TTISI Team Behav PDF

Behavioral Team Report
TTISI Team
TTI Success Insights
3-3-2017
Copyright © 2006-2016. Target Training International, Ltd.

Introduction
Predictable patterns of human nature can be accurately measured through behavioral assessments. A clear understanding of these predictable
behaviors can enable productive outcomes. When individual behavioral scores are compiled to examine members of a team, managers are able to see
areas of strength, pursue improvement opportunities, and secure the resources needed to deliver on organizational goals.
CONTENTS OF THE REPORT TEAM MEMBER LIST
Overview - A summary examining the composition of your James Alire Cassandra Nelson
team for both DISC and behavioral segmentation Kate Biben Cindy Rosser
expressed as a percentage. Vanessa Boettcher Brent Rowland
Tom Bogart Sandra Stoner
Team composition - Defines the makeup of your Ron Bonnstetter Teresa Taylor
organization by behavioral segment and shares the DISC Alec Bonnstetter Bobby Tyning
graphs of individuals on your team. Rick Bowers Kefei Wang
John Carli Adam Wong
Behavioral segment analysis - Examines the individuals Craig Casimir
within each segment, segment characteristics, ways to Nick Chris
communicate, and ideal environment. Rodney Cox
Philip Daugs
Group wheel plots - Identifies the natural, adapted, and Kayla DeVault
migrated styles of each team member. Todd Fox
Candice Frazer
Behavioral characteristics hierarchy - Compares individual Eric Gehrig
scores to others on the team, team averages, and Susan Ginn
population means. Erin Healy
Jill Heberling
Dustin Hebets
Richard Hunt
Anne Klink
Amy Lane
Favor Larson
Ann Leitensdorfer
Carol Mettenbrink
Ryan Miller
Cherisse Mowry
TTISI Team
Copyright © 2006-2016. Target Training International, Ltd. 1
Team DISC Overview
The TTI Success Insights® wheel is a graphic representation of a team's behavioral make-up among the four quadrants of the DISC wheel.
OBSERVING DISC
Have you ever noticed:

TASK ORIENTED
Some people are forceful, direct, and results-oriented
Some are optimistic, fun, and talkative
Some are steady, patient, and relaxed
Some are precise, accurate, and detail-oriented

C
28% (10)
D
19% (7)
ER PACED
FASTER PACED
DEFINING DISC
SLOW
Dominance
How you respond to problems and challenges
S
22% (8) 31% (11)
I
Influence
How you influence others to your point of view
Steadiness
How you respond to the pace of the environment
PE OP
L E O R IE N T E D
Compliance
How you respond to rules and procedures
TTISI Team
®
The TTI Success Insights Wheel
The wheel illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles, while demonstrating the similarities and differences in behavioral styles among the team
members. This wheel shows the behavioral composition of a team, represented as percentages in each of the eight segments.
BEHAVIORAL SEGMENT DEFINITIONS
CONDUCTOR - D - People who tend to be direct, decisive, and seek

results. EMENTOR
IMPL
CO
PERSUADER - D/I - People who tend to convince others by appealing to ER C/D ND
Y Z
reason, understanding, or emotion.
U
AL
CT
C D
AN
OR
11%
PROMOTER - I - People who tend to verbalize many thoughts to
influence outcomes. 3% 8%
RDINATOR
PERSUADER
RELATER - I/S - People who tend to take time, think positively, and are
S/C
D/I
focused on interpersonal relationships. 33% 8%
COO
SUPPORTER - S - People who tend to be champions of sound ideas,
working steadily and diligently to ensure a project is fully realized. 6% 19%
11%
SU
S I
R
COORDINATOR - S/C - People who tend to be fact-oriented and adhere
TE
PP
to proven methods to complete projects and tasks.
O
R
O
TE M
I/S O
ANALYZER - C - People who tend to seek out accuracy in all activities
R PR
and ensure the highest quality possible by gathering precise data. RELATER
IMPLEMENTOR - C/D - People who tend to assess, leverage facts and

figures, and advance toward a solution.
TTISI Team
3
Coordinator Team Characteristics - (S/C)
Coordinators tend to be fact-oriented and adhere to proven methods to complete projects and tasks. The following information will give the team
members a clear understanding and appreciation of Coordinators.
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
Task Oriented People Oriented
Work for a leader and a cause
Make tough decisions without letting emotions interfere
Follow projects through to completion
Identify problems, rules, errors, and procedures Slower Paced Faster Paced
Implement and fine-tune the plan
POTENTIAL WEAKNESSES
Become stubborn under stress VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Downplay accomplishments
Suppress feelings
Communicate indirectly
Objective outlook
Resist change without reasoning Looks for logical solutions
Conscientious and steady
WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK
Proven Unfamiliar
Standard Hectic
Organized Incomplete
21.28% 12/36
of the Population 33% of the Team
TTISI Team
Coordinator Team DISC Graphs - (S/C)
COORDINATOR TEAM D I S C D I S C D I S C D I S C
100 100 100 100
Kate Biben 90 90 90 90
80 80 80 80
Alec Bonnstetter
C. Mowry
70 70 70 70
P. Daugs
K. Biben
Nick Chris
A. Lane
60 60 60 60
Philip Daugs 50 50 50 50
Erin Healy 40 40 40 40
Anne Klink 30 30 30 30
Amy Lane 20 20 20 20
Carol Mettenbrink 10 10 10 10
Ryan Miller 0 0 0 0
% 7 38 83 91 % 13 12 92 93 % 12 36 84 91 % 8 58 85 81
Cherisse Mowry
Brent Rowland
Kefei Wang D I S C D I S C D I S C D I S C
100 100 100 100
90 90 90 90
C. Mettenbrink
A. Bonnstetter
80 80 80 80
B. Rowland
70 70 70 70
E. Healy
60 60 60 60
50 50 50 50
40 40 40 40
30 30 30 30
20 20 20 20
10 10 10 10
0 0 0 0
% 43 36 66 61 % 17 6 94 100 % 28 8 92 82 % 43 12 74 81
D I S C D I S C D I S C D I S C
100 100 100 100
90 90 90 90
80 80 80 80
70 70 70 70
K. Wang
R. Miller
N. Chris
A. Klink
60 60 60 60
50 50 50 50
40 40 40 40
30 30 30 30
20 20 20 20
10 10 10 10
0 0 0 0
% 22 8 84 93 % 15 62 76 81 % 13 12 95 91 % 41 32 68 62
TTISI Team
Promoter Team Characteristics - (I)
Promoters tend to verbalize many thoughts to influence outcomes. The following information will give the team members a clear understanding and
appreciation of Promoters.
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
See the "big picture" and communicate it
People-oriented
Promote the team throughout the organization
Bring the team together Slower Paced Faster Paced
Advocate for new ideas and products
Emphasize fun over efficiency VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Overvalue the skills of others
Overly optimistic about team abilities
Inattentive to detail
Verbalize feelings
React based on emotions Spontaneity
Good mixer
Flexible Ordinary
Exciting Quiet
Inspiring Strict
17.46% 7/36
TTISI Team
Promoter Team DISC Graphs - (I)
PROMOTER TEAM
D I S C D I S C D I S C D I S C
James Alire 100 100 100 100
Tom Bogart
Rodney Cox 90 90 90 90
Jill Heberling 80 80 80 80
A. Leitensdorfer
Ann Leitensdorfer
70 70 70 70
Cassandra Nelson
S. Stoner
Sandra Stoner
J. Alire
R. Cox
60 60 60 60
50 50 50 50
40 40 40 40
30 30 30 30
20 20 20 20
10 10 10 10
0 0 0 0
% 64 84 24 32 % 37 84 63 28 % 37 88 65 16 % 22 92 68 32
D I S C D I S C D I S C
100 100 100
90 90 90
80 80 80
J. Heberling
70 70 70
C. Nelson
T. Bogart
60 60 60
50 50 50
40 40 40
30 30 30
20 20 20
10 10 10
0 0 0
% 32 96 65 16 % 35 93 62 26 % 35 92 68 14
TTISI Team
Relater Team Characteristics - (I/S)
Relaters tend to take time, think positively, and are focused on interpersonal relationships. The following information will give the team members a clear
understanding and appreciation of Relaters.
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
Possess strong commitment to team
Listen actively
Offer understanding and friendship
Create an environment where people feel significant Slower Paced Faster Paced
Protect and value people and things
Freeze under stress VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Avoid confrontation
Accept the current situation
Agree with the opinions of others
Cooperative member of the team
Hold grudges Positive sense of humor
Tenacious
Easygoing Complex
Simple Abstract
Responsive Analytical
20.08% 4/36
TTISI Team
Relater Team DISC Graphs - (I/S)
RELATER TEAM
D I S C D I S C
Kayla DeVault 100 100
Todd Fox
Susan Ginn 90 90
Bobby Tyning 80 80
K. DeVault 70 70
S. Ginn
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
% 15 88 92 22 % 26 93 84 8
D I S C D I S C
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
B. Tyning
T. Fox
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
% 8 93 89 28 % 34 65 62 61
TTISI Team
Implementor Team Characteristics - (C/D)
Implementors tend to assess, leverage facts and figures and advance toward a solution. The following information will give the team members a clear
understanding and appreciation of Implementors.
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
Aware and sensitive to the cost of errors and mistakes
Share creative ideas
Finish tasks quickly
Expect high performance standards Slower Paced Faster Paced
Use time well
Under-appreciate other team members VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Make decisions inconsistently
Disregard the feelings of team members
Overuse facts and figures
Looks for logical solutions
Take on too much within the team Requires fact-based ideas
Excellent troubleshooter
Function Relax
Action Perception
Data Assume
4.22% 4/36
TTISI Team
Implementor Team DISC Graphs - (C/D)
IMPLEMENTOR TEAM
D I S C D I S C
Candice Frazer 100 100
Eric Gehrig
Richard Hunt 90 90
Adam Wong 80 80
C. Frazer 70 70
R. Hunt
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
% 74 45 12 72 % 88 5 45 91
D I S C D I S C
100 100
90 90
80 80
70 70
E. Gehrig
A. Wong
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
% 62 37 45 62 % 66 32 36 72
TTISI Team
Conductor Team Characteristics - (D)
Conductors tend to be direct, decisive and seek results. The following information will give the team members a clear understanding and appreciation of
Conductors.
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
Forward-looking and competitive
Energized by direct answers
Comfortable with power and authority
Seeking problems to solve Slower Paced Faster Paced
Driven toward results
Poor or selective listening VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Make decisions without all of the facts
Lack tact and diplomacy
Use fear as a motivator
Results driven
Over delegate and under instruct Challenges the status quo
Venturesome, ambitious
Quick Inconsistent
Advantage Follow Directions
Decisive Patient
7.12% 3/36
TTISI Team
Conductor Team DISC Graphs - (D)
CONDUCTOR TEAM
D I S C D I S C
Vanessa Boettcher 100 100
Ron Bonnstetter
Dustin Hebets 90 90
80 80
V. Boettcher 70 70
D. Hebets
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
% 100 34 24 46 % 92 56 32 35
D I S C
100
90
80
R. Bonnstetter
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 100 68 8 26
TTISI Team
Persuader Team Characteristics - (D/I)
Persuaders tend to convince others by appealing to reason, understanding, or emotion. The following information will give the team members a clear
understanding and appreciation of Persuaders.
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
Optimistic about team goals
Independent and autonomous
Engage others in projects and tasks
Get results through team members Slower Paced Faster Paced
Promote and accept changes
Do not manage time or deadlines well VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Do not follow up and follow through as needed
Take on too many responsibilities at once
Push their agenda
Represents company in organizations
Be overly enthusiastic Ability to handle many activities
Innovative
Amazing Standardized
Unprecedented Structured
Extraordinary Uniform
12.68% 3/36
TTISI Team
Persuader Team DISC Graphs - (D/I)
PERSUADER TEAM
D I S C D I S C
Rick Bowers 100 100
Favor Larson
Cindy Rosser 90 90
80 80
R. Bowers 70 70
C. Rosser
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
0 0
% 86 88 7 28 % 100 94 24 5
D I S C
100
90
80
70
F. Larson
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 100 96 7 8
TTISI Team
Supporter Team Characteristics - (S)
Supporters tend to be champions of sound ideas, working steadily and diligently to ensure a project is fully realized. The following information will give
the team members a clear understanding and appreciation of Supporters.
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
Focus on team activities
Comfort others and show patience
Perform well in team environments
Conform to established procedures Slower Paced Faster Paced
Add stability to the team
Lack a sense of urgency VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Do the work themselves, rather than delegate
Resist team-initiated changes
Hesitate to move forward
Negotiates conflicts
Do not forgive faults or mistakes Dependable team player
Consistent and steady
Consistent Unexpected
Usual Urgent
Secure Confrontation
11.90% 2/36
TTISI Team
Supporter Team DISC Graphs - (S)
SUPPORTER TEAM
D I S C
Craig Casimir 100
Teresa Taylor
90
80
C. Casimir 70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 14 63 87 61
D I S C
100
90
80
70
T. Taylor
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 8 64 87 64
TTISI Team
Analyzer Team Characteristics - (C)
Analyzers tend to seek out accuracy in all activity and are careful to gather precise data to ensure the highest quality possible. The following information
will give the team members a clear understanding and appreciation of Analyzers.
POTENTIAL STRENGTHS
Operate in a self-disciplined manner
Accurate and precise
Use facts to support their opinion and cause
Maintain high standards for self and subordinates Slower Paced Faster Paced
Think critically
Do the work themselves and do not delegate VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

Lean on team leader or supervisor
Hesitate to act without sufficient facts
Keep their feelings to themselves
Will gather data for decision making
Conceal new ideas Comprehensive problem solving
Accurate and intuitive
Factual Imagine
Precise Educated guess
Verified Experimental
5.12% 1/36
TTISI Team
Analyzer Team DISC Graphs - (C)
D I S C
100
90
80
J. Carli 70
60
50
40
30
20
10
% 58 7 65 91
TTISI Team
Wheel Segment Definitions
The following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains a definition and the percentage of team
members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.
CONDUCTOR - D (8%) SUPPORTER - S (6%)

People who tend to be direct, decisive, and seek results. People who tend to be champions of sound ideas, working steadily
and diligently to ensure a project is fully realized.
PERSUADER - D/I (8%) COORDINATOR - S/C (33%)

People who tend to convince others by appealing to reason, People who tend to be fact-oriented and adhere to proven methods
understanding, or emotion. to complete projects and tasks.
PROMOTER - I (19%) ANALYZER - C (3%)

People who tend to verbalize many thoughts to influence outcomes. People who tend to seek out accuracy in all activities and ensure the
highest quality possible by gathering precise data.
RELATER - I/S (11%) IMPLEMENTOR - C/D (11%)

People who tend to take time, think positively, and are focused on People who tend to assess, leverage facts and figures, and advance
interpersonal relationships. toward a solution.
TTISI Team
Team Member Overview
The following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains team members and the percentage of
team members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.
CONDUCTOR (8%) SUPPORTER (6%)

Vanessa Boettcher Craig Casimir
Ron Bonnstetter Teresa Taylor
Dustin Hebets
PERSUADER (8%) COORDINATOR (33%)

Rick Bowers Kate Biben Carol Mettenbrink
Favor Larson Alec Bonnstetter Ryan Miller
Cindy Rosser Nick Chris Cherisse Mowry
Philip Daugs Brent Rowland
Erin Healy Kefei Wang
Anne Klink
Amy Lane
PROMOTER (19%) ANALYZER (3%)
James Alire John Carli
Tom Bogart
Rodney Cox
Jill Heberling
Ann Leitensdorfer
Cassandra Nelson
Sandra Stoner
RELATER (11%) IMPLEMENTOR (11%)
Kayla DeVault Candice Frazer
Todd Fox Eric Gehrig
Susan Ginn Richard Hunt
Bobby Tyning Adam Wong
TTISI Team
Team Member Characteristics
The following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains team member characteristics and the
percentage of team members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

Competitive Accommodating
Direct Reflective
Results-Oriented Persistent
Acts with Urgency Composed
Change Agent Dependable
Strong Willed Good Listener

Quick to Change Slow to Change
Independent Self-Disciplined
Optimistic Executor
Confident Logical
Charismatic Realistic
Influential Process-Oriented

Trusting Precise
Convincing Accurate
Inspiring Focus on Quality
Outgoing Critical Listener
Cordial Non-Verbal Communicator
Cheerful Detail oriented

Good Supporter Creative
Team Player Thorough thinker
Persistent Task-Oriented
Cooperative Fact-Based
Empathetic Selective
Compassionate Inventive
TTISI Team
Ideal Environment for Team Members
The following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains the ideal environment for the team and
the percentage of team members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

Bold and Aggressive Actions Logical Thinking
Challenging Assignments Systematic Routine
Expedites Action Relaxed Pace
Firm and Quick Decision Making Team Participation
Results-Oriented Security

Enthusiasm Adherence to Standards
Persuasive Communications Routine Work
Results Through People Guidelines to Follow
Testing of New Ideas Facts and Data to Analyze
Competition with Others Diplomacy and Cooperation

People Contact High Quality Standards
Solutions to "People Problems" Procedures to Follow
Optimistic Outlook Clean and Tidy Workstation
Verbalizes Thoughts and Ideas Accuracy
Varied Activities Analysis of Facts and Data

Teamwork Logical Decisions
Coaching and Counseling Studying and Solving Problems
Service to Others Efficient Methodology
Harmonious Work Environment Effective Time-Management
Assistance to Customers Fact-based Solutions
TTISI Team
Words That Don't Work with Team Members
The following matrix illustrates the blending of the four DISC styles into eight segments. Each segment contains the words that don't work with the team
and the percentage of team members in the respective segment. Segments are deliberately located beside the segment that has the opposing style.

Inconsistent Unexpected
Follow Directions Urgent
Patient Confrontation

Standardized Unfamiliar
Structured Hectic
Uniform Incomplete

Ordinary Imagine
Quiet Educated guess
Strict Experimental

Complex Relax
Abstract Perception
Analytical Assume
TTISI Team
Team Member Characteristics
Inventive
Selective
Fact-Based
Task-Oriented
tor Thorough thinker St
ted nica Creative Ac Cha ron
n u
rie mm ner y Re s w ng g
t
o ste alit
Fo ritic al C o
su ith
W ge ncy d
C rb ail
e Urg nte
i u lt s
ille nt
A e
e et
Q te
Ac on L
Co D -
d
n-V D
cu al
ra e m r i
O ct ve
MENTOR
is IMPLE
rie
p
Pr u
e titi
s
c
ec
e
CO
No
ER ND
YZ
U
AL
CT
AN
OR
11.1%
2.8% 8.3%
DINATOR
Process-Oriented
Quick to Change
PERSUADER
Slow to Change
Self-Disciplined
Independent
Charismatic
Optimistic
Confident
Influential
Executor
Realistic
Logical
33.3% 8.3%
COOR
5.6% 19.4%
11.1%
SU
R
TE
PP
O
R
O
TE M
O
Ac R r s p
R PR
c o e fl i
i n ing
g i ri n i n g
m e
o
m
st
RELATE R
Pe o m n
c t d at u
c
Tr nv
r d oi n g g
C pe Li
i
s t v e i ng
D e od
p
os e n t C o In s t
Go
er ial
u
l
d ed
fu
st able O Co
e
en
er Good Supporter Ch
T ea m Pl ayer
P er s i s t e nt
C o o p e r a ti v e
Empathetic
Compassionate
TTISI Team
Ideal Environment for Team Members
Fact-based Solutions
tive Time-Managem
Effec cient Methodolo ent
Effi gy
ta g and Solving Problem Fir
i n m
Da Study s an Re
d Logical Decisions d Q su
an ion
ts y stat Bo Chal Exp uic lts-
c c rk ow ld len e k
ra Wo oll rds an g di
Hig roc nd ccu a
O cis tio en ions

P a A fF
d A in te
rie io n
F a
D s Ac ignm Act
to tand gg g
e
o
nt n M
ua res y
h Q edu Tid
si s
ed
MENTOR
IMPLE
S r
As ssiv
aly
e
s e
lity
CO
An
ak
an ER ND
ing
Cle
YZ
ts
U
AL
CT
AN
OR
11.1%
Pers
Diplo nd Data to An tion
alyze
Result
Compe
ence to Standards
2.8% 8.3%
Testing o
uasive Communications
macy and Coopera
Guidelines to Follow
DINATOR
PERSUADER
Routine Work
s Through People
Enthusiasm
tition with Others

f New Ideas
33.3% 8.3%
COOR
a
5.6% 19.4%
e
s
h
Fact
Ad
11.1%
SU
R
TE
PP
s"
O
tiv s a ok lem
R
O
TE M
as
O
Lo m x e
Sy R e m P ecu
u O P t
Ac ght utlo rob
R PR
c ple tac
s Id e
gi a
s t e l a ar
c a ti
o on
Te
i ti e n d
lT
C
h RELATE R
c in le
a S
d R o ki ng e op "Pe i
ti c P a c u t i n P t o i st
r it i p a e e s im o
i n pt T h
o
y ti o
n o l u t O e s rie d
S l i z Va
T ea m w or k
C o ac
h i n g a n d C o un s eli n g e r ba
V
Harm Service to Others
onious W en t
A ss i s t ork Environm
ance to Customers
TTISI Team
Words That Don't Work with Team Members
Assume
Perception
Relax
l Fo
ta s llo P
en ues Inc w D at
m g
on
ie ct t
d ine
a i
uc er
MENTOR
IMPLE
nt ion
Im te
ire sten
Ed Exp
ag
si
CO
ER ND
s
YZ
U
AL
CT
AN
OR
11.1%
2.8% 8.3%
DINATOR
PERSUADER
Standardized
Incomplete
Structured
Unfamiliar
Uniform
Hectic
33.3% 8.3%
COOR
5.6% 19.4%
11.1%
SU
R
TE
PP
O
R
O
TE M
O
R PR
Un Ur ro
r i c et y
ex g
ui ar
Co
in
p
e ct RELATE R rd
nf
n t nt e d O Q
t
at
io St
n
C omplex
A b s tr a c t
A n a l y ti c a l
TTISI Team
Group Wheel Natural
TASK ORIENTED
TEAM MEMBERS
IMPLEMENTOR 1: James Alire
2: Kate Biben
8 16 CO 3: Vanessa Boettcher
ER ND
1
4: Tom Bogart
YZ 9 5: Alec Bonnstetter
U
AL
24 21 36 15
CT
10 6: Ron Bonnstetter
AN
3
7: Rick Bowers *
OR
23 25
40 8: John Carli
26 11 9: Craig Casimir
39 10: Nick Chris
7 41 6 20
56 27
22 42 11: Rodney Cox
55 2
8 12: Philip Daugs
38
COORDI ATOR
43 12 13: Kayla DeVault

12
PERSUADER
SLOWER PACED
18 10 30
FASTER PACED
54
2 60 57
28
24
14: Todd Fox
31 22
44 15: Candice Frazer
21 23
N
37 53 16: Eric Gehrig

27 45 29 13 17: Susan Ginn
35 26
28 52 18: Erin Healy
5 7
36
59 58 19: Jill Heberling
46
20 51
20: Dustin Hebets
30
6 47
21: Richard Hunt
14
35
50 34
48
22: Anne Klink
49 1 3
9 33 31 23: Amy Lane
19 34 19
24: Favor Larson
11
33
32 15 25: Ann Leitensdorfer
25 4
SU
26: Carol Mettenbrink
R
29
TE 27: Ryan Miller

32
PP
18 13 14 17
16
28: Cherisse Mowry
O
R 17
O
TE M 29: Cassandra Nelson

O
R PR
5
4 30: Cindy Rosser
31: Brent Rowland
32: Sandra Stoner
RE LATE R 33: Teresa Taylor
34: Bobby Tyning
35: Kefei Wang
P E O P L E O R IE N T E D 36: Adam Wong
Natural
Leader
TTISI Team
Group Wheel Adapted
TASK ORIENTED
TEAM MEMBERS
2: Kate Biben
8 CO 3: Vanessa Boettcher
ER ND
1
4: Tom Bogart
YZ 9 5: Alec Bonnstetter
U
AL
24 15
CT
36
AN
3
7: Rick Bowers *
OR
16 21 20
23 25
40 8: John Carli
26
23
11 9: Craig Casimir
12
39 10: Nick Chris
7 26 2 8 41 6 7
56 27
22 42 11: Rodney Cox
31 55 2
12: Philip Daugs
38
COORDI ATOR

18
PERSUADER
SLOWER PACED
27 10
FASTER PACED
54
5 60 57
28
30
14: Todd Fox
22
N
21 37 53 16: Eric Gehrig

33 45 29 13 17: Susan Ginn
1
28 52 18: Erin Healy
35 24
36
59 58 19: Jill Heberling
46
20 51
20: Dustin Hebets
30
6 47
21: Richard Hunt
14
35
50 34
48
22: Anne Klink
49 3
9 31 23: Amy Lane
19 34 32
24: Favor Larson
17
33
32 15 25: Ann Leitensdorfer
11
SU
R
29 4 19
TE 27: Ryan Miller

PP
18 13 14 25
16
28: Cherisse Mowry
O
R 17
O
TE M 29: Cassandra Nelson

O
R PR
5
4 30: Cindy Rosser
31: Brent Rowland
32: Sandra Stoner
34: Bobby Tyning
35: Kefei Wang
Adapted
Leader
TTISI Team
Group Wheel Migration
TASK ORIENTED
TEAM MEMBERS
2/N21: Kate Biben
8 16 CO 3: Vanessa Boettcher
ER ND
1
4/N15: Tom Bogart
YZ 9 A21/5: Alec Bonnstetter
U
AL
24 21 36 15 15
CT
36
AN
3 3
7: Rick Bowers *
OR
16 21 20
23 25
40 8: John Carli
26
23
11 9: Craig Casimir
12 7
39 A21/N21: Nick Chris
7 26 2 8 41 20 6 6
56 27
22 42 A15/N15: Rodney Cox
31 55 2
8 12/N21: Philip Daugs
38
COORDI ATOR
PERSUADER
SLOWER PACED
30 30
FASTER PACED
54
A21
60 57
28
24
14: Todd Fox
22
N21
22
N
21 37 53 16: Eric Gehrig

27 33 28 45 29 24 13 A15/17: Susan Ginn
1
35 26
28 52 A21/N21: Erin Healy
5 7
36
59 58 19/N15: Jill Heberling
35 46
20 51
20: Dustin Hebets
30
6 47
21: Richard Hunt
14
35 33 50 34
48
22: Anne Klink
49 34 1 3
9 9 31 23/N21: Amy Lane
19 34
24: Favor Larson
33
32 A15 15 25/N15: Ann Leitensdorfer
SU
R
25 17 N15 4 19
TE A21/27: Ryan Miller

PP
18 13 13 29 14 14
16
28: Cherisse Mowry
O
R 17
O
TE M 29/N15: Cassandra Nelson

O
R PR
5
4 30: Cindy Rosser
31/N21: Brent Rowland
A15/N15: Sandra Stoner
34: Bobby Tyning
35: Kefei Wang
Adapted Natural
Leader Leader
TTISI Team
Behavioral Hierarchy Defined
Twelve behavioral factors that are critical to team success are measured in this assessment. Comprehending each phrase and its definition drives a
common language that will enable you to compare individual scores, the team average, and the population means on subsequent pages.
Analysis of Data - Information is maintained accurately for repeated Frequent Change - Moving easily from task to task or being asked to
examination as required. leave several tasks unfinished and easily move on to the new task with
little or no notice.
Competitiveness - Tenacity, boldness, assertiveness and a "will to
win" in all situations. Frequent Interaction with Others - Dealing with multiple interruptions
on a continual basis, always maintaining a friendly interface with others.
Consistency - The ability to do the job the same way.
Organized Workplace - Systems and procedures followed for success.
Customer Relations - A desire to convey your sincere interest in
them. People Oriented - Spending a high percentage of time successfully
working with a wide range of people from diverse backgrounds to
achieve "win-win" outcomes.
Follow Up and Follow Through - A need to be thorough.
Urgency - Decisiveness, quick response and fast action.

Following Policy - Complying with the policy or if no policy, complying
with the way it has been done.
Versatility - Bringing together a multitude of talents and a willingness to
adapt the talents to changing assignments as required.
TTISI Team
The Bell Curve Defined
Understanding how to read a bell curve and standard deviation will enable you to clearly analyze the composition of your team.
The bell curve, known as a normal distribution, is the most common For example, if the assessment scores of 100 people are collected and
type of distribution for a population. The highest point on the curve, used in a normal probability distribution, 68 people, representing 68%
represents the highest population of people, or the mean of the group. of the 100 assessment scores, should fall within one standard deviation
The standard deviation is a number used to show how data is spread of the mean. Thirty four percent will be one standard deviation above
out from the mean, representing a percentage of the total data the mean and 34% will be one standard deviation below the mean.
collected. The remaining 32% of people will be two or more standard deviations
away from the mean. Sixteen percent will be two or more standard
deviations above the mean and 16% will be two or more standard
deviations below the mean.
16% 34% 34% 16%
Two or more standard deviations below the mean One standard deviation above the mean
One standard deviation below the mean Two or more standard deviations above the mean
TTISI Team
Behavioral Style Comparison
r
tte
tte
r
he
te
te
g.
ir
s
rt
ns
ns
er
tc
im
Av
en
is
ga
et
w
li
n
r
b
ir
r
am
Bo
Bo
Bo
Ch
Bo
Ca
n
Bo
Ca
Behavioral Characteristics
Bi
Al
ea
Te
R.
K.
R.
A.
C.
N.
V.
T.
J.
J.
M
Following Policy 70 30 40 98 52 55 30 85 85 82 100 69
Consistency 68 32 38 95 52 52 35 75 80 80 100 65
People Oriented 67 75 75 65 40 85 60 50 40 85 55 68
Follow Up and Follow Through 64 27 37 87 60 40 33 80 83 73 90 63
Analysis of Data 60 25 25 90 65 25 40 80 100 60 100 55
Customer Relations 60 45 65 62 48 65 35 65 40 88 58 66
Frequent Interaction with
Others 57 90 90 40 40 90 70 40 10 70 10 62
Others
Organized Workplace 57 20 25 90 65 15 30 80 100 55 100 52
Versatility 51 95 85 30 60 70 85 40 25 45 15 53
Frequent Change 50 90 80 18 68 68 90 40 28 38 15 52
Competitiveness 48 100 70 10 100 40 100 50 50 20 30 47
Urgency 43 95 75 10 90 35 100 40 40 15 20 43
Team Leader
TTISI Team
Behavioral Style Comparison Continued
g
lin
g.
lt
s
rig
au
er
er
Av
er
y
ug
n
w
az
al
V
x
eh
b
x
in
am
Bo
Co
De
n
Da
He
Fo
He
Fr
ea
Te
R.
R.
K.
C.
P.
E.
S.
E.
T.
J.
M
Consistency 68 32 55 100 68 68 55 62 62 100 55 65
People Oriented 67 75 85 55 100 100 50 45 100 55 85 68
Analysis of Data 60 25 25 100 25 25 70 80 20 100 25 55
Others 57 90 90 20 90 90 50 40 90 10 90 62
Others
Versatility 51 95 65 15 50 60 70 45 60 10 70 53
Frequent Change 50 90 62 12 50 52 62 52 60 12 65 52
Urgency 43 95 35 15 15 10 85 60 20 15 35 43
Team Leader
TTISI Team
r
rfe
k
rin
do
g.
nb
s
ns
Av
ts
on
ry
er
te
er
be
ne
ite
nt
ow
w
rs
in
et
ill
am
n
Bo
Hu
He
La
Le
La
Kl
ea
M
M
Te
R.
D.
R.
A.
A.
A.
C.
R.
C.
M
F.
Consistency 68 32 45 72 80 95 28 52 100 100 88 65
People Oriented 67 75 50 35 80 65 75 85 55 55 75 68
Analysis of Data 60 25 45 100 70 90 20 25 100 100 75 55
Others 57 90 50 10 70 40 90 90 10 20 50 62
Others
Versatility 51 95 60 30 50 30 100 65 10 15 35 53
Frequent Change 50 90 72 42 38 18 100 65 18 12 25 52
Urgency 43 95 90 70 20 15 100 35 20 15 10 43
Team Leader
TTISI Team
nd
g.
r
n
ng
er
er
se
la
Av
or
g
so
g
on
on
w
an
ni
s
yl
l
am
Bo
Ro
Ro
Ne
n
Ty
Ta
St
ea
Te
R.
C.
C.
B.
B.
K.
A.
S.
T.
M
Following Policy 70 30 55 25 90 65 82 78 85 70 69
Consistency 68 32 52 30 88 62 80 68 75 62 65
People Oriented 67 75 85 75 50 85 85 70 50 40 68
Follow Up and Follow Through 64 27 40 23 97 47 73 67 80 73 63
Analysis of Data 60 25 25 20 100 25 60 60 80 85 55
Customer Relations 60 45 65 38 48 85 85 75 65 42 66
Others 57 90 90 90 20 90 70 70 40 40 62
Others
Organized Workplace 57 20 15 10 100 25 55 55 80 85 52
Versatility 51 95 70 90 25 70 45 55 40 55 53
Frequent Change 50 90 68 95 28 60 38 50 40 52 52
Competitiveness 48 100 40 100 50 30 10 40 50 70 47
Urgency 43 95 35 90 35 30 10 35 40 75 43
Team Leader
TTISI Team

TTISI Team Behav PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

TTISI Team Behav PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Behavioral Team Report

Copyright © 2006-2016. Target Training International, Ltd.

CONTENTS OF THE REPORT TEAM MEMBER LIST

Have you ever noticed:

Some are optimistic, fun, and talkative

Some are steady, patient, and relaxed

Some are precise, accurate, and detail-oriented

BEHAVIORAL SEGMENT DEFINITIONS

CONDUCTOR - D - People who tend to be direct, decisive, and seek

IMPLEMENTOR - C/D - People who tend to assess, leverage facts and

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Become stubborn under stress VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Emphasize fun over efficiency VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Freeze under stress VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Under-appreciate other team members VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Poor or selective listening VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Do not manage time or deadlines well VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Lack a sense of urgency VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES BEHAVIORAL ATTRIBUTES

Do the work themselves and do not delegate VALUE TO THE ORGANIZATION

WORDS THAT WORK WORDS THAT DON'T WORK

CONDUCTOR - D (8%) SUPPORTER - S (6%)

PERSUADER - D/I (8%) COORDINATOR - S/C (33%)

PROMOTER - I (19%) ANALYZER - C (3%)

RELATER - I/S (11%) IMPLEMENTOR - C/D (11%)

CONDUCTOR (8%) SUPPORTER (6%)

PERSUADER (8%) COORDINATOR (33%)

CONDUCTOR (8%) SUPPORTER (6%)

PERSUADER (8%) COORDINATOR (33%)

PROMOTER (19%) ANALYZER (3%)

RELATER (11%) IMPLEMENTOR (11%)

CONDUCTOR (8%) SUPPORTER (6%)

PERSUADER (8%) COORDINATOR (33%)

PROMOTER (19%) ANALYZER (3%)

RELATER (11%) IMPLEMENTOR (11%)

CONDUCTOR (8%) SUPPORTER (6%)

PERSUADER (8%) COORDINATOR (33%)

PROMOTER (19%) ANALYZER (3%)

RELATER (11%) IMPLEMENTOR (11%)

Hig roc nd ccu a

O cis tio en ions

tition with Others

43 12 13: Kayla DeVault

37 53 16: Eric Gehrig

26: Carol Mettenbrink

TE 27: Ryan Miller

TE M 29: Cassandra Nelson

43 12 13: Kayla DeVault

21 37 53 16: Eric Gehrig

26: Carol Mettenbrink