Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problem Areas in Legal Ethics barratry and champerty. - Linsangan v. Atty. Tolentino, A.C. No. 6672,
Arellano University School of Law – Arellano Law Foundation September 4, 2009
2018-2019
CANON 2 - A LAWYER SHALL MAKE HIS LEGAL SERVICES CANON 8 - A LAWYER SHALL CONDUCT HIMSELF WITH
AVAILABLE IN AN EFFICIENT AND CONVENIENT MANNER COURTESY, FAIRNESS AND CANDOR TOWARDS HIS PROFESSIONAL
COMPATIBLE WITH THE INDEPENDENCE, INTEGRITY AND COLLEAGUES, AND SHALL AVOID HARASSING TACTICS AGAINST
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROFESSION. OPPOSING COUNSEL.
Rule 2.01 - A lawyer shall not reject, except for valid reasons, the cause Rule 8.02 - A lawyer shall not, directly or indirectly, encroach upon the
of the defenseless or the oppressed. professional employment of another lawyer, however, it is the right of any
Rule 2.02 - In such cases, even if the lawyer does not accept a case, he lawyer, without fear or favor, to give proper advice and assistance to those
shall not refuse to render legal advice to the person concerned if only to seeking relief against unfaithful or neglectful counsel.
the extent necessary to safeguard the latter's rights.
Rule 2.03 - A lawyer shall not do or permit to be done any act designed The following elements distinguish the legal profession
primarily to solicit legal business. from a business:
Rule 2.04 - A lawyer shall not charge rates lower than those
customarily prescribed unless the circumstances so warrant. 1. A duty of public service, of which the emolument is a by-product,
and in which one may attain the highest eminence without making
much money;
Code of Professional Responsibility 2. A relation as an “officer of the court” to the administration of
justice involving thorough sincerity, integrity and reliability;
CANON 3 - A LAWYER IN MAKING KNOWN HIS LEGAL SERVICES 3. A relation to clients in the highest degree of fiduciary;
SHALL USE ONLY TRUE, HONEST, FAIR, DIGNIFIED AND OBJECTIVE 4. A relation to colleagues at the bar characterized by candor,
INFORMATION OR STATEMENT OF FACTS. fairness, and unwillingness to resort to current business methods
of advertising and encroachment on their practice, or dealing
Rule 3.01 - A lawyer shall not use or permit the use of any false, directly with their clients. - Atty. Khan Jr. v. Atty. Simbillo, A.C. No.
fraudulent, misleading, deceptive, undignified, self-laudatory or unfair 5299, August 19, 2003
statement or claim regarding his qualifications or legal services.
Rule 3.02 - In the choice of a firm name, no false, misleading or assumed General rule
name shall be used. The continued use of the name of a deceased partner
is permissible provided that the firm indicates in all its communications Hence, lawyers are prohibited from soliciting cases for the purpose of
that said partner is deceased. gain, either personally or through paid agents or brokers. Such
Rule 3.03 - Where a partner accepts public office, he shall withdraw from actuation constitutes malpractice, a ground for disbarment. - Linsangan
the firm and his name shall be dropped from the firm name unless the v. Atty. Tolentino, A.C. No. 6672, September 4, 2009
law allows him to practice law currently.
Rule 3.04 - A lawyer shall not pay or give anything of value to
Thru all means of communication
representatives of the mass media in anticipation of, or in return for
publicity to attract legal business.
Solicitation or obtaining of professional employment by any means of
communication." - Geffen v. Moss, 53 Cal.App.3d 215, 125 Cal.Rptr. 687
Rule 138 [1975]
Sec. 27. Attorneys removed or suspended by Supreme Court on what ………
grounds. - A member of the bar may be removed or suspended from his
office as attorney by the Supreme Court for any deceit, malpractice, or The term "solicit" includes contact in person, by telephone or telegraph,
other gross misconduct in such office, grossly immoral conduct, or by by letter or other writing, or by other communication directed to a
reason of his conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, or for any specific recipient, but does not include letters addressed or
violation of the oath which he is required to take before admission to advertising circulars distributed generally to persons not known to
practice, or for a wilfull disobedience of any lawful order of a superior need legal services of the kind provided by the lawyer in a particular
court, or for corruptly or wilfully appearing as an attorney for a party to a matter, but who are so situated that they might in general find such
case without authority so to do. The practice of soliciting cases at law services useful.- Shapero v. KBA, 726 S.W.2d 299 (1986)
for the purpose of gain, either personally or through paid agents or
brokers, constitutes malpractice.
1
prevent, and thus the application of the Disciplinary Rules in question to
Solicitation or Ambulance chasing appellant does not offend the Constitution.
We need not labor the point that solicitation or ambulance chasing, (a) A lawyer's solicitation of business through direct, in-person
so-called, either directly or indirectly through the services of runners or communication with the prospective clients has long been viewed as
others, is conduct which is reprehensible and inimicable to the inconsistent with the profession's ideal of the attorney-client
traditions and best interests of the legal profession. Not only does it relationship and as posing a significant potential for harm to the
provoke derision and disrespect in the eyes of the public, but it is an prospective client.
overreaching of the other members of the profession who adhere to the
standards fixed by canons of ethics and the dictates of good conscience. (b) The State does not lose its power to regulate commercial activity
To permit such conduct to continue undeterred could only result in deemed harmful to the public simply because speech is a component
unsavory competitions and consequences materially detrimental of that activity.
to the dignity and honor of the legal profession as a whole. - In re
Krasner 204 N.E.2d 10 (1965) (c) A lawyer's procurement of remunerative employment is only
marginally affected with First Amendment concerns. While entitled to
Ambulance chasing some constitutional protection, [respondent's] conduct is subject to
regulation in furtherance of important state interests. - Ohralik v.
This rule proscribes “ambulance chasing” (the solicitation of almost any Ohio State Bar Assn., 436 U.S. 447 (1978)
kind of legal business by an attorney, personally or through an agent in ……
order to gain employment) as a measure to protect the community from
barratry and champerty. - Linsangan v. Atty. Tolentino, A.C. No. 6672, (d) In addition to its general interest in protecting consumers and
September 4, 2009 regulating commercial transactions, the State bears a special
responsibility for maintaining standards among members of the
Solicitation of a political organization licensed professions, especially members of the Bar. Protection of
the public from those aspects of solicitation that involve fraud, undue
Appellant, a practicing lawyer in South Carolina who was also a influence, intimidation, overreaching, and other forms of "vexatious
cooperating lawyer with a branch of the American Civil Liberties Union conduct" is a legitimate and important state interest.
(ACLU), after advising a gathering of women of their legal rights
resulting from their having been sterilized as a condition of receiving (e) Because the State's interest is in averting harm by prohibiting
public medical assistance, informed one of the women in a subsequent solicitation in circumstances where it is likely to occur, the absence of
letter that free legal assistance was available from the ACLU. Thereafter, explicit proof or findings of harm or injury to the person solicited
the disciplinary Board of the South Carolina Supreme Court charged and is immaterial. The application of the Disciplinary Rules to appellant,
determined that appellant, by sending such letter, had engaged in who solicited employment for pecuniary gain under circumstances likely
soliciting a client in violation of certain Disciplinary Rules of the State to result in the adverse consequences the State seeks to avert, does not
Supreme Court, and issued a private reprimand. offend the Constitution.
2
agrees to represent a client, he is precluded from handling cases of the
opposing party based on the prohibition on conflict of interest. Thus, the Telephone directory
incurs an opportunity cost by merely accepting the case of the client
which is therefore indemnified by the payment of acceptance fee. Since He may likewise have his name listed in a telephone directory but not
the acceptance fee only seeks to compensate the lawyer for the lost under a designation of special branch of law. - Atty. Khan Jr. v. Atty.
opportunity, it is not measured by the nature and extent of the Simbillo, A.C. No. 5299, August 19, 2003
legal services rendered. – Dalupan v. Gacott, A.C. No. 5067, June 29,
2015
3
use of a nom de plume, assumed or trade name in law practice is
improper. Philippine Daily Inquirer, which reads:
Whether or not the firm of Velasquez, Rodriguez, Respicio, “ANNULMENT OF MARRIAGE Specialist 532-4333/521-2667.”
Ramos, Nidea, and Prado may call itself “A law Firm Of St.
Thomas More and Associate Members” - Atty. Khan Jr. v. Atty. Simbillo, A.C. No. 5299, August 19, 2003
We agree with the OBC. Rule 3.02 is clear. No name not belonging to
any of the partners or associates may be used in the firm name for Calling card of Atty. Tolentino
any purpose. In one case, we have ruled that the use of the firm name
of a foreign law firm is unethical because that firm is not
authorized to practice law in this jurisdiction. In this case, “The Law NICOMEDES TOLENTINO
Firm of St. Thomas More and Associate Members” is not a law firm in LAW OFFFICE
this jurisdiction or even in any other jurisdiction. A “St. Thomas More CONSULTANCY & MARITIME SERVICES
and Associates” or STMA is in fact the socio-political ministry or the W/ FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
couples for Christ, a Christian family-renewal community. - PP v.
Gonzalez, Jr., G.R. No. 139542 June 10, 2003 Fe Marie L. Labiano
Paralegal
…..
1st MIJI Mansion, 2nd Flr. Rm. M-01 Tel: 362-7820
To appellate to the name of the lawyers “The Law Firm of St. Thomas 6th Ave., cor M.H. Del Pilar Fax: (632) 362-7821
More and Associate Members” indeed appears misleading. It implies Grace Park, Caloocan City Cel.: (0926) 2701719
that St. Thomas More is a Law Firm when in fact it is not it would
also convey to the public the impression that the lawyers are members of
the law firm which does not exist. To the public, it would seem that the
purpose or intention of adding “The Law Firm of St. Thomas More and Back
Associates Members” is to bask in the name of a Saint, although that SERVICES OFFERED:
may not really, be the purpose or intention of the lawyers. The CONSULTATION AND ASSISTANCE
appellation only tends to confuse the public and in a way demean TO OVERSEAS SEAMEN
both the saints and the legal profession whose members must REPATRIATED DUE TO ACCIDENT,
depend on their own name and record and merit and not on the INJURY, ILLNESS, SICKNESS, DEATH
name/glory of other persons living or dead. – PP v. Gonzalez, Jr., G.R. No. AND INSURANCE BENEFIT CLAIMS
139542 June 10, 2003 ABROAD.
Unacceptable advertisement
…..
LUIS B. TAGORDA
Attorney Complainant alleged that respondent, with the help of paralegal Fe Marie
Notary Public Labiano, convinced his clients to transfer legal representation.
CANDIDATE FOR THIRD MEMBER Respondent promised them financial assistance and expeditious
Province of Isabela collection on their claims. To induce them to hire his services, he
persistently called them and sent them text messages.
(NOTE. — As notary public, he can execute for you a deed of sale for the To support his allegations, complainant presented the sworn
purchase of land as required by the cadastral office; can renew lost affidavit of James Gregorio attesting that Labiano tried to prevail upon
documents of your animals; can make your application and final him to sever his lawyer-client relations with complainant and utilize
requisites for your homestead; and can execute any kind of affidavit. As a respondent’s services instead, in exchange for a loan of P50,000.
lawyer, he can help you collect your loans although long overdue, as well
as any complaint for or against you. Come or write to him in his town, …..
Echague, Isabela. He offers free consultation, and is willing to help and
serve the poor.) Moreover, by engaging in a money-lending venture with his clients as
borrowers, respondent violated Rule 16.04:
Prohibited advertisement or solicitation
In re: Tagorda, 53 Phil. 37 (1929) Rule 16.04 – A lawyer shall not borrow money from his client unless the
client’s interests are fully protected by the nature of the case or by
independent advice. Neither shall a lawyer lend money to a client except,
But solicitation of business by circulars or advertisements, or by personal
when in the interest of justice, he has to advance necessary expenses in a
communications or interview not warranted by personal relations, is
legal matter he is handling for the client. - Linsangan v. Atty. Tolentino,
unprofessional.
A.C. No. 6672, September 4, 2009
It is equally unprofessional to procure business by indirection through
…..
toutersof any kind, whether allied real estate firms or trust companies
advertising to secure the drawing of deeds or wills or offering retainers in
The rule is that a lawyer shall not lend money to his client. The only
exchange for executorships or trusteeships to be influenced by the lawyer.
exception is, when in the interest of justice, he has to advance necessary
expenses (such as filing fees, stenographer’s fees for transcript of
Indirect advertisement for business by furnishing or inspiring
stenographic notes, cash bond or premium for surety bond, etc.) for a
newspaper comments concerning the manner of their conduct, the
matter that he is handling for the client.
magnitude of the interest involved, the importance of the lawyer's
position, and all other like self-laudation, defy the traditions and lower
The rule is intended to safeguard the lawyer’s independence of mind so
the tone of our high calling, and are intolerable.
that the free exercise of his judgment may not be adversely affected. It
seeks to ensure his undivided attention to the case he is handling as well
4
as his entire devotion and fidelity to the client’s cause. - Linsangan v.
Atty. Tolentino, A.C. No. 6672, September 4, 2009 Volunteer [legal] advice is malpractice
Lending money to client It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit,
except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make
If the lawyer lends money to the client in connection with the client’s it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only
case, the lawyer in effect acquires an interest in the subject matter of the unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law. - Canons of
case or an additional stake in its outcome. Either of these circumstances Professionals Ethics adopted by the American Bar Association in 1908 and
may lead the lawyer to consider his own recovery rather than that of by the Philippine Bar Association in 1917. Canons 27 and 28 of the Code of
his client, or to accept a settlement which may take care of his interest Ethics - In re: Tagorda, 53 Phil. 37 (1929)
in the verdict to the prejudice of the client in violation of his duty of
undivided fidelity to the client’s cause. - Linsangan v. Atty. Tolentino, Your best advertisement as a lawyer
A.C. No. 6672, September 4, 2009
We repeat, the canon of the profession tell us that the best advertising
Including a government lawyer in a business card possible for a lawyer is a well-merited reputation for professional
capacity and fidelity to trust, which must be earned as the outcome of
Thus, while he may not be actually and directly employed with the firm, character and conduct.
the fact that his name appears on the calling card as a partner in the Good and efficient service to a client as well as to the community has a
Baligod, Gatdula, Tacardon, Dimailig& Celera Law Offices give the way of publicizing itself and catching public attention. That publicity is a
impression that he is connected therein and may constitute an act of normal by-product of effective service which is right and proper. A good
solicitation and private practice which is declared unlawful under and reputable lawyer needs no artificial stimulus to generate it and to
Republic Act No. 6713. - Samonte v. Atty. Gatdula A.M. No. P-99-1292 magnify his success. He easily sees the difference between a normal by-
[1999] product of able service and the unwholesome result of propaganda. -
A verified complaint, sought to enjoin Juan G. Collas, Jr. Ulep vs. Legal Clinic 223 SCRA 378
and nine other lawyers from practicing law under the
name of Baker & McKenzie, a law firm organized in Best mode of advertisement
Illinois
The most worthy and effective advertisement possible, even for a young
We hold that Baker & McKenzie, being an alien law firm, cannot practice lawyer, and especially with his brother lawyers, is the establishment of a
law in the Philippines (Sec. 1, Rule 138, Rules of Court). As admitted by well-merited reputation for professional capacity and fidelity to
the respondents in their memorandum, Baker & McKenzie is a trust. This cannot be forced, but must be the outcome of character
professional partnership organized in 1949 in Chicago, Illinois with and conduct. - In re: Tagorda, 53 Phil. 37 (1929)
members and associates in 30 cities around the world. Respondents,
aside from being members of the Philippine bar, practicing under the Law firm with a foreign lawyer as partner
firm name of Guerrero & Torres, are members or associates of Baker
&Mckenzie. - Dacanay v. Baker & McKenzie, et. al. Adm. Case No. 2131 In the year 1904 he made an arrangement with the defendant Ney, a
[1985] practicing attorney, to carry on business together, sending out a
circular signed "Ney & Bosque," stating that they had established an
….. office for the general practice of law in all the courts of the Islands and
that Bosque would devote himself especially to consultation and
As pointed out by the Solicitor General, respondents' use of the firm office work relating to Spanish law. The paper was headed "Law Office
name Baker & McKenzie constitutes a representation that being - Ney & Bosque. Juan G. Bosque, juris consultoespañol - C.W. Ney,
associated with the firm they could "render legal services of the highest abogado americano."
quality to multinational business enterprises and others engaged in
foreign trade and investment“. This is unethical because Baker & Since that time the defendant Bosque has not personally appeared in the
McKenzie is not authorized to practice law here. - Dacanay v. Baker & courts, and with one exception, occuring through an inadvertance,
McKenzie, et. al. Adm. Case No. 2131 [1985] papers from the office were signed not with the firm name alone nor with
any designation of the firm as attorneys, but with the words "Ney &
Bosque - C.W. Ney, abogado.“ - U.S. vs. Ney and Bosque, 8 Phil. 146 (1907)
Director of Religious Affairs v. Bayot,
A.C. No. L-1117, March 20, 1944 …..
Sunday Tribune of June 13, 1943, which reads as follows: Moreover the firm circular in setting forth the establishment of an office
for the general practice of law in all the courts of the Islands, amounted
Marriage license promptly secured thru our assistance & the annoyance to an assertion of his right and purpose, not effectively qualified by the
of delay or publicity avoided if desired, and marriage arranged to addition that he would devote himself to consultation and office
wishes of parties. Consultation on any matter free for the poor. work relating to Spanish law.
Everything confidential.
Rule 3.01 - A lawyer shall not use or permit the use of any false,
Legal assistance service fraudulent, misleading, deceptive, undignified, self-laudatory or
12 Escolta, Manila, Room, 105 unfair statement or claim regarding his qualifications or legal services.
Tel. 2-41-60. Rule 3.02 - In the choice of a firm name, no false, misleading or
assumed name shall be used. Xxx.
Admonition to a young lawyer
A disbarred lawyer's name cannot be part of a firm's
"The most worth and effective advertisement possible, even for a young name
lawyer, . . . is the establishment of a well-merited reputation for
professional capacity and fidelity to trust. This cannot be forced but must A lawyer who appears under a firm name that contains a disbarred
be the outcome of character and conduct.“ - Director of Religious Affairs lawyer's name commits indirect contempt of court. - David Yu Kimteng,
v. Bayot, A.C. No. L-1117, March 20, 1944 et. al. v. Atty. Young, et. al., G.R. No. 210554, August 05, 2015
5
Moreover, other lawyers do include in their calling cards their
former/present titles/positions like President of the Jaycees, Rotary Club,
etc., so where then does one draw the line?
“Informal partnership” ……..
vis-a-vis
“acting together as a law firm” In Ulep v. Legal Clinic, Inc., we explained that the use of an ordinary and
simple professional card by lawyers is permitted and that the card "may
…….. contain only a statement of his name, the name of the law firm which he
is connected with, address, telephone number and special branch of law
In their defense, respondents admitted that they indeed operated under practiced." In herein case, Judge’s calling cards cannot be considered as
the name Valencia CioconDabao Valencia De La Paz simple and ordinary. By including therein the honors he received
DionelaPandanRubica Law Office, but explained that their association from his law school with a claim of being a bar topnotcher, Judge []
is not a formal partnership, but one that is subject to certain breached the norms of simplicity and modesty required of judges.
"arrangements."
Use of titles “Justice” and “Judge”
According to them, each lawyer contributes a fixed amount every
month for the maintenance of the entire office; and expenses for We have previously declared that the use of titles such as “Justice” is
cases, such as transportation, copying, printing, mailing, and the like are reserved to incumbent and retired members of the Supreme Court, the
shouldered by each lawyer separately, allowing each lawyer to fix and Court of Appeals and the Sandiganbayan and may not be used by any
receive his own professional fees exclusively. other official of the Republic, including those given the rank of “Justice”.
By analogy, the title “Judge” should be reserved only to judges,
……. incumbent and retired, and not to those who were dishonorably
discharged from the service.
As such, the lawyers do not discuss their clientele with the other
lawyers and associates, unless they agree that a case be handled As correctly pointed out by the Investigating Commissioner, the right to
collaboratively. Respondents claim that this has been the practice of the retain and use said title applies only to the aforementioned
law firm since its inception. members of the bench and no other, and certainly not to those who
were removed or dismissed from the judiciary, such as respondent.
They averred that complainant's labor cases were solely and exclusively
handled by Atty. Dionela and not by the entire law firm. Moreover, Thank you for your attention!!
respondents asserted that the qualified theft case filed by FEVE Farms
was handled by Atty. Penalosa, a new associate who had no knowledge of
complainant's labor cases, as he started working for the firm after the
termination thereof.
Held
As the Court observes, the law firm's unethical acceptance of the criminal
case arose from its failure to organize and implement a system by
which it would have been able to keep track of all cases assigned to
its handling lawyers to the end of, among others, ensuring that every
engagement it accepts stands clear of any potential conflict of interest.
Judge [] was circulating calling cards bearing his name as the Presiding
Judge of RTC, Branch 73, Malabon City, and indicating therein that he is
a "bar exams topnotcher (87.55%)" and with "full second honors" from
the Ateneo de Manila University, A.B. and LL.B.
…….