You are on page 1of 4

Journal of º

Refractive �ISHS
Surgery
� lnternational Society of Refractive Surgery
A Portner ofthe American AcodemyofOphthofmology

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF EDITORIAL BOARD


Amar Agarwal, MS, FRCS, FRCOphth Richard L. Lindstrom, MD
·=
Bradley Randleman, MD
Chennai, India Minneapolis, Minnesota
Sa100I of Medicine, University of Southern California
=es,_ ::,-e lnstrtute Jorge L. Alió, MD, PhD Scott MacRae, MD
'...-'-S: San Pablo Street, Suite 4700 Alicante, Spain Rochester, New York
...:,s ;-,s;s,es. CA 90033
Noel Alpins, FR ANZCO, FRCOphth, FACS Marguerite B. McDonald, MD
=. -.,,t: randlema@usc.edu
Meltiourne. Australia Lynbrook, New York

IOR ASSOCIATE EDITeR Renato Ambróslo, Jr., MD, PhD Erik L. Mertens, MD, FEBO
Rio ele Janeiro, Brazil Antwcrp, Belgium
1 C. Knorz, MD
• Gem1any Rosa Braga-Mele, MD, MEd, FRCSC Robert Montés-Micó, OD, PhD
Valencia, Spain
Toronto, Ganada
ASSOCIATE EDITORS Jens Bühren, MD Majid Moshirfar, MD, FACS
Draper, Utah
6eo(ge Asimellis, PhD Frankfurt, Germany
=- e,•.e. Kentucky Beatrice Cochener-Lamard, MD, PhD, FEBO Zoltan Z,Nagy, MD
Budapest, Hungary
Fraocesco Carones, MD Brest, France
.Z-� ,::a Deepinder Dhaliwal, MD Jay Pepose, MD, PhD
Chesterfield, Missouri
·- A. Henderson, MD Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
H. Burkhard Dick, MD, PhD Konrad Pesudovs, PhD
Bedfork Park, Australia
Geoc'ge D. Kymlonls, MD, PhD Bochum, Gem1any
- -a Greece Alaa M. EI-Danasoury, MD Francls Prlce, MD
lndianapolis, Indiana
ne Mala Rocha, MD, PhD Jcddah, Saudi Arabia
• South Carolina Daniel Epstein, MD, PhD Cynthia Roberts, PhD
Zurich, Switzerland Columbus, Ohio
y R. Santhiago, MD, PhD
Beatrice Frueh, MD Alain Saad, MD
=-r :.e J.aneil'O, Brazil
Bern, Switzerland Paris, France
SECTION EDITORS Damien Gatinel, MD Jason Stahl, MD
Paris, France Overland Park, Kansas

Günther Grabner, MD R. Doyle Stulting, MD, PhD


Salzburg, Austria Atlanta, Georgia

Jesper Hjortdal, MD, PhD lkuko Toda, MD


lements and Special Sections Tokyo, Japan
Aarhus, Denmark
R. Krueger, MD, MSE Minoru Tomita, MD, PhD
Jack Holladay, MD
::--...ae.Onoo Tokyo, Japan
Houston, Texas
peutic Refractive Surgery David Huang, MD, PhD Kazuo Tsubota, MD
L Reinstein, MD, MA(Cantab}, FRCSC Portland, Oregon Tokyo, Japan
_--:-.ed Kingdom Luis Izquierdo, Jr., MD, PhD Paolo Vinciguerra, MD
Milan, ltaly
ational Science San Isidro, Peru

Soosan Jacob, MS, FRCS, DNB Li Wang, MD, PhD


Hafezi, MD, PhD
Houston, Texas
S, '=1and Chennai, India
Elias F. Jarade, MD, FICS George O. Waring, IV, MD, FACS
PAGE EDITOR Dubai, United Arab Emirates Mount Pleasant, South Carolina

A. John Kanellopoulos, MD, PhD Steven E. Wilson, MD


"' Athens, Greece
Cleveland, Ohio

Stephen D. Klyce, PhD, FARVO Sonia H. Yoo, MD


RS EMERITI Miami, Florida
Port Washington, New York
-'-sJ.Salz,MD
ca.t.omia
ISRS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
A. John Kanellopoulos, MD, PhD H. Burkhard Dick, MD, PhD Jodhbir S. Mehta, MBBS, PhD
President Germany United States
Greece/United States Alaa M. EI-Dansoury, MD Zoltan z. Nagy, MD
Richard L. Abbott, MD Saudi Arabia Hungary
United States
Damien Gatinel, MD J. Bradley Randleman, MD
Jorge L. Alió, MD, PhD France United States
Spain
Aylin Kilic, MD William B. Trattler, MD
Renato Ambrósio, Jr., MD, PhD Turkey United States
Brazil
Ronald R. Krueger, MD, MSE George O. Waring, IV, MD,
George Beiko, MD United States FACS
-m; Fax: 415.561.8533 Ganada United States
Richard L. Lindstrom, MD
� John So-Min Chang, MD United States Sonia H. Yoo, MD
Hong Kong United States
Marguerite B. McDonald, MD
United States
(Potential confücts of interest for members of the editorial board are available upen request from the office of the Executive
Editor of the Jouma/ of Refractive Surge,y.)
NOVEMBER 2017
Volume 33 • Number 11
Official Journal of the ISRS
®
Journal of �ISRS
ljefré
�'"'""""º""''"'"'Yº'"'"'"'"'"''"'
A ParTMt º'rlltAmtri<OII Nadffll)' º'Oph1holmo/ogr

---
urgery·
EDITORIAL
727 Corneal Cross-Linking (CXL): Standardizing Terminology and Protocol
Nomenclature
J. Bradley Randleman, Marcony R. Santhiago, George D. Kymionis, Farhad Hafezi

ORIGINAL ARTICLES
730 Assesslng the Llkely Effect of Posterior Corneal Curvature on Toric IOL
Calculatlon for IOLs of 2.50 D or Greater Cyllnder Power
Benjamín R. LaHood, Michael Goggin, Adrian Esterman
The authors retrospectively evaluated outcomes after phacoemulsification with toric I0L
implantation in 113 eyes with anterior cornea! keratometric astigmatism requiring I0L cylinder
power of 2.50 D and found a mean overcorrection of 0.16 ± 0.57 D in WTR eyes and a
mean undercorrection of -0.14 ± 0.53 D in ATR eyes, whereas the effect sizes of these
prediction errors (0.40 for WTR and 0.36 for ATR) and the error values fell below a clinically
significant value of 0.25 D.
736 In Vivo Measurement of Longitudinal Chromatic Aberration in Patients
lmplanted With Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses
Maria Vinas, Ana Gonzalez-Ramos, Carlos Dorronsoro, Vyas Akondi, Nuria Garzon,
Francisco Poyales, Susana Marcos
Using a polychromatic adaptive optics system, the authors obtained in vivo LCA measurements
and found that objective LCA was lower than subjective LCA in pseudophakic patients
bilaterally implanted with a hydrophilic trifocal diffractive intraocular lens.
744 Comparison of Wound Sealability Between Femtosecond Laser-Constructed
and Manual Clear Corneal lncisions in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery:
A Pilot Study
Harvey Siy Uy, Sunil Shah, Mark Packer
The authors compared wound sealability between femtosecond laser-constructed and
manual clear corneal incisions during phacoemulsification in 62 eyes and found better overall
sealability after femtosecond laser wound creation, with 22% of eyes in the femtosecond laser
group needing reformation of the anterior chamber and hydration of the wound compared to
77% of eyes in the manual group.
749 Monovision LASIK Versus Presbyopia-Correcting IOLs: Comparison of
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes
Steven C. Schallhorn, David Teenan, Jan A. Venter, Julie M. Schallhorn,
Keith A. Hettinger, Stephen J. Hannan, Martina Pelouskova
The authors retrospectively compared clinical and quality of life outcomes between 590
patients who underwent monovision LASIK and 608 patients with refractive lens exchange
stratified by preoperative refractive error and found no significant objective differences in
outcomes between populations and a statistically significant patient satisfaction advantage
in favor of monovision LASIK for moderate to high myopia only, with refractive lens exchange
groups experiencing more postoperative visual phenomena than patients with monovision
LASIK.

You might also like