợ╗ùฌ

ƆĠḶDzƆ╗Ő●ЌḚ7AbAb●Aฌ ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7 ธฌ
AbAb●A7⎯‫่֭ש‬ਙऑγੂккŴฌ

ҜDzṲ●bAЌ7ОAՁḶ7ЋDzŐCDzฌ ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7 ″ฌ
ОAŐì●ЌƆḶЌ●A7Ŵ㌱—к֭Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵฌ

bAՁ●ḶŐЌ●A7ОDzООDzŐ7╗ŐDzDzฌ
ƆbĠ●ЌⓈƆ7こਙкк֭7 ธㅡफ7ԱḶṲ7 ̶ฌ

ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ7Ŵ่₡7ḚŐḶⓈЌC7bḶЋDzŐฌ

b7 DzA╗ĠDzŐù7bAƆƆ●Aฌ ㄦ7ḚAՁ7 ‫ں‬xฌ


bAƆƆ●A7Ŵผ‫֭ש‬こħ⎯ħਙħ₡֭⎯ฌ

ԱԱ7 ԱḶ╗╗ՁDz7ԱŐⓈƆĠฌ ㄦ7ḚAՁ7 ɱฌ


bAՁՁ●Ɔ╗DzҜḶЌ7㌱ħ‫ש‬ผħ่—⎯ฌ

ŐОฌ
ŐDzC╗●О7ОĠḶ╗●Ќ●Aฌ ㄦ7ḚAՁ7 ‫ں‬x7 bฌ ŐО
ОĠḶ╗●Ќ●A7⑾ผŴ⎯֭ผħฌ
ŐОฌ
ԱԱ7 ԱԱฌ
╗Ձฌ ԱԱฌ
╗ŐA●Ձ●ЌḚ7ՁAЌ╗AЌAฌ ㄦ7ḚAՁ7 ㅡฌ
ՁAЌ╗AЌA7こਙ่‫—֭ש‬ħ₡่֭⎯ħ⎯ฌ

ЌḶ╗Dz̬7AՁՁ7●ЌḶŐḚAЌ●b7ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ḚŐḶⓈЌC7bḶЋDzŐฌ ŐО ŐОฌ
╗Ḷ7ԱDz7∵फ7●ЌC●AЌ7ŐDzC7ÛAƆĠDzC7ḚŐAЋDzՁ7ḶЋDzŐ7AՁՁฌ
ЌḶЌֱОAЋDzC7ḶОDzЌ7AŐDzAƆ7
b7 ŐОฌ bฌ
●ŐŐ●ḚA╗●ḶЌฌ
DzҜҜ●╗╗DzŐƆฌ
╗Ձฌ
╗ŐDzDzƆ7ֱ7ӧ̶ỏ7ĠAŐC●Dz7╗ⓈŐԱḶֱƆb7ӧCОİֱxฎỏ7ОDzŐ7╗ŐDzDzฌ
ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ7ֱ7ӧ‫ں‬ỏ7ĠAŐC●Dz7╗ⓈŐԱḶֱƆb7ӧCОİֱxฎ7ОDzŐ7ƆĠŐⓈԱฌ
ЌḶ╗DzƆ̬ฌ

‫ں‬㈠7AՁՁ7ธㅡֱЋḶՁ╗7Û●Ő●ЌḚ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7 ‫ں‬ㅡ7Ⓢ7C●ŐDzb╗7ԱⓈŐ●AՁⓒฌ
ƆḶՁ●C7bḶООDzŐ㈠ฌ

ธ㈠7AՁՁ7О●О●ЌḚ7AЌC7C●ŐDzb╗7ԱⓈŐ●AՁ7Û●Ő●ЌḚ7ⓈЌCDzŐ7ОAЋDzҜDzЌ╗ฌ
bฌ
ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7ƆՁDzDzЋDzC7●Ќ7ƆbĠDzCⓈՁDz7ㅡx7ОЋb7ƆՁDzDzЋDzƆ㈠7ƆՁDzDzЋDzƆฌ
ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7╗Û●bDz7╗ĠDz7C●AҜDz╗DzŐ7Ḷ7О●ОDz7ԱDz●ЌḚ7ƆՁDzDzЋDzC㈠ฌ ŐОฌ
̶㈠7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ7ƆĠAՁՁ7●ЌƆ╗AՁՁ7AՁՁ7ธㅡֱЋḶՁ╗7Û●Ő●ЌḚ7ŐḶҜฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐḶՁՁDzŐƆ7╗Ḷ7AՁՁ7ЋAՁЋDzƆ7●Ќ7ҜA●Ќ7Ձ●ЌDz7╗ŐDzЌbĠ㈠7●7Û●Ő●ЌḚฌ
ՁDzAЋDzƆ7ҜA●ЌՁ●ЌDz7╗ŐDzЌbĠⓒ7DzЌbՁḶƆDzC7●Ќ7ธxx7bՁAƆƆ7ОЋb7О●ОDz㈠ฌ
ԱԱฌ ԱԱฌ
ㅡ㈠7●ЌC●Ћ●CⓈAՁ7DzҜ●╗╗DzŐƆ7AŐDz7ЌḶ╗7ƆĠḶÛЌ7ḶЌ7CŐAÛ●ЌḚƆ7ḶŐฌ
bՁAŐ●╗ù㈠7ƆDzDz7ƆbĠDzCⓈՁDz7ḶŐ7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ7Ḷ7DzҜ●╗╗DzŐƆ7ОDzŐ7ОՁAЌ╗ฌ
bฌ
AЌC7bḶḶŐC●ЌA╗Dz7Û●╗Ġ7ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7●ЌƆ╗AՁՁDzŐ7╗Ḷ7CDz╗DzŐҜ●ЌDzฌ ԱԱฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ỢⓈAЌ╗●╗ù7Ḷ7DzҜ●╗╗DzŐƆ㈠7 ŐОฌ
ㄦ㈠7C●Ɔ╗Ő●ԱⓈ╗●ḶЌ7О●ОDz7ḶŐ7CŐ●О7ӧDzҜ●╗╗DzŐỏ7ƆùƆ╗DzҜ7ƆĠAՁՁ7ԱDz7∵फฌ
bՁAƆƆ7ธxx7ОЋb7ӧこħ่㈠ỏ7
Ġb ฌ b7 ╗Ձฌ
╗Ձฌ
ԱԱฌ
bฌ ŐОฌ

Page 658 of 1332


bฌ
ŐОฌ
ԱԱฌ

╗Ձฌ

ӧЌỏԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ ฌ b7 ԱԱฌ

bฌ
ㅡⓒฎ″x7Ɔ㈠㈠ฌ ŐОฌ

ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫ں‬फ7ए7‫ں‬xƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬7
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ҜDz╗AՁ7DzЌ╗Őù7bAЌḶОùӧ╗ùОỏฌ
AՁⓈҜ●ЌⓈҜ7Ɔ╗ḶŐDzŐḶЌ╗ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
Ɔ╗ḶЌDz7ЋDzЌDzDzŐӧ╗ùОỏฌ
Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶ7ŐDzЋDzAՁӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱ″फฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱ″फ7╗ḶО7Ḷ7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ

‫ں‬ㅡƥֱxफ7Ġ●ḚĠ7Ɔ●CDz7Ḷ7ŐḶḶฌ

‫ں‬xƥֱxफ7ԱḶ╗╗ḶҜ7Ḷ7╗ŐⓈƆƆDzƆฌ

ŐḶЌ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬7
DzṲОḶƆDzC7bҜⓈӧ╗ùОỏฌ

‫ں‬ՙƥֱ″फฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱ″फ7╗ḶО7Ḷ7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ

Page 659 of 1332


ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ
ธ7 ŐDzAŐ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
DzṲОḶƆDzC7bҜⓈӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱ″फฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱ″फ7╗ḶО7Ḷ7ОAŐAОDz╗ฌ

ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ


ㅡ7 Ɔ●CDz7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ ̶7 Ɔ●CDz7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
‫ں‬xฎƥֱxफฌ

ธՙƥֱxफ7 ธՙƥֱxफ7 ธՙƥֱxफ7 ธՙƥֱxफฌ

ㅡƥֱฎफฌ
‫ںں‬ƥֱ″फ7
ɱƥֱฎफ7

ㅡㄦƥֱxफฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7 A ฌ ⓈЌ●╗7 Ա ฌ ⓈЌ●╗7 b ฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ

‫ں‬ⓒธ‫ں‬ㄦ7Ɔ㈠ ㈠ฌ ธⓒㅡ̶x7Ɔ㈠ ㈠ฌ ‫ں‬ⓒธ‫ں‬ㄦ7Ɔ㈠ ㈠ฌ

ธƥֱ″फ7
″फ7
‫ںں‬ƥֱ″फ7
″फ7
ธƥֱ″फ7

Page 660 of 1332


‫ں‬ƥֱฎफ7
‫ں‬ƥֱ″फฌ

ㅡƥֱฎफ7 ‫ں‬ՙƥֱฎफ7 ̶ƥֱฎफ7 ㄦƥֱฎफ7 ″ƥֱ″फ7 ㄦƥֱxफ7 ธ‫ں‬ƥֱฎफ7 ㄦƥֱxफ7 ″ƥֱ″फ7 ㅡƥֱฎफ7 ㅡƥֱฎफ7 ‫ں‬ՙƥֱฎफ7 ㅡƥֱฎफฌ

7 ՁḶḶŐ ОՁAЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱxफฌ
‫ں‬7

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 661 of 1332
 >$
 $

 
#

 !>
#
# !!






 

\
#
 
 
#

=^
 

"

 
< #



Page 662 of 1332
 >$
 $

 
#

 !>
#
# !!






 

\
#
 
 
#

=^
 

"

 
< #



Page 663 of 1332
 >$
 $

 
#

 !>
#
# !!






 

\
#
 
 
#

=^
 

"

 
< #



Page 664 of 1332
 >$
 $

 
#

 !>
#
# !!






 

\
#
 
 
#

=^
 

"

 
< #



Page 665 of 1332


 >$
 $

 
#

 !>
#
# !!






 

\
#
 
 
#

=^
 

"

 
< #



╗ਙ̬7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬
A‫่̬שש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ʉγਙこ7ħ‫ש‬7こŴੂ7㌱ਙ่㌱֭ผ่ฌ
Ő̬֭7‫ں‬ฎxՙ7Û7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ

╗γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭⎯7₡֭こਙкħ⎯γħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7⑾ħผ֭7₡ŴこŴ‫֭ف‬₡7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ӧ⇡—ħк‫ש‬7ħ่7‫ں‬ɱㄦㄦ7ਙผħ‫ف‬ħ่Ŵккੂ7Ŵ⎯ฌ
Ŵ7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ่֭7㌱ਙ่‫֭ﭨ‬ผ‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭ỏ㈠7●่7ऑкŴ㌱֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ŴこŴ‫֭ف‬₡7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ‫—׀‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡ฌ
⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙʉ่֭ผ7ʉਙ—к₡7кħ8֭7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬7Ŵ7่֭ʉ7‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡7—ऑ7⎯γ֭кк7ਙ⑾7ㅡฎ″x7⎯⑾7⑾ਙผ7—⎯֭7Ŵ⎯7Ҝ֭₡ħ㌱Ŵкฌ
ਙผ7C่֭‫ש‬Ŵк7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭㈠7╗γ֭7่֭ʉ7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭7ʉਙ—к₡7⇡֭7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ਙ—‫ש‬γ7⎯ħ₡֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7кਙ‫ש‬㈠7╗γ֭7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ
ʉħ₡่֭ħ่‫ف‬7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ħ⎯7γŴ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่7ħこऑŴ㌱‫ש‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬㈠7●‫ש‬7ʉŴ⎯7γਙऑ֭₡7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7㌱ਙ—к₡ฌ
ʉŴħ‫ש‬7—่‫ש‬ħк7‫ש‬γ֭7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7ʉħ₡่֭ħ่‫ف‬7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ħこऑŴ㌱‫ש‬7ʉŴ⎯78่ਙʉ่ⓒ7⇡—‫ש‬7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7่֭㌱֭⎯⎯Ŵผੂ7‫ש‬ਙ78֭֭ऑฌ
⇡—⎯ħ่֭⎯⎯7こਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ่‫ف‬7⑾ਙผʉŴผ₡㈠

╗γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7ผ֭₡—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ħ่7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ธx7ʉγ֭ผ֭7̶x7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡ⓒ7㌱ħ‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
кਙ⎯⎯7ਙ⑾7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭7₡—֭7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7Ŵ7₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7Ŵ่₡7㌱ผਙ⎯⎯7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯㈠ฌ
bผਙ⎯⎯7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7Ŵ‫ف‬ผ֭֭こ่֭‫ש‬7ʉħкк7⇡֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡㈠7

╗γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ʉਙ—к₡7Ŵк⎯ਙ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7Ŵ7ผ֭₡—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7⇡—⑾⑾֭ผ⎯7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬㈠7‫ں‬xɸฌ
ʉਙ—к₡7⇡֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7ʉγ֭ผ֭7‫ں‬ㄦɸ7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡㈠7Aк⎯ਙ7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑŴผħ่‫ف‬7ʉγ֭ผ֭7″ɸ7ħ⎯7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡㈠7╗γ֭7ผ֭₡—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
ħ⎯7่֭֭₡֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7こŴゥħこħ▷֭7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ⑾‫֭ש‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7кਙ⎯⎯7ਙ⑾7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7₡—֭7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7Ŵ่7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬㈠7

●่7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭₡—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7⇡—⑾⑾֭ผⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙʉ่֭ผ7ʉਙ—к₡7Ŵк⎯ਙ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7Ŵ่ฌ
֭ゥ㌱֭ऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7кਙ‫ש‬7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑħ่‫ف‬㈠7ОкŴ่‫֭ש‬ผ⎯7֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผੂ7″7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ʉਙ—к₡7ผ֭₡—㌱֭7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ‫ﭨ‬ŴħкŴ⇡к֭ฌ
ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7⇡ੂ7Ŵ่7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7ธ7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯ฌ

╗ਙ7こŴ8֭7⇡֭‫֭שש‬ผ7—⎯֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ่₡7⇡֭7ħ่78֭֭ऑħ่‫ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Û֭⎯‫ש‬
‫ש‬γ֭ ਙʉ่֭ผ ʉਙ—к₡ ผ֭‫ ש⎯֭—׀‬Ŵ ‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7⑾ਙผ7⎯ħ₡֭7⎯֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱7‫ש‬ਙ7ㄦɸ7ʉγ֭ผ֭7‫ں‬xɸ ħ⎯ ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡ⓒ Ŵ่₡ Ŵ ผ֭Ŵผ
⎯֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱87ਙ⑾7″ɸ ֱ″㈚7ʉγ֭ผ֭7ธxɸ7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡㈠7

╗γ֭7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7ʉŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7Ŵ่₡7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7+Ŵ㌱Ŵ₡֭⎯7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬
こŴ8ħ่‫ف‬7่ਙ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γਙ⎯֭7⎯ħ₡֭⎯7Ŵผ֭7⎯㌱ผ่֭֭֭₡7⑾ผਙこ7ऑ—⇡кħ㌱7‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ㈠

╗γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ธ7‫ש‬ผŴ⎯γ7่֭㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭⎯7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7⎯֭ผ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7ʉħкк7⇡֭7—ऑ‫ف‬ผŴ₡֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7ผਙਙ⑾
Ŵ่₡7Ŵผ֭7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡7⑾ਙผ7⎯γŴผ֭₡7—⎯֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯㈠

╗γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ʉħкк7ผ֭ऑкŴ㌱֭7Ŵ7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ʉŴ⎯7₡ŴこŴ‫֭ف‬₡7Ŵ่₡7ਙผħ‫ف‬ħ่Ŵккੂ7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡7⑾ਙผ
ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7—⎯֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7่֭ʉ֭ผ7こਙผ֭7こਙ₡֭ผ่7ਙ่֭7⑾ਙผ7bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7—⎯֭㈠7●‫ש‬7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙऑħ่ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭ฌ
‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7ħ‫ש‬7ʉਙ—к₡7⇡֭7Ŵ7‫֭ﭨ‬ผੂ7ŴऑऑผਙऑผħŴ‫֭ש‬7—⎯֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡ħ่‫ف‬7こ֭₡ħ㌱Ŵк7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭7ħ่7㌱кਙ⎯֭7ऑผਙゥħこħ‫ੂש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7γਙ⎯ऑħ‫ש‬Ŵк㈠7

Ɔħ่㌱֭ผ֭кੂ

ìb7bŴこħ⎯ⓒ7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 6eo 61f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 38

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75832 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: APPLICANT:JASON MAHEU -
OWNER: MOORE MICHAEL & DIANA TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance
TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT SIDE SETBACK WHERE TEN FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW
A SIX-FOOT REAR SETBACK WHERE 20 FEET IS REQUIRED on 0.42 acres on 1807 West
Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-04-112-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-75798]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 667 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 668 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 6eo 91f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 39

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75833 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75829 AND VAR-75832
- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: JASON MAHEU - OWNER: MOORE MICHAEL & DIANA
TRUST - Request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED OFFICE, MEDICAL
OR DENTAL DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO ALLOW A SIX-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER
ALONG A PORTION OF THE EAST PROPERTY LINE WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED, TO
ALLOW NO LANDSCAPING IN A LANDSCAPING BUFFER AREA WHERE SUCH IS
REQUIRED, TO ALLOW BLANK FACADES WHERE SUCH IS NOT ALLOWED, AND TO ALLOW
LESS PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING THAN WHAT IS ALLOWED on 0.42 acres on 1807 West
Charleston Boulevard (APN 162-04-112-021), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 1
(Tarkanian) [PRJ-75798]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 670 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 671 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙɱฎ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 6g 7eo 21f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 40

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75852 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER:
INTEGRAL PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW ZERO PARKING SPACES WHERE 2,545 ARE REQUIRED
on 14.71 acres at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive (APN 162-08-418-
002), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75760]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]

Page 673 of 1332


Page 674 of 1332
Page 675 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER: INTEGRAL
PARTNERS PARK PLACE CENTRE-LAS VEGAS, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75852 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
SDR-75854 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75852
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 13

NOTICES MAILED 81- VAR-75852


81 - SDR-75854

PROTESTS 0- VAR-75852
0 - SDR-75854

APPROVALS 0- VAR-75852
0 - SDR-75854

JB
Page 676 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75852 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-75854) shall be required, if approved.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
70652) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73309).

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-75854 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75852) shall be required, if approved.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
70652) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73309).

JB
Page 677 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 02/19/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

7. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

9. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, provide proof of payment to the Clark
County Water Reclamation District (CCWRD) for sewer connection fees.

10. Site development to comply with all applicable conditions of approval for SDR-
73309, and all other applicable site-related actions.

JB
Page 678 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has obtained previous approval for a 173,518 square-foot Commercial
Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor) building at the southwest corner of Sirius
Avenue and Rancho Drive and now wishes to add 6,800 square feet of floor area to a
second floor mezzanine that will increase the total floor area to 180,318 square feet.
Additional site improvements are also proposed.

ISSUES

• The additional floor area requires an increase of 34 parking spaces for the
development.
• The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75852) to allow 921 parking spaces
where 1,065 spaces are required. Staff does not support the request.

ANALYSIS

Site development is subject to Title 19 requirements. There are no overlay district


regulatory requirements pertaining to the development on this site. Commercial
Recreation/Amusement (Indoor) and Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Outdoor) are
permitted uses in the C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district.

On August 16th, 2017 the City Council approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
70652) for a proposed 146,494 square-foot Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor
and Outdoor) Development with Waivers to allow a building to not be oriented to the
corner and street frontages where such is required, a monolithic building design with no
changes in wall plane or color, and large windowless areas at the southwest corner of
Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive.

On August 14th, 2018 the Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-
73309) of the approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70652), which increased
the total floor area to 173,518 square feet with 32,454 square feet of Commercial
Recreation/Amusement (Outdoor) – Other Than Listed area. In addition, the Planning
Commission approved an associated Special Use Permit (SUP-73921) for an Alternative
Parking Standard to allow 921 parking spaces where 1,031 spaces are required.

JB
Page 679 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Changes are proposed to add 6,800 square feet of interior floor area to the mezzanine.
The approved outdoor theme park area (containing 32,454 square feet) would not be
affected by the proposal. As the additional floor area (6,800 square feet) would be added
as a mezzanine level inside the approved building, no increase in the approved 46-foot
building height is proposed. The elevations would remain as approved, except for the
addition of an exterior staircase added to the west elevation that would reach
approximately 22 feet in height.

A total of 921 parking spaces are proposed, which is consistent with the most recently
approved Major Amendment (SDR-73309). The additional proposed building floor area
requires 34 more parking spaces over and above the Title 19 requirement for the
Commercial Recreation/Amusement use. Commercial Amusement/Recreation parking
requirements allow for a ratio of one required parking space per 200 square feet of floor
area inside the building and the same ratio for outdoor space dedicated to the use when
the use cannot be specifically categorized. No unique or extraordinary evidence has been
presented to warrant the requested Variance. As such, the hardship is self-imposed and
therefore, staff recommends denial of this request.

FINDINGS (VAR-75852)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

JB
Page 680 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by requesting to deviate from Title 19.12
parking development standards. Alternative site design would allow conformance to the
Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

FINDINGS (SDR-75854)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed development is not compatible with surrounding development in the


area as evidenced by the requested Variance to address insufficient on-site parking
and will have a negative impact to the adjacent commercial developments.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The applicant has requested a Variance to address to address insufficient on-site


parking, which is inconsistent with the development standards outlined in Title 19.
Staff has determined the proposed project is not compatible with surrounding
development in the area, and will have a negative impact to the adjacent
commercial developments.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Access to the site is from multiple driveways from Sirius Avenue, a 60-foot wide
minor street and Rancho Drive, a 47-foot wide local street. These roadways are
expected to be adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed
expansion of the approved recreation/amusement facility.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

Building materials include painted tilt-up concrete panels, architectural metal,


corrugated metal containers and open wire fencing. The materials are
representative of the theme of the approved facility and are acceptable in this
primarily industrial area.

JB
Page 681 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The appearance of the provided elevations was previously determined to be


harmonious and compatible with the adjacent commercial and industrial uses. The
proposed alterations to the west elevation are appropriate for the size of the building
and would not be visible from Rancho Drive or Interstate 15.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

This development will be subject to building permit and business license review and
inspection, thereby protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the public.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


A Final Map (FMP-4056) for a one-lot commercial subdivision (Fletcher
07/16/04 Jones Imports Property) on 21.04 acres at 3100 and 3200 South Rancho
Drive was recorded.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-9219) to add
the subject property to the Las Vegas Redevelopment Area as part of a larger
05/17/06
request and designate the area as C (Commercial). The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-70650) from C-1
(Limited Commercial) to C-2 (General Commercial) on 14.72 acres at the
southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70652)
for a proposed 146,494 square-foot Commercial Recreation/Amusement
08/16/17
(Indoor and Outdoor) Development with Waivers to allow a building to not be
oriented to the corner and street frontages where such is required, a non-
coherent building design with no changes in wall plane or color, and large
windowless areas on 21.03 acres at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue
and Rancho Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.

JB
Page 682 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-73309) of an
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-70652) for a proposed
59,478 square-foot addition to an approved 146,494 square-foot Commercial
Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor) development at the southwest
corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive. Staff recommended approval of
08/14/18
the request.
The Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-73921) for
an Alternative Parking Standard to allow 921 parking spaces where 1,031
parking spaces are required at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and
Rancho Drive.
The Planning Commission will hear a Variance (VAR-75636) to allow
proposed wall signs to cover 29 percent of the east elevation and 24 percent
of the north elevation of the building where 20 percent is the maximum
03/12/19 allowed at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive.
The Planning Commission will hear a Master Sign Plan (MSP-75637) for an
approved Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor)
development at the southwest corner of Sirius Avenue and Rancho Drive.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/21/05 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#94355263) was issued for a freestanding sign at 3100
11/03/94
South Rancho Drive. A final inspection was completed 07/06/95.
A building permit (#95883297) was issued for an off-premise sign at 3200
South Rancho Drive. The permit expired 11/02/96.
11/30/95
A building permit (#95883298) was issued for an off-premise sign at 3200
South Rancho Drive. The permit expired 11/02/96.
A building permit (#96390565) was issued for an addition to an existing auto
01/12/96 showroom at 3100 South Rancho Drive. A final inspection was completed
11/21/96.
An application (80227) was submitted for a building permit for a chain link
01/23/07 fence with barbed wire on top at 3200 South Rancho Drive. A permit was
never issued and the application expired on 08/06/07.
A building permit (C18-01463) was issued for grading, clear and grub and
04/12/18 stockpiling on property located at 3215 South Rancho Drive. A final
inspection has not been approved.

JB
Page 683 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (L18-00678) was issued for a 4’x5’ bell hole at 3200 South
Rancho Drive. The permit has not been finalized.
04/17/18
A building permit (L18-00679) was issued for a 4’x5’ bell hole at 3200 South
Rancho Drive. The permit has not been finalized.
A building permit (L18-00086) was issued for Civil Improvements for a
proposed Commercial Recreation/Amusement (Indoor and Outdoor)
05/31/18
development at 3200 South Rancho Drive. The permit has not been
finalized.
Building plan revisions (PRC18-00018-R001) were submitted for a 2nd floor
07/02/18
addition to a commercial shell building at 3215 South Rancho Drive.
A building permit (C18-00607) was issued for a proposed standard
07/16/18 commercial shell building at 3215 South Rancho Drive. A final inspection
has not been approved.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss
02/11/19 submittal requirements for an amendment to an approved Site
Development Plan Review.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site visit staff noted that the subject site was currently
02/28/19
under construction and is surrounded by temporary chain link fencing.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 14.72

JB
Page 684 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Planned or
Surrounding Existing Land Use Existing Zoning
Special Land Use
Property Per Title 19.12 District
Designation
Commercial
Subject C-2 (General
Recreation/Amusement C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
(Indoor and Outdoor)
Commercial
Recreation/Amusement C (Commercial)
(Outdoor)
North M (Industrial)
Warehouse
LI/R (Light
Auto Repair Garage,
Industry/Research)
Major
CT (Commercial M-1 (Light
Office, Other Than
South Tourist) – Clark Manufacturing) – Clark
Listed
County County
East Interstate 15 Right-of Way Right-of-Way
General Retail Store C (Commercial)
West LI/R (Light M (Industrial)
Warehouse
Industry/Research)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District (140 Feet/175 Feet) Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

JB
Page 685 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and the approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
70652 and 73309), the following standards apply:
Standard Approved SDR-70652 Provided Change
Min. Setbacks
• Front (Sirius Ave) 186 Feet 186 Feet No change
• Front (Desert Inn) 531 Feet 531 Feet No change
• Side 10 Feet 10 Feet No change
• Corner 65 Feet 65 Feet No change
• Rear N/A Feet N/A N/A
Max. Lot Coverage 18 % 18 % No change
Max. Building Height 46 Feet 46 Feet No change

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Sirius Avenue Minor Street Title 13 60 N/A
Rancho Drive Local Street Title 13 47 N/A

JB
Page 686 of 1332
VAR-75852 and SDR-75854 [PRJ-75760]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Commercial
Recreation/
1 space
Amusement 173,518 SF
per 200 868
(Indoor) – (Existing)
SF GFA
Other Than
Listed
Commercial
Recreation/
1 space
Amusement 6,800 SF
per 200 34
(Indoor) – (Addition)
SF GFA
Other Than
Listed
Commercial
1 space
Recreation/
per 200
Amusement 32,454 SF
SF 163
(Outdoor) – (Existing)
outdoor
Other Than
area
Listed
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1065 921 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 1044 21 897 24 N*
3, plus 1
add’l per
Loading 100,000
212,772 SF 5 7 Y
Spaces SF over
50,000
SF
Percent Deviation 14%
*The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75852) to allow 921 parking spaces where 1,065
parking spaces are required.

JB
Page 687 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 688 of 1332


Page 689 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 690 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 691 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 692 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 693 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 694 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 695 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 696 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 697 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 698 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 699 of 1332
 >
 '"

 
#

# &


=
<  

 

% 
  
 

 
%



 
=
 

#

# 



Page 700 of 1332
 >
 '"

 
#

# &


=
<  

 

% 
  
 

 
%



 
=
 

#

# 



Page 701 of 1332
 >
 '"

 
#

# &


=
<  

 

% 
  
 

 
%



 
=
 

#

# 



Page 702 of 1332
 >
 '"

 
#

# &


=
<  

 

% 
  
 

 
%



 
=
 

#

# 



Page 703 of 1332
 >
 '"

 
#

# &


=
<  

 

% 
  
 

 
%



 
=
 

#

# 



Page 704 of 1332
 >
 '"

 
#

# &


=
<  

 

% 
  
 

 
%



 
=
 

#

# 



Page 705 of 1332


 >
 '"

 
#

# &


=
<  

 

% 
  
 

 
%



 
=
 

#

# 



ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 7g 0eo 61f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 41

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75854 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75852 AND SUP-75853
- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: FISHER BROTHERS - OWNER: PARADISE LAS VEGAS,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED
152 SPACE OVERFLOW PARKING LOT FOR AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL
RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (INDOOR AND OUTDOOR) DEVELOPMENT WITH WAIVERS TO
ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT WEST AND NORTH PERIMETER LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 6.31 acres on the north side of Desert Inn Road,
360 west of Rancho Drive (APN 162-08-418-003), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-
75760]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 707 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 708 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″x
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 7g 0eo 91f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 42

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75869 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JAMES LEE, JEANNINE
LEE, MINI FANEGA AND JIN HO LEE - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW FIVE PARKING SPACES WHERE TWELVE ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED
MULTI-FAMILYRESIDENTIAL USE on 0.16 acres at 2517 Valley Street (APN 139-36-410-015),
R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75270]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75720]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75720]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75720]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75720]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75720]

Page 710 of 1332


Page 711 of 1332
Page 712 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: JEANNINE LEE, ET AL

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75869 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
SDR-75870 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75869
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 38

NOTICES MAILED 222 - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870

PROTESTS 0 - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870

APPROVALS 0 - VAR-75869 and SDR-75870

CS
Page 713 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75869 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-75870) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-75870 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-


75869) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, date stamped 03/13/19,
landscape plan, and building elevations, date stamped 02/20/19, except as
amended by conditions herein.

CS
Page 714 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. A Waiver from Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow three-foot landscape


buffer widths along the east and west property lines where six feet is required.

5. A Waiver from Title 19.06.110 is hereby approved, to allow a four-foot landscape


buffer width along the south property line where 10 feet is required.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

7. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

10. Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the
subject site. A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any future
building permit applications related to the site.

11. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

12. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies, if any, on the sidewalk
along Valley Street adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of
Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development
of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development
of this site.

13. This site shall connect to the public sewer line in the alley.

CS
Page 715 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

14. The parking stalls located adjacent to the alley shall be a minimum of 22-feet in
length.

15. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site
prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainage ways as recommended.

CS
Page 716 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to construct a six-unit apartment building that does not meet the
minimum parking and landscaping requirements at 2517 Valley Street.

ISSUES

• Variance (VAR-75869) is requested to allow five parking spaces where 12 are


required for a proposed multi-family residential development. Staff does not
support the request.
• Waivers are requested to allow a three-foot landscape buffer width along the east
and west property lines where six feet is required. Staff does not support the
request.
• A Waiver is requested to allow a four-foot landscape buffer width along the south
property line where 10 feet is required. Staff does not support the request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district and
is subject to Title 19 development standards. The proposed six-unit Multi-Family
Residential use is a permitted use in the R-3 (Medium Density Residential) zoning district.
The subject site is currently an undeveloped parcel located within an existing residential
neighborhood. While an apartment building is an appropriate use, the submitted six-unit
apartment building is excessive for the size of the parcel.

The submitted elevations and site plan depict a two-story, 4,920 square-foot apartment
building. The building façade will have a stucco finish and shingle/asphalt combination
roof. Outdoor staircases are provided to reach the second floor units. The submitted floor
plan depicts two levels with three two-bedroom units on each floor. The applicant has
requested Waivers to allow three-foot landscape buffer widths along the east and west
property lines and a four-foot landscape buffer width along the south property line where
10 feet is required. The proposed landscaping materials adhere to the Southern Nevada
Regional Plant List.

CS
Page 717 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

A total of five parking spaces are provided. The site plan depicts four standard spaces
provided in the rear and one handicapped accessible space provided at the front
entrance. The rear parking spaces abut an alley. Variance (VAR-75869) is requested to
allow five parking spaces where 12 are required. Per the submitted justification letter,
“The proposed development is intended to meet the needs of the low income community
who rely on public transportation or a maximum of one vehicle per unit.”

The City of Las Vegas Public Works - Engineering Department has commented, “This
project will add approximately 44 trips per day on Eastern Avenue, Charleston Boulevard
and Valley Street. Currently, Eastern is at about 82 percent of capacity and Charleston is
at about 88 percent of capacity. With this project, these capacities are expected to be
unchanged. Counts are not available for Valley Street, but it is believed to be under
capacity. Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 3
additional cars per hour, or about one every twenty minutes.”

Due to the proposed parking Variance and landscape buffer Waivers, staff finds that the
proposed development is not appropriate for the subject site as submitted; therefore, staff
recommends denial of both entitlements. If approved, the entitlements are subject to
conditions.

FINDINGS (VAR-75869)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

CS
Page 718 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a residential development
that does not conform to Title 19 requirements. Reducing the number of dwelling units
would help alleviate the need for additional parking. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

FINDINGS (SDR-75870)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed development is not compatible with the adjacent development in the
area due to the lack of parking provided.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed development is consistent with the M (Medium Density Residential)


land use plan designation. However, the proposed development is not consistent
with Title 19 development standards. The proposal fails to meet the minimum
parking and landscaping requirements.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Site access is provided by Valley Street, a 60-foot local street, adequate in size to
serve the subject site. However, the lack of proposed onsite parking will negatively
impact the adjacent roads.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The proposed stucco façade is compatible with the existing building materials of
other developments in the near vicinity. The proposed landscape materials adhere
to the Southern Nevada Regional Plant List.

CS
Page 719 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The submitted building elevation design characteristics are not unsightly,


undesirable or obnoxious in appearance. The proposed stucco façade is
compatible with the existing development in the area.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

If approved, the proposed development will be subject to building permits, thereby


ensuring the protection of public health, safety and general welfare.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Board of Zoning Adjustment approved Variance (#V-0018-79) to
03/22/79
allow an existing four-foot high solid block wall in the front yard area.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


05/15/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no related building permits/business licenses associated with the subject site.

Pre-Application Meeting
Planning Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant
12/12/18 where the submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a
proposed apartment building.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

CS
Page 720 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
Planning Staff conducted a routine field check and found a vacant lot
02/28/19
with a chain-link fence along the front property line.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.16

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
Undeveloped
Property Residential) Residential)
Single Family, M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
North
Detached Residential) Residential)
RM (Residential R-3 (Multiple-Family
Single Family,
South Medium) – Clark Residential) – Clark
Detached
County County
Multi-Family M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
East
Residential Residential) Residential)
Multi-Family M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
West
Residential Residential) Residential)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


Rafael Riviera Walkable Community Plan N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CS
Page 721 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06.110, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 6,500 SF 6,969 SF Y
Min. Lot Width NA NA NA
Min. Setbacks
• Front 10 Feet 26 Feet Y
• Side 5 Feet 5 Feet Y
• Rear 20 Feet 22 Feet Y
Min. Distance Between Buildings 10 Feet NA NA
Max. Lot Coverage NA NA NA
Max. Building Height 55 Feet 23 Feet Y
Screened,
Trash Enclosure Screened, Gated, Gated, w/ a Y
w/ a Roof or Trellis Roof or Trellis

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 3 Trees 3 Trees Y
• East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 8 Trees 12 Trees Y
• West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 8 Trees 12 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 19 Trees 27 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
2 Trees 2 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North NA NA NA
• South 10 Feet 4 Feet N*
• East 6 Feet 3 Feet N*
• West 6 Feet 3 Feet N*
*Waivers have been requested in conjunction with the subject Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-75870) to allow reduced landscape buffer widths.

CS
Page 722 of 1332
VAR-75869 and SDR-75870 [PRJ-75270]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Ratio Regular Regular
Units capped capped
6 Two- 1.75
Multi-Family
Bedroom spaces 11
Residential
Units per unit
1 space
Multi-Family
Guest Space per 6 1
Residential
units
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 12 5 N
Regular and Handicap Spaces N
11 1 4 1
Required
Percent Deviation 59%

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow a three-foot
Provide 6-foot landscape landscape buffer
buffers along interior property width along the east Denial
lines. and west property
lines.
To allow a four-foot
Provide 10-foot landscape
landscape buffer
buffer adjacent to the Right- Denial
width along the south
of-Way
property line.

CS
Page 723 of 1332
C ֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ ่֭‫ש‬7Ⓢ ⎯֭ฌ
b Ŵ⎯֭7 ฌ

A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7゜7О ֭‫ש‬ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่70ਙผこ 7ִ ฌ Ҝ ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7C Ŵ‫֭ש‬ฌ

Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬こ ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾70ħ่Ŵ่㌱ħŴк7●่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ฌ ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк70֭֭ฌ


Ő ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Ա ‫゜ﭨ‬C Ŵ‫֭ש‬ฌ

b ŴƆ ֭7╗ੂऑ֭7ӧ⎯ऑ֭㌱ħŴк7—⎯֭7О ֭ผこ ħ‫ש‬ⓒ7Ő ֭▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7Ћ ŴผħŴ่㌱֭ⓒ7 Ɔ ħ‫֭ש‬7C ֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ ่֭‫ש‬7О кŴ่7Ő ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ ⓒ7֭‫ש‬㌱ỏฌ Ɔ ●╗Dz 7О ՁA Ќ 7Ő Dz Ћ ●Dz Û ゜7О A Ő ì ●Ќ Ḛ 7Ћ A Ő ●Dz Ќ b Dz ฌ

О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ỏ7 ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7Ћ A ՁՁDz ù 7Ɔ ╗Ő Dz Dz ╗㈠7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ 7Ќ Ћ 7ฎɱ‫ں‬x‫ں‬ฌ

О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќ Ŵこ ֭7 О Ő Ḷ О Ḷ Ɔ Dz C 7″ֱО ՁDz Ṳ 7Ҝ Ⓢ Ձ╗●70A Ҝ ●Ձù 7Ő Dz Ɔ ●C Dz Ќ b Dz 7 О ผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7Ⓢ ⎯֭7 Ő ̶ฌ

A ⎯⎯֭⎯⎯ਙผƥ⎯7 О Ŵผ㌱֭к7 ӧ⎯ỏ7 ‫ں‬7̶ɱ̶ֱ″ֱㅡ‫ں‬7xֱx‫ں‬7ㄦฌ Û Ŵผ₡7 ฌ


Ő ̶ฌ
Ḛ ่֭֭ผŴк7О кŴ่̬7Dz ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ О ผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 Ύਙ่ħ่‫̬ف‬7 Dz ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 О ผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 Ő ̶ฌ

A ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7 к่⑾ਙผこ Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ธ7Ɔ ╗Ḷ Ő ù 7″ֱО ՁDz Ṳ 7Ա Ⓢ ‫ש‬ՁC ‫ש‬Ќ Ḛ 7Û ২╗Ġ 7Ɔ ‫ש‬Ṳ 7ธ7Ա Dz C Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7 ִ 7Ḷ Ќ Dz 7Ա A ╗Ġ 7Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ㈠7A 00Ḷ Ő C A Ա ՁDz 7 Ҝ Ⓢ Ձ╗●70A Ҝ ●Ձù 7●ฌ
Dz A b Ġ 7Ⓢ Ќ ●╗7●Ɔ 7ฎธx7Ɔ Ợ ㈠0╗㈠7ฎ7О A Ő ì ●Ќ Ḛ 7Ɔ О A b Dz Ɔ 7О Ő Ḷ Ћ ●C Dz C ฌ

О ผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ਙʉ ่֭ผ7İDz A Ќ Ќ ●Dz 7ՁDz Dz ฌ b ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ฌ


A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7″ธՙɱ7ਙA ì 7О A Ő ì A Ћ Dz ฌ ㌱‫ੂש‬7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ ฌ Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ќ Ћ 7 Ύऑ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ฎฌ
‫ֱש‬㏂—ħ‫ש‬7ħʉ ่่ɱк﹒̶x7⇓‫⇓׀‬ਙਙ㈠7‫ש‬Ŵ‫่ﭨ‬7 О γਙ่֭ฌ
ƥ‫ں‬ਙΎ7ֱՙ﹒7 ՙ‫ש‬к●ฌ
ฎƥֱ
A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬7 Ő A Ћ ●Ќ 7Ќ A ╗Ġ A Ќ ฌ b ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ฌ
A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7‫ں‬x‫ں‬7‫ں‬ՙ7Ḷ b ╗b A ╗7A Ћ Dz ฌ ㌱‫ੂש‬7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ 7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ќ Ћ 7▷ħऑ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬7″″ฌ
Dz ﹝こ Ŵħк7ผ‫่่ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬γŴ่㌀ ੂŴγਙਙ㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ О γਙ่֭7ՙxธธㅡㄦฎ″ɱxฌ

Ő ֭ऑผ֭⎯่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7 Ձb ִ C b Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ╗Ő Ⓢ b ╗●Ḷ Ќ ՁՁb ฌ ㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7Ա Ő Ⓢ b Dz ฌ


A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7ㅡㅡㄦ7Dz 7Û ●Ќ C Ҝ ●ՁՁ7ՁA Ќ Dz 7 ธA ฌ ㌱‫ੂש‬7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ 7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ќ Ћ 7▷ħऑ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ
к֭‫่֭ف‬₡ɱ̶ㄦɱ㌀ ‫ف‬こ Ŵħк㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ
Dz ֱこ Ŵħк7 О γਙ่֭7 ՙxธ7ฎxՙ7ɱ̶ㄦɱฌ

╗ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡֭⎯‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ੂਙ—ผ7P่ਙʉ к֭₡‫֭ف‬ⓒ7₡ਙ֭⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7Ҝ Ŵੂਙผ7ਙผ7Ŵ่ੂ7こ ֭こ ⇡֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7b ħ‫ੂש‬7b ਙ—่㌱ħк7ਙผ7О кŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7b ਙこ こ ħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7


γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7⑾ħ่Ŵ่㌱ħŴк7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬7ħ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ਙผ7Ŵ่ੂ7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ʉ ħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผкੂ7ਙʉ ่֭ผⓒ7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬ฌ ⁸7 Ћ ֭⎯
ਙʉ ่֭ผ7ਙผ7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬ƥ⎯7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴк7ਙผ7кħこ ħ‫֭ש‬₡7ऑŴผ‫่֭ש‬ผ⎯ⓒ7ਙผ7Ŵ่7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ħผ7㌱ਙผऑਙผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙผ7кħこ ħ‫֭ש‬₡7кħŴ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7㌱ਙこ ऑŴ่ੂ﹒7Dz 7ผ—ਙฌ
к⑾7ੂ֭⎯ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7ħ่₡ħ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7こ ֭こ ֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7b ħ‫ੂש‬7b ਙ—่㌱ħк7ਙผ7О кŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7b ਙこ こ ħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ʉ γਙ7ħ⎯7ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Ŵ่₡7кħ⎯‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7่Ŵこ ֭ӧ⎯ỏ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑ֭ผ⎯ਙ่7ਙผ7ऑ֭ผ⎯ਙ่⎯7ʉ ħ‫ש‬γ7ʉ γਙこ ฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7b ħ‫ੂש‬7Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴк7γਙк₡⎯7Ŵ่7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬㈠7A к⎯ਙ7кħ⎯‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7A ⎯⎯֭⎯⎯ਙผƥ⎯7О Ŵผ㌱֭к7Ќ —こ ⇡֭ผ7ħ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ħ่7ʉ γħ㌱γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬7ħ⎯7γ֭к₡7ħ⎯7₡ħ⑾⑾֭ผ่֭‫ש‬7⑾ผਙこ 7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱Ŵ⎯֭7ऑŴผ㌱֭к㈠ฌ

b ħ‫ੂש‬7Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴк7 О Ŵผ‫่֭ש‬ผӧ⎯ỏฌ


О Ŵผ‫่֭ש‬ผӧ⎯ỏฌ

㈠7A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ʉ ħкк7่ਙ‫ש‬7⇡֭7₡֭֭こ ֭₡7㌱ਙこ ऑк֭‫֭ש‬7 —่‫ש‬ħк7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—⇡こ ħ‫֭שש‬₡7こ Ŵ‫֭ש‬ผħŴк⎯7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7⇡่֭֭7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ ֭₡7⇡ੂ7C ֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ‫ں‬7О кŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7⑾ਙผ7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ⎯‫่֭ש‬㌱ੂ7ʉ ħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ύਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7Ḷ ผ₡ħ่Ŵ่㌱֭ฌ

О ผਙऑ่֭ੂ7Ḷ ʉ ่֭ผ7Ɔ ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ


A ่7Ŵ—‫ש‬γਙผħ▷֭₡7Ŵ‫ש่֭ف‬7こ Ŵੂ7⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ่7кħ֭—7 Ҝ Ŵऑ⎯7Ŵ่₡7О Ŵผ㌱֭к7Ҝ Ŵऑ⎯ฌ

О ผħ่‫ש‬7Ќ Ŵこ ֭ฌ
ΎA b Ġ A Ő ù 7Ɔ Ҝ ●╗Ġ ฌ
Ќ ਙħਙผੂ7О —⇡кħ㌱ⓒ7Ɔ кਙк֭7ਙ⑾7Ќ ਙ‫ﭨ‬ਙ₡ਙฌ
Ɔ —⇡⎯㌱ผħ⇡֭₡7Ŵ่₡7⎯ʉ ਙผ่7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭ฌ
Ќ ਙⓒ7‫ں‬ㅡֱ‫ں‬ㅡxxธֱƥкฌ
╗γħ⎯7 ₡Ŵੂਙ⑾7⇓7 ⇓㌱7 b ì ֱⓒк㌱A ӧЋ 7 ⓒ▷ਙ7⇓ɱฌ Ҝ ੂ7A ऑऑ‫ש‬㈠7Dz ゥऑ㈠7İ—к㈠7‫ں‬ՙⓒธxธธฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
ħ่7Ŵ่₡7⑾ਙผ7⎯Ŵħ₡7b ਙ—่‫ﭨש‬7Ŵ่₡7Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬ฌ Page 724 of 1332
ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ҜⓈՁ╗●7AҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzฌ
7㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ

ธ7Ɔ╗ḶŐù7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ

Page 725 of 1332


ОՁḶ╗7ОՁAЌ7 ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ҜⓈՁ╗●7+AҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzฌ
ŐḶО
ŐḶ
ŐḶОḶ
ŐḶО
ḶОḶ
ОḶ
ḶƆDzC
ƆDzC7Ҝ
ƆDz
ƆDz
DzCC ҜⓈՁ╗●
ⓈՁ╗●7
Ⓢ Ձ╗●● +AҜ●Ձ
AҜ ù7Ő
AҜ ùŐ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫ں‬फए‫ں‬xƥฌ 7㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz
7㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌDz
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬ฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
Ձb7ִ7C7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7●่㌱㈠ฌ
Ձb7ִ7C7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●

ЌbՁ ̬7
ЌbՁ ̬
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
╗DzՁ̬ฌ
╗DzՁ̬
╗ DzՁ̬ CA╗Dz̬7 x̶゜‫ں゜ںں‬ɱฌ
xxՙ‫ں‬″ㄦฎ7
ㄦ ฎ7
ㄦฎ ӧՙxธỏ7ฎxՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱฌ
ӧՙxธỏ
ӧՙxธỏ7ฎ
ӧՙ ỏ ฎxxՙ
xՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱ
ՙ ɱɱ̶ㄦɱ
̶̶ㄦɱ
ㄦɱ
ㄦɱ

CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬7
CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬
bḶЋDzŐ7ƆĠDzDz╗7ִ7Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ
bḶЋDzŐ7ƆĠDzDz╗7ִ7Ɔ●╗Dz7
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬
╗DzՁ̬7
╗DzՁ̬ CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌⓈҜ㈠̬7
ŐЋЌ7 ӧՙxธỏ7ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx7
ӧՙxธỏ ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx Axฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ҜA╗DzŐ●AՁ7Ձ●Ɔ╗ฌ

╗ผŴ⎯γฌ

ḚŐḶⓈЌC7bḶЋDzŐฌ
ธ7Ɔ╗ḶŐù7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ

फ7ŐDzC7ŐḶbì7ҜⓈՁbĠ7
ฎฌ

Page 726 of 1332


ОՁḶ╗7ОՁAЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫ں‬फए‫ں‬xƥฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ҜⓈՁ╗●7(AҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzฌ
ŐḶОḶƆDz C ҜⓈՁ╗● (AҜ●Ձù Ő
㌀ ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ ЋAՁՁDzù Ɔ╗ŐDzDz
Dz
7㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬ฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
Ձb7ִ7C7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7●่㌱㈠ฌ
Ձb ִ C bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●●
ЌbՁ ̬7
ЌbՁ ̬
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
╗DzՁ̬ฌ
╗DzՁ̬
╗ DzՁ̬ CA╗Dz̬7 xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
xxՙ‫ں‬″ㄦฎ7
ㄦฎ ӧӧՙxธỏ7ฎxՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱฌ
ՙxธỏ ฎxՙֱɱ̶ ㄦɱ

CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬7
CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz ОՁAЌ
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬
╗DzՁ̬7
╗DzՁ̬ CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌⓈҜ㈠̬7
ŐЋЌ7 ӧՙxธỏ7ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx7
ӧՙxธỏ ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx Ձ●ฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ҜA╗DzŐ●AՁ7Ձ●Ɔ╗ฌ

╗ผŴ⎯γฌ

ḚŐḶⓈЌC7bḶЋDzŐฌ
ธ7Ɔ╗ḶŐù7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚฌ

फ7ŐDzC7ŐḶbì7ҜⓈՁbĠ7
ฎฌ

Page 727 of 1332


ОՁḶ╗7ОՁAЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫ں‬फए‫ں‬xƥฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ҜⓈՁ╗●7(AҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzฌ
ŐḶОḶƆDz C ҜⓈՁ╗● (AҜ●Ձù Ő
㌀ ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ ЋAՁՁDzù Ɔ╗ŐDzDz
Dz
7㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬ฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
Ձb7ִ7C7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7●่㌱㈠ฌ
Ձb ִ C bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●●
ЌbՁ ̬7
ЌbՁ ̬
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
╗DzՁ̬ฌ
╗DzՁ̬
╗ DzՁ̬ CA╗Dz̬7 xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
xxՙ‫ں‬″ㄦฎ7
ㄦฎ ӧӧՙxธỏ7ฎxՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱฌ
ՙxธỏ ฎxՙֱɱ̶ ㄦɱ

CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬7
CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz7ОՁAЌฌ
ՁAЌCƆbAОDz ОՁAЌ
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬
╗DzՁ̬7
╗DzՁ̬ CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌⓈҜ㈠̬7
ŐЋЌ7 ӧՙxธỏ7ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx7
ӧՙxธỏ ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx Ձ●ฌ
ÛDzƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥฌ

Page 728 of 1332


DzAƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ҜⓈՁ╗●7*AҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzฌ
О ŐḶОḶƆDz C ҜⓈՁ╗● *AҜ●Ձù
㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
㌀ ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ ЋAՁՁDzù Ɔ╗ŐDz
Dz
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
Ձb7ִ7C7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7●่㌱㈠ฌ
Ձb ִ C bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●Ḷ

ЌbՁ ̬7
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
╗DzՁ̬
╗DzՁ̬7 CA╗Dz̬7 ‫ں‬ธ゜x̶゜‫ں‬ฎฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7 xxՙ‫ں‬″ㄦฎ7
ฎ ӧӧՙxธỏ7ฎxՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱ7
ՙxธ ỏ ฎxՙֱɱ̶ ㄦɱ

ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥ7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥ7 CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬ฌ

CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ
╗DzՁ̬7
╗DzՁ̬ ӧՙxธỏ ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx
ӧՙxธỏ7ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx7 CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌⓈҜ㈠̬7
ŐЋЌ7
Ќ Aธฌ
DzṲ╗DzŐ●ḶŐ7*●Ќ●ƆĠ7ҜA╗DzŐ●AՁ7ִ7bḶՁḶŐฌ

ÛDzƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥฌ

Page 729 of 1332


DzAƆ╗7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ҜⓈՁ╗●7*AҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzฌ
О ŐḶОḶƆDz C ҜⓈՁ ╗● *AҜ●Ձù
㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
㌀ ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ ЋAՁՁDzù Ɔ╗ŐDzDz
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
Ձb7ִ7C7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7●่㌱㈠ฌ
Ձb ִ C bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●Ḷ

ЌbՁ ̬7
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
╗DzՁ̬
╗DzՁ̬7 CA╗Dz̬7 xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌ7 xxՙ‫ں‬″ㄦฎ7
ฎ ӧӧՙxธỏ7ฎxՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱ7
ՙxธ ỏ ฎxՙֱɱɱ̶ ㄦɱ

ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥ7 ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥ7 CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬7


DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌƆ
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ
╗DzՁ̬7
╗DzՁ̬ ӧՙxธỏ ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx
ӧՙxธỏ7ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx7 CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌⓈҜ㈠̬7
ŐЋЌ7
Ќ Aธฌ
ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ
ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ⓈЌ●╗7 ธ7 ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7 ‫ں‬ฌ ⓈЌ●╗7 ̶ฌ

ƆDzbḶЌC7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥֱxफ777ӧ7 ՁḶḶŐ7AŐDzA7ए7ธⓒㅡ″x7Ɔ㈠ ㈠ỏฌ

Page 730 of 1332


ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ
ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ ⓈЌ●╗7 ธ7 ธ7ԱDzCŐḶḶҜฌ
ⓈЌ●╗7 ‫ں‬ฌ ⓈЌ●╗7 ̶ฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ҜⓈՁ╗●7 AҜ●Ձù7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzฌ
О ŐḶ
ḶОḶƆDzC ҜⓈՁ╗● AҜ Ҝ●Ձ
㌀7ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7ЋAՁՁDzù7Ɔ╗ŐDzDz╗ฌ
㌀ ธ ㄦ‫ں‬ՙ ЋAՁՁDz ù Ɔ╗
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬ฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
Ձb7ִ7C7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7●่㌱㈠ฌ
Ձb ִ C bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●Ḷ

ЌbՁ ̬7 ╗DzՁ̬
╗DzՁ̬7 CA╗Dz̬7 ‫ں‬ธ゜x̶゜‫ں‬ฎฌ

xxՙ‫ں‬″ㄦฎ7 xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
ӧՙxธỏ7ฎxՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱ7
ӧՙxธỏ ฎxՙֱɱ̶ㄦɱ
●ŐƆ╗7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7 CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌAҜDz̬ฌ
ƆbAՁDz̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥֱxफ777ӧ7 ՁḶḶŐ7AŐDzA7ए7ธⓒㅡ″x7Ɔ㈠ ㈠ỏ7 ●ŐƆ╗7ִ7ƆDzbḶЌC7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌฌ
●ŐƆ╗ ִ ƆDzbḶЌC ՁḶḶ
CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ ╗DzՁ̬7
╗DzՁ̬ CŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌⓈҜ㈠̬7
ŐЋЌ7
Ќ ӧՙxธỏ7ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx7
ӧՙxธỏ ธㅡㄦֱฎ″ɱx A‫ں‬ฌ
Page 731 of 1332


 '$
 >"

 
#

# "

 





> 
^
 



֭⇡㈠7‫ں‬ɱ‫ש‬γ7ธx‫ں‬ɱⓒ7

7777777777777777777777İⓈƆ╗●●bA╗●ḶЌ7ՁDz╗╗DzŐ
777777777777777ОŐḶОḶƆDzCธ7Ɔ╗ḶŐùⓒ77″ֱОՁDzṲ7AООAŐ╗ҜDzЌ╗7ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ
7777777777777777777777AОЌ 7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱ″ֱㅡ‫ں‬xֱx‫ں‬ㄦ

ОкŴ่⎯7DzゥŴこħ่֭
bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7C֭ऑ‫ש‬㈠
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯㈠

╗γ֭7ਙʉ่֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7İ֭Ŵ่่ħ֭7Ձ֭֭7ʉਙ—к₡7кħ9֭7‫ש‬ਙ7ħこऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7x㈠‫ں‬″7A㌱㈠7‫ﭨ‬Ŵ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬ฌ
кਙ‫ש‬㈠77╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7ㅡɱธx7⎯‫׀‬㈠⑾‫ש‬ⓒ7╗ʉਙ7⎯‫ש‬ਙผੂ7ธธɸֱธ㈚7γħ‫ف‬γ7″ֱОк֭ゥ7ŴऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ʉħкк7⇡֭7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7ħ่ฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—⇡㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ħ่7㌱ਙこऑкħŴ่㌱֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱97ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7⑾ਙผ77Ő̶ֱ7Ύਙ่ħ่‫ف‬㈠777
Ḷ่7ִ7ਙ⑾⑾⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ħこऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7ħ่7㌱ਙこऑкħŴ่㌱֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7О—⇡кħ㌱7Ûਙผ9⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫ש‬㈠7Ɔħ‫֭ש‬ฌ
кŴੂਙ—‫ש‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7ħ่7bਙこऑкħŴ่㌱֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ⇡к֭7㌱ਙ₡֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7C֭ऑ‫ש‬㈠7Cผਙ—‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙк֭ผŴ่‫ש‬ฌ
кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7Ŵผਙ—่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่₡7ħ่7ऑŴผ9ħ่‫ف‬7кਙ‫ש‬㈠7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡ฌ
ʉħ‫ש‬γ7ħผ֭7Ɔऑผħ่9к֭ผ⎯㈠
╗γ֭ผ֭7ħ⎯7₡֭こŴ่₡7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ⑾⑾ਙผ₡Ŵ⇡к֭7γਙ—⎯ħ่‫ف‬7ħ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7่֭ħ‫ف‬γ⇡ਙผγਙਙ₡7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7⎯γŴкк7⇡֭7₡֭⎯ħ‫่֭ف‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7
7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵこ่֭ħ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7こ֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7₡֭こŴ่₡㈠7
Aк‫ש‬γਙ—‫ف‬γ7‫ש‬ਙ7ʉ֭7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7″7ऑŴผ9ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯ⓒ7Ύਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7bਙ₡֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭⎯7‫ں‬ธ㈠7╗γ֭ผ֭⑾ਙผ֭7ʉ֭7ʉਙ—к₡ฌ
кħ9֭7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵऑऑкੂ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭7Ŵ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ħ⎯7ħ่‫่֭ש‬₡֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7こ֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7кਙʉ7ħ่㌱ਙこ֭7㌱ਙここ—่ħ‫ੂש‬7ʉγਙฌ
ผ֭кੂ7ਙ่7О—⇡кħ㌱7╗ผŴ่⎯ऑਙผ‫ש‬7ਙผ7こŴゥ㈠7ਙ⑾7ਙ่֭7‫֭ﭨ‬γħ㌱к֭7ऑ֭ผ7—่ħ‫ש‬㈠

╗γŴ่97ੂਙ—7‫֭ﭨ‬ผੂ7こ—㌱γ7⑾ਙผ7ੂਙ—ผ7㌱ਙਙऑ֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠

Ɔħ่㌱֭ผ֭кੂⓒ

Ձbִ7C7bਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7●่㌱㈠
7

ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 7g 3eo 21f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 43

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75870- SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75869 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JAMES LEE, JEANNINE LEE, MINI FANEGA AND JIN HO
LEE - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED
SIX-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW ZERO-
FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS ALONG ALL PROPERTY LINES on 0.16 acres at 2517
Valley Street (APN 139-36-410-015), R-3 (Medium Density Residential) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin)
[PRJ-75270]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Clark County School District School Tracking Form
4. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 733 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 734 of 1332


C ֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ ่֭‫ש‬7Ⓢ ⎯֭ฌ
b Ŵ⎯֭7 ฌ

A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7゜7О ֭‫ש‬ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่70ਙผこ 7ִ ฌ Ҝ ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7C Ŵ‫֭ש‬ฌ

Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬こ ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾70ħ่Ŵ่㌱ħŴк7●่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬ฌ ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк70֭֭ฌ


Ő ֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Ա ‫゜ﭨ‬C Ŵ‫֭ש‬ฌ

b ŴƆ ֭7╗ੂऑ֭7ӧ⎯ऑ֭㌱ħŴк7—⎯֭7О ֭ผこ ħ‫ש‬ⓒ7Ő ֭▷ਙ่ħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7Ћ ŴผħŴ่㌱֭ⓒ7 Ɔ ħ‫֭ש‬7C ֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ ่֭‫ש‬7О кŴ่7Ő ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ ⓒ7֭‫ש‬㌱ỏฌ Ɔ ●╗Dz 7О ՁA Ќ 7Ő Dz Ћ ●Dz Û ゜7О A Ő ì ●Ќ Ḛ 7Ћ A Ő ●Dz Ќ b Dz ฌ

О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ỏ7 ธㄦ‫ں‬ՙ7Ћ A ՁՁDz ù 7Ɔ ╗Ő Dz Dz ╗㈠7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ 7Ќ Ћ 7ฎɱ‫ں‬x‫ں‬ฌ

О ผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќ Ŵこ ֭7 О Ő Ḷ О Ḷ Ɔ Dz C 7″ֱО ՁDz Ṳ 7Ҝ Ⓢ Ձ╗●70A Ҝ ●Ձù 7Ő Dz Ɔ ●C Dz Ќ b Dz 7 О ผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7Ⓢ ⎯֭7 Ő ̶ฌ

A ⎯⎯֭⎯⎯ਙผƥ⎯7 О Ŵผ㌱֭к7 ӧ⎯ỏ7 ‫ں‬7̶ɱ̶ֱ″ֱㅡ‫ں‬7xֱx‫ں‬7ㄦฌ Û Ŵผ₡7 ฌ


Ő ̶ฌ
Ḛ ่֭֭ผŴк7О кŴ่̬7Dz ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ О ผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 Ύਙ่ħ่‫̬ف‬7 Dz ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 О ผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 Ő ̶ฌ

A ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7 к่⑾ਙผこ Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ธ7Ɔ ╗Ḷ Ő ù 7″ֱО ՁDz Ṳ 7Ա Ⓢ ‫ש‬ՁC ‫ש‬Ќ Ḛ 7Û ২╗Ġ 7Ɔ ‫ש‬Ṳ 7ธ7Ա Dz C Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7 ִ 7Ḷ Ќ Dz 7Ա A ╗Ġ 7Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ㈠7A 00Ḷ Ő C A Ա ՁDz 7 Ҝ Ⓢ Ձ╗●70A Ҝ ●Ձù 7●ฌ
Dz A b Ġ 7Ⓢ Ќ ●╗7●Ɔ 7ฎธx7Ɔ Ợ ㈠0╗㈠7ฎ7О A Ő ì ●Ќ Ḛ 7Ɔ О A b Dz Ɔ 7О Ő Ḷ Ћ ●C Dz C ฌ

О ผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ਙʉ ่֭ผ7İDz A Ќ Ќ ●Dz 7ՁDz Dz ฌ b ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ฌ


A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7″ธՙɱ7ਙA ì 7О A Ő ì A Ћ Dz ฌ ㌱‫ੂש‬7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ ฌ Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ќ Ћ 7 Ύऑ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ฎฌ
‫ֱש‬㏂—ħ‫ש‬7ħʉ ่่ɱк﹒̶x7⇓‫⇓׀‬ਙਙ㈠7‫ש‬Ŵ‫่ﭨ‬7 О γਙ่֭ฌ
ƥ‫ں‬ਙΎ7ֱՙ﹒7 ՙ‫ש‬к●ฌ
ฎƥֱ
A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬7 Ő A Ћ ●Ќ 7Ќ A ╗Ġ A Ќ ฌ b ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬ฌ
A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7‫ں‬x‫ں‬7‫ں‬ՙ7Ḷ b ╗b A ╗7A Ћ Dz ฌ ㌱‫ੂש‬7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ 7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ќ Ћ 7▷ħऑ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬7″″ฌ
Dz ﹝こ Ŵħк7ผ‫่่ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬γŴ่㌀ ੂŴγਙਙ㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ О γਙ่֭7ՙxธธㅡㄦฎ″ɱxฌ

Ő ֭ऑผ֭⎯่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7 Ձb ִ C b Ḷ Ќ Ɔ ╗Ő Ⓢ b ╗●Ḷ Ќ ՁՁb ฌ ㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7Ա Ő Ⓢ b Dz ฌ


A ₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7ㅡㅡㄦ7Dz 7Û ●Ќ C Ҝ ●ՁՁ7ՁA Ќ Dz 7 ธA ฌ ㌱‫ੂש‬7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ Dz Ḛ A Ɔ 7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ќ Ћ 7▷ħऑ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ
к֭‫่֭ف‬₡ɱ̶ㄦɱ㌀ ‫ف‬こ Ŵħк㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ
Dz ֱこ Ŵħк7 О γਙ่֭7 ՙxธ7ฎxՙ7ɱ̶ㄦɱฌ

╗ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡֭⎯‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ੂਙ—ผ7P่ਙʉ к֭₡‫֭ف‬ⓒ7₡ਙ֭⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7Ҝ Ŵੂਙผ7ਙผ7Ŵ่ੂ7こ ֭こ ⇡֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7b ħ‫ੂש‬7b ਙ—่㌱ħк7ਙผ7О кŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7b ਙこ こ ħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7


γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่ੂ7⑾ħ่Ŵ่㌱ħŴк7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬7ħ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ਙผ7Ŵ่ੂ7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ʉ ħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผкੂ7ਙʉ ่֭ผⓒ7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬ฌ ⁸7 Ћ ֭⎯
ਙʉ ่֭ผ7ਙผ7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬ƥ⎯7‫่֭֭ف‬ผŴк7ਙผ7кħこ ħ‫֭ש‬₡7ऑŴผ‫่֭ש‬ผ⎯ⓒ7ਙผ7Ŵ่7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ħผ7㌱ਙผऑਙผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙผ7кħこ ħ‫֭ש‬₡7кħŴ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7㌱ਙこ ऑŴ่ੂ﹒7Dz 7ผ—ਙฌ
к⑾7ੂ֭⎯ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7ħ่₡ħ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7こ ֭こ ֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7b ħ‫ੂש‬7b ਙ—่㌱ħк7ਙผ7О кŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7b ਙこ こ ħ⎯⎯ħਙ่7ʉ γਙ7ħ⎯7ħ่‫ﭨ‬ਙк‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Ŵ่₡7кħ⎯‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7่Ŵこ ֭ӧ⎯ỏ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑ֭ผ⎯ਙ่7ਙผ7ऑ֭ผ⎯ਙ่⎯7ʉ ħ‫ש‬γ7ʉ γਙこ ฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7b ħ‫ੂש‬7Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴк7γਙк₡⎯7Ŵ่7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬㈠7A к⎯ਙ7кħ⎯‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7A ⎯⎯֭⎯⎯ਙผƥ⎯7О Ŵผ㌱֭к7Ќ —こ ⇡֭ผ7ħ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7ħ่7ʉ γħ㌱γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่‫֭ש‬ผ֭⎯‫ש‬7ħ⎯7γ֭к₡7ħ⎯7₡ħ⑾⑾֭ผ่֭‫ש‬7⑾ผਙこ 7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱Ŵ⎯֭7ऑŴผ㌱֭к㈠ฌ

b ħ‫ੂש‬7Ḷ ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħŴк7 О Ŵผ‫่֭ש‬ผӧ⎯ỏฌ


О Ŵผ‫่֭ש‬ผӧ⎯ỏฌ

㈠7A ऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ʉ ħкк7่ਙ‫ש‬7⇡֭7₡֭֭こ ֭₡7㌱ਙこ ऑк֭‫֭ש‬7 —่‫ש‬ħк7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯—⇡こ ħ‫֭שש‬₡7こ Ŵ‫֭ש‬ผħŴк⎯7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7⇡่֭֭7ผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ ֭₡7⇡ੂ7C ֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ‫ں‬7О кŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7⑾ਙผ7㌱ਙ่⎯ħ⎯‫่֭ש‬㌱ੂ7ʉ ħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ύਙ่ħ่‫ف‬7Ḷ ผ₡ħ่Ŵ่㌱֭ฌ

О ผਙऑ่֭ੂ7Ḷ ʉ ่֭ผ7Ɔ ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ


A ่7Ŵ—‫ש‬γਙผħ▷֭₡7Ŵ‫ש่֭ف‬7こ Ŵੂ7⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ่7кħ֭—7 Ҝ Ŵऑ⎯7Ŵ่₡7О Ŵผ㌱֭к7Ҝ Ŵऑ⎯ฌ

О ผħ่‫ש‬7Ќ Ŵこ ֭ฌ
ΎA b Ġ A Ő ù 7Ɔ Ҝ ●╗Ġ ฌ
Ќ ਙħਙผੂ7О —⇡кħ㌱ⓒ7Ɔ кਙк֭7ਙ⑾7Ќ ਙ‫ﭨ‬ਙ₡ਙฌ
Ɔ —⇡⎯㌱ผħ⇡֭₡7Ŵ่₡7⎯ʉ ਙผ่7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭ฌ
Ќ ਙⓒ7‫ں‬ㅡֱ‫ں‬ㅡxxธֱƥкฌ
╗γħ⎯7 ₡Ŵੂਙ⑾7⇓7 ⇓㌱7 b ì ֱⓒк㌱A ӧЋ 7 ⓒ▷ਙ7⇓ɱฌ Ҝ ੂ7A ऑऑ‫ש‬㈠7Dz ゥऑ㈠7İ—к㈠7‫ں‬ՙⓒธxธธฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙx
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
ħ่7Ŵ่₡7⑾ਙผ7⎯Ŵħ₡7b ਙ—่‫ﭨש‬7Ŵ่₡7Ɔ ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬ฌ P a 7g 3eo 51f 3 3 2
Real Property Management School Development Tracking Form
1180 Military Tribute Place
Henderson, Nv. 89074 http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property

Date Filed Application Number Entity


Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Mobile Fax Email

Project Name

Project Description

APN's

Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School


Single-Family Units (1) x 0.196 = x 0.101 = x 0.137 =
Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.140 = x 0.058 = x 0.064 =
Resort Condo Units (3)
Total

(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD

Schools Serving the Area*


Name Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date

* CCSD Comments

Approved Disapproved

Page 736 of 1332


SDR 75870
Jeannine Lee, et al

2517 Valley Street


Proposed 6 unit multi-family residential development.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7.32 44


AM Peak Hour MULTIFAMILY HOUSING (LOW-RISE) [DU] 6 0.46 3
PM Peak Hour 0.56 3
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Eastern Avenue
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 41,693
PM Peak Hour 3335
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Charleston Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 31,067
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent street ADT
Capacity
Eastern Avenue 50,900
Charleston Boulevard 35,490

This project will add approximately 44 trips per day on Eastern Ave., Charleston Blvd. and Valley St. Currently, Eastern is at
about 82 percent of capacity and Charleston is at about 88 percent of capacity. With this project, these capacities are
expected to be unchanged. Counts are not available for Valley, but it is believed to be under capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 3 additional cars, or about one every twenty
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 737 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 44

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75818 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: SERENITY BIRTH
CENTER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO A ZERO-FOOT SETBACK
WHERE A 5-FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK IS REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN
at 332 S Jones Boulevard (APN 138-36-210-008), P-R (Professional Office and Parking) Zone,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75764]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter

Page 738 of 1332


Page 739 of 1332
Page 740 of 1332
VAR-75818 [PRJ-75764]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: SERENITY BIRTH CENTER, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75818 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 21

NOTICES MAILED 413

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

CC
Page 741 of 1332
VAR-75818 [PRJ-75764]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75818 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to the approved conditions for Special Use Permit (SUP-74060).

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CC
Page 742 of 1332
VAR-75818 [PRJ-75764]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a zero-foot setback from the west property
line where five feet is required for a proposed seven-foot tall, 16 square-foot monument
sign at an existing Hospital [two-bed Birthing Center] located at 332 South Jones
Boulevard.

ISSUES

• Pursuant to Title 19.08.120(F)(13), the monument sign minimum setback is five feet
from all property lines. The proposed monument sign is zero feet from the front
property line. Staff does not support this request.

ANALYSIS

The subject property contains an existing Hospital [two-bed Birthing Center] development
that is located within the O (Office) zoning district. In addition, the subject site is within the
Airport Overlay District with a height limitation of 175 feet.

The applicant is proposing a monument sign that is zero feet from the front property line
facing South Jones Boulevard. Pursuant to Title 19.08, the required setback for a
monument sign is five feet from all property lines. The monument sign will be located in
the existing landscaping area in front of the parking lot adjacent to South Jones
Boulevard.

The applicant’s Justification Letter states “The request for relief from the setback
requirement is warranted as it will not be detrimental to the public good nor will it have
substantial impairment of the adjoining properties for the use of their land. Other signage
in the area have similar setbacks which have not resulted in any detriment to the public
good.”

Staff has determined that the proposed signage is inconsistent with the intent of the Title
19.08.120 Commercial and Industrial District Sign development standards; therefore,
staff recommends denial of this project.

CC
Page 743 of 1332
VAR-75818 [PRJ-75764]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (VAR-75818)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship requesting to install signage that fails to
meet the minimum setback requirements allowed under Title 19.08. Relocation of the sign
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (Z-0026-91) from R-1
05/18/94 (Single Family Residential) to P-R (Professional Office and Parking) at 332
S Jones Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-74058) from P-R
(Professional Office and Parking) to O (Office) at 332 S Jones Boulevard.
10/17/18
Planning Commission recommended approval and staff recommended
denial.

CC
Page 744 of 1332
VAR-75818 [PRJ-75764]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-74059) to allow a
five-foot side yard setback where 10 feet is required and a lot width of 65 feet
10/17/18
where 100 feet is required at 332 S Jones Boulevard. Planning Commission
recommended approval and staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-74060)
for a Hospital Use [two-bed Birthing Center] at 332 S Jones Boulevard.
10/17/18
Planning Commission recommended approval and staff recommended
denial.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/31/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


c. 1961 The existing building was constructed.
A General License (P50-01688) was issued for Professional Services at 332
01/07/05
S Jones Boulevard. The license expired on 01/01/13.
A General License (Q01-00653) was issued for a Real Estate Business at
11/21/05
332 S Jones Boulevard. The license was inactive on 11/28/14.
A General License (Q03-04978) was issued for a Real Estate Salesperson
01/14/14
at 332 S Jones Boulevard. The license was inactive on 09/28/16.
A General License (G65-07817) was issued for a Management or Consultant
10/25/17
Service at 332 S Jones Boulevard. The license was inactive on 01/30/18.
A General License (G66-01363) was issued for Professional Services –
02/25/18
Medical at 332 S Jones Boulevard. The license expires on 03/01/19.

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application Meeting was conducted to discuss the submittal
02/11/19
requirements for a Variance with the applicant.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
A trash receptacle for the development was observed in an unscreened,
02/28/19
existing landscape area in front of the building.

CC
Page 745 of 1332
VAR-75818 [PRJ-75764]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.18

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject
Hospital O (Office) O (Office)
Property
Office, Medical or
North O (Office) P-R (Professional Office)
Dental
South Office O (Office) P-R (Professional Office)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
East
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
West
Detached Residential) Residential)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 175 Feet Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
South Jones Master Plan of
Major Collector 82 Y
Boulevard Streets & Highways

CC
Page 746 of 1332
VAR-75818 [PRJ-75764]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to 19.08.120, the following standards apply:


Monument Sign:
Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 / Street frontage 1 / Street frontage
Maximum Number Y
1 total 1 total
Maximum Area 75 SF /sign 16 SF Y
Maximum Height 8 Feet 7 Feet Y
Minimum Setback 5 Feet Zero Feet N*
External landscape
Illumination Internal/External flood lights on each Y
side of the sign
* The applicant is requesting a Variance (VAR-75818) to reduce the allowable minimum
setback requirement for a proposed monument sign.

CC
Page 747 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″ㅡ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 748 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″ㅡ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 749 of 1332


╗7 ●7 Ա7Ⓢ7Ő7Ḷ7Ќฌ
bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌฌ
bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7ִ7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7bਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯ฌ
Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7bਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯7Ձħ㌱่֭⎯֭7 ՙ″ㅡ̶‫ں‬ฌ

̶‫ںں‬x7Ɔ㈠7ОḶՁAŐ●Ɔฌ
ƆⓈ●╗Dz7ธฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆฌ
ЌDzЋACAฌ
ฎɱ‫ں‬xธฌ

ㅡ7 ㄦ7 ″7 ՙ7 ฎฌ

ㅡธƥֱㄦफฌ

Ɔ֭ผ่֭ħ‫ੂש‬7Աħผ‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผฌ

ḶÛЌDzŐ ฌ
Aऑผħк7bкੂ₡֭ฌ
ՙɱɱㅡ7Ձਙਙਙ—‫ש‬7Őਙ㌱7bħผ㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ธɱฌ

ฎƥฌ

ՙxธֱṲṲṲֱṲṲṲṲฌ

ㄦƥฌ

Ɔ●ḚЌ7DzՁDzЋA╗●ḶЌฌ

Page 750 of 1332


̶xƥฌ
Ɔ֭ผ่֭ħ‫ੂש‬7Աħผ‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผฌ
╗่֭Ŵ่‫ש‬7●こऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫ש‬ฌ
̶̶ธ7Ɔ㈠7İਙ่֭⎯7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ ں‬xՙฌ

İ ḶЌDzƆ7ԱՁЋC7 Ќฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz О
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁA Ќ7
Ќ
AОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″ㅡ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
AƆ㈠‫ں‬ฌ
╗7 ●7 Ա7Ⓢ7Ő7Ḷ7Ќฌ
bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌฌ
bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7ִ7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7bਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯ฌ
Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7bਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯7Ձħ㌱่֭⎯֭7 ՙ″ㅡ̶‫ں‬ฌ

̶‫ںں‬x7Ɔ㈠7ОḶՁAŐ●Ɔฌ
ƆⓈ●╗Dz7ธฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆฌ
ЌDzЋACAฌ
ฎɱ‫ں‬xธฌ

Ɔ֭ผ่֭ħ‫ੂש‬7Աħผ‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผฌ

ḶÛЌDzŐ ฌ
Aऑผħк7bкੂ₡֭ฌ
ՙɱɱㅡ7Ձਙਙਙ—‫ש‬7Őਙ㌱7bħผ㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ธɱฌ

Page 751 of 1332


Ɔ֭ผ่֭ħ‫ੂש‬7Աħผ‫ש‬γħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผฌ
╗่֭Ŵ่‫ש‬7●こऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫ש‬ฌ
̶̶ธ7Ɔ㈠7İਙ่֭⎯7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ ں‬xՙฌ

Ќฌ
Ɔ●╗Dz О
Ɔ●╗Dz7ОՁAЌฌ
ADzŐ●AՁ7ОՁA Ќ
Ќ7
AОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″ㅡ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
AƆ㈠‫ں‬ฌ
Page 752 of 1332
  
 '&

 

 
 ^
< 
 


!!>


< #



Page 753 of 1332
  
 '&

 

 
 ^
< 
 


!!>


< #



Page 754 of 1332


  
 '&

 

 
 ^
< 
 


!!>


< #



ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″ㅡ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 7g 5eo 51f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ″ㅡ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 7g 5eo 61f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 45

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75824 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: RAD MANAGEMENT, LLC -
OWNER: DSRS PROPERTIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
REDUCED LOT SIZES AND WIDTHS FOR THREE PROPOSED LOTS on 0.70 acres at 835
Shetland Road (APN 139-32-802-025), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone, Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-
75738]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter

Page 757 of 1332


Page 758 of 1332
Page 759 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: RAD MANAGEMENT, LLC - OWNER: DSRS
PROPERTIES, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75824 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 25

NOTICES MAILED 206

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

CS
Page 760 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75824 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. The existing accessory structure on Lot 2 of the submitted site plan, date stamped
03/13/19, shall be demolished and removed prior to the recordation of a map.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CS
Page 761 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to divide the subject parcel into 3 lots to allow a future mapping
realignment. The lots fail to meet the minimum lot size and width requirements. The
subject site is located at 835 Shetland Road.

ISSUES

• A Variance is requested to allow a lot size of 16,303 square feet where 20,000
square feet is the minimum required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.
Staff does not support the request.
• A Variance is requested to allow a 26-foot rear yard setback where 35 feet is
minimum required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district. Staff does not
support the request.
• A Variance is requested to allow a lot size of 13,844 square feet where 20,000
square feet is the minimum required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.
Staff does not support the request.
• A condition of approval has been added to require the existing accessory structure
on Lot 2 be demolished and removed prior to the recordation of any map.
• A Variance is requested to allow a lot size of 1,000 square feet where 20,000
square feet is the minimum required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.
Staff does not support the request.
• A Variance is requested to allow a lot width of 10 feet where 100 feet is the
minimum required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district. Staff does not
support the request.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located within the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district and is
subject to Title 19 requirements. The applicant requests a Variance to split the subject
parcel into three lots that fail to meet the minimum Title 19 requirements. Per the
submitted justification letter, the future goal is to reconfigure the subject site in conjunction
with two lots adjacent to the south (APNs: 139-32-802-027 and 028) in order to provide
additional parking for the existing medical office uses. It will require several steps and
entitlements in order to accomplish the proposed end result. If the subject Variance is
approved, requests of a Parcel Map, General Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Site
Development Plan Review must follow.

CS
Page 762 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Per the submitted site plan, three lots are proposed that fail to meet the minimum Title 19
requirements. In particular, Lot 1, identified on the submitted site plan, date stamped
03/13/19, depicts a 16,303 square-foot lot size where the minimum is 20,000 square feet
in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district. Lot 1 also depicts a 26-foot rear yard
setback where 35 feet is the minimum required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
district. Lot 2, identified on the submitted site plan, date stamped 03/13/19, depicts a
13,844 square-foot lot size where the minimum is 20,000 square feet in the R-E
(Residence Estates) zoning district. It also depicts an existing accessory structure that
will create a nonconforming use if the requested Variance is approved. A condition of
approval has been added that requires the existing accessory structure be demolished
and removed prior to the recordation of a map. Lot 3, identified on the submitted site plan,
date stamped 03/13/19, depicts a 1,000 square-foot lot size where the minimum is 20,000
square feet in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district. It also depicts a minimum lot
width of 10 feet where 100 feet is required in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.

The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) submitted the following comment, “This
parcel is served by a quasi-municipal well as part of the Shetland Mutual Water
Association. NDEP would be the agency to approve the proposed parceling of this land.
Recommend the owner provide written guidance.”

The subject site is also located within the Rancho Charleston Land Use Study Area. It
was adopted in June of 2002 and was initiated to determine appropriate measures for
neighborhood preservation of the subject area. The proposed future development of the
subject site fails to meet Goal #1 of the Rancho Charleston Land Use Study, which states,
“Protect the existing residential neighborhoods from any additional encroachment by
commercial and/or office uses.” As such, staff recommends denial of the requested
entitlement as it does not meet the minimum Title 19 development standards and does
not align with the goals of the Rancho Charleston Lane Use Study Area. If the requested
Variance is approved, it is subject to conditions.

FINDINGS (VAR-75824)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

CS
Page 763 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to create lots that don’t
conform to Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the
site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential
in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of
Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Board of City Commissioners approved a Rezoning (Z-0097-78)
11/15/78 from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-D (Designed Commercial) with the
proposed use of offices at 2622 West Charleston Boulevard.
The Planning Commission approved Plot Plan Building Elevation
05/28/91 Reviews [Z-0018-68 (15)] and (Z-0097-78) for an office addition at 2622
and 2628 West Charleston Boulevard. Staff recommended approval.
Variance (VAR-61336) request to allow 29 parking spaces where 38
were previously approved was pulled from the Planning Commission
10/07/15
agenda as it was determined the Variance was no longer needed due
to the revision of the submitted site plan.
Planning Department Staff administratively approved Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-61338) for a Minor Amendment of an approved Plot
10/14/15
Plan Review [Z-0018-68 (15)] to redesign the site circulation on 0.80
acres at 2622 and 2628 West Charleston Boulevard.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/30/06 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

CS
Page 764 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


1947 The original building was constructed.
A building permit (#91112375) was issued for a building addition at 2622
West Charleston Boulevard. The permit expired on 01/02/92.
07/02/91
A building permit (#91112374) was issued for on-site improvement at
2622 West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 02/26/92.
A building permit (#91114808) was issued for a tenant improvement at
07/30/91
2622 West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 10/21/91.
A business license (P55-009889) was issued for a Medical Office at
12/04/06
2628 West Charleston Boulevard. The license is active as of 10/06/15.
A business license (P55-01130) was issued for a Medical Firm at 2628
2/04/07
West Charleston Boulevard. The license is active as of 10/06/15.
A business license (P55-01156) was issued for a Medical Office at 2628
03/21/08
West Charleston Boulevard. The license is active as of 10/06/15.
A building permit (#256126) was issued for a tenant improvement at
04/05/12
2628 West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 07/23/12.
A business license (C55-00451) was issued for a Clinic at 2628 West
Charleston Boulevard. The license is active as of 10/06/15.
06/14/12
A business license (P55-01763) was issued for a Medical Firm at 2628
West Charleston Boulevard. The license is active as of 10/06/15.
A building permit (#256126) was issued for a tenant improvement at
03/17/14
2628 West Charleston Boulevard. The permit was finalized on 06/23/14.

Pre-Application Meeting
Planning Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal
02/06/19 requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a proposed lot
reconfiguration.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an existing single-family
02/28/19
dwelling. No issues were noted.

CS
Page 765 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.70

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Single-Family, C-D (Designed
O (Office)
Property Detached Commercial)
Single-Family, DR (Desert Rural R-E (Residence
North
Detached Density Residential) Estates)
Office, Medical or
Dental C-D (Designed
South O (Office)
Church/House of Commercial)
Worship
Vacant (Proposed
East O (Office) O (Office)
Parking Structure)
DR (Desert Rural C-D (Designed
Undeveloped
Density Residential) Commercial)
West
Single-Family, R-E (Residence
O (Office)
Detached Estates)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


Rancho Charleston Land Use Study N*
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District Y
CD-O (Designed Commercial Overlay) District Y
RP-O (Rural Preservation Overlay) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A
*The proposed future development fails to meet Goal #1 of the Rancho Charleston Land
Use Study which states, “Protect the existing residential neighborhoods from any
additional encroachment by commercial and/or office uses.”

CS
Page 766 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply (Lot 1):


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 16,303 SF N*
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 100 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front 50 Feet 52 Feet Y
• Side 10 Feet 11 Feet Y
• Rear 35 Feet 26 Feet N*
*The applicant has requested the subject Variance (VAR-75824) to allow a reduced lot
size and rear yard setback.

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply (Lot 2):


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 13,844 SF N*
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 100 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front 50 Feet 36 Feet N**
• Side 10 Feet 14 Feet Y
• Rear 35 Feet 19 Feet N**
*The applicant has requested the subject Variance (VAR-75824) to allow a reduced lot
size.
**A condition of approval has been added that requires the existing accessory structure
be demolished and removed prior to the recordation of a map.

Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply (Lot 3):


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 1,000 SF N*
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 10 Feet N*
Min. Setbacks
• Front 50 Feet N/A N/A
• Side 10 Feet N/A N/A
• Rear 35 Feet N/A N/A
*The applicant has requested the subject Variance (VAR-75824) to allow a reduced lot
size and lot width.

CS
Page 767 of 1332
VAR-75824 [PRJ-75738]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Shetland Road Local Title 13 60 Feet Y

CS
Page 768 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ฎ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 769 of 1332


ОŐḶİDzb╗7CA╗A ฌ
ОAŐbDzՁ7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱธֱฎxธֱxธㄦฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777̶‫ں‬ⓒ‫ں‬ㅡՙ7ƆỢ㈠╗ોฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777ŐֱDzฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ̬ฌ
‫ں‬″ⓒ̶x̶7ƆỢ㈠╗㈠7ӧDzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ŐDzƆ●CDzЌbDzỏ77777777777777777777777777777777777777ŐֱDzฌ
‫ں‬ⓒxxx7ƆỢ㈠╗㈠7ӧ╗Ḷ7╗ĠDz7ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7A╗7ƆĠDz╗ՁAЌCỏ77777777777777777777777777bֱCฌ
‫̶ں‬ⓒฎㅡㅡ7ƆỢ㈠╗㈠7ӧ╗Ḷ7╗ĠDz7DzAƆ╗7Ḷ7ОŐḶОDzŐ╗ùỏ777777777777777777777777777bֱCฌ

Page 770 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ฎ
x̶゜‫ں゜̶ں‬ɱ
Page 771 of 1332
 >&
 !

 


#
%


 
# 
  


!
#
#



Page 772 of 1332


 >&
 !

 


#
%


 
# 
  


!
#
#



İ֭ผผੂ7Ҝħ㌱֭кħฌ
Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬ฌ
̶xธx7Оγਙ่֭ħゥ7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬77777ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ77Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ‫ں‬ฌ
Оγਙ่֭7ӧՙxธỏ7ㅡ̶‫ںֱں‬ธㅡ‫ں‬777㈾こħ㌱кħŴผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬㌀㌱ਙゥ㈠่֭‫ש‬ฌ
b֭ผ‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ќ—こ⇡֭ผ7ธฎ″ฎฌ

770֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬ㅡⓒ77ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ
bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
̶̶̶7Ќ㈠7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ⓒฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″ฌ

Ő̬֭777İ—⎯‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ձ֭‫֭שש‬ผฌ

77777777777Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7ЋŴผħŴ่㌱֭7⑾ਙผ7ฎ̶ㄦ7Ɔγ֭‫ש‬кŴ่₡7ŐਙŴ₡ⓒ7ОŴผ㌱֭к7Ќ—こ⇡֭ผ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱธֱฎxธֱxธㄦ㈠ฌ
77777777777Cħ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ⇡ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬7ОŴผ㌱֭к7ħ่‫ש‬ਙ7̶7ОŴผ㌱֭к⎯7Ŵ่₡7Ő֭▷ਙ่֭7╗ʉਙ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭こ̬ฌ
77777777777‫ں‬″ⓒ̶x̶7ƆỢ㈠0╗㈠77ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭こŴħ่77ŐֱDz㈠ฌ
77777777777‫ں‬ⓒxxx7ƆỢ㈠70╗㈠77‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7Ŵ‫ש‬7Ɔγ֭‫ש‬кŴ่₡7⑾ผਙこ7ŐֱDz7‫ש‬ਙ7bֱC㈠ฌ
77777777777‫̶ں‬ⓒฎㅡㅡ7ƆỢ㈠0╗㈠7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7ਙ⑾77‫ש‬γ֭7Оผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7⑾ผਙこ7ŐֱDz7‫ש‬ਙ7bֱC㈠ฌ

77777777777Ő֭Ŵ⎯ਙ่7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ⇡ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬7ผ֭‫̬ש⎯֭—׀‬ฌ
77777777777Cผ㈠7Ő—⎯⎯֭кк7İ7ƆγŴγ7ħ⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7Ḷʉ่֭ผ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ⇡ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬7ОŴผ㌱֭к7Ŵ่₡7Ŵк⎯ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙʉ่֭ผ7ਙ⑾7ธ″ธธֱธ″ธฎ7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ
777777777777ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬xธ㈠77ОŴผ㌱֭к Ќ—こ⇡֭ผ⎯̬7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱธֱฎxธֱxธՙ7Ŵ่₡7ธฎ7㈠ฌ

770—‫—ש‬ผ֭7Оผਙऑਙ⎯Ŵк̬ฌ
‫ں‬ỏ77Őֱ֭₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7㌱ħผ㌱—кŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7⑾ਙผ7ธ″ธธֱธ″ธฎ7Û㈠7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ
7777╗γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7⑾Ŵ㌱ħкħ‫ੂש‬7γŴ⎯7Ŵ7‫ש‬ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7ਙ⑾7ㅡ7γŴ่₡ħ㌱Ŵऑऑ֭₡7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7Ŵ่₡7่ਙ่֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭こฌ
77777こ֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡㈠7ԱŴ⎯֭₡7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7ਙ่кੂ7ธ7Ġ㈠b㈠7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7Ŵ่₡7こਙ⎯‫ש‬7ਙ⑾ฌ
7777‫ש‬γ֭7‫ש‬ħこ֭7‫ש‬γ֭ੂ7ผ֭こŴħ่7—่—⎯֭₡7ʉγħк֭7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7γŴ⎯7Ŵ7⎯γਙผ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7ਙ⑾7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬㈠7A7㌱Ŵผ7่֭‫֭ש‬ผħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7⑾ผਙこ7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ
77777‫ف‬ਙħ่‫ف‬7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7ʉħкк7Ŵ‫֭שש‬こऑ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑŴผ>7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙ่֭7ʉŴੂ7‫ف‬ਙħ่‫ف‬7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7ⓒ7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭₡7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7ਙผ7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙ่֭7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
77777‫ف‬ਙħ่‫ف‬7Û֭⎯‫ש‬㈠7●่7ਙผ₡֭ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑŴผ>7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Û֭⎯‫⎯ש‬ħ₡֭7ʉŴкк7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7こ—⎯‫ש‬7่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7Ɔγ֭‫ש‬кŴ่₡7ŐਙŴ₡7Ŵ่₡7ผֱ่֭֭‫֭ש‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬ฌ
77777ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7่֭‫ש‬ผŴ่㌱֭7่֭Ŵผ7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่㈠7A7㌱Ŵผ7⑾ผਙこ7Ɔγ֭‫ש‬кŴ่₡7ŐਙŴ₡7㌱Ŵ่7่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭‫ש‬ผŴ่㌱֭7่֭Ŵผฌ
77777bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7ħ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7Ŵผ֭7่ਙ7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯ⓒ7㌱Ŵ่7่ਙ‫ש‬7ऑผਙ㌱֭֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7こŴ>֭7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ‫֭שש‬こऑ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑŴผ>7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
77777⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7ਙผ7DzŴ⎯‫ש‬7⎯ħ₡֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬㈠7╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡77ธ7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7γŴ่₡ħ㌱Ŵऑऑ֭₡7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ﭨ‬Ŵ่7⑾Ŵ㌱ħкħ‫ੂש‬7こ֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
bħ‫ੂש‬7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡㈠7Ûħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7่֭ʉ7⎯‫ש‬ผħऑħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7㌱Ŵผ7‫ف‬ਙħ่‫ف‬7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7ਙ่7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7㌱Ŵ่7₡ผਙऑ7Ŵ7ऑŴ‫ש‬ħ่֭‫ש‬77Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ่֭7֭ゥħ‫ש‬7ਙ่ฌ
bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่㈠7A7㌱Ŵผ7⑾ผਙこ7Ɔγ֭‫ש‬кŴ่₡7ŐਙŴ₡7㌱Ŵ่7่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7่֭‫ש‬ผŴ่㌱֭7่֭Ŵผ7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7ħ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7Ŵผ֭7่ਙ77ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯ⓒฌ
㌱Ŵ่7ऑผਙ㌱֭֭₡7Ŵ่₡7こŴ>֭7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7Ŵ่₡7ऑผਙ㌱֭֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7⑾ħ่₡7Ŵ77ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭7ਙผ7֭ゥħ‫ש‬7ਙ่7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่㈠ฌ
ธỏ77Ő֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ő֭▷ਙ่֭7ธ7ऑਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7ਙ⑾7ОŴผ㌱֭к7Ќ—こ⇡֭ผ7‫̶ں‬ɱ̶ֱธֱฎxธֱxธㄦ77⑾ผਙこ7ŐֱDz7‫ש‬ਙ7bֱC̬ฌ
77777Ŵỏ77‫ں‬xxx7Ɔ‫׀‬㈠0‫ש‬㈠7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γⓒ7Ŵ‫ש‬7Ɔγ֭‫ש‬кŴ่₡7⎯ħ₡֭㈠7╗γħ⎯7ʉħкк7Ŵ₡₡7ㅡ7ОŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7⑾ਙผ7ธ″ธธֱธ″ธฎ7Û㈠7bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬㈠ฌ
77777⇡ỏ77‫̶ں‬ⓒฎㅡㅡ7Ɔ‫׀‬㈠70‫ש‬㈠7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Û֭⎯‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7Оผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬㈠7●่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7่֭ʉ7ОŴผ㌱֭к77‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7ħ⎯7Ŵ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ธⓒㅡ̶x7Ɔ‫׀‬㈠0‫ש‬㈠7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭㈠ฌ
77777777777Cผ㈠7ƆγŴγ7ऑкŴ่⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ่֭ਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭7Ŵ่₡7—⎯֭7⑾ਙผ7γħ⎯7こ֭₡ħ㌱Ŵк7ਙ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭㈠ฌ
77777777777Оਙผ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7‫̶ں‬7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7㌱ਙ—к₡7⇡֭7—⎯֭₡7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ⑾⑾7ऑŴผ>ħ่‫ف‬7ਙ⑾7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ธ″ธธ7Ŵ่₡7ธ″ธฎ7Û㈠ฌ
77777777777bγŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ⓒ7⎯ħ่㌱֭7Cผ㈠7ƆγŴγ7่֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7γŴ⎯7‫̶ں‬7ऑŴ‫ש‬ħ่֭‫⎯ש‬7ʉŴħ‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯Ŵこ֭7‫ש‬ħこ֭㈠ฌ
7777777777Û֭7ผ֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7ੂਙ—ผ7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7ਙ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠ฌ

Ɔħ่㌱֭ผ֭кੂⓒ

77Ɔħ่㌱֭ผ֭кੂⓒฌ

İ֭ผผผੂ Ҝħ㌱֭кħ Ő A
7İ֭ผผੂ7Ҝħ㌱֭кħ7Ő㈠A㈠ฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ฎ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 7g 7eo 31f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 46

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75831 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BRO HYMN, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW TWO PROPOSED 60-FOOT TALL
FREESTANDING SIGNS WHERE 40 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWED on 0.72 acres
at 1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard (APN 162-03-302-010), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone,
Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75734]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter

Page 774 of 1332


Page 775 of 1332
Page 776 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: BRO HYMN, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75831 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 26

NOTICES MAILED 187

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

CS
Page 777 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75831 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. A minimum setback of 5 feet shall be provided for the proposed freestanding signs.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

6. If not already recorded, submit a License Agreement for landscaping, aerial signage
or any other private improvements in the Las Vegas Boulevard South public right of
way prior to this issuance of permits for this sign. The applicant must carry an
insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the
City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at
the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The
installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way
shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the
property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate
all requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development Section of
the Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).

CS
Page 778 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request to erect two freestanding signs that exceed the maximum height allowed
for a proposed Marijuana Dispensary use at 1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard.

ISSUES

• A Variance (VAR-75831) is requested to allow two 60-foot tall freestanding signs


where the maximum height allowed is 40 feet. Staff does not support the request.

ANALYSIS

The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-72982) request to allow a
Marijuana Dispensary use at the subject site on 05/08/18. The applicant proposes to
replace two existing freestanding signs with two freestanding signs that do not meet the
minimum Title 19 height requirements. The subject site is located within the C-2 (General
Commercial) zoning district and is subject to Title 19 sign development standards. The
applicant has requested the subject Variance to allow a height of 60 feet where 40 feet is
the maximum height allowed. Per the submitted justification letter, the applicant states,
“the Variance is needed at this location to be able to compete with the other signage along
the boulevard and needs the increased height so it is visible along the roadway.”

Per the submitted site plan, two existing freestanding signs will be replaced along both
street frontages of Main Street and Las Vegas Boulevard. The submitted elevations depict
two 60-foot tall freestanding signs. The top of the sign has a cross shape and is branded
with the proposed Marijuana Dispensary name, “Curaleaf.” The subject site is also located
within the Scenic Byway Overlay District. Per Title 19.10.160, all signage for any
development in this district must provide at least 75% of illuminated signage, in the form
of neon signs, animated signs, or a combination thereof. All such illuminated signs must
be fully illuminated from at least one hour before dusk until one hour after dawn. Such
signs may be fully illuminated during daylight hours also. and is required to provide a
minimum of 75% illumination. Per the submitted justification letter, this requirement is
met as the proposed signs will have 60% neon illumination and 40% animation.

The applicant has presented no evidence of unique or extraordinary circumstances


pursuant to Title 19.16.140 that would justify the height increase of the freestanding sign
from 40 feet to 60 feet; therefore, staff recommends denial of this request.

CS
Page 779 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

FINDINGS (VAR-75831)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to erect signage that does
not meet Title 19 requirements. Reducing the height of the proposed signs to 40 feet
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The City Council approved a Variance (V-0082-82) to allow a 6’ x 6’
double-faced sign to a height of 18’ in conjunction with an existing 45’
10/20/82 high double-faced sign where only one freestanding sign is permitted at
1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The Board of Zoning Adjustment
recommended denial of the request.
The Planning Commission approved Special Use Permit (SUP-72982)
to allow a proposed 3,200 square-foot Marijuana Dispensary use at
05/08/18
1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard. Planning Department Staff
recommended approval.

CS
Page 780 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Most Recent Change of Ownership


04/16/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (#R09-00135) was issued for a restaurant (Burger
01/01/51 King 3396) at 1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The license was
marked inactive on 10/07/15.
A Code Enforcement case (#66821) was processed for a sign sweep at
06/18/08
1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The case was resolved on 06/25/08.
A Code Enforcement case (#155060) was processed for vagrants
hanging around the vacant lot across from the subject site causing
05/19/15
nuisance at 1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The case was resolved
on 05/20/15.
A business license (#G63-07509) was issued for a restaurant (Burger
10/08/15 King 3396) at 1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard. The license is listed
inactive as of 12/05/18.
A tenant improvement building permit (#PRC18-00148) was issued for
08/16/18
a Marijuana Dispensary use at 1736 South Las Vegas Boulevard.

Pre-Application Meeting
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
02/05/19 submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a proposed
Variance.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an existing building
02/28/19 undergoing renovations and two existing freestanding signs located
adjacent to each fronting right-of-way.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.72

CS
Page 781 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Proposed
Subject C-2 (General
Marijuana C (Commercial)
Property Commercial)
Dispensary
General Retail C-2 (General
North C (Commercial)
Restaurant Commercial)
C-2 (General
South Restaurant C (Commercial)
Commercial)
C-2 (General
East Parking Lot C (Commercial)
Commercial)
Undeveloped
C-2 (General
West Motel C (Commercial)
Commercial)
General Retail

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District - (200 Feet) Y
DTLV-O (Downtown Las Vegas Overlay) – Gateway District Y
SB-O (Las Vegas Boulevard Scenic Byway Overlay) District Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails Y
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Primary Arterial Master Plan of
Main Street 90 Feet Y
Street Streets & Highways
Las Vegas Primary Arterial Master Plan of
105 Feet Y
Boulevard Street Streets & Highways

CS
Page 782 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Freestanding Sign –Las Vegas Boulevard Elevation


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 sign per each two
hundred lineal feet of
street frontage or portion
thereof.

1. The total number of all


freestanding and
monument signs shall
Maximum not exceed one per One Freestanding
Y
Number each two hundred Sign
lineal feet of street
frontage or portion
thereof.
2. Corner lots are
permitted to have
signs for each street
frontage

2 square feet of sign


area for each lineal foot
Maximum Area 32.16 SF Y
of street frontage (285
SF)
Maximum Height 40 Feet 60 Feet N*
Minimum Setback 5 Feet By Condition By Condition
75% exposed neon,
60% neon illumination
Illumination animation, or any Y
and 40% animation
combination thereof

CS
Page 783 of 1332
VAR-75831 [PRJ-75734]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Freestanding Sign – Main Street Elevation


Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 sign per each two
hundred lineal feet of
street frontage or portion
thereof.

3. The total number of all


freestanding and
monument signs shall
Maximum not exceed one per One Freestanding
Y
Number each two hundred Sign
lineal feet of street
frontage or portion
thereof.
4. Corner lots are
permitted to have
signs for each street
frontage

2 square feet of sign


area for each lineal foot
Maximum Area 32.16 SF Y
of street frontage (285
SF)
Maximum Height 40 Feet 60 Feet N*
Minimum Setback 5 Feet By Condition By Condition
75% exposed neon,
60% neon illumination
Illumination animation, or any Y
and 40% animation
combination thereof

CS
Page 784 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 785 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 786 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 787 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 788 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 789 of 1332


Page 790 of 1332
 !
 !&

 

 
< 
^


!'


%
< #



Page 791 of 1332
 !
 !&

 

 
< 
^


!'


%
< #



Page 792 of 1332
 !
 !&

 

 
< 
^


!'


%
< #



Page 793 of 1332


 !
 !&

 

 
< 
^


!'


%
< #



ՁAƆ7bਙ่⎯—к‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
‫ں‬ɱ̶x7ЋħккŴ‫֭ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7bħผ㌱к֭7Աк₡‫ف‬7̶ֱㄦՙՙฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫̶ں‬ㅡฌ
ӧՙxธỏ7ㅡɱɱֱ″ㅡ″ɱֱ㌱֭кк㈠ฌ
ӧՙxธỏ7ɱㅡ″ֱxฎㄦՙֱ⑾Ŵゥฌ

֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬ฎⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ

bਙ—ผ֭ੂ7Ɔ‫֭ש‬ʉŴผ‫ש‬ⓒ7ОкŴ่่֭ผฌ
bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่₡7C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬ฌ
̶̶̶ Ќ㈠ ŐŴ่㌱γਙ Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″ฌ

ŐDz̬7bŴ่่Ŵ⇡ħ⎯7Cħ⎯ऑ่֭⎯Ŵผੂฌ
‫ں‬ՙ̶″7Ɔ㈠7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Աਙ—к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵผ₡㈠ฌ
●่㌱ผ֭Ŵ⎯֭7Ɔħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫ֱ֭ف‬7bŴ่่Ŵ⇡ħ⎯7Cħ⎯ऑ่֭⎯Ŵผੂฌ

ŐDz̬7777ОŐİՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ﹝İxx‫ں‬ฌ

C֭Ŵผ7Ҝผ㈠7Ɔ‫֭ש‬ʉŴผ‫̬ש‬ฌ

Ок֭Ŵ⎯֭7Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7к֭‫֭שש‬ผ7Ŵ⎯7ਙ—ผ7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7‫ש‬ਙ7ħ่㌱ผ֭Ŵ⎯֭7‫ש‬γ֭7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫⎯่ف‬7⑾ਙผฌ
Ŵ7bŴ่่Ŵ⇡ħ⎯7Cħ⎯ऑ่֭⎯Ŵผੂ㈠77●่7ҜŴੂ7ਙ⑾7кŴ⎯‫ש‬7ੂ֭Ŵผⓒ7ԱкŴ㌱7㈾Ŵ㌱77bਙкк֭㌱‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7ʉŴ⎯ฌ
Ŵऑऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7ผ֭кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬7⑾ผਙこ7Ġħ‫ف‬γкŴ่₡7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ⓒ7⑾ਙผこ֭ผкੂ7Ŵ7Ա—ผ‫֭ف‬ผ7ìħ่‫ف‬ฌ
Ő֭⎯‫ש‬Ŵ—ผŴ่‫ש‬㈠77╗γ֭7่֭ʉ7₡ħ⎯ऑ่֭⎯Ŵผੂ7ħ⎯7—่₡֭ผ7㌱ਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠ฌ

Ќਙʉ7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7₡ħ⎯ऑ่֭⎯Ŵผੂ7ħ⎯7⇡ਙ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7こ֭₡ħ㌱Ŵк7Ŵ่₡7ผ֭㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7₡ħ⎯ऑ่֭⎯Ŵผੂⓒฌ
こŴ่ੂ7ਙ⑾7ħ‫⎯ש‬7ऑŴ‫ש‬ħ่֭‫゜⎯ש‬㌱кħ่֭‫⎯ש‬7Ŵผ֭7⑾ผਙこ7ਙ—‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬ਙʉ่㈠77╗γ֭7㌱ħ‫ੂש‬7㌱ਙ—่㌱ħк7Ŵ₡ਙऑ‫֭ש‬₡ฌ
Ŵ่7ਙผ₡ħ่Ŵ่㌱֭7Ŵккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7こŴผħ㈾—Ŵ่Ŵ7₡ħ⎯ऑ่֭⎯Ŵผħ֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7こ֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱—ผผ่֭‫ש‬7⎯ħ‫่ف‬ฌ
ਙผ₡ħ่Ŵ่㌱֭7⑾ਙผ7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬㈠ฌ

Û֭7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7ऑਙк֭7⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ่ħこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ŵผਙ—่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑ֭ผħこ֭‫֭ש‬ผⓒ7ਙ่7⇡ਙ‫ש‬γฌ
⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ‫⎯֭ف‬㈠7╗γ֭ผ֭7ʉħкк7⇡֭7่֭ਙ่7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫⎯่ف‬7Ŵ่₡7ՙㄦ੧7ħкк—こħ่Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ⓒ7ऑ֭ผฌ
‫ש‬γ֭7⎯㌱่֭ħ㌱7⇡ੂʉŴੂɸ⎯7ผ֭‫—ف‬кŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯㈠77DzŴ㌱γ7⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ⎯7₡֭⎯㌱ผħ⇡֭₡7Ŵ⎯7⑾ਙккਙʉ⎯̬ฌ

7
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ ‫ںں‬ฌ
P a 7g 9eo 41f 3 3 2
ֱ●кк—こħ่Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7bγŴ่่֭к7Ձ֭‫֭שש‬ผֱ‫ں‬㈠ՙㅡ777⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬ฌ
ֱՁDzC7ԱŴ㌱7кħ‫ש‬7Оੂкਙ่7⎯ħ‫ֱ่ف‬777777777‫ں‬ՙ㈠ㄦธ7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬ฌ
ֱA่ħこŴ‫֭ש‬₡7ՁDzC7Ɔ‫ש‬ผħऑ7Ɔ㌱ผֱ่֭֭‫ں‬ธ㈠ɱ777⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬ฌ
╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк7Ɔħ‫่ف‬7Aผ֭Ŵ̬77777777777777777777777̶ธ㈠‫ں‬″7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7⑾֭֭‫ש‬ฌ
●кк—こħ่Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่̬7″x੧ฌ
A่ħこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่̬77777ㅡx੧ฌ

Û֭7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ﭨ‬ŴผħŴ่㌱֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7ħ่㌱ผ֭Ŵ⎯֭7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫่ف‬7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫⎯ש‬7⑾ผਙこ7ㅡx7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7″xฌ
⑾֭֭‫ש‬㈠7╗γ֭7⎯ħ▷֭ⓒ7⎯γŴऑ֭7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬ਙऑਙ‫ف‬ผŴऑγੂ7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7₡ਙ֭⎯่ɸ‫ש‬7Ŵккਙʉ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬ਙฌ
֭ゥऑŴ่₡ⓒ7Ŵккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7⑾ਙผ7こਙผ֭7⎯ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬㈠7╗γ֭7㌱ħ‫ੂש‬7γŴ⎯7ผ֭㌱่֭‫ש‬кੂ7ħ่⎯‫ש‬Ŵкк֭₡7⎯γਙʉ7‫ف‬ħผкฌ
⎯ħ‫⎯่ف‬7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Աਙ—к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵผ₡㈠77Aк⎯ਙⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭ੂ7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Ŵ7่֭ʉ7C่่֭ੂɸ⎯ฌ
Ŵ่₡7⎯ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7่֭Ŵผ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬㈠7╗γħ⎯7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7㈾—⎯‫ש‬7่֭֭₡⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7Ŵ⇡к֭7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙこऑ֭‫֭ש‬ฌ
ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙ‫ש‬γ֭ผ7⎯ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡ਙ—к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵผ₡7Ŵ่₡7่֭֭₡⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7ħ่㌱ผ֭Ŵ⎯֭₡7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬ⓒฌ
⎯ਙ7ħ‫ש‬7ħ⎯7‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħ⇡к֭7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7ผਙŴ₡ʉŴੂ㈠ฌ

Û֭7⇡֭кħ֭‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ف‬ħ‫่֭ﭨ‬7ਙ—ผ7ผ֭ऑ—‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7⑾ਙผ7֭ゥ㌱֭кк่֭‫ש‬7⎯֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭ⓒ7֭ゥ֭こऑкŴผੂฌ
ਙऑ֭ผŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯ⓒ7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7こŴ㈾ਙผ7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫⎯ש‬7Ŵ่₡7γħ‫ف‬γʉŴੂ⎯7Ŵ่₡ฌ
㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭⎯7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵผ֭Ŵⓒ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ħ⎯7Ŵ่7֭ゥ㌱֭кк่֭‫ש‬7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠77Û֭ฌ
㈾—⎯‫ש‬7ʉŴ่‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7こŴ7֭7⎯—ผ֭7ਙ—ผ7ऑŴ‫ש‬ħ่֭‫゜⎯ש‬㌱—⎯‫ש‬ਙこ֭ผ⎯7㌱Ŵ่7⑾ħ่₡7—⎯㈠77Û֭7ผ֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂฌ
ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7ੂਙ—ผ7Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк㈠ฌ

ùਙ—ผ⎯7‫ש‬ผ—кੂⓒฌ

Ձ—㌱ੂ7Ɔ‫֭ש‬ʉŴผ‫ש‬

Ձ—㌱ੂ7Ɔ‫֭ש‬ʉŴผ‫ש‬

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶ㅡ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ ธธฌ
P a 7g 9eo 51f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 47

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAR-75834 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: OSEVENA NOEL - OWNER:
MARIA GENISTE - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW SIX-INCH
CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING
ADDITION at 500 Vincent Way (APN 138-34-711-009), R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zone,
Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75747]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter

Page 796 of 1332


Page 797 of 1332
Page 798 of 1332
VAR-75834 [PRJ-75747]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: OSEVENA NOEL - OWNER: MARIE GENISTE

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75834 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 25

NOTICES MAILED 359

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

CC
Page 799 of 1332
VAR-75834 [PRJ-75747]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAR-75834 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

3. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

4. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CC
Page 800 of 1332
VAR-75834 [PRJ-75747]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has constructed a 10-foot x 19-foot ‘Exercise Room’ which is attached to
an existing single family, detached dwelling located at 500 Vincent Way. The addition
does not comply with the corner side yard setback requirement.

ISSUES

• The addition currently does not comply with Title 19.06.070 setback requirements, nor
have any building permits been obtained.
• A Variance (VAR-75834) has been requested for the existing addition to a single
family, detached building at 500 Vincent Way to allow a two-foot corner side yard
setback where 15 feet is required as per Title 19.06.070. Staff does not support this
request.
• An application for a Building Permit (R18-15768) was processed on 11/28/18 seeking
approval for a residential room addition at 500 Vincent Way. The application has not
been issued.
• Per Title 19.06.070, perimeter walls in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) zone are
restricted to a maximum height of eight feet. Initially, a Variance was required to keep
an existing nine-foot tall perimeter wall; however, observations of the site revealed an
eight-foot tall perimeter with a retaining wall of varying height, culminating in a total
wall height of nine-feet which is permitted under Title 19.06.070. As such, the
perimeter/retaining wall component no longer requires a Variance.

ANALYSIS

This is a request for a Variance to allow an existing 190 square-foot addition to a single
family, detached building located at 500 Vincent Way, which does not comply with Title
19.06 corner yard setback development standards. The subject property is zoned R-1
(Single Family Residential). The applicant has requested a Variance to allow a two-foot
corner side yard setback where 15 feet is required.

The applicant’s justification letter states “the addition is screened from Alta Drive behind
a nine-foot high cement block perimeter wall therefore reducing visual impacts. The house
is of traditional stucco construction with a shingled roof.”

CC
Page 801 of 1332
VAR-75834 [PRJ-75747]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

On the submitted drawings, the applicant indicated that a nine-foot tall perimeter wall
would screen the addition to the single family, detached dwelling. Title 19.06.070 requires
a maximum perimeter wall height of six-to-eight feet in an R-1 zone; therefore, a Variance
was requested to allow the nine-foot tall perimeter wall. However, site observations
revealed an eight-foot tall perimeter wall with a retaining wall of varying height,
culminating in a total wall height of nine feet at its highest point. As such, the Variance
associated with the perimeter/retaining wall is no longer required. On the basis of the
above information, the hardship is self-imposed and; therefore, staff recommends denial
of this request.

FINDINGS (VAR-75834)

In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:

1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;


2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”

Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:


“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the


applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by constructing additions to an existing
single family, detached dwelling, which do not comply with Title 19.06.070 development
standards for corner yard setbacks. Alternatively, remodeling the building addition by
increasing the setback to the corner side yard property line would allow conformance to
the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s
physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in
nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

CC
Page 802 of 1332
VAR-75834 [PRJ-75747]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.


A Code Enforcement case (#54091) was initiated for vehicle junk at 500
06/05/07
Vincent Way. The case was resolved on 07/17/07.
A Code Enforcement case (#125390) was initiated for vehicle junk at
02/26/13
500 Vincent Way. The case was resolved on 04/02/13.
A Code Enforcement case (#173778) was initiated for trash and debris
01/12/17
at 500 Vincent Way. The case was resolved on 02/03/17.
A Code Enforcement case (#186700) was initiated for parking a
03/14/18 commercial vehicle at 500 Vincent Way. The case was resolved on
03/20/18.
A Code Enforcement case (#192798) was initiated for people living in a
09/06/18 rear yard shed as part of an event at 500 Vincent Way. The case
remains open.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


07/26/02 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


c. 1970 A single family, detached building was constructed at 500 Vincent Way.
A building permit (R18-15768) was being processed for a residential
11/28/18
room addition at 500 Vincent Way. The application has not been issued.

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application Meeting was conducted to discuss the submittal
02/06/19 requirements for a Variance of corner yard setback requirements with
the applicant.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

CC
Page 803 of 1332
VAR-75834 [PRJ-75747]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Field Check
A single family, detached dwelling was observed during a field check. Site
observations revealed that the perimeter wall was eight-foot tall with a
02/28/19 retaining wall of varying height, culminating in a total of a nine-foot tall
perimeter and retaining wall which complies with Title 19 requirements.
As such, a Variance for the perimeter/retaining wall is no longer required.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.18

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
Property Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
North
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
South
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
East
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
West
Detached Residential) Residential)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

CC
Page 804 of 1332
VAR-75834 [PRJ-75747]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.06.070 Single Family Residential District regulations, the


following standards apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Setbacks
• Front Yard 20 Feet 48 Feet Y
• Side Yard 5 Feet 42 Feet Y
• Corner Side Yard 15 Feet 2 Feet N*
• Rear Yard 15 Feet 25 Feet Y
Max. Building Height Two stories, 35 Feet One story, 12 Feet Y
Max. Wall Height 10 Feet 9 Feet Y
Max. Perimeter Wall Height 6-8 Feet 8 Feet Y
Varying height up
Max. Retaining Wall Height 4 Feet to 1-Foot Y
* A Variance (VAR-75834) has been requested to allow a two-foot corner side yard
setback where 15 feet is required.

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Vincent Way Local Street Title 13 50 Y

CC
Page 805 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㅡՙ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 806 of 1332


Page 807 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㅡՙ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㅡՙ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 808 of 1332


Page 809 of 1332
 !&
 &

 





 
 
%

""

^



Page 810 of 1332


 !&
 &

 





 
 
%

""

^



ОŐİֱՙㄦՙㅡՙ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 8g 1eo 11f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 48

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SUP-75850 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: MIGUEL
GUTIERREZ - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR BUILDING
MAINTENANCE SERVICE AND SALES at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 138-03-602-
013), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75587]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
3. Supporting Documentation - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
4. Photo(s) - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
5. Justification Letter - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]

Page 812 of 1332


Page 813 of 1332
Page 814 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: MIGUEL GUTIERREZ

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-75850 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-75851 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-75850

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 24

NOTICES MAILED 284 - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851

PROTESTS 0 - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851

APPROVALS 0 - SUP-75850 and SDR-75851

JB
Page 815 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-75850 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Building
Maintenance Service and Sales use.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development


Plan Review (SDR-75851) shall be required.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

6. Heavy equipment and machinery, including, but not limited to tractors, backhoes,
dump trucks, tow trucks, bucket or ladder trucks, front end loaders, semi-trucks and
trailers and similar vehicles, shall not be parked or stored at the subject site. No
equipment that is available for rent shall be stored outside.

7. Prior to the issuance of a business license, all Title 19.08.040(E)(4)(e) outdoor


storage area screening requirements must be fulfilled and all walls must be brought
into compliance with Title 19.08 development standards prior to any area being
utilized for outdoor storage on the subject property.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

JB
Page 816 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

SDR-75851 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-75850) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 03/05/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow a five-foot landscape


buffer on a portion of the south perimeter and a zero-foot landscape buffer on a
portion of the north property line where eight feet is required.

5. An Exception from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow four interior parking
lot islands and ends caps where 14 are the minimum required.

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

7. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

JB
Page 817 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

10. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site
prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainage ways as recommended.

JB
Page 818 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Site Development Plan Review and Special Use Permit to establish
a 13,053 square-foot Building Maintenance Services and Sales use with an accessory
1,834 square-foot Outdoor Storage use at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard.

ISSUES

• The Building Maintenance Service and Sales use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district as a Conditional Land Use. However, the use does not
comply with Condition #1, which states “No outdoor storage is allowed”. As the
proposed use provides approximately 1,834 square feet of Outdoor Storage area,
approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP-75850) is required.
• The applicant has requested a Major Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75851) to
establish a new 9,000 square-foot structure on the subject site.
• A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 has been requested, to allow a five-foot landscape
buffer on a portion of the south perimeter and a zero-foot landscape buffer on a portion
of the north property line where eight feet is required. Staff recommends approval of
this request.
• The applicant has request an exception to allow four trees, where 14 trees should be
required within parking lot islands or at the end of a row of parking spaces and to allow
zero trees in the western landscape buffer where six trees are required. Staff
recommends approval of this request.

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75851) to develop
the subject site containing an existing 4,503 square-foot contractors office with an
additional 9,000 square-foot building for a proposed Building Maintenance Service and
Sales development on 1.21 acres located at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard.
Accompanying Waivers are required to allow a five-foot landscape buffer on a portion of
the south perimeter and a zero-foot landscape buffer on a portion of the north property
line where eight feet is required.

The subject site is located in the Centennial Hills Sector of the General Plan and has a
current land use designation of SC (Service Commercial) and zoning designation of C-1
(Limited Commercial), which requires approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP-75850) to
allow the proposed 1,834 square feet of Outdoor Storage area located on the south
perimeter of the site.
JB
Page 819 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

A Building Maintenance Services and Sales use is described in Tile 19.12 as: “A facility
or area for contracting services such as building repair and maintenance, the installation
of plumbing, electrical, air conditioning and heating equipment, janitorial services, and
exterminating services. The retail sale of supplies is permitted as an accessory use.”

Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:


*1. Accessory outdoor storage must meet all requirements of LVMC 19.08.040(E)(4)(e),
irrespective of whether or not for purposes of LVMC 19.08.040(E)(4)(e) a Variance from
its requirements is granted pursuant to that provision and LVMC 19.16.140.

The applicant has proposed an approximately 1,834 square-foot area dedicated to


outdoor storage, located in the rear yard area located on the south perimeter of the
existing 4,053 square-foot commercial building. The Outdoor Storage area is screened
from view from the public right-of-way and adjacent commercial property to the south by
an eight-foot tall solid CMU screening wall. The proposed outdoor storage area is also
not located within any required setback areas, landscaping buffer yards or other required
landscape areas, or parking spaces to meet minimum parking requirements.

The subject property has an existing eight-foot wall that runs the eastern and southern
perimeters of the property, adjacent to the outdoor storage area. The applicant has
proposed to add additional courses to the existing wall, to meet the required minimum
eight-foot tall wall around the outdoor storage area, so as to bring it into conformance with
all Title 19.08.040(E)(4)(e) requirements. All Title 19.08.040(E)(4)(e) outdoor storage
area screening requirements must be fulfilled prior to any area being utilized for outdoor
storage on the subject property. A condition of approval has been added to ensure
compliance with this requirement.

*2. Accessory outdoor storage shall be limited to no more than 10% of the total lot area.

The proposed 1,834 square-foot Outdoor Storage area is approximately 3.00% of the
total 52,707 square-foot lot, which is under the 10% maximum allowed.

The site is located within the Airport Overlay District as referenced by 19.10.080 with a
height restriction of 175 feet. The submitted building elevations indicate the structure will
be approximately 24 feet in height measured to the midpoint of the sloped roof eaves and
will comply with the requirements of the Overlay District and the C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district.

The site will provide 44 total parking spaces with two van-accessible ADA parking spaces,
which complies with Title 19.12 parking requirements for a 13,053 square-foot Building
Maintenance Service and Sales land use. In addition, the applicant has requested an
Exception to allow four trees, where 14 trees should be required within parking lot islands
or at the end of a row of parking spaces and to allow zero trees in the western landscape

JB
Page 820 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

buffer where six trees are required. Staff has determined that since the proposed
deviations will be located in the rear yard area of the site located behind a gate and are
adjacent to the existing mini-storage development adjacent to the west of the site; the
proposed deviations will have a minimal negative impact to the existing surrounding
commercial developments. The primary tree species being utilized are 24” box Chinese
Pistache and 24” box Acacia, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional
Plan Coalition Regional Plant List.

According to the submitted justification letter and floor plan, the proposed use meets the
definition outlined above. The proposed Building Maintenance Services and Sales use
adheres to all minimum special use permit requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. It has
been determined that the proposed Building Maintenance Services and Sales use can be
conducted in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding land uses, therefore, staff
is recommending approval, as the use is considered appropriate for the surrounding area.

FINDINGS (SUP-75850)
In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed Building Maintenance Service and Sales use can be conducted in a
harmonious and compatible manner with the adjacent commercial and residential
uses. Any proposed outside storage would be appropriately screened from view of
the Rainbow Boulevard right-of-way.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The site is of sufficient size to accommodate the proposed Building Maintenance


Service and Sales use, including items for storage and parking.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Access to the site will be provided by Rainbow Boulevard a 90-foot Major Collector
Street according to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which is sufficient in
size to carry the amount of traffic this proposed development will generate.

JB
Page 821 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed Building Maintenance Service and Sales use will not compromise
the public health, safety and general welfare. Activities on the site are subject to
licensing, permitting and inspection for the public’s protection.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Building Maintenance Service and Sales use will comply with the
requirement to screen all outside storage from view of adjacent properties and
streets.

FINDINGS (SDR-75851)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed storage building is aesthetically compatible with the buildings on the
adjacent commercial sites and is appropriately designed for the C-1 District, which
is intended to be located on the periphery of residential neighborhoods.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The proposed Building Maintenance Service and Sales development is consistent


with the General Plan. However, the proposed design does not comply with all Title
19 development standards. The applicant has requested a Waiver to allow a five-
foot landscape buffer on a portion of the south perimeter where eight feet is
required. Staff recommends approval of this request. Also, the applicant has
requested an exception to allow four trees where 14 trees should be required within
parking lot islands or at the end of a row of parking spaces. Staff has determined
the associated Waivers and Exception will have minimal negative impact to the
overall development.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

JB
Page 822 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Access to the site will be provided by Rainbow Boulevard, a 90-foot Major Collector
Street according to the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which is sufficient in
size to carry the amount of traffic this proposed development will generate.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building
elevations indicate the building façades will be comprised of beige pre-fabricated
metal. The primary tree species being utilized are 24” box Chinese Pistache and
24” box Acacia trees, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional Plan
Coalition Regional Plant List.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and
are compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable
for the surrounding commercial and residential uses and the desert environment.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed commercial development will be subject to inspections in order to


protect the public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved the Annexation (A-0013-98) of approximately 1.43
gross acres located at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard into the City of Las
01/11/99
Vegas. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
annexation became effective on 01/22/99.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0029-99) from R-E (Residence
Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 1.22 acres at 4485 North Rainbow
07/12/99
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
Resolution of Intent expired on 07/12/00.

JB
Page 823 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-1112) from R-E (Residence
12/18/02 Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 1.22 acres at 4485 North Rainbow
Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved Ordinance #5668, which amended the Official
02/04/04 Zoning Map to change the zoning on the subject site from R-E (Residence
Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial).
The City Council approved a Special Use Permit (SUP-5554) for a proposed
Auto Detail Facility at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a related Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
01/19/05
5553) for a proposed 2,220 square-foot Auto Detail Facility and waivers of
parking lot, perimeter and foundation landscaping standards on 1.21 acres
at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Major Amendment (SDR-19122) of a
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5553) for a
02/22/07 proposed two-story, 4,364 square-foot Auto Detail Facility at 4485 North
Rainbow Boulevard. Staff recommended approval. This approval expired
02/22/09.
The City Council approved an Extension of Time (EOT-19400) of a previously
approved Special Use Permit (SUP-5554) for a proposed Auto Detail Facility
03/07/07
at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. Staff recommended approval. The
approval expired 01/19/09.
The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a General
Plan Amendment (GPA-39489) from SC (Service Commercial) to GC
(General Commercial) on 1.21 acres at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a
Rezoning (ZON-34490) from C-1 (Limited Commercial) to C-2 (General
04/06/11 Commercial) on 1.21 acres at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a
Variance (VAR-39492) to allow a zero-foot rear yard setback where 20 feet
is required and a zero-foot side yard setback where 10 feet is required on
1.21 acres at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended denial.

JB
Page 824 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-39491) for the addition of a proposed 9,000
square-foot Rental Store (With Outside Storage) building to a site containing
an existing 4,011 square-foot Office, with a Waiver of Perimeter Landscape
Buffer standards to allow a seven-foot buffer along a portion of the south
property line where eight feet is required on 1.21 acres at 4485 North
Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
denial.
The City Council voted to Withdraw Without Prejudice a request for a Special
Use Permit (SUP-40564) for a Rental Store (With Outside Storage) at 4485
North Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-43004) for the addition of an existing 4,970 square-foot building to a
site containing an existing 4,011 square-foot office with waivers to allow a
two-foot landscape buffer along a portion of the north perimeter where eight
feet is required and to allow no building articulation or architectural features
where required at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The Planning Commission
01/18/12
and staff recommended approval of the request. The entitlement expired on
01/18/14.
The City Council approved a request for Special Use Permit (SUP-43005) for
Building Maintenance Service and Sales at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.
The entitlement expired on 01/18/14.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/09/15 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


c. 1978 The existing building was constructed on the subject site.
A business license (C25-00034) was issued for a contractor (Sequoia
12/12/03 Electric, LLC) at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The license was
marked inactive on 11/02/15.
A building permit (#04006226) was issued for city design block walls at
03/19/04 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. A final inspection was completed on
03/31/04.

JB
Page 825 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (P50-01891) was issued for professional services
07/17/08 (Ticket Lady) at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The license was
marked inactive on 09/12/14.
A business license (B20-00912) was issued for a business support
service (paralegal services) at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The
08/28/08
license was previously issued at another location in the city. The license
is still active.
A business license (C11-07585) was issued for an electrical contractor
09/18/08 at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The license had been previously
issued at another location in the city. The license is still active.
A Code Enforcement case (#74600) was processed for storing
02/17/09 equipment and vehicles on an unpaved lot at 4485 North Rainbow
Boulevard. The case was closed by Code Enforcement on 03/04/09.
A business license (C25-01740) was issued for a contractor (Sequoia
03/24/09 Electric, LLC) at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The license was
marked inactive on 08/07/14.
A building permit (#137098) was issued for an interior remodel tenant
improvement for certificate of occupancy at 4485 North Rainbow
Boulevard. A final inspection was completed on 04/22/11.
04/07/09
A building permit (#137104) was issued for non-structural demolition at
4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. A final inspection was completed on
04/16/10.
A Code Enforcement case (#77677) was processed for storing
commercial trucks and operating a business out of a temporary trailer
04/30/09
without proper zoning approvals at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The
case was closed by Code Enforcement on 03/05/10.
An application (E02-90960) for a business license for equipment rental
at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard was submitted for staff review. Staff
08/14/09
denied the application on 08/18/09. The application was closed out on
02/10/10 at the request of the applicant.
A building permit (#161965) was issued for city design block walls and
04/29/10 engineering to add courses to existing block walls at 4485 North
Rainbow Boulevard. A final inspection was completed on 06/28/10.
A building permit (#164257) was issued for a city design eight-foot tall
06/02/10 block wall on the north side of the site at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard.
A final inspection was completed on 06/28/10.
A business license (R50-00264) was issued for equipment rental
04/13/11 (Desert Seguro, LLC) at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The license
was marked inactive on 08/18/14.

JB
Page 826 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (M18-05258) was issued for management or
04/25/11 consulting service (Desert Seguro, LLC) at 4485 North Rainbow
Boulevard. The license was marked inactive on 03/16/15.
A Code Enforcement case (#101530) was processed for storing
05/05/11 equipment illegally at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The case remains
open.
A Code Enforcement case (#102037) was processed for storage
05/17/11 containers and equipment at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The case
remains open.
A business license (C25-04277) was issued for a contractor (Sequoia
08/23/12 Electric, LLC) at 4485 North Rainbow Boulevard. The license was
marked inactive on 02/27/14.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application conference was held with the applicant to discuss
Special Use Permit and Site Development Plan Review submittal
01/09/19
requirements for a Building Maintenance Service and Sales
development on the subject site.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
A routine field check was conducted by staff and found a well maintained
02/28/19 commercial site free from trash and debris with an existing eight-foot
wall on the perimeter of the site.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 1.21

JB
Page 827 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject Office, Other Than SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Property Listed Commercial) Commercial)
Single Family, LI/R (Light C-PB (Planned
North
Detached (vacant) Industry/Research) Business Park)
Animal Hospital
SC (Service C-1 (Limited
South (with no Outside
Commercial) Commercial)
Pens)
Single Family, M (Medium Density R-CL (Single Family
East
Detached Residential) Compact-Lot)
Mini-Storage SC (Service C-1 (Limited
West
Facility Commercial) Commercial)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 175 Feet Y
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08.070, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 184 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front 10 Feet 206 Feet Y
• Side (north) 10 Feet 25 Feet Y
• Side (south) 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
• Rear 20 Feet 20 Feet Y

JB
Page 828 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Eleven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance


Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 25 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 24 Feet Y
Screened,
Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or
Roof or Trellis Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Pursuant to Title 19.08.040, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• North 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 8 Trees 12 Trees Y
• South 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 8 Trees 13 Trees Y
• East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 6 Trees 10 Trees Y
• West 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 6 Trees 0 Trees N*
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 28 Trees 35 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
14 Trees 4 Trees N*
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North 8 Feet 0 Feet N*
• South 8 Feet 5 Feet N*
• East 15 Feet 21 Feet Y
• West 8 Feet 20 Feet Y
Not Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Indicated
* The applicant has request an Exception to allow four trees where 14 trees should be
required within parking lot islands or at the end of a row of parking spaces and to allow
zero trees in the western landscape buffer where six trees are required.
** The applicant has requested Waivers to allow a five-foot landscape buffer on a portion
of the south perimeter and a zero-foot landscape buffer on a portion of the north property
line where eight feet is required.

JB
Page 829 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Twelve
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Rainbow Secondary
Streets and 90 Y
Boulevard Collector
Highways

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Building
Maintenance
Service and
Sales
13,053 SF 1:300 44
(Existing –
4,503 SF)
(Proposed –
9,000 SF)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 44 44 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 42 2 42 2 Y

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow a five-foot
landscape buffer on
Approval
a portion of the south
An eight-foot landscaping
perimeter.
buffer is required along all
To allow a zero-foot
interior lot lines.
landscape buffer on
Approval
a portion of the north
perimeter.

JB
Page 830 of 1332
SUP-75850 and SDR-75851 [PRJ-75587]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow four trees,
where 14 trees
One Tree / Six Uncovered should be required
Spaces, plus one tree at the within parking lot Approval
end of each row of spaces. islands or at the end
of a row of parking
spaces
To allow zero trees in
the western
One 24” box tree every 30
landscape buffer Approval
linear feet
where six trees are
required.

JB
Page 831 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 832 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
Page 833 of 1332 x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
Page 834 of 1332 x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7⑾ਙผ̬ฌ
Ҝħ֭7Ḛ—‫ש‬ħ֭ผผ֭▷ฌ
ㅡㅡฎㄦ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬xฎฌ
Оผਙ₡—㌱֭₡7⇡ੂ̬ฌ
bਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ќ֭‫ש‬ʉਙผ7Ɔ֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭ฌ

Page 835 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

ⓈƆCḶㄦธㅡɱㅡ‫ں‬ธㄦ7ֱ7̶゜ㅡ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ
ㄦ ֱ ̶゜ㅡ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ
Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7⑾ਙผ̬ฌ
Ҝħ֭7Ḛ—‫ש‬ħ֭ผผ֭▷ฌ
ㅡㅡฎㄦ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬xฎฌ
Оผਙ₡—㌱֭₡7⇡ੂ̬ฌ
bਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ќ֭‫ש‬ʉਙผ7Ɔ֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭ฌ

Page 836 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

ⓈƆCḶㄦธㅡɱㅡ‫ں‬ธㄦ7ֱ7̶゜ㅡ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱฌ
ㄦ ֱ ̶゜ㅡ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 837 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
Page 838 of 1332 xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
CҜƆ7C●ЋDzŐƆ● ●DzC7ҜDzbĠAЌ●bAՁ7ƆḶՁⓈ╗●ḶЌƆⓒ7ՁՁb
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 ㅡㅡฎㄦ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7び7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7び7ฎɱ‫ں‬xฎ
777777777777777777777777777777777 Оγ㈠̬ՙxธ㈠ɱ̶ธ㈠ㅡxㅡ‫ں‬7び7#Ŵゥ̬7ՙxธ㈠ɱㅡ̶㈠‫ں‬ɱxฎ7び7DzこŴħк̬7●่⑾ਙ㌀₡こ⎯ֱк‫ﭨ‬㈠㌱ਙこ7び77ЌЋ7Ձħ㌱่֭⎯֭7 7xxՙ″ฎ‫̶ں‬ⓒ7 7xxՙ″ฎ‫̶ں‬A

ҜŴผ㌱γ7ㅡⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯
C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬
̶̶̶7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″

ŐDz̬7 Ҝħ‫֭—ف‬к7Ḛ—‫ש‬ħ֭ผผ֭▷゜CҜƆⓒ7ՁՁb
7 Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫̬ש‬77ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙฌ
7 Оผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7Ŵ‫̬ש‬
7 7 7
ㅡㅡฎㄦ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠
7 7 7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬xฎ

ОкŴ่่ħ่‫゜ف‬Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7C֭ऑ‫ש‬㈠̬

Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭7ʉħкк7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7ऑŴħ่‫ש‬7㌱ਙкਙผ⎯̬

7 Őਙਙ⑾7ֱ7Ҝਙ㌱γŴ7╗Ŵ่7ธธ77ӧҜŴ‫ש‬㌱γ֭⎯7ผਙਙ⑾7ਙ่7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬ỏ
7 Աਙ₡ੂ7ֱ7Ձħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7Ɔ‫ש‬ਙ่֭7″̶
7 ╗ผħこ7ֱ7ОਙкŴผ7Ûγħ‫֭ש‬7ฎx

╗γŴ่>7ੂਙ—㈠

Ҝħ‫֭—ف‬к7Ḛ—‫ש‬ħ֭ผผ֭▷
่⎯ⓒ ՁՁb
Cħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ⎯ħ⑾ħ֭₡7Ҝ֭㌱γŴ่ħ㌱Ŵк7Ɔਙк—‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯ⓒ7ՁՁb
ՙxธֱㅡɱㅡֱฎՙธㄦ

ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
7

Page 839 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 840 of 1332


Page 841 of 1332
"
 



 
#

# 

 
%

% +

&&
 
<
< #



Page 842 of 1332
"
 



 
#

# 

 
%

% +

&&
 
<
< #



Page 843 of 1332
"
 



 
#

# 

 
%

% +

&&
 
<
< #



Page 844 of 1332


"
 



 
#

# 

 
%

% +

&&
 
<
< #



CҜƆ7C●ЋDzŐƆ●●DzC7ҜDzbĠAЌ●bAՁ7ƆḶՁⓈ╗●ḶЌƆⓒ7ՁՁb
7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 ㅡㅡฎㄦ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7び7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7び7ฎɱ‫ں‬xฎ
777777777777777777777777777777777 Оγ㈠̬ՙxธ㈠ɱ̶ธ㈠ㅡxㅡ‫ں‬7び7#Ŵゥ̬7ՙxธ㈠ɱㅡ̶㈠‫ں‬ɱxฎ7び7DzこŴħк̬7●่⑾ਙ㌀₡こ⎯ֱк‫ﭨ‬㈠㌱ਙこ7び77ЌЋ7Ձħ㌱่֭⎯֭7 7xxՙ″ฎ‫̶ں‬ⓒ7 7xxՙ″ฎ‫̶ں‬A

֭⇡ผ—Ŵผੂ7ธ″ⓒ7ธx‫ں‬ɱ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯
C֭ऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬
̶̶̶7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผħ‫֭ﭨ‬
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″

ŐDz̬7 Ҝħ‫֭—ف‬к7Ḛ—‫ש‬ħ֭ผผ֭▷゜CҜƆⓒ7ՁՁb
7 İ—⎯‫ש‬ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7Ձ֭‫֭שש‬ผ
7 Оผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7Ŵ‫̬ש‬
7 7 7
ㅡㅡฎㄦ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠
7 7 7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵ7ฎɱ‫ں‬xฎ

ОкŴ่่ħ่‫゜ف‬Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7C֭ऑ‫ש‬㈠̬

Û֭7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ7Ɔऑ֭㌱ħŴк7Ⓢ⎯֭7О֭ผこħ‫ש‬7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ҜŴħ่‫่֭ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭7Ɔ֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭7Ŵ่₡7ƆŴк֭⎯7Ⓢ⎯֭ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7Ɔħ‫֭ש‬ฌ
C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7ОкŴ่7Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉ7⑾ਙผ7Ŵ7่֭ʉ7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7ɱⓒxxx7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผֱ֭⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ⓒ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ7ÛŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵккਙʉ7Ŵฌ
⑾ħ‫⑾ֱ֭ﭨ‬ਙਙ‫ש‬7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7⇡—⑾⑾֭ผ7ਙ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ਙ—‫ש‬γ7ऑ֭ผħこ֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ʉγ֭ผ֭7֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש֭֭⑾ֱש‬7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡㈠

A₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7㌱ਙ—ผ⎯֭⎯7ʉħкк7⇡֭7Ŵ₡₡֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ʉŴкк7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙこऑкੂ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫⑾ֱש‬ਙਙ‫ש‬7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡ⓒ7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡
Ḷ—‫ש‬₡ਙਙผ7Ɔ‫ש‬ਙผŴ‫֭ف‬7Ŵผ֭Ŵⓒ7Ŵ่₡7Ŵ7‫⑾ֱ่֭ש‬ਙਙ‫ש‬7⎯ħ₡֭7ੂŴผ₡7⎯֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱97ऑ֭ผ7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬㈠

╗γŴ่97ੂਙ—㈠

Ҝħ‫֭—ف‬к7Ḛ—‫ש‬ħ֭ผผ֭▷
Cħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ⎯ħ⑾ħ֭₡7Ҝ֭㌱γŴ่ħ㌱Ŵк7Ɔਙк—‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯ⓒ7ՁՁb
ՙxธֱㅡɱㅡֱฎՙธㄦ

7
ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
x̶゜xㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 8g 4eo 51f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 49

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75851 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-75850 -
APPLICANT/OWNER: MIGUEL GUTIERREZ - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR THE ADDITION OF A PROPOSED 9,000 SQUARE-FOOT
BUILDING TO A SITE CONTAINING AN EXISTING 4,011 SQUARE-FOOT OFFICE WITH
WAIVERS TO ALLOW A FIVE-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE SOUTH PERIMETER
WHERE EIGHT FEET IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED on 1.21 acres at 4485 North Rainbow
Boulevard (APN 138-03-602-013), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-
75587]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 846 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 847 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦㄦฎՙ
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 8g 4eo 81f 3 3 2
SDR 75851
Miguel Gutierrez

4485 N Rainbow Boulevard


Proposed 9 thousand square foot utility building.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10.22 92


AM Peak Hour SPECIALTY TRADE CONTRACTOR [1000 SF] 9 1.66 15
PM Peak Hour 1.97 18
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Existing Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.74 39


AM Peak Hour GENERAL OFFICE BUILDING [1000 SF] 4.053 1.16 5
PM Peak Hour 1.15 5
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Total Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10.22 131


AM Peak Hour SPECIALTY TRADE CONTRACTOR [1000 SF] 13.053 1.66 20
PM Peak Hour 1.97 23
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Rainbow Boulevard
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 8,337
PM Peak Hour 667
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Craig Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 29,353
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent street ADT
Capacity
Rainbow Boulevard 16,380
Craig Road 50,900

This project will add approximately 92 trips per day on Rainbow Blvd. and Craig Rd. Currently, Rainbow is at about 51
percent of capacity and Craig is at about 58 percent of capacity. With this project, these capacities are expected to be
Page 849 of 1332
unchanged.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 18 additional cars, or about one every three
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 850 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 50

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SUP-75861 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST -
OWNER: GRAND TETON LODGE LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 4,330 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE
ESTABLISHMENT USE at the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive (APN
125-09-401-031), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75685]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SUP-75861, SUP-75862 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
2. Special Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - SUP-75861, SUP-75862 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
4. Supporting Documentation - SUP-75861, SUP-75862 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
5. Photo(s) - SUP-75861, SUP-75862 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
6. Justification Letter - SUP-75861, SUP-75862 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]

Page 851 of 1332


Page 852 of 1332
Page 853 of 1332
Page 854 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST, INC. - OWNER: GRAND
TETON LODGE LAND, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-75861 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SUP-75862 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-75861
SDR-75863 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: SUP-75861
SUP-75862

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 36

NOTICES MAILED 1005 - SUP-75861 and SUP-75862


1005 - SDR-75863

PROTESTS 0 - SUP-75861 and SUP-75862


0 - SDR-75863

APPROVALS 0 - SUP-75861 and SUP-75862


0 - SDR-75863

JB
Page 855 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-75861 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a


Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use.

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-75862) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75863) shall be required.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

6. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor license.

7. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las Vegas
Municipal Code.

8. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SUP-75862 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Car Wash,
Full Service or Auto Detailing use.

JB
Page 856 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-75861) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75863) shall be required.

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

5. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

6. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

SDR-75863 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-75861) and Special Use Permit (SUP-75862) shall be required, if approved.

2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Variance (VAR-5694) and Site


Development Plan Review (SDR-5689).

3. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 02/20/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

5. An Exception from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow 12 interior parking


lot islands trees and end caps, where 17 are required.

JB
Page 857 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

6. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

7. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

8. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

9. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

10. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

11. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies, if any, on the sidewalk
along Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive adjacent to this site in accordance with
code requirements of Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed
by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site.

12. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent
with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend from the
sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway network
and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.

13. No trees or landscaping over 3-feet tall allowed in existing Public Sewer Easement
20060426:02839.

14. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

JB
Page 858 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Conditions Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

15. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the Grand
Teton Drive and Durango Drive public rights-of-way, if any, prior to this issuance of
permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for
the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally
insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall
remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense
pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and
maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way shall be the
responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the property and
assigns pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development Section of the
Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).

16. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed
by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.

17. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainage ways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

JB
Page 859 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Major Amendment to approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-5689) and two Special Use Permits to allow a Convenience Store with fuel pumps
and canopy with a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale and Car Wash, Full Service or Auto
Detailing use on a portion of 2.71 acres at the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and
Durango Drive.

ISSUES

• A Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited


Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff support
the request.
• A Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Staff support
the request.
• A Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
5689) is required for a proposed 4,330 square-foot general retail store [convenience
store] with fuel pumps and 1,080 square-foot Car Wash, Full Service, pursuant to the
Title 19.16.100.

ANALYSIS

The subject site is located at the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango
Drive within an existing commercial development, which is zoned C-1 (Limited
Commercial) and SC (Service Commercial) General Plan Designation. On April 6th, 2005
the City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5689) for a proposed
commercial development with a Liquor Establishment (Tavern) and three proposed
building pads oriented towards the southwest perimeter of the site.

Currently, the subject site is partially developed with an existing 6,375 square-foot Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) located on the southeast perimeter of the site. Also, pursuant to
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5689) all required streetscape
improvements have been installed adjacent to the subject site including an existing multi-
use equestrian trail (five-foot amenity zone and 10-foot detached sidewalk) on the west
perimeter of the site and a five-foot sidewalk on the south perimeter of the site.

JB
Page 860 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The applicant has proposed a Major Amendment to the previously approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-5689), which would remove the three previously
approved building pads oriented at the southwest perimeter of the site and replace them
with a 4,330 square-foot general retail store [convenience store] building with fuel pumps
and 1,080 square-foot Car Wash, Full Service use, which will operate as an accessory
use to the general retail store [convenience store]. The proposed structures has been
oriented toward the southwest corner of the subject site and complies with Title 19.08
building placement requirements. The structure will have a single stacking drive-through
lane on the south perimeter of the building and will accommodate up to six vehicles and
will be screened by an 18-foot wide landscape buffer, which complies with Title 19.12
development standards. In addition, the interior parking lot design has been reconfigured
from the previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-5689) to
accommodate the proposed convenience store on this portion of the site.

The submitted building elevations indicate the general retail store [convenience store]
structure will be approximately 22.66 feet in height measured to the building parapet wall
and fuel canopy will be 19.50 feet in height in conformance to the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district development standards. The submitted building elevations
indicate the building façades will be comprised of “Floating Feather”, “Wooded Acre” and
“Swiss Coffee” painted cement plaster, with “White Oak” stacked stone veneer accents
and a “Charcoal Brown Blend” concrete roof tiles.

A Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Per Title 19, the
Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing is defined as “An establishment that provides
for the washing, cleaning, waxing or detailing of passenger vehicles, either by means of
employees or by means of automated or semi-automated methods of cleaning, or by a
combination thereof.”

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

1. Each wash bay shall have a stacking lane that will accommodate at least six cars.

The proposed use meets this requirement as the proposed stacking lane will
accommodate six cars.

In addition, the applicant has requested a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use


which will operate in conjunction with the proposed general retail store [convenience
store]. A Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Per Title 19, the
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is defined as “An establishment whose
license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers to

JB
Page 861 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

consumers only and not for resale, in original sealed or corked containers, for
consumption off the premise where the same are sold, and is operated in connection with
a grocery store, drug store, convenience store or specialty merchandise store.” The
proposed use meets the definition as it is in connection with a convenience store.

The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:

*1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment


(hereinafter “establishment”) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house
of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or
City park.

The proposed use meets this requirement, as there are no protected land uses
within 400 feet of the subject property.

*2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to in


Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance between
two property lines, one being the property line of the proposed establishment which
is closest to the existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other
being the property line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed
establishment. The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to
intervening obstacles. For purposes of measurement, the term “property line” refers
to property lines of fee interest parcels and does not include the property line of:

a. Any leasehold parcel; or


b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1.

The proposed use meets this requirement, as there are no protected land uses
within 400 feet of the subject property.

*3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80


acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be
measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of
the structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to
intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest property
line of the existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold or
occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located, without regard
to intervening obstacles.

JB
Page 862 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

This requirement is not applicable, as the subject site is 2.71 acres.

4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which also
requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of its
recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement should
be waived and the reasons in support of the decision.

This requirement is not applicable, as there are no protected land uses within 400
feet of the subject site.

5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:


a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection
with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or in
connection with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after
July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail
floor space.

This requirement is not applicable, as the proposed use will not be operated within
a non-restricted gaming hotel with 200 rooms or a retail establishment with more
than 50,000 square feet of floor area.

*6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.

The proposed use will be subject to all business licensing requirements outlined in
LVMC Chapter 6.50 if approved.

7. The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are otherwise
nonwaivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be waived:
a. In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any
establishment which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the “Town Center
Development Standards Manual” for any establishment which is proposed
to be located within the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and which is
designated MS- TC (Main Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land Use
Plan;
c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000
square feet and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than 10
percent of the retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages; or

JB
Page 863 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square


feet of retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are
separated by a highway or a right of way with a width of at least 100 feet.

This requirement is met as there are no protected land uses within 400 feet of the
subject property.

8. No beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment shall be permitted on or adjacent to the


Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.

This requirement is not applicable, as the subject site is not located adjacent to an
existing Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.

The site will provide 114 total parking spaces with six accessible ADA parking spaces,
which complies with Title 19.12 parking requirements for a for the overall development.
In addition, the applicant has request an Exception to allow 12 trees within interior parking
lot area where 17 trees are required within parking lot islands or at the end of a row of
parking spaces. Staff has determined that the proposed deviations will have a minimal
negative impact to the existing commercial development. The primary tree species being
utilized are 24-inch box Velvet Mesquite and 24-inch box Mondell Pine, which are
consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional Plan Coalition Regional Plant List.

Staff has determined the proposed project is compatible with surrounding development
in the area. As this area is physically suitable for this use and the project meets the base
development standards of Title 19.08 and minimum special use permit requirements
outlined in Title 19.12 for the two Special Use Permits, staff recommends approval of this
request.

FINDINGS (SUP-75861)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed land use can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner
with the existing surrounding commercial and residential land uses.

JB
Page 864 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject commercial development is physically suitable for a Beer/Wine/Cooler


Off-Sale Establishment use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Primary access for the development will remain from Durango Drive, an 106-foot
wide Primary Arterial and Grand Teton Drive, an 120-foot wide Primary Arterial as
classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which have sufficient
capacity to serve the development.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed use will be subject to business license review and periodic inspection,
thereby safeguarding the public health, safety and general welfare.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use meets all applicable


conditions per Title 19.12.

FINDINGS (SUP-75862)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed land use can be conducted in a harmonious and compatible manner
with the existing surrounding commercial and residential land uses.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

JB
Page 865 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The subject commercial development is physically suitable for a Car Wash, Full
Service or Auto Detailing use.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Primary access for the development will remain from Durango Drive, an 106-foot
wide Primary Arterial and Grand Teton Drive, an 120-foot wide Primary Arterial as
classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, which have sufficient
capacity to serve the development.

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed use will be subject to business license review and periodic inspection,
thereby safeguarding the public health, safety and general welfare.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use meets all applicable
conditions per Title 19.12.

FINDINGS (SDR-75863)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

The proposed Convenience Store with fuel pumps and canopy with a
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale and Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing use
development is compatible with adjacent commercial development in the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

JB
Page 866 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The proposed Convenience Store with fuel pumps and canopy with a
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale and Car Wash, Full Service or Auto Detailing
development is consistent with the General Plan and complies with all Title 19
development standards, except for the proposed minor Exception of planting
materials to allow 12 interior parking lot islands trees and end caps, where 17 are
required.

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Primary access for the development will remain from Durango Drive, an 106-foot
wide Primary Arterial and Grand Teton Drive, an 120-foot wide Primary Arterial as
classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

The project design and style are appropriate for the subject location and will be
harmonious with buildings in the surrounding area. The submitted building
elevations indicate the building façades will have be comprised of with “Floating
Feather”, “Wooded Acre” and “Swiss Coffee” painted cement plaster, with “White
Oak” stacked stone veneer accents and a “Charcoal Brown Blend” concrete roof
tiles. The primary tree species being utilized are 24” box Velvet Mesquite and 24”
box Mondell Pine, which are consistent with the Southern Nevada Regional Plan
Coalition Regional Plant List.

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are not unsightly and
are compatible with development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable
for the surrounding commercial and residential uses and the desert environment.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

The proposed commercial development will be subject to inspections in order to


protect the public health, safety and general welfare by City staff.

JB
Page 867 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit and Plot
Plan Review (U-0011-00) to allow a proposed 6,670 square foot tavern
06/21/00 in conjunction with a restaurant on the northeast corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time [U-0011-
00(1)] of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0011-00) which allowed a
07/17/02 proposed tavern in conjunction with an approved restaurant (The Lodge)
adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango
Drive. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
2529) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0011-00) which allowed a
08/20/03 proposed tavern in conjunction with an approved restaurant (The Lodge)
adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango
Drive. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Review of Condition (ROC-
2671) number #6 of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0011-00) which
restricted commercial zoning to the western portion of APN: 125-09-
401-006 adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and
Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-3483) from PCD (Planned Community Development) to SC
(Service Commercial) adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand Teton
03/17/04
Drive and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-3509) from
U (Undeveloped) [PCD (Planned Community Development) General
Plan Designation] under resolution of intent to C-1 (Limited Commercial)
and U (Undeveloped) [PCD (Planned Community Development)
General Plan Designation] to C-1 (Limited Commercial) adjacent to the
northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission voted to table a request for a Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-3511) for a proposed 71,570 square
01/22/04
foot Office, Tavern and Mini-Storage development adjacent to the
northeast corner of Durango Drive and Grand Teton Drive.

JB
Page 868 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Ten
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The Planning Commission voted to table a request for a Special Use
Permit (SUP-3513) for a proposed Mini-Warehouse development
adjacent to the north side of Grand Teton Drive, approximately 1,270
feet east of Fort Apache Road.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
4433) of an approved Special Use Permit (U-0011-00) which allowed a
06/16/04 proposed tavern in conjunction with an approved restaurant (The Lodge)
adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango
Drive. Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-4374)
Rezoning from U (Undeveloped) [PCD (Planned Community
Development) General Plan Designation] to R-PD7 (Residential
Planned Development - 7 Units per Acre) adjacent to the north side of
Grand Teton Drive, approximately 495 feet east of the centerline of
Durango Drive. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
07/07/04
approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-4375) for a proposed 48-lot single-family residential
development adjacent to the north side of Grand Teton Drive,
approximately 495 feet east of the centerline of Durango Drive. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval of the request.
The Planning Commission voted to strike a request for Variance (VAR-
5693) to allow 132 parking spaces where 148 spaces are the minimum
02/10/05
required for a proposed commercial development adjacent to the
northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
(TMP-6005) for a 48-lot residential subdivision adjacent to the north side
03/10/05
of Grand Teton Drive, approximately 700 feet east of Durango Drive.
Staff recommended approval of the request.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-5689) for a 6,115 square-foot Tavern and a waiver of
trash enclosure separation adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand
Teton Drive and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission
recommended approval and staff recommended denial of the request.
04/06/05 The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-
5691) for a proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) and a waiver of the
1,500-foot distance separation requirement from an existing park
adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango
Drive. The Planning Commission recommended approval and staff
recommended denial of the request.

JB
Page 869 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Eleven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-5694) to allow
a 24-foot setback where residential adjacency standards require a
minimum of 73 feet adjacent to the northeast corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and staff recommended denial of the request.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Variance (VAR-
11033) to allow a setback of 24 feet where 99 feet is required for
02/09/06 residential adjacency standards adjacent to the northeast corner of
Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive. Staff recommended approval of
the request.
The City Council approved a request to withdraw without prejudice a
request a Special Use Permit (SUP-18347) for a proposed 800 square
foot Car Wash, Full Service on the northeast corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Durango Drive. The Planning Commission recommended
approval and staff recommended denial of the request.
The City Council approved a request to withdraw without prejudice a
request for a Major Amendment (SDR-18349) to an approved Site
Development Plan Review for a proposed 4,056 square-foot Service
Station without Automotive Repair, an 800 square foot Car Wash, Full
02/06/08 Service, and a 2,700 square foot Restaurant with Drive-Through on the
northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive. The Planning
Commission recommended approval and staff recommended denial of
the request.
The City Council approved a request to withdraw without prejudice a
request a Special Use Permit (SUP-18630) for a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-
Sale Establishment in a proposed service station without automotive
repair on the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive.
The Planning Commission recommended approval and staff
recommended denial of the request.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


10/27/99 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A Code Enforcement case (#25002) was processed for high weeds and
01/10/05 vegetation on property located the northeast corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Durango Drive. The case was resolved on 01/11/05.

JB
Page 870 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Twelve
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A business license (L16-00266) was issued for a Tavern (The Lodge at
08/22/05
Grand Teton) at 8350 Grand Teton Drive. The license is still active.
A business license (R09-01408) was issued for a Restaurant (The
Lodge at Grand Teton) at 8350 Grand Teton Drive. The license is still
active.
04/24/07
A business license (C05-02557) was issued for a Tobacco Dealer (The
Lodge at Grand Teton) at 8350 Grand Teton Drive. The license is still
active.
A business license (C08-01761) was issued for a Coin Amusement
07/10/07 Machine (The Lodge at Grand Teton) at 8350 Grand Teton Drive. The
license is still active.
A Code Enforcement case (#189321) was processed for high weeds
05/21/18 and vegetation in the median on property located on APN 125-09-401-
031. The case was resolved on 05/24/18.

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application conference was held with the applicant to discuss the
two Special Use Permits and Site Development Plan Review submittal
01/29/19
requirements for a Convenience Store with accessory fuel pumps and
car wash development on the subject site.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site inspection staff observed a well maintained
commercial development with an undeveloped building pad on the
02/28/19 southwest perimeter of the site. Trial improvements have been made on
the western perimeter of the site adjacent to Durango Drive and on the
northern perimeter of the site.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.71

JB
Page 871 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Thirteen
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Liquor
Subject Establishment SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Property (Tavern) Commercial) Commercial)
Undeveloped
PCD (Planned R-PD6 (Residential
Single Family,
North Community Planned Development –
Detached
Development) 6 Units per Acre)
PCD (Planned R-PD7 (Residential
Single Family,
South Community Planned Development –
Detached
Development) 7 Units per Acre)
PCD (Planned R-PD7 (Residential
Single Family,
East Community Planned Development –
Detached
Development) 7 Units per Acre)
PCD (Planned
C-1 (Limited
West Shopping Center Community
Commercial)
Development)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

JB
Page 872 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Fourteen
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Title 19.08.070, the following standards apply:


Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 267 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front (Durango Drive) 10 Feet 21 Feet Y
• Side 10 Feet 155 Feet Y
• Corner (Grand Teton Drive) 10 Feet 38 Feet Y
• Rear 20 Feet 310 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 13 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 22.66 Feet Y
Screened,
Gated, w/ a
Trash Enclosure Y
Screened, Gated, w/ a Roof or
Roof or Trellis Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Pursuant to Title 19.08.040, the following standards apply:


Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 14 Trees 14 Trees Y
• South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 11 Trees 11 Trees Y
• West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 11 Trees 11 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 36 Trees 36 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
17 Trees 12 Trees N*
Trees end of each row of
spaces
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North 8 Feet 10 Feet Y
• South 15 Feet 18 Feet Y
• West 10 Feet 11 Feet Y
Not Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential
Indicated
*The applicant has requested an Exception, to allow 12 interior parking landscaping
islands and end caps where 17 are required.

JB
Page 873 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Fifteen
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Durango Drive Primary Arterial Streets and 106 Y
Highways
Master Plan of
Grand Teton
Primary Arterial Streets and 120 Y
Drive
Highways

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
General Retail
(Convenience 4,330 SF 1:175 25
Store)
1:50 SF
of public
seating
6,375 SF and
(3,200 SF waiting
Liquor
public area,
Establishment
seating & plus 80
(Tavern) -
3,175 SF 1:200 SF
Existing
remaining of the
GFA) total
remainin
g gross
floor area
Car Wash,
Full Service
Or Auto
Detailing 1,082 SF N/A 0
(Accessory to
Convenience
Store)
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 105 114 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 100 5 108 6 Y
Loading
10,705 SF 2 2 Y
Spaces

JB
Page 874 of 1332
SUP-75861, SUP-75682 and SDR-75863 [PRJ-75685]
Staff Report Page Sixteen
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Exceptions
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow 12 trees
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
within interior parking
Spaces, plus 1 tree at the Approval
lot area where 17
end of each row of spaces
trees are required

JB
Page 875 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 876 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 877 of 1332


AƆƆDzƆƆḶŐƥƆ7ОAŐbDzՁ7ЌⓈҜԱDzŐ̬ฌ ‫ں‬ธㄦֱxɱֱㅡx‫ֱں‬x̶‫ں‬ฌ

ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ̬ฌ bֱ‫ں‬7ֱ7Ձ●Ҝ●╗DzC7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ

ОՁAЌЌDzC7ՁAЌC7ⓈƆDz̬ฌ Ɔb7ֱ7ƆDzŐЋ●bDz7bḶҜҜDzŐb●AՁฌ

Ɔ●╗Dz7AŐDzAƆ̬7777777777777777777777ЌDz╗ֱ7777777777777777777777 ‫ںں‬ՙⓒxx″7ӧธ㈠″ɱ7AbŐDzƆỏฌ

ƆDz╗ԱAbìƆ̬77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC7777777777ОŐḶЋ●CDzCฌ
+ŐḶЌ╗ֱ777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777‫ں‬xƥֱxफ7 ̶ฎƥ̶ֱफฌ
Ɔ●CDz7ӧbḶŐЌDzŐỏֱ77777777777777777777777777777777777777777 777777‫ں‬xƥֱxफ7 ธ‫ں‬ƥֱธफฌ
ŐDzAŐֱ7 ธxƥֱxफ7ӧㄦฎƥֱ″फ7╗Ḷ7ŐDzƆ㈠ỏ7 ″ՙƥֱɱफฌ

ОŐḶОḶƆDzC7ⓈƆDzƆ̬ฌ bḶЌЋDzЌ●DzЌbDz7Ɔ╗ḶŐDzฌ
Û゜7ḚAƆḶՁ●ЌDz7Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌฌ
ЋDzĠ●bՁDz7ÛAƆĠ7ӧAbbDzƆƆḶŐùỏฌ

ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7AŐDzAƆ̬7 bḶЌЋDzЌ●DzЌbDz7Ɔ╗ḶŐDzֱ7 ㅡⓒ̶̶xƆฌ


ḚAƆḶՁ●ЌDz7Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌ7bAЌḶОùֱ7 ̶ⓒɱɱxƆฌ
ЋDzĠ●bՁDz7ÛAƆĠֱ7 ‫ں‬ⓒxฎxƆฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ̬7 ɱⓒㅡxxƆฌ

ԱⓈ●ՁC●ЌḚ7ĠDz●ḚĠ╗Ɔ̬7 bḶЌЋDzЌ●DzЌbDz7Ɔ╗ḶŐDz7ֱ7 ̶xƥֱxफ7ҜAṲ㈠ฌ


‫ں‬ɱƥֱxफ7╗ùО㈠ฌ
ḚAƆḶՁ●ЌDz7Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌ7bAЌḶОù7ֱ7 ‫ں‬ɱƥֱ″फฌ
ЋDzĠ●bՁDz7ÛAƆĠ7ֱ7 ธธƥֱxफฌ

ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzҜDzЌ╗Ɔ̬7 ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7╗AЋDzŐЌⓒ7ОⓈԱՁ●b7ֱ7‫̬ں‬ㄦxƆ+7 ″ㅡฌ
DzṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7╗AЋDzŐЌⓒ7ԱḶĠ7ֱ7‫̬ں‬ธxxƆ+7 ‫ں‬″ฌ
bḶЌЋDzЌ●DzЌbDz7Ɔ╗ḶŐDz7ֱ7‫ں̬ں‬ՙㄦƆ+7 ธㄦฌ
+ⓈDzՁ7bAЌḶОùֱ7 xฌ
bAŐ7ÛAƆĠֱ7‫ں̬ں‬ㄦxƆ+7 ฎฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzC̬7 ‫̶ںں‬ฌ

╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzC̬7 ‫ںں‬ㅡฌ

AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzҜDzЌ╗Ɔ̬7 ŐDzỢⓈ●ŐDzCฌ
bḶЌЋDzЌ●DzЌbDz7Ɔ╗ḶŐDzֱ7 ธฌ

AbbDzƆƆ●ԱՁDz7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ОŐḶЋ●CDzCฌ
ธฌ

Page 878 of 1332


╗ŐⓈDzฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġฌ

ḶÛЌDzŐ̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7 ̬ฌ
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7ՁḶCḚDz7ՁAЌC7ՁՁbฌ
Dz╗ḶЌ ՁḶCḚDz ՁAЌC ՁՁb ‫ں‬ฎֱxㄦㄦฌ
ACCŐDzƆƆ̬ฌ
̬
CA╗Dz̬ฌ
ЌDzb7Û㈠7ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7CŐ㈠ฌ
ŐAЌC ╗Dz╗ḶЌ CŐ㈠
‫ں‬ɱ7DzԱ7‫ں‬ɱฌ
ִ7Ќ㈠7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ㈠ฌ
AЌḚḶ CŐ㈠
╗DzŐŐ●ԱՁDz7ĠDzŐԱƆ╗ฌ ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬ฌ
AƆⓒ ЌЋฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬ ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ AОЌ̬ฌ
İⓈŐ●ƆC●b╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
╗●ḶЌ̬ xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ ‫ں‬ธㄦֱxɱֱㅡx‫ֱں‬x̶‫ں‬ฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
AƆⓒ ЌDzЋACA
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7AЌC7CⓈŐAЌḚḶฌ
╗ŐDzDzƆ̬ฌ

ОŐḶƆḶО●Ɔ7ЋDzՁⓈЌ╗●ЌA゜ЋDzՁЋDz╗7ҜDzƆỢⓈ●╗Dz7 ธㅡफԱḶṲฌ ̶‫ں‬ฌ

ОĠḶDzЌ●Ṳ7bAЌAŐ●DzЌƆ●Ɔ゜bAЌAŐù7CA╗Dz7ОAՁҜ7 ธㅡफԱḶṲฌ ″ฌ

О●ЌⓈƆ7DzՁCAŐ●bA゜ҜḶЌCDzՁՁ7О●ЌDz7 ธㅡफԱḶṲ7 ‫̶ں‬ฌ

ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ̬ฌ

ՁDzⓈbḶОĠùՁՁⓈҜ7ОŐⓈ●ЌḶƆⓈҜ゜╗DzṲAƆ7ŐAЌḚDzŐ7ㄦ7ḚAՁ㈠777777 ‫ں̶ں‬ฌ
ƥƆ●DzŐŐA7ԱḶⓈỢⓈDz╗ƥฌ

CḶЌCḶЌADzA7Ћ●ƆbḶƆA゜ОⓈŐОՁDz7ĠḶОƆDzDzC7 ㄦ7ḚAՁ㈠777777 ‫̶ںں‬ฌ


ӧОՁAЌ╗DzC7●Ќ7ḚŐḶⓈО●ЌḚƆ7AƆ7A7ĠDzCḚDz7ƆbŐDzDzЌỏฌ

ՁAЌ╗AЌA7ƥЌDzÛ7ḚḶՁCƥ゜ƥЌDzÛ7ḚḶՁCƥ7ՁAЌ╗AЌA77‫ں‬7ḚAՁ㈠7 77‫̶ںں‬ฌ

ŐḶbì7ҜⓈՁbĠ̬ฌ
ḚḶՁC7C㈠Ḛ㈠7A╗7ธफ7CDzО╗Ġ7●Ќ7AՁՁ7ОՁAЌ╗●ЌḚ7 ̶゜ㅡफฌ
AŐDzAƆ7ⓈЌՁDzƆƆ7ЌḶ╗DzC7ḶЌ7ОՁAЌ7 ƆbŐDzDzЌDzCฌ

AՁՁ7╗ŐDzDzƆ゜ƆĠŐⓈԱƆ7╗Ḷ7ԱDz7ОՁAЌ╗DzC7●Ќ7AbbḶŐCAЌbDz7Û●╗Ġ7╗ĠDz7b●╗ùฌ
Ḷ+7ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆ7ⓈЌ●+●DzC7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7bḶCDz7╗●╗ՁDz7‫ں‬ɱ㈠7ՁAЌCƆbAОDzฌ
CDzƆ●ḚЌ7●Ɔ7bḶЌbDzО╗ⓈAՁ7ִ7+ḶŐ7ՁAЌCֱⓈƆDz7ОⓈŐОḶƆDzƆ7ḶЌՁùฌ
ƆĠḶÛ●ЌḚ7●Ќ╗DzЌ╗7╗Ḷ7ҜDzDz╗7CDzЋDzՁḶОҜDzЌ╗7bḶCDz7Ҝ●Ќ●ҜⓈҜƆ㈠ฌ

Page 879 of 1332


╗ŐⓈDzฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġฌ

ḶÛЌDzŐ̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7 ̬ฌ
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7ՁḶCḚDz7ՁAЌC7ՁՁbฌ
Dz╗ḶЌ ՁḶCḚDz ՁAЌC ՁՁb ‫ں‬ฎֱxㄦㄦฌ
ACCŐDzƆƆ̬ฌ
̬
CA╗Dz̬ฌ
ЌDzb7Û㈠7ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7CŐ㈠ฌ
ŐAЌC ╗Dz╗ḶЌ CŐ㈠
‫ں‬ɱ7DzԱ7‫ں‬ɱฌ
ִ7Ќ㈠7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ㈠ฌ
AЌḚḶ CŐ㈠
╗DzŐŐ●ԱՁDz7ĠDzŐԱƆ╗ฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬ฌ
AƆⓒ ЌЋฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬
AОЌ̬ฌ
İⓈŐ●ƆC●b╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
╗●ḶЌ̬ xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ ‫ں‬ธㄦֱxɱֱㅡx‫ֱں‬x̶‫ں‬ฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
AƆⓒ ЌDzЋACA
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7AЌC7CⓈŐAЌḚḶฌ
Page 880 of 1332
ḶÛЌDzŐ̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7 ̬ฌ
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7ՁḶCḚDz7ՁAЌC7ՁՁbฌ
Dz╗ḶЌ ՁḶCḚDz ՁAЌC ՁՁb ‫ں‬ฎֱxㄦㄦฌ
ACCŐDzƆƆ̬ฌ
̬
CA╗Dz̬ฌ
ЌDzb7Û㈠7ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7CŐ㈠ฌ
ŐAЌC ╗Dz╗ḶЌ CŐ㈠
‫ں‬ɱ7DzԱ7‫ں‬ɱฌ
ִ7Ќ㈠7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ㈠ฌ
AЌḚḶ CŐ㈠
╗DzŐŐ●ԱՁDz7ĠDzŐԱƆ╗ฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬ฌ
AƆⓒ ЌЋฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬
AОЌ̬ฌ
İⓈŐ●ƆC●b╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
╗●ḶЌ̬ xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ ‫ں‬ธㄦֱxɱֱㅡx‫ֱں‬x̶‫ں‬ฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
AƆⓒ ЌDzЋACA
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7AЌC7CⓈŐAЌḚḶฌ
Page 881 of 1332
ОŐḶİDzb╗ฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġฌ

ḶÛЌDzŐ̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7 ̬ฌ
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7ՁḶCḚDz7ՁAЌC7ՁՁbฌ
Dz╗ḶЌ ՁḶCḚDz ՁAЌC ՁՁb ‫ں‬ฎֱxㄦㄦฌ
ACCŐDzƆƆ̬ฌ
̬
CA╗Dz̬ฌ
ЌDzb7Û㈠7ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7CŐ㈠ฌ
ŐAЌC ╗Dz╗ḶЌ CŐ㈠
‫ں‬ɱ7DzԱ7‫ں‬ɱฌ
ִ7Ќ㈠7CⓈŐAЌḚḶ7CŐ㈠ฌ
AЌḚḶ CŐ㈠
╗DzŐŐ●ԱՁDz7ĠDzŐԱƆ╗ฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬ฌ
AƆⓒ ЌЋฎɱ‫ں̶ں‬
AОЌ̬ฌ
İⓈŐ●ƆC●b╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
╗●ḶЌ̬ xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ ‫ں‬ธㄦֱxɱֱㅡx‫ֱں‬x̶‫ں‬ฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌDzЋACAฌ
AƆⓒ ЌDzЋACA
ḚŐAЌC7╗Dz╗ḶЌ7AЌC7CⓈŐAЌḚḶฌ
Page 882 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 883 of 1332
'
 '



 
#

'>
#
# '!



 <
 <
?

 
% #

#%
#


 
 
=
% #

# 
#
# %
# 



Page 884 of 1332
'
 '



 
#

'>
#
# '!



 <
 <
?

 
% #

#%
#


 
 
=
% #

# 
#
# %
# 



Page 885 of 1332
'
 '



 
#

'>
#
# '!



 <
 <
?

 
% #

#%
#


 
 
=
% #

# 
#
# %
# 



Page 886 of 1332
'
 '



 
#

'>
#
# '!



 <
 <
?

 
% #

#%
#


 
 
=
% #

# 
#
# %
# 



Page 887 of 1332


'
 '



 
#

'>
#
# '!



 <
 <
?

 
% #

#%
#


 
 
=
% #

# 
#
# %
# 



ธ‫ں‬7C֭㌱֭こ⇡֭ผ7ธx‫ں‬ฎฌ

bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7C֭ऑ‫ש‬㈠7ਙ⑾7ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
̶̶̶7Ќ㈠7ŐŴ่㌱γਙ7Cผ㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬x″ฌ

ŐDz̬77╗֭ผผħ⇡к֭7Ġ֭ผ⇡⎯‫ש‬7ḚผŴ่₡7╗֭‫ש‬ਙ่7ִ7C—ผŴ่‫ف‬ਙ7ॅ7bֱƆ‫ש‬ਙผ֭ⓒ7.—֭к7Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ִ7Ћ֭γħ㌱к֭7ÛŴ⎯γ7
AОЌ̬7‫ں‬ธㄦֱxɱֱㅡx‫ֱں‬x̶‫ں‬ฌ
ŐÛA7İਙ⇡㈠7Ќਙ㈠7‫ں‬ฎֱxㄦㄦฌ

╗ਙ7Ûγਙこ7●‫ש‬7ҜŴੂ7bਙ่㌱֭ผ่̬ฌ

Ḷ่7 ⇡֭γŴк⑾7 ਙ⑾7 ਙ—ผ7 ㌱кħ่֭‫ש‬ⓒ7 ╗֭ผผħ⇡к֭7 Ġ֭ผ⇡⎯‫ש‬ⓒ7 ●่㌱㈠7 ħ่7 Ŵ⎯⎯ਙ㌱ħŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ʉħ‫ש‬γ7 ḚผŴ่₡7 ╗֭‫ש‬ਙ่7 Ձਙ₡‫֭ف‬7 ՁŴ่₡7 ՁՁbⓒ7 ʉ֭7 Ŵผ֭ฌ
⎯—⇡こħ‫שש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ‫ש‬γħ⎯7 Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ⑾ਙผ7 Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7 C֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ֭ʉⓒ7 Ⓢ⎯֭7 О֭ผこħ‫⎯ש‬7 Ŵ่₡7 Ŵ7 ÛŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7 ⑾ਙผ7 Ŵ7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡ฌ
㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7 ⎯‫ש‬ਙผ֭ⓒ7 ‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ਙкħ่֭7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ㌱Ŵ่ਙऑੂ7 ʉħ‫ש‬γ7 Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ਙผੂ7 ‫֭ﭨ‬γħ㌱к֭7 ʉŴ⎯γⓒ7 ⇡֭֭ผ7 ⎯Ŵк֭⎯ⓒ7 ʉħ่֭7 ⎯Ŵк֭⎯7 Ŵ่₡
‫ف‬Ŵこħ่‫ف‬㈠7 ╗γ֭7 ऑŴผ㌱֭к7 ħ⎯7 ㌱—ผผ่֭‫ש‬кੂ7 ▷ਙ่֭₡7 Ձħこħ‫֭ש‬₡7 bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7 ӧbֱ‫ں‬ỏ7 ʉħ‫ש‬γ7 Ŵ7 кŴ่₡ֱ—⎯֭7 ₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ਙ⑾7 Ɔ֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭ฌ
bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк㈠7 7 ╗γ֭7 ㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7 ⎯‫ש‬ਙผ֭7 Ŵ่₡7 ‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ਙкħ่֭7 ⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 Ŵผ֭7 ऑ֭ผこħ‫֭שש‬₡7 —⎯֭⎯7 ʉγħк֭7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ⑾—ккֱ⎯֭ผ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱֭7 ㌱Ŵผ
ʉŴ⎯γ7—⎯֭7Ŵ่₡7⇡֭֭ผ゜ʉħ่֭゜㌱ਙਙк֭ผ7ਙ⑾⑾ֱऑผ֭こħ⎯֭7⎯Ŵк֭⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭7⎯ऑ֭㌱ħŴк7—⎯֭7ऑ֭ผこħ‫⎯ש‬㈠

╗γ֭7 ₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7 ⑾ਙผ7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 ⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7 —‫ש‬ħкħ▷֭⎯7 Ŵ7 こħゥ7 ਙ⑾7 Ŵผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫—ש‬ผŴккੂ7 Ŵ֭⎯‫ש‬γ֭‫ש‬ħ㌱7 こŴ‫֭ש‬ผħŴк⎯ⓒ7 ħ่㌱к—₡ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
⎯‫—ש‬㌱㌱ਙⓒ7⎯‫ש‬ਙ่֭ⓒ7㌱ਙ่㌱ผ֭‫֭ש‬7‫ש‬ħк֭7Ŵ่₡7ʉਙ—к₡7⇡֭7ਙ⑾7ʉŴผこ7֭Ŵผ‫ש‬γֱ‫ש‬ਙ่֭₡7㌱ਙкਙผ⎯㈠77╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7Ŵผ֭7̶xɸֱx㈚
‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7γħ‫ف‬γ֭⎯‫ש‬7ผਙਙ⑾7֭к֭こ่֭‫ש‬ⓒ7ʉγħк֭7‫ש‬γ֭7こŴ㈾ਙผħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7Ŵผ֭7Ŵ‫ש‬7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ธ‫ں‬ɸֱx㈚7ਙผ7к֭⎯⎯㈠77╗γ֭7⑾—֭кฌ
㌱Ŵ่ਙऑੂⓒ7Ŵ‫ש‬7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ں‬ɱɸֱ″㈚ⓒ7ħ⎯7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7ਙ—‫⎯ש‬ħ₡֭7‫ש‬γ֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7̶̬‫ں‬7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱่֭㌱ੂ7⎯֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱8㈠ฌ

╗γ֭7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7 ʉਙ—к₡7 ㈾ਙħ่7 Ŵ่7 ֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ่ⓒ7 ऑผ֭‫ﭨ‬ħਙ—⎯кੂ7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑ֭₡7 ਙ่7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ֭Ŵ⎯‫֭ש‬ผ่7 ⎯ħ₡֭7 ਙ⑾7 ‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬㈠7 7 ╗γ֭7 ֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ่7 ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡7 ฎx7 ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7 ⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯㈠7 7 ╗γħ⎯7 ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7 ʉਙ—к₡7 ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭7 ̶̶7 Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7 ਙֱ่
⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7 ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7 ⎯ऑŴ㌱֭㈠7 7 ╗γħ⎯7 ⇡ผħ่‫⎯ف‬7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ⎯ħ‫ֱ֭ש‬ʉħ₡֭7 ऑŴผ8ħ่‫ف‬7 ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫ש‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ‫̶ںں‬7 ⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7 Ŵ่₡7 ‫̶ںں‬7 ⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7 Ŵผ֭ฌ
ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ऑкŴ่㈠ฌ

A7ÛŴħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7ħ⎯7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7ผ֭‫֭ש⎯֭—׀‬₡ⓒ7ħ่7Ŵ⎯⎯ਙ㌱ħŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯ⓒ7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵккਙʉ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7⎯‫ש‬ਙผ֭゜㌱Ŵผ
ʉŴ⎯γ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬ਙ7่ਙ‫ש‬7⇡֭7ਙผħ่֭‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙผ่֭ผⓒ7ऑ֭ผ7╗ħ‫ש‬к֭7‫ں‬ɱ㈠xฎ㈠xㅡx㈠77╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7—‫ש‬ħкħ▷֭⎯7⇡ਙ‫ש‬γฌ
֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7 ₡ผħ‫⎯֭ﭨ‬7 Ŵ่₡7 ⎯֭֭8⎯7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭7 ⑾ਙผ7 ⎯Ŵ⑾֭7 Ŵ่₡7 ㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭‫ש‬7 ਙֱ่⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7 ‫֭ﭨ‬γħ㌱к֭7 こਙ‫֭ﭨ‬こ่֭‫⎯ש‬7 ⑾ਙผ
֭こ֭ผ‫่֭ف‬㌱ੂ7 ŴऑऑŴผŴ‫⎯—ש‬ⓒ7 ㌱—⎯‫ש‬ਙこ֭ผ7 ‫֭ﭨ‬γħ㌱к֭⎯7 Ŵ่₡7 ⑾—֭к7 ‫ש‬ผ—㌱8⎯㈠7 7 ╗γ֭7 ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7 ₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬ⓒ7 ่ਙ‫ש‬7 ਙผħ่֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ‫ש‬ਙ7 ‫ש‬γ֭
㌱ਙผ่֭ผⓒ7 ⎯γਙ—к₡7 γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7 こħ่ħこŴк7 ħこऑŴ㌱‫ש‬7 ਙ่7 ‫ש‬γ֭7 ⎯—ผผਙ—่₡ħ่‫ف‬7 ₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7 Ŵ⎯7 ‫ש‬γ֭ผ֭7 ħ⎯7 Ŵк⎯ਙ7 Ŵ7 ⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7 ่ਙ‫ש‬
ਙผħ่֭‫֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙผ่֭ผ7Ŵ㌱ผਙ⎯⎯7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7ʉ֭⎯‫ש‬㈠

A⎯7Ŵ7ผ֭⎯—к‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ผਙ‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ਙผħ่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ŴʉŴੂ7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙผ่֭ผⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱Ŵผ7ʉŴ⎯γ7‫֭—֭—׀‬7кŴ่֭7ħ⎯7⇡֭‫ש‬ʉ่֭֭
‫ש‬γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑ—⇡кħ㌱7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ʉŴੂ㈠77╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7ऑкŴ่7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭⎯7⑾ਙผ7⎯㌱ผ่֭֭ħ่‫ف‬7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱Ŵผ
ʉŴ⎯γ7₡ผħ‫שֱ֭ﭨ‬γผ—7кŴ่֭7Ŵ่₡7‫่่֭—ש‬кⓒ7‫ש‬ਙ7こħ‫ש‬ħ‫ف‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯ħ⇡ħкħ‫ੂש‬7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑ—⇡кħ㌱7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ʉŴੂ㈠7

Ḛħ‫ש ่֭ﭨ‬γħ⎯7₡Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵⓒ7ʉ֭7ผ֭‫ש⎯֭—׀‬7ੂਙ—ผ7⎯—ऑऑਙผ‫ש‬7ਙ่7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬㈠77●⑾7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7ħ่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ħ⎯7่֭㌱֭⎯⎯Ŵผੂ7‫ש‬ਙ7ऑผ֭ऑŴผ֭ฌ
‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯7⑾ਙผ7ऑ—⇡кħ㌱7γ֭Ŵผħ่‫ف‬ⓒ7ऑк֭Ŵ⎯֭7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7こ֭7Ŵ‫ש‬7ੂਙ—ผ7֭Ŵผкħ֭⎯‫ש‬7㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭㈠ฌ

Ɔħ่㌱֭ผ֭кੂⓒฌ

bγผħ⎯7A㈠7Őħ㌱γŴผ₡⎯ਙ่ⓒ7ՁDzDzC7AОฌ
ОкŴ่่ħ่‫ف‬7Cħผ֭㌱‫ש‬ਙผⓒ7Őħ㌱γŴผ₡⎯ਙ่7Û֭‫֭▷ש‬к7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫⎯ש‬

ㅡ ̶ x x 7 Dz ㈠ 7 Ɔ — ่ ⎯ ֭ ‫ ש‬7 Ő ₡ ㈠ ⓒ 7 Ɔ — ħ‫ ֭ש‬7 Dz ̶ ⓒ 7 Ġ ֭ ่ ₡ ֭ ผ ⎯ ਙ ่ ⓒ 7 Ќ Ћ 7 ฎ ɱ x ‫ ں‬ㅡ 7 7 7 О γ ਙ ่ ֭ 7 ՙ x ธ ㈠ ՙ ̶ ″ ㈠ ฎ ฎ ธ ธ 7 7 7 . Ŵ ゥ 7 ՙ x ธ ㈠ ՙ ̶ ″ ㈠ ฎ ฎ ㄦ ㄦ

Ɔ ‫ ่ ֭ ﭨ ֭ש‬7 A ㈠ 7 Ő ħ㌱ γ Ŵ ผ₡ ⎯ ਙ ่ 7 A ●A ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ҝ ħ㌱ γ Ŵ ֭ к 7 Dz ㈠ 7 Û ֭ ‫ ֭ ▷ש‬к 7 A ●7A

P a 8g 8eo 81f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 51

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SUP-75862 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO SUP-75861 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST - OWNER: GRAND TETON LODGE LAND, LLC - For possible
action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED CAR WASH, FULL SERVICE
OR AUTO DETAILING USE at the northeast corner of Grand Teton Drive and Durango Drive
(APN 125-09-401-031), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75685]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation

Page 889 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 890 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 8g 9eo 11f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 8g 9eo 21f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 52

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75863 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO SUP-75861 AND SUP-75862
- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TERRIBLE HERBST - OWNER: GRAND TETON LODGE
LAND, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 4,330 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE [CONVENIENCE STORE] WITH
FUEL PUMPS AND 1,082 SQUARE-FOOT CAR WASH, FULL SERVICE WITH A WAIVER TO
ALLOW BUILDINGS TO NOT BE ORIENTED TO THE CORNER AND STREET FRONTAGES
WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on a portion of 2.71 acres at the northeast corner of Grand Teton
Drive and Durango Drive (APN 125-09-401-031), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore)
[PRJ-75685]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Supporting Documentation
3. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 893 of 1332


Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.

Page 894 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 8g 9eo 51f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ฎㄦ
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 8g 9eo 61f 3 3 2
SDR 75863
Terrible Herbst, Inc.

NEC Grand Teton Drive & Durango Drive


Proposed 5.41 thousand square foot convenience store with gas sales.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 837.58 4,531


SUPER CONVENIENCE MARKET/GAS STATION
AM Peak Hour 5.41 83.14 450
[1000 SF]
PM Peak Hour 69.28 375
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Existing Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 112.18 715


AM Peak Hour HIGH-TURNOVER (SIT-DWN) RESTRNT [1000 SF] 6.375 9.94 63
PM Peak Hour 9.77 62
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Total Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 10.22 5,246


AM Peak Hour SPECIALTY TRADE CONTRACTOR [1000 SF] 11.785 1.66 513
PM Peak Hour 1.97 437
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Grand Teton Drive


Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 7,829
PM Peak Hour 626
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Durango Drive
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 18,247
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:


Adjacent street ADT
Capacity
Grand Teton Drive 35,490
Durango Drive 35,490

This project will add approximately 4,531 trips per day on Grand Teton Dr. and Durango Dr. Currently, Grand Teton is at
about 22 percent of capacity and Durango is at about 51 percent of capacity. With this project, Grand Teton is expected to
Page 897 of 1332
be at about 35 percent of capacity and Durango to be at about 64 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 450 additional cars, or about fifteen every two
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 898 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 53

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SUP-75838 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMMEL V.
FAJARDO AND LORENA DE LIOS FAJARDO - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A COMMUNITY RESIDENCE USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 455-FOOT
DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A SIMILAR USE WHERE 660 FEET IS REQUIRED at 125
Antelope Way (APN 138-34-514-001), Ward 1 (Tarkanian) [PRJ-75806]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter

Page 899 of 1332


Page 900 of 1332
Page 901 of 1332
Page 902 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: ROMMEL V. FAJARDO AND LORENA
DE LIOS FAJARDO

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-75838 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 21

NOTICES MAILED 385

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

CC
Page 903 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

SUP-75838 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a


Community Residence use.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

4. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.

5. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

CC
Page 904 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This is a request for a Special Use Permit for a Community Residence use to be located
at 125 Antelope Way.

ISSUES

• A Community Residence is a conditional land use in the R-1 (Single Family


Residential) zoning district.
• Conditional Use Regulation Number One (1) for a Community Residence use states,
“a Community Residence may not be located closer than 660 feet to any other
Community Residence.” The proposed site is approximately 455 feet away from
another Community Residence; therefore, a Special Use Permit is required. Staff
recommends denial of the request.

ANALYSIS

The applicant has proposed a Community Residence use at 125 Antelope Way, which is
a 3,000 square-foot single family residence zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential).
Located within an established residential neighborhood, the subject residence is a six
bedroom, three-bath, single-story, detached residential home.

A Community Residence is a Conditional use in the R-1 (Single Family Residential)


zoning district. Conditional Use Regulation number one (1) requires: “a Community
Residence may not be located closer than 660 feet to any other Community Residence
(measured from property line to property line).” The subject site is approximately 455 feet
northwest from an existing Community Residence located at 6924 Acoma Court;
therefore, staff is recommending denial of this request.

Title 19.12 defines the Community Residence use as “A residential family-like living
arrangement for 5 to 10 unrelated individuals with disabilities who are in need of the
mutual support furnished by other residents, as well as the support services, if any,
provided by the operator of the Community Residence. Residents may be self-governing
or supervised by a sponsoring entity or its staff which furnishes habilitative or rehabilitative
services related to the needs of the residents. Interrelationships among residents are an
essential component of a Community Residence. A Community Residence shall be

CC
Page 905 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

considered a residential use of property for purposes of all zoning and building codes.
However, the Fire Marshal, pursuant to and consistent with the City’s Fire Code, may
require enhanced fire protection, including the installation of fire sprinklers and other
mitigating measures, where one or more residents has a lessened ability to ambulate
adequately. The use includes a Family Community Residence and a Transitional
Community Residence, but does not include any of the following:

1. Senior Citizen Apartment;


2. Individual Care Center;
3. Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home;
4. Facility for Transitional Living for Released Offenders;
5. Facility to Provide Testing, Treatment, or Counseling for Drug and Alcohol Abuse;
6. Hospice;
7. Sex Offender Counseling Facility;
8. Boarding House or Rooming House;
9. Any other group living arrangement for unrelated individuals who are not disabled; or
10. Any of the following, as defined by NRS Chapter 449:
a. Facilities for the Treatment of Drug and Alcohol Abuse;
b. Modified Medical Detoxification Facilities;
c. Transitional Living Facilities for Released Offenders;
d. Facility for the Treatment of Narcotics; or
e. Community Triage Center.”

The Conditional Use Regulations for this use include:

1. Except as otherwise provided in Regulations 2 and 3, a Community Residence may


not be located closer than 660 feet to any other Community Residence (measured
from property line to property line).

The proposed use does not meet this regulation as there is an existing Community
Residence approximately 455 feet southeast located at 6924 Acoma Court when
measured parcel line to parcel line.

2. Where there is a street, freeway or drainage channel at least 100 feet wide between
the proposed Community Residence and an existing Community Residence, the
minimum separation requirement is reduced to 100 feet from property line to property
line.

There are no streets, freeways or drainage channels at least 100 feet wide between
the proposed Community Residence and an existing Community Residence;
therefore, this regulation is not applicable.

CC
Page 906 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. When the population of proposed Community Residence is of such a nature that its
location must be kept confidential for it to function successfully, such as a Community
Residence for victims of domestic abuse, the minimum separation requirements set
forth in Regulations 1 and 2 above shall not apply.

This regulation is not applicable as the proposed use is not a residence for victims of
domestic abuse.

4. A maximum of 2 persons who function as facility operator or support staff may reside
in a Community Residence without being counted toward the 10-resident limit
established for that use. Resident operator/support staff in excess of 2 shall be
counter toward the 10-person limit.

The applicant has proposed one to two staff members onsite for the anticipated ten
residents.

5. A Community Residence shall comply with all public health and safety requirements
including all Building and Fire Code requirements for the dwelling type in question.

This is a Condition of Approval, and will be enforced as such.

6. In Federal or State law or regulations require the proposed Community Residence to


be licensed or certified, then the applicant must obtain that required license or
certification before commencing operation of the Community Residence.

This is a Condition of Approval, and will be enforced as such.

7. When located in an O, C-1 or C-2 Zoning District, a Community Residence may not
be established unless it is part of a mixed use development.

This Condition of Approval is not applicable as the subject site is zoned R-1 (Single
Family Residential).

8. The operator of the Transitional Community Residence:

a. Must require residents to be actively and continuously enrolled in an offsite


support program, including without limitation Alcoholics Anonymous or an
equivalent program, or
b. Must prohibit the use of alcohol and illegal drugs by residents; and
c. Upon request and with reasonable notice, must produce evidence satisfactory to
the Director or the Code Enforcement Manager residents are in compliance with
this Regulation.
This Conditional Use Regulation does not apply at this time as the applicant has
proposed this facility for an elderly clientele.

CC
Page 907 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

9. Occupancy within a Community Residence shall not be made available to any


individual whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health and safety of
individuals or would result in substantial physical damage to the property of others.
The fact that a person is sentenced or referred to a Transitional Community
Residence by a judge does not, without other evidence of a person’s actual danger
to other persons or property, establish that the person is a direct threat to the health
and safety of others.

This is a Condition of Approval, and will be enforced as such.

10. The Community Residence must be consistent with the scale and architectural
character of the neighborhood.

The proposed Community Residence will be carried out from an existing single family
detached dwelling. No alterations or additions are proposed; as such, the use will
retain its residential character and is in keeping with the surrounding residential area.

11. The Special Use Permit provisions of LVMC 19.12.040(B) shall not apply to
Regulations 5 through 10 above.

The Special Use Permit application was triggered by Regulation 1 which requires a
distance separation of 660 feet between Community Residence uses.

12. In case of a Special Use Permit application that is filed as a consequence of not
qualifying for conditional use treatment under Regulations 1 and 2 above, the
application must be approved unless the Planning Commission or City Council
determines that one or more of the following conditions would occur:

a. The building to be occupied as a Community Residence would be established or


modified in a manner that would make it inconsistent with the scale and
architectural character of the neighborhood.

The applicant has proposed no alterations to the exterior of the existing single
family residence, and will remain consistent with the scale and architectural
character of the neighborhood.

b. The proposed Community Residence, together with existing Community


Residences, would alter the residential character of the neighborhood by creating
an institutional atmosphere due to the concentration of the Community
Residences on a block or adjoining blocks; or

CC
Page 908 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

The proposed Community Residence has a 455-foot distance separation from a


similar use and could potentially create an institutional atmosphere due to the
concentration of Community Residences in the immediate area.

c. The application or Community Residence does not or would not comply with
Regulations 5 through 10 above.

The proposed Community Residence does not meet Regulation 10; therefore,
staff is recommending denial.

FINDINGS (SUP-75838)

In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.

The proposed land use is a family-like living arrangement proposed for an existing
single-family residence located within an established residential neighborhood. The
proposed land use cannot be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with the existing surrounding neighborhood due to the requested
distance separation Waiver.

2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.

The subject site contains a 3,000 square-foot single family residence located with
an existing residential neighborhood. The proposed land use is a family-like living
arrangement for five to ten unrelated elderly individuals, as well as the support
services provided by the operator of the Community Residence. The subject site is
physically suited for the proposed Community Residence.

3. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be


adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.

Antelope Way is an 80-foot wide collector road adequate in size to meet the
requirements of the proposed Community Residence which is a residential family-
like living arrangement.

CC
Page 909 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.

The proposed Community Residence use will be subject to regular City and County
inspections for licensing and will therefore not compromise the public health, safety,
or general welfare or any objective of the General Plan.

5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.

The proposed Community Residence does not meet Condition Number One (1) of
Title 19.12. The subject site is located approximately 455 feet away from another
Community Residence. Since the subject site is not able to meet this condition, a
Special Use Permit is required. Staff does not support this request for a Special Use
Permit as the nearest existing Community Residence (6924 Acoma Court) is 455
feet from the proposed Community Residence; approval would result in a
concentration of Community Residences, potentially creating an institutionalized
atmosphere.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.


The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for Rezoning (Z-
0028-67) from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family
Residence) on property generally located on the south side of the Las
12/20/67
Vegas Expressway (West Fremont) [now U.S. 95 Freeway], between
Rainbow Boulevard and Buffalo Drive. The Planning Commission and
staff recommended approval.
Code Enforcement processed a case (#190885) regarding a complaint
07/02/18 that major work was being done to a kitchen without permits at 125
Antelope Way. The case was resolved on 07/30/18.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


11/28/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

CC
Page 910 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


A building permit (#4186) was issued for a 1,938 square-foot single
09/25/75 family residence at 125 Antelope Way. A final inspection was completed
12/16/75.
A building permit (#3852) was issued for a 100 square-foot patio screen
05/27/76 room addition at 125 Antelope Way. A final inspection was completed
08/11/76.
A building permit (#5344) was issued for a 392 square-foot room
04/12/78 addition at 125 Antelope Way. A final inspection was completed
01/23/80. (2332 SF total)
A building permit (#1214) was issued for a patio cover at 125 Antelope
03/24/80
Way. A final inspection was completed 05/15/80.
A building permit (#2074) was issued for a garage extension and
09/17/87 enclosure at 125 Antelope Way. A final inspection was completed
01/12/88.
A building permit (R18-09112) was issued for residential drywall
07/16/18 replacement at 125 Antelope Way. A final inspection was completed
07/19/18.

Pre-Application Meeting
A Pre-Application Meeting was conducted where the submittal
02/14/19 requirements for a Special Use Permit were discussed with the
applicant.

Neighborhood Meeting
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.

Field Check
During a routine site inspection, staff observed a well maintained single
03/04/19
family residence. Nothing of concern was noted during the field check.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 0.19

CC
Page 911 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
Property Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
North
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
South
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
East
Detached Residential) Residential)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
West
Detached Residential) Residential)

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets and
Antelope Way Major Collector 80 Y
Highways Map

CC
Page 912 of 1332
SUP-75838 [PRJ-75806]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
2 Spaces
Community per
1 2
Residence Dwelling
unit.
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 2 2 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 2 N/A 2 Y

CC
Page 913 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 914 of 1332


ՙ″ƥֱธ फฌ

ผ֭⎯ħ ₡่֭‫ש‬ħ Ŵк7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭7 ผ֭⎯ħ ₡่֭‫ש‬ħ Ŵк7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂ ש‬7кħ ่֭ 7 ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂ ש‬7кħ ่֭ 7 ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ ่֭ ฌ

⎯7ħ 7₡7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7к7ฌ
кਙ‫ש‬7Ŵผ֭Ŵ̬ฌ

‫ںں‬ƥֱฎफ ฌ

㌱7ਙ7ऑ7ऑ7֭7ผ777к7Ŵ7่7‫ש‬7֭7ผ7่777Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬7֭7่7—7֭ ฌ
ฎⓒ ธ ՙ″7⎯‫׀‬㈠⑾‫ש‬㈠ฌ

ธ ㄦƥֱ″फฌ

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂ ש‬7кħ ่֭ ฌ
่ฌ
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ ่֭ ฌ

⎯7ħ 7₡7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7к7ฌ
ผ֭⎯ħ ₡่֭‫ש‬ħ Ŵк7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ

ɱƥฌ

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂ ש‬7кħ ่֭ฌ


֭ゥ‫ש‬ħ ⎯‫ש‬ħ ่‫ف‬ฌ
⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ฌ
̶ⓒ xxx7⎯‫׀‬㈠⑾‫ש‬㈠ฌ
ผਙਙ⑾7кħ ่֭ฌ

‫ں‬ɱƥฌ

⎯7ħ 7₡7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7к7ฌ
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂ ש‬7кħ ่֭ฌ

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂ ש‬7кħ ่֭ฌ


ผਙਙ⑾7кħ ่֭ ฌ

㌱7ਙ7ऑ7ऑ7֭7ผ777к7Ŵ7่7‫ש‬7֭7ผ7่777Ŵ7‫ﭨ‬7֭7่7—7֭ฌ
ผਙਙ⑾7кħ ่֭ ฌ

㌱7Ŵ7ผ7 ㌱7Ŵ7ผ7 ㌱7Ŵ7ผฌ

㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭₡7ऑŴผħ ่‫ف‬7Ŵผ֭Ŵ ฌ
ผ֭⎯ħ ₡่֭‫ש‬ħ Ŵк7⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫—ש‬ผ֭ ฌ

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ ่֭ ฌ

⎯7ħ 7₡7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7к7ฌ
㌱7Ŵ7ผ7 ㌱7Ŵ7ผ7 ㌱7Ŵ7ผฌ
ผਙਙ⑾7кħ ่֭ ฌ
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂ ש‬7кħ ่֭ ฌ

xƥฌ
ธx

7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7ੂ
Ŵ ੂ
₡7ผ7ħ 7‫ ﭨ‬7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7ੂฌ

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬
ऑผਙ
ਙ ऑ֭ผ‫ש‬
‫ੂ ש‬7кħ
ੂ кħ ่֭
֭ฌ
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ ่֭ ฌ
⎯7ħħ 7₡7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7к7ฌ
⎯ ₡֭ ʉ Ŵ к

ผŴこऑ7—ऑฌ
ऑ —ऑ
̶ㄦƥֱธ फ 7
㌱7Ŵ7ผ
㌱ Ŵ ผ ㌱
㌱7Ŵ7ผฌ
Ŵ

ऑ Ŵ ผ  ħ 7่7‫ف‬77Ŵ7ผ7֭7Ŵ
ऑ7Ŵ7ผ77ħ ่‫ ف‬Ŵ ผ֭ ฌ
Ŵ7่7‫ש‬7֭7к7ਙ7ऑ7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7ੂ7
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″ Ŵ7่7‫ש‬7֭7к7ਙ7ऑ7֭777ʉ7Ŵ7ੂฌ

xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
⎯ħ ‫֭ש‬7ऑкŴ่ฌ
⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬7֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ
֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ ਙ่7
ਙ่ ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫̬ੂש‬7‫ں‬ธ
кŴ⎯
ㄦ7Ŵ่‫֭ש‬кਙऑ֭7ʉŴੂⓒฌ
‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ 7่‫ﭨ‬7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡㄦฌ
кŴ⎯7‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ
ਙʉ่֭ผ⎯̬
ਙʉ่֭ผ⎯̬7ผਙここ֭к7⑾Ŵ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙ ฌ
777777777777ผਙ‫ ﭨ‬ħ ผħ ㌱7⑾Ŵ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙฌ

Page 915 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 916 of 1332


ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫̬ੂש‬7‫ں‬ธㄦ7Ŵ่‫֭ש‬кਙऑ֭7ʉ Ŵੂฌ

‫ں‬ธㄦ7Ŵ่‫֭ש‬кਙऑ֭7ʉŴੂ
‫ں‬ธㄦ Ŵ่‫֭ש‬кਙऑ

่ਙผ‫ש‬γ

ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

⎯ħ ‫֭ש‬7ऑкŴ่7゜7‫ﭨ‬ħ ㌱ħ ่ħ ‫ੂש‬7こŴऑ7ӧ⇡ħ
こŴऑ ӧ⇡ħ ผ₡ƥ⎯7֭ੂ֭7‫ﭨ‬ħ
ผ₡ƥ⎯ ֭ੂ֭ ‫ﭨ‬ħ ֭ʉ ỏ
Page 917 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 918 of 1332


ㄦxƥֱธ फฌ
ㅡƥฌ

㌱֭ħ кħ ่‫ف‬7кħ ่֭ฌ

‫ں‬ธ ƥฌ
‫ں‬xƥฌ
ฎƥฌ

ฎƥฌ
̶ƥฌ
⑾ħ ่ħ ⎯γ7⑾кਙਙผ7кħ ่֭ฌ

⑾ผਙ่‫ש‬7֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ ਙ่ฌ
่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯㌱Ŵк֭ฌ

ㄦxƥֱธ फฌ

ธ ″ƥֱɱफ ฌ
ธ̶ƥֱㄦफฌ

㌱֭ħ кħ ่‫ف‬7кħ ่֭ฌ


‫ں‬ธ ƥฌ

‫ں‬ธ ƥฌ
‫ں‬xƥฌ

㌱γħ こ่֭ੂฌ

ฎƥ7
̶ƥฌ

̶ƥฌ

⑾ħ ่ħ ⎯γ7⑾кਙਙผ7кħ ่֭ฌ

ผ֭Ŵผ7֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ
ผ֭Ŵผ ֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ ਙ่ฌ

่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯㌱Ŵк֭ฌ
ਙ‫ש ש‬ਙ ⎯㌱Ŵк֭

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫̬ੂש‬7‫ں‬ธ ㄦ7Ŵ่‫֭ש‬кਙऑ֭7ʉ
‫֭ ש‬кਙऑ֭ ʉ Ŵੂⓒฌ
Ŵੂⓒ
кŴ⎯7‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7่‫ﭨ‬7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡㄦฌ ㅡㄦ
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
⑾Ŵ ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙ
ਙʉ่֭ผ⎯̬7ผਙここ֭к7⑾Ŵ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙฌ
⑾Ŵ ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙ
777777777777ผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ ผħ ㌱7⑾Ŵ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙฌ
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 919 of 1332


ՙ‫ں‬ƥֱ″फฌ
ㅡƥฌ

㌱֭ħкħ่‫ ف‬7кħ่֭ฌ

‫̶ں‬ƥֱ″फฌ
‫ں‬ธƥฌ

‫ں‬xƥฌ
ฎƥฌ

̶ƥฌ

̶ƥฌ
⑾ħ่ħ⎯γ7⑾кਙਙผ7кħ่֭ฌ

ผħ‫ف‬γ‫⎯ֱש‬ħ₡֭77֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯㌱Ŵк֭ฌ

ՙ‫ں‬ƥֱ″फฌ

㌱֭ħкħ่‫ف‬7кħ่֭ฌ
‫̶ں‬ƥֱ″फ7

‫ں‬ธƥฌ
㌱γħこ่֭ੂฌ
‫ں‬ธƥ7
‫ں‬xƥฌ

‫ں‬xƥฌ
ฎƥ7

̶ƥฌ

⑾ħ่ħ⎯γ7⑾кਙਙผ7кħ่֭ฌ

к֭⑾‫⎯ֱש‬ħ₡֭7֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่
к֭⑾‫ש‬ ⎯ħ₡֭ ֭к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ ฌ
่ਙ‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7⎯㌱Ŵк֭ฌ
ਙ‫ש ש‬ਙ ⎯㌱Ŵк֭

ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫̬ੂש‬7‫ں‬ธㄦ7Ŵ่‫֭ש‬кਙऑ֭7ʉŴੂⓒฌ
кŴ⎯7‫ف֭ﭨ‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7่‫ﭨ‬7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡㄦฌ
ਙʉ่֭ผ⎯̬7ผਙここ֭к7⑾Ŵ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙฌ
777777777777ผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħผħ㌱7⑾Ŵ㈾Ŵผ₡ਙฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 920 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 921 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 922 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 923 of 1332


Page 924 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 925 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 926 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 927 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 928 of 1332
!
 "'



 

 

?
=  #
#
 
#


=  #

>

^



Page 929 of 1332
!
 "'



 

 

?
=  #
#
 
#


=  #

>

^



Page 930 of 1332


!
 "'



 

 

?
=  #
#
 
#


=  #

>

^



ОŐİֱՙㄦฎx″
xธ゜ธㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 9g 3eo 11f 3 3 2
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 54

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
VAC-75859 - VACATION - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: BP HOLDINGS, INC - OWNER:
VFR-SOUTHWESTDESERT EQUITIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Petition to
Vacate a 33-foot wide patent easement and a portion of the north half of Darling Road located
east of Hualapai Way, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75736]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approve, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
4. Photo(s) - VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
5. Justification Letter

Page 932 of 1332


Page 933 of 1332
Page 934 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: BP HOLDINGS, INC. - OWNER: VFR-
SOUTHWEST DESERT EQUITIES, LLC

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAC-75859 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
SDR-75860 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAC-75859
conditions:

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 29

NOTICES MAILED 1 - VAC-75859


70 - SDR-75860

PROTESTS 0 - VAC-75859
0 - SDR-75860

APPROVALS 1 - VAC-75859
0 - SDR-75860

JB
Page 935 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Conditions Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** CONDITIONS **

VAC-75859 CONDITIONS
1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the U.S. Government Patent
Easements located along the north and east sides of assessor parcel number #125-
19-401-002 and the north half of Darling Road, east of Hualapai Way.

2. A Clark County Order of Vacation to remove adjacent Clark County rights-of-way


and patent easements so that no “orphan” dedication or patent easement in Clark
County remains shall record concurrent with this Order of Vacation unless
specifically allowed in writing by Clark County.

3. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of the Order of Vacation
for this application. Appropriate drainage easements shall be reserved if
recommended by the approved Drainage Plan/Study. The drainage study required
by SDR-75860 may be used to satisfy this requirement provided that it addresses
the area to be vacated.

4. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation
application are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the
recordation of an Order of Vacation.

5. Reservation of easements for the facilities of the various utility companies together
with reasonable ingress thereto and egress there from shall be provided if required.

6. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design


standards of all City Departments.

7. The Order of Vacation and Order of Relinquishment of Interest shall not be recorded
until all of the conditions of approval have been met provided, however, the
conditions requiring modification of public improvements may be fulfilled for
purposes of recordation by providing sufficient security for the performance thereof
in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is
empowered to modify this application if necessary because of technical concerns or
because of other related review actions as long as current City right-of-way
requirements are still complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not
changed. If applicable, a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire
hydrant purposes shall be retained on all vacation actions abutting public street
corridors that will remain dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable
and where needed, public easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements
that would/should cross any right-of-way being vacated must be retained.

JB
Page 936 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Conditions Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

8. If the Order of Vacation and Order of Relinquishment of Interest is not recorded


within one (1) year after approval by the City of Las Vegas or an Extension of Time
is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval will terminate and a new
petition must be submitted.

SDR-75860 CONDITIONS

Planning

1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Vacation (VAC-


75859) shall be required, if approved.

2. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.

3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 02/20/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.

4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.070 is hereby approved, to allow an eight-foot landscape


buffer on the south perimeter where 15 feet is required.

5. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.

6. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.

7. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape


Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.

8. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.

JB
Page 937 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Conditions Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

9. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.

Public Works

10. An Order of Vacation, such as VAC-75859, shall record prior to the recordation of a
map or the issuance of permits for this site, whichever comes first.

11. Construct all half-street improvements meeting Current City Standards (detached
sidewalks) on Hualapai Road concurrent with the development of this site. Off-site
improvements shall also be coordinated with and approved by Clark County Public
Works based the ultimate design of the 215 on ramp at Hualapai Way. All existing
paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original
location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site. Grant
appropriate Public Pedestrian Access Easements if needed.

12. Extend public sewer in Hualapai Way from Centennial Parkway to this site at a depth
and location acceptable to the Sanitary Sewer Planning Section of the Department
of Public Works.

13. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent
with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend from the
sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway network
and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.

14. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.

15. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the
Hualapai Way public right of way, if any, prior to this issuance of permits for these
improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the
terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (702-229-4836).

JB
Page 938 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Conditions Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

16. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed
by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.

17 A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainage ways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.

JB
Page 939 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The applicant has proposed a Major Amendment to approved Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-73576) for the proposed expansion of the subject site and parking lot
reconfiguration for a 9,043 square-foot commercial development at 6840 North Hualapai
way.

ISSUES

• The applicant has requested a Petition to Vacate (VAC-75859) Vacate U.S.


Government Patent Easements and a portion of the north half of Darling Road located
east of Hualapai Way. Staff supports the proposed vacation of the existing U.S.
Government Patent Easement. However, staff does not support the proposed
vacation of the north half of Darling Road.
• The applicant has requested a waiver of Title 19.08.070 development standards to
allow an eight-foot landscape buffer on the south perimeter where 15 feet is required.
Staff does not support this request.
• A Major Amendment to a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
73576) is required for the proposed expansion of the subject site onto the vacated
Darling Road alignment and parking lot reconfiguration and waiver of perimeter
landscaping. Staff does not support this request.

ANALYSIS

On November 21st, 2018 the City Council approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
73576) for a proposed 9,043 square-foot commercial development with a waiver to allow
buildings to not be oriented to the corner and street frontages where such is required on
2.02 acres at the southeast corner of Clark County 215 and Hualapai Way. The subject
site is located in a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district, which allows for retail
shopping and personal services.

The applicant has proposed a Petition to Vacate (VAC-75859) 33-foot wide U.S.
Government Patent Easements located on the north and east perimeter of the subject
site. As the proposed vacation of the U.S. Government Patent Easements will not affect
the design of the previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576), staff
supports the proposed vacation of the existing U.S. Government Patent Easements.

JB
Page 940 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

In addition, the applicant has requested to vacate a 30-foot wide portion of the north side
of the Darling Road right-of-way alignment, located on the south perimeter of the subject
site. As the proposed vacation of right-of-way could eliminate public street access to the
parcel to the east of the subject site and result in a landlocked parcel, staff does not
support the proposed vacation of right-of-way.

The proposed vacation of the north portion of Darling Road would result in the expansion
of the subject site onto the area of the vacated right-of-way. As a result, the parking lot
area adjacent to the southern perimeter of the site and southern landscape buffer has
been reconfigured to accommodate the expansion of the site. The applicant requested a
waiver to allow an eight-foot landscape buffer on the south perimeter where 15 feet is
required by the previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576). Per
Title 19.16.100 the proposed waiver of required landscaping requires approval of a Major
Amendment to the previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576).
The submitted drawings indicate that the rest of the site will remain as previously
approved with regards to building placement, building size and perimeter landscape
buffers and interior parking lot landscaping.

The proposed vacation of the Darling Road right-of-way could eliminate public street
access to the parcel to the east of the subject site and result in a landlocked parcel. Staff
has determined that the applicant’s proposal is not harmonious with the surrounding
properties in the area; therefore, staff recommends denial of the proposed vacation and
associated Major Amendment to the previously approved Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-73576).

FINDINGS (VAC-75859)

We present the following information concerning this request to vacate certain public street
ROW:

A. Does this vacation request result in uniform or non-uniform right-of-way


widths? Yes, it will result in a non-standard right-of-way width unless a reciprocal
vacation for the south half of Darling Road is processed through Clark County.

B. From a traffic handling viewpoint will this vacation request result in a reduced
traffic handling capability? Possibly, as the property to the east is currently
owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land and it is unclear at this
time how it will develop once it is sold.

C. Does it appear that the vacation request involves only excess right-of-way?
No, it is for right-of-way which the developer hopes to incorporate into their site.

JB
Page 941 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

D. Does this vacation request coincide with development plans of the adjacent
parcels? Yes, SDR-75860.

E. Does this vacation request eliminate public street access to any abutting
parcel? Yes to the east.

F. Does this vacation request result in a conflict with any existing City
requirements? Yes, access to adjacent property which could result in a land
locked parcel.

G. Does the Department of Public Works have an objection to this vacation


request? Yes.

The Department of Public Works and Department of Planning are opposed to this Petition
of Vacation, as the elimination of a portion of the Darling Road right-of-way could eliminate
public street access to the parcel to the east of the subject site and result in a landlocked
parcel.

FINDINGS (SDR-75860)

In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:

1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and


development in the area;

As the proposed vacation of the Darling Road right-of-way could eliminate public
street access to the parcel to the east of the subject site and result in a land locked
parcel, staff has determined that the proposed Major Amendment to approved Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-73576) and associated waiver of landscaping is
not harmonious with the surrounding developments in the area.

2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;

The development as proposed does not meet perimeter landscaping requirements


on the south perimeter of the site. The applicant has requested a Waiver of this
requirement to allow an eight-foot landscape buffer where 15 feet is required by the
previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576), which staff does
not support.

JB
Page 942 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or


neighborhood traffic;

Access to the site is from Hualapai Way, a 150-foot wide Freeway/Expressway as


designated on the Master Plan of Streets and Highways, and Darling Road, a 60-
foot right-of-way. The driveway into the site from Hualapai Way is nearer to the
Darling Road intersection than allowed and may require a deviation from the City
Traffic Engineer. Access design is not anticipated to negatively affect traffic in the
vicinity.

4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;

Building and landscape materials remain consistent with the previously approved
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576).

5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and


aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;

The proposed building elevations remain consistent with the previously approved
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576), which will be harmonious and
compatible with the proximate environment.

6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.

Site development is subject to building permit review and inspection, thereby


protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the public.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


The City Council approved the Annexation (ANX-12215) of 207.83 acres
generally located north of Centennial Parkway between Shaumber Road
02/07/07 and Fort Apache Road, including Centennial High School on the west side
of Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The annexation became effective 02/15/07.

JB
Page 943 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Five
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc


Department of Planning staff denied a request for a Minor Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-35394) for the installation of an 80-foot
09/24/09 tall Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design (Monopine) on
property located at the northeast corner of Darling Road and Hualapai
Way.
A neighborhood meeting was held to discuss a proposed commercial
06/20/18 development at the southeast corner of Clark County 215 and Hualapai
Way. An application was not submitted for this design of the project.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-73572) from R (Rural Density Residential) to SC (Service
Commercial) at the southeast corner of Clark County 215 and Hualapai
Way. The Planning Commission and Planning Department Staff
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for Rezoning (ZON-73573) from U
(Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) General Plan Designation]
to C-1 (Limited Commercial) at the southeast corner of Clark County 215
and Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and Planning Department
Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for Special Use Permit (SUP-73574)
11/21/18
for a proposed 3,043 square-foot Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale
Establishment use with a waiver to allow a 385-foot distance separation
from a school where 400 feet is required at the southeast corner of Clark
County 215 and Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and Planning
Department Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-73576) to allow a proposed 9,043 square-foot commercial
development with a waiver to allow buildings to not orient to the corner
and street frontages where such is required at the southeast corner of
Clark County 215 and Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and
Planning Department Staff recommended approval.

Most Recent Change of Ownership


03/07/16 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses


There are no relevant building permits or business licenses related to this request.

JB
Page 944 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Six
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss
12/11/18
proposed amendments to an approved commercial development.

Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was held to discuss a proposed commercial
06/20/18 development at the southeast corner of Clark County 215 and Hualapai
Way. An application was not submitted for this design of the project.

Field Check
The site is undeveloped. It slopes down from west to east and from
north to south, as it is adjacent to the Hualapai Way on-ramp to Clark
02/28/19
County 215. Improvements to Hualapai Way are incomplete, and there
are no improvements to Darling Road.

Details of Application Request


Site Area
Net Acres 2.02

Existing Land Planned or Special


Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Undeveloped
Property Commercial) Commercial)
North CC 215 ROW ROW (Right-of-Way) ROW (Right-of-Way)
R-E (Rural Estates
RL (Residential Low)
South Undeveloped Residential) – Clark
– Clark County)
County
R (Rural Density
East Undeveloped U (Undeveloped)
Residential)
PR-OS
West Undeveloped (Parks/Recreation/ C-V (Civic)
Open Space)

JB
Page 945 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Seven
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance


No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance Y

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Pursuant to Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576), the following standards


apply:
Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Size 87,991 SF 87,991 SF N/A
Min. Lot Width 305 Feet 335 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
• Front 48 Feet 48 Feet Y
• Side 37 Feet 37 Feet Y
• Corner 59 Feet 89 Feet Y
• Rear 68 Feet 68 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 15 % 15 % Y
Max. Building Height 31 Feet 31 Feet N/A
Screened, Gated, w/ a Screened, Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure Y
Roof or Trellis a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Parapet screened Y

JB
Page 946 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Eight
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576), the following standards


apply:
Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
• North 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 14 Trees 13 Trees Y
• South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 12 Trees 13 Trees Y
• East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 15 Trees 17 Trees Y
• West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 13 Trees 13 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 54 Trees 56 Trees Y
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone Width
• North 15 Feet 15 Feet Y
• South 15 Feet 8 Feet N*
• East 8 Feet 8 Feet Y
• West 15 Feet 15 Feet Y
6’ wall along
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Y
east PL
*The applicant has requested a Waiver to allow an eight-foot landscape buffer on the south
perimeter where 15 feet is required.

Functional Actual Compliance


Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Freeway/
Hualapai Way Title 13 80-86 N
Expressway

JB
Page 947 of 1332
VAC-75859 and SDR-75860 [PRJ-75736]
Staff Report Page Nine
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
General
Retail Store, 1 space
6,043 SF 35
Other Than per 175 SF
Listed
1 space
1,200 SF
per 50 SF
seating
seating
and waiting
and waiting
Restaurant 33
plus 1
1,800 SF
space per
remaining
200 SF
BOH
remaining
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 68 79 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 65 3 75 4 Y
Loading Less than
9,043 SF 1 1 Y
Spaces 10,000 SF

Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow an eight-foot
A 15-foot landscaping buffer landscape buffer
is required along all rights-of- along the south Denial
way. perimeter where 15
feet is required.

JB
Page 948 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 949 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 950 of 1332


A㈠О㈠Ќ㈠̬ฌ

Ќฌ

CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗̬ฌ
ՁDzḚDzЌC̬ฌ bĠDzbìDzC7Աù̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ќਙ̬ฌ

ƆbAՁDz̬ฌ CA╗Dz̬ฌ

ΎDzЌ●╗Ġ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ●ЌḚฌ
DzDzŐ●ЌḚ
‫ ں‬ɱฎx7DzƆ╗●ЋAՁ7ОՁAΎA7CŐ●ЋDzฌ
A CŐ●ЋDz
ƆⓈ●╗Dz7ㅡㄦxฌ

ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫̶ ں‬ㄦฌ
ӧՙxธỏ7ฎ″″ֱɱㄦ̶ㄦฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 951 of 1332


ОŴผ㌱֭к7ҜŴऑ7bγ֭㌱ 7Ő֭ऑਙผ‫ש‬
bкħ่֭‫̬ש‬7 Оผ֭ऑŴผ֭₡7⇡ੂ̬
bкħ่֭‫ש‬7 Оผ֭ऑŴผ֭ผ
bкħ่֭‫ש‬7bਙこऑŴ่ੂ7 ùਙ—ผ7bਙこऑŴ่ੂ7ЌŴこ֭
A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7‫ں‬7 ‫ں‬ธ̶7ҜŴħ่7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬
CŴ‫̬֭ש‬7‫゜ں‬ธㄦ゜ธx‫ں‬ɱ7ธ̬xฎ̬xx7ОҜ

ОŴผ㌱֭к7ЌŴこ̬֭7Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7‫ں‬7ֱ7Оผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7̬7‫ں‬7
C֭⎯㌱ผħऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่̬7
Оผਙ㌱֭⎯⎯7⎯֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙผ₡֭ผ7㌱ਙ—่‫֭ש‬ผ㌱кਙ㌱>ʉħ⎯̬֭7@Ŵк⎯֭7
Dz่Ŵ⇡к֭7こŴऑ㌱γ֭㌱>7Ŵ㌱ผਙ⎯⎯7㌱γਙผ₡̬7@Ŵк⎯֭7
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬ฎxɱⓒ̶x̶㈠ՙ̶̶ՙƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬ՙ̶ㄦⓒՙㅡㅡ㈠ՙㅡ″ՙƥ
77 7
Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7‫̬ں‬7Ձħ่֭7 7
bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ќx¤7x″ƥ7ㄦɱफDz7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7̶x‫ں‬㈠ɱ″ƥ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ″xㄦ㈠″ɱ̶‫ں‬ƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒՙㅡㄦ㈠̶″x‫ں‬ƥ
77 7
Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7ธ̬7Ձħ่֭7 7
bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ќฎɱ¤7ㅡxƥ7‫ں‬ธफÛ7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7ธㅡฎ㈠ՙㄦƥ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ″xՙ㈠‫ں‬ธㄦฎƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒㅡɱ″㈠″‫ں‬ㅡธƥ
77 7
Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7̶̬7b—ผ‫֭ﭨ‬7 7
Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7ㅡՙ㈠ՙɱƥ7 ŐŴ₡ħ—⎯̬7ㄦx㈠xxƥ
C֭к‫ש‬Ŵ̬7ㄦㅡ¤ㅡㄦƥㄦฎफ7 ╗Ŵ่‫̬ש่֭ف‬7ธㄦ㈠ɱxƥ
bγਙผ₡̬7ㅡㄦ㈠ɱɱƥ7 bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ќㅡㅡ¤7ธฎƥ7ㄦՙफDz
bਙ—ผ⎯֭7●่̬7Ɔՙธ¤7ㄦㅡƥ7xธफDz7 bਙ—ผ⎯֭7Ḷ—‫̬ש‬7Ќ‫ں‬ฎ¤7xฎƥ7xㄦफÛ
ŐО7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒㄦɱธ㈠ㅡธㅡธƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒㄦㅡㅡ㈠ㅡxㅡxƥ
Dz่₡7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ″̶ɱ㈠ɱㅡx″ƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒㄦธฎ㈠ฎㅡ‫̶ں‬ƥ
77 7
Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7ㅡ̬7Ձħ่֭7 7
bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ɔฎɱ¤7ㅡxƥ7‫ں‬ธफDz7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7ธㅡɱ㈠ㄦɱƥ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦx̶‫ں‬ƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒՙՙฎ㈠ㅡธՙธƥ
77 7
Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7ㄦ̬7Ձħ่֭7 7
bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ɔx¤7x″ƥ7ㄦɱफÛ7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7̶̶ㅡ㈠ɱㅡƥ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶x̶㈠ㄦ″̶ฎƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒՙՙՙ㈠ՙㅡ″ฎƥ
77 7

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 952 of 1332


Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7″̬7Ձħ่֭7 7
bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ќฎɱ¤7ㅡธƥ7̶ㅡफÛ7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7̶̶㈠xxƥ
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶x̶㈠ՙ̶‫ںں‬ƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒՙㅡㅡ㈠ՙㅡՙธƥ
77 7
О֭ผħこ֭‫֭ש‬ผ̬7‫ں‬ⓒธ‫ں‬″㈠x̶ƥ7 Aผ֭Ŵ̬7‫ں‬ฎⓒɱxㄦ㈠ธ‫ں‬Ɔ‫׀‬㈠@‫ש‬㈠
Dzผผਙผ7bкਙ⎯—ผ̬֭7x㈠xxธՙ7 bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ɔ‫ں‬ธ¤7ㅡธƥ7ㅡ̶फDz
Dzผผਙผ7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7̬7ֱx㈠xxธ″‫ں‬7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7x㈠xxxㄦɱ
77 7
Оผ֭㌱ħ⎯ħਙ่7‫̬ں‬7ㅡㄦxⓒ̶ฎ‫ں‬㈠ㅡฎ7 7

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 953 of 1332


ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 954 of 1332


A㈠О㈠Ќ㈠̬ฌ

Ќฌ

CŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗̬ฌ
ՁDzḚDzЌC̬ฌ bĠDzbìDzC7Աù̬ฌ ОŐḶİDzb╗7Ќਙ̬ฌ

ƆbAՁDz̬ฌ CA╗Dz̬ฌ

ΎDzЌ●╗Ġ7DzЌḚ●ЌDzDzŐ●ЌḚฌ
DzDzŐ●ЌḚ
‫ ں‬ɱฎx7DzƆ╗●ЋAՁ7ОՁAΎA7CŐ●ЋDzฌ
A CŐ●ЋDz
ƆⓈ●╗Dz7ㅡㄦxฌ

ՁAƆ7ЋDzḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫̶ ں‬ㄦฌ
ӧՙxธỏ7ฎ″″ֱɱㄦ̶ㄦฌ

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 955 of 1332


ОŴผ㌱֭к7ҜŴऑ7bγ֭㌱ 7Ő֭ऑਙผ‫ש‬
bкħ่֭‫̬ש‬7 Оผ֭ऑŴผ֭₡7⇡ੂ̬

bкħ่֭‫ש‬7 Оผ֭ऑŴผ֭ผ

bкħ่֭‫ש‬7bਙこऑŴ่ੂ7 ùਙ—ผ7bਙこऑŴ่ੂ7ЌŴこ֭

A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7‫ں‬7 ‫ں‬ธ̶7ҜŴħ่7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬

CŴ‫̬֭ש‬7‫゜ں̶゜ں‬ธx‫ں‬ɱ7‫ں̬ں‬x̬xx7ОҜ

ОŴผ㌱֭к7ЌŴこ̬֭7Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7‫ں‬7ֱ7Оผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7̬7‫ں‬7
C֭⎯㌱ผħऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่̬7
Оผਙ㌱֭⎯⎯7⎯֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬7ਙผ₡֭ผ7㌱ਙ—่‫֭ש‬ผ㌱кਙ㌱"ʉħ⎯̬֭7$Ŵк⎯֭7
Dz่Ŵ⇡к֭7こŴऑ㌱γ֭㌱"7Ŵ㌱ผਙ⎯⎯7㌱γਙผ₡̬7$Ŵк⎯֭7
Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬ฎxɱⓒ̶xㄦ㈠‫̶ں‬ㄦㄦƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬ՙ̶ㄦⓒㅡ″ฎ㈠ธxฎxƥ

77 7

Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7‫̬ں‬7Ձħ่֭7 7

bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ќx¤7‫ں‬ɱƥ7x‫ں‬फDz7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7ㄦㄦ㈠x‫ں‬ƥ

Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶″x㈠‫ں‬ㅡㅡՙƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒㅡ″ฎ㈠ㄦ‫ں‬ธ̶ƥ

77 7

Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7ธ̬7b—ผ‫֭ﭨ‬7 7

Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7̶ɱ㈠ธฎƥ7 ŐŴ₡ħ—⎯̬7ธㄦ㈠xxƥ

C֭к‫ש‬Ŵ̬7ɱx¤x‫ں‬ƥ̶″फ7 ╗Ŵ่‫̬ש่֭ف‬7ธㄦ㈠x‫ں‬ƥ

bγਙผ₡̬7̶ㄦ㈠̶″ƥ7 bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ɔㅡㅡ¤7ㅡ‫ں‬ƥ7ㅡՙफDz

bਙ—ผ⎯֭7●่̬7Ɔฎɱ¤7ㅡxƥ7ㄦɱफDz7 bਙ—ผ⎯֭7Ḷ—‫̬ש‬7Ɔx¤7‫ں‬ՙƥ7ธ″फÛ

ŐО7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶″x㈠xx″ㅡƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒㅡɱ̶㈠ㄦ‫ں‬ธxƥ

Dz่₡7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶̶ㄦ㈠xx″ՙƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒㅡɱ̶㈠̶ฎㄦธƥ

77 7

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 956 of 1332


Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7̶̬7Ձħ่֭7 7

bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ɔฎɱ¤7ㅡธƥ7̶ㅡफDz7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7ธฎㅡ㈠ㅡ̶ƥ

Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶̶̶㈠ㄦ″ㅡ̶ƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒՙՙՙ㈠ฎ‫ںں‬ㄦƥ

77 7

Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7ㅡ̬7Ձħ่֭7 7

bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ɔx¤7x″ƥ7ㄦɱफÛ7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7̶x㈠xxƥ

Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶x̶㈠ㄦ″ㅡㅡƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒՙՙՙ㈠ՙㄦx″ƥ

77 7

Ɔ֭‫ف‬こ่֭‫ש‬ 7ㄦ̬7Ձħ่֭7 7

bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ќฎɱ¤7ㅡธƥ7̶ㅡफÛ7 Ձ่֭‫שف‬γ̬7̶xɱ㈠ㄦㅡƥ

Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ̬7ฎxɱⓒ̶xㄦ㈠‫̶ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬ƥ7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7ՙ̶ㄦⓒㅡ″ฎ㈠ธ‫ں‬ㅡ″ƥ

77 7

О֭ผħこ֭‫֭ש‬ผ̬7ՙ‫ں‬ฎ㈠ธ″ƥ7 Aผ֭Ŵ̬7ɱⓒㅡ‫ں‬ฎ㈠ɱՙƆ‫׀‬㈠$‫ש‬㈠

Dzผผਙผ7bкਙ⎯—ผ̬֭7x㈠xx″ՙ7 bਙ—ผ⎯̬֭7Ɔՙՙ¤7ㅡㄦƥ7ธฎफDz

Dzผผਙผ7Ќਙผ‫ש‬γ7̬7ֱx㈠xx‫ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬7 DzŴ⎯‫̬ש‬7x㈠xx″ㄦธ

77 7

Оผ֭㌱ħ⎯ħਙ่7‫̬ں‬7‫ں‬xՙⓒธxธ㈠ɱɱ7 7

ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

Page 957 of 1332


Page 958 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 959 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 960 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
Page 961 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 9g 6eo 21f 3 3 2
Page 963 of 1332


$
 !'


#

# '"


<
#%
?

 
= 

# 
_


 
#

 
=


#

!"=
 
=

 
=
=
# %
#

#

=

^



AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 55

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
SDR-75860 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAC-75859 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: BP HOLDINGS, INC - OWNER: VFR-SOUTHWESTDESERT
EQUITIES, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Major Amendment to a previously
approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-73576) FOR A PROPOSED 9,043 SQUARE-
FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT on 2.02 acres at 6840 North Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-
401-002), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75736]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

May go to City Council on: 05/15/2019


OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 10 Days)

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Justification Letter
5. Comments from City of Las Vegas Department of Public Works Traffic Engineering Division

Page 964 of 1332


Page 965 of 1332
Page 966 of 1332
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 9g 6eo 71f 3 3 2
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶″
xธ゜ธx゜‫ں‬ɱ

P a 9g 6eo 81f 3 3 2
SDR 75860
BP Holdings, Inc.

SWC CC-215 & Hualapai Way


Proposed 9.043 thousand square foot retail development.

Traffic produced by proposed development:

RATE/#
First Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 837.58 2,549


SUPER CONVENIENCE MARKET/GAS STATION
AM Peak Hour 3.043 83.14 253
[1000 SF]
PM Peak Hour 69.28 211
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Second Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 37.75 151


AM Peak Hour SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 4 0.94 4
PM Peak Hour 3.81 15
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Third Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 470.95 942


AM Peak Hour FAST-FOOD W/ DRIVE THRU [1000 SF] 2 40.19 80
PM Peak Hour 32.67 65
(heaviest 60 minutes)

RATE/#
Total Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 37.75 3,642


AM Peak Hour SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 9.043 0.94 337
PM Peak Hour 3.81 291
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Existing traffic on all nearby streets:

Hualapai Way
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3,341
PM Peak Hour 267
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Centennial Parkway
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 4,246
PM Peak Hour 275
(heaviest 60 minutes)

Page 969 of 1332


Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent street ADT
Capacity
Hualapai Way 35,490
Centennial Parkway 16,380

This project will add approximately 3,642 trips per day on Hualapai Wy. and Centennial Pkwy. Currently, Hualapai is at about
9 percent of capacity and Hualapai is at about 26 percent of capacity. With this project, Hualapai is expected to be at about
20 percent of capacity and Centennial is expected to be at about 48 percent of capacity.

Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 337 additional cars, or about eleven every two
minutes.

Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.

Page 970 of 1332


AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 56

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION


DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
TXT-75815 - TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS
VEGAS - For possible action on a request to remove and replace LVMC Title 19.09 Form-Based
Code with an updated version of LVMC Title 19.09 Form-Based Code, amend the LVMC Title 19
Appendix F Interim Downtown Las Vegas Development Standards as applicable, and to provide
for other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL

BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Proposed Amendments and Staff Report

Page 971 of 1332


TXT-75815

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING


PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 9, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS

** STAFF RECOMMENDATION **

CASE REQUIRED FOR


RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TXT-75815 Staff recommends APPROVAL.

** NOTIFICATION **

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED N/A

NOTICES MAILED Newspaper Notification Only

PROTESTS 0

APPROVALS 0

LM
Page 972 of 1332
TXT-75815
Proposed Amendments Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** PROPOSED AMENDMENTS **

1. LVMC Title 19 is hereby amended by removing LVMC Chapter 19.09 Form-Based


Code in its entirety and replacing it with an updated version of LVMC Chapter
19.09 Form-Based Code, as shown in Exhibit B.

LM
Page 973 of 1332
TXT-75815
Staff Report Page One
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

** STAFF REPORT **

PROJECT DESCRIPTION

This Text Amendment request is for the discussion and possible action to amend the
LVMC Title 19, Unified Development Code (UDC) of the City of Las Vegas to update
LVMC Chapter 19.09 Form-Based Code by removing the current Chapter 19.09 in its
entirety, and replacing it with a newer version of LVMC Chapter 19.09 Form-Based Code
that has been developed between September 2018 and February 2019.

ANALYSIS

This Text Amendment replaces the LVMC Chapter 19.09 Form-Based Code (FBC) with an
updated version of LVMC Chapter 19.09 Form-Based Code. The Vision 2045 Downtown
Masterplan envisions update development standards for the 12 downtown districts through
an innovative approach to zoning: Form-Based Code. Due to the significant amount of
surveying, public input, and background analysis necessary to carry on such a
comprehensive update of development standards, the implementation of this code update
is meant to be achieved on a district-by-district basis, This standards’ update began in the
Las Vegas Medical District Pilot Area, where since January 16th, 2019, properties have been
regulated by LVMC Chapter 19.09 Form-Based Code. This Pilot is still under the monitoring
of the Planning Department, and although no site development plan has been approved
under the new FBC to date, staff has been coordinating with potential projects applicants
and collecting their feedback on the FBC.

One of the primary reasons for this text amendment is the maintenance and refinement of
a complex document, the first of its kind in Nevada, which staff is currently testing for
performance. Following its January 16th adoption, staff began reviewing the FBC in its
entirety, and collecting comments from the public on specific standards. As a result, this
amendment modifies certain language provided in the FBC to fix minor inconsistencies,
clarify language, and ensure harmonious co-existence of the FBC within the Title 19 UDC
(Unified Development Code).

This amendment also includes new provisions, Transect Zones, and a Thoroughfare Plan
that have been drafted by Lisa Wise Consulting, a leading firm specialized in Form-Based
Code drafting and development. These new provisions, Transect Zones, and the
Thoroughfare Plan, have been created based on the needs and opportunities of the
Fremont East District. The new Transect Zones applicable to Fremont East have been
publicly available since February 6, 2019, along with the proposed Regulating Map that
shows where such districts are proposed. This Fremont East Form-Based Code Update
and the Regulating Plan are currently in the public comment period, and Staff is collecting
feedback from residents and stakeholders to refine and enhance these documents. The
proposed FBC Land Use Designation will allow for the Fremont East Code update and
Rezoning to be implemented in the area.

LM
Page 974 of 1332
TXT-75815
Staff Report Page Two
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Although the majority of this proposed LVMC Chapter 19.09 update is consistent with the
standards adopted by the City Council with Ordinance #6649, all changes, edits, and
additions proposed with this amendment are marked by red coloring within Exhibit B.
Additionally, the Staff Report is hereby including a table which tracks all deletions and
additions to the document (see Table below).

FINDINGS

This amendment is consistent with the City’s goals, policies and objectives of the Las
Vegas 2020 Master Plan and its related Elements; with the Vision 2045 Downtown Las
Vegas Masterplan; and with the City of Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan. It is a key step
to move towards the adoption of a Form-Based Code for the twelve districts of Downtown
Las Vegas, which began with the Pilot area of the Las Vegas Medical District in January
2019. The FBC land use designation fosters density and intensity of development that is
compatible with existing land use designations, and the zoning designations allowed by
the proposed amendment will be compatible with the existing adjacent land uses and
zoning districts. The FBC designation allows for zoning districts, or transect zones, that
were carefully drafted by taking into consideration the specific context of the Fremont East
neighborhood, and by conducting surveys, analysis, and outreach to stakeholders.

This amendment will accomplish the following:

1. Include three additional Transect Zones that have been drafted based on the
Fremont East District context and the vision set by the Downtown Masterplan for
future development within the area.
2. Include a new Subsection dedicated to standards specific to Fremont East that will
incentivize adaptive reuse of historic hotels and motels.
3. Introduces standards related to in-lieu fees that would substitute provision of Open
Space on-site.
4. Introduces a Thoroughfare Plan for the Fremont East District.
5. Introduces a Community Benefits Program that provides a height bonus for
developments that include a portion the units to be offered for rent below market
rate.
6. Updates language and provisions within the Chapter based on the feedback
received from applicants, residents, and staff during the implementation of the Las
Vegas Medical District Pilot of the Form-Based Code.

Staff considers the proposed amendment as a compelling amendment to promote the five
“Big Ideas” envisioned in the Vision 2045 Downtown Masterplan: 1) Diversify the
Economy; 2) Create Mixed-use Hubs; 3) Create Streets for People; 4); A Greener
Downtown; and 5) Expedite Implementation.

Staff recommends approval of this Text Amendment.

LM
Page 975 of 1332
TXT-75815
Staff Report Page Three
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
The Planning Department launched the outreach efforts related to the
Fremont East Code update by hosting an Open House at 508 Fremont
Street. During this meeting, attendees were able to comment on the draft
“Vision Statement” for the District, which was later used by City Staff and
Lisa Wise Consulting to draft the standards that will update the Form-Based
Code based on the Fremont East neighborhood context. Several pictures of
10/12/18
existing buildings located in the area were presented, and the residents were
able to comment on which building types they liked the most.

Start: 5:00 p.m. End: 7:00 p.m.

Attendees: 5 City Staff (Applicant), 19 Members of the Public


City Staff organized an early pop-up event at 1126 Fremont Street. During
this event, Staff was able to share informational material on the Fremont
East FBC project, re-direct attendees to the material available on the
01/17/19 dedicated website, and inform the residents of the area about the Code.

Start: 7:30 a.m. End: 9:30 a.m.


Attendees: 2 City Staff (Applicant), 27 Members of the Public
The Planning Department hosted an informal outreach series of events
called “Community Conversations”, which were hosted by two businesses
located within the District. Staff was able to share the document of the Form-
Based Code Fremont East Update, a Draft Regulating Plan, and discuss the
timeline and next steps for implementing a Code update in the District.

Location: 508 Fremont Street


Start: 5:00 p.m. End: 7:00 p.m.
Attendees: 2 City Staff (Applicant), 9 Members of the Public

Location: 520 Fremont Street


01/29/19
Start: 4:30 p.m. End: 6:30 p.m.
and
Attendees: 3 City Staff (Applicant), 16 Members of the Public
02/06/19
Meeting results:
• Attendees expressed concern over preserving the unique character of
the neighborhood by facilitating the use and rehabilitation of historic
properties, such as the Hotels/Motels located along the Fremont East
Corridor. Attendees expressed interest in the relationship between the
city’s Innovation District and the Code update, and praised the
concept of fostering a greater relationship between the streets,
multiple transportation options, and the buildings.

LM
Page 976 of 1332
TXT-75815
Staff Report Page Four
April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting

Neighborhood Meeting
• Attendees expressed interest in the relationship between the
city’s Innovation District and the Code update, and praised the
concept of fostering a greater relationship between the streets,
multiple transportation options, and the buildings.

A Neighborhood meeting was held in the Historic 5th Street School


Auditorium. The meeting was notified via letters to all affected property
owners and property owners within a 1000-foot radius buffer around
the subject properties.

Start: 5:30 p.m. End: 7:00 p.m.

Attendees: 5 City Staff (Applicant), 59 Members of the Public.

Meeting results:
• Staff delivered a presentation on the Form-Based Code initiative and
its impact on the subject properties. The presentation is available at
03/14/19 the project website www.formbasedcode.vegas
• Following Staff’s presentation, an open Q&A session was held.
• Following the general Q&A session, staff members were available at
five different stations equipped with maps and handouts to answer
questions specific to the attendees’ properties.

Overall, the public was supportive of an initiative that fosters a complete,


walkable neighborhood and provides services and amenities for the
current and future residents of the Fremont East District. A number of
residents of the area expressed concern over vacant properties along
Fremont East and their related problems; they inquired about the
possible benefits that the FBC would bring to the area.

LM
Page 977 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

19.09.010 Preamble 19.09.010.E Organization of Replaced "Applicability" with "Intent"


the Form-Based 5
Code Replaced " Building Types" with "Standards"

19.09.020 Purpose and Purpose of the

TXT-75815
19.09.020.B 9 Deleted "Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Master Plan" (first usage already indicated in 19.09.010)
Intent Form-Based Code
19.09.020.D Applicability Deleted "In the manner described by this Section"
Deleted "only as and when is rezoned to the FBC designation established by this Chapter. In addition,
provisions of this Chapter that apply to the process of rezoning property to the FBC….shall apply to
the application and processing thereof. It is intended that"
12 Deleted "designation"
Deleted "generally located west of the I-15 right of way to Rancho Drive, between Alta Drive and
Charleston Boulevard"
Added "The provisions of the Chapter apply to all property with a Transect Zone designation. The City
will begin the process of implementing the FBC with a pilot area located within the Las Vegas Medical
District (see Figure 19.09.020. B-1)".

19.09.030 Administration - - 13 Added " Review" to Side Development Plan Review Section Title
and
Subdivision of
Procedures 19.09.030.D 14 Replaced "shall apply" with "applies"
Land
19.09.030.M Miscellaneous 15 Added "Permits" to subsection title
Replaced "are included in LVMC Chapter 19.18 (Definitions and
19.09.030.R Definitions 16
Measures)" with "are defined in Section 19.09.110 (Form-Based Code Definitions"

19.09.040 Specific to 19.09.040 - Deleted "Vision 2045" (first usage of Downtown Master Plan already indicated in 19.09.010)
Districts
Added "Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition" before abbreviation for first usage
Moved intent/intro language from "Additional Landscaping Standards" to the beginning of the
Subsection
Deleted "The purpose of"
17 Added "is intended"
Deleted "and planting requirements"
Added "allowed"
Replaced "have been developed to be" with "are"
Replaced "as expressed in" with "of"

Staff Report Page Five


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
LM
Page 978 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Replaced "conform to the standards provided below" with "must be in compliance with this
Subsection"
Deleted "in"
19.09.040.C-1 Symphony Park 21 Added " See Symphony Park Design Standards"

TXT-75815
19.09.040.I Fremont East Added "Historic Hotels and Motels - Adaptive Reuse Standards" and "Micro Community Standards"
District
Added "a. Purpose
Hotels and motels located in the Fremont East District are the foundation of the City’s tourism
economy. Adaptive reuse is an important aspect of development in the Fremont East District as it
contributes to the historic character of the area. The purpose of these standards is to allow for a
change of use of existing vacant or abandoned hotel or motel buildings on Fremont Street, and the
property on which they are located, into new and more productive residential or commercial uses.
b. Applicability
These additional standards apply to existing hotels and motels or to features of these hotels or
motels such as signs, that have been designated as Historic Landmarks, Districts, Sites, Buildings,
Structures, or Objects in compliance with LVMC Section 19.10.150.I (Designation of Historic
Landmarks, Districts, Sites, Buildings, Structures, and Objects) located in the T5 Main Street (T5-MS),
T4 Main Street (T4-MS), and T4 Corridor (T4-C) Zones.
22 c. Allowed Uses
i. In addition to the land use types listed in Table I (Use Types) of the Zones listed in paragraph b
(Applicability)
above, the Director may determine that a use not listed in Table I is allowed either within the
building(s) or on the property if it is listed in LVMC Section 19.12.010 (Land Use Tables), it supports
the purpose and intent of the Zone, and it is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Master Plan. ii. The Director may also determine that a use not listed in LVMC Section 19.12.010
(Land Use Tables) is allowed either within the building(s) or on the property if the use supports the
purpose and intent of the Zone and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown Master
Plan, subject to issuance of a Temporary Commercial Permit under LVMC Section 19.16.160
(Temporary Commercial Permit).
d. Use Specific Standards
Refer to LVMC Section 19.12.070 (Permissible Use Descriptions and Applicable Conditions and
Requirements) for the standards applicable to specific uses.
19.09.040.K Las Vegas Added "Las Vegas Medical District (LVMD)" abbreviation to first usage of within Subsection
Medical District
Deleted "harmonious and"
Deleted "the"
23 Added "City"
Changed "provided" to "provides" (and revised other verbiage to match)
Deleted "Over time"

Staff Report Page Six


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
Deleted "It is the intent of"

LM
Page 979 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Changed "section" to "Subsection" where appropriate


Added "is intended to provide regulations that"
Deleted "to"
Added "and enhance the effective components of the Las Vegas Medical District Plan"

TXT-75815
Deleted "these traits of the LVMD, and to further this goal the following landscaping standards shall
apply:"
Deleted "the"
Replaced "will be" with "are"
Deleted "To support the long term development of the LVMD"
Added "Chapter" in appropriate cross-references
Deleted "In order"
Added "(Form-Based Code)"
Deleted "Title"
Deleted "provisions"
Deleted "Form-Based Code"
Deleted "the provisions contained in"
Replaced "and" with "or"
Replaced "provisions" with "standards"
Deleted "and plazas Public open space,"
Deleted "These spaces"
Added "must be"
Replaced "as well as" with "and"
Deleted "Commercial developments shall provide"
Replaced "provide" with "include"
Added "must be provided according to the following guidelines (see Figure 19.09.040.K-1 below)"
Added "detailed"
Deleted "for such areas"
Deleted "Such areas must be provided according to the following guidelines (see Figure 19.09.040.K-1
below):"
Deleted "such"

Staff Report Page Seven


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
Deleted "proposed"

LM
Page 980 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Replaced "Developments shall provide" with "A minimum of"


Added "area"
Added " must be provided"
Replaced "such" with "civic"

TXT-75815
Replaced "will be" with "is"
Replaced "the ones set forth" with "those"
Replaced "provision which is more restrictive or imposes higher standards or requirements shall
apply" with "most restrictive standard applies"
19.09.040.O Symphony Park Added Subsection
District (new) 25
Added " See Symphony Park Design Standards"

19.09.050 Transect Zone 19.09.050.B Applicability All instances of "Civic Space" replaced with "Open Space"
Standards 27
19.09.050.D Transect Zones Added "The photographs in this Section are illustrative only and not regulatory." and created
Overview numbered list
Replaced "Use Types" with "allowed uses"
28
Added "Arcade, Gallery and"
Added "uses"
29
Added "uses"
28-
Added "No Blank walls or planes" to Desired Form tables
31
Added "Urban Core Zone T6-UC"
Added "Attached"
Added " Large lot width"
Added "Large footprint and lot coverage"
Added "No blank walls or planes"
28 Added" "Buildings placed at or near the edge of the right-of-way
Added " Diverse mix of building frontages"
Added "Small to no setbacks"
Added "5-20 stories"
Added "Ground floor commercial or service uses with a mix of commercial, residential, service and/or
office uses on upper stories"

Staff Report Page Eight


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
LM
Page 981 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Added "To reinforce and enhance the downtown urban core and provide the highest-intensity
vibrant, compact, walkable urban environment. A variety of building types with active pedestrian
street facades and a diverse range of uses supported by active ground floor frontages. A wide range
of regional- center appropriate uses as well as, employment, retail, services, civic, or public uses"
Added T4 Main Street

TXT-75815
Added "Attached or detached"
Added "Medium lot width"
Added" "Buildings placed at or near the edge of the right-of-way
Added "Diverse mix of building frontages, mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront"
Added "Small to no setbacks"
Changed "2 to 5 stories"
Added "Ground floor commercial or service uses with a mix of commercial, residential, service,
and/or office uses on upper stories."
Added "To provide a compact and walkable urban environment with building types that can
accommodate a diverse range of uses. A range of small to medium building types allows for mainly
active pedestrian street facades. The flexible nature of the building types is
intended to encourage revitalization and investment. This zone also supports public transportation
alternatives."
Added T4 Neighborhood Zone
30
Added "Attached or detached"
Added "Medium lot width"
Added "Small to medium footprint and lot coverage"
Added" "Buildings placed at or near the edge of the right-of-way"
Added "Primarily stoop, dooryard, forecourt, Shopfront at corners, or Porches"
Added "Medium setbacks"
Added "Max 3 stories"

Added "Primarily multi-unit residential uses with


smaller neighborhood-supporting uses
at appropriate locations."

Added "To reinforce established neighborhoods in walkable urban areas. Neighborhoods will evolve
through the use of small to medium building footprints and medium intensity building types to
achieve a compact urban form that accommodates a variety of urban
housing choices. This zone also supports public transportation alternatives."
All appropriate

Staff Report Page Nine


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
Added new footnote for "Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites"

LM
Page 982 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Subsections Added "Micro Community" as a use with new footnote


Revised language in appropriate footnotes
Revised indentation levels of Table F "Building Form Standards"
Revised "May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft, subject to approval of an

TXT-75815
Encroachment Agreement by the Public Works Director" footnote
Deleted "Buildings must meet setback requirements independent of lot coverage requirements"
footnote
Deleted "." after cross-references to Table I
Added "Allowed frontage types are described in Table G (Frontages)"
19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core
33 NEW IN ENTIRETY
Zone (T6-UC)
19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General 41 Added " No blank walls or planes"
Zone (T6-UG)
Added "Accessory Structure…..
42 Added "Multiple courtyards must be connected through and between buildings where feasible".
Added "Courtyards must be accessible from the primary thoroughfare where feasible".
43 Added ... pocket plaza " is appropriate"
Added "1-5 stories min 5/5/0/0/ft"
Added "1-5 stories max 10/10/10/--ft"
Added "6-10 stories min 10/10/0/5ft"
44
Added "10+ stories min 20/20/0/5ft"
Changed Accessory "Building" to Structure"
Added "above curb"
Added “The primary building entrance must be located to face
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary
thoroughfare through an Open Space type consistent with
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards)."
Added Shopfront, awning, balcony, bay window, or projecting shade structure not allowed interior
45 side and rear
Added Signage not allowed Interior or Rear
Added Driveways not allowed interior side
Added "Mechanical and Utility Equipment" only allowed at rear
Added “All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view from the street".
46 Added "Public [Park] or…"

Staff Report Page Ten


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
LM
Page 983 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Added "Sustainable Infrastructure" permitted in both T6-UG and UG-L


Added Sub-Zone permitted uses: Schools Not permitted, Beer/Wine/Cooler…Off-Sale Not permitted,
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Not permitted, Mixed-use Conditional, Liquefied Petroleum Special Use.
All others remain same in Sub-Zone
48 Added "and may include pools and amenity decks".

TXT-75815
19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone Added "utilizing"
(T5-M) 49
Added "No blank walls or planes"
50 Added "appropriate"
Changed Accessory "Building" to Structure"
51
Added "above curb"
Added "Mechanical and Utility Equipment" only allowed at rear
52
Added “All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view from the street".
Added "Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites" as permitted use
53 Added "Hotel, Residence" as Special Use
Added "Sustainable Infrastructure" as permitted use
55 Added "and may include pools and amenity decks".
19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone 57 Added "vehicular"
(T5-C)
Added "Pedestrian"
58 Added "Multiple courtyards must be connected through and between buildings where feasible".
Added "Courtyards must be accessible from the primary thoroughfare where feasible".
59 Added "appropriate"
Changed Accessory "Building" to Structure"
Added "above curb"
60 Added “The primary building entrance must be located to face
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary
thoroughfare through an Open Space type consistent with
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards)."
Added "Mechanical and Utility Equipment" only allowed at rear
61
Added “All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view from the street".
Added "Sustainable Infrastructure" as permitted use
62
Added "Public [Park] or…"

Staff Report Page Eleven


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
64 Added "and may include pools and amenity decks".

LM
Page 984 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Added "No blank walls or planes"


Zone (T5-MS) 65
Changed stories minimum to 3
Added "Pedestrian"

TXT-75815
66 Added "Multiple courtyards must be connected through and between buildings where feasible".
Added "Courtyards must be accessible from the primary thoroughfare where feasible".
67 Added "appropriate"
Changed Accessory "Building" to Structure"
68
Added "above curb"
Added “The primary building entrance must be located to face
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary
thoroughfare through an Open Space type consistent with
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards)."
69
Added "Mechanical and Utility Equipment" only allowed at rear
Added “All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view from the street".
Added Driveways not allowed interior side, allowed at rear
70 Added "Public [Park] or…"
71 Added "Sustainable Infrastructure" as permitted use
73 Added "and may include pools and amenity decks".
19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Added "Pedestrian"
Zone (T5-N)
77 Added "Multiple courtyards must be connected through and between buildings where feasible".
Added "Courtyards must be accessible from the primary thoroughfare where feasible".
Changed Accessory "Building" to Structure"
78
Added "above curb"
Added “The primary building entrance must be located to face a primary thoroughfare or be
connected to a primary thoroughfare through an Open Space type consistent with Section 19.09.080
(Open Space Standards)."
Added "Mechanical and Utility Equipment" only allowed at rear
79
Added “All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view from the street".
Added Driveways not allowed interior side, allowed at rear
Added Signage not allowed Interior or Rear
80 Added "Public [Park] or…"

Staff Report Page Twelve


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
LM
Page 985 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Added "Sustainable Infrastructure" as permitted use


82 Added "and may include pools and amenity decks".
19.09.050.E. T4 Corridor Zone Added "Pedestrian"
028 (T4-C)

TXT-75815
84 Added "Multiple courtyards must be connected through and between buildings where feasible".
Added "Courtyards must be accessible from the primary thoroughfare where feasible".
Changed Accessory "Building" to Structure"
85
Added "above curb"
Added “The primary building entrance must be located to face a primary thoroughfare or be
connected to a primary thoroughfare through an Open Space type consistent with Section 19.09.080
(Open Space Standards)."
86 Added Shopfront, awning, balcony, bay window, or projecting shade structure not allowed interior
side and rear
Added Signage not allowed Interior or Rear
Added Driveways not allowed interior side, allowed at rear
87 Added "Public [Park] or…"
88 Added "Sustainable Infrastructure" as permitted use
90 Added "and may include pools and amenity decks".
19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street 91- NEW IN ENTIRETY
Zone (T4-MS) 99
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood 101- NEW IN ENTIRETY
Zone (T4-N) 108
19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood 111 Added "above curb"
Zone (T3-N)
112 Added Porch and Stoop not allowed interior side nor rear
Added "Public [Park] or…"
113
Added "Sustainable Infrastructure" as permitted use

19.09.060 Building Type 19.09.060.A Purpose 115 Removed "highly valued"


Standards
19.09.060.C Building Types Added House/Block Scale to each Building Type
Overview 116- Added Left to Right, House/House/House/House/House/House, House/House/House/House (≤3
122 units) Building (≥3 units)/House/Block,/House (≤3 units) Building (≥3 units)//House (≤3 units) Building

9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting


(≥3 units)/Block/Block/Block/Block/House
116 Added "-size", "consisting of one unit usually"

Staff Report Page Thirteen


AprilTXT-75815
117 Added "small-to-medium-size …with two attached residential"

LM
Page 986 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Removed "additional…typically located at the rear of a lot that provides space for a single small"
Added "size single-family house, and is appropriately scaled to fit within lower-intensity residential"
Removed "for providing incubator spaces for small businesses
Removed "a small to medium size building with two attached residential
Removed "commercial, service or…storage use. This building type is important…"
Added "An additional structure typically located at the rest of a lot that provides space for a single
small commercial, office, service, or storage use. This building type is important for providing
incubator spaces for small businesses within walkable neighborhoods"
Added "The unit in front faces the street and has the form of a small single-family house. This duplex
building type is appropriately scaled to fit with lower intensity residential neighborhoods. It supports
well-designed moderate intensity development"... "A series of small, detached...buildings arranged to
define"
118 Added "…this building type. … Intensities…walkability. Sin: Cottage Court"
Removed "side and/or stacked dwelling…is appropriately scaled to fit…sparingly within low to
medium…design higher intensity of …walkability. Syn. Mansion"
Added "is appropriately scaled to fit sparingly within low to medium-intensity neighborhoods. Private
119
open space is not required but can be provided with a balcony. This building type enables
appropriately-scaled, well-designed higher intensity of development, and is important for providing a
broad choice of housing types and promoting walkability. Syn. Mansion Apartment House"
Removed "intensity neighborhoods. Private…open space is not required but can be provided with a
balcony. A wide range of housing types This building type enables appropriately sealed, well
120
development…broad choice… Apartment House well designed higher densities, and is important for
providing and promoting"
121 Replaces "building" with "structure"
Added Fourplex Court: Two detached structures, each with four units, located on a single lot with
each building arranged to define a shared court that is typically perpendicular to the street. The
shared court serves as common open space taking the place of a private yard. The common open
122 space is an essential element of this building type. A fourplex court may be scaled to fit within small
to medium-
intensity neighborhoods where it allows for appropriately scaled, well-designed moderate intensities
and is important for providing a wide range of housing types and promoting walkability.

19.09.070 Frontage Type All appropriate


- - Deleted "Allowed in" zone duplication on each Frontage Type spread
Standards Subsections
19.09.070.C Private Frontages 124 Removed "conjunction with other private"
Overview
125 Removed "frontage line with an attached"
126 Replaced "with the first story" with "an at-grade entrance along the public right-of-way"

LM
Page 987 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Added "A shopfront may be used in conjunction with other frontage types. Syn: Retail Frontage"

19.09.080 Open Space - All appropriate

TXT-75815
Changed: all references to "Civic Space Standards" replaced with "Open Space Standards"
Standards text
19.080.B Applicability Added "and the standards in the Subsection 19.09.100.J (Additional Standards for Large
Developments), if applicable."
Added "Open spaces are maintained outdoor spaces which are accessible by the general public,
improve the pedestrian
139
environment, are aesthetically pleasing, and serve as an amenity for the Downtown as a whole as
well as for occupants of the
building served by the open space. Open spaces are generally constructed by landowners during the
development process."
19.09.080.C Open Space In- 1. The owner of any property upon which a development is proposed may request to pay an in-lieu
Lieu Fee (new) fee for open space
required, if it is approved as a part of the site plan review for the development. A request to pay the
in-lieu fee for
required civic space must be made before the submittal of any application, must be approved by the
Director, and
recorded as a binding agreement as provided by the Department as part of the project’s approval.
Staff shall make the
140 following findings before approving any in-lieu fee proposal:
a. There is open space available or planned within the District in which the development is
proposed to offset the
need for the civic space;
b. The open space will be made available within a reasonable time period of the approval of the
development; and, 2. The in-lieu fee shall be determined by the Department based on the current
value of land and estimated
construction costs for the needed civic space. The cost per square footage, as amended from time to
time, shall be made available upon request of the applicant and kept for the Department’s records.
19.09.080.D-1 Open Space Added description for "Greenway”: Greenways are linear spaces for community gathering and
Types Overview strolling for nearby residents and employees. These spaces may be defined by tree-lined streets on
142
their flanks as well as by the buildings beyond. Greenways tend to have narrow dimensions that
support passive use and can serve as a green connector between destinations.
143 Added "These smaller-scaled spaces"
19.09.080.E Greenway (new) 146 NEW IN ENTIRETY

19.09.090 Thoroughfare 19.09.090.I Fremont East

Staff Report Page Fifteen


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
Standards District
160 Added Figure 19.09.090I-1 Thoroughfare Plan - Hierarchy
Thoroughfare
Plan

LM
Page 988 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

161 Added Figure 19.09.090I-2 Thoroughfare Plan - Downtown Thoroughfare Types

TXT-75815
19.09.100 Supplemental 19.09.100.A Purpose Replaced "The purpose of this Section is to provide a cross-reference from the Form-Based Code
to Transect provisions of LVMD
Zones 19.09 to the additional standards found in the Unified Development Code." with "The purpose of this
Section are:
1. To cross-reference between standards pertaining to LVMC 19.09 Form-Based Code and other
applicable additional
169 standards found in the Title 19; and
2. To provide additional special program provisions, standards, and requirements, such as the
provisions, standards, and requirements applicable to the Community Benefits Program."
19.09.100.B Applicability Added "the following sections"… ";and"
Deleted "Vision 2045" and "Las Vegas " (first usage of Downtown Master Plan already indicated in
19.09.010)
19.09.100.C Fencing and Added “In addition to those standards, the following shall apply: The maximum height of fences and
Screening walls erected between the front property line and the primary structure shall not exceed five (5) feet,
Standards and the maximum height of solid fences or walls shall not exceed two (2) feet. Notwithstanding the
preceding sentence, the Director may approve fences and walls that serve to satisfy screening
requirements set forth in this Title and that exceed the special fences and walls requirements. For the
purposes of satisfying this requirement, a solid fence or wall is any fence or wall that is opaque for
over sixty percent of its surface, as to be viewed perpendicularly from the right-of-way line.”
Added“ In addition to those standards, the following shall apply: The maximum height of fences and
walls erected between the front property line and the primary structure shall not exceed five (5) feet,
and the maximum height of solid fences or walls shall not exceed two (2) feet. Notwithstanding the
preceding sentence, the Director may approve fences and walls that serve to satisfy screening
requirements set forth in this Title and that exceed the special fences and walls requirements. For the
170 purposes of satisfying this requirement, a solid fence or wall is any fence or wall that is opaque for
over sixty percent of its surface, as to be viewed perpendicularly from the right-of-way line.”
19.09.030.3D Flood Control and
LID Standards Subsection named edited

19.09.100.E Landscaping Added "Planting Requirements" using language originally in "District-specific Standards for Street
Standards Trees" and reorganized language for clarity
Revised graphics
Added "The intent of these planting requirements is"
Deleted "s" from "trees"

Staff Report Page Sixteen


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
Deleted "downtown"
Added "required"

LM
Page 989 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Replaced "below" with "as indicated in Figure 19.09.040.C-1"


Deleted "#" in appropriate locations

TXT-75815
Replaced "conceptual" with "illustrative"
Deleted "or family"
Deleted "the provisions of"
19.09.100.G Parking Standards Deleted "The standards for"
Deleted "for individual uses"
Added "(Form-Based Code Parking Requirements)"
Revised cross-reference to Figure 19.09.100.G-1
Deleted "as amended from time to time"
Revised language for consistency in Tables G-1 and G-2
Revised spacing for consistency in Tables G-1 and G-2
Listed "How to apply the Form-Based Code Parking Requirements:" as 2
171
Added "(Downtown Parking Load Map)"
Replaced "step #1" with "2.a"
Replaced "utilizing" with "using"
Deleted "Comply with the requirement."
Added "(Variance)"
Deleted "as set forth and"
Deleted "accordingly to"
Added "above"
19.09.100.I Community
173-
Benefits Program NEW IN ENTIRETY
174
(new)
19.09.100.J Additional Replaced "For new development proposed on a large development site, i.e. a development proposed
Standards for on 50 percent or more
Large of an existing block, the following standards to ensure pedestrian connectivity through a block, shall
Developments apply;" with "The following standards apply to any new development proposed on a large
174
development site."
Added "Pedestrian Connectivity. Development proposed on a site exceeding 157,000 square feet,
which is the historic downtown block size, must be consistent with the following standards where

Staff Report Page Seventeen


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
feasible"

LM
Page 990 of 1332
Section Subsection Page Edit

Added: Civic Spaces


Development sites 40,000 square feet or more in area, new buildings, or additions to existing
buildings that are equal to 20 percent or more of the building’s gross floor area, must provide a
minimum of five percent of the site, or a portion of the site proposed for development in a multi-
phased project, as civic space(s). The civic space must be consistent with the standards in Section
19.09.080 (Civic Space Standards) and the following:
175 a. Dedicated rights-of-way, areas used to meet the minimum setbacks required for the zone, and

TXT-75815
minimum frontage standards established in Section 19.09.070 (Frontage Type Standards) may not
count toward the required amount of civic space.
b. The minimum required area of civic space may be provided by enlarging any or all allowed usable
open space(s) beyond the minimum required area or by providing additional open space(s) with a
minimum dimension as identified for each civic space type.
c. At grade open space must be directly accessible from the adjacent ground floor."

19.18 Definitions - - Subsection name changed from "Definitions used in the Form-Based Code" to "Form-Based Code
Definitions"
Added "This Section provides definitions of terms, phrases, and land uses for application only in the
FBC and that are technical or specialized, or that may not reflect common usage. For all other
176 definitions see LVMC Section Chapter 19.18 (Definitions and Measures)."
A Definitions Added "Affordable Units. Units that are made available for rent at a price based on the Fair Market
Rent value, as recorded and updated from time to time by the Department based on State and
Federal reports. These units are eligible to satisfy the eligibility requirement for the Affordable
Housing Bonus as part of a project application."
D Definitions Replaced "as required per" with "as established in LVMC Section"
178
Deleted last sentence of "Downtown Residential" definition
G Definitions Added "Greenway. A linear space that may be defined by tree-lined streets, which tents to have
180 narrow dimensions that support passive use and can serve as a green connector between
destinations."
Added "Utility Equipment. Electric transformers, switch cabinets, traffic signal cabinets, telephone or
U Definitions 184
television/cable cabinets, heating and cooling equipment, and similar devices."
Global Global - All appropriate Added "Transect Zones Standards" in cross-reference where appropriate
locations
Reorganized "19.09.040.C District-specific Standards for Street Trees" into appropriate standards for
each Subsection
- Revised grammar (e.g., comma usage) where appropriate
Replaced "shall" with "must" (or other appropriate term) in appropriate locations
Replaced "developments" with "projects" in appropriate locations

Staff Report Page Eighteen


April 9, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
LM
Page 991 of 1332
19.09 FORM-BASED CODE
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NV

Final Draft (Las Vegas Medical District) | July 30, 2018


Page 992 of 1332
This page intentionally left blank

Page 993 of 1332


TABLE OF CONTENTS
19.09.010 PREAMBLE

19.09.010.A Introduction
19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code?
19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.E Organization of the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code

19.09.020 PURPOSE AND INTENT

19.09.020.A Title
19.09.020.B Purpose of the Form-Based Code
19.09.020.C Authority
19.09.020.D Applicability
19.09.020.E Responsibility for Administration
19.09.020.F Organization of the Form-Based Code

19.09.030 ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES

19.09.030.A Purpose
19.09.030.B Applicability
19.09.030.C Application Review Procedures
19.09.030.D Subdivision of Land
19.09.030.E Vacations
19.09.030.F Rezoning
19.09.030.G Site Development Plan
19.09.030.H Special Use Permit
19.09.030.I Administrative Deviation
19.09.030.J Waiver
19.09.030.K Variance
19.09.030.L Development Agreement
19.09.030.M Miscellaneous Permits
19.09.030.N Master Sign Plan

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 994 of 1332 Page 09-i


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.030.O Nonconformities
19.09.030.P Enforcement
19.09.030.Q Extension of Time

  

19.09.040 SPECIFIC TO DISTRICTS

19.09.040.A Purpose
19.09.040.B Applicability
  
  




19.09.040.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.E Cashman District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.F Civic & Business District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.G Design District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.H Founders District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.I Fremont East (Placeholder)
19.09.040.J Gateway District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.K Historic Westside (Placeholder)
19.09.040.L Las Vegas Medical District
19.09.040.M Market District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.N Resort & Casino District (Placeholder)
19.09.040.O Symphony Park District (Placeholder)

19.09.050 TRANSECT ZONES

19.09.050.A Purpose
19.09.050.B Applicability
19.09.050.C Establishment of Transect Zones
19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview
19.09.050.E Transect Zones
19.09.050.E.003 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)
19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)
19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)
19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)
19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)
19.09.050.E.024 T4 Zone (T4) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.028 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) Placeholder

Page 09-ii Page 995 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.032 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) Placeholder


19.09.050.E.036 T4 Maker Zone (T4-M) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)
19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

19.09.050.F Special Districts


19.09.050.F.004 Special District Placeholder

19.09.060 BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS

19.09.060.A Purpose
19.09.060.B Applicability
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

19.09.070 FRONTAGE TYPE STANDARDS

19.09.070.A Purpose
19.09.070.B Applicability
19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview
19.09.070.D Arcade
19.09.070.E Common Yard
19.09.070.F Dooryard
19.09.070.G Forecourt
19.09.070.H Gallery
19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged
19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting
19.09.070.K Shopfront
19.09.070.L Stoop
19.09.070.M Terrace

19.09.080 CIVIC SPACE TYPE STANDARDS

19.09.080.A Purpose
19.09.080.B Applicability
19.09.080.C Civic Space Types Overview
19.09.080.D Greenway (Placeholder)
19.09.080.E Urban Park
19.09.080.F Square

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 996 of 1332 Page 09-iii


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.G Plaza
19.09.080.H Pocket Plaza
19.09.080.I Pocket Park
19.09.080.J Community Garden
19.09.080.K Playground

19.09.090 THOROUGHFARE TYPE STANDARDS

19.09.090.A Purpose
19.09.090.B Applicability
19.09.090.C Thoroughfare Standards Overview
19.09.090.D 18b Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.E Cashman District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.F Civic & Business District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.G Design District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.H Founders District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.I Fremont East District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.J Gateway District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.K Historic Westside District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan
19.09.090.M Market District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.N Resort & Casino District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.O Symphony Park District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.100 SUPPLEMENTAL TO TRANSECT ZONES

19.09.100.A Purpose
19.09.100.B Applicability
19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards
19.09.100.D Flood Control and LID Standards
19.09.100.E Landscaping Standards
19.09.100.F Outdoor Lighting Standards
19.09.100.G Parking Standards
19.09.100.H Sign Standards
19.09.100.I Incentives for Development Under the Form-Based Code (Placeholder)
19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Developments

Page 09-iv Page 997 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


19.09.010 PREAMBLE
Subsections:
19.09.010.A Introduction
19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code?
19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.E Organization of the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code

19.09.010.A Introduction
The Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Master Plan (Downtown Master Plan) adopted by the City Council on July
15, 2016 is the policy document that provides an overall vision, policy direction, and implementation strategy
in support of the ongoing recovery and revitalization of the Downtown region. The Downtown Master Plan
envisions and encourages downtown Las Vegas to achieve a compact, vibrant urban environment, with a
focus on higher density mixed-use development around transit hubs and activity nodes. The Master Plan is
intended to enable an energetic urban way of life and high-quality physical environment for locals and visitors
alike. To better anticipate growth and change, the Master Plan includes an expanded study area and includes
12 downtown planning districts including the addition of the Las Vegas Medical District and other peripheral
areas to the Downtown (See Figure B-1 Districts Within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District).

Adopted under the requirements of the Las Vegas Municipal Code, and other applicable laws, the Form-Based
Code establishes the new form-based standards for the area of the City included within the Downtown Las
Vegas Overlay (DTLV-O) established in LVMC Section 19.10.110. The Form-Based Code applies to the Downtown
Las Vegas Overlay District which encompasses the 12 Downtown Districts listed in Section 19.09.020.B
(Purpose of the Code). Over time a Regulating Plan and Form-Based Code will be applied to each of these 12
Downtown Districts, and when adopted, the existing base zones within each District and the standards in the
Interim Downtown Las Vegas Development Standards will be replaced by the standards included in the Form-
Based Code. The Form-Based Code has been designed so it can be easily updated as new Transect Zones
within the Downtown Form-Based Code are incrementally added.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 998 of 1332 Page 09.010-1


19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code? City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code?


A Form-Based Code (FBC) is a placed-based planning approach that supports walkable, mixed-use, and
compact urban environments rather than suburban development and sprawl. A FBC is an alternative to a
conventional zoning code.




!  "


#$ 
%
$

'"$  

 *$

results and a high-quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the
organizing principle for the code. A form-based code is a regulation, not a mere guideline, adopted into city,
+ /" ;$+<*

=
+
"$$
  %
 %
  $> '
'"$  @<
 $ 
'"$
*" $ '  *" $ '"

 "' ;X" ;[
'"$  /

%
    
;
*" $
%  
#$
@*
 " ;%   

A FBC addresses the relationship between building facades and the public realm (i.e. the public and private
space between buildings), the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the scale and types
of streets and blocks. Regulations and standards in a FBC are presented graphically in simple diagrams and
photographs as well as supplemental text. These standards are keyed to a plan (i.e. a Regulating Plan) that
functions like a zoning map that assigns an appropriate form and scale (i.e. the character) of development,
rather than only distinctions in land use types (see Figure B-1). So, while FBCs focus on an intended physical
form they do also regulate use by allowing an appropriate range of uses chosen to ensure compatibility
between uses and the intended physical form of the zone.

Figure B-1 Illustrative Pages and a Regulating Plan from Form-Based Codes

An important aspect of a FBC is that they are not just design guidelines; indeed, they replace the existing
> '  
'"$   %



'"$;
=
 ;
> '
'"$  


 +*
'" $ >
*; 
/+ / " 

" ;" 

  '
 %
  $> '  "$ $$ '


  *
"
> '
'"$   $ $


community’s vision or plans for the future. Like Las Vegas, many city residents are concerned about sprawl
    
$/ ;   $
"
/ 

%  
/ $" '
"  
X  
 
[
 ]

 =
 %
  $> '
 


*;+ 
;


/
"* 

of the standards they contain and how those standards are presented, the mechanism by which they are
implemented, and the built form they produce. In summary, a FBC is a regulatory tool drafted to implement
a community vision or plan that allows a community to approach the urban environment holistically by
establishing standards, for buildings, streets and sidewalks, parks, and parking as examples, that address the
design and regulation of both private and public space.

Page 09.010-2 Page 999 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code

19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code
The Rural-to-Urban Transect is an organizing principle used in Form-Based Codes to establish a hierarchy of

%  
$
*
 



 '   
>
$ ' 
;  
determined by the character, form, intensity of development, and type of environment, and secondly, by the
uses allowed within the environment. This hierarchy of environments is used as the organizing framework
for the FBC rather than the use of land use categories, which are typically used in conventional or Euclidean
zoning as the organizing framework.


; $ 
<
  +   % 
  ^ 
_
X
`"
$;


#>
@[/
each of which is given a number with the lower numbers designating more rural/natural zones and higher
numbers designating more urban zones, and which are arranged from most natural to most urban, as
follows: Natural (T1), Rural (T2), Sub-Urban (T3), General Urban (T4), Urban Center (T5), and Urban Core (T6),
together with a Special District (SD) designation for places with specialized purposes (e.g., heavy industrial,
entertainment, or university districts). See Figure C-1. The transect for Las Vegas is illustrated in Figure C-2.

Figure C-1 The Rural-to-Urban Transect

The rural-to-urban transect illustrating from left to right a continuum of environments (places) from the most rural to the most urban.
Source: Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1000 of 1332 Page 09.010-3


19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code? City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Figure C-2 The Las Vegas Transect

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

Page 09.010-4 Page 1001 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form Based Code

19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form Based Code

$$+ '
 ' *|
 %


}

 


 ~

1. Encourage a variety of housing types, development styles, and uses that provide diversity and visual
interest in the Downtown Overlay District while preserving the City’s desired character;
2. Encourage design, massing, and development standards that promote walkable urban cores;
3. Encourage high quality streetscape design that activates the public realm through pedestrian-oriented
and multimodal practices;
4. Encourage the development of neighborhoods that provide a high-quality living environment and
generate civic pride;
5. Encourage building design that complements surrounding development;
6. Encourage facades to be designed to include entries, porches, and other architectural elements that are
oriented to, and appropriate for, pedestrians; and
7. Encourage the preservation of areas of the City with unique historic character and context as well as
traditional single-family residential neighborhoods.

19.09.010.E Organization of the Form-Based Code


1. The following advisory text is intended to give a brief overview of the overall structure of Chapter 19.09
(Form-Based Code).
2. Section 19.09.010 - Preamble
The preamble introduces the context for the Form-Based Code within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay
District. It includes a brief overview of a FBC and the use of Transect Zones, describes guiding principles
for the FBC and how it is organized, and concludes with a short description of how to use the Code.
3. Section 19.09.020 - Purpose and Applicability
Establishes the legal foundation for the FBC and includes an overview of its purpose, organization,
authority, responsibility for administration, and applicability.
4. Section 19.09.030 - Administration and Procedures
Provides a cross-reference to the City’s existing processes by which development is permitted by the
 ; 

`" 


$

 ;
"* $" `"

!$% 

cross-reference to the City’s existing enforcement procedures.
5. 
    
!


 
" `"

   
6. Section 19.09.050 - Transect Zone Standards
Establishes the Transect Zones and Special District Zones for the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District,
+ 
 $

%
$
 
 
>

7. Section 19.09.060 - Building Types Overview
Provides an overview of a wide range of pre-approved building types that are appropriate for walkable,
transit-supportive urban environments in the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District.
8. Section 19.09.070 - Frontage Type Standards
Establishes standards for a range of pre-approved building frontages that provide an important
transition between the public street and the private frontages of buildings.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1002 of 1332 Page 09.010-5


19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

9. Section 19.09.080 - Civic Space Standards


Establishes a range of pre-approved civic space types intended to be integrated into medium and large
projects in the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District.
10. Section 19.09.090 - Thoroughfare Standards
Establishes a range of pre-approved standards for creating complete streets to reinforce walkable
communities by providing access to multiple modes of transportation.
11. Section 19.09.100 - Supplemental to Transect Zones
Provides a cross-reference to the City’s existing development standards that will also apply within the
Transect Zones, including for example, fencing and screening standards, landscaping standards, parking
standards, sign standards, and a placeholder for development incentives.

19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code


The basic steps a user would follow for the development of a new project using the Form-Based Code are
illustrated in Figure F-1.

Page 09.010-6 Page 1003 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code

Figure F-1 How to Use the Form-Based Code



   

Instructions Section Title

If your property needs to be subdivided, 19.16.040 Parcel Map,


follow the procedures and requirements for 19.16.050 Tentative Map,
subdividing land 19.16.060 and Final Map

Find the Transect Zone for your parcel



    19.09.050 Transect Zone Standards
Zone

 
        
19.09.040
your District Standards

Select the building type from the types


19.09.060 Building Type Standards
allowed in the Transect Zone

Apply building setbacks to the lot to be


developed, as well as applicable building 19.09.050 Transect Zone Standards
height, parking, etc. standards


   
19.09.070 Frontage Type Standards
that will be used and apply them to the building

Select the civic space and or thoroughfare 19.09.080 Civic Space Standards
standards that may apply to the development 19.09.090 Thoroughfare Standards

Follow the permit procedures and comply with Administration


19.09.030
the requirements for a permit application and Procedures

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1004 of 1332 Page 09.010-7


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1005 of 1332


19.09.020 PURPOSE AND INTENT
Subsections:
‡<  $

‡ …"




‡ <" ;


‡  <$ * $ ;
‡ˆ 
  * $ ;<  
‡ ‰' >  



19.09.020.A Title


€
'

%
$

$$*
‚ +  ;*
 




ƒ   
/ ;$*
‚ + 
#@

19.09.020.B Purpose of the Form-Based Code


1. 


 + + €
' 

 ;€
'


%
$

X [
%
$
 $


Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Master Plan
X + + „
…$ [
 + + „
…$ % 
 %
$$%   /$ ; 
   
$

  
';"
 ' '
%
; 
% $ >  
 + + 
 % * "* 
%  
+ "  '

 ; ^
"

%
$




"   "*  % ; 

2. 
 + + „
…$  $"

'   

  '+ 
%
$


€
' + + 
 $$'%
 
   %

 

/ $" '~
a. Land Use Regulation


$ "

'"$;
+ /
^$
/$
  
"


"


 *$
"
 
^
 
%$'

|
/
%$
%
$ '$;

'"$  / %

%
$
 /   


 %
_ '

$;*
 $ '
+ 
„
…$ 
" $
‚ '/
"'
+$‚*$
"* 
%  
/ "
%
$

 ^
"
  "*†
* Redevelopment Sites
! 
 % >

%
$
  ;

%
$
 
  ''
 %
"" $; 
|
 "$
" *$
 %
 %

  $ 

"  " ' 

 + + +  
    
"* " ' %
 $ ^
"

%
$

 

+
'  $$   ;

%
$
 

May 2018 | Final Draft Page 1006 of 1332 Page 09.020-1


19.09.020.A Title City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Figure B-1 Districts within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District

Downtown City of Las Vegas


Masterplan Printed: Tuesday, October 9, 2018

N Martin L King Blvd


Vegas Dr W Owens Ave E Owens Ave

N Las Vegas Blvd


N Tonopah Dr

Historic Westside District

St
E Washington Ave
W Washington Ave

ain
NM

N Maryland Pkwy
W Bonanza Rd
Cashman District
NR

N4
anc

th S
Ste E Bonanza Rd
h

S Martin L King Blvd

wa
oD

t
rt A
ve
r

SU
Resort & Casino District S9
5 N
US
Symphony Park District

N Bruce St
95
S Tonopah Dr

lvd
Market District
ga t
S
sB
th

Fremont East District


S4

Alta Dr
Ve
as

Las Vegas Medical District


SL

Civic & Business District Fre


m on
tS
t
Founders District

W Charleston Blvd 18b Las Vegas Arts District E Charleston Blvd


S Commerce St

S 15th St
S Main St
S Rancho Dr

S Eastern Ave
d
lR
tria

S Maryland Pkwy
us

W Oakey Blvd E Oakey Blvd


Ind

Design District Gateway District


Spencer St

·
R d
ise
ra d
Pa

W Sahara Ave E Sahara Ave


0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75
Miles

GIS maps are normally produced


only to meet the needs of the City.
Due to continuous development activity

Legend Las Vegas Medical District


this map is for reference only.
Geographic Information System
Planning & Development Dept.
702-229-6301

18b Las Vegas Arts District Founders District Pilot Area

Cashman District Fremont East District Market District


Civic & Business District Gateway District Resort & Casino District
Design District Historic Westside District Symphony Park District

Page 09.020-2 Page 1007 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.020.B Purpose of the Form-Based Code

 Community Development


+ + Š$ %* $ ; 


 
^  '" ;
"
/ $" '
%   


 %

% 


 % / $
% 
/
$
/
"  $/ 


  $


" ;"'" ;
 † 
 Downtown Enhancement
ˆ  


 + + 
%  
"' 
'"*$ 
$
%

  $

  '
 '

"'
 %

;
%

<
'"$;""
   + + Š" `"
 ; "$"
 


 $ 
  

%   "
    % "$

 
  
3. 
  



%
$
 $
*
/ 

 $$; 

*

 *$
+ 
 
'
' 

  $;/

"$$;
'"$

"
^  >
 * $ ;*
+


"
 
 

; $
>
 + 

;
$
"/
+ $$*
"



^  '/


+/+$‚*$
 ^
"

"* 
%  
  

 %
/ '+/ 
 $;" 

4. 

*$ 
 
_
 " $ ';
/ '
;
/ % 
;
/ 
"'
 $;+  
‡  
 + + €
'‰%
$;  
X€„
  [/

 '"
 $ 
*
$+~
a. €
'„
 $  †
* ‹€
'<  †
 
 ˆ  †
    †
e.  %  "
  †
f.
 '   †
g. " 
  †
h. Œ
+;  †
i.   ƒ
 
  †
| „‚
  †
‚ 
    † 
$ ; ;…‚  
5. 
  X
   [ $"
" `"
 
$ *$
 
 
+ +   

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1008 of 1332 Page 09.020-3


19.09.020.C Authority City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.020.C Authority



 

*
 
" ;%

 
 ;€
'*;

%
% 

"
XŽ[/ $" 'Ž
‡‹/ $  
+ €„
  ‡X<" ;[

19.09.020.D Applicability
1. ! 


 *
*; 
  /
$
 $;
 + + €
'‰%
$;  

*$ 
 €„
  + 


‡ + +   $ 
 
  
‡X…"


[
%    
$;
; $; +


>


 '   
*$ 
*; 
!    /%    

$;


> '
;

 '   $$$;
$    

 '

!  


 ;+ $$*
' 

 $

 '

 '   
+  $
$
+  
€
'„
 $  /'

$$;$
+

!‘ '
+;   %
/*
+

<$  %
 $
 "$
%‰%
 



+ $ *$
 
_

 
_ '„+ $$*
$



‡ + + 
 <
   
/

^  '*
>
+  
   
  

! 
  + + €
'
%
$
 + $$*

$
*;
  




2. !    $$$ *$


$/
/ " ;$+ 
'"$  '%
 '$ "
 

%
$
/ $
$$$ 
 ' 
+  
 + + €
'‰%
$;
 
3. 
  
$;
$$+ '~
a. <$$

+
%
$
+  
 
_

* <$$   
^  '
%
$
 


*" $ ' *;


†
 <

%  
 ;
 ;

 '
 
^  '*" $ '† 
 !%



  %
 "$

4. ƒ

%
 ;%   +  
 
%
$ '  ;
'"$  /+

%

 ;%   
  ;
 ;
/"$
/
'"$   
%
$ '  ;

'"$  /
%   +  

  %
 
 '
 
`" 

$$
'%
 / $$


  %
%   $$$;
5.  
*


 '
  *

 $;"

+ 
_
  

  + + €
'‰%
$;  
 

$$;


19.09.020.E Responsibility for Administration


1. Responsible Bodies and Individuals
 

$$*
 

*;
 



…$ ' $  

+ €„
  X<   [
2. Exercise of Discretion
! 

%
%   
$$+

%
+<" ;X
  *$
*;  % "$[

^
 
 
   
$   
  
`" 

/*"
  
 ;
 
 
 
   /
$$+ ' 
 $$*
"
~
a. 


%
$
$
+ $$$ *$
%   
X


* 

^
 
 
  + $$
"

 * $ ;


%
$
+   
/
""  '

/ 
" ;† 
 

      
+ 
 + + „
…$ 

Page 09.020-4 Page 1009 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


19.09.030 ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES
Subsections:
< …"

 <$ * $ ;


 <$   
%
+…
"

  "* %    
ˆ €  
 
> '
Π 

%
$
…$
 
 $

 
! <  %

%  
“ ƒ %

” €  


%
$
<'



„ „ 
$$
"…
 
Ž „
 ' …$
‰ Ž   

… ˆ 


• ˆ^
   


  

19.09.030.A Purpose
 
  % 

"
 
`" 



  / $ '/ 
 '$ '
$    

 $


`" 
*;




19.09.030.B Applicability


%
+

$$$ '$   +  
 + + €
'‰%
$;  X€„

  [

 €„
’X<$    …
"
[

19.09.030.C Application Review Procedures



 $ ' 
%
+$$$ '$   +  
 + + €
'‰%
$;  "$;
+ €„
  ’XŒ

$
`" 

[

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1010 of 1332 Page 09.030-1


19.09.030.D Subdivision of Land City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.030.D Subdivision of Land


  %   
$
; "
+
$/
"* $/%$ 
  
$
 
`" 
 $  
+ €„
  ’X…
$„[
‡  %   $ 
 


 
 
$
*$ 
 €„
  
’X…
$„[/
$  $$ $

 %

"* %   $  $  

+ €„
  ’‘X
 %
„[
 < $/

 $  
+ 
%

 %
/

 $

%
 '   %

 %
/"*
"* 
 $  
+ 
%   
Ž
‡‹/€„’‘X‰[/ 

`" 

 
 €„
  ’’
X $„[
 
%
  
$
;" "* % 

'
/
%   €„
  ’
X
%
  ;„[$$$;

19.09.030.E Vacations
…
"

%  "*$ 






*$ 
 €„
  ’‹
X€  [

19.09.030.F Rezoning
…
"

> '
$
;

*$ 
 €„
  ’X
> '[

19.09.030.G Site Development Plan Review


< 

%
$
…$ 
%
+/

„ „|/ 
`" 
$$
%
$
+  
 + + 
€
'‰%
$;   $  
+ €„
  ’X 

%
$
…$ 
%
+[

19.09.030.H Special Use Permit



…$ '   ;%
/%
+     /
; $   
 $

…
 
"
$ 
 
  ‘ˆX 
_
[ $  
+ €„
  ’
X
 $

 [

19.09.030.I Administrative Deviations



 
;'  <  %

%    $  
+ €„
  ’‡X<  %


%   [

19.09.030.J Waiver
< $  ;$;ƒ %
   



 
%
$
  *



…$ '   ;%
/%
+     /
; $   ƒ %
 
$  
+ €„
  ’Xƒ %
[

19.09.030.K Variance

…$ '    
 ;"  $;" €  
$    $  
+ €„

  ’X€  
[

19.09.030.L Development Agreement


…
"

*$

 ;"  $

 
%
$
<'




*$ 
 €„

  ’‘X
%
$
<'


[

Page 09.030-2 Page 1011 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.030.M Miscellaneous

19.09.030.M Miscellaneous
 

"

 " 

;
 $…
 
 
 % 
 

*$ 
 €„
  ’’X
;
 $…
 [
‡ 

"

 " 

; ' …
  
*$ 
 €„
  ’
X
; ' …
 [
 

"

 " 

‰"  …
  
*$ 
 €„
  ’‹
X
‰"  …
 [
 

"

 " 
„
$

  
*$ 
 €„
  ’X„
$


 [
‘ 

"

 " 
 ' 
 
 
*$ 
 €„
  ’‡X ' 

 
[

19.09.030.N Master Sign Plan




"

%$„
 ' …$  
*$ 
 €„
  ’‡X„
 ' 
…$ [

19.09.030.O Nonconformities
 
/""
/
$/ $+

$+"$*


  


/ 
+ *

    '*;
 
  
/"$;+ €„

XŽ   '
 ""
[
‡ < ;"
""
+
*$ 
 "
 % $  
$ *$
> '

'"$   
=

 

*$ 
 "  / + 
  

$ *$

'"$   /      '"
""
/ 
"
""
  
% $    $

 
%

     '""
  
"
  
_

%
"*$ 

;/
%  
$/
  / $*

  
+ 
'$
 + + „

…$  
"'
Ž   '""
  
"
  
_
;*


^ 
/
$'
/  %
 
  
 
$;  
+ 

`" 


€„
XŽ   '
 ""
[ „| 

%
$
…$  %

 
$$+ '  '

*;
…$ '     ;"  $~
 <$


$$+ '*

 % 

" ;~
 *$

  / $/
"*$ 
$/
;/
%  
$*


* 
 '

 
"$  '   

 
%
$$ 
 ;"
*
; 


^  '"
X[†
 
 '

^ 

^  ' *; 
 

X


  
‡ [† 



^   /
$'

/ %

+ $$




   ;/ ^ " '
    

‡


 < ;
^   
^
   
$ 
 ;    '"

"$$
$;
 %


  $
]
;    
$
 ;"
 % '"*$ 
$ 
;
%  '
  / $/
%  
$*

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1012 of 1332 Page 09.030-3


19.09.030.P Enforcement City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code


 $  
+ 
 "*
‚ '

`" 
; *
   >
%


 " '
%
+


^
      '""
  
"
 
 
_
† 
 < ; '
+ $$ " 
 *$; 


$ '
 $

  
 + + „

…$ *
"
$


$$+ '$;~
 


 '  % " 
" $ >


 

% $*$
$ ‚
$;*


% $*$
 



%
$
  
+ 
 + + „
…$ †
 
 ""


;"
$ '

%
$


  $

†
or
 
 %

+ $$  '  $;  
* $ ;‚

 %

    

+"
 
%
$
" 
  
+ 
 + + „
…$ Š$ '

%   

19.09.030.P Enforcement

 
 
  *$
$; '/ 
 '/ 
 '
%    
 
$  
+ €„
  Xˆ 

[

19.09.030.Q Extension of Time


< $  Š
`"
 
^
   
"*
 $
+ 
 
*


^   

 
%$/'

+ 

`" 
 $ '

 $  
+ €„
  ’‡’Xˆ^
  
 
[

  
<$$
"
 
X

[
 $"
 €„
‹X
   
„
"
[

Page 09.030-4 Page 1013 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


19.09.040 SPECIFIC TO DISTRICTS
$% &
< …"

 <$ * $ ;


  
  




  ‹€
'<  X…$
$
[
ˆ    X…$
$
[
  % –"
  X…$
$
[
Œ
 '   X…$
$
[
 " 
  X…$
$
[
! 
 ˆX…$
$
[
“ Œ
+;  X…$
$
[
”   ƒ
 
X…$
$
[
 €
'„
 $  
„ „‚
  X…$
$
[
Ž 
–   X…$
$
[
‰ ; ;…‚  X…$
$
[

19.09.040.A Purpose

"
 
    $ 
 ;" `"

'"$; 
$ *$

 
Districts within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District (LVMC Section 19.10.110) such as land use regulation,
signage, parking, streetscape or landscaping standards, to ensure that proposed development with the
 
_
 $  
+   
   


%
$


support the character, scale, and special requirements of the Downtown Districts.

ƒ

%
 =


"*
+


  
  $ 
 €„X
 
 [ 
%   $ 
 /
  
  $$$;

19.09.040.B Applicability
The standards in this Section apply to all proposed development in each of the Downtown Districts within the
Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District (LVMC Section 19.10.110). The regulations and standards that are applied
on parcels owned and operated by federal, state or city government through the application of this Code will
be interpreted as guidelines by the Review Authority. Nonetheless, to promote the urban form desired within
the Downtown Districts, compliance with all applicable standards and guidelines is encouraged.

!  "  #



"
 "*
   
 '`"$ ;/+$‚*$

%  

 >


" `"


 + +   "'
 $

    
 

$$


The tree species and planting requirements have been developed to be consistent with the goals and
*|
 %

^

 
 ;€
'„
…$ /
€   ‡‘ + + „
$ / 

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1014 of 1332 Page 09.040-1



       City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

  
  

% %   
;€
'€$$
;*  ;< $; +
$$


'  $…$  
%
$
*;
Ž…/

%  
$/ $/ 
  *



<$$



 


`" 
+  *"=
  
*‚

`" 

‘$$
 
 % 
 *$
X  …$$





   '



`" 

[  '"
X<   $…$  '
`" 

[
 

<$
  '


‰     >


 $  

 

' %
    "$

 



/ *; '

% '

 
 ;


 
       !"#

District $%  &'( ) *


+ $%  &'( , *
+

*  / Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia) Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia)
Arts Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Eysenhardtia Orthocarpa (Kidneywood) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
       
 !   "

4# Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)


Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
Parkinsonia Microphylla (Foothill Palo Verde) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Civic & Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Celtis Australis (Mediterranean Hackberry)
<" Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Celtis Occidentalis (Common Hackberry)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Ilex Vomitoria (Yaupon Holly) Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree)
Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree) Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange)
Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Platanus Occidentalis Var. Mexicana (Mexican
Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak) Sycamore)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak) Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak)
        Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Vachellia Farnesiana (Sweet Acacia) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak)
Vachellia Farnesiana (Sweet Acacia)

Page 09.040-2 Page 1015 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code
      

 Acacia Craspedocarpa (Leather Leaf Acacia) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Parkinsonia Florida (Blue Palo Verde)
Eysenhardtia Orthocarpa (Kidneywood) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Parkinsonia x ‘AZT Thornless’ (Thornless hybrid
Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree) Palo Verde)
Parkinsonia Florida (Blue Palo Verde) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Parkinsonia Microphylla (Foothill Palo Verde) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Parkinsonia x ‘AZT Thornless’ (Thornless hybrid  !   "
palo verde)
Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
       
 !   "
=" Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Celtis Australis (Mediterranean Hackberry)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Celtis Occidentalis (Common Hackberry)
Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Platanus Occidentalis Var. Mexicana (Mexican Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Sycamore) Platanus Occidentalis Var. Mexicana (Mexican
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Sycamore)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak)
Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak) Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak) Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak) Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak) Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak)
Styphnolobium japonicum (Japanese Pagoda Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak)
Tree) Styphnolobium japonicum (Japanese Pagoda Tree)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm) Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1016 of 1332 Page 09.040-3



       City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

=# > Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Celtis Australis (Mediterranean Hackberry)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Celtis Occidentalis (Common Hackberry)
Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Pistacia Chinensis (Chinese Pistache) Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Pistacia Chinensis (Chinese Pistache)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Platanus Occidentalis Var. Mexicana (Mexican
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak) Sycamore)
Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm) Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
@%J Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia) Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia)
Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia) Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia)
Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Eysenhardtia Orthocarpa (Kidneywood) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Ilex Vomitoria (Yaupon Holly)
Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)

K Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia) Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia)


( Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Vachellia Farnesiana (Sweet Acacia)
Vachellia Farnesiana (Sweet Acacia)
 / Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
N Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
District Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak)
Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak) Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
       
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)

Page 09.040-4 Page 1017 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code
 
*<  / $  &4+

NQ Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)


Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
 V Ilex Vomitoria (Yaupon Holly) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
 Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
J#4J Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Q Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Parkinsonia x ‘AZT Thornless’ (Thornless Hybrid
Parkinsonia x ‘AZT Thornless’ (Thornless Hybrid Palo Verde)
Palo Verde) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)

="
 
$  !"#

To promote urban trees biodiversity, and prevent the possible degradation of the downtown canopy due to species-
related diseases and parasites, the street strees as required per 19.09.050 shall be planted utilizing the minimum spacing
# $  % ' *+  ' */;   < % !  => ;     
representative of the actual tree species allowed in each district as per Table 19.09.040.C-1, uses alphabet letters (A, B, and
C) and images to symbolize trees pertaining to the same genus, or family, of trees, spaced at a minimum distance pattern
from each other. A Variance is not available to permit a deviation from the provisions of this Section.

' X

AB - AB

' XY
ABC - ABC

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1018 of 1332 Page 09.040-5



 
*<  / $  &4+ City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

'()*+  /;



<
Placeholder

=!  /;



<
Placeholder

! > @($   /;



<
Placeholder

X   /;



<
Placeholder

[$  /;



<
Placeholder

\=  /;



<
Placeholder

]X    /;



<
Placeholder

^[  _   /;



<
Placeholder

))*` 
  
1. $   K [

To support the long term harmonious development of the Las Vegas Medical District, accessory structures




*
"   $$;

 $
 $"
/"" $ ; 
 $
$

facilities, will be allowed as part of the development in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the
surrounding properties, as approved by the Director.

Y $  

‰ “"
/‡‡/
"  $

€
'„
 $  …$ /+ / '

'"$  /
% 
 


/$ 
*"=
/ 



+  
€
'„
 $  
(LVMD). Over time, these standards enhanced the physical quality of the LVMD, and created an environment
 
/

 $$;$
 '/ 


  "'
/+
$$$



 ' /
 " `"
$ 

 ' 
  ! 
 
 
  

%


 

LVMD, and to further this goal the following landscaping standards shall apply:

ˆ^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
+

 $$


*


  

€„X

[/ $" '
+ "*
`"
$;+"$ *
 $$
$  *;
virtue of adoption of provisions LVMC 19.09, shall be properly mantained, preserved, and replaced in case of
death.

Page 09.040-6 Page 1019 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code
   / N 

*! 


%
   
^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
/+

%
 } ;
 
*
+


%    
 €„ $
X

[ 


%  

^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
/



$$*
' %



%  
^  '


/"*/ $ 


*"=
  $"
/*"  $  
/ } ; 
/
' '

*‚/

>
/ $%
'



…$ '   ;' 

%$
^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
 % "


$/
;/ +
$
 
 † 
`" %$
"   $ >


/"*/ $ 



*"=

$$*
 $$
/%
*;=

d. A Variance is not available to permit a deviation from the provisions of this Section.

\  '   ]

…

  ‰

 …$>…"*$ 

/$>"*$ '
 '/ 
`" 
$$

+
 $ ]

%
$
/`"


'




$$% 

 '
and should be easily observed and accessible from the street and/or pedestrian circulation areas. When


 '


 ^
"
*" $ '/ $;
'}

]
"
+ $$*

  

‰"

  

 $>% 

/" 

 
$

]   
+
$$
   $" % 
"%
 '  '
 $

%
$
$$% 


  

 $> 
$  
 >


%
$
 
must include designs for such areas in the site plan. Such areas shall be provided according to the following
'" 
$
X

 '"
‡*
$+[~


%
$
$$% 

`"
$>
‘`"


'}
*" $ '
/`"


‘/`"


$'
*" $ '/    $
`"



$$*

`" 

   $‘`"


}
‚ '''
/

$$*

provided at the rate of one square foot per stall.

*"$>
$$*
     ;"
% 
*;  % "$
 *"


the use of their customers.

…

  

 $>$$*
 
'$
%
$$
 ' 


%
$
 
$$*
$
 
 '

  ] "
*
 %

 
 $;
 *$

Such spaces shall remain open to the public and accessible during normal hours of operation.

d. Maintenance of these open spaces will be the responsibility of the property owner.


ƒ

%

  
  
   


 ‘%
$  
each other, the provision which is more restrictive or imposes higher standards or requirements shall apply.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1020 of 1332 Page 09.040-7



 N NQ  &4+ City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

="
 Y
@"   '   ]

``j  /;



<
Placeholder

{@!   /;



<
Placeholder

|   ;j  /;



<
Placeholder

Page 09.040-8 Page 1021 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


19.09.050 TRANSECT ZONE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.050.A Purpose
19.09.050.B Applicability
19.09.050.C Establishment of Transect Zones
19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview
19.09.050.E Transect Zones
19.09.050.E.003 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)
19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)
19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)
19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)
19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)
19.09.050.E.024 T4 Zone (T4) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.028 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.032 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Maker Zone (T4-M) Placeholder
19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)
19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)
19.09.050.F Special Districts
19.09.050.F.004 Special District Placeholder

19.09.050.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish the regulatory standards for building form, building placement, and
land use within the Transect Zones applicable within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District (LVMC Section
19.10.110). These standards are intended to ensure that proposed development is compatible with future
development on neighboring properties, and produces an environment of desirable character and scale
consistent with the City’s vision for implementing the Downtown Master Plan, and any other applicable Master
Plan.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1022 of 1332 Page 09.050-1


19.09.050.B Applicability City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.B Applicability
1. The standards in this Section apply to all proposed development within the Transect Zones, and must be
considered in combination with the standards in Sections 19.09.060 (Building Type Standards), 19.09.070
(Frontage Type Standards), 19.09.080 (Civic Space Standards), 19.09.090 (Thoroughfare Standards), and

$ *$

  €„ $
X

%
$

[
2. One or more of each of the following must be selected for, and applied to, each lot:
a. Building Type (at least one primary building);
b. Frontage Type (multiple types as allowed by the Zone);
c. Thoroughfare Type (as per each District Thoroughfare Plan); and
d. Use Type (multiple types as allowed by the Zone).
3. One or more of the following may be selected and applied to each lot, as applicable;
a. Civic Space Type (multiple types are allowed within each Zone).
4. Building Types, Frontage Types, Civic Space Types, Thoroughfare Types, and Land Use Types not listed in
the standards for a zone are not allowed in that zone.

19.09.050.C Establishment of Transect Zones


1. Within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District, each District mapped on Figure B-1 (Districts Within
the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District) is divided into Transect Zones. These zones implement the
vision of the Downtown Master Plan by providing a mix of intensity of development and a mix of uses
that are compatible with the character of the Downtown’s districts and neighborhoods.
2. The Transect Zones listed in Section 19.09.050.D (Transect Zones Overview) are mapped on the City’s
] $_ '„X

€„
  X_ '„[

19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview


Table 19.09.050.D-1 (Transect Zones Overview) provides a summary of each of the Transect Zones that will be
applied within Downtown Las Vegas. This overview includes a typical illustrative photograph of the transect,
and a summary of the desired form, general use, and intent, of each Transect Zone.

Page 09.050-2 Page 1023 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC)
T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)
Placeholder
Photo Placeholder

Desired Form Desired Form Desired Form


Placeholder Attached or detached Attached
Large lot width Medium to large lot width
Large footprint Large footprint
Simple wall plane along street Simple wall plane along street
Buildings placed at or near the right- Buildings placed at or near the right-of-
of-way way
Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of frontages, mostly
mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront Shopfront
Small to no setbacks Small to no setbacks
4 to 12 stories 1 to 5 stories
General Use General Use General Use
Placeholder Œ" }
 $
% 
 Œ" }
 $/
% 
/
uses with a mix of commercial, industrial uses with a mix of commercial,

 
 $/
% 
/ —]
"
 
 
 $/
% 
/]
 —
on upper stories. industrial uses on upper stories.
Intent Intent Intent
Placeholder To reinforce a vibrant, compact, To maximize the opportunities created
walkable, urban core that serves by medium and high-intensity walkable
multiple districts and the overall urban environments. Specialized uses
region with a diverse range of uses in in this Zone can be categorized as
a variety of building types with active downtown light industrial, and utilize
pedestrian street facades on multiple performance measures to ensure
frontages. A range of regional-center  * $ ;*
+


 =



appropriate uses such as hospitals and Types.
other medical facilities support public
transportation alternatives.
Subsection Subsection Subsection
19.09.050.E.003 19.09.050.E.006 19.09.050.E.010

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1024 of 1332 Page 09.050-3


19.09.050.B Applicability City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

Desired Form Desired Form Desired Form


Attached Attached Attached
Medium to large lot width Large lot width Medium to large lot width
Large footprint Large footprint Medium to large footprint
Simple wall plane along street Simple wall plane along street Simple wall plane along street
Buildings placed at or near the right-of- Buildings placed at or near the right- Buildings placed at or near the right-
way of-way of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of building frontages, but
mostly Shopfront mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront mostly Arcade, Forecourt, Shopfront,
and Terrace
Small setbacks Small to no setbacks Medium setbacks
2 to 7 stories 3 to 7 stories 2 to 5 stories
General Use General Use General Use
Œ" }
 $
% 
 Œ" }
 $
% 
 Primarily multi-unit residential with
with a mix of commercial, residential, uses with a mix of commercial, neighborhood-supporting retail,

% 
/ —]
"
 "
 
 
 $/
% 
/ —]
"
 commercial, and/or service uses on the
stories. on upper stories. '" }
Intent Intent Intent
To enhance the City’s existing To provide a compact, walkable, To provide walkable, urban
corridors so that over time they will urban area in which revitalization neighborhoods with a variety of urban
become more walkable and serve and investment is encouraged and housing choices in small to large
multiple districts with a diverse that serves multiple districts with footprint, medium-intensity building
range of commercial, retail, service, 
 $/
 $/]
/  % "
 types that support and are within short
 ]
"
/ $$$'
 in a range of building types. This zone walking distance of neighborhood-
footprint, moderate-intensity building also supports public transportation serving commercial and service
types. This zone also supports public alternatives. uses. This zone also supports public
transportation hubs. transportation alternatives.
Subsection Subsection Subsection
19.09.050.E.012 19.09.050.E.016 19.09.050.E.020

Page 09.050-4 Page 1025 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.B Applicability

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N)
T4 Zone Placeholder (T4)
Placeholder Placeholder
Photo Placeholder Photo Placeholder Photo Placeholder

Desired Form Desired Form Desired Form


Placeholder Placeholder Placeholder

General Use General Use General Use


Placeholder Placeholder Placeholder

Intent Intent Intent


Placeholder Placeholder Placeholder
Subsection Subsection Subsection
19.09.050.E.024 19.09.050.E.028 19.09.050.E.032

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1026 of 1332 Page 09.050-5


19.09.050.B Applicability City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T4 Maker Zone (T4-M)
T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)
Placeholder
Photo Placeholder

Desired Form Desired Form Desired Form


Placeholder Attached or detached Typically detached; may be attached
Medium to large lot width Small to medium lot width
Medium to large footprint Small to medium footprint
Buildings placed at or near the right- Building placement varied, but mostly
of-way set back from right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, Primarily common yards, stoops, and
mostly Shopfront porches
Medium setbacks Medium to large setbacks
2 to 5 stories 1 to 2 stories

General Use General Use General Use


Placeholder Œ" }
 $
% 
 Primarily residential with smaller
with a mix of commercial, service, and/ neighborhood-supporting uses at
]
"
 "

 appropriate locations.
Intent Intent Intent
Placeholder To enhance the City’s existing To protect the integrity of existing
corridors so that over time they will small to medium lot, detached homes
become more walkable and serve and to reinforce their importance
multiple districts with a diverse within walkable neighborhoods with
range of commercial, retail, service, medium footprint, low-intensity housing
 ]
"
/ $$$'
 types within short walking distance
footprint, moderate-intensity building to public transportation options and
types. This zone also supports public neighborhood-serving retail and service
transportation alternatives. uses.

Subsection Subsection Subsection


19.09.050.E.036 19.09.050.E.040 19.09.050.E.044

Page 09.050-6 Page 1027 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.B Applicability

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


Special District
Placeholder
Photo Placeholder

Desired Form
Placeholder

General Use
Placeholder
Intent
Placeholder
Subsection
19.09.050.F.004

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1028 of 1332 Page 09.050-7


19.09.050.E.003 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) Placeholder City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.003 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) Placeholder

This page intentionally left blank

Page 09.050-8 Page 1029 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zones


The intent of the T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) is to T6-UG-L
provide a vibrant, compact, high-intensity walkable The limited sub-zone provides the same building form as
urban environment that can accommodate a variety the T6-UG Zone, with the following exceptions:
of building types with active pedestrian street facades
and a diverse range of uses supported by required a. The minimum allowed building height is 1 story, and
retail frontages on multiple streets. Parking is typically the maximum allowed building height is 14 stories.
provided in multi-story garages, which if placed next
to a street frontage, are lined with active retail/service
uses. This zone supports a wide range of regional-center C. Lot Size
appropriate uses as well as, employment, retail, services, No width, depth or area standards are included for the
civic, or public uses that support public transportation T6-UG Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
alternatives as well as walking and biking. Specialized the min. and max. building width and depth standards
"
/" $ $'

 $]
  for the building types established in Table D (Building
facilities, are accomodated in a limited Sub-Zone. The Types).
following form elements are generally appropriate in this
Zone:
Attached or detached
Large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
Simple wall plane along the street
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, mostly Arcade, Gallery,
and Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
Min. 4 to max. 12 stories

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1030 of 1332 Page 09.050-9


19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Courtyard Building

Side Street

Side Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Street Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
Width-to-Height
A B C D 1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
 
$
^ ' 
380 ft1,2 200 ft1 75 ft 100 ft Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F
1 1
$
^„  
200 ft 175 ft 75 ft 100 ft Percentage of width
50% max.
Courtyard Building 175 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft -- of building
Lined Building 

*" $ ' 
    Total Area 400 sf min.
Subsection D (Building Types, < "+";
'
"*


*;
Additional Standards for a Lined the building.
Building)
";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

Miscellaneous 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  The proportions and orientation of courtyards must

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
Notes: comfort.
1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series Access Standards
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
2
Access to the building must be from the street or from
Or the max. length of the block.
the courtyard.
Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
individual entry from the courtyard.
Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
between buildings
Key for Tables Courtyards must be accessible from the highest order
-- Ž
`" 

 "'
X


  [

Page 09.050-10 Page 1031 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

Lined Building

Side Street
G K

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Lined Building Miscellaneous
Dimensions - Exterior Building Building height must comply with the height standards
Length 400 ft max. 1,2
G 

 
_

Width 300 ft max. 1,2
H Allowed frontage types are described in Table G
(Frontages).
Depth (from front of 30 ft min.
I The side of an interior building exposed to a street or
building)
civic space must be lined by the exterior building.
Dimensions - Interior Building
A forecourt or pocket plaza is required along the primary
Width 180 ft max. J
frontage or at a primary street corner.
Depth 230 ft max. K
Access Standards
Notes:
1
Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

Or the max. length of the block.
2
accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
type.
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
present.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1032 of 1332 Page 09.050-11


19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
N M
P
S

R
T Q

Street
Street
Key for Diagrams
Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories P
Front1,2 Rear1,3,4
(Distance from Side Side1,3,4 Primary Building 4 min. - 12 max.
ROW/Lot Line) L M N O Accessory Building 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 0 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 Q
Max. 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft -- Height above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone 
 
 $ 1.50 ft min.
Front (min.) 80% 
% 

 $
0.50 ft max.
Side Street (min.) 60% uses
Miscellaneous Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
on corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Floor-to-Ceiling
Notes: Œ" } 14 ft min. R
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street 
} 9 ft min. S
ROW or a utility easement is needed. 3
2
Footprint
Sidewalk must be extended into the facade zone to meet the
building. Lot coverage 90% max.
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must Depth
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Œ" }
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a 30 ft min. T
space
minimum of 10 feet setback distance from the balcony or window
Notes:
edge to the property side and rear lot lines is required. 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the Form-Based Code
and additions to those buildings that are less than 50% of the
> >       $
2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.
3
Independently by lot coverage requirements, all buildings must still
meet setback requirements as per 19.09.050.E.E.

Page 09.050-12 Page 1033 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

Side Street
W V

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments into Facade Zone


Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G U V W X
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Frontage Type
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Arcade1
Terrace1 A A 19.09.070.M Gallery1
Pedestrian Access Shopfront: 10 ft 10 ft -- --
awning, balcony1,
Pedestrian entrances must be provided at least every 50
bay window,
$ '
'" } ;


 

projecting shade
side street facade.
structure
Miscellaneous

}
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
Balconies2
and other service entries must be screened and must be
Architectural
located to the rear or on side street facades. 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
Note:
1 Signage A A -- --
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
Driveways3 A3 A3 -- A3

Key for Tables Miscellaneous

-- Ž
`" 

 Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone,
and except for an arcade, gallery, or balconies and in
A Allowed
conjunction with an encroachment agreement, they are
$$+
+  

‰ƒ/$$
;‰ƒ/
lot line.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1034 of 1332 Page 09.050-13


19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T6-UG T6-UG-L Use Type T6-UG T6-UG-L
Residential Sub-Zone Other Sub-Zone
Assisted Living Apartment P -- Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground -- P
" ;
 

P -- Government Facility P P
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P -- Helipad C 3
C3
+ + 
 
 $ P --  `"
…
$
"Œ! $$  X‡‹‹
C C
Home Occupation P -- Gallons or Less)
Hospice P  `"
…
$
"Œ! $$  
-- S
(Over 288 Gallons)
Senior Citizen Apartments P --
Parking Facility P P
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly
Public Services, Minor C C
Church/House of Worship P P
Temporary Uses4 T T
Park, Playground, or Open Space P P
Urban Agriculture
Public or Private School (Primary or
S -- Community Garden P P
Secondary)
Retail Trade Notes:
     =    +[+\ ]= 
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural
Measures). Individual land use types that are included within a general
Establishment; Beer/Wine/Cooler On-
S --    > ] ^  ]  <   
 ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
†


=    +[+\
ƒ
—$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 

If a use is not listed in this table, it is not allowed in the T6-UG Zone and
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C -- _`{}` %`~;        +[+/+
Commercial, Other than Listed S S $  € % {  ]  $  $    
+ + 
 $ 1
P P   %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Use Tables) and the use supports the purpose and intent of the Zone and
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge
S S is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown Master Plan.
Bar; or Urban Lounge
^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ]  
Mixed-Use P C Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards applicable to

"  P P = 

" + <$$†
" 
C C 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as
with Service Bar
 {  
Employment and Services 2
„ >; "      "  { ";  …
Blood Plasma Donor Center P P >  <; $      {  
Clinic P P 3
For life-safety medical purposes only; otherwise a Special Use Permit is
Downtown Services 2
P P required.
4
„  $   ^ „  '‡     
Hospital P P
{  
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P P
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
 Key
P P
Than Listed P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Social Service Provider P P C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Telecommunication Facilities 

 €„
  ‡    $
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate uses.
Height); Wireless Communication Facility, S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
S S
Non-Stealth Design (Not Qualifying for * '
 $

 

 €„
Conditional Use Approval) Section 19.16.110.
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying C C 

 €„
  ’’
for Conditional Use Approval) -- Use is not allowed.

Page 09.050-14 Page 1035 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

BB

Side Street
AA Z

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side <   /
%  /Ž
+" $ '1
Line (min.)
Y Z AA BB < 5,000 sf 2
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/ 8
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‡/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
No new surface parking lots are allowed adjacent to Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
primary or side street frontages. ’X<
;_
[ƒ

 =


"/

provisions of 19.09.040 shall apply.
Covered parking in parking areas established before


=
 %

 $$+
+ 
*‚ All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
primary street or side street.  } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
When a lot has an adjoining side street, parking must be
Note:
accessed only from the side street.
1
^‚    +[[/] "%
Required Parking


€„
  ŒX…‚ ' [
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.

`" 
‚ ';*

"

 €„
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Notes:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1036 of 1332 Page 09.050-15


19.09.050.E.006 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Civic Space Standards) if
civic space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater

Page 09.050-16 Page 1037 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The intent of the T5 Maker Zone is to None
maximize the opportunities created by medium and C. Lot Size
high-intensity walkable urban environments. This zone
No width, depth or area standards are included for the
is well connected to transportation infrastructure and
T5-M Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
accommodates a variety of new and repurposed
the min. and max. building width and depth standards
*" $ ';
 
 
 $/
 $/]
/
for the building types established in Table D (Building
and service uses while providing for centrally located
Types).
employment sites. The diverse mix of uses supports
active transportation commuting modes and a lively
24-hour neighborhood during both work and non-work
hours. Specialized uses in this Zone can be categorized
as downtown light industrial, and utilize performance
measures and conditions to ensure compatibility
*
+


 =


;

$$+ '
elements are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached
Medium to Large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
Simple wall plane along the street
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of frontages, mostly Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
Min. 1 to max. 5 stories

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1038 of 1332 Page 09.050-17


19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Lined Building

Side Street
Side Street
C
G K

B
I
A A

Street Street

Key for Diagrams Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area Courtyard Area Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Lined Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Exterior Building
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Length 400 ft max.1,2 G
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) 1,2
Width 300 ft max. H
A B C D
Depth (from front of 30 ft min.
$
^„  
200 ft1 175 ft1 75 ft 100 ft I
building)
$
^+ 
150 ft1 150 ft 60 ft 60 ft Dimensions - Interior Building
Multi-plex: Large 100 ft 75 ft 20 ft 30 ft Width 180 ft max. J
Loft 175 ft1 -- 30 ft 30 ft Depth 230 ft max. K
Live/Work 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft Notes:
1
+"
18-36 ft 45 ft -- -- Or the max. length of the block.
2
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series of
Lined Building 

*" $ ' 
   
buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
Subsection D (Building Types,
Additional Standards for a Lined Miscellaneous
Building) Building height must comply with the height standards
Accessory -- -- -- -- 

 
_

Structure2 Allowed frontage types are described in Table G
Miscellaneous (Frontages).

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  The side of an interior building exposed to a street or civic

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 space must be lined by the exterior building.
Notes: Access Standards
1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series of Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

buildings no wider than 100 ft each. accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage
2
The total GFA of all Accessory Dwelling Units and Accessory type.
Structures cannot exceed 60% of the GFA of the primary structure.
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
Key for Tables present.
-- Ž
`" 



Page 09.050-18 Page 1039 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

Side Street
N M
P
S

R
T Q

Street
Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories P
Front1,2 Rear1,3,4
(Distance from Side Side1,3,4 Primary Building 1 min. - 5 max.
ROW/Lot Line) L M N O Accessory Building 4 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 0 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 Q
Max. 10 ft 15 ft 10 ft -- Height above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone 
 
 $ 1.50 ft min.
Front (min.) 70% All other uses 2 ft max.
Side Street (min.) 50% Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Miscellaneous *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Floor-to-Ceiling
corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Œ" } 14 ft min. R
Notes: 
} 9 ft min. S
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street 3
Footprint
ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the facade zone to meet the Lot coverage 90% max.
building. Depth
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must Œ" }
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. 30 ft min. T
space
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum
Notes:
of 10 feet setback distance from the balcony or window edge to the 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the Form-Based Code
property side and rear lot line is required.
and additions to those buildings that are less than 50% of the
> >       $
2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.
3
Independently by lot coverage requirements, all buildings must still
meet setback requirements as per 19.09.050.E.E.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1040 of 1332 Page 09.050-19


19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
W V

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments into Facade Zone


Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G U V W X
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Frontage Type
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Arcade1
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M Gallery1
Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F Shopfront: 10 ft 10 ft -- --
awning, balcony1,
Pedestrian Access
bay window, or
Pedestrian entrances must be provided at least every 80 projecting shade


$ '
'" } ;


 
 structure
side street facade.

}
Miscellaneous 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, Architectural
and other service entries must be screened and must be 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
located to the rear or on side street facades.
Signage A A -- --
Driveways A 3
A 3
-- A
Miscellaneous
Key for Tables
Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone,
-- Ž
`" 


and except for an arcade, gallery, or balconies and in
A Allowed conjunction with an encroachment agreement, they are
$$+
+  

‰ƒ/$$
;‰ƒ/
lot line.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

Page 09.050-20 Page 1041 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T5-M Use Type T5-M
Residential Urban Agriculture
Assisted Living Apartment P Community Garden P
" ;
 

P
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P Notes:
     =    +[+\ ]=
+ + 
 
 $ P
and Measures). Individual land use types that are included within a
Home Occupation P >     > ] ^  ]  <
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly    =    +[+\
Church/House of Worship P If a use is not listed in this table, it is not allowed in the T5-M Zone,
       +[+/+ $ 
Park, Playground, or Open Space P
Prohibited Uses) the Director may determine that a use not listed in
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S %    ‚       +[+/+  {
Retail Trade Tables) and the use supports the purpose and intent of the Zone
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown Master


—ƒ
—$
‰  ‰=$
 Plan.
S ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
ˆ*$ 
†

—ƒ
—$
‰=$

Establishment and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
%  = 
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C
1
+ + 
 $ P 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
Commercial, Other than Listed S   {  
2
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; or The conditions for all individual uses that are grouped under the
S Downtown Industrial are replaced by the following conditions: 1) All
Urban Lounge
work shall be performed within a completely enclosed building; 2)
Mixed-Use P
There shall be no audible or noticeable indication of a manufacturing

"  P operation outside the building, and no noticeable smoke or foreign

" + <$$†
" +  matter emitted; 3) Outdoor storage is only allowed as accessory
C
Service Bar to the principal use and shall not be visible from the right-of-way
Employment and Services and adjacent properties; 4) Work equipment larger than 60 cubic
feet shall not be visible from the right-of-way; and 5) All hazardous
Downtown Industrial2 C
materials resulting from the repair, storage, or dismantling of
3
Downtown Services P vehicles shall be properly stored and removed from the premises in
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P a timely manner. Storage, use and removal of toxic substances, solid
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
     $$% #;    >; ;
P
Listed solvents and thinners, shall conform to all applicable Federal, State,
and local regulations.
Social Service Provider C
3
„ >; "      "  { "; 
Telecommunication Facilities
… >  <; $      {  
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height); 4
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth  {  
S
Design (Not Qualifying for Conditional Use
Approval)
Key
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for C
Conditional Use Approval) C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions


 €„
  ‡    $
Other
uses.
Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P
S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
Government Facility P * '
 $

 

 €„
Helipad S Section 19.16.110.
Parking Facility P T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Public Services, Minor C 

 €„
  ’’
Temporary Uses4 T -- Use is not allowed.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1042 of 1332 Page 09.050-21


19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

BB

Side Street
AA Z

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side <   /
%  /Ž
+" $ '1
Line (min.)
Y Z AA BB < 5,000 sf 2
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/ 8
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‡/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
No new surface parking lots are allowed adjacent to
’X<
;_
[ƒ

 =


"/

primary or side street frontages.
provisions of 19.09.040 shall apply.
Covered parking in parking areas established before
All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid


=
 %

 $$+
+ 
*‚
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

primary street or side street.
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
When a lot has an adjoining side street, parking must be
Note:
accessed only from the side street. 1
^‚    +[[/] "%
Required Parking


€„
  ŒX…‚ ' [
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.

`" 
‚ ';*

"

 €„
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed.

Page 09.050-22 Page 1043 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.010 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Civic Space Standards) if
civic space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1044 of 1332 Page 09.050-23


19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The T5 Corridor Zone is intended to enhance the City’s None
existing corridors by allowing a wide variety of building
types to accommodate a range of commercial, retail,
C. Lot Size
]
/ 
% 
"
 $$$'
 
buildings along major arterial corridors carrying high No width, depth or area standards are included for the
%$"
]ƒ 
""

%
$
 T5-C Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
"    ' $     / the min. and max. building width and depth standards
these corridors, such as the Multi-Functional Spine or for the building types established in Table D (Building
Iconic/Ceremonial Corridors, supported by this Zone Types).
will likely transition to a more urban and walkable built
environment with residential uses behind or above
the commercial uses. The following form elements are
generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached
Medium to large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Mix of building frontages, but mostly Shopfront
Small setbacks
Min. 2 to max. 7 stories

Page 09.050-24 Page 1045 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

Courtyard Building

Side Street

Side Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Street Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F
Body Wing Percentage of width
50% max.
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth of building
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) Total Area 400 sf min.
A B C D < "+";
'
"*


*;
$
^ ' 
380 ft1 200 ft1 75 ft 100 ft the building.
$
^„  
200 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft 75 ft ";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

Lined Building 

 
    

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
Subsection D (Additional The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
Standards for a Lined Building) be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
$
^+ 
90 ft 150 ft 40 ft 40 ft comfort.

Courtyard Building 90 ft 150 ft 40 ft 100 ft Access Standards

Multi-plex: Large 90 ft 70 ft 20 ft 30 ft Access to the building must be from the street or from
the courtyard.
Live/Work2 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft
3
Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
Accessory Structure -- -- -- --
individual entry from the courtyard.
Miscellaneous
Multiple courtyards must be connected through and

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  between buildings

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "

Courtyards must be accessible from the primary street.
Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building Notes:
Dimensions - Courtyard(s) 1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
2
Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max.
Width-to-Height
1:2 min.; 2:1 max. width of all attached buildings must not exceed 150 ft.
 4
3
The total GFA of all Accessory Dwelling Units and Accessory
Structures cannot exceed 10% of the GFA of the primary structure.
Key for Tables 4
> > $ $   >   = ‚
-- Ž
`" 

 the Zone.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1046 of 1332 Page 09.050-25


19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
I H

Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area Facade Zone

D. Building Types (cont.) E. Building Placement


Additional Standards for a Lined Building Setback Distance Corner Interior
Front1,2 Rear3,4
Dimensions - Exterior Building (Distance from Side1 Side3,4
Length 400 ft max.1,2 G ROW/Lot Line) G H I J
Width 300 ft max. 1,2
H Primary Building
Depth (from front of 30 ft min. Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 0 ft
I
building) Max. 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft --
Dimensions - Interior Building Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone
Width 180 ft max. J Front (min.) 80%
Depth 230 ft max. K Side Street (min.) 65%
Notes: Miscellaneous
1
Or the max. length of the block.
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed
2
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
on corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided.
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
Notes:
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street
ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the
building.
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements.
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a
minimum of 10 feet setback distance from the balcony or window
edge to the property side and rear lot line is required.

Page 09.050-26 Page 1047 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

K
N

M
L
O

Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area Facade Zone

2
  ˆ   %  
F. Building Form Standards
+[\‰Š ^ "ˆ    
Building Height Stories K 3
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the Form-Based Code
Primary Building 2 min. - 7 max.1,2 and additions to those buildings that are less than 50% of the
Accessory Building 2 max. > >       $
4
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
Primary Building
street are exempt.
Ground Floor Finish Level3,4 L 5
Independently by lot coverage requirements, all buildings must still
Height above curb meet setback requirements as per 19.09.050.E.E.

 
 $ 1.50 ft min.
G. Frontages

% 

 $
0.50 ft max. Private Frontage Corner
uses Front Standards
Type Side
Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D
*" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G
Floor-to-Ceiling
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H
Œ" } 14 ft min. M
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K

} 9 ft min. N
1
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M
Footprint5
Pedestrian Access
Lot coverage
Pedestrian entrances must be provided at least every 50
Mixed-use with
95% max. $ '
'" } ;


 

residential uses
side street facade.
All other uses 85% max.
Miscellaneous
Depth
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors,
Œ" }
30 ft min. O and other service entries must be screened and must be
Notes:
located to the rear or on side street facades.
1
Max. 10 stories allowed for only the Flex High-Rise Building Type Note:
1
%ˆ  ˆ  ]<$ € ^< ^‚   Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
 +[+_+} ˆ ^< ‚  ]<$ €

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1048 of 1332 Page 09.050-27


19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
R Q

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

H. Encroachments into Facade Zone Notes:


1
Corner Interior May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
Front Rear curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.) 2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
Type (max.) (max.)
subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
P Q R S 3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.
Frontage Type
Arcade1
Gallery1
Shopfront: 10 ft 10 ft -- --
awning, balcony1,
bay window, or
projecting shade
structure

}
6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2
Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
Signage A A -- --
Driveways3 A3 A3 -- A
Miscellaneous
Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, and

^
 
/'$$
;/"
}*$

Key for Tables
and in conjunction with an encroachment agreement,

;
 $$+
+  

‰ƒ/$$
;‰ƒ/ -- Ž
`" 


across a lot line. A Allowed

Page 09.050-28 Page 1049 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T5-C Use Type T5-C
Residential Social Services Provider C
Accessory Structure P Telecommunication Facilities
Assisted Living Apartment P Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);
" ;
 

C Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth
S
Design (Not Qualifying for Conditional Use
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P
Approval)
+ + 
 
 $ P
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design or
Home Occupation P Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for Conditional Use C
Hospice P Approval)
Senior Citizen Apartments P Other
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P Government Facility P
Church/House of Worship P Parking Facility P
College, University, or Seminary P Public Services, Minor C

 $

  —<"

/!  P Temporary Uses 3
T
" ;

   $ ;/…"*$  P Urban Agriculture
Park, Playground, or Open Space P Community Garden P
Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S Notes:
Trade School P      =    +[+\ ]=
and Measures). Individual land use types that are included within a
Retail Trade
>     > ] ^  ]  <
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; Beer/    =    +[+\
ƒ
—$
‰  ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
† If a use is not listed in this table, it is not allowed in the T5-C Zone;
S


—ƒ
—$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
/

—        +[+/+ $ 


Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment Prohibited Uses) the Director may determine that a use not listed
+ + 
 $1 P  %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C Use Tables) and the use supports the purpose and intent of the
Zone and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; Urban
S Master Plan.
" '
†…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 

^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Mixed-Use P and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards

"  P %  = 
1

" + <$$†
" +  Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
C   {  
Service Bar
2
„ >; "      "  { " 
Employment & Services
… >  <; $      {  
Blood Plasma Donor Center P 3
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
Clinic P  {  
Downtown Services2 P Key
   $
% 
!  "  /

 S P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Hospital P C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites S 

 €„
  ‡    $

$/
 

P uses.

Individual Care Center P S 


 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
* '
 $

 

 €„
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P
Section 19.16.110.
Massage Establishment S
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
  

 €„
  ’’
P
Listed
-- Use is not allowed.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1050 of 1332 Page 09.050-29


19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
V U

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side <   /
%  /Ž
+" $ '1
Line (min.)
T U V W < 1,000 sf --
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/‘ 2
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft ›‡/‘ 4
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way Miscellaneous
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
max. max. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
Miscellaneous Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
Driveways may be shared between adjacent parcels. ’X<
;_
[ƒ

 =


"/

provisions of 19.09.040 shall apply.
No new surface parking lots are allowed next to primary
or side street frontages. All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
must be accessed only from the secondary street.
Note:
Required Parking 1
^‚    +[[/] "%


€„
  ŒX…‚ ' [
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards. Key for Tables

`" 
‚ ';*

"

 €„ -- Ž
`" 


Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed.

Page 09.050-30 Page 1051 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 15 ft min.
Depth 15 ft min.
Common open space
250 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Civic Space Standards) if
civic space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1052 of 1332 Page 09.050-31


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The intent of the T5 Main Street Zone is to provide None
a compact and walkable urban environment with
building types that can accommodate a diverse range
C. Lot Size

  $]
/
% 
/ 
 $"
/+
$$

 
 $"
 
"
}*" $ '< '
 No width, depth or area standards are included for the
of building types allows for a majority of active pedestrian T5-MS Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
street facades supported by required retail frontages on the min. and max. building width and depth standards
multiple streets. Parking is typically provided in multi- for the building types established in Table D (Building
story garages, which if placed next to a street frontage, Types).

$
+  %

 $—
% 
"

}
^ *$

nature of the building types is intended to encourage
revitalization and investment. The following form
elements are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached
Large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
Simple wall plane along the street
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, mostly Arcade, Gallery,
and Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
Min. 3 to max. 7 stories

Page 09.050-32 Page 1053 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

Courtyard Building

Side Street

Side Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Street Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
Width-to-Height
A B C D 1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
 3
$
^ ' 
380 ft1 200 ft1 75 ft 100 ft Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F
1 1
$
^„  
200 ft 175 ft 75 ft 100 ft Percentage of
50% max.
$
^+ 
150 ft 150 ft 70 ft 70 ft width of building
Courtyard Building 175 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft -- Total Area 400 sf min.
Accessory < "+";
'
"*


*;
-- -- -- --
Structure2 the building.
Lined Building 

*" $ ' 
    ";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

Subsection D (Building Types, 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
Additional Standards for a Lined The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
Building) be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
Miscellaneous comfort.

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  Access Standards

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 Access to the building must be from the street or from
Notes: the courtyard.
1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each. individual entry from the courtyard.
2
The total GFA of all Accessory Dwelling Units and Accessory
Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
Structures cannot exceed 20% of the GFA of the primary structure.
3
between buildings.
> > $ $   >   = ‚
the Zone. Courtyards must be accessible from the primary street.

Key for Tables


-- Ž
`" 



July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1054 of 1332 Page 09.050-33


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Lined Building

Side Street
G K

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Lined Building Miscellaneous
Dimensions - Exterior Building Building height must comply with the height standards
Length 400 ft max. 1
G 

 
_

Width 300 ft max. 2
H Allowed frontage types are described in Table G
(Frontages).
Depth (from front 30 ft min.
I The side of an interior building exposed to a street or
of building)
civic space must be lined by the exterior building.
Dimensions - Interior Building
A forecourt or pocket plaza is required along the primary
Width 180 ft max. J
frontage or at a primary street corner.
Depth 230 ft max. K
Access Standards
Notes:
1
Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

Or the max. length of the block.
2
accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
type.
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
present.

Page 09.050-34 Page 1055 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

Side Street
N M
P
S

R
T Q

Street
Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories P
Front1,2 Rear4
(Distance from Side1,2 Side3,4 Primary Building 2 min. - 7 max.
ROW/Lot Line) L M N O Accessory Building 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 10 ft 0 ft3 5 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 Q
Max. 10 ft 20 ft 15 -- Height above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone 
 
 $ 1.50 ft min.
Front (min.) 70% 
% 

 $
0.50 ft max.
Side Street (min.) 60% uses
Miscellaneous Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
on corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Floor-to-Ceiling
Notes: Œ" } 14 ft min. R
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where 
} 9 ft min. S
street ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
Footprint3
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the
building. Lot coverage 90% max.
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property Depth
line must comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code Œ" }
requirements. 30 ft min. T
space
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a
Notes:
minimum of 10 feet setback distance from the balcony or window 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the Form-Based Code
edge to the property side and rear lot line is required.
and additions to those buildings that are less than 50% of the
> >       $
Key for Tables 2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
-- Ž
`" 

 street are exempt.
3
Independently by lot coverage requirements, all buildings must
still meet setback requirements as per 19.09.050.E.E.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1056 of 1332 Page 09.050-35


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
W V

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments into Facade Zone


Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F U V W X
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G Frontage Type
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Arcade1
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Gallery1
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L Shopfront: 10 ft 10 ft -- --
1 awning, balcony1,
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M
bay window, or
Pedestrian Access projecting shade
Pedestrian entrances must be provided at least every 50 structure
$ '
'" } ;


 
 
}
side street facade. 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2
Miscellaneous Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, Features
and other service entries must be screened and must be Signage A A -- --
located to the rear or on side street facades. 3 3 3
Driveways A A -- --
Note:
1 Miscellaneous
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone,
and except for an arcade, gallery, or balconies and in
conjunction with an encroachment agreement, they are
Key for Tables $$+
+  

‰ƒ/$$
;‰ƒ/
lot line.
-- Ž
`" 


Notes:
A Allowed 1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

Page 09.050-36 Page 1057 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T5-MS Use Type T5-MS
Residential Telecommunication Facilities
Accessory Structure P Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);
Assisted Living Apartment P Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth
S
Design (Not Qualifying for Conditional Use
" ;
 

P
Approval)
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
+ + 
 
 $ P Design or Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for C
Home Occupation P Conditional Use Approval)
Hospice P Other
Senior Citizen Apartments P Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground S
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Government Facility P
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P Parking Facility P
Church/House of Worship P Public Services, Minor C
College, University, or Seminary P Temporary Uses3 T

 $

  —<"

/!  P Urban Agriculture
" ;

  $ $ ;X…"*$ [ P Community Garden P
Park, Playground, or Open Space P Notes:
Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P      =    +[+\ ]=
and Measures). Individual land use types that are included within a
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S
>     > ] ^  ]  <
Trade School P    =    +[+\
Retail Trade If a use is not listed in this table, it is not allowed in the T5-MS Zone;
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment;        +[+/+ $ 


—ƒ
—$
‰  ‰=$
 Prohibited Uses) the Director may determine that a use not listed
S  %    ‚       +[+/+ 
ˆ*$ 
†

—ƒ
—$
‰=$

Establishment Use Tables) and the use supports the purpose and intent of the
Zone and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C
Master Plan.
+ + 
 $1 P ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; or %  = 
S 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
Urban Lounge
  {  
Mixed-Use P 2
„ >; "      "  { " 
…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 S … >  <; $      {  

"  P 3
„  $   ^ „  '‡    

" + <$$†
" +   {  
P
Service Bar
Employment & Services Key
Blood Plasma Donor Center S P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Clinic P C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Downtown Services2 P 

 €„
  ‡    $
Hospital C uses.
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites S S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
* '
 $

 

 €„

$/
 

S
Section 19.16.110.
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Marijuana Dispensary S 

 €„
  ’’
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
  -- Use is not allowed.
P
Listed

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1058 of 1332 Page 09.050-37


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

BB

Side Street
AA Z

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side <   /
%  /Ž
+" $ '1
Line (min.)
Y Z AA BB < 2,500 sf --
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‡/‘œ‘/ 2
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
must be accessed only from the secondary street. ’X<
;_
[ƒ

 =


"/

provisions of 19.09.040 shall apply.
Required Parking
All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid


€„
  ŒX…‚ ' [
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.

`" 
‚ ';*

"

 €„
Note:
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives). 1
^‚    +[[/] "%
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed. Key for Tables
-- Ž
`" 



Page 09.050-38 Page 1059 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Civic Space Standards) if
civic space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1060 of 1332 Page 09.050-39


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The intent of the T5 Neighborhood Zone is to provide None
a compact urban form that accommodates a variety
of urban housing choices, including small footprint/
C. Lot Size
low density building types to medium/large footprint
building types, as well as limited retail and services No width, depth or area standards are included for the
uses. This Zone reinforces the walkable nature of T5-N Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
the neighborhood, supports neighborhood-serving the min. and max. building width and depth standards
commercial and service uses adjacent to this Zone, and for the building types established in Table D (Building
supports public transportation alternatives. The following Types).
form elements are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached or detached
Medium to large lot width
Medium to large footprint and lot coverage
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, but primarily Arcade,
Dooryard, Forecourt, Shopfront, or Terrace
Medium setbacks
Min. 2 to max. 5 stories

Page 09.050-40 Page 1061 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

Side Street
C

B
A A

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Miscellaneous
Body Wing 
}$
 ;}" *
$'
 
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth 
}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "

(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) Notes:
1
A B C D Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
1 1 of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
Courtyard Building 175 ft 175 ft 40 ft --
2
The shared courtyard must be accessible from the primary street
1 1
$
^„  
170 ft 175 ft 60 ft 60 ft and the entrance to each bungalow must be from the shared
$
^+ 
150 ft 150 ft 60 ft 60 ft courtyard.
3
Multi-plex: Large 100 ft 75 ft 20 ft 30 ft Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max.
width of all attached buildings must not exceed 150 ft.
Multi-plex: Small 50 ft 50 ft 20 ft 20 ft
4
The total GFA of all Accessory Dwelling Units and Accessory
Duplex, Side-by-side 48 ft -- -- --
Structures cannot exceed 20% of the GFA of the primary structure.
Duplex, Front-and-
36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft
Back
Duplex, Stacked 36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft
18 - 36
+"
45 ft -- --
ft
Bungalow Court2 32 ft 26 ft -- --
Live/Work3 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft
Accessory Dwelling
36 ft 32 ft -- --
Unit4
Accessory Structure4 36 ft 32 ft -- --

Key for Tables


-- Ž
`" 



July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1062 of 1332 Page 09.050-41


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Courtyard Building

Side Street
F
E

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building (cont.)
Dimensions - Courtyard(s) Access Standards
Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E Access to the building must be from the street or from
Width-to-Height the courtyard.
1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
 5 Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F individual entry from the courtyard.
Percentage of width
50% max.
of building
Total Area 400 sf min.
< "+";
'
"*


*;
the building.
";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*



*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
comfort.
Note:
5
> > $ $   >   = ‚
the Zone.

Page 09.050-42 Page 1063 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

Side Street
I H
K
N

M
L
O

Street
Street
Key for Diagrams
Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories K
Front1,2 Rear4
(Distance from Side1 Side3,4 Primary Building 2 min. - 5 max.
ROW/Lot Line) G H I J Accessory Building 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 5 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 L
Max. 15 ft 20 ft 30 ft -- Height above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone 
 
 $ 1.50 ft min.
Front (min.) 65% 
% 

 $
0.50 ft max.
Side Street (min.) 50% uses
Miscellaneous Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
on corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Floor-to-Ceiling
Notes: Œ" }
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street (service or retail 14 ft min. M
ROW or a utility easement is needed. uses)
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the 
} 8 ft min. N
building.
3
Footprint3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Lot coverage 85% max.
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a Depth
minimum of 10 feet setback distance from the balcony or window Œ" }

edge to the property side and rear lot line is required. 30 ft min. O
retail/service space
Notes:
Key for Tables 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the Form-Based Code
-- Ž
`" 

 and additions to those buildings that are less than 50% of the
> >       $
2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.
3
Independently by lot coverage requirements, all buildings must still
meet setback requirements as per 19.09.050.E.E.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1064 of 1332 Page 09.050-43


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
R Q

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments into Facade Zone


Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Common Yard A A 19.09.070.E P Q R S
Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F Frontage Type
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G Arcade1
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Gallery1
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Shopfront: 10 ft 10 ft -- --
awning, balcony1,
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L
bay window, or
1
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M projecting shade
Pedestrian Access structure
For service and retail uses pedestrian entrances must 
}
6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
*
% 
$

%
;‘$ '
'" } balconies2
primary street facade and the side street facade. Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Miscellaneous Features
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, Signage A A -- --
and other service entries must be screened and must be Driveways A3 A3 -- --
located to the rear or on side street facades.
Miscellaneous
Note:
1 Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone,
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
and except for an arcade, gallery, or balconies and in
conjunction with an encroachment agreement, they are
$$+
+  

‰ƒ/$$
;‰ƒ/
lot line.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
Key for Tables
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
-- Ž
`" 

 2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
A Allowed subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

Page 09.050-44 Page 1065 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T5-N Use Type T5-N
Residential Other
Accessory Dwelling Unit P Parking Facility P
Accessory Structure P Public Services, Minor C
3
Assisted Living Apartment P Temporary Uses T
" ;
 

P Urban Agriculture
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P Community Garden P
+ + 
 
 $ P
Fraternity, Sorority House, or Private Dorms P Notes:
     =    +[+\ ]=
Home Occupation P
and Measures). Individual land use types that are included within a
Hospice P >     > ] ^  ]  <
Individual Care – Family Home P    =    +[+\
Individual Care - Group Home S If a use is not listed in this table, it is not allowed in the T5-N Zone;
       +[+/+ $ 
Senior Citizen Apartments P
Prohibited Uses) the Director may determine that a use not listed
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly  %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P Use Tables) and the use supports the purpose and intent of the
Church/House of Worship P Zone and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Master Plan.
" ;

  $ $ ;/…"*$  P
^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Park, Playground, or Open Space P and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Public or Private School (Primary or %  = 
S
Secondary)
1
Retail Trade Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
1   {  
+ + 
 $ P 2
„ >; "      "  { " 
Mixed-Use P … >  <; $      {  

"  P 3
„  $   ^ „  '‡    

" + <$$†
" +   {  
C
Service Bar
Employment & Services
Downtown Services2 P

$/
 

S
Individual Care Center P
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P Key
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
 P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
P
Than Listed C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Telecommunication Facilities 

 €„
  ‡    $
uses.
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate
Height); Wireless Communication Facility, S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
S * '
 $

 

 €„
Non-Stealth Design (Not Qualifying for
Conditional Use Approval) Section 19.16.110.
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Not qualifying C 

 €„
  ’’
for Conditional Use Approval) -- Use is not allowed.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1066 of 1332 Page 09.050-45


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
V U

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side <   /
%  /Ž
+" $ '1
Line (min.)
T U V W < 2,500 sf --
Ground Floor 35 ft 10 ft 5 ft 5 ft ›‡/‘œ‘/ 2
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‘/œ/ 4
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft ›/ As required
max. max. along all street
Miscellaneous frontages
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between Miscellaneous
adjacent parcels. All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
Parking spaces may be enclosed, covered, or open. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
 
‚ ' $$+
=

‚ '

 Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section


the requirements for a residential unit. ’X<
;_
[ƒ

 =


"/

provisions of 19.09.040 shall apply.
When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
must be accessed only from the secondary street. All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

Required Parking
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.


€„
  ŒX…‚ ' [
Note:
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards. 1
^‚    +[[/] "%

`" 
‚ ';*

"

 €„
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note: Key for Tables
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed. -- Ž
`" 



Page 09.050-46 Page 1067 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Civic Space Standards) if
civic space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1068 of 1332 Page 09.050-47


19.09.050.E.024 T4 Zone (T4) Placeholder City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.024 T4 Zone (T4) Placeholder

This page intentionally left blank

Page 09.050-48 Page 1069 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.028 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) Placeholder

19.09.050.E.028 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) Placeholder

This page intentionally left blank

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1070 of 1332 Page 09.050-49


19.09.050.E.032 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) Placeholder City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.032 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) Placeholder

This page intentionally left blank

Page 09.050-50 Page 1071 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.036 T4 Maker Zone (T4-M) Placeholder

19.09.050.E.036 T4 Maker Zone (T4-M) Placeholder

This page intentionally left blank

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1072 of 1332 Page 09.050-51


19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The T4 Corridor Zone is intended to enhance the City’s None
existing corridors by allowing a wide variety of building
types to accommodate a range of commercial, retail,
C. Lot Size
]
/ 
% 
"
 $$$'
 
buildings along major arterial corridors carrying high No width, depth or area standards are included for the
%$"
%
 "$]ƒ 
""

%
$
 T4-C Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
"    ' $     / the min. and max. building width and depth standards
these corridors, such as the Multi-Functional Spine or for the building types established in Table D (Building
Iconic/Ceremonial Corridors, supported by this Zone Types).
will likely transition to a more urban and walkable built
environment with residential uses behind or above
the commercial uses. The following form elements are
generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached or detached
Medium to large lot width
Medium to large footprint and lot coverage
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Mix of building frontages, but mostly Shopfront
Medium setback
Min. 2 to max. 5 stories

Page 09.050-52 Page 1073 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

Courtyard Building

Side Street

Side Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Street Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building (cont.)
Body Wing < "+";
'
"*


*;
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth the building.
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) ";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

A B C D 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
$
^„  
200 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft 75 ft The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
$
^+ 
100 ft 100 ft 40 ft 40 ft be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
comfort.
Courtyard Building 100 ft 100 ft 40 ft 100 ft
Access Standards
Multi-plex: Large 90 ft 65 ft 20 ft 30 ft
Access to the building must be from the street or from
Multi-plex: Small 50 ft 50 ft 20 ft 20 ft
the courtyard.
+"
18-36
45 ft -- -- Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
ft
individual entry from the courtyard.
Live/Work2 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft
Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
Accessory Structure3 -- -- -- -- between buildings
Miscellaneous Courtyards must be accessible from the primary street.

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  Notes:

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
2
Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max.
Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
width of all attached buildings must not exceed 150 ft.
Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E 3
The total GFA of all Accessory Dwelling Units and Accessory
Width-to-Height Structures cannot exceed 30% of the GFA of the primary structure.
1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
 4 4
> > $ $   >   = ‚
Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F the Zone.
Percentage of width
50% max.
of building
Total Area 400 sf min.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1074 of 1332 Page 09.050-53


19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
I H
K
N

M
L
O
Street
Street
Key for Diagrams
Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards (cont.)


Setback Distance Corner Interior Primary Building
Front1,2 Rear4
(Distance from Side1 Side3,4 Ground Floor Finish Level3,4 L
ROW/Lot Line) G H I J Height above curb
Primary Building 
 
 $ 1.50 ft min.
Min. 10 ft 10 ft 0 ft 10 ft 
% 

 $"
 0.50 ft max.
Max. 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft -- Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
Front (min.) 75% Floor-to-Ceiling
Side Street (min.) 50% Œ" } 14 ft min. M
Miscellaneous 
} 9 ft min. N
5
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Footprint
corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Lot coverage
Notes: Mixed-use with
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street 85% max.
residential uses
ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
All other uses 75% max.
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the
building. Depth
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must Œ" }
30 ft min. O
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Notes:
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum 1
Max. 8 stories allowed for only the Flex Mid-Rise Building Type
of 10 feet setback distance from the balcony or window edge to the %ˆ  ˆ  ]<$ € ^< ^‚  
property side and rear lot line is required.  +[+_+} ˆ ^< ‚  ]<$ €
2
  ˆ   %  
F. Building Form Standards +[\‰Š ^ "ˆ    
3
Building Height Stories K Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the Form-Based Code
1,2
and additions to those buildings that are less than 50% of the existing
Primary Building 2 min. - 5 max.
>       $
Accessory Building 2 max. 4
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.
5
Independently by lot coverage requirements, all buildings must still
meet setback requirements as per 19.09.050.E.E.

Page 09.050-54 Page 1075 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

Side Street
R Q

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments into Facade Zone


Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H P Q R S
Porch: Engaged A A 19.09.070.I Frontage Type
Porch: Projecting A A 19.09.070.J Arcade1
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Gallery1
Terrace1 A A 19.09.070.M Shopfront: 10 ft 10 ft -- --
awning, balcony1,
Pedestrian Access
bay window, or
Pedestrian entrances must be provided at least every 50 projecting shade
$ '
'" } ;


 
 structure
side street facade.

}
Miscellaneous 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, Architectural
and other service entries must be screened and must be 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
located to the rear or on side street facades.
Signage A A -- --
Note:
3 3
1 Driveways A A -- A
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
Miscellaneous
Key for Tables Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, and

^
 
/'$$
;/"
}*$

-- Ž
`" 


and in conjunction with an encroachment agreement,
A Allowed 
;
 $$+
+  

‰ƒ/$$
;‰ƒ/
across a lot line.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1076 of 1332 Page 09.050-55


19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T4-C Use Type T4-C
Residential ‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
 
P
Accessory Structure P Listed
Assisted Living Apartment C Telecommunication Facilities
" ;
 

C Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);
Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P S
Design (Not Qualifying for Conditional Use
+ + 
 
 $ P Approval)
Home Occupation P Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design or
Hospice P Non-Stealth Design (Not qualifying for Conditional C
Senior Citizen Apartments C Use Approval)
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Other
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P
Church/House of Worship P Government Facility P
College, University, or Seminary P Parking Facility P

 $

  —<"

/!  P Public Services, Minor C
" ;

   $ ;/…"*$  P Temporary Uses3 T
Park, Playground, or Open Space P Urban Agriculture
Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P Community Garden P
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S Notes:
Trade School P      =    +[+\ ]=
and Measures). Individual land use types that are included within a
Retail Trade
>     > ] ^  ]  <
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; Beer/    =    +[+\ ‚       
ƒ
—$
‰  ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
†

— table, it is not allowed in the T4-C Zone; except that as allowed under
S
ƒ
—$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
/

—ƒ
—   +[+/+ $  € % {  ] 
Cooler On-Sale Establishment may determine that a use not listed in Table I. is allowed if it is listed
+ + 
 $1 P    +[+/+  { %     
Drive-Through C the purpose and intent of the Zone and is consistent with the goals
  ‚  ]  € ^‚   
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C
+[+/ƒ € $% { ]   "%  
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; Urban ^# $ ‚    %  = 
S
" '
†…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 

Mixed-Use P 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as

"  P  {  
2
„ >; "      "  { " 

" + <$$†
" + 
% 

C … >  <; $      {  
Bar 3
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
Employment & Services  {  
Clinic P
Key
Downtown Services2 P
P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
   $
% 
!  "  /

 S
C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Hospital P 

 €„
  ‡    $
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites S uses.

$/
 

P S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
Individual Care Center P * '
 $

 

 €„
Section 19.16.110.
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit as
Massage Establishment S


 €„
  ’’
-- Use is not allowed.

Page 09.050-56 Page 1077 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

Side Street
V U

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front Rear
Side Side <   /
%  /Ž
+" $ '1
Line (min.)
T U V W < 1,000 sf --
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/‘ 2
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft ›‡/‘ 4
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way Miscellaneous
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
max. max. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
Miscellaneous Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
Driveways may be shared between adjacent parcels. ’X<
;_
[ƒ

 =


"/

provisions of 19.09.040 shall apply.
No new surface parking lots are allowed next to primary
or side street frontages. All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
must be accessed only from the secondary street.
Note:
Required Parking 1
^‚    +[[/] "%


€„
  ŒX…‚ ' [
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.

`" 
‚ ';*

"

 €„
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed, Key for Tables
except on a driveway. -- Ž
`" 



July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1078 of 1332 Page 09.050-57


19.09.050.E.040 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 15 ft min.
Depth 15 ft min.
Common open space
250 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Civic Space Standards) if
civic space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

Page 09.050-58 Page 1079 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

Side Street
B

A A

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The T3 Neighborhood Zone is intended to protect the None
integrity of existing neighborhoods with detached homes
on small-to-medium sized lots. The Zone reinforces the
C. Lot Size
role of these residential building types within walkable
neighborhoods, supports adjacent neighborhood- Area
serving retail and service uses, and supports public Min. 6,000 sf
transportation options. The following form elements are Max. 12,800 sf
generally appropriate in this Zone:
Width A
Primarily detached, but may be attached
Min. 50 ft
Small to medium lot width
Max. 80 ft
Small to medium footprint and lot coverage
Depth B
Primarily with common yards, stoops, and porches
Min. 90 ft
Medium to large front setback
Max. 160 ft
Medium to large side setbacks
1 to 2 stories

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1080 of 1332 Page 09.050-59


19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
E

D
C C

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Buildable Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Main Building Secondary
Per Body Wing Per Body Wing
Building Building
Lot Width Depth Width Depth Lot Width Depth Width Depth
Type Type
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
C D E F C D E F
Duplex, Bungalow 3 min.;
1 48 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft 32 ft 26 ft -- --
Side-by-side Court1 9 max.
Duplex – Accessory
Front and 1 36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft Dwelling 1 -- -- -- --
Back Unit2
Duplex - Accessory
1 36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft 2 -- -- -- --
Stacked Structure2
Large House 1 65 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft Notes:
1
Medium Only 1 residential unit per bungalow allowed. The shared
1 50 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft courtyard must be accessible from the primary street and the
House
entrance to each bungalow must be from the shared courtyard.
Small House 1 30 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft 2
The total GFA of all Accessory Dwelling Units and Accessory
Structures cannot exceed 60% of the GFA of the primary structure.

Key for Tables


-- Ž
`" 



Page 09.050-60 Page 1081 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

Side Street
I H
K
N

G
L M

Street
Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Buildable Area

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories K
Front Rear
(Distance from Side Side Primary Building 2 max.
ROW/Lot Line) G H I J ADU or Accessory
2 max.
Primary Building Structure1
Min. 15 ft 15 ft 5 ft 15 ft Primary Building
Max. 25 ft 20 ft -- -- Ground Floor Finish Level2,3 L
ADU or Accessory Structure Height above curb
Min. 30 ft 15 ft 3 ft 1
3 ft 1 
 
 $ 1.50 ft min.
Miscellaneous Floor-to-Ceiling
Patio covers must comply with the standards provided Œ" }
*$
X… %
[ €„
  ’X (service or retail 8 ft min. M
X '$
 $;
 
 $[[ uses)
All structures located < 5 feet from another structure 
} 8 ft min. N
must comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code Footprint
requirements.
Lot coverage 65% max.
Notes:
Notes:
1
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property 1
ADUs or accessory structures must not exceed the overall height
line must comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code
of the primary building.
requirements. 2
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the Form-Based Code
and additions to those buildings that are less than 50% of the
> >       $
Key for Tables 3
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
-- Ž
`" 

 street are exempt.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1082 of 1332 Page 09.050-61


19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
Q P

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments into Facade Zone


Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Common Yard A A 19.09.070.E Type (max.) (max.)
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G O P Q R
Porch: Engaged A A 19.09.070.I Frontage Type
Porch: Projecting A A 19.09.070.J Porch: Engaged
5 ft 5 ft -- --
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L Porch: Projecting
Stoop
Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
Driveways A A A A
Miscellaneous
Key for Tables
Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone and are
-- Ž
`" 

 $$+
+  

‰ƒ/$$
;‰ƒ/$
A Allowed line, or beyond the minimum setback line.

Page 09.050-62 Page 1083 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

I. Use Types Key


Use Type T3-N P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Residential C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Accessory Dwelling Unit P 

 €„
  ‡    $
uses.
Accessory Structure P
S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
" ;
 

P
* '
 $

 

 €„
+ + 
 
 $ P Section 19.16.110.
Home Occupation P T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Individual Care – Family Home P 

 €„
  ’’
Individual Care - Group Home S -- Use is not allowed.
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly
Church/House of Worship P
" ;

   $ ;/…"*$  P
Park, Playground and Open Space P
Public or Private School (Primary or
S
Secondary)
Telecommunication Facilities
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate
Height); Wireless Communication Facility,
S
Non-Stealth Design (Not Qualifying for
Conditional Use Approval)
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Not qualifying C
for Conditional Use Approval)
Other
Public Services, Minor C
Temporary Uses1 T
Urban Agriculture
Community Garden C

Notes:
     =    +[+\ ]=
and Measures). Individual land use types that are included within a
>     > ] ^  ]  <
   =    +[+\
If a use is not listed in this table it is not allowed in the T3-N Zone;
       +[+/+ $ 
Prohibited Uses) the Director may determine that a use not listed
 %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Use Tables) and the use supports the purpose and intent of the
Zone and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Master Plan.

^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 


and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
%  = 

1
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
 {  

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1084 of 1332 Page 09.050-63


19.09.050.E.044 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Side Street
T

Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Open Space


Corner Interior Usable Open Space
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Width 10 ft min.
Line (min.)
S T Depth 10 ft min.
Ground Floor 20 ft 15 ft 0 ft 0 ft Common open space
150 sf min.
Parking Driveway area per unit
Width 12 ft min. - 20 ft max.
Miscellaneous
Driveways may be shared between adjacent parcels.
Parking spaces may be enclosed, covered, or open.
 
‚ ' $$+
=

‚ '


the requirements for a residential unit.
When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
must be accessed only from the secondary street.
Required Parking


€„
  ŒX…‚ ' [
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.

`" 
‚ ';*

"

 €„
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed,
except on a driveway.

Page 09.050-64 Page 1085 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.F.004 Special District Placeholder

19.09.050.F.004 Special District Placeholder

This page intentionally left blank

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1086 of 1332 Page 09.050-65


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1087 of 1332


19.09.060 BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.060.A Purpose
19.09.060.B Applicability
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

19.09.060.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to provide an overview of the building types that are appropriate to use within
the Transect Zones. The overview is intended to ensure that new development establishes or reinforces the
highly-valued character and scale of the City’s Downtown districts and neighborhoods.

19.09.060.B Applicability
1. The requirements of this Section apply to all development proposed within the Transect Zones, and
they must be considered in combination with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section
19.09.050 (Transect Zone Standards).
2. Development that includes education, public assembly, transportation, communications, and/or
infrastructure uses must comply with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section 19.09.050
(Transect Zone Standards), but are not required to meet the standards of this Section.
3. Building types are categorized into two groups: house-scale buildings and block scale buildings.
a. House-scale buildings are the size of a house, typically ranging from as small as 25 feet wide up to
90 feet wide.
b. Block-scale buildings are individually as large as most or all of a block, or when arranged together
along a street, appear to be as long as most or all of a block.
4. The standards for each building type are established in the Transect Zones, including standards for lot
 >
!
$ $$
 "$*" $ ';
/ =

*" $ ';
"
*

$

/
*" $ ';
"*
$
 
$+  



 
established for the Transect Zone.
5. Where multiple principal buildings are proposed for a single lot, the proposal must include potential lot
lines, which conform with this Ordinance, the purpose of which is to determine compliance with building
type standards.

19.09.060.C Building Types Overview


1. Table 19.09.060.C-1 (Building Types Overview) provides an overview of the allowed building types that
are appropriate to use within the Transect Zones. The names of the building types are not intended to
limit uses within a particular building type. For example, a medium house building type may have non-

 
 $"
+   /"
" ]
/$$+
*;
 
_

2. Secondary wings and accessory structures must have a smaller footprint, a narrower width, and a depth
that is less than the width or depth of the footprint of the primary building.
3. The photographs in Table 19.09.060.C-1 (Building Types Overview) are illustrative only and not
regulatory.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1088 of 1332 Page 09.060-1


19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T3-N T3-N T3-N
Building Form Small House Medium House Large House
Example

Description A small detached structure, A medium-size detached A large detached structure


consisting of one unit, usually structure, consisting of one unit, consisting of one unit usually
sited on a small lot with private usually sited on a medium size sited on a large lot with private
open space. lot with private open space. open space.

Typically located within a Typically located within a This building type is


lower-intensity residential lower-intensity residential frequently located within the
neighborhood in a walkable neighborhood in a walkable lowest-intensity residential
urban setting, and potentially urban setting, and potentially neighborhoods. It is important
near a neighborhood main near a neighborhood main for providing a wide range of
street, this building type is street, this building type is housing types.
important for providing a wide important for providing a wide
range of housing types and range of housing types and
promoting walkability. promoting walkability.

Building Scale House-Scale House-Scale House-Scale

Page 09.060-2 Page 1089 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T3-N, T5-N T3-N, T4-C, T5-N, T5-M, T5-MS, T3-N, T5-N
T5-C
Building Form Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Accessory Structure Duplex: Side-by-Side
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc.

Description An additional structure typically An additional structure typically A small to medium-size building
located at the rear of a lot located at the rear of a lot that with two attached residential
constructed as a single-story provides space for a single small units, both of which have private
freestanding structure or placed 
 $/]
/
% 
/ open space and face the street.
above a garage to provide space storage use.
for a single small residential unit. This duplex building type has
This building type is important the form of a medium- or large-
An ADU is important for for providing incubator spaces size single-family house, and
%  '=*$
" ' for small businesses within  
$;$
 
opportunities within walkable walkable neighborhoods. within lower-intensity residential
neighborhoods. neighborhoods. It supports well-
designed moderate intensity
development, and is important
for providing a wide range of
housing types and promoting
walkability.
Building Scale House-Scale House-Scale House-Scale

July 2018| Final Draft Page 1090 of 1332 Page 09.060-3


19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T3-N, T5-N T3-N, T5-N T3-N, T5-N
Building Form Duplex: Front-and-back Duplex: Stacked Bungalow Court
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Description A small to medium-size structure A small to medium-size structure A series of small, detached
consisting of two attached units consisting of two units with one single-family structures located
with one unit located behind the $
 
'" }  on a single lot with individual
other, both of which have private the other located directly above. *" $ ' '



open space. The unit in front Both units face the street and a shared court that is typically
faces the street and has the form are within one single building perpendicular to the street. The
of a small single-family house. that has the form of a small shared court serves as common
single-family house. open space taking the place of
This duplex building type is a private rear yard, which is not
 
$;$
 +   This duplex building type is required. The common open
lower-intensity residential  
$;$
 +   space is an essential element of
neighborhoods. It supports well- lower-intensity residential this building type.
designed moderate intensity neighborhoods. It supports well-
development, and is important designed moderate intensity A bungalow court may be scaled
for providing a wide range of development, and is important  +  $+
 "
housing types and promoting for providing a wide range of intensity neighborhoods where
walkability. housing types and promoting it allows for appropriately
walkability. scaled, well-designed moderate
intensities and is important
for providing a wide range of
housing types and promoting
walkability. Syn: Cottage Court

Building Scale House-Scale House-Scale House-Scale

Page 09.060-4 Page 1091 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T4-C, T5-M, T5-N, T5-C T4-C, T5-N T4-C, T5-C, T5-M, T5-N
Building Form Live/Work Multi-plex: Small Multi-plex: Large
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Description A small to medium-sized A medium-size structure A large-size structure, 2 - 5
attached or detached structure consisting of 3 - 6 side-by- stories in height, consisting of 7
that consists of one dwelling unit side and/or stacked dwelling - 18 side-by-side and/or stacked
*%
 —*
 }
^ *$
 units, typically with one shared dwelling units, typically with one
'" }
  entry or individual entries shared entry. Each unit has its
be used for service, artisan, or along the front of the building. own private open space as a
commercial uses as allowed by This building type has the small yard or balcony.

>

'" } appearance of a medium-
}
^
 
" *%
 sized single-family home and This building type is
are owned by one entity. Private  
$;$
   
$;$
 +  
open space is not required sparingly within low to medium- medium-intensity or more
but can be provided with a intensity neighborhoods. Private urban neighborhoods. It enables
balcony. Live/work units are open space is not required but well-designed higher densities,
typically located within medium can be provided with a balcony. and is important for providing
intensity- neighborhoods or in a wide range of housing types
This building type enables
locations that will transition into and promoting walkability. Syn:
a neighborhood main street. appropriately-scaled, well- Stacked-Flats Building
designed higher intensity of
This building type can be development, and is important
applied in industrial contexts. for providing a broad choice of
They are appropriate for housing types and promoting
incubating neighborhood-serving walkability. Syn. Mansion
commercial uses and allowing Apartment House
neighborhood main streets to
expand in response to increasing
market demands.
Building Scale "
$
™"  House-Scale Block-Scale
Block-Scale > 3 units

July 2018| Final Draft Page 1092 of 1332 Page 09.060-5


19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T4-C, T5-M, T5-N T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-N T4-C, T5-C, T5-M, T5-MS, T5-N
Building Form Rowhouse Courtyard Building Flex Low-Rise Building
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc. Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Description A medium size-structure A large structure composed of A medium- to large-size building
composed of 2 - 8 individual multiple attached or stacked on a medium size lot and 1 -
Rowhouse buildings attached in units accessed from a shared 3 stories in height, that may
a series with individual entries courtyard, a series of courtyards, incorporate structured parking.
along the front. Each unit has its or a common corridor. Each Each unit may have its own
own private open space. unit may have its own individual individual entry, or units may
entry, or up to three units may share a common entry accessed
This type is typically located share a common entry. Private from the street or a courtyard
within medium-intensity open space is not required but or series of courtyards. Private
neighborhoods or near or on can be provided with a balcony open space is not required but
a neighborhood main street. per unit. can be provided with a balcony
This type enables appropriately- per unit.
scaled, well-designed higher This building type is typically
densities, and is important integrated sparingly into lower This building type can be used
for providing a wide range of intensity neighborhoods or to provide a vertical mix of uses
housing types and promoting more consistently into medium- + '" }
 $/
% 
/
walkability. Syn: Townhouse intensity neighborhoods, or it or industrial uses and service
can be applied in non-residential or residential uses on upper
contexts. This building type }† ;*
 '$

enables appropriately-scaled, use building, with residential,
well-designed higher densities, service, or industrial uses, where
and is important for providing a '" }
 $"

 
wide range of housing types and appropriate.
promoting walkability.
This building type enables
appropriately-scaled, well-
designed higher densities, and
is important for providing a
wide range of housing types and
promoting walkability.
Building Scale "
$
™"  "
$
™"  Block-Scale
Block-Scale > 3 units Block-Scale > 3 units

Page 09.060-6 Page 1093 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T4-C, T5-M, T5-MS, T5-C, T6-UG T5-MS, T5-C, T6-UG T5-M, T5-MS, T5-C, T6-UG
Building Form Flex Mid-Rise Building Flex High-Rise Building Lined Building
Example

Description A medium- to large-size A large, tall structure over 8 A buildingSource:


that buildabetterburb.org
consists of two
structure built on a large lot stories in height built on a large  
†  
 
and 4 – 8 stories in height, that lot that typically incorporates building that may be a parking
typically incorporates multi-level multi-level structured parking. garage, movie theater or large
structured parking. Private open Private open space is not retail store (i.e. “big-box store”),
space is not required but can be required but can be provided and an exterior building to
provided with balconies. with a balcony per unit. conceal the interior building
from the street. The exterior
This building type can be used This building type is used building is usually designed for
to provide a vertical mix of uses to provide a vertical mix of 
 $/
% 
/]
/ —
+ '" }
 $/
% 
/ "
+ '" }
 $ residential uses.
or industrial uses and service or service uses, and service
or residential uses on upper or residential uses on upper
}† ;*
 '$
 } *" $ ';
 
use building, with residential, a primary component of an
service, or industrial uses, where urban downtown as it enables
'" }
 $"

 the highest densities that are
not appropriate. This building appropriately-scaled and well-
type is a primary component designed, and is important
of an urban downtown or for providing a wide range of
neighborhood as it enables housing types as well as other
appropriately-scaled, well- commercial uses, and promoting
designed higher densities, and walkability.
is important for providing a
wide range of housing types and
promoting walkability.

Building Scale Block-Scale Block-Scale Block-Scale

July 2018| Final Draft Page 1094 of 1332 Page 09.060-7


19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T5-M
Building Form Loft
Example

Description The Loft building type is a


tipically multi-story structure
with a large footprint. Tall
ceilings, and a design that
facilitates natural lighting make
these buildings adaptable to
 =

  % "$"
%

the course of their life-cycle.
As such, the Loft building
type is a form within the built
environment which is apt to be
}
^ *$

*
" $ >

in areas transitioning between
commercial, residential, and light
industrial uses.
Building Scale Block-Scale

Page 09.060-8 Page 1095 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


19.09.070 FRONTAGE TYPE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.070.A Purpose
19.09.070.B Applicability
19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview
19.09.070.D Arcade
19.09.070.E Common Yard
19.09.070.F Dooryard
19.09.070.G Forecourt
19.09.070.H Gallery
19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged
19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting
19.09.070.K Shopfront
19.09.070.L Stoop
19.09.070.M Terrace

19.09.070.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish standards for each of the frontage types that are appropriate to
use within the Transect Zones. Private frontages are the components of a building that provide an important
transition and interface between the public realm (i.e. the street and sidewalk) and the private realm (i.e. a
yard and building). These standards supplement the standards for each Transect Zone in which the frontage
types are allowed. They are intended to ensure development that establishes or reinforces the highly-valued
character and scale of the City’s Downtown districts and neighborhoods.

19.09.070.B Applicability
1. The requirements of this Section apply to all proposed development within the Transect Zones, and
they must be considered in combination with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section
19.09.050 (Transect Zone Standards).
2. Development with education, public assembly, transportation, communications, and/or infrastructure
uses must comply with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section 19.09.050 (Transect Zone
Standards), but are not required to meet the standards of this Section.
3. Each building must have at least one frontage type for each street frontage.
4. Frontage types not listed in the applicable transect zone standards are not allowed in that zone.
5. A building may have multiple frontage types as stipulated in this Section. For example, a dooryard
frontage may have a stoop or engaged porch frontage type as well.

19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview


Table 19.09.070.C-1 (Private Frontages Overview) provides an overview of the allowed frontage types with a
description of each type and an illustration showing its typical character and form. The private frontage is the
area between the building facade and the frontage line (edge of right-of-way).

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1096 of 1332 Page 09.070-1


19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T3-N T5-M, T5-MS, T5-N
T5-N, T4-C
Frontage Type Arcade Common Yard Dooryard
LOT > < LOT > < LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description The Arcade Frontage is The Common Yard Frontage In a Dooryard Frontage the
a covered walkway with has a landscaped frontage main facade of the building is
habitable space above that with a facade substantially set back a small distance and
often encroaches over a set back from the frontage 
 '
$
 

*;
sidewalk into the right-of-way. $
/%  '*"=
 a low wall or fence, creating a
An arcade is used to provide thoroughfares. The front yard small dooryard. The dooryard
pedestrian circulation along created remains unfenced must not provide public
a frontage and it should and is visually continuous with circulation along a right-of-way.
extend far enough from the adjacent yards, supporting The dooryard may be raised,
building to provide adequate a common landscape in sunken, or at grade, and is
protection and circulation space conjunction with other private intended primarily for ground-
for pedestrians. An arcade is frontages. }
 
 $"

intended for buildings with
'" }
 $"

and is common along public
courtyards and walkable
streets.

Page 09.070-2 Page 1097 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS T4-C, T3-N
T5-N, T3-N T5-N, T4-C
Frontage Type Forecourt Gallery Porch: Engaged
LOT > < LOT > < LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description The Forecourt Frontage has a The Gallery Frontage has a The Engaged Porch has two
portion of the facade close to facade aligned close to the adjacent sides of the porch that
the frontage line and the central frontage line with an attached are connected to the building
portion is set back creating cantilevered structure or a while the other two sides are
a small courtyard space. The lightweight colonnade over the open. The main facade of the
courtyard may be used as an sidewalk. Galleries are typical building has a small-to-medium
entry court or shared garden for retail uses, but can be used setback from the frontage
space for residential buildings, ]
"
 line. The resulting front yard
or as an additional shopping or is typically small and can be
restaurant seating area within 

*;+$$


retail and service use areas. A  $$;



'


forecourt may be allocated in street.
conjunction with other frontage
types.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1098 of 1332 Page 09.070-3


19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T4-C, T3-N T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-MS, T5-N, T3-N
T5-N, T4-C
Frontage Type Porch: Projecting Shopfront Stoop
LOT > < LOT > < LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description The Projecting Porch Frontage In the Shopfront Frontage the The Stoop Frontage has a
is open on three sides, and main facade of the building is facade aligned close to the
it may project in front of a at or near the frontage line with  '
$
+ 
 ;
building into the facade zone. an at-grade entrance along the elevated from the sidewalk
The main facade of the building public right-of-way. Shopfronts "]
$;
"
 %;
has a small-to-medium setback are typically intended for  ;+ +

from the frontage line. The 
 $]
"
 
; entrance is usually an exterior
resulting front yard is typically have substantial glazing at the stair and landing. Stairs or
$$  *


*; sidewalk level. Shopfronts may ramps from the stoop may lead
+$$

 $$;

 include awnings or cantilevered directly to the sidewalk or may
the edge of the street. shade structures that overlap provide access to the side.
the sidewalk. A shopfront may
be used in conjunction with
other frontage types. Syn: Retail
Frontage.

Page 09.070-4 Page 1099 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS,
T5-N, T4-C
Frontage Type Terrace
LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description In the Terrace Frontage the


main facade of the building is
at or near the frontage line with
an elevated terrace providing
public circulation along the
facade. A terrace can be used
to provide at-grade access
while accommodating a grade
change. Frequently spaced
steps to access the terrace are
necessary to avoid dead walls
and to maximize accessibility.
Terraces are suitable for
conversion to outdoor cafes
and may be used in historic
industrial areas to mimic
historic loading docks.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1100 of 1332 Page 09.070-5


19.09.070.D Arcade City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.D Arcade Allowed in: T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C

A
B
C
A

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Arcade
1. Description
The Arcade Frontage Type is a covered walkway with
habitable space above that often encroaches over a
sidewalk into the right-of-way. An arcade should be
used to provide pedestrian circulation along a frontage
and it should extend far enough from the building to
provide adequate protection and circulation space for
pedestrians. An arcade is intended for buildings with
'" }
 $"
   $ '
public courtyards and walkable streets.
2. Size
Depth, Clear 10 ft min. A
Œ" }
'/$
 14 ft min. B
Setback from back of curb 2 ft min. C
3. Miscellaneous
Arcades must have a consistent depth along a frontage.
<
+ 
 ‡}* *$


above the colonnade must not encroach onto a public
right-of-way, and must be located so that they abut the
right-of-way.
Arcade Frontages must be used in conjunction with
the standards for the Shopfront Frontage Type. In case
 } *
+


/
<
 '
;

standards prevail.

Page 09.070-6 Page 1101 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.E Common Yard

19.09.070.E Common Yard Allowed in: T5-N, T3-N

C
B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Common Yard
1. Description
In the Common Yard Frontage Type, the main facade of
the building has a large landscaped setback from the
 '
$
%  '*"=
"'

The front yard created remains unfenced and is visually
continuous with adjacent yards, supporting a common
landscape in conjunction with the other private
frontages.
2. Size
Depth 20 ft min. A
3. Miscellaneous
Fences between adjoining front yards or street
side yards or between the sidewalk and front B
yard are not allowed in Common Yard frontages.
Common Yard Frontages must be used in
conjunction with another allowed private C
frontage type, such as a Porch.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1102 of 1332 Page 09.070-7


19.09.070.F Dooryard City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.F Dooryard Allowed in: T5-M, T5-MS, T5-N

C
B

D
E A
C

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Dooryard
1. Description
In the Dooryard Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is set back a small distance and the frontage
$
 

*;$++$$

/
 '$$
dooryard. The dooryard must not provide public
circulation along a right-of-way. The dooryard may be
raised, sunken, or at grade and is intended primarily
'" }
 
 $"

2. Size
Depth, Clear 8 ft min. A
Length 50 ft min. B
Distance between Glazing 4 ft min. C
Ground Floor
50% min.1
Transparency
Depth of Recessed Entries 5 ft max.
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel D
max.
Finish Level above
3.5 ft max. E
Sidewalk
Finish Level below
6 ft max.
Sidewalk
3. Miscellaneous
For live/work, retail and service uses, these standards
are to be used in conjunction with those for the
  '
;
! 
 } *
+


them, the Dooryard Frontage Type standards prevail.
Shall not be used for circulation for more than one
'" }
;
Note:
1
For live/work, retail, and service uses only.

Page 09.070-8 Page 1103 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.G Forecourt

19.09.070.G Forecourt Allowed in: T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T3-N

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Forecourt
1. Description
In the Forecourt Frontage Type, the main facade of
the building is at or near the frontage line and a small
percentage is set back, creating a small courtyard
space. The space could be used as an entry court or
shared garden space for residential buildings, or as an
additional shopping or restaurant seating area within
retail and service use areas.
2. Size
Width, Clear 12 ft min. A
Depth, Clear 12 ft min. B
Ratio, Height to Width 2:1 max.
3. Miscellaneous
The proportions and orientation of courtyard spaces
must be carefully considered for solar orientation and
user comfort. Source: Opticos Design, Inc.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1104 of 1332 Page 09.070-9


19.09.070.H Gallery City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.H Gallery Allowed in: T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C

A
C
E
D
B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Gallery
1. Description
In the Gallery Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is at the frontage line and the gallery element
encroaches into the sidewalk of the right-of-way. This
Frontage Type is intended for buildings with ground-
}
 $
 $"
 ;*


two stories. Due to the encroachment into the right-
of-way, an easement is usually required with a license
agreement approved by the Department of Public
Works. Alternatively, the frontage line must be aligned
with the edge of the gallery and curb, and a sidewalk is
established within an easement under the gallery.
2. Size
Depth, Clear 8 ft min. A
Ground Floor Height, Clear 11 ft min. B
Upper Floor Height, Clear 9 ft min. C
Height 2 stories max. D
Setback from back of curb 2 ft min.; 3 ft max. E
3. Miscellaneous
Gallery Frontages must be used in conjunction with
the standards for the Shopfront Frontage Type. In case
 } *
+


/
Œ$$
; '
;

standards prevail.
Galleries must have a consistent depth along a
frontage.
Galleries may project over a sidewalk.

Page 09.070-10 Page 1105 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged

19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged Allowed in: T4-C, T3-N

E
A
C

B B F
D

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Porch: Engaged
1. Description
In the Engaged Porch Frontage Type, the main facade
of the building has a small-to-medium setback from
the frontage line. The resulting front yard is typically
$$  *


*;+$$

 $$;
maintain the edge of the street. The engaged porch has
two adjacent sides of the porch that are attached to the
building while the other two sides are open.
2. Size
Width, Clear 8 ft min. A
Depth, Clear 6 ft min. B
Height, Clear 8 ft min. C
Height 1 story max.
Finish Level above
1.5 ft min. D
Sidewalk
Furniture Area, Clear 4 ft X 6 ft min. E
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel F
max.
3. Miscellaneous
Up to 40% of the building facade may project into the
facade zone.
Engaged porches must be open on two sides and have
a roof.
In zones where both porches and encroachments are
allowed, a porch and up to 40% of the building facade
are allowed encroaching elements.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1106 of 1332 Page 09.070-11


19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting Allowed in: T4-C, T3-N

C
F
E

D B
B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Porch: Projecting
1. Description
In the Projecting Porch Frontage Type, the main facade
of the building has a small-to-medium setback from the
frontage line. The resulting front yard is typically very
$$  *


*;+$$

 $$;
maintain the edge of the street. The projecting porch
is open on three sides and it may project in front of a
building into the facade zone.
2. Size
Width, Clear 8 ft min. A
Depth, Clear 6 ft min. B
Height, Clear 8 ft min. C
Height 1 story max.
Finish Level above
1.5 ft min. D
Sidewalk Source: tdwhs.nwasco.k12.or.us
Furniture Area, Clear 4 ft X 6 ft min. E
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel F
max.
3. Miscellaneous
Projecting porches must be open on three sides and
have a roof.
In zones where both porches and encroachments are
allowed, a porch is an allowable encroaching element.

Page 09.070-12 Page 1107 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.K Shopfront

19.09.070.K Shopfront Allowed in: T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C

B C

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Shopfront
1. Description
In the Shopfront Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is placed at or near the frontage line with an
at-grade entrance along the public right-of-way. It is
intended for retail or service uses and has substantial
glazing at the sidewalk level. This frontage may include
an awning or projecting shade structure that may
overlap the sidewalk. A shopfront may be used in
conjunction with other frontage types.
2. Size
Distance between Glazing 2 ft min. A
Ground Floor Transparency 75% min.
Depth of Recessed Entries1 5 ft max.
3. Awning
Depth 4 ft min. B
Setback from back of curb 2 ft min. C
Height 8 ft min. D
4. Miscellaneous
Residential windows shall not be used.
Doors may be recessed as long as the main facade is at
the frontage line.
Operable awnings are encouraged.
Open-ended awnings are encouraged.
Shopfronts with accordion-style doors/windows or
other operable windows that allow the space to open
to the street are encouraged.
Notes:
1
"    $ % >   <  ‚ => 
(recessed door, sawtooth pattern, etc.).

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1108 of 1332 Page 09.070-13


19.09.070.L Stoop City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.L Stoop Allowed in: T5-MS, T5-N, T3-N

C
B

D B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Stoop
1. Description
In the Stoop Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is near the frontage line and the elevated
stoop engages the sidewalk. The stoop must be
elevated above the sidewalk to ensure privacy within
the building. The entrance is usually an exterior stair
and landing. A stoop is appropriate for residential uses
with small setbacks.
2. Size
Width, Clear 5 ft min.; 8 ft max. A
Depth, Clear 5 ft min.; 8 ft max. B
Height, Clear 8 ft min. C
Height 1 story max.
Depth of Recessed Entries 6 ft max.
Finish Level above
1.5 ft min. D
Sidewalk
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel E
max.
3. Miscellaneous
Stairs may be perpendicular or parallel to the building
facade.
Ramps must be placed parallel to the facade or along
the side of the building.
The entry doors are encouraged to be covered or
recessed to provide shelter from the elements.
Gates are not allowed.
All doors must face the street.

Page 09.070-14 Page 1109 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.M Terrace

19.09.070.M Terrace Allowed in: T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C

A C

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Terrace
1. Description
In the Terrace Frontage the main facade of the building
is at or near the frontage line with an elevated terrace
providing public circulation along the facade. A
terrace can be used to provide at-grade access while
accommodating a grade change, and is often used in
combination with a shopfront. Frequently spaced steps
to access the terrace are necessary to avoid dead walls
and to maximize accessibility. Terraces are suitable
for conversion to outdoor cafes and may be used in
historic industrial areas to mimic historic loading docks.
2. Size
Depth, Clear 8 ft min. A
Finish Level above
3.5 ft max. B
Sidewalk
Length of Terrace 150 ft max.
Distance between Stairs 50 ft max. C
3. Miscellaneous
Low walls used as seating are encouraged.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1110 of 1332 Page 09.070-15


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1111 of 1332


19.09.080 CIVIC SPACE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.080.A Purpose
19.09.080.B Applicability
19.09.080.C Civic Space Types Overview
19.09.080.D Greenway (Placeholder)
19.09.080.E Urban Park
‹ `"

19.09.080.G Plaza
19.09.080.H Pocket Plaza
19.09.080.I Pocket Park
19.09.080.J Community Garden
19.09.080.K Playground

19.09.080.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to provide the standards for pre-approved civic space types that are
appropriate to use within the Transect Zones. These standards are intended to ensure that these civic spaces
reinforce the highly valued walkable character and scale of the City’s Downtown districts and neighborhoods.

19.09.080.B Applicability
This Section describes the standards for development of civic spaces throughout the Transect Zones that
apply to all proposed new development. They must be considered in combination with the standards for the
$ *$
>
 €„
  ‘X 
_
 [ƒ



  } + 

%   


%
$

/
   
  $


19.09.080.C Civic Space Types Overview


1. The civic spaces of a downtown are important public elements that provide open space and recreational
opportunities. The best civic spaces become the “outdoor living rooms” of the City and they play an
important role in placemaking by providing places where the community can come together to celebrate

%
/
$^/  $ >

  % 
"*
  

$ ' 
*" $ '/
*" $ ';
/ '
;
/ "'

`"$ ;"* 
%  

2. 


 ^ =

 % 
;
/'

+ "$

; " ;
'
 $;'" /+ ;*
 '


 
_


"$

;
civic space types may be established as a standalone civic space or may be incorporated into any of the
civic space types.
3. 
 
  $
`" 


 % 


'"$;

   
 % 
/
+ 

/$$+
—; $"
/ +
 '


 `"
/

  %
/ 
they delineate a broad range of possible characteristics and uses for each of the civic spaces. It is not



 % 
% 

"$$ '
; $"
 
  $ 
/*"


 

+‚ % 
+  
 
_
% 

 *$
 ^ $

;
range of civic space opportunities.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1112 of 1332 Page 09.080-1


19.09.080.C Civic Space Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.080.C-1 Civic Space Types Overview


Transect Zones T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C, T6-UG, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C,
T3-N T3-N
Civic Space Type Greenway (Placeholder) Urban Park Square
Example

Description Greenways are a linear space Urban parks provide a `"


% 
"*$ "* 
for community gathering and central open-space focus for 

 % "
/
strolling for nearby residents and neighborhoods or groups of 
 $ % ;/" ""

employees. These spaces are neighborhoods. They are useful 

  / 
 %



*;


$


 for unstructured recreation and "


`"



*;
forming a one-way couplet on smaller structured recreational buildings and tree-lined streets

} ‚+
$$*;
 facilities. These larger parks may + 

$
//$+ /
buildings beyond. Greenways also serve as civic amenities for 

/

/
tend to have narrow dimensions the larger community. They are and trees formally arranged.
that support passive use and  $$;

*;*" $ ' These spaces include seating
can serve as a green connector  '
$  '/  " 
/+$‚+;/ 
between destinations. typically consist of formal and landscape materials at all edges.
natural landscape elements that
*
/$+ /


/ 

$  '

Page 09.080-2 Page 1113 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.C Civic Space Types Overview

Table 19.09.080.C-1 Civic Space Types Overview

Transect Zones T6-UG, T5-C, T5-M, T5-MS, T5-N, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T5-N, T5-M, T5-C, T5-MS, T4-C, T3-N
T4-C T4-C
Civic Space Type Plaza Pocket Plaza Pocket Park
Example

Description Plazas add to the vitality of Pocket plazas are small-scaled Pocket parks provide small-
streets within more urban areas civic spaces that function in a scale public urban open spaces
and create formal open spaces similar manner and follow the intended to provide recreational
available for civic purposes and same rules as a larger plaza. opportunities where space is
commercial activity. These spaces These smaller-scaled spaces $  
 $
^  ;
are located at street corners create more intimate places for neighborhood residences. Pocket
 


*;*" $ ' seating or dining and provide parks are often located between
frontages. They are typically a place for commercial and *" $ ' 
%
$
/ 
hardscaped with formally neighborhood activity . These irregular shaped sites and on
arranged trees. plazas can also be used to create single vacant lots.
a formal space in front of a
prominent building entrance.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1114 of 1332 Page 09.080-3


19.09.080.C Civic Space Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.080.C-1 Civic Space Types Overview


Transect Zones T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C, T3-N T6-UG, T5-M, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-C,
T3-N
Supplemental
Community Garden Playground
Civic Space Type
Example

Description Community gardens provide Playgrounds provide an open


space for garden plots in a 

 '
 
`" 

publicly accessible area that are for children’s recreation.
available to nearby residents They are interspersed within
for small-scale cultivation. residential areas in locations
These gardens may be provided where children do not have to
as a component of other cross major streets. They may
publicly accessible civic-space *


  '/$
+  
types or may be provided as a *$‚/$
+  $'

freestanding open space. parks and other civic space types.

Page 09.080-4 Page 1115 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.D Greenway (Placeholder)

19.09.080.D Greenway (Placeholder)

Greenway
1. Description
Placeholder
2. Size and Location
Placeholder
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Placeholder
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Placeholder

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1116 of 1332 Page 09.080-5


19.09.080.E Urban Park City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.E Urban Park

Source: westjetmagzine.com

Urban Park
1. Description
<$'


% $*$
 % "
/$  


 $ % ;/ " ""


  
neighborhoods or groups of neighborhoods.
2. Size and Location
Area Min. 0.50 acres
Width 100 ft min.
Depth 100 ft min.
Frontage Must have a frontage on a min. of 2
streets
Character $ — "$
…/$+ / 


$$;
arranged
Walkways and planting at all edges
Civic element at a prominent location
3. Allowed/Typical Uses Source: timeout.com
… %
— %
X" ""
[


 % "
/ $" '"% $  /
 

$
/" ;'
 '/"
 '/"*$ 
restrooms
Trails for bicycles and pedestrians
Community gardens
Playgrounds
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
ˆ^



  * 
! 
'
" =
Porous pavers
Landscaping

Page 09.080-6 Page 1117 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.F Square

19.09.080.F Square

Source: e-architect.co.uk

Square
1. Description
A space for unstructured recreation and civic purposes.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.50 - 5 acres
Width 100 ft min.
Depth 100 ft min.
Frontage Must have a frontage on a min. of 2
streets
Character Formal
 $$;

*;*" $ ' 
tree-lined streets
Walkways and planting at all edges

`"
$;$

 

  
of important thoroughfares
Abundant seating opportunities
May be hardscaped or landscaped Source: swagroup.com

3. Allowed/Typical Uses
… %
X" ""
[

  / ' >

 % "
/ $" '"% $  /
 

$
/" ;'
 '/"
 '

 $"
/ $" '
Š‚
 
outdoor dining
Paths
Community gardens
Playgrounds
…"*$ —
 %


4. Stormwater Management Techniques


French drains
Porous pavers
Landscaping

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1118 of 1332 Page 09.080-7


19.09.080.G Plaza City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.G Plaza

Source: swagroup.com

Plaza
1. Description
A space for civic and commercial activities.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.25 - 2 acres
Width 100 ft min.
Depth 40 ft min.
Frontage Must have building frontages on a
min. of 3 streets
Character Formal
Primarily hardscape
Trees and planting

`"
$;$

 

  
of important streets
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
… %
— %
X" ""
[


 % "
/ $" '"% $  /
  Source: Princeton Public Library

$
/"
*$;/"
 '/"*$ 
restrooms

 $"
/ $" '
Š‚
 
outdoor dining
Playgrounds
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Dry wells
French drains
Swales
Porous pavers
Landscaping

Page 09.080-8 Page 1119 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.H Pocket Plaza

19.09.080.H Pocket Plaza

Source: Halvorson Design Partnership

Pocket Plaza
1. Description
A compact space for civic and commercial activities.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.10 - 1 acres
Width 75 ft min.
Depth 75 ft min.
Frontage Must have building frontages on a
min. of 3 streets
Character Formal
Primarily hardscape
Trees and planting
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
… %
— %
X" ""
[


 % "
/ $" '"% $  /
 

$
/"
*$;/"
 '/"*$ 
restrooms Source: gehlinstitute.org


 $"
/ $" '
Š‚
 
outdoor dining
Playgrounds
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Dry wells
French drains
Area drains
Porous pavers
Landscaping

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1120 of 1332 Page 09.080-9


19.09.080.I Pocket Park City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.I Pocket Park

Source: xconomy.com

Pocket Park
1. Description
A compact space for a wide range of informal activities
$
^  ;
'*
 


2. Size and Location
Area „^‘

Width 40 ft min.
Depth 40 ft min.
Frontage Must have building frontages on a
min. of 2 sides
Character Formal or informal
Trees and planting
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
… %
— %
X" ""
[


 % "
/ $" '  
$
/"$
 '
Trails and paths
Source: fairfaxcounty.gov
Community gardens
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
! 
'
" =
Swales
Porous pavers
Landscaping

Page 09.080-10 Page 1121 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.J Community Garden

19.09.080.J Community Garden

Source: brownstoner.com

Community Garden
1. Description
An open space with a collection of garden plots that are
available to nearby residents for small-scale cultivation.
May be provided as a component of other civic space
;
/

  '

/ ;*
 
a roof. May be fenced to protect edible plants from
wildlife.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.10 - 1 acres
Width No min.
Depth No min.
Frontage Independent of building frontages
Character Formal or informal
Space organized for growing food
Passive open space
Regularly spaced planting beds Source: ourcanadaproject.ca
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Community gardens
Small accessory structures for storage
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
! 
'
" =
Permeable paving
Rainwater harvesting

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1122 of 1332 Page 09.080-11


19.09.080.K Playground City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.K Playground

Source: Halvorson Design Partnership

Playground
1. Description
< 


`" 
 
 '
 $
Š
recreation. Playgrounds may be located within other
 % 
;
/

  '

/ 
may be on a roof.
2. Size and Location
Area No min.
Width No min.
Depth No min.
Frontage Independent of building frontages
Character Formal or informal
Interspersed within residential areas


+  $
^ 
May include open shelter
…

]
3. Allowed/Typical Uses Source: exerplay.com

Playgrounds
Picnic facilities and outdoor seating
…"*$ —
 %


4. Stormwater Management Techniques


Bioretention BMPs
Porous pavers
Landscaping

Page 09.080-12 Page 1123 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


19.09.090 THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.090.A Purpose
19.09.090.B Applicability
19.09.090.C Thoroughfare Standards Overview
19.09.040.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.E Cashman District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.F Civic & Business District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.G Design District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.H Founders District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.I Fremont East Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.J Gateway District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.K Historic Westside Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan
19.09.040.M Market District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.N Resort & Casino District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.O Symphony Park District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.090.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish standards for pre-approved thoroughfare components and
assemblies that are appropriate to use within the Transect Zones. These components and assemblies
can be combined to form thoroughfares that can be used in new developments to create walkable urban
environments that reinforce the highly valued walkable character and scale of the City’s Downtown districts
and neighborhoods.

19.09.090.B Applicability
1. This Section describes the standards for development of thoroughfares within the Transect Zones. It
"$


 ;€
'ˆ '

 ' ƒ



'" 
$
 } + 

Engineering Standards, the Engineering Standards must apply.
2. These thoroughfare standards may be applied to transform existing streets or to create new walkable
urban thoroughfares within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District.
3. Additional thoroughfare standards and assemblies can be integrated into this Section as they are
approved by the City.

19.09.090.C Thoroughfare Standards Overview


the Thoroughfare standards are intended to support the character of the neighborhoods and context-based
placemaking, while providing a guideline to establish and reinforce a hierarchy for the mobility infrastructure
that complements the standards applicable to the Transect Zones as described in 19.09.050. As such, all right-
+;+  

'"$
*;$$*

+ "'
…$  

… ;/
Secondary, and Tertiary Thoroughfares, as described in this Section.

Final Draft | July 2018 Page 1124 of 1332 Page 09.090-1


19.09.090.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

In addition to the standards contained in this Section, the provisions established by 19.04 regarding
Downtown Thoroughfare Types, shall apply.

1. Primary Thoroughfares

… ;"'

 '$
%
$

   % ;  '$
%
$%
 "$]
‰ … ;

/ %
"
¢
 
 $/
 $/
" ]
¢$ '‚ '""
  

}*" $ '/ 
 
%
 "$

 



  
^


… ;


provide the opportunity for more intense, urban development including shallow setbacks and, in some cases,
increased building height. Primary Thoroughfares are the highest order thoroughfare.

2. Secondary Thoroughfares


 ;"'
%


$
%
$

   % ; 

$
%
$%
 "$]
Secondary Streets may be mixed-use or more residential in character

3. Tertiary Thoroughfares

Tertiary Streets are visually less prominent than Primary and Secondary streets, and usually have narrower
Right-of-Way width. Traditionally, Tertiary Thoroughfares have been city alleys. They may function as “back of
house” for buildings with multiple street frontages. Care should be taken to make these streets as pedestrian-
friendly as possible while accommodating loading and access needs. Secondary Thoroughfares are the second
highest order thoroughfare.

4. Thoroughfares Hierarchy for Frontages, Vehicular Access, and Utility Location

a. Frontages: For the purposes of applying the standards provided in Section 19.09.050 (Transect Zones)
and 19.09.070 (Frontage Type Standards) the side of the lot facing the higher order thoroughfare shall
be considered as the frontage, or front, of the lot. Tertiary Thoroughfares are the third highest order
thoroughfare. Whenever two or more sides of the lot face Primary Thoroughfares, all such sides shall be
considered the frontage, or front.

b. Vehicular Access and Utilities Location: For the purposes of applying the standards provided in Section
19.09.050 (Transect Zones), including, but not limited to, standards related to driveway access and parking,
whenever possible, vehicular access shall be located along a thoroughfare of the lower order; and all utilities,
whenever possible, shall be located along the perimeter of thoroughfare of the lower order.

19.09.090.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.E Cashman District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.F Civic & Business District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.G Design District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

Page 09.090-2 Page 1125 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


Placeholder

19.09.090.H Founders District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.I Fremont East District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.J Gateway District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.K Historic Westside District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

Final Draft | July 2018 Page 1126 of 1332 Page 09.090-3


19.09.090.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan


Figure 19.09.090.L-1
Thoroughfare Plan - Hierarchy

Page 09.090-4 Page 1127 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


Figure 19.09.090.L-2
Thoroughfare Plan - Downtown Thoroughfare Types

19.09.090.M Market District (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.N Resort & Casino District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

19.09.090.O Symphony Park District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

Final Draft | July 2018 Page 1128 of 1332 Page 09.090-5


19.09.100 SUPPLEMENTAL TO TRANSECT ZONES
Subsections:
19.09.100.A Purpose
19.09.100.B Applicability
19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards
19.09.100.D Flood Control Standards
ˆ   ' 
19.09.100.F Outdoor Lighting Standards
Œ …‚ ' 
  '  
19.09.100.I Incentives for Development Under the Form-Based Code (Placeholder)
19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Development Sites

19.09.100.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to provide a cross-reference from the Form-Based Code provisions of LVMD

   $ "  


%
$



19.09.100.B Applicability
1. This Section applies to all new development within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District as further
described in Section 19.09.020 (Purpose and Applicability).
2. !

  } *
+

 ; 
*$ 
 
 
_
X
  ‘
X 
_
 [[  ;  $"
 


%
$

/

restrictive standard applies.
3. 
"
$; '
  X
 ' 

' [/ˆ
X  ' [/‹X‰" ' ' [/ ‹X '  [/
the Director or Director’s designee shall determine whether the standards for residential or commercial
>
$$$;/*
 
$$+ '~

%   /*|
 %
/ '$
*$ 
 
‡‘ + + €
'„
…$
*
$

"*|

;+
$$
*$‚ 
'* 
^
""  '


  % "$$ "
/"
/
"*|

;

19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards


1.  
 ' 

' $$
 
 $>


*$ 
 €„
  ’
(Fences and Walls).
2. Standards and procedures for fencing and screening in all commercial zones are established in LVMC

  ‹ˆX* 
 ' /

'  ' '[

19.09.030.D Flood Control Standards



  
"
} $ 

'"$    '

+


established in LVMC Title 20 (Flood Control).

19.09.100.E Landscaping Standards

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1129 of 1332 Page 09.100-1


19.09.100.F Outdoor Lighting Standards City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

1. Standards for landscaping required in all residential zones are established in LVMC Section 19.06
(Residential Districts – Purpose and Development and Design Standards). The Director shall determine
the amount of landscaping required for a particular building type placed within any of the Transect
_
*
 
*" $ ';
*
 '
>
—"

 '    €„
  ’ 
€„
  ‹X 
"=
 "    [/+
$ *$

2.  $  '
`" 
 $$
 $>


*$ 
 €„
  ‹
(Commercial and Industrial Districts – Purpose and Development and Design Standards). The Director
shall determine the amount of landscaping required for a particular building type placed within any of

 
_
*
 
*" $ ';
*
 '
>
—"

 '    €„
  
‹ €„
  ‹X 
"=
 "    [

19.09.100.F Outdoor Lighting Standards


1.  "$ ' ' $$
 
 $>


*$ 
 €„
  ’
(Development Standards).
2. Standards and procedures for outdoor lighting in all commercial zones are established in LVMC Section
‹ˆX* 
 ' /

'  ' '[

19.09.100.G Parking Standards


1. 
  " ^ "  
‚ '
`" 

  % "$"


*
 *   €„
  ‡’X…‚ '
`" 

[/*$
Œ*
$+/ 

+ + …‚ '„X 'Œ[/

 
 
/+   


 

‚ '$*
 
'* 
^/$  /
/ "
 ""
 ""


Table G-1 Form-Based Code Parking Requirements


Load (Zone) Required Parking Spaces
+X_
[ „ "£ „^ "’£
‚ '
`" 

  
 
19.12.060 for the individual use
„
 "X_
‡[ „ "‘£ „^ "’‘£
‚ '
`" 

  
 
19.12.060 for the individual use
 'X_
[ „ "‘£ „^ "£
‚ '
`" 

  
 
19.12.060 for the individual use
 +$;


…‚ '
`" 

~
a.  
…‚ '
`" 


  % "$"

 ‡’ $"$


" ‚ '
`" 

 ‡/`"


Œ<
 $
 ˆ$;
–

% 

;
X


  ‘!*$
[

^
 $"$  
b.  ;"
;$   
 + + …‚ '„  
 ; 
…‚ '
_
  'X
[/„
 "X;
$$+[/+X'

[  
  '"
Œ
c.  '

`" 
‚ '" $"$
 
¤† 
 ;
 " ^ "

`" 
‚ '*;" $ > '


'
*
 
…‚ '_




^$

*
$+~

 @Y =#<  Q !"# " (Q…%

19.12.060 Parking Parking Load Zone is Medium (Zone 2) Form-Based Code Parking Requirement
Requirement

20 spaces „ "‘£ „^ "£


 Minimum Required
‚ '
`" 

‡’ …‚ '
~
the individual use „^ "
`" 

…‚ '
~

Page 09.100-2 Page 1130 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.100.G Parking Standards

d. $;+ 

`" 

! $  /
|
+ $$


%$€  


 €„
  ’

Figure G-1 Downtown Parking Load Map

2. 
`" 
‚ '
 $"$
 '$; €„
  Œ;*


"

 €„
  ‹ X…‚ '<$
  %
[
3. 
 

 '  $;"‚ '
$$
 $ "$  $;
 
 $
"


*$ 
 €„
  ‹X
 $ ! " $…‚ '
 '  [
 Bicycle Parking Standards
a.  ;$

"%
‚ 

; *

 $;
%
 ‚"*


 '

+

$ 

* ;$
 *
$‚

"
$; +  /*$
/
$‚

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1131 of 1332 Page 09.100-3


19.09.100.H Sign Standards City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

b. ƒ


`" 
/
* ;$
‚ '
"*
%  *$


 
 


  $*" $ '/ $
+  



 

c. 

%
$
/
 ' / $

$$* ;$
‚ '

`" 

 
Š%$

Table G-3 Bicycle Parking Requirements


Use Required Parking Spaces
Residential (over 20 units only) ‡ /$"

%
;‡" 


  /ˆ"  / …"*$ <
*$; ‡ /$"

%
;‹/Œ<
Retail Trade ‡ /$"

%
;/Œ<
ˆ$;
 
% 
 ‡ /$"

%
;‡/Œ<
Telecommunication Facilities --
Other --
Urban Agriculture --

19.09.100.H Sign Standards


1. Standards and procedures for permanent and temporary signs allowed in all residential zones are

*$ 
 €„
  ’X
 
 $ '  [
2. Standards and procedures for permanent and temporary signs allowed in all commercial zones are

*$ 
 €„
  ‹‡X
 $ ! " $   '  [

19.09.100.I Incentives for Development Under the Form-Based Code (Placeholder)


This Subsection will be developed in the future to enable the inclusion of incentives into the Form-Based Code

 

 
 % >
 

+
%
$


 
 %
"$ $"
/
^$
/

"   
 "*
‚ '

`" 
 
^
 
%$




 ;"$$ $"

 
" ;

…' 


 
'"$/
^$
/$$+
%
$
 



'*" $ '*;

 "*



^ '
%  '" ;*

/"'" 

=*$
" '/" ;‚
$>/
!
 ;""
"' + $$

*

"$$;$ *

  
_
 
Districts within Downtown Las Vegas.

19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Development Sites



+
%
$

 $'

%
$
 
/ 

%
$

 ‘



 
^  '*$‚/
$$+ ' 
"


  
 % ;"'*$‚/$$$;†

1. <

  '
"*
% 
% 
 %

 
;+$‚ '
"'
*$‚
*
+

| '"*$ "'


…

  '


 


  "
 ;
have limited vehicular access.
2. …

  '
" 
$$;*
$


 $
*$‚/ 
 

% 


 % ;
^  '

  
+‚ 

"*$ 
"$>
";/"'
/$$
;/ ‚ '''

3. A pedestrian passage provides additional frontage opportunities for the commercial (retail and restaurant)
 —
 

"
$ ' 
'
 "*$ 
;$% 
 " ; $
formal community gathering.
 Pedestrian passages must be designated as a public access easement or public right of way and must be a
 "‡

 + + %
+$‚+; "

+ 


Page 09.100-4 Page 1132 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


DEFINITIONS USED IN THE FORM-BASED CODE


$ 
*
$++ $$*
 
+  
‹X
   „
"
[



%
$

/ €„
  ‹‡Xƒ 


[

+  
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU). <"* 
+
$$ '" 
/

+  /


+
$$ '% 
* 
`" 

 


$ % '/$

 '/
 '/‚ '/    



  +  $
 

$ '$
 $;" 
*" $ '
;
$$+
" 

_
_ '  /
 *
 €„/’/ ‹/" $ >


 
 $"
¥
$

^  '
  <
;""
/$¦

Active Ground Floor. <

 '
$$+ %
% "$
''

*
+



$
" 

""
 
"
/ % 
/
$
/$
 
""
Š'" }!   %
'" 
}
 §
*" $ ' 
 
 

 
+
 '+;$ '+ 


  
 % 
<$ '
 


 ' 
< %
Œ" $ 

'"$ '$ /

  '
"*

$

/  $;  
}
 %
$
'$  
}
 %
 
'$+ 
%  *$
$ '   
*"’

"*
"


Architectural Feature. <  


"$
$

/+ $

 /
*

;$
/

 ' /'

$ '



^
 *" $ '""
/ $" '*" $  

‚ /
$/ 
^"
*" $ '
 $/ ;$
 ;
+ +//$ '/
/  ' 
¥
$

^  '
  ¦

Awning. <%
|

+$$*" $ '%
+ +/ 
 %/
$" "  $
 $/+ ;*
 ^
 $

*$

"

$ '
+;+ +

$



(  
Balcony. <$|

+$$*" $ '  
$
*;
 $ '

Block Face. 
''
'
$$
*" $ '
 
 
*$‚
*$‚
% 


 
^
*$  '
 
"$

'

*$‚

Bungalow Court. <*" $ ';


  

$$/

""
  '$
$/
%  '"$ $
" 
 '



"

Building Entrance. 
$


   '
 
'
*" $ '
`"
$;"
*;

"*$ 

Building Form. 
%
$$
  
  *" $ '

Building, Main Body. 


 ; '*" $ '

Building, Primary. 



  " $ '/…  $

Building, Secondary Wing. <*" $ '""


 ; $$;
 ;*" $ '  

 ;   
$
 ;*" $ ' 
  
  $"
‚ '""


Building Type. <""




*;*     '"  /$

 $/ "   

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1133 of 1332 Page 09.18-1


  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

!  
Ceiling Height, Ground Floor. 

'
 
}
 

$ ' ;
 
'" }/  $" '
 ;"*/$
/" $ ;/ '

spaces.

Ceiling Height, Upper Floor(s). 



'
 
}
 

$ ' ; 

}X[*%

'" }/  $" '
 ;"*/$
/" $ ;/
 '



Chamfered Corner. < 


^
 $+$$*" $ '
+

 "$
^
 +$$/; $$;
;
 $‘
'

 '$


*
%
$

'

*" $ '
 
'




Source: slideshare.net Source: Opticos Design, Inc.

Civic.<

'  ' >  

 
/"$"
/
"  /

  /
'%
 
/  / "*$ ‚ ' $ 


Civic Space. < "



 
"*$ '
 '  %  % 


Common Yard.< '


;
 

+$$*
+

 ;*
+


 ;
 
 
+$‚ % "$$;  """$ $

$%  ' $ 



Corner Entry.<

  
 
$
 

*" $ '

Courtyard.< " 



 $

$; $$;
$
*;+$$*" $ ' 


*;"$ $

 
 $" 
 $


Courtyard Building. <$'


""

"$ $

‚
" 



";/

";/  

Covered Parking.<  ‚ '


 + 
""
X[%
*

 $$
% 


‚
%
 $


Page 09.18-2 Page 1134 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code  

  
Depth, Ground Floor Space. 
  



 '§


 
 +$$

'" }
% $*$
 $$+
"


Distance Between Entries. 


 > $  

"
$$
$
§
*
+


 

*" $ '*" $ '

Dooryard. < '


;
+ $$+
*‚  '
 /""$$;+ $++$$

 '
$
/; $$;"
    + '" }
 
 $"


Downtown Industrial. 

 " $  "
*"



 *$
+ 
""  '
+ + "
 
$
 
|*" 
 
$ >
$  

"
/+ 

 '$
  % "$"
     
$
*;" $     / $"
/
^$
~<"
 
Œ'
/„|†<"
 Œ'
/„ †" $ '– 
„
 $—"*
;†" $ '„ 
 


% 
 $
†$

/
 $—! " $†$'
…$ † "  „
 $"$;
¨† Š…$ /–'
¨†"–ƒ‚†Œ
"$;—…$  "
;†
%;
„
; ˆ`" 
X
$/$
/ 
% 
[† '<
*$;–*   †„ "" '/ '†
…‰]
/
'  $† $—  ¨†ƒ
"
—  *"  

†ƒ
$ '
 †ƒ$
$

+ $ ;

Downtown Residential. 


 
 $  "
  " %
 %

 ^" '  
"'"
+
$%
 + +   

"
 $"
/
^$
/
$$+ '~ '$
 $;/
<
† '$
 $;/

† '$
 $;/_

†+ "
†+ $; +
$$ '†„"$ 
 $;
 
 $! 
""
*
$$+
/ *$
" $ ';
$$+
 
_


‘"*

$

† 
"
   *$
+  ;" $ ';
$$+
+  
 _
/

"
  $$+
 _


Downtown Retail. 


 
$$ ' ;$

  

"$ 
 "
 ;
"

 
$
/ $" '/
^$
/
$$+ '
 $

  
~<
'$$

/
 $†<"  "
† `"
 $ ;†;

†
‚…"*$  '†Œ

$
 $
/‰

  
†Œ
"$;—…$ Ž"
;†! 

—$'"
$
‰]
†" ;/
$
% 
†…
†

$
†
  
$
† '

†" '
† 

Downtown Services.  $ 


  $;
''
 %  '
 $
% 
/
 $
% 
/
  
$$
"
 
% 
 / $" '/
^$
/
$$+ '~< $ $/$ /

$
X+  ‰" 

[†"
$†
 '
% 
†
‚ '
% 
/  
†
ˆ$;
<'
;†   $!  "  XŒ

$[†Œ

$…
 $
% 
†
$$"*†„'

<
;†„ $<" †…‰]
/$
% 
†…  '–…"*$  '†" '

†
$†
ƒ
 '
$

Duplex - Front and Back. <


 
 $*" $ '
 '
*
"
*;+ $
$ % ' 


$;


+ +
+
$$ '"  
$+ 
" $
*
 

  '
 +$$¥
$

^  '
   "$
^¦

Duplex - Side by Side. <


 
 $*" $ '
 '
*
"
*;+ $
$ % ' 


$;


+ +
+
$$ '"  
$+ + 
¢*; 
$ % '"  ' 
wall.

July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1135 of 1332 Page 09.18-3


>  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Duplex - Stacked. <


 
 $*" $ '
 '
*
"
*;+ $
$ % ' 


$;


+ +
+
$$ '"  
$+ 
" ‚
 



=  
Encroachment into Façade Zone. < ; 
"$
"
/""
/""$
$

/" 

/'$$
;/

/'
+$$///*$ ;/*;+ +/

/*
‚
$

 > $
'"$;$  
^
 ' 
§
>

*‚/ 
"*$  '+;

Entry. < 


'/"/'
/'
/$$+
*" $ '

  
Façade, Primary. 

^
 +$$*" $ ' ' ;



Façade, Secondary. 

^
 +$$*" $ ' '
 ;

 




Façade Zone. 

*
+


 " ^ "
*‚$
$ '
 
$ 
$ '
 




$

Finish Level, Ground Floor. 



' =


*
+


 
} 
'" } 

|
"*$  
+$‚

Flex Low-Rise Building. <


 "$'
 >
""
 $'
$; 
""

‚ '!  *" $ ';
/
" ;%
 +   % "$
;/" ;
 
;/





";

";! *
"
% 
%
 $ ^"

;*
 '$
"
*" $ '

Flex Mid-Rise Building. <


 "$'
 >
""
*" $ $'
$; $$; 
"$ 
$
%
$""
‚ ' "
% 
%
 $ ^"
;*
 '$
"
*" $ '

Flex High-Rise Building. <$'


 $$""
*" $ $'
$; $$; 
"$ $
%
$
""
‚ '"
% 
%
 $ ^"
+ '" }
 $
% 
"
/ 
% 


 
 $"
 "
} *" $ ';
  ;
 "* + + 

Footprint. 
"$


'" %

*;
"   *" $ '""


Forecourt. 

" '
  
§
$

 '
$
+ $


$
   
*‚
 '$$";

";;*
"
 
;"

'


*" $ '/    $ '
" 
 '
+  
retail and service areas.

Frontage.< $ *" '"'


/ % 
/
"*$  '+;

Frontage Private. 

*
+


*" $ '§
 

$$
*
+


"*$ 
 '+; 
$
Frontage Public. 

*
+


"*
%
 "$$
 

'

 '+;

Frontage Line. 
$$
X[$  '"'

"*$ +;/ % 


Page 09.18-4 Page 1136 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code @ 

Furniture Area. 
  
 
+$‚$$+
$





/  /


$ '/*

/ 
/* ‚
‚/


"  '
`" 
+ "
  '

%



  

X  
Gallery. < '
;
; $$;"
 
 $$   +


§
 $ '
$

 '

$
+  
  $
%


$ '+
'$ 
%
$ '
 
+$‚

Glazing. 
+ + 

' *" $ ' + '$  $$


Greenway. X…$
$
[

Ground Floor. 
}*" $ '$



$
%
$
'" " 
*" $ '

[  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#@
"
$;



\  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#!@
"
$;



]  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#“@
"
$;



^  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#”@
"
$;



)  
Large House.<$'


""
   '
" ""$$; 
 $'
$

Lined Building. <+*" $ '   ' 


^
 " *$
*" $ '
 $$;
 '

‚
 
 *" $ '   '‚ '""
/*" $ '+ 
++ +/‚ '$/
 '


Live/Work.<  
'
" '"  +‚ '
/"
 " $ >
*; '$
"
$ 
*" $ '/

 '$
 $;+
$$ '"$ $
 $;+
$$ '/*


 '
""$$;


| 
 
 $" ; +‚ % ;/ +  $"
$


‚ 

  ; $ 
 +‚ '


%
/ 
'"$$;"
*;/


" 
" ¥
$

^  '
   %
—ƒ‚ ¦

Loading Dock.<$+

'%
 $
  *
$
" $


Loft. <*" $ ';


*" $*

*$
%
;"
 ‚}$ /
 $/ 
 
$;"  
  
$ $ 


^ 

*
+

   $"


`  
Medium House. <
 " >


""
/   '
" /""$$; 
 
 " >
$

Minimum Canopy Clearance. „


"


'" 
*


July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1137 of 1332 Page 09.18-5
†  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Mixed-Use. < '$


*" $ '  '
 
;
$ "
 '$

%
$

 

*" $ ' "
 $" '/*" $  
/
 
 $/]
/
 $/

  /"*$ /

 

"
/+


 =

$ "
;

 $
^  ;/$
"
$

;+$
/
 


   %
 "$
 ‚ '

"   $$; 
'
„ ^
"
;
*
 
'
%
 $$;X 
+
 =

"
";

*" $ '""$$;  =

}[
 > $$;X 
+
 =

;
"

$

^

 


$/
$
" / 

'

+ 

   %
 "$
[¥
$

^  '
  
„ ^


Multi-Plex, Large. <$'


 >
""
   ' 
*; 
 —‚
+
$$ '" /
; $$;+ 


;  
$;$
  +  
 "
 ;
"* 

'*

Multi-Plex, Small. <


 " >
""
   ' 
*; 
 —‚
+
$$ '" /
; $$;+ 


;  % "$

$ '
 
*" $ ' *" $ ';



 

 "$'
 >
 $;
   
$;$
  '$;+    $;
 '$
 $;
'* 
 "
 ;
'*

{  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#Ž@
"
$;



|  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#‰@
"
$;



;  
Parapet. <$++$$$ '

'

  +$$
^
*%

$


Parking Driveway Width.


 > $
"

 
 %
+;‚ '
/
"



 "$
 
  %
$

Playgrounds. <;
 % 

 '
 
`" 
 $
Š

  

Plazas. <;
$ % 
"
  "* 
 ' % / %


  /
$^  /
 
 $ % 
/ ; $$;% 
+ 
 '/ 
$"  / "*$  
%
/$ 
/ %
/  $$;

*;*" $ ' '
¥

^  '
  ¦

Pocket Plazas.<$$
;
$"*  % 
 $>/"      $
 
$$+

"$
$'
$>

Pocket Parks.<;
 % 
% 
$$$
"*$ "* 

 

% 



  $" 
+


 $  
 $
^  ;
'*
 



Porch, Engaged.< 
''
+ 





*" $ '+ $


other two sides are open.

Porch, Projecting.<|
 ' 
 

 
 

Page 09.18-6 Page 1138 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code ‡ 

Public Services, Minor. $ ;


% 

"

"*$  $"
" $ ;"*  /" '
  / 
       *"   $ 


‚  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#•@
"
$;



  
Recessed Entry. < 
 
*" $ ' 
*‚
§

*" $ '

Recreation, Active. 

  $"" ""$$;

+ 
 

`"  '
`" 

+ 
`" 
; $$
  

 + 
;


"

 
 %
$;"
/
  $"
*"
 $  
$;'" /"/*
*$$—*$$ 

$/ 
+  '$

Recreation, Passive. 

  $""  %$% '
^  ' "$
"
+  *

"+ 
$ $
$
   "  

 + 
;


  $"
/*"  $  
/"
 % 
+$‚ '/ ‚ '/* ;$ '/*   $+ '/   ‚ '

Regulating Plan. 
 

 '  '
$   
_
  
 ; '‚
;

$

"
`" 

 $ '
  % 
<
'"$ '$  ; $$; 
 

 ;Š] $_ '„

Right-of-Way. < $ `" 


*;

%  /
   /

   /
   /
 
   "*$ "


   %
 "$%

"
*;/+$‚/ $/

$
     $
/ $' 
$
/+
$
/ ;
+

"*$ " $ ; $ ;
¥

^  '
  ¦

Rowhouse.< '$
 $;+
$$ '
;+$$+  


;
$
 
*; 

+   % "$

$ '
  
 
 %



" ; $$;$
 

rear.

  
Service Entry. < 
 
*" $ '%  '


$ %
;' 

%$
"
/
+
$$

" —
$;


*" $ '

Shopfront. <;
 '
/; $$;
 $ 
 $"
/+


§
 $ '
$


 '
$
+ 
*" $ '
 

$
%
$
 
+$‚

Sidewalk. 
   '+; %
  


^$" %
$;

  "
/ 

$$
*
+


"* |

;$


Simple Wall Plane. <+$$*" $ '*" $ '""$$;$


$$
$

 '+; 

 '
 " 
+  $ > $ "$  $$
*" $ '
/;
;%

 
"$
 $ 
"
"/*;+ +/%
 '/ 
/% 
 



July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1139 of 1332 Page 09.18-7


  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Small House. <$$



""
/   '
" /""$$; 
 $$$+  %


space.

Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Street Frontage. 



  # '

@

Stoop. < '


;
+


§
 $ '
$

 '
$
+ 
 ;
$
%


 
+$‚"]
$;
"
 %; ;+ + 

 
""$$; 
^
  
 $  '

Shade Structure. <""





% 

%

" /‚ '
/ 
+$‚+;

Shade Structure, Projecting. <""



 > $$;
 
*" $ '% 


 
+$‚/+$‚+;/

 

Square. <;
 % 
%  '"*$ "* 

 % "
/
 $ % ;/
" ""


  / 
 %
"
`"



*;*" $ ' 

$


+ 


$
//$+ / 

$$; '


#  
Tandem Parking. <‚ '



"'$$++‚
*
 



Temporary Uses. <


 

 % ; $" '…‚ '— 
+$‚$
/
 $‰"
$
/
; Š "  ¨/
;‰"
 $ˆ%
/
;
$
ˆ
$
‰]
/   $  

"


Terrace. < '


;
+


 

*" $ ' 

 '
$
+  
$
%



%  '"*$  "$  $ '
§


Thoroughfares. < '+;"


*;%
 "$/

  / * ;$
]% 

$
 

/  
%
 "$$
 "*$  '


Thoroughfare, Primary. 


+ 
 '
*" $ '
    ;/  
 

"'
…$ 
 + +   

Thoroughfare, Secondary. 


+ 

  '
*" $ '
    ;/  
 

"'
…$ 
 + +   

Page 09.18-8 Page 1140 of 1332 Final Draft | July 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code [ 

Thoroughfare, Tertiary.<

+  $* $ ;"    


% ' $;‚ ' 
$ %
;

/  
 
"'
…$ 
 + +   

Transect. <
  

%  
+ ' '
 =

* 
%  


"$"*  
"
 €„
X

[  % 
  ^ 
_

 '

 "$
"* 

>

 *

; $ 

$
 '

 ;  
 ; $ "
 "* 

Transect Zone. ‰

%
$
%  
 
_ '„
'"$
*;
 " +  
€„
X

[ 
_




 "$

"*  
_

  %
$;  $
$ "
>
 


%
$

/

^
    
""$*" $ '"
/
 ;/
' 
*‚
`" 

/

$



 


%  

 
'
/ $" '*" $ ';
 
"*$  '


Transparency.

 '
/""$$;$

'" }*" $ '/"  
 ""  
'$

Two-Family Dwelling. <



+
$$ '
 '
 "

^$" %
$;*;+ $
$ % '



$;

 

+
$$ '"   '$
$

$/ "$
^/  ‚†
"$
^/ 
*; 
†  "$
^/‚
¥

^  '
  ¦

ƒ  
Unit. < 

  *" $ '

Upper Floor.<} *" $ '  '* *$



 $
*%

'" }

Urban Park.< % 


;
%  '
$



'*'"

'*"
"$" ""


   $$
""


  $ $ 


*  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#€@
"
$;



_  
Walkway.<%
+;$
 

$"


   

^$" %
"

$
+
X[/
'"
/  % 



Wall Plane.<%
 $"


*;
§
*" $ '

„  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#©@
"
$;



…  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#¨@
"
$;



†  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#_@
"
$;



July 2018 | Final Draft Page 1141 of 1332 Page 09.18-9


AF
19.09 FORM-BASED
FORM-BAS CODE
CITY OF LASS VEGAS, NV
R
D

Public Review Draft (Ver.2.0 - Fremont East Update) | February


Page 1142 5, 2019
of 1332
This Public Review Draft includes
new and modified content with
respect to the Title 19.09 Form-
Based Code as adopted on
October 17, 2018. All new and
updated content is indicated by
red markings. All pre-existing
content is included in black,
blue, and white ink. Feedback
on this Draft is essential, and
encouraged by the City of Las
Vegas Department of Planning.
For more information visit
w w w. f o r m b a s e d c o d e . v e g a s

Page 1143 of 1332


TABLE OF CONTENTS
19.09.010 PREAMBLE

19.09.010.A Introduction
19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code?
19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.E Organization of the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code

19.09.020 PURPOSE AND INTENT

19.09.020.A Title
19.09.020.B Purpose of the Form-Based Code
19.09.020.C Authority
19.09.020.D Applicability
19.09.020.E Responsibility for Administration

19.09.030 ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES

19.09.030.A Purpose
19.09.030.B Applicability
19.09.030.C Application Review Procedures
19.09.030.D Subdivision of Land
19.09.030.E Vacations
19.09.030.F Rezoning
19.09.030.G Site Development Plan Review
19.09.030.H Special Use Permit
19.09.030.I Administrative Deviation
19.09.030.J Waiver
19.09.030.K Variance
19.09.030.L Development Agreement
19.09.030.M Miscellaneous Permits
19.09.030.N Master Sign Plan
19.09.030.O Nonconformities

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1144 of 1332 Page i


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.030.P Enforcement
19.09.030.Q Extension of Time

  

19.09.040 SPECIFIC TO DISTRICTS

19.09.040.A Purpose
19.09.040.B Applicability
  
  




19.09.040.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District (New)
19.09.040.E Cashman District (New)
19.09.040.F Civic & Business District (New)
19.09.040.G Design District (New)
19.09.040.H Founders District (New)
19.09.040.I Fremont East District (New)
19.09.040.J Gateway District (New)
19.09.040.K Historic Westside District (New)
19.09.040.L Las Vegas Medical District
19.09.040.M Market District (New)
19.09.040.N Resort & Casino District (New)
19.09.040.O Symphony Park District (New)

19.09.050 TRANSECT ZONES STANDARDS

19.09.050.A Purpose
19.09.050.B Applicability
19.09.050.C Establishment of Transect Zones
19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview
19.09.050.E Transect Zones
19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (New)
19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)
19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)
19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)
19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)
19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)
19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)
19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (New)
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (New)

Page ii Page 1145 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)


19.09.050.F Special Districts

19.09.060 BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS

19.09.060.A Purpose
19.09.060.B Applicability
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

19.09.070 FRONTAGE TYPE STANDARDS

19.09.070.A Purpose
19.09.070.B Applicability
19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview
19.09.070.D Arcade
19.09.070.E Common Yard
19.09.070.F Dooryard
19.09.070.G Forecourt
19.09.070.H Gallery
19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged
19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting
19.09.070.K Shopfront
19.09.070.L Stoop
19.09.070.M Terrace

19.09.080 OPEN SPACE STANDARDS

19.09.080.A Purpose
19.09.080.B Applicability
19.09.080.C Open Space In-Lieu Fee (New)
19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview
19.09.080.E Greenway (New)
19.09.080.F Urban Park
19.09.080.G Square
19.09.080.H Plaza
19.09.080.I Pocket Plaza
19.09.080.J Pocket Park
19.09.080.K Community Garden

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1146 of 1332 Page iii
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.L Playground

19.09.090 THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS

19.09.090.A Purpose
19.09.090.B Applicability
19.09.090.C Thoroughfare Standards Overview
19.09.090.D 18b Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.E Cashman District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.F Civic & Business District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.G Design District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.H Founders District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.I Fremont East District Thoroughfare Plan (New)
19.09.090.J Gateway District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.K Historic Westside District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan
19.09.090.M Market District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.N Resort & Casino District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.090.O Symphony Park District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.100 SUPPLEMENTAL TO TRANSECT ZONES

19.09.100.A Purpose
19.09.100.B Applicability
19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards
19.09.100.D Flood Control and LID Standards
19.09.100.E Landscaping Standards
19.09.100.F Outdoor Lighting Standards
19.09.100.G Parking Standards
19.09.100.H Sign Standards
19.09.100.I Community Benefits Program (New)
19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Developments

19.09.110 FORM-BASED CODE DEFINITIONS (NEW)

Page iv Page 1147 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


19.09.010 PREAMBLE
Subsections:
19.09.010.A Introduction
19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code?
19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.E Organization of the Form-Based Code
19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code

19.09.010.A Introduction
The Vision 2045 Downtown Las Vegas Master Plan (Downtown Master Plan) adopted by the City Council on July
15, 2016 is the policy document that provides an overall vision, policy direction, and implementation strategy
in support of the ongoing recovery and revitalization of the Downtown region. The Downtown Master Plan
envisions and encourages downtown Las Vegas to achieve a compact, vibrant urban environment, with a
focus on higher density mixed-use development around transit hubs and activity nodes. The Master Plan is
intended to enable an energetic urban way of life and high-quality physical environment for locals and visitors
alike. To better anticipate growth and change, the Master Plan includes an expanded study area and includes
12 downtown planning districts including the addition of the Las Vegas Medical District and other peripheral
areas to the Downtown (See Figure 19.09.020.B-1 Districts Within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District).

Adopted under the requirements of the Las Vegas Municipal Code, and other applicable laws, the Form-Based
Code establishes the new form-based standards for the area of the City included within the Downtown Las
Vegas Overlay (DTLV-O) established in LVMC Section 19.10.110. The Form-Based Code applies to the Downtown
Las Vegas Overlay District which encompasses the 12 Downtown Districts listed in Section 19.09.020.B
(Purpose of the Code). Over time a Regulating Plan and Form-Based Code will be applied to each of these 12
Downtown Districts, and when adopted, the existing base zones within each District and the standards in the
Interim Downtown Las Vegas Development Standards will be replaced by the standards included in the Form-
Based Code. The Form-Based Code has been designed so it can be easily updated as new Transect Zones
within the Downtown Form-Based Code are incrementally added.

December 2018 | Public Review Draft Page 1148 of 1332 Page 1


19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code? City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code?


A Form-Based Code (FBC) is a placed-based planning approach that supports walkable, mixed-use, and
compact urban environments rather than suburban development and sprawl. A FBC is an alternative to a
conventional zoning code.




!  "


#$ 
%
$

'"$  

 *$

results and a high-quality public realm by using physical form (rather than separation of uses) as the
organizing principle for the code. A form-based code is a regulation, not a mere guideline, adopted into city,
+ /" ;$+<*

=
+
"$$
  %
 %
  $> '
'"$  @<
 $ 
'"$
*" $ '  *" $ '"

 "' ;X" ;[
'"$  /

%
    
;
*" $
%  
#$
@*
 " ;%   

A FBC addresses the relationship between building facades and the public realm (i.e. the public and private
space between buildings), the form and mass of buildings in relation to one another, and the scale and types
of streets and blocks. Regulations and standards in a FBC are presented graphically in simple diagrams and
photographs as well as supplemental text. These standards are keyed to a plan (i.e. a Regulating Plan) that
functions like a zoning map that assigns an appropriate form and scale (i.e. the character) of development,
rather than only distinctions in land use types (see Figure 19.09.010.B-1). So, while FBCs focus on an
intended physical form they do also regulate use by allowing an appropriate range of uses chosen to ensure
compatibility between uses and the intended physical form of the zone.

Figure 19.09.010.B-1 Illustrative Pages and a Regulating Plan from Form-Based Codes

An important aspect of a FBC is that they are not just design guidelines; indeed, they replace the existing
> '  
'"$   %



'"$;
=
 ;
> '
'"$  


 +*
'" $ >
*; 
/+ / " 

" ;" 

  '
 %
  $> '  "$ $$ '


  *
"
> '
'"$   $ $


community’s vision or plans for the future. Like Las Vegas, many city residents are concerned about sprawl
    
$/ ;   $
"
/ 

%  
/ $" '
"  
X  
 
[
 ]

 =
 %
  $> '
 


*;+ 
;


/
"* 

of the standards they contain and how those standards are presented, the mechanism by which they are
implemented, and the built form they produce. In summary, a FBC is a regulatory tool drafted to implement
a community vision or plan that allows a community to approach the urban environment holistically by
establishing standards, for buildings, streets and sidewalks, parks, and parking as examples, that address the
design and regulation of both private and public space.

Page 2 Page 1149 of 1332 Public Review Draft | December 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code

19.09.010.C The Rural-to-Urban Transect: The Framework for the Form-Based Code
The Rural-to-Urban Transect is an organizing principle used in Form-Based Codes to establish a hierarchy of

%  
$
*
 



 '   
>
$ ' 
;  
determined by the character, form, intensity of development, and type of environment, and secondly, by the
uses allowed within the environment. This hierarchy of environments is used as the organizing framework
for the FBC rather than the use of land use categories, which are typically used in conventional or Euclidean
zoning as the organizing framework.


; $ 
<
  +   % 
  ^ 
_
X
`"
$;


#>
@[/
each of which is given a number with the lower numbers designating more rural/natural zones and higher
numbers designating more urban zones, and which are arranged from most natural to most urban, as
follows: Natural (T1), Rural (T2), Sub-Urban (T3), General Urban (T4), Urban Center (T5), and Urban Core (T6),
together with a Special District (SD) designation for places with specialized purposes (e.g., heavy industrial,
entertainment, or university districts). See Figure 19.09.010.C-1. The transect for Las Vegas is illustrated in
Figure 19.09.010.C-2.

Figure 19.09.010.C-1 The Rural-to-Urban Transect

The rural-to-urban transect illustrating from left to right a continuum of environments (places) from the most rural to the most urban.
Source: Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company

December 2018 | Public Review Draft Page 1150 of 1332 Page 3


19.09.010.B What is a Form-Based Code? City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Figure C-2 The Las Vegas Transect

T1

T2

T3

T4

T5

T6

Page 4 Page 1151 of 1332 Public Review Draft | December 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form Based Code

19.09.010.D Overview of the Guiding Principles for the Form Based Code

$$+ '
 ' *|
 %


}

 


 ~

1. Encourage a variety of housing types, development styles, and uses that provide diversity and visual
interest in the Downtown Overlay District while preserving the City’s desired character;
2. Encourage design, massing, and development standards that promote walkable urban cores;
3. Encourage high quality streetscape design that activates the public realm through pedestrian-oriented
and multimodal practices;
4. Encourage the development of neighborhoods that provide a high-quality living environment and
generate civic pride;
5. Encourage building design that complements surrounding development;
6. Encourage facades to be designed to include entries, porches, and other architectural elements that are
oriented to, and appropriate for, pedestrians; and
7. Encourage the preservation of areas of the City with unique historic character and context as well as
traditional single-family residential neighborhoods.

19.09.010.E Organization of the Form-Based Code


1. The following advisory text is intended to give a brief overview of the overall structure of Chapter 19.09
(Form-Based Code).
2. Section 19.09.010 - Preamble
The preamble introduces the context for the Form-Based Code within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay
District. It includes a brief overview of a FBC and the use of Transect Zones, describes guiding principles
for the FBC and how it is organized, and concludes with a short description of how to use the Code.
3. Section 19.09.020 - Purpose and Intent
Establishes the legal foundation for the FBC and includes an overview of its purpose, organization,
authority, responsibility for administration, and applicability.
4. Section 19.09.030 - Administration and Procedures
Provides a cross-reference to the City’s existing processes by which development is permitted by the
 ; 

`" 


$

 ;
"* $" `"

!$% 

cross-reference to the City’s existing enforcement procedures.
5. 
    
!


 
" `"

   
6. Section 19.09.050 - Transect Zones Standards
Establishes the Transect Zones and Special District Zones for the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District,
+ 
 $

%
$
 
 
>

7. Section 19.09.060 - Building Types Standards
Provides an overview of a wide range of pre-approved building types that are appropriate for walkable,
transit-supportive urban environments in the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District.
8. Section 19.09.070 - Frontage Type Standards
Establishes standards for a range of pre-approved building frontages that provide an important
transition between the public street and the private frontages of buildings.

December 2018 | Public Review Draft Page 1152 of 1332 Page 5


19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

9. Section 19.09.080 - Civic Space Standards


Establishes a range of pre-approved civic space types intended to be integrated into medium and large
projects in the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District.
10. Section 19.09.090 - Thoroughfare Standards
Establishes a range of pre-approved standards for creating complete streets to reinforce walkable
communities by providing access to multiple modes of transportation.
11. Section 19.09.100 - Supplemental to Transect Zones
Provides a cross-reference to the City’s existing development standards that will also apply within the
Transect Zones, including for example, fencing and screening standards, landscaping standards, parking
standards, sign standards, and a placeholder for development incentives.

19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code


The basic steps a user would follow for the development of a new project using the Form-Based Code are
illustrated in Figure 19.09.010.F-1.

Page 6 Page 1153 of 1332 Public Review Draft | December 2018


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.010.F How to Use the Form-Based Code

Figure 19.09.010.F-1 How to Use the Form-Based Code

; $
"
}+

Instructions Section Title

If your property needs to be subdivided, 19.16.040 Parcel Map,


follow the procedures and requirements for 19.16.050 Tentative Map,
subdividing land 19.16.060 and Final Map

Find the Transect Zone for your parcel



    19.09.050 Transect Zone Standards
Zone

 
   
19.09.040     
your District

Select the building type from the types


19.09.060 Building Type Standards
allowed in the Transect Zone

Apply building setbacks to the lot to be


developed, as well as applicable building 19.09.050 Transect Zones Standards
height, parking, etc. standards


   
19.09.070 Frontage Type Standards
that will be used and apply them to the building

Select the civic space and or thoroughfare 19.09.080 Civic Space Standards
standards that may apply to the development 19.09.090 Thoroughfare Standards

Follow the permit procedures and comply with Administration


19.09.030
the requirements for a permit application and Procedures

December 2018 | Public Review Draft Page 1154 of 1332 Page 7


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1155 of 1332


19.09.020 PURPOSE AND INTENT
Subsections:
‡<  $

‡ …"




‡ <" ;


‡  <$ * $ ;
‡ˆ 
  * $ ;<  

19.09.020.A Title


€
'

%
$

$$*
‚ +  ;*
 




ƒ   
/ ;$*
‚ + 
#@

19.09.020.B Purpose of the Form-Based Code


1. 


 + + €
' 

 ;€
'


%
$

X [
%
$
 $


 + + „
…$ 
 + + „

…$ % 
 %
$$%   /$ ; 
    $

  
';"
 ' '

%
; 
% $ >  
 + +  % * "* 
%  
+ "
  '

 ; ^
"

%
$



"   "*  % ; 

2. 
 + + „
…$  $"

'   

  '+ 
%
$


€
' + + 
 $$'%
 
   %

 

/ $" '~
a. Land Use Regulation


$ "

'"$;
+ /
^$
/$
  
"


"


 *$
"
 
^
 
%$'

|
/
%$
%
$ '$;

'"$  / %

%
$
 /   


 %
_ '

$;*
 $ '
+ 
„
…$ 
" $
‚ '/
"'
+$‚*$
"* 
%  
/ "
%
$

 ^
"
  "*†
* Redevelopment Sites
! 
 % >

%
$
  ;

%
$
 
  ''
 %
"" $; 
|
 "$
" *$
 %
 %

  $ 

"  " ' 

 + + +  
    
"* " ' %
 $ ^
"

%
$

 

+
'  $$   ;

%
$
 

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1156 of 1332 Page 9


19.09.020.A Title City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Figure 19.09.020.B-1 Districts within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District

Page 10 Page 1157 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.020.B Purpose of the Form-Based Code

 Community Development


+ + Š$ %* $ ; 


 
^  '" ;
"
/ $" '
%   


 %

% 


 % / $
% 
/
$
/
"  $/ 


  $


" ;"'" ;
 † 
 Downtown Enhancement
ˆ  


 + + 
%  
"' 
'"*$ 
$
%

  $

  '
 '

"'
 %

;
%

<
'"$;""
   + + Š" `"
 ; "$"
 


 $ 
  

%   "
    % "$

 
  
3. 
  



%
$
 $
*
/ 

 $$; 

*

 *$
+ 
 
'
' 

  $;/

"$$;
'"$

"
^  >
 * $ ;*
+


"
 
 

; $
>
 + 

;
$
"/
+ $$*
"



^  '/


+/+$‚*$
 ^
"

"* 
%  
  

 %
/ '+/ 
 $;" 

4. 

*$ 
 
_
 " $ ';
/ '
;
/ % 
;
/ 
"'
 $;+  
‡  
 + + €
'‰%
$;  
X€„
  [/

 '"
‡ $ 
*
$+~
a. €
'„
 $  †
* ‹€
'<  †
 
 ˆ  †
    †
e.  %  "
  †
f.
 '   †
g. " 
  †
h. Œ
+;  †
i.   ƒ
 
  †
| „‚
  †
‚ 
    † 
$ ; ;…‚  
5. 
  X
   [ $"
" `"
 
$ *$
 
 
+ +   

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1158 of 1332 Page 11


19.09.020.C Authority City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.020.C Authority



 

*
 
" ;%

 
 ;€
'*;

%
% 

"
XŽ[/ $" 'Ž
‡‹/ $  
+ €„
  ‡X<" ;[

19.09.020.D Applicability
1. 
$
 $;
 + + €
'‰%
$;  
*$ 
 €„
  
+ 


‡ + +   $ 
 
  ‡X…"


[The
%    
$;$$
;+  
_

 '   
 ;+ $$*
' 


 $

 '
+  $
$
+  
€
'„
 $  X


 '"
‡[‰%
 
+ $ *$
 
_

 
_ '„+ $$*

$



‡ + +   <
   
/

^  '*
>

+  
   
  
! 
  + + €
'
%
$
 + $$
*

$
*;
  
.
2. !    $$$ *$


$/
/ " ;$+ 
'"$  '%
 '$ "
 

%
$
/ $
$$$ 
 ' 
+  
 + + €
'‰%
$;
 
3. 
  
$;
$$+ '~
a. <$$

+
%
$
+  
 
_

* <$$   
^  '
%
$
 


*" $ ' *;


†
 <

%  
 ;
 ;

 '
 
^  '*" $ '† 
 !%



  %
 "$

4. ƒ

%
 ;%   +  
 
%
$ '  ;
'"$  /
+

%
 ;%   
  ;
 ;
/"$
/
'"$   
%
$ '
  ;
'"$  /
%   +  

  %
 
 '
 

`" 

$$'%
 / $$


  %
%   $$$;
5.  
*


 '
  *

 $;"

+ 
_
  

  + + €
'‰%
$;  
 

$$;


19.09.020.E Responsibility for Administration


1. Responsible Bodies and Individuals
 

$$*
 

*;
 



…$ ' 
$  
+ €„
  X<   [
2. Exercise of Discretion
! 

%
%   
$$+

%
+<" ;X
  *$
*;  % "$[

^
 
 
   
$   
  
`" 

/*"
  
 ;
 
 
 
   /
$$+ ' 
 $$*
"
~
a. 


%
$
$
+ $$$ *$
%   
X



* 

^
 
 
  + $$
"

 * $ ;


%
$
+   
/
""  '

/ 
" ;† 
 

      
+ 
 + + „
…$ 

Page 12 Page 1159 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


19.09.030 ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES
Subsections:
< …"

 <$ * $ ;


 <$   
%
+…
"

  "* %    
ˆ €  
 
> '
Π 

%
$
…$ 
%
+
 
 $

 
! <  %

%  
“ ƒ %

” €  


%
$
<'



„ „ 
$$
"…
 
Ž „
 ' …$
‰ Ž   

… ˆ 


• ˆ^
   


  

19.09.030.A Purpose
 
  % 

"
 
`" 



  / $ '/ 
 '$ '
$    

 $


`" 
*;




19.09.030.B Applicability


%
+

$$$ '$   +  
 + + €
'‰%
$;  X€„

  [

 €„
’X<$    …
"
[

19.09.030.C Application Review Procedures



 $ ' 
%
+$$$ '$   +  
 + + €
'‰%
$;  "$;
+ €„
  ’XŒ

$
`" 

[

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1160 of 1332 Page 13


19.09.030.D Subdivision of Land City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.030.D Subdivision of Land


  %   
$
; "
+
$/
"* $/%$ 
  
$
 
`" 
 $  
+ €„
  ’X…
$„[
‡  %   $ 
 


 
 
$
*$ 
 €„
  
’X…
$„[/
$  $$ $

 %

"* %   $  $  

+ €„
  ’‘X
 %
„[
 < $/

 $  
+ 
%

 %
/

 $

%
 '   %

 %
/"*
"* 
 $  
+ 
%   
Ž
‡‹/€„’‘X‰[/ 

`" 

 
 €„
  ’’
X $„[
 
%
  
$
;" "* % 

'
/
%   €„
  ’
X
%
  ;„[$ies

19.09.030.E Vacations
…
"

%  "*$ 






*$ 
 €„
  ’‹
X€  [

19.09.030.F Rezoning
…
"

> '
$
;

*$ 
 €„
  ’X
> '[

19.09.030.G Site Development Plan Review


< 

%
$
…$ 
%
+/

„ „|/ 
`" 
$$
%
$
+  
 + + 
€
'‰%
$;   $  
+ €„
  ’X 

%
$
…$ 
%
+[

19.09.030.H Special Use Permit



…$ '   ;%
/%
+     /
; $   
 $

…
 
"
$ 
 
  ‘ˆX 
_
[ $  
+ €„
  ’
X
 $

 [

19.09.030.I Administrative Deviation



 
;'  <  %

%    $  
+ €„
  ’‡X<  %


%   [

19.09.030.J Waiver
< $  ;$;ƒ %
   



 
%
$
  *



…$ '   ;%
/%
+     /
; $   ƒ %
 
$  
+ €„
  ’Xƒ %
[

19.09.030.K Variance

…$ '    
 ;"  $;" €  
$    $  
+ €„

  ’X€  
[

19.09.030.L Development Agreement


…
"

*$

 ;"  $

 
%
$
<'




*$ 
 €„

  ’‘X
%
$
<'


[

Page 14 Page 1161 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.030.M Miscellaneous Permits

19.09.030.M Miscellaneous Permits


 

"

 " 

;
 $…
 
 
 % 
 

*$ 
 €„
  ’’X
;
 $…
 [
‡ 

"

 " 

; ' …
  
*$ 
 €„
  ’
X
; ' …
 [
 

"

 " 

‰"  …
  
*$ 
 €„
  ’‹
X
‰"  …
 [
 

"

 " 
„
$

  
*$ 
 €„
  ’X„
$


 [
‘ 

"

 " 
 ' 
 
 
*$ 
 €„
  ’‡X ' 

 
[

19.09.030.N Master Sign Plan




"

%$„
 ' …$  
*$ 
 €„
  ’‡X„
 ' 
…$ [

19.09.030.O Nonconformities
 
/""
/
$/ $+

$+"$*


  


/ 
+ *

    '*;
 
  
/"$;+ €„

XŽ   '
 ""
[
‡ < ;"
""
+
*$ 
 "
 % $  
$ *$
> '

'"$   
=

 

*$ 
 "  / + 
  

$ *$

'"$   /      '"
""
/ 
"
""
  
% $    $

 
%

     '""
  
"
  
_

%
"*$ 

;/
%  
$/
  / $*

  
+ 
'$
 + + „

…$  
"'
Ž   '""
  
"
  
_
;*


^ 
/
$'
/  %
 
  
 
$;  
+ 

`" 


€„
XŽ   '
 ""
[ „| 

%
$
…$  %

 
$$+ '  '

*;
…$ '     ;"  $~
 <$


$$+ '*

 % 

" ;~
 *$

  / $/
"*$ 
$/
;/
%  
$*


* 
 '

 
"$  '   

 
%
$$ 
 ;"
*
; 


^  '"
X[†
 
 '

^ 

^  ' *; 
 

X


  
‡ [† 



^   /
$'

/ %

+ $$




   ;/ ^ " '
    

‡


 < ;
^   
^
   
$ 
 ;    '"

"$$
$;
 %


  $
]
;    
$
 ;"
 % '"*$ 
$ 
;
%  '
  / $/
%  
$*

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1162 of 1332 Page 15


19.09.030.P Enforcement City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code


 $  
+ 
 "*
‚ '

`" 
; *
   >
%


 " '
%
+


^
      '""
  
"
 
 
_
† 
 < ; '
+ $$ " 
 *$; 


$ '
 $

  
 + + „

…$ *
"
$


$$+ '$;~
 


 '  % " 
" $ >


 

% $*$
$ ‚
$;*


% $*$
 



%
$
  
+ 
 + + „
…$ †
 
 ""


;"
$ '

%
$


  $

†
or
 
 %

+ $$  '  $;  
* $ ;‚

 %

    

+"
 
%
$
" 
  
+ 
 + + „
…$ Š$ '

%   

19.09.030.P Enforcement

 
 
  *$
$; '/ 
 '/ 
 '
%    
 
$  
+ €„
  Xˆ 

[

19.09.030.Q Extension of Time


< $  Š
`"
 
^
   
"*
 $
+ 
 
*


^   

 
%$/'

+ 

`" 
 $ '

 $  
+ €„
  ’‡’Xˆ^
  
 
[

  
<$$
"
 
X

[


 in SectionX



  [

Page 16 Page 1163 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


19.09.040 SPECIFIC TO DISTRICTS
$% &
< …"

 <$ * $ ;


  
  




  ‹€
'<  X…$
$
[
ˆ    X…$
$
[
  % –"
  X…$
$
[
Œ
 '   X…$
$
[
 " 
  X…$
$
[
! 
 ˆ(New)
“ Œ
+;  X…$
$
[
”   ƒ
 
X…$
$
[
 €
'„
 $  
„ „‚
  X…$
$
[
Ž 
–   X…$
$
[
‰ ; ;…‚  (New)

19.09.040.A Purpose

"
 
    $ 
 ;" `"

'"$; 
$ *$

 
Districts within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District (LVMC Section 19.10.110) such as land use regulation,
signage, parking, streetscape or landscaping standards, to ensure that proposed development with the
 
_
 $  
+   
   


%
$


support the character, scale, and special requirements of the Downtown Districts.

ƒ

%
 =


"*
+


  
  $ 
 €„X
 
 [ 
%   $ 
 /
  
  $$$;

19.09.040.B Applicability
The standards in this Section apply to all proposed development in each of the Downtown Districts within the
Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District (LVMC Section 19.10.110). The regulations and standards that are applied
on parcels owned and operated by federal, state or city government through the application of this Code will
be interpreted as guidelines by the Review Authority. Nonetheless, to promote the urban form desired within
the Downtown Districts, compliance with all applicable standards and guidelines is encouraged.

!  "  #



"
 "*
   
 '`"$ ;/+$‚*$

%  

 >

" `"



 + +   "'
 $

    
 

$$






 $  '
requirements have been developed to be consistent with the goals and objectives as expressed in the City of Las Vegas
„
…$ /
€   ‡‘ + + „
$ /    
  

% %   
;€
'€$$
;

February 2019 | Final Draft Page 1164 of 1332 Page 17



       City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

*  ;< $; +


$$

'  $…$  
%
$
*;
Ž…/

%  
$/ $/ 

  *



<$$



 


`" 
+  *"=
  
*‚

`" 

‘$$
 
 % 
 *$
X  …$$





   '



`" 

[  '"
X<   $…$  '
`" 

[
 

<$
  '


‰     >


 $  

 

' %
    "$

 



/ *; '

% '

 
 ;


 
       !"#

District $%  &'( ) *


+ $%  &'( , *
+

*  / Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia) Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia)
Arts Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Eysenhardtia Orthocarpa (Kidneywood) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
       
4# Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Ceratonia Siliqua (Carob)
Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Parkinsonia Microphylla (Foothill Palo Verde) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Civic & Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Celtis Australis (Mediterranean Hackberry)
<" Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Celtis Occidentalis (Common Hackberry)
Ilex Vomitoria (Yaupon Holly) Gleditsia Triacanthos Var. inermis (Honey Locust)
Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree) Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree)
Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange) Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange)
Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
Pistacia Lentiscus (Mastic Tree) Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak)
Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
        Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak)
Vachellia Farnesiana (Sweet Acacia) Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak)
Ulmus Parvifolia (Lacebark Elm)

Page 18 Page 1165 of 1332 Final Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code
      

District $%  &'( ) *


+ $%  &'( , *
+
 Acacia Craspedocarpa (Leather Leaf Acacia) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Parkinsonia Florida (Blue Palo Verde)
Eysenhardtia Orthocarpa (Kidneywood) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Parkinsonia x ‘AZT Thornless’ (Thornless hybrid
Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree) Palo Verde)
Parkinsonia Florida (Blue Palo Verde) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Parkinsonia Microphylla (Foothill Palo Verde) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Parkinsonia x ‘AZT Thornless’ (Thornless hybrid
palo verde)
Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
       
=" Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Celtis Australis (Mediterranean Hackberry)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Celtis Occidentalis (Common Hackberry)
Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree) Ceratonia Siliqua (Carob)
Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Koelreuteria paniculata (Goldenrain Tree)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange)
Platanus Occidentalis Var. Mexicana (Mexican Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Sycamore) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Platanus Occidentalis Var. Mexicana (Mexican
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Sycamore)
Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak)
Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak) Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak) Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak) Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak) Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak)
Styphnolobium japonicum (Japanese Pagoda Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak)
Tree) Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm) Styphnolobium japonicum (Japanese Pagoda Tree)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)

February 2019 | Final Draft Page 1166 of 1332 Page 19



       City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

District $%  &'( ) *


+ $%  &'( , *
+
=# > Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Celtis Australis (Mediterranean Hackberry)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Celtis Occidentalis (Common Hackberry)
Ilex Vomitoria (Yaupon Holly) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange) Gleditsia Triacanthos Var.inermis (Honey Locust)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Pistacia Chinensis (Chinese Pistache) Maclura Pomifera (Osage Orange)
Pistacia Lentiscus (Mastic Tree) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum) Pistacia Chinensis (Chinese Pistache)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Platanus Occidentalis Var. Mexicana (Mexican
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Sycamore)
Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak) Quercus Macrocarpa (Bur Oak)
        Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm) Quercus Virginiana (Cathedral Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (High Rise Live Oak)
Quercus Virginiana (Southern Live Oak)
Quercus x Virginiana (Heritage Live Oak)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
@%J Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia) Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia)
Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia) Acacia Salicina (Willow Acacia)
Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Eysenhardtia Orthocarpa (Kidneywood) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Ilex Vomitoria (Yaupon Holly)
Leucaena Retusa (Golden Leadball Tree)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
K Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia) Acacia Pendula (Weeping Acacia)
( Celtis Reticulata (Netleaf Hackberry) Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony)
Havardia Mexicana (Mexican Ebony) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak)
Quercus Douglasii (Blue Oak) Vachellia Farnesiana (Sweet Acacia)
Vachellia Farnesiana (Sweet Acacia)
 / Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Ceratonia Siliqua (Carob)
N Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea) Parkinsonia Praecox (Palo Brea)
District Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum) Pittoposrum Angustifolium (Willow Pittosporum)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak) Quercus Cambyi (Canby Oak)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak) Quercus Polymorpha (Monterrey Oak)
Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak) Quercus Shumardii (Shumard Oak)
        Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)

Page 20 Page 1167 of 1332 Final Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code
      

District $%  &'( ) *


+ $%  &'( , *
+
NQ Chilopsis Linearis (Desert Willow) Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood)
Dalbergia Sissoo (Indian Rosewood) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite)
Prosopis x Alba (Thornless Hybrid Mesquite) Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite)
Prosopis Glandulosa (Thornless Honey Mesquite) Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
Ulmus Crassifolia (Cedar Elm)
 V Cordia Boissieri (Texas Olive) Ceratonia Siliqua (Carob)
 Ilex Vomitoria (Yaupon Holly) Cordia Boissieri (Texas Olive)
Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive) Olea Europaea (Fruitless Olive)
Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache) Pistacia Atlantica (Red Push Pistache)
Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak) Quercus Fusiformis (Escarpment Oak)
Quercus Canbyi (Canby Oak)
J#4J See Symphony Park Design Standards See Symphony Park Design Standards
Q

="
 
$  !"#

To promote urban trees biodiversity, and prevent the possible degradation of the downtown canopy due to species-
related diseases and parasites, the street strees as required per 19.09.050 shall be planted utilizing the minimum spacing
# $  % ' *+  ' */;   < % !  => ;     
representative of the actual tree species allowed in each district as per Table 19.09.040.C-1, uses alphabet letters (A, B, and
C) and images to symbolize trees pertaining to the same genus, or family, of trees, spaced at a minimum distance pattern
from each other. A Variance is not available to permit a deviation from the provisions of this Secti

'
ˆ $<$<

A B A B

' Yˆ $<$$<$

A B A C A B A C

February 2019 | Final Draft Page 1168 of 1332 Page 21



 
*<  / $  &4+ City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

'()*+  /;



<
Placeholder

=!  /;



<
Placeholder

! > @($   /;



<
Placeholder

X   /;



<
Placeholder

[$  /;



<
Placeholder

\=  /{=_\{={#\=#…<


1. K K  N  $‰ " 
a. "

$ 
$$
 

 ˆ  

"   
 ;Š" 

 ;< %

"
    

%
$
 

 ˆ   
contributes to the historic character of the area. The purpose of these standards is to allow for a
 '
"

^  '% * 

$
$*" $ ' 
 

/ 

property on which they are located, into new and more productive residential or commercial uses.
b. $J
These additional standards apply to existing hotels and motels or to features of these hotels or

$" ' /%
*


 ' 
   ‚/  / 
/" $ '/
""
/‰*|
 $  
+ €„
  ‘!X
 '     
 ‚/  / 
/" $ '/""
/ ‰*|
[$
 
‘„ 

X‘„[/
„ 

X„[/  X[_



c. $% [
i. !    
$ "
;
$ 
 *$
!X
;
[
_
$ 
 '
*X<$ * $ ;[*%
/
 
;


"
 $ 
 *$
! $$+



+  
*" $ 'X[ 

;   $ 
 €„
  ‡X 

Tables), it supports the purpose and intent of the Zone, and it is consistent with the goals and
policies of the Downtown Master Plan.
ii. 
 
;$


"
 $ 
 €„
  ‡X 

Tables) is allowed either within the building(s) or on the property if the use supports the
purpose and intent of the Zone and is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown
Master Plan, subject to issuance of a Temporary Commercial Permit under LVMC Section
19.16.160 (Temporary Commercial Permit).
d. [  


€„
  ‡X…
  *$


    <$ *$
     

`" 

[
 $ *$

 "


Page 22 Page 1169 of 1332 Final Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code
 Š @%J  &4+

]X    /;



<
Placeholder

^[  _   /;



<
Placeholder

))*` 
  
1. $   K [

To support the long term harmonious development of the Las Vegas Medical District, accessory structures




*
"   $$;

 $
 $"
/"" $ ; 
 $
$

facilities, will be allowed as part of the development in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the
surrounding properties, as approved by the Director.

Y $  

‰ “"
/‡‡/
"  $

€
'„
 $  …$ /+ / '

'"$  /
% 
 


/$ 
*"=
/ 



+  
€
'„
 $  
(LVMD). Over time, these standards enhanced the physical quality of the LVMD, and created an environment
 
/

 $$;$
 '/ 


  "'
/+
$$$



 ' /
 " `"
$ 

 ' 
  ! 
 
 
  

%


 

LVMD, and to further this goal the following landscaping standards shall apply:

ˆ^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
+

 $$


*


  

€„X

[/ $" '
+ "*
`"
$;+"$ *
 $$
$  *;
virtue of adoption of provisions LVMC 19.09, shall be properly mantained, preserved, and replaced in case of
death.

*! 


%
   
^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
/+

%
 } ;
 
*
+


%    
 €„ $
X

[ 


%  

^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
/



$$*
' %



%  
^  '


/"*/ $ 


*"=
  $"
/*"  $  
/ } ; 
/
' '

*‚/

>
/ $%
'



…$ '   ;' 

%$
^  '

/"*/ $ 


*"=
 % "


$/
;/ +
$
 
 † 
`" %$
"   $ >


/"*/ $ 



*"=

$$*
 $$
/%
*;=

d. A Variance is not available to permit a deviation from the provisions of this Section.

\  '   ]

…

  ‰

 …$>…"*$ 

/$>"*$ '
 '/ 
`" 
$$

+
 $ ]

%
$
/`"


'




$$% 

 '
and should be easily observed and accessible from the street and/or pedestrian circulation areas. When


 '


 ^
"
*" $ '/ $;
'}

]
"
+ $$*


February 2019 | Final Draft Page 1170 of 1332 Page 23



   / N  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

  

‰"

  

 $>% 

/" 

 
$

]   
+
$$
   $" % 
"%
 '  '
 $

%
$
$$% 


  

 $> 
$  
 >


%
$
 
must include designs for such areas in the site plan. Such areas shall be provided according to the following
'" 
$
X

 '"
‡*
$+[~


%
$
$$% 

`"
$>
‘`"


'}
*" $ '
/`"


‘/`"


$'
*" $ '/    $
`"



$$*

`" 

   $‘`"


}
‚ '''
/

$$*

provided at the rate of one square foot per stall.

*"$>
$$*
     ;"
% 
*;  % "$
 *"


the use of their customers.

…

  

 $>$$*
 
'$
%
$$
 ' 


%
$
 
$$*
$
 
 '

  ] "
*
 %

 
 $;
 *$

Such spaces shall remain open to the public and accessible during normal hours of operation.

d. Maintenance of these open spaces will be the responsibility of the property owner.


ƒ

%

  
  
   


 ‘%
$  
each other, the provision which is more restrictive or imposes higher standards or requirements shall apply.

Page 24 Page 1171 of 1332 Final Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code
 N NQ  &4+

="
 Y
@"   '   ]

``j  /;



<
Placeholder

{@!   /;



<
Placeholder

|   ;j  /{=_\{={#\=#…<


See Symphony Park Design Standards

February 2019 | Final Draft Page 1172 of 1332 Page 25


19.09.050.A Purpose City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.050 TRANSECT ZONES STANDARDS


Subsections:
19.09.050.A Purpose
19.09.050.B Applicability
19.09.050.C Establishment of Transect Zones
19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview
19.09.050.E Transect Zones
19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)
19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)
19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)
19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)
19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)
19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)
19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)
19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)
19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

19.09.050.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish the regulatory standards for building form, building placement, and
land use within the Transect Zones applicable within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District (LVMC Section
19.10.110). These standards are intended to ensure that proposed development is compatible with future
development on neighboring properties, and produces an environment of desirable character and scale
consistent with the City’s vision for implementing the Downtown Master Plan, and any other applicable Master
Plan.

Page 26 Page 1173 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.B Applicability

19.09.050.B Applicability
1. The standards in this Section apply to all proposed development within the Transect Zones, and must be
considered in combination with the standards in Sections 19.09.060 (Building Type Standards), 19.09.070
(Frontage Type Standards), 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards), 19.09.090 (Thoroughfare Standards), and

$ *$

  €„ $
X

%
$

[
2. One or more of each of the following must be selected for, and applied to, each lot:
a. Building Type (at least one primary building);
b. Frontage Type (multiple types as allowed by the Zone);
c. Thoroughfare Type (as per each District Thoroughfare Plan); and
d. Use Type (multiple types as allowed by the Zone).
3. One or more of the following may be selected and applied to each lot, as applicable;
a. Open Space Type (multiple types are allowed within each Zone).
4. Building Types, Frontage Types, Open Space Types, Thoroughfare Types, and Land Use Types not listed
in the standards for a zone are not allowed in that zone.

19.09.050.C Establishment of Transect Zones


1. Within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District, each District mapped on Figure B-1 (Districts Within
the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District) is divided into Transect Zones. These zones implement the
vision of the Downtown Master Plan by providing a mix of intensity of development and a mix of uses
that are compatible with the character of the Downtown’s districts and neighborhoods.
2. The Transect Zones listed in Section 19.09.050.D (Transect Zones Overview) are mapped on the City’s
] $_ '„X

€„
  X_ '„[[

19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview


1. Table 19.09.050.D-1 (Transect Zones Overview) provides a summary of each of the Transect Zones that
will be applied within Downtown Las Vegas. This overview includes a typical illustrative photograph of
the transect, and a summary of the desired form, general use, and intent, of each Transect Zone.
2. The photographs in this Section are illustrative only and not regulatory.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1174 of 1332 Page 27


19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW) T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

Desired Form Desired Form Desired Form


Attached Attached or detached Attached
Large lot width Large lot width Medium to large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage Large footprint Large footprint
No blank walls or planes No blank walls or planes No blank walls or planes
Buildings placed at or near the edge of Buildings placed at or near the right- Buildings placed at or near the right-of-
right-of-way of-way way
Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of frontages, mostly
mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront Shopfront
Small to no setbacks Small to no setbacks Small to no setbacks
5 to 20 stories 4 to 12 stories Max. 5 stories
General Use General Use General Use
Œ" }
 $
% 
 Œ" }
 $
% 
 Œ" }
 $/
% 
/
uses with a mix of commercial, uses with a mix of commercial, industrial uses with a mix of commercial,

 
 $/
% 
/ —]
"
 
 
 $/
% 
/ —]
"
 
 
 $/
% 
/]
 —
on upper stories. on upper stories. industrial uses on upper stories.
Intent Intent Intent
To reinforce and enhance the To reinforce a vibrant, compact, To maximize the opportunities created
downtown urban core and provide walkable, urban core that serves by medium and high-intensity walkable
the highest-intensity vibrant, compact, multiple districts and the overall urban environments. Specialized uses
walkable urban environment. A variety region with a diverse range of uses in in this Zone can be categorized as
of building types with active pedestrian a variety of building types with active downtown light industrial, and utilize
street facades and a diverse range of pedestrian street facades on multiple performance measures to ensure
"
"
*; %
'" } frontages. A range of regional-center  * $ ;*
+


 =


frontages. A wide range of regional- appropriate uses such as hospitals and allowed uses.
center appropriate uses as well as, other medical facilities support public
employment, retail, services, civic, or transportation alternatives.
public uses.
Subsection Subsection Subsection
19.09.050.E.004 19.09.050.E.008 19.09.050.E.012

Page 28 Page 1175 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

Desired Form Desired Form Desired Form


Attached Attached Attached
Medium to large lot width Large lot width Medium to large lot width
Large footprint Large footprint Medium to large footprint
No blank walls or planes No blank walls or planes No blank walls or planes
Buildings placed at or near the right-of- Buildings placed at or near the right- Buildings placed at or near the right-of-
way of-way way
Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of building frontages, but
mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront mostly Arcade, Forecourt, Shopfront,
and Terrace
Small setbacks Small to no setbacks Medium setbacks
2 to 7 stories 2 to 7 stories 2 to 5 stories
General Use General Use General Use
Œ" }
 $
% 
 Œ" }
 $
% 
 Primarily multi-unit residential uses
uses with a mix of commercial, uses with a mix of commercial, with neighborhood-supporting retail,

 
 $/
% 
/ —]
"
 
 
 $/
% 
/ —]
"
 commercial, and/or service uses on the
on upper stories. on upper stories. '" }
Intent Intent Intent
To enhance the City’s existing To provide a compact, walkable, To provide walkable, urban
corridors so that over time they will urban area in which revitalization neighborhoods with a variety of urban
become more walkable and serve and investment is encouraged and housing choices in small to large
multiple districts with a diverse that serves multiple districts with footprint, medium-intensity building
range of commercial, retail, service, 
 $/
 $/]
/  %  types that support and are within short
 ]
"
/ $$$'
 uses in a range of building types. walking distance of neighborhood-
footprint, moderate-intensity building This zone also supports public serving commercial and service
types. This zone also supports public transportation alternatives. uses. This zone also supports public
transportation hubs. transportation alternatives.
Subsection Subsection Subsection
19.09.050.E.016 19.09.050.E.020 19.09.050.E.024

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1176 of 1332 Page 29


19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW) T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW)

Desired Form Desired Form Desired Form


Attached or detached Attached or detached Attached or detached
Medium to large lot width Medium lot width Medium lot width
Medium to large footprint Medium footprint and lot coverage Small to Medium footprint and lot
coverage
Buildings placed at or near the right-of- Buildings placed near the edge of Buildings placed near the edge of right-
way right-of-way of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, Diverse mix of building frontages, Primarily Stoop, Dooryard, Forecourt,
mostly Shopfront mostly Arcade, Gallery, and Shopfront Shopfront at corners, or Porches
Medium setbacks No blank walls or planes Medium setbacks
2 to 5 stories Small to no setbacks Max. 3 stories
2 to 5 stories
General Use General Use General Use
Œ" }
 $
% 
 Œ" }
 $
% 
 Primarily multi-unit residential uses with
uses with a mix of commercial, service, uses with a mix of commercial, smaller neighborhood-supporting uses
 —]
"
 "

 
 
 $/
% 
/ —]
"
 at appropriate locations.
on upper stories.
Intent Intent Intent
To enhance the City’s existing To provide a compact and walkable To reinforce established neighborhoods
corridors so that over time they will urban environment with building types in walkable urban areas. Neighborhoods
become more walkable and serve that can accommodate a diverse range will evolve through the use of small
multiple districts with a diverse of uses. A range of small to medium to medium building footprints and
range of commercial, retail, service, building types allows for mainly medium intensity building types to
 ]
"
/ $$$'
 active pedestrian street facades. The achieve a compact urban form that
footprint, moderate-intensity building }
^ *$
 "

*" $ ';
  accommodates a variety of urban
types. This zone also supports public intended to encourage revitalization housing choices. This zone also supports
transportation alternatives. and investment. This zone also public transportation alternatives.
supports public transportation
alternatives.
Subsection Subsection Subsection
19.09.050.E.028 19.09.050.E.032 19.09.050.E.036

Page 30 Page 1177 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.D Transect Zones Overview

Table 19.09.050.D-1 Transect Zones Overview


T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

Desired Form
Typically detached; may be attached
Small to medium lot width
Small to medium footprint
Building placement varied, but mostly
set back from right-of-way
Primarily common yards, stoops, and
porches
Medium to large setbacks
Max. 2 stories
General Use
Primarily residential uses with smaller
neighborhood-supporting uses at
appropriate locations.
Intent
To protect the integrity of existing small
to medium lot, detached homes and
to reinforce their importance within
walkable neighborhoods with medium
footprint, low-intensity housing
types within short walking distance
to public transportation options and
neighborhood-serving retail and service
uses.

Subsection
19.09.050.E.040

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1178 of 1332 Page 31


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1179 of 1332


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zones


The T6-UC Zone is intended to reinforce and enhance the None
downtown urban core and provide the highest-intensity
vibrant, compact, walkable urban environment. This Zone
C. Lot Size
enables a variety of building types with active pedestrian
street facades and a diverse range of uses supported No width, depth or area standards are included for the
*; %
'" } '
…‚ ' ; $$; T6-UC Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
provided in multi-story garages, which if placed next the min. and max. building width and depth standards
to a street frontage, are lined with active retail/service for the building types established in Table D (Building
uses. This Zone supports a wide range of regional-center Types).
appropriate uses as well as, employment, retail, services,
civic, or public uses that support public transportation
alternatives as well as walking and biking. The following
form elements are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached
Large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
No blank walls or planes
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, mostly Arcade, Gallery,
and Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
5 to 20 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1180 of 1332 Page 33


19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Lined Building

Secondary Street
Secondary Street
C
E I

B
G
A A

Primary Street Primary Street

Key for Diagram Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Lined Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Exterior Building
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Length 400 ft max.1 E
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) 1
Width 300 ft max. F
A B C D
Depth (from front of 30 ft min.
Flex High-Rise 380 ft1 200 ft 75 ft 100 ft G
building)
Flex Mid-Rise 200 ft 200 ft 75 ft 100 ft Dimensions - Interior Building
Lined Building Refer to building dimensions in Width 180 ft max. H
Subsection D (Building Types,
Depth 230 ft max. I
Additional Standards for a Lined
Building) Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous The side of an interior building exposed to a street or


open space must be lined by the exterior building.

}$
 ;}" *
$'
 

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 A forecourt or pocket plaza is appropriate along the
primary frontage or at a primary street corner.
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G
(Frontages). Access Standards
Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage
type.
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
present.
Note:
1
Or the max. length of the block.

Page 34 Page 1181 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
L K N
Q

J
P
R O

Street
Primary Street
Key for Diagrams
Lot Line Building Setback Line Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height1 Stories N
Front3 Rear4,5
(Distance from Side Side 4,5 Primary Building 5 min. - 20 max.
ROW/Lot Line)1,2 J K L M Primary Building
1-5 Stories Ground Floor Finish Level2,3 O
Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 0 ft Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Max. 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft -- Service or Retail
0.50 ft max. above curb
6-10 Stories uses
Min. 10 ft 10 ft 0 ft 5 ft Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
10+ Stories *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$

Min. 20 ft 20 ft 0 ft 5 ft Floor-to-Ceiling

Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone Œ" } 14 ft min. P

Front (min.) 80% 


} 9 ft min. Q

Side Street (min.) 60% Footprint

Miscellaneous Lot coverage 95% max.

A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed Depth


on corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Œ" }
30 ft min. R
Notes: space
1
%… # $ $ % < ‚  ]  =  Notes:
1
an appropriate publicly accessible Open Space type (see Section Additional setbacks may be required for buildings with 5+ stories.
19.09.080 (Open Space Standards)) is located between the setback Refer to Table E for setback distance.
2
and the building or is adjoining the setback and the building; or Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions
a larger area is required to preserve existing mature trees or to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
3
landscaping. Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
2
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street street are exempt.
ROW or a utility easement is needed.
3
Sidewalk must be extended into the facade zone to meet the Key for Tables
building. -- No Requirement
4
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements.
5
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a
minimum 10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to
the side and rear lot line is required.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1182 of 1332 Page 35


19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
U T

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)

Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G S T U V

Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Arcade1

Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Gallery1

Terrace1 A A 19.09.070.M Shopfront: awning, 10 ft 10 ft N N


balcony1, bay
Pedestrian Access
window, projecting
The primary building entrance must be located to face shade structure
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary

}
thoroughfare through a Open Space type consistent with 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
Balconies2
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards).
Architectural
Miscellaneous 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors,
Signage A A N N
and other service entries must be screened and must be
located to the rear or on side street facades. Driveways 3
A 3
A 3
N A3
Note: Mechanical and
N N N A
1
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change. Utility Equipment4
Miscellaneous
Key for Tables Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, but not
A Allowed allowed within a street ROW, alley ROW, or across a lot
line, except for arcades, galleries, and balconies with an
N Not Allowed
encroachment agreement.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public
Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.
4
All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view
from the street.

Page 36 Page 1183 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

I. Use Types Notes:


Use Type T6-UC      =   +[[++ 
 $`  
]= <          > 
Residential
land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services) are also
Accessory Structure P =   +[[++
Assisted Living Apartment P ‚        %;       _`{ ~; 
Community Residence P that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and Prohibited
{  ]  $  $       %   
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P
‚       +[+/+  { %   
Downtown Residential P        ‚  ~     
Home Occupation P goals and policies of the Downtown Master Plan.
Hospice P ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ]  
Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards applicable to
Senior Citizen Apartments P
= 
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as
Nightclub S  {  
2
„ >; "      "  { ";  …
Church/House of Worship P
>  <; $      {  
College, University, or Seminary P 3
See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
Commercial Recreation/Amusement, Indoor P 4
„  $   ^ „  '‡     
Community Center, Private (Accessory) P {  

Public Park or Playground; Open Space P


Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P Key
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Retail Trade C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; Beer/Wine/ 

 €„
  ‡    $"

$
‰  ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
†

—ƒ
— S S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 * '
$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 
 $

 

 €„
  
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C 19.16.110.
Commercial, Other than Listed P T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit as


 €„
  ’’
Downtown Retail1 P
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; or Urban
S
Lounge
Mixed-Use P
…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 S
Parking Lot/Sidewalk Sale T
Pawn Shop S
Restaurant P
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with Service Bar C
Social Event with Alcoholic Beverage Sales S
Tavern-Limited Establishment S

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1184 of 1332 Page 37


19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types (cont.) I. Use Types (cont.)


Employment and Services Use Type T6-UC
Automobile Rental C Telecommunication Facilities
Blood Plasma Donor Center P Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);
Building Maintenance Service and Sales C Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth Design S
(Not Qualifying for Conditional Use Approval)
Bus Charter Service and Service Facility P
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design or
Cleaners, Commercial/Industrial S
Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for Conditional Use C
Clinic P Approval)
Crop Production C Radio, TV, or Microwave Communication Tower S
Custodial Institution S Satellite Dish C
Custom & Craft Work C TV Broadcasting & Other Communication Service P
Daily Labor Service S Other
Downtown Services2 P Electric Utility Substation P
Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P Government Facility P
Facility to Provide Testing, Treatment, or Counseling for Helipad S
S
Drug or Alcohol Abuse
 `"

…
$
"Œ! $$  X‡‹‹Œ$$ 
Food Processing C C
Less)
Gaming Establishment, Business Related S Parking Facility C
Gaming, Establishment, Non-restricted S Public Services, Minor C
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites3 P Sustainable Infrastructure P
Hotel, Residence S Temporary Uses4 T
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P Urban Agriculture
Marijuana Dispensary S Community Garden P
Massage Establishment S
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
  
 P Notes:
     =   +[[++ 
 $`  
Open Air Vending/Transit Sales Lot C
]= <          > 
Social Service Provider P
land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services) are also
Tattoo Parlor/Body Piercing Studio S =   +[[++
Valet Parking C ‚        %;       _`{ ~; 
that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and Prohibited
{  ]  $  $       %   
Key ‚       +[+/+  { %   
P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.        ‚  ~     
C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions goals and policies of the Downtown Master Plan.


 €„
  ‡    $"
 ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ]  
Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards applicable to
S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 * '
= 

 $

 

 €„
  
19.16.110. 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit as  {  


 €„
  ’’ 2
„ >; "      "  { ";  …
>  <; $      {  
3
See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
4
„  $   ^ „  '‡     
{  

Page 38 Page 1185 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
Y X

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building 1
Line (min.)
W X Y Z < 5,000 sf 2
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/ 8
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‡/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
No new surface parking lots are allowed adjacent to Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
primary or side street frontages. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /

  X
   [$

Covered parking in parking areas established before


=
 %

 $$+
+ 
*‚ All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
primary street or side street.  } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
When a lot has an adjoining side street, parking must be
Note:
accessed only from the side street.
1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability)
Required Parking
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Notes:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1186 of 1332 Page 39


19.09.050.E.004 T6 Urban Core Zone (T6-UC) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

Page 40 Page 1187 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zones


The intent of the T6-UG Zone is to provide a vibrant, T6-UG-L
compact, high-intensity walkable urban environment that The limited sub-zone provides the same building form as
can accommodate a variety of building types with active the T6-UG Zone, but it allows a limited mix of land uses.
pedestrian street facades and a diverse range of uses
"
*; %
'" } '
 "$ $

streets. Parking is typically provided in multi-story C. Lot Size
garages, which if placed next to a street frontage, are No width, depth or area standards are included for the
lined with active retail/service uses. This zone supports T6-UG Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
a wide range of regional-center appropriate uses as the min. and max. building width and depth standards
well as, employment, retail, services, civic, or public for the building types established in Table D (Building
uses that support public transportation alternatives as Types).
well as walking and biking. Specialized uses, such as
 $ $'

 $]
  $ 
/

accommodated in a limited Sub-Zone. The following form
elements are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached or detached
Large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
No blank walls or planes
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, mostly Arcade, Gallery,
and Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
4 to 12 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1188 of 1332 Page 41


19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Courtyard Building

Secondary Street

Secondary Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Primary Street Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
Width-to-Height
A B C D 1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
Ratio
Flex High-Rise 380 ft1 200 ft 75 ft 100 ft Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F
Flex Mid-Rise 200 ft 175 ft 75 ft 100 ft Percentage of width
50% max.
Courtyard Building 175 ft 175 ft 40 ft -- of building
Lined Building Refer to building dimensions in Total Area 400 sf min.
Subsection D (Building Types, < "+";
'
"*


*;
Additional Standards for a Lined the building.
Building)
";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

Accessory Structure -- -- -- -- 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
Miscellaneous The proportions and orientation of courtyards must

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  be carefully considered for solar orientation and user

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 comfort.
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G Access Standards
(Frontages). Pedestrian access to the building must be from the
Notes: thoroughfare or courtyard.
1
Or the max. length of the block. Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
individual entry from the courtyard.
Key for Tables Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
-- No Requirement between buildings where feasible.
Courtyards must be accessible from the primary
thoroughfare where feasible.

Page 42 Page 1189 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

Lined Building

Secondary Street
G K

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Lined Building Additional Standards for a Lined Building (cont.)
Dimensions - Exterior Building Miscellaneous
1
Length 400 ft max. G The side of an interior building exposed to a street or
Width 300 ft max. 1
H open space must be lined by the exterior building.
Depth (from front of 30 ft min. A forecourt or pocket plaza is appropriate along the
I primary frontage or at a primary street corner.
building)
Dimensions - Interior Building Access Standards
Width 180 ft max. J Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage
Depth 230 ft max. K
type.
Notes:
1
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an
Or the max. length of the block.
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
present.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1190 of 1332 Page 43


19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
N M
P
S

R
T Q

Street
Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories P
Front1,2 Rear1,3,4
(Distance from Side Side1,3,4 Primary Building 4 min. - 12 max.
ROW/Lot Line) L M N O Accessory Structure 2 max.
1-5 Stories Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 0 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 Q
Max. 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft -- Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
6-10 Stories Service or Retail
0.50 ft max. above curb
Min. 10 ft 10 ft 0 ft 5 ft uses
10+ Stories Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Min. 20 ft 20 ft 0 ft 5 ft *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$

Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone Floor-to-Ceiling

Front (min.) 80% Œ" } 14 ft min. R

Side Street (min.) 60% 


} 9 ft min. S

Miscellaneous Footprint

A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Lot coverage 90% max.
corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Depth
Notes: Œ" }
30 ft min. T
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street Notes:
ROW or a utility easement is needed. 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the facade zone to meet the to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
building. 2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must street are exempt.
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements.
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum
10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to the side and
rear lot line is required.

Key for Tables


-- No Requirement

Page 44 Page 1191 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
W V

Primary Street
Key for Diagram
Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G U V W X
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Arcade1
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Gallery1
Terrace1 A A 19.09.070.M Shopfront: awning, 10 ft 10 ft N N
balcony1, bay
Pedestrian Access
window, projecting
The primary building entrance must be located to face shade structure
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary

}
thoroughfare through a Open Space type consistent with 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
Balconies2
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards).
Architectural
Miscellaneous 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors,
Signage A A N N
and other service entries must be screened and must be
located to the rear or on side street facades. Driveways A 3
A 3
N A
Note: Mechanical and
N N N A
1
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change. Utility Equipment4
Miscellaneous
Key for Tables Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, but not
A Allowed allowed within a street ROW, alley ROW, or across a lot
line, except for arcades, galleries, and balconies with an
N Not Allowed
encroachment agreement.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft, subject
to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public Works
Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.
4
All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view
from the street.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1192 of 1332 Page 45


19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T6-UG T6-UG-L Use Type T6-UG T6-UG-L
Residential Sub-Zone Other Sub-Zone
Assisted Living Apartment P N Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground N P
Community Residence P N Government Facility P P
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P N Helipad C 3
C3
Downtown Residential P N  `"

…
$
"Œ! $$  X‡‹‹
C C
Home Occupation P N Gallons or Less)
Hospice P N  `"

…
$
"Œ! $$  
N S
(Over 288 Gallons)
Senior Citizen Apartments P N
Parking Facility P P
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly
Public Services, Minor C C
Church/House of Worship P P
Sustainable Infrastructure P P
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P P
4
Temporary Uses T T
Public or Private School (Primary or
S N Urban Agriculture
Secondary)
Retail Trade Community Garden P P
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural
Establishment; Beer/Wine/Cooler On- Notes:
S N      =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
 ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
†


ƒ
—$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 ]= <          > 
land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services) are also
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C N
=  Section 19.09.110.
Commercial, Other than Listed S S ‚        %;       _`{} ~ 
1
Downtown Retail P P _`{}` %`~;        +[+/+
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge $  € % {  ]  $  $    
S S   %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Bar; or Urban Lounge
{ %           ‚  ~ 
Mixed-Use P C
is consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown Master Plan.
Restaurant P P ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ]  
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards applicable to
C C
with Service Bar = 
Employment and Services
1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as
Blood Plasma Donor Center P P
 {  
Clinic P P 2
„ >; "      "  { ";  …
2
Downtown Services P P >  <; $      {  
3
Hospital P P
 ‚`‚ $   Œ     { € $ 
required.
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P P 4
„  $   ^ „  '‡     
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
 {  
P P
Than Listed
Social Service Provider P P Key
Telecommunication Facilities P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate C 
 $$+
  
+ 
    


Height); Wireless Communication Facility, in LVMC Section 19.12.040 for conditional uses.
S S
Non-Stealth Design (Not Qualifying for S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 * '
Conditional Use Approval) 
 $

 

 €„
  
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth 19.16.110.
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying C C T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit as
for Conditional Use Approval) 

 €„
  ’’
N Use is not allowed.

Page 46 Page 1193 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG)

Tertiary Street / Alley

BB

Secondary Street
AA Z

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
Y Z AA BB < 5,000 sf 2
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/ 8
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‡/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
No new surface parking lots are allowed adjacent to Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
primary or side street frontages. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /

  X
   [$

Covered parking in parking areas established before


=
 %

 $$+
+ 
*‚ All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
primary street or side street.  } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
When a lot has an adjoining side street, parking must be
Note:
accessed only from the side street.
1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability)
Required Parking
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Notes:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1194 of 1332 Page 47


19.09.050.E.008 T6 Urban General Zone (T6-UG) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

Page 48 Page 1195 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The intent of the T5-M Zone is to maximize the None
opportunities created by medium and high-intensity C. Lot Size
walkable urban environments. This zone is well
No width, depth or area standards are included for the
connected to transportation infrastructure and
T5-M Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
accommodates a variety of new and repurposed
the min. and max. building width and depth standards
*" $ ';
 
 
 $/
 $/]
/
for the building types established in Table D (Building
and service uses while providing for centrally located
Types).
employment sites. The diverse mix of uses supports
active transportation commuting modes and a lively
24-hour neighborhood during work and non-work
hours. Specialized uses in this Zone can be categorized
as downtown light industrial, utilizing performance
measures and conditions to ensure compatibility
*
+


 =


;

$$+ '
elements are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached
Medium to Large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
No blank walls or planes
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of frontages, mostly Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
Max. 5 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1196 of 1332 Page 49


19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Lined Building

Secondary Street

Secondary Street
C
G K

B
I
A A

Primary Street Primary Street

Key for Diagram Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Lined Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Exterior Building
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Length 400 ft max.1,3 G
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) 1,3
Width 300 ft max. H
A B C D
Depth (from front of 30 ft min.
Flex Mid-Rise 200 ft1 175 ft1 75 ft 100 ft I
building)
Flex Low Rise 150 ft1 150 ft 60 ft 60 ft Dimensions - Interior Building
Multi-plex: Large 100 ft 75 ft 20 ft 30 ft Width 180 ft max. J
Loft 175 ft1 -- 30 ft 30 ft Depth 230 ft max. K
Live/Work 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft Miscellaneous
Rowhouse 18-36 ft 45 ft -- -- The side of an interior building exposed to a street or
Lined Building Refer to building dimensions in open space must be lined by the exterior building.
Subsection D (Building Types, A forecourt or pocket plaza is appropriate along the
Additional Standards for a Lined primary frontage or at a primary street corner.
Building)
Access Standards
Accessory
-- -- -- -- Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

Structure2 accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage
Miscellaneous type.

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G present.
(Frontages).
Notes: Key for Tables
1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series of
-- No Requirement
buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
2
The total GFA of Accessory Structures must not exceed 60% of the
GFA of the primary structure.
3
Or the max. length of the block.

Page 50 Page 1197 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
N M
P
S

R
T Q

Primary Street Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories P
Front1,2 Rear1,3,4
(Distance from Side Side1,3,4 Primary Building 5 max.
ROW/Lot Line) L M N O Accessory Structure 4 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 0 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 Q
Max. 10 ft 15 ft 10 ft -- Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone All other uses 2 ft max. above curb
Front (min.) 70% Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Side Street (min.) 50% *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
Miscellaneous Floor-to-Ceiling
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Œ" } 14 ft min. R
corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. 
} 9 ft min. S
Notes: Footprint
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street
Lot coverage 90% max.
ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the facade zone to meet the building. Depth
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must Œ" }
30 ft min. T
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Notes:
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions to
10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to the side and those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
rear lot line is required. 2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1198 of 1332 Page 51


19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
W V

Primary Street
Key for Diagram
Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Side Side
Encroachment Type (max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D (max.) (max.)
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G U V W X
1
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Arcade
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Gallery1
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M Shopfront: awning, 10 ft 10 ft N N
balcony1, bay
Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F
window, or projecting
Pedestrian Access shade structure
Pedestrian entrances must be provided at least every 80 
}


$ '
'" } ;


 
 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
Balconies2
side street facade.
Architectural
Miscellaneous 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, Signage A A N N
and other service entries must be screened and must be
Driveways A 3
A 3
N A
located to the rear or on side street facades.
Mechanical and
N N N A
Utility Equipment4
Key for Tables Miscellaneous
A Allowed Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, but not
N Not Allowed allowed within a street ROW, alley ROW, or across a lot
line, except for arcades, galleries, and balconies with an
encroachment agreement.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft, subject
to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public Works
Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.
4
All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view
from the street.

Page 52 Page 1199 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T5-M Use Type T5-M
Residential Urban Agriculture
Assisted Living Apartment P Community Garden P
Community Residence P Notes:
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P      =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
]= <          > 
Downtown Residential P
land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services) are also
Home Occupation P =  Section 19.09.110.
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly ‚        %;       ` ~; 
Church/House of Worship P that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and Prohibited
{  ]  $  $       %  
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P
 ‚       +[+/+  { %  
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S         ‚  ~    
Retail Trade the goals and policies of the Downtown Master Plan.
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; Beer/Wine/ ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ]  
$
‰  ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
†

—ƒ
— S Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards applicable to
$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 = 

Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C 1


Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as
1
Downtown Retail P  {  
Commercial, Other than Listed S 2
The conditions for all individual uses that are grouped under the
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; or Urban ]      %  ‚> Ž + "  …
S shall be performed within a completely enclosed building; 2) There shall
Lounge
be no audible or noticeable indication of a manufacturing operation
Mixed-Use P
outside the building, and no noticeable smoke or foreign matter emitted;
Restaurant P 3) Outdoor storage is only allowed as accessory to the principal use and
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with Service Bar C   % <% ‚ $  >`‚`  ˆ   Œ ‰
Employment and Services Work equipment larger than 60 cubic feet shall not be visible from the
>`‚`Œ   " ‘  $  > ‚ $   ;
Downtown Industrial2 C
storage, or dismantling of vehicles shall be properly stored and removed
3
Downtown Services P from the premises in a timely manner. Storage, use and removal of toxic
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites P %;     $$% #;   
Hotel, Residence S gasoline, paints, solvents and thinners, shall conform to all applicable
Federal, State, and local regulations.
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P
3
„ >; "      "  { "; 
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
  
 P
… >  <; $      {  
Social Service Provider C 4
„  $   ^ „  '‡     
Telecommunication Facilities {  
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);
Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth Design S Key
(Not Qualifying for Conditional Use Approval) P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design or C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for Conditional Use C 

 €„
  ‡    $
Approval) uses.
Other S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P * '
 $

 

 €„
Government Facility P Section 19.16.110.

Helipad S T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit




 €„
  ’’
Parking Facility P
Public Services, Minor C
Sustainable Infrastructure P
Temporary Uses4 T

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1200 of 1332 Page 53


19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

BB

Secondary Street
AA Z

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
Y Z AA BB < 5,000 sf 2
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/ 8
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‡/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
No new surface parking lots are allowed adjacent to
’X<
;_
[! 

 } /
primary or side street frontages.

  X
   [$

Covered parking in parking areas established before
All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid


=
 %

 $$+
+ 
*‚
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

primary street or side street.
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
When a lot has an adjoining side street, parking must be
Note:
accessed only from the side street. 1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability)
Required Parking
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed.

Page 54 Page 1201 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.012 T5 Maker Zone (T5-M)

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1202 of 1332 Page 55


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1203 of 1332


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The T5-C Zone is intended to enhance the City’s existing None
corridors by allowing a wide variety of building types

 '

 $/
 $/]
/
C. Lot Size
and service uses in small to large footprint buildings
along major arterial corridors carrying high volumes No width, depth or area standards are included for the
of vehicular]ƒ 
""

%
$
 T5-C Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
Bus Rapid Transit or Light Rail transportation options, the min. and max. building width and depth standards
these corridors, such as the Multi-Functional Spine or for the building types established in Table D (Building
Iconic/Ceremonial Corridors, supported by this Zone Types).
will likely transition to a more urban and walkable built
environment with residential uses behind or above
the commercial uses. The following form elements are
generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached
Medium to large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Mix of building frontages, but mostly Shopfront
Small setbacks
2 to 7 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1204 of 1332 Page 57


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Courtyard Building

Secondary Street

Secondary Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Primary Street Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
Width-to-Height Ratio 1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
A B C D
Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F
Flex Mid-Rise 200 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft 75 ft
Percentage of width
Lined Building Refer to dimensions in 50% max.
of building
Subsection D (Additional
Total Area 400 sf min.
Standards for a Lined Building)
< "+";
'
"*


*;
Flex Low-Rise 90 ft 150 ft 40 ft 40 ft
the building.
Courtyard Building 90 ft 150 ft 40 ft 100 ft
";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

Multi-plex: Large 90 ft 70 ft 20 ft 30 ft 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
Live/Work2 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
Accessory Structure3 -- -- -- -- be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
Miscellaneous comfort.


}$
 ;}" *
$'
  Access Standards

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 Pedestrian access to the building must be from the
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G thoroughfare or courtyard.
(Frontages). Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
Notes: individual entry from the courtyard.
1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each. between buildings where feasible.
2
Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max. Courtyards must be accessible from the primary
width of all attached buildings must not exceed 150 ft. thoroughfare where feasible.
3
The total GFA of Accessory Structures must not exceed 10% of
the GFA of the primary structure.
Key for Tables
-- No Requirement

Page 58 Page 1205 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
I H

Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line Building Area Facade Zone

D. Building Types (cont.) E. Building Placement


Additional Standards for a Lined Building Setback Distance Corner Interior
Front1,2 Rear3,4
Dimensions - Exterior Building (Distance from Side1 Side3,4
Length 400 ft max.1 G ROW/Lot Line) G H I J
Width 300 ft max. 1
H Primary Building
Depth (from front of 30 ft min. Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 0 ft
I
building) Max. 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft --
Dimensions - Interior Building Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone
Width 180 ft max. J Front (min.) 80%
Depth 230 ft max. K Side Street (min.) 65%
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
The side of an interior building exposed to a street or A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on
open space must be lined by the exterior building. corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided.
A forecourt or pocket plaza is appropriate along the Notes:
primary frontage or at a primary street corner. 1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street
Access Standards ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the
Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

building.
accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage 3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must
type.
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements.
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an 4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is 10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to the side and
present. rear lot line is required.
Note:
1
Or the max. length of the block.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1206 of 1332 Page 59


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

K
N

M
L
O

Street

F. Building Form Standards G. Frontages


Building Height Stories K Private Frontage Corner
Front Standards
Primary Building 2 min. - 7 max. 1,2 Type Side
Accessory Structure 2 max. Arcade A A 19.09.070.D
Primary Building Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G
Ground Floor Finish Level 3,4
L Gallery A A 19.09.070.H
Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K
1
Service or Retail Terrace A A 19.09.070.M
0.50 ft max. above curb
uses Pedestrian Access
Œ" }$**
  
 "$ "  The primary building entrance must be located to face
*" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$ a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary
Floor-to-Ceiling thoroughfare through a Open Space type consistent with
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards).
Œ" } 14 ft min. M
Miscellaneous

} 9 ft min. N
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors,
Footprint
and other service entries must be screened and must be
Lot coverage located to the rear or on side street facades.
Mixed-use with Note:
95% max.
residential uses 1
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
All other uses 85% max.
Depth Key for Tables
Œ" }
30 ft min. O A Allowed

Notes:
1
 +    ‚  
 Š>`^ >  %ˆ  ˆ  ]<$ € ^< ^‚   
19.16.100.G (Major Review of Site Development Plans).
2
The residential adjacency standards established in LVMC Section19.08.040.H (Residential Adjacency Standards) will apply.
3
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
4
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the street are exempt.

Page 60 Page 1207 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
R Q

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Encroachment

H. Encroachments H. Encroachments (cont.)


Corner Interior Miscellaneous
Front Rear
Encroachment Side Side Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, but not
(max.) (max.)
Type (max.) (max.) allowed within a street ROW, alley ROW, or across a lot
P Q R S line, except for arcades, galleries, and balconies with an
Arcade1 encroachment agreement.
Notes:
Gallery1
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
Shopfront:
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
awning, balcony1, 10 ft 10 ft N N
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
bay window, or
subject to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public
projecting shade
Works Director.
structure 3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

} 4
All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view
6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2 from the street.
Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
Signage A A N N Key for Tables
Driveways A 3
A3
N A A Allowed
Mechanical and N Not Allowed
N N N A
Utility Equipment4

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1208 of 1332 Page 61


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T5-C Use Type T5-C
Residential Telecommunication Facilities
Accessory Structure P Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);
Assisted Living Apartment P Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth Design S
(Not Qualifying for Conditional Use Approval)
Community Residence C
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design or
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P
Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for Conditional Use C
Downtown Residential P Approval)
Home Occupation P Other
Hospice P Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P
Senior Citizen Apartments P Government Facility P
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Parking Facility P
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P Public Services, Minor C
Church/House of Worship P Sustainable Infrastructure P
College, University, or Seminary P Temporary Uses 4
T
Commercial Recreation/Amusement, Indoor P Urban Agriculture
Community Recreation Facility, Public P Community Garden P
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P Notes:
Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P      =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S ]= <          > 
land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services) are also
Trade School P
=  Section 19.09.110
Retail Trade ‚        %;       ` ~Œ
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; Beer/Wine/ except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
$
‰  ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
†

—ƒ
— € % {  ]  $  $      
S
$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
/

—ƒ
—$
 %    ‚       +[+/+  {
On-Sale Establishment %           ‚  ~  
Downtown Retail1 P consistent with the goals and policies of the Downtown Master Plan.
^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ]  
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C
Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards applicable
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; Urban  = 
S
" '
†…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as
Mixed-Use P  {  
2
Restaurant P „ >; "      "  { " 
… >  <; $      {  
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with Service
C 3
See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
Bar 4
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
Employment & Services  {  
Blood Plasma Donor Center P
Clinic P Key
Downtown Services 2
P P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
   $
% 
!  "  /

 S C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Hospital P 

 €„
  ‡    $
uses.
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites3 S
S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
Hotel, Residence P
* '
 $

 

 €„
Individual Care Center P Section 19.16.110.
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Massage Establishment S 

 €„
  ’’
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
  
 P
Social Services Provider C

Page 62 Page 1209 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
V U

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
T U V W < 1,000 sf --
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/‘ 2
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft ›‡/‘ 4
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way Miscellaneous
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
max. max. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
Miscellaneous Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
Driveways may be shared between adjacent parcels. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /

  X
   [$

No new surface parking lots are allowed next to primary
or side street frontages. All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
must be accessed only from the secondary street.
Note:
Required Parking 1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability).
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards. Key for Tables
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC -- No Requirement
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1210 of 1332 Page 63


19.09.050.E.016 T5 Corridor Zone (T5-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 15 ft min.
Depth 15 ft min.
Common open space
250 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

Page 64 Page 1211 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The intent of the T5-MS Zone is to provide a compact and None
walkable urban environment with building types that
 
 %

 '

  $]
/
C. Lot Size
service, and retail uses, as well as residential uses on

"
}*" $ '< '
*" $ ';
 No width, depth or area standards are included for the
allows for a majority of active pedestrian street facades T5-MS Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
"
*; %
'" } '
 "$ $
 the min. and max. building width and depth standards
streets. Parking is typically provided in multi-story for the building types established in Table D (Building
garages, which if placed next to a street frontage, are Types).
$
+  %

 $—
% 
"

}
^ *$
 "

the building types is intended to encourage revitalization
and investment. The following form elements are
generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached
Large lot width
Large footprint and lot coverage
No blank walls or planes
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, mostly Arcade, Gallery,
and Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
2 to 7 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1212 of 1332 Page 65


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Courtyard Building

Secondary Street

Secondary Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Primary Street Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
Body Wing Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
Width-to-Height
A B C D 1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
Ratio
Flex Mid-Rise 200 ft1 175 ft1 75 ft 100 ft Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F
Flex Low-Rise 150 ft 150 ft 70 ft 70 ft Percentage of
50% max.
Courtyard Building 175 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft -- width of building
Accessory Total Area 400 sf min.
-- -- -- --
Structure2 < "+";
'
"*


*;
Lined Building Refer to building dimensions in the building.
Subsection D (Building Types, ";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

Additional Standards for a Lined 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
Building)
The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
Miscellaneous be carefully considered for solar orientation and user

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  comfort.

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 Access Standards
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G Pedestrian access to the building must be from the
(Frontages). thoroughfare or courtyard.
Notes: Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series individual entry from the courtyard.
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
2
Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
The total GFA of Accessory Structures must not exceed 20% of the
between buildings where feasible.
GFA of the primary structure.
Courtyards must be accessible from the primary
thoroughfare where feasible.

Key for Tables


-- No Requirement

Page 66 Page 1213 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

Lined Building

Secondary Street
G K

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Lined Building Miscellaneous
Dimensions - Exterior Building The side of an interior building exposed to a street or
Length 400 ft max. 1
G open space must be lined by the exterior building.
Width 300 ft max. 2
H A forecourt or pocket plaza is appropriate along the
primary frontage or at a primary street corner.
Depth (from front 30 ft min.
I Access Standards
of building)
Dimensions - Interior Building Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*

accessed from the street or alley by an allowed frontage
Width 180 ft max. J
type.
Depth 230 ft max. K
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an
Notes:
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
1
Or the max. length of the block.
present.
2
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1214 of 1332 Page 67


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
N M
P
S

R
T Q

Street
Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories P
Front1,2 Rear4
(Distance from Side1,2 Side3,4 Primary Building 2 min. - 7 max.
ROW/Lot Line) L M N O Accessory Structure 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 10 ft 0 ft3 5 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 Q
Max. 10 ft 20 ft 15 -- Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone Service or Retail
0.50 ft max. above curb
Front (min.) 70% uses
Side Street (min.) 60% Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Miscellaneous *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$

A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Floor-to-Ceiling


corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Œ" } 14 ft min. R
Notes: 
} 9 ft min. S
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street Footprint
ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
Lot coverage 90% max.
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the
building. Depth
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must Œ" }
30 ft min. T
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Notes:
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions
10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to the side and to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
rear lot line is required. 2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.
Key for Tables
-- No Requirement

Page 68 Page 1215 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
W V

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line H. Encroachments
Encroachment Corner Interior
Front Rear
Encroachment Side Side
G. Frontages (max.) (max.)
Type (max.) (max.)
Private Frontage Corner U V W X
Front Standards
Type Side Arcade 1

Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Gallery1


Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F Shopfront:
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G awning, balcony1, 10 ft 10 ft N N
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H bay window, or
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K projecting shade
structure
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L

}
Terrace 1
A A 19.09.070.M 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2
Pedestrian Access
Architectural
The primary building entrance must be located to face 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary
Signage A A N N
thoroughfare through a Open Space type consistent with
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards). Driveways A3 A3 N A

Miscellaneous Mechanical and


N N N A
Utility Equipment4
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors,
and other service entries must be screened and must be Miscellaneous
located to the rear or on side street facades. Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, but not
Note: allowed within a street ROW, alley ROW, or across a lot
1
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change. line, except for arcades, galleries, and balconies with an
encroachment agreement.
Key for Tables Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
A Allowed
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
N Not Allowed 2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public
Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.
4
All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view
from the street.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1216 of 1332 Page 69


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types Notes:


Use Type T5-MS      =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
]= <         
Residential
general land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services)
Accessory Structure P    =  Section 19.09.110.
Assisted Living Apartment P ‚        %;       ` ~Œ
Community Residence P except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
€ % {  ]  $  $     
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P
 %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Downtown Residential P { %           ‚ 
Home Occupation P ~      >   ‚  ]
Hospice P Master Plan.
^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Senior Citizen Apartments P
and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly %  = 
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
Church/House of Worship P   {  
2
„ >; "      "  { " 
College, University, or Seminary P
… >  <; $      {  
Commercial Recreation/Amusement, Indoor P 3
See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
Community Recreational Facility (Public) P 4
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
Community Center, Private (Accessory) P  {  

Public Park or Playground; Open Space P


Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P Key
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Trade School P C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Retail Trade 

 €„
  ‡    $
uses.
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; Beer/
ƒ
—$
‰  ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
† S S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 


—ƒ
—$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 * '
 $

 

 €„
Section 19.16.110.
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C
1
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Downtown Retail P


 €„
  ’’
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; or
S
Urban Lounge
Mixed-Use P
…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 S
Parking Lot/Sidewalk Sale T
Pawn Shop S
Restaurant P
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with
P
Service Bar
Social Event with Alcoholic Beverage Sales S
Tavern-Limited Establishment S

Page 70 Page 1217 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

I. Use Types (cont.) Notes:


     =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
Employment & Services
]= <         
Blood Plasma Donor Center S
general land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services)
Cleaners, Commerical/Industrial S    =  Section 19.09.110.
Clinic P ‚        %;       ` ~Œ
Crop Production C except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
€ % {  ]  $  $     
Custom & Craft Work C
 %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Daily Labor Services S { %           ‚ 
2
Downtown Services P ~      >   ‚  ]
Food Processing C Master Plan.
^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Hospital C
and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites3 S %  = 
Hotel, Residence S 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P   {  
2
„ >; "      "  { " 
Marijuana Dispensary S
… >  <; $      {  
Massage Establishment S 3
See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
  4
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
P
Listed  {  
Open Air Vending/Transit Sales Lot C
Tattoo Parlor/Body Piercing Studio S Key
Valet Parking C P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Telecommunication Facilities C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Satellite Dish C 

 €„
  ‡    $
uses.
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);
Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
S * '
 $

 

 €„
Design (Not Qualifying for Conditional Use
Approval) Section 19.16.110.

TV Broadcasting & Other Communication Service P T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit


 €„
  ’’
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design
or Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for Conditional C
Use Approval)
Other
Electric Utility Substation P
Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground S
Government Facility P
Parking Facility P
Public Services, Minor C
Sustainable Infrastructure P
4
Temporary Uses T
Urban Agriculture
Community Garden P

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1218 of 1332 Page 71


19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

BB

Secondary Street
AA Z

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
Y Z AA BB < 2,500 sf --
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‡/‘œ‘/ 2
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
must be accessed only from the secondary street. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /

  X
   [$

Required Parking
All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Note:
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives). 1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed. Key for Tables
-- No Requirement

Page 72 Page 1219 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.020 T5 Main Street Zone (T5-MS)

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1220 of 1332 Page 73


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1221 of 1332


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The intent of the T5-N Zone is to provide a compact None
urban form that accommodates a variety of urban
housing choices, including small footprint/low density
C. Lot Size
building types to medium/large footprint building types,
as well as limited retail and services uses. This Zone No width, depth or area standards are included for the
reinforces the walkable nature of the neighborhood, T5-N Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
supports neighborhood-serving commercial and the min. and max. building width and depth standards
service uses adjacent to this Zone, and supports public for the building types established in Table D (Building
transportation alternatives. The following form elements Types).
are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached or detached
Medium to large lot width
Medium to large footprint and lot coverage
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, but primarily Arcade,
Dooryard, Forecourt, Shopfront, or Terrace
Medium setbacks
2 to 5 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1222 of 1332 Page 75


19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Secondary Street
C

B
A A

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Miscellaneous
Body Wing 
}$
 ;}" *
$'
 
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth 
}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "

(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) Allowed frontage types are described in Table G
A B C D (Frontages).
Courtyard Building 175 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft -- Notes:
1
1 1 Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
Flex Mid-Rise 170 ft 175 ft 60 ft 60 ft
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
Flex Low-Rise 150 ft 150 ft 60 ft 60 ft 2
The shared courtyard must be accessible from the primary street
Multi-plex: Large 100 ft 75 ft 20 ft 30 ft and the entrance to each bungalow must be from the shared
Multi-plex: Small 50 ft 50 ft 20 ft 20 ft courtyard.
3
Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max.
Duplex, Side-by-side 48 ft -- -- --
width of all attached buildings must not exceed 150 ft.
Duplex, Front-and- 4
36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft   }
" ‚  "  ]> {  " 
Back
Structures must not exceed 20% of the GFA of the primary
Duplex, Stacked 36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft structure.
18 - 36
Rowhouse 45 ft -- --
ft
Bungalow Court2 32 ft 26 ft -- --
Live/Work3 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft
Accessory Dwelling
36 ft 32 ft -- --
Unit4
Accessory Structure4 36 ft 32 ft -- --

Key for Tables


-- No Requirement

Page 76 Page 1223 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

Courtyard Building

Secondary Street
F
E

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
Dimensions - Courtyard(s) Access Standards
Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E Pedestrian access to the building must be from the
Width-to-Height thoroughfare or courtyard.
1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
Ratio Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F individual entry from the courtyard.
Percentage of width Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
50% max. between buildings where feasible.
of building
Total Area 400 sf min. Courtyards must be accessible from the primary
thoroughfare where feasible.
< "+";
'
"*


*;
the building.
";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*



*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
comfort.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1224 of 1332 Page 77


19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
I H
K
N

M
L
O

Primary Street Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line
Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories K
Front1,2 Rear4
(Distance from Side1 Side3,4 Primary Building 2 min. - 5 max.
ROW/Lot Line) G H I J Accessory Structure 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 5 ft 5 ft 0 ft 5 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 L
Max. 15 ft 20 ft 30 ft -- Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone Service or Retail
0.50 ft max. above curb
Front (min.) 65% uses
Side Street (min.) 50% Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Miscellaneous *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$

A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Floor-to-Ceiling


corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Œ" }
Notes: (service or retail 14 ft min. M
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street uses)
ROW or a utility easement is needed. 
} 8 ft min. N
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the Footprint
building.
3
Lot coverage 85% max.
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Depth
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a Œ" }

30 ft min. O
minimum 10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to retail/service space
the side and rear lot line is required. Notes:
1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions
Key for Tables to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
-- No Requirement
street are exempt.

Page 78 Page 1225 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
R Q

Primary Street
Key for Diagram
Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Common Yard A A 19.09.070.E P Q R S
1
Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F Arcade
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G Gallery1
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Shopfront:
awning, balcony1, 10 ft 10 ft N N
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K
bay window, or
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L projecting shade
1
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M structure
Pedestrian Access 
}
6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
For service and retail uses, the primary building entrance balconies2
must be located to face a primary thoroughfare or be Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
connected to a primary thoroughfare through a Open Features
Space type consistent with Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Signage A A N N
Standards). 3 3
Driveways A A N A
Miscellaneous
Mechanical and
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, N N N A
Utility Equipment4
and other service entries must be screened and must be
Miscellaneous
located to the rear or on side street facades.
Encroachments are not allowed within a street ROW, alley
Note:
1 ROW, or across a lot line, except for balconies with an
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
Encroachment Agreement.
Notes:
Key for Tables
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
A Allowed curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
N Not Allowed 2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public
Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.
4
All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened from view
from the street.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1226 of 1332 Page 79


19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types Tattoo Parlor/Body Piercing Studio S


Use Type T5-N Telecommunication Facilities
Residential Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate
Accessory Dwelling Unit P Height); Wireless Communication Facility,
S
Non-Stealth Design (Not Qualifying for
Accessory Structure P
Conditional Use Approval)
Assisted Living Apartment P
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
Community Residence P Design or Non-Stealth Design (Not qualifying C
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P for Conditional Use Approval)
Downtown Residential P I. Use Types (cont.)
Fraternity, Sorority House, or Private Dorms P Use Type T5-N
Home Occupation P Other
Hospice P Parking Facility P
Individual Care – Family Home P Public Services, Minor C
Individual Care - Group Home S Sustainable Infrastructure P
Senior Citizen Apartments P Temporary Uses 3
T
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Urban Agriculture
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P Community Garden P
Church/House of Worship P Notes:
Community Recreational Facility, Public P      =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
]= <         
Community Center, Private (Accessory) P
general land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services)
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P    =  Section 19.09.110.
Public or Private School (Primary or ‚        %;       `’ ~Œ
S
Secondary) except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
Retail Trade € % {  ]  $  $     
 %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Downtown Retail1 P
{ %           ‚ 
Mixed-Use P ~      >   ‚  ]
Parking Lot/Sidewalk Sale T Master Plan.
Restaurant P ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with
C %  = 
Service Bar
Social Event with Alcoholic Beverage Sales S 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
Tavern-Limited Establishment S   {  
2
Employment & Services „ >; "      "  { " 
… >  <; $      {  
Custom & Craft Work C
2
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
2
Downtown Services P
 {  
Hotel, Residence S
Individual Care Center P Key
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Massage Establishment S C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
 

 €„
  ‡    $
P uses.
Than Listed
Open Air Vending/Transit Sales Lot C S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
* '
 $

 

 €„
Section 19.16.110.
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit


 €„
  ’’

Page 80 Page 1227 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
V U

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
T U V W < 2,500 sf --
Ground Floor 35 ft 10 ft 5 ft 5 ft ›‡/‘œ‘/ 2
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‘/œ/ 4
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft ›/ As required
max. max. along all street
Miscellaneous frontages
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between Miscellaneous
adjacent parcels. All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
Parking spaces may be enclosed, covered, or open. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
 
‚ ' $$+
=

‚ '

 Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section


the requirements for a residential unit. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /

  X
   [$

When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
must be accessed only from the secondary street. All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

Required Parking
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
Note:
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards. 1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability).
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note: Key for Tables
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed. -- No Requirement

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1228 of 1332 Page 81


19.09.050.E.024 T5 Neighborhood Zone (T5-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

Page 82 Page 1229 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The T4-C Zone is intended to enhance the City’s existing None
corridors by allowing a wide variety of building types

 '

 $/
 $/]
/
C. Lot Size
and service uses in small to large footprint buildings
along major arterial corridors carrying high volumes No width, depth or area standards are included for the
%
 "$]ƒ 
""

%
$
 T4-C Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
Bus Rapid Transit or Light Rail transportation options, the min. and max. building width and depth standards
these corridors, such as the Multi-Functional Spine or for the building types established in Table D (Building
Iconic/Ceremonial Corridors, supported by this Zone Types).
will likely transition to a more urban and walkable built
environment with residential uses behind or above
the commercial uses. The following form elements are
generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached or detached
Medium to large lot width
Medium to large footprint and lot coverage
Buildings placed at or near the edge of right-of-way
Mix of building frontages, but mostly Shopfront
Medium setback
2 to 5 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1230 of 1332 Page 83


19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Courtyard Building

Secondary Street

Secondary Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Primary Street Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building (cont.)
Body Wing < "+";
'
"*


*;
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth the building.
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) ";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

A B C D 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
Flex Mid-Rise 200 ft1 175 ft1 40 ft 75 ft The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
Flex Low-Rise 100 ft 100 ft 40 ft 40 ft be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
comfort.
Courtyard Building 100 ft 100 ft 40 ft 100 ft
Access Standards
Multi-plex: Large 90 ft 65 ft 20 ft 30 ft
Pedestrian access to the building must be from the
Multi-plex: Small 50 ft 50 ft 20 ft 20 ft
thoroughfare or courtyard.
Rowhouse 18-36 ft 45 ft -- --
Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
2
Live/Work 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft individual entry from the courtyard.
Accessory Structure3 -- -- -- -- Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
Miscellaneous between buildings where feasible.

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  Courtyards must be accessible from the primary

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 thoroughfare where feasible.
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G Notes:
1
(Frontages). Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series
of buildings no wider than 100 ft each.
Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
2
Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max.
Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
width of all attached buildings must not exceed 150 ft.
Width 20 ft min.; 100 ft max. E 3
The total GFA of Accessory Structures must not exceed 30% of the
Width-to-Height Ratio 1:2 min.; 2:1 max. GFA of the primary structure.
Depth 50 ft min.; 100 ft max. F
Percentage of width
50% max.
of building
Total Area 400 sf min.

Page 84 Page 1231 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
I H K
N

G
M
L
O
Street
Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories K
Front1,2 Rear4
(Distance from Side1 Side3,4 Primary Building 2 min. - 5 max.1,2
ROW/Lot Line) G H I J Accessory Structure 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 10 ft 10 ft 0 ft 10 ft Ground Floor Finish Level3,4 L
Max. 15 ft 15 ft 15 ft -- Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone Service or Retail uses 0.50 ft max. above curb
Front (min.) 75% Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Side Street (min.) 50% *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
Miscellaneous Floor-to-Ceiling
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Œ" } 14 ft min. M
corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. 
} 9 ft min. N
Notes: Footprint
1
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street
Lot coverage
ROW or a utility easement is needed.
2
Sidewalk must be extended into the setback area to meet the Mixed-use with
85% max.
building. residential uses
3
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must All other uses 75% max.
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Depth
4
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum
Œ" }
30 ft min. O
10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to the side and
Notes:
rear lot line is required.
1
 \    ‚  
 `^ > 
subject to Major Site Development Plan Review (Refer to LVMC
Section 19.16.100.G (Major Review of Site Development Plans)).
2
The residential adjacency standards established in LVMC
Section19.08.040.H (Residential Adjacency Standards) will apply.
3
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions
to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
4
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1232 of 1332 Page 85


19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
R Q

Primary Street
Key for Diagram
Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H P Q R S
Porch: Engaged A A 19.09.070.I Arcade1
Porch: Projecting A A 19.09.070.J Gallery1
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Shopfront:
awning, balcony1, 10 ft 10 ft N N
1
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M
bay window, or
Pedestrian Access projecting shade
The primary building entrance must be located to face structure
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary 
}
thoroughfare through a Open Space type consistent with 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards).
Architectural
Miscellaneous 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, Signage A A N N
and other service entries must be screened and must be 3 3
Driveways A A N A
located to the rear or on side street facades.
Miscellaneous
Note:
1
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change. Encroachments are not allowed within a street ROW, alley
ROW, or across a lot line, except for balconies with an
Encroachment Agreement.
Key for Tables Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
A Allowed
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
N Not Allowed 2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public
Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

Page 86 Page 1233 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

I. Use Types I. Use Types (cont.)


Use Type T4-C Employment & Services
Residential Building Maintenance Service and Sales C
Accessory Structure P Bus Charter Service and Service Facility P
Assisted Living Apartment C Cleaners, Commercial/Industrial S
Community Residence C Clinic P
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P Crop Production C
Downtown Residential P Custodial Institution S
Home Occupation P Custom & Craft Work C
Hospice P Daily Labor Service S
2
Senior Citizen Apartments C Downtown Services P
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P    $
% 
!  "  /

 S
Church/House of Worship P Food Processing C
College, University, or Seminary P Hospital P
3
Commercial Recreation/Amusement, Indoor P Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites S
Community Recreation Facility, Public P Hotel, Residence P
Community Center, Private (Accessory) P Individual Care Center P
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P Laboratory, Medical or Dental P
Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P Massage Establishment S
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) S ‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
  
 P
Trade School P Open Air Vending/Transit Sales Lot C
Retail Trade Tattoo Parlor/Body Piercing Studio S
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment; Beer/Wine/ Valet Parking C
$
‰  ‰=$
ˆ*$ 
†

—ƒ
—
S
$
‰=$
ˆ*$ 
/

—ƒ
—$

On-Sale Establishment
Downtown Retail1 P Key
Drive-Through C P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; Urban 

 €„
  ‡    $
S uses.
" '
†…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 

Mixed-Use P S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
* '
 $

 

 €„
Parking Lot/Sidewalk Sale T
Section 19.16.110.
Pawn Shop S
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit as
Restaurant P 

 €„
  ’’
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with Service
C
Bar
Social Event with Alcoholic Beverage Sales S
Tavern-Limited Establishment S

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1234 of 1332 Page 87


19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Notes:
I. Use Types (cont.)
     =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
Use Type T4-C ]= <          > 
Telecommunication Facilities land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services) are also
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height); =  Section 19.09.110.
Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth Design S ‚        %;       ‰` ~Œ 
(Not Qualifying for Conditional Use Approval) that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and Prohibited
{  ]  $  $       %  
Radio, TV, or Microwave Communication Tower S
 ‚       +[+/+  { % 
Satellite Dish C
         ‚  ~   
TV Broadcasting & Other Communication Service P with the goals and policies of the Downtown Master Plan.
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design or ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ]  
Non-Stealth Design (Not qualifying for Conditional C Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards applicable to
Use Approval) = 

Other
1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed as
Electric Utility Substation P
 {  
Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground P 2
„ >; "      "  { " 
Government Facility P … >  <; $      {  
3
Parking Facility P See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
4
„  $   ^ „  '‡     
Public Services, Minor C
{  
Sustainable Infrastructure P
Temporary Uses4 T Key
Urban Agriculture P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Community Garden P C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions


 €„
  ‡    $
uses.
S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
* '
 $

 

 €„
Section 19.16.110.
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit as


 €„
  ’’

Page 88 Page 1235 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
V U

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front Rear
Side Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
T U V W < 1,000 sf --
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/‘ 2
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft ›‡/‘ 4
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way Miscellaneous
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
max. max. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
Miscellaneous Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
Driveways may be shared between adjacent parcels. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /

  X
   [$

No new surface parking lots are allowed next to primary
or side street frontages. All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
must be accessed only from the secondary street.
Note:
Required Parking 1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability).
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC Key for Tables
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives). -- No Requirement
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed,
except on a driveway.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1236 of 1332 Page 89


19.09.050.E.028 T4 Corridor Zone (T4-C) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 15 ft min.
Depth 15 ft min.
Common open space
250 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

Page 90 Page 1237 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The intent of the T4-MS Zone is to provide a compact None
and walkable urban environment that supports public
transportation alternatives with building types that can
C. Lot Size

 %

 '

  $]
/
service, and retail uses, as well as residential uses on No width, depth or area standards are included for the
"
}< '
$$
 "*" $ ';
 T4-MS Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
allows for mainly active pedestrian street facades. the min. and max. building width and depth standards

}
^ *$
 "

*" $ ';
  

 for the building types established in Table D (Building
encourage revitalization and investment. The following Types).
form elements are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached or detached
Medium lot width
Medium footprint and lot coverage
No blank walls or planes
Buildings placed near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, mostly Arcade, Gallery,
and Shopfront
Small to no setbacks
2 to 5 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1238 of 1332 Page 91


19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Courtyard Building

Secondary Street

Secondary Street
C
F
E

B
A A

Primary Street Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building
Secondary Wing
Body Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth Width 20 ft min.; 70 ft max. E
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
Width-to-Height
A B C D 1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
Ratio
Flex Mid-Rise 200 ft1 140 ft 75 ft 100 ft Depth 35 ft min.; 75 ft max. F
Flex Low-Rise 120 ft 120 ft 60 ft 60 ft Percentage of
50% max.
Courtyard Building 150 ft 150 ft 50 ft 100 ft width of building
Multi-plex: Small 50 ft 80 ft 20 ft 20 ft Total Area 400 sf min.
Live/Work 2
28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft < "+";
'
"*


*;

Accessory building.
-- -- -- --
Structure3 ";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*

Lined Building Refer to building dimensions in 

*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
Subsection D (Building Types, The proportions and orientation of courtyards must be
Additional Standards for a Lined carefully considered for solar orientation and user comfort.
Building) Access Standards
Miscellaneous Pedestrian access to the building must be from the

}$
 ;}" *
$'
  thoroughfare or courtyard.

}*
$+/
^
  
 '
;
 "
 Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G individual entry from the courtyard.
(Frontages). Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
Notes: between buildings where feasible.
1
Buildings wider than 150 ft must be designed to read as a series of Courtyards must be accessible from the primary
buildings no wider than 100 ft each. thoroughfare where feasible.
2
Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max.
width of all attached buildings must not exceed 120 ft.
3
Key for Tables
The total GFA of Accessory Structures must not exceed 20% of the
GFA of the primary structure. -- No Requirement

Page 92 Page 1239 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

Lined Building

Secondary Street
G K

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Interior Building Exterior Building

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Lined Building Miscellaneous
Dimensions - Exterior Building The side of an interior building exposed to a street or open
Length 400 ft max. 1
G space must be lined by the exterior building.

Width 150 ft max. H A forecourt or pocket plaza is appropriate along the


primary frontage or at a primary street corner.
Depth (from front 30 ft min.
I Access Standards
of building)
Dimensions - Interior Building Œ" }"  '

$$
;"*



from the street or alley by an allowed frontage type.
Width 180 ft max. J
Vehicle access to the interior building must be from an
Depth 230 ft max. K
alley or a min. of 150 ft from an intersection if no alley is
Notes: present.
1
Or the max. length of the block.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1240 of 1332 Page 93


19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
N M
P
S

R
T Q

Street
Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories P
Front3 Rear5
(Distance from Side3 Side 4,5 Primary Building 2 min. - 5 max.
ROW/Lot Line)1,2 L M N O Accessory Structure 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 0 ft 0 ft 0 ft 5 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 Q
Max. 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft -- Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone Service or Retail
0.50 ft max. above curb
Front (min.) 70% uses
Side Street (min.) 60% Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Miscellaneous *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$

A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on Floor-to-Ceiling


corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Œ" } 14 ft min. R
Notes: 
} 9 ft min. S
1
%… # $ $ % < ‚  ]  =  Footprint
an appropriate publicly accessible Open Space type (see Section
Lot coverage 85% max.
19.09.080 (Open Space Standards)) is located between the setback
and the building or is adjoining the setback and the building; or Depth
a larger area is required to preserve existing mature trees or Œ" }
30 ft min. T
landscaping. Notes:
2
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street 1
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions
ROW or a utility easement is needed. to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
3
Sidewalk must be extended into the facade zone to meet the 2
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
building. street are exempt.
4
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property line must
comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code requirements. Key for Tables
5
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum
-- No Requirement
10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to the side and
rear lot line is required.

Page 94 Page 1241 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
W V

Primary Street
Key for Diagram
Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Arcade A A 19.09.070.D Type (max.) (max.)
Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F U V W X
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G Arcade1
Gallery A A 19.09.070.H Gallery1
Shopfront A A 19.09.070.K Shopfront:
awning, balcony1, 10 ft 10 ft N N
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L
bay window, or
Terrace1 A A 19.09.070.M projecting shade
Pedestrian Access structure
The primary building entrance must be located to face 
}
6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
a primary thoroughfare or be connected to a primary balconies2
thoroughfare through a Open Space type consistent with Architectural
Section 19.09.080 (Open Space Standards). 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
Miscellaneous Signage A A N N
For non-residential uses, loading docks, overhead doors, Driveways A 3
A 3
N A
and other service entries must be screened and must be
Miscellaneous
located to the rear or on side street facades.
Encroachments are not allowed within a street ROW, alley
Note:
1 ROW, or across a lot line, except for balconies with an
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change.
Encroachment Agreement.
Key for Tables Notes:
1
A Allowed May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
N Not Allowed 2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public
Works Director.
3
Only allowed when there is no alternative access from the rear.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1242 of 1332 Page 95


19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types
Use Type T4-MS Notes:
     =   +[[++ 
 $`  
Residential
]= <         
Accessory Structure P general land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services)
Assisted Living Apartment P    =   +[[++
Community Residence P ‚        %;       ‰` ~Œ
except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
Convalescent Care Facility/Nursing Home P
€ % {  ]  $  $     
Downtown Residential P  %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Home Occupation P { %           ‚ 
Hospice P ~      >   ‚  ]
Master Plan.
Senior Citizen Apartments P
^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P %  = 
1
Church/House of Worship P Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
  {  
College, University, or Seminary S 2
„ >; "      "  { " 
Commercial Recreation/Amusement, Indoor P … >  <; $      {  
Community Center, Private (Accessory) P 3
See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
4
Community Recreational Facility (Public) P „  $   ^ „  '‡    
 {  
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P
Private Club, Lodge, or Fraternal Organization P
Key
Public or Private School (Primary or Secondary) P
P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Retail Trade
C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Beer/Wine/Cooler Cultural Establishment;


 €„
  ‡    $


—ƒ
—$
‰  ‰=$

S uses.
ˆ*$ 
†

—ƒ
—$
‰=$

Establishment S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
* '
 $

 

 €„
Beer/Wine/Cooler On-Sale Establishment C
Section 19.16.110.
Downtown Retail1 P
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Grocery Store with Alcohol Sales C 

 €„
  ’’
Liquor Establishment (Tavern); Lounge Bar; or
S
Urban Lounge
Mixed-Use P
…‚'
 `"‰=$
ˆ*$ 
 S
Parking Lot/Sidewalk Sale T
Pawn Shop S
Restaurant P
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with
P
Service Bar
Social Event with Alcoholic Beverages Sales S
Tavern-Limited Establishment S

Page 96 Page 1243 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

Employment & Services


Clinic P Notes:
     =   +[[++ 
 $`  
Custom & Craft Work C
]= <         
2
Downtown Services P general land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services)
Food Processing C    =   +[[++
Hotel, Motel or Hotel Suites3 S ‚        %;       ‰` ~Œ
except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
Hotel, Residence S
€ % {  ]  $  $     
Laboratory, Medical or Dental P  %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Marijuana Dispensary S { %           ‚ 
Massage Establishment S ~      >   ‚  ]
Master Plan.
‰]
/„
 $
$†‰]
/‰
 
P ^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Listed
and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Open Air Vending/Transit Sales Lot C %  = 
Tattoo Parlor/Body Piercing Studio S 1
Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
Valet Parking C   {  
2
„ >; "      "  { " 
I. Use Types (cont.)
… >  <; $      {  
Use Type T4-MS 3
See Subsection 19.09.040.H (Fremont East District) for standards.
Telecommunication Facilities 4
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate Height);  {  
Wireless Communication Facility, Non-Stealth
S
Design (Not Qualifying for Conditional Use Key
Approval)
P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Satellite Dish C
C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
TV Broadcasting & Other Communication 

 €„
  ‡    $
P
Service uses.
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Qualifying for C * '
 $

 

 €„
Conditional Use Approval) Section 19.16.110.
Other T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Emergency Ambulance Services, Ground S 

 €„
  ’’
Government Facility P
Parking Facility P
Public Services, Minor C
Sustainable Infrastructure P
Temporary Uses4 T
Urban Agriculture
Community Garden P

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1244 of 1332 Page 97


19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

BB

Secondary Street
AA Z

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
Y Z AA BB < 2,500 sf --
Ground Floor 40 ft 10 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‡/‘œ‘/ 2
Upper Floor 40 ft 40 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›‘/œ/ 4
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›/ As required
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft along all street
max. max. frontages
Miscellaneous Miscellaneous
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
adjacent parcels. 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
must be accessed only from the secondary street. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /

  X
   [$

Required Parking
All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
 } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Note:
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives). 1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed. Key for Tables
-- No Requirement

Page 98 Page 1245 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.032 T4 Main Street Zone (T4-MS) (NEW IN ENTIRETY)

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1246 of 1332 Page 99


This page intentionally left blank

Page 1247 of 1332


City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY)

19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY)

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The T4-N Zone is intended to reinforce established None
neighborhoods in walkable urban areas. These
neighborhoods will evolve through the use of small
C. Lot Size
to medium building footprints and medium intensity
building types to achieve a compact urban form No width, depth or area standards are included for the
that accommodates a variety of urban housing T4-N Zone. Min. lot sizes may be determined based on
choices. This Zone reinforces the walkable nature of the min. and max. building width and depth standards
the neighborhood, supports neighborhood-serving for the building types established in Table D (Building
commercial and service uses, and supports public Types).
transportation alternatives. The following form elements
are generally appropriate in this Zone:
Attached or detached
Medium lot width
Small to Medium footprint and lot coverage
Buildings placed near the edge of right-of-way
Diverse mix of building frontages, but primarily Stoop,
Dooryard, Forecourt, Shopfront at corners, or Porches
Medium setbacks
Max. 3 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1248 of 1332 Page 101
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Secondary Street
C

B
A A

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Notes:
1
Body Wing The shared courtyard must be accessible from the primary
street and the entrance to each building must be from the shared
Building Type Width Depth Width Depth
courtyard.
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
2
Must be built with a minimum of 2 units attached together. Max.
A B C D width of all attached buildings must not exceed 120 ft.
Courtyard Building 150 ft 150 ft 50 ft 100 ft 3
  }
" ‚  "  ]> {  " 
Flex Low-Rise 120 ft 120 ft 60 ft 60 ft Structures must not exceed 20% of the GFA of the primary
structure.
Multi-plex: Small 50 ft 80 ft 20 ft 20 ft
1
Fourplex Court 40 ft 80 ft -- -- Key for Tables
Duplex, Side-by-side 48 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft -- No Requirement
Duplex, Front-and-
36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft
Back
Duplex, Stacked 36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft
18 - 36
Rowhouse 45 ft -- --
ft
Bungalow Court1 32 ft 26 ft -- --
2
Live/Work 28 ft 36 ft 16 ft 18 ft
Accessory Dwelling
36 ft 32 ft -- --
Unit3
Accessory Structure3 36 ft 32 ft -- --
Miscellaneous
Allowed frontage types are described in Table G
(Frontages).

Page 102 Page 1249 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY)

Courtyard Building

Secondary Street
F
E

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area Courtyard Area

D. Building Types (cont.) D. Building Types (cont.)


Additional Standards for a Courtyard Building Additional Standards for a Bungalow Court
Dimensions - Courtyard(s) Dimensions - Courtyard(s)
Width 20 ft min.; 70 ft max. E Width 20 ft min. E
Width-to-Height Depth 20 ft min F
1:2 min.; 2:1 max.
Ratio Area 400 sf min.
Depth 25 ft min.; 60 ft max. F
Percentage of width
50% max.
of building
Total Area 400 sf min.
< "+";
'
"*


*;
the building.
";
'
 

*;
*" $ '"*



*;+$$ —^‘ 
'
The proportions and orientation of courtyards must
be carefully considered for solar orientation and user
comfort.
Access Standards
Pedestrian access to the building must be from the
thoroughfare or courtyard.
Each unit (residential or commercial) may have an
individual entry from the courtyard.
Multiple courtyards must be connected through and
between buildings where feasible.
Courtyards must be accessible from the primary
thoroughfare where feasible.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1250 of 1332 Page 103
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Building / Alley

Secondary Building
I H
K
N

G
M L
O

Street
Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line Building Area Facade Zone

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories K
Front2,3 Rear
(Distance from Side2 Side3 Primary Building 3 max.
ROW/Lot Line)1 G H I J Accessory Structure 2 max.
Primary Building Primary Building
Min. 10 ft 10 ft 5 ft 15 ft Ground Floor Finish Level1,2 L
Max. 20 ft 20 ft 30 ft -- Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Primary Building Facade within Facade Zone Œ" }$**
  
 "$ " 
Front (min.) 65% *" $ ';%
™‘'" } $
%
$
Side Street (min.) 50% Floor-to-Ceiling
Miscellaneous Œ" }3 9 ft min. M
A building form with a chamfered corner is only allowed on 
} 8 ft min. N
corner lots and only if a corner entry is provided. Footprint
Notes: Lot coverage 75% max.
1
%… # $ $ % < ‚  ]  = 
Depth
an appropriate publicly accessible Open Space type (see Section
19.09.080 (Open Space Standards)) is located between the setback Œ" }

30 ft min. O
and the building or is adjoining the setback and the building; or retail/service space
a larger area is required to preserve existing mature trees or Notes:
1
landscaping. Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions to
2
Additional setback and/or easement may be required where street those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
2
ROW or a utility easement is needed. Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
3
Where building elevations include balconies or windows, a minimum street are exempt.
3
10 ft setback from the edge of the balcony or window to the side and +‰ ‚ $$$  >      ˆ  … ‚
rear lot line is required. commercial uses.

Key for Tables


-- No Requirement

Page 104 Page 1251 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
R Q

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Common Yard A A 19.09.070.E Type (max.) (max.)
Dooryard A A 19.09.070.F P Q R S
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G Porch: Engaged
Porch: Engaged A A 19.09.070.I Porch: Projecting 5 ft 5 ft N N
Porch: Projecting A A 19.09.070.J Stoop
Shopfront 1
A A 19.09.070.K Shopfront:
awning, balcony1,
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L
bay window, or 10 ft 10 ft N N
1,2
Terrace A A 19.09.070.M projecting shade
Note: structure
1
Allowed only on building corners for commercial uses.

}
2
Allowed only when necessary to accommodate a grade change. 6 ft 6 ft 5 ft 5 ft
balconies2
Key for Tables Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
A Allowed Features
N Not Allowed Signage A A N N
Driveways A A N N
Miscellaneous
Encroachments are not allowed within a street ROW, alley
ROW, or across a lot line, except for balconies with an
Encroachment Agreement.
Notes:
1
May encroach into the street ROW to within 2 ft of the face of the
curb, subject to approval by the Public Works Director.
2
May encroach into the street ROW up to a maximum of 5 ft,
subject to approval of an Encroachment Agreement by the Public
Works Director.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1252 of 1332 Page 105
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

I. Use Types Notes:


Use Type T4-N      =   +[[++ 
 $`  
]= <         
Residential
general land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services)
Accessory Dwelling Unit P    =   +[[++
Accessory Structure P ‚        %;       ‰`’ ~Œ
Assisted Living Apartment P except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
€ % {  ]  $  $     
Community Residence P
 %    ‚       +[+/+ 
Downtown Residential P { %           ‚ 
Fraternity, Sorority House, or Private Dorms P ~      >   ‚  ]
Home Occupation P Master Plan.
^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 
Hospice P
and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
Individual Care – Family Home P %  = 
Individual Care - Group Home S
1
Senior Citizen Apartments P Except Pet Shop, Secondhand Dealer, and Thrift Shop are allowed
  {  
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly 2
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
Museum, Art Display, or Art Sales (Private) P  {  
Church/House of Worship P
Community Center, Private (Accessory) P Key
Community Recreational Facility, Public P P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Public or Private School (Primary or 

 €„
  ‡    $
S uses.
Secondary)
Retail Trade S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
* '
 $

 

 €„
Downtown Retail1 P
Section 19.16.110.
Restaurant P
T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Restaurant with Alcohol; or Restaurant with 

 €„
  ’’
C
Service Bar
Tavern-Limited Establishment S
Telecommunication Facilities
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate
Height); Wireless Communication Facility,
S
Non-Stealth Design (Not Qualifying for
Conditional Use Approval)
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Not qualifying C
for Conditional Use Approval)
Other
Public Services, Minor C
Sustainable Infrastructure P
2
Temporary Uses T
Urban Agriculture
Community Garden P

Page 106 Page 1253 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
V U

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Street Trees


Corner Interior ƒ  #   Min. No. Trees
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Addition, Renovation, or New Building1
Line (min.)
T U V W < 1,000 sf --
Ground Floor 20 ft 20 ft 0 ft 0 ft ›/œ‡/‘ 2
Parking Driveway One-way Two-way ›‡/‘ 4
Width 12 ft min. - 14 ft 32 ft min. - 34 ft Miscellaneous
max. max.
All street trees must be planted in accordance with the
Miscellaneous 

$ 
 €„
  X
 
Where feasible, driveways must be shared between Districts) and the planting requirements of LVMC Section
adjacent parcels. ’X<
;_
[! 

 } /
Parking spaces may be enclosed, covered, or open. 
  X
   [$


 
‚ ' $$+
=

‚ '

 All street trees must be planted and maintained to avoid


the requirements for a residential unit.  } + $'
"‚  
—

'
;%
 $

The min. canopy clearance at maturity is 14 ft.
When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
Note:
must be accessed only from the secondary street.
1
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.020.D (Applicability).
Required Parking
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note: Key for Tables
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed. -- No Requirement

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1254 of 1332 Page 107
19.09.050.E.036 T4 Neighborhood Zone (T4-N) (NEW IN ITS ENTIRETY) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

L. Required Open Space


Common Open Space
Width 20 ft min.
Depth 20 ft min.
Common open space
100 sf min.1
area per unit
Miscellaneous
The common open space requirement may be met by
%  '

 
'" }/"
}/
and the roof, and may include pools and amenity decks.
No private open space per residential unit is required.
Common open space may also be provided in compliance
with LVMC Section 19.09.090 (Open Space Standards) if
open space is provided on the lot.
Note:
1
Or 5% of lot area, whichever is greater.

Page 108 Page 1255 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

Secondary Street
B

A A

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line

A. General Intent B. Sub-Zone


The T3-N Zone is intended to protect the integrity None
of existing neighborhoods with detached homes on
small-to-medium sized lots. The Zone reinforces the
C. Lot Size
role of these residential building types within walkable
neighborhoods, supports adjacent neighborhood- Area
serving retail and service uses, and supports public Min. 6,000 sf
transportation options. The following form elements are Max. 12,800 sf
generally appropriate in this Zone:
Width A
Primarily detached, but may be attached
Min. 50 ft
Small to medium lot width
Max. 80 ft
Small to medium footprint and lot coverage
Depth B
Primarily with common yards, stoops, and porches
Min. 90 ft
Medium to large front setback
Max. 160 ft
Medium to large side setbacks
Max. 2 stories

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1256 of 1332 Page 109
19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Secondary Street
E

D
C C

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Building Area

D. Building Types D. Building Types (cont.)


Main Building Secondary Main Building Secondary
Per Body Wing Per Body Wing
Building Building
Lot Width Depth Width Depth Lot Width Depth Width Depth
Type Type
(max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.) (max.)
C D E F C D E F
Duplex, Bungalow 3 min.;
1 48 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft 32 ft 26 ft -- --
Side-by-side Court1 9 max.
Duplex – Accessory
Front and 1 36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft Dwelling 1 -- -- -- --
Back Unit2
Duplex - Accessory
1 36 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft 2 -- -- -- --
Stacked Structure2
Large House 1 65 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft Miscellaneous
Medium Allowed frontage types are described in Table G
1 50 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft
House (Frontages).
Small House 1 30 ft -- 20 ft 22 ft Notes:
1
Only 1 residential unit per bungalow allowed. The shared
courtyard must be accessible from the primary street and the
entrance to each bungalow must be from the shared courtyard.
2
  }
" ‚  "  ]> {  " 
Structures must not exceed 60% of the GFA of the primary
structure.

Key for Tables


-- No Requirement

Page 110 Page 1257 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
I H
K
N

G
L M

Street
Primary Street

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Building Setback Line Building Area

E. Building Placement F. Building Form Standards


Setback Distance Corner Interior Building Height Stories K
Front Rear
(Distance from Side Side Primary Building 2 max.
ROW/Lot Line) G H I J ADU or Accessory
2 max.
Primary Building Structure1
Min. 15 ft 15 ft 5 ft 15 ft Primary Building
Max. 25 ft 20 ft -- -- Ground Floor Finish Level2,3 L
ADU or Accessory Structure Residential 1.50 ft min. above curb
Min. 30 ft 15 ft 3 ft 1
3 ft 1 Floor-to-Ceiling
Miscellaneous Œ" }
Patio covers must comply with the standards provided (service or retail 8 ft min. M
in Table 4 (Patio Cover) in LVMC Section 19.06.070 (R-1 uses)
(Single Family Residential)). 
} 8 ft min. N
All structures located < 5 feet from another structure Footprint
must comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code Lot coverage 65% max.
requirements.
Notes:
Notes: 1
"]{       $    <  >
1
Buildings and structures located < 5 feet from a property of the primary building.
line must comply with all applicable Building and Fire Code 2
Buildings existing at the time of adoption of the FBC and additions
requirements. to those buildings less than 50% of the existing GFA are exempt.
3
Primary buildings located on lots sloping down and away from the
street are exempt.
Key for Tables
-- No Requirement

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1258 of 1332 Page 111
19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
Q P

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line Encroachment

G. Frontages H. Encroachments
Private Frontage Corner Corner Interior
Front Standards Front Rear
Type Side Encroachment Side Side
(max.) (max.)
Common Yard A A 19.09.070.E Type (max.) (max.)
Forecourt A A 19.09.070.G O P Q R
Porch: Engaged A A 19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged
Porch: Projecting A A 19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting 5 ft 5 ft N N
Stoop A A 19.09.070.L Stoop
Architectural
3 ft 3 ft 3 ft 3 ft
Features
Driveways A A A A
Key for Tables Miscellaneous
A Allowed Encroachments are allowed into the facade zone, but are
N Not Allowed not allowed within a street ROW, alley ROW, across a lot
line, or beyond the minimum setback line.

Page 112 Page 1259 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N)

I. Use Types Key


Use Type T3-N P Use is allowed as a principal use by right.
Residential C Use is allowed in accordance with the conditions
Accessory Dwelling Unit P 

 €„
  ‡    $
uses.
Accessory Structure P
S 
 $$+
  $"
 $;
 
Community Residence P
* '
 $

 

 €„
Downtown Residential P Section 19.16.110.
Home Occupation P T Use is allowed with a Temporary Commercial Permit
Individual Care – Family Home P 

 €„
  ’’
Individual Care - Group Home S
Recreation, Education, and Public Assembly
Church/House of Worship P
Community Recreation Facility, Public P
Public Park or Playground; Open Space P
Public or Private School (Primary or
S
Secondary)
Telecommunication Facilities
Mounted Antenna Over 15 ft (Ultimate
Height); Wireless Communication Facility,
S
Non-Stealth Design (Not Qualifying for
Conditional Use Approval)
Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth
Design or Non-Stealth Design (Not qualifying C
for Conditional Use Approval)
Other
Public Services, Minor C
Sustainable Infrastructure P
1
Temporary Uses T
Urban Agriculture
Community Garden C

Notes:
     =  Section 19.09.110 (
 $`  
]= <         
general land use type (e.g. Downtown Retail or Downtown Services)
   =  Section 19.09.110.
‚        %       “`’ ~Œ
except that as allowed under LVMC Section 19.12.100 (Similar and
€ % {  ]  $  $     
 %    ‚       +[+/+ 
{ %           ‚ 
~      >   ‚  ]
Master Plan.

^‚    +[+/ƒ € $% { ] 


and Applicable Conditions and Requirements) for the standards
%  = 

1
„  $   ^ „  '‡    
 {  

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1260 of 1332 Page 113
19.09.050.E.040 T3 Neighborhood Zone (T3-N) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Tertiary Street / Alley

Secondary Street
T

Primary Street

Key for Diagram


Lot Line Building Line
Parking Area

J. Parking Standards K. Required Open Space


Corner Interior Usable Open Space
Setback from Lot Front1 Rear
Side1 Side Width 10 ft min.
Line (min.)
S T Depth 10 ft min.
Ground Floor 20 ft 15 ft 0 ft 0 ft Common open space
150 sf min.
Parking Driveway area per unit
Width 12 ft min. - 20 ft max.
Miscellaneous
Driveways may be shared between adjacent parcels.
Parking spaces may be enclosed, covered, or open.
 
‚ ' $$+
=

‚ '


the requirements for a residential unit.
When a lot has an adjoining secondary street, parking
must be accessed only from the secondary street.
Required Parking
Refer to LVMC Section 19.09.100.G (Parking Standards)
for vehicular and bicycle parking standards.
Required parking may be reduced as set forth in LVMC
Section 19.18.030.D.4 (Parking Alternatives).
Note:
1
No vehicle parking in the front or corner side yard is allowed,
except on a driveway.

Page 114 Page 1261 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
19.09.060 BUILDING TYPE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.060.A Purpose
19.09.060.B Applicability
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

19.09.060.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to provide an overview of the building types that are appropriate to use within
the Transect Zones. The overview is intended to ensure that new development establishes or reinforces the
character and scale of the City’s Downtown districts and neighborhoods.

19.09.060.B Applicability
1. The requirements of this Section apply to all development proposed within the Transect Zones, and
they must be considered in combination with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section
19.09.050 (Transect Zones Standards).
2. Development that includes education, public assembly, transportation, communications, and/or
infrastructure uses must comply with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section 19.09.050
(Transect Zones Standards), but are not required to meet the standards of this Section.
3. Building types are categorized into two groups: house-scale buildings and block scale buildings.
a. House-scale buildings are the size of a house, typically ranging from as small as 25 feet wide up to
90 feet wide.
b. Block-scale buildings are individually as large as most or all of a block, or when arranged together
along a street, appear to be as long as most or all of a block.
4. The standards for each building type are established in the Transect Zones, including standards for lot
 >
!
$ $$
 "$*" $ ';
/ =

*" $ ';
"
*

$

/
*" $ ';
"*
$
 
$+  



 
established for the Transect Zone.
5. Where multiple principal buildings are proposed for a single lot, the proposal must include potential lot
lines, which conform with this Ordinance, the purpose of which is to determine compliance with building
type standards.

19.09.060.C Building Types Overview


1. Table 19.09.060.C-1 (Building Types Overview) provides an overview of the allowed building types that
are appropriate to use within the Transect Zones. The names of the building types are not intended to
limit uses within a particular building type. For example, a medium house building type may have non-

 
 $"
+   /"
" ]
/$$+
*;
 
_

2. Secondary wings and accessory structures must have a smaller footprint, a narrower width, and a depth
that is less than the width or depth of the footprint of the primary building.
3. The photographs in Table 19.09.060.C-1 (Building Types Overview) are illustrative only and not
regulatory.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1262 of 1332 Page 115
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T3-N T3-N T3-N
Building Form Small House Medium House Large House
Example

Description A small-size detached structure, A medium-size detached A large-size detached structure


consisting of one unit, usually structure, consisting of one consisting of one unit usually
sited on a small lot with private unit, usually sited on a medium sited on a large lot with private
open space. size lot with private open space. open space.

Typically located within a Typically located within a This building type is


lower-intensity residential lower-intensity residential frequently located within the
neighborhood in a walkable neighborhood in a walkable lowest-intensity residential
urban setting, and potentially urban setting, and potentially neighborhoods. It is important
near a neighborhood main near a neighborhood main for providing a wide range of
street, this building type is street, this building type is housing types.
important for providing a wide important for providing a wide
range of housing types and range of housing types and
promoting walkability. promoting walkability.
Building Scale House-Scale House-Scale House-Scale

Page 116 Page 1263 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T5-N, T4-N, T3-N T5-M, T5-MS, T5-C, T5-N, T4- T5-N, T4-N, T3-N
MS, T4-C, T4-N, T3-N
Building Form Accessory Dwelling Unit Accessory Structure Duplex: Side-by-Side
(ADU)
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Description An additional structure An additional structure typically A small- to medium-size
typically located at the rear of located at the rear of a lot that structure with two attached
a lot constructed as a single- provides space for a single residential units, both of which
story freestanding structure $$
 $/]
/ have private open space and
or placed above a garage to service, or storage use. face the street.
provide space for a single small
residential unit. This building type is important This duplex building type has
for providing incubator spaces the form of a medium- or large-
An ADU is important for for small businesses within size single-family house, and is
%  '=*$
" ' walkable neighborhoods.  
$;$
 +  
opportunities within walkable lower-intensity residential
neighborhoods. neighborhoods. It supports
well-designed moderate
intensity development, and is
important for providing a wide
range of housing types and
promoting walkability.
Building Scale House-Scale House-Scale House-Scale

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1264 of 1332 Page 117
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T5-N, T4-N, T3-N T5-N, T4-N, T3-N T5-N, T4-N, T3-N
Building Form Duplex: Front-and-back Duplex: Stacked Bungalow Court
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Description A small- to medium-size A small- to medium-size A series of small, detached
structure consisting of two structure consisting of two units single-family structures located
attached units with one unit with one located on the ground on a single lot with individual
located behind the other, both } 

$
 *" $ ' '



of which have private open directly above. Both units face a shared court that is typically
space. The unit in front faces the street and are within one perpendicular to the street. The
the street and has the form of a single building that has the shared court serves as common
small single-family house. form of a small single-family open space taking the place of
house. a private rear yard, which is not
This duplex building type is required. The common open
 
$;$
 +   This duplex building type is space is an essential element of
lower-intensity residential  
$;$
 +   this building type.
neighborhoods. It supports lower-intensity residential
well-designed moderate neighborhoods. It supports A bungalow court may
intensity development, and is well-designed moderate *
$
 +  
important for providing a wide intensity development, and is low or medium-intensity
range of housing types and important for providing a wide neighborhoods where it allows
promoting walkability. range of housing types and for appropriately scaled, well-
promoting walkability. designed moderate intensities
and is important for providing
a wide range of housing types
and promoting walkability. Syn:
Cottage Court
Building Scale House-Scale House-Scale House-Scale

Page 118 Page 1265 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T5-M, T5-C, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C, T4-N T5-M, T5-C, T5-N, T4-C
T4-N
Building Form Live/Work Multi-plex: Small Multi-plex: Large
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Description A small- to medium-size A medium-size structure A large-size structure, 2 - 5
attached or detached structure consisting of 3 - 6 side-by- stories in height, consisting of 7
that consists of one dwelling side and/or stacked dwelling - 18 side-by-side and/or stacked
unit above and/or behind a units, typically with one shared dwelling units, typically with
}
^ *$
'" }
 entry or individual entries one shared entry. Each unit has
that can be used for service, along the front of the building. its own private open space as a
artisan, or commercial uses as This building type has the small yard or balcony.
allowed by the zone. Both the appearance of a medium-
'" }}
^
  sized single-family home and This building type is
the unit above are owned by  
$;$
   
$;$
 
one entity. Private open space sparingly within low to medium- within medium-intensity or
is not required but can be intensity neighborhoods. more urban neighborhoods. It
provided with a balcony. Live/ Private open space is not enables well-designed higher
work units are typically located required but can be provided densities, and is important
within medium intensity- with a balcony. for providing a wide range of
neighborhoods or in locations housing types and promoting
that will transition into a This building type enables walkability. Syn: Stacked-Flats
neighborhood main street. appropriately-scaled, well- Building
designed higher intensity of
This building type can be development, and is important
applied in industrial contexts. for providing a broad choice of
They are appropriate for housing types and promoting
incubating neighborhood- walkability. Syn. Mansion
serving commercial uses and Apartment House
allowing neighborhood main
streets to expand in response
to increasing market demands.
Building Scale "
$
™"  House-Scale Block-Scale
Block-Scale > 3 units

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1266 of 1332 Page 119
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T5-M, T5-N, T4-C, T4-N T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-C, T5-N, T4- T5-M, T5-MS, T5-C, T5-N, T4-
MS, T4-C, T4-N MS, T4-C, T4-N
Building Form Rowhouse Courtyard Building Flex Low-Rise Building
Example

Source: Opticos Design, Inc. Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


Description A medium-size structure A large-size structure composed A medium- to large-size
composed of 2 - 8 individual of multiple attached or structure on a medium size lot
Rowhouse buildings attached in stacked units accessed from and 1 - 3 stories in height, that
a series with individual entries a shared courtyard, a series may incorporate structured
along the front. Each unit has of courtyards, or a common parking. Each unit may have
its own private open space. corridor. Each unit may have its own individual entry, or
its own individual entry, or units may share a common
This type is typically located up to three units may share a entry accessed from the street
within medium-intensity common entry. Private open or a courtyard or series of
neighborhoods or near or on space is not required but can courtyards. Private open space
a neighborhood main street. be provided with a balcony per is not required but can be
This type enables appropriately- unit. provided with a balcony per
scaled, well-designed higher unit.
densities, and is important This building type is typically
for providing a wide range of integrated sparingly into lower This building type can be used
housing types and promoting intensity neighborhoods or to provide a vertical mix of uses
walkability. Syn: Townhouse more consistently into medium- + '" }
 $/
% 
/
intensity neighborhoods, or industrial uses and service
or it can be applied in or residential uses on upper
non-residential contexts. }† ;*
 '$

This building type enables use building, with residential,
appropriately-scaled, well- service, or industrial uses,
designed higher densities, and +

'" }
 $"

is important for providing a are not appropriate.
wide range of housing types
and promoting walkability. This building type enables
appropriately-scaled, well-
designed higher densities, and
is important for providing a
wide range of housing types
and promoting walkability.
Building Scale "
$
™"  "
$
™"  Block-Scale
Block-Scale > 3 units Block-Scale > 3 units

Page 120 Page 1267 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.060.C Building Types Overview

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-MS, T5- T6-UC, T6-UG T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-MS,
C, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C T5-C, T4-MS,
Building Form Flex Mid-Rise Building Flex High-Rise Building Lined Building
Example

Source: buildabetterburb.org
Description A medium- to large-size A large, tall structure over 8 A structure that consists of two
structure built on a large lot stories in height built on a large  
†  
 
and 4 – 8 stories in height, that lot that typically incorporates building that may be a parking
typically incorporates multi- multi-level structured parking. garage, movie theater or large
level structured parking. Private Private open space is not retail store (i.e. “big-box store”),
open space is not required but required but can be provided and an exterior building to
can be provided with balconies. with a balcony per unit. conceal the interior building
from the street. The exterior
This building type can be used This building type is used building is usually designed for
to provide a vertical mix of to provide a vertical mix of 
 $/
% 
/]
/ —
"
+ '" }
 $/ "
+ '" }
 $ residential uses.
service, or industrial uses and or service uses, and service
service or residential uses or residential uses on upper
 "
}† ;*
 } *" $ ';
 
a single-use building, with a primary component of an
residential, service, or industrial urban downtown as it enables
"
/+

'" }
 $ the highest densities that are
uses are not appropriate. appropriately-scaled and well-
This building type is a primary designed, and is important
component of an urban for providing a wide range
downtown or neighborhood as of housing types as well as
it enables appropriately-scaled, other commercial uses, and
well-designed higher densities, promoting walkability.
and is important for providing
a wide range of housing types
and promoting walkability.
Building Scale Block-Scale Block-Scale Block-Scale

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1268 of 1332 Page 121
19.09.060.C Building Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.060.C-1 Building Types Overview


Transect Zones T5-M T4-N
Building Form Loft Fourplex Court (New)
Example

Description A multi-story structure with Two detached structures,


a large footprint, tall ceilings, each with four units, located
and a design that facilitates on a single lot with each
natural light. This building type is *" $ ' '



*$
 =

  % "$ shared court that is typically
uses over the course of a life- perpendicular to the street. The
;$
 =
}
^ *$

 shared court serves as common
be utilized in areas transitioning open space taking the place of a
between commercial, residential, private yard. The common open
and light industrial uses. space is an essential element of
this building type.

A fourplex court may be scaled


 +  $$
 "
intensity neighborhoods where
it allows for appropriately
scaled, well-designed moderate
intensities and is important
for providing a wide range of
housing types and promoting
walkability.
Building Scale Block-Scale House-Scale

Page 122 Page 1269 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
19.09.070 FRONTAGE TYPE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.070.A Purpose
19.09.070.B Applicability
19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview
19.09.070.D Arcade
19.09.070.E Common Yard
19.09.070.F Dooryard
19.09.070.G Forecourt
19.09.070.H Gallery
19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged
19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting
19.09.070.K Shopfront
19.09.070.L Stoop
19.09.070.M Terrace

19.09.070.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish standards for each of the frontage types that are appropriate to
use within the Transect Zones. Private frontages are the components of a building that provide an important
transition and interface between the public realm (i.e. the street and sidewalk) and the private realm (i.e. a
yard and building). These standards supplement the standards for each Transect Zone in which the frontage
types are allowed. They are intended to ensure development that establishes or reinforces the character and
scale of the City’s Downtown districts and neighborhoods.

19.09.070.B Applicability
1. The requirements of this Section apply to all proposed development within the Transect Zones, and
they must be considered in combination with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section
19.09.050 (Transect Zone Standards).
2. Development with education, public assembly, transportation, communications, and/or infrastructure
uses must comply with the standards for the applicable zone in LVMC Section 19.09.050 (Transect Zone
Standards), but are not required to meet the standards of this Section.
3. Each building must have at least one frontage type for each street frontage.
4. Frontage types not listed in the applicable transect zone standards are not allowed in that zone.
5. A building may have multiple frontage types as stipulated in this Section. For example, a dooryard
frontage may have a stoop or engaged porch frontage type as well.

19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview


Table 19.09.070.C-1 (Private Frontages Overview) provides an overview of the allowed frontage types with a
description of each type and an illustration showing its typical character and form. The private frontage is the
area between the building facade and the frontage line (edge of right-of-way).

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1270 of 1332 Page 123
19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-MS, T5- T5-N, T4-N, T3-N T5-M, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-MS,
C, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C T4-N
Frontage Type Arcade Common Yard Dooryard
LOT > < LOT > < LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description The Arcade Frontage is The Common Yard Frontage In a Dooryard Frontage the
a covered walkway with has a landscaped frontage main facade of the building is
habitable space above that with a facade substantially set back a small distance and
often encroaches over a set back from the frontage 
 '
$
 

*;
sidewalk into the right-of-way. $
/%  '*"=
 a low wall or fence, creating a
An arcade is used to provide thoroughfares. The front yard small dooryard. The dooryard
pedestrian circulation along created remains unfenced must not provide public
a frontage and it should and is visually continuous with circulation along a right-of-way.
extend far enough from the adjacent yards, supporting The dooryard may be raised,
building to provide adequate a common landscape in sunken, or at grade, and is
protection and circulation space conjunction with other private intended primarily for ground-
for pedestrians. An arcade is frontages. }
 
 $"

intended for buildings with
'" }
 $"

and is common along public
courtyards and walkable
streets.

Page 124 Page 1271 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-MS, T5- T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5- T4-C, T4-N, T3-N
C, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-N, T3-N MS, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C
Frontage Type Forecourt Gallery Porch: Engaged
LOT > < LOT > < LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description The Forecourt Frontage has a The Gallery Frontage has a The Engaged Porch has two
portion of the facade close to facade aligned close to the adjacent sides of the porch that
the frontage line and the central frontage line with an attached are connected to the building
portion is set back creating cantilevered structure or a while the other two sides are
a small courtyard space. The lightweight colonnade over the open. The main facade of the
courtyard may be used as an sidewalk. Galleries are typical building has a small-to-medium
entry court or shared garden for retail uses, but can be used setback from the frontage
space for residential buildings, ]
"
 line. The resulting front yard
or as an additional shopping or is typically small and can be
restaurant seating area within 

*;+$$


retail and service use areas. A  $$;



'


forecourt may be allocated in street.
conjunction with other frontage
types.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1272 of 1332 Page 125
19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T4-C, T4-N, T3-N T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-C, T5- T5-MS, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-N, T3-N
MS, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C, T4-N
Frontage Type Porch: Projecting Shopfront Stoop
LOT > < LOT > < LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > < FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description The Projecting Porch Frontage In the Shopfront Frontage the The Stoop Frontage has a
is open on three sides, and main facade of the building is facade aligned close to the
it may project in front of a at or near the frontage line with  '
$
+ 
 ;
building into the facade zone. an at-grade entrance along the elevated from the sidewalk
The main facade of the building public right-of-way. Shopfronts "]
$;
"
 %;
has a small-to-medium setback are typically intended for  ;+ +

from the frontage line. The 
 $]
"
 
; entrance is usually an exterior
resulting front yard is typically have substantial glazing at the stair and landing. Stairs or
$$  *


*; sidewalk level. Shopfronts may ramps from the stoop may lead
+$$

 $$;

 include awnings or cantilevered directly to the sidewalk or may
the edge of the street. shade structures that overlap provide access to the side.
the sidewalk. A shopfront may
be used in conjunction with
other frontage types. Syn: Retail
Frontage.

Page 126 Page 1273 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.C Frontage Types Overview

Table 19.09.070.C-1 Private Frontages Overview


Transect Zones T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-M, T5-MS, T5-
C, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C, T4-N
Frontage Type Terrace
LOT > <
PRIVATE ROW
FRONTAGE > <

Example

Description In the Terrace Frontage the


main facade of the building is
at or near the frontage line with
an elevated terrace providing
public circulation along the
facade. A terrace can be used
to provide at-grade access
while accommodating a grade
change. Frequently spaced
steps to access the terrace are
necessary to avoid dead walls
and to maximize accessibility.
Terraces are suitable for
conversion to outdoor cafes
and may be used in historic
industrial areas to mimic
historic loading docks.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1274 of 1332 Page 127
19.09.070.D Arcade City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.D Arcade

A
B
C
A

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Arcade
1. Description
The Arcade Frontage Type is a covered walkway with
habitable space above that often encroaches over a
sidewalk into the right-of-way. An arcade should be
used to provide pedestrian circulation along a frontage
and it should extend far enough from the building to
provide adequate protection and circulation space for
pedestrians. An arcade is intended for buildings with
'" }
 $"
   $ '
public courtyards and walkable streets.
2. Size
Depth, Clear 10 ft min. A
Œ" }
'/$
 14 ft min. B
Setback from back of curb 2 ft min. C
3. Miscellaneous
Arcades must have a consistent depth along a frontage.
<
+ 
 ‡}* *$


above the colonnade must not encroach onto a public
right-of-way, and must be located so that they abut the
right-of-way.
Arcade Frontages must be used in conjunction with
the standards for the Shopfront Frontage Type. In case
 } *
+


/
<
 '
;

standards prevail.

Page 128 Page 1275 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.E Common Yard

19.09.070.E Common Yard

C
B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Common Yard
1. Description
In the Common Yard Frontage Type, the main facade of
the building has a large landscaped setback from the
 '
$
%  '*"=
"'

The front yard created remains unfenced and is visually
continuous with adjacent yards, supporting a common
landscape in conjunction with the other private
frontages.
2. Size
Depth 20 ft min. A
3. Miscellaneous
Fences between adjoining front yards or street
side yards or between the sidewalk and front B
yard are not allowed in Common Yard frontages.
Common Yard Frontages must be used in
conjunction with another allowed private C
frontage type, such as a Porch.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1276 of 1332 Page 129
19.09.070.F Dooryard City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.F Dooryard

C
B

D
E A
C

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Dooryard
1. Description
In the Dooryard Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is set back a small distance and the frontage
$
 

*;$++$$

/
 '$$
dooryard. The dooryard must not provide public
circulation along a right-of-way. The dooryard may be
raised, sunken, or at grade and is intended primarily
'" }
 
 $"

2. Size
Depth, Clear 8 ft min. A
Length 50 ft min. B
Distance between Glazing 4 ft min. C
Ground Floor
50% min.1
Transparency
Depth of Recessed Entries 5 ft max.
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel D
max.
Finish Level above
3.5 ft max. E
Sidewalk
Finish Level below
6 ft max.
Sidewalk
3. Miscellaneous
For live/work, retail and service uses, these standards
are to be used in conjunction with those for the
  '
;
! 
 } *
+


them, the Dooryard Frontage Type standards prevail.
Shall not be used for circulation for more than one
'" }
;
Note:
1
For live/work, retail, and service uses only.

Page 130 Page 1277 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.G Forecourt

19.09.070.G Forecourt

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Forecourt
1. Description
In the Forecourt Frontage Type, the main facade of
the building is at or near the frontage line and a small
percentage is set back, creating a small courtyard
space. The space could be used as an entry court or
shared garden space for residential buildings, or as an
additional shopping or restaurant seating area within
retail and service use areas.
2. Size
Width, Clear 12 ft min. A
Depth, Clear 12 ft min. B
Ratio, Height to Width 2:1 max.
3. Miscellaneous
The proportions and orientation of courtyard spaces
must be carefully considered for solar orientation and
user comfort. Source: Opticos Design, Inc.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1278 of 1332 Page 131
19.09.070.H Gallery City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.H Gallery

A
C
E
D
B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Gallery
1. Description
In the Gallery Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is at the frontage line and the gallery element
encroaches into the sidewalk of the right-of-way. This
Frontage Type is intended for buildings with ground-
}
 $
 $"
 ;*


two stories. Due to the encroachment into the right-
of-way, an easement is usually required with a license
agreement approved by the Department of Public
Works. Alternatively, the frontage line must be aligned
with the edge of the gallery and curb, and a sidewalk is
established within an easement under the gallery.
2. Size
Depth, Clear 8 ft min. A
Ground Floor Height, Clear 11 ft min. B
Upper Floor Height, Clear 9 ft min. C
Height 2 stories max. D
Setback from back of curb 2 ft min.; 3 ft max. E
3. Miscellaneous
Gallery Frontages must be used in conjunction with
the standards for the Shopfront Frontage Type. In case
 } *
+


/
Œ$$
; '
;

standards prevail.
Galleries must have a consistent depth along a
frontage.
Galleries may project over a sidewalk.

Page 132 Page 1279 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged

19.09.070.I Porch: Engaged

E
A
C

B B F
D

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Porch: Engaged
1. Description
In the Engaged Porch Frontage Type, the main facade
of the building has a small-to-medium setback from
the frontage line. The resulting front yard is typically
$$  *


*;+$$

 $$;
maintain the edge of the street. The engaged porch has
two adjacent sides of the porch that are attached to the
building while the other two sides are open.
2. Size
Width, Clear 8 ft min. A
Depth, Clear 6 ft min. B
Height, Clear 8 ft min. C
Height 1 story max.
Finish Level above
1.5 ft min. D
Sidewalk
Furniture Area, Clear 4 ft X 6 ft min. E
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel F
max.
3. Miscellaneous
Up to 40% of the building facade may project into the
facade zone.
Engaged porches must be open on two sides and have
a roof.
In zones where both porches and encroachments are
allowed, a porch and up to 40% of the building facade
are allowed encroaching elements.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1280 of 1332 Page 133
19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.J Porch: Projecting

C
F
E

D B
B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Porch: Projecting
1. Description
In the Projecting Porch Frontage Type, the main facade
of the building has a small-to-medium setback from the
frontage line. The resulting front yard is typically very
$$  *


*;+$$

 $$;
maintain the edge of the street. The projecting porch
is open on three sides and it may project in front of a
building into the facade zone.
2. Size
Width, Clear 8 ft min. A
Depth, Clear 6 ft min. B
Height, Clear 8 ft min. C
Height 1 story max.
Finish Level above
1.5 ft min. D
Sidewalk Source: tdwhs.nwasco.k12.or.us
Furniture Area, Clear 4 ft X 6 ft min. E
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel F
max.
3. Miscellaneous
Projecting porches must be open on three sides and
have a roof.
In zones where both porches and encroachments are
allowed, a porch is an allowable encroaching element.

Page 134 Page 1281 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.K Shopfront

19.09.070.K Shopfront

B C

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Shopfront
1. Description
In the Shopfront Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is placed at or near the frontage line with an
at-grade entrance along the public right-of-way. It is
intended for retail or service uses and has substantial
glazing at the sidewalk level. This frontage may include
an awning or projecting shade structure that may
overlap the sidewalk. A shopfront may be used in
conjunction with other frontage types.
2. Size
Distance between Glazing 2 ft min. A
Ground Floor Transparency 75% min.
Depth of Recessed Entries1 5 ft max.
3. Awning
Depth 4 ft min. B
Setback from back of curb 2 ft min. C
Height 8 ft min. D
4. Miscellaneous
Residential windows shall not be used.
Doors may be recessed as long as the main facade is at
the frontage line.
Operable awnings are encouraged.
Open-ended awnings are encouraged.
Shopfronts with accordion-style doors/windows or
other operable windows that allow the space to open
to the street are encouraged.
Notes:
1
"    $ % >   <  ‚ => 
(recessed door, sawtooth pattern, etc.).

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1282 of 1332 Page 135
19.09.070.L Stoop City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.070.L Stoop

C
B

D B

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Stoop
1. Description
In the Stoop Frontage Type, the main facade of the
building is near the frontage line and the elevated
stoop engages the sidewalk. The stoop must be
elevated above the sidewalk to ensure privacy within
the building. The entrance is usually an exterior stair
and landing. A stoop is appropriate for residential uses
with small setbacks.
2. Size
Width, Clear 5 ft min.; 8 ft max. A
Depth, Clear 5 ft min.; 8 ft max. B
Height, Clear 8 ft min. C
Height 1 story max.
Depth of Recessed Entries 6 ft max.
Finish Level above
1.5 ft min. D
Sidewalk
3 ft wide min.; 6 ft
Path of Travel E
max.
3. Miscellaneous
Stairs may be perpendicular or parallel to the building
facade.
Ramps must be placed parallel to the facade or along
the side of the building.
The entry doors are encouraged to be covered or
recessed to provide shelter from the elements.
Gates are not allowed.
All doors must face the street.

Page 136 Page 1283 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.070.M Terrace

19.09.070.M Terrace

A C

Key for Diagrams


Lot Line Setback Line
Grade Building

Terrace
1. Description
In the Terrace Frontage the main facade of the building
is at or near the frontage line with an elevated terrace
providing public circulation along the facade. A
terrace can be used to provide at-grade access while
accommodating a grade change, and is often used in
combination with a shopfront. Frequently spaced steps
to access the terrace are necessary to avoid dead walls
and to maximize accessibility. Terraces are suitable
for conversion to outdoor cafes and may be used in
historic industrial areas to mimic historic loading docks.
2. Size
Depth, Clear 8 ft min. A
Finish Level above
3.5 ft max. B
Sidewalk
Length of Terrace 150 ft max.
Distance between Stairs 50 ft max. C
3. Miscellaneous
Low walls used as seating are encouraged.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1284 of 1332 Page 137
This page intentionally left blank

Page 1285 of 1332


19.09.080 OPEN SPACE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.080.A Purpose
19.09.080.B Applicability
19.09.080.C Open Space In-Lieu Fee (New)
19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview
19.09.080.E Greenway (New)
19.09.080.F Urban Park
19.09.080.G Square
19.09.080.H Plaza
19.09.080.I Pocket Plaza
19.09.080.J Pocket Park
19.09.080.K Community Garden
19.09.080.L Playground

19.09.080.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to provide the standards for pre-approved open space types that are
appropriate to use within the Transect Zones. These standards are intended to ensure that these open spaces
reinforce the highly valued walkable character and scale of the City’s Downtown districts and neighborhoods.

19.09.080.B Applicability
This Section describes the standards for development of civic spaces throughout the Transect Zones that
apply to all proposed new development. They must be considered in combination with the standards for
the applicable zone in LVMC Section 19.09.050 (Transect Zone Standards) and the standards in Subsection
19.09.100.J (Additional Standards for Large Developments), if applicableƒ



  } + 

%   


%
$

/
   
  $;

Open spaces are maintained outdoor spaces which are accessible by the general public, improve the
pedestrian environment, are aesthetically pleasing, and serve as an amenity for the Downtown as a whole
as well as for occupants of the building served by the open space. Open spaces are generally constructed by
landowners during the development process.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1286 of 1332 Page 139
19.09.080.C Open Space In-Lieu Fee (New) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.C Open Space In-Lieu Fee (New)


1. The owner of any property upon which a development is proposed may request to pay an in-lieu fee for
open space required, if it is approved as a part of the site plan review for the development. A request to
pay the in-lieu fee for required civic space must be made before the submittal of any application, must
be approved by the Director, and recorded as a binding agreement as provided by the Department as

|
Š%$=$$‚

$$+ '  '*

% ' ; $
"


proposal:
a. There is open space available or planned within the District in which the development is proposed
=




 % 
†
b. The open space will be made available within a reasonable time period of the approval of the

%
$
† /
2. The in-lieu fee shall be determined by the Department based on the current value of land and estimated
construction costs for the needed civic space. The cost per square footage, as amended from time to
time, shall be made available upon request of the applicant and kept for the Department’s records.

19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview


1. The open spaces of a downtown are important public elements that provide open space and
recreational opportunities. The best open spaces become the “outdoor living rooms” of the City
and they play an important role in placemaking by providing places where the community can come
together to celebrate events, relax, and socialize. The standards for civic spaces must be considered
alongside building form, building types, frontage types, and thoroughfares to shape a quality urban
environment.
2. 


 ^ =



;
/'

+ "$

; " ;
gardens and playgrounds, which may be assigned to one or more Transect Zones. These supplementary
open space types may be established as a standalone open space or may be incorporated into any of
the open space types.
3. The dimensional requirements of each open space are regulatory. The descriptions of each open space,
with the character, allowed/typical uses, and stormwater management techniques, are descriptive,

Page 140 Page 1287 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview

Table 19.09.080.D-1 Open Space Types Overview


Transect Zones T6-UC, T5-M, T5-MS, T5-C, T5-N, T6-UC, T5-M, T5-MS, T5-C, T5-N, T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-C, T5-
T4-MS, T4-C, T4-N, T3-N T4-MS, T4-C, T4-N, T3-N N, T4-MS, T4-C, T4-N, T3-N
Open Space Greenway (New) Urban Park Square
Type
Example

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1288 of 1332 Page 141
19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

Table 19.09.080.D-1 Open Space Types Overview


Description Greenways are linear spaces Urban parks provide a Squares provide a public urban
for community gathering and central open-space focus for open space for civic purposes,
strolling for nearby residents and neighborhoods or groups of commercial activity, unstructured
employees. These spaces may neighborhoods. They are useful recreation, and other passive
*


*;

$


 for unstructured recreation and "


`"



*;
 
} ‚+
$$*;
 smaller structured recreational buildings and tree-lined streets
buildings beyond. Greenways facilities. These larger parks may with open shelters, paths, lawns,
tend to have narrow dimensions also serve as civic amenities for open areas, hardscape areas,
that support passive use and the larger community. They are and trees formally arranged.
can serve as a green connector  $$;

*;*" $ ' These spaces include seating
between destinations. frontages or landscaping, and opportunities, walkways, and
typically consist of formal and landscape materials at all edges.
natural landscape elements that
combine paths, lawn, or open
areas, and tree planting.
Transect Zones T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-C, T5- T6-UC, T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-C, T5- T5-M, T5-MS, T5-C, T4-MS, T4-C,
M, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C M, T5-N, T4-MS, T4-C T4-N, T3-N
Civic Space Type Plaza Pocket Plaza Pocket Park
Example

Page 142 Page 1289 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview

Table 19.09.080.D-1 Open Space Types Overview


Description Plazas add to the vitality of Pocket plazas are small-scaled Pocket parks provide small-
streets within more urban areas civic spaces that function in a scale public urban open spaces
and create formal open spaces similar manner and follow the intended to provide recreational
available for civic purposes and same rules as a larger plaza. opportunities where space is
commercial activity. These spaces These smaller-scaled spaces limited in close proximity to
are located at street corners create more intimate places for neighborhood residences. Pocket
 


*;*" $ ' seating or dining and provide parks are often located between
frontages. They are typically a place for commercial and buildings and developments, on
hardscaped with formally neighborhood activity. These irregular shaped sites and on
arranged trees. plazas can also be used to create single vacant lots.
a formal space in front of a
prominent building entrance.

Transect Zones T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-N, T4-MS, T4- T6-UG, T5-MS, T5-M, T5-N, T4-
C, T4-N, T3-N MS, T4-C, T4-N, T3-N
Supplemental
Community Garden Playground
Civic Space Type
Example

Description Community gardens provide Playgrounds provide an open


space for garden plots in a space designed and equipped
publicly accessible area that are for children’s recreation.
available to nearby residents They are interspersed within
for small-scale cultivation. residential areas in locations
These gardens may be provided where children do not have to
as a component of other cross major streets. They may
publicly accessible civic-space be freestanding, placed within
types or may be provided as a a block, or located within larger
freestanding open space. parks and other civic space types.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1290 of 1332 Page 143
19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

and they delineate a broad range of possible characteristics and uses for each of the open spaces. It
is not intended that each open space provide the full range of typical uses and characteristics listed,

Greenway
1. Description
<$

;*


*;

$

streets, which tends to have narrow dimensions
that support passive use and can serve as a green
connector between destinations.
2. Size and Location
Area 1 acre min.
Width 75 ft average min.
Depth No min.
Frontage Independent of building frontages
Character Informal
Passive open space
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Passive/active (unstructured) open space
Trails for bicycles and pedestrians
Community gardens
Playgrounds
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
Extended detention basins
! 
'
" =
Landscaping

Page 144 Page 1291 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.D Open Space Types Overview

but that the entire network of open spaces within the Transect Zones provide a desirable mix and
complementary range of open space opportunities.

Source: westjetmagzine.com

Urban Park
1. Description
A large open space available for civic purposes, limited
commercial activity, and unstructured recreation for
neighborhoods or groups of neighborhoods.
2. Size and Location
Area Min. 0.50 acres
Width 100 ft min.
Depth 100 ft min.
Frontage Must have a frontage on a min. of 2
streets
Character Formal and/or natural
Paths, lawns, and trees are formally
arranged
Walkways and planting at all edges
Civic element at a prominent location
3. Allowed/Typical Uses Source: timeout.com
Passive/active (unstructured) open space
Civic uses, including outdoor pavilions, open-air
shelters, community gathering, outdoor seating, public
restrooms
Trails for bicycles and pedestrians
Community gardens
Playgrounds
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
Extended detention basins
! 
'
" =
Porous pavers
Landscaping

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1292 of 1332 Page 145
19.09.080.E Greenway (New in its entirety) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.E Greenway (New in its entirety)

Source: e-architect.co.uk

Square
1. Description
A space for unstructured recreation and civic purposes.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.50 - 5 acres
Width 100 ft min.
Depth 100 ft min.
Frontage Must have a frontage on a min. of 2
streets
Character Formal
 $$;

*;*" $ ' 
tree-lined streets
Walkways and planting at all edges
Frequently located at the intersection
of important thoroughfares
Abundant seating opportunities
May be hardscaped or landscaped Source: swagroup.com

3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Passive (unstructured) recreation, no organized sports
Civic uses, including outdoor pavilions, open-air
shelters, community gathering, outdoor seating
Commercial uses, including farmer’s market and
outdoor dining
Paths
Community gardens
Playgrounds
Public art/creative space
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
French drains
Porous pavers
Landscaping

Page 146 Page 1293 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.E Greenway (New in its entirety)

Source: swagroup.com

Plaza
1. Description
A space for civic and commercial activities.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.25 - 2 acres
Width 100 ft min.
Depth 40 ft min.
Frontage Must have building frontages on a
min. of 3 streets
Character Formal
Primarily hardscape
Trees and planting
Frequently located at the intersection
of important streets
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Passive/active (unstructured) open space
Civic uses, including outdoor pavilions, open-air Source: Princeton Public Library
shelters, outdoor assembly, outdoor seating, public
restrooms
Commercial uses, including a farmer’s market and
outdoor dining
Playgrounds
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Dry wells
French drains
Swales
Porous pavers
Landscaping

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1294 of 1332 Page 147
19.09.080.F Urban Park City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.F Urban Park

Source: Halvorson Design Partnership

Pocket Plaza
1. Description
A compact space for civic and commercial activities.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.10 - 1 acres
Width 75 ft min.
Depth 75 ft min.
Frontage Must have building frontages on a
min. of 3 streets
Character Formal
Primarily hardscape
Trees and planting
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Passive/active (unstructured) open space
Civic uses, including outdoor pavilions, open-air
shelters, outdoor assembly, outdoor seating, public
restrooms Source: gehlinstitute.org

Commercial uses, including farmer’s market and


outdoor dining
Playgrounds
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Dry wells
French drains
Area drains
Porous pavers
Landscaping

Page 148 Page 1295 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.G Square

19.09.080.G Square

Source: xconomy.com

Pocket Park
1. Description
A compact space for a wide range of informal activities
in close proximity to neighborhood residences.
2. Size and Location
Area Max. 0.50 acres
Width 40 ft min.
Depth 40 ft min.
Frontage Must have building frontages on a
min. of 2 sides
Character Formal or informal
Trees and planting
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Passive/active (unstructured) open space
Civic uses, including picnic shelters, casual seating
Trails and paths
Source: fairfaxcounty.gov
Community gardens
Public art
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
! 
'
" =
Swales
Porous pavers
Landscaping

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1296 of 1332 Page 149
19.09.080.H Plaza City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.080.H Plaza

Source: brownstoner.com

Community Garden
1. Description
An open space with a collection of garden plots that are
available to nearby residents for small-scale cultivation.
May be provided as a component of other civic space
types, or as freestanding open space, and may be on
a roof. May be fenced to protect edible plants from
wildlife.
2. Size and Location
Area 0.10 - 1 acres
Width No min.
Depth No min.
Frontage Independent of building frontages
Character Formal or informal
Space organized for growing food
Passive open space
Regularly spaced planting beds Source: ourcanadaproject.ca
3. Allowed/Typical Uses
Community gardens
Small accessory structures for storage
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
! 
'
" =
Permeable paving
Rainwater harvesting

Page 150 Page 1297 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.080.I Pocket Plaza

19.09.080.I Pocket Plaza

Source: Halvorson Design Partnership

Playground
1. Description
An open space equipped and designed for children’s
recreation. Playgrounds may be located within other
civic space types, or as freestanding open space, and
may be on a roof.
2. Size and Location
Area No min.
Width No min.
Depth No min.
Frontage Independent of building frontages
Character Formal or informal
Interspersed within residential areas
Fenced with minimal exits
May include open shelter
…

]
3. Allowed/Typical Uses Source: exerplay.com

Playgrounds
Picnic facilities and outdoor seating
Public art/creative space
4. Stormwater Management Techniques
Bioretention BMPs
Porous pavers
Landscaping

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1298 of 1332 Page 151
This page intentionally left blank

Page 1299 of 1332


19.09.090 THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS
Subsections:
19.09.090.A Purpose
19.09.090.B Applicability
19.09.090.C Thoroughfare Standards Overview
19.09.040.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.E Cashman District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.F Civic & Business District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.G Design District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.H Founders District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.I Fremont East District Thoroughfare Plan (New)
19.09.040.J Gateway District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.K Historic Westside District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan
19.09.040.M Market District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.N Resort & Casino District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)
19.09.040.O Symphony Park District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.090.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section is to establish standards for pre-approved thoroughfare components and
assemblies that are appropriate to use within the Transect Zones. These components and assemblies
can be combined to form thoroughfares that can be used in new developments to create walkable urban
environments that reinforce the highly valued walkable character and scale of the City’s Downtown districts
and neighborhoods.

19.09.090.B Applicability
1. This Section describes the standards for development of thoroughfares within the Transect Zones. It
"$


 ;€
'ˆ '

 ' ƒ



'" 
$
 } + 

Engineering Standards, the Engineering Standards must apply.
2. These thoroughfare standards may be applied to transform existing streets or to create new walkable
urban thoroughfares within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District.
3. Additional thoroughfare standards and assemblies can be integrated into this Section as they are
approved by the City.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1300 of 1332 Page 153
19.09.090.C Thoroughfare Standards Overview City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.C Thoroughfare Standards Overview


The Thoroughfare standards are intended to support the character of the neighborhoods and context-based
placemaking, while providing a guideline to establish and reinforce a hierarchy for the mobility infrastructure
that complements the standards applicable to the Transect Zones as described in Section 19.09.050. As
such, all right-of-way within areas regulated by Chapter 19.09 shall be mapped with a Thoroughfare Plan that


… ;/
 ;/ 
 ;"'
/
 *
  
  

In addition to the standards contained in this Section, the provisions established by Chapter 19.04 regarding
Downtown Thoroughfare Types, shall apply.

1. Primary Thoroughfares
Primary Thoroughfares accommodate high levels of pedestrian activity and high levels of vehicular
]‰ … ;

/ %
"
¢
 
 $/
 $/
" ]
¢$ '‚ '""

  
 }*" $ '/ 
 
%
 "$

 



  
^



Primary streets provide the opportunity for more intense, urban development including shallow
setbacks and, in some cases, increased building height. Primary Thoroughfares are the highest order
thoroughfare.
2. Secondary Thoroughfares
Secondary Thoroughfares have moderate levels of pedestrian activity and moderate levels of vehicular
]
 ;

;*
 ^
"


 
 $ 

3. Tertiary Thoroughfares
Tertiary Streets are visually less prominent than Primary and Secondary streets, and usually have
narrower Right-of-Way width. Traditionally, Tertiary Thoroughfares have been City alleys. They may
function as “back of house” for buildings with multiple street frontages. Care should be taken to make
these streets as pedestrian-friendly as possible while accommodating loading and access needs.
Secondary Thoroughfares are the second highest order thoroughfare.
4. Thoroughfares Hierarchy for Frontages, Vehicular Access, and Utility Location
a. Frontages. For the purposes of applying the standards provided in Section 19.09.050 (Transect
Zones) and 19.09.070 (Frontage Type Standards) the side of the lot facing the higher order
thoroughfare shall be considered as the frontage, or front, of the lot. Tertiary Thoroughfares
are the third highest order thoroughfare. Whenever two or more sides of the lot face Primary
Thoroughfares, all such sides shall be considered the frontage, or front.
b. Vehicular Access and Utilities Location. For the purposes of applying the standards provided
in Section 19.09.050 (Transect Zones), including, but not limited to, standards related to driveway
access and parking, whenever possible, vehicular access shall be located along a thoroughfare
of the lower order; and all utilities, whenever possible, shall be located along the perimeter of
thoroughfare of the lower order.

Page 154 Page 1301 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.090.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.090.D 18B Las Vegas Arts District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1302 of 1332 Page 155
19.09.090.E Cashman District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.E Cashman District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

Page 156 Page 1303 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.090.F Civic & Business District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.090.F Civic & Business District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1304 of 1332 Page 157
19.09.090.G Design District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.G Design District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

Page 158 Page 1305 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.090.H Founders District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.090.H Founders District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1306 of 1332 Page 159
19.09.090.I Fremont East District Thoroughfare Plan (New) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.I Fremont East District Thoroughfare Plan (New)

Figure 19.09.090.I-1 Thoroughfare Plan - Hierarchy (new)

KEY
Primary Throughfare
Secondary Throughfare
Tertiary Throughfare
Special Transit Alignment

FREMONT EAST DISTRICT


DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS FORM-BASED CODE
Throughfare Plan (Draft) Miles 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 N
October 2018

Page 160 Page 1307 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.090.I Fremont East District Thoroughfare Plan (New)

Figure 19.09.090.I-2 Thoroughfare Plan - Downtown Thoroughfare Types (new)

KEY
Boulevard
Avenue
Avenue - Bike Emphasis
Commercial Street
Major Neighborhood Street
Minor Neighborhood Street
Special Transit Alignment

FREMONT EAST DISTRICT


DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS FORM-BASED CODE
Throughfare Plan (Draft) Miles 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 N
October 2018

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1308 of 1332 Page 161
19.09.090.J Gateway District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.J Gateway District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

Page 162 Page 1309 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.090.K Historic Westside District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.090.K Historic Westside District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1310 of 1332 Page 163
19.09.090.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan

Figure 19.09.090.L-1 Thoroughfare Plan - Hierarchy

Page 164 Page 1311 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.090.L Las Vegas Medical District Thoroughfare Plan

Figure 19.09.090.L-2 Thoroughfare Plan - Downtown Thoroughfare Types

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1312 of 1332 Page 165
19.09.090.M Market District (Placeholder) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.M Market District (Placeholder)


Placeholder

Page 166 Page 1313 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.090.N Resort & Casino District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)

19.09.090.N Resort & Casino District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1314 of 1332 Page 167
19.09.090.O Symphony Park District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder) City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.090.O Symphony Park District Thoroughfare Plan (Placeholder)


Placeholder

Page 168 Page 1315 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
19.09.100 SUPPLEMENTAL TO TRANSECT ZONES
Subsections:
< …"

19.09.100.B Applicability
19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards
  $ $ !  
19.09.100.E Landscaping Standards
19.09.100.F Outdoor Lighting Standards
Œ …‚ ' 
19.09.100.H Sign Standards
! " ;

…'
19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Developments

19.09.100.A Purpose
The purpose of this Section are:

1. To cross-reference between standards pertaining to LVMC 19.09 Form-Based Code and other applicable
additional standards found in the Title 19; and
2. To provide additional special program provisions, standards, and requirements, such as the provisions,
 / 
`" 

$ *$

" ;

…'

19.09.100.B Applicability
1. This Section applies to all new development within the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District as further

 *
 
  ‡X…"
 ! 
[
2. !

  } *
+

 ; 
*$ 
 
 
_
X
  ‘
X 
_
 [[  ;  $"
 


%
$

/

restrictive standard applies.
3. For the purpose of applying the following sections, the Director shall determine whether the standards
for residential or commercial zones apply, based on the following:
a. 
%   /*|
 %
/ '$
*$ 
 
 + + „
…$ ;
b. The scale of the subject property as well as the block and neighborhood context of the surrounding
area; and
c. The individual land use, or uses, of the subject property.

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1316 of 1332 Page 169
19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards


1. Standards for fencing and screening in all residential zones are established in LVMC Section 19.06.040.H
X

 ƒ$$[!    
 /
$$+ '$$$;~
The maximum height of fences and walls erected between the front property line and the primary
""
$$ 
^

 %
X‘[

/ 
^ "
'$ 

+$$$$ 
^


+X‡[

Ž+   '




 '


/
 
;%


 +$$
serve to satisfy screening requirements set forth in this Title and that exceed the special fences and
walls requirements. For the purposes of satisfying this requirement, a solid fence or wall is any fence or
wall that is opaque for over sixty percent of its surface, as to be viewed perpendicularly from the right-
of-way line.
2. Standards and procedures for fencing and screening in all commercial zones are established in LVMC

  ‹ˆX* 
 ' /

'  ' '[!    


 /
$$+ '
shall apply:
The maximum height of fences and walls erected between the front property line and the primary
""
$$ 
^

 %
X‘[

/ 
^ "
'$ 

+$$$$ 
^


+X‡[

Ž+   '




 '


/
 
;%


 +$$
serve to satisfy screening requirements set forth in this Title and that exceed the special fences and
walls requirements. For the purposes of satisfying this requirement, a solid fence or wall is any fence or
wall that is opaque for over sixty percent of its surface, as to be viewed perpendicularly from the right-
of-way line.

19.09.030.D Flood Control and LID Standards



  
"
} $ 

'"$    '

+



*$ 
 €„ $
‡X$ $[

19.09.100.E Landscaping Standards


1. Standards for landscaping required in all residential zones are established in LVMC Section 19.06
X
 
 $  ¢…"
 
%
$
 
 '  [
 
$$



the amount of landscaping required for a particular building type placed within any of the Transect
_
*
 
*" $ ';
*
 '
>
—"

 '    €„
  ’ 
€„
  ‹X 
"=
 "    [/+
$ *$

2. Standards for landscaping required in all commercial zones are established in LVMC Section 19.08
X
 $ ! " $  ¢…"
 
%
$
 
 '  [
 

shall determine the amount of landscaping required for a particular building type placed within any of

 
_
*
 
*" $ ';
*
 '
>
—"

 '    €„
  
‹ €„
  ‹X 
"=
 "    [

19.09.100.F Outdoor Lighting Standards

Page 170 Page 1317 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.100.G Parking Standards

1. Standards for outdoor lighting in all residential zones are established in LVMC Section 19.06.040
X
%
$
 [
2. Standards and procedures for outdoor lighting in all commercial zones are established in LVMC Section
‹ˆX* 
 ' /

'  ' '[

19.09.100.G Parking Standards


1. Minimum and maximum on-site parking requirements 
$
+  
_
are
*
 *   €„
  ‡’X…‚ '
`" 

[/*$
Œ(Form-


…‚ '
`" 

[*
$+/  '"
ŒX + + …‚ '„[/
which indicate the estimated parking load based on neighborhood context, location, access, and current
and future infrastructure.

Table 19.09.100.G-1 Form-Based Code Parking Requirements


Load (Zone) Required Parking Spaces
Min. 40% and Max. 60% of the parking requirement indicated in LVMC Section
+X_
[
19.12.060 X…‚ '
`" 

[ for the use
„ ‘£ „^’‘£
‚ '
`" 

  
 LVMC Section
„
 "X_
‡[
19.12.060 X…‚ '
`" 

[ for the use
„ ‘£ „^£
‚ '
`" 

  
 LVMC Section
 'X_
[
19.12.060 X…‚ '
`" 

[ for the use
2. +$;


…‚ '
`" 

~
a. Find the parking requirements for the individual use as established in LVMC Section 19.12.060
X…‚ '
`" 

[ $"$

" ‚ '
`" 

 ‡/`"



of Gross Floor Area (GFA[ of Retail Trade and Employment and
% 

;
X


  
‘!*$
[

^
 $"$  
b.  ;"
;$   
 + + …‚ '„  
 ; 
…‚ '
_
  'X
[/„
 "X;
$$+[/+X'

[  
  '"
Œ(Downtown
…‚ '„[.
c.  '

`" 
‚ '" $"$
 2.a, identify the minimum and maximum

`" 
‚ '*;" '


'
*
 
…‚ '_




^$
*
$+~



@Y =#<  Q !"# " (Q…%

LVMC Section 19.12.060 Parking Load Zone is Medium Form-Based Code


Parking Requirement (Zone 2) Parking Requirement

„ ‘£ „^£
 Min. Required =
parking requirement indicated in …‚ '
~
20 spaces
LVMC Section 19.12.060 X…‚ ' Max. Required =

`" 

[ for the use …‚ '
~

d. ! $  with the requirement, the project will need the approval of a Variance as
established in LVMC Section 19.16.140 X€  
[.
3. Required parking calculated in LVMC Section 19.09.100.G.1 above may be further reduced as established
€„
  ‹ X…‚ '<$
  %
[
4. The standards for the design and layout of parking areas for all commercial and multi-family residential
"


*$ 
 €„
  ‹X
 $ ! " $…‚ '
 '  [
‘ Bicycle Parking Standards

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1318 of 1332 Page 171
19.09.100.C Fencing and Screening Standards City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

="

@
%% Q  N

Table 19.09.100.G-3 Bicycle Parking Requirements


Use Required Parking Spaces

 
 $X%
‡"  $;[ 2 min., plus 1 per every 20 units


  /ˆ"  / …"*$ <
*$; 2 min., plus 1 per every 8,000 GFA
Retail Trade 2 min., plus 1 per every 10,000 GFA
Employment and Services 2 min., plus 1 per every 20,000 GFA
Telecommunication Facilities --
Other --
* <' "$"
--

Page 172 Page 1319 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.100.H Sign Standards

a. Bicycle spaces must have racks anchored so that they cannot be easily removed and racks must be
designed so that the wheel and frame of the bicycle can be locked securely to it with a chain, cable,
or padlock.
b. Where required, the bicycle parking spaces must be visible from one of the main entrances of the
principal building, and placed within 40 feet of the entrance.
c. The development, design, and placement of all bicycle parking spaces requires the Director’s
approval.

19.09.100.H Sign Standards


1. Standards and procedures for permanent and temporary signs allowed in all residential zones are

*$ 
 €„
  ’X
 
 $ '  [
2. Standards and procedures for permanent and temporary signs allowed in all commercial zones are

*$ 
 €„
  ‹‡X
 $ ! " $   '  [

19.09.100.I !$  (;


 "*
   $"
 
 

 
 % >

%
$
% 
*


and amenities that are key to the prosperity of the downtown community as a whole.

1. $ΠK" <"


Ž‡‹‡‘ 

 ;€
'


"
 
   

%
$=*$
" ';"
" '$ 
`" 
 
„
…$ †
"
"
 

%   
 ;* "

"'


%
$
=*$
" '

a. …
"

<$  

$
' *$

<=*$
" ' " / 

%
$
…$ 

%
+<$   /  

+ $$ $"

 

'
<=*$
 +  



%
$
 %  '*  ''


*
""$$;‚ +$
'
*;

City and the project applicant, a proposed development project shall be allowed to a height bonus

*$ 
 *$
!X" '<=* $ ; "
'*$
[
b. Requirements
i. As part of the project submittal, the applicant shall submit a binding agreement mutually
‚ +$
'
*;
 ; 
|
$  /% 
*;


…$ '
The agreement must contain information on the project business plan, on the size and layout of

<=*$
 *
  


* 
<=*$
" ' "
ii. 
<=*$
 $$*
% $*$

 $;
$+
 
 „‚

/
% 
*;


…$ ' 

;
$;*
 
   
provided by State and Federal authorities, for a minimum of ten years.
iii. The project applicant and all property owners shall mantain a copy of the binding agreement
" + 
<=*$
" ' "+' 
/ % 
; ;"

the in the case of transfer of the property.
iv. The property owner and managers are equally responsible to keep a record of all current rental
'


/ ‚
"   % $*$
 ;= 
$;

c. € $  /


/…
$


February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1320 of 1332 Page 173
19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Developments City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

i. Any violation of the binding agreement constitutes a violation pertaining to this Section. Such
% $  ; $"
/*"  $  
~ $"
% 

 " <=*$

 † $"
% 
   
' '
=* $ ;


† $"




<=*$
 
;
 " 

`" 


ii.  %
   % $  /
 ;;  ;



 
$



by the binding agreement, which may include, but are not limited to: revocation the property’s

 
" ;†    
†   % $$ * $ 




ƒ
K" $ŒJ <" K4 

Transect Zone !"#  <" K4

Ž
'* Ž—<

Ž
'* ‡£
=*$
" ~;

ࣣ=*$
" ~;
T4 Corridor ‘££=*$
" ~‡

‘£
=*$
" ~

ࣣ=*$
" ~;
T4 Main Street
‘£
=*$
" ~‡

ࣣ=*$
" ~;
‘Ž
'*
‘£
=*$
" ~‡

ࣣ=*$
" ~;
‘„‚

‘£
=*$
" ~‡

ࣣ=*$
" ~;
‘  ‘££=*$
" ~‡

‘£
=*$
" ~

ࣣ=*$
" ~;
‘„ 


‘£
=*$
" ~‡

‘£‡£=*$
" ~;
££=*$
" ~‡

’* Œ

$–’* Œ

$  

£‘£=*$
" ~

‘‘£
=*$
" ~

££=*$
" ~;
‡£‡£=*$
" ~‡

££=*$
" ~

’* 

££=*$
" ~

ԣԣ=*$
" ~‘

’£
=*$
" ~’


19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Developments


The following standards apply to any new development proposed on a large development site.

1. Pedestrian Connectivity

Page 174 Page 1321 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code 19.09.100.J Additional Standards for Large Developments


%
$

  

^

 '‘/`"


/+  


  + + *$‚
size, must be consistent with the following standards, where feasible, to ensure pedestrian connectivity
through a block.
a. A pedestrian passage must be provided to provide convenient and easy walking access through the
*$‚*
+

| '"*$ "'


…

  '


 


  "

and may have limited vehicular access.
b. …

  '
" 
$$;*
$


 $
*$‚/ 
 

% 

connectivity to existing pedestrian networks and connect to other public spaces such as plazas or
courtyards, thoroughfares, alleys, and parking garages.
c. A pedestrian passage provides additional frontage opportunities for the commercial (retail and

" [ —
 

"
$ ' 
'
 "*$ 
;$% 
 
opportunity for informal or formal community gathering.
d. …

  '
"*

 ' 
"*$ 



"*$  '+; 
must be a minimum of 20 feet in width with a paved walkway a minimum of 10 feet wide.
2. Civic Spaces
Development sites 40,000 square feet or more in area, new buildings, or additions to existing buildings


`"$‡



*" $ 'Š'}
/"% 
 " %

percent of the site, or a portion of the site proposed for development in a multi-phased project, as
 % 
X[
 % 
"*
  
+ 
  
  ‹X % 

 [ 
$$+ '~
a. Dedicated rights-of-way, areas used to meet the minimum setbacks required for the zone, and
 " '
 
*$ 
 
  X '
;
 [; 
count toward the required amount of civic space.
b. The minimum required area of civic space may be provided by enlarging any or all allowed usable


X[*
; 
 "
`" 

*;%  '   $

X[+ 
 " 
   


 % 
;

c. <'


"*
 
$;
 *$

|
'" }

February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1322 of 1332 Page 175
$  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

19.09.110 FORM-BASED CODE DEFINITIONS (NEW)


 
  % 

  
/
/ $ "
$    $; 
 


 $
 $ >
/; 
}
 "'
$$

  

€„
  

‹X
   „
"
[

+  
$J % [ &$[+ <"* 
+
$$ '" 
/

+  /


+
$$ '% 
* 
`" 

 


$ % '/$

 '/
 '/‚ '/    



  +  $
 

$ '$
 $;" 
*" $ '
;
$$+
" 

_
_ '  /
 *
 €„/’/ ‹/" $ >


 
 $"


$‰ @" = <

 '
$$+ %
% "$
''

*
+



$
" 

""
 
"
/ % 
/
$
/$
 
""
Š'" }!   %
'" 
}
 §
*" $ ' 
 
 

 
+
 '+;$ '+ 


  
 % 
<$ '
 


 ' 
< %
Œ" $ 

'"$ '$ /

  '
"*

$

/  $;  
}
 %
$
'$  
}
 %
 
'$+ 
%  *$
$ '   
*"’

"*
"


<=*$
  


% $*$

 
*
 
 „‚

%$"
/


 "
 
 
*;


*
 
 

$



" 

$
' *$
 ;

$
' * $ ;
`" 


<=*$
" ' "|

$   

$4" =" <  


"$
$

/+ $

 /
*

;$
/

 ' /'

$ '



^
 *" $ '""
/ $" '*" $  

‚ /
$/ 
^"
*" $ '
 $/ ;$
 ;
+ +//$ '/
/  ' 

$% <%
|

+$$*" $ '%
+ +/ 
 %/
$" "  $
 $/+ ;*
 ^
 $

*$

"

$ '
+;+ +

$



(  
<J <$|

+$$*" $ '  
$
*;
 $ '

<Q = 
''
'
$$
*" $ '
 
 
*$‚
*$‚
% 


 
^
*$  '
 
"$

'

*$‚

<"% " <*" $ ';


  

$$/

""
  '$
$/
%  '"$ $
" 
 '



"

<" > 
$


   '
 
'
*" $ '
`"
$;"
*;

"*$ 

<" =# 
%
$$
  
  *" $ '

<" N <J 


 ; '*" $ '

<" #J 



  " $ '/…  $

Page 176 Page 1323 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code  

<" J ( <*" $ '""


 ; $$;
 ;*" $ '  

 ;   
$
 ;*" $ ' 
  
  $"
‚ '""


<" J <""




*;*     '"  /$

 $/ "   

!  
 K4 @" = 

'
 
}
 

$ ' ;
 
'" }/  $" '
 ;"*/$
/" $ ;/ '




 K4 [ =&+ 



'
 
}
 

$ ' ; 

}X[*%

'" }/  $" '
 ;"*/$
/" $ ;/
 '



4#  < 


^
 $+$$*" $ '
+

 "$
^
 +$$/; $$;
;
 $‘
'

 '$


*
%
$

'

*" $ '
 
'




‰ <

'  ' >  

 
/"$"
/
"  /

  /
'%
 
/  / "*$ ‚ ' $ 


Source: slideshare.net Source: Opticos Design, Inc.


## Ž < '
;
 

+$$*
+

 ;*
+


 ;
 
 
+$‚ % "$$;  """$ $

$%  ' $ 



 >J <



  
 
$
 

*" $ '

"J < " 



 $

$; $$;
$
*;+$$*" $ ' 


*;"$ $

 
 $" 
 $


"J <" <$'


""

"$ $

‚
" 



";/

";/  

‰ Q <  ‚ '


 + 
""
X[%
*

 $$
% 


‚
%
 $


February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1324 of 1332 Page 177
  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

  
4 @" =  
  



 '§


 
 +$$

'" }
% $*$
 $$+
"


 <% > 


 > $  

"
$$
$
§
*
+


 

*" $ '*" $ '

J < '


;
+ $$+
*‚  '
 /""$$;+ $++$$

 '
$
/; $$;"
    + '" }
 
 $"


%% ƒ" 

 " $  "
*"



 *$
+ 
""  '
+ + "
 
$
 
|*" 
 
$ >
$  

"
/+ 

 '$
  % "$"
     
$
*;" $     / $"
/
^$
~<"
 
Œ'
/„|†<"
 Œ'
/„ †" $ '– 
„
 $—"*
;†" $ '„ 
 


% 
 $
†$

/
 $—! " $†$'
…$ † "  „
 $"$;
¨† Š…$ /–'
¨†"–ƒ‚†Œ
"$;—…$  "
;†
%;
„
; ˆ`" 
X
$/$
/ 
% 
[† '<
*$;–*   †„ "" '/ '†
…‰]
/
'  $† $—  ¨†ƒ
"
—  *"  

†ƒ
$ '
 †ƒ$
$

+ $ ;

%%  


 
 $  "
  " %
 %

 ^" '  
"'"
+
$%
 + +   

"
 $"
/
^$
/
$$+ '~ '$
 $;/
<
† '$
 $;/

† '$
 $;/_

†+ "
†+ $; +
$$ '†„"$  $;

 
 $

%%  


 
$$ ' ;$

  

"$ 
 "
 ;
"

 
$
/ $" '/
^$
/
$$+ '
 $

  
~<
'$$

/
 $†<"  "
† `"
 $ ;†;

†
‚…"*$  '†Œ

$
 $
/‰

  
†Œ
"$;—…$ Ž"
;†! 

—$'"
$
‰]
†" ;/
$
% 
†…
†

$
†
  
$
† '

†" '
† 

%% ‰  $ 


  $;
''
 %  '
 $
% 
/
 $
% 
/
  
$$
"
 
% 
 / $" '/
^$
/
$$+ '~< $ $/$ /

$
X+  ‰" 

[†"
$†
 '
% 
†
‚ '
% 
/  
†
ˆ$;
<'
;†   $!  "  XŒ

$[†Œ

$…
 $
% 
†
$$"*†„'

<
;†„ $<" †…‰]
/$
% 
†…  '–…"*$  '†" '

†
$†
ƒ
 '
$

"  =  <Q <


 
 $*" $ '
 '
*
"
*;+ $
$ % ' 


$;


+ +
+
$$ '"  
$+ 
" $
*
 

  '
 +$$

"   J  <


 
 $*" $ '
 '
*
"
*;+ $
$ % ' 


$;


+ +
+
$$ '"  
$+ + 
¢*; 
$ % '"  ' 
+$$

"  Q <


 
 $*" $ '
 '
*
"
*;+ $
$ % ' 


$;


+ +
+
$$ '"  
$+ 
" ‚
 



Page 178 Page 1325 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code > 

=  
>4#  = ‘ < ; 
"$
"
/""
/""$
$

/" 

/'$$
;/

/'
+$$///*$ ;/*;+ +/

/*
‚
$

 > $
'"$;$  
^
 ' 
§
>

*‚/ 
"*$  '+;

>J < 


'/"/'
/'
/$$+
*" $ '

  
= #J 

^
 +$$*" $ ' ' ;



= J 

^
 +$$*" $ ' '
 ;

 




= ‘ 

*
+


 " ^ "
*‚$
$ '
 
$ 
$ '
 




$

=4 ‰ @" = 



' =


*
+


 
} 
'" } 

|
"*$  
+$‚

= % <" <


 "$'
 >
""
 $'
$; 
""

‚ '!  *" $ ';
/
" ;%
 +   % "$
;/" ;
 
;/





";

";! *
"
% 
%
 $ ^"

;*
 '$
"
*" $ '

= N <" <


 "$'
 >
""
*" $ $'
$; $$; 
"$ 
$
%
$""
‚ ' "
% 
%
 $ ^"
;*
 '$
"
*" $ '

= K4 <" <$'


 $$""
*" $ $'
$; $$; 
"$ $
%
$
""
‚ '"
% 
%
 $ ^"
+ '" }
 $
% 
"
/ 
% 


 
 $"
 "
} *" $ ';
  ;
 "* + + 

= 
"$


'" %

*;
"   *" $ '""


=" 

" '
  
§
$

 '
$
+ $


$
   
*‚
 '$$";

";;*
"
 
;"

'


*" $ '/    $ '
" 
 '
+  

 $ 
% 



=" " +



""
/
+ "" /$
  '$
$+ 
*" $ '
 '



" ; $$;

 "$




"
%

 

‚ '
$
 %
;
 

  

 $
$


 *" $ ';


= < $ *" '"'


/ % 
/
"*$  '+;

= ‰ 

*
+


*" $ '§
 

$$
*
+


"*$ 
 '+; 
$
= " 

*
+


"*
%
 "$$
 

'

 '+;

=  
$$
X[$  '"'

"*$ +;/ % 


February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1326 of 1332 Page 179
@  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

="" $ 
  
 
+$‚$$+
$





/  /


$ '/*

/ 
/* ‚
‚/


"  '
`" 
+ "
  '

%



  

X  
@J < '
;
; $$;"
 
 $$   +


§
 $ '
$

 '

$
+  
  $
%


$ '+
'$ 
%
$ '
 
+$‚

@] 
+ + 

' *" $ ' + '$  $$


@%J <$

;*


*;

$


/+ 
%
 + 
  
" %
"
  
%
'


*
+


   

@" = 
}*" $ '$



$
%
$
'" " 
*" $ '

[  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#@
"
$;



\  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#!@
"
$;



]  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#“@
"
$;



^  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#”@
"
$;



)  
 K" <$'


""
   '
" ""$$; 
 $'
$

 <" <+*" $ '   ' 


^
 " *$
*" $ '
 $$;
 '

‚
 
 *" $ '   '‚ '""
/*" $ '+ 
++ +/‚ '$/
 '


‰’(Q <  
'
" '"  +‚ '
/"
 " $ >
*; '$
"
$ 
*" $ '/

 '$
 $;+
$$ '"$ $
 $;+
$$ '/*


 '
""$$;


| 
 
 $" ; +‚ % ;/ +  $"
$


‚ 

  ; $ 
 +‚ '


%
/ 
'"$$;"
*;/


" 
" 

 Q <$+



'%
 $
  *
$
" $


 <*" $ ';


*" $*

*$
%
;"
 ‚}$ /
 $/ 
 
$;"  
  
$ $ 


^ 

*
+

   $"


`  
N"# K" <
 " >


""
/   '
" /""$$; 
 
 " >
$

N#"# J  „


"


'" 
*

Page 180 Page 1327 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code † 

N[ < '$


*" $ '  '
 
;
$ "
 '$

%
$

 

*" $ ' "
 $" '/*" $  
/
 
 $/]
/
 $/

  /"*$ /

 

"
/+


 =

$ "
;

 $
^  ;/$
"
$

;+$
/
 


   %
 "$
 ‚ '

"   $$; 
'
„ ^
"
;
*
 
'
%
 $$;X 
+
 =

"
";

*" $ '""$$;  =

}[
 > $$;X 
+
 =

;
"

$

^

 


$/
$
" / 

'

+ 

   %
 "$
[

N"  <$'


 >
""
   ' 
*; 
 —‚
+
$$ '" /
; $$;+ 


;  
$;$
  +  
 "
 ;
"* 

'*

N" # <


 " >
""
   ' 
*; 
 —‚
+
$$ '" /
; $$;+ 


;  % "$

$ '
 
*" $ ' *" $ ';



 

 "$'
 >
 $;
   
$;$
  '$;+    $;
 '$
 $;
'* 
 "
 ;
'*

{  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#Ž@
"
$;



|  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#‰@
"
$;



;  
 <$++$$$ '

'

  +$$
^
*%

$


Q ‰%J (4 


 > $
"

 
 %
+;‚ '
/
"



 "$
 
  %
$

J" <;
 % 

 '
 
`" 
 $
Š

  

] <;
$ % 
"
  "* 
 ' % / %


  /
$^  /
 
 $ % 
/ ; $$;% 
+ 
 '/ 
$"  / "*$  
%
/$ 
/ %
/  $$;

*;*" $ ' '


Q ] <$$


;
$"*  % 
 $>/"      $
 
$$+

"$
$'
$>

Q Q <;


 % 
% 
$$$
"*$ "* 

 

% 



  $" 
+


 $  
 $
^  ;
'*
 



4 > < 


''
+ 





*" $ '+ $



+ 




4 “ <|


 ' 
 

 
 

" ‰ N  $ ;


% 

"

"*$  $"
" $ ;"*  /" '
  / 
       *"   $ 


February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1328 of 1332 Page 181
‡  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

‚  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#•@
"
$;



  
 >J < 
 
*" $ ' 
*‚
§

*" $ '

 $‰ 

  $"" ""$$;

+ 
 

`"  '
`" 

+ 
`" 
; $$
  

 + 
;


"

 
 %
$;"
/
  $"
*"
 $  
$;'" /"/*
*$$—*$$ 

$/ 
+  '$

 ‰ 

  $""  %$% '
^  ' "$
"
+  *

"+ 
$ $
$
   "  

 + 
;


  $"
/*"  $  
/"
 % 
+$‚ '/ ‚ '/* ;$ '/*   $+ '/   ‚ '

"  
 

 '  '
$   
_
  
 ; '‚
;

$

"
`" 

 $ '
  % 
<
'"$ '$  ; $$; 
 

 ;Š] $_ '„

4(J < $ `" 


*;

%  /
   /

   /
   /
 
   "*$ "


   %
 "$%

"
*;/+$‚/ $/

$
     $
/ $' 
$
/+
$
/ ;
+

"*$ " $ ; $ ;

%4" < '$


 $;+
$$ '
;+$$+  


;
$
 
*; 

+   % "$

$ '
  
 
 %



" ; $$;$
 




  
‰ >J < 
 
*" $ '%  '


$ %
;' 

%$
"
/
+
$$

" —
$;


*" $ '

4 <;
 '
/; $$;
 $ 
 $"
/+


§
 $ '
$


 '
$
+ 
*" $ '
 

$
%
$
 
+$‚

%Q 
   '+; %
  


^$" %
$;

  "
/ 

$$
*
+


"* |

;$


# (  <+$$*" $ '*" $ '""$$;$


$$
$

 '+; 

 '
 " 
+  $ > $ "$  $$
*" $ '
/;
;%

 
"$
 $ 
"
"/*;+ +/%
 '/ 
/% 
 



# K" <$$



""
/   '
" /""$$; 
 $$$+  %





 = 



  # '

@

 < '


;
+


§
 $ '
$

 '
$
+ 
 ;
$
%


 
+$‚"]
$;
"
 %; ;+ + 

 
""$$; 
^
  
 $  '

Page 182 Page 1329 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code  

4 "" <""





% 

%

" /‚ '
/ 
+$‚+;

4 "" “ <""



 > $$;
 
*" $ '% 


 
+$‚/+$‚+;/

 

!" <;
 % 
%  '"*$ "* 

 % "
/
 $ % ;/
" ""


  / 
 %
"
`"



*;*" $ ' 

$


+ 


$
//$+ / 

$$; '


" ƒ"" $


$/ 
  $
% 
"
'




+*$


';



 
*;
 


#  
# Q <‚ '



"'$$++‚
*
 



#J [ <


 

 % ; $" '…‚ '— 
+$‚$
/
 $‰"
$
/
; Š "  ¨/
;‰"
 $ˆ%
/
;
$
ˆ
$
‰]
/   $  

"


 < '


;
+


 

*" $ ' 

 '
$
+  
$
%



%  '"*$  "$  $ '
§


4"4 < '+;"


*;%
 "$/

  / * ;$
]% 

$
 

/  
%
 "$$
 "*$  '


4"4 #J 


+ 
 '
*" $ '
    ;/  
 

"'
…$ 
 + +   

4"4 J 


+ 

  '
*" $ '
    ;/  
 

"'
…$ 
 + +   

4"4 J <

+  $* $ ;"    


% ' $;‚ ' 
$ %
;

/  
 
"'
…$ 
 + +   

 <
  

%  
+ ' '
 =

* 
%  


"$"*  
"
 €„
X

[  % 
  ^ 
_

 '

 "$
"* 

>

 *

; $ 

$
 '

 ;  
 ; $ "
 "* 

 ‘ ‰

%
$
%  
 
_ '„
'"$
*;
 " +  
€„
X

[ 
_




 "$

"*  
_

  %
$;  $
$ "
>
 


%
$

/

^
    
""$*" $ '"
/
 ;/
' 
*‚
`" 

/

$



 


%  

 
'
/ $" '*" $ ';
 
"*$  '


J 

 '
/""$$;$

'" }*" $ '/"  
 ""  
'$

%=#J % <



+
$$ '
 '
 "

^$" %
$;*;+ $
$ % '



$;

 

+
$$ '"   '$
$

$/ "$
^/  ‚†
"$
^/ 
*; 
†  "$
^/‚


February 2019 | Public Review Draft Page 1330 of 1332 Page 183
[  City of Las Vegas Form-Based Code

ƒ  
[ < 

  *" $ '

[ = <} *" $ '  '* *$



 $
*%

'" }

[ Q < % 


;
%  '
$



'*'"

'*"
"$" ""


   $$
""


  $ $ 


[J >!"# ˆ$
  
/+ *
/] ' $*
/
$


$
%   —
*$
*
/
 ' $ '
`" 
/   $
% 


*  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#€@
"
$;



_  
(Q%J <%
+;$
 

$"


   

^$" %
"

$
+
X[/
'"
/  % 



(  <%


 $"


*;
§
*" $ '

„  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#©@
"
$;



…  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#¨@
"
$;



†  
Ž
 $ >

*
' '+ 
$

#_@
"
$;



Page 184 Page 1331 of 1332 Public Review Draft | February 2019
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 9, 2019 57

DEPARTMENT: Planning
DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield

SUBJECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA
MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU
WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

Page 1332 of 1332

You might also like