THE MUSIC FORUM
Volume 1
Edited by WILLIAM J. MITCHELL and FELIX SALZER
Columbia University Press 1967 New York and LondonA Glossary of the
Elements of Graphic Analysts
LINEAR-STRUCTURAL oF voice-leading analyses are usually presented in
the form of graphs that make use of elements of musical notation and a few
additional symbols.! When these are meaningfully employed, the sense of
an analysis can be presented with an unrivaled clarity, even when the musical
judgments that prompt it are, perhaps, faulty. When carelessly or im-
properly employed they can easily create hopeless confusion, even when the
musical judgments might be valid. In an attempt to eliminate as much
obscurity as possible, a glossary of recurrent symbols is presented herewith.
Our aim, it must be understood, is to suggest how analytic judgments can
be presented graphically with definiteness and conviction, rather than to
give instruction in the ways of reaching conclusions, or to justify conchu-
sions that may have been reached. Variants of the symbols and abbrevia-
tions here presented are easily conceivable, as are additional symbols not
included herein. Analysts have their own ways of presenting conclusions,
and contrasting styles of composition often demand different graphing
techniques (see the graphs of works by Perotinus and Wagner in this
issue). The test of the validity of a symbol is its clarity, rather than its
subservience to a fiat.
Before proceeding, it should be observed that structure, as conceived
in linear analysis, is the interrelation of all musical factors as they subserve
the inclusive character of an entire work. Structure, in this sense, exists on
several levels, from immediately perceptible relationships to broad inclusive
ones. In general, it is sufficient to construct separate but related graphs for
three levels—immediate, intermediate, and remote. These are intended as
equivalents of Heinrich Schenker’s Vordergrund, Mittelgrund, and Hinter-
grand (foreground, middle ground, and background). At times, additional
igraphs of sections of a work are required for the explication of complex
1 The content of this gle
y applies to the graphing techniques employed in the articles by
Peter Bergquist, William J.
ell, and Felix Salzer.GLOSSARY 261
relationships. In the case of simple contexts, one or perhaps two graphs will
prove sufficient,
Notes. Notes in various shapes are employed for the designation of pitches
in the usual sense and also to differentiate among the various levels of
structure, The different shapes have no fixed temporal or rhythmic value,
coee 1, Unstemmed black noteheads are most universally employed to
denote immediate levels of structure.
Ort 2, Stems added to black noteheads signify an intermediate level of
structure. Within this level, further nuances of structural value
are indicated by employing stems of different lengths.
ales) 3. Combinations of stemmed and unstemmed noteheads represent
contexts in which a relationship of the stemmed notes is filled in
or extended by means of the immediate values represented by
unstemmed noteheads.
Jd 4. Half notes represent relatively remote structural contexts and
should be employed for this purpose only.
. To differentiate in a graph between various levels of structure,
the three suggested shapes, unstemmed noteheads, stemmed note~
heads (of which the length of stems may vary), and half notes,
should be employed. Three levels of structural relations are
illustrated in the marginal example, The half notes indicate a
context on a remote level; the quarter notes on an intermediate
level; and the noteheads on an immediate level.
Note values such as eighths and sixteenths designate immediate,
at times intermediate, structural values. They are used sparingly
and often mark a specific characterizing feature of a composition.
@) ch 7 Patenthesized notes in various shapes represent notes that have
been circumvented in a composition, yet form the underlying
sense of a melodic or contrapuntal detour.
Neledeed
~
=
a)
Orker Symbols, Notes and noteheads by themselves represent judgments by
the analyst about the various levels of structural significance. To clarify
their specific contextual meanings, they must be used in connection with
other symbols, Unattended notes can be a source of obscurity or they may
reveal indecisiveness on the part of the analyst.