Final Year Project A Report Assessment Form (10%)

Student Name Student ID

Examiner Name Examiner

Signature

Learning Point Percentage

Outcome Poor (1 point) Fair (2 points) Moderate (3 points) Good (4 points) Excellent (5 points) (B) (%)
(A) (B/5 x A%)
PLO1 Poorly apply Fairly apply Moderately apply Good knowledge Excellently apply
Knowledge knowledge of knowledge of knowledge of application of knowledge of
(1%) engineering engineering engineering engineering engineering
fundamentals on fundamentals on fundamentals on fundamentals on fundamentals on
engineering problems engineering problems engineering problems engineering problems engineering problems
PLO2 Engineering Problem Some engineering Engineering Problem Engineering Problem Problem statement
Problem not identified in Problem fairly identified in Problem in Problem Statement clearly identified and
Analysis Problem Statement. identified in Problem Statement but not clearly identified. excellently written
(1%) Statement. much related to the and discussed.
project.
PLO3 Problem’s solution Some problem’s Problem’s solution Problem’s solution Problem’s solution
Design of not discussed in solution discussed in moderately discussed adequately discussed excellently discussed
Solution problem statement, problem statement in problem statement in problem statement in problem statement
(2%) and no discussion on without discussion on but not much related with sufficient with ample
public health & public health & to the project with discussion on public discussion on public
safety, cultural, safety, cultural, sufficient discussion health & safety, health & safety,
societal, and societal, and on public health & cultural, societal, and cultural, societal, and
environmental environmental safety, cultural, environmental environmental
considerations. considerations. societal, and considerations. considerations.
environmental
considerations.
PLO4 Literature Review Literature Review Literature Review Literature Review Literature review and
Investigation and Methodology and Methodology and Methodology and Methodology Methodology
(2%) poorly written. fairly written. moderately written. adequately written. excellently written
and discussed.

20
PLO6 Poor choice of Fair choice of section Moderate choice of Good choice of Excellent choice of
Communication section headings. headings. Very section headings, section headings, section headings,
(2%) Very sloppy report sloppy report with no figures, captions, figures, captions, figures, captions,
with no attention to attention to text or usage of English and usage of English and usage of English and
text or figures. Poor figures. Fair usage of formatting. formatting. formatting.
usage of English and English and
formatting formatting

PLO10 No referencing Some referencing Inadequate list of Good All captions are cited
Ethics system used. Figures system used. Figures references. Some implementation of as per referencing
(1%) and charts were and charts were captions, figures, citation of others standard required.
clearly "copy- clearly "copy- tables were cited. works but not as per Very low similarity
pasted". Percentage pasted". Percentage Percentage similarity standard format. Low percentage in
of similarity on of similarity on in Turnitin is quite similarity percentage Turnitin. (<20%)
Turnitin too high Turnitin too high high. (23%-27%) in Turnitin. (20%-
(>30%) (27%-30%) 23%)

PLO11 No creativity in Some creativity in Adequate creativity Good creativity in Excellent creativity
Lifelong solving problems. No solving problems. No in solving problems, solving problems, in solving problems,
Learning effort to retrieve effort to retrieve effort to retrieve effort to retrieve effort to retrieve
(1%) critical information critical information critical information critical information critical information
to solve project to solve project to solve project to solve project to solve project
problems. Not problems. problems, problems, problems,
independent learner. independent learner. independent learner. independent learner.

Total /10%

21
 Final Year Project A Oral Presentation Assessment Form (10%)

Student’s Name: Student’s ID:

Examiner’s Name: Examiner’s Signature:

Percentage
Points
Learning Outcome (A) Poor (1 point) Fair (2 points) Moderate (3 points) Good (4 points) Excellent (5 points) (%) =
(B)
B/5 x A

No evidence of Little knowledge Average engineering Good understanding Student has an

engineering demonstrated on the knowledge on on theoretical excellent background
knowledge on engineering concepts project. This is background of project understanding of
project. and theories behind demonstrated via via good research on project. This is
PLO1: Engineering project. average literature literatures and theory demonstrated via the
Knowledge
review. were well scientific and
(2.0%) demonstrated in theoretical concepts
presentation. researched and gained
through literatures and
other resources.

No evidence of any Little data analysis Acceptable data Good data analysis Innovative data
data analysis. and manipulation. analysis and and manipulation. analysis and
Failure to apply Poor reasoning and manipulation. Good reasoning, and manipulation. Highest
PLO2: Problem Analysis analytical and argument. Little Adequate reasoning, argument and quality reasoning and
scientific methods. calculations and data argument, calculation interpretation of argument.
(2.0%)
interpretation. and poor results.
interpretation of
results.

23
 No evidence of Poor or insufficient Demonstrates Demonstrates high Demonstrates
depth of solution to problem. competence in both competence in both innovation in both
understanding of Little or no project subject and its project subject and its project subject and its
the project problem demonstration of background science, background science. background science. A
and background design and but inadequate A good solution to complete and
PLO3: Design/Development science in terms of development to the solution to problem problem but not comprehensive solution
of Solutions
public health and solution provided in and no innovation in innovative in terms of method including
(2.0%) safety, cultural, terms of public terms of public health public health and public health and
societal, and health and safety, and safety, cultural, safety, cultural, safety, cultural,
environmental cultural, societal, and societal, and societal, and societal, and
considerations. No environmental environmental environmental environmental
solution to problem. considerations. considerations. considerations. considerations.

No proper use of Very little form of Adequate research Good research Excellent and highest
research methods, investigation and methodology, but not methodology. Proper quality research
PLO4: Investigation poor synthesis of research innovative in interpretation of data methodology used,
results. methodology applied experiments and and synthesizing of with no error in data
(2.0%) in project. No integrating results results. interpretation and good
innovation. into solution. relation to project
solution.
Delivery Very poor delivery. More practice and Presentation is clear Presentation is skillful Presentation is highly
Hard to understand creativity are needed and adequate. and creative. creative and
(0.5%) the idea presented. to keep audience accomplished.
interested.

Voice Too much stutters, Volume, Voice and language Voice and language Volume, tone,
PLO6: very poor voice pronunciation or are adequate for the are skillful and inflection, timing and
Communicati (0.5%) volume. vocal variation need delivery of the effective. language are used to
on - Oral improvement presentation. enhance presentation.
Presentation
Manner Bad manners and Appearance, body Appearance and Appearance and Appearance and
and overall appearance. language or gestures mannerisms are mannerisms are mannerisms are
Appearance need improvement. appropriate. presented with presented with
business like conduct professional demeanor
(0.5%) and style and personal style.

24
 Q&A The student has The student The student responses The student responses The student proactively
response little or no response responses to the to the questions to the questions responses to the
to the questions. questions fairly. adequately but poor adequately with questions in an
(0.5%) level of confidence. confidence. excellent manner and
with confidence.

Total (%) /10%

25