You are on page 1of 3

CHEM 161L Biochemistry Laboratory 2

1st Quarter SY 2010-2011

Protein Characterization by Electrophoresis


Solidum, Andrew .1, Chan, Catherine T.2

1
Professor, School of Chemical Engineering, Chemistry and Biotechnology, Mapua Institute of Technology; 2Student, CHM161L / C20, School of Chemical Engineering,
Chemistry and Biotechnology, Mapua Institute of Technology

ABSTRACT

Another type of electrophoresis is SDS-PAGE or sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. PAGE is commonly used
for the separation and qualitative analysis of protein. Agarose can also be used but polyacrylamide gel can give better resolution
compared with agarose. Protein has different charge depending on the amino acid comprises the polypeptide chain thus, when
subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the separation will be based on the charge of the protein and its size. In SDS-PAGE,
SDS denatures the protein into its subunits and with an excess, it coats the protein with negative charge. With this, the protein will be
separated just according to its size since they all have the same charge. This is the advantage of SDS-PAGE compared to PAGE. In the
experiment, bovine serum albumin (BSA) should be subjected to SDS-PAGE for protein characterization but problem arises due to the
gel not able to polymerize. The experiment was not able to perform. A possible source of error is the shelf life of the reagents used
(agarose, APS). The goal of the experiment is to familiarize the students to the principle of SDS-PAGE and to characterize the protein,
BSA, into its subunits.

Keywords: albumin, casein, invertase, Bradford Assay, Warburg-Christian Assay, Benedict’s reagent

INTRODUCTION

Electrophoresis is one of the techniques that qualitatively negative charge and the protein coated to be negatively
analyse protein sample or mixture. This technique is use in charge will repel and go through the positive side (anode)
biochemistry as well as molecular biology. Biomolecules and this is how the protein moves through the gel. Smaller
such as DNA and protein are separated based on the molecule will have smaller friction with the gel so it will
electrophoretic mobility of the molecule dependent on the travel faster compared with the larger molecule.
size, charge, shape and chemical composition. Type of
electrophoresis that is commonly used for protein is The SDS-PAGE electrophoresis gel is comprised of two,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Other type of the stacking gel and the resolving gel. The stacking gel has
electrophoresis, agarose gel electrophoresis, can also be larger pores compared to the resolving gel. This helps in
used but the resolution of the bands or the separation of the process of packing the protein so they will enter into the
protein is much better when PAGE (polyacrylamide gel resolving gel all at the same time. In the stacking gel, the
electrophoresis) is used. spreading of the sample was decreased before the protein
micelles enter the resolving gel. The size of the gel’s pore
Commonly use PAGE is SDS-PAGE or sodium dodecyl can be changed depending on the protein sample. The
sulphide-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis where, the higher the per cent of the gel, the smaller the gel’s pore will
basis of protein separation is solely dependent on size. be. If the protein to be analysed or purify is large, the per
SDS-PAGE is one of the denaturing electrophoretic cent gel should be lower.
techniques used. Sodium dodecyl sulphate, SDS,
denatures the protein into its subunit (polypeptide There are two advantages of SDS-PAGE to PAGE and
components). In an excess amount, SDS will make coat the these are: (1) it coats polypeptides with negative charge so
protein with negative charge thus, proteins in sample will it will migrate towards the anode and (2) it masks the
have the same charge and the separation will be based on natural charge of the polypeptide so they will separate
the size of the protein. Cathode, negative electrode, is according to their molecular size.
placed on top and anode, positive electrode, is placed at
the bottom of the gel. As the current is applied, the running
buffer provides ion to carry the current. The cathode’s

Experiment 02│ Group 1│ September 13, 2010 1 of 3


CHEM 161L Biochemistry Laboratory 2
1st Quarter SY 2010-2011

The mobility of the biomolecule is directly proportional to The loading buffer was prepared by combining the following
the log of the corresponding molecular weight. The mobility and diluted to 25 mL distilled water: 2.5 mL 10% SDS, 2.5
is expressed as the effective mobility or Rf (retention factor). mL 0.625 M Tris-HCl pH6.8, 2.5 mL 10% glycerol, 5.0 g
The Rf is the distance migrated by the protein/ distance 0.02% bromophenol blue and 12.0 g 8 M urea.
travelled by the tracking dye. Having the R f of the marker
and its corresponding log of molecular size, this serves as 100 µL of BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) was transferred in
the standard to know the size of the protein sample to be a micro test tube using pipette. 100 µL of the prepared
analysed thus, electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is also an loading buffer was then added. The sample was placed in a
analytical method. boiling water bath for ten minutes and immediately
immersed in an ice-water bath for three minutes.
This study’s objective is to familiarize the students to how
the principle of electrophoresis and also, to characterize the Sample Loaidng and Gel Running
given protein sample (i.e. subunits comprises the sample,
the molecular weight, etc.), BSA (bovine serum albumin). First, running buffer was prepared by mixing the following
and diluting to 1 L: 3.0 g Tris base, 14.4 g glycine and 1.0 g
MATERIALS AND METHODS SDS. The polymerized gel slabs was placed in the gel
chamber. The chamber was then filled with the running
Running Gel Preparation buffer (the gel was completely immersed). The wells were
rinsed with buffer. The air bubbles at the bottom of the gel
The following reagents were mixed to made the 7.5% gel were removed. The electrophoretic set-up was placed on a
with 9.2 mL total volume using micro pipette: 1.75 mL 40% level surface. The sample was loaded into the wells using
stock acrylamide, 0.925 mL 2% stock bisacrylamide, 1.75 micropipette, 5-10 µL. The voltage was asset to 100 volts.
mL 2M Tris-HCl pH 8.8 and 4.9 mL distilled water. After, the The protective electrode covering was then placed and the
solution was degas for ten minutes using vacuum aspirator. gel was run until the dye reaches a 1 cm level from the
To activate the running gel, the following reagents were bottom of the gel slab.
added: 94 µL 10% SDS, 62.5 µL freshly prepared 10%
APS and 1.6 µL TEMED. The gel mixture was swirl not Staining and Visualization
more than three times Using 1 mL pipetor, the gel mixture
was transferred in the casting tray up to 1 cm below the Staining solution was prepared by mixing the following and
level of the comb. The gel was overlaid with small amount diluted it to 100 mL using 100-mL volumetric flask: 50 mL
of isobutanol-water solution. The mixture was allowed to methanol, 10 mL glacial acetic acid and 0.25 mg Coomasie
polymerize and the isobutanol layer was then removed by brilliant blue (R250). The glass plate was transferred from
washing the gel with distilled water. the gel apparatus to a flat-bottom container. Small amount
of staining solution was added to completely immerse the
Stacking Gel Preparation gel plate. The gel from the glass plates was removed using
a spatula and incubated in the staining solution with mild
The following reagents were mixed to made the stacking shaking until the desired band intensity is observed. The
gel: 0.6 mL 40% stock acrylamide, 0.28 mL 2% stock destaining solution was prepared by mixing 25 mL 95%
bisacrylamide, 0.70 mL 0.625 M Tris-HCl pH 6.8 and 1.88 ethanol and 5 mL glacial acetic acid and diluted it to 100 mL
mL distilled deionized water. Before pouring the gel in the distilled water using 100-mL volumetric flask. The
glass plate, 50 µL 10% SDS, 120 µL freshly prepared APS background staining was removed by several washings of
and 3.8 µL TEMED were added to the mixture for it to be destaining solution with vigorous shaking until the bands
activated. The mixture was poured over the polymerized are visible. The gel was then dried under cellophane.
resolving gel using pipette. The comb was placed on top
and there should be no air bubble. The gel was allowed to RESULTS
polymerize. The comb was then removed (in one fluid
motion). The experiment was unable to proceed to the
electrophoresis proper. The stacking and resolving gel were
Loading Buffer and Sample Preparatiton unable to polymerize.

Experiment 02│ Group 1│ September 13, 2010 2 of 3


CHEM 161L Biochemistry Laboratory 2
1st Quarter SY 2010-2011

DISCUSSION

Polyacrylamide gel is made by co-polymerization of


acrylamide monomer (40% stock acrylamide) and the N, N-
methylene bisacrylamide (stock bisacrylamide), which is a
cross linking agent. APS (ammonium persulphate) and
TEMED (tetramethylenediamine) was added just before the
gel was ready to polymerize. This is because TEMED
catalyzes the crosslinking of the acrylamide monomer and
the N, N-methylene bisacrylamide and APS initiates that
reaction. SDS denatures the protein to its subunits and
coats the protein with negative charge.

The stacking gel and resolving gel were unable to


polymerize and possible sources of error are: the stock
acrylamide used was not newly obtained and its shelf life is
approximately three years. It might be that its shelf life is
already met thus, it is not usable anymore; also, the APS
might be the problem. Its shelf life is only one year with
good storage and this is shorter compared to the
acrylamide. Thus, even if the APS is freshly prepared, it is
still not able to initiate the crosslinking of acrylamide
monomer and bisacrylamide. APS is unstable. That’s why
after a week, the prepared APS cannot be use anymore.

REFERENCES

            1. Weaver, Robert F. (2001) Molecular Biology, 2nd


Edition

            2. Cox, Michael M., Nelson, David L. (2005)


Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 4th Edtion.

            1. Garrett, Reginald H., Grisham, Charles M. (1999)


Biochemistry, 2nd Edition

            2. Murray, Robert K., Granner, Daryl ., Mayes, Peter


A., Victor, Rodwell W. (2003) Harper’s Illustrated
Biochemistry, 26th Edition

            1. Weaver, Robert F. (2001) Molecular Biology, 2nd


Edition

Experiment 02│ Group 1│ September 13, 2010 3 of 3

You might also like