04.23.19 PC Final Agenda Packet

Mayor Carolyn G.
Goodman (At-Large) Commissioner Sam Cherry, Chair

Mayor Pro-Tem Lois Tarkanian (Ward 1) Commissioner Louis De Salvio, Vice Chair
Vacant (Ward 2) Commissioner Vicki Quinn
Councilman Bob Coffin (Ward 3) Commissioner Trinity Haven Schlottman
Councilman Stavros S. Anthony (Ward 4) Commissioner Donna Toussaint
Councilman Cedric Crear (Ward 5) Commissioner Christina E. Roush
Councilwoman Michele Fiore (Ward 6) Commissioner Brenda J. Williams
Planning Commission Agenda

Council Chambers - 495 South Main Street - Phone 229-6011
City of Las Vegas Internet Address: www.lasvegasnevada.gov
Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for convenience of persons with disabilities. For meetings held in
the Council Chambers, sound equipment is available for persons with hearing impairments. Reasonable
efforts will be made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an
accommodation to attend and participate in this meeting, please call the DEPARTMENT DESIGNEE at
702-229-6301 and advise of your need at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay
Nevada.
April 23, 2019

6:00 PM
ITEMS MAY BE TAKEN OUT OF THE ORDER PRESENTED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRPERSON. TWO
OR MORE AGENDA ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION MAY BE COMBINED; AND ANY ITEM ON THE AGENDA MAY
BE REMOVED OR RELATED DISCUSSION MAY BE DELAYED AT ANY TIME.
Backup material for this agenda may be obtained from Milagros Escuin, Department of Planning, 333 North Rancho
Drive, 3RD Floor, (702)-229-6301 or on the City's webpage at www.lasvegasnevada.gov.
ACTIONS: All actions except general plan amendments, rezonings, and related cases thereto are final unless an appeal
is filed by the applicant or an aggrieved person, or a review is requested by a member of the city council within ten days
and payment of those costs shall be made upon filing of the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

1. Staff will present each item to the Commission in order as shown on the agenda, along with a recommendation and suggested
conditions of approval, if appropriate.
2. The applicant is asked to be at the public microphone during the staff presentation. When the staff presentation is complete,
the applicant should state his name and address, and indicate whether or not he accepts staff’s conditions of approval.
3. If areas of concern are known in advance, or if the applicant does not accept staff's condition, the applicant or his
representative is invited to make a brief presentation of his item with emphasis on any items of concern.
4. Persons other than the applicant who support the request are invited to make brief statements after the applicant. If more than
one supporter is present, comments should not be repetitive. A representative is welcome to speak and indicate that he speaks
for others in the audience who share his view.
5. Objectors to the item will be heard after the applicant and any other supporters. All who wish to speak will be heard, but in the
interest of time it is suggested that representatives be selected who can summarize the views of any groups of interested
parties.
6. After all objectors' input have been received; the applicant will be invited to respond to any new issues raised.
7. Following the applicant's response, the public hearing will be closed; Commissioners will discuss the item amongst themselves,
ask any questions they feel are appropriate, and proceed to a motion and decision on the matter.
Page 1 of 1187
8. Letters, petitions, photographs and other submissions to the Commission will be retained for the record. Large maps, models
and other materials may be displayed to the Commission from the microphone area, but need not be handed in for the record
unless requested by the Commission.
As a courtesy, we would ask those not speaking to be seated and not interrupt the speaker or the Commission. We
appreciate your courtesy and hope you will help us make your visit with the Commission a good and fair experience.
BUSINESS ITEMS:
1. Call to Order
2. Announcement: Compliance with Open Meeting Law
3. Roll Call
4. Public Comment during this portion of the Agenda must be limited to matters on the Agenda for action. If
you wish to be heard, come to the podium and give your name for the record. The amount of discussion,
as well as the amount of time any single speaker is allowed, may be limited.
5. For Possible Action to Approve the Final Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of March 26, 2019.
6. For Possible Action - Any Items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant wish to be
stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted upon at this time.
ONE MOTION - ONE VOTE
The following are items that may be considered in one motion/one vote. They are considered routine non-public and
public hearing items. All public hearings and non-public hearings will be opened at one time. Any person representing
an application or a member of the public or a member of the Planning Commission not in agreement with the conditions
and all standard conditions for the application recommended by staff, should request to have that item removed from
this part of the agenda.
7. TMP-75951 - TENTATIVE MAP - SHOWBOAT 2019 (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) - APPLICANT: LOCHSA
ENGINEERING - OWNER: 2800 FREMONT, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR
A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 25.55 acres at 2800 Fremont Street (APNs 162-01-201-006 and
007), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75892]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
8. GPA-75937 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BUS YARD
PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: M (MEDIUM
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: ML (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 15.00 acres generally located
west of the intersection of Ann Road and Shaumber Road (APNs 126-36-101-006, 007 and 027), Ward 6 (Fiore)
[PRJ-75900]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
9. ZON-75938 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75937 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BUS YARD
PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: R-CL (SINGLE FAMILY COMPACT-LOT) on 15.00 acres generally located west of the
intersection of Ann Road and Shaumber Road (APNs 126-36-101-006, 007 and 027), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75900].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
10. GPA-75942 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: AMH DEVELOPMENT, LLC
- OWNER: MNC HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM:
DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO:
L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 3.81 acres at the southeast corner of Craig Road and Buffalo Drive (APNs
138-03-301-001 and 004), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75274]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
11. ZON-75943 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75942 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: AMH DEVELOPMENT,
LLC - OWNER: MNC HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: U
(UNDEVELOPED) [DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD
PRESERVATION) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS] TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 3.81 acres
at the southeast corner of Craig Road and Buffalo Drive (APNs 138-03-301-001 and 004), Ward 4 (Anthony)
Page 2 of 1187
12. TMP-75945 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75942 AND ZON-75943 - CRAIG & BUFFALO - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: AMH DEVELOPMENT, LLC - OWNER: MNC HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 19-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 3.81 acres
at the southeast corner of Craig Road and Buffalo Drive (APNs 138-03-301-001 and 004), U (Undeveloped) Zone
[DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designations]
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75274]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
13. WVR-75925 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CARMEL CANYON HOA - For possible
action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO LANDSCAPING ALONG PORTIONS OF LA CONCHA ROAD
AND LEON AVENUE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED FOR AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on a
portion of 51.50 acres adjacent to the northeast corner of Iron Mountain Road and Jones Boulevard (APNs
125-01-397-019; 125-01-497-006 and 012), RPD-3 (Residential Planned Development - 3 Units per Acre) Zone,
Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75733]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
14. VAR-75872 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR - OWNER: STATE
OF NEVADA - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN EXISTING 63-FOOT TALL OFF-
PREMISE SIGN TO BE INCREASED TO 83 FEET IN HEIGHT on 2.12 acres at 1604 West Oakey Boulevard
(APN 162-04-602-009), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75866]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
15. SUP-75967 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHERN NEVADA
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CLINIC - OWNER: A. NICKNAM, PC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW 15 PARKING SPACES WHERE
22 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED 4,928 SQUARE-FOOT CLINIC USE at 1640 East
Sahara Avenue (APN 162-02-411-031), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75911]. Staff
recommends APPROVAL.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
16. ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - VAR-75123 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ
ANN RAINBOW, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 25-FOOT
RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 79 FEET IS REQUIRED on 3.24 acres at the northeast corner
of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard (APNs 125-26-410-004, 005, 006 and 007), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75062]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
17. ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SUP-75124 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-75123 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ ANN RAINBOW, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a
Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,985 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE
ESTABLISHMENT USE at the northeast corner of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-26-410-007),
C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75062]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
18. ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SDR-75125 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO
VAR-75123 AND SUP-75124 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ ANN RAINBOW, LLC, ET AL -
For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 19,785 SQUARE-
FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER INCLUDING A 2,985 SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH FUEL
PUMPS AND CANOPY; AND TWO, 8,400 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS WITH WAIVERS TO
NOT ORIENT THE BUILDINGS TO THE CORNER OR THE STREET FRONT WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED;
TO ALLOW PORTIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE WEST PROPERTY LINE TO BE
THREE FEET, AND PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO BE FIVE FEET WHERE 15 FEET IS
REQUIRED FOR BOTH; AND TO ALLOW PORTIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE
EAST PROPERTY LINE TO BE FIVE FEET WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 3.24 acres at the northeast
corner of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard (APNs 125-26-410-004, 005, 006 and 007), C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75062]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
19. ABEYANCE – SDR-75583 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
DEBRA J. REOCH, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED 16,800 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED WITH A WAIVER
TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST
PERIMETER on 2.42 acres on the east side of Rainbow Boulevard, approximately 85 feet north of Ann Road
(APNs 125-26-410-004 through 006), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75062]. Staff
Page 3 of 1187
20. ABEYANCE – VAR-75755 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75732 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC. - OWNER: TOUCHSTONE ALEXANDER, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Variance TO ALLOW A STUB STREET TERMINUS WHERE A CUL-DE-SAC IS REQUIRED AND TO
ALLOW A 25-FOOT PRIVATE STREET WITHOUT A SIDEWALK WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on 7.60 acres
on the east side of Hualapai Way, approximately 960 feet south of Alexander Road (APNs 138-07-103-006;
138-07-201-001 and 002), PD (Planned Development) Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special
Land Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75604]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
21. ABEYANCE – VAR-75756 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75732 AND VAR-75755 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC. - OWNER: TOUCHSTONE ALEXANDER, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 179 PARKING SPACES WHERE 282 PARKING SPACES ARE
REQUIRED on 7.60 acres, on the east side of Hualapai Way (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001 and 002),
PD (Planned Development) Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation],
Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75604]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
22. ABEYANCE – SDR-75639 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75732 AND VAR-75755
AND VAR-75756 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC. - OWNER: TOUCHSTONE
ALEXANDER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED
130-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 7.60 acres on the east side of
Hualapai Way, approximately 960 feet south of Alexander Road (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001 and
002), PD (Planned Development) Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75604]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
23. ABEYANCE – TMP-75640 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75732, VAR-75755, VAR-75756 AND
SDR-75639 - HUALAPAI AND ALEXANDER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC.
- OWNER: TOUCHSTONE ALEXANDER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A
PROPOSED 130-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 7.60 acres on the east
side of Hualapai Way, approximately 960 feet south of Alexander Road (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001
and 002), PD (Planned Development) Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special Land Use
Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75604]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
24. GPA-75668 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ZION LOVINGIER
- For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.50 acres at 8311 Farm Road (APN 125-16-301-003),
25. ZON-75669 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75668 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ZION
LOVINGIER - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-1
(LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.50 acres at 8311 Farm Road (APN 125-16-301-003), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75621].
Staff recommends DENIAL.
26. GPA-75931 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN J
SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: PCD
(PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) TO: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 1.25 acres on the west
side of El Capitan Way, approximately 340 feet north of O’Hare Road (APN 125-05-302-012), Ward 6 (Fiore)
[PRJ-75902]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
27. ZON-75932 - REZONING - RELATED TO GPA-75931 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN J
SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) ZONE
[PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION] TO: R-D (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL-RESTRICTED) on 1.25 acres on the west side of El Capitan Way, approximately 340 feet north
of O’Hare Road (APN 125-05-302-012), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75902]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
28. GPA-75954 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GOLD LT RE, LLC
- For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.06 acres at 5445 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN
125-35-101-007), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75934]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
29. ZON-75955 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75954 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GOLD LT RE,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-1 (LIMITED
COMMERCIAL) on 1.06 acres at 5445 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-007), Ward 4 (Anthony)
Page 4 of 1187
30. GPA-75958 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:
FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R
(RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO: L (LOW
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 4.43 acres on the north side of Regena Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee
Pee Lane (APN 125-30-502-008), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
31. ZON-75959 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75958 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON -
OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E
(RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 4.43 acres on the north side of Regena
Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee Pee Lane (APN 125-30-502-008), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff
32. VAR-75960 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75958 AND ZON-75959 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR
HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
A 1.00 CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED AND A PRIVATE STREET
WITHOUT AN ACCESS GATE NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS on 4.43 acres
on the north side of Regena Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee Pee Lane (APN 125-30-502-008), R-
E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
33. VAC-75961 - VACATION RELATED TO GPA-75958, ZON-75959 AND VAR-75960 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a
Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located north of Regena Avenue, east of Tee
Pee Lane (APN 125-30-502-008), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
34. TMP-75962 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75958, ZON-75959, VAR-75960 AND VAC-75961 -
REGENA CHIEFTAIN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE
PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED 16-LOT SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 60-FOOT INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE
220 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO DEFER OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING STREETLIGHTS FOR
REGENA AVENUE WHERE OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT
on 4.43 acres on the north side of Regena Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee Pee Lane (APN
125-30-502-008), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore)
SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R
(RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.11 acres on the north side of
Alexander Road, approximately 960 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-027), Ward 4 (Anthony)
OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E
(RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.11 acres on the north side of Alexander
Road, approximately 960 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-027), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75904].
HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
A 1.00 CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED; PRIVATE STREETS WITHOUT
A GATE TO NOT BE CONSTRUCTED TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS; AND A NON-GATED MODIFIED
STREET TERMINUS WHERE A CUL-DE-SAC IS REQUIRED on 2.11 acres on the north side of Alexander
Road, approximately 960 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-027), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75904]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
38. VAC-75974 - VACATION RELATED TO GPA-75969, ZON-75972 AND VAR-75973 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for
a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements and portions of a public sewer easement generally
located on the north side of Alexander Road, west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-027), Ward 4 (Anthony)
Page 5 of 1187
ALEXANDER JULIANO EAST - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY
TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED EIGHT-LOT SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.11 acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 960
feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-027), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single
Family Residential)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75904]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) TO: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.09 acres on the north side of Alexander Road,
approximately 1,640 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-025), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75903]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE
ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.09 acres on the north side of Alexander Road,
approximately 1,640 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-025), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75903]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 1.00
CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED; PRIVATE STREETS NOT
CONSTRUCTED TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS AND WITHOUT AN ACCESS GATE WHERE SUCH IS
REQUIRED; AND A MODIFIED STREET TERMINUS WHERE A CUL-DE-SAC OR HAMMERHEAD IS
REQUIRED on 2.09 acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 1,640 feet west of Durango Drive
(APN 138-05-801-025), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4
(Anthony) [PRJ-75903]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
43. VAC-75978 - VACATION RELATED TO GPA-75971, ZON-75976, AND VAR-75977 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Petition to
Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located on the north side of Alexander Road, west of
Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-025), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75903]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
ALEXANDER JULIANO WEST - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST
- For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED EIGHT-LOT SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.09 acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 1,640 feet west
of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-025), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family
Residential)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75903]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
45. GPA-75997 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND
RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 5.03 acres at the
southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of
Parcel Maps), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
46. ZON-75998 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75997 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000,
LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [R (RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS]
TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 5.03 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN
125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
47. SUP-75999 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-75997 AND ZON-75998 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 3,500 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN) USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW
A 630-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 1,500 FEET IS
REQUIRED at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File
124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural
Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designations] [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 6
(Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
Page 6 of 1187
48. SUP-76000 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-75997, ZON-75998 AND SUP-75999 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit
FOR A PROPOSED 6,000 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at the
southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel
Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation)
General Plan Designations] [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
49. SDR-76002 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999 AND
SUP-76000 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 18,500 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT,
INCLUDING A 6,000 SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH FUEL PUMPS AND CANOPY,
RESTAURANT AND DRIVE THROUGH LANE; 3,500 SQUARE-FOOT TAVERN; 5,000 SQUARE-FOOT
RESTAURANT AND 4,000 SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL RETAIL SPACE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW
BUILDINGS NOT TO BE ORIENTED TO THE CORNER AND STREET FRONTAGES WHERE SUCH IS
REQUIRED on 5.03 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010
and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP
(Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designations] [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward
6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
50. TMP-76001 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000 AND
SDR-76002 - PUBLIC HEARING - ELKHORN PLAZA (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) - APPLICANT/OWNER:
TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL
SUBDIVISION on 5.03 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010
and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP
(Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designations] [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward
6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
51. ZON-76145 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on
a request for a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION)
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION] TO: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) on 3.55 acres at the southwest corner of
Elkhorn Road and Eula Street (Lot 1 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75935]. Staff
52. TMP-76004 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO ZON-76145 - ELKHORN ESTATES - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A SIX-LOT
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 3.55 acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Eula
Street (Lot 1 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation)
General Plan Designation] [PROPOSED: R-E (Residence Estates)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75935]. Staff
53. ZON-75980 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F.
WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning
FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 5.09 acres on the north
side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 300 feet east of Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), Ward 6 (Fiore)
54. VAR-75981 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-75980 AND VAR-75981 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR
HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F. WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST -
For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 1.00 CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS
THE MINIMUM REQUIRED; PRIVATE STREETS NOT CONSTRUCTED TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS
WITHOUT AN ACCESS GATE; AND PRIVATE STREETS TO TERMINATE IN STUB STREETS WHERE CUL-
DE-SACS OR HAMMERHEADS ARE REQUIRED on 5.09 acres on the north side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 300 feet east of Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75891]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
55. VAC-75983 - VACATION RELATED TO ZON-75980 AND VAR-75981 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR
HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F. WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST -
For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located on
the north side of Deer Springs Way, east of Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75891].
Staff recommends APPROVAL.
Page 7 of 1187
56. TMP-75984 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO ZON-75980, VAR-75981 AND VAC-75983 - DEER SPRINGS
EULA - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F. WONG AND EUNICE
ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A
PROPOSED 16-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 181-FOOT
INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS REQUIRED on 5.09 acres on the north side of Deer Springs
Way, approximately 300 feet east of Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75891]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
57. VAR-75906 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GILCREASE NATURE SANCTUARY -
For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 38 PARKING SPACES WHERE 94 ARE REQUIRED
on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel Street (APN 125-09-401-033), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-74896]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
58. VAR-76015 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-75906 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GILCREASE
NATURE SANCTUARY - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW NO HALF-STREET
IMPROVEMENTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel Street (APN 125-09-401-033),
59. SDR-75907 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75906 AND VAR-76015 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GILCREASE NATURE SANCTUARY - For possible action on a request for
a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-43981) FOR THE PROPOSED 3,500
SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (OUTDOOR)
FACILITY [NATURE SANCTUARY] on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel Street (APN 125-09-401-033), Ward 6 (Fiore)
60. VAR-75964 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT -
OWNER: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO
ALLOW DEVIATIONS FROM TITLE 19.10.020 C-V (CIVIC) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS on a portion of 20.00
acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Fort Apache Road (APNs 125-19-802-013 and 006),
C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75913]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
61. SDR-75965 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75964 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - OWNER: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT,
ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED UTILITY
INSTALLATION [ZONE RESERVOIR AND PUMPING STATION] on a portion of 20.00 acres at the northwest
corner of Centennial Parkway and Fort Apache Road (APNs 125-19-802-013 and 006), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward
6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75913]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
62. VAR-75957 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS-CLARK COUNTY LIBRARY
DISTRICT - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A PROPOSED 16-FOOT TALL
FREESTANDING SIGN WHERE 12 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED AND A PROPOSED ANIMATED SIGN
WITHIN 200 FEET OF PROPERTY ZONED FOR RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE SUCH IS PROHIBITED on 8.32
acres at 2851 East Bonanza Road (APN 139-36-101-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75912]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
63. SUP-75949 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THAI HEALING SOLUTIONS SPA -
OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A
PROPOSED 1,432 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE ESTABLISHMENT USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-
FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY WHERE 400 FEET IS
REQUIRED at 6720 North Hualapai Way, Suite #180 (APN 125-19-313-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone,
Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75933]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
64. SDR-75970 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TORAH
LEARNING CENTER, INC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A
PROPOSED TWO-STORY, 5,675 SQUARE-FOOT CLASSROOM BUILDING ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
HOUSE OF WORSHIP on 0.60 acres at 9590 West Sahara Avenue (APN 163-06-816-024), C-1 (Limited
Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Vacant) [PRJ-75914]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
DIRECTOR'S BUSINESS:
65. TXT-76115- TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS - For
possible action on a request to amend LVMC Title 19.12 Permissible Uses to add Minimum Special Use Permit
Page 8 of 1187
requirements to the Multi-Family Residential use, and to provide for other related matters. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
Citizens Participation:
66. Citizens Participation: Public comment during this portion of the agenda must be limited to matters
within the jurisdiction of the Planning Commission. No subject may be acted upon by the Planning
Commission unless that subject is on the agenda and is scheduled for action. If you wish to be
heard, come to the podium and give your name for the record. The amount of discussion on any
single subject, as well as the amount of time any single speaker is allowed, may be limited.
Facilities are provided throughout City Hall for the convenience of persons with disabilities. Reasonable efforts will be
made to assist and accommodate persons with disabilities or impairments. If you need an accommodation to attend and
participate in this meeting, please call the City Clerk’s office at 702-229-6311 and advise of your need at least 48 hours
in advance of the meeting. Dial 7-1-1 for Relay Nevada.
THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PROPERLY NOTICED AND POSTED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
City Hall, 495 South Main Street, 1st Floor
Clark County Government Center, 500 South Grand Central Parkway
Grant Sawyer Building, 555 East Washington Avenue
City of Las Vegas Development Services Center, 333 North Rancho Drive
Page 9 of 1187
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
Planning Commission Agenda Item No.:
Meeting of: April 23, 2019 1
DEPARTMENT: Planning
DIRECTOR: Robert Summerfield
SUBJECT:
CALL TO ORDER
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
SUBJECT:
ANNOUNCEMENT: COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
SUBJECT:
ROLL CALL
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
SUBJECT:
PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA MUST BE LIMITED TO
MATTERS ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION. IF YOU WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE
PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD. THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION, AS
WELL AS THE AMOUNT OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 26, 2019.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION

SUBJECT:
FOR POSSIBLE ACTION - Any items from the Planning Commission, staff and/or the applicant
wish to be stricken or held in abeyance to a future meeting may be brought forward and acted
upon at this time.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Planning CONSENT

SUBJECT:
TMP-75951 - TENTATIVE MAP - SHOWBOAT 2019 (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) -
APPLICANT: LOCHSA ENGINEERING - OWNER: 2800 FREMONT, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 25.55 acres
at 2800 Fremont Street (APNs 162-01-201-006 and 007), C-2 (General Commercial) Zone, Ward
3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75892]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
May go to City Council on: 06/05/2019

OR May be Final Action (Unless Appealed Within 7 Days)
PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:
Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0
City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
BACKUP DOCUMENTATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps
2. Conditions and Staff Report
3. Supporting Documentation
4. Photo(s)
5. Justification Letter
6. Action Letter for SDR-74657 [PRJ-74513]
7. Action Letter for SUP-74656 [PRJ-74513]
8. Action Letter for SUP-74781 [PRJ-74513]
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: APRIL 23, 2019
DEPARTMENT: PLANNING
ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LOCHSA ENGINEERING - OWNER: 2800
FREMONT, LLC
** STAFF RECOMMENDATION(S) **
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TMP-75951 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED N/A
NOTICES MAILED N/A
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Conditions Page One
April 23, 2019 - Planning Commission Meeting
** CONDITIONS **
TMP-75951 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final Map
is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map within
four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.
2. Street names must be provided in accordance with the City’s Street Naming
Regulations.
3. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire hydrants
and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to construction of
any combustible structures.
4. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State

Subdivision Statutes.
Public Works
5. Per condition #18 of SDR-74657, grant a Traffic Signal Easement, if needed, on the
south side of Fremont Street on the Final Map of this site.
6. Construct off-site improvements on Fremont Street as shown on the approved

Tentative Map prior to recordation of the Final Map for this site.
7. Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All parcels
created through this map shall have perpetual unobstructed access to all driveways
servicing the overall subdivision unless incompatible uses can be demonstrated to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer.”
8. Per Title 19.16.060.W.2, sewer service for this commercial subdivision shall be
shown in accordance with one of the following alternatives, and the appropriate note
shall appear on the face of the recorded Final Map:
I. On-site sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per
the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) of this commercial
subdivision.
II. On-site sewers are a common element privately owned and maintained per
the Joint Use Agreement of this commercial subdivision.
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Conditions Page Two
9. Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states “All subdivided
lots within this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage rights across all
existing and future parcel limits.”
10. Label Easement 35 as a Clark County Aviation Easement on the Final Map for this
site.
11. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
by the Department of Public Works prior to the recordation of the Final Map for this
site. Appropriate drainage easements shall be reserved if recommended by the
approved Drainage Plan/Study. The drainage study required by SDR-74657 may
be used to satisfy this requirement provided that it addresses the Tentative Map
area.
12. Comply with all applicable conditions of approval for Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-74657) and any other site related actions.
13. As per Unified Development Code (UDC) 19.16.060.G, all requirements must be
complied with or such future compliance must be guaranteed by an approved
performance security method in accordance with UDC sections 19.02.130.
14. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative Map
is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size, type
and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and
drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans
by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless
specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to the
recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision-related construction plans,
whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute
approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a revised Tentative
Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Staff Report Page One
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant requests approval for a one-lot commercial subdivision on 25.55 acres
located at 2800 Fremont Street. Currently the site consists of two commercial lots with a
single owner. There is an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-74657) for a
344-unit multi-family residential complex with 132,644 square-foot of commercial space.
Remapping the site will give the owner the flexibility to sell portions of the site and
delineate ownership through future records of survey. Staff recommends approval of this
request with conditions.
ISSUES
 A commercial subdivision will allow the owner the flexibility to sell portions of land to
multiple owners. A single-lot subdivision accomplishes the desired flexibility.
ANALYSIS
Site Location, General Plan and Zoning Designations
The site consists of two parcels (APN’s 162-01-201-006 and 007) on an irregular-shaped
lot. In 2006, the City of Las Vegas Redevelopment Area 1 (RDA) was amended to include
162-01-201-007 with other parcels along Fremont Street. When APN 162-01-201-006
was annexed in 2014, it did not become part of the RDA. As a result, the current General
Plan designations of APNs 162-01-201-006 and 007 differ; the RDA parcel (007) is
designated C (Commercial) and the non-RDA parcel (006) is designated GC (General
Commercial). Both parcels are in separate tax districts; however, both land use
designations (C and GC) allow for similar uses and zoning districts, and both APNs are
zoned C-2; therefore, there is no need for a General Plan Amendment on APN 162-01-
201-006 to make the designations consistent with each other and no need to include this
parcel in the RDA.
Over 21 acres of this site is in the RDA 1. The remapping of this site is consistent with the
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan section IV (Land Uses and Development Requirements)
subsection (G)(1)(e) Which states: “All development plans (whether public or private)
shall be processed in the manner provided by applicable City codes, as they are, or as
they may be, amended from time to time.” This Tentative map will allow the approved
development plan to be constructed in a matter consistent with City of Las Vegas zoning
and building codes by removing that property line that would bisect proposed building 17
of Site Development Plan Review (SDR-74657).
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Staff Report Page Two
Pursuant to Title 19.18, the definition of Lot Frontage is “The side of the lot which fronts
on a street or drive. In the case of a corner lot, the “front” of the lot shall be considered to
be the side which has the lesser dimension in width, unless the Director authorizes
another side to be designated as the “front” and attaches whatever conditions are deemed
necessary to ensure that such alternative designation does not result in land use
incompatibility with the surrounding area.” Fremont Street was determined to be the lot
frontage. The subject property has an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
74657). It was reviewed and approved with the lot frontage along Fremont Street. The
mapping of this site as a one-lot commercial subdivision will allow for the construction of
the approved development plan and future records of survey to be drawn delineating
ownership of portions of the site.
Primary access to the site will be from Fremont Street as depicted on approved SDR-
74657. Secondary access will be provided along Atlantic Street. Cross access and shared
parking will be shared throughout the commercial subdivision. Condition of approval
number Seven will ensure that shared access and parking will be recorded on the Final
Map. Additionally, Staff notes that cross sections were shown for the site, but they do not
show existing or proposed elevations. However, since the site has been in existence for
several years and all walls are existing walls and no retaining walls are shown, staff does
not anticipate perimeter walls that are greater than the allowable height.
This application was properly noticed and the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD)
returned the following comments. “These parcels are currently served by LVVWD for both
fire and domestic service and neither have the backflow prevention required for this use
per NAC 445A.67195. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for
domestic meter sizing, fire flow availability and backflow retrofit. To comply with LVVWD
Service Rules, executed CC&Rs or REA regarding the shared water system between the
two parcels will be required for civil plan approval.”
Findings
This Tentative map is will combine the two parcels listed above and allow for the
construction of a 132,644 square-foot commercial development and a 344-unit multi-
family complex approved by SDR-74657. This Tentative map is consistent with NRS 278,
Title 19 zoning requirements, the RDA and the City of Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan;
therefore, Staff recommends approval of this request subject to conditions.
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Staff Report Page Three
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.

The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-9219) to
change the future land use designations on various parcels located within
05/17/06 the Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan area and proposed Redevelopment
Plan expansion area to Commercial, Mixed Use, Industrial or Public
Facilities. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Tentative Map (TMP-16274) for a
10/05/06 one-lot commercial subdivision (Castaways Station) on 26.12 acres at
2800 Fremont Street. The approval expired 10/05/08.
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-56263) 4.45 acres of
land on the west side of Fremont Street, approximately 220 feet north of
12/17/14
Oakey Boulevard, into the City of Las Vegas. The annexation became
effective 12/26/14.
A Parcel Map (PMP-58350) for a two-lot merger and resubdivision on
04/16/15 30.55 acres at the northeast corner of Oakey Boulevard and Atlantic
Street was recorded.
Code Enforcement processed a Case (186368) for a homeless
02/27/18 encampment and rubbish along the property. The case was resolved on
03/28/18.
Code Enforcement processed a Case (190172) regarding a homeless
06/06/18 camp on this site facing Oakey Boulevard. The case was resolved on
09/17/18.
07/30/18 encampment and rubbish along the property. The case was resolved on
03/28/18.
09/24/18
encampment. The case has not been resolved as of 03/13/19.
The Planning Commission approved request for a Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-74657) for a two-story, 344-Unit multi-family
residential development with 132,644 square-foot commercial
development with Waivers to allow commercial buildings to not be
12/11/18 located not at the minimum setback line, a Special Use Permit (SUP-
74656) for a Multi-Family Residential Use, and a Special Use Permit
(SUP-74781) for a 13,651 square-foot Package Liquor Off-Sale
Establishment Use at the northeast corner of Oakey Boulevard and
Atlantic Street.
Most Recent Change of Ownership

05/09/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Staff Report Page Four
Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

There are no active business licenses or building permits on this site.
A building permit (C-46254) was issued for demolition of a six-story
07/06/05 parking structure and foundations at 2800 Fremont Street (Castaways
Hotel/Casino). This permit expired on 01/03/06.
A building permit (C-47697) was issued for demolition of three, two-story
07/26/05 motel buildings at 2800 Fremont Street (Castaways Hotel/Casino). This
permit expired on 02/03/06.
A building permit (C-48881) was issued for demolition of an existing 18-
story tower, three-story west casino, two-story east casino, two-story
08/12/05 bowling alley, two-story sports book connector and three porte cocheres
at 2800 Fremont Street (Castaways Hotel/Casino). This permit expired
on 02/16/06.
Pre-Application Meeting
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss
02/25/19 submittal requirements for entitlements for a one-lot commercial
subdivision.
Neighborhood Meeting
A neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.
Details of Application Request

Site Area
Net Acres 25.55
Existing Land Planned or Special

Surrounding Existing Zoning
Use Per Title Land Use
Property District
19.12 Designation
GC (General
Subject C-2 (General
Undeveloped Commercial)
Property Commercial)
C (Commercial)
C-2 (General
North Undeveloped C (Commercial)
Commercial)
Single Family, L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
South
Detached Residential) Residential)
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Staff Report Page Five

Property District
19.12 Designation
Motel
General Retail
Store, Other Than
H-2 ( General Highway
Listed
Frontage) – Clark
Undeveloped County
Private Club, CT (Commercial

East Lodge or Fraternal Tourist)
Organization
C-2 (General
Motor Vehicle
Commercial) – Clark
Sales, Used
County
Motor Vehicle
H-1 (Limited Resort and
Sales, Used
Apartment) – Clark
Single Family,
County
Detached
L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
West
Residential) Residential)
Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance

No Applicable Master Plan Area N/A
Special Area and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Area or Overlay Districts N/A
Other Plans or Special Requirements Compliance
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area Y
Interlocal Agreement N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification N/A
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance N/A
MR
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892]
Staff Report Page Six
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:

Standard Required/Allowed Provided Compliance
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 1,330 Feet Y*
*The front property line is on Fremont Street as approved by SDR-74656.
Functional Actual Compliance

Governing
Street Name Classification Street Width with Street
Document
of Street(s) (Feet) Section
Master Plan of
Primary
Fremont Street Streets and 165 Y
Arterial
Highways Map
Atlantic Street Local Street Title 13 52 Y
Oakey
Minor Collector Title 13 72 Y
Boulevard
MR
x
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
╗ฌ
Աฌ
Աฌ
Aฌ
Ｃฌ
Ｃฌ
Ｃฌ
╗ฌ
Aฌ
Աฌ
╗ฌ
Aฌ
Աฌ
Ｃฌ
ǲฌ Ќ ฌ Ḛ
ฌ
●ฌ
Ձฌ
Ḷฌ
b ฌ Ġ ฌƆ ฌ
Ќ ฌ ǲฌ ǲฌ Ő
ฌ
Aฌ
●ฌ
ЌฌḚฌ
ｘ̶゜ธՙ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎɱธ
ǲฌ Ќ ฌ
Ḛฌ
●ฌ
Ձฌ
Ḷฌ
Ќ ฌ ǲฌǲฌ
b ฌ Ġ ฌƆ ฌ
Őฌ
Aฌ
●ฌ
Ќฌ Ḛฌ
″̶ㅡㄦ7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7İਙ่֭⎯7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ
Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7‫ں‬ｘｘฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ฎฌ
Оγਙ่֭7ӧՙｘธỏ7̶″ㄦֱɱ̶‫ں‬ธฌ
'Ŵゥ7ӧՙｘธỏ7̶″ㄦֱɱ̶‫ں‬ՙฌ
ʉʉʉ㈠кਙ㌱γ⎯Ŵ㈠㌱ਙこฌ
Ќฌ Ḛ ǲฌ
ฌ
●ฌ
ｘ̶゜ｘㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ձฌ
Ḷฌ
Ќฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎɱธ
ǲฌ ǲฌ
b ฌĠ ฌ Ɔ ฌ
A
Őฌ
ฌ
●ฌ Ќ
ฌḚ ฌ
″̶ㅡㄦ7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ7İਙ่֭⎯7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠ฌ
Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7‫ں‬ｘｘฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ฎฌ
Оγਙ่֭7ӧՙｘธỏ7̶″ㄦֱɱ̶‫ں‬ธฌ
'Ŵゥ7ӧՙｘธỏ7̶″ㄦֱɱ̶‫ں‬ՙฌ
ʉʉʉ㈠кਙ㌱γ⎯Ŵ㈠㌱ਙこฌ
TMP-75951 [PRJ-75892] - TENTATIVE MAP - APPLICANT: LOCHSA ENGINEERING - OWNER: 2800 FREMONT, LLC
2800 FREMONT STREET
03/13/19
PRJ-75892
03/06/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
PRJ-75892
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
GPA-75937 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: BUS
YARD PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: M (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: ML (MEDIUM LOW DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) on 15.00 acres generally located west of the intersection of Ann Road and
Shaumber Road (APNs 126-36-101-006, 007 and 027), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75900]. Staff
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL
2. Land Use Map
3. Staff Report - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: BUS YARD PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-75937 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
ZON-75938 Staff recommends APPROVAL. GPA-75937
** NOTIFICATION **
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 4
NOTICES MAILED 18 - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938
PROTESTS 0 - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938
APPROVALS 0 - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to change the land use designation and rezone 15.00
undeveloped acres generally located west of the intersection of Ann Road and Shaumber
Road.
ISSUES
 A General Plan Amendment is requested to change the land use designation on this
site from M (Medium Density Residential) to ML (Medium Low Density Residential).
Staff recommends approval.
 A Rezoning is requested on this site from R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to R-CL
(Single Family Compact-Lot). Staff recommends approval.
 A Site Development Plan Review for a specific development on this site has not been
submitted.
ANALYSIS
The site consists of three undeveloped parcels located near the western edge of the city
limits, northwest of the Clark County School District bus transit yard. The site is
surrounded by undeveloped property. West of the site is a 380 acre parcel annexed to
the City on 01/14/17. On the south, east, and portions of the north is 58 acres owned by
the Bureau of Land Management. A gravel pit operation is located on the southern portion
of the parcel to the south, as well as on the parcel to the west. A Site Development Plan
Review has not been submitted for any specific development on this site at this time.
The subject site was annexed by the City in two portions in 2007, and has a land use
designation of M (Medium Density Residential). According to the Land Use & Rural
Neighborhoods Preservation Element of the 2020 Master Plan, the (Medium) designation
allows up to 25.49 dwelling units per acre. To the north are parcels designated M (Medium
Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) which allows 2.00
dwelling units per acre. To the south, east, and a portion of the north is a parcel with a PF
(Public Facilities) designation where residential density is not applicable. The land to the
west is designated DR (Desert Rural) which allows up to 2.49 units per acre.
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
The applicant is proposing to designate the subject site as ML (Medium Low Density)
which allows single family detached homes up to 8.49 units per acre. This is a 66 percent
decrease in density from the current (Medium) designation. Ann Road, a 100-foot Primary
Arterial, will be extended westward to abut the northern boundary of this site. In addition,
the Sheep Mountain Parkway freeway connector is proposed to run from approximately
Ann Road north, parallel to the existing 215 freeway corridor. Considering the decrease
in density, the adjacent land use designations, and the expected growth in the area, staff
is recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment (GPA-75937) request.
The applicant is proposing to Rezone (ZON-75938) the subject site as R-CL (Single
Family Compact-Lot) which allows a minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet. According to
Title 19.06.080, the proposed R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zone is consistent with
the proposed ML (Medium Low Density) land use designation. The final density of any
future residential development on the subject site will be limited by the ML (Medium Low
Density) designation of 8.49 single family dwelling units; therefore, staff is recommending
approval of the Rezoning request.
On 01/13/17, the City annexed approximately 4,500 acres of federal land generally
located along the northwest boundaries of the City, including portions of land adjacent to
and near the Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument and the Red Rock National
Conservation Area. These lands include an area extending over one mile west of the
subject site. Most of this land carries a Undeveloped zoning designation, which is
considered a “holding” zone to prevent haphazard development until such time as another
district becomes compatible with neighboring properties. As additional property is
developed along Ann Road, the 215, and the proposed Sheep Mountain Parkway, it is
expected that higher density uses will be appropriate in the area. The subject site would
provide more intense residential development that will provide a buffer for less intense
residential development expected to the west within the newly annexed area. Staff
therefore recommends approval of the General Plan Amendment and Rezoning. If
denied, the site will retain the existing General Plan and zoning designations.
FINDINGS (GPA-75937)
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following conditions
be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:
1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is

compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations,
The ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan designation allows for up
to 8.49 dwelling units per acre. This is a proposed decrease in existing density, and
is compatible with the RNP (Rural Preservation Neighborhood) land use
designation to the north. All adjacent property is currently undeveloped.
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be

compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts,
The zoning districts supported by the proposed ML (Medium Low Density

Residential) General Plan Designation include the proposed R-CL (Single Family
Compact-Lot), which is compatible with existent and adjacent zoning districts
3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General
Plan Amendment; and
There is currently no paved access to the subject site. Ann Road, a Primary Arterial
roadway, is proposed to be extended west by the City and would provide direct
access to the property. A future Site Development Plan Review must be filed to
review ingress and egress design and effects to neighborhood traffic, which is
currently affected by commuting buses from Clark County School District’s bus
transit yard facility. The nearest public recreation facility is located approximately
5,450 feet south of this site. Utilities must be extended to serve this site.
4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and

policies.
The proposed amendment conforms to the intent and policies of the 2020 Master
Plan. There are no neighborhood plans or special area plans that include this
area.
FINDINGS (ZON-75938)
In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning

Commission or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.
If approved, the proposed R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning district would
conform to the proposed ML (Medium Low Density Residential) General Plan
designation.
2. The uses which would be allowed on the subject property by approving the
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts.
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
The R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) zoning district allows for single family
residential development with densities up to 8.49 dwelling units per acre. The
surrounding area is currently undeveloped and zoning designations are subject to
change as development expands west of Shaumber Road.
3. Growth and development factors in the community indicate the need for or
appropriateness of the rezoning.
Ann Road, a Primary Arterial, will be extended west along the northern boundary of
this site. The city limits were recently extended westward through annexation
adjacent to the Red Rock Conservation Area. This land will provide a buffer
between the Conservation Area and higher densities.
4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be

adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zoning district.
Access to the property will be provided by the future western extension of Ann
Road, which will align with the northern boundary of the site. Ann Road is proposed
to be a Primary Arterial (100 feet wide) in this area at full build-out, which will be
adequate in size to accommodate the densities allowed by the R-CL zoning district.
Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

The City Council approved the Annexation (ANX-10156) of approximately 246
acres generally located west of Clark County 215 and east of the Puli Road
05/16/07
alignment. The action included the subject area. The annexation became
effective 05/25/07.
The City Council approved an Annexation (ANX-23477) of 5 acres located on
11/21/07 the east side of the Puli Road alignment 660 feet south of the Ann Road
alignment. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-25625) to amend
a portion of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan of the Master Plan from PCD
08/20/08 (Planned Community Development) to PF (Public Facilities) on 131.7 acres at
the southwest corner of Ann Road and Clark County 215. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval.
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]

The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-25626) from U (Undeveloped)
[PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan Designation] to C-V
(Civic) on 131.7 acres at the southwest corner of Ann Road and Clark County
215. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Variance (VAR-38553) to
allow an 11-foot tall retaining wall where six feet is allowed and to allow the
combined height of retaining and screening walls to be 14 feet where 12 feet is
allowed on a 37.20-acre portion of a 131.70-acre parcel at the northwest corner
07/29/10 of Washburn Road and Alpine Ridge Way. Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-38557) for a proposed 41,000 square-foot Transit Yard on a
37.20-acre portion of a 131.70-acre parcel at the northwest corner of Washburn
Road and Alpine Ridge Way. Staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-53055) to amend
the Master Plan of Streets and Highways and Map 2A of the Transportation &
Streets and Highways Element of the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan to assign
05/21/14
classifications and right-of-way alignments to several roadways in the
northwest portion of the city. The Planning Commission and staff
recommended approval.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-66493) from
PCD (Planned Community Development) and PF (Public Facilities) to M
(Medium Density Residential) on 15.00 acres on the west side of Shaumber
Road, approximately 700 feet south of Ann Road. The Planning Commission
02/15/17 and staff recommended approval.
and C-V (Civic) to R-3 (Medium Density Residential on 15.00 acres on the west
side of Shaumber Road, approximately 700 feet south of Ann Road. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.

08/07/18 A deed was recorded for a change in ownership on APN 126-36-101-007.

No related building permits/business licenses.
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
A pre-application meeting was conducted over the telephone with the
02/26/19 applicant to discuss submittal requirements for a General Plan Amendment
and Rezoning applications.
Centennial Hills Community Center YMCA
6:00 - 6:30 pm
04/11/19 1 Consultant
1 Developer
1 Planning Staff Member
0 Members of the Public
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an undeveloped area within
03/13/19 mountain terrain, and is situated at a higher elevation than Shaumber Road
and Ann Road. Shaumber Road is used extensively by commuting buses.

Site Area
Gross Acres 15.00
Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Land Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Use Designation District
19.12
Subject M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
Undeveloped
Property Residential) Residential)
M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
North Undeveloped RNP (Rural Neighborhood R-E (Residence
Preservation) Estates)
PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Undeveloped/
South PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Gravel Pit
East Undeveloped PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
West Undeveloped DR (Desert Rural) U(DR)
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
Staff Report Page Seven
Master Plan Areas Compliance

Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Trails (MUNE Transportation Trail) N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification
N/A
Assessment)
Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed

R-3 (Medium Density
13-50 du/ac* 500*
Residential)
Proposed Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed
R-CL (Single Family
14.52 du/ac 217*
Compact-Lot)
General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
M (Medium Density
25.49 du/ac 382
Residential)
Proposed General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
ML (Medium Low Density
8.49 du/ac 127
Residential)
*Density is limited by the maximum number of units per acre allowed by the approved General
Plan designation.
Actual
Functional Compliance
Street
Street Name Classification of Governing Document with Street
Width
Street(s) Section
(Feet)
Master Plan of Streets
Shaumber Road Major Collector 80 Y
and Highways
Master Plan of Streets
Ann Road (future
Primary Arterial and Highways 80 Y
alignment)
(GPA-53055)
JAB
GPA-75937 and ZON-75938 [PRJ-75900]
Staff Report Page Eight
Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD):

The parcel is not served by LVVWD. The closest distribution line is located in Shaumber
Road. A pre-submittal meeting is advised.
JAB
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
GPA-75937 [PRJ-75900] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-75938 - APPLICANT/OWNER: BUS
YARD PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL
WEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF ANN ROAD AND SHAUMBER ROAD
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
BUS YARD PROPERTIES, LLC & VENTO BUS YARD, LLC
1635 Village Center Circle, Ste. 100
Las Vegas, NV 89134
Ph. (702) 242-4949 ▪ Fax (702) 242-0414
February 18, 2019
Peter Lowenstein, AICP

Planning Section Manager
City of Las Vegas
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Re: General Plan Amendment and Zone Change Applications for APNs 126-36-101-006,
126-36-101-007 and 126-36-101-027 (the “Site”)
Dear Peter,
Bus Yard Properties, LLC and Vento Bus Yard, LLC are seeking a General Plan designation of Medium-Low
Density Residential (M-L) and a zoning designation of Single-Family Compact-Lot (R-CL) for the subject
parcels with the intent to develop a detached single-family compact-lot development (the “Project”) on
the Site.
The Project will satisfy the requirements of LVMC §§19.16.090 and 19.16.030(I). In particular, approval
of the applications is warranted for a number of reasons, including:
1. The Site is located at the intersection of two major arterials - Puli Road and Ann Road. Both
roadways are planned for 100-foot wide rights-of-ways, which will be more than capable of
handling the traffic generated by the Project.

2. The Site is near the freeway interchange of CC-215 and Ann Road.
3. The Project is compatible with the existing uses in the area, which currently includes the Clark
County School District’s Northwest Transportation Facility (Bus Yard) and a large gravel
pit/excavation facility (to the southwest).

4. Abutting properties are currently undeveloped and zoning designations are subject to change as
development expands west of Shaumber Road. The Project will likely serve as a
transition/buffer between the Bus Yard and gravel pit and possibly less intense uses north and
west of the Site.

5. The Project will not adversely impact any existing residences. The only single-family residences
in the area are separated from the Site by vacant land and, in most cases, vacant land and the
CC-215 Beltway. There are currently no residences within a quarter mile of the Site.
6. The Project will contribute to the satisfying the need for more affordable housing in the Las
Vegas Valley.
We appreciate your consideration. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions
or need anything further.
Sincerely,
Lenny Badger PRJ-75900

03/01/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ZON-75938 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75937 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: BUS YARD PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request
for a Rezoning FROM: R-3 (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: R-CL (SINGLE FAMILY
COMPACT-LOT) on 15.00 acres generally located west of the intersection of Ann Road and
Shaumber Road (APNs 126-36-101-006, 007 and 027), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75900]. Staff
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Land Use Map
Consistent with the City’s
sustainability efforts to reduce
paper use, backup
documentation pertaining to
related items will appear as
backup under the first item. This
item includes such consolidated
backup documentation. Please
refer to the first related
application in the subject line of
the Agenda Summary Page.
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
PRJ-75900
03/01/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
GPA-75942 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: AMH
DEVELOPMENT, LLC - OWNER: MNC HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
General Plan Amendment FROM: DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP
(RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 3.81
acres at the southeast corner of Craig Road and Buffalo Drive (APNs 138-03-301-001 and 004),
Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75274]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Land Use Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-75942, ZON-75943 and TMP-75945 [PRJ-75274]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-75942, ZON-75943 and TMP-75945 [PRJ-75274]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-75942, ZON-75943 and TMP-75945 [PRJ-75274]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-75942, ZON-75943 and TMP-75945 [PRJ-75274]
7. Protest Postcard(s) for GPA-75942, ZON-75943 and TMP-75945 [PRJ-75274]
8. Protest and/or Support Documentation Not Vetted for GPA-75942, ZON-75943 and TMP-
75945 [PRJ-75274]
GPA-75942, ZON-75943 and TMP-75945 [PRJ-75274]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: AMH DEVELOPMENT, LLC - OWNER: MNC
HOLDINGS, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TMP-75945 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-75942
ZON-75943
** NOTIFICATION **

254 - TMP-75945

6 - TMP-75945

0 - TMP-75945
JAB
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
2. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-75942) and Rezoning (ZON-75943)

shall be required, if approved.
Regulations.
5. In conjunction with creation, declaration and recordation of the subject common-

interest community, and prior to recordation of the Covenants, Codes and
Restrictions (“CC&R”), or conveyance of any unit within the community, the
Developer is required to record a Declaration of Private Maintenance Requirements
(“DPMR”) as a covenant on all associated properties, and on behalf of all current
and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a listing of all privately owned
and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with assignment of
maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest community or the
respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief description of the
required level of maintenance for privately maintained components. The DPMR must
be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations
prior to recordation, and must include a statement that all properties within the
community are subject to assessment for all associated costs should private
maintenance obligations not be met, and the City of Las Vegas be required to
provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to include a statement of
obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following recordation, the Developer is to
submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R documents to the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations.

JAB
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
7. Correct all Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalk along
Buffalo Drive and Craig Road adjacent to this site in accordance with code
requirements of Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent
with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site.
8. Construct complete half street improvements on Helena Avenue meeting current

City Standards adjacent to this site concurrent with development of this site. All
existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
original location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
9. This site shall connect to the public sewer in Helena Avenue approximately 660-feet
east of the proposed subdivision at a size, location and depth acceptable to the
Sanitary Sewer Section of the Department of Public Works.
10. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site.
All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular traffic at
all development access drives and abutting street intersections.
11. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the public
right-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site prior to this issuance of permits for these
improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity
on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove property
encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant to the
terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of all
private improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the
adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale of the property for
the entire term of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the
License Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of
Building and Safety (702-229-4836).
by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study.
The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or
local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas
Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with
development of this site.
JAB
Conditions Page Three
and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, gating, sewer
and drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction
plans by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless
JAB
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to develop a 19-lot single-family residential subdivision on 3.81

acres at the southeast corner of Craig Road and Buffalo Drive.
ISSUES
 The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan designation from RNP (Rural
Neighborhood Preservation) to L (Low Density Residential). Staff supports this
request.
 A companion Rezoning request from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single Family
Residential) is requested. Staff supports this request.
ANALYSIS
General Plan Amendment

The subject site consists of two undeveloped, adjacent parcels at the southeast corner of
Craig Road and Buffalo Drive. The northern parcel was annexed to the City in 1996 with
a General Plan designation of RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation). The southern
parcel was annexed to the City in 2003 with a General Plan designation of DR (Desert
Rural Density Residential).
The Land Use & Rural Neighborhoods Preservation Element of the City of Las Vegas
Master Plan 2020 defines both land use designations. The predominant feature of Rural
Neighborhood Preservation areas is single-family homes on large lots, many including
equestrian facilities. This is generally a rural environment that permits greater privacy and
some noncommercial raising of domestic animals. This designation allows up to 2.00
dwelling units per acre. The predominant feature of Desert Rural Density Residential
areas is the same as above except it allows up to 2.49 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant is proposing to designate both parcels as L (Low Density Residential) which
permits single-family detached homes at a maximum density of 5.49 units per acre. The
surrounding area has many other existing residential developments with different
densities. To the north is a development designated L (Low Density Residential) with 4.49
units per acre. To the south and east are Clark County developments designated Rural
Neighborhood with 2.00 units per acre. To the west is a development designated R (Rural
Density Residential) with 3.59 units per acre. Staff finds the proposed Low Density
Residential Land Use Designation to be compatible with the existing adjacent land use
designations and is recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment request.
JAB
Rezoning
Both parcels at the subject site are zoned U (Undeveloped) which is a temporary
classification used until property is ready for development for a more intense, permanent
use. This classification is used as a holding zone to prevent the premature, haphazard
development of property. The minimum lot size for this district is 20,000 square feet.
The applicant is proposing to rezone the subject site to R-1 (Single Family Residential).
The R-1 District provides for the development of single-family detached dwellings in a
suburban setting with a minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet. While the proposed R-1
zoning district allows for lot sizes as small as 6,500 square feet, the underlying General
Plan Designation will ultimately determine the number of lots developed. The lot sizes
proposed range in size from 6,501 square feet to 8,689 square feet. The proposed R-1
zoning district is compatible with the surrounding zoning districts which includes R-1 to
the north and east of the subject site; therefore, staff is recommending approval of the
rezoning request.
Tentative Map
The proposed subdivision shows 19 residential lots adjacent to a proposed 48-foot wide
public street with a cul-de-sac that meets the street cross section required in Title 19.04.
There is a proposed 15-foot wide public, pedestrian access path to Buffalo Drive that
gives the development a conforming street connectivity rating. The density of the
proposed development would be 4.98 units per acre, which is below the maximum 5.49
units allowed in the proposed L (Low Density Residential) land use designation.
The applicant proposes perimeter landscaping and landscape buffer widths that meet
Title 19.06 requirements. The proposed trees and shrubs consist of drought tolerant
species approved by the Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition Regional Plant
List. Appropriate street lights are shown on Maxwell Street and Helena Avenue. The
submitted tentative map shows required street improvements on Helena Avenue.
According to Title 19.02.020, the Director of Public Works administratively approves a

deviation from standards to allow a 189-foot intersection offset where 220 feet is required
along Helena Avenue. The Department of Public Works notes that the submitted
north/south and east/west cross sections depict a maximum grade less than two percent
across this site. Per Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with natural
slope greater than two percent is allowed a maximum four-foot retaining wall. A three-foot
retaining wall is shown along the eastern border and it appears retaining walls less than
four feet could be used on both the northern and southern boundaries, but no retaining is
shown.
JAB
The proposed residential development is accessed from a local street; it has adequate
landscaping, street improvements, and lot size; and the density is less than allowed by
the proposed land use designation; therefore, staff is recommending approval of the
tentative map.

The density and intensity of the proposed Low Density Residential designation is
compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations.

The proposed Low Density Residential designation allows the proposed R-1 zoning
district, which is compatible with the adjacent zoning districts. Although the
proposed R-1 district has a minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet, the density
limitation of 5.49 set by the proposed Low Density Residential designation will
determine the number of residential lots developed.

Plan Amendment; and
There are adequate recreation and utility facilities to accommodate the proposed
residential development.

policies.
The proposed amendment from RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) to L

(Low Density Residential) conforms to the intent and policies of the 2020 Master
Plan.
JAB
Conditions Page Four

If approved, the proposed Rezoning to the R-1 (Single Family Residential) zone
would be in conformance with the proposed L (Low Density Residential) General
Plan Designation.
districts.
The R-1 district allows single-family residential homes, which are compatible with
the existing residential neighborhoods and residential zoning districts adjacent to
the subject site.
The area is appropriate for residential infill and there are no neighborhood
commercial centers in this area.

The proposed residential subdivision will only be accessed by Helena Avenue, a

60-foot Local Street, which is adequate in size to meet the R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zoning district.
Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex [A-0031-95(A)] approximately
04/17/96
2.58 acres located on the southeast corner of Craig Road and Buffalo Drive.
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (A-0038-02) approximately 495
02/05/03 acres located in various parts of the City under provisions of NRS 268.597
No.1(B).
JAB


There are no related building permits/business licenses.
A pre-application meeting was conducted with the applicant to discuss
12/11/18 submittal requirements for a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and
Tentative Map applications.
Rainbow Library Meeting Room
3150 N. Buffalo Drive
6:30 – 7:50 pm
11 neighborhood residents, 1 consultant, 1 developer, 1 council representative
Presentation
 Explained process of General Plan Amendment and Rezoning and why
these are necessary for development
 Described orientation of houses proposed for site
 Development would be rental units, detached single family homes
 The perimeter would be landscaped
 Street lights would meet code
 Discussed neighborhood potential, neighborhood growth
04/08/19
Public Questions, Concerns and Discussion
 There is no other neighborhood of single family homes that are all for rent
 Concern that rental units would increase crime, traffic, high turnover
 Renters do not add value to an existing rural neighborhood
 Rental units will destroy property values
 Some neighbors desire street lights, some demand no street lights
 Developer is giving no consideration of desires of neighborhood
 Will there be follow-up meetings
 Where/when is Planning Commission meeting
Take Away
 Neighbors want less density, no rental units, less traffic, and want to
maintain rural nature
JAB
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an undeveloped parcel within
03/13/19
an existing single family residential neighborhood. No trash or debris.

Site Area
Net Acres 3.51
Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Land Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Use Designation District
19.12
DR (Desert Rural Density
U (Undeveloped)
Subject Residential)
Undeveloped
Property RNP (Rural Neighborhood
U (Undeveloped)
Preservation)
Single Family L (Low Density R-1 (Single Family
North
R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family RN (Rural Neighborhood)
South Residential) – Clark
Detached – Clark County
County
R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family RN (Rural Neighborhood)
East Residential) – Clark
Detached – Clark County
County
Single Family R (Rural Density R-D (Single Family
West
Detached Residential) Residential – Restricted)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District – (200 Feet) Y
Trails N/A
N/A
Assessment)
JAB
Pursuant to 19.06, the following standards apply for the proposed R-1 Zoning District:
Standard Required/Allowed
Min. Lot Size 6,500 SF
Min. Lot Width 60 Feet
Min. Setbacks
 Front 20 Feet
 Side 5 Feet
 Corner 15 Feet
 Rear 15 Feet
Max. Lot Coverage 50 %
Max. Building Height 2 Stories / 35 Feet

U (Undeveloped) 2.18 du/ac 8*
R-1 (Single Family Residential) 6.70 du/ac 25*
RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) 2.00 du/ac 7
DR (Desert Rural) 2.49 du/ac 9
L (Low Density) 5.49 du/ac 20
*Density is limited by the maximum number of units per acre allowed by the approved
General Plan designation.

Landscaping and Open Space Standards
Standards Required Provided Compliance
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 North 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 10 Trees 11 Trees Y
 South 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 8 Trees 9 Trees Y
 East N/A
 West 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 19 Trees 19 Trees Y
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 37 Trees 39 Trees Y
JAB

Ratio Trees
LANDSCAPE BUFFER WIDTHS
Min. Zone
Width
 North 6 Feet 6 Feet Y
 South 0 Feet 6 Feet Y
 East N/A
 West 6 Feet 6 Feet Y

Street
Classification Governing Document Street Width with Street
Name
Helena
Local Street Title 13 25 N*
Ave
Master Plan of Streets &
Craig Rd Primary Arterial 100 Y
Highways
Master Plan of Streets &
Buffalo Dr Primary Arterial 100 Y
Highways
*Off-site improvements are required as part of the proposed residential development.
19.04.040 Connectivity
Transportation Network Element # Links # Nodes
Internal Street 1
Cul-de-sac Terminus 1
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 0.5
Total 1.5 1
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes): 1.30 1.50
Pursuant to Title 19.06 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply for the
proposed R-1 Zoning District:
Gross Floor Required
Use Area or Number Parking
of Units Parking Ratio
Regular Handi-capped
Single Family,
19 2 Per Lot 38
Detached
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 38
JAB
Staff Report Page Nine

This parcel is not currently served by the District. This development may require two
sources of water to serve it due to the number of homes and fire department connections
on a single feed. The tentative map has identified one point of connection. To comply with
District Service Rules the development will be required submit a hydraulic analysis for
approval.
JAB
PRJ-75274
03/04/19
ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙㅡ
Ա Ⓢ ●Ձ Ｃ ●Ќ Ḛ 7bḶ Ｃ ǲ 7A Ќ A Ձ ù Ɔ ●Ɔ ฌ
ḶЌǲ7ִ7╗Û Ḷ7 AҜ ●Ձù7ＣÛ ǲՁՁ●ЌḚฌ
ⓈƆǲ7ḚŐḶⓈО7̬
ⓈЌОŐḶ╗ǲb╗ǲＣฌ
bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7bՁAƆƆ7̬
Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗7ִ7AŐǲA7Ձ●Ҝธ7Ɔ╗ḶŐù7Ҝ
●╗A╗●ḶЌ7̬ AṲ●Ҝ7ⓈҜ 7Ġ╗㈠7Ḷ 7̶ㄦ7 ǲǲ╗ฌ
ǲḚŐǲƆƆ7ḶŐ7ŐǲƆbⓈǲ7Û
ǲҜ ǲŐḚǲЌbù7ǲƆbAОǲ7̬ 7 ●ЌＣḶÛ Ɔ7 ŐḶҜ 7ƆՁǲǲО●ЌḚ7
ƆĠAՁՁ7ĠAЋǲ7Ҝ ●Ќ●Ҝ ⓈҜ 7Ḷ 7ㄦ㈠ՙ7ƆỢ㈠7 ╗㈠ฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ
‫ں‬ゥ̶7ԱḶAŐＣ7ִ7ԱA╗╗ǲЌ7ӧ‫ں‬″फ7Ḷ゜bỏฌ ‫゜ں‬ธफ7ḚùОƆⓈҜ 7ԱＣ㈠
ḚAŐAḚǲ゜ĠḶⓈƆǲ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚ゜ĠḶⓈƆǲ7AƆƆǲҜ 7Û AՁՁ7ִ7ㄦ゜ฎ
ԱՁù7̬ 7
ㄦฌ ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆ7
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ 7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777╗ùОǲ7फṲफ7Û
‫ں‬ธฌ ＣǲƆ●ḚЌ7ՁḶAＣƆ7̬ Ɔǲǲ7Ɔ╗ŐⓈb╗ⓈŐAՁ7ǲЌḚ●
7 ЌǲǲŐ●ЌḚ
″फ7╗Ő●Ҝ ฌ
ㄦ7 ‫ں‬ธ7 ӧ̶ｘｘ7ƆỢ7 ╗7A╗╗●
A╗╗●b7ЋǲЌ╗●ՁA╗● ḶЌ̬7 b7ƆОAbǲ7゜7‫ں‬7ƆỢ7 ╗7ЋǲЌ╗●ՁA╗●ḶЌỏฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱ″फゥㄦƥֱｘफ7ԱḶAŐＣ7AЌＣฌ ㄦ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ ‫ں‬ธฌ 〈bAՁbⓈՁA╗●ḶЌƆ7Őǲ Ձǲb╗7ㄦｘ੧7Ő●ＣḚǲ7AЌＣ7ㄦｘ੧7ƆḶ ●
ԱA╗╗ǲЌ7ƆĠⓈ╗╗ǲŐƆฌ ㄦ7 ธ̶ธฎ7ƆỢ7 ╗7ⓈЌＣǲŐ7ŐḶḶ 7A╗╗●b7゜ฌ
AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ ฌ ㄦฌ ̶ｘｘ7ƆỢ7 ╗7゜7‫ں‬7ƆỢ7 ╗7ए7ՙ㈠ՙ″ƆỢ7 ╗7ЋǲЌ╗●ՁA╗●ḶЌฌ
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ӧ╗ùО ฌ Ő●ＣḚǲ7ЋǲЌ╗‫ں‬ฎ7ƆỢ7●Ќ7ए7ӧ㈠‫ں‬ธㄦ7ƆỢ7 ╗ỏฌ
″फฌ
ĠǲǲՁ7Ġ╗㈠ฌ ƆḶ ●╗7ЋǲЌ╗
ɱ7ƆỢ7●Ќ7ए7ӧ㈠ｘ″ธㄦ7ƆỢ7 ╗ỏฌ
ՙ㈠ՙ″7ƆỢ7 ╗7ゥ7ㄦｘ੧7ए7̶㈠ฎฎ7ƆỢ7 ╗7Ő●ＣḚǲⓒ7̶㈠ฎฎ7ƆỢ7 ╗7ゥ7ㄦｘ੧7ए7‫ں‬
Ɔ●╗ǲ7ОՁAЌƆ7Աǲ ḶŐǲ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ㈠7╗ĠǲƆǲ7ＣŐAÛ ●ЌḚƆ7Ｃ
ŐǲbḶŐＣỏ㈠7AЌù7Ｃ●ƆbŐǲОAЌbù7ӧＣ●Ҝ ǲЌƆ●ḶЌƆⓒ7ḶŐ●ǲЌ╗A╗●Ḷ
●Ќ ḶŐҜ A╗●ḶЌ7 ḶŐ7AЌù7Ɔ╗ŐⓈb╗ⓈŐAՁ7ǲՁǲҜ ǲЌ╗Ɔ7ӧ╗Ḷ7Աǲ7
‫ש⎯ں‬7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ
‫ں‬ㅡफ7Ő●ＣḚǲ7Ġ╗㈠ฌ
╗Ḷ7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ7A╗7ḶЌbǲ7AЌＣ7ЌḶ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7ƆĠAՁՁ
ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7Ḷ ●b●AՁƆ7ִ7╗Ḷ7bḶҜ ОՁù7Û ●╗Ġ7 ՁḶŐ●ＣA7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●Ќ
Ő●ＣḚǲ7ЋǲЌ╗ฌ
ＣŐAÛ ●ЌḚƆ7AЌＣ7╗Ġǲ7AƆƆḶb●A╗ǲＣ7ＣŐAÛ ●ЌḚƆ7Ŵ่₡゜ਙผ7Ɔ●╗ǲ7Ｃ
ＣḶ7ЌḶ╗7ƆbAՁǲ7╗ĠǲƆǲ7ＣŐAÛ ●ЌḚƆ㈠7ЋǲŐ● ù7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7ḶŐ●ǲЌ╗

╗Ġǲ7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ7AƆƆⓈҜ ǲƆ7╗Ġǲ7ŐǲƆОḶЌƆ●Ա●Ձ●╗ù7╗Ḷ7Ҝ ǲǲ╗
̶㈠ฎฎ7ƆỢ7 ╗
7ए7̶‫ں‬㈠ｘㅡ7 ǲǲ╗7Ḷ 7Ő●ＣḚǲ7ЋǲЌ╗ฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱ‫ں‬ｘ
㈠‫ں‬ธㄦ7ƆỢ7 ╗ฌ
Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲฌ ƆḶ ●╗7ЋǲЌ╗ฌ
‫ں‬㈠ɱㅡ7ƆỢ7 ╗
7ए7̶‫ں‬㈠ｘㅡ7 ǲǲ╗7Ḷ 7ƆḶ ●╗7ЋǲЌ╗ฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ ㈠ｘ″ธㄦ7ƆỢ7 ╗ฌ
ㄦฎफ7Ҝ ǲAЌ7ŐḶḶ 7Ġ╗㈠ฌ

ㅡफ7bḶŐЌǲŐ7╗Ő●Ҝ ฌ
‫̶ں‬ƥֱㄦ
ɱƥֱ‫ں‬फ7
ՙƥֱｘफฌ
ĠḶŐ●ΎḶЌ╗AՁ7ՁAО7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚฌ
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ ‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธฌ
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7ǲՁǲЋฌ ㄦ7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㄦฌ
ŐḶЌ╗7ＣḶḶŐ7Ɔ╗ùՁǲฌ
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆฌ ㄦ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ŐḶЌ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ธ‫ں‬
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ОAЌǲՁ7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7゜ฌ
Ġ Ő●ΎḶЌ╗AՁ7ՁAО7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚฌ
̶ｘ″ｘ‫ں‬7A‫ف‬ਙ—ผŴ7ŐਙŴ₡ⓒƆ—ħ‫֭ש‬7ธｘｘฌ
AҜ Ġ 7Ｃ ǲЋǲՁḶОҜ ǲЌ ╗ⓒ7ՁՁbฌ
A‫ف‬ਙ—ผŴ7Ġ ħкк⎯7bA7ɱ‫̶ں‬ｘ‫ں‬ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
7
ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗ฌ
Ձǲ ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ77 ธ‫ں‬ฌ
‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธฌ
ㄦ7 ㄦฌ
ㄦ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ
AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
″फ7
ĠǲǲՁ7Ġ╗㈠ฌ
‫ש⎯ں‬7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ
Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲ7 ОAЌǲՁ7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7゜ฌ

ӧ ùОỏฌ
ɱƥֱ‫ں‬फ7
ՙƥֱｘफ7
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7ǲՁǲЋ7 ‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธฌ
ㄦ7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㄦฌ
ㄦ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ
ŐǲAŐ7ǲՁǲ A╗●ḶЌ7 ธ‫ں‬7
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
bḶ ⓈЌ ╗ùⓒ7b●╗ùⓒ7Ɔ╗A╗ǲฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ Ɔฌ
ОкŴ่7 7Оֱ‫ں‬″ｘ″7ӧǲՁǲЋ㈠7ธ‫ں‬ỏ7ḚAŐAḚǲ7Ő●ḚĠ ╗7
Ҝ ＣAฌ
A̶ֱธ‫ں‬ฌ
ＣA╗ǲ̬ฌ‫ں‬ธ゜‫ں‬ธ゜ธｘ‫ں‬ՙฌ
Ő●ḚĠ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ77 ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ƆbAՁǲ̬ฌ ‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฌ
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
ธ่₡7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ ՙ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ
Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ฎƥֱ″फฌ
ՙƥֱｘफฌ

ㄦ7 ㄦฌ
ธफ7Ő●ＣḚǲ7Ġ╗㈠ฌ
ƆǲbḶЌＣ7 ՁŐฌ
ธ̶ƥ‫ںֱں‬
″फฌ
‫ש⎯ں‬7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ ĠḶŐ●ΎḶЌ╗AՁ7ՁAО
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7
ОՁ㈠7Ġ╗㈠ฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธฌ Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7Ҝ ǲAЌ7ŐḶḶ 7Ġ╗㈠ฌ

ՙ7 ՙฌ ‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ɱƥֱ‫ں‬फ7
ฎƥֱ″फ7
ՙƥֱｘफฌ
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7ǲՁǲЋฌ
ฎƥֱ″फฌ
ՙƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ
‫ں‬ธ7 ՙฌ ŐḶЌ╗7ＣḶḶŐ7Ɔ╗ùՁǲฌ
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆ
ՙฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ŐḶЌ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ธｘฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗ฌ
7
ՙ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
Ő●ḚĠ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ77 ธｘ7 ƆbAՁǲ7̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफ7 ㄦ7 ㄦฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ՙ7 ՙ7 ОAЌǲՁ7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7゜ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ
ՙ7 ‫ں‬ธ7 ŐǲAŐ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ธｘฌ
ՙ7 ƆbAՁǲ7̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ Ɔ7 ธｘฌ
ОкŴ่7 7Оธ‫ں‬ɱ̶7ḚAŐAḚǲ7Ő●ḚĠ ╗7
Ҝ ＣAฌ
A̶ֱธｘฌ
ＣA╗ǲ̬ฌ‫ں‬ธ゜ธ″゜‫ں‬ՙฌ
Ձǲ ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ77 ธｘฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฌ
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
ธ่₡7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ ՙ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ
Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ゥ̶7ԱḶAŐＣ7ִ7ԱA╗╗ǲЌ7ӧ‫ں‬″फ7Ḷ゜bỏฌ
ฎƥֱ″फฌ
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆ7
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ՙƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ
‫ں‬ธ7 ㄦฌ

ㄦฌ
ธफ7Ő●ＣḚǲ7Ġ╗㈠ฌ
ƆǲbḶЌＣ7 ՁŐฌ
ธ̶ƥ‫ںֱں‬
″फฌ
‫ש⎯ں‬7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ ĠḶŐ●ΎḶЌ╗AՁ7ՁAО
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù
ОՁ㈠7Ġ╗㈠ฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธฌ Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7Ҝ ǲAЌ7ŐḶḶ 7Ġ╗㈠ฌ

ՙ7 ՙฌ ‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ɱƥֱ‫ں‬फ7
ฎƥֱ″फ7
ՙƥֱｘफฌ
ฎƥֱ″फฌ
ՙƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ
ՙฌ ŐḶЌ╗7ＣḶḶŐ7Ɔ╗ùՁǲฌ
ОǲŐ7bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ŐḶЌ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗7 ㅡƥ7ЋǲЌ╗ฌ
7
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
Ő●ḚĠ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ77 ธ‫ں‬7 ƆbAՁǲ7̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफ7 ㄦ7 ㄦฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ՙ7 ՙ7 ОAЌǲՁ7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7゜ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ
ՙ7 ŐǲAŐ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ Ɔ7 ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ОкŴ่7 7Оธ‫ں‬ɱ̶7ḚAŐAḚǲ7Ő●ḚĠ ╗7
Ҝ ＣAฌ
A̶ֱธ‫ں‬ฌ
Ձǲ ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ77 ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ＣA╗ǲ̬ฌ‫ں‬ธ゜ธ″゜‫ں‬ՙฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฌ
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
″゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ
‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธ7 AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ ฌ ″゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ ‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
″7 ฎ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ ″7 AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ 7 ฎฌ
ฎฌ
AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ ฌ ӧ╗ùОỏ7 ‫ں‬ธฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7Ḷ ●b●AՁƆ7ִ7╗Ḷ7bḶҜ ОՁù7Û ●╗Ġ7Ɔ╗A╗ǲ7ԱⓈ
ฎฌ
″फฌ
ธ่₡7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ
Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱｘफ7╗ùО㈠ฌ
Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶ7ОǲŐฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
bḶҜ Ҝ ⓈЌ●╗ù7ƆОǲbƆฌ
ฎƥֱ‫ں‬
ՙƥֱｘफฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ธՙƥֱฎफ7Ő●ＣḚǲ7Ġ╗㈠ฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ
ㅡฌ ƆǲbḶЌＣ7 ՁŐ7 ㅡ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ ″फ7ĠǲAＣǲŐ7╗Ő●Ҝ ฌ
Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶ7ОǲŐฌ AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ 7ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ธ̶ƥֱธफ7Ҝ ǲAЌ7ŐḶḶ 7Ġ╗㈠ฌ

ӧ╗ùОỏ7 ‫ש⎯ں‬7 ՁŐ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚฌ ‫ں‬ｘफ7╗Ő●Ҝ ฌ
Û ●ЌＣḶÛ 7Ձ●Ќǲฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
ɱƥֱ‫ں‬
Ɔ╗ḶЌǲ7ЋǲЌǲǲŐ7ОǲŐ
ՙƥֱｘफ7
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
̶ƥֱｘफฌ
Ձǲ ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ㅡ7 ŐḶЌ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ㅡฌ
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफ7 ƆbAՁǲ7̬7‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
7
ฎफฌ
ㄦ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ธ7 ОǲŐ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ

ฎ゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ ″7 ฎ7 ″゜‫ں‬ธ7О●╗bĠฌ ฎฌ
AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ ฌ AŐbĠ7ƆĠ●ЌḚՁǲ7ŐḶḶ ฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ ‫ں‬फ7″फ7‫ں‬फฌ
Ɔǲǲ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
ЋǲŐ● ù7●Ќ7 ●ǲՁＣฌ
‫ں‬ธฌ ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
ㅡฌ
ӧ╗ùОỏ7 ｘƥֱｘफ7 ㈠㈠ฌ
‫゜ں‬ธफ7 ㄦ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
bḶՁⓈҜЌ7Ｃǲ╗A●Ձฌ
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
bḶⓈЌ ╗ùⓒ7b●╗ùⓒ7Ɔ╗A╗ǲฌ
ОкŴ่7 7Оֱธ̶ՙ̶7ֱḚAŐAḚǲ7Ő●ḚĠ ╗7
/ŐḶЌ ╗7ִ 7Ɔ●Ｃǲ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ Ɔ7 ㅡฌ
Ő●ḚĠ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ㅡ7 ŐǲAŐ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ㅡฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦธՙㅡ

Ҝ ＣA7
A̶㈠̶ฌ
ＣA╗ǲ̬ฌ‫ں‬ｘ゜̶゜ธｘ‫ں‬ՙฌ
ƆbAՁǲ̬ฌ‫゜ں‬ㅡफए‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฌ
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ɱƥֱｘफ7 ธ‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ɱƥֱ″फ7 ɱƥֱ″फ7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥֱธफฌ ㄦƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ ⓈЌ●╗7ƆǲbⓈŐǲＣ7╗Ḷฌ
̶ƥゥ̶ƥ7A゜b7ОAＣฌ
ธƥֱㅡफ7 ‫ں‬ｘƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ ธƥֱｘफฌ
″फ7 ̶ㅡफゥ″ｘफฌ
ОŐǲֱ AԱ7 ●ԱǲŐḚՁAƆƆฌ
ƆĠḶÛ ǲŐ7ОAЌฌ
″फฌ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃ 7О Ḷ Ő bĠ
ㅡṲㅡ7О╗7Û ŐAООǲＣฌ ฌ ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7 ŐAҜ ǲＣ7ḚՁAƆƆฌ
ОḶƆ╗77ӧ″फ7ƆỢ㈠ỏ7ӧ╗ùОỏ
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ ǲЌbՁḶƆⓈŐǲฌ
bḶ Ќ bŐ ǲ ╗ ǲ 7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő Ɔ ฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
Ҝ A Ɔ ╗ ǲŐ 7Աǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ฌ
ɱƥֱ″फ7 ɱƥֱ″फฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
‫̶ں‬ƥֱㅡफฌ
7

ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ЋƆԱ̶″ฌ
Ҝ A Ɔ ╗ ǲŐ 7ԱA ╗ Ġ ฌ
″ｘ″ฎ7ƆՁ●ＣǲŐฌ
ĠԱฌ ╗ǲҜ Оฌ
″फ7Û AՁՁฌ
ㄦƥֱㅡफ7
ธฎ″ฎฌ
ธ″″ฎฌ
ธ7ЋƆԱ̶″ฌ
ธ″″ฎ7 ธ″″ฎฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆ7 ‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆฌ
ธƥֱ″फฌ
ธƥֱ″फ7
Ḛ Ő ǲ A ╗ 7Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7 7ӧㄦỏ7‫ں‬ธफ7Ձ●ǲЌฌ
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7 Û ㈠●㈠b㈠ฌ ̶ธफゥธธफ7
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7 ӧธỏธ″″ฎฌ
″ƥֱ″फ7
7 ƆbⓈ╗╗Ձǲฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱฎफฌ
ธƥֱ″फ7 ̶ƥֱՙफ7 ̶ƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7 ̶ƥֱ″फ7 ㄦƥֱ″फ7 ɱƥֱธफ7 ㄦƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ
″ƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆฌ
‫ں‬ｘƥֱธफ7
‫ں‬ธƥֱธफ7
Ա A ╗ Ġ 7 ธ ฌ
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ㄦƥֱｘफฌ
″ƥֱｘफ7
ƆĠḶÛ ǲŐฌ
″फ7Û AՁՁฌ
Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7ธ ฌ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
ОŐǲֱ AԱ7ㄦƥ7╗ⓈԱ7゜ฌ
ธゥㅡ7Û AՁՁ7㌀ ฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱฎफฌ
ธƥֱ″फ7
̶ㅡ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7A㈠㈠㈠77Û ゜ฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7ԱAŐ╗ḶОฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ธ7 ЋƆԱㅡธฌ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
ธ″″ฎฌ
ธฎ″ฎ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱㅡफฌ
Ա̶ｘ7 ธฌ
ɱƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ㈠7Ġ╗㈠ฌ
ㅡｘƥֱｘफ7
Աɱ7 ＣÛ 7 ̶ƥֱฎफ7 ̶ƥֱｘफ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱธफฌ
ธƥֱㅡफ7 ธƥֱｘफ7
ฎƥֱㅡफ7
Û ̶ｘ‫ں‬ฎฌ Û ̶ｘ̶″ ธ7
ƆԱ ●Ќ ì
̶″ ธ″″ฎ7 ธ″″ฎฌ
ธฎ″ฎ7
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
ŐAЌḚǲ7゜7Ҝ ●bŐḶฌ
ì ●╗ bĠ ǲЌ ฌ7
Ա‫ں‬ㄦฌ
″ธƥֱｘफฌ
″ธƥֱｘफฌ
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ ฌ

7
̶ƥֱｘफ7 ธƥֱฎफฌ
ĠЋAbฌ
7ӧㄦỏ7‫ں‬ธफ7Ձ●ǲЌฌ
ธ Û ̶ｘ̶″ฌ
ธ7 Ա̶ｘฌ
‫ںں‬ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7
Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7̶ ฌ
Ա̶″7 ธฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ɱƥֱ″फ7
ธｘ″ฎฌ Őǲ ฌ
̶ƥֱㅡफ7
ธฎ″ฎ7 ӧธỏธ″″ฎฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱฎफ7
Û ̶″‫ں‬ฎ ธ Û ‫ں‬ฎ̶″Û ‫ں‬ฎ̶″ ธ7
″ƥֱธफ7
7ӧㄦỏ7‫ں‬ธफ7ƆĠՁЋƆ
″फ7Û AՁՁฌ
ՁA Ⓢ Ќ Ｃ Ő ù 7Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ฌ
̶ƥֱｘफゥฎƥֱｘफฌ ㄦƥֱｘफゥฎƥֱｘफฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ธƥֱ″फ7 ธƥֱธफ7‫ں‬ƥֱ″फ‫ں‬ƥֱɱफ ‫ں‬ƥ̶ֱफ‫ں‬ƥֱㅡफ7ธƥֱธफ‫ں‬ƥֱㅡफ7

ḶОǲЌ●ЌḚฌ ḶОǲЌ●ЌḚฌ
Ｃ ●Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ 7 ธฎ″ฎฌ
ÛAƆĠǲŐ7AՁÛ AùƆ
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ Ḷ ù ǲŐ ฌ ธｘ7Ҝ ●Ќ㈠ฌ

ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7 ŐA╗ǲＣฌ
̶ƥֱｘफ7
ՁḶbA╗ǲＣ7ḶЌ7╗Ġǲ7Ձǲ ╗
7 Û Ġฌ
ḶОǲЌ●ЌḚฌ
″ƥֱｘफゥฎƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ｘƥֱฎफ7
ㅡƥֱㅡफ7 ธƥֱㅡफ7 ″ƥֱ″फ7 ㄦƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ธƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ ″ƥֱฎफ7 ธƥֱฎफ7 ฎƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ธƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ
ㄦㅡफゥธธफฌ
ㄦƥֱㅡफ7
ƆbⓈ╗╗Ձǲฌ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ ̶ｘ″ฎฌ
ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7 ǲЌ╗Őùฌ
ḚAŐAḚǲ7Û AՁՁƆ7bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌฌ
″ƥֱɱफ7 ″ƥ̶ֱफ7 ″ƥֱｘफฌ Û ●╗Ġ7Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐǲA Ҝ ⓈƆ╗ฌ
ㅡƥֱｘफ7
ㅡƥֱｘफ7
ĠAЋǲ77‫゜ں‬ธफ7ＣŐùÛ AՁՁ
ธ 7bA Ő 7Ḛ A Ő A Ḛ ǲฌ
ƆǲОAŐA╗●ḶЌฌ
ธธƥֱธफฌ
ӧҜ ●Ќ㈠7ธｘ7Ҝ ●Ќ7 ●Őǲỏ

″फ7
‫ں‬ɱƥֱธफ7
ㅡṲㅡ7О╗7Û ŐAООǲＣ ″फฌ

ОḶƆ╗77ӧฎफ7ƆỢ㈠ỏ7ӧ╗ùОỏฌ
‫̶ں‬ƥֱｘफ7 ″ƥֱｘफ7 A Ő ǲ A 7╗ A Ա Ⓢ Ձ A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ฌ
7Ձ●Ћ ●Ќ Ḛ ̬ฌ ‫ں‬″ ｘ ″ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
‫ں‬ｘƥֱｘफ7
‫ں‬ｘƥֱｘफ7
bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃ 7О Ḷ Ő bĠ 7
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ ╗ Ḷ ╗ A Ձ 7A ゜b̬ฌ ‫ں‬″ ｘ ″ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
bḶ Ќ bŐ ǲ ╗ ǲ 7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő Ɔ ฌ Ḛ A Ő A Ḛ ǲ ̬ฌ ㅡ ㄦ ″ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
ĠԱฌ
Ő Ḷ Ќ ╗ 7bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃ 7Оธ ㅡḶ7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
Ő bĠ ̬
‫ں‬″ƥֱｘफ7ゥ7ՙƥֱｘफ7Ḷ㈠Ġ㈠7ḚAŐAḚǲ7ＣḶḶŐฌ Ő ǲ A Ő 7bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃ 7О‫ں‬ㄦḶ ธŐ 7Ɔ
bĠ㈠㈠ฌ
̬
╗ Ḷ ╗ A Ձ 7bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃธ̬ธ ̶ ฎ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
ธƥֱ″फ7 ‫ں‬″ƥֱｘफฌ ธƥֱ″फ7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ

AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
/ՁḶ ḶŐ7ОՁAЌ ฌ
ОкŴ่7 7Оֱ‫ں‬″ｘ ″ӧǲՁǲЋ㈠7ธｘ7ִ 7ธ‫ں‬ỏ7ḚAŐAḚǲ7Ő●ḚĠ ╗7
‫ں‬ɱƥֱｘफ7 ธ‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ ОŐḶЋ●Ｃǲ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ӧҜ ●Ќ●Ҝ ⓈҜ ỏ7ḚùОƆⓈҜ 7ԱḶAŐＣ7ƆǲОAŐA╗●ḶЌ7A╗7Û AՁՁƆ7AЌＣ7b

AＣİAbǲЌ╗7╗Ḷ7╗Ġǲ7Ҝ A●Ќ7ĠḶⓈƆǲ7AЌＣ7A╗╗●b7AŐǲAƆ㈠ฌ
ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ
Û AƆĠ●ЌḚ7Ҝ AbĠ●Ќǲ7●Ɔ7AՁÛ AùƆ7ՁḶbA╗ǲＣ7Ձǲ ╗7Ḷ 7╗Ġǲ7ＣŐùǲŐ7ⓈЌՁǲƆƆ7ЌḶ
AՁՁ7ǲṲ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7Û AՁՁƆ7AŐǲ7ＣŐAÛ Ќ7A╗7̶7‫ں‬ ゜ธफ7Ɔ╗ⓈＣ7AЌＣ7AＣＣ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ƆĠǲA╗
AՁՁ7●Ќ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7AЌＣ7bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7Û AՁՁƆ7AŐǲ7ＣŐAÛ Ќ7A╗7̶7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ⓈЌՁǲƆƆ7ЌḶ╗
Ҝ ＣA7
A‫ں‬ฌ
ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ӧǲՁǲЋ7ธｘ7ִ7ธ‫ں‬ỏฌ ĠǲAＣǲŐ7 ḶŐ7 ●ŐƆ╗7 ՁḶḶŐ7●Ɔ7A╗7ฎƥֱｘफ7ʉ゜7ɱƥ7bՁḚ7ִ7ƆǲbḶЌＣ7 ՁḶ Ő7●Ɔ7A╗7

ＣA╗ǲ̬ฌ‫ں‬ธ゜‫ں‬ธ゜ธｘ‫ں‬ՙฌ
ĠAЌＣŐA●Ձ7Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗7ƆĠAՁՁ7Աǲ7̶″फ7Ҝ ǲAƆⓈŐǲＣ7ЋǲŐ╗●bAՁՁù7 ŐḶҜ 7╗Ġǲ7ЌḶƆ●

ƆĠǲǲ╗7
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7 ธฎƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ㄦƥ̶ֱफ7 ‫ں‬ธƥֱɱफฌ
ㅡƥ̶ֱ
̶ㅡफ7 ̶ƥֱㅡ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ̶ƥֱㅡ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ㅡƥֱธ
‫ں‬ㅡफ7 ㅡƥֱ″
‫ں‬ธफ7 ̶ƥֱㅡ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ㅡƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ⓈЌ●╗7ƆǲbⓈŐǲＣ7╗Ḷฌ
̶ƥゥ̶ƥ7A゜b7ОAＣฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ
ธƥֱｘफฌ
ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ ㅡ7
ㅡ‫ں‬ธफ7ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ
‫ں‬ธफ7ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
ㅡ‫ں‬ธफ7ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
″ƥֱｘफฌ
ธƥֱｘफฌ
AҜ ●Ձù7ŐḶḶҜ ฌ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő Ɔ ฌ
Ҝ A Ɔ ╗ ǲŐ 7Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ฌ

ㅡṲㅡ7О╗7Û ŐAООǲＣ7ОḶƆ╗ฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7Û ゜7ฎ फ7╗ Ő A ù ฌ
‫ں‬ㄦƥֱｘफฌ
ӧ″फ7ƆỢ㈠ỏ7ӧ╗ùОỏ7 Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
‫ں‬ฎफฌ
‫ں‬ฎƥֱธ
bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃ 7О Ḷ Ő bĠ ฌ
ฎƥֱｘफ7
″ƥֱｘफ7 ″ƥֱｘफฌ
ธฎ″ฎฌ
″ｘ″ฎ7ƆՁ●ＣǲŐฌ ธ″″ฎฌ
ĠԱฌ ╗ǲҜ Оฌ ธゥㅡ7Û AՁՁ7㌀ ฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
̶ㅡ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7A㈠㈠㈠ฌ
̶ƥֱㅡफฌ
‫ں‬ฌธफ7
‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7 ㅡƥֱՙ
‫ں‬ธफฌ ㅡƥֱ‫ں‬
̶ㅡफ7 ̶ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘ
‫ں‬ㅡफฌ ธƥֱՙ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱฎफ7 ธƥֱ″ ฎƥֱ″
‫ں‬ฌธफ
‫ں‬ธफ7
ธ″″ฎ7
ㄦƥ̶ֱ
̶ฌ
̶ 7ӧㄦỏ7‫ں‬ธफ7Ձ●ǲЌฌ
ㅡƥֱㅡफゥฎƥֱธफฌ
7ƆǲҜ ●ֱ ŐAҜ ǲՁǲƆƆฌ
ḚՁAƆƆ7ǲЌbՁḶƆⓈŐǲฌ
ธƥֱ″फ7 ธƥֱɱ
ㅡｘ‫ں‬ｘ7╗ŐAЌƆḶҜ ฌ
●ƆՁAЌＣฌ
‫ںں‬फ‫ں‬ｘफㅡफ7
‫ں‬ธफฌ
Ｃ ●Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ 7Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱՙ
Աㅡฎ7
‫ں‬ธफ7
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
̶ㅡफゥ″ｘफฌ
ธṲ″7Û AՁՁฌ
″ƥֱｘ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő Ɔ 7 ОŐǲֱ AԱ7 ●ԱǲŐḚՁAƆƆฌ
ＣЋƆԱ″ｘฌ
Ҝ A Ɔ ╗ ǲŐ 7ԱA ╗ Ġ ฌ ธ″″ฎฌ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő Ɔ ฌ
ƆĠḶÛ ǲŐ7ОAЌฌ
‫ں‬ธफ
ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ ǲЌＣ7ＣÛ 7 ƆԱ̶″7 Ա̶ｘ7
″ƥֱㅡ
Ɔ●Ќì
″ƥֱㅡफ7
‫ںں‬ƥֱɱफ7 ㄦƥֱㄦ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ธธƥֱɱ
‫ں‬ธफฌ ฎफฌ
ธｘ″ฎฌ
Û ̶″‫ں‬ฎฌ Û ธㅡ̶″ฌÛ ธㅡ̶″ฌ
Őǲ ฌ
ธฎ″ฎฌ ‫ں‬ธƥֱㄦफ7 ‫ں‬ธफ7
″फ7 ̶ƥֱɱ ฎƥ̶ֱ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ̶ƥֱՙ
‫ں‬ธफฌ ธƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ ̶7
ธｘ7Ҝ ●Ќ㈠ฌ ŐAЌḚǲ7Û ゜ฌ

̶7
ŐA╗ǲＣฌ ธ Ա̶ｘ7 Ҝ ●bŐḶ7 Ա̶ｘ7 ธฌ
ֱｘफฌ
ㄦफ7
A╗╗●b7AbbǲƆƆ7
Û AՁՁ7Ġ╗㈠7ฎƥֱ″फฌ Û AՁՁ7Ġ╗㈠7ฎƥֱ″फ7 ̶ƥֱｘफゥฎƥֱｘफฌ

̶ƥֱ″फゥฎƥֱｘफฌ ㅡƥֱ‫ں‬
‫ں‬ธफฌ ̶ƥ̶ֱ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ธƥֱฎफ7
ธ″″ฎ7 ฎƥֱ″फ7bՁḚ㈠7 ḶОǲЌ●ЌḚ7 Û ̶ｘ̶″7 Û ̶ｘ‫ں‬ฎ7 Û ̶ｘ̶″ฌ ‫ں‬ Û ●bฌ
̶ƥֱㄦ
̶ƥֱՙ
ㄦՙƥֱｘफฌ
̶ㅡफฌ
ฌ ֱฎफゥՙƥ
ธ″″ฎ‫ں‬ƥ̶ֱธफฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ㄦƥ̶ֱ
‫ں‬ㅡफฌ
ƆՁḶООǲＣ7bՁḚ㈠ฌ Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő Ɔ ฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
‫ں‬ธफ7
ธ″″ฎ7
ՙƥֱｘ
ⓈЌＣǲŐ7Ɔ╗A●ŐƆฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
7ӧㄦỏ7‫ں‬ธफ7ƆĠՁЋƆฌ
ธฎ″ฎฌ
ฎƥֱธ
ฎƥֱธ
Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7ㅡ ฌ Ա ǲＣ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7̶ ฌ
ฎƥֱɱ
ОAЌ╗Őù7
‫ں‬ธफ7
7
‫ں‬ธफ7
ฎ ƥֱ″ फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ӧЋ A Ⓢ Ձ ╗ ǲ Ｃ ỏ7 ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ƆԱ̶ｘ7 ธฌ
ㄦƥֱ″
‫ںں‬ƥ̶ֱ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ 7 ՁA Ⓢ Ќ Ｃ Ő ù 7Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ฌ
‫ں‬ธफ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ㄦƥֱ″फ7
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7
Û AƆĠǲŐ7AՁÛ AùƆฌ
Ձ Ḷ ╗ ฌ
ㅡ‫ ں‬फ7
̶ƥֱㄦफ7
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷธฎ″ฎฌ
ḶŐƆ
‫ں‬ธफ7
‫ں‬ㅡƥֱｘ
‫ں‬ㅡƥֱｘ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
ㅡธफ7ìЌǲǲ7Û AՁՁฌ
ฎ ƥֱ″ फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7ӧЋ A Ⓢ Ձ ╗ ǲ Ｃ ỏ7
ธｘ7Ҝ ●Ќ㈠7 7ӧㄦỏ7‫ں‬ธफ7ƆĠՁЋƆ ‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆฌ
ฎƥֱ″
Ա A ╗ Ġ 7 ̶ ฌ
̶ƥֱｘफฌ
ฎ ƥֱ″ फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ

Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ 7 ŐA╗ǲＣฌ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
ธฎ″ฎฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì ฌ7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ธƥ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠธ ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
ㄦƥֱ‫ںں‬
‫ں‬ธफ7 ̶ƥֱㄦ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ㅡƥֱɱ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ̶ƥֱ‫ںں‬
‫ں‬ธफ7
ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲฌ ㅡƥֱธफ7 ㅡƥֱㄦफ7 ̶ƥֱｘफฌ
̶ƥֱｘफ7
̶ƥֱｘ
‫ں‬ㅡफ7
ธƥֱ″फ7
╗Ḷ7ธ่₡7 ՁŐฌ
Û Ġฌ
7ӧ‫ں‬ՙỏ7Ő●ƆǲŐƆฌ
ОŐǲֱ AԱ7ㄦƥ7╗ⓈԱฌ
ㅡ″ƥֱｘफ7
ՙƥֱｘ
̶ㅡफ7
゜7ƆĠḶÛ ǲŐ7
ՙ7̶゜ฎफ7Ő●ƆǲŐ7Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗ฌ
ĠЋAbฌ ㄦ゜ฎफ7╗ùОǲ7फṲफ7ḚùОƆⓈҜ 7ԱḶAŐＣฌ
ㅡƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7
ㄦƥ̶ֱ
ӧธỏ7ธ″″ฎฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
ḶЌ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚ7Ḷ 7ḚAŐAḚǲฌ
‫ںں‬फ7╗ŐǲAＣƆ7ӧ‫ں‬ｘफ7Û ゜7‫ں‬फ7ЌḶƆ●ЌḚỏฌ
ƆՁḶ О ǲฌ
bǲ ●Ձ ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ƆՁḶ О ǲฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
bǲ ●Ձ ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
bĠAƆǲฌ ‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆฌ
ธƥֱｘ
Û AՁՁ7Ġ╗㈠7ՙƥֱ‫ں‬फ7ો゜ֱ7 ‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆ7 Û AՁՁ7Ġ╗㈠7ՙƥֱ‫ں‬फ7ો゜ֱ7 ธṲ″7Û AՁՁ7
‫ں‬ธफ7
ธ″″ฎฌ
ՙ‫ں‬ธफ7ธƥ̶ֱ
ḶОǲЌ7ŐA●Ձ●ЌḚฌ
ㄦƥֱ‫ںں‬
ⓈО7ӧ‫ں‬ՙỏ7Ő●ƆǲŐƆฌ
Ձ●Ќǲ7Ḷ 7ธ่₡7 ՁŐ7AԱḶЋǲฌ

ՙ7̶゜ฎफ7Ő●ƆǲŐ7Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗ฌ ՁḶbA╗ǲＣ7ḶЌ7╗Ġǲ7Ձǲ ╗ฌ
ḚAŐAḚǲ7Û AՁՁƆ7bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7Û ●╗Ġฌ

ƆԱ̶ｘ7 ธฌ
‫ںں‬फ7╗ŐǲAＣƆ7ӧ‫ں‬ｘफ7Û ゜7‫ں‬फ7ЌḶƆ●ЌḚỏฌ
ḶОǲЌ●ЌḚฌ Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐǲA7Ҝ ⓈƆ╗7ĠAЋǲ77‫゜ں‬ธफฌ

ㄦƥֱɱफ7 ″ƥֱธफ7 ㄦƥ̶ֱ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ̶ƥֱɱफ7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥֱฎ
‫ں‬ธफฌ Ա A ╗ Ġ 7 ธ ฌ ธฎ″ฎฌ ㅡƥֱｘफゥฎƥֱｘफฌ ＣŐùÛ AՁՁ7ƆǲОAŐA╗●ḶЌฌ
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7 ӧҜ ●Ќ㈠7ธｘ7Ҝ ●Ќ7 ●Őǲỏฌ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 77 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
゜7ƆĠḶÛ ǲŐฌ
̶″फゥธธफฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱธ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ‫ں‬ɱƥֱㄦ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ƆbⓈ╗╗Ձǲฌ
ОŐǲֱ AԱ7ㄦƥ7╗ⓈԱฌ
ㅡｘƥֱｘफ7 ธｘ″ฎฌ
ธธƥֱธफ7
ธ″″ฎฌ
″ƥֱՙफฌ
ธƥֱｘफ7 ՙƥֱՙफ7
‫ں‬ɱƥֱธफ7
7ӧㄦỏ7‫ں‬ธफ7Ձ●ǲЌฌ
̶ｘ″ฎฌ
ǲЌ╗Őùฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ㄦㅡ‫ں‬ธ7╗ŐAЌƆ‫ں‬ธफฌ
Ɔ●ＣǲՁ●╗ǲ
Û ゜7̶फ7Ա╗ÛƆ●ЌＣǲՁ●╗ǲฌ
″ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7 ธƥֱ‫ں‬ｘ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ̶ƥֱㄦ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ՙƥֱՙफ7 ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ‫ں‬ɱƥֱธफฌ
‫̶ں‬ƥֱՙफ7
Ա ǲＣ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7ธ 7 A Ő ǲ A 7╗ A Ա Ⓢ Ձ A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ฌ
ฎƥֱ‫ں‬फ7
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7 ĠԱฌ ‫ש⎯ں‬7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ̬ฌ ‫ں‬″ ՙㄦ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ

Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ Ő Ḷ Ќ ╗ 7О Ḷ Ő bĠ ฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱｘफ7ゥ7ՙƥֱｘफ7Ḷ㈠Ġ㈠7ḚAŐAḚǲ7ＣḶḶŐฌ ธ ่₡7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ̬ฌ ㄦ ‫ں‬ฎ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ ╗ Ḷ ╗ A Ձ 7A ゜b̬ฌ ธ ‫ں‬ɱ ̶ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱ″फ7
ㅡ‫ں‬ธफฌ ธƥֱｘफฌ Ḛ A Ő A Ḛ ǲ ̬ฌ ㅡ ธ ㄦ 7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ
″फฌ
Ő Ḷ Ќ ╗ 7bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃ 7О″ ̶Ḷ7Ɔ

Ő bĠ
㈠㈠ฌ
̬
″फฌ Ő ǲ A Ő 7bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃ 7ОɱḶ″Ő7ƆbĠ㈠㈠ฌ
̬
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ㅡṲㅡ7О╗7Û ŐAООǲＣฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱ″फฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱฎफ7
ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ ОḶƆ╗77ӧ‫ں‬ｘफ7ƆỢ㈠ỏ7ӧ╗ùОỏฌ ╗ Ḷ ╗ A Ձ 7bḶ Ћ ǲ Ő ǲ Ｃธ̬ՙՙՙ7Ɔ ㈠㈠ฌ

ธƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ
ㅡƥֱ″
‫ں‬ㅡफ7 ̶ƥֱㅡ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ㅡƥֱ″
‫ں‬ㅡफฌ ḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱㄦफฌ ฎƥֱㅡफฌ ‫ں‬ƥ̶ֱफ7 ‫ں‬″ƥֱｘफฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
/ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ 7ӧǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ 7 ‫ں‬7ִ 7̶ỏฌ
ОкŴ่7 7Оֱธ‫ں‬ɱ̶7ḚAŐAḚǲ7Ő●ḚĠ ╗ฌ
ОŐḶЋ●Ｃǲ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ӧҜ ●Ќ●Ҝ ⓈҜ ỏ7ḚùОƆⓈҜ 7ԱḶAŐＣ7ƆǲОAŐA╗●ḶЌ7A╗7Û AՁՁƆ7AЌＣ7bǲ●Ձ●

ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ AＣİAbǲЌ╗7╗Ḷ7╗Ġǲ7Ҝ A●Ќ7ĠḶⓈƆǲ7AЌＣ7A╗╗●b7AŐǲAƆ㈠ฌ
Û AƆĠ●ЌḚ7Ҝ AbĠ●Ќǲ7●Ɔ7AՁÛ AùƆ7ՁḶbA╗ǲＣ7Ձǲ ╗7Ḷ 7╗Ġǲ7ＣŐùǲŐ7ⓈЌՁǲƆƆ7ЌḶ╗ǲＣ
AՁՁ7ǲṲ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7Û AՁՁƆ7AŐǲ7ＣŐAÛ Ќ7A╗7̶7‫ں‬゜ธफ7Ɔ╗ⓈＣ7AЌＣ7AＣＣ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ƆĠǲA╗Ġ●Ќ
AՁՁ7●Ќ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7AЌＣ7bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7Û AՁՁƆ7AŐǲ7ＣŐAÛ Ќ7A╗7̶7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ⓈЌՁǲƆƆ7ЌḶ╗ǲＣ7
Ҝ ＣA7
A‫ں‬㈠‫ں‬ฌ
ĠǲAＣǲŐ7 ḶŐ7 ●ŐƆ╗7 ՁḶḶŐ7●Ɔ7A╗7ฎƥֱｘफ7ʉ゜7ɱƥ7bՁḚ7ִ7ƆǲbḶЌＣ7 ՁḶḶŐ7●Ɔ7A╗7ฎƥֱｘ

ĠAЌＣŐA●Ձ7Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗7ƆĠAՁՁ7Աǲ7̶″फ7Ҝ ǲAƆⓈŐǲＣ7ЋǲŐ╗●bAՁՁù7 ŐḶҜ 7╗Ġǲ7ЌḶƆ●ЌḚ7
ＣA╗ǲ̬ฌ‫ں‬ｘ゜ธㅡ゜‫ں‬ՙฌ
ธ่₡7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7 ‫ש⎯ں‬7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌฌ

ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฌ
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
О A ╗ ●Ḷ ฌ
‫ں‬ธ ƥֱｘ फ7Ṳ 7‫ں‬ｘ ƥֱｘ फฌ
‫ںں‬ƥֱㅡफฌ bḶ Ќ bŐ ǲ ╗ ǲ 7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő Ɔ ฌ
ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ｘƥֱｘफฌ
ՙƥֱｘफ7 ‫ں‬ｘƥֱธफ7 ɱƥֱ‫ں‬फ7 ̶ƥֱ″फ7 ̶ƥֱ″फ7 ″ƥֱɱफฌ

″ｘ″ฎ7ƆḚＣ7ӧ╗ǲҜ Оỏฌ
̶ｘ̶″7ƆĠ7

bAԱƆ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ

ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7 ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
ĠԱ7 Ɔ●Ќì7 ＣÛ ฌ
″ƥֱㅡफฌ
ƆԱ̶″ฌ
ธƥֱ″फ7 ̶ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ㄦƥֱｘफฌ
Ҝ ●bŐḶฌ
ԱŐǲAì AƆ╗7 AҜ ●Ձù7ŐḶḶҜ ฌ
ŐAЌḚǲ7Û ゜ฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ㄦƥֱｘफ7Ṳ7ธƥֱｘफฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7 ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ธƥֱｘफ7
‫ں‬ㅡƥֱ″
●ƆՁAЌＣฌ
‫ں‬ㅡƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ 7 Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
‫ں‬ㄦƥֱฎफฌ
bAԱƆฌ
ì ●╗ bĠ ǲЌ ฌ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
″ƥֱธफ7
ՙƥֱՙफฌ
Őǲ ฌ
bAԱƆฌ ธฎ″ฎฌ
ธฎ″ฎฌ ǲЌ╗Őùฌ
ธｘ7Ҝ ●Ќ㈠ฌ‫ں‬ƥֱธफฌ
╗Őฌ
ŐA╗ǲＣฌ
Û Ġฌ
ฌ
╗Оฌ
̶ƥֱｘफฌ
ㄦƥֱฎफ7
″ฎ
ㄦƥֱㄦफ7
ОAЌ╗Őùฌ
О Ḷ Û Ｃ ǲŐ 7Ա A ╗ Ġ
ธฎ″ฎ
ӧㄦỏ‫ں‬ธफ7ƆĠՁЋƆ7
ธｘ
ỏฌ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
ӧธ ธฎՙｘฌ Ћ ● ù Ձ╗Őฌ ̶ƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7 ‫ں‬ธƥֱɱफฌ ̶ƥֱｘफฌ
ɱƥֱ‫ں‬
ḶОǲЌ●ЌḚ7
̶ɱƥֱｘफ7
̶ɱƥֱｘफฌ
ḚAŐAḚǲ7Û AՁՁƆ7bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌฌ

ธƥֱฎफ7 ̶ƥֱㅡफ7 ㄦƥֱㄦफ7 ㄦƥֱㅡफ7 ̶ƥֱฎ
‫ں‬ธफฌ Û ●╗Ġ7Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7AŐǲA7Ҝ ⓈƆ╗ฌ
ĠAЋǲ77‫゜ں‬ธफ7ＣŐùÛ AՁՁฌ
ธƥֱɱफ7
ƆǲОAŐA╗●ḶЌฌ
ӧҜ ●Ќ㈠7ธｘ7Ҝ ●Ќ7 ●Őǲỏฌ
7
ธ 7bA Ő 7Ḛ A Ő A Ḛ ǲฌ
Ｃ ●Ќ ●Ќ Ḛ 7 ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ธｘƥֱㄦफ7
ㄦƥֱㅡफ7
ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ ɱ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
ฎƥֱｘफ7
ㄦ゜ฎफ7╗ùОǲ7फṲफ7ḚùОƆⓈҜ 7ԱḶAŐＣฌ
ḶОǲЌ7ŐA●Ձ●ЌḚฌ
‫̶ں‬ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7
A Ҝ ●Ձ ù 7ǲ Ќ ╗ Ő ù ฌ
ⓈО7ӧ‫ں‬″ỏ7Ő●ƆǲŐƆฌ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì ฌ7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ḶЌ7bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚ7Ḷ 7ḚAŐAḚǲฌ
ฎｘՙｘ7ḶОǲЌ●ЌḚ7
‫ں‬ｘफ7╗ŐǲAＣƆ7ӧ‫ں‬ｘफ7Û ゜7‫ں‬फ7ЌḶƆ●ЌḚỏฌ
Ɔ╗AŐ╗7Ɔ╗A●ŐƆ7ĠǲŐǲฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
ḶŐ7 ՁḶŐ●ＣA7ԱⓈ●ՁＣƆฌ
ㄦƥֱｘफ7
̶ƥֱɱ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ ̶ｘ″ฎฌ ĠԱฌ

ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7 ǲЌ╗Őù7 ธ″″ฎฌ
̶ｘ‫ں‬ธ7╗ŐAЌƆฌ
Û ゜7̶फ7Ա╗Û Ќฌ ‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆ ‫ں‬″ƥֱｘफ7ゥ7ՙƥֱｘफ7Ḷ㈠Ġ㈠7ḚAŐAḚǲ7ＣḶḶŐฌ
ㅡƥֱㄦफ7 ̶ƥֱㅡफ7 ̶ƥֱฎफ7 ‫ں‬ธफฌ
̶ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7 ธƥ̶ֱफ7 ̶ƥֱฎ
ㄦƥֱｘफ7
ฎफ7ƆỢⓈAŐǲฌ
̶ƥֱｘफ7 ธƥֱｘफ7 ̶ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7
bḶՁⓈҜ Ќⓒฌ
̶ƥֱｘफ7
ОǲŐ7ƆОǲb7
О Ḷ Ő bĠ ฌ
″फฌ
″फฌ ‫ںں‬ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ㄦƥֱ″फ7 ̶ƥֱｘ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱɱ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ‫ں‬″ƥֱｘफ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱㅡफ7 ธธƥֱฎफฌ
ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ
‫ש⎯ں‬7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌฌ
A Ő ǲ A 7╗ A Ա Ⓢ Ձ A ╗ ●Ḷ Ќ ฌ
‫ש⎯ں‬7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő 7Ձ ●Ћ ●Ќ ‫ں‬ｘ
Ḛ ̬‫ں‬ㅡ 7⎯‫׀‬7⑾‫ש‬ฌ
ธ ่₡7 ՁḶ Ḷ Ő 7Ձ●Ћ ●Ќ‫̶ں‬Ḛฎ̬ธ 7⎯‫׀‬7⑾‫ש‬ฌ
╗ Ḷ ╗ A Ձ 7A ゜b̬7 ธ ̶ ɱ ″ 7⎯‫׀‬7⑾‫ש‬ฌ
Ő Ḷ Ќ ╗ 7ǲ Ќ ╗ Ő ù ̬7 ฎ ㄦ 7⎯‫׀‬7⑾‫ש‬ฌ
Ḛ A Ő A Ḛ ǲ ̬7 ̶ ɱ ㅡ 7⎯‫׀‬7⑾‫ש‬ฌ
╗ Ḷ ╗ A Ձ ̬7 ธ ฎ ՙㄦ 7⎯‫׀‬7⑾‫ש‬ฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
‫ש⎯ں‬7/ՁḶḶ Ő7ОՁAЌ Ɔ7ӧธゥ″7ǲṲ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7Û AՁՁỏฌ
Ҝ ＣA7
A‫ں‬ฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱ″फ7 ‫ں‬ｘ‫ں‬ธफ7 ㄦƥ̶ֱ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ธƥֱㅡ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ‫̶ں‬ƥֱ‫ںں‬
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ㄦƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ̶ƥֱ″फ7 ฎƥֱธफ7 ‫ںں‬ƥֱㄦ
‫ں‬ธफ7 ธƥֱ″फฌ


̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ7 ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ

̶ｘṲ″ｘฌ ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
ธƥֱｘफฌ
ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ7 ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
̶ƥֱｘफฌ
╗ⓈԱ゜ƆĠḶÛ ǲŐฌ
ฌ
″ƥֱฎफฌ
╗Őฌ ″ฎ
ธƥֱｘफฌ ỏธｘ
̶ƥֱㅡफ7
ӧธ Ա ǲＣ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7ㅡ ฌ
╗О7 ธㅡ″ฎฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ฎ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱ‫ں‬ｘ
╗Őฌ bĠAƆǲฌ
ЋƆԱ̶″ฌ
̶ƥֱธफ7
ธƥֱ″फ7
Ҝ A Ɔ ╗ ǲ Ő 7Ա ǲＣ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ฌ
ฎ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠7Û ゜7ฎ फ7╗ Ő A ù ฌ
‫ں‬ՙƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲฌ
ㅡƥֱｘफ7
̶ƥֱฎफ7
ĠЋAbฌ
ธㅡ″ฎ7 ธ″″ฎฌ
ธฎ″ฎฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
ธฎ″ฎฌ
̶ƥֱฎफฌ
ธƥֱㄦ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
̶ƥֱㅡफ7
̶ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7
̶ƥֱɱफ7 ธƥֱՙफ7 ̶ƥֱ″फ7 ㄦƥֱｘफ7 ธƥֱธफ7 ̶ƥֱฎफ7 ㅡƥֱ‫ں‬फ7 ธƥֱฎफ7 ธ″″ฎฌ ‫ں‬ธƥֱฎफฌ ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏฌ
bĠAƆǲฌ
̶ㅡƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱฎफ7
̶″ƥֱｘफฌ
̶″ƥֱｘफฌ
bĠAƆǲ7 ‫ں‬ธफ7ŐִƆ7 Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7̶ ฌ ‫ںں‬ƥֱ″फ7
ธƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
ɱƥֱｘ
‫ں‬ธफ7
╗Ő7 ธ″″ฎ7 ธธफゥㄦㅡफฌ
ฌ
ՙƥֱฎफ7
A╗╗●bฌ
╗Ḷ7ḚŐḶⓈЌＣ7 ՁŐฌ
╗Оฌ
ㄦƥֱɱ
ＣḶÛ Ќ7ӧ‫ں‬″ỏ7Ő●ƆǲŐƆฌ
″ฎ
ธㅡ″ฎฌ AbbǲƆƆฌ
ㅡƥֱｘफ7
ỏธฎ
‫ں‬ｘफ7╗ŐǲAＣƆ7ӧ‫ں‬ｘफ7Û ゜7‫ں‬फ7ЌḶƆ●ЌḚỏฌ
ӧธ
‫ںں‬ƥֱ″फ7
ธ″″ฎ
ธ″″ฎฌ
‫ں‬ธफฌ
Ҝ A Ɔ ╗ ǲŐ 7ԱA ╗ Ġ
‫ں‬ƥֱฎफ7
Û ●bฌ
7
ฎ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ ฎ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁ Ḛ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ

Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ ЋḚ●Ќ7ù Ձ 7О ՁA ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ㅡธफ7ìЌǲǲÛ AՁՁฌ
‫ں‬ธफ7
̶ƥֱㅡफ7
ㄦƥ̶ֱ
ธ″″ฎฌ
ㅡｘ‫ں‬ｘ7╗ŐAЌƆḶҜ ฌ
̶ㅡゥ″ｘ7ƆĠḶÛ ǲŐ7
ธƥֱ″फ7 ธƥֱɱ
7ƆǲҜ ●ֱ ŐAҜ ǲՁǲƆƆฌ
ḚՁAƆƆ7ǲЌbՁḶƆⓈŐǲฌ
ธฎ″ฎ7
Ա ǲ Ｃ Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ 7ธ ฌ
ฎƥֱ″फ7
‫ں‬ธफ7
‫ںں‬ƥֱՙ
ธㅡ″ฎฌ Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ
ㄦƥֱ‫ں‬फ7
Ձ●ЌǲЌฌ
ՙƥֱㅡफ7
ฎƥֱｘफ7
ฌ
ЋƆԱ̶″7 ＣƆ‫̶ں‬7 ЋƆԱ̶″ฌ
ӧㄦỏ‫ں‬ธफ7ƆĠՁЋƆฌ
ธｘ̶ธ7ƆĠฌ
ḚŐǲù7ԱḶṲฌ
Ձ A Ⓢ Ќ Ｃ Ő ù 7Ő Ḷ Ḷ Ҝ ฌ ″ฎ
Û AƆĠǲŐ゜ＣŐùǲŐฌ
ӧ╗ǲҜ Оỏ7 ╗Ő7 ธｘ̶ธ7ƆĠฌ ฎ ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7bՁḚ ㈠7Ġ ╗ ㈠ฌ ỏธฌฎ
Ћ ●Ќ ù Ձ 7О ՁA Ќ ì 7 Ձ Ḷ Ḷ Ő ●Ќ Ḛ ฌ ӧธ
̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠ̶ｘㄦｘ7ƆĠฌ
ӧǲḚŐǲƆƆỏ
ฎफ‫ں‬ƥֱㅡफ7
ธｘ̶ธ7ƆĠฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7 ㅡƥֱธफ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ ㄦƥֱｘफ7 ̶ƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7 ̶ƥֱ‫ںں‬फ7 ̶ƥֱɱफ7 ̶ƥֱㅡफ7 ″ƥֱ‫ں‬फฌ

̶ƥֱɱफ7 ″ƥֱ‫ں‬फ7 ″ƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफฌ ธƥֱㅡफ7 ‫̶ں‬ƥֱธफฌ
‫ں‬″ƥֱฎफ7 ՙƥֱ‫ں‬ｘफ7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥֱ″फฌ
ㅡｘƥֱｘफฌ
ธ่₡7 ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ӧǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ㅡⓒ7ㄦⓒ7″7ִ7ՙỏ
ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
ธ่₡7/ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ ﹝ธゥ″7ǲṲ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7Û AՁՁ7ӧǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ 7 ㅡⓒㄦ7ִ7″ỏฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
ОŐḶЋ●Ｃǲ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ӧҜ ●Ќ●Ҝ ⓈҜ ỏ7ḚùОƆⓈҜ 7ԱḶAŐＣ7ƆǲОAŐA╗●ḶЌ7A╗7Û AՁՁƆ7AЌＣ7bǲ●Ձ●

AＣİAbǲЌ╗7╗Ḷ7╗Ġǲ7Ҝ A●Ќ7ĠḶⓈƆǲ7AЌＣ7A╗╗●b7AŐǲAƆ㈠ฌ
Û AƆĠ●ЌḚ7Ҝ AbĠ●Ќǲ7●Ɔ7AՁÛ AùƆ7ՁḶbA╗ǲＣ7Ձǲ ╗7Ḷ 7╗Ġǲ7ＣŐùǲŐ7ⓈЌՁǲƆƆ7ЌḶ╗ǲＣ
ㄦฌ
AՁՁ7ǲṲ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7Û AՁՁƆ7AŐǲ7ＣŐAÛ Ќ7A╗7̶7‫ں‬゜ธफ7Ɔ╗ⓈＣ7AЌＣ7AＣＣ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ƆĠǲA╗Ġ●Ќ
AՁՁ7●Ќ╗ǲŐ●ḶŐ7AЌＣ7bḶҜ Ҝ ḶЌ7Û AՁՁƆ7AŐǲ7ＣŐAÛ Ќ7A╗7̶7‫゜ں‬ธफ7ⓈЌՁǲƆƆ7ЌḶ╗ǲＣ7
Ҝ ＣA7
A‫ں‬㈠ㅡฌ
ĠǲAＣǲŐ7 ḶŐ7 ●ŐƆ╗7 ՁḶḶŐ7●Ɔ7A╗7ฎƥֱｘफ7ʉ゜7ɱƥ7bՁḚ7ִ7ƆǲbḶЌＣ7 ՁḶḶŐ7●Ɔ7A╗7ฎƥֱｘ

ĠAЌＣŐA●Ձ7Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗7ƆĠAՁՁ7Աǲ7̶″फ7Ҝ ǲAƆⓈŐǲＣ7ЋǲŐ╗●bAՁՁù7 ŐḶҜ 7╗Ġǲ7ЌḶƆ●ЌḚ7
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฌ
ＣŐAÛ Ќ7Աù̬
ｘ̶゜ธ″゜‫ں‬ɱ
GPA-75942 [PRJ-75274] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-75943 AND TMP-75945 - APPLICANT:
AMH DEVELOPMENT, LLC - OWNER: MNC HOLDINGS, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CRAIG ROAD AND BUFFALO DRIVE
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
PRJ-75274
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ZON-75943 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75942 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: AMH
DEVELOPMENT, LLC - OWNER: MNC HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [DR (DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND
RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS] TO: R-
1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 3.81 acres at the southeast corner of Craig Road and
Buffalo Drive (APNs 138-03-301-001 and 004), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75274]. Staff
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Consolidated Backup
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-75943, VAR-75944 and TMP-75945 [PRJ-75274]
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75274
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
TMP-75945 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75942, ZON-75943 AND VAR-75944 -
CRAIG & BUFFALO - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: AMH DEVELOPMENT, LLC - OWNER:
MNC HOLDINGS, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A 19-LOT
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 3.81 acres at the southeast corner of Craig
Road and Buffalo Drive (APNs 138-03-301-001 and 004), U (DR) [Undeveloped (Desert Rural
Density Residential) and U (RNP) [Undeveloped (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) Zones
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75274]. Staff
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
3. School Development Tracking Form from Clark County School District
4. Comments from City of Las Vegas Public Works Traffic Engineering Division
paper use, backup
PRJ-75274
03/04/19
PRJ-75274
03/04/19
PRJ-75274
03/04/19
PRJ-75274
03/04/19
Real Property Management School Development Tracking Form
1180 Military Tribute Place
Henderson, Nv. 89074 http://ccsd.net/departments/real-property
Date Filed Application Number Entity

Company Name
Contact Name
Contact Mailing Address
City State Zip Code
Phone Mobile Fax Email
Project Name
Project Description
APN's
Student Yield Elementary School Middle School High School

Single-Family Units (1) x 0.196 = x 0.101 = x 0.137 =
Multi-Family Units (2) x 0.140 = x 0.058 = x 0.064 =
Resort Condo Units (3)
Total
(1) Single Family unit is defined as single family detached home, mobile home, and town homes.
(2) Multi-Family unit is defined as apartment, multiplexes, and condominiums.
(3) Resort Condominium units for tracking purposes only.
* To be completed by CCSD
Schools Serving the Area*

Name Address Grade Capacity Enrollment Site Date
* CCSD Comments
Approved Disapproved
TMP 75945
AMH Development LLC
SEC Craig Road & Buffalo Drive

Proposed 19 unit single family residential development.
Traffic produced by proposed development:
RATE/#
Proposed Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 9.44 179

AM Peak Hour SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED [DU] 19 0.74 14
PM Peak Hour 0.99 19
(heaviest 60 minutes)
Existing traffic on all nearby streets:
Craig Road
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 14,535
PM Peak Hour 1163
Buffalo Drive
PM Peak Hour 275
Traffic Capacity of adjacent streets:
Adjacent street ADT

Capacity
Craig Road 35,490
Buffalo Drive 35,490
This project will add approximately 179 trips per day on Helena Ave., Craig Rd. and Buffalo Dr. Currently, Craig is at about
41 percent of capacity and Buffalo is at about 19 percent of capacity. With this project, Craig is expected to remain at about
41 percent of capacity and Buffalo is expected to be at about 20 percent of capacity. Counts are not available for Helena, but
it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 19 additional cars, or about one every three
minutes.
Note that this report assumes all traffic from this development uses all named streets.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
WVR-75925 - WAIVER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CARMEL CANYON HOA -
For possible action on a request for a Waiver TO ALLOW NO LANDSCAPING ALONG
PORTIONS OF LA CONCHA ROAD AND LEON AVENUE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED FOR
AN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on a portion of 51.50 acres adjacent to the northeast
corner of Iron Mountain Road and Jones Boulevard (APNs 125-01-397-019; 125-01-497-006 and
012), RPD-3 (Residential Planned Development - 3 Units per Acre) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-
75733]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Protest Postcard(s)
7. Protest and/or Support Documentation Not Vetted
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CARMEL CANYON HOA
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
WVR-75925 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 692
PROTESTS 4
APPROVALS 0
JAB
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
WVR-75925 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. This approval shall be void two years from the date of final approval, unless
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time may
be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
2. All necessary building permits shall be obtained and final inspections shall be
completed in compliance with Title 19 and all codes as required by the Department
of Building and Safety.
3. These Conditions of Approval shall be affixed to the cover sheet of any plan set
submitted for building permit.
4. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City departments must be
satisfied, except as modified herein.
JAB
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request to remove existing landscaping along Leon Avenue, north of Iron
Mountain Road, and portions of La Concha Road, between Bradley Road and North
Jones Boulevard.
ISSUES
 The applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow no landscaping along Leon Avenue and
portions of La Concha Road. Staff supports this request.
ANALYSIS
On 08/21/02 the City Council approved a 172-lot single family residential subdivision at
the northeast corner of Jones Boulevard and Iron Mountain Road. The landscaping plan
for this development was submitted as part of Site Development Plan Review Z-0051-
02(1). The plan reflected Title 19 street frontage landscaping standards which required a
24-inch box tree every 30 linear feet and (4) five-gallon shrubs for every required tree.
The subdivision was only required to landscape the buffer areas adjacent to their
development. During a site visit on 03/13/19, staff observed that the frontage roads in this
development still meet standards. The landscaping is lush and well-maintained.
The applicant proposes to remove all landscaping along adjacent portions of La Concha
Road and Leon Avenue. La Concha Road was planned as a Primary Arterial, but was
later closed by the City of Las Vegas as the undeveloped land to the north was designated
a part of the Tule Springs Fossil Beds National Monument in 2014. No vehicular traffic
can access La Concha Road. Along La Concha Road to the north, the residential
subdivision has fewer trees per linear foot and no shrubbery. Along La Concha Road to
the south, the residential subdivision has trees every 30 linear feet and no shrubbery.
Leon Avenue has also been closed to vehicular traffic, and provides no access to the
applicant’s subdivision on the west. Leon Avenue was required by the City and
constructed so that future development to the east could use it as an access road.
However, the City Council ultimately approved a subdivision to the east whose orientation
did not require access from Leon Avenue. The subsequent development made Leon
Avenue a dead end with a half cul-de-sac that provides no access to homes or other
streets.
JAB
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733]
Per justification letter stamped 02/28/19, the applicant wants to remove landscaping along
portions of La Concha Road and Leon Avenue because their contracted landscaping
company cannot access these areas with the heavy equipment required to maintain
mature trees, since these roads have been barricaded. The applicant is also concerned
about how much potable water is wasted every year to maintain landscaping along streets
that nobody currently uses, and will not use in the foreseeable future. Since these streets
were closed by events unanticipated in 2002, staff believes this waiver request is not self-
created or preferential in nature, and therefore supports the waiver request.

The subject property was Annexed (A-0003-64) into the City of Las Vegas as
05/20/64
part of a larger request.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-0027-02) to
amend a portion of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan from DR (Desert Rural)
to PF (Public Facilities) and R (Rural) on 51.5 acres adjacent to the northeast
corner of Jones Boulevard and Iron Mountain Road. The Planning
Commission recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0051-02) from R-E (Residence
08/21/02 Estates) to R-PD3 (Residential Planned Development – 3 Units per Acre) on
51.5 acres adjacent to the northeast corner of Jones Boulevard and Iron
Mountain Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0051-02(1)]
for a 172-lot single family residential subdivision on 51.5 acres adjacent to
the northeast corner of Jones Boulevard and Iron Mountain Road. The
Planning Commission recommended approval.
A Final Map (FMP-2193) was recorded for a 38-lot single family subdivision,
12/04/03
located on the north east corner of Iron Mountain Road and Jones Boulevard.
A Final Map (FMP-2492) was recorded for a 33-lot single family subdivision,
01/30/04
located on the north east corner of Iron Mountain Road and Jones Boulevard.

Various A deed was recorded for a change in ownership.

JAB
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733]
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting with the applicant where the
01/29/19
submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a proposed Waiver.
A neighborhood meeting was not required or held.
Field Check
During a routine field check, staff observed the subject site. The landscaping
03/13/19
was lush and well-maintained

Site Area
Net Acres 51.50

Surrounding
Use Per Title Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property
19.12 Designation
R-PD3 (Residential Planned
Subject Single Family, R (Rural Density
Development – 3 Units per
Property Detached Residential)
Acre)
Single Family, R (Rural Density
North Detached Residential)
Acre)
Undeveloped PF (Public Facilities) N/A
South R-PD3 (Residential Planned
Detached Residential)
Acre)
East Detached Residential) Residential)
Undeveloped PF (Public Facilities) N/A
JAB
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733]

Surrounding
Property
19.12 Designation
Acre)
West
PR-OS (Parks,
Undeveloped Recreation, Open R-E (Residence Estates)
Space)

Northwest Open Space Y
Trails (20 foot Non-Equestrian) Y
Trails (20 foot Equestrian) Y
Assessment)
Pursuant to Site Development Plan Review Z-0051-02(1), the following standards

apply:
Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 La Concha Rd 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 26 Trees 26 Trees Y
 Leon Ave 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 30 Trees 65 Trees Y
Min. Zone Width
 La Concha Rd 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
 Leon Ave 10 Feet 10 Feet Y
JAB
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733]

Street Governing
Classification Street Width with Street
Name Document
Planned Streets and
La Concha Primary Arterial 50 Y
Highways Map
Planned Streets and
Leon Ave Local Street 26 Y
Highways Map
JAB
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ｘธ゜ธฎ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
A
Ɔ
Ɔ
ǲ
Ɔ
Ɔ
Ḷ
Ő
ƥ
Ɔ
7
b
Ḷ
О
ù
ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
A
Ɔ
Ɔ
ǲ
Ɔ
Ɔ
Ḷ
Ő
ƥ
Ɔ
7
b
Ḷ
О
ù
ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
A
Ɔ
Ɔ
ǲ
Ɔ
Ɔ
Ḷ
Ő
ƥ
Ɔ
7
b
Ḷ
О
ù
ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
A
Ɔ
Ɔ
ǲ
Ɔ
Ɔ
Ḷ
Ő
ƥ
Ɔ
7
b
Ḷ
О
ù
ฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
AƆ
Ɔ ǲƆ
ƆḶ
Őƥ
Ɔ 7b
ḶО
ùฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
ОŐİֱՙㄦՙ̶̶
WVR-75925 [PRJ-75733] - WAIVER - APPLICANT/OWNER: CARMEL CANYON HOA
NORTHEAST CORNER OF IRON MOUNTAIN ROAD AND JONES BOULEVARD
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
PRJ-75733
02/28/19
PRJ-75733
02/28/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAR-75872 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR -
OWNER: STATE OF NEVADA - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW AN
EXISTING 63-FOOT TALL OFF-PREMISE SIGN TO BE INCREASED TO 83 FEET IN HEIGHT
on 2.12 acres at 1604 West Oakey Boulevard (APN 162-04-602-009), M (Industrial) Zone, Ward
3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75866]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR - OWNER:
STATE OF NEVADA
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75872 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 114
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
NE
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
VAR-75872 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
54890), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-71233) and Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-74329) shall be required, except as amended herein.
exercised pursuant to the provisions of LVMC Title 19.16. An Extension of Time
may be filed for consideration by the City of Las Vegas.
NE
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting the height of an existing Off-Premise Sign at 1604 West
Oakey Boulevard to be raised from 63 feet to 83 feet.
ISSUES
 The height proposed exceeds the height limitation set forth by Title 19.19.12.120
in order for the Director to grant an approval by means of a Minor Site development
Plan Review.
ANALYSIS
As ‘Project Neon’ nears completion, the existing 63-foot tall Off-Premise sign located at
1604 West Oakey Boulevard is now only visible to the vehicular traffic traveling
northbound on Interstate 15. The applicant is proposing to raise the overall height of the
Off-Premise sign to 83 feet.
As stated by Title 19.12.120, “The Director shall have the authority to grant approval, by
means of a Minor Site Development Plan Review under LVMC 19.16.100(F), to do any of
the following regarding an off-premise sign within 660 feet of any highway classified by the
State of Nevada as part of the interstate or primary highway system, and, subject to the
provision of Paragraph (3) of this Subsection (G), no Special Use Permit or public hearing
shall be required in connection therewith:
a. Adjust the height or angle of an off-premise sign to a height or angle that:
I. Restores the visibility of the sign to the same or comparable visibility as before the
construction of a noise abatement or highway improvement project;
ii. Is not more than 45 feet above the noise abatement improvement project,
measured from the tallest point of the improvement project to the top of the sign;
and
iii. Is not more than 65 feet from the existing grade at the base of the sigh to the top
thereof;
b. Relocate a sign to another location on the same existing parcel in order to achieve
visibility that was obstructed by a noise abatement or highway improvement project;
or
NE
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866]
c. Make a structural modification to allow a digital display on a sign that adjoins a

controlled-access freeway, in compliance with the size limitations and other applicable
requirements of this Title.”
The proposed 83 feet in height exceeds the 65-foot height limit expressed in Title LVMC
19.12.120(G)(1)(a)(iii), therefore the applicant is requesting a Variance to raise the existing
Off-Premise Sign from 63 feet in height to 83 feet. Due to the extraordinary circumstance of
‘Project Neon’ raising the overall elevation of the interstate, staff supports the Variance
request and is recommending approval with conditions.
FINDINGS (VAR-75872)
In accordance with the provisions of Title 19.16.140(B), Planning Commission and City
Council, in considering the merits of a Variance request, shall not grant a Variance in
order to:
1. Permit a use in a zoning district in which the use is not allowed;

2. Vary any minimum spacing requirement between uses;
3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.”
Additionally, Title 19.16.140(L) states:

“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific
piece of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of
exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation
or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation
would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and
undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict
application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief
may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without
substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially
impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”
A unique and extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that due to the
construction activities related to ‘Project Neon,’ the overall elevation of Interstate 15 has
been raised making the subject Off-Premise sign visible from the north bound lanes and
not the southbound lanes. In view of the hardship imposed by the site’s physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is not preferential in nature,
and it is thereby within the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances and staff
is recommending approval of the request. If denied, the height of the Off-Premise sign
will remain at 63 feet.
NE
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866]

The Department of Planning administratively approved a request for a Minor
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-54890) for the conversion of an
07/28/14
existing 50-foot tall, 14-foot by 48-foot off-premise sign to a digital display unit
(LED) on the south facing side only at 1604 West Oakey Boulevard.
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-71233) for the proposed relocation of
08/15/17
an off-premise sign due to the widening of a public roadway (Project Neon)
at 1604 West Oakey Boulevard.
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-74329) for the conversion of an
10/01/18
existing 63-foot tall, 14-foot by 48-foot off-premise sign to a digital display unit
(LED) on the south facing side only at 1604 West Oakey Boulevard.


A building permit (#C17-01413) was issued for two outdoor signs at
10/30/17 1604 West Oakey Boulevard. The permit received its final inspection on
04/11/18.
A building permit (#C18-04362) was issued for a billboard sign at 1604
10/11/18 West Oakey Boulevard. The permit received its final inspection on
01/23/19.
A building permit (#C18-04682) was issued for the relocation of
10/29/18 electrical service for a billboard due to project neon at 1604 West Oakey
Boulevard. The permit received its final inspection on 11/07/18.
A building permit (#C19-00036) was issued for electrical for existing
01/07/19 billboards located at 1604 West Oakey Boulevard. The permit received
its final inspection on 01/18/19.
Staff conducted a routine pre-application meeting where the submittal
02/20/19 requirements for a Variance and a Site Development Plan Review were
discussed.
NE
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866]
A Neighborhood meeting was not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
Staff observed the subject billboard during a routine field check to the
subject site to ensure the support structure was in good condition. Staff
then drove on the interstate to view the subject billboard. While traveling
03/13/19
northbound staff observed the billboard to be visible barely above this
elevated portion of the interstate. While traveling southbound, staff was
unable to view the subject billboard amongst traffic on the interstate.

Site Area
Net Acres 2.12

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject
Parking Lot C (Commercial) M (Industrial)
Property
Sexually Oriented LI/R (Light
North M (Industrial)
Business Industry/Research)
Convenience
South C (Commercial) M (Industrial)
Store
Convenience
East C (Commercial) M (Industrial)
Store
West I-15 Right-of-Way Right-of-Way

A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 200 Feet Y
LW-O (Live/Work Overlay) District Y
NE
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866]

Appendix F, Interim Downtown Las Vegas Development Standards Y
Trails N/A
Las Vegas Redevelopment Plan Area 1 Y
Assessment)

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Oakey
Collector Street Streets and 98 Y
Boulevard
Highways
Master Plan of
Western
Collector Street Streets and 60 Y
Avenue
Highways
NE
PRJ-75866
03/13/19
PRJ-75866
03/13/19
ㅡฎɸ7 Ќ7 Ћ●b●Ќ●╗ù7ҜAО7 Ќฌ
AǲŐ●AՁ7Ћ●ǲÛฌ
‫ں‬ㅡɸṲㅡฎɸ77ОAŐ╗●AՁ7>ՁAḚฌ Û7 ǲฌ
‫ں‬ㅡɸฌ Ｃħ‫ف‬ħ‫ש‬Ŵк7—่ħ‫⎯ש‬ฌ
Û ǲฌ
Ɔฌ
̶ɸฌ
7 Ɔ●ḚЌ7ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌ 7
ӧƆǲǲ7Ｃǲ╗A●Ձỏฌ
Ɔฌ
ฎ̶ɸ7Ḷ‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴкк7Ġ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬ฌ
ฎ̶ɸฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ḚŐAＣǲฌ
ḚǲЌǲŐAՁ7ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
╗ḶО7Ћ●ǲÛฌ ‫ں‬㈠7Ќਙ‫ש‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γħ่7̶ｘｘ7⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬7ผŴ₡ħ—⎯7ਙ⑾
Ḛ●ƆҜḶ
ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7—⎯֭㈠ฌ
ธ㈠7Ќਙ7ऑŴผ ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ʉħкк7⇡֭7‫ש‬Ŵ ่֭ฌ
ÛAùฌ
ÛAՁì
Ɔ●ḚЌ7Abǲฌ ⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่㈠ฌ
О●ḚǲḶЌ7ОAЌฌ
╗ḶŐƆ●ḶЌ7ԱAŐ bḶՁⓈҜЌฌ
ǲЌbՁḶƆⓈŐǲฌ
bŐḶƆƆḶЋǲŐ7ÛAՁìÛAùฌ
Ɔ●ḚЌ7Abǲฌ
ÛAՁìÛ
Aùฌ
ㅡฎɸֱｘ㈚7Ɔ
●ḚЌ7A
bǲฌ
ＣḶЌḶЋAЌ7İḶЌǲƆฌ
İḶЌǲƆ7ҜǲＣ●A7ՁՁbฌ
Ձ●bǲЌƆǲ7ฎｘɱㄦㅡฌ
ㅡ‫ں‬ㅡㄦ7Û㈠7╗ǲbḶ7AЋǲ㈠゜7ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ฎ゜7ՙｘธֱ″ㅡㄦֱｘｘɱธฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐ̬ฌ
bՁǲAŐ7bĠAЌЌǲՁฌ
ƆbAՁǲ̬ AООŐḶЋǲＣ7Աù̬7 ＣŐAÛЌ7Աù̬ฌ
ЌḶ╗ǲＣฌ ＣḶЌḶЋAЌ7İḶЌǲƆฌ
ＣA╗ǲ̬ฌ ŐǲЋ●ƆǲＣ̬ฌ
ㅡֱ‫ں‬ฎֱ‫ں‬ՙฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
‫ں‬″ｘㅡ7ḶŴ ֭ੂฌ
ＣŐAÛ●ЌḚ7ЌⓈҜԱǲŐ̬ฌ
AÛ
AОЌ 7‫ں‬″ธֱｘㅡֱ″ｘธֱｘｘɱ7
ㅡֱ″ｘธֱｘｘɱ ̶ ОŐİֱՙㄦฎ″″
̶̶ธฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎ″″
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR - OWNER: STATE OF NEVADA
1604 WEST OAKEY BOULEVARD
03/13/19
VAR-75872 [PRJ-75866] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR - OWNER: STATE OF NEVADA
1604 WEST OAKEY BOULEVARD
03/13/19
PRJ-75866
03/13/19
PRJ-75866
03/13/19
PRJ-75866
03/13/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SUP-75967 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: SOUTHERN NEVADA
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CLINIC - OWNER: A. NICKNAM, PC, ET AL - For possible action on
a request for a Special Use Permit FOR AN ALTERNATIVE PARKING STANDARD TO ALLOW
15 PARKING SPACES WHERE 22 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED FOR A PROPOSED
4,928 SQUARE-FOOT CLINIC USE at 1640 East Sahara Avenue (APN 162-02-411-031), C-1
(Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75911]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: SOUTHERN NEVADA OCCUPATIONAL
HEALTH CLINIC - OWNER: A. NICKNAM, PC, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-75967 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 167
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
NE
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
SUP-75967 CONDITIONS
Planning
1. The alternative parking demand analysis date stamped 03/04/19 is hereby

approved. The alternative parking standard is valid for the duration of the Clinic Use
at the site. The alternative parking standard shall expire, when the use ceases to
operate on the site.
submitted for building permit, as well as submitted as part of any business license
application.
NE
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for an Alternative Parking Standard to allow 15 parking spaces where
22 are required for a proposed Clinic use at 1640 East Sahara Avenue.
ISSUES
• A Special Use Permit is requested for an Alternative Parking Standard to allow 15

parking spaces where a minimum of 22 parking spaces is required. Staff supports
this request.
ANALYSIS
The applicant, the Southern Nevada Occupational Health Center, is currently located
within a 4,800 square-foot building at 4060 North Martin L. King Boulevard. The
applicant is proposing to relocate their operations to 1640 East Sahara Avenue which is
comparable in size at 4,928 square feet.
The subject site is located within the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district which
allows a Clinic use by right. Title 19.12 defines a Clinic use as, “A facility which is occupied
and used for the purpose of providing dental or medical care, and which regularly provides
any of those services to the general public on an emergency basis or without appointment.
This use does not include a hospital or a facility which provides for the overnight care or
overnight stay of patients.”
The proposed Clinic use specializes in workers’ health and safety, and helps employees
recover from on-the-job injuries through physical exams, specialized testing and wellness
programs. The proposed occupational health clinic primarily schedules appointments, but
will take a walk-in on emergency. Due to specialization of services and uniqueness of the
proposed clinic, staff determined it was eligible for an Alternative Parking Standard which
is defined by Title 19.18.030 as “where the unique operation of a particular use creates a
lesser parking demand than the parking requirements otherwise applicable under this
Subsection and LVMC Chapter 19.12, an alternative parking standard for the use may be
established in conjunction with the submittal of a Parking Demand Analysis. In order to
qualify for consideration, a Parking Demand Analysis must be signed and sealed by a
professional traffic engineer, must document the weekday and weekend peak parking
demand for the proposed use(s) for the site, and must provide justification for the
alternative parking standard. Alternative Parking Standard request shall follow the
process for a Special Use Permit application under LVMC 19.16.0110.
NE
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]
As stated by the applicant’s engineer in the justification letter and traffic analysis date
stamped 03/04/19, between June 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018, the practice saw
2,342 patients. Within those 145 working days of the practice, they saw on average 16.15
patients per day. This breaks down to an average of 2.02 patients per hour over an eight-
hour day. With a staff of four, three patients being treated, and three patients waiting to
be seen, this yields 10 vehicles parked with five available parking spaces for early arrivals
and late departures. The engineer finds the 15 available parking spaces on site is
sufficient for the proposed use.
The applicant has provided an Alternative Parking Demand Analysis that was prepared
by a Nevada licensed Professional Engineer. This analysis was based on the
observations of the current parking counts at their current location at 4060 North Martin
L. King Boulevard, and other similar medical, dental and clinic uses. The applicant has
substantiated this request through a parking study performed by a Nevada licensed
Professional Engineer which has demonstrated that 15 parking spaces is sufficient for
proposed Clinic use; therefore, staff recommends approval of the application. If denied,
the proposed Clinic use could not be located on the site.
FINDINGS (SUP-75967)
In order to approve a Special Use Permit application, per Title 19.16.110(L) the Planning
Commission and City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.
Currently, a variety of office type services exist within the subject building. The
applicant is proposing to operate an occupational health clinic which is compatible
the existing surrounding land uses.
2. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of land use
proposed.
Although the proposed use is appropriate for the commercial site, the proposal
cannot adhere to minimum parking requirements as outlined by Title 19.12. The
submitted parking demand analysis substantiates a reduced number of parking
spaces required and therefore, the intensity of land use is acceptable.
NE
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]

adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
Site access is provided by Sahara Avenue, a 147-foot wide Primary Arterial that is
adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use for the site.
4. Approval of the Special Use Permit at the site in question will not be
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.
Approval of the Special Use Permit for an Alternative Parking Standard will not
compromise the public health, safety, or general welfare, as the proposed use is
subject to minimum licensing requirements.
5. The use meets all of the applicable conditions per Title 19.12.
The applicant has requested an Alternative Parking Standard in order to meet the
parking requirements for the proposed Clinic use.

1986 Construction Year.
The Department of Planning administratively approved a request for a
Site Development Plan Review (SDR-19909) to allow the installation of
09/18/03
two (2) wireless antennas on the existing rooftop of the building located
at 1640 East Sahara Avenue.


A business license (I50-00618) was issued for a law firm at 1640 East
08/26/10 Sahara Avenue, Suite A. The license is active as of 04/08/19 and due
for renewal on 07/01/19.
NE
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]

A business license (A24-00111) was issued for psychic arts at 1640
10/17/11 East Sahara Avenue, Suite K. The license is active as of 04/08/19 and
due for renewal on 03/01/20.
A business license (P50-02969) was issued for music lessons at 1640
08/23/12 East Sahara Avenue, Suite K. The license is active as of 04/08/19 and
A business license (G62-09829) was issued for income tax
preparation, bookkeeping, and tax and accounting consulting at 1640
12/24/14
East Sahara Avenue, Suite B. The license is active as of 04/08/19 and
A business license (G65-06590) was issued for instruction and
10/05/17 consulting at 1640 East Sahara Avenue, Suite C. The license is active
as of 04/08/19 and due for renewal on 10/01/19.
A business license (G66-04388) was issued for document preparation
07/14/18 at 1640 East Sahara Avenue, Suite H. The license is active as of
04/08/19 and due for renewal on 07/01/19.
A business license (G66-04995) was issued for an attorney at law at
07/30/18 1640 East Sahara Avenue, Suite H. The license is active as of
04/08/19 and due for renewal on 07/01/19.
A business license (G66-06745) was issued for a notary and
10/29/18 document preparation at 1640 East Sahara Avenue, Suite J. The
license is active as of 04/08/19 and due for renewal on 10/01/19.
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal
02/27/19
requirements for an alternative parking plan were discussed.
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check of the subject site where nothing
03/13/19
of concern was noted by staff.
NE
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]

Site Area
Net Acres 0.16
Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use Existing Zoning
Land Use
Property Per Title 19.12 District
Designation
Office, Other Than
Subject C-1 (Limited
Listed O (Office)
(Proposed Clinic)
North
C-2 (General
Office, CG (Commercial
South Commercial District)
Medical or Dental General) Clark County
Clark County
C-1 (Limited
East Vacant O (Office)
Commercial)
Office, C-1 (Limited
West O (Office)
Other Than Listed Commercial)

A-O (Airport Overlay) District – 200 Feet Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
NE
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911]

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Sahara Avenue Primary Arterial Streets and 147 Y
Highways
Pursuant to Title 19.08 and 19.12, the following parking standards apply:
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Required Provided Compliance
Area or Parking Parking
Use
Number of Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
1:200
First 2,000 SF
Clinic 4,928 SF 22
1:250
Remaining
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 22 15 N*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 21 1 14 1 N*
*The applicant is requesting approval of an Alternative Parking Standard.
NE
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ںں‬
ｘ̶゜‫ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ƆḶⓈ╗ĠǲŐЌ7ЌǲЋAＣA7ḶbbⓈОA╗●ḶЌAՁฌ
ĠǲAՁ╗Ġ7bՁ●Ќ●bฌ
‫ں‬″ㅡｘ7ǲŴ⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴⓒ7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ㈠7ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘㅡ̶ֱㅡɱｘฌ
‫ں‬″ㅡｘ7ǲŴ⎯‫ש‬7ƆŴγŴผŴⓒฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚ7ЋAŐ●AЌbǲฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ㈠7ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘㅡ̶ֱㅡɱｘฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗ĠǲŐЌ7ЌǲЋAＣAฌ
ḶbbⓈОA╗●ḶЌAՁ7ĠǲAՁ╗Ġ7bՁ●Ќbฌ
7777777777777bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ̬ฌ
ǲṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7bḶＣǲ7●Ќ?ḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ ОŐḶİǲb╗7ƆⓈҜҜAŐù̬7 Ɔ●╗ǲ7ƆùҜԱḶՁƆ̬ฌ ḚǲЌǲŐAՁ7ҜA╗ǲŐ●AՁ7ƆùҜԱḶՁƆ̬7 ƆĠǲǲ╗7●ЌＣǲṲฌ ╗γ֭⎯֭7ऑкŴ่⎯7Ŵผ֭7ऑผ֭ऑŴผ֭₡7⇡ੂฌ

‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ7Ŵ⎯ฌ
Ŵ่7֭ゥ֭こऑ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7ЌŐƆ7″ธ″㈠̶̶ｘฌ
bḶＣǲƆ7AЌAՁùƆ●Ɔ7̬ฌ ⑾ਙผ7ʉਙผ57—่₡֭ผฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7bਙ₡֭77ӧธｘ‫ں‬ฎ7●่‫֭ש‬ผ่Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7bਙ₡֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵこ่֭₡こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ỏฌ Őǲ?㈠ฌ ㌱ਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ7кħ㌱่֭㌱֭7Ŵ—‫ש‬γਙผħ▷֭₡ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7?ħผ֭7bਙ₡֭7●?b7ธｘ‫ں‬ฎ7ӧЌ?ОA7‫̶ں‬ⓒ7ธｘ‫̶ں‬7ǲ₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵこ่֭₡こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ỏฌ İⓈŐ●ƆＣ●b╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ ОŐḶİǲb╗7ＣǲƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ ОḚ㈠ЌḶ㈠ฌ —่₡֭ผ7ЌŐƆ7″ธㅡ㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Ҝ֭㌱γŴ่ħ㌱Ŵк7bਙ₡֭77ӧธｘ‫ں‬ฎ7Ⓢ่ħ⑾ਙผこ7Ҝ֭㌱γŴ่ħ㌱Ŵк7bਙ₡֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵこ่֭₡こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ỏฌ b●╗ù7Ḷ?7ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆฌ bƆ‫ں‬7777777bḶЋǲŐ7ƆĠǲǲ╗ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7Ок—こ⇡ħ่‫ف‬7bਙ₡֭77ӧธｘ‫ں‬ฎ7Ⓢ่ħ⑾ਙผこ7Ок—こ⇡ħ่‫ف‬7bਙ₡֭77ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵこ่֭₡こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ỏฌ
ŐǲЌḶЋA╗ǲ7ǲṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ㅡɱธฎ7ƆỢ7?╗7Ḷ??●bǲฌ
ＣǲОAŐ╗ҜǲЌ╗7Ḷ?7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7ִฌ ＣAЌbḶЌ7ՁՁbฌ
ธｘ‫ں‬ՙ7ЌŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7ǲк֭㌱‫ש‬ผħ㌱7bਙ₡֭7ӧʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵこ่֭₡こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ỏฌ ƆОAbǲ7╗Ḷ7ОŐḶЋ●Ｃǲ7ҜǲＣ●bAՁ7Ḷ??●bǲƆⓒ7ǲṲAҜฌ bֱ‫ں‬㈠ｘ777777Ɔ●╗ǲ7ОՁAЌฌ
?●Őǲ7ОŐǲЋǲЌ╗●ḶЌฌ Őǲ?㈠ฌ
ӧbਙこऑŴ่ੂ7ЌŴこ֭ỏฌ
●bb゜●ǲbbֱธｘ‫ں‬ฎฌ ŐḶḶҜƆⓒ7ՁḶԱԱù゜ŐǲbǲО╗●ḶЌ7AŐǲAⓒ7bĠǲbì7ḶⓈ╗ฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7Ｃ●Ћ●Ɔ●ḶЌฌ
ОḚ㈠ЌḶ㈠ฌ
Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌⓒ7ӧ‫ں‬ỏ7ⓈЌ●ƆǲṲ7ŐǲƆ╗ŐḶḶҜⓒ7ОA╗●ǲЌ╗ฌ Aֱ‫ں‬7㈠ｘ777777?ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌฌ ｘｘՙฎɱธฎฌ
̶̶̶7Ќ㈠7ŐAЌbĠḶ77ŐḶAＣฌ
ŐǲƆ╗ŐḶḶҜƆ77ӧ‫ں‬7ҜǲЌ7‫ں‬7ÛḶҜǲЌỏ77ЌⓈŐƆǲƆฌ ӧbਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯7Ձħ㌱่֭㌱֭7 ỏฌ
ḚǲЌǲŐAՁ7bḶＣǲ7●Ќ?ḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆⓒ77ЌǲЋAＣA7ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘ″ฌ
Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌⓒ7ǲҜОՁḶùǲǲ7ԱŐǲAì7ŐḶḶҜⓒ7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲฌ Aֱธ㈠ｘ7777777ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
ӧՙｘธỏธธɱֱ″ธㄦ‫ں‬ฌ
bՁḶƆǲ╗Ɔⓒ7ǲՁǲb╗Ő●bAՁ7ŐḶḶҜ7ⓒ7AЌＣ7İAЌ●╗ḶŐƆฌ ЌḶ㈠ฌ
Ḷ㌱㌱—ऑŴ่㌱ੂ7bкŴ⎯⎯ħ⑾ħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่̬7777777777777777777Ա7ӧԱⓈƆ●ЌǲƆƆ7ḚŐḶⓈО7ОŐḶ?ǲƆƆ●ḶЌAՁ7ƆǲŐЋ●bǲƆฌ
bՁḶƆǲ╗7Û7゜Ɔ●Ќìⓒฌ ӧОкŴ่⎯7Оผ֭ऑŴผ֭₡7Աੂỏฌ
77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777ḶⓈ╗ОA╗●ǲЌ╗7bՁ●Ќ●b7Ɔǲb㈠7̶ｘㅡỏฌ bḶЌ╗Ab╗7ЌAҜǲ̬ฌ ƆĠ╗㈠ЌḶ㈠ฌ
ＣAЌbḶЌ7ՁՁb777ㄦｘฎՙ7Ɔ7Aผ‫ﭨ‬ħкк֭7Ɔ‫֭ש‬㈠7?7㈠ฌ bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌ7╗Ḷ7●ЌbՁⓈＣǲ7ЌǲÛ7ЌḶЌֱՁḶAＣฌ ƆⓈООḶŐ╗●ЌḚ7ＣḶbⓈҜǲЌ╗A╗●ḶЌฌ

╗ੂऑ֭7ਙ⑾7bਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7̬77 ╗ùОǲ7ЋֱԱฌ
Ḷ⑾⑾77ՙｘธֱㄦㅡ‫ֱں‬ՙɱՙՙ777b֭к7ՙｘธ̶̶ֱธֱՙㅡ‫ں‬ธฌ ԱǲAŐ●ЌḚ7ÛAՁՁƆⓒ7ＣḶḶŐƆⓒ7AbḶⓈƆ╗●bAՁฌ ӧbਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯7Ő֭ऑผ֭⎯่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬ỏฌ
?ħผ֭7Ɔऑผħ่5к֭ผ⎯̬77 ЌḶฌ
ＣŴ่7ìผ—‫֭ف‬ผ777ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ㈠7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ฎฌ bǲ●Ձ●ЌḚƆⓒ7ŐǲЋ●ƆǲＣ7ＣⓈb╗7ÛḶŐì7ӧĠAЋbỏⓒ7ЌǲÛฌ
7777777777777777777ǲṲĠ●Ա●╗Ɔฌ
Aผ֭Ŵ̬7 ㅡɱธฎ7Ɔ⑾㈠?‫ש‬㈠ฌ
ǲՁǲb╗Ő●bAՁ7Ｃ●Ɔ╗Ő●ԱⓈ╗●ḶЌⓒ7AЌＣ7AＣＣ●╗●ḶЌ7Ḷ?ฌ
Ќ—こ⇡֭ผ7ਙ⑾7Ɔ‫ש‬ਙผħ֭⎯777777777777777777777777777777777‫ں‬ฌ ǲՁǲЋA╗ḶŐ7?ḶŐ7ĠAЌＣ●bAООǲＣ7AbbǲƆƆ7╗Ḷฌ ӧbਙ่‫ש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬ਙผ⎯7Ɔħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭ỏฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7ＣA╗A̬ฌ
ОAŐì●ЌḚⓒ7ḚŐḶⓈЌＣ7ՁǲЋǲՁⓒ7AЌＣ7?●ŐƆ╗7?ՁḶḶŐฌ A㈠㈠7ＣǲǲＣ7ִ7ՁǲḚAՁ7ＣǲƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ
ⓈƆǲ7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777AŐǲA77777777777777777777777777777ḶbbⓈОAЌbùฌ ՁḶԱԱù㈠ฌ ╗ĠǲƆǲ7ＣŐAÛ●ЌḚƆ7AЌＣฌ
Ḷ??●bǲ7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777ए7777ㅡㄦธธ7Ɔ㈠?㈠777777777777777‫ں゜ں‬ｘｘ77ए7ㅡㄦ7ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆ̬ฌ Ա㈠7İⓈƆ╗●?●bA╗●ḶЌ7Ձǲ╗╗ǲŐฌ bḶО●ǲƆ7╗ĠǲŐǲḶ?7AŐǲฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ777777777777777777777777777777777777777ए77777ธธ̶7Ɔ㈠?㈠7777777777777777‫̶゜ں‬ｘｘ77ए77‫ں‬7ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬″ㅡｘ7ǲ7ƆAĠAŐA7AЋǲฌ ՁǲḚAՁ7●ЌƆ╗ŐⓈҜǲЌ╗Ɔ7Ḷ?ฌ
ŐǲƆ╗ŐḶḶҜƆ7777777777777777777777777777777777ए7777‫ں‬ฎ̶7Ɔ㈠?㈠77777777777777777‫ں゜ں‬ｘｘ77ए77ธ7ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ㈠7ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘㅡฌ b㈠㈠7ОAŐì●ЌḚ7AЌAՁùƆ●Ɔฌ ƆǲŐЋ●bǲ7AЌＣ7ŐǲҜA●Ќ7╗Ġǲฌ
ƆḶՁǲ7ОŐḶОǲŐ╗ù7Ḷ?7╗Ġ●Ɔฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ7AŐǲA7777777777777777777777777777777777ए77777ㅡɱธฎ7ƆỢ㈠?╗㈠ฌ ОŴผ㌱֭к7Ќ—こ⇡֭ผ̬ฌ Ｃ㈠7Ɔ╗A╗ǲ7Ḷ?7?●ЌAЌb●AՁ7●Ќ╗ǲŐǲƆ╗ฌ bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ḶbbⓈОAЌbù7ՁḶAＣ7777777777ए77777ㅡฎ7ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔฌ ‫ں‬″ธֱｘธֱㅡ‫ֱںں‬ｘ̶‫ں‬ฌ ?ḶŐ7╗Ġǲ7ⓈƆǲ7Ḷ?7╗Ġǲฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐ777AЌù7AⓈ╗ĠḶŐ●ΎǲＣฌ
ОՁⓈҜԱ●ЌḚ7?●Ṳ╗ⓈŐǲƆ777777ㅡฎ7ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔ777ӧ╗AԱՁǲ7ธɱｘธ㈠‫ں‬ỏ7ธｘ‫ں‬ฎ7●Աbฌ AḚǲЌ╗Ɔ7?ḶŐ7╗Ġǲฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7Aผ֭Ŵ̬ฌ
ＣǲƆ●ḚЌA╗ǲＣฌ
ÛA╗ǲŐ7bՁḶƆǲ╗Ɔ̬7777777777777777ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ̬77ธ77777777777777777ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ̬777̶ฌ ㅡɱธฎ7Ɔ‫׀‬7?‫ש‬7?●ŐƆ╗7?ՁḶḶŐฌ
ОŐḶОǲŐ╗ù7ḶЌՁù㈠7╗Ġǲùฌ
ՁAЋA╗ḶŐ●ǲƆ̬777777777777777777777777ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ̬777ธ77777777777777777ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ̬777̶ฌ ㄦｘㄦɱ7Ɔ‫׀‬7?‫ש‬㈠7ⓈЌＣǲŐ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7ОAŐì●ЌḚฌ
bAЌЌḶ╗7Աǲ7bḶО●ǲＣฌ
ＣŐ●Ќì●ЌḚ7?ḶⓈЌ╗A●ЌƆ̬7777777ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ̬777‫ں‬77777777777777777ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ̬777ธฌ
Աù7Ḷ╗ĠǲŐƆ7Û●╗ĠḶⓈ╗7Աǲ●ЌḚฌ
ƆǲŐЋ●bǲ7Ɔ●ЌìƆ̬7777777777777777777ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ̬777‫ں‬77777777777777777ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ̬777‫ں‬ฌ ОAŐì●ЌḚ7Aผ֭Ŵ̬ฌ ḚŐAЌ╗ǲＣ7ОǲŐҜ●ƆƆ●ḶЌฌ
‫ں‬ㅡ7ƆОAbǲƆฌ ?ŐḶҜ7╗Ġ●Ɔ7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐฌ
ҜǲAЌƆ7Ḷ?7ǲḚŐǲƆƆฌ
ǲゥħ‫⎯ש‬7Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡̬77‫ש⎯ں‬7⑾кਙਙผ777777777ธฌ ‫ں‬7ĠAЌＣ●bAООǲＣ7ƆОAbǲฌ ḶŐ7Աǲ?ḶŐǲ7╗Ġǲù7AŐǲฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁ7‫ں‬ㄦ7ƆОAbǲƆฌ ⓈƆǲＣ7●Ќ7Ḷ╗ĠǲŐ7ОⓈŐОḶƆǲฌ
ǲゥħ‫⎯ש‬7Оผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡̬77‫ש⎯ں‬7⑾кਙਙผ777777777ธฌ
╗ĠAЌ7Ɔ╗A╗ǲＣ7AԱḶЋǲ㈠ฌ
Ћ●b●Ќ●╗ù7ҜAОฌ AbbǲƆƆ●Ա●Ձ●╗ùฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌ7ҜAОฌ
‫ں‬″ㅡｘ7ǲ7ƆAĠAŐA7AЋǲฌ ОŐḶİǲb╗7Ɔ●╗ǲฌ
ОŐḶİǲb╗ฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ㈠7ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘㅡฌ
‫ں‬″ㅡｘ7ǲ7ƆAĠAŐA7AЋǲฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ㈠7ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘㅡฌ ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ ƆĠǲǲ╗7╗●╗Ձǲฌ
●ֱ‫ں‬ㄦฌ bĠAŐՁǲƆ╗ḶЌ77ŐＣ㈠ฌ
Ќ㈠7ՁAƆฌ ЌḶ7ƆbAՁǲฌ
ЋǲḚAƆฌ Ќ7ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆ7ԱՁЋＣฌ bḶЋǲŐ7ƆĠǲǲ╗ฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌฌ
ǲ㈠7Ɔ╗㈠7ՁḶⓈ●Ɔฌ ЌḶ7ƆbAՁǲฌ
ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ AŐǲAฌ
ฌ
ӧƆǲǲ7Ћ●b●Ќ●╗ù7ҜAОỏฌ
ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ
ǲ㈠7Ɔ╗7ՁḶⓈ●Ɔฌ
ŐǲЋ●Ɔ●ḶЌƆฌ
ՁЋＣ
‫ں‬ՙ╗Ġ7Ɔ╗㈠ฌ
ฌ
Ｃ㈠
ǲ㈠7ƆAĠAŐA77AЋǲ㈠ฌ
ՁЋ
㈠ฌ
7Ա
ŐＣ
AƆ
‫ں‬ՙ╗Ġ7Ɔ╗㈠ฌ
ǲ7
ǲ㈠7ＣǲƆǲŐ╗7●ЌЌฌ
ǲḚ
●Ɔ
7Ћ
ҜAŐì7 ＣA╗ǲ7 ＣǲƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ
AＣ
AƆ
ǲ㈠7ƆAĠAŐA77AЋǲ㈠ฌ
Ձ
AŐ
О
?ՁAҜ●ЌḚḶ7ŐＣ㈠ฌ
Ɔ7Ա
ǲＣЌA77AЋǲ㈠ฌ
㈠ฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
╗ŐḶО●bAЌA7ŐＣ㈠㈠ฌ
ḚA
ОǲbḶƆฌ
ҜḶĠAЋǲฌ
ＣǲƆǲŐ╗77●ЌЌฌ
ǲAƆ╗ǲŐЌฌ
ҜbՁǲAＣ7ＣŐฌ
●ֱ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
7ŐＣ
ҜAŐùՁAЌＣ7ОìÛùฌ
●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦฌ
7Ћǲ
ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ
Ɔ
●Ɔǲ
ＣǲƆǲŐ╗77●ЌЌฌ ＣA╗ǲ7
ＣA ＣŐAÛЌ7Աùฌ
A
●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦฌ ՁŴ֭7Ҝ֭Ŵ₡7
Ձ
Աк—֭7ＣħŴこਙ่₡7Ġʉੂฌ ผħ₡‫֭ف‬7ऑʉੂฌ ธ゜‫ں‬ฎ゜ธｘ‫ں‬ɱ7
ธ゜ＣÛŐฌ
ŐAＣ ОŐ
ОŐḶİǲb╗7ЌḶ㈠7 bĠǲbìǲＣ7Աùฌ
ҜAŐùՁAЌＣ7ＣŐ㈠ฌ
ḶĠb‫ں‬″ㅡｘฌ
Ḷ Ｃìฌ
ОA
Ɔ㈠7ǲAƆ╗ǲŐЌฌ
ԱⓈŐЌĠAҜ7AЋǲฌ
╗ŐḶО●bAЌAฌ ƆĠǲǲ╗7ЌḶ㈠ฌ
ƆĠ
₡֭㌱Ŵ‫—ש‬ผฌ
Ɔ7ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆ7ԱՁЋＣฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ںں‬
ｘ̶゜ｘㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ bƆ‫ں‬ฌ
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: SOUTHERN NEVADA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CLINIC - OWNER: A. NICKNAM, PC, ET AL
1640 EAST SAHARA AVENUE
03/13/19
SUP-75967 [PRJ-75911] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: SOUTHERN NEVADA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CLINIC - OWNER: A. NICKNAM, PC, ET AL
1640 EAST SAHARA AVENUE
03/13/19
PRJ-75911
03/04/19
PRJ-75911
03/04/19
PRJ-75911
03/04/19
From 6-1-2018 to 12-31-2018, the Practice saw 2342 patients.
During those seven months, there are 214 days, with 145 working days, 63
weekend days and 6 public holidays.
Therefore, 2342/145=16.15 patients per day.
At 8 hours per day, 16.15/8=2.02 patients per hour on average.
With a staff of 4, and an average wait time of 1 hour, round 2.02 up to 3,
there will be 3 patients being see, 3 patients waiting and 4 staff, which
yields 10 vehicles parked at the location at any given time on average.

This leaves 5 spaces free for early arrivals or late exits.
The reduced parking is supported.
03/04/19
PRJ-75911
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - VAR-75123 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ ANN RAINBOW, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a
Variance TO ALLOW A 25-FOOT RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SETBACK WHERE 79 FEET IS
REQUIRED on 3.24 acres at the northeast corner of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard (APNs
125-26-410-004, 005, 006 and 007), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75062].

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved, subject to conditions:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75123, SUP-75124 and SDR-75125 [PRJ-75062]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75123, SUP-75124 and SDR-75125 [PRJ-75062]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75123, SUP-75124 and SDR-75125 [PRJ-75062]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75123, SUP-75124 and SDR-75125 [PRJ-75062]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75123, SUP-75124 and SDR-75125 [PRJ-75062]
6. Protest and Support Postcards for VAR-75123 and SUP-75124 and Documentation Not
Vetted - Protest Comment Forms for VAR-75123 and Support Comment Forms for VAR-75123
[PRJ-75062]
7. Protest/Support Postcard(s) for VAR-75123, SUP-75124 and SDR-75125 [PRJ-75062]
VAR-75123, SUP-75124 and SDR-75125 [PRJ-75062]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ ANN RAINBOW, LLC, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75123 Staff recommends DENIAL, subject to conditions.
SUP-75124 Staff recommends DENIAL, subject to conditions: VAR-75123
SDR-75125 Staff recommends DENIAL, subject to conditions: VAR-75123
SUP-75124
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 707 - VAR-75123 and SUP-75124

707 - SDR-75125
PROTESTS 16 - VAR-75123 and SUP-75124

16 - SDR-75125
APPROVALS 3 - VAR-75123 and SUP-75124

3 - SDR-75125
NE
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use Permit
(SUP-75124) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75125) shall be required, if
approved.
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a

Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use.
2. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-

75123) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75125) shall be required.
NE
Conditions Page Two
application.
6. Approval of this Special Use Permit does not constitute approval of a liquor
license.
7. This business shall operate in conformance to Chapter 6.50 of the City of Las
Vegas Municipal Code.
SDR-75125 CONDITIONS
Planning

75123) and Special Use Permit (SUP-75124) shall be required, if approved.
3. Site Development Plan Review (SDR-58147) and Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-68324) shall be expunged upon final approval.
4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan date stamped 03/19/19;
landscape plan and building elevations date stamped 03/18/19, except as
amended by conditions herein.
NE
5. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow a portion of the

landscape buffer adjacent to the west property line to be three feet where 15 feet is
required.
6. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow a portion of the

landscape buffer adjacent to the south property line to be five feet where 15 feet is
required.
7. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot wide

landscape buffer adjacent to the east property line where eight feet is required.
8. An Exception from 19.08.110 is hereby approved, to allow no interior parking lot

landscape islands where one is required in front of the convenience store.
11. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to
determine the most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the
existing lots. The mapping action shall be completed and recorded prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
12. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,

Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device. The
technical landscape plan shall include the following changes from the conceptual
landscape plan:
 A minimum of one 36-inch box tree planted every 20 feet on-center with
four, five-gallon shrubs for each required tree in all landscape buffer areas,
including parking lot landscape islands.
 A minimum of four, five-gallon shrubs for each required tree in all landscape
buffer areas, including parking lot landscape islands.
13. All City Code requirements and design standards of all City Departments must be
NE
Public Works
14. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, grant a traffic signal chord easement
at the northeast corner of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard.
15. Construct half-street improvements on Rainbow Boulevard including any transition

paving at the north edge of this site concurrent with development of this site. All
16. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks
(including sidewalk ramps) and remove unused driveways on Ann Road adjacent
to this site in accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56.040 to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development of this site.
17. Provide a copy of a recorded Joint Access Agreement between this site and the
adjoining parcel to the south prior to the issuance of any permits. If a map
combining these parcels is recorded, this condition will not be enforced.
18. Concurrent with development of this site the applicant shall provide proof that
abandonment of the existing individual sewage disposal system is in accordance
with Southern Nevada Health District regulations and connect to the public sewer.
19. Unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer, construct sidewalk on at least one
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets
concurrent with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend
from the sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway
network and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.
20. Landscape and maintain all unimproved rights-of-way adjacent to this site. All
landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be situated
NE
Conditions Page Five
21. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the Ann
Road and Rainbow Boulevard public rights-of-way, if any, prior to this issuance of
permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for
the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an
additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the
applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the
applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The
installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way
shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to the
property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate
all requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development Section of
the Department of Building and Safety (229-4836).
22. A Traffic Impact Analysis must be submitted to and approved by the Department of
Public Works prior to the issuance of any building or grading permits, submittal of
any construction drawings or the recordation of a Map subdividing this site,
whichever may occur first. Comply with the recommendations of the approved
Traffic Impact Analysis prior to occupancy of the site. The Traffic Impact Analysis
shall also include a section addressing Standard Drawings #234.1 #234.2 and
#234.3 to determine additional right-of-way requirements for bus turnouts adjacent
to this site, if any; dedicate all areas recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. All additional rights of way required by Standard Drawing #201.1 for
exclusive right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be dedicated prior to or
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
specifically noted as not required in the approved Traffic Impact Analysis. Phased
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor
compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of
approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the
23. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this
site prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainage ways as recommended.
NE
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct a new 2,985 square-foot convenience store with
fuel pumps and canopy; and two, 8,400 square-foot commercial buildings at the
northeast corner of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard.
ISSUES
 A Special Use Permit is requested to allow a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use in the

C-1 (Limited Commercial) zone. Staff does not support this request.
 A Variance is requested to allow a 25-foot residential adjacency setback where 70
feet is required. Staff does not support this request.
 A Waiver is requested to allow a three-foot wide landscape buffer along a portion of
the west property line where 15 feet is required. Staff does not support this request.
 A Waiver is requested to allow a five-foot wide landscape buffer along the south
property line where 15 feet is required. Staff does not support this request.
 A Waiver is requested to allow a zero-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the
east property line. Staff supports this request as it is due to an existing access
easement for an active well and the required landscaping is provided west of the
access easement.
 A Waiver is required to not orient the buildings to the corner or the street frontage
where such is required. Staff does not support this request.
 An exception is required to allow no parking lot landscape islands in front of the
proposed convenience store where one is required. Staff does not support this
request.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to construct a 2,985 square-foot convenience store with fuel
pumps and a canopy with a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use at the northeast corner of
Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard. North of the proposed convenience store, the
applicant is also proposing to construct two, 8,400 square-foot commercial buildings.
These applications were held in abeyance on January 8, 2019 to allow the applicant
time to coordinate in order to provide interior access between the two proposed
developments in order for them to function as one cohesive development.
NE
The proposed convenience store structure does not meet residential adjacency
setbacks and is not oriented to the corner where such is required. The building meets
the 20-foot rear setback standard for a C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoned property but
does not meet the required residential adjacency setback of 70-feet from the existing
residential properties to the east of the subject site. Furthermore, a Waiver is required
due to the proposed building not being oriented to the corner of the property as required
by Title 19.08 for development on corner lots. The subject site could be redesigned in
such a way to orient the building to the corner, which would eliminate the need for the
Residential Adjacency Setback Variance, and the building orientation Waiver. A similar
use to the south of the subject site was designed in such a way to orient the building to
the corner and meet residential adjacency setbacks.
In addition to the proposed convenience store for the corner lot, the applicant is
proposing to construct two, 8,400 square-foot commercial buildings to the north.
Due to the existence of a quasi-municipal well at the rear of 5686 North Rainbow
Boulevard, an access easement is necessary to provide access to the well for
maintenance and service. This access easement prevents the proposed development
from providing the required eight-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the east property line
as required by Title 19 and a Waiver is necessary. Per the Department of Public Works,
“no onsite improvements shall be constructed within the easement.” This extraordinary
site condition prevents the applicant from meeting the minimum standards for the
eastern landscape buffer; therefore, staff supports the Waiver request. Although the
required landscape buffer is not able to be constructed adjacent to the property line as
required by Title 19, the applicant is proposing a landscape buffer along the east
property line that ranges in width from five feet to the rear of the proposed convenience
store, to 19 feet to the rear of the proposed commercial buildings. This proposed
landscape buffer does provide a buffer to the residential neighborhood to the east.
The landscape buffers adjacent to the south and west property lines of the subject are
required by Title 19.08 to be 15 feet in width due to the lots adjacency to right-of-way.
The applicant has proposed to reduce a portion of the southern landscape buffer to five
feet in width, and a portion of the western landscape buffer to three feet in width, which
staff does not support. In addition, the applicant is requesting to not construct one
parking lot landscape island that is required for the proposed 10 parking spaces in front
of the convenience store. Title 19.08 requires one parking lot landscape island for every
six uncovered parking spaces. Staff does not support this request as well.
NE
The Department of Public Works has waived the Complete Streets requirement for the
proposed development if approved, as the proposed development is adjacent to
property that has already incurred half-street improvements and the Department of
Public Works has conditioned the development to match existing adjacent site
improvements. Rather than create sidewalks and curbing that do not match adjacent
existing improvements and create an inconsistent roadway for both pedestrians and
vehicular traffic, the Department of Public Works has conditioned the site to develop
harmoniously with the surrounding existing area.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is permitted in the C-1

(Limited Commercial) zoning district with the approval of a Special Use Permit. The
subject site meets all of the minimum distance separation requirements for the use as
outlined in Title 19.12. The minimum distance from a school is 400 feet; a school,
Kinder Prep Academy, is located just outside of this radius at a distance of 429 feet.
The Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use is defined as: “An establishment whose license to
sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer, wine and coolers to consumers
only and not for resale, in original sealed or corked containers, for consumption off the
premises where business is conducted, and is operated in connection with a grocery
store, drugstore, convenience store, restaurant or general retail store.”
The proposed site is requesting to sell beer and wine in conjunction with the General
Retail Store, Other than Listed. The alcoholic beverages will only be sold to be
consumed off-site therefore meeting the Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use.
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment

(hereinafter “establishment”) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house
of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or
City park.
The proposed use meets this requirement as there are not any protected uses
within the 400-foot radius. However, there is a school located 429 feet to the
north and west of the subject site and a private park located 397 feet from the
subject site.
NE
2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to

in Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance
between two property lines, one being the property line of the proposed
establishment which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement
pertains, and the other being the property line of that existing use which is
closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a
straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term “property line” refers to property lines of fee interest
parcels and does not include the property line of:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for on-site
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1.
The proposed use meets this requirement as this is the measuring method used
to determine compliance with Requirement Number One.
3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80

acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be
measured in a straight line:
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of
the structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to
intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest
property line of the existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold
or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located, without
regard to intervening obstacles.
This requirement is not applicable, as the subject site is less than 80 acres.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which

also requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of
its recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement
should be waived and the reasons in support of the decision.
This requirement is not applicable as the site meets all minimum distance
requirements and no waivers have been requested.
NE
5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:

a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection
with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or
in connection with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms
after July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail
floor space.
This requirement is not applicable, as the proposed retail floor area is less than
50,000 square feet and is not in connection with a non-restricted gaming hotel
with more than 200 guest rooms.
6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.
The proposed use meets this requirement as the business license will be subject
to regular inspections to ensure compliance.
7. The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are

otherwise nonwaivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be
waived:
a. In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any

establishment which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the “Town Center
Development Standards Manual” for any establishment which is
proposed to be located within the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and
which is designated MS-TC (Main Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center
Land Use Plan;
c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000
square feet and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than
10 percent of the retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages; or
d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square
feet of retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are
separated by a highway or a right of way with a width of at least 100 feet.
This requirement is not applicable as the use meets all minimum distance
requirements.
NE
8. No beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment shall be permitted on or adjacent

to the Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.
The proposed use meets this requirement as it is adjacent to commercial and

residential properties, none of which are considered to be a Pedestrian Mall.
The subject site does not contain any site constraints that would prevent the applicant
from meeting the minimum development standards set forth by Title 19.08 for
commercially zoned property. The applicant has created self-imposed hardships by not
proposing a site plan that aligns the proposed commercial buildings with the street
frontage and corner as required by Title 19.08. This building placement would allow the
proposed buildings to meet residential adjacency standards, thus eliminating the need
for a Variance. Do to the overall site design which has resulted in a Residential
Adjacency Setback Variance, staff does not support the proposed development and is
recommending denial of all applications, subject to conditions if approved.
order to:

3. Relieve a hardship which is solely personal, self-created or financial in nature.

exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or
hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”
NE
No evidence of a unique or extraordinary circumstance has been presented, in that the

applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by designing the site to have a
residential adjacency setback of 25 feet where 79 feet is required. Alternately, the site
could have been designed to reorient the buildings to the corner and street frontage
which would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of
any hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious

and compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future
surrounding land uses as projected by the General Plan.
The subject property is located on a parcel adjacent to other similar commercial

uses. The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use would be in conjunction with
a General Retail Store, Other than Listed (Convenience Store) and could be
conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the existing
surrounded land uses if the proposed building was oriented to the corner, thus
eliminating the need for a Variance of the Residential Adjacency Standards.
proposed.
The subject site is a vacant lot zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial). The site is
physically suitable for the type and intensity of the land use proposed when the
proposed structure meets Title 19 requirements for residential adjacency.

The subject property can be accessed from Ann Road, a 104-foot Primary Arterial
and Rainbow Boulevard, a 97-foot Primary Arterial. These streets are adequate in
size to service the Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use.
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or
the overall objectives of the General Plan.
NE
The approval of the Special Use Permit on this subject property will be subject to
conditions of approval, business license approval, and compliance inspections to
ensure it will not compromise the public health, safety, and welfare if approved.
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale use complies with all minimum Special
Use Permit Requirements per Title 19.12.
FINDINGS (SDR-75125)
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
1. The proposed development is compatible with adjacent development and

development in the area;
The proposed development is adjacent to an existing residential neighborhood to

the east where Title 19 requires a slope ratio of 3:1 for commercial buildings
adjacent to residentially zoned properties. The applicant has created a self-
imposed hardship by not positioning the proposed structure on the corner and/or
aligned with the street frontages as required by Title 19.08. This has resulted in
the need for a Residential Adjacency Variance to allow a 25-foot setback where
79 feet is required. Due to the ability of the applicant to provide a site design that
would meet the minimum development requirements set forth in Title 19.08, staff
finds the proposed development is not compatible with adjacent residential
development to the east.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;
The proposed development does not meet the minimum development standards
set forth by Title 19, including landscape buffer widths, parking lot landscape
island requirements, building positioning for corner lots and lots with street
frontage, and residential adjacency setback standards.
3. Site access and circulation do not negatively impact adjacent roadways or

neighborhood traffic;
The subject property can be accessed from Ann Road, a 104-foot Primary Arterial
and Rainbow Boulevard, a 97-foot Primary Arterial. These streets are adequate in
size to service the proposed convenience store with fuel pumps, and other
commercial activities permitted by right in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning
district.
NE
4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;
Building materials are typical for commercial development in this area. Landscape
materials are drought tolerant and are appropriate for the area and the City.
5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and

aesthetic features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in
appearance; create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and
are harmonious and compatible with development in the area;
The proposed building elevations are not unsightly or obnoxious, but the structure
does not meet the minimum setback distance for residential adjacency and
therefore will not create an aesthetically pleasing environment for the adjacent
single-family residences to the east.
6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health,
safety and general welfare.
The subject site is subject to building permit review and regular inspections during
construction, as well as regular inspections while in operation for licensing and
food related land uses thereby protecting the health, safety, and general welfare
of the public if approved.

The City Council approved a petition to Annex (ANX-57277) 0.82
02/18/15
acres at 5620 North Rainbow Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment
05/20/15
(GPA-58144) at 5620 North Rainbow Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request to Rezone (ZON-58146) from R-
05/20/15 E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 0.82 acres at
5620 North Rainbow Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Review
(SDR-58147) for a proposed 3,680 square-foot Restaurant with Drive
05/20/15
Through and General Retail Development on 0.82 acres at 5620 North
Rainbow Boulevard.
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-
69670) of an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-58147)
05/03/17 for a proposed 3,680 square-foot Restaurant with Drive Through and
General Retail Development on 0.82 acres at 5620 North Rainbow
Boulevard.
NE
Staff Report Page Ten

Code Enforcement opened a case (#181761) for high weeds and
08/17/17
trash. The case was resolved as of 09/19/17.
Code Enforcement opened a case (#183136) for an illegal Temporary
10/05/17 Sign at the northeast corner of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard. The
case was resolved as of 10/16/17.
The Planning Commission approved a request for an abeyance for
Variance (VAR-75125), Special Use Permit (SUP-75124) and Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-75125) for a proposed 2,985 square-
foot convenience store with fuel pumps and canopy with Waivers to
not orient the building to the corner where such is required and to
01/08/19 allow portions of the landscape buffer adjacent to the west and south
property lines to be five feet where 15 feet is required and to allow
portions of the landscape buffer adjacent to the east and north
property lines to be five feet where eight feet is required on 0.82 acres
at the northeast corner of Ann Road and Rainbow Boulevard until the
February 12, 2019 Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission approved a request to hold in abeyance
02/12/19
Development Plan Review (SDR-75125) until the March 12, 2019
Planning Commission meeting.
The Planning Commission approved a request to hold in abeyance
03/12/19
Development Plan Review (SDR-75125) until the April 23, 2019
Planning Commission meeting.


A Building Permit (#328011) was issued to demolish a Single Family
10/13/16
Dwelling at 5620 North Rainbow Boulevard.
Staff met with the applicant to discuss the submittal requirements and
11/13/18 deadlines for a Site Development Plan Review, Variance, and Special
Use Permit.
NE
Staff Report Page Eleven
Field Check
During a routine site visit, staff observed the vacant corner lot, which
was free of trash and debris. The proposed sites north of the corner lot
11/29/18
currently contain single family residences which appear to be inhabited
and maintained as such.

Site Area
Net Acres 3.24

Property District
19.12 Designation
Undeveloped
Subject SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Single Family,
Property Commercial) Commercial)
Detached
RN (Rural R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family,
North Neighborhood) Clark Residential District)
Detached
County Clark County
General Retail
Store, Other than
Listed
SC (Service C-1 (Limited
South (Convenience
Commercial) Commercial)
Store with Fuel
Pumps and Car
Wash)
RNP (Rural
R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family, Neighborhood
East Residential District)
Detached Preservation) Clark
Clark County
County
General Retail
C-1 (Limited
Store, Other than R (Rural)
Commercial)
Listed
West
R-PD8 (Residential
Single Family, ML (Medium Low
Planned Development –
Detached Density Residential)
8 Units Per Acre)
NE
Staff Report Page Twelve


Trails N/A
Project of Significant Impact (Development Impact Notification Y
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance Y
Pursuant to Title 19.08 the following standards apply:

Min. Lot Size N/A 141,134 SF N/A
Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 269 Feet Y
Min. Setbacks
 Front 10 Feet 72 Feet Y
 Side 10 Feet 25 Feet Y
 Corner 10 Feet 137 Feet Y
 Rear 20 Feet 66 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50 % 14 % Y
Residential Adjacency
Max. Building Height Limits the Height to 27 Feet N*
15 Feet
Gated, w/ a Roof or Gated w/ a
Trash Enclosure Y
Trellis Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened By Condition
*The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a 25-foot rear yard setback where
Residential Adjacency Standards require a 79-foot rear yard setback for a structure 26
feet, four-inches in height.
Residential Adjacency Standards Required/Allowed Provided Compliance

3:1 proximity slope 79 Feet 25 Feet N*
Trash Enclosure 50 Feet 60 Feet Y
*A Variance has been requested to allow a 25-foot residential adjacency setback where
79 feet is required.
NE
Staff Report Page Thirteen

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 24 Trees 24 Trees Y
1 Tree / 6 Uncovered
Parking Area Spaces, plus 1 tree at the
28 Trees 38 Trees Y
Trees end of each row of
spaces
Min. Zone Width
 South 8 Feet 5 Feet N*
 East 15 Feet Zero Feet N**
 West 15 Feet 3 Feet N*
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential By Condition By Condition
*The applicant is requesting a Waiver to reduce the widths of the south and west landscape
buffer areas.
**This Waiver request is due to a required access easement. Landscaping is provided west of
the access easement.

Governing
Document
Planned Streets and
Ann Road Primary Arterial 100 Y
Highways
Rainbow Planned Streets and
Primary Arterial 100 Y
Boulevard Highways
NE
Staff Report Page Fourteen
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Number of Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
General
Retail Store,
1:175 114
Other than
Listed
19,785 SF No additional
Beer/Wine/Co parking spaces
oler Off-Sale required beyond
Establishment that of the primary
use.
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 114 129 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 109 5 125 5 Y
Loading
2 3 Y
Spaces
Waivers
Requirement Request Staff Recommendation
To allow a zero-foot
To provide an eight-foot
landscape buffer
landscape buffer along the Approval
along the east
east property line.
property line.
To allow a portion of
To provide a 15-foot the landscape buffer
landscape buffer along the adjacent to the south Denial
south property line. property line to be
five feet in width.
To allow a portion of
To provide a 15-foot the landscape buffer
landscape buffer along the adjacent to the west Denial
west property line. property line to be
three feet in width.
To allow the building
To orient the buildings to the
to not be oriented to
corner and the street Denial
the corner or the
frontage.
street frontage.
NE
Staff Report Page Fifteen
Exceptions
To provide a parking lot To allow no
landscape island with a 24- landscape islands in
Denial
inch box trees for every six front of the proposed
uncovered parking spaces. convenience store.
NE
ОŐİֱՙㄦｘ″ธ
‫ں゜ںں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ฎ
PRJ-75062
03/19/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
PRJ-75062
03/18/19
VAR-75123 [PRJ-75062] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-75124 AND SDR-75125 - APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ ANN
RAINBOW, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ANN ROAD AND RAINBOW BOULEVARD
11/29/18
VAR-75123 [PRJ-75062] - VARIANCE RELATED TO SUP-75124 AND SDR-75125 - APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ ANN
RAINBOW, LLC
NORTHEAST CORNER OF ANN ROAD AND RAINBOW BOULEVARD
11/29/18
ธㄦฎｘ7Ɔ‫ש‬㈠7Őਙ⎯֭7ОŴผʉŴੂⓒ7Ɔ—ħ‫֭ש‬7̶ｘㄦⓒฌ
Ġ่֭₡֭ผ⎯ਙ่ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱｘՙㅡฌ
╗֭к㈠̬7ӧՙｘธỏ7ՙ‫ ں‬ɱֱธｘธｘ7(Ŵゥ̬7ӧՙｘธỏ7ธ″ɱֱɱ″ՙ̶ฌ
ՁՁbฌ ḚŴผੂ7Ձ㈠7bŴผк⎯ਙ่ⓒ7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬7ӧՁħ㌱่֭⎯֭7Ќਙ㈠7‫ں‬ฎㄦɱỏฌ
Ɔγ֭к₡ਙ่7bਙк่֭ⓒ7Aผ㌱γħ‫֭ש‬㌱‫ש‬7ӧՁħ㌱่֭⎯֭7Ќਙ㈠7ՙՙｘ‫ں‬ỏฌ
İŴ่—Ŵผੂ7‫ں‬ｘⓒ7ธｘ‫ں‬ɱฌ
Ок֭Ŵ⎯֭7Ŵ㌱㌱֭ऑ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7к֭‫֭שש‬ผ7ਙ⑾7ħ่‫ש่֭ש‬7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7㌱ਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผ—㌱‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾7Ŵ7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7Ŵ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
⑾ਙккਙʉħ่‫ف‬7⎯ħ‫̬⎯֭ש‬ฌ
〈7ㄦ″ธｘ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7ӧAОЌ̬7‫ں‬ธㄦֱธ″ֱㅡ‫ں‬ｘֱｘｘՙỏ㈠ฌ
〈7ㄦ″ㅡｘ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7ӧAОЌ̬7‫ں‬ธㄦֱธ″ֱㅡ‫ں‬ｘֱｘｘ″ỏ㈠ฌ
〈7ㄦ″″ㅡ7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7ӧAОЌ̬7‫ں‬ธㄦֱธ″ֱㅡ‫ں‬ｘֱｘｘㄦỏ㈠ฌ
〈7ㄦ″ฎ″7Ќ㈠7ŐŴħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աк‫ﭨ‬₡㈠7ӧAОЌ̬7‫ں‬ธㄦֱธ″ֱㅡ‫ں‬ｘֱｘｘㅡỏ㈠ฌ
╗γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7Ŵ7ਙ่֭7⎯‫ש‬ਙผੂ7ՙֱǲк֭‫่֭ﭨ‬7㌱ਙ่‫่֭ﭨ‬ħ่֭㌱֭7⎯‫ש‬ਙผ֭7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7⎯‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ฌ
Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬ʉਙ7⎯ħ่‫ف‬к֭7⎯‫ש‬ਙผੂ7ผ֭‫ש‬Ŵħк7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬㈠77╗γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬ɸ⎯7₡֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7ħ่‫ש่֭ש‬7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7γŴผこਙ่ħਙ—⎯кੂ7⇡к่֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7⎯—ผผਙ—่₡ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵผ֭Ŵ7Ŵ่₡7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ʉŴੂ㈠77╗γ֭7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬7‫ف‬ผਙ⎯⎯7⎯‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭ฌ
⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7ħ⎯7Ŵ⎯7⑾ਙккਙʉ̬ฌ
〈77—֭к7bŴ่ਙऑੂ7ӧՙֱǲк֭‫่֭ﭨ‬ỏ7ħ⎯7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7̶ⓒ̶ㅡｘ7⎯⑾7Ŵ่₡7γŴ⎯7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ں‬ՙƥֱ″फ㈠ฌ
〈7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7㉬Aɸ7ӧՙֱǲк֭‫่֭ﭨ‬ỏ7ħ⎯7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7ธⓒɱฎㄦ7⎯⑾7Ŵ่₡7γŴ⎯7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ธ″ƥֱㅡफ㈠ฌ
〈7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7㉬Աɸ7ħ⎯7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7ฎⓒㅡｘｘ7⎯⑾7Ŵ่₡7γŴ⎯7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ธ″ƥֱㅡफ㈠ฌ
〈7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7㉬bɸ7ħ⎯7ŴऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬кੂ7ฎⓒㅡｘｘ7⎯⑾7Ŵ่₡7γŴ⎯7Ŵ7γ֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ธ″ƥֱㅡफ㈠ฌ
Ûγ֭ผ֭7‫ںں‬ㅡ7ऑŴผ<ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7Ŵผ֭7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭⎯7‫ں‬ㅡ‫ں‬7ऑŴผ<ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯7ħ่㌱к—₡ħ่‫ف‬7̶7㌱Ŵผ7Ŵ่₡7ธ7‫ﭨ‬Ŵ่ฌ
Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭⎯ⓒ7ʉγħ㌱γ7㌱ਙ—к₡7⇡֭7֭Ŵ⎯ħкੂ7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯֭₡7⇡ੂ7Ŵкк7ऑŴ‫ש‬ผਙ่⎯7‫ﭨ‬ħŴ7ʉŴк<ʉŴੂ⎯7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱่֭‫ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ŵкк7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫⎯ف‬㈠ฌ
●่㌱к—₡֭₡7ਙ่7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬7ħ⎯7Ŵк⎯ਙ7ਙ่֭7кਙŴ₡ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ऑŴ㌱֭7ऑ֭ผ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7こħ่ħこ—こ7₡ħこ่֭⎯ħਙ่⎯7ਙ⑾7⑾ħ⑾‫่֭֭ש‬7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7ʉħ₡֭7⇡ੂ7‫ש‬ʉ่֭‫ੂש‬ฌ
⑾ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7₡֭֭ऑ㈠77A⎯7⎯γਙʉ่7ਙ่7⎯γ֭֭‫ש‬7AƆ‫ں‬ⓒ7Ŵкк7ऑŴผ<ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ่₡7₡ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂ⎯7Ŵผ֭7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7ħкк—こħ่Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7⇡ੂ7่֭ʉ7ਫ₡ਙʉֱ่кħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬㈚ฌ
ऑਙ⎯‫⎯ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7֭кħこħ่Ŵ‫֭ש‬7Ŵ่ੂ7кħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ऑਙкк—‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ—‫⎯ש‬ħ₡֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭7⎯ħ‫֭ש‬ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙこऑкੂ7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7bħ‫ੂש‬7ਙ⑾7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯7ผ֭‫—ف‬кŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่⎯㈠ฌ
A₡֭‫—׀‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7ħ⎯7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7ħ่⎯‫ש‬Ŵкк֭₡7ħ่7‫ש‬γ֭7⑾ਙผこ7ਙ⑾7⇡—⑾⑾֭ผ⎯7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7֭‫֭ﭨ‬ผ‫ف‬ผ่֭֭7ऑħ่֭7‫ש‬ผ֭֭⎯7⇡֭‫ש‬ʉ่֭֭ฌ
ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7Ŵ่₡7‫ש‬γ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬ⓒ7Ŵ⎯7ʉ֭кк7Ŵ⎯7⑾ħ่‫֭ف‬ผ⎯7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬ผ֭֭⎯7Ŵ‫ש‬7֭Ŵ㌱γ7่֭₡7ਙ⑾7ऑŴผ<ħ่‫ف‬7ผਙʉ⎯㈠ฌ
Aкк7ऑкŴ่‫⎯ש‬7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7—⎯֭₡7Ŵผ֭7кਙʉ7こŴħ่‫่֭ש‬Ŵ่㌱֭ⓒ7кਙʉ7ʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผⓒ7Ŵ่₡7่Ŵ‫ש‬ħ‫֭ﭨ‬7‫ש‬ਙ7Ɔਙ—‫ש‬γ֭ผ่7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵⓒ7㌱ਙこऑкੂħ่‫ف‬7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭ฌ
ผ֭‫ف‬ħਙ่Ŵк7ऑкŴ่‫ש‬7кħ⎯‫ש‬㈠77●่7Ŵ₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7кŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7⇡—⑾⑾֭ผ⎯ⓒ7ʉ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭7‫ש‬ਙ7֭ゥ‫่֭ש‬₡7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7⎯ħゥ7⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬7γħ‫ف‬γ7bҜⓈฌ
ʉŴкк7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7่ਙผ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ่₡7֭Ŵ⎯‫ש‬7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ่֭⎯㈠77Աੂ7₡ਙħ่‫ف‬7⎯ਙⓒ7ʉ֭7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭7‫ש‬γ֭7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵкк֭ੂ7Ŵкਙ่‫ف‬7‫ש‬γ֭7֭Ŵ⎯‫ש‬7⎯ħ₡֭7‫ש‬ਙฌ
ผ֭こŴħ่7ਫŴ⎯ֱħ⎯㈚ⓒ7ħ่7ਙผ₡֭ผ7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ₡㈾Ŵ㌱่֭‫ש‬7ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫⎯ש‬7‫ש‬ਙ7㌱ਙ่‫ש‬ħ่—֭7‫ف‬Ŵħ่ħ่‫ف‬7Ŵ㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡Ŵ㌱<7⎯ħ₡֭7ਙ⑾7‫ש‬γ֭ħผ7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯ฌ
Ŵ่₡7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ʉŴ‫֭ש‬ผ7‫ש‬Ŵ่<㈠ฌ
Ḷ่֭7‫ש‬ผŴ⎯γ7่֭㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭7ऑ֭ผ7⇡—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7⎯㌱ผ่֭֭֭₡7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7ผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7ʉŴੂ7ħ⎯7⇡֭ħ่‫ف‬7ऑผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ŵ่ฌ
ผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡ ‫ש‬ਙ ⇡֭ ㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ
Ŵк—こħ่—こ7кŴ‫שש‬ħ㌱֭7Ŵ่₡7⎯—ผผਙ—่₡֭₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7⎯ऑкħ‫ש‬7⑾Ŵ㌱֭7bҜⓈ7ʉŴкк⎯㈠77Ûγ֭ผ֭7Ŵ7こħ่ħこ—こ7⑾ħ⑾‫ੂש‬7ӧㄦｘƥỏ7⑾ਙਙ‫ש‬7⎯֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱<7⑾ผਙこฌ
⑾ ⑾‫ש‬
⑾ħ ⑾ ੂ ӧㄦｘƥỏ ⑾ਙ
⑾ ਙ‫⇡ש֭⎯ ש‬Ŵ
ผ֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк7ħ⎯7ผ֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡ⓒ7‫ש‬γ֭7‫ש‬ผŴ⎯γ7่֭㌱кਙ⎯—ผ֭⎯7γŴ‫֭ﭨ‬7⇡่֭֭7кਙ㌱Ŵ‫֭ש‬₡7Ŵ7こħ่ħこ—こ7ਙ⑾7⎯ħゥ‫ੂש‬7֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ӧ″ฎƥỏ7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7่ਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
֭ОŐİֱՙㄦｘ″ธ
ħ‫ف‬γγ‫ ש‬ӧ″ฎƥỏ ⑾֭֭‫⑾ שש‬ผਙこ
こ
VAR-75123, SUP-75124, SDR-75125 and SDR-7
ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ่֭ⓒ7Ŵ่₡7こħ่ħこ—こ7ਙ⑾7֭ħ‫ف‬γ‫ੂש‬7⑾ਙ—ผ7ӧฎㅡƥỏ7⑾֭֭‫ש‬7⑾ผਙこ7‫ש‬γ֭7֭Ŵ⎯‫ש‬7ऑผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7кħ่֭㈠ฌ ｘ‫゜ں‬ｘɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Û֭7⑾֭֭к7‫ש‬γŴ‫ש‬7‫ש‬γħ⎯7㌱ਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7₡֭‫֭ﭨ‬кਙऑこ่֭‫ש‬7ʉħкк7Ŵ‫שש‬ผŴ㌱‫ש‬7่֭ʉ7⇡—⎯ħ่֭⎯⎯֭⎯7‫ש‬ਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵผ֭Ŵⓒ7ʉγħ㌱γ7ħ่7ผ֭‫—ש‬ผ่7ʉħккฌ
㌱ผ֭Ŵ‫֭ש‬7֭こऑкਙੂこ่֭‫ש‬7ਙऑऑਙผ‫่—ש‬ħ‫ש‬ħ֭⎯7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γ֭7㌱ਙここ—่ħ‫ੂש‬㈠7Ûħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γ֭⎯֭7ħ‫֭ש‬こ⎯7ħ่7こħ่₡7ʉ֭7ผ֭⎯ऑ֭㌱‫—⑾ש‬ккੂ7Ŵ⎯<7⑾ਙผ7ੂਙ—ผฌ
Ŵऑऑผਙ‫ﭨ‬Ŵк7ผ֭㌱ਙここ่֭₡Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7⑾ਙผ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7ऑผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬㈠ฌ
7╗γŴ่<7ੂਙ—ⓒฌ
Ɔγ֭к₡ਙ่7bਙк่֭ฌ
ƆbA7Ｃ֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬ฌ
VAR-75123, SUP-75124, SDR-75125 and SDR-7 ｘ‫゜ں‬ｘɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SUP-75124 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO VAR-
75123 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ ANN RAINBOW, LLC, ET AL - For
possible action on a request for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 2,985 SQUARE-FOOT
BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at the northeast corner of Ann Road
and Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-26-410-007), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore)

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE - RENOTIFICATION - SDR-75125 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW
RELATED TO VAR-75123 AND SUP-75124 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: DZ
ANN RAINBOW, LLC, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan
Review FOR A PROPOSED 19,785 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL CENTER INCLUDING A
2,985 SQUARE-FOOT CONVENIENCE STORE WITH FUEL PUMPS AND CANOPY; AND TWO,
8,400 SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS WITH WAIVERS TO NOT ORIENT THE
BUILDINGS TO THE CORNER OR THE STREET FRONT WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED; TO
ALLOW PORTIONS OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE WEST PROPERTY
LINE TO BE THREE FEET, AND PORTIONS OF THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO BE FIVE
FEET WHERE 15 FEET IS REQUIRED FOR BOTH; AND TO ALLOW PORTIONS OF THE
LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE EAST PROPERTY LINE TO BE FIVE FEET WHERE
EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED on 3.24 acres at the northeast corner of Ann Road and Rainbow
Boulevard (APNs 125-26-410-004, 005, 006 and 007), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6

RECOMMENDATION:
3. Protest and Support Postcards
paper use, backup
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE – SDR-75583 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: DEBRA J. REOCH, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 16,800 SQUARE-FOOT GENERAL RETAIL
STORE, OTHER THAN LISTED WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT LANDSCAPE
BUFFER WHERE EIGHT FEET IS REQUIRED ALONG THE EAST PERIMETER on 2.42 acres
on the east side of Rainbow Boulevard, approximately 85 feet north of Ann Road (APNs 125-26-
410-004 through 006), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75062]. Staff

RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions
1. Request to Withdraw Without Prejudice
2. Agenda Summary Page
5. Photo(s)
7. Protest and Support Postcards and Documentation Not Vetted - Protest Comment Form
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: DEBRA J. REOCH, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-75583 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 406
PROTESTS 4
APPROVALS 3
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
2. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, landscape plan, and
building elevations, date stamped 01/09/19, except as amended by conditions
herein.
3. Site Development Plan Review (SDR-68324) shall be expunged upon final approval.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.08 is approved to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer along
the east perimeter where eight feet is required.
5. A six to eight-foot tall solid screen wall shall be constructed along the north property
line and the east perimeter of the development, allowing access to the existing well
for maintenance.
8. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to determine
the most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the existing lots. The
mapping action shall be completed and recorded prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
9. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect, Landscape

Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted prior to or at
the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent underground
sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory
manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed
landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device. The technical
landscape plan shall include the following changes from the conceptual landscape
plan:
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]
Conditions Page Two
 A minimum of one 24-inch box tree planted every 20 feet on-center with four,
five-gallon shrubs for each required tree in all landscape buffer areas, including
parking lot landscape islands.
 A minimum of four, five-gallon shrubs for each required tree in all landscape
buffer areas, including parking lot landscape islands.
Public Works
12. In accordance with code requirements of Title 13.56, remove all substandard offsite
improvements and unused driveways and replace with new improvements meeting
current City Standards concurrent with development of this site. Correct all
American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies on the sidewalks, if any, on Ann
Road adjacent to this site concurrent with on-site development activities. All existing
paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original
location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
13. Construct half-street improvements on Rainbow Boulevard including any transition

paving at the north edge of this site concurrent with development of this site. All
Any modification to not construct the full width of the right-of-way must be approved
by the City Engineer.
14. Provide a copy of a recorded Joint Access Agreement between this site and the
adjoining parcel to the south prior to the issuance of any permits. If a map combining
these parcels is recorded, this condition will not be enforced.
15. Construct a median in Rainbow Boulevard that restricts the southern driveway to
right out access only while maintaining left-in access to the parcel on the west side
of Rainbow Boulevard.
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets concurrent
with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend from the
sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the on-site roadway network
and shall be terminated on-site with a handicap ramp.
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]
17. Abandon the existing septic tank system per Southern Nevada Health District
regulations and connect to the public sewer concurrent with on-site development
activities.
19. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the
Rainbow Boulevard public rights-of-way, if any, prior to this issuance of permits for
these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of
the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured
entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense pursuant
to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and maintenance of
all private improvements in the public right of way shall be the responsibility of the
applicant and any successors in interest to the property and assigns pursuant to the
terms of the License Agreement. Coordinate all requirements for the License
Agreement with the Land Development Section of the Department of Building and
Safety (229-4836).
concurrent with the commencement of on site development activities unless
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact Analysis.
No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, nor compliance
therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of approval imposed
by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the development of this site.
21. Meet with the Flood Control Section of the Department of Public Works for
assistance with establishing finished floor elevations and drainage paths for this site
prior to submittal of construction plans, the issuance of any building or grading
permits or the submittal of a map for this site, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainage ways as recommended.
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant has proposed to construct two, 8,400 square-foot single-story general retail
buildings adjacent to Rainbow Boulevard, approximately 85 feet north of Ann Road.
ISSUES
 A Waiver is required to allow a zero-foot landscape buffer where eight feet is

required along the eastern perimeter of the subject site. Staff supports this request
due to an existing access easement for an active well.
ANALYSIS
The subject site was previously approved by the City Council on January 17, 2018 for a
commercial development [Site Development Plan Review (SDR-68324)] that consisted
of two, single-story 10,680 square-foot buildings, and two, single-story 2,000 square-foot
buildings. The development was approved with a Waiver to allow a zero-foot wide
landscape buffer adjacent to the east perimeter due to the existing access easement for
an existing well that services the adjacent residential neighborhood to the east.
The applicant is proposing to construct two, 8,400 square-foot single-story commercial

buildings instead of the previously approved four, single-story structures. This is an 8,560
square-foot reduction from the previously approved 25,360 square-foot development.
This site design allows the applicant to provide a driveway along the southern perimeter
that would provide cross access to the proposed commercial development to the south
and allow the two developments to function as one.
Due to the existence of a quasi-municipal well at the rear of 5686 North Rainbow Boulevard,
an access easement is necessary to provide access to the well for maintenance and service.
This access easement prevents the proposed development from providing the required
eight-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the east property line as required by Title 19 and a
Waiver is necessary. Per the Department of Public Works, “no onsite improvements shall
be constructed within the easement.” This extraordinary site condition prevents the applicant
from meeting the minimum standards for the eastern landscape buffer; therefore, staff
supports the Waiver request once again. Although the required landscape buffer is not able
to be constructed adjacent to the property line as required by Title 19, the applicant is
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]
proposing a landscape buffer along the east edge to provide landscaping for the proposed
parking lot and to buffer the proposed commercial development from the residential
neighborhood to the east.
The proposed development meets the minimum design standards set forth by Title 19.08
for commercial development for setbacks, landscape buffers, and parking lot design. In
addition, the proposed development exceeds the minimum parking requirements set forth
by Title 19.12 for general retail, which would allow for more intense uses such as a coffee
shop to operate within the development without the need for a parking variance depending
on the size and ratio of public seating areas to back-of-house.
The Department of Public Works has waived the Complete Streets requirement for the
proposed development if approved, as the proposed development is adjacent to property
that has already incurred some half-street improvements and the Department of Public
Works has conditioned the development to match existing adjacent site improvements.
Rather than create sidewalks and curbing that do not match adjacent existing
improvements and create an inconsistent roadway for both pedestrians and vehicular
traffic, the Department of Public Works has conditioned the site to develop harmoniously
with the surrounding existing area.
Staff recognizes the fact that the subject site is within the Ann-Rainbow Character Area
of the Rainbow Boulevard North Corridor Plan that stated non-residential development
should be limited to the Ann and Rainbow intersection and south thereof. On January 17,
2018 the City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-67883)
and Rezoning (ZON-67884) that approved the subjects sites to further commercial
development north of the Ann and Rainbow intersection. The applicant has proposed a
commercial development that aligns the commercial buildings with the street frontage
(Rainbow Boulevard) and provides the necessary design elements to meet the minimum
requirements for a commercial development adjacent to existing residential
neighborhoods.
Staff finds the applicant has proposed a site design that is compatible with adjacent
development in the area, and provides the ability for future land uses to be conducted in
a manner that is harmonious with the surrounding area; therefore, staff is recommending
approval of this site review.
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E) the
Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]

The proposed single-story commercial development is compatible with both the

residential and commercial development in the area.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title, and
other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;
The proposed development meets the minimum development standards set forth
by Title 19.08 for property zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial), and is consistent with
the General Plan designation.

If approved, site access and circulation would not negatively impact the adjacent
roadway (Rainbow Boulevard).
4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the City;
Building and landscape materials proposed are appropriate for the area and the
City as they are desert friendly and are similar to the materials used in the
immediate area.

The proposed building elevations are not unsightly or obnoxious, and create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment that is compatible with the
surrounding area.
The proposed development is subject to building permit review, as well as regular

inspections during the construction phase thus securing and protecting the public
health, safety and general welfare.
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]

A Final Map was recorded for the Rainbow Gardens Subdivision [Book
06/21/74
17 Page 6 of Plats].
The Clark County Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit
(UC-0193-08) to allow employees (unrelated) in conjunction with a
04/03/08 home occupation at 5686 North Rainbow Boulevard where only family
members are permitted to work as employees and to allow customers
at the residence where not permitted.
The Clark County Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit
(UC-0407-09) to allow two employees (unrelated) in conjunction with a
home occupation at 5664 North Rainbow Boulevard where only family
members are permitted to work as employees, to allow clients to come
08/06/09 to a residence where not permitted, to allow accessory structures to be
used in conjunction with a home occupation for the storage of business
records and files where not permitted and to increase the floor area
utilized for a home occupation to approximately 645 square feet where
a maximum of 581 square feet is permitted.
The City Council approved the Annexation (ANX-63178) of 0.81 net
04/20/16 acres at 5664 North Rainbow Boulevard into the city of Las Vegas as
Bill 2016-22. The annexation became effective 04/29/16.
(GPA-67883) from DR (Desert Rural Density Residential) and R (Rural
Density Residential) to SC (Service Commercial) on 2.42 acres on the
east side of Rainbow Boulevard, approximately 85 feet north of Ann
Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval, staff
01/17/18 recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-67884) from
R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 2.42 acres on
the east side of Rainbow Boulevard, approximately 85 feet north of Ann
Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval, staff
recommended denial.
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-68324) for a proposed 28,800 square-foot general retail
store, other than listed with a Waiver to allow a zero-foot landscape
buffer where eight feet is required along the east perimeter on 2.42
acres on the east side of Rainbow Boulevard, approximately 85 feet
north of Ann Road. The Planning Commission recommended approval,
staff recommended denial.
The Planning Commission approved a request to hold in abeyance Site
02/12/19 Development Plan Review (SDR-75583) until the 03/12/19 Planning
Commission meeting.


The existing 2,713 square-foot dwelling at 5686 North Rainbow
1977
Boulevard was constructed.
1979
1983

Site Area
Net Acres 2.42
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]

Property District
19.12 Designation
DR (Desert Rural
Subject Single Family, Density Residential) R-E (Residence
Property Detached R (Rural Density Estates)
Residential)
RN (Rural R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family,
North Neighborhood) Residential)
Detached
Clark County Clark County
South Undeveloped
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family, Preservation)
East Residential)
Detached Clark County
Clark County
RL (Residential Low)
Clark County
R-PD8 (Residential
Single Family, ML (Medium Low
Detached Density Residential)
West 8 Units per Acre)
General Retail R (Rural Density C-1 (Limited
Store Residential) Commercial)

Trails N/A
Assessment)
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]

Min. Setbacks
 Corner 10 Feet N/A N/A
Limited by Residential
Max. Building Height 27 Feet Y
Adjacency
Screened, Gated, w/ a By By
Trash Enclosure
Roof or Trellis Condition Condition
By By
Mech. Equipment Screened
Condition Condition
Review the following from Title 19.08.040 for compliance

3:1 proximity slope 81 Feet 269 Feet Y

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 North 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
 South 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet By Condition
 East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
 West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES By Condition
By Condition
spaces
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]

Ratio Trees
Min. Zone Width
 East 8 Feet Zero Feet N*
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential By Condition By Condition
*An existing easement prevents the applicant from constructing the required landscape
buffer adjacent to the east property line.

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Rainbow Blvd Primary Arterial Streets and 60-95 N
Highways Map
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
General
Retail Store,
16,800 SF 1:175 96
Other Than
Listed
10,000 SF
Loading
16,800 SF to 2 2 Y
Spaces
29,999 SF
NE
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062]
Waivers
To allow a zero-foot
An eight-foot wide landscape
wide landscape
buffer adjacent to the east Approval
buffer along the east
property line.
perimeter.
NE
ｘ‫ں゜ں‬ｘ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ｘ‫ں゜ں‬ㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ｘ‫゜ں‬ｘɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7╗ผ֭֭⎯ฌ Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7Ɔγผ—⇡⎯7Ŵ่₡7A㌱㌱่֭‫⎯ש‬ฌ Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7Ḛผਙ—่₡㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ⎯ฌ
●‫֭ש‬こ7 Ɔħ▷֭7 Ợ—Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬ฌ ●‫֭ש‬こ7 Ɔħ▷֭7 Ợ—Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬ฌ ●‫֭ש‬こ7 Ɔħ▷֭7 Ợ—Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬ฌ
‫ں‬ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк7 ̶゜ㅡफ7ƥAऑŴ㌱γ֭7Աผਙʉ่ƥ7ḚผŴ‫֭ﭨ‬к7 ̶゜ㅡफ7 ธธⓒɱธｘ7⎯‫׀‬㈠7⑾‫ש‬㈠ฌ

Ҝਙ่₡֭кк7Оħ่֭7 ธㅡफ7 ㅡฎฌ Ձ֭—㌱ਙऑγੂкк—こ7ผ—‫⎯֭ש‬㌱่֭⎯7 ‫ںں‬ฎฌ
╗֭ゥŴ⎯7ƆŴ‫֭ف‬ฌ ӧธफ7╗γħ㌱7Ҝħ่㈠ỏฌ
Оħ่—⎯7ǲк₡Ŵผħ㌱Ŵ7 Ɔħ่‫ف‬к֭7╗ผ—่ฌ
Őਙ⎯こŴผħ่—⎯7Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħ่Ŵкħ⎯ฌ ‫ں‬ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк7 ‫ں‬ㄦธฌ

Őਙ⎯֭こŴผੂฌ
ОŴผ ħ่⎯ਙ่ħŴ7ゥ7ƥＣ֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7Ҝ—⎯֭—こƥฌ ธㅡफฌ ㄦ″ฌ
Ｃ֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7Ҝ—⎯֭—こ7ОŴкਙ7Ћ֭ผ₡֭ฌ Ҝ—к‫ש‬ħ7╗ผ—่ฌ
Ġ֭⎯ऑ֭ผŴкਙ֭7ОŴผ‫ﭨ‬ħ⑾кਙผŴฌ ‫ں‬ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк7 ‫ں‬ㅡธฌ
Ő֭₡7ù—㌱㌱Ŵฌ
Ҝ—γк่֭⇡֭ผ‫ف‬γħŴ7ผħ‫⎯่֭ف‬ฌ ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк㈠7 ‫ں‬ㅡｘฌ

Ｃ֭֭ผ7ḚผŴ⎯⎯ฌ
Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7╗ผ֭֭⎯ฌ Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7Ɔγผ—⇡⎯7Ŵ่₡7A㌱㌱่֭‫⎯ש‬ฌ Оผਙऑਙ⎯֭₡7Ḛผਙ—่₡㌱ਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ⎯ฌ
●‫֭ש‬こ7 Ɔħ▷֭7 Ợ—Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬ฌ ●‫֭ש‬こ7 Ɔħ▷֭7 Ợ—Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬ฌ ●‫֭ש‬こ7 Ɔħ▷֭7 Ợ—Ŵ่‫ש‬ħ‫ੂש‬ฌ
‫ں‬ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк7 ̶゜ㅡफ7ƥAऑŴ㌱γ֭7Աผਙʉ่ƥ7ḚผŴ‫֭ﭨ‬к7 ̶゜ㅡफ7 ธธⓒɱธｘ7⎯‫׀‬㈠7⑾‫ש‬㈠ฌ

Ҝਙ่₡֭кк7Оħ่֭7 ธㅡफ7 ㅡฎฌ Ձ֭—㌱ਙऑγੂкк—こ7ผ—‫⎯֭ש‬㌱่֭⎯7 ‫ںں‬ฎฌ
╗֭ゥŴ⎯7ƆŴ‫֭ف‬ฌ ӧธफ7╗γħ㌱7Ҝħ่㈠ỏฌ
Оħ่—⎯7ǲк₡Ŵผħ㌱Ŵ7 Ɔħ่‫ف‬к֭7╗ผ—่ฌ
Őਙ⎯こŴผħ่—⎯7Ḷ⑾⑾ħ㌱ħ่Ŵкħ⎯ฌ ‫ں‬ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк7 ‫ں‬ㄦธฌ

Őਙ⎯֭こŴผੂฌ
ОŴผ ħ่⎯ਙ่ħŴ7ゥ7ƥＣ֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7Ҝ—⎯֭—こƥฌ ธㅡफฌ ㄦ″ฌ
Ｃ֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7Ҝ—⎯֭—こ7ОŴкਙ7Ћ֭ผ₡֭ฌ Ҝ—к‫ש‬ħ7╗ผ—่ฌ
Ġ֭⎯ऑ֭ผŴкਙ֭7ОŴผ‫ﭨ‬ħ⑾кਙผŴฌ ‫ں‬ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк7 ‫ں‬ㅡธฌ
Ő֭₡7ù—㌱㌱Ŵฌ
Ҝ—γк่֭⇡֭ผ‫ف‬γħŴ7ผħ‫⎯่֭ف‬ฌ ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк㈠7 ‫ں‬ㅡｘฌ

Ｃ֭֭ผ7ḚผŴ⎯⎯ฌ
ⓈЌՁǲAＣǲＣ7 Ҝ●ＣֱḚŐAＣǲ7 ОŐǲҜ● ⓈҜ 7 ⓈЌՁǲAＣǲＣ7 Ҝ ● ＣֱḚŐAＣǲ7 ОŐǲҜ ● ⓈҜฌ
ฎՙ7 ฎɱ7 ɱ̶7 ฎՙ7 ฎɱ7 ɱ̶ฌ
Ő7 Őฌ
ⓈЌՁǲAＣǲＣ7 Ҝ●ＣֱḚŐAＣǲ7 ОŐǲҜ● Ⓢ Ҝ7 Ⓢ ЌՁǲAＣǲ Ｃ7 Ҝ●ＣֱḚŐAＣǲ 7 ОŐǲҜ●Ⓢ Ҝฌ
ฎՙ7 ฎɱ7 ɱ̶7 ฎՙ7 ฎɱ7 ɱ̶ฌ
Ő7 Őฌ
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEBRA J. REOCH, ET AL
EAST SIDE OF RAINBOW BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 85 FEET NORTH OF ANN ROAD
12/27/2018
SDR-75583 [PRJ-75062] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: DEBRA J. REOCH, ET AL
EAST SIDE OF RAINBOW BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 85 FEET NORTH OF ANN ROAD
12/27/2018
2580 St. Rose Parkway, Suite 305,
Henderson, NV 89074
Tel.: (702) 71 9-2020 Fax: (702) 269-9673
LLC
Gary L. Carlson, Architect (License No. 1859)
Sheldon Colen, Architect (License No. 7701)
January 10, 2019
Please accept this letter of intent for the proposed construction of a commercial development at the
following sites:
* 5620 N. Rainbow Blvd. (APN: 125-26-410-007).
The proposed commercial development is to be a one story 7-Eleven convenience store with gas station
and two single story retail buildings. The building’s design intent is to harmoniously blend with the existing
commercial surrounding area and have accessible access from the right of way. The buildings gross square
footage is as follow:
* Fuel Canopy (7-Eleven) is approximately 3,340 sf and has a height of 17'-6".
* Building ‘A’ (7-Eleven) is approximately 2,985 sf and has a height of 26'-4".
* Building ‘B’ is approximately 8,400 sf and has a height of 26'-4".
* Building ‘C’ is approximately 8,400 sf and has a height of 26'-4".
Where 114 parking spaces are required, the site provides 141 parking spaces including 3 car and 2 van
accessible spaces, which could be easily accessed by all patrons via walkways located adjacent to all buildings.
Included on site is also one loading space per building with minimum dimensions of fifteen feet wide by twenty
five feet deep. As shown on sheet AS1, all parking and driveways are to be illuminated by new “down-light”
posts to eliminate any light pollution outside of the site, and to comply with City of Las Vegas regulations.
Adequate landscape is being installed in the form of buffers with evergreen pine trees between
residential properties and the proposed development, as well as fingers with trees at each end of parking rows.
All plants being used are low maintenance, low water, and native to Southern Nevada, complying with the
regional plant list. In addition to the landscape buffers, we propose to extend the existing six foot high CMU
wall along the north and east property lines. By doing so, we propose the existing alley along the east side to
remain “as-is”, in order for the adjacent residents to continue gaining access to the back side of their properties
and existing water tank.
One trash enclosure per building screened from the right of way is being proposed to be covered with an
aluminum lattice and surrounded with split face CMU walls. Where a minimum fifty (50') foot setback from
residential is required, the trash enclosures have been located a minimum of sixty eight (68') feet from the north
PRJ-75062
property line, and minimum of eighty four (84') feet from the east property line.
01/09/19
We feel that this commercial development will attract new businesses to the area, which in return will
create employment opportunities for the community. With these items in mind we respectfully ask for your
approval recommendation for this project.
Thank you,
Sheldon Colen
SCA Design
PRJ-75062
01/09/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE – VAR-75755 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75732 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC. - OWNER: TOUCHSTONE ALEXANDER, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A STUB STREET TERMINUS WHERE A
CUL-DE-SAC IS REQUIRED AND TO ALLOW A 25-FOOT PRIVATE STREET WITHOUT A
SIDEWALK WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED on 7.60 acres on the east side of Hualapai Way,
approximately 960 feet south of Alexander Road (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001 and
002), PD (Planned Development) Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special Land
Use Designation], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75604]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75755, VAR-75756, SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-
75604]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75755, VAR-75756, SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-
75604]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75755, VAR-75756, SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-
75604]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75755, VAR-75756, SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-75604]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75755 and VAR-75756 [PRJ-75604]
6. Protest/Support Postcard(s) for VAR-75755, VAR-75756, SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-
75604]
VAR-75755, VAR-75756, SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-75604]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC. – OWNER:
TOUCHSTONE ALEXANDER, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75755 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to GPA-75732
conditions: VAR-75756
SDR-75639
TMP-75640
SDR-75639
TMP-75640
SDR-75639 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to GPA-75732
VAR-75756
TMP-75640
TMP-75640 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to GPA-75732
VAR-75756
SDR-75639
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 617 - VAR-75755

617 - VAR-75756
617 - SDR-75639
617 - TMP-75640
CC
Notification Page Two
April 23, 2019 – Planning Commission Meeting
PROTESTS 3 - VAR-75755
3 - VAR-75756
3 - SDR-75639
3 - TMP-75640
APPROVALS 1 - VAR-75755
1 - VAR-75756
0 - SDR-75639
1 - TMP-75640
CC
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-75732) and approval of and

conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-75756), Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-75639) and Tentative Map (TMP-75640) shall be
required, if approved.
Planning

conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-75755), Site
Development Plan Review (SDR-75639) and Tentative Map (TMP-75640) shall be
CC
Conditions Page Two
Planning

conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variances (VAR-75755 and VAR-
75756), and Tentative Map (TMP-75640) shall be required, if approved.
3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plans and landscape plan date
stamped 04/02/19, and building elevations and floor plans date stamped 03/26/19,
except as amended by conditions herein.
permits.
CC
7. Republic Services shall provide documentation confirming that the waste collection
system associated with the development can be appropriately serviced prior to
issuance of building permits. If required, pad sites for trash collection shall be
established at the interior of the development to accommodate such collections.

the same time as Final Map submittal. A permanent underground sprinkler system
is required, and shall be permanently maintained in a satisfactory manner; the
landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications. Installed landscaping shall not
impede visibility of any traffic control device. The technical landscape plan shall
indicate the number and size of each plant species.
Public Works
11. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public
Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage
Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner’s Association. Grant
additional Public Sewer Easements outside of the private street such that the public
sewer main is centered within a 20-foot wide Public Sewer Easement. Additionally,
grant a 5-foot Pedestrian Access Easement adjacent to Hualapai Way to allow for
future detached sidewalks.
12. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies, if any, on the sidewalk
along Hualapai Way adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of
Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development
of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
restored at its original location and to its original width concurrent with development
of this site.
CC
14. An update to the Lone Mountain Master Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted
to the City Traffic Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works prior
to issuance of any building or grading permits. Comply with the recommendation of
the City Traffic Engineer.
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first.
Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved drainage
plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such
neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the
City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Plan/Study concurrent with development of this site.
Planning
2. Approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA-75732) and approval of and

conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variances (VAR-75755 and VAR-
75756) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75639) shall be required, if
approved.
Regulations.
CC


Public Works
7. Private streets must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public
Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage
Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner’s Association. Grant
additional Public Sewer Easements outside of the private street such that the public
sewer main is centered within a 20-foot wide Public Sewer Easement. Additionally,
grant a 5-foot Pedestrian Access Easement adjacent to Hualapai Way to allow for
future detached sidewalks.
8. Correct all American’s with Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies, if any, on the sidewalk
along Hualapai Way adjacent to this site in accordance with code requirements of
Title 13.56.040 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer concurrent with development
of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
of this site.
CC
Conditions Page Six
10. An update to the Lone Mountain Master Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted
to the City Traffic Engineer and approved by the Department of Public Works prior
to issuance of any building or grading permits. Comply with the recommendation of
the City Traffic Engineer.
and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer and
drainage improvements, shall be resolved prior to approval of the construction plans
by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed unless
CC
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct a 124-unit residential townhouse development,

over three parcels south of Alexander Road, on the east side of Hualapai Way.
ISSUES
 A General Plan Amendment (GPA-75732) has been requested to amend a section of

a Master Planned Trail identified in the Trails Element of the 2020 Master Plan,
replaced by a five-foot sidewalk and ten-foot landscape buffer. This item was heard
separately at the March 12 Planning Commission. Planning Commission and staff
recommends approval of this request. GPA-75732 will be heard at the April 17 City
Council meeting.
 A Variance is sought to allow a 30-foot wide private gated street where a 33-foot wide
street with on-street parking on both sides and one five-foot wide sidewalk is required.
Additionally, the developer is seeking to include stub streets where a cul-de-sac and/or
hammerhead treatment is required under Title 19.04. Staff does not support either
request.
 A second Variance is sought to provide 237 parking spaces for the proposed
development where 269 parking spaces are required as per Title 19.12.070. Staff
does not support this request.
 A Site Development Plan Review is requested for a single family, attached
development. The subject sites are designated MFM (Multi-Family Medium) and are
subject to the Lone Mountain Master Plan Design Standards for Single Family
Residential Developments and Multi Family Residential (Medium Density) special land
use designation Development Standards. The applicant is proposing to develop the
site in accordance with the development standards for Medium Density.
 A Tentative Map is requested for a 124-lot single family, attached residential
subdivision over three parcels totaling 7.60 acres.
ANALYSIS
The subject parcels (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001 and 002) combine to form
7.60-acres of undeveloped land within the Lone Mountain Master Plan area. All three
parcels are zoned P-D (Planned Development) with the MFM (Multi Family Medium)
[Medium Density] Lone Mountain special land use designation. The proposed single
family, attached residential townhouse development seeks to apply Medium Density
district development standards to this subdivision.
CC
The Lone Mountain Master Plan Design Standards for Single Family Residential
Developments and Multi Family Residential (Medium Density) special land use
designation Development Standards allows for a maximum of 18 residential dwelling units
per acre and shall not exceed three stories in height. The proposed development has a
land use density of 16.31 dwelling units per acre with development not exceeding three
stories in height, therefore meeting the maximum density and height requirements.
The Master Developer has determined the residential district development standards for
this project. Lot sizes range from 1,144 square-feet to 2,874 square-feet, with an average
lot size of 2,004 square-feet with a minimum lot width of 22 feet.
A General Plan Amendment (GPA-75732) is requested to amend a portion of the Trails

Element in the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan. The Plan requires a 20-foot wide corridor
featuring a five-foot wide landscape area, a ten-foot wide Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail,
and a second five-foot wide landscape buffer on the west boundary of the northern parcel
(APN 138-07-103-006) which adjoins Hualapai Way. A five-foot wide sidewalk
improvement is provided along the west boundary of the three subject sites. The applicant
seeks to amend the Trails Element by retaining the 5-foot wide sidewalk with the addition
of a 10-foot landscape buffer, matching existing improvements on the north and south
adjoining lots. Providing the required 20-foot wide Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail would
result in a fragmented section of trail that does not match existing improvements to the
north and south of the subject site; therefore, the proposed Trails Element amendment is
supported. The General Plan Amendment item was heard separately at the Planning
Commission held on March 12, 2019; the Planning Commission recommended approval
and the item will be heard at the April 17, 2019 City Council meeting.
A Variance (VAR-75755) is requested to vary the standards for street terminations and
private gated community streets within the proposed development. Three stub street
termini are shown on the submitted plans. The Lone Mountain Master Plan does not
prescribe stub street standards; therefore, the requirements of Title 19 prevail. Title
19.04.100 requires either a cul-de-sac or a hammerhead termination for private streets
that terminate other than at an intersection with another private or public street. The
applicant’s justification letter states that stub streets have been used in previous
subdivisions in the Lone Mountain area and that stub streets were discussed with the Las
Vegas Fire Department without objection; additionally, redesigning the street layout would
significantly reduce the density of the development.
The proposed development will be a gated community, with all streets beyond the gate
functioning as private gated community streets. Title 19.04.230 requires a street width of
24 feet measured curb flow line to curb flow line with a minimum five-foot wide sidewalk
on one side. The street widths as submitted are 30-35 feet wide without sidewalks and
on-street parking on both sides.
CC
A second Variance (VAR-75756) is requested to vary the parking space requirements

generated by the proposed development. Submitted plans show the provision of 237
parking spaces associated with the proposed single family, attached development. Title
19.12.070 prescribes an on-site parking requirement of two spaces per dwelling unit, plus
one guest space for every six dwelling units; a 124-unit single dwelling, attached
development generates demand for 269 on-site parking spaces. The applicant’s
Justification Letter for the Variance states that the development will provide three product
types; one that provides a single stall (47 spaces), another product that provides a tandem
garage (47 spaces) and the third product that provides a side by side garage (60 spaces).
Title 19.18.020 defines a Parking Space as “A space within a building, garage or parking
area, as defined, for the temporary parking or storage of one automobile with continuous
and unimpeded access to a public right-of-way, service drive or aisle.” The tandem
parking arrangement does not provide unimpeded access and is not supported as a
method of calculating the parking requirements of the proposed development. In addition,
the Site Plan makes provision for 32 on-street parking spaces within the development.
Title 19 states that a certain number of spaces must be provided on-site, which is defined
as “located on the lot that is the subject of an application for development”. For this
development, each townhouse is located on its own separate lot, so the two on-site
parking spaces required for the individual units must be provided on the lot that the
townhouse is located on. Additionally, the on-street parking spaces must meet
dimensional requirements that allow them to function, including the access to and from
the spaces. In the site plan submitted, on-street parking spaces are depicted that do not
meet the minimum standards. Parallel spaces are depicted across from 90-degree
parking stalls, located on a street with a width of 30 feet. A minimum drive aisle width of
24 feet is required in front of a 90-degree parking space to allow free access to the
space. A standard nine-foot wide space would limit drive aisle access to the 90-degree
spaces to only 21 feet. These parallel spaces cannot be counted and cannot be included
as valid spaces.
Building Elements for the proposed single family, attached residential townhouse
development include concrete roof tiles with pitched roofs, stucco fascia, and recessed
balconies incorporated into the building form. Colors consist of earth tones and warm off
whites. Six-foot tall private screen walls are provided where appropriate. Garages and
exterior doorways are recessed. The proposed development is designed to comply with
the Architecture requirements of the Lone Mountain Master Plan.
The Landscaping Plan incorporates trees, shrubs, subshrubs and ground covers, and
cacti / accents that match species listed in the Lone Mountain Plant Palette. Lone
Mountain Master Plan defers to the landscaping standards prescribed in Title 19.06. Title
19.06 sets out perimeter area landscaping requirements, requiring 24-inch box trees
planted every 30 feet. The landscape plan shows a total of 43 perimeter 24-inch box trees
CC
over 960 feet at a rate of approximately one tree per 22 feet; this meets the perimeter
area landscaping requirements. A six-foot landscape buffer is required for sites adjacent
to a right-of-way; submitted plans propose a landscape buffer of ten feet which satisfies
Title 19.06 requirements.
Lone Mountain Master Plan prescribes 330 square feet of open space for each dwelling
unit. The proposed Tentative Map provides 56,531 square feet of open space where
40,920 square feet of open space is required for 124 dwelling units, meeting the open
space requirement.
A curbside trash collection system is proposed to service the development. Three stub
streets are shown on the submitted site plan; this arrangement will require trash collection
vehicles to reverse. A condition will be imposed requiring confirmation from Republic
Services that the proposed development can be serviced appropriately.
The submitted cross sections depict a natural grade ranging from 1.5% to 4.5%, the
average being greater than 2% across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code
19.06.050 a development with natural slope less than 2%, is allowed a maximum four-
foot retaining wall. A four-foot maximum retaining wall is shown interior to the site.
The Connectivity Ratio for this project is 1.04, below the minimum 1.3 ratio required for
similar projects in other parts of the city. However, the parcel is subject to the Lone
Mountain Master Plan, which does not prescribe Connectivity Ratio standards.
The Parking and Transportation department assessed the project and provided the
following information: “This project will add approximately 707 trips per day on Hualapai
Way and Alexander Rd. Currently, Hualapai is at about 20 percent of capacity and
Alexander is at about 15 percent of capacity. With this project, Hualapai is expected to be
at about 22 percent of capacity and Alexander is expected to be at about 17 percent of
capacity. Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 57
additional cars, or about one every minute.”
The Clark County School District projects that approximately 56 additional primary and
secondary school students will be generated by the proposed development on this site.
Of the three levels of schools serving the area (Eileen Conners Elementary School,
Justice Myron Leavitt Middle School and Centennial High School), Justice Myron Leavitt
Middle School and Centennial High School were over capacity for the 2018-2019 school
year.
CC
The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) objects to parts of the proposed
modification, providing the following comments: “The proposed development will be
served by the public water system, including public water mains and individual meters for
each lot. As such, the minimum width of the streets throughout the development must be
30 feet wide, to comply with LVVWD Service Rules and to provide adequate room for
service and maintenance of the public water facilities.”
The proposed single dwelling, attached residential townhouse development conforms to

the height, density and open space requirements of the Lone Mountain Master Plan.
Landscaping measures and buffers, walls and fences comply with the requirements of
Title 19. The proposed street network, including private gated community street widths,
street terminations, and provision of on-site parking spaces do not comply with the
requirements of Title 19; therefore, staff recommends denial of the two Variances, Site
Development Plan Review and Tentative Map.
order to:

“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece

of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of
the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted
so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected
natural resources and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any
ordinance or resolution.”
CC

applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing street layouts and street
sections which do not comply with Title 19.04 Complete Streets Standards. A redesign of
the street layouts and street sections would allow conformance to the Title 19
requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s physical
characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and
it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.
order to:

“Where by reason of exceptional narrowness, shallowness, or shape of a specific piece

of property at the time of enactment of the regulation, or by reason of exceptional
topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situation or condition of
the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning regulation would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardships
upon, the owner of the property, a variance from that strict application may be granted
so as to relieve the difficulties or hardship, if the relief may be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good, without substantial impairment of affected
natural resources and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any
ordinance or resolution.”

applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing a land use that requires
additional parking on the subject sites. A less intense land use would allow conformance
with Title 19.12 parking requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed
by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is
preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting
of Variances.
CC

The proposed single family, attached residential townhouse development is not

compatible with adjacent development, with Variances required for reduced
parking, private gated community street widths and non-compliant street
terminations.
The proposed residential townhouse development conforms to the General Plan,

and the Lone Mountain Master Plan. However, the proposed street terminations,
private gated community street widths, and on-site parking space provisions do not
comply with the requirements of Title 19.

The proposed single family, attached residential townhouse development gains

access from Hualapai Way which is capable of absorbing the increased traffic
generated by the proposed development and therefore will not negatively impact
adjacent roadways or neighborhood traffic.
The proposed single family, attached residential townhouse development will use
building and landscape materials in conformance with the requirements of the Lone
Mountain Master Plan and are therefore appropriate for the area and the City.

The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations create an

aesthetically pleasing environment and are compatible with development in the
area.
CC
If approved, the proposed single family, attached residential townhouse

development will be subject to building permit review, construction inspection and
licensing to assure that the public health, safety and general welfare are protected.
FINDINGS (TMP-75640)
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to the Lone Mountain Master Development Plan
and Design Standards, and the minimum requirements set forth by Title 19 for Tentative
Maps. However, the proposed street terminations, private gated community street widths,
and on-site parking space provisions do not comply with the requirements of Title 19;
therefore, staff recommends denial.
CC

The City Council approved a request for Rezoning (Z-0033-97) from C-
V (Civic) and N-U (Non Urban) under a Resolution of Intent to R-CL
(Single Family Compact-Lot) and R-PD9 (Residential Planned
06/23/97
Development - 9 units per acre) to PD (Planned Development) for the
Lone Mountain Master Plan Area. The Planning Commission and staff
A request for Rezoning (ZON-2999) of a portion of the subject property
from a U (Undeveloped) zone [PCD (Planned Community Development)
11/06/03 General Plan Designation] under Resolution of Intent to PD (Planned
Development) to C-V (Civic) zone was stricken from the Planning
Commission's agenda.
The City Council approved a request for a Major Modification (MOD-
5581) to the Lone Mountain Master Development Plan to change the
land use designations from Neighborhood Commercial and
04/06/05 Park/School/Recreation/Open Space to Multi-Family Medium on 8.74
acres adjacent to the east side of Hualapai Way, north and south of
Gilmore Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
Review (SDR-5579) for a proposed 136-Unit Residential Condominium
04/06/05 Development on 8.74 acres adjacent to the east side of Hualapai Way,
north and south of Gilmore Avenue. The Planning Commission and staff
The Planning Commission approved a request for a Tentative Map
(TMP-7667) for a 136 Unit Condominium Development on 9.32 acres
08/11/05
adjacent to the southeast corner of Hualapai Way and Alexander Road.
Staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to recommend approval
03/12/19 on a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-75732). Staff
The Planning Commission unanimously voted to hold the following
items in abeyance to the April 23, 2019 Planning Commission Meeting.
 Variance (VAR-75755)
03/12/19
 Variance (VAR-75756)
 Site Development Plan Review (SDR-75639)
 Tentative Map (TMP-75640)
CC

A deed was recorded for a change in ownership for the three subject
12/17/18
parcels.

No related building permits or business licenses were found for the subject sites.
A Pre-Application Meeting was held where submittal requirements were
01/15/19
discussed with the applicant.
A mandatory neighborhood meeting was held at the Durango Hills
Community Center YMCA at 3521 North Durango Drive in Las Vegas to
discuss the project. Twenty-seven (27) members of the public, four (4)
representatives from the applicant’s development team, one (1) staff
member from the City Council Office representing Ward 4, and one (1)
staff member of the Planning Department were in attendance.
Concerns included the following:

 Amending the sections and location of the trail was done to
accommodate more development on the subject sites
 Traffic generated by the proposed development
 Crosswalk needed where the current trail meets Hualapai Way just
south of Miami Springs Avenue
 Safety concerns about a gas pipeline that crosses just outside the
02/28/19 boundary line of the southern site
 Lack of parking on site will lead to overflow parking issues on
Hualapai Way
 Overflow parking on Hualapai Way would increase local traffic
congestion and impede on the nearby Academy’s use of the road
as part of their training route
 Three story building heights are too tall, existing development on
the west side of Hualapai Way is mostly single story
 View loss. Existing developments west of the subject site bought
into the area expecting a parkland view and not a three story
development
 Narrow private gated community street network would have trouble
accommodating larger vehicles (school buses, trash collection
vehicles, emergency vehicles)
CC
 Sidewalks not included as part of the development; access to
internal open space would require pedestrians to mix with vehicles
presenting a safety issue
 Provision of a single access point for future residents and their
guests
 Potential conflict with height of streetlights and proposed three story
building height.
Field Check
01/23/19 A routine field visit was carried out. No issues or concerns were noted.

Site Area
Gross Acres 9.27
Net Acres 7.60
Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Land Use Designation District
19.12
PCD (Planned
Subject Community P-D (Planned
Undeveloped
Property Development) – Multi- Development)
Family Medium
PCD (Planned
Multi-Family Community P-D (Planned
North
Residential Development) – Multi- Development)
Family Medium
PR-OS
P-D (Planned
South City Park (Park/School/Recreation
Development)
/Open Space)
PR-OS
P-D (Planned
East City Park (Park/School/Recreation
Development)
/Open Space)
CC
Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special Existing Zoning
Use Per Title
Property Land Use Designation District
19.12
PCD (Planned
Single Family, Community
Attached Development) – Multi-
Family Medium P-D (Planned
West
PCD (Planned Development)
Single Family, Community
Detached Development) – Multi-
Family Medium

Lone Mountain Y
PD (Planned Development) District Y
Trails N*
Assessment)
*Applicant is requesting GPA-75732 to amend Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail.
CC
Pursuant to the Lone Mountain Master Plan (Design Standards for Single Family
Residential), the following standards apply
Min. Lot Width N/A 22 Feet N/A
Min. Setbacks
 Front Yard N/A 5 Feet N/A
 Side Yard N/A Zero Feet N/A
 Side Yard (Corner) N/A 5 Feet N/A
10 Feet w/ 2 Feet
Overhang and 4 Feet
N/A Balcony Overhang N/A
 Rear Yard N/A Zero Feet for Four-Plex N/A
Min. Distance Between
Buildings N/A 10 Feet N/A
18 dwelling units 16.31 dwelling units per
Max. Density per acre acre Y
Max. Building Height 3 Stories 3 Stories Y
Element Standard Required (for 124 Units) Provided Compliance
330 Square Feet 56,531
Open Space per Unit 40,920 Square Feet Square Feet Y
CC

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees: One 24” box tree per 30
 West linear feet 32 Trees 43 Trees Y
Min. Zone Width
 East 0 Feet 0 Feet Y
PERIMETER WALL HEIGHT WITH SLOPE < 2%
Maximum Wall
Height 12 Feet 10 Feet Y
Maximum
Perimeter Wall
Height 6-8 Feet 6 Feet Y
Maximum
Retaining Wall
Height 6 Feet 4 Feet Y
Maximum
Ornament Height
above wall 18 inches 0 inches Y

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Hualapai Way Primary Arterial 100 Y
Streets & Highways
CC
Parking Requirement
Use
Number of Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Townhouse 124 2 per unit 248
Guest 1 per 6
124 21
Spaces townhouses
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 269 N/A 237 N/A N*
*The applicant has requested a Variance (VAR-75756) to allow 237 parking spaces where
269 parking spaces are required.
Internal Street 14
Intersection – Internal 8
Intersection – External Street or Stub Terminus 6
Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
0
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 1
Total 14.5 14
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links /
N/A 1.04
Nodes):
CC
ОŐİֱՙㄦ″ｘㅡ
ｘธ゜‫ں‬ธ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ｘ‫゜ں‬ธㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
㈎㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈚ฌ
⎯ฌ ⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
㈎
㈚ฌ
㈎㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎㈎
㈎
㈎㈎
Ġฌ
ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
Ṳ7
㈎
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ ㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎Ṳ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
ธㄦ7
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
‫ف‬㌱ʉ
Ћ●b●Ќ●╗ù7ҜAОฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱฌ
╗̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธｘｘｘฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
ｘㅡ゜ｘธ゜‫ں‬ɱ
㈎
ǲЌḚ●ЌǲǲŐƆ7ƆⓈŐЋǲùḶŐƆ7 ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ
㈎
Ձ A Ɔ 7Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⓒ7Ќ Ћ 7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″ฌ
㈎
‫ں‬ㄦㄦㄦ7Ɔ ㈠7Ő A ●Ќ Ա Ḷ Û 7Ա ՁЋ Ｃ㈠ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ ฌ
㈎
╗ḶⓈbĠƆ╗ḶЌǲ7Ձ●Ћ●ЌḚ7 ‫ں‬ㄦㄦㄦ7Ɔ ㈠7Ő A ●Ќ Ա Ḷ Û 7Ա ՁЋ Ｃ㈠
ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ⓒ7Ќ Ћ 7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″7
7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″ ՙɱฎֱｘｘ̶ฌ
╗̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธｘｘｘ
ĠⓈAՁAОA●7AЌＣ7AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
ǲЌḚ●ЌǲǲŐƆ7
ЌǲǲŐƆ ƆⓈŐЋǲùḶŐƆ
ƆⓈŐЋǲùḶŐƆ7‫ف‬㌱ʉ ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ
ƆＣŐฌ
Ɔ●╗ǲ7ＣǲЋǲՁḶОҜǲЌ╗7ОՁAЌฌ
੧7bḶҜОՁǲ╗ǲฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈚ฌ
⎯ฌ ⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
㈎
㈚ฌ
㈎㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎㈎
㈎
㈎㈎
Ġฌ
ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
Ṳ7
㈎
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ ㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎Ṳ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
ธㄦ7
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
‫ف‬㌱ʉ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ ฌ
㈎
ЋAŐฌ
ЋAŐ●AЌbǲ7Ɔ●╗ǲ7ОՁAЌฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ ⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ Ṳฌ
ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ
Ｃ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ
7Ő
⎯ฌ
ǲŐ
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
⎯ฌ
ЌＣ
⎯ฌ Ṳฌ
A
Ṳฌ Ṳฌ Ṳ Ṳ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
ǲṲ
⎯ฌ Ṳ7 Ṳฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
AՁ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ġ ฌ
⎯ฌ
b ●╗ ù 7Ḷ 7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ฌ
⎯ฌ
A О Ќ 7‫̶ں‬ฎֱｘՙֱ‫ں‬ｘ̶ֱｘｘธ7 b ●╗ ù 7Ḷ 7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ฌ
㈎㈎㈎ฌ ㈎ A О Ќ 7‫̶ں‬ฎֱｘՙֱธｘ‫ֱں‬ｘ‫ں‬ｘฌ
㈎7 ㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ ฌ
㈎
㈎
ฌ
ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
ฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎
㈎㈎ ⎯ฌ
㈎㈎
ՙɱฎֱｘｘ̶ฌ
㈎㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ
㈎㈎
㈎
㈎
⎯ฌ
ОՁAЌ╗7ҜA╗ǲŐ●AՁƆ7ՁǲḚǲЌＣฌ ㈎
㈎
㈎
A О Ќ 7‫̶ں‬ฎֱｘՙֱธｘ‫ֱں‬ｘ‫ں‬ｘฌ
b ●╗ ù 7Ḷ 7ՁA Ɔ 7Ћ ǲ Ḛ A Ɔ ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎
‫ں‬ㄦㄦㄦ7Ɔ ㈠7Ő A ●Ќ Ա Ḷ Û 7Ա ՁЋ Ｃ㈠
̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ
Ṳฌ Ġ Ⓢ AՁAОA●7Û Aùฌ
㈎㈎ฌ ㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ Ṳ Ṳฌ Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎㈎㈎ฌ
Ġ ฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ ㈎㈎㈎㈎ฌ ㈎㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ ㈎㈎㈎ฌ ㈎㈎㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎㈎㈎㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ ㈎㈎㈎㈎ฌ ㈎㈎㈎
㈎㈎㈎ฌ ㈎㈎ฌ
ฌ ฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
ฌ
㈎
ОⓈՁ╗ǲ7ĠḶҜǲƆ7
ՁAЌＣƆbAОǲ7ОՁAЌฌ
ĠⓈAՁAОA●7AЌＣ7AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7
ՁƆฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈚ฌ
⎯ฌ ⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎㈎
㈎ฌ
㈚ฌ
㈎
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ ㈎
Ġฌ
㈎ ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
ฌ
㈎
ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
㈎
Ṳ7
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳ7
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
㈎㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ ㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎ฌṲฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
㈎Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎Ṳฌ
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
ธㄦ7
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
ǲЌḚ●ЌǲǲŐƆ7ƆⓈŐЋǲùḶŐƆ7‫ف‬㌱ʉ ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ
㈎㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
╗ǲЌ╗A╗●Ћǲ7ҜAОฌ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
ธฌ
ㄦฎƥ7ǲЌ╗Őù7ӧОŐ●ЋA╗ǲỏฌ
Ɔ●╗ǲ7bŐḶƆƆ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
ֱ7
bฌ
ֱ
ֱ
‫ں‬ฌ
Աฌ
ĠⓈAՁAОA●7ÛAù7ӧОⓈԱՁ●bỏฌ
╗ùО●bAՁ7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7ӧ̶ｘƥỏฌ
ֱ
ǲฌ
ֱ
Ｃฌ
ОǲŐ●Ҝǲ╗ǲŐ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
╗ùО●bAՁ7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7ӧ̶ㄦƥỏฌ
╗Ҝธฌ
╗ǲЌA╗●Ћǲ7ҜAОฌ
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE – VAR-75756 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75732 AND VAR-75755 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC. - OWNER: TOUCHSTONE
ALEXANDER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 179 PARKING
SPACES WHERE 282 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED on 7.60 acres, on the east side of
Hualapai Way (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001 and 002), PD (Planned Development)
Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation], Ward 4
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE – SDR-75639 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75732
AND VAR-75755 AND VAR-75756 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: TOUCHSTONE LIVING,
INC. - OWNER: TOUCHSTONE ALEXANDER, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Site
Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 130-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT on 7.60 acres on the east side of Hualapai Way, approximately
960 feet south of Alexander Road (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001 and 002), PD (Planned
Development) Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation],
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-75604]
3. Justification Letter - SDR-75639 and TMP-75640 [PRJ-75604]
4. School Development Tracking Form from Clark County School District for SDR-75639 and
TMP-75640 [PRJ-75604]

Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's

Total

* CCSD Comments
SDR 75639
Touchstone Alexander, LLC
SEC Alexander Road and Hualapai Way

Proposed 130 unit multi-family residential development.
RATE/#

AM Peak Hour MULTIFAMILY HOUSING (MID-RISE) [DU] 130 0.36 47
Hualapai Way
PM Peak Hour 573
Alexander Road
PM Peak Hour 275
Adjacent street ADT

Capacity
Hualapai Way 35,490
Alexander Road 35,490
This project will add approximately 707 trips per day on Hualapai Wy. and Alexander Rd. Currently, Hualapai is at about 20
percent of capacity and Alexander is at about 15 percent of capacity. With this project, Hualapai is expected to be at about
22 percent of capacity and Alexander is expected to be at about 17 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 57 additional cars, or about one every minute.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ABEYANCE – TMP-75640 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75732, VAR-75755, VAR-
75756 AND SDR-75639 - HUALAPAI AND ALEXANDER - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT:
TOUCHSTONE LIVING, INC. - OWNER: TOUCHSTONE ALEXANDER, LLC - For possible action
on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED 130-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 7.60 acres on the east side of Hualapai Way, approximately 960
feet south of Alexander Road (APNs 138-07-103-006; 138-07-201-001 and 002), PD (Planned
Development) Zone [MFM (Multi-Family Medium) Lone Mountain Special Land Use Designation],
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
ｘ‫゜ں‬ธㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
㈎ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈚ฌ
⎯ฌ ⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎㈎
㈎ฌ
㈚ฌ
㈎
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ ㈎
Ġฌ
㈎ ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
ฌ
㈎
ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
⎯ฌ
Ṳฌ Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
㈎
Ṳ7
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳ7
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
㈎㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ ㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
㈎ฌṲฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
㈎Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
Ṳฌ
㈎Ṳฌ
Ṳ
㈎
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
Ṳฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
Ṳ
⎯ฌ
ธㄦ7
Ṳฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎
㈎
Ṳ
㈎
㈎
Ṳฌ
㈎
Ṳ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
⎯ฌ
㈎
⎯ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ
㈎ฌ ㈎ฌ
㈎㈎
㈎
㈎ฌ
╗ǲЌ╗A╗●Ћǲ7ҜAОฌ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
ธฌ
ㄦฎƥ7ǲЌ╗Őù7ӧОŐ●ЋA╗ǲỏฌ
ֱ7
bฌ
ֱ
ֱ
‫ں‬ฌ
Աฌ
ĠⓈAՁAОA●7ÛAù7ӧОⓈԱՁ●bỏฌ
╗ùО●bAՁ7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7ӧ̶ｘƥỏฌ
ֱ
ǲฌ
ֱ
Ｃฌ
ОǲŐ●Ҝǲ╗ǲŐ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
╗ùО●bAՁ7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7ӧ̶ㄦƥỏฌ
╗Ҝธฌ
╗ǲЌA╗●Ћǲ7ҜAОฌ
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
GPA-75668 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: ZION
LOVINGIER - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: PCD
(PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.50 acres at
8311 Farm Road (APN 125-16-301-003), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75621]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends DENIAL
2. Land Use Map
7. Protest Postcard(s) for GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: ZION LOVINGIER
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
GPA-75668 Staff recommends DENIAL.
ZON-75669 Staff recommends DENIAL. GPA-75668
** NOTIFICATION **
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing a General Plan Amendment for 8311 Farm Road. The
proposal includes designating the 1.50-acre subject site SC (Service Commercial), and
Rezoning the site to C-1 (Limited Commercial).
ISSUES
 A General Plan Amendment is requested to designate the subject site SC (Service

Commercial) from PCD (Planned Community Development). Staff does not
support this request.
 Rezoning the subject site from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited
Commercial) is proposed by the applicant. Staff does not support this proposal.
 The subject site currently operates as a licensed, short-term residential rental use.
If approved, these operations would be required to cease and desist and the
business license marked out-of-business.
ANALYSIS

PCD (Planned Community Development) – The Planned Community Development
category allows for a mix of residential uses that maintains an average overall density
ranging from two to eight dwelling units per gross acre, depending upon compatibility with
adjacent uses (e.g., a density of two units per acre will be required when adjacent to DR
designated property). In addition, commercial, public facilities and office projects may be
used as buffers (depending on compatibility issues) within the PCD. Residential streets
shall be designed to discourage through traffic, provide maximum privacy, and avoid the
appearance of lot conformity. In order to protect existing lifestyles, adjacency standards
and conditions may be required for new development.
The Service Commercial category allows low to medium intensity retail, office, or other
commercial uses that serve primarily local area patrons, and that do not include more
intense general commercial characteristics. Examples include neighborhood shopping
centers, theaters, and other places of public assembly and public and semi-public uses.
This category also includes offices either singly or grouped as office centers with
professional and business services. The Service Commercial category may also allow
mixed-use development with a residential component where appropriate.
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
Rezoning
The subject site is currently zoned R-E (Residence Estates). The purpose of the R-E
District is to provide for low density residential units located on large lots that convey a
rural environment. This is achieved by 20,000 square-foot minimum lot sizes, and
conservative setbacks. This zoning district does allow for a limited number of commercial
uses either by right, or through an approved Special Use Permit. The chart below
demonstrates these uses and the mechanisms necessary to operate such uses within the
R-E zoning district:
Permitted Use Conditional Use Special Use Permit
Animal Hospital, Clinic, or
Animal Keeping &
Single Family, Detached Shelter (with Outside
Husbandry
Pens)
Community Recreational Community Center, Private Convalescent Care
Center (Public) (Accessory) Facility/Nursing Home
Crop Production Cemetery/Mausoleum Country Club, Private
Individual Care – Family
Community Garden Church/House of Worship
Home
Community Residence
(including Family
Public Park or Playground Community Residence and Horse Corral or Stable
Transitional Community
Residence)
Short-Term Residential
Hospice
Rental
Individual Care – Group
Home
Individual Care Center
Public or Private School,
Primary and/or Secondary
The proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district is intended to provide most retail
shopping and personal services, and may be appropriate for mixed-use developments.
This district should be located on the periphery of residential neighborhoods and should
be confined to the intersections of primary and secondary thoroughfares along major retail
corridors. The subject site is not part of the retail corridor found west of Tule Springs Road
nor is it at the intersection of thoroughfares. While Farm Road is an 80-foot wide collector
street, east of Tule Springs Road, Farm Road primarily provides access to residential
neighborhoods.
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
Below is a chart that demonstrates a sampling of the type and intensity of the land uses
that would be allowed within the proposed C-1 zoning district either by right, as a
Conditional use, or via a Special Use Permit:
Permitted Use Conditional Use Special Use Permit
Banquet Facility Mixed-Use Development Assisted Living Apartments
Business School Auto Broker Auto Repair Garage, Minor
Open Air
Church/House of Worship Vending/Transient sales Bailbond Service
Lot
Clinic Pet Shop Nightclub
Beer/Wine/Cooler On
Employment Agency Senior Citizen Apartments and/or Off-Sale
Establishment
General Personal Service
Hotel, Motel or Hotel
(Beauty Salon, Dry Social Service Provider
Suites
Cleaners, etc.)
Health Club Thrift Shop Massage Establishment
General Retail Store Motor Vehicle Sales, Used
Restaurant Mini-Storage Facility
Trade School Pawn Shop
Restaurant with Alcohol or
Wedding Chapel
Service Bar
Staff finds the proposed C-1 zoning district would permit land uses too intense for direct
residential adjacency. These uses such as restaurants and general personal services are
typically open past normal business hours and would introduce public activity adjacent to
a residential neighborhood that staff finds to be incompatible and not capable of being
operated in a harmonious manner with detached, single family residences that exist in
the immediate area.
On August 14, 2018, the Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use
Permit (SUP-73820) for a five-bedroom short-term residential rental to be operated at the
subject site. If approved, these operations, along with any other residential type use would
have to cease immediately as they would not be permitted uses within a commercially
zoned property. Staff is prepared to issue a Cease and Desist order upon approval of
these applications.
According to the Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD), this parcel is currently served
by a well. If approved, the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) would
be the agency to review the proposed zone change and possibly require the subject site
to relinquish well rights and connect to a water service line.
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
Development factors in the area indicate commercial uses west of Tule Springs Road,
with residential uses east of Tule Springs Road. The subject site is surrounded by
residentially zoned property used as such with the exception of the property directly west,
which is currently used as a daycare center for children. These existing development
factors in the area do not indicate the need for the existing commercial west of Tule
Springs Road to encroach eastward into the residential neighborhoods; therefore, staff
recommends denial of both the requested General Plan Amendment and the Rezoning
request.

The density and intensity of the proposed Service Commercial designation is not
compatible with the existing Low Density Residential and Planned Community
Development land use designations.

The proposed Service Commercial General Plan designation allows the C-1
(Limited Commercial), O (Office), and P-O (Professional Office) zoning districts.
Due to the subject sites adjacency to single-family residential neighborhoods, the
P-O zoning district would be the only district compatible with the adjacent residential
zoning districts, not the proposed C-1 zoning district.

Plan Amendment; and
There are adequate transportation and utility facilities to accommodate the uses
permitted by the proposed Service Commercial General Plan designation.

policies.
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
Amending the existing General Plan designation to Service Commercial does not
conform to the intent of the Commercial and Industrial Development Standards,
Title 19.08.020, which strives to “to encourage sensitive design and planning of
commercial and industrial development which enhances compatibility between
the built environment and the natural environment and will not negatively impact
the use and enjoyment of adjacent and neighboring properties.”

If approved, the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district would conform
to the proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan Designation.
districts.
The uses allowed within the proposed C-1 zoning district are not compatible with
the surrounding residential land uses and zoning districts.
Growth and development factors in the surrounding community do not indicate the
need for commercial zoning to encroach into the residential neighborhoods east of
Tule Springs Road.

Farm Road is an 80-foot wide Collector street, which is adequate in size to meet
the requirements of the proposed C-1 zoning district.
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Special Use Permit
08/14/18 (SUP-73820) for a proposed Short Term Residential Rental use at 8311
Farm Road. Staff recommended approval.


A business license (G66-07437) was issued for a short-term residential
12/14/18
rental at 8311 Farm Road. The license is active as of 03/28/19.
01/10/19 requirements for a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning application
were discussed.
Centennial Hills Community Center YMCA 6:00 pm – 7:00pm
 One (1) property owner
 One (1) representative for the ownership
o Nathan Taylor
 Zero (0) representatives present for Council Ward 6
 Thirteen (13) members of the public were in attendance.
Issues
03/28/19
1. Concerns were raised about what type of business the property
owner was proposing to develop on the subject site.
a. The applicants’ representative indicated the property owner
would like to conduct weddings on the property. He further
indicated that the applicant intended to convert the property
through a Site Development Plan Review, which would be
presented to the Planning Commission at a later date if the
property is rezoned.
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
2. Concerns were raised about additional noise which would be created
by the proposed Wedding Chapel.
a. The applicants’ representative indicated the Wedding Chapel
use would be subject to all City of Las Vegas noise
ordinances and will be monitored by licensing and code
enforcement.
3. Concerns were raised about additional overflow parking for the
proposed Wedding Chapel use and how it would negatively impact
the surrounding neighborhood.
a. The applicants’ representative indicated that some onsite
parking would be provided; and overall parking requirements
for the proposed Wedding Chapel would be addressed during
the Site Development Plan Review process at a later date
4. Concerns were raised about the negative impact the existing Short-
Term Residential Rental use has to the surrounding neighborhood
(noise/traffic/trash/alcohol/parties).
a. The applicants’ representative indicated the subject site is
monitored by City of Las Vegas licensing and code
enforcement.
City staff indicated to residents that disturbances and concerns should
be reported to Code Enforcement if potential violations are taking
place.
Field Check
Staff observed the subject site during a routine field check. Nothing of
03/13/19
concern was noted by staff.

Site Area
Net Acres 1.50
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]

Property District
19.12 Designation
PCD (Planned
Subject Short Term R-E (Residence
Community
Property Residential Rental Estates)
Development)
R-PD4 (Residential
Single Family, L (Low Density
North Planned Development –
4 Units Per Acre)
PCD (Planned R-PD8 (Residential
Single Family,
South Community Planned Development –
Detached
Development) 8 Units Per Acre)
PCD (Planned R-PD8 (Residential
Single Family,
East Community Planned Development –
Detached
Development) 8 Units Per Acre)
Individual Care PCD (Planned
R-E (Residence
West Center (Six Community
Estates)
Children or More) Development)

Northwest Open Space Plan Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
NE
GPA-75668 and ZON-75669 [PRJ-75621]
Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards would apply to future development
for the proposed C-1 zoning district:
Min. Setbacks*
 Front 10 Feet
 Side 10 Feet
 Corner 10 Feet
 Rear 20 Feet
*Residential Adjacency could increase the minimum distance required for each setback
requirement.
1.50 Acres / 65,340 Square Feet

R-E (Residence Estates) 20,000 SF Lots 6.53
C-1 (Limited Commercial) N/A N/A
Existing General Plan Permitted Density Units Allowed
PCD (Planned Community
8.00 12
Development)
SC (Service Commercial) N/A N/A
Functional Actual
Governing Compliance with
Street Name Classification Street Width
Document Street Section
of Street(s) (Feet)
Master Plan of
Farm Road Collector Streets and 80 Y
Highways
NE
PRJ-75621
01/28/19
GPA-75668 [PRJ-75621] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-75669 - APPLICANT/OWNER: ZION
LOVINGIER
8311 FARM ROAD
03/13/19
LOVINGIER
8311 FARM ROAD
03/13/19
LOVINGIER
8311 FARM ROAD
03/13/19
January 28, 2019
City of Las Vegas Planning Department
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Re: 8311 Farm Road, Las Vegas, NV 89131
To Whom It May Concern:
We are respectfully requesting an amendment to the City’ s
General Plan—the property is currently set to be SC ( Service
Commercial) , but our request is to have the property re-zoned C-

1 ( Limited Commercial) . We believe this zone change is
appropriate due to the surrounding commercial in the area. In
addition, this property fronts Farm Road—a very busy street with
traffic in and out of 3 adj acent commercial centers. We plan to
remove the existing building and submit a plan for the property
following this application and its public hearings.
Thank you in advance for your time and attention to this matter.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me on
my mobile phone at: 702-994-3844
Respectfully,
NathanielTaylor
Nathaniel Taylor
President
PRJ-75621
03/25/19
8414 W. Farm Rd., #180, Las Vegas, Nevada 89131 (702) 483-7045
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE


SUBJECT:
APPLICANT/OWNER: ZION LOVINGIER - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning
FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.50 acres at 8311
Farm Road (APN 125-16-301-003), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75621]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75621
01/28/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
GPA-75931 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
JOHN J SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT) TO: R (RURAL DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL) on 1.25 acres on the west side of El Capitan Way, approximately 340 feet north
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Land Use Map
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN J SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 182
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
JAB
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a General Plan Amendment and Rezone of 1.25 acres of the
Centennial Hills Plan on the west side of El Capitan Way, approximately 340 feet north of
O’Hare Road.
ISSUES
 A General Plan Amendment is requested to change the future land use designation
on this site from PCD (Planned Community Development) to L (Low Density
Residential). Staff recommends denial.
 A Rezoning is requested on this site from U (Undeveloped) to R-D (Single Family
Residential-Restricted). Staff recommends denial.
 A Site Development Plan Review for a specific development on this site has not been
submitted.
ANALYSIS
The site is a 1.25 acre vacant parcel on the west side of El Capitan Way, north of O’Hare
Road. The parcel is midblock at the perimeter of a 137-lot residential neighborhood that
was developed as part of a large, single project approved in 2002. The subject site only
has access to El Capitan Way and cannot access the residential neighborhood that
surrounds it on the north, south and west. Likewise, the 137-lot subdivision was
developed with a requirement that there be no direct access to El Capitan Way. The
existing neighborhood built eight-foot walls around the subject site. As a result, the subject
site is uniquely isolated from the 137-lot neighborhood on three sides. Across the street,
on the east side of El Capitan Way, is a residential neighborhood in Clark County. None
of the Clark County residential parcels have direct access to El Capitan Way. The
adjacent Clark County residential parcels have one home per two acres. The adjacent
Las Vegas 137-lot neighborhood has three homes per acre.
The subject site has a land use designation of PCD (Planned Community Development).
Every parcel, 0.5 miles to the west and 1.5 miles to the south, has a similar land use
designation. The applicant is proposing to amend the land use designation for the subject
site from PCD (Planned Community Development) to L (Low Density Residential). The
applicant has not yet proposed a specific residential development on the vacant site, but
states that there is more potential for the site if it had a different land use designation. In
2016, the same applicant applied for a similar change in land use designation, but
withdrew before payment.
JAB
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]
The applicant is also proposing to change the current zoning from U (Undeveloped) to R-
D (Single Family Residential-Restricted). The U (Undeveloped) zone allows a maximum
of 2.18 dwelling units per acre while the R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) allows
4.35 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is essentially requesting a doubling of
residential density at the subject site. The entire area, again from 0.5 miles west and 1.5
miles south, is currently zoned R-PD3 (Residential Planned Development-3 Units per
Acre) which allows a maximum of three units per acre. If the applicant’s zoning change
request is approved, then the subject site will have a higher residential density than every
neighborhood near it.
When the 137-lot residential subdivision was approved [Z-0104-01(1)], City Council
added a condition that required all lots abutting El Capitan Way be larger than the rest of
the lots within the development. They also required homes on these lots be single story
only. These size and story requirements are a buffer along El Capitan Way and were in
response to discussions with a variety of stakeholders at the time. The applicant’s request
to double the density of the subject site is not compatible with the neighborhood.
Considering the uniformity of land use designation and zoning in the area, and the extent
to which the City Council and stakeholders ensured a particular lot size and density, staff
does not support the request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-75931) and Rezoning
(ZON-75932).

The proposed General Plan Amendment from PCD (Planned Community

Development) to L (Low Density Residential) is not compatible with any of the existing
adjacent residential land use designations.

The zoning districts supported by the proposed L (Low Density Residential) General
Plan Amendment include the proposed R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted)
zoning district, which is not compatible with existing adjacent land uses or zoning
districts because it would double the existing density of dwelling units.
JAB
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]

accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and
There are adequate transportation and utility facilities to accommodate residential uses
permitted by the L (Low Density Residential) General Plan Designation.

policies.
The proposed amendment conforms to the intent and policies of the 2020 Master
Plan.

If approved, the proposed Rezoning from U (Undeveloped) to R-D (Single Family

Residential-Restricted) zone is in conformance with the proposed L (Low Density
Residential) General Plan designation.
rezoning will be compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
The R-D (Single Family Residential-Restricted) zoning district allows for single family
homes, but the proposed density would not be compatible with the surrounding land
uses and zoning districts.
The neighborhood is exclusively three dwelling units per acre or less. The R-D (Single
Family Residential-Restricted) would be inappropriate at this location.

JAB
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]
Access to the property will be provided by North El Capitan Way, an 80-foot Primary
Collector in this area after street improvements, which will be adequate in size to
accommodate the densities allowed by the R-D zoning district.

The City Council approved an Annexation (A-0046-01) for 29.45 acres
03/01/02 generally located on the southwest corner of Log Cabin Way and El Capitan
Way.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0104-01) from U (Undeveloped) to
R-PD3 (Residential Planned Development-3 Units per Acre on approximately
37 acres located adjacent to the southwest corner of El Capitan Way and Log
Cabin Way.
03/06/02
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review [Z-0104-01(1)]
for a proposed 137-lot single family residential development on approximately
37 acres located adjacent to the southwest corner of El Capitan Way and Log
Cabin Way.


JAB
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]
Centennial Hills Library Meeting Room
6711 N. Buffalo Drive
6:10 – 6:50 pm
1 neighborhood resident, 1 consultant
Presentation
 Explained process of General Plan Amendment and Rezoning and why
these are necessary for development
 Explained that site had previously attempted a GPA and ZON
 Described possible floor plans of houses proposed for site
 Assured resident that equestrian trail would remain
 Assured resident that street improvement would be made
 Discussed neighborhood
04/04/19 Public Questions, Concerns and Discussion

 Why such a complicated process for three homes
 Ensure that home is only single story
 Could this land be turned into commercial
 Neighborhood desires continuity of the equestrian trail
 How many street lights
 If sold before development, could new developer increase density
 Will there be follow-up meetings
 Where/when is Planning Commission meeting
Take Away
 Neighbors had no objections to the proposed residential development if only
single story
 The home will be aesthetically compatible with rest of neighborhood
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an undeveloped parcel within
03/13/19
an existing single family residential neighborhood. No trash or debris.

Site Area
Gross Acres 1.25
JAB
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]

Surrounding
Property
19.12 Designation
PCD (Planned
Subject
Undeveloped Community U (Undeveloped)
Property
Development)
Single Family PCD (Planned R-PD3 (Residential
North Dwelling, Community Planned Development – 3
Detached Development) Units per Acre)
South Dwelling, Community Planned Development – 3
R-A (Residential
East Clark County Lone Mountain
Agriculture)
West Dwelling, Community Planned Development – 3

Trails Y
Assessment)

U (Undeveloped) 2.18 du/ac 2
R-D (Single Family
4.35 du/ac 5
Residential-Restricted)
JAB
GPA-75931 and ZON-75932 [PRJ-75902]

PCD (Planned Community
8.00 du/ac 10
Development)
L (Low Density Residential) 5.49 du/ac 6
Functional Actual
Street Governing Compliance with
Classification of Street Width
Name Document Street Section
Street(s) (Feet)
El Capitan Planned Streets
Major Collector 40 N*
Way and Highways
*Street improvements that comply with code will be part of the Conditions required of any
future mapping action.

The parcel is not served by LVVWD. The closest distribution line is located adjacent to the
parcel. Civil plans will need to be submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and fire
flow availability.
JAB
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱｘธ
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱｘธ
GPA-75931 [PRJ-75902] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-75932 - APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN J
SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST
WEST SIDE OF EL CAPITAN WAY NORTH OF O’HARE ROAD
03/13/19
SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST
03/13/19
SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST
03/13/19
JO H N V O R N S A N D , A |C P
P lanning & Zoning E ntitlem ents
62 S W A N C IR C LE
H E N D E R S O N , N E V A D A 89074
P hone (7oz) 896-2932
E m ail: landuseplanning@ em barqm ail.com
February 15,2019
R E : Justification Letter - A P N 125-05-302-012
The applicant is requesting a zone change from U (P C D ) to R -D to subdivide into 3, 14,000
square foot m inim um lots on the W est side of E lC apitan W ay approxim ately 335 feet N orth of
O 'H are R oad forthe future construction of single fam ilyresidential hom es on 1.25 acres. The
applicant is also requesting a G P A from the existing P C D designation to R esidential Low to
accom m odate the rezoning. The adjacent property to the N orth, S outh and W est is an existing
R P D -3 zoned residential developm ent. To the E ast across E lC apitan W ay are single fam ily
residential properties zoned R -A (R esidential A gricultural) and located w ithin rm incorporated
C lark C ounty. A s a P U D is not feasible since the property is too sm all for an appropriate P U D
developm ent and, in additioo, a 5 acre m inim um is required by N R S , a G P A am endm entto
R esidential Low and am ne change to R -D is appropriate.
@
S IN C E R E LY
John V om sanT.:P gC P
PRJ-75902
02/28/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ZON-75932 - REZONING - RELATED TO GPA-75931 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT/OWNER: JOHN J SARAPUCHIELLO TRUST - For possible action on a request for
a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) ZONE [PCD (PLANNED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION] TO: R-D (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-
RESTRICTED) on 1.25 acres on the west side of El Capitan Way, approximately 340 feet north
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Location and Aerial Map
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75902
02/28/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
GPA-75954 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
GOLD LT RE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: DR
(DESERT RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: SC (SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 1.06 acres
at 5445 North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-007), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75934]. Staff
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Abeyance Request for GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]
3. Land Use Map
8. Support Postcard(s) for GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]
Jason Binks
City of Las Vegas
Planning & Zoning Department
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
Re: PRJ-75934
Due to the nature of our project and the subsequent variances we are requesting it will be
necessary to abey our item from the April 23 meeting to the May 28, 2019. This delay will allow
us to detail with staff our proposed project in greater detail and give us the time to adequately
address each specific item. It is our main desire to work with staff to come up with solutions that
will be beneficial and ultimately deliver a quality project on this site.
Currently, we are working on the neighborhood meeting place and will have it shortly for your
files.
Sincerely,
Smith Bros. Realty
_________________________
By: James P. Smith
9159 West Flamingo Road Las Vegas NV 89147 Phone 702.321.6000

GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: GOLD LT RE, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
** NOTIFICATION **
JAB
GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting to change the future land use designation and rezone 1.06
undeveloped acres at 5445 North Rainbow Boulevard.
ISSUES
 A General Plan Amendment is requested to change the land use designation from DR
(Desert Rural) to SC (Service Commercial). Staff recommends approval.
 A Rezoning is requested from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial).
Staff recommends approval.
 The applicant is not proposing development for the subject site at this time.
ANALYSIS
The site is a 1.06 acre undeveloped parcel on the east side of Rainbow Boulevard and
south of Ann Road. The parcel is currently zoned residential, and has never been
developed. The site is adjacent to three different residential zones and a commercial zone
to the north. The applicant proposes to amend the land use designation from DR (Desert
Rural) to SC (Service Commercial) in order to change from a residential to a commercial
designation. The applicant has not proposed a specific commercial development, but
states that the property has more potential as a commercial lot than a residential lot, since
it’s remained undeveloped since annexation in 1964.
The subject site is in the Rainbow Boulevard North Corridor Plan, in a section titled Ann-
Rainbow. The intersection of Rainbow Boulevard and Ann Road is the single anchor to
this entire section. This section of the Corridor Plan is the primary focus of future
development because of unique vehicular patterns and large numbers of vacant parcels.
The Ann-Rainbow section of the Corridor Plan recommends commercial development
near the intersections and on vacant parcels most accessible to the surrounding
residential subdivisions. Considering the high volume of traffic on Rainbow Boulevard, a
100-foot Primary Arterial, and no other access to the subject site except Rainbow
Boulevard, staff supports the request to change the land use designation from DR (Desert
Rural) to SC (Service Commercial).
JAB
GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]
The applicant proposes to change the zoning from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1
(Limited Commercial). The C-1 zone is appropriate for the proposed SC (Service
Commercial) land use designation. The C-1 zone is intended to provide most retail
shopping and personal services for residential neighborhoods and fulfills the intent of the
Rainbow Boulevard North Corridor Plan. The parcel is adjacent to a commercial
development to the north and is an appropriate zone for Rainbow Boulevard, a 100-foot
Primary Arterial. Development factors in the area indeicate the appropriateness for the
subject site to be zoned commercial; therefore, staff supports the request to change the
zoning from R-E (Residence Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial).

The proposed General Plan Amendment from DR (Desert Rural) to SC (Service

Commercial) satisfies the intent of the Rainbow Boulevard North Corridor Plan and
is compatible with other commercial land use designations in the area.

The zoning districts supported by the proposed SC (Service Commercial) General

Plan Designation include the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial), which is
compatible with existing adjacent zoning districts.

Plan Amendment; and
There are adequate transportation and utility facilities to accommodate commercial

uses permitted by the SC (Service Commercial) General Plan designation.

policies.
The proposed amendment conforms to the intent and policies of the 2020
Master Plan.
JAB
GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]

If approved, the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district would conform
to the proposed SC (Service Commercial) General Plan designation.
districts.
The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district allows for retail shopping and
personal services for area residents and is compatible with surrounding land uses
and zoning districts.
The Rainbow Boulevard North Corridor Plan was created to manage and guide
development in this particular area in response to the need for community services.
Development factors in the area indicate the appropriateness for the subject site to
be rezoned from a residential district to a commercial district.

The site is adjacent to Rainbow Boulevard, a 100-foot primary arterial, and is

adequate in size and capacity to serve the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial)
zoning district.

The Board of Commissions approved an Annexation (A-0003-64) of the
05/12/64
subject site.
JAB
GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]


Centennial Hills Library
5:30 – 6:15pm
1 Consultant
1 Planning Staff Member
1 Member of the Public
Presentation
 No specific development yet, just General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
 When developer has specific plan, neighborhood will receive notification
 Will work with neighbors on future development
04/15/19 Public Questions, Concerns and Discussion

 Representative of neighborhood is very active in adjacent development
projects
 Has no specific comments on GPA and Rezone
 Would like opportunity to speak with developer about any Site Development
Plan Reviews
 Wants to ensure developer balances commercial intent with reasonable
amount of intensity on such a small lot
Take Away
 No issues with Rezone of single lot from residential to commercial
 As in past projects, will motivate neighborhood to participate in commenting
about a future, specific development
JAB
GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check and found an undeveloped area within
03/13/19 surrounded by residential and commercial developments. No trash or debris
at the subject site.

Site Area
Gross Acres 1.06
Planned or Special
Surrounding Existing Land Use
Land Use Existing Zoning District
Property Per Title 19.12
Designation
Subject
Undeveloped DR (Desert Rural) R-E (Residence Estates)
Property
Building
SC (Service
North Maintenance C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Commercial)
Service
Community R (Rural Density
South R-E (Residence Estates)
Residence Residential)
R-PD4 (Residential
Single Family L (Low Density
East Planned Development – 4
Dwelling, Detached Residential)
Units per Acre)
Single Family ML (Medium Low R-1 (Single Family
West
Dwelling, Detached Density Residential) Residential)

RP-O (Rural Preservation Overlay) District Y
Trails Y
Centennial Hills Sector Plan Y
Rainbow Blvd North Corridor Plan Y
Northwest Sector Plan Y
Assessment)
JAB
GPA-75954 and ZON-75955 [PRJ-75934]

Governing
Street Name Classification of Street Width with Street
Document
Street(s) (Feet) Section
Planned Streets
Rainbow Blvd Primary Arterial 100 Y
and Highways
JAB
PRJ-75934
03/04/19
PRJ-75934
03/04/19
PRJ-75934
03/04/19
GPA-75954 [PRJ-75934] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-75955 - APPLICANT/OWNER: GOLD
LT RE, LLC
5445 NORTH RAINBOW BOULEVARD
03/13/19
PRJ-75934
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
APPLICANT/OWNER: GOLD LT RE, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning
FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on 1.06 acres at 5445
North Rainbow Boulevard (APN 125-35-101-007), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75934]. Staff
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75934
03/04/19
PRJ-75934
03/04/19
PRJ-75934
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
GPA-75958 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON
- OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD
PRESERVATION) TO: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 4.43 acres on the north side of
Regena Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee Pee Lane (APN 125-30-502-008), Ward 6
(Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Land Use Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-75958, ZON-75959, VAR-75960, VAC-75961 and TMP-
75962 [PRJ-75893]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-75958, ZON-75959, VAR-75960, VAC-75961 and TMP-
75962 [PRJ-75893]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-75958, ZON-75959, VAR-75960, VAC-75961 and TMP-75962 [PRJ-75893]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-75958, ZON-75959, VAR-75960, VAC-75961 and TMP-75962 [PRJ-
75893]
GPA-75958, ZON-75959, VAR-75960, VAC-75961 and TMP-75962 [PRJ-75893]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE
PERUCHINI
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
conditions: ZON-75959
VAC-75961 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: GPA-75958
ZON-75959
VAR-75960
VAR-75960
VAC-75961
** NOTIFICATION **

167 - VAR-75960
1 - VAC-75961
167 - TMP-75962

0 - VAR-75960
0 - VAC-75961
0 - TMP-75962
NE

0 - VAR-75960
0 - VAC-75961
0 - TMP-75962
NE
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-75958) and Rezoning (ZON-75959);

and approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Variance (VAR-
75960), Petition to Vacate (VAC-75961) and Tentative Map (TMP-75962) shall be
VAC-75961 CONDITIONS
1. The limits of this Petition of Vacation shall be the U.S. Government Patent
Easements located on the west and south sides of Assessor Parcel Number 125-
30-502-008 excluding those portions of Regena Avenue and Centennial Parkway
which will be dedicated as right-of-way.
2. This Order of Relinquishment shall record immediately prior to and concurrent with
a mapping action that subdivides this site.
NE
Conditions Page Two
3. All public improvements, if any, adjacent to and in conflict with this vacation
application are to be modified, as necessary, at the applicant's expense prior to the
recordation of an Order of Vacation.
4. The Order of Relinquishment of Interest shall not be recorded until all of the
conditions of approval have been met provided, however, the conditions requiring
modification of public improvements may be fulfilled for purposes of recordation by
providing sufficient security for the performance thereof in accordance with the
Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Las Vegas. City Staff is empowered to modify
this application if necessary because of technical concerns or because of other
related review actions as long as current City right-of-way requirements are still
complied with and the intent of the vacation application is not changed. If applicable,
a five foot wide easement for public streetlight and fire hydrant purposes shall be
retained on all vacation actions abutting public street corridors that will remain
dedicated and available for public use. Also, if applicable and where needed, public
easement corridors and sight visibility or other easements that would/should cross
any right-of-way being vacated must be retain.
5. All development shall be in conformance with code requirements and design

standards of all City Departments.
6. If the Order of Vacation (or Order of Relinquishment of Interest if a Patent

Reservation) is not recorded within one (1) year after approval by the City of Las
Vegas or an Extension of Time is not granted by the Planning Director, then approval
will terminate and a new petition must be submitted.
Planning
2. Approval of General Plan Amendment (GPA-75958), Rezoning (ZON-75959),

Variance (VAR-75960) and Petition to Vacate (VAC-75961) shall be required, if
approved.
NE
Regulations.


Public Works
7. A Petition of Vacation, such as VAC-75961, shall record immediately prior to

(concurrent with) the recordation of a Final Map for this site to eliminate the U.S.
Government Patents Easements adjacent to this site.
8. Street “A” must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public Utility
Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and Public Drainage Easements to
be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association. Grant Public Pedestrian
Access Easements for all public sidewalks outside of the public right-of-way and any
public easements need for infrastructure on Centennial Parkway.
NE
9. Construct complete half street improvements on Centennial Parkway meeting

current City Standards adjacent to this site concurrent with development of this site.
Regena Avenue shall be constructed meeting Standard Drawing number 209 as
modified by the required Drainage Study. All other off-site improvements on Regena
Avenue are hereby deferred. In accordance with Title 19.02.025.F, the applicant
shall make an improvement contribution equal to 50% of the City’s bond estimate
costs for all deferred improvements. The street light contribution for Regena Avenue
may be reduced to 25% if a service is provided. All existing paving damaged or
removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its
original width concurrent with development of this site.
10. Construct a median, acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer, in Centennial Parkway
that restricts this site to right-in/right-out access only.
Centennial Parkway and Regena Avenue public rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to
this site prior to this issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must
carry an insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of
Las Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by
the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way
at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement.
The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of
way shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be
transferred with the sale of the property for the entire term of the License Agreement.
Coordinate all requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development
Section of the Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).
NE
plans by the City. No deviations from adopted City Standards shall be allowed
unless specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer prior to
the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision-related construction
plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not constitute
NE
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to develop a 16-lot single-family residential subdivision on

4.43-acres on the south side of Centennial Parkway, approximately 320 feet east of Tee
Pee lane.
ISSUES
 The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan designation from RNP
(Rural Neighborhood Preservation) and R (Rural Density Residential) to L (Low
Density Residential). Staff supports this request.
 A companion Rezoning request from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-1 (Single
Family Residential) is requested. Staff supports this request.
 A Variance is requested to allow a Connectivity Ration of 1.0 where 1.3. Staff does
not support this request.
 A second Variance is requested to allow a private street not developed to public
street standards and without gate is requested. Staff does not support this request.
 The applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow a 60-foot Intersection Offset where
220 feet is the minimum required. Staff is recommending denial of this request and
the associated Tentative Map.
ANALYSIS

The subject site currently has two land use designations, RNP (Rural Neighborhood
Preservation) and R (Rural Density Residential).
The predominant feature of the Rural Neighborhood Preservation areas is single-family

homes on large lots, many including equestrian facilities. This is generally a rural
environment that permits greater privacy and some noncommercial raising of domestic
animals. An Interlocal Agreement between the city of Las Vegas and Clark County
approved January 2, 2002 established certain parcels with these characteristics in the
Centennial Hills Sector and the unincorporated area of the Northwest as “rural
neighborhood preservation” areas. A Restated Interlocal Agreement between the parties
approved on December 3, 2008 reestablished these parcels, and set the allowable
density requirements and the rules by which parcels may be permitted to be amended to
a more intense land use category.
NE
The second portion of the subject site is designated R (Rural Density Residential). – This
category is a rural or semi-rural environment with a lifestyle much like that of the Desert
Rural (single-family homes on large lots, many including equestrian facilities), but with a
smaller allowable lot size.
The applicant is proposing to designate the entire parcel L (Low Density Residential)
which permits single-family detached homes, with a density of up to 5.49 units per acre.
The surrounding area includes the adjacent 4.49 acres to the east designated Low
Density Residential; the existing single-family residential development to the north
designated Residential Suburban (Clark County); the adjacent property to the north has
two designations, with the northern portion designated Residential Low (Clark County)
and the southern portion designated Rural Neighborhood Preservation (Clark County);
and finally the adjacent properties to the south are designated Rural Neighborhood
Preservation (Clark County). Staff finds the proposed Low Density Residential Land Use
Designation to be compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations and is
recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment request.
Rezoning
The subject site is currently zoned R-E (Residence Estates) which provides for low
density residential units located on large lots that convey a rural environment. The
minimum lot size for this district is 20,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to
rezone the subject site to R-1 (Single Family Residential). The R-1 District provides for
the development of single-family detached dwellings in a suburban setting with a
minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet.
Located within the Interlocal Agreement Planning Area B, Planning Area B states that
during the term of the agreement, the areas identified as Planning Area B must remain
residential and maintain a minimum buildable lot size of 10,000 square feet. The City of
Las Vegas is not to amend its land use plan, rezone such properties or approve special
or conditional use permits to allow industrial or commercial uses or residential lots with a
buildable area of less than 10,000 square feet within the areas identified as Planning Area
B. With agreement between the City, the County, and existing property owners,
modifications to the Planning Areas may occur.
While the proposed R-1 zoning district allows for lot sizes as small as 6,500 square feet,
the underlying General Plan Designation will ultimately determine the number of lots
developed. The lot sizes proposed range in size from 10,004 square feet to 10,786 square
feet. The proposed lot sizes satisfy the requirements of the Interlocal Agreement while
providing lot sizes that are comparable to those of the surrounding area. The proposed
R-1 zoning district is compatible with the surrounding zoning districts which includes R-1
to the north and east of the subject site; therefore, staff is recommending approval of the
rezoning request.
NE
Variance
Connectivity is a measurement of the diversity of vehicular or pedestrian options a
transportation network provides within and around its transportation network. The higher
the ratio, the more options there are for travelers in a given neighborhood and the lower
the ratio, less options are available. The Connectivity Ratio is calculated by taking the
number of street links (road sections between intersections) in the development’s street
layout divided by the number of street nodes (intersections and terminations). For
comparison purposes, a perfect street grid has a Connectivity Ratio of 2.0, while a
subdivision with only cul-de-sacs has a Connectivity Ratio of 1.0. The proposed
residential development has one link (street) and one node (cul-de-sac) for a connectivity
ratio of 1.0. The applicant would be able to meet the minimum connectivity ratio by
providing pedestrian access within proposed Common Element “C” to Regena Avenue.
The second portion of this request includes proposing to construct a private street without
a gate and not to public standards, which would include a sidewalk on both sides of the
proposed private street. Sidewalk is proposed for the east side of the private street,
terminating at proposed Common Element “C” leaving the future residents on the west
side of the private street without a pedestrian pathway (sidewalk).
The inability to meet the minimum ratio requirement for connectivity and the proposal of
a private street not constructed to public standards and without a gate are self-imposed
hardships not based on a unique or extraordinary circumstance; therefore, staff is
recommending denial of the Variance request.
Vacation
Staff has no objection to the vacation application request to relinquish the City's interests
in U.S. Government Patent Reservations generally located on the north side of Regena
Avenue, east of Tee Pee Lane. The Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities
however, as no right-of-way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are
involved, it is not necessary to wait for responses from any of the public utilities or other
parties interested in preserving a right in this patent easement. Since only City interests
are involved, any utility company's interests will need to be addressed with each
respective utility company and will not be affected by the City relinquishing its interest;
therefore, staff is recommending approval of the Petition to Vacate U.S. Government
Patent Reservations generally located on the north side of Regena Avenue, east of Tee
Pee Lane.
Tentative Map
The applicant has proposed to develop a 16-lot single-family residential subdivision on
4.49 net acres on the south side of Centennial Parkway, approximately 330 feet east of
Tee Pee Lane. The proposed development demonstrates 11 home sites developed
adjacent to one cul-de-sac, with the remaining four lots adjacent to Regena Avenue. The
density of the proposed development would be 3.56 units per acre.
NE
The submitted north/south and east/west cross sections depict a maximum grade greater
than 2% across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development
with natural slope greater than two percent is allowed a maximum six-foot retaining wall.
All retaining walls are shown as less than four feet in height.
Prior to the submittal deadline, the applicant met with the City Traffic Engineer who
determined the submitted layout is unacceptable. The applicant was advised to relocate
the entrance of the development to Regena Avenue or align the entrance with the existing
subdivision entrance on the north side of Centennial Parkway, Iguassu Falls Road. This
plan shows neither alternative staff provided. The 220-foot Intersection Offset Standard
provides a minimum distance required for turning movements that could potentially have
a conflict in the same area, in this instance Centennial Parkway. The proposed design
with a proposed 60-foot intersection offset creates an unsafe condition to a subdivision
entrance that currently has no turning movement concerns. In order to mitigate the
potential negative impact of the proposed driveway, the applicant will need to construct a
median that removes the ability for vehicular traffic to make a left turn out of the
subdivision onto Centennial Parkway, and restricts this site to right-in/right-out access
only from Centennial Parkway. If not constructed as a right-in/right-out only subdivision,
undesired “U” turn movements on Centennial Parkway could occur and become a safety
issue for vehicular and pedestrian traffic alike.
Traffic Engineering cannot support the proposed Tentative Map, for the following
reasons:
 Centennial Parkway is a 100-foot right-of-way, and a future six-lane arterial with a
posted speed limit of 45 mph. For safety reasons, direct access onto an arterial
should be limited and spaced, 300-foot minimum. Closely spaced driveways
increases conflict points.
 Access from Centennial Parkway will create a left-turn conflict due to the
inappropriate off-set with Iguassu Falls Road. A median island from Tee Pee
Lane to Fort Apache Road will be required to define the allowable movements.
Many of the existing intersections will be restricted to right-in/ right-out movements
only. This will increase the number of U-turn conflicts and cut-thru traffic on to other
streets.
 As traffic engineers we plan for the future and try not to create future safety
issues. This is the reason the proper hierarchy of roads is so important. For
example, major arterials should be intersected by minor arterials which are
intersected with collectors which are intersected with residential
streets. Maintaining this hierarchy improves safety for all road users. Crash rates
are reduced because access points are reduced, turning movements are reduced,
and pedestrian crossings are manageable.
NE
 Regena Avenue is a residential collector. The posted speed limits will likely remain
25 miles per hour. It is appropriate for residential roads to intersect this
street. This project is expected to generate about 16 vehicle trips in the peak hour,
which is virtually undetectable. These trips would be distributed appropriately to
intersections that the City can control.
The Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada (RTC) established the

RTC Clark County Area Access Management Guidelines that support all items
above. Staff is unable to support the proposed tentative map with direct access for
residential traffic to a future, six-lane Primary Arterial which does not comply with the
hierarchy of roads and creates potential conflict points for vehicular and pedestrian traffic
alike and is recommending denial of the Tentative Map.

The density and intensity of the proposed Low Density designation is compatible
with the existing adjacent land use designations.

The proposed Low Density designation allows the R-E, R-D and the proposed R-1
zoning district, which are compatible with the adjacent zoning districts. Although the
proposed R-1 district has a minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet, the density
limitation of 5.49 set by the proposed Low Density designation will determine the
number of residential lots developed.

Plan Amendment; and
There are adequate recreation and utility facilities to accommodate the proposed
residential development.
NE

policies.
The proposed amendment from RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) and R

(Rural Density Residential) to L (Low Density Residential) conforms to the
applicable adopted plans and policies.

If approved, the proposed R-1 (Single Family Residential) zoning district would
conform to the proposed L (Low Density Residential).
districts.
The R-1 district allows single-family residential homes, which are compatible with
the existing residential neighborhoods and residential zoning districts adjacent to
the subject site.
Development factors in the area indicate the appropriateness of the rezoning

request as it is similar to the existing zoning districts in the area.

Centennial Parkway is a 100-foot right-of-way, and a future six-lane arterial with a

posted speed limit of 45 mph. It is not appropriate for residential roads to intersect
this Primary Arterial. It is appropriate for the proposed private street to intersect
with Regena Avenue a residential collector road with a posted speed limit of 25
miles per hour. This project is expected to generate about 16 vehicle trips in the
peak hour, which is virtually undetectable. These trips would be distributed from
Regena Avenue appropriately to intersections such as Fort Apache Road and Tee
Pee Lane that the City can control.
NE
order to:



applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to construct private streets
without an access gate and not to public street standards, which includes a sidewalk on
both sides of the street; and a residential neighborhood design that does not meet the
minimum connectivity ratio required. An alternative neighborhood design including the
addition of sidewalk on the west side of proposed “Street A,” and pedestrian access for
“Common Element C” from “Street A” to Regena Avenue would allow conformance to
the minimum Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by
the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is
of Variances.

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-73915) 5.06 acres
11/07/18 on the north side of Regena Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee
Pee Lane.
NE


There are no related building permits or business licenses for the subject site.
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting to discuss the submittal
02/27/19
requirements for the proposed project.
Date: April 11, 2019
Start Time: 5:30 p.m.
End Time: 6:40 p.m.
Attendees:
One representative for the developer.
One representative from the Planning Department.
11-12 Members of the public (neighbors).
Issues discussed at the meeting:

 The neighbors in attendance were County residents that live on
the south side of Regena Avenue. They do not feel like they are
04/11/19 being heard or considered since they are County residents and
not within the City.
 Everything facing Regena Avenue was promised to be no less
than ½ acre size lots to buffer the RNP properties to the south.
This particular lot was promised to mirror the county development
to the west which has only 10 lots, with those adjacent to Regena
half-acre in size.
 The neighbors want a buffer of large lots adjacent to Regena in
order to buffer their RNP properties from higher density
development to the north.
 Drainage has become an issue in the area with some areas
developed and others not, the run-off water is causing the rural
roads to be washed out and dangerous for vehicles and horses.
NE
 In regards to this (proposed) development, the neighbors do not
want four lots facing Regena, only two in order to buffer the RNP
lots to the south.
 The neighbors would prefer to see this development mirror the
development directly to the west of this lot which contains ten
lots, with a horse trail along Regena Avenue.
This lot should only have 8-10 homes maximum.
Field Check
During a routine field check staff observed the undeveloped site and
03/13/19
noted nothing of concern.

Site Area
Net Acres 4.43

Property District
19.12 Designation
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Subject R-E (Residence
Undeveloped Preservation)
Property Estates)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
RS (Residential R-1 (Single Family
Single Family,
North Suburban) Clark Residential District)
Detached
County Clark County
RNP (Rural
R-E (Rural Estates
South Residential District)
Clark County
County
East Undeveloped
NE

Property District
19.12 Designation
R-D (Suburban Estates
RNP (Rural
Residential District)
West R-E (Rural Estates
County
Clark County

Northwest Open Space Plan
Trails N/A
Interlocal Agreement - Accepted Area B Y*
Assessment)
*The areas identified as Planning Area B must remain residential and maintain a minimum
buildable lot size of 10,000 square feet and the City must not amend its land use plan,
rezone such properties or approve special or conditional use permits to allow industrial or
commercial uses or residential lots with a buildable area of less than 10,000 square feet
within the areas.
Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply for the proposed R-1 Zoning
District:
Min. Setbacks
 Front 20 Feet
 Side 5 Feet
 Corner 15 Feet
 Rear 15 Feet
NE
4.43 Acres or 192,971 Square Feet:

R-1 (Single Family Residential) 6,500 SF Lots 29.69
RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation)* 2.00 4.44
R (Rural Density Residential)* 3.59 7.97
L (Low Density Residential) 5.49 24.32
*The subject site has a split General Plan Designation with the northern portion
designated Rural and the southern portion designated Rural Neighborhood Preservation.

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
Min. Zone Width
 North 6 Feet 10 Feet* Y
*The applicant has proposed to install the Complete Street standard which includes a five-foot
wide landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of-way (Centennial Parkway), followed by a five-foot
wide sidewalk and another five-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the perimeter wall for a
total of ten feet of landscaping.

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Centennial
Primary Arterial Streets and 90 N*
Parkway
Highways
Regena Avenue Local Street Title 13 60 N*
NE
Internal Street 1
Total 1 1
Required Provided
Required
Gross Floor Area or
Use Parking
Number of Units Parking Ratio
Single Family,
16 2 Per Lot 32
Detached

The parcel is currently not served by LVVWD. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be
submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and fire flow availability. The closest
available distribution water main to serve the property is located at the intersection of Regena
Ave and Fort Apache Road. To comply with District Service Rules the development will be
required submit a hydraulic analysis for approval.
NE
ḚbÛⓒ7●่㌱㈠゜ԱผŴ่₡ħ7Ő֭ħ₡7Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7bਙਙผ₡ħ่Ŵ‫ש‬ਙผ
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎɱ̶
ԱผŴ่₡ħ7Ő֭ħ₡ฌ
ՙｘธֱฎｘㅡֱธ‫ں‬ｘɱฌ
ՙｘธֱฎｘㅡֱธธɱɱฌ
⇡ผ֭ħ₡㌀‫ف‬㌱ʉ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこฌ
ՙｘธֱฎｘㅡֱธ‫ں‬ｘɱฌ
⇡ผ֭ħ₡㌀‫ف‬㌱ʉ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこฌ
ＣǲОAŐ╗ҜǲЌ╗7Ḷ7ОՁAЌЌ●ЌḚฌ
AООՁ●bA╗●ḶЌ7ΆАОǲ╗İ╗İḶЌ7ḶŐҜฌ
Aऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่゜О֭‫ש‬ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙผ̬7﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝7﹝
Окƥਙ㈾㌱㌱‫ש‬7A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7ӧՁਙ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่ỏ7 Ő ֭ ‫่֭ ف‬Ŵ7A‫֭—่֭ﭨ‬7Ŵ่₡7bγħ֭ႥŴ่7Ɔ‫ש‬ผ֭֭‫ש‬
Оผਙ㈠ħ ֭㌱‫ש‬7ЌŴこ֭7 Ő֭ ‫่ ֭ف‬Ŵ7Ŵ่₡7bγħ֭ ⑾‫ש‬Ŵ่ О‫≶ں‬ｘ‫ںں‬ਙ⎯֭₡7Ⓢ⎯֭7 ⎯7⑾㈠7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴкฌ
A⎯⎯֭⎯⎯ਙผƥ⎯7ОŴผ㌱֭к7 ӧ⎯ỏ㈈Ő‫ں‬ธए
ㄦ
ਛ≶ए
̶ｘ
χֱㅈ
ㄦएｘएธ
ֱｘए
ㅊ ｘएฎｹֱֱֱֱֱֱֱֱ ÛŴผ₡7 7ֱए″
7﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝7﹝
Ḛ่֭֭ผŴк7ОкŴ่̬7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 ֱֱֱֱχผਙ ऑਙ⎯֭₡7 ▷ⓒこħ่‫̬ف‬7֭ゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7 Őֱǲ7 ऑҹऑਙ⎯㌱₡
bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк7Ɔ‫—׀‬Ŵผ֭7*ਙਙ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ف‬7Ќ゜A7 *кਙਙ‫≶ں‬7Aผ㌱Ŵ7ŐŴ‫ں‬ħਙ﹝ᖝЌ
ᖝ゜AƆ ﹝
7 ﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝ฌ
﹝ฌ
Ḛผਙ⎯⎯7A㌱ผ֭⎯7﹝ㅡ�ֱ�ㅡ̶ֱ
�7﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝7Ձ ਙ‫゜⎯ש‬кк่ħ‫⎯ש‬7 ﹝﹝﹝﹝Ｃ่֭ ⎯ħ‫ੂש‬7﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝﹝7﹝
A₡₡ħ‫ש‬ħਙ่Ŵк7●่⑾ਙผこŴ‫ש‬ħਙ่7 ΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆΆАฌ
ОŐḶОǲŐ╗ù7ḶÛЌǲŐ7 Ûħ่⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7bγ—Ŵ bਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7 Ûħ่⎯‫ש‬ਙ่
A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7 ″″̶ՙ7b֭к֭⎯‫֭ש‬7A‫֭ﭨ‬ Оγਙ่̬֭7ՙｘธֱ″ㅡㄦֱ″ㅡฎㄦ7╥ƥŴゥ̬
bħ‫ੂש‬7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7 ЌЋ7 Ύħऑ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘՙฌ
ֱこŴħк7A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯
AİƥОՁкbAЌ╗7 Ｃ㈠Ő㈠7ĠਙФਙ่㈠7●่㌱㈠ bਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7 Ҝħ㌱γŴ֭к7b—₡₡ᖝฌ

A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7 ㅊฎ‫ں‬7Û⇡ħ‫ש‬ਙ֭ƈ7ԱŴŴ㌱⇡7Ｃผħᖝ֭7ᖝĠ‫ں‬ฌ Оγਙ่̬֭7 ӧՙｘธỏ7″̶ㄦ̶ֱ″ｘｘ7 )Ŵゥ̬7 ӧｘฎธỏ7ՙｘ̶̶̶̶ֱฎ
bħˇ7 Ġ่֭₡֭ผ⎯ਙ่ Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7 ЌЋ7 Ύħऑ7 ฎɱｘ‫ں‬ㅡ

ǲֱこŴħк7A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7 こऑ㌱—₡₡ੂ㌀₡ผγਙผ‫ש‬ਙ่㈠㌱ਙこฌ
ŐǲОŐǲƆǲЌ╗A╗●Ћǲ7 ḚbÛⓒ7●่㌱㈠ bਙ่‫ש‬Ŵ㌱‫ש‬7 777ԱผŴ่₡ħ7Ő֭ħ₡

㈈7﹝7﹝ฌ
A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯7 ‫ ں‬ㄦㄦㄦ7Ɔ㈠7Ő Ŵħ่⇡ਙʉ7Աਙ—к֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵผ₡ Оγਙ่̬֭7ՙｘธֱฎｘㅡֱธ‫ں‬ｘɱ

ӧ7
*Ŵゥ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ7ฎｘㅡֱธ‫ں‬ธ″
bħ‫ੂש‬7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ‫֭ש‬7 ЌЋ7 Ύħऑ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″

ֱ7 ֱ
ǲֱこŴħк7A₡₡ผ֭⎯⎯ฌ⇡ผ֭ħ₡㌀‫ف‬㌱ʉ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこ
●7㌱+ผ‫ש‬ħ⑾ੂ7‫ש‬γ่ผ7●7ポ‫ںںں‬7‫ש‬γ֭7Ŵ‫ں‬ħ‫ںں‬кħ㌱Ŵ่‫ש‬7Ŵħ‫ש‬₡7‫ש‬γ‫ש‬7‫ں‬γ֭7こㅼ่こ‫ש‬ħਙ—7⎯—⇡่̬ħкк㌱₡7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7‫ש‬γħ⎯7Ŵऑऑкħ㌱Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ħ⎯7‫ש‬ผ่֭7‫่ںں‬ᖝ7Ŵ㌱㌱Ⓢİ7Ŵ‫֭ש‬7кਙ7‫ש‬γ֭7⇡਼֭‫ں‬7ਙ‫ש‬7‫ੂ—ں‬7 ่ਙʉк֭₡‫֭ف‬7‫ש‬Ⓢƥ₡7γ‫ש‬кħ㌱⑾㈠7●7—ਙ‫ש‬к‫ש‬ผִкֳ่₡7‫⇡ں‬㌫‫ں‬7‫ש‬γ֭7bħ‫ੂש‬7İȽ7‫ںں‬ｘ‫ں ں‬㌱Ⱦ‫⎯ںںںںں ں‬ħ⇡⇓֭7⑾ਙผ
‫ںںں‬Ŵⓒ㌱—‫ں‬Aᖝħ�फ7ħ่7ħ่╛‫ں‬ɁŴ‫ں‬ħ่่7‫ںں ں‬ⓒ⎯Ḹ‫ں‬İⓒ7ӫ㈠—İ7‫ש‬к‫ں‬İ●7ħ—��ħ̬—ผ—₡㌱�ⓒ7‫ںںں‬ㄤ֭7ħ—⑾ਙȿこħਙ่7ਙผ7ħ่㌱ਙ่ħऑк�к‫ש‬7่İкİİкħ㌱кккħਙ่7่к่⇡7㌱ŴⓈ17‫ں‬γ֭7่ऑ░кŴ‫ש‬ħਙ‫ںں‬7‫ש‬ਙ7γ֭7‫ں‬㌱İɀ֭ʉк7 ‫ں ں‬7⇓—‫ש‬γ‫ש‬ผ7㌱㌱‫ںں‬İ⑾｜ƥ7‫ש‬γ่к7‫ں‬7่こ7‫ש‬γ֭7ਙʉ‫ںש‬ħびⓒ7び�╞7‫ںںںں‬ผ₡ผ่‫ں‬㌱ผ
ӧਙผ7่ऑⓒ⊿こⓒ7γਙк₡֭ผỏ7ਙ⑾7‫ں ںں‬ｘ7кƥफƥ●ƥƥफ⇓ 7—‫֭ﭨں‬к⇓ƥ㌱ⓒ●7ħ่7₡ⓒħⓒ7びऑऑ‫ש‬ⓒผ่‫ש‬ħਙ⁸кⓒ7फƥ7●फ7⁸ʉ֭֭7ਙผ7Ŵ‫ש่֭ف‬7⑾ਙкӧù7‫●ںײ‬Ġ‫ﮔ‬ħħ㌱₡7⇡ੂ7ƥฌ ƥ‫⇓ں‬ƥⓈb●7‫ש‬ਙ7่—sਙ7‫ש‬к‫ں‬ħⓒ7ผ่⇡่ⓒħफħਙ่ⓒ7่—7ħ่₡ħ㌱ն‫ں‬ｹİ7γкƥ7‫ש‬γび7ਙÛ่㌱⒕ƥਙ7ⓒħ‫ں—ש่่ف‬ｘ7γਙкਙʉ㈠
㈠ⓒ ‫ں‬ฌ
Оผਙऑ֭ผ‫ੂש‬7Ḷʉ่֭ผ7Ɔħ‫่ف‬Ŵ‫—ש‬ผ֭〈7 ゜7त⒊ⓒ7 फ▷㈾7ӧ゜ ‫ں‬7 ֱ‫ש‬ 7 ゜ฌ ḶŐ7ＣǲОAŐ╗ҜǲЌ╗7ⓈƆǲ7ḶЌՁùฌ

〈7A่7่—‫ں‬γਙ¤≶ճ₡7่‫ש่֭ف‬7こŴੂ7ⓒħ‫่ف‬7●кк7кγ⁸Ⓢ7‫ں‬⒕‫ں‬7‫ש‬γए7ऑ‫ש‬ਙऑ่֭ੂ7ਙʉ่֭ผ7⑾ਙผ71ħ่Ŵк7γкぼऑผⓒ7╗֭‫שںں‬Ŵ⑾ผ‫ں‬び㌱7ȼкŴऑ�㈠7Ŵ่İ7Оこ㌱�●7Ҝ่Њฌ bŴ⎯֭
Окƥħ่‫ש‬7ЌŴこ֭7 Ûħ่⎯‫ש‬ਙ่7bγ—Ŵ
Ҝ֭֭‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬7ＣŴ‫̬֭ש‬
Ɔ—⇡⎯㌱ผħ⇡֭₡7Ŵ่₡7⎯ʉਙ《7⇡֭⑾ਙผ֭7こ֭
╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк71̬֭֭
╗γħ⎯7 ∵7Ｃ7 ₡Ŵੂ7ਙ⑾﹝Ɔ Ћỏʋ̬㈠㈠�ֱֱֱⓒ7ธｘ7ㅊ7㈠ฌ
ᖝ7��
㈈
ＣŴ‫֭ש‬7Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬₡̬〈ฌ
‫ﻴ‬Ԁ ⒋ฌ Ő֭㌱֭ħ‫֭ﭨ‬₡7Աੂ̬
⑾γ֭7‫ں‬ȥİħ㌱‫⑾שںں‬ਙ‫ںں‬7ʉħкк7่⊁ผ7γŴ7₡�⇓≶ɂ㌱₡7㌱ਙɃऑк㌱‫ש‬ਙ7—่ผħк7ккʉ
╗Őन7⇡A॥ฌ —⇡ผ่ħ่㌱₡7 こŴ‫֭ں‬ħγγ7 кこ⇓ƥ㌱7 ⇡่֭֭7 ่̬ⓒ‫⑾ں‬ਙʉ֭₡7 ⇡ੂ7 ‫ש‬к‫ֱ̬ں‬
ЌḶ╗K7ОⓈਙ b ‫ש‬ऑɄ‫ש‬こ㌱่‫ש‬7ਙ⑾7‫ںںںںשںںںں‬ħ‫ש‬ⓒ‫ف‬7⑾ਙผ7
‫ں‬ħ‫ש‬ⓒ‫⑾ ف‬ਙผ ㌱ਙ‫—ں‬ħɊк㌱่㌱ỏ ʉк‫ں‬к‫ں‬
ʉк‫ں‬к‫ں‬7 ㈠‫ש‬ऑऑкħħ̬‫ש‬₡₡ਙ
ΆА7
Ά
ִƥ╗A╗ǲ7Ą7Ќੂ к A ㌱㌱‫ں‬ħŴこ7ਙ⑾₡‫֭ں‬7Ύਙ—ħ่‫ف‬7Ḷผ₡ħ่Ŵ่㌱㈠
่‫ ف‬Ḷผ₡ħ่Ŵ่㌱㈠
Ő֭‫ﭨ‬ħ⎯֭₡7ｘ̶゜ธฎ゜‫ں‬″ฌ �7㈠7‫ں‬ՙ﹒‫ں‬
к‫ߛש‬7㈠7ǲ㉨ ߙ㈠7ㄔⓒ7ธ㉷‫ں‬ฌ
ธㄦฌ
ŐǲƆ╗Ő●b╗●Ћǲ7bḶЋǲЌAЌ╗7ЌḶ╗ǲ7
Ｃ㈠Ő㈠7ĠḶŐ╗ḶЌ7 ‫ں‬ㄦㄦㄦ7Ɔ ㈠7Ő A ●Ќ Ա Ḷ Û 7Ա ՁЋ Ｃ㈠
7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″ ՙ″ՙֱ″̶ｘฌ
ŐǲḚǲЌA7bĠ●ǲ╗A●Ќ7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
ƆОฌ
Ɔ●╗ǲ7ОՁAЌฌ
ֱ
Aฌ
Աฌ
ֱ
ОՁAЌ╗7ҜA╗ǲŐ●AՁƆ7ՁǲḚǲЌＣฌ
ՁƆฌ
ՁAЌＣƆbAОǲ7ОՁAЌฌ
ธㄦฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
ЌǲǲŐƆ ƆⓈŐЋǲùḶŐƆ7
ƆⓈŐЋǲùḶŐƆ ‫ف‬㌱ʉ ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこ ฌ
╗ǲЌ╗A╗●Ћǲ7ҜAО7●ฌ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
Աฌ
Ɔ●╗ǲ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7Aฌ
Ɔ●╗ǲ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7Աฌ
╗Ҝธฌ
╗ǲЌ╗A╗●Ћǲ7ҜAО7●●ฌ
GPA-75958 [PRJ-75893] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RELATED TO ZON-75959, VAR-75960, VAC-75961 AND
TMP-75962 - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI
NORTH SIDE OF REGENA AVENUE EAST OF TEE PEE LANE
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ZON-75959 - REZONING RELATED TO GPA-75958 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR
HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on
4.43 acres on the north side of Regena Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee Pee Lane
(APN 125-30-502-008), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
GCW, Inc./Brandi Reid Project Coordinator
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
702-804-2299
breid@gcwengineering.com
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
APPLICATION ĀȀPETJTJON FORM
Application/Petition For: ______________________________

Pl'ojcct Address (Location) R e g ena Avenue and Chieﬅan Street
Pro.i ect Name Re ge na andChie ftan P1·011osed Use s f. Residential
Assessor's Parcel #(s)R12=

5
30
·=-
5= 0=8<-------- Ward # -=6
-0=
0=2
_______
General Plan: existing ----ro posed z,ming: existing R-E pposcd
Commercial Square FootageN/A Floo1· Arca Ra1io_�N
�/AS ______
Gross Acres _4�-�4-3

�______ Lots/llnits ____Den sity _______________
Additional Information ĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀȀ
PROPERTY OWNER Winston Chua Contact Winston

Address 6637 Celeste Ave Phone:702-645-6485 Þ'ax:
City Las Vegas State NV Zip 89107
-mail Address
AJ'PLlCANT D.R. HoĒon. Inc. Contact Michael Cudd�
Address 81 Wbitoe Baacb Dri�e�H1

Phone: (702) 635-3600 Fax: (082) 703-3338
CiČ Henderson State NV Zip 89014

E-mail Address mpcuddy@drhorton.com
REPRESENTATIVE GCW, Inc. Contact Brandi

_ _
Reid
Address 1 555 S. R ainbow Boulevard (
Phone: 702-804-2109Fax: (702) 804-2126

E-mail Address
- -
I cɤrtifythnr I ®111 the a1i11licant aitd tht 1he mţnmtiou sub:nillcd with this application is trne 11n� accUJ ate lo the beº1 ot 1uy knowledge tU'd htlicf. I uotltr&lɥnd 1b±1 the City JȽ 1101 1cȾ1 11111sib\e for
111a,cu1A�i�" in inŤ1Ɂa1inn 1 11,sŒ1kJ, ¯.uJ tl1JI iu��i:urudc�, 111~e iufoȿmion or inconipl�lt nJlJJliclllion nlnb caUF 1he npµlkatio11 to he 1cJɀewl 1 1 \uthtr cc11Jf}' thnl 1 nm the owt1i•, •�Ţ 1111rdrn1cr
(or np,;m, holder) of 11 10 l'"'I''"\ u1vel\'c,I in d,i, •ppt,rntio!l, "' I" !wee or agent fol(Y ā1IH»iicd by '
'1\'UCI to nuÙo tl1i, rnbn,i"ion, nu indic¹1<J hl' th• oWnc>'o ,ignntu10 holow.
"zj (/
.,
Property Owner Signature* / ³², 1 -t /

FOR DEPARTMENT USEONLY
* An nu1ho°·d ngent may ,ign Ill lh!U 1>1 th= ptopeny ownerfor Final hl¸pr, Te11tafr1•c ȼlap�. anJ Pmc�I MnƢ
Case#
Pl'int Name Winston Chua
Meeting Date:
Subscribed and swođ before me
Total Fee:
This [D V)¥:..�---, 20 .
� ��
day of_S

Date Received:*
ЀԀ ̀‫
؀‬ Received By:
TRñ bA$
fhe 1ȥJic11tfo11 will n¼r ha d�\·ɂcd coɃplcto unril llw
NOTkPUo C
ubrnincd ma1eihh lm\'c been n:,1fowed by tl1-:
&'TATE Å Ny l A
tpɄtmcnt of 1111t1111it,g for co1uiɊlcnc) wl1l1 .tpplii:tddo
ĀȀ
cc1iam ofd1e Zouing Ordinanc.

Revised 03/28/16
� . 17?1
ltߛ. E ߙ. , 21
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAR-75960 - VARIANCE RELATED TO GPA-75958 AND ZON-75959 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a
request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 1.00 CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS THE
MINIMUM REQUIRED AND A PRIVATE STREET WITHOUT AN ACCESS GATE NOT TO BE
CONSTRUCTED TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS on 4.43 acres on the north side of Regena
Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee Pee Lane (APN 125-30-502-008), R-E (Residence
Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
702-804-2299
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
PRJ-75893
03/04/19


5
30
·=-
5= 0=8<-------- Ward # -=6
-0=
0=2
_______
�/AS ______


-mail Address

Phone: (702) 635-3600 Fax: (082) 703-3338


_ _
Reid
Phone: 702-804-2109Fax: (702) 804-2126

E-mail Address
- -
"zj (/
.,

Case#
Meeting Date:
Total Fee:
This [D V)¥:..�---, 20 .
� ��
day of_S

Date Received:*
ЀԀ ̀‫
؀‬ Received By:
TRñ bA$
NOTkPUo C
&'TATE Å Ny l A
ĀȀ

Revised 03/28/16
� . 17?1
ltߛ. E ߙ. , 21
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAC-75961 - VACATION RELATED TO GPA-75958, ZON-75959 AND VAR-75960 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible
action on a request for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located
north of Regena Avenue, east of Tee Pee Lane (APN 125-30-502-008), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-
75893]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Location and Aerial Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
702-804-2299
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
PRJ-75893
03/04/19


5
30
·=-
5= 0=8<-------- Ward # -=6
-0=
0=2
_______
�/AS ______


-mail Address

Phone: (702) 635-3600 Fax: (082) 703-3338


_ _
Reid
Phone: 702-804-2109Fax: (702) 804-2126

E-mail Address
- -
"zj (/
.,

Case#
Meeting Date:
Total Fee:
This [D V)¥:..�---, 20 .
� ��
day of_S

Date Received:*
ЀԀ ̀‫
؀‬ Received By:
TRñ bA$
NOTkPUo C
&'TATE Å Ny l A
ĀȀ

Revised 03/28/16
� . 17?1
ltߛ. E ߙ. , 21
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
TMP-75962 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75958, ZON-75959, VAR-75960 AND VAC-
75961 - REGENA CHIEFTAIN - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER:
FRANK D & JANE PERUCHINI - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A
PROPOSED 16-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION WITH A WAIVER TO
ALLOW A 60-FOOT INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE 220 FEET IS REQUIRED AND TO
DEFER OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING STREETLIGHTS FOR REGENA AVENUE
WHERE OFFSITE IMPROVEMENTS ARE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF DEVELOPMENT on
4.43 acres on the north side of Regena Avenue, approximately 320 feet east of Tee Pee Lane
(APN 125-30-502-008), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family
Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75893]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
702-804-2299
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
Brandi Reid
702-804-2109
PRJ-75893
03/04/19


5
30
·=-
5= 0=8<-------- Ward # -=6
-0=
0=2
_______
�/AS ______


-mail Address

Phone: (702) 635-3600 Fax: (082) 703-3338


_ _
Reid
Phone: 702-804-2109Fax: (702) 804-2126

E-mail Address
- -
"zj (/
.,

Case#
Meeting Date:
Total Fee:
This [D V)¥:..�---, 20 .
� ��
day of_S

Date Received:*
ЀԀ ̀‫
؀‬ Received By:
TRñ bA$
NOTkPUo C
&'TATE Å Ny l A
ĀȀ

Revised 03/28/16
� . 17?1
ltߛ. E ߙ. , 21
PRJ-75893
03/04/19
ธㄦฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
Աฌ
╗Ҝธฌ
ｘ̶゜ธｘ゜‫ں‬ɱ

Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's

Total

* CCSD Comments
TMP 75962
DR Horton
N side of Regina Avenue, E of Tee Pee Lane

RATE/#

Centennial Parkway
PM Peak Hour 529
Fort Apache Road

PM Peak Hour 275
Adjacent street ADT

Capacity
Centennial Parkway 35,490
Fort Apache Road 35,490
This project will add approximately 151 trips per day on Regina Ave., Tee Pee Ln., Centennial Pkwy. and Fort Apache Rd.
Currently, Centennial is at about 19 percent of capacity and Fort Apache is at about 22 percent of capacity. With this project,
Centennial expected to remain unchanged and Fort Apache to be at about 23 percent of capacity. Counts are not available
for Regina or Tee Pee, but they are believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 16 additional cars, or about one every four
minutes.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
- OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a General Plan
Amendment FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
on 2.11 acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 960 feet west of Durango Drive
(APN 138-05-801-027), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75904]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Land Use Map
75975 [PRJ-75904]
75975 [PRJ-75904]
75904]
7. Protest Postcard(s) for GPA-75969, ZON-75972, VAR-75973, VAC-75974 and TMP-75975
[PRJ-75904]
8. Protest and/or Support Documentation Not Vetted for GPA-75969, ZON-75972, VAR-75973,
VAC-75974 and TMP-75975 [PRJ-75904]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY
TRUST, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-75972
VAR-75973
VAR-75973
VAC-75974
** NOTIFICATION **

296 - VAR-75973
5 - VAC-75974
296 - TMP-75975

1 - VAR-75973
0 - VAC-75974
1 - TMP-75975
NE

0 - VAR-75973
0 - VAC-75974
0 - TMP-75975
NE
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Petition to Vacate
(VAC-75974) and Tentative Map (TMP-75975) shall be required, if approved.
VAC- CONDITIONS
Easements located on the north, east, and west sides of Assessor Parcel Number
138-05-801-027 and the existing Public Sewer Easement generally located on the
north and east portions of this site.
NE
Conditions Page Two
any right-of-way being vacated must be retained.


Planning

(VAC-75974) and Variance (VAR-75973) shall be required, if approved.
NE
Regulations.
4. Written approval must be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit from
Republic Services for the modified hammerhead configuration.

include the following changes from the conceptual landscape plan:
• One 24-inch box shade tree with four, five-gallon shrubs for each required tree
shall be planted within the landscape buffer areas adjacent to Alexander Road.


NE
Public Works

10. Grant a Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail Easement for the required trail that is outside
of the Public right-of-way. Street “A” must be granted and labeled on the Final Map
for this site as Public Utility Easements (P.U.E.), Public Sewer Easements, and
Public Drainage Easements to be privately maintained by the Homeowner's
Association.
11. Construct complete half street improvements on Alexander Road including the
required Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail meeting current City Standards adjacent to
this site concurrent with development of this site. All existing paving damaged or
removed by this development shall be restored at its original location and to its
original width concurrent with development of this site.
12. Construct a minimum 12-foot wide paved access on Common Element “C” in
between lots 4 and 5 to provide drivable access to the sanitary sewer manhole from
street “A”.
Alexander Road public right-of-way adjacent to this site prior to this issuance of
the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally
insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall
remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at the applicant's expense
pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The installation and
maintenance of all private improvements in the public right of way shall be the
responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transferred with the sale
of the property for the entire term of the License Agreement. Coordinate all
requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development Section of the
Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).
NE
NE
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct an eight-lot single-family residential subdivision

on 2.21 acres on the north side of Alexander Road approximately 960 feet west of
Durango Drive.
ISSUES
 The applicant is proposing to amend the General Plan designation from Rural
Density Residential to Low Density Residential. Staff does not support this request.
 A request to Rezone the subject site from R-E to R-1 accompanies the General
Plan Amendment. Staff does not support this request.
 The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a 1.00 Connectivity Ratio where
1.30 is required. Staff does not support this request.
 A Variance to allow a private street without a gate and for it to not be constructed
to public standards is requested. Staff does not support this request.
 The final portion of the Variance request is for a modified hammerhead. Staff does
ANALYSIS

The subject site is currently designated R (Rural Density Residential). The Rural Density
Residential category is a rural or semi-rural environment with a lifestyle much like that of
the Desert Rural (single-family homes on large lots, including equestrian facilities), but
with a smaller allowable lot size. This category allows up to 3.59 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant is proposing to amend the General Plan designation to L (Low Density
Residential). The Low Density category generally permits single-family detached homes
and manufactured homes on individual lots. This category allows up to 5.49 dwelling units
per acre.
The area north of Alexander Road where the subject site is located, is currently
designated R (Rural Density Residential) or RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation).
These designations have a density range of 2.00 to 3.59 dwelling units per acre
respectively. Amending the General Plan designation to allow a density of 5.49 dwelling
units per acre is not compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations and staff
is recommending denial of the request.
NE
Rezoning
District is to provide for low density residential units located on large lots and conveying
a rural environment.
The applicant is proposing to Rezone the subject site to R-1 (Single Family Residential).
The purpose of the R-1 District is to provide for the development of single-family detached
dwellings in a suburban setting.
The subject site is located within an area with residential lot sizes that range from 17,500
square feet up to 32,800 square feet that conveys a rural environment. Rezoning the
subject site will introduce a suburban development pattern into an area that is rural. A
suburban zoning district is not compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts; therefore, staff is recommending denial of the Rezoning application.
Variance
ratio of 1.0.
The Variance request also includes proposing to construct a private street without a gate
and not to public standards, which would include a sidewalk on both sides of the proposed
private street. Sidewalk is proposed for the west side of the private street, terminating at
Lot 5 leaving the future residents on the east side of the private street without a pedestrian
pathway (sidewalk).
The final portion of the Variance request is to allow a modified hammerhead as a terminus
where a standard hammerhead or cul-de-sac is required. The proposed modified
hammerhead does not provide adequate space for vehicular traffic to turn around; this
includes emergency vehicles such as ambulances and trash disposal trucks dispatched
by Republic Services. Staff has added a recommended Condition of Approval requiring
the applicant to submit written approval for the modified hammerhead from Republic
Services prior to the issuance of a building permit.
NE
The inability to meet the minimum ratio requirement for connectivity, the proposal of a
private street not constructed to public standards and without a gate, and the request for
a modified hammerhead terminus are self-imposed hardships not based on a unique or
extraordinary circumstance. These variance requests are evidence of a site that is being
overdeveloped. Staff finds the proposed density and overall neighborhood design to be
too intense for the surrounding area and staff is recommending denial of the Variance
request in addition to the Rezoning and General Plan Amendment requests.
Vacation
in U.S. Government Patent Reservations and Public Sewer Easements generally located
on the north side of Alexander Road, west of Durango Drive. The Vacation request should
be sent to all the utilities however, as no right of way is proposed to be vacated, and thus
no franchise rights are involved, it is not necessary to wait for responses from any of the
public utilities or other parties interested in preserving a right in this patent easement.
Since only City interests are involved, any utility company's interests will need to be
addressed with each respective utility company and will not be affected by the City
relinquishing its interest.
Tentative Map
The applicant is proposing to develop eight home sites with lot sizes that range in size
from 8,684 square feet to 12,511 square feet within “Accepted Area B” of the Interlocal
Agreement. The proposed lot sizes do not satisfy the requirements of the Interlocal
Agreement, which requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Only one of the
proposed eight-lots provide the required minimum lot size set forth in the Interlocal
Agreement, the remaining seven lots range in size from 8,684 square feet to 9,545 square
feet, below the required 10,000 square feet and well below the neighboring lot sizes that
range in size from 17,500 square feet up to 32,800 square feet. The submitted tentative
map is preferential in nature and not compatible with the Interlocal Agreement or the
surrounding area; therefore, staff is recommending denial of the Tentative Map.
The submitted north/south and east/west cross sections depict a maximum grade less
than two percent across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06 a
development with natural slope less than two percent is allowed a maximum four-foot
retaining wall. A four-foot retaining wall is shown along the north and east borders.
NE

The surrounding area consist of Rural Density Residential and Rural Neighborhood
Preservation designations that allow a maximum of 3.59 dwelling units per acre.
The proposed Low Density Residential allows a density up to 5.49 dwelling units
per acre which is too intense for the area and not compatible with the existing
adjacent land uses.

The proposed Low Density Residential allows the proposed R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zoning district, the R-SL (Residential Small Lot) and the R-MH
(Mobile/Manufactured Home Residential) zoning districts, which are too intense and
not compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts.

Plan Amendment; and
There are adequate transportation (Alexander Road), recreation and utility facilities
to accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment

policies.
The proposed amendment does not conform to the Interlocal Agreement which
requires the subject site to remain residential and maintain a minimum buildable lot
size of 10,000 square feet.

NE
districts.
The Low Density Residential designation allows 6,500 square-foot residential lot
sizes, which are not compatible with the surrounding R-D (10,000 square feet), and
R-E (18,500 square feet) zoning districts.
Development factors in the area do not indicate the need for 6,500 square-foot size
home sites as the smallest adjacent lot size is 17,546 square feet.

Alexander Road is adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed

zoning district.
order to:


NE

without an access gate and not to public street standards, including a modified
hammerhead; and a residential neighborhood design that does not meet the minimum
connectivity ratio required. An alternative neighborhood design including sidewalk on
both sides of the street and a standard cul-de-sac or hammerhead are examples of some
of the design elements required to meet the minimum requirements set forth by Title 19.
In view of the absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it
is concluded that the applicant’s hardships are preferential in nature, and it is thereby
outside the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Annex (ANX-74572)
02/06/19 2.21 acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 115 feet east
of Gold Chip Street.


There are building permits or business licenses related to the subject site.
02/27/19 requirements for the proposed single family residential subdivision were
discussed.
NE
Date: 04/08/19
End Time: 6:50 p.m.
Application: GPA-75969 (PRJ-75904)
Attendees:
One representative for the applicant.
Two members of the public (neighbors).
Meeting Notes:
 The applicant’s representative gave an introduction to the
proposed residential development and explained to the
04/08/19 residents in attendance that the homes would be single-story
ranging in size from 2,400 square feet to 2,500 square feet.
They anticipate the price of the homes to start in the low
$500,000 range without upgrades.
 The residents in attendance had questions about the perimeter
wall and whether or not it would abut theirs, or have a dead
space; and that they prefer to have sidewalks and streetlights.
 The residents also expressed the preference would be for the
lot sizes to be closer to theirs (north of 17,000 square feet). The
smaller lot size in addition to a lower price point then their
existing homes (to the east) give them concern as to whether or
not this development will affect their property value since a
contributing factor to determining property values is what homes
sell for in the area.
Field Check
Staff observed the undeveloped lot during a routine field check. Staff did
03/13/19
not note anything of concern.

Site Area
Gross Acres 2.21
NE

Property District
19.12 Designation
Subject R (Rural Density R-E
Undeveloped
Property Residential) (Residence Estates)
RNP (Rural
North Undeveloped Neighborhood U (Undeveloped)
Preservation)
Undeveloped L (Low Density
South C-V (Civic)
Utility Installation Residential)
RNP (Rural
Neighborhood
Single Family, R-D (Single Family
East Preservation)
Detached Residential-Restricted)
R (Rural Density
Residential)
R-E
RL (Residential Low) (Rural Estates
West Undeveloped
Clark County Residential District)
Clark County

Trails – Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Y
Interlocal Agreement – Accepted Area B N*
Assessment)
*Accepted Area B requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet.
NE
District:
Min. Setbacks
 Front 20 Feet
 Side 5 Feet
 Corner 15 Feet
 Rear 15 Feet

R (Rural Density Residential) 3.59 7.93

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 10 Trees 10 Trees Y*
Min. Zone Width
 North 5 Feet 5 Feet** Y
*The site plan submitted with this application does not indicate plant materials or quantities. Staff
has added a Condition of Approval to ensure the proper amount of shade trees are installed
within the landscape buffer areas if approved.
**The subject site is adjacent to a Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail that includes a five-foot
landscape buffer with a ten-foot sidewalk.
NE

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Alexander Road Primary Arterial Streets and 70 N*
Highways
Internal Street 1
Modified Hammerhead Terminus 1
Total 1 1
Required Provided
Required
Gross Floor Area or
Use Parking
Single Family,
8 2 Per Lot 16
Detached

This parcel is currently not served by LVVWD. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be
submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and fire flow availability. There is an existing
six-inch stub approximately 168 LF from the west property line. To comply with District
Service Rules the development will be required submit a hydraulic analysis for approval.
NE
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱｘㅡ
ｘ̶゜ｘㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ՙｘธֱฎｘㅡֱธ‫ں‬ｘɱ7 ՙｘธֱฎｘㅡֱธธɱɱฌ
⇡ผ֭ħ₡㌀‫ف‬㌱ʉ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこฌ
Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7Aฌ
7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″ ՙ″ՙֱ″̶″ฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7ŐＣฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
Ｃ㈠Ő㈠7ĠḶŐ╗ḶЌ7
ธㄦ7
ŐǲƆ╗Ő●b╗●Ћǲ7bḶЋǲЌAЌ╗7ЌḶ╗ǲฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ǲAƆ╗7
Aฌ Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7A7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 Աฌ AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7Ɔ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
ֱ7 ֱ ╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
Աฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ǲAƆ╗7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
╗Ҝธฌ
TMP-75975 - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL
NORTH SIDE OF ALEXANDER ROAD WEST OF DURANGO DRIVE
03/13/19
TMP-75975 - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL
03/13/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a
Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on
2.11 acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 960 feet west of Durango Drive
(APN 138-05-801-027), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75904]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
702-804-2109 702-804-2299
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on
a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 1.00 CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS THE
MINIMUM REQUIRED; PRIVATE STREETS WITHOUT A GATE TO NOT BE CONSTRUCTED
TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS; AND A NON-GATED MODIFIED STREET TERMINUS
WHERE A CUL-DE-SAC IS REQUIRED on 2.11 acres on the north side of Alexander Road,
approximately 960 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-027), R-E (Residence Estates)
Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75904]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends
paper use, backup
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
702-804-2109 702-804-2299
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAC-75974 - VACATION RELATED TO GPA-75969, ZON-75972 AND VAR-75973 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible
action on a request for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements and portions of a
public sewer easement generally located on the north side of Alexander Road, west of Durango
Drive (APN 138-05-801-027), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75904]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
702-804-2109 702-804-2299
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
A
S
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
C
O
P
Y

PRJ-75904
03/05/19
A
S
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
C
O
P
Y

PRJ-75904
03/05/19
A
S
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
C
O
P
Y

PRJ-75904
03/05/19
A
S
S
E
S
S
O
R
'
S
C
O
P
Y

PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
75974 - ALEXANDER JULIANO EAST - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON -
OWNER: SCOTT FAMILY TRUST, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map
FOR A PROPOSED EIGHT-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.11 acres
on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 960 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-
801-027), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
702-804-2109 702-804-2299
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
PRJ-75904
03/05/19
Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7Aฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
ОḶ
bฌ
ธㄦ7
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ǲAƆ╗7
Aฌ Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7A7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 Աฌ AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7Ɔ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
ֱ7 ֱ ╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
Աฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ǲAƆ╗7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
╗Ҝธฌ

Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's

Total

* CCSD Comments
TMP 75975
DR Horton
N side of Alexander Road, W of Durango Drive

RATE/#

PM Peak Hour 0.99 8
Alexander Road
PM Peak Hour 659
Durango Drive
PM Peak Hour 275
Adjacent street ADT

Capacity
Durango Drive 35,490
This project will add approximately 76 trips per day on Alexander Rd., Juliano Rd. and Durango Dr. Currently, Alexander is at
about 23 percent of capacity and Durango is at about 61 percent of capacity. With this project, these capacities are expected
to remain unchanged. Counts are not available for Juliano, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 8 additional cars, or about two every fifteen
minutes.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
- OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment
FROM: R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) TO: L (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.09
acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 1,640 feet west of Durango Drive (APN
138-05-801-025), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75903]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Land Use Map
75979 [PRJ-75903]
75979 [PRJ-75903]
75903]
7. Protest/Support Postcard(s) for GPA-75971, ZON-75976, VAR-75977, VAC-75978 and TMP-
75979 [PRJ-75903]
8. Protest and/or Support Documentation Not Vetted for GPA-75971, ZON-75976, VAR-75977,
VAC-75978 and TMP-75979 [PRJ-75903]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-75976
VAR-75977
VAR-75977
VAC-75978
** NOTIFICATION **

259 - VAR-75977
1 - VAC-75978
259 - TMP-75979

1 - VAR-75977
0 - VAC-75978
1 - TMP-75979
NE

1 - VAR-75977
0 - VAC-75978
0 - TMP-75979
NE
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

(VAC-75978) and Tentative Map (TMP-75979) shall be required, if approved.
VAC- 75978 CONDITIONS

Easements located on the west, north and east sides of Assessor Parcel Number
138-05-801-025.
NE
Conditions Page Two


Planning

(VAC-75978) and Variance (VAR-75977) shall be required, if approved.
Regulations.
Republic Services for the modified hammerhead configuration.
NE

• One 24-inch box shade tree with four, five-gallon shrubs for each required tree
shall be planted within the landscape buffer areas adjacent to Alexander Road.


Public Works

NE
10. Dedicate 30 feet of right-of-way on Juliano Road where such does not existing on
the Final Map for this site. Additionally, Grant a Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail
Easement for the required trail that is outside of the Public right-of-way. Street “A”
must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public Utility
be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association.
11. Construct complete half street improvements on Alexander Road and Juliano Road
including the required Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail meeting current City
Standards adjacent to this site concurrent with development of this site. All existing
paving damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original
location and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
12. Concurrent with development, remove the existing sanitary sewer manhole from the
proposed backyard of lot 5.
Alexander Road and Juliano Road public rights-of-way, if any, adjacent to this site
prior to this issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry
an insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the
City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at
the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The
shall be the responsibility of the adjacent property owner(s) and shall be transferred
with the sale of the property for the entire term of the License Agreement. Coordinate
the Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).
NE
NE
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct an eight-lot single-family residential subdivision

on 2.18 acres on the north side of Alexander Road approximately 645 feet east of El
Capitan Way.
ISSUES
 The applicant is proposing to amend the General Plan designation from Rural
Density Residential to Low Density Residential. Staff does not support this request.
 A request to Rezone the subject site from R-E to R-1 accompanies the General
Plan Amendment. Staff does not support this request.
 The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a 1.00 Connectivity Ratio where
1.30 is required. Staff does not support this request.
 A Variance to allow a private street without a gate and for it to not be constructed
to public standards is requested. Staff does not support this request.
 The final portion of the Variance request is for a modified hammerhead. Staff does
ANALYSIS

The subject site is currently designated R (Rural Density Residential). The Rural Density
Residential category is a rural or semi-rural environment with a lifestyle much like that of
the Desert Rural (single-family homes on large lots, including equestrian facilities), but
with a smaller allowable lot size. This category allows up to 3.59 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant is proposing to amend the General Plan designation to L (Low Density
Residential). The Low Density category generally permits single-family detached homes
and manufactured homes on individual lots. This category allows up to 5.49 dwelling units
per acre.
The area north of Alexander Road where the subject site is located, is currently
designated R (Rural Density Residential) or RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation).
These designations have a density range of 2.00 to 3.59 dwelling units per acre
respectively. Amending the General Plan designation to allow a density of 5.49 dwelling
units per acre is not compatible with the existing adjacent land use designations and staff
is recommending denial of the request.
NE
Rezoning
District is to provide for low density residential units located on large lots and conveying
a rural environment.
The applicant is proposing to Rezone the subject site to R-1 (Single Family Residential).
The purpose of the R-1 District is to provide for the development of single-family detached
dwellings in a suburban setting.
The subject site is located within an area with residential lot sizes that range from 20,000
square feet up to 25,250 square feet that conveys a rural environment. Rezoning the
subject site will introduce a suburban development pattern into an area that is rural. A
suburban zoning district is not compatible with the surrounding land uses and zoning
districts; therefore, staff is recommending denial of the Rezoning application.
Variance
ratio of 1.0.
The Variance request also includes proposing to construct a private street without a gate
and not to public standards, which would include a sidewalk on both sides of the proposed
private street. Sidewalk is proposed for the west side of the private street, terminating at
Lot 5 leaving the future residents on the east side of the private street without a pedestrian
pathway (sidewalk).
The final portion of the Variance request is to allow a modified hammerhead as a terminus
where a standard hammerhead or cul-de-sac is required. The proposed modified
hammerhead does not provide adequate space for vehicular traffic to turn around; this
includes emergency vehicles such as ambulances and trash disposal trucks dispatched
by Republic Services. Staff has added a recommended Condition of Approval requiring
the applicant to submit written approval for the modified hammerhead from Republic
Services prior to the issuance of a building permit.
NE
The inability to meet the minimum ratio requirement for connectivity, the proposal of a
private street not constructed to public standards and without a gate, and the request for
a modified hammerhead terminus are self-imposed hardships not based on a unique or
extraordinary circumstance. These variance requests are evidence of a site that is being
overdeveloped. Staff finds the proposed density and overall neighborhood design to be
too intense for the surrounding area and staff is recommending denial of the Variance
request in addition to the Rezoning and General Plan Amendment requests.
Vacation
in U.S. Government Patent Reservations generally located at the northeast corner of
Alexander Road and Juliano Road. The Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities
however, as no right of way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are
are involved, any utility company's interests will need to be addressed with each
respective utility company and will not be affected by the City relinquishing its interest.
Tentative Map
The applicant is proposing to develop eight home sites with lot sizes that range in size
from 7,465 square feet to 12,650 square feet within “Accepted Area B” of the Interlocal
Agreement, which requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Only two of the
proposed eight-lots provide the required minimum lot size set forth in the Interlocal
Agreement, the remaining seven lots range in size from 7,465 square feet to 8,063 square
feet, below the required 10,000 square feet and well below the neighboring lot sizes that
range in size from 20,000 square feet up to 25,250 square feet. The submitted tentative
map is preferential in nature and not compatible with the Interlocal Agreement or the
surrounding area; therefore, staff is recommending denial of the Tentative Map.
The submitted north/south and east/west cross sections depict a maximum grade less
than two percent across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06 a
development with natural slope less than two percent is allowed a maximum four-foot
retaining wall. A four-foot retaining wall is shown along the north and east borders.
NE

The surrounding area consist of Rural Density Residential and Rural Neighborhood
Preservation designations that allow a maximum of 3.59 dwelling units per acre.
The proposed Low Density Residential allows a density up to 5.49 dwelling units
per acre which is too intense for the area and not compatible with the existing
adjacent land uses.

The proposed Low Density Residential allows the proposed R-1 (Single Family
Residential) zoning district, the R-SL (Residential Small Lot) and the R-MH
(Mobile/Manufactured Home Residential) zoning districts, which are too intense and
not compatible with the existing adjacent land uses or zoning districts.

Plan Amendment; and
There are adequate transportation (Alexander Road), recreation and utility facilities
to accommodate the uses and densities permitted by the proposed General Plan
Amendment

policies.
The proposed amendment does not conform to the Interlocal Agreement which
requires the subject site to remain residential and maintain a minimum buildable lot
size of 10,000 square feet.

NE
districts.
The Low Density Residential designation allows 6,500 square-foot residential lot
sizes, which are not compatible with the surrounding R-D (10,000 square feet), and
R-E (18,500 square feet) zoning districts.
Development factors in the area do not indicate the need for 6,500 square-foot size
home sites as the smallest adjacent lot size is 20,000 square feet.

Alexander Road is adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed

zoning district.
order to:


NE

without an access gate and not to public street standards, including a modified
hammerhead; and a residential neighborhood design that does not meet the minimum
connectivity ratio required. An alternative neighborhood design including sidewalk on
both sides of the street and a standard cul-de-sac or hammerhead are examples of some

02/06/19 2.59 acres on the north side of Alexander Road, approximately 270 feet east
of Gold Glimmer Street.


There are building permits or business licenses related to the subject site.
02/27/19 requirements for the proposed single family residential subdivision were
discussed.
NE
Date: 04/08/19
End Time: 5:45 p.m.
Application: GPA-75971 (PRJ-75903)
Attendees:
One representative for the applicant.
Two property owners.
Four members of the public (neighbors).
Meeting Notes:
 The applicant’s representative gave an introduction to the
proposed residential development and explained to the residents
in attendance that the homes would be single-story ranging in
04/08/19 size from 2,400 square feet to 2,500 square feet. They anticipate
the price of the homes to start in the low $500,000 range without
upgrades.
 The residents in attendance had questions about the perimeter
wall and whether or not it would abut theirs, or have a dead
space; and that they prefer to have sidewalks and streetlights.
 The residents also expressed the preference would be for the lot
sizes to be closer to theirs (north of 17,000 square feet). The
smaller lot size in addition to a lower price point then their existing
homes (to the east) give them concern as to whether or not this
development will affect their property value since a contributing
factor to determining property values is what homes sell for in the
area.
 The neighbors with a home just northwest of the subject had
similar concerns and would prefer to see half-acre home sites
similar to theirs.
Field Check
Staff observed the undeveloped lot during a routine field check. Staff did
03/13/19
not note anything of concern.
NE

Site Area
Gross Acres 2.18
Planned or Special
Designation
Subject R (Rural Density
Undeveloped R-E (Residence Estates)
Property Residential)
R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family, RL (Residential
North Residential District) Clark
Detached Low) Clark County
County
R-PD5 (Residential
Single Family, L (Low Density
South Planned Development – 5
Units Per Acre)
R-E (Rural Estates
RL (Residential
East Undeveloped Residential District) Clark
Low) Clark County
County
R-E (Rural Estates
RL (Residential
West Undeveloped Residential District) Clark
Low) Clark County
County

Trails – Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Y
Interlocal Agreement – Accepted Area B N*
Assessment)
*Accepted Area B requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet.
NE
District:
Min. Setbacks
 Front 20 Feet
 Side 5 Feet
 Corner 15 Feet
 Rear 15 Feet


Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
Min. Zone Width
**The subject site is adjacent to a Multi-Use Non-Equestrian Trail that includes a five-foot
landscape buffer with a ten-foot sidewalk.
NE

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Alexander Road Primary Arterial Streets and 70 N*
Highways
Internal Street 1
Modified Hammerhead Terminus 1
Total 1 1
Required Provided
Required
Gross Floor Area or
Use Parking
Single Family,
8 2 Per Lot 16
Detached

This parcel is currently not served by LVVWD. Civil and plumbing plans will need to be
submitted to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and fire flow availability. There is an existing
6-inch stub approximately 158 LF from the east property line. To comply with District Service
Rules the development will be required submit a hydraulic analysis for approval.
NE
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱｘ̶
ОḶ
bฌ
Ɔ ╗Őǲǲ╗7Aฌ
ՙ″ՙֱ″̶″ฌ
İ ⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ŐＣฌ
bฌ
ОḶ
ธㄦฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ÛǲƆ╗7
Aฌ Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7A7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 Աฌ AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7Ɔ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 bฌ İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ŐＣ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
ֱ ֱ ֱ ｘ̶゜ｘㄦ゜‫ں‬ɱ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
Աฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ÛǲƆ╗7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
╗Ҝธฌ
TMP-75979 - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST
03/13/19
TMP-75979 - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST
03/13/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM:
R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 2.09 acres on the
north side of Alexander Road, approximately 1,640 feet west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-
025), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-75903]. Staff recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for
a Variance TO ALLOW A 1.00 CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS THE MINIMUM
REQUIRED; PRIVATE STREETS NOT CONSTRUCTED TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS
AND WITHOUT AN ACCESS GATE WHERE SUCH IS REQUIRED; AND A MODIFIED STREET
TERMINUS WHERE A CUL-DE-SAC OR HAMMERHEAD IS REQUIRED on 2.09 acres on the
025), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAC-75978 - VACATION RELATED TO GPA-75971, ZON-75976, AND VAR-75977 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a
request for a Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Easements generally located on the north
side of Alexander Road, west of Durango Drive (APN 138-05-801-025), Ward 4 (Anthony) [PRJ-
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
75978 - ALEXANDER JULIANO WEST - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON -
OWNER: JOHNSON TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR A
PROPOSED EIGHT-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 2.09 acres on the
025), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 4
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
PRJ-75903
03/05/19
ОḶ
bฌ
ՙ″ՙֱ″̶″ฌ
İ ⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ŐＣฌ
bฌ
ОḶ
ธㄦฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ÛǲƆ╗7
Aฌ Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7A7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 Աฌ AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7Ɔ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 bฌ İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ŐＣ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ֱ
ֱ
Aฌ
Աฌ
AՁǲṲAЌＣǲŐ7İⓈՁ●AЌḶ7ÛǲƆ╗7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
╗Ҝธฌ

Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's

Total

* CCSD Comments
TMP 75979
DR Horton
NEC Alexander Road & Juliano Road

RATE/#

PM Peak Hour 0.99 8
Alexander Road
PM Peak Hour 659
Durango Drive
PM Peak Hour 275
Adjacent street ADT

Capacity
Durango Drive 35,490
This project will add approximately 76 trips per day on Alexander Rd., Juliano Rd. and Durango Dr. Currently, Alexander is at
about 23 percent of capacity and Durango is at about 61 percent of capacity. With this project, these capacities are expected
to remain unchanged. Counts are not available for Juliano, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 8 additional cars, or about two every fifteen
minutes.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
GPA-75997 - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP
1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a General Plan Amendment FROM: R (RURAL
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) TO: SC
(SERVICE COMMERCIAL) on 5.03 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai
Way (APN 125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Land Use Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-76002
and TMP-76001 [PRJ-75936]
4. Supporting Documentation - GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-76002
and TMP-76001 [PRJ-75936]
5. Photo(s) - GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-76002 and TMP-76001
[PRJ-75936]
6. Justification Letter - GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-76002 and
TMP-76001 [PRJ-75936]
7. Protest Postcard(s) for GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-76002 and
TMP-76001 [PRJ-75936]
8. Protest and/or Support Documentation Not Vetted for GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999,
SUP-76000, SDR-76002 and TMP-76001 [PRJ-75936]
GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-76002 and TMP-76001 [PRJ-
75936]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to GPA-75997
SUP-75999
GPA-75997
Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
SUP-76000 ZON-75998
conditions:
SUP-75999
GPA-75997
ZON-75998
SDR-76002 conditions:
SUP-75999
SUP-76000
GPA-75997
ZON-75998
TMP-76001 SUP-75999
conditions:
SUP-76000
SDR-76002
** NOTIFICATION **

585 - SUP-75999
585 - SUP-76000
585 - SDR-76002
585 - TMP-76001
SS
75936]

3 - SUP-75999
3 - SUP-76000
3 - SDR-76002
3 - TMP-76001

0 - SUP-75999
0 - SUP-76000
0 - SDR-76002
0 - TMP-76001
SS
75936]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) use.
2. Approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA-75997) and Rezoning (ZON-75999),

and approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Special Use
Permit (SUP-76000), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-76002) and Tentative
Map (TMP-76001) shall be required.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved to allow a 630-foot distance

separation from a church/house of worship where 1,500 feet is required from
property line to property line.
application.
license.
SS
75936]
Conditions Page Two
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a

Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use.

Permit (SUP-75999), Site Development Plan Review (SDR-76002) and Tentative
Map (TMP-76001) shall be required.
application.
license.
SS
75936]
Planning

Permits (SUP-75999 and SUP-76000) and Tentative Map (TMP-76001) shall be
required.
3. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan and landscape plan,
date stamped 04/09/19 and building elevations, date stamped 03/05/19, except as
amended by conditions herein.
4. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow buildings to be set back
behind the minimum setback lines along Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road where
required to be located at the front and corner of the site at the minimum setback
line.
5. A Waiver from Title 19.08.040 is hereby approved, to allow a 13-foot perimeter

landscape buffer along a portion of Hualapai Way and a 12-foot landscape buffer
along a portion of Wittig Avenue where 15 feet is required.
6. An Exception from Title 19.08.110 is hereby approved, to allow 34 parking lot trees
where 55 trees are required (one every six uncovered spaces and at the ends of
each parking row).
9. The applicant shall coordinate with the City Surveyor and other city staff to
determine the most appropriate mapping action necessary to consolidate the
existing lots. The mapping action shall be completed and recorded prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
SS
75936]
10. A technical landscape plan, signed and sealed by a Registered Architect,

Landscape Architect, Residential Designer or Civil Engineer, must be submitted
prior to or at the same time application is made for a building permit. A permanent
underground sprinkler system is required, and shall be permanently maintained in
a satisfactory manner; the landscape plan shall include irrigation specifications.
Installed landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device. The
technical landscape plan shall include provision for a minimum three-foot amenity
zone within Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road with minimum 24-inch box shade
trees spaced 45 feet on center in conformance with Title 19.04.180.
11. A fully operational fire protection system, including fire apparatus roads, fire
hydrants and water supply, shall be installed and shall be functioning prior to
construction of any combustible structures.
12. Prior to the submittal of a building permit application, the applicant shall meet with
Department of Planning staff to develop a comprehensive address plan for the
subject site. A copy of the approved address plan shall be submitted with any
future building permit applications related to the site.
Public Works
14. Where such does not exist, dedicate 50 feet of right-of-way for Hualapai Way and
50 feet for Elkhorn Road including an appropriate radius corner at the southeast
corner of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road adjacent to this site prior to the
issuance of offsite permits or concurrent with the recordation the Final Map,
whichever occurs first. Also dedicate additional right-of way per Standard Drawing
#201.1 on Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road. Dedicate a bus turnout per Standard
Drawing #234.4 on Elkhorn Road and grant a Bus Shelter Pad Easement to the
Regional Transportation Commission.
15. Construct complete half-street improvements on Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road
including the exclusive right turn lane on Hualapai Way and the bus turnout on
Elkhorn Road per current City Standards and traffic signal underground
infrastructure at the southeast corner of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road adjacent
to this site concurrent with development of this site. All existing off-site
improvements damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
SS
75936]
side of all access drives connecting this site to the adjacent public streets
concurrent with development of this site. The connecting sidewalk shall extend
from the sidewalk on the public street to the first intersection of the onsite roadway
network and shall be terminated onsite with a handicap ramp.
Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road public rights-of-way prior to this issuance of
the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an
applicant’s expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The
installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right-of-way
concurrent with the commencement of onsite development activities unless
compliance will be allowed if recommended by the approved Traffic Impact
Analysis. No recommendation of the approved Traffic Impact Analysis, or
compliance therewith, shall be deemed to modify or eliminate any condition of
approval imposed by the Planning Commission or the City Council on the
SS
75936]
Conditions Page Seven
20. A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and
approved by the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of any building
or grading permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur
first. Provide and improve all drainageways recommended in the approved
drainage plan/study. The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct
such neighborhood or local drainage facility improvements as are recommended
by the City of Las Vegas Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage
Planning
1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final
Map is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map
within four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.

Permits (SUP-75999 and SUP-76000) and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
76002) shall be required.
Regulations.

Developer is required to record a Declaration of Private Maintenance
Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on all associated properties, and on behalf
of all current and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a listing of all
privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with
assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest
SS
75936]
Conditions Page Eight
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief

description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained
components. The DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement
that all properties within the community are subject to assessment for all
associated costs should private maintenance obligations not be met, and the City
of Las Vegas be required to provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to
include a statement of obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following
recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R
documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.
6. The Final Map shall contain a note granting perpetual common access and parking
across the entire subdivision.

Public Works
8. Where such does not exist, dedicate 50 feet of right-of-way for Hualapai Way and
50 feet for Elkhorn Road including an appropriate radius corner at the southeast
corner of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road adjacent to this site prior to the
issuance of offsite permits or concurrent with the recordation the Final Map,
whichever occurs first. Also dedicate additional right-of-way per Standard Drawing
#201.1 on Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road. Dedicate a bus turnout per Standard
Drawing #234.4 on Elkhorn Road and grant a Bus Shelter Pad Easement to the
Regional Transportation Commission.
9. Construct complete half-street improvements on Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road

including the exclusive right turn lane on Hualapai Way and the bus turnout on
Elkhorn Road per current City Standards and traffic signal underground
infrastructure at the southeast corner of Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road adjacent
to this site concurrent with development of this site. All existing offsite
improvements damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its
10. Per Title 19.16.060.W.1, provide a note on the Final Map that states, “All parcels
created through this map shall have perpetual unobstructed access to all
driveways servicing the overall subdivision unless incompatible uses can be
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.”
SS
75936]
Conditions Page Nine
11. Per Title 19.16.060.W.3, provide a note on the Final Map that states, “All
subdivided lots within this Final Map shall provide perpetual inter-lot drainage
rights across all existing and future parcel limits.” This condition shall not be
enforced if the Owner demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Flood Control Section
of Public Works that each lot can drain independently to abutting public roadways.
12. The Commercial Subdivision sewer note shown on this Tentative Map shall appear
on the recorded Final Map.
14. Comply with all applicable conditions of approval for Site Development Plan
Review SDR-76002 and any other site related actions.
performance security method in accordance with UDC Section 19.02.130.
16. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative
Map is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size,
type and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer
plans by the City. No additional deviations from adopted City Standards shall be
allowed unless specific written approval for such is received from the City Engineer
prior to the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision related
construction plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does
not constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a
revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.
SS
75936]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to construct an 18,500 square-foot commercial center on

undeveloped land at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way as part of
a larger project that includes low density single-family residential lots. A General Plan
Amendment and Rezoning is requested for the portion of land planned for commercial
uses (APNs 125-19-101-010 and 013). The remaining portion is proposed to be
rezoned for residential uses under a separate request.
ISSUES
 The subject site is located within Planning Area B of the 2016 Interlocal Agreement
document between the City of Las Vegas and Clark County, an area within which
the parties have agreed to maintain residential uses unless agreed otherwise.
 A General Plan Amendment is requested to change the General Plan land use on
this site from R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood
Preservation) to SC (Service Commercial). Staff recommends denial.
 A Rezoning is requested to change the zoning classification on this site from U
(Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood
Preservation) General Plan Designations] to C-1 (Limited Commercial). Staff
recommends denial.
 Special Use Permits are requested for Liquor Establishment (Tavern) and
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment uses in conjunction with the proposed
commercial development. A waiver of the minimum distance separation requirement
between the proposed Tavern and an existing Church/House of Worship is
requested. Staff recommends denial of the waiver.
 A Tentative Map for a one-lot commercial subdivision is included with this request.
 A Waiver of Title 19.08.040(B) is requested to allow buildings not to be oriented to
the corner and street frontages where such is required. Staff recommends denial.
 Waivers of the required 15-foot perimeter landscape buffer requirements along
portions of Hualapai Way and Wittig Avenue are requested. Staff recommends
denial.
 An Exception of Title 19.08.040(F) is requested to allow 34 parking lot trees where
55 trees are required. Staff denies the Exception.
SS
75936]
ANALYSIS
Land Use Considerations
The site is located at the corner of two major arterials. There are existing commercial
uses on the west side of Hualapai Way within the Providence master planned
community. However, except at the intersection of Hualapai Way and Deer Springs
Way, the area east of Hualapai Way is exclusively residentially zoned. A previous
request for commercial zoning at this corner was denied in December 2015. That
request was originally for a 60,900 square-foot commercial development on 10 acres,
but was reduced to a smaller development on five acres with the remaining five acres
west of Eula Street reserved for future residential uses.
The current request is similarly configured, with an 18,500 square-foot commercial

center proposed on 5.03 acres and a low-density residential development proposed
(under a separate request) on the remaining acreage between Hualapai Way and Eula
Street south of Elkhorn Road. In 2015, with no existing development adjacent to the
site, staff recommended that this area be developed with residential development that
would transition from planned rural densities to the east and south to planned higher
densities on the north and west.
Since the denial of the previous actions requesting commercial uses on this site, an
updated Interlocal Agreement between the City of Las Vegas and Clark County was
adopted that placed restrictions on land use and development in certain portions of the
northwest Las Vegas Valley, including this area. Within the 2016 Interlocal Agreement,
the subject site is designated as a portion of Planning Area B. The parties have agreed
that within this area the land use must remain residential and maintain a minimum
buildable lot size of 10,000 square feet, and that the City may not amend its land use
plan, rezone or approve special or conditional use permits to allow industrial or
commercial uses or residential lots with a buildable area of less than 10,000 square
feet, unless otherwise agreed to by the existing property owner and the two parties.
Staff has not received written evidence of such an agreement between the parties and
therefore cannot recommend land use actions that would allow commercial
development on this site at this time. However, the Interlocal Agreement still allows the
property owner, City of Las Vegas and Clark County to negotiate to allow nonresidential
uses.
SS
75936]
General Plan Amendment and Rezoning
In order to allow commercial uses on this site, a General Plan Amendment and
Rezoning must be approved. The General Plan designates 4.49 acres (APN 125-19-
101-010) of the subject site as R (Rural Density Residential) and 0.54 acres (APN 125-
19-101-013) as RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation). These designations allow
only low density residential zoning districts. The applicant has made the necessary
preparations for requesting a General Plan Amendment by obtaining approval of a
Variance to allow a 40-foot wide lot and recordation of a Parcel Map (PMP-75517) to
separate the proposed commercial area from a planned low density residential area
under separate requests. Given its location at the intersection of two Primary Arterials,
which are intended to carry higher volumes of traffic, the subject site would typically be
appropriate for commercial uses. Per the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan, the SC
(Service Commercial) designation is intended to accommodate low to medium intensity
retail, office or other commercial uses and mixed-use developments that serve primarily
local area patrons and do not include more intense general commercial characteristics.
This category is typically located on the periphery of residential development adjacent to
major streets. However, because staff supports the terms of the Interlocal Agreement,
which discourages amendments to land use plans or rezonings to allow for
nonresidential uses within Planning Area B, staff recommends denial of the request to
amend the General Plan from R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural
Neighborhood Preservation) to SC (Service Commercial) and likewise the request to
rezone the site from U (Undeveloped) to C-1 (Limited Commercial).
Special Use Permits
The applicant has requested a development containing various commercial uses

including a Liquor Establishment (Tavern), Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment,
Restaurant, Drive-Through and General Retail (including a convenience store with
fueling station). A Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited
Commercial) zoning district with approval of a Special Use Permit. Likewise, a
Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment is permitted in the C-1 zoning district with
approval of a Special Use Permit.
The Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use is defined as “a facility which sells alcoholic
beverages for consumption on the premises where the same are sold and authorizes
the sale, to consumers only and not for resale, of alcoholic beverages in original sealed
or corked containers, for consumption off the premises where the same are sold.” The
proposed use meets the definition, as the establishment intends to sell alcoholic
beverages for consumption on the premises.
SS
75936]
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include the following: (an
asterisk indicates that the requirement is nonwaivable):
*1. Pursuant to its general authority to regulate the sale of alcoholic beverages, the
City Council declares that the public health, safety and general welfare of the City
are best promoted and protected by generally requiring both a minimum
separation between liquor establishments (tavern), and a minimum separation
between a liquor establishment (tavern) and certain other uses that should be
protected from the impacts associated with a liquor establishment (tavern).
Therefore, except as otherwise provided below, no liquor establishment (tavern)
may be located within 1500 feet of any other liquor establishment (tavern),
church/house of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12
children, or City park.
The proposed use does not meet this requirement, as there is a church/house of
worship located 630 feet northeast of the property. This requirement is waivable
under Special Use Permit Requirement 5e, as the protected use (church) is
separated from the proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) by a planned 100-
foot right-of-way (Elkhorn Road).
*2. The distance separation referred to in Requirement 1 shall be measured with

reference to the shortest distance between two property lines, one being the
property line of the proposed liquor establishment (tavern) which is closest to the
existing use to which the measurement pertains, and the other being the property
line of that existing use which is closest to the proposed liquor establishment
(tavern). The distance shall be measured in a straight line without regard to
intervening obstacles.
Measurement is taken from the eastern property line of APN 125-19-101-013.

Future consolidation of the parcels on the subject site would not change the
separation distance from property line to property line.
*3. For the purpose of Requirement 2, and for that purpose only:
a. The “property line” of a protected use refers to the property line of a fee
interest parcel that has been created by an approved and recorded parcel
map or subdivision map, and does not include the property line of a
leasehold parcel; and
b. The “property line” of a liquor establishment (tavern) refers to:
i. The property line of a parcel that has been created by an approved
and recorded parcel map or commercial subdivision map; or
ii. The property line of a parcel that is located within an approved and
recorded commercial subdivision and that has been created by a
record of survey or legal description, if:
SS
75936]
A. Using the property line of that parcel for the purpose of

measuring the distance separation referred to in Requirement
1 would qualify the parcel under the distance separation
requirement;
B. The proposed liquor establishment (tavern) will have direct
access (both ingress and egress) from a street having a
minimum right-of-way width of 100 feet. The required access
may be shared with a larger development but must be located
within the property lines of the parcel on which the proposed
liquor establishment (tavern) will be located;
C. All parking spaces required by this Subchapter 19.12.070 for
the liquor establishment (tavern) use will be located on the
same parcel as the use; and
D. The owners of all parcels within the commercial subdivision,
including the owner of the parcel on which the liquor
establishment (tavern) use will be located, execute and
record an agreement, satisfactory to the City Attorney, that
provides for perpetual, reciprocal cross-access, ingress and
egress throughout the commercial subdivision.
A commercial subdivision map is expected to be recorded that creates a single

4.32-acre lot by which measurement to protected uses is taken for purposes of
this request. The map should provide for perpetual cross access throughout the
lot, regardless of future parcelization. Future record of survey lines may be
recorded that may or may not capture all measurement requirements in
Subparagraphs A-D.
4. The distance separation requirement set forth in Requirement 1 does not apply to
an establishment which has a non-restricted gaming license in connection with a
hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992, or in connection
with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after July 1, 1992.
This requirement does not apply, as neither circumstance applies to the subject
establishment.
5. The distance separation requirement set forth in Requirement 1 may be waived

in accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), but only in connection
with a proposed liquor establishment (tavern) that:
a. Will be located on a parcel within the C-V District, the Parkway Center
District within the Downtown Centennial Plan, the Gaming Enterprise
Overlay District, or the Downtown Casino Overlay District;
SS
75936]
b. Will be located on a parcel or within a building that, pursuant to State law or

City ordinance, has been designated as an historic property, historic
building, or landmark;
c. Will be located within a regional mall; or
d. Will be located within a mixed-use development
i. that has been approved by means of Special Use Permit pursuant
to LVMC Chapters 19.12 and 19.16;
ii. that has a minimum net site area of 15 acres; and
iii. whose gross floor area of nonresidential space is a minimum of
250,000 square feet; or
e. Will be separated from the existing use by a street or highway with a
minimum right-of-way width of 100 feet.
Requirement 5e applies to the proposed request, and the distance separation

requirement above is therefore waivable. The protected use (church/house of
worship) is separated from the proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) by a
planned 100-foot right-of-way (Elkhorn Road).
*6. The use shall conform to, and is subject to, the provisions of LVMC Chapters
6.40 and 6.50.
The proposed use is required to comply with this requirement as a condition of

approval.
The Tavern use would be located in a proposed 3,500 square-foot building that would
be centrally located on the site. Approximately 2,000 square feet would be utilized for
seating and waiting. Food is intended to be served at this location, although there is no
specific tenant for the building at this time. This use will be located within 1,500 feet of
a church/house of worship to the northwest along Elkhorn Road. Per Title 19.12.070,
the separation requirement is waivable, as Elkhorn is a planned 100-foot public right-of-
way. As the proposed use is to be located within a commercial development suited to
accommodate similar uses and is separated from the protected use by a Primary
Arterial, staff supports the waiver request. However, the 2016 Interlocal Agreement
precludes the City from approving a Special Use Permit that would allow a commercial
use within Planning Area B unless otherwise agreed to by the parties. Without such an
approval, staff supports the Interlocal Agreement and recommends denial of the Special
Use Permit for a Liquor Establishment (Tavern).
SS
75936]
The Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use is defined by Title 19.18 as “an

establishment whose license to sell alcoholic beverages is limited to the sale of beer,
wine and coolers to consumers only and not for resale, in original sealed or corked
containers, for consumption off the premises where the same are sold, and is operated
in connection with a grocery store, drug store, convenience store or specialty
merchandise store.” The proposed use meets the definition, as only beer, wine and
wine coolers are proposed to be sold in connection with a convenience store in their
original sealed containers for off-premises consumption.
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include the following: (an
asterisk indicates that the requirement is nonwaivable):
*1. Except as otherwise provided, no beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment

(hereinafter “establishment”) shall be located within 400 feet of any church/house
of worship, school, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or
City park.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the proposed use will not be
located within 400 feet of any protected use.
*2. Except as otherwise provided in Requirement 3 below, the distances referred to

in Requirement 1 shall be determined with reference to the shortest distance
between two property lines, one being the property line of the proposed
establishment which is closest to the existing use to which the measurement
pertains, and the other being the property line of that existing use which is
closest to the proposed establishment. The distance shall be measured in a
straight line without regard to intervening obstacles. For purposes of
measurement, the term “property line” refers to property lines of fee interest
parcels and does not include the property line of:
a. Any leasehold parcel; or
b. Any parcel which lacks access to a public street or has no area for onsite
parking and which has been created so as to avoid the distance limitation
described in Requirement 1.
Measurement is taken from the eastern property line of APN 125-19-101-013.

Future consolidation of the parcels on the subject site would not change the
separation distance from property line to property line.
*3. In the case of an establishment proposed to be located on a parcel of at least 80

acres in size, the minimum distances referred to in Requirement 1 shall be
measured in a straight line:
SS
75936]
a. From the nearest property line of the existing use to the nearest portion of
the structure in which the establishment will be located, without regard to
intervening obstacles; or
b. In the case of a proposed establishment which will be located within a
shopping center or other multiple tenant structure, from the nearest
property line of the existing use to the nearest property line of a leasehold
or occupancy parcel in which the establishment will be located, without
regard to intervening obstacles.
This requirement does not apply, as the parcel is less than 80 acres in size.
4. When considering a Special Use Permit application for an establishment which

also requires a waiver of the distance limitation in Requirement 1, the Planning
Commission shall take into consideration the distance policy and shall, as part of
its recommendation to the City Council, state whether the distance requirement
should be waived and the reasons in support of the decision.
This requirement does not apply, as a waiver of distance separation is not

necessary.
5. The minimum distance requirements in Requirement 1 do not apply to:
a. An establishment which has a nonrestricted gaming license in connection

with a hotel having 200 or more guest rooms on or before July 1, 1992 or
in connection with a resort hotel having in excess of 200 guest rooms after
July 1, 1992; or
b. A proposed establishment having more than 50,000 square feet of retail
floor space.
Neither condition above applies to this request; therefore, the minimum distance
requirements apply.
*6. All businesses which sell alcoholic beverages shall conform to the provisions of
LVMC Chapter 6.50.
The proposed use is required to comply with this requirement as a condition of

approval.
7. The minimum distance requirements set forth in Requirement 1, which are

otherwise nonwaivable under the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C), may be
waived:
SS
75936]
a. In accordance with the provisions of LVMC 19.12.050(C) for any

establishment which is proposed to be located on a parcel within the
Downtown Casino Overlay District;
b. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the “Town Center
Development Standards Manual” for any establishment which is proposed
to be located within the T-C (Town Center) Zoning District and which is
designated MS-TC (Main Street Mixed Use) in the Town Center Land Use
Plan;
c. In connection with a proposed establishment having between 20,000
square feet and 50,000 square feet of retail floor space, if no more than 10
percent of the retail floor space is regularly devoted to the display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages; or
d. In connection with a retail establishment having less than 20,000 square
feet of retail floor space, if the area to be used for the sale, display or
merchandising of alcoholic beverages and each use to be protected are
separated by a highway or a right-of-way with a width of at least 100 feet.
This requirement does not apply, as no waiver of distance separation is

necessary.
8. No beer/wine/cooler off-sale establishment shall be permitted on or adjacent to

the Pedestrian Mall, as defined in LVMC Chapter 11.68.
This requirement does not apply, as the proposed use would not be located on or
adjacent to the Pedestrian Mall.
The proposed Beer/Wine Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use would be located within a
proposed convenience store that is also planned to contain restaurant and drive-through
uses. As there is no specific group of tenants for the building, it is not known at this
time where the alcohol would be located on the floor plan. All distance separation
requirements will be met by the proposed use, and the use can be conducted in a
manner that is harmonious and compatible with the surrounding land uses. However,
the 2016 Interlocal Agreement precludes the City from approving a Special Use Permit
that would allow a commercial use within Planning Area B unless otherwise agreed to
by the parties. Without such an approval, staff supports the Interlocal Agreement and
recommends denial of the Special Use Permit for a Liquor Establishment (Tavern).
SS
75936]
Site Development Plan
Access to the subject property is provided by one driveway along northbound Hualapai
Way, which will allow right-in, right-out turning movements only and from one driveway
along Elkhorn Road, also with right-in, right-out only access. Additional right-of-way
along Hualapai Way, Elkhorn Road and Wittig Avenue will be dedicated and improved
with this project. Internally, drive aisles are all at least 24 feet wide to accommodate 90
degree parking rows, and there do not appear to be any traffic circulation conflicts.
The site consists of four buildings oriented away from the corner and surrounded by
parking. Buildings must be oriented to the corner and street frontages, unless the
applicant has cause to place the buildings otherwise. In this case, staff recommends
approval of the requested waiver if the Site Development Plan Review is approved, as
this will allow for consistent circulation around the perimeter of the site. The 6,000
square-foot convenience store will feature a fueling station covered by a canopy and a
restaurant with a drive through that meets all conditional use regulations of Title
19.12.070. A 4,000 square-foot multitenant building is proposed to contain four lease
spaces. The other two buildings are proposed to contain a tavern and restaurant with
no drive-through uses. Sufficient parking is provided for all proposed uses; however, if
the intensity of even one of these uses increases in the future, a variance to reduce the
parking requirement would be necessary. Loading spaces will be provided in sufficient
number and would be appropriately located on the site.
Title 19.08 residential adjacency standards apply to the buildings on this site. Buildings
will conform to the required 3:1 proximity slope from both the planned residential parcel
to the east and the existing single-family residential development to the south. The
provided trash enclosures will be placed at least 50 feet away from existing or future
residential property.
Perimeter landscaping will be provided on all four sides of the development, with a
wider buffer containing tightly spaced Mondel Pines and a six-foot CMU wall along the
east property line to screen proposed uses from the planned future low density
residential development. Conceptually, the proposed perimeter landscaping conforms
to Title 19 requirements with two minor exceptions that will require waivers. Along
Hualapai Way, the perimeter buffer pinches down to approximately 13 feet where the
street must accommodate a right-turn lane. Along the Wittig Avenue cul-de-sac bulb,
the buffer is reduced to approximately 12 feet in order to maintain a 24-foot drive aisle
along the curve. In these instances, the waivers are warranted and staff would support
their approval if the Site Development Plan Review is ultimately approved. Within the
parking lot, landscape buffer islands with 24-inch box trees are required every six
SS
75936]
spaces; trees are also required at the ends of each parking row. In order to
accommodate sufficient parking, only 34 of the 55 required trees will be provided. If the
Site Development Plan Review is ultimately approved, staff approves the needed
Exception from Title 19, as more than the minimum number of trees will be provided in
the perimeter, which will compensate for the loss of trees in the parking area.
Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road are classified as Primary Arterial streets by the city’s
Master Plan of Streets and Highways. Title 19 Complete Streets Standards require a
five-foot sidewalk and a three-foot amenity zone with shade trees 45 feet on center.
The landscape plan indicates that a five-foot detached sidewalk and five-foot amenity
zone will be provided containing Mexican Fan Palms and shrubs in 25-foot intervals. As
the palm trees would be inappropriate for shading the sidewalk, a condition of approval
will require that 24-inch box shade trees be provided within the amenity zone no more
than 45 feet on center in conformance with Complete Streets Standards.
Tentative Map
The accompanying tentative map proposes a one-lot commercial subdivision, which will
allow for future parceling through records of survey. The final map must contain a note
to allow for perpetual shared access and parking throughout the entire subdivision.
Staff notes that the street sections for Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road do not match
the proposed site plan for the commercial development. Complete Streets Standards
are more accurately reflected on the site and landscape plan. The submitted east/west
and north/south cross sections do not show proposed or existing grades. Based on the
preliminary layout and the overall flatness of the site, no retaining walls are anticipated.
Although the map substantially conforms to all requirements, the proposed commercial
development is inconsistent with the 2016 Interlocal Agreement and therefore, staff
cannot recommend approval.
Other Development Considerations
The Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD) has reviewed the proposed project and
has provided the following comment: “Civil and plumbing plans will need to be submitted
to LVVWD for domestic meter sizing and fire flow availability. The closest available
distribution water main to serve the property is located adjacent to the parcel on Elkhorn
Road. The development may propose a shared onsite fire system, but for domestic
service, each building shall be individually metered to comply with LVVWD Service
Rules. CC&Rs will be required with the recordation of a commercial subdivision map, is
required prior to civil plan approval by LVVWD.”
SS
75936]
This project requires a completed Development Impact Notice and Assessment (DINA)
based on the request for a Special Use Permit within 500 feet of the city’s boundary with
unincorporated Clark County. The DINA was distributed to internal and external
agencies for review and comment. No responses have been received. Based on the
proposed uses, the applicant estimates that approximately 4,600 daily trips would be
generated by the development. Both Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road, once fully
improved, will be capable of handling these expected trips.
The project as proposed generally conforms to Title 19 requirements. However, it is

inconsistent with the provisions included in the 2016 Interlocal Agreement to keep
Planning Area B parcels residential. As staff supports the Interlocal Agreement, it
cannot recommend approval of any of the applicant’s requests. If these requests are
approved and an agreement is reached to develop the site as proposed, the
development would be subject to conditions and require the requested waivers and
exception to Title 19.
Section 19.16.030(I) of the Las Vegas Zoning Code requires that the following
conditions be met in order to justify a General Plan Amendment:

The proposed SC (Service Commercial) land use designation is compatible with

the PCD (Planned Community Development) designation west of Hualapai Way,
which contains a master planned commercial land use designation at the corner
of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way. In this location, the proposed SC designation
would be compatible with the adjacent RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation)
designation, as the land is part of a comprehensively planned development (under
separate request) intended to transition to lower density residential uses. The L
(Low Density Residential) and R (Rural Density Residential) designations to the
north and south of this site are either separated from this site by a 100-foot
Primary Arterial or existing development walls. Nevertheless, staff recommends
adherence to the Interlocal Agreement, which states that the City must not amend
its land use plan to allow commercial uses on properties identified within Planning
Area B in the Agreement, such as the subject property.
SS
75936]

The SC (Service Commercial) land use designation allows for the C-1 (Limited
Commercial), O (Office) and P-O (Professional Office) zoning districts. If
approved, these zoning districts would be compatible with the PD (Planned
Development) zoning district west of Hualapai Way. The residential zoning
districts north or south of the subject site are either separated from this site by a
100-foot Primary Arterial or existing development walls.

Plan Amendment; and
The subject site is adequately served by Hualapai Way and Elkhorn Road, both
classified by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways as Primary Arterials. If
approved, these roadways will be fully improved adjacent to the site. The nearest
fire station is approximately one mile east on Elkhorn Road, and the nearest
police substation is approximately five miles to the south.

policies.
The proposal is not in conformance with the 2016 Interlocal Agreement

between the City of Las Vegas and Clark County, which has designated the
subject property to remain residential. The land adjacent to the subject site is
undeveloped and not designated as a rural preservation neighborhood as
defined by the Las Vegas 2020 Master Plan.

If the related General Plan Amendment to SC (Service Commercial) is approved,

the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district would conform to the
General Plan. However, staff recommends adherence to the Interlocal
Agreement, which states that the City must not rezone properties identified within
Planning Area B in the Agreement for commercial uses, such as the subject
property.
SS
75936]
districts.
The C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district allows for retail shopping and
personal services, as well as mixed use developments. This zoning district is
allowed on the periphery of residential development adjacent to major streets.
The site is located at the intersection of two Primary Arterials, making this an
appropriate location for commercial development and inappropriate for ultra-low
density residential development.

Access would be provided by two 100-foot wide Primary Arterials (Elkhorn Road
and Hualapai Way), which when fully improved will be adequate in size to meet
the needs of the proposed C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district.

The proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use will be situated within a

proposed commercial center suited to accommodate such uses and will be
separated from protected uses by two planned 106-foot public rights-of-way. The
proposed use can therefore be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with the adjacent commercial and residential land uses. However,
staff cannot support a change to the City’s General Plan or rezone that would
allow for commercial uses pursuant to the Interlocal Agreement. Therefore, it
cannot recommend approval of a Special Use Permit for the proposed Liquor
Establishment (Tavern) use on this site.
SS
75936]
proposed.
The subject site has sufficient area to accommodate parking and building facilities
spaces for the proposed Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use.

The proposed use would be subject to licensing requirements and regular

inspection and would not compromise the public health, safety and welfare.
All minimum Special Use Permit requirements for the Liquor Establishment
(Tavern) use can be met by the proposal, except for distance separation from an
existing church/house of worship. Staff supports the requested waiver of the
distance separation, but cannot recommend approval of the Special Use Permit
based on incompatibility with the Interlocal Agreement.

SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Sixteen
The proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use will be situated

within a proposed commercial center suited to accommodate such uses and
meets all distance separation requirements. The proposed use can therefore be
conducted in a manner that is harmonious and compatible with the adjacent
commercial and residential land uses. However, staff cannot support a change to
the City’s General Plan or rezone that would allow for commercial uses pursuant
to the Interlocal Agreement. Therefore, it cannot recommend approval of a
Special Use Permit for the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment
use on this site.
proposed.
The subject site has sufficient area to accommodate parking and building facilities
spaces for the proposed Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use.

The proposed use would be subject to licensing requirements and regular

inspection and would not compromise the public health, safety and welfare.
All minimum Special Use Permit requirements for the Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale
Establishment use can be met by the proposal. However, staff cannot
recommend approval of the Special Use Permit based on incompatibility with the
Interlocal Agreement.
In order to approve a Site Development Plan Review application, per Title 19.16.100(E)
the Planning Commission and/or City Council must affirm the following:
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Seventeen

The site is located at the corner of two major arterials. The proposed commercial
development is designed to locate buildings away from existing and planned
residential development and employs additional landscaping to screen the
commercial uses from these surrounding properties. However, as the site is
located within the Interlocal Agreement Planning Area B, commercial uses on this
site would be inconsistent with the Agreement.
2. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan, this Title,
and other duly-adopted city plans, policies and standards;
The proposed development would require approval of a General Plan Amendment

and Rezoning to allow for commercial uses on the site. Unless agreed to by the
property owner, City of Las Vegas and Clark County to develop the site for
nonresidential purposes, the Interlocal Agreement does not allow the City to
approve these requests.

Right-only ingress and egress to and from the site is proposed from Hualapai Way
and Elkhorn Road, both classified as Primary Arterial streets by the Master Plan of
Streets and Highways. Due to this design, access is not anticipated to negatively
affect traffic in the vicinity.
4. Building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and for the
City;
Building materials are similar to those used for commercial buildings in this area.
Landscape materials are reduced in the parking lot but are compensated for along
the perimeter, where screening from residential development is a priority.

The proposed building elevations are aesthetically pleasing and accommodate

residential adjacency requirements.
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Eighteen
Site development is subject to review of permits and inspection, thereby ensuring

the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare.
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes and Title 19
requirements for tentative maps. However, although the map substantially conforms to
these requirements, the proposed commercial development is inconsistent with the
2016 Interlocal Agreement and therefore, staff cannot recommend approval of the
Tentative Map.

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-46720) 10.02
acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way.
01/09/13
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
Annexation became effective 01/22/13.
The City Council denied a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-61055) from R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural
Neighborhood Preservation) to SC (Service Commercial) on 10.00
acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Avenue and Hualapai Way.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council denied a request for a Rezoning (ZON-61056) from
R-E (Residence Estates) (sic) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 10.00
The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial. [NOTE: the
12/16/15
existing zoning was U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential)
and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan designation
as stated by Annexation Ordinance 6231.]
The City Council denied a request for a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-61057) for a proposed 17,000 square-foot commercial center
and a Waiver to allow buildings to be located away from public rights-
of-way on 5.00 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
denial.
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Nineteen

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Variance (VAR-
74338) to allow a lot width of 40 feet where 100 feet is required for a
10/23/18 proposed lot in the U (Undeveloped) zoning district on a portion of 5.00
acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Eula Street. Staff
recommended denial.
A Parcel Map (PMP-75517) for two lots at the southwest corner of
03/12/19
Elkhorn Road and Eula Street was recorded.


There are no related building permits or business licenses relevant to this site.
submittal requirements for General Plan Amendment, Rezoning,
Special Use Permit, Site Development Plan Review and Tentative Map
02/28/19 applications. It was noted that this area lies within Excepted Area B of
the Interlocal Agreement and that modifications to land use in this area
may occur with agreement between the City, County and existing
property owners.
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Twenty
A neighborhood meeting was held at the Centennial Hills Community
Center/YMCA at 6601 North Buffalo Drive, Las Vegas to address the
proposed General Plan Amendment and related cases. Approximately
75 members of the public were in attendance along with five
owner/developer representatives and one member of Planning staff.
The applicant’s representative began the meeting by acknowledging

that lessons were learned from the denial of the previous commercial
development proposal for this site. Meetings were held with area
neighbors in 2018 to address concerns. As a result, the current
proposal reduces commercial uses to five acres along the Elkhorn and
Hualapai frontages and adds low density residential uses on the
acreage to the east, with dense landscape buffering between the two
areas. The planned commercial space is not merely speculative; there
is already interest from a number of companies to be tenants in the
proposed center.
03/28/19
Neighbors that spoke emphasized that they collectively did not want
any commercial uses on this corner; instead, they would support low
density residential within the General Plan and up to R-1 zoning. They
did not see the value of commercial at this corner and questioned
whether the market could bear any additional gas stations or taverns
along Hualapai. Many residents moved to this area knowing there was
little to no commercial there, and prefer to keep it that way. They were
concerned about increasing traffic on streets that they perceive
already to be congested, and that proposed 24-hour businesses would
have undesirable effects on the area. Several felt that too much
parking would be provided.
The applicant’s representative stated they understood the residents’

concerns and opposition to the project, but would still consider moving
forward with the current proposal.
Field Check
The site is undeveloped with native vegetation, but contains some
03/13/19 debris. Existing single family dwellings are constructed to the north
and are under construction to the south.
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Twenty-One

Site Area
Gross Acres 5.03
Net Acres 4.31
Existing Land Use Planned or Special

Per Title 19.12/ Land Use
Property District
Special Area Plan Designation
R (Rural Density
Residential)
Subject Property Undeveloped RNP (Rural U (Undeveloped)
Neighborhood
Preservation)
North
Single Family, R (Rural Density R-1 (Single Family
South
RNP (Rural
East Undeveloped Neighborhood U (Undeveloped)
Preservation)
Convenience Store
Car Wash PCD (Planned
PD (Planned
West Gasoline Sales Community
Development)
Restaurants Development)
Retail Sales

Trails N/A
Interlocal Agreement Y
Y
Assessment)
Project of Regional Significance Y
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Twenty-Two

Min. Lot Width 100 Feet 279 Feet* Y
Min. Setbacks
Limited by residential
Max. Building Height 26 Feet** Y
adjacency
Screened, Gated, w/ a Screened, Gated, w/
Trash Enclosure Y
Roof or Trellis a Roof or Trellis
Mech. Equipment Screened Parapet screened Y
*Lot width is defined as the mean horizontal distance between the side lot lines.
**Building height is measured to the midpoint of a pitched roof.
Pursuant to Title 19.08.040, the following standards apply:

3:1 proximity slope: C-store (to east) 65 Feet 66 Feet Y
Retail shops (to east) 48 Feet 48 Feet Y
Restaurant (to south) 57 Feet 70 Feet Y
Adjacent development matching
35 Feet 48 Feet Y
setback

U (Undeveloped) 2.18 du/ac 11*
C-1 (Limited Commercial) N/A N/A
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Twenty-Three

R (Rural Density
up to 3.59 du/ac 16
Residential)
RNP (Rural Neighborhood
up to 2.00 du/ac 0
Preservation)
SC (Service Commercial) N/A N/A
*U (Undeveloped) is intended to be a holding zone only and must be rezoned to meet the
density or intensity requirements of a particular development.

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 East 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 27 Trees 35 Trees Y
55 Trees 34 Trees N
spaces
Min. Zone Width
 South (ROW) 15 Feet 12 Feet N
 West 15 Feet 13 Feet N
6’ along
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential south and Y
east PL
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Twenty-Four

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Hualapai Way Primary Arterial Streets and 84-96 N*
Highways Map
Master Plan of
Elkhorn Road Primary Arterial Streets and 56 N*
Highways Map
*Public right-of-way sufficient to meet Title 19 Complete Streets street sections will be dedicated and
improved to meet those standards as part of this development.
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Units Ratio Regular Regular
capped capped
General
1 space
Retail Store,
7,600 per 175 sf 44
Other Than
GFA
Listed
1 space
per 50 sf
Liquor seating
3,500
Establish- plus 1
(2,000 sf 48
ment space per
seating)
(Tavern) 200 sf
remaining
GFA
1 space
per 50 sf
seating
7,400
plus 1
Restaurant (3,800 sf 94
space per
seating)
200 sf
remaining
GFA
Loading 10,000-
18,500 sf 2 2 Y
Spaces 29,000 sf
SS
75936]
Staff Report Page Twenty-Five
Waivers
Requirement Request Staff
Recommendation
Buildings on corners should be To allow buildings to be set
oriented to the corner and street back 82 feet from Hualapai
Approval
frontages at the minimum Way and 66 feet from Elkhorn
setback line (10-15’) Road
Liquor Establishment (Tavern)
To allow a 668-foot distance
use shall maintain a 1,500-foot
separation from a Approval
distance separation from
Church/House of Worship use
protected uses
15-foot perimeter landscape To allow a 13-foot buffer along
buffer along all public rights-of- Hualapai Way and a 12-foot Approval
way buffer along Wittig Ave
Exceptions
Recommendation
One 24” box parking lot tree in
island per 6 parking spaces and
To allow 34 parking lot trees Approval
at the end of each parking row
(55 total trees required)
SS
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ̶″
ｘㅡ゜ｘɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ｘㅡ゜ｘɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
Ġ Ⓢ A Ձ A О A ●7Û A ù
ǲ Ձ ì Ġ Ḷ Ő Ќ 7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ
ǲ Ő Ќ ǲ Ɔ ╗ 7A ㈠7Ա ǲ b ì ǲ Ő 7●Ќ Ћ ǲ Ɔ ╗ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗ 7b Ḷ Ҝ О A Ќ ù ฌ
ՁǲḚAՁ7ＣǲƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ
Ɔ●╗ǲฌ
ԱAƆ●Ɔ7Ḷ7ԱǲAŐ●ЌḚ̬ฌ
ԱǲЌbĠҜAŐìฌ
ＣǲЋǲՁḶОǲŐฌ
ǲ Ő Ќ ǲ Ɔ ╗7A ㈠7Ա ǲ b ì ǲ Ő 7●Ќ Ћ ǲ Ɔ ╗Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗7b Ḷ Ҝ О A Ќ ù ฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
Ձ ǲḚ ǲЌ Ｃ
Ġ Ⓢ A Ձ A О A ●7Û A ù 7ӧ‫ں‬ｘｘƥỏฌ
7Ɔ ●╗ ǲ 7Ｃ A ╗ A
ǲ Ձ ì Ġ Ḷ Ő Ќ 7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ӧ‫ں‬ｘｘƥỏ7 ЌḶ╗ǲ̬ฌ
GPA-75977 [PRJ-75936] - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT REALTED TO ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-
76002 AND TMP-76001 - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ELKHORN ROAD AND HUALAPAI WAY
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
PRJ-75936
03/05/19
PRJ-75936
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: U
(UNDEVELOPED) [R (RURAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) AND RNP (RURAL NEIGHBORHOOD
PRESERVATION) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS] TO: C-1 (LIMITED COMMERCIAL) on
5.03 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010 and
Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000, SDR-76002 and TMP-
76001 [PRJ-75936]
3. Land Use Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75936
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SUP-75999 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-75997 AND ZON-75998 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Special
Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 3,500 SQUARE-FOOT LIQUOR ESTABLISHMENT (TAVERN)
USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 630-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION FROM A
CHURCH/HOUSE OF WORSHIP WHERE 1,500 FEET IS REQUIRED at the southeast corner of
Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel
Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood
Preservation) General Plan Designations] [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 6
CC: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75936
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SUP-76000 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT RELATED TO GPA-75997, ZON-75998 AND SUP-75999 -
PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for
a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 6,000 SQUARE-FOOT BEER/WINE/COOLER OFF-
SALE ESTABLISHMENT USE at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN
125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural
Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designations]
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
2. Special Map
paper use, backup
PRJ-75936
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SDR-76002 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO GPA-75997, ZON-75998,
SUP-75999 AND SUP-76000 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED 18,500
SQUARE-FOOT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING A 6,000 SQUARE-FOOT
CONVENIENCE STORE WITH FUEL PUMPS AND CANOPY, RESTAURANT AND DRIVE
THROUGH LANE; 3,500 SQUARE-FOOT TAVERN; 5,000 SQUARE-FOOT RESTAURANT AND
4,000 SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL RETAIL SPACE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW BUILDINGS
NOT TO BE ORIENTED TO THE CORNER AND STREET FRONTAGES WHERE SUCH IS
REQUIRED on 5.03 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and Hualapai Way (APN 125-
19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U (Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural
Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designations]
[PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75936]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75936
03/05/19
SDR 76002
TP 1000, LLC
SEC Elkhorn Road & Hualapai Way

Proposed 18.5 thousand square foot commercial development.
RATE/#
First Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 470.95 2,826

AM Peak Hour FAST-FOOD W/ DRIVE THRU [1000 SF] 6 40.19 241
RATE/#
Second Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

AM Peak Hour HIGH-TURNOVER (SIT-DWN) RESTRNT [1000 SF] 8.5 9.94 84
RATE/#
Third Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

AM Peak Hour SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 4 0.94 4
RATE/#
Total Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 37.75 3,931

AM Peak Hour SHOPPING CENTER [1000 SF] 18.5 0.94 329
Elkhorn Road
PM Peak Hour 152
Hualapai Way
PM Peak Hour 275
Adjacent street ADT
Capacity
Elkhorn Road 16,380
Hualapai Way 25,935
This project will add approximately 3,931 trips per day on Elkhorn Rd. and Hualapai Wy. Currently, Elkhorn is at about 12
percent of capacity and Hualapai is at about 36 percent of capacity. With this project, Elkhorn is expected to be at about 29
percent of capacity and Hualapai to be at about 50 percent of capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 329 additional cars, or about eleven every two
minutes.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
TMP-76001 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO GPA-75997, ZON-75998, SUP-75999, SUP-76000
AND SDR-76002 - PUBLIC HEARING - ELKHORN PLAZA (A COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION) -
APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative Map FOR
A ONE-LOT COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION on 5.03 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road
and Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-101-010 and Lot 2 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U
(Undeveloped) Zone [R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation)
General Plan Designations] [PROPOSED: C-1 (Limited Commercial)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75936
03/05/19
Ġ Ⓢ A Ձ A О A ●7Û A ù
ǲ Ձ ì Ġ Ḷ Ő Ќ 7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ
ǲ Ő Ќ ǲ Ɔ ╗ 7A ㈠7Ա ǲ b ì ǲ Ő 7●Ќ Ћ ǲ Ɔ ╗ Ҝ ǲ Ќ ╗ 7b Ḷ Ҝ О A Ќ ù ฌ
Ɔ●╗ǲฌ
ԱǲЌbĠҜAŐìฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
Ձ ǲḚ ǲЌ Ｃ
Ġ Ⓢ A Ձ A О A ●7Û A ù 7ӧ‫ں‬ｘｘƥỏฌ
7Ɔ ●╗ ǲ 7Ｃ A ╗ A
ǲ Ձ ì Ġ Ḷ Ő Ќ 7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ӧ‫ں‬ｘｘƥỏ7 ЌḶ╗ǲ̬ฌ
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ZON-76145 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For
possible action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: U (UNDEVELOPED) [RNP (RURAL
NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION) GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION] TO: R-E (RESIDENCE
ESTATES) on 3.55 acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Eula Street (Lot 1 of File
124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75935]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
3. Supporting Documentation - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
4. Photo(s) - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
5. Justification Letter - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
6. Protest/Support Postcard(s) for ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
7. Protest and/or Support Documentation Not Vetted for ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-
75935]
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-76145 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
TMP-76004 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: ZON-76145
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 236 - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004
PROTESTS 1 - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004
APPROVALS 1 - ZON-76145 and TMP-76004
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of the Tentative Map shall be for no more than four (4) years. If a Final
Map is not recorded on all or a portion of the area embraced by the Tentative Map
within four (4) years of the approval of the Tentative Map, this action is void.
2. At the time of application for building permits, submit a landscape plan

demonstrating conformance with Title 19.06 perimeter landscape standards.
Regulations.

Developer is required to record a Declaration of Private Maintenance
Requirements (“DPMR”) as a covenant on all associated properties, and on behalf
of all current and future property owners. The DPMR is to include a listing of all
privately owned and/or maintained infrastructure improvements, along with
assignment of maintenance responsibility for each to the common interest
community or the respective individual property owners, and is to provide a brief
description of the required level of maintenance for privately maintained
components. The DPMR must be reviewed and approved by the City of Las Vegas
Department of Field Operations prior to recordation, and must include a statement
that all properties within the community are subject to assessment for all
associated costs should private maintenance obligations not be met, and the City
of Las Vegas be required to provide for said maintenance. Also, the CC&R are to
include a statement of obligation of compliance with the DPMR. Following
recordation, the Developer is to submit copies of the recorded DPMR and CC&R
documents to the City of Las Vegas Department of Field Operations.

SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
7. Grant Public Pedestrian Access Easements for all public sidewalks located outside
of the public right-of-way on Elkhorn Road on the Final Map for this site.
8. Construct complete half street improvements on Elkhorn Road concurrent with the
development of this site. Per the approved administrative deferral form signed
March 18, 2019, all off-site improvements on Eula Street and Wittig Avenue are
deferred. In accordance with Title 19.02.025.F, the applicant shall make an
improvement contribution equal to 50% of the City’s bond estimate costs for all
deferred improvements. The street light contribution for Eula Street and Wittig
Avenue may be reduced to 25% if a service is provided. All existing paving
damaged or removed by this development shall be restored at its original location
and to its original width concurrent with development of this site.
9. All lots shall be connected to the public sewer system. Extend public sewer in
Wittig Avenue to a depth and location acceptable to the Sewer Planning Section of
the Department of Public Works.
10. Sign and record a Covenant Running with Land agreement for the possible future
installation of half-street improvements on Eula Street and Wittig Avenue in
accordance with City Standards for all improvements not required to be
constructed at this time. Such Covenant Running with Land agreement shall
record prior to the issuance of any permits.
11. All landscaping and private improvements installed with this project shall be
situated and maintained so as to not create sight visibility obstructions for vehicular
traffic at all development access drives and abutting street intersections.
Elkhorn Road, Eula Street, and Wittig Avenue public rights-of-way prior to the
issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an
insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by
the City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way
at the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement.
The installation and maintenance of all private improvements in the public right-of-
way shall be the responsibility of the applicant and any successors in interest to
the property and assigns pursuant to the terms of the License Agreement.
Coordinate all requirements for the License Agreement with the Land Development
Section of the Department of Building and Safety (702-229-4836).
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
13. A working sanitary sewer connection shall be in place prior to final inspection of
any units within this development. Full permanent improvements on all major
access streets, including all required landscaped areas between the perimeter wall
and adjacent public street, shall be constructed and accepted by the City prior to
issuance of any building permits beyond 50% of all units within this development.
All off-site improvements adjacent to this site, including all required landscaped
areas between the perimeter walls and adjacent public streets, shall be
constructed and accepted prior to issuance of building permits beyond 75%. The
above thresholds notwithstanding, all required improvements shall be constructed
in accordance with Title 19.02.130.D.
performance security method in accordance with UDC Section 19.02.130.
16. The approval of all Public Works related improvements shown on this Tentative
Map is in concept only. Specific design and construction details relating to size,
type and/or alignment of improvements, including but not limited to street, sewer
the recordation of a Final Map or the approval of subdivision related construction
plans, whichever may occur first. Approval of this Tentative Map does not
constitute approval of any deviations. If such approval cannot be obtained, a
revised Tentative Map must be submitted showing elimination of such deviations.
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Map for a proposed six-lot single-family
residential subdivision on 3.55 net acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and
Eula Street.
ISSUES
 The applicant has submitted an accompanying request for a Rezoning (ZON-76145)

of this site from U (Undeveloped) [RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General
Plan Designation] to R-E (Residence Estates).
 On 03/18/19 in accordance with Title 19.02.010, the Department of Public Works
administratively approved the deferral of offsite improvements along Eula Street and
Wittig Avenue, including streetlights, sidewalks, curbs and gutters. This matches the
adjacent residential development.
 Per Title 19.04, residential subdivisions in the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
district are not subject to connectivity requirements. Based on its design, the
Connectivity Ratio of the proposed subdivision is not applicable to this site.
 Landscaping is required along the northern perimeter of the proposed development
along Elkhorn Road. Sufficient onsite buffer area has been provided to
accommodate landscaping; however, a condition of approval will require that a
landscape plan be submitted demonstrating conformance to Title 19.06 perimeter
landscape standards.
 Following the submittal of this project but prior to public notification, a Parcel Map
(PMP-75517) creating two lots at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Eula
Street was recorded. Portions of Elkhorn Road, Eula Street and Wittig Avenue were
dedicated for public right-of-way as part of this map.
ANALYSIS
The proposed area to be mapped is included in Planning Area B of the 2016 Interlocal
Agreement between the City of Las Vegas and Clark County. Within this area, the
parties have agreed that the land use must remain residential and maintain a minimum
buildable lot size of 10,000 square feet, and the City may not amend its land use plan,
rezone or approve special or conditional use permits to allow industrial or commercial
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
uses or residential lots with a buildable area of less than 10,000 square feet, unless
otherwise agreed to by the existing property owners and the two parties. No changes to
Planning Area B are proposed concerning this site. If this project is approved, all of the
proposed lots will have a buildable area exceeding 10,000 square feet in conformance
with the Interlocal Agreement.
Pursuant to Title 19.06.050, the existing U (Undeveloped) zoning district functions as a

temporary classification to be used until property is ready for development for a
permanent use. With the proposed residential development, a zone change is therefore
necessary. The General Plan designation of this area is RNP (Rural Neighborhood
Preservation) and will remain unchanged. The R-E (Residence Estates) zoning
classification conforms to the RNP designation. In addition, the development standards
of the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district are identical to those of the U District and
will ensure compatibility with the adjacent low density residential development. The
subject property is not designated as a Rural Preservation Neighborhood. Rezoning to
the R-E zoning district would not allow for an increase in the density of the subject
property.
Development of the site is subject to development standards of the R-E (Residence

Estates) zoning district, which requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. The
RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan designation limits residential
density to two dwelling units per acre. Based on the 3.55-acre project area, up to seven
dwelling units could be created under the R-E (Residence Estates) zoning classification
and seven units would also be allowed under the RNP General Plan designation. The
proposed tentative map would create six lots for a density of 1.69 dwelling units per
acre.
Access to each of the lots will be provided from Eula Street or Wittig Avenue, both Minor
Collector streets that will be fully improved with this project. Since there are no internal
links or nodes created by the subdivision design, the Connectivity Ratio of this
development cannot apply; appropriately, as an R-E zoned development, the
subdivision is not subject to Title 19.04 connectivity requirements. Nevertheless, each
lot may be considered to have full connectivity to exterior streets.
Per Title 19.06.040(F), landscape standards apply to all single family residential
development with five or more lots adjacent to streets classified as major collectors (80
feet wide) or larger. In this case, the proposed development will contain six lots, with
the northern boundary abutting Elkhorn Road, which is classified as a Primary Arterial.
The applicant is providing an onsite seven-foot wide landscape buffer with a five-foot
sidewalk and three-foot wide amenity zone within public right-of-way along Elkhorn
Road to comply with the standard. A landscape plan indicating conformance with tree
and shrub planting requirements along Elkhorn Road will be required to be submitted
with the plans for building permit review.
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
The submitted east/west cross section depicts a maximum grade greater than two
percent across this site. Per Title 19.06.050 a development with natural slope greater
than two percent is allowed a maximum six-foot retaining wall. Cross sections show a
proposed six-foot screen wall along Elkhorn Road and a retaining wall of up to six feet
and a total height of 12 feet along the west property line, each of which meets Title 19
standards. No perimeter wall is indicated or required along Eula Street adjacent to Lot
2 at this time.
The Clark County School District projects that three additional primary and secondary
school students would be generated by the proposed residential development on this
site. The District notes that Centennial High School is over capacity for the 2018-2019
school year.

The proposed R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district conforms to the existing
RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan designation, which allows
for the proposed district.
districts.
The R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district provides for low intensity residential
units on large lots conveying a rural environment. These and related uses are
compatible with the R-1 (Single Family Residential) and R-E (Rural Estates
Residential – Clark County Designation) zoning districts on adjacent parcels,
which similarly provide for low density residential units.
The subject property is adjacent to existing single family residential development

with R-E (Rural Estates Residential – Clark County Designation) or R-1 (Single
Family Residential) zoning, and is located away from a Primary Arterial (Hualapai
Way) containing commercial uses, making this site appropriate for low density
residential uses.
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]

Both Eula Street and Wittig Avenue are planned 60-foot rights-of-way that will be
fully improved as part of any proposed development on the adjacent property.
The proposed improvements will be adequate in size to meet the needs of the
proposed R-E (Residence Estates) zoning district.
The proposed Tentative Map conforms to Nevada Revised Statutes and Title 19
requirements for tentative maps, and the Department of Public Works has
administratively approved deferral of offsite improvements along Eula Street and Wittig
Avenue. Staff therefore recommends approval of the tentative map, subject to
conditions.

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-46720) 10.02
01/09/13
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
Annexation became effective 01/22/13.
The City Council denied a request for a General Plan Amendment
(GPA-61055) from R (Rural Density Residential) and RNP (Rural
Neighborhood Preservation) to SC (Service Commercial) on 10.00
acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Avenue and Hualapai Way.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial.
The City Council denied a request for a Rezoning (ZON-61056) from
R-E (Residence Estates) (sic) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 10.00
The Planning Commission and staff recommended denial. [NOTE: the
12/16/15
existing zoning was U (Undeveloped) [R (Rural Density Residential)
and RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan designation
as stated by Annexation Ordinance 6231.]
The City Council denied a request for a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-61057) for a proposed 60,900 square-foot Shopping Center and
a Waiver to allow buildings to be located away from public rights-of-
way on 10.00 acres at the southeast corner of Elkhorn Road and
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
denial.
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]

The Planning Commission approved a request for a Variance (VAR-
74338) to allow a lot width of 40 feet where 100 feet is required for a
10/23/18 proposed lot in the U (Undeveloped) zoning district on a portion of 5.00
acres at the southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Eula Street. Staff
recommended denial.
A Parcel Map (PMP-75517) to create two lots at the southwest corner
03/12/19
of Elkhorn Road and Eula Street was recorded.


There are no building permits or business licenses related to this request.
submittal requirements for a Tentative Map application for residential
02/28/19
lots at the same time as discussion on the adjacent commercial
development to the west.
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
The site is undeveloped and contains native vegetation. There are
03/13/18
no existing perimeter walls.

Site Area
Net Acres 3.55
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]

Property District
19.12 Designation
RNP (Rural
Subject Property Undeveloped Neighborhood U (Undeveloped)
Preservation)
North
RNP (Rural
R-E (Rural Estates
South Residential) – Clark
Detached Preservation) – Clark
County Designation
County Designation
Undeveloped RNP (Rural
R-E (Rural Estates
Neighborhood
East Single Family, Residential) – Clark
Preservation) – Clark
Detached County Designation
County Designation
R (Rural Density
Residential)
RNP (Rural
West Undeveloped U (Undeveloped)
Neighborhood
Preservation) – Clark
County Designation

Trails N/A
Interlocal Agreement Y
N/A
Assessment)
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]

Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 20,000 SF Y
Min. Setbacks*
 Front 50 Feet N/A By Permit
 Side 10 Feet N/A By Permit
 Corner 15 Feet N/A By Permit
 Rear 35 Feet N/A By Permit
*Conformance with Title 19 setback standards will be reviewed at the time of building permits for
individual lots in this development.
Existing Zoning Permitted Density* Units Allowed

U (Undeveloped) 2.18 du/ac 7
R-E (Residence Estates) 2.18 du/ac 7
RNP (Rural Neighborhood
2.00 du/ac 7
Preservation)
*Residential density is limited by the maximum density allowed by the General Plan for the subject
site as well as the development standards of the zoning district.

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 North 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 8 Trees 0 Trees N
 South N/A N/A N/A Trees N/A
 East N/A N/A N/A Trees N/A
 West N/A N/A N/A Trees N/A
TOTAL PERIMETER TREES 8 Trees 0 Trees N*
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]

Ratio Trees
Min. Zone Width
*Conformance with Title 19 perimeter landscape standards will be reviewed at the time of building
permits for this development.

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Elkhorn Road Primary Arterial Streets and 55-65 N*
Highways Map
Eula Street Minor Collector Title 13 27-33 N*
Wittig Avenue Minor Collector Title 13 31 N*
*Public right-of-way sufficient to meet Title 19 Complete Streets street sections has been dedicated and
will be improved to meet those standards as part of this development.
Internal Street 0
Intersection – External Street or Stub Terminus 0
Intersection – Stub Terminus w/ Temporary Turn Around
0
Easements
Non-Vehicular Path - Unrestricted 0
Total 0 0
Required Provided
Connectivity Ratio (Links / Nodes): N/A N/A
SS
ZON-76145 and TMP-76004 [PRJ-75935]
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Number of Handi- Handi-
Units Ratio Regular Regular
capped capped
Single
2 spaces
Family, 6 units 12
per unit
Detached
SS
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ̶ㄦ
Ɔ●╗ǲฌ
ԱǲЌbĠҜAŐìฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
Ձ ǲḚ ǲЌ Ｃ
ǲ Ձ ì Ġ Ḷ Ő Ќ 7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ӧ‫ں‬ｘｘƥỏฌ
7Ɔ ●╗ ǲ 7Ｃ A ╗ A
″ ｘƥ77Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ֱ7ǲ Ⓢ Ձ A 7Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗ ฌ
″ｘƥ7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ֱ77Û ●╗ ╗ ●Ḛ 7A Ћ ǲ Ќ Ⓢ ǲ ฌ
ЌḶ╗ǲ̬ฌ
Ќ̬⇓Ա֭㌱֭ผ㈠ǲผ่֭⎯‫ש‬7ֱ7ǲкγਙผֱ่Ġ—ŴкŴऑŴħ7Աธ̶ธ⇓ＣÛḚ⇓ҜAОƆ⇓Ա֭㌱֭ผ7╗Ҝｘ‫ں‬7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк㈠₡ʉ‫ف‬ⓒ7̶゜ธՙ゜ธｘ‫ں‬ɱ7‫̬ںں‬ธ‫̬ں‬ธㅡ7AҜฌ
ZON-76145 [PRJ-75935] - REZONING RELATED TO TMP-76004 - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELKHORN ROAD AND EULA STREET
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
DEPARTMENT: Planning CONSENT

SUBJECT:
TMP-76004 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO ZON-76145 - ELKHORN ESTATES - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: TP 1000, LLC - For possible action on a request for a Tentative
Map FOR A SIX-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION on 3.55 acres at the
southwest corner of Elkhorn Road and Eula Street (Lot 1 of File 124 Page 42 of Parcel Maps), U
(Undeveloped) Zone [RNP (Rural Neighborhood Preservation) General Plan Designation]
[PROPOSED: R-E (Residence Estates)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75935]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
CC: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
Ɔ●╗ǲฌ
ԱǲЌbĠҜAŐìฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
Ձ ǲḚ ǲЌ Ｃ
ǲ Ձ ì Ġ Ḷ Ő Ќ 7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ӧ‫ں‬ｘｘƥỏฌ
7Ɔ ●╗ ǲ 7Ｃ A ╗ A
″ ｘƥ77Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ֱ7ǲ Ⓢ Ձ A 7Ɔ ╗ Ő ǲ ǲ ╗ ฌ
″ｘƥ7Ő Ḷ A Ｃ 7ֱ77Û ●╗ ╗ ●Ḛ 7A Ћ ǲ Ќ Ⓢ ǲ ฌ
ЌḶ╗ǲ̬ฌ
Ќ̬⇓Ա֭㌱֭ผ㈠ǲผ่֭⎯‫ש‬7ֱ7ǲкγਙผֱ่Ġ—ŴкŴऑŴħ7Աธ̶ธ⇓ＣÛḚ⇓ҜAОƆ⇓Ա֭㌱֭ผ7╗Ҝｘ‫ں‬7Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭‫ש‬ħŴк㈠₡ʉ‫ف‬ⓒ7̶゜ธՙ゜ธｘ‫ں‬ɱ7‫̬ںں‬ธ‫̬ں‬ธㅡ7AҜฌ

Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's

Total

* CCSD Comments
TMP 76004
TP 1000, LLC
SWC Elkhorn Road & Eula Street

RATE/#

PM Peak Hour 0.99 6
Elkhorn Road
PM Peak Hour 152
Hualapai Way
PM Peak Hour 275
Adjacent street ADT

Capacity
Elkhorn Road 16,380
Hualapai Way 25,935
This project will add approximately 57 trips per day on Eula St., Elkhorn Rd. and Hualapai Wy. Currently, Elkhorn is at about
12 percent of capacity and Hualapai is at about 35 percent of capacity. With this project, these capacities are expected to
remain unchanged. Counts are not available for Eula, but it is believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 6 additional cars, or about one every ten minutes.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
ZON-75980 - REZONING - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: 1997
MORTON M.F. WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST - For possible
action on a request for a Rezoning FROM: R-E (RESIDENCE ESTATES) TO: R-1 (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) on 5.09 acres on the north side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 300
feet east of Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75891]. Staff
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - ZON-75980, VAR-75981, VAR-75982 and TMP-75984 [PRJ-
75891]
2. Land Use Map
3. Conditions and Staff Report - ZON-75980, VAR-75981, VAR-75982, VAC-75983 and TMP-
75984 [PRJ-75891]
4. Supporting Documentation - ZON-75980, VAR-75981, VAR-75982, VAC-75983 and TMP-
75984 [PRJ-75891]
5. Photo(s) - ZON-75980, VAR-75981, VAR-75982, VAC-75983 and TMP-75984 [PRJ-75891]
6. Justification Letter - ZON-75980, VAR-75981, VAR-75982, VAC-75983 and TMP-75984 [PRJ-
75891]
7. Protest and/or Support Documentation Not Vetted for ZON-75980, VAR-75981, VAR-75982,
VAC-75983 and TMP-75984 [PRJ-75891]
ZON-75980, VAR-75981, VAC-75983 and TMP-75984 [PRJ-75891]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F.
WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
ZON-75980 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
VAR-75981 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to ZON-75980
conditions:
VAC-75983 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: ZON-75980
VAR-75981
TMP-75984 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to ZON-75980
VAC-75983
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 209 - ZON-75980

209 - VAR-75981
3 - VAC-75983
209 - TMP-75984
PROTESTS 0 - ZON-75980
0 - VAR-75981
0 - VAC-75983
0 - TMP-75984
APPROVALS 0 - ZON-75980
0 - VAR-75981
0 - VAC-75983
0 - TMP-75984
NE
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of Rezoning (ZON-75980), and approval and conformance to the

Conditions of Approval for Petition to Vacate (VAC-75983) and Tentative Map (TMP-
75984) shall be required, if approved.
VAC-75983 CONDITIONS
Easements located on the west and south sides of Assessor Parcel Number 125-
19-202-007 excluding those portions of Deer Springs Way and Eula Street which
will be dedicated as right-of-way.
NE
Conditions Page Two


Planning
2. Approval of Rezoning (ZON-75980), Variance (VAR-75981) and Vacation (VAC-

Republic Services for the stub street configuration.
Regulations.
NE

 One 24-inch box shade tree with four, five-gallon shrubs for each required tree
shall be planted within the landscape buffer areas adjacent to Deer Springs Way
and Eula Street.


Public Works

NE
10. Dedicate 45 feet of right-of-way for Deer Springs Way, 30 feet for Eula Street, and
a 20-foot radius at the southwest corner of Deer Springs Way and Eula Street
adjacent to this site on the Final Map.
11. Street “A” must be granted and labeled on the Final Map for this site as Public Utility
be privately maintained by the Homeowner's Association.
12. Construct complete half street improvements on Deer Springs Way and Eula Street
meeting current City Standards adjacent to this site concurrent with development of
this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this development shall be
of this site.
13. Modify the existing median in Deer Springs Way, to the satisfaction of the City Traffic
Engineer, to further restrict the right-in/right-out access on Deer Springs Way.
15. Submit a License Agreement for landscaping and private improvements in the Deer
Springs Way and Eula Street public rights of way, if any, adjacent to this site prior to
this issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an
insurance policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las
Vegas as an additionally insured entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the
City, the applicant shall remove property encroaching in the public right-of-way at
the applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The
with the sale of the property for the entire term of the License Agreement. Coordinate
NE
NE
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to develop a 16-lot residential subdivision on 5.09 acres on

the north side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 300 feet east of Hualapai Way.
ISSUES
 The applicant is requesting to Rezone the subject site from R-E (Residence
Estates) to R-1 (Single Family Residential). Staff supports this request.
 A Variance is requested to allow a Connectivity Ration of 1.0 where 1.3. Staff does
 A Variance is requested to allow a private street not developed to public street
standards and without gate. The private street is also proposed to terminate in a
non-standard terminus (stub streets). Staff does not support this request.
 A Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent Reservations generally located on
the north side of Deer Springs Way, west of Eula Street. Staff supports this request.
 The applicant is requesting a Waiver to allow a 181-foot Intersection Offset where
220 feet is the minimum required. Staff is recommending denial of this request and
the associated Tentative Map.
ANALYSIS
Rezoning
The subject site is currently zoned R-E (Residence Estates) which provides for low
density residential units located on large lots that convey a rural environment. The
minimum lot size for this district is 20,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to
rezone the subject site to R-1 (Single Family Residential). The R-1 District provides for
the development of single-family detached dwellings in a suburban setting with a
minimum lot size of 6,500 square feet.
Located within the Interlocal Agreement Planning Area B, Planning Area B states that
during the term of the agreement, the areas identified as Planning Area B must remain
residential and maintain a minimum buildable lot size of 10,000 square feet. The City of
Las Vegas is not to amend its land use plan, rezone such properties or approve special
or conditional use permits to allow industrial or commercial uses or residential lots with a
buildable area of less than 10,000 square feet within the areas identified as Planning Area
B. With agreement between the City, the County, and existing property owners,
modifications to the Planning Areas may occur.
NE
While the proposed R-1 zoning district allows for lot sizes as small as 6,500 square feet,
the underlying General Plan Designation will ultimately determine the number of lots
developed. The subject site has a General Plan designation of R (Rural Density
Residential), which allows a maximum density of 3.59 dwelling units per acre. The subject
site is adjacent to commercially zoned property to the west and south, with the residential
development to the north zoned R-1, like the proposed. The parcel east of the subject site
is zoned R-E and the proposed R-1 will provide a buffer zone to the commercially zoned
property to the west, adjacent to Hualapai Way; therefore, staff is recommending approval
of the rezoning request.
Variance
residential development has three links and three nodes for a connectivity ratio of 1.0.
The applicant would be able to meet the minimum connectivity ratio by providing primary
access via Eula Street with a secondary “right in right out” only access via Deer Springs
Way.
The second portion of this request includes proposing to construct a private street without
a gate and not to public standards, which would include a sidewalk on both sides of the
proposed private street. Sidewalk is proposed for the west side of the private street,
terminating at proposed Lot 7, leaving the future residents on the north and east sides of
the private street without a pedestrian pathway (sidewalk).
The final part of the Variance request includes a request to allow a private street to
terminate in a nonstandard terminus such as a hammerhead or cul-de-sac. The applicant
is proposing two stub streets that are perpendicular to the proposed “Street A.” Stub
streets do not provide adequate space for vehicular traffic to turn around; this includes
emergency vehicles such as ambulances and trash disposal trucks dispatched by
Republic Services. Staff has added a recommended Condition of Approval requiring the
applicant to submit written approval for the stub streets from Republic Services prior to
the issuance of a building permit.
The inability to meet the minimum ratio requirement for connectivity and the proposal of
a private street not constructed to public standards, without a gate, and to terminate in
stub streets are self-imposed hardships not based on a unique or extraordinary
circumstance; therefore, staff is recommending denial of the Variance request.
NE
Vacation
in U.S. Government Patent Reservations generally located on the north side of Deer
Springs Way, west of Eula Street. The Vacation request should be sent to all the utilities
however, as no right of way is proposed to be vacated, and thus no franchise rights are
are involved any utility company's interests will need to be addressed with each respective
utility company and will not be affected by the City relinquishing its interest; therefore,
staff is recommending approval of the Petition to Vacate U.S. Government Patent
Reservations generally located on the north side of Deer Springs Way, west of Eula
Street.
Tentative Map
The applicant has proposed to develop a 16-lot single-family residential subdivision on
5.09 gross acres on the north side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 300 feet east of
Hualapai Way. The proposed development demonstrates four home sites developed with
access via a stub street, with the remaining 12 lots adjacent to proposed private “Street
A.” The density of the proposed development is 3.14 units per acre.
The submitted east/west cross section depicts a maximum grade greater than two percent
across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050, a development with a
natural slope, greater than two percent is allowed a maximum six-foot retaining wall.
There are two, four-foot retaining walls separated by a five-foot required spacing in
between the retaining walls.
The submitted north/south cross section depicts a maximum grade less than two percent
across this site. Per the Tables in Subdivision Code 19.06.050 a development with
natural slope greater than two percent is allowed a maximum four-foot retaining wall. No
retaining walls are shown.
Through previous correspondence, Traffic Engineering has advised the applicant that the
submitted layout is unacceptable and requested the applicant to provide access to the
proposed residential neighborhood via Eula Street and not Deer Springs Way, as the
proposed design creates an unsafe condition to a commercial site that currently has no
turning movement concerns. The proposed subdivision entrance may encourage drivers
to drive into oncoming traffic and create illegal “U” turns on Deer Springs Way, and future
residents will be forced to make a u-turn at Eula Street in order to access their
neighborhood. In addition, residents will not be able to make a left-turn onto Deer Springs
Way and will be forced to Dorrell Lane via Hualapai Way in order to get to the middle
school located at the southeast corner of Echelon Point Drive and Grand Canyon Drive.
NE
In order to mitigate the potential negative impact of the proposed driveway on Deer
Springs Way, the applicant will need to construct a median that removes the ability for
vehicular traffic to make a left turn out of the subdivision onto Deer Springs Way, and
restricts this site to right-in/right-out access only from Deer Springs Way. If not
constructed as a right-in/right-out only subdivision, undesired “U” turn movements on Eula
Street could occur and become a safety issue for vehicular and pedestrian traffic alike.
Reconfiguring the proposed neighborhood to provide primary access via Eula Street with
a right-in/right-out access only onto Deer Springs Way would mitigate future traffic
conflicts for Deer Springs Way while satisfying the Connectivity Ratio required by Title
19.04.
As traffic engineers we plan for the future and try not to create future safety issues. This
is the reason the proper hierarchy of roads is so important. For example, major arterials
should be intersected by minor arterials, which are intersected with collectors, which are
intersected with residential streets. Maintaining this hierarchy improves safety for all road
users. Crash rates are reduced because access points are reduced, turning movements
are reduced, and pedestrian crossings are manageable.
Eula Street is a residential collector. The posted speed limits will likely remain 25 miles
per hour. It is appropriate for residential roads to intersect this street. The number of
vehicle trips generated by this development is expected to be minimal and virtually
undetectable in the area. These trips would be distributed appropriately to intersections
that the City can control.
The applicant is proposing to develop 16 home sites with lot sizes that range in size from
8,805 square feet to 11,705 square feet within “Accepted Area B” of the Interlocal
Agreement, which requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Only four of the
proposed 16-lots provide the required minimum lot size set forth in the Interlocal
Agreement. While the proposed R-1 zoning district allows a minimum residential lots size
of 6,500 square feet, the current land use designation of Rural Density Residential limits
the number of home sites to 3.59 dwelling units per acre. The submitted tentative map is
preferential in nature and not compatible with the Interlocal Agreement, nor is it compliant
with the RTC Clark County Area Access Management Guidelines for vehicular traffic;
therefore, staff is recommending denial of the Tentative Map and associated Waiver
request.

NE
The proposed R-1 zoning district conforms to the existing Rural Residential Density
designation.
districts.
The R-1 zoning district allows single-family detached homes, which is compatible
with the surrounding land uses and zoning districts.
Development factors in the area including commercial to the west and south of the
subject indicate the need and appropriateness of the proposed R-1 zoning district.

If approved, half-street improvements for both Deer Springs Way and Eula Street
will be required that includes a median to limit the vehicular traffic of the proposed
neighborhood to right-in/right-out only traffic movements, thus creating street
facilities that are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed R-1
zoning district.
order to:

NE


without an access gate and not to public street standards, including stub streets; and a
residential neighborhood design that does not meet the minimum connectivity ratio
required. An alternative neighborhood design including sidewalk on both sides of the
street and a through street to Eula Street rather than a stub street are examples of some

02/06/19 5.09 acres on the north side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 350 feet
east of Hualapai Way.


There are no building permits or business licenses related to the subject site.
NE
02/27/19
requirements for the proposed residential subdivision where discussed.
Field Check
Staff observed the undeveloped site during a routine field check and did
03/13/19
not note any concerns or issues.

Site Area
Gross Acres 5.09
Planned or Special
Designation
Subject R (Rural Density
Undeveloped R-E (Residence Estates)
Property Residential)
RNP (Rural
Single Family, R-1 (Single Family
North Neighborhood
Preservation)
SC (Service
South Shopping Center C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Commercial)
RL (Residential R-E (Rural Estates
East Undeveloped
Low) Residential) Clark County
SC (Service
West Shopping Center C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Commercial)

NE

Trails N/A
Interlocal Agreement - Accepted Area B N*
Assessment)
*Areas with City Boundaries: During the term of this agreement, the areas identified as
Planning Area B must remain residential and maintain a minimum buildable lot size of
10,000 square feet and the City must not amend its land use plan, rezone such properties
or approve special or conditional use permits to allow industrial or commercial uses or
residential lots with a buildable area of less than 10,000 square feet within the areas
identified as Planning Area B.
*With agreement between the City, the County, and existing property owners, modifications
to the Planning Areas may occur. Upon completion of the western beltway, both parties
acknowledge the boundaries of Areas A2 and B may change between Ann Road and Lone
Mountain at the western beltway.
Pursuant to Title 19.06, the following standards apply for the proposed R-1 zoning
district:
Min. Setbacks
 Front 20 Feet
 Side 5 Feet
 Corner 15 Feet
 Rear 15 Feet
Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet
NE
5.09 acres or 221,720 square feet:

Existing Zoning Minimum Lot Size Units Allowed
R-E (Residence Estates) 20,000 SF 11.09
Proposed Zoning Minimum Lot Size Units Allowed
R-1 (Single Family Residential) 6,500 SF 34.11

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 East 1 Tree / 30 Linear Feet 21 Trees 21 Trees
Min. Zone Width
**The applicant has proposed to install the Complete Street standard adjacent to Deer Springs
Way which includes a five-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to the right-of-way (Deer Springs
Way), followed by a five-foot wide sidewalk and another five-foot wide landscape buffer adjacent
to the perimeter wall for a total of ten feet of landscaping.

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Deer Springs
Collector Street Streets and 20 N*
Way
Highways
Eula Street Local Street Title 13 20 N*
NE
Internal Street 3
Cul-de-sac, Hammerhead or Non-Standard Terminus 2
Total 3 3
Required Provided
Required
Gross Floor Area or
Use Parking
Single Family,
16 2 Per Lot 32
Detached

The subject site is not currently served by LVVWD. This development may require two
sources of water to serve it due to the number of homes and fire department connections on
a single feed. The proposed Tentative Map has identified one point of connection. To comply
with District Service Rules the development will be required submit a hydraulic analysis for
approval.
NE
ОŐİֱՙㄦฎɱ‫ں‬
ӧՙｘธỏ7ฎｘㅡֱธ‫ں‬ｘɱ7 ӧՙｘธỏ7ฎｘㅡֱธ‫ں‬ｘɱฌ
⇡ผ֭ħ₡㌀‫ف‬㌱ʉ่֭‫ف‬ħ่֭֭ผħ่‫ف‬㈠㌱ਙこฌ
7ฎɱ‫ں‬ㅡ″ ՙ″ՙֱ″̶ㄦฌ
ＣǲǲŐ7ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ7ÛAùฌ
ǲⓈՁA7Ɔ╗ฌ
ธㄦฌ
ＣǲǲŐ7ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ7ǲⓈՁA7
‫ف‬㌱ʉ
Aฌ Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7A7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 Աฌ ǲⓈՁA7Ɔ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 bฌ ＣǲǲŐ7ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ7ÛAù7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
ƆОฌ
ŐǲƆ╗Ő●b╗●Ћǲ7bḶЋǲЌAЌ╗7ЌḶ╗ǲฌ ОḶ bฌ
ՙ″ՙֱ″̶ㄦฌ
ОḶ bฌ
ǲⓈՁA7Ɔ╗ฌ
ธㄦฌ
Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7A7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 ǲⓈՁA7Ɔ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 ＣǲǲŐ7ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ7ÛAù7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦฎɱ‫ں‬

Aฌ Աฌ bฌ
ֱ ֱ ֱ ｘㅡ゜ｘɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ＣǲǲŐ7ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ7ǲⓈՁA7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
╗Ҝธฌ
╗ǲЌ╗A╗●Ћǲ7ҜAО7ธฌ
ZON-75980 [PRJ-75891] - REZONING RELATED TO VAR-75981, VAC-75938 AND TMP-75984 - APPLICANT: DR
HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F. WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST
NORTH SIDE OF DEER SPRINGS WAY EAST OF HUALAPAI WAY
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAR-75981 - VARIANCE RELATED TO ZON-75980 AND VAR-75981 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F. WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH
WONG REVOCABLE TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A 1.00
CONNECTIVITY RATIO WHERE 1.30 IS THE MINIMUM REQUIRED; PRIVATE STREETS NOT
CONSTRUCTED TO PUBLIC STREET STANDARDS WITHOUT AN ACCESS GATE; AND
PRIVATE STREETS TO TERMINATE IN STUB STREETS WHERE CUL-DE-SACS OR
HAMMERHEADS ARE REQUIRED on 5.09 acres on the north side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 300 feet east of Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), R-E (Residence Estates)
Zone [PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75891]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
Brandi Reid
(702) 804-2109 (702) 804-2109
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAC-75983 - VACATION RELATED TO ZON-75980 AND VAR-75981 - PUBLIC HEARING -
APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON M.F. WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH
WONG REVOCABLE TRUST - For possible action on a request for a Petition to Vacate U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located on the north side of Deer Springs Way, east of
Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75891]. Staff recommends
APPROVAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
Brandi Reid
(702) 804-2109 (702) 804-2109
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
TMP-75984 - TENTATIVE MAP RELATED TO ZON-75980, VAR-75981 AND VAC-75983 - DEER
SPRINGS EULA - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: DR HORTON - OWNER: 1997 MORTON
M.F. WONG AND EUNICE ELIZABETH WONG REVOCABLE TRUST - For possible action on a
request for a Tentative Map FOR A PROPOSED 16-LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SUBDIVISION WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A 181-FOOT INTERSECTION OFFSET WHERE
220 FEET IS REQUIRED on 5.09 acres on the north side of Deer Springs Way, approximately
300 feet east of Hualapai Way (APN 125-19-202-007), R-E (Residence Estates) Zone
[PROPOSED: R-1 (Single Family Residential)], Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-75891]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.
C.C.: 06/05/2019
RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
Brandi Reid
(702) 804-2109 (702) 804-2109
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
PRJ-75891
03/05/19
ŐǲƆ╗Ő●b╗●Ћǲ7bḶЋǲЌAЌ╗7ЌḶ╗ǲฌ ОḶ bฌ
ՙ″ՙֱ″̶ㄦฌ
ОḶ bฌ
ǲⓈՁA7Ɔ╗ฌ
ธㄦฌ
Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7A7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 ǲⓈՁA7Ɔ╗7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌ7 ＣǲǲŐ7ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ7ÛAù7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦฎɱ‫ں‬

Aฌ Աฌ bฌ
ֱ ֱ ֱ ｘㅡ゜ｘɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
╗Ҝ‫ں‬ฌ
ＣǲǲŐ7ƆОŐ●ЌḚƆ7ǲⓈՁA7 ̬7ՙｘธ㈠ฎｘㅡ㈠ธธɱɱ
╗Ҝธฌ
╗ǲЌ╗A╗●Ћǲ7ҜAО7ธฌ

Company Name
Contact Name
City State Zip Code
Project Name
Project Description
APN's

Total

* CCSD Comments
TMP 75984
DR Horton
NWC Deer Springs Way & Eula Street

RATE/#

Deer Springs Way

PM Peak Hour 417
Hualapai Way
PM Peak Hour 275
Adjacent street ADT

Capacity
Deer Springs Way 35,490
Hualapai Way 35,490
This project will add approximately 151 trips per day on Eula St., Deer Springs Wy. and Hualapai Wy. Currently, Deer
Springs is at about 15 percent of capacity and Hualapai is at about 78 percent of capacity. With this project, Deer Springs is
expected to remain unchanged and Hualapai to be at about 79 percent of capacity. Counts are not available for Eula, but it is
believed to be under capacity.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area roughly 16 additional cars, or about one every four
minutes.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAR-75906 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GILCREASE NATURE
SANCTUARY - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW 38 PARKING SPACES
WHERE 94 ARE REQUIRED on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel Street (APN 125-09-401-033), Ward 6

OR May be Final Action Unless Appealed Within 10 Days
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75906, VAR-76015 and SDR-75907 [PRJ-74896]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75906, VAR-76015 and SDR-75907 [PRJ-74896]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75906, VAR-76015 and SDR-75907 [PRJ-74896]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75906, VAR-76015 and SDR-75907 [PRJ-74896]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75906, VAR-76015 and SDR-75907 [PRJ-74896]
6. Support Postcard(s) for VAR-75906, VAR-76015 and SDR-75907 [PRJ-74896]
VAR-75906, VAR-76015 and SDR-75907 [PRJ-74896]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: GILCREASE NATURE SANCTUARY
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75906 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to
conditions:
VAR-76015 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75906
conditions:
SDR-75907 Staff recommends DENIAL, if approved subject to VAR-75906
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 510 - VAR-75906 and VAR-76015

510 - SDR-75907
PROTESTS 0 - VAR-75906 and VAR-76015

0 - SDR-75907
APPROVALS 1 - VAR-75906 and VAR-76015

1 - SDR-75907
ES/NE
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning

approved.
2. Conformance to the approved conditions for General Plan Amendment (GPA-

43983), Rezoning (ZON-43982), and Site Development Plan Review (SDR-43981)
shall be required, except as amended herein.
ES/NE
Conditions Page Two
Planning

approved.

required, except as amended herein.
Planning

75906) and Variance (VAR-76015) shall be required, if approved.

required, except as amended herein.
ES/NE
4. All development shall be in conformance with the site plan, and building elevations,
date stamped 03/19/19, except as amended by conditions herein.
Public Works
9. Construct all incomplete half-street improvements on Racel Street and Al Carrison

Street in accordance with the approved Site Plan concurrent with on-site
development as shown on the approved Phasing Plan. Racel Street may be
constructed to a 60-foot width to match the adjacent street improvements. All
Extend all required underground utilities, such as electrical, telephone, etc., located
within public rights-of-way, past the boundaries of this site prior to construction of
hard surfacing (asphalt or concrete). This condition shall not be imposed if VAR-
76015 is approved.
10. Prior to the approval of Construction drawings for this site, sign a Covenant Running
with Land agreement for the possible future installation of any off-site improvements
that are not constructed at this time. The Covenant agreement must be recorded
with the County Recorder and a copy of the recorded document must be provided
to the City prior to the issuance of building permits for this site.
11. Abandon all existing septic tank systems in accordance with Southern Nevada
Heath District regulations and connect to the City of Las Vegas public sewer system.
ES/NE
13. Submit an Encroachment Agreement for all landscaping and private improvements,
if any, located in the public right-of-way adjacent to this site prior to occupancy of
this site. The applicant must carry an insurance policy for the term of the
encroachment agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an additionally insured
entity on this insurance policy. If requested by the City, the applicant shall remove
landscaping and private improvements encroaching in the public right-of-way at the
applicant’s expense pursuant to the terms of the City’s encroachment agreement.
The installation and maintenance of all private structures in the public right-of-way
with the sale of the property for the entire term of the Encroachment Agreement.
14.A Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study must be submitted to and approved
ES/NE
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to add a new 1,500 square-foot building to an existing bird
sanctuary at 8103 Racel Street.
ISSUES
 The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow 38 parking stalls where 94 is the

minimum required. Staff recommends denial of this request.
 The applicant is requesting a Variance to not install the required off-site improvements
for both Racel Street and Al Carrison Street where such are required, and to make no
contribution for future off-site improvements installed by the City of Las Vegas. Staff
recommends denial of this request.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing to construct an additional 1,500 square-foot aviary building

within an existing bird sanctuary [Gilcrease Nature Sanctuary] located on 7.88 acres at
the southeast corner of Racel Street and Al Carrison Street. The facility operated as a
bird sanctuary in Clark County until the site was annexed (ANX-41279) into the city in
2011. At the time of annexation, the land use was legal, nonconforming but became a
conforming land use in 2012 when a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
43983), Rezoning (ZON-43982), and a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-43981) was
approved by the City Council. At the time, a condition of approval for Site Development
Plan Review (SDR-43981) required the applicant to construct all incomplete half-street
improvements for Racel Street and Al Carrison Street.
The previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-43981) designated a pad
for the future construction of the aviary building. The pad is located in the middle of the
subject site, outside of the required setback areas. The proposed aviary building is a 30-
foot by 50-foot prefabricated metal building with rib siding and roof panels to enclose the
aviary. These materials are consistent with the architectural character of the existing
buildings on site and, according to the submitted justification letter date stamped
03/14/19, are suitable to properly house the birds and keep them secure.
ES/NE
The “Commercial Recreation/Amusement Outdoor” use is defined as “An outdoor facility

or area for sport, entertainment, games of skill, or recreation that is open to use by the
general public for a fee. This use includes without limitation game courts, water slides,
golf courses, outdoor miniature golf courses, drive-in theaters, batting cages,
practice/instructional fields, amusement parks, amphitheaters, and sports events: The
proposed use meets the definition as it provides activity in an outdoor venue for the public
to utilize. Title 19 does not specifically designate a use for a zoo, animal enclosure, or
animal sanctuary; therefore, staff determined “Commercial Recreation/Amusement
Outdoor” was the most fitting land use designation.
The site is currently developed with 38 parking stalls where 55 are required. Title 19.12
requires one parking space for every 200 square feet of gross floor area for a Commercial
Recreation/Amusement (Outdoor) use [bird sanctuary]. The subject site is currently
developed with 11,000 square feet of existing floor area which requires 55 parking stalls.
The proposed 1,500 square-foot aviary building will require nine additional parking spaces
for a total of 64 parking spaces required. No additional parking spaces are proposed and
a Variance is requested to allow for 38 parking spaces where 64 are required. Staff does
Racel Street and Al Carrisson Street are currently not improved roadways and do not
have the necessary curb, gutter, or sidewalk. The applicant is requesting to permanently
remove the requirement for off-site [half-street] improvements and to not make an
improvement contribution where 50 percent is required by Title 19.02.025.B. Since the
adoption of the new off-site code in August of 2018, a Variance has not been approved
to allow an applicant to make zero contribution for future improvements made by the City
of Las Vegas. If this request (VAR-76015) is approved, the City will be responsible for
100 percent of the costs to perform half-street improvements for this section of Racel
Street and Al Carrison Street. This approval could also have unintended consequences
and set a precedence that will allow other applicants and/or developers to come in and
request a similar Variance, thus placing more financial burden on the City for necessary
off-site improvements.
As a counter measure, proposed condition number 10 for VAR-76015 requires a

Covenant Running with Land Agreement. If this item is approved with a Covenant, the
City will need to find the financial resources to cover whatever cannot be assessed
through a Special Improvement District and assess the current property owner the
maximum amount allowed by Nevada Revised Statues before constructing what should
be required of this applicant/developer. This site is surrounded by existing offsite
improvements; therefore the Department of Public Works strongly recommends denial of
this request (VAR-76015).
ES/NE
The applicant has proposed no additional parking to an already deficient site in addition
to requesting a Variance to not install required half street improvements, nor make any
contribution to such future improvements performed by the City; therefore, staff is
recommending denial of all request.
order to:



applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by not proposing to install the required
parking stalls set forth by Title 19.12 for the existing use and additional aviary structure.
Installing the necessary parking stalls would allow conformance to the minimum parking
requirements set forth by Title 19.12. In view of the absence of any hardships imposed
by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the applicant’s hardship is
of Variances and staff is recommending denial of the request.
order to:
ES/NE



applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by not constructing the half-street
improvements as previously conditioned and requesting a Variance to allow no
contribution to the cost of said improvements the City will be required to install at a future
date. Agreeing to a 50 percent cost contribution for the overall costs of said improvements
would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of the absence of any
hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is concluded that the
applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside the realm of NRS
Chapter 278 for granting of Variances and staff is recommending denial of the request.

The existing bird and animal sanctuary has been operating for several years. The
proposed structure is not visible from the public right-of-way and the park-like setting
will remain as is and is compatible with the existing residential developments.
ES/NE
The subject site is zoned C-V (Civic) which is consistent with the PF (Public
Facilities) category of the General Plan. These designations intend to house public
and quasi-public uses. The proposed addition is consistent with these policies and
can be operated under this designation as it provides education and recreation to
members of the community and is operated by a recognized service organization;
but the proposed development is not consistent with the development standards as
the applicant is requesting two Variances to allow a deficiency in the parking
requirement, and to not contribute to the future costs the off-site [half-street]
improvements required by Title 19.02.025.B.

The proposed addition will not impact the existing conditions for neighborhood
traffic. Racel Street, a 47-foot wide collector street, and Al Carrisson Street, a 32-
foot wide local street, are of adequate size to serve the proposed site. The lack of
half-street improvements will negatively impact both vehicular and pedestrian traffic
in the area.
The proposed building materials are consistent with the architectural character of
the surrounding structures on site and are appropriate for the subject site.

The aesthetics of the proposed structure are similar to those of surrounding

buildings and creates an orderly environment. The proposed structure will not be
visible from the public right-of-way and is therefore harmonious and compatible with
the surrounding development.
The development is subject to building permit review and regular inspections during
construction; thus securing the public health, safety, and general welfare.
ES/NE

The Clark County Commission approved a request for a Rezoning (ZC-
106-79) from R-E (Rural Estates Residential) to R-A (Residential
07/09/79 Agricultural) for the commercial raising and sale of birds on 11.03 acres
on the south side of Racel Road, one-quarter mile east of Durango
Drive.
The Clark County Commission approved a request for a Petition to
05/07/97 Vacate (VS-0207-97) of Al Carrison Street between Racel Street to a
point 350-feet north of Grand Teton Drive.
The Clark County Commission approved a request for a Use Permit and
Variance (UC-0680-97) for a 55-foot high monopole with four antennas
05/22/97
on a portion of an 8.04 acre parcel generally located on the southeast
corner of Racel Street and Al Carrison Street.
The Clark County Commission approved a request for a Use Permit
07/17/08 (UC-0606-08) for a Recreational Facility/Nature Sanctuary on the
southeast corner of Racel Street and Al Carrison Street.
The Clark County Commission approved a request for a Use Permit
(UC-0153-10) to replace an existing communication tower with an 80-
06/01/10
foot high communication tower and to reduce the separation between a
communication tower and a residential use.
A Temporary Commercial License for an Arts and Crafts Fair on April
02/08/11 16 and 17, 2011 was approved for the southeast corner of Racel Street
and Al Carrision Street.
The City Council approved a request for a Petition to Annex (ANX-
41279) property at 8103 Racel Street, containing 8.02 acres south of
10/19/11 Racel Street, east and west of Al Carrison Street. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended approval. The effective date was
10/28/11.
(GPA-43983) from PCD (Planned Community Development) to PF
(Public Facilities on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel Street. The Planning
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-43982) from
02/15/12 R-E (Residence Estates) to C-V (Civic) on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel
Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
Review (SDR-43981) for a Commercial Recreation/Amusement
(Outdoor) Facility [Nature Sanctuary] on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel
Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
ES/NE


A business license (N31-00342) was issued for a nature sanctuary. The
04/04/12
license is active as of 04/04/19.
Staff met with the applicant to discuss the project proposal and submittal
10/30/18
deadlines.
Field Check
During a routine field check staff observed the subject site. Nothing of
03/13/19
concern was noted by staff during the field check.

Site Area
Net Acres 7.88
Planned or
Special Land
Use Designation
Commercial
Subject Recreation/Amusement PF (Public
C-V (Civic)
Property Outdoor (Nature Facility)
Sanctuary)
R-PD3 (Residential
Single Family L (Low Density
North Planned Development –
Residential Residential)
3 Units per Acre)
ES/NE
Planned or
Special Land
Use Designation
R-PD4 (Residential
Single Family
Residential PCD (Planned
4 Units per Acre)
South Community
R-A (Residential
Wedding Chapel and Development)
Agriculture – Clark
Banquet Facility
County Designation)
PCD (Planned R-A (Residential
East Undeveloped Community Agriculture – Clark
Development) County Designation)
PCD (Planned R-A (Residential
Single Family
West Community Agriculture – Clark
Residential
Development) County Designation)

Trails N/A
Assessment)

Governing
Document
Racel Street Collector Street Title 13 47 N*
Al Carrison
Local Street Title 13 32 N*
Street
*A Variance has been requested to allow the applicant to not install the required off-site [half-
street] improvements for both Racel Street and Al Carrison Street, nor make any monetary
contribution to the future costs of said improvements where 50 percent is required by Title
19.02.025.B.
ES/NE
Parking Requirement
Use Parking
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Commercial
Recreation /
12,800 SF 1:200 SF 64
Amusement
(Outdoor)
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 61 3 36 2 N*
Percent Deviation 40.6%
*The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow the existing 38 parking stalls to remain with no
additional parking stalls to be installed with the proposed addition.
ES/NE
PRJ-74896
02/26/19
PRJ-74896
02/26/19
Aฌ
Աฌ
‫ ں‬ㅡ″ƥֱɱ7̶゜ㅡफฌ
Ⓢฌ
Őฌ
ฌफ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌ7Ḷ7ЌǲÛ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ ฌ
゜ธ
ㅡ ՙธƥֱՙफฌ
7‫ں‬
ƥֱㄦ
̶ฎ
ǲṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7ՁǲḚǲЌＣ̬ฌ
bฌ ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗7ՁḶAＣ●ЌḚ ฌ
╗ฌ ԱՁＣḚ7777777ⓈƆǲ 7 Ɔ●Ύǲ 7 AŐǲA77777777777777ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔ ฌ AḚŐ●bⓈՁ╗ⓈŐAՁ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ77 ‫̶゜ں‬ｘｘ ฌ
A7 ỢⓈḶЌƆǲ╗7ĠⓈ╗7ĠḶⓈƆǲƆ7ＣⓈbìƆ7AЌＣ7ḚǲǲƆǲ77777 ธㅡƥṲ̶ՙƥ7 ฎฎฎ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 77777 ธ㈠ɱ″ ฌ AbbǲƆƆḶŐù7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ7AŐǲA7 ‫̶゜ں‬ｘｘ ฌ
Աฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ7╗ŐA●ՁǲŐ 7 ฎƥṲㅡ‫ں‬ƥ7 ̶ธฎ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠ｘɱ ฌ Ḷ●bǲ7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦｘ ฌ
Ɔฌ Ûฌ bฌ ҜA●Ќ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ 7 ฎธƥṲ″ㅡƥ7 ㄦⓒธㅡฎ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶″㈠‫ں‬ɱ ฌ
ธफฌ Ɔ●ＣǲÛAՁì7AŐǲA7ӧƆ╗AЌＣ●ЌḚỏ7 ‫゜ں‬ՙ ฌ
ธ̶″ƥֱฎ7‫゜ں‬ Ｃฌ ĠḶⓈƆǲƆ7Ա●ŐＣƆ7●Ќ7Û●Ќ╗ǲŐ 7 ‫̶ں‬ƥṲธฎƥ7 ̶″ㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ธ फฌ ОA╗●Ḷ゜╗AԱՁǲƆ 7 ӧƆǲA╗●ЌḚỏ7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦ ฌ
7‫゜ ں‬ ǲฌ AЋ●AŐù 7 ‫ں‬ธ㈠ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬″ƥ7 ธｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠″ՙ ฌ
Ⓢฌ ‫ں‬ｘ ╗ฌ
bḶฌ
Ɔ╗AḚǲ 7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦ ฌ
̶ƥֱ ฌ AЋ●AŐù 7 ‫ں‬ธ㈠ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬″ƥ7 ธｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠″ՙ ฌ
ㄦ AҜОĠ●╗ĠǲA╗ǲŐ 7 ӧƆǲA╗●ЌḚỏ7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦ ฌ
Ḛฌ AЋ●AŐù 7 ‫̶ں‬㈠ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬″ƥ7 ธ‫ں‬″7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ՙธ ฌ
ǲ7 ฌ Ġฌ ҜA●Ќ╗ǲЌAЌbǲ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚֱƆ╗ḶŐAḚǲ 7 ‫ں‬ㅡƥṲธｘƥ7 ธฎｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ɱ̶ ฌ ОՁⓈҜԱ●ЌḚ7●Ṳ╗ⓈŐǲ7bAՁbⓈՁA╗●ḶЌ ฌ
●ฌ
फฌ
ҜA●Ќ╗ǲЌAЌbǲ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚֱҜA●Ќ╗ 7 ̶ɱƥṲ″‫ں‬ƥ7 ธⓒ̶ՙɱ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ՙ㈠ɱ̶ ฌ ԱAƆǲＣ7ḶЌ7ǲṲĠ●Ա●╗●ḶЌ7ĠAՁՁ ฌ
゜ธ
Ｃฌ İฌ ŐǲＣ7ŐḶḶҜ7ֱ7ĠḶⓈƆǲƆ7Ա●ŐＣƆ 7 ธ″ƥṲ̶ɱƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒｘ‫ں‬ㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶㈠̶ฎ ฌ ̶ⓒｘ″″7ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔ ฌ
ฎ7‫ں‬
ìฌ
ƥֱ
Ḛฌ ОA╗●Ḷ 7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥṲธ″ƥ7 ̶ɱｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ՙฎ ฌ ‫ں‬ⓒㄦ̶̶7ҜǲЌ7ִ7‫ں‬ⓒㄦ̶̶7ÛḶҜǲЌ ฌ
Ձฌ
̶‫ں‬
ƆĠǲＣ7ֱ7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ 7 ‫ں‬ㅡƥṲธ‫ں‬ƥ7 ธɱㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ɱฎ ฌ ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ ฌ
Ќฌ Ҝฌ AЌ●ҜAՁ7AŐǲA7ֱ7bĠ●bìǲЌƆ 7 ‫ں‬ธƥṲ‫ں‬ธƥ7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ㅡฎ ฌ ╗Ḷ●Ձǲ╗Ɔ ฌ
Ћฌ
Ќฌ ԱA╗ĠŐḶḶҜ 7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬ㄦƥ7 ธธㄦ7Ɔ㈠㈠ฌ ҜǲЌ7ए7‫ں゜ں‬ธㄦ77ए7‫ں‬ธ㈠̶ ฌ
Ġฌ Ḷฌ ՁAŐḚǲ7ỢⓈḶЌƆǲ╗7ĠⓈ╗7Ձ●ḚĠ╗7ḶŐ7ҜAbAÛƆ 7 ̶ㅡƥṲㄦｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒՙｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ㄦ㈠″ՙ ฌ ÛḶҜǲЌ7ए7‫゜ں‬″ㄦ7ए7ธ̶㈠″ ฌ
Оฌ ҜA●Ќ╗ǲЌAЌbǲ7AЌＣ7ḶḶＣ7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ 7 ‫ں‬″ƥゥธㄦƥ7 ㅡｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠̶̶ ฌ ՁAЋA╗ḶŐ●ǲƆ ฌ
●7 Ҝฌ Ợฌ Ɔ╗AḚǲ7ֱ7ЌḶ╗7A7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ 7 ㄦｘɱ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠ՙ ฌ ҜǲЌ7ए7‫゜ں‬ธｘｘ7ए7ՙ㈠ՙ ฌ
Őฌ bĠ●bìǲЌ7bḶḶО 7 ธ̶ƥṲฎｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒฎㅡｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ″㈠‫ ̶ں‬ฌ
Ợฌ ÛḶҜǲЌ7ए7‫゜ں‬ธｘｘ7ए7ՙ㈠ՙ ฌ
Ⓢฌ Ɔฌ ЌǲÛ7AЋ●AŐù 7 ㄦｘƥṲ̶ｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒㄦｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ㄦฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ ฌ
╗ฌ ЌǲÛ7ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AЋ●AŐù 7 ธｘƥṲㄦｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒｘｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶㈠̶̶ ฌ ҜǲЌ7ए7‫̶ں‬7╗Ḷ●Ձǲ╗Ɔ7ִ7ฎ7ՁAЋA╗ḶŐ●ǲƆ ฌ
Ձฌ Ⓢฌ
Ɔ●ＣǲÛAՁì7AŐǲA7 ‫ں‬″ⓒธ″″7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ธⓒ̶ธ̶㈠ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ÛḶҜǲЌ7ए7ธㅡ7╗Ḷ●Ձǲ╗Ɔ7ִ7ฎ7ՁAЋA╗ḶŐ●ǲƆ ฌ
ìฌ Ћฌ
İ7 AҜОĠ●╗ĠǲA╗ǲŐ7ƆǲA╗●ЌḚ7AŐǲA 7 ㄦⓒɱｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶ɱ̶㈠̶̶ ฌ
Û7 ОAŐì●ЌḚ7bAՁbⓈՁA╗●ḶЌ ฌ
ОA╗●Ḷ7╗AԱՁǲ7AŐǲA7 ธⓒฎㄦｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬ɱｘ ฌ
bⓈŐŐǲЌ╗Ձù7ЌḶ7ǲṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ╗Ő●О●ЌḚ7ƆḶ7ЌḶ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ ฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁƆ 7 ԱՁＣḚ7AŐǲA 7 ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔ ฌ
bḶⓈЌ╗7AЋA●ՁAԱՁǲ ฌ
ธธ ̶ƥֱɱ7‫゜ں‬ㅡ फฌ
‫ں‬ฎⓒ″‫ں‬ｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶ⓒｘ″ㄦ㈠ㅡ‫ں‬ฌ
ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ ฌ
‫ں‬ฎⓒ″‫ں‬ｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7゜7ธｘｘ7ए7ɱㅡ7ƆОAbǲƆ ฌ
ㅡ7Ġb7ƆОAbǲƆ7ӧ‫ں‬7ЋAЌỏฌ
ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ̬ฌ
̶ฎ7ƆОAbǲƆ7Û゜7ӧธỏĠbӧ‫ں‬ỏЋAЌ7Abb ฌ
Ḷฌ
Оฌ
bฌ
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7 ‫ں‬फ7ए7̶ｘƥֱｘफฌ
ธ7 Ɔ●╗ǲ7ОՁAЌฌ
ОŐİֱՙㅡฎɱ″
Aฌ
Աฌ
‫ ں‬ㅡ″ƥֱɱ7̶゜ㅡफฌ
Ⓢฌ
Őฌ
ฌफ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌ7Ḷ7ЌǲÛ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ ฌ
゜ธ
ㅡ ՙธƥֱՙफฌ
7‫ں‬
ƥֱㄦ
̶ฎ
ǲṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7ՁǲḚǲЌＣ̬ฌ
bฌ ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗7ՁḶAＣ●ЌḚ ฌ
╗ฌ ԱՁＣḚ7777777ⓈƆǲ 7 Ɔ●Ύǲ 7 AŐǲA77777777777777ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔ ฌ AḚŐ●bⓈՁ╗ⓈŐAՁ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ77 ‫̶゜ں‬ｘｘ ฌ
A7 ỢⓈḶЌƆǲ╗7ĠⓈ╗7ĠḶⓈƆǲƆ7ＣⓈbìƆ7AЌＣ7ḚǲǲƆǲ77777 ธㅡƥṲ̶ՙƥ7 ฎฎฎ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 77777 ธ㈠ɱ″ ฌ AbbǲƆƆḶŐù7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ7AŐǲA7 ‫̶゜ں‬ｘｘ ฌ
Աฌ Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ7╗ŐA●ՁǲŐ 7 ฎƥṲㅡ‫ں‬ƥ7 ̶ธฎ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠ｘɱ ฌ Ḷ●bǲ7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦｘ ฌ
Ɔฌ Ûฌ bฌ ҜA●Ќ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ 7 ฎธƥṲ″ㅡƥ7 ㄦⓒธㅡฎ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶″㈠‫ں‬ɱ ฌ
ธफฌ Ɔ●ＣǲÛAՁì7AŐǲA7ӧƆ╗AЌＣ●ЌḚỏ7 ‫゜ں‬ՙ ฌ
ธ̶″ƥֱฎ7‫゜ں‬ Ｃฌ ĠḶⓈƆǲƆ7Ա●ŐＣƆ7●Ќ7Û●Ќ╗ǲŐ 7 ‫̶ں‬ƥṲธฎƥ7 ̶″ㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠ธ‫ں‬ฌ
ธ फฌ ОA╗●Ḷ゜╗AԱՁǲƆ 7 ӧƆǲA╗●ЌḚỏ7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦ ฌ
7‫゜ ں‬ ǲฌ AЋ●AŐù 7 ‫ں‬ธ㈠ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬″ƥ7 ธｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠″ՙ ฌ
Ⓢฌ ‫ں‬ｘ ╗ฌ
bḶฌ
Ɔ╗AḚǲ 7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦ ฌ
̶ƥֱ ฌ AЋ●AŐù 7 ‫ں‬ธ㈠ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬″ƥ7 ธｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠″ՙ ฌ
ㄦ AҜОĠ●╗ĠǲA╗ǲŐ 7 ӧƆǲA╗●ЌḚỏ7 ‫ں゜ں‬ㄦ ฌ
Ḛฌ AЋ●AŐù 7 ‫̶ں‬㈠ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬″ƥ7 ธ‫ں‬″7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ՙธ ฌ
ǲ7 ฌ Ġฌ ҜA●Ќ╗ǲЌAЌbǲ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚֱƆ╗ḶŐAḚǲ 7 ‫ں‬ㅡƥṲธｘƥ7 ธฎｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ɱ̶ ฌ ОՁⓈҜԱ●ЌḚ7●Ṳ╗ⓈŐǲ7bAՁbⓈՁA╗●ḶЌ ฌ
●ฌ
फฌ
ҜA●Ќ╗ǲЌAЌbǲ7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚֱҜA●Ќ╗ 7 ̶ɱƥṲ″‫ں‬ƥ7 ธⓒ̶ՙɱ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ՙ㈠ɱ̶ ฌ ԱAƆǲＣ7ḶЌ7ǲṲĠ●Ա●╗●ḶЌ7ĠAՁՁ ฌ
゜ธ
Ｃฌ İฌ ŐǲＣ7ŐḶḶҜ7ֱ7ĠḶⓈƆǲƆ7Ա●ŐＣƆ 7 ธ″ƥṲ̶ɱƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒｘ‫ں‬ㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶㈠̶ฎ ฌ ̶ⓒｘ″″7ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔ ฌ
ฎ7‫ں‬
ìฌ
ƥֱ
Ḛฌ ОA╗●Ḷ 7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥṲธ″ƥ7 ̶ɱｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ՙฎ ฌ ‫ں‬ⓒㄦ̶̶7ҜǲЌ7ִ7‫ں‬ⓒㄦ̶̶7ÛḶҜǲЌ ฌ
Ձฌ
̶‫ں‬
ƆĠǲＣ7ֱ7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ 7 ‫ں‬ㅡƥṲธ‫ں‬ƥ7 ธɱㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ɱฎ ฌ ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ ฌ
Ќฌ Ҝฌ AЌ●ҜAՁ7AŐǲA7ֱ7bĠ●bìǲЌƆ 7 ‫ں‬ธƥṲ‫ں‬ธƥ7 ‫ں‬ㅡㅡ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ｘ㈠ㅡฎ ฌ ╗Ḷ●Ձǲ╗Ɔ ฌ
Ћฌ
Ќฌ ԱA╗ĠŐḶḶҜ 7 ‫ں‬ㄦƥṲ‫ں‬ㄦƥ7 ธธㄦ7Ɔ㈠㈠ฌ ҜǲЌ7ए7‫ں゜ں‬ธㄦ77ए7‫ں‬ธ㈠̶ ฌ
Ġฌ Ḷฌ ՁAŐḚǲ7ỢⓈḶЌƆǲ╗7ĠⓈ╗7Ձ●ḚĠ╗7ḶŐ7ҜAbAÛƆ 7 ̶ㅡƥṲㄦｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒՙｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ㄦ㈠″ՙ ฌ ÛḶҜǲЌ7ए7‫゜ں‬″ㄦ7ए7ธ̶㈠″ ฌ
Оฌ ҜA●Ќ╗ǲЌAЌbǲ7AЌＣ7ḶḶＣ7Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ 7 ‫ں‬″ƥゥธㄦƥ7 ㅡｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠̶̶ ฌ ՁAЋA╗ḶŐ●ǲƆ ฌ
●7 Ҝฌ Ợฌ Ɔ╗AḚǲ7ֱ7ЌḶ╗7A7ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ 7 ㄦｘɱ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬㈠ՙ ฌ ҜǲЌ7ए7‫゜ں‬ธｘｘ7ए7ՙ㈠ՙ ฌ
Őฌ bĠ●bìǲЌ7bḶḶО 7 ธ̶ƥṲฎｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒฎㅡｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ″㈠‫ ̶ں‬ฌ
Ợฌ ÛḶҜǲЌ7ए7‫゜ں‬ธｘｘ7ए7ՙ㈠ՙ ฌ
Ⓢฌ Ɔฌ ЌǲÛ7AЋ●AŐù 7 ㄦｘƥṲ̶ｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒㄦｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ㄦฌ ╗Ḷ╗AՁ7ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ ฌ
╗ฌ ЌǲÛ7ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AЋ●AŐù 7 ธｘƥṲㄦｘƥ7 ‫ں‬ⓒｘｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶㈠̶̶ ฌ ҜǲЌ7ए7‫̶ں‬7╗Ḷ●Ձǲ╗Ɔ7ִ7ฎ7ՁAЋA╗ḶŐ●ǲƆ ฌ
Ձฌ Ⓢฌ
Ɔ●ＣǲÛAՁì7AŐǲA7 ‫ں‬″ⓒธ″″7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ธⓒ̶ธ̶㈠ՙ‫ں‬ฌ ÛḶҜǲЌ7ए7ธㅡ7╗Ḷ●Ձǲ╗Ɔ7ִ7ฎ7ՁAЋA╗ḶŐ●ǲƆ ฌ
ìฌ Ћฌ
İ7 AҜОĠ●╗ĠǲA╗ǲŐ7ƆǲA╗●ЌḚ7AŐǲA 7 ㄦⓒɱｘｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶ɱ̶㈠̶̶ ฌ
Û7 ОAŐì●ЌḚ7bAՁbⓈՁA╗●ḶЌ ฌ
ОA╗●Ḷ7╗AԱՁǲ7AŐǲA7 ธⓒฎㄦｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ‫ں‬ɱｘ ฌ
bⓈŐŐǲЌ╗Ձù7ЌḶ7ǲṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7Ɔ╗Ő●О●ЌḚ7ƆḶ7ЌḶ7ОAŐì●ЌḚ ฌ
╗Ḷ╗AՁƆ 7 ԱՁＣḚ7AŐǲA 7 ḶbbⓈОAЌ╗Ɔ ฌ
bḶⓈЌ╗7AЋA●ՁAԱՁǲ ฌ
ธธ ̶ƥֱɱ7‫゜ں‬ㅡ फฌ
‫ں‬ฎⓒ″‫ں‬ｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7 ̶ⓒｘ″ㄦ㈠ㅡ‫ں‬ฌ
ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ ฌ
‫ں‬ฎⓒ″‫ں‬ｘ7Ɔ㈠㈠7゜7ธｘｘ7ए7ɱㅡ7ƆОAbǲƆ ฌ
ㅡ7Ġb7ƆОAbǲƆ7ӧ‫ں‬7ЋAЌỏฌ
ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ̬ฌ
̶ฎ7ƆОAbǲƆ7Û゜7ӧธỏĠbӧ‫ں‬ỏЋAЌ7Abb ฌ
Ḷฌ
Оฌ
bฌ
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7 ‫ں‬फ7ए7̶ｘƥֱｘफฌ
ธ7 Ɔ●╗ǲ7ОՁAЌฌ
ｘ̶゜‫ں‬ɱ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ՁḶԱƆ╗ǲŐ7Û●Őǲ7ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AŐǲA ฌ
Ġ●7Ő●Ա7Ҝǲ╗AՁ7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7ОAЌǲՁƆฌ
ㄦｘƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ƥֱｘफ7 ‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7 ธㅡƥֱｘफ7 ‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7 ‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7Û●Ｃǲ7Ṳ7‫ں‬ｘƥ7╗AՁՁ7ƆՁ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7ＣḶḶŐ 7 ‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7Û●Ｃǲ7Ṳ7‫ں‬ｘƥ7╗AՁՁ7ƆՁ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7ＣḶḶŐ ฌ
ԱAŐЌฌ ԱAŐЌฌ
ƆՁ●Ｃ●ЌḚฌ ƆՁ●Ｃ●ЌḚฌ
ＣḶḶŐฌ ＣḶḶŐฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱㅡफฌ
●ЌＣḶḶŐ7AЋ●AŐù ฌ
̶ｘՙｘƆb 7 ̶ｘՙｘƆb ฌ
●ЌＣḶḶŐ7Ћ●ǲÛ●ЌḚ7AŐǲA 7
̶ｘƥֱｘफฌ
ㄦƥֱฎफ7
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ ՁḶԱƆ╗ǲŐ7Û●Őǲฌ
Ġ●7Ő●Ա7Ҝǲ╗AՁ7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7ОAЌǲՁƆ7
ธ7 Ɔ●Ｃǲ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AŐǲA 7 ธｘƥֱฎ7‫゜ں‬ธफ7 ฎƥֱՙफ7 ธｘƥֱฎ7‫゜ں‬ธफฌ
̶ｘՙｘƆb ฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7
●ЌＣḶḶŐ7AЋ●AŐù 7 ●ЌＣḶḶŐ7AЋ●AŐù ฌ
ฎƥֱฎफฌ
Ɔ╗ḶŐAḚǲ ฌ
‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7Û●Ｃǲ7Ṳ7‫ں‬ｘƥ7╗AՁՁ7ƆՁ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7ＣḶḶŐ 7 ‫ں‬ธƥֱｘफ7Û●Ｃǲ7Ṳ7‫ں‬ｘƥ7╗AՁՁ7ƆՁ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7ＣḶḶŐ ฌ
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफ7
̶7 Ɔ●Ｃǲ7Û゜7ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7ùAŐＣฌ Ġ●7Ő●Ա7Ҝǲ╗AՁ7Ɔ●Ｃ●ЌḚ7ОAЌǲՁƆ7 ՁḶԱƆ╗ǲŐ7Û●Őǲ7ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AŐǲA 7 ՁḶԱƆ╗ǲŐ7Û●Őǲ7ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AŐǲA ฌ
ՁḶԱƆ╗ǲŐ7Û●Őǲฌ ՁḶԱƆ╗ǲŐ7Û●Őǲฌ
ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AŐǲA ฌ ḶⓈ╗ＣḶḶŐ7AŐǲA ฌ
7"ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌฌ
‫ں‬ㅡƥֱｘफฌ
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
‫ں‬7
‫ں‬ธƥֱฎफฌ
ƆbAՁǲ7̬7 ‫゜ں‬ㅡफ7ए7‫ں‬ƥֱｘफฌ
ㅡ7 "ŐḶЌ╗7ִ7ŐǲAŐ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
VAR-75906 [PRJ-74896] - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-76015 AND SDR-75907 - APPLICANT/OWNER: GILCREASE
NATURE SANCTUARY
8103 RACEL STREET
03/13/19
NATURE SANCTUARY
8103 RACEL STREET
03/13/19
NATURE SANCTUARY
8103 RACEL STREET
03/13/19
NATURE SANCTUARY
8103 RACEL STREET
03/13/19
To: City of Las Vegas Planning
Attn: to whom it may concern

Re: Gilcrease Aviary. - Justification Letter
This justification letter is being submitted in support of the proposed
addition of an aviary building to the existing bird sanctuary located on the
Gilcrease Nature Sanctuary at 8103 Racel (APN number 125-09-401-033).
The new structure will be a 30’x50’ prefabricated metal building with High
rib siding and roofing panels for the enclosed portion. The outdoor areas of
the building will be covered in lobster wire over the steel frame. It is
important for the structure to be sturdy as the birds to be housed there
(approximately 30 cockatoos of various species) are large and powerful.
Imagine a 3 year old with a can opener attached to their face and you ’ll
have a pretty good idea of the destructive potential.
The colors will be complementary with the existing facility. There will be a
man door on either side with a hallway through the middle to provide a path
for guests to walk through and observe the birds.
The 7.88 acre property is zoned C-V. Parking is existing and will be left as
is. The addition of the aviary will greatly improve the ability to care for the
animals and will have no detrimental impact. It is the opinion of this office
that an addition to the facility can only serve to improve the property.
Sincerely
KC Camis, Architect
PRJ-74896
03/14/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAR-76015 - VARIANCE RELATED TO VAR-75906 - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
GILCREASE NATURE SANCTUARY - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW
NO HALF-STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHERE SUCH ARE REQUIRED on 7.88 acres at 8103
Racel Street (APN 125-09-401-033), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-74896]. Staff recommends DENIAL.

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-74896
02/26/19
PRJ-74896
02/26/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SDR-75907 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75906 AND VAR-76015
- PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: GILCREASE NATURE SANCTUARY - For possible
action on a request for a Major Amendment to an approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
43981) FOR THE PROPOSED 3,500 SQUARE-FOOT EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING
COMMERCIAL RECREATION/AMUSEMENT (OUTDOOR) FACILITY [NATURE SANCTUARY]
on 7.88 acres at 8103 Racel Street (APN 125-09-401-033), Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-74896]. Staff
recommends DENIAL.

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-74896
02/26/19
PRJ-74896
02/26/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAR-75964 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER
DISTRICT - OWNER: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL - For possible action on
a request for a Variance TO ALLOW DEVIATIONS FROM TITLE 19.10.020 C-V (CIVIC)
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS on a portion of 20.00 acres at the northwest corner of Centennial
Parkway and Fort Apache Road (APNs 125-19-802-013 and 006), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 6
(Fiore) [PRJ-75913]. Staff recommends APPROVAL.

RECOMMENDATION:
1. Location and Aerial Maps - VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
2. Conditions and Staff Report - VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
3. Supporting Documentation - VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
4. Photo(s) - VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
5. Justification Letter - VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT -
OWNER: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75964 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
SDR-75965 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions: VAR-75964
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 484
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Approval of and conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Site Development

Plan Review (SDR-75965) shall be required, if approved.
Planning

JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
Conditions Page Two
herein.
permits.

landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.
Public Works
10. Provide written proof that any conflicting Clark County Bureau of Land Management
Grants, if any, have been relinquished prior the issuance of permits for this site.
11. Construct all half-street improvements meeting Current City Standards (detached
sidewalks) on Centennial Parkway and Fort Apache concurrent with the
development of this site. All existing paving damaged or removed by this
development shall be restored at its original location and to its original width
concurrent with development of this site. Grant appropriate Public Pedestrian
Access Easements if needed.
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
12. Contact the City Traffic Engineer’s Office at 702-229-2199 to coordinate the
development of this project with the Centennial Parkway/Fort Apache Road Traffic
signal project and any other public improvement projects adjacent to this site.
Comply with the recommendations of the City Traffic Engineer. Additionally, provide
written proof of coordination with Clark County project’s for Fort Apache Road.
Centennial Parkway and Fort Apache Road public rights-of-way, if any, prior to this
issuance of permits for these improvements. The applicant must carry an insurance
policy for the term of the License Agreement and add the City of Las Vegas as an
applicant's expense pursuant to the terms of the City's License Agreement. The
permits or submittal of any construction drawings, whichever may occur first. Provide
and improve all drainage ways recommended in the approved drainage plan/study.
The developer of this site shall be responsible to construct such neighborhood or
local drainage facility improvements as are recommended by the City of Las Vegas
Neighborhood Drainage Studies and approved Drainage Plan/Study concurrent with
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Zone Reservoir and Pumping Station on 20 acres on the northwest
corner of Centennial Parkway and Fort Apache Road.
ISSUES
 A Variance (VAR-75964) is requested to allow deviations from Title 19.10.12 C-V

(Civic) Development Standards. Staff supports this request.
ANALYSIS
The subject property is located in the C-V (Civic) zoning district and has an underlying
General Plan designation of PF (Public Facilities). The proposed Utility Installation will
occupy a portion of the 20 acre site, on two adjacent parcels, along the southern boundary
of the property. The subject property is located at the corner of two primary arterial streets
within the Centennial Sector Hill Plan. The property is adjacent to the jurisdictional
boundary with Clark County, but the proposed development does not require a
Development Impact Notice and Assessment and is not a Project of Regional
Significance.
The applicant is proposing a water pumping station and a five million gallon below-grade
reinforced concrete water reservoir. There is proposed space for a future five million
gallon reservoir. A station building will incorporate equipment to pump 38 million gallons
of treated water per day into the rapidly expanding northwest Centennial Zone. A second
building will house operations and electrical equipment, and a third building will contain
sodium hypochlorite/disinfection processing machinery. The subject site will not be open
to the public, and will only be manned during routine maintenance. As a result, only two
parking spaces will be provided. An access road will encircle the site for maintenance
vehicles.
In the C-V (Civic) zoning district, Title 19.10.020 states that development standards shall
be designed to ensure compatibility of the development with existing and planned
development in the surrounding area. The subject site is adjacent to residentially zoned
properties on the south, and residentially zoned properties in Clark County on the east
and west. Development standards should ensure compatibility with these residential
zones.
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
The proposed perimeter walls and building orientation do not meet the minimum
standards set forth in Title 19.10. Consequently, the applicant is requesting a Variance
(VAR-75964) for deviations to Title 19.10.020. The applicant proposes a ten-foot wall
along the front and corner property lines where five feet is the maximum allowed and a
ten-foot wall along the rear and portions of the west property line where eight feet is the
maximum allowed. The applicant also proposes to place several buildings near the center
of the site, whereas Title 19.10 requires buildings be located at the front of the site at the
minimum setback line. Finally, the applicant proposes no landscape buffer to the north
and west where perimeters of utility installations shall be buffered with drought-tolerant
landscape material. Staff supports these requests as the Utility Installation is a unique
development with specific design elements in order to secure the site.
The applicant proposes to end Darling Road on their property in a modified street terminus
where a cul-de-sac is required. According to Title 19.02.010, the Director of Public Works
has the authority to allow administrative deviations to certain development standards. At
the subject site, the Director of Public Works will allow a modified street terminus instead
of a cul-de-sac. Any future adjacent development would be required to complete the right-
of-way improvements for this portion of Darling Road. All future building permits will be
issued by the State of Nevada.
Along Centennial Parkway and Fort Apache Road, the applicant is proposing 73 trees
and associated shrubs. The landscaping consists of drought tolerant species in
compliance with the Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition Regional Plant List.
The materials and color of the buildings and fence pilasters are consistent with a desert
environment and surrounding development. The design and landscaping are aesthetically
pleasing. The pump station and reservoir is necessary for the communities in the
northwest, and the zoning district was created with Utility Installations in mind; therefore
staff recommends approval of all applications.
order to:

JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]

may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good, without substantial
impairment of affected natural resources and without substantially impairing the intent
and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”
A Utility Installation is a unique development that is located close to, and among,
residential neighborhoods, yet often produces noise and light that is difficult to conceal
from outside the property. Title 19.10 requires public facilities to be oriented to roads at
the minimum setback line. In order to buffer the sounds and light associated with the
proposed use, the applicant has proposed to locate the proposed pumping station and
associated electrical and mechanical equipment buildings at the center of the subject site.
The applicant also proposes a 10-foot tall wall instead of the required eight-foot wall for
added site security and buffering to adjacent residential neighborhoods. Staff finds the
requested Variance (VAR-75964) to not be preferential in nature and is therefore
recommending approval of the request.

The proposed development of the subject site is compatible with the surrounding
development in the area.
Staff recommends approval of Variance (VAR-75964) to allow deviations from Title

19.10.12 due to the uniqueness of the proposed development and necessity of site
security. Apart from the Variance, the proposed development is consistent with the
General Plan, this Title, and other duly-adopted city standards.
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]

Site access and circulation will not negatively impact adjacent roadways or
neighborhood traffic. The site will only be frequented by maintenance personnel of the
water district and is not open to the public.
The building and landscape materials are appropriate for the area and the City.
5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and
compatible with development in the area;
The design characteristics of the proposed building elevations are compatible with
development in the area. The proposed materials are suitable for the surrounding uses
and create an orderly environment.
6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety
and general welfare.
Site development is subject to permits and inspection by the State of Nevada, thereby
safeguarding the public health, safety and general welfare.

The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
24534) to amend a portion of the Centennial Hills Sector Plan of the Master
Plan from L (Low Density Residential) to PF (Public Facilities) on 8.80 acres
at the northwest corner of Fort Apache Road and Centennial Parkway. The
Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
11/21/07
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-24536) from U
(Undeveloped) [L (Low Density Residential) General Plan Designation] to C-V
(Civic) on 8.80 acres at the northwest corner of Fort Apache Road and
Centennial Parkway. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-27508) for a proposed 10,719 square-foot Utility Installation on 14.0
06/04/08
acres at the northwest corner of Fort Apache Road and Centennial Parkway.
The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-29206)
for a 100-foot tall radio communication tower at the northwest corner of Fort
11/05/08
Apache Road and Centennial Parkway. The Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a request for an Extension of Time (EOT-37953)
of a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-29206) for a 100-foot tall
06/02/10
radio communication tower at the northwest corner of Fort Apache Road and
Centennial Parkway.
of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-27508) for a
11/03/10
proposed 10,719 square-foot Utility Installation on 14.0 acres at the northwest
corner of Fort Apache Road and Centennial Parkway.
of a previously approved Site Development Plan Review (SDR-27508) for a
07/10/13
proposed 10,719 square-foot Utility Installation on 14.0 acres at the northwest
corner of Fort Apache Road and Centennial Parkway.
of a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUP-29206) for a 100-foot tall
12/18/13
radio communication tower at the northwest corner of Fort Apache Road and
Centennial Parkway.


There are no relevant building permits or business licenses related to the subject sites.
02/27/19 submittal requirements and deadlines were reviewed for a proposed Variance
and Site Development Plan Review.
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]
Field Check
During a routine field check, staff observed the subject site. There was some
03/13/19
wind-blown trash on the undeveloped lot.

Site Area
Net Acres 20.0
Surrounding Existing Land Use Planned or Special Existing Zoning

Property Per Title 19.12 Land Use Designation District
Subject
Undeveloped PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Property
Undeveloped
North Single Family, TC (Town center) T-C (Town Center)
Detached
Undeveloped
Residential) Residence)
South
R (Rural density R-E (Residence
Assisted Living
Residential) Estates)
R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family, RS (Residential Clark County
East
Detached Suburban) Clark County R-2 (Medium Density
Clark County
R-E (Rural Estates
Single Family, RS (Residential Clark County
West
Detached Suburban) Clark County R-2 (Medium Density
Clark County
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]

Trails N/A
Assessment)

Min. Setbacks
Max. Building Height 56 Feet 24 Feet Y
Mech. Equipment Screened Screened Y

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 North N/A
 South N/A 32 Trees Y*
 East N/A 41 Trees Y*
 West 1 Tree / 20 Linear Feet 30 Trees 0 Trees N**
JAB
VAR-75964 and SDR-75965 [PRJ-75913]

Ratio Trees
Min. Zone Width
 North N/A 8 Feet Y*
 South N/A 8 Feet Y*
 East N/A 15 Feet Y*
 West N/A 8 Feet Y
Wall Height 6 to 8 Feet Adjacent to Residential Existing Y*
*Title 19.10.020 states that development standards in the C-V (Civic) zoning district will be
approved by the submitted Site Development Plan Review. These are the proposed development
standards submitted by the applicant as part of SDR-75965.
** Applicant is requesting a Variance (VAR-75964) to Title 19.10.12 C-V (Civic) Development
Standards.

Governing
Document
Centennial Planned Streets and
Parkway Highways Map
Fort Apache Planned Streets and
Road Highways Map
Parking Requirement
Required Provided Compliance
Gross Floor Parking Parking
Use
Area or # of Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
1 + one for each
Utility
840 SF 300 SF office 1
Installation
space
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1 2 Y*
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 1 0 2 0 Y*
* The site is not open to the public and will not be manned, except during routine maintenance.
Therefore, staff concludes that two parking spaces are sufficient.
JAB
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫̶ں‬
ՁAЌＣƆbAОǲ7AŐǲAฌ
‫ں‬ｘƥ7ԱՁḶbì7ÛAՁՁฌ
╗ⓈԱⓈՁAŐ7Ɔ╗ǲǲՁฌ
ǲЌb●ЌḚฌ
ОĠḶЌǲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ՙ̶ธֱｘㅡㅡฎⓒ 7 !AṲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ㅡ̶ㅡ̶̶ֱՙฎฌ
ฎɱ″ㄦ7 Ɔ㈠ 7 ǲAƆ╗ǲŐЌ7 AЋǲ㈠ ⓒ 7 ƆⓈ●╗ǲ7 ̶ธㄦⓒ 7 ՁAƆ7 ЋǲḚAƆⓒ 7 ЌЋ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ
ՁǲḚǲЌＣฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚฌ
ŐǲƆǲŐЋḶ●Őฌ
ӧԱⓈŐ●ǲＣỏฌ
ԱǲՁḶÛ7ḚŐAＣǲฌ
ŐǲƆǲŐЋḶ●Ő゜ЋAⓈՁ╗Ɔฌ
ՁAЌＣƆbAОǲ7AŐǲAฌ
Û●╗Ġ7Ɔ●ＣǲÛAՁìฌ
╗ⓈԱⓈՁAŐ7Ɔ╗ǲǲՁฌ
ƆǲbⓈŐ●╗ù7 ǲЌb●ЌḚฌ
ӧ‫ں‬ｘֱ ╗7╗AՁՁỏฌ
ԱՁḶbì7ÛAՁՁฌ
ӧ‫ں‬ｘֱ ╗7╗AՁՁỏฌ
ḶОǲŐA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
Ｃ●Ɔ●Ќ ǲb╗●ḶЌฌ
ОⓈҜО●ЌḚฌ
Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌฌ
ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ԱⓈƆฌ
╗ⓈŐЌḶⓈ╗ฌ
●ḚⓈŐǲ7‫ں‬ฌ
ｘ̶゜ｘㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ ՁЋЋÛＣ7b‫ں‬ㅡฎ‫ں‬ฌ
Ab●Ձ●╗ù7Ɔ●╗ǲฌ
ОՁAЌฌ
ฎɱ″ㄦ7 Ɔ㈠ 7 ǲAƆ╗ǲŐЌ7 AЋǲ㈠ ⓒ 7 ƆⓈ●╗ǲ7 ̶ธㄦⓒ 7 Ձ AƆ7 ЋǲḚAƆⓒ 7 ЌЋ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ
İ77Û77Ύ77Ⓢ77Ќ77●77Ќ77Ḷ
İ77Û77Ύ77Ⓢ77Ќ77●77Ќ77Ḷฌ
Ձ7A7Ќ7Ｃ7Ɔ7b7A7О7ǲ77A7Ő7b7Ġ7●7╗7ǲ7b7╗7Ⓢ7Ő7ǲฌ
Ձ7777A7777Ɔ777777777Ћ77777ǲ77777Ḛ77777A77777Ɔ777777777777777Ќ77Ћฌ
̶‫ ں‬ɱ‫ ں‬77Ɔ㈠77İḶЌǲƆ77ԱՁЋＣ㈠ฌ
77Ɔ㈠77İḶЌǲƆ77ԱՁЋＣ㈠7 ՁAƆ77ЋǲḚAƆⓒ77ЌЋ7777ฎɱ‫ ں‬ㅡ″ฌ ㅡ″
╗777ՙ7ｘ7ธ7㈠7ธ7ㄦ7̶7㈠7ɱ7̶7ɱ7ｘ7
╗777ՙ7ｘ7ธ7㈠7ธ7ㄦ7̶7㈠7ɱ7̶7ɱ7ｘฌ !777ՙ7ｘ7ธ7㈠7ธ7ㄦ7̶7㈠7‫ ں‬7ｘ7‫ ں‬7″ฌ
7″
b777777A777777Ő777777Ձ777777Ɔ777777Ա777777A777777Ｃ777777777b77Aฌ
ธธㅡฎ77!AŐAＣAù77AЋǲ㈠7
ธธㅡฎ77!AŐAＣAù77AЋǲ㈠ฌ bAŐՁƆԱAＣⓒ77bA777ɱธｘｘฎ
bAŐՁƆԱAＣⓒ77bA777ɱธｘｘฎฌ
İ77Û77Ύ77Ⓢ77Ќ77●77Ќ77Ḷฌ
Ձ7777A7777Ɔ777777777Ћ77777ǲ77777Ḛ77777A77777Ɔ777777777777777Ќ77Ћฌ
̶‫ ں‬ɱ‫ ں‬77Ɔ㈠77İḶЌǲƆ77ԱՁЋＣ㈠7 ՁAƆ77ЋǲḚAƆⓒ77ЌЋ7777ฎɱ‫ ں‬ㅡ″ฌ
╗777ՙ7ｘ7ธ7㈠7ธ7ㄦ7̶7㈠7ɱ7̶7ɱ7ｘ7 !777ՙ7ｘ7ธ7㈠7ธ7ㄦ7̶7㈠7‫ ں‬7ｘ7‫ ں‬7″ฌ
b777777A777777Ő777777Ձ777777Ɔ777777Ա777777A777777Ｃ777777777b77Aฌ
ธธㅡฎ77!AŐAＣAù77AЋǲ㈠7 bAŐՁƆԱAＣⓒ77bA777ɱธｘｘฎฌ
İ77Û77Ύ77Ⓢ77Ќ77●77Ќ77Ḷฌ
Ձ7777A7777Ɔ777777777Ћ77777ǲ77777Ḛ77777A77777Ɔ777777777777777Ќ77Ћฌ
̶‫ ں‬ɱ‫ ں‬77Ɔ㈠77İḶЌǲƆ77ԱՁЋＣ㈠7 ՁAƆ77ЋǲḚAƆⓒ77ЌЋ7777ฎɱ‫ ں‬ㅡ″ฌ
╗777ՙ7ｘ7ธ7㈠7ธ7ㄦ7̶7㈠7ɱ7̶7ɱ7ｘ7 !777ՙ7ｘ7ธ7㈠7ธ7ㄦ7̶7㈠7‫ ں‬7ｘ7‫ ں‬7″ฌ
b777777A777777Ő777777Ձ777777Ɔ777777Ա777777A777777Ｃ777777777b77Aฌ
ธธㅡฎ77!AŐAＣAù77AЋǲ㈠7 bAŐՁƆԱAＣⓒ77bA777ɱธｘｘฎฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ìǲùЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ ‫ ں‬㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 Ő● ＣḚǲ7 b AО7 ╗ùО● b AՁฌ
‫ ں‬ธ7 ㅡ7 ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
ㅡฌ ธฌ ธ㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ɔ╗AЌＣ● ЌḚ7 ƆǲAҜ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁฌ
ŐḶḶƆùƆ╗ǲҜ7 ╗ùО● b AՁ7 ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
̶㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 AՁⓈҜ● Ќ● ⓈҜ7 AƆb ● A7 ╗ùО● b AՁฌ
̶ฌ ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
ㅡ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
╗ùО● b AՁӧƆ● ǲŐŐA7 ╗AЌỏฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ ㄦ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ㅡ̶㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ╗ùО● b AՁӧԱ Ⓢb ìƆì● Ќỏฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ ″㈠7 ǲ● Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ
ธฌ b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶7 ՙ㈠7 ḶОǲЌ● ЌḚ7 ḶŐ7 ＣⓈb ╗ⓒ7 Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ƥ‫ ں‬ｘ゜AＣธƥⓒ 7 Ɔǲǲฌ
ǲ● Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ b İ7
ĠЋAb 7 ＣÛḚƆ7 ╗ùО● b AՁ㈠ฌ
AＣ̶ฌ ╗ùО㈠ฌ
ฎ㈠7 ḶОǲЌ● ЌḚ7 ḶŐ7 Ҝǲb Ġ㈠ⓒ7 Ɔǲǲ7 Ҝǲb Ġ㈠7 ＣÛḚƆฌ
″ฌ
‫ ں‬ƥֱ″फฌㅡƥֱ″फฌ
ㅡฌ ḚǲЌǲŐAՁ7 ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
‫ ں‬ㅡƥֱｘफฌ
ㄦฌ ‫ ں‬㈠7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 ŐḶḶ7 AЌＣ7 AƆb ● A7 b ḶՁḶŐƆ7 Ա AƆǲＣ7 ḶЌฌ
Ա ǲŐŐ● ＣḚǲ7 ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐ●ЌḚ7 b ḶҜОAЌù㈠ฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
ธ㈠7 ǲ● Ɔ7 ֱ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
● ǲՁＣ7 AЌＣ7 Ab b ǲЌ╗7 Ա AЌＣ7 b ḶՁḶŐƆ7 Ա AƆǲＣ7 ḶЌฌ
ＣŐùЋ● ╗7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜ7 ● Ќb ㈠ฌ
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ̶㈠7 Ɔ● Ҝ● ՁAŐ7 ḶŐ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ7 ОŐḶＣⓈb ╗Ɔ7 Ḷ7 Ḷ╗ĠǲŐฌ
ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐǲŐƆ7 ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 ОŐḶЋ● ＣǲＣ㈠ฌ
ḶО‫ ں‬ｘ‫ں‬7 ḶО‫ ں‬ｘธ7 ḶО‫ ں‬ｘ̶7 ḶО‫ ں‬ｘㅡ7 ḶО‫ ں‬ｘㄦ7 ḶО‫ ں‬ｘ″ฌ
ОĠḶЌǲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ՙ̶ธֱｘㅡㅡฎⓒ 7 "AṲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ㅡ̶ㅡ̶̶ֱՙฎฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ Ｃ‫ ں‬ｘ‫ ں‬Aฌ b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷฌ ㅡ㈠7 AՁՁ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ÛAՁՁ7 ƆⓈŐAb ǲƆ7 Ḷ7 ╗Ġǲ7 Ա Ⓢ● ՁＣ●ЌḚฌ
ՙฌ╗ùО㈠7 ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 b ḶA╗ǲＣ7 Û● ╗Ġ7 फḚƆƆֱ‫ ں‬ｘ7 AЌ╗● ֱḚŐA● ╗● ฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ｘｘƥฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆ7ЋAՁՁǲù7ÛA╗ǲŐ7Ｃ●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ
AЌＣ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐù7 ÛAՁՁ㈠7 Ɔǲǲฌ b ḶA╗● ЌḚफ7 AƆ7 ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐǲＣ7 Ա ù7 AҜǲŐ● b AЌฌ
ОḶՁùҜǲŐ7 b ḶŐОḶŐA╗● ḶЌ7 ḶŐ7 AЌ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ㈠ฌ
Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆ7 ḶŐฌ

ÛǲƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ● Ќฌ ŐǲǲŐ7 ƆОǲb ● ● b A╗● ḶЌ7 ｘɱ7 ɱ″7 ｘｘֱОŐḶ╗ǲb ╗● Ћǲฌ
b ḶA╗● ЌḚƆฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ

‫゜ں‬ธ
‫ں‬ฌ ‫ں‬ฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ
ｘ
‫ ں‬ธฌ ‫ ں‬ธ7 ‫ ں‬ธฌ

ㅡ7 ธฌ ㅡฌ ธฌ
ㅡฌ ㅡ7
Ա AŐ7 ŐǲОŐǲƆǲ╗ЌƆฌ
ḶЌǲ7 AЌＣ7 ḶЌǲֱĠAՁฌ
‫゜ں‬ธ7
ЋǲŐ●ù7 ƆbAՁǲฌ
̶ฌ ̶ฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ ╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ

Ɔb AՁǲ ฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ㅡ̶㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ㅡ̶㈠ㄦｘƥฌ

″7 ″ฌ
̶゜‫ ں‬″फए‫ ں‬ƥ ｘफฌ ● Ќb ĠǲƆ7 ḶЌ7 ḶŐ● Ḛ● ЌAՁฌ
b İ7 b İฌ
b İ7 b İฌ
ㅡฌ
ㅡฌ
ㄦฌ ㄦฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ㄦｘƥ7 ●Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ

b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷฌ b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ｘｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ｘｘƥฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ
AЌＣ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐù7 ÛAՁՁ㈠7 Ɔǲǲฌ AЌＣ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐù7 ÛAՁՁ㈠7 Ɔǲǲฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆ7 ḶŐฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆ7 ḶŐฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7 b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ● Ќฌ 7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ● Ќฌ
ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
AŐbĠ●╗ǲb╗ⓈŐAՁ7
‫ں‬ฌ
‫ ں‬ธ7 ‫ ں‬ธฌ
ㅡ7 ㅡฌ ธฌ
ธՙㅡㄦ7 ΎḶЌǲ7 ОⓈҜО●ЌḚ7 Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌฌ
ḶОǲŐA╗●ḶЌƆ7 ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
̶ฌ
bǲЌ╗ǲЌЌ●AՁ7 ธ″̶ㄦ7 ΎḶЌǲ7 ŐǲƆǲŐЋḶ●Ő7 AЌＣฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ

ǲՁ7 ธ″ㅡ̶㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
″ฌ
b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İฌ
ОŐǲՁ●Ҝ●ЌAŐù7ֱ7ЌḶ╗7ḶŐ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌฌ
Ձ‫ ں‬ｘ‫ں‬7 ㅡฌ
ㄦฌ
ฎ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ Ｃ‫ ں‬ｘ‫ ں‬Ա7 Ｃ‫ ں‬ｘ‫ ں‬b7 Ｃ‫ ں‬ｘธ7

b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ｘｘƥฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ
AЌＣ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐù7 ÛAՁՁ㈠7 Ɔǲǲฌ
ǲAƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆ7 ḶŐฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ● Ќฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ
ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
ḚƆ╗7
AԱ Աฌ
b ĠŐ● Ɔ╗ḶОĠǲŐ7 ՁⓈỢⓈǲ╗╗ǲฌ
ŐùAЌ7 ОǲAŐƆḶЌฌ
b Ġǲb ìǲＣ7 Ա ù̬ฌ

Őǲb ḶҜҜǲЌＣǲＣ7 Ա ù̬ฌ
Ab b ǲО╗ǲＣ7 Ա ù̬ฌ
ＣŐAÛЌ7 Ա ù̬ฌ
‫ ں‬ƥֱ″फฌ
ㅡ7 ㅡฌ
b İ7 b İฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ
İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ
ɱƥֱㅡफฌ
ɱƥֱㅡफฌ
ՙƥֱ‫ ں‬ｘफฌ
ՙƥֱ‫ ں‬ｘफฌ
″7 ″ฌ
ḶОǲŐA╗● ЌḚ7 ՁḶḶŐฌ ḶОǲŐA╗● ЌḚ7 ՁḶḶŐฌ

ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫̶ں‬ b ḶЌ╗ŐAb ╗7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ｘｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ธɱ㈠ｘｘƥฌ
ƆbŐǲǲЌ7ÛAՁՁ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7A7 ƆbŐǲǲЌ7ÛAՁՁ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7Աฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7 7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7 b‫ں‬ㅡฎ‫ ں‬ฌ
ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚ7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ7 A̶ฌ
ОՁ Ḷ╗╗ǲＣ̬ฌธ゜‫ ں‬ｘ゜ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱ7 ‫ ں‬ｘ̬ｘ″̬‫ ں‬″7 AҜฌ

ŐǲЋ● Ɔ● ḶЌƆ̬ฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฎㄦ7 Ḷ7 ธ″̶ฌ

‫ ں‬㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 Ő● ＣḚǲ7 b AО7 ╗ùО● b AՁฌ
ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
ธ㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ɔ╗AЌＣ● ЌḚ7 ƆǲAҜ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁฌ
ŐḶḶƆùƆ╗ǲҜ7 ╗ùО● b AՁ7 ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
̶㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 AՁⓈҜ● Ќ● ⓈҜ7 AƆb ● A7 ╗ùО● b AՁฌ
ㅡ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
ㄦ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
‫ں‬ฌ ╗ùО● b AՁӧԱ Ⓢb ìƆì● Ќỏฌ
″㈠7 ǲ● Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ
‫ ں‬ธ7 ‫ ں‬ธฌ ՙ㈠7 ḶОǲЌ● ЌḚ7 ḶŐ7 ＣⓈb ╗ⓒ7 Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ƥ‫ ں‬ｘ゜AＣธƥⓒ7 Ɔǲǲฌ
ㅡ7 ㅡฌ ธฌ ĠЋAb 7 ＣÛḚƆ7 ╗ùО● b AՁ㈠ฌ
ธฌ ǲ● Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ
ฎ㈠7 ḶОǲЌ● ЌḚ7 ḶŐ7 Ҝǲb Ġ㈠ⓒ7 Ɔǲǲ7 Ҝǲb Ġ㈠7 ＣÛḚƆฌ
AＣ̶ฌ╗ùО● b AՁฌ ɱ㈠7 ÛAՁՁ7 ҜḶⓈЌ╗ǲＣ7 Ҝǲb ĠAЌ● b AՁ7 ǲỢⓈ● ОҜǲЌ╗㈠7 Ɔǲǲฌ
̶ฌ Ҝǲb Ġ㈠7 ＣÛḚƆ㈠ฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ḚǲЌǲŐAՁ7 ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ
İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ
ㅡƥֱｘफฌ
‫ ں‬㈠7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 ŐḶḶ7 AЌＣ7 AƆb ● A7 b ḶՁḶŐƆ7 Ա AƆǲＣ7 ḶЌฌ
Ա ǲŐŐ● ＣḚǲ7 ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐ● ЌḚ7 b ḶҜОAЌù㈠ฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ՁḶⓈЋǲŐฌ ㅡ7 ธ㈠7 ǲ● Ɔ7 ֱ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ●Ќ●ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″̶″㈠ㄦƥฌ ● ǲՁＣ7 AЌＣ7 Ab b ǲЌ╗7 Ա AЌＣ7 b ḶՁḶŐƆ7 Ա AƆǲＣ7 ḶЌฌ
ОĠḶЌǲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ՙ̶ธֱｘㅡㅡฎⓒ 7 AṲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ㅡ̶ㅡ̶̶ֱՙฎฌ
‫ ں‬ธƥ ֱｘफฌ
″ฌ
̶㈠7 Ɔ● Ҝ● ՁAŐ7 ḶŐ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ7 ОŐḶＣⓈb ╗Ɔ7 Ḷ7 Ḷ╗ĠǲŐฌ
Ձ‫ں‬ｘธฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐǲŐƆ7 ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 ОŐḶЋ● ＣǲＣ㈠ฌ
ㄦฌ
ㅡ㈠7 AՁՁ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ÛAՁՁ7 ƆⓈŐAb ǲƆ7 Ḷ7 ╗Ġǲ7 Ա Ⓢ● ՁＣ●ЌḚฌ

ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 b ḶA╗ǲＣ7 Û● ╗Ġ7 फḚƆƆֱ‫ ں‬ｘ7 AЌ╗● ֱḚŐA● ╗● ฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธ″㈠ㄦｘƥฌ b ḶA╗● ЌḚफ7 AƆ7 ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐǲＣ7 Ա ù7 AҜǲŐ● b AЌฌ
ОḶՁùҜǲŐ7 b ḶŐОḶŐA╗● ḶЌ7 ḶŐ7 AЌ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ㈠ฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥ7 ＣธｘธԱ7 Ｃธｘ‫ں‬ฌ ŐǲǲŐ7 ƆОǲb ● ● b A╗● ḶЌ7 ｘɱ7 ɱ″7 ｘｘֱОŐḶ╗ǲb ╗● Ћǲฌ
b İ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷฌ
‫゜ں‬ธ7
ฎ7 b ḶA╗● ЌḚƆฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ●Ɔฌ
ｘ7
ÛǲƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ● Ќฌ

7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
‫゜ں‬ธ7
Ɔb AՁǲ ฌ
̶゜‫ ں‬″फए‫ ں‬ƥｘफฌ ● Ќb ĠǲƆ7 ḶЌ7 ḶŐ●Ḛ●ЌAՁฌ
ЋǲЌ╗7 ╗ĠŐⓈฌ ‫ں‬ฌ

ŐḶḶ7 ╗ùО㈠7 AＣ̶ฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
‫ ں‬ธ7 ‫ ں‬ธฌ ‫ ں‬ธ7
‫ ں‬ธ7 ธฌ ธฌ
ㅡ7 ㅡ7 ㅡ7 ㅡฌ
̶ฌ ̶ฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ ╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ

ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
b İ7 ″ฌ b İฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ՁḶⓈЋǲŐฌ ″7
ㅡƥֱｘफฌ
ㅡฌ
ㅡƥ ֱｘफฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ՁḶⓈЋǲŐฌ ㅡ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ՙ㈠ฎ̶ƥฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ㅡ㈠ㄦｘƥ7 ḶО‫ ں‬ｘՙฌ
Ձ‫ ں‬ｘㅡ7 ㄦฌ
‫ ں‬ธƥֱｘफฌ
ㄦฌ
ḶО‫ ں‬ｘฎฌ
Ձ‫ ں‬ｘ̶ฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
ฎƥ ֱｘफฌ
●Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธ″㈠ㄦｘƥ7 ● Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธ″㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ

ฎ7 ɱ7 ՙ7 ╗ùО㈠7 b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷฌ

b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ●Ɔฌ
Ｃ●Ɔ●Ќǲb╗●ḶЌ7 ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ

ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7 7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ
ОŐǲՁ●Ҝ●ЌAŐù7ֱ7ЌḶ╗7 ḶŐ7bḶЌƆ╗ŐⓈb╗●ḶЌฌ
‫ ں‬ธ7
‫ں‬ฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ
ㅡ7 ㅡฌ
ธฌ
̶ฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7
″ฌ
ㅡƥֱｘफฌ
ㅡฌ
ḚƆ╗7
AԱ Աฌ
ḶО‫ ں‬ｘɱฌ
ḶО‫ ں ں‬ｘฌ
ㄦฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
● Ќ7 ՁŐ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธ″㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥ7 ＣธｘธA7

ɱ7 ՙ7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ
ҜAƆḶЌŐù7
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫̶ں‬ b ḶЌ╗ŐAb ╗7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐฌ
ǲAƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7 ｘ̶゜ｘㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7
ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚ7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ7 A‫ ں‬ｘฌ

b‫ں‬ㅡฎ‫ ں‬ฌ
ОՁḶ╗╗ǲＣ̬ฌธ゜‫ ں‬ｘ゜ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱ7 ‫ ں‬ｘ̬ｘ̶̶̬ฎ7 AҜฌ

ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ɱธ7 Ḷ7 ธ″̶ฌ

‫ ں‬㈠7 ОŐǲ
● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 Ő● ＣḚǲ7 b AО7 ╗ùО● b AՁฌ
ธ㈠7 ОŐǲ
● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ɔ╗AЌＣ● ЌḚ7 ƆǲAҜ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁฌ
ŐḶḶ
ƆùƆ╗ǲҜ7 ╗ùО● b AՁ7 ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
̶㈠7 ОŐǲ
● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 AՁⓈҜ● Ќ● ⓈҜ7
AƆb ● A7 ╗ùО● b AՁฌ
ㅡ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7
● Ќ●ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
ㄦ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7
● Ќ●ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
╗ùО●b AՁӧԱ Ⓢb ìƆì●Ќỏฌ
‫ں‬ฌ ″㈠7 ǲ●
Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ ‫ ں‬ธฌ
‫ں‬7 ЋǲЌ╗7 ╗ĠŐⓈฌ ㅡ7 ㅡฌ
AＣ̶ฌ ŐḶḶ
ฌ ธฌ
ḚǲЌǲŐAՁ7 ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
̶ฌ
‫ ں‬㈠7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 ŐḶḶ
7 AЌＣ7
AƆb ● A7 b ḶՁḶŐƆ7 Ա AƆǲＣ7 ḶЌฌ
Ա ǲŐŐ● ＣḚǲ7 ҜAЌⓈ
Ab ╗ⓈŐ● ЌḚ7 b ḶҜОAЌù㈠ฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ
7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
ธ㈠7 ǲ●
Ɔ7 ֱ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ㄦ‫ ں‬㈠‫ ں‬ՙƥฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ ＣŐùЋ● ╗7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜ7 ● Ќb ㈠ฌ
İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ ̶㈠7 Ɔ● Ҝ● ՁAŐ7 ḶŐ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ7 ОŐḶＣⓈb ╗Ɔ7 Ḷ
7 Ḷ╗ĠǲŐฌ
b İ7 b İฌ ҜAЌⓈ
Ab ╗ⓈŐǲŐƆ7 ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 ОŐḶЋ● ＣǲＣ㈠ฌ
ㅡ㈠7 AՁՁ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ÛAՁՁ7 ƆⓈŐ
Ab ǲƆ7 Ḷ
7 ╗Ġǲ7 Ա Ⓢ● ՁＣ● ЌḚฌ
ǲ●
Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ ธฌ ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 b ḶA╗ǲＣ7 Û● ╗Ġ7 फḚƆƆֱ‫ ں‬ｘ7 AЌ╗● ֱḚŐA
● ╗● ฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ b ḶA╗● ЌḚफ7 AƆ7 ҜAЌⓈ
Ab ╗ⓈŐǲＣ7 Ա ù7 AҜǲŐ● b AЌฌ
ОḶՁùҜǲŐ7 b ḶŐОḶŐA╗● ḶЌ7 ḶŐ7 AЌ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ㈠ ฌ
‫̶ ں‬ƥֱธफฌ
Őǲ
ǲŐ7 ƆОǲb ●
● b A╗● ḶЌ7 ｘɱ7 ɱ″7 ｘｘֱОŐḶ╗ǲb ╗● Ћǲฌ
″ฌ b ḶA╗● ЌḚƆฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
ㅡฌ
ธธƥֱฎफฌ
‫゜ں‬ธ7
ｘ7
ㄦฌ
ḶЌǲ7 AЌＣ7 ḶЌǲֱĠAՁ
ฌ
‫゜ں‬ธ7
ฎƥֱｘफฌ

● Ќ● ƆĠ7
ՁḶḶŐฌ
Ɔb AՁǲ ฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
ḶО‫ ں ں‬ธ7
b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷ

ฌ

● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İḶ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ●
Ɔฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆฌ

ḶŐ7 b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗ฌ
Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ●Ќ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
ǲAƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ
ㅡฌ
ㅡฌ
ธฌ
̶ฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ
7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
ОⓈҜО●ЌḚ7 Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌ7 ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ

b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 ǲ●
Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ ธฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ
7 ՁḶⓈЋǲŐฌ AＣ̶ฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ㅡ″㈠″ՙƥฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ
İḶ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ
Ձ‫ ں‬ｘฎ7 Ձ‫ ں‬ｘՙ7 Ձ‫ ں‬ｘ″7 Ձ‫ ں‬ｘㄦฌ
ธธƥֱฎफฌ
ㅡฌ
″ฌ
ฎƥֱｘफฌ
ㄦฌ

● Ќ● ƆĠ7
ՁḶḶŐฌ
Ｃ̶ｘ‫ ں‬b7 Ｃ̶ｘ‫ ں‬Ա7 b İ ̬7 ՁḶb A╗● ḶЌ7 Ḷ
ฌ

● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ●
Ɔฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆฌ
ḚƆ╗7
AԱ Աฌ

ḶŐ7 b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İ Ḷ● Ќ╗ฌ
Ｃǲ╗A● Ձ7 ● Ќ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐùฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫̶ں‬ b ḶЌ╗ŐAb ╗7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ

ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚ7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ7 A‫ ں‬″ฌ

ОՁḶ╗╗ǲＣ̬ฌธ゜‫ ں‬ｘ゜ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱ7 ‫ ں‬ｘ̬‫̶̶̬ ں‬ㅡ7 AҜฌ

ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ɱฎ7 Ḷ
7 ธ″̶ฌ
‫ ں‬㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 Ő● ＣḚǲ7 b AО7 ╗ùО●b AՁฌ

ЋǲЌ╗7 ╗ĠŐⓈฌ ‫ں‬7 ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
ธ㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 Ɔ╗AЌＣ● ЌḚ7 ƆǲAҜ7 Ҝǲ╗AՁฌ
╗ùО㈠7 AＣ̶ฌ ŐḶḶƆùƆ╗ǲҜ7 ╗ùО● b AՁ7 ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
‫ں‬ฌ ̶㈠7 ОŐǲ● Ќ● ƆĠǲＣ7 AՁⓈҜ● Ќ● ⓈҜ7 AƆb ● A7 ╗ùО● b AՁฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ ‫ ں‬ธฌ ӧb ḶООǲŐ7 Ա ŐḶÛЌỏฌ
ㅡฌ ㅡฌ ㅡ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
ธฌ ╗ùО● b AՁӧƆ● ǲŐŐA7 ╗AЌỏฌ
ㄦ㈠7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
╗ùО● b AՁӧԱ Ⓢb ìƆì● Ќỏฌ
̶ฌ ″㈠7 ǲ● Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ ḚǲЌǲŐAՁ7 ЌḶ╗ǲƆฌ
‫ ں‬㈠7 Ҝǲ╗AՁ7 ŐḶḶ7 AЌＣ7 AƆb ● A7 b ḶՁḶŐƆ7 Ա AƆǲＣ7 ḶЌฌ

b İ7 b İฌ Ա ǲŐŐ● ＣḚǲ7 ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐ● ЌḚ7 b ḶҜОAЌù㈠ฌ
ǲ● Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ ธฌ
AＣ̶ฌ ธ㈠7 ǲ● Ɔ7 ֱ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ● ЌƆⓈՁA╗● ḶЌ7 AЌＣ7 ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ƆùƆ╗ǲҜฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ
̶㈠7 Ɔ● Ҝ● ՁAŐ7 ḶŐ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ7 ОŐḶＣⓈb ╗Ɔ7 Ḷ7 Ḷ╗ĠǲŐฌ
″ฌ ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐǲŐƆ7 ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 ОŐḶЋ● ＣǲＣ㈠ฌ
ㅡ㈠7 AՁՁ7 ǲṲ╗ǲŐ● ḶŐ7 ÛAՁՁ7 ƆⓈŐAb ǲƆ7 Ḷ7 ╗Ġǲ7 Ա Ⓢ● ՁＣ● ЌḚฌ
ОĠḶЌǲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ՙ̶ธֱｘㅡㅡฎⓒ 7 AṲ̬7 ӧՙｘธỏ 7 ㅡ̶ㅡ̶̶ֱՙฎฌ
ƆĠAՁՁ7 Ա ǲ7 b ḶA╗ǲＣ7 Û● ╗Ġ7 फḚƆƆֱ‫ ں‬ｘ7 AЌ╗● ֱḚŐA● ╗● ฌ

ㅡฌ b ḶA╗● ЌḚफ7 AƆ7 ҜAЌⓈAb ╗ⓈŐǲＣ7 Ա ù7 AҜǲŐ● b AЌฌ
ธธƥֱฎफฌ
ОḶՁùҜǲŐ7 b ḶŐОḶŐA╗● ḶЌ7 ḶŐ7 AЌ7 AООŐḶЋǲＣ7 ǲỢⓈAՁ㈠ ฌ

ŐǲǲŐ7 ƆОǲb ● ● b A╗● ḶЌ7 ｘɱ7 ɱ″7 ｘｘֱОŐḶ╗ǲb ╗● Ћǲฌ
‫ ں‬ƥ ֱ″फฌ
b ḶA╗● ЌḚƆฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
ㄦฌ
‫゜ں‬ธ7
ฎƥ ֱｘफฌ
ｘ7
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ՁḶḶŐฌ
‫゜ں‬ธ7
Ｃ̶ｘ‫ ں‬A7

● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İḶ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ
Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆฌ
ḶŐ7 b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İḶ● Ќ╗ฌ
Ɔb AՁǲ ฌ
ÛǲƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ
‫ں‬ฌ
‫ ں‬ธฌ
ㅡฌ
ㅡฌ
ธฌ
̶ฌ
b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İฌ
ǲ● Ɔ7 ŐǲЋǲAՁฌ ธฌ
╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ
ḶО‫ں ں ں‬ฌ
″ฌ
ㅡฌ
ธธƥֱฎफฌ
ОⓈҜО●ЌḚ7 Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌ7 ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
ㄦฌ
ฎƥ ֱｘफฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ՁḶḶŐฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İḶ● Ќ╗7 ● Ќ7 ǲ● Ɔฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ AЌＣ7 ҜAƆḶЌŐù7 ÛAՁՁ㈠7 Ɔǲǲฌ
Ɔ╗ŐⓈb ╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚƆฌ
ḶŐ7 b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7 İḶ● Ќ╗ฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफฌ
╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌAŐùฌ ╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌAŐùฌ ╗ḶО7 Ḷ7 ҜAƆḶЌAŐùฌ
ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦｘƥ7 ㅡ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ㅡ7 ǲՁ7 ธ″̶ฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ㅡฌ

ḚƆ╗7
AԱ Աฌ

b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İ7 b İฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ b ḶЌ╗ŐḶՁฌ ㅡฌ
İḶ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ İ Ḷ● Ќ╗7 ╗ùО㈠ฌ AＣ̶ฌ
‫ ں‬ｘƥֱｘफฌ
ฎƥֱ″फฌ
ฎƥ ֱ″फฌ
ฎƥ ֱ″फฌ
ㄦ7 ㄦ7 ㄦฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ՁḶḶŐฌ ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ՁḶḶŐฌ ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ՁḶḶŐฌ

ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ㄦｘƥฌ
● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ ● Ќ● ƆĠ7 ḚŐAＣǲฌ

ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ ǲՁ7 ธ″ธฎ㈠ｘｘƥฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫̶ں‬ b ḶЌ╗ŐAb ╗7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐฌ
ƆbŐǲǲЌ7ÛAՁՁ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7A7 ƆbŐǲǲЌ7ÛAՁՁ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7Ա7 ƆbŐǲǲЌ7ÛAՁՁ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7bฌ ｘ̶゜ｘㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ

7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7 7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7 7 ̶゜‫ ں‬″फ7 ए7 ‫ ں‬ƥ ֱｘफ7
ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚ7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ7 A‫ ں‬ՙฌ

ОՁḶ╗╗ǲＣ̬ฌธ゜‫ ں‬ｘ゜ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱ7 ‫ ں‬ｘ̬ｘㄦ̬ㅡՙ7 AҜฌ

ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ɱɱ7 Ḷ7 ธ″̶ฌ

ОՁḶ╗╗ǲＣ̬ฌ̶゜ㅡ゜ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱ7 ‫ ں̬ ں ں‬ㄦ̬ㄦՙ7 AҜฌ
ЌḶ7 Ɔb AՁǲฌ
ЌḶ7 Ɔb AՁǲฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲAƆ╗7ОǲŐƆОǲb╗●Ћǲฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ÛǲƆ╗7ОǲŐƆОǲb╗●Ћǲฌ
ŐǲЋ● Ɔ● ḶЌƆ̬ฌ bǲЌ╗ǲЌЌ●AՁ7 ธ″̶ㄦ7 ΎḶЌǲ7 ŐǲƆǲŐЋḶ●Ő7 AЌＣฌ
ḚƆ╗7 ธՙㅡㄦ7 ΎḶЌǲ7 ОⓈҜО●ЌḚ7 Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌฌ ЋǲŐ●ù7 ƆbAՁǲฌ ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆ7ЋAՁՁǲù7ÛA╗ǲŐ7Ｃ●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ
AԱ Աฌ
AŐbĠ●╗ǲb╗ⓈŐAՁ7 ‫゜ں‬ธ7 ｘ7 ‫゜ں‬ธ7 ‫ں‬ฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ฎ̶7
ḶОǲŐA╗●ḶЌƆ7 ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ̶Ｃ7 ОǲŐƆОǲb╗●Ћǲ7 Ћ●ǲÛƆฌ
Ɔb AՁǲฌ Ա AŐ7 ŐǲОŐǲƆǲ╗ЌƆฌ
Ab b ǲО╗ǲＣ7 Ա ù̬ฌ ḶЌǲ7 AЌＣ7 ḶЌǲֱĠAՁฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐAb ╗7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ
●Ќb ĠǲƆ7 ḶЌ7 ḶŐ● Ḛ● ЌAՁฌ ฎɱ″ㄦ7 Ɔ㈠ 7 ǲAƆ╗ǲŐЌ7 AЋǲ㈠ ⓒ 7 ƆⓈ●╗ǲ7 ̶ธㄦⓒ 7 Ձ AƆ7 ЋǲḚAƆⓒ 7 ЌЋ7 ฎɱ‫ں‬ธ̶ฌ
ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚ7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ7 A‫ں‬ฌ

Ќ╗Ɔฌ
Ḷ7 ธ″‫ں‬ฌ
ОՁḶ╗╗ǲＣ̬ฌ̶゜ㅡ゜ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱ7 ‫ ں ں̬ ں ں̬ ں ں‬7 AҜฌ
ЌḶ7 Ɔb AՁǲ7
ЌḶ7 Ɔb AՁǲฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲAƆ╗7ОǲŐƆОǲb╗●Ћǲฌ
AԱ Աฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ɱｘ7
Ｃ●Ɔ●Ќǲb╗●ḶЌ7 ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ̶Ｃ7 ОǲŐƆОǲb╗●Ћǲ7 Ћ●ǲÛƆฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐAb ╗7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐฌ

Ќ╗Ɔฌ
ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚ7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ7 Aฎฌ
ОՁḶ╗╗ǲＣ̬ฌ̶゜ㅡ゜ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱ7 ‫ ں‬ธ̬‫ ں‬ｘ̬ｘｘ7 ОҜฌ
ЌḶ7 Ɔb AՁǲฌ
ЌḶ7 Ɔb AՁǲฌ
ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲAƆ╗7ОǲŐƆОǲb╗●Ћǲ7
AԱ Աฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7 ɱ″7
ОⓈҜО●ЌḚ7 Ɔ╗A╗●ḶЌ7 ԱⓈ●ՁＣ●ЌḚ7 ̶Ｃ7 ОǲŐƆОǲb╗●Ћǲ7 Ћ●ǲÛƆฌ
b ḶЌ╗ŐAb ╗7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐฌ

Ќ╗Ɔฌ
ＣŐAÛ● ЌḚ7 ЌⓈҜԱ ǲŐ7 A‫ ں‬ㅡฌ

╗ฌ
╗7
╗ฌ
╗ฌ
╗7 ╗ฌ
VAR-75964 [PRJ-75913] - VARIANCE REALTED TO SDR-75965 - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER
DISTRICT - OWNER: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL
NORTHWEST CORNER OF CENTENNIAL PARKWAY AND FORT APACHE ROAD
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
PRJ-75913
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SDR-75965 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW RELATED TO VAR-75964 - PUBLIC
HEARING - APPLICANT: LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT - OWNER: LAS VEGAS
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL - For possible action on a request for a Site Development
Plan Review FOR A PROPOSED UTILITY INSTALLATION [ZONE RESERVOIR AND PUMPING
STATION] on a portion of 20.00 acres at the northwest corner of Centennial Parkway and Fort
Apache Road (APNs 125-19-802-013 and 006), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore) [PRJ-

RECOMMENDATION:
paper use, backup
PRJ-75913
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
VAR-75957 - VARIANCE - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS-CLARK
COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT - For possible action on a request for a Variance TO ALLOW A
PROPOSED 16-FOOT TALL FREESTANDING SIGN WHERE 12 FEET IS THE MAXIMUM
ALLOWED AND A PROPOSED ANIMATED SIGN WITHIN 200 FEET OF PROPERTY ZONED
FOR RESIDENTIAL USE WHERE SUCH IS PROHIBITED on 8.32 acres at 2851 East Bonanza
Road (APN 139-36-101-001), C-V (Civic) Zone, Ward 3 (Coffin) [PRJ-75912]. Staff recommends
DENIAL.

RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS-CLARK COUNTY
LIBRARY DISTRICT
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
VAR-75957
conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 142
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
SS
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to the standards of Title 19.08.120(B)(11) – Animated Signs

Containing a Changeable Electronic Message.
2. Conformance to the approved conditions for Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
67915).
SS
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is proposing to erect a 16-foot tall illuminated freestanding sign along the
south side of Bonanza Road, west of Wardelle Street. The sign will feature a 48
square-foot double-faced animated LED display with 24-hour on-premise marketing
content.
ISSUES
 A Variance is requested to allow a 16-foot tall freestanding sign where C-V (Civic)
zoning district sign regulations allow a maximum of 12 feet. For public and
semipublic institutions within the C-V zoning district, Title 19.10 allows signs in
addition to those allowed by the base standards on a case-by-case basis subject to
review and approval by the Planning Commission.
 A Variance is requested to allow an animated sign 106 feet from property zoned for
residential use where 200 feet is required. Staff recommends denial.
ANALYSIS
The sign is proposed to advertise a new public library. As the property is zoned C-V
(Civic), special sign standards apply, which are detailed in Title 19.10.020. The base
sign regulations are those that apply in the P-O (Professional Office and Parking)
zoning district. Under these standards, the sign does not meet the 12-foot maximum
height provision. However, on a case-by-case basis, Title 19.10.020(H)(3) permits
additional signs for public institutions subject to the review and approval of the Planning
Commission. In this case, the proposed height of 16 feet represents a 33 percent
deviation from the standard; however, the sign is compatible with the scale of the
adjacent library building and the two-story buildings on the adjacent properties. Staff
therefore has no objection to a sign with a proposed height of 16 feet.
The proposed sign features an eight-foot by six-foot double-sided, animated LED

display facing east and west for intended viewing from Bonanza Road. As this property
is surrounded by residential development within residentially designated zoning districts,
Residential Protection sign standards apply. The adjacent residential developments are
designated R-3 (Medium Density Residential), a zoning district that excludes single
family residential uses. Per Title 19.08.120(C), illuminated signs are permitted as long
SS
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]
as they do not contain electronic message units, animated or flashing signs. However,
animated signs (such as the proposed sign), flashing signs and electronic message
units are prohibited within 200 feet of property zoned for any residential use, including
multi-family residential uses, unless the sign design, location or orientation ensure that
light from the sign will not be visible from the property zoned for residential use. The
sign will be located 106 feet from the adjacent multi-family residential development to
the north of this site and 198 feet from a multi-family residential development to the east
of this site. Although the sign is oriented to the east and west, light from the display and
from the exterior of the supporting structure will still be visible from the multi-family
residential developments. According to the applicant, the proposed sign will be
programmed to provide diminished light output outside of normal library operating
hours.
Although the Unified Development Code provides flexibility in the sign standards to
accommodate public and semipublic institutions such as the adjacent library where
compatible with surrounding development, there is no such flexibility for animated
signage. The applicant has not adequately demonstrated that the proposed sign would
not be placed or designed in a manner such that light from the sign would not be visible
from the adjacent multi-family residential developments. Furthermore, there is nothing
extraordinary about the property that warrants use of an animated display when a non-
animated display would meet Title 19 requirements. Staff therefore recommends denial
of the requested variance, subject to conditions if approved, which include standard
Title 19 restrictions on animated on-premise signs such as brightness, transition time
between messages and duration of message display.
order to:


exceptional topographic conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
situation or condition of the piece of property, the strict application of any zoning
regulation would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardships upon, the owner of the property, a variance
SS
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]
from that strict application may be granted so as to relieve the difficulties or

hardship, if the relief may be granted without substantial detriment to the public
good, without substantial impairment of affected natural resources and without
substantially impairing the intent and purpose of any ordinance or resolution.”

applicant has created a self-imposed hardship by proposing to place a freestanding sign
with an animated display 106 feet from property zoned for residential use. A non-
electronic static sign would allow conformance to the Title 19 requirements. In view of
the absence of any hardships imposed by the site’s physical characteristics, it is
concluded that the applicant’s hardship is preferential in nature, and it is thereby outside
the realm of NRS Chapter 278 for granting of Variances.

The Board of City Commissioners approved a request for a Rezoning
(Z-0019-69) from R-E (Residence Estates) to R-3 (Medium Density
04/16/69 Residential) on 4.73 acres at the southeast corner of Bonanza Road
and 28th Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
(GPA-67913) from M (Medium Density Residential) to PF (Public
Facilities) on 8.34 acres at the southeast corner of Bonanza Road and
28th Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-67914)
from R-3 (Medium Density Residential) to C-V (Civic) on 8.34 acres at
02/15/17
the southeast corner of Bonanza Road and 28th Street. The Planning
Review (SDR-67915) for a proposed 39,898 square-foot public library
on a portion of 8.34 acres at the southeast corner of Bonanza Road
and 28th Street. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
A Reversionary Final Map (FMP-70594) to revert two residential lots to
07/12/17 acreage on 8.02 acres at the southeast corner of Bonanza Road and
28th Street was recorded.
An amended Reversionary Final Map (FMP-71626) to revert two
06/18/18 residential lots to acreage on 8.32 acres at the southeast corner of
Bonanza Road and 28th Street was recorded.
SS
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]


A building permit (54806) was issued for an 86-unit multi-family
09/09/70 residential apartment complex (20 buildings) at 2800 East Bonanza
Road. A final inspection was completed 06/14/72.
A building permit (162165) was issued for demolition of an existing
05/04/10 apartment complex at 2851 East Bonanza Road. A final inspection
was completed 09/27/10.
A building permit (342704) was issued for a public library building at
12/19/17
2851 East Bonanza Road. A final inspection has not been approved.
A building permit (C19-00396) was issued for two monument signs at
01/29/19
2851 East Bonanza Road. A final inspection has not been approved.
A building permit (C19-01046) was issued for a 12-foot tall,
03/28/19 illuminated, non-animated freestanding sign at 2851 East Bonanza
Road. A final inspection has not been approved.
A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to review
02/27/19
submittal requirements for a Variance application.
A neighborhood meeting is not required, nor was one held.
Field Check
A field check revealed that the library is still under construction. The
existing apartment complex on the north side of Bonanza Road is
buffered from the street by mature evergreen trees. Buildings situated
03/13/19 along Bonanza Road have south facing windows except for the
building directly across from the proposed sign location. The buildings
on the east side of Wardelle Avenue are screened by parking canopies
and a CMU wall.
SS
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]

Site Area
Net Acres 8.32
Planned or Special
Land Use
Designation
Library, Art Gallery or
Subject Property PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Museum (Public)
Multi-Family
Residential
General Retail Store,
Other Than Listed M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium
North
Car Wash, Full Service Residential) Density Residential)
or Auto Detailing
Package Liquor Off-
Sale Establishment
Multi-Family ML (Medium Low R-3 (Medium
Residential Density Residential) Density Residential)
South
Warehouse/Distribution
PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Center
Senior Citizen
Apartments
M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium
East Multi-Family
Residential) Density Residential)
Residential
(condominiums)
Multi-Family M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium
West
Residential Residential) Density Residential)

Trails N/A
N/A
Assessment)
SS
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912]

Governing
Document
Master Plan of
Bonanza Road Primary Arterial Streets and 99 N
Highways Map
Freestanding Signs: [south side of Bonanza Road]

Standards Allowed Provided Compliance
1 / street frontage 1 / street frontage
Maximum Number Y
1 total 1 total
Maximum Area 48 SF 48 SF Y
Maximum Height 12 Feet 16 Feet N
Minimum Setback 5 Feet 7 Feet Y
Illumination Internal and external Internal/animated N*
*Per Title 19.08.120(C), animated signs are prohibited within 200 feet of property planned for
zoned for residential use unless the sign design on its location and orientation ensure that the
animated portion of the sign or any other light from the sign will not be visible from the property
planned or zoned for residential use.
SS
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ں‬ธ
ǲAƆ╗7ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐḶAＣ7 ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌ7Ḷ7Ɔ●ḚЌฌ
‫ں‬ㄦ‫ں‬7ǲ㈠7ÛŴผこ7Ɔऑผħ่‫⎯ف‬7Ő₡㈠ฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌ7Ḷฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ɱฌ
ОḶÛǲŐ゜ＣA╗Aฌ ՙｘธֱㅡ̶ㄦֱ‫ںں‬ㄦｘฌ
ʉʉʉ㈠⎯ħこऑ⎯ਙ่㌱ਙ—к‫֭ש‬ผ㈠㌱ਙこฌ
ḶЌ7Ɔ●╗ǲฌ
ЌḶ㈠77 ＣA╗ǲ7 ＣǲƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ
Ձ●ԱŐAŐùฌ
bḶЌƆⓈՁ╗AЌ╗ฌ
Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ÛAŐＣǲՁՁǲ7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗ฌ
ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ธ ฎ╗Ġ7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗ฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆֱbՁAŐì7bḶⓈЌ╗ùฌ
Ձ●ԱŐAŐù7Ｃ●Ɔ╗Ő●b╗ฌ
ОùՁḶЌ7Ɔ●ḚЌฌ
ธฎㄦ‫ں‬7ǲ㈠7ԱḶЌAЌΎA7ŐＣ㈠ฌ
ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ں‬ｘ‫ں‬ฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
ОŐḶİǲb╗7ЌAҜǲฌ ǲAƆ╗7ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆ7Ձ●ԱŐAŐùฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7╗●╗Ձǲฌ
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ں‬ธ ＣA╗ǲฌ ｘ‫゜ں‬ธฎ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ

ОŐḶİǲb╗7ЌḶ㈠ฌ ƆbƆֱ‫ں‬ฎ̶‫ں‬ฌ
ǲAƆ╗7ÛAՁЌⓈ╗7AЋǲЌⓈǲฌ ｘ̶゜ｘㅡ゜‫ں‬ɱ
ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁฌ Ɔ●ḚЌAḚǲฌ
ОAbìAḚǲฌ
ƆĠǲǲ╗7ЌḶ㈠ฌ
ｘ7 ̶ｘƥ7 ″ｘƥ7
″ｘƥ ɱｘƥ7
ɱｘƥ
ƆОֱｘธฌ
‫ں‬ㄦ‫ ں‬7ǲ㈠7ÛŴผこ7Ɔऑผħ่‫⎯ف‬7Ő₡㈠ฌ
ՁǲＣ7Ｃ●ƆОՁAù7bḶЌЌǲb╗●ḶЌƆⓒฌ ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ɱฌ
ОŐḶОǲŐ7bḶЌЌǲb╗●ḶЌƆ7╗Ḷ7Աǲฌ ՙｘธֱㅡ̶ㄦֱ‫ںں‬ㄦｘฌ
ƆⓈООՁ●ǲＣ7Աù7ՁǲＣ7Ｃ●ƆОՁAùฌ ʉʉʉ㈠⎯ħこऑ⎯ਙ่㌱ਙ—к‫֭ש‬ผ㈠㌱ਙこฌ
ҜAЌⓈAb╗ⓈŐǲŐฌ
ธ㈚7Ṳ7ธ㈚7Ṳ7̶゜‫ں‬″㈚7AЌḚՁǲ7●ŐḶЌ7ŐAҜǲฌ
ӧՁǲＣ7ⓈЌ●╗7ƆⓈООḶŐ╗ỏⓒ7ОA●Ќ╗ǲＣฌ ЌḶ㈠77 ＣA╗ǲ7 ＣǲƆbŐ●О╗●ḶЌฌ
Û●╗Ġ7ìùЌAŐ7ㄦｘｘ7●Ќ●ƆĠฌ
ОҜƆ7ㄦ‫ںں‬ฌ
ĠƆƆ7″㈚7Ṳ7″㈚7Ɔ╗ǲǲՁ7ƆỢ㈠7╗ⓈԱǲⓒฌ
ОA●Ќ╗ǲＣ7Û●╗Ġ7ìùЌAŐ7ㄦｘｘ7●Ќ●ƆĠฌ
ŐḚԱ7ՁǲＣ7Ɔǲ╗7●Ќ7bĠAЌЌǲՁฌ
ӧＣǲbḶŐA╗●Ћǲ7Ɔǲb╗●ḶЌỏ7ОA●Ќ╗ǲＣฌ
Û●╗Ġ7ìùЌAŐ7ㄦｘｘ7●Ќ●ƆĠ7 ОҜƆ7ธ̶ɱㄦฌ
Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
ՁⓈƆĠ7ҜḶⓈЌ╗7ƆǲbⓈŐ●╗ù7bAҜǲŐAฌ
ӧ‫ں‬7ОǲŐ7Ɔ●Ｃǲỏฌ
ŐḶⓈ╗ǲＣ7ḶⓈ╗7bḶОù7ԱAbìǲＣฌ
Û゜7ÛĠ●╗ǲ7ОḶՁùbAŐԱḶЌA╗ǲฌ
″ㄦｘｘ7ÛĠ●╗ǲ7ՁǲＣ7ḚŐ●Ｃ7 ОҜƆ7‫ں‬ㅡɱㄦฌ
ŐḚԱ7ՁǲＣ7Ɔǲ╗7●Ќ7bĠAЌЌǲՁฌ
ОA●Ќ╗ǲＣ7AՁⓈҜ●ЌⓈҜ7bՁAＣＣ●ЌḚฌ
ḶЌ7Abǲ7ִ7Őǲ╗ⓈŐЌƆ7Û●╗Ġ7ìùЌAŐฌ
ㄦｘｘ7●Ќ●ƆĠฌ
ŐḚԱ7ՁǲＣ7Ɔǲ╗7●Ќ7bĠAЌЌǲՁ7
ОҜƆ7″ㄦㅡฌ
Ɔ╗ŐⓈb╗ⓈŐAՁ7bḶЌbǲО╗ฌ
AԱŐ●bA╗ǲＣ7‫ں‬ฎ7ḚA㈠7AՁⓈҜ㈠7ԱAƆǲฌ
bḶЋǲŐ7Û゜7ՁⓈƆĠ7ҜḶⓈЌ╗7ՁǲＣฌ
ՁḶḶＣ7Ձ●ḚĠ╗Ɔ7ӧธ7ОǲŐ7Ɔ●Ｃǲỏฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
‫ں‬ธｘ7Ћ㈠7ǲՁǲb╗㈠7ОŐ●ҜAŐùฌ
̶゜ㅡ㈚7bḶЌＣⓈ●╗7ḶŐ7ՁǲＣ7ִ7bAҜǲŐAฌ
ОḶÛǲŐ7AЌＣ7ＣA╗Aฌ
bḶЌЌǲb╗7╗Ḷ7ǲṲ●Ɔ╗●ЌḚ7ОḶÛǲŐฌ ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ں‬ธ ＣA╗ǲฌ ｘ‫゜ں‬ธฎ゜‫ں‬ɱฌ
ՁḶbA╗●ḶЌⓒ7ЋǲŐ●ù7●Ќ7●ǲՁＣฌ
bḶЌbŐǲ╗ǲ7ḶⓈЌＣA╗●ḶЌ̬ฌ
AՁՁ7ƆОǲb●●bA╗●ḶЌƆ7╗Ḷ7Աǲ7ОǲŐฌ ƆⓈԱҜ●╗╗AՁฌ Ɔ●ḚЌAḚǲฌ
ǲЌḚ●ЌǲǲŐ●ЌḚ7ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲҜǲЌ╗Ɔ7Աùฌ ОAbìAḚǲฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐฌ
ЌḶ╗ǲƆ̬7777‫ں‬㈠7Ɔǲǲ7ОAḚǲƆ7ƆОֱｘㄦ7AЌＣ7ƆОֱｘ″7ḶŐ7Ｃ●ҜǲЌƆ●ḶЌƆ㈠ฌ Ɔ╗ŐⓈb╗ⓈŐAՁ bḶЌbǲО╗

Ɔ╗ŐⓈb╗ⓈŐAՁ7bḶЌbǲО╗ฌ
7 777ธ㈠7ìùЌAŐ7ㄦｘｘ7●Ќ●ƆĠ7╗Ḷ7Աǲ7AООՁ●ǲＣ7╗Ḷ7AՁՁ7ǲṲОḶƆǲＣฌ ƆbAՁǲ̬
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ ںں‬ธ㈚7ए7‫ں‬ ɸ ｘ㈚
ธ㈚ ए ‫ ں‬ɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ƆОֱｘɱฌ
7 7777777ƆⓈŐAbǲƆฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ںں‬ɱฌ
ՙｘธֱㅡ̶ㄦֱ‫ںں‬ㄦｘฌ
Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
ＣAù╗●Ҝǲ7Ћ●ǲÛ7Ḷ7Ɔ●ḚЌฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ

ОAbìAḚǲฌ
ƆОֱｘ̶ฌ
Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
Ќ●ḚĠ╗╗●Ҝǲ7Ћ●ǲÛ7Ḷ
7Ɔ●ḚЌฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ

ОAbìAḚǲฌ
ƆОֱｘㅡฌ
Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ

ОAbìAḚǲฌ
ǲAƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
A ●ḶЌ
A╗
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ ں‬ธ㈚7ए7‫ ں‬ɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ɸ ｘ㈚
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ ں‬ธ㈚7ए7‫ ںں‬ɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ƆОֱｘㄦฌ
Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
bḶЌ╗ŐḶՁ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ

ОAbìAḚǲฌ
ÛǲƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
A ●ḶЌ
A╗
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ ں‬ธ㈚7ए7‫ ں‬ɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ɸ ｘ㈚
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ ں‬ธ㈚7ए7‫ ںں‬ɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ƆОֱｘ″ฌ
″ɸֱｘ㈚7╗AՁՁ7Ṳ7ฎɸֱｘ㈚7Û●Ｃǲฌ
ＣḶⓈԱՁǲֱAbǲＣ7ՁǲＣ7ԱḶAŐＣฌ Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
‫ں‬″ҜҜ7ⓈՁՁ7bḶՁḶŐฌ
AԱŐ●bA╗ǲＣ7‫ں‬ฎ7ḚA㈠7AՁⓈҜ㈠ฌ
bAԱ●Ќǲ╗ⓒ7ŐḶⓈ╗ǲＣ7ḶⓈ╗7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗ฌ
AＣＣŐǲƆƆ7Û゜7ÛĠ●╗ǲ7ОՁǲṲⓒ7ՁǲＣฌ
ԱAbìՁ●╗ⓒ7bḶОù7″㈚7Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗7●Ќ7ḶЌ╗ฌ
AЋǲЌ●Ő7ŐǲḚⓈՁAŐฌ
ՁǲＣ7ǲＣḚǲ7Ձ●ḚĠ╗ฌ
ӧ╗ùО●bAՁ7ḶŐ7AՁՁ7ḶЋǲŐՁAОฌ
AŐǲAƆ7ḶЌՁùỏฌ
Ɔ●ḚЌ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
‫ں‬ฎ7ḚA㈠7AՁⓈҜ㈠7ԱAƆǲ7bḶЋǲŐ7Û●╗Ġฌ
ՁǲＣ7ⓈОՁ●ḚĠ╗Ɔ7ӧธ7ОǲŐ7Ɔ●Ｃǲỏฌ
ОAbìAḚǲฌ
ǲAƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ ЌḶŐ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ՁǲЋA
ЋA╗●ḶЌ
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ ں‬ธ㈚7ए7‫ ں‬ɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ں‬ธ㈚
ธ㈚7ए7‫ں‬ ｘ㈚
ए ‫ ں‬ɸɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ƆОֱｘՙฌ
″ɸֱｘ㈚7╗AՁՁ7Ṳ7ฎɸֱｘ㈚7Û●Ｃǲฌ Ɔ╗AҜОฌ
ＣḶⓈԱՁǲֱAbǲＣ7ՁǲＣ7ԱḶAŐＣฌ
‫ں‬″ҜҜ7ⓈՁՁ7bḶՁḶŐฌ
AԱŐ●bA╗ǲＣ7‫ں‬ฎ7ḚA㈠7AՁⓈҜ㈠ฌ
bAԱ●Ќǲ╗ฌ
ŐḶⓈ╗ǲＣ7ḶⓈ╗7Ɔ╗Őǲǲ╗7AＣＣŐǲƆƆฌ
Û゜7ÛĠ●╗ǲ7ОՁǲṲⓒ7ՁǲＣ7ԱAbìՁ●╗ฌ
bḶОù7″㈚7Ġǲ●ḚĠ╗7●Ќ7ḶЌ╗7AЋǲЌ●Őฌ
ŐǲḚⓈՁAŐฌ
ՁǲＣ7ǲＣḚǲ7Ձ●ḚĠ╗ฌ
ӧ╗ùО●bAՁ7ḶŐ7AՁՁ7ḶЋǲŐՁAОฌ
AŐǲAƆ7ḶЌՁùỏฌ
Ɔ●ḚЌ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌƆฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐฌ
‫ں‬ฎ7ḚA㈠7AՁⓈҜ㈠7ԱAƆǲ7bḶЋǲŐ7Û●╗Ġฌ
ՁǲＣ7ⓈОՁ●ḚĠ╗Ɔ7ӧธ7ОǲŐ7Ɔ●Ｃǲỏฌ

ОAbìAḚǲฌ
ÛǲƆ╗7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ ƆḶⓈ╗Ġ7ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌฌ
ՁǲЋA
ЋA╗●ḶЌ
ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ ں‬ธ㈚7ए7‫ ں‬ɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ƆbAՁǲ̬7‫゜ں‬ธ㈚
ธ㈚7ए7‫ں‬ ｘ㈚
ए ‫ ں‬ɸɸ7ｘ㈚ฌ ƆОֱｘฎฌ
VAR-75957 [PRJ-75912] - VARIANCE - APPLICANT/OWNER: LAS VEGAS-CLARK COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT
2851 EAST BONANZA ROAD
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
East Las Vegas Library Pylon Sign: Justification Letter
The East Las Vegas Library Pylon Sign is intended to accompany the newly constructed East Las
Vegas Library on 2851 E. Bonanza Rd. It is an aluminum sign with a full color, double-faced LED
board that will feature various marketing content related to the Las Vegas-Clark County Library
District’s services and programs at the East Las Vegas Library. The LED board is intended to feature
marketing content 24 hours a day, with diminished light output at night (outside of the library hours of
operation) for minimizing light pollution entering the residential complex north of the library site. The
sign is oriented in the east-west direction, to be visible to pedestrians and vehicles traveling east-
west on Bonanza Road and will be located on the north side of the East Las Vegas Library parcel,
adjacent to Bonanza Road, as noted in the site plan.
The sign is 15 feet 3 inches high, approximately 10 feet wide on the primary elevation, and 2 feet 6
inches wide on the secondary elevation. It sits on a 5 foot by 5 foot aluminum base which is 6 inches
in height. The aluminum panels that make up the cabinets leading up to the LED board will be paint-
ed to feature the colors associated with the LVCCLD branding (detailed color information provided
in drawings). The street address is routed and backlit and located just under the LED board on both
sides. The sign also contains a flush-mounted security camera on both sides for monitoring any acts
of vandalism.
The current City of Las Vegas code requires a 200-foot setback of all such electronic messaging
units from residential developments. The intended location of the sign as indicated on the site plan
places it 175 feet away from the neighboring residential complex to the north of the site. We are
requesting a variance based on this condition. The orientation of the sign to the east-west direction
ensures that minimal light pollution will extend to the residential complex to the north. Additionally, a
site survey revealed that the residential complex to the north has no windows on the south facades
that could potentially allow for light pollution to penetrate living spaces. There is also a significant
landscape buffer that mitigates light pollution penetrating exterior or courtyard spaces within the
complex. To minimize light pollution even further, the Las Vegas-Clark County Library District intends
on programming the sign’s content and settings at night so that light output is significantly de-
creased during the time of day when light pollution is most concerning.
PRJ-75912
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SUP-75949 - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT: THAI HEALING
SOLUTIONS SPA - OWNER: DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC - For possible action on a request
for a Special Use Permit FOR A PROPOSED 1,432 SQUARE-FOOT MASSAGE
ESTABLISHMENT USE WITH A WAIVER TO ALLOW A ZERO-FOOT DISTANCE SEPARATION
FROM A RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTY WHERE 400 FEET IS REQUIRED at 6720 North
Hualapai Way, Suite #180 (APN 125-19-313-004), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 6 (Fiore)

RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT: THAI HEALING SOLUTIONS SPA - OWNER:
DEER SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SUP-75949 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 158
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to all Minimum Requirements under LVMC Title 19.12 for a Massage
Establishment use.
3. A Waiver from Title 19.12 is hereby approved, to allow a zero-foot distance

separation from a residentially zoned property where 400 feet is required.
application.
6. This business shall operate in accordance to Chapter 6 of City of Las Vegas

Municipal Code.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a Special Use Permit to allow a proposed Massage Establishment
use with a distance separation waiver from residentially zoned property at 6720 North
Hualapai Way.
ISSUES
 A Massage Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning

district with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
 A Waiver has been requested to allow a zero-foot distance separation from
residentially zoned property where 400 feet is required. Staff supports the request.
ANALYSIS
The proposed Massage Establishment use will operate out of an existing 1,432 square-
foot suite within a 97,415 square-foot shopping center. The shopping center is at the
northeast corner of Clark County 215 and Hualapai Way, and is adjacent to several
undeveloped properties and a 416-unit mutli-family residential development. The
Massage Establishment will be across the street from a shopping center that contains a
convenience store, a mini-storage facility, and a restaurant with drive through. The subject
site is a developing shopping center that contains a grocery store with a package liquor
license. While a waiver for a zero-foot distance separation is required because the
shopping center is adjacent to residentially zoned property to the east, the actual location
of the proposed Massage Establishment use is in the center of the shopping center
separated by a block wall, as there is no direct access from the shopping center to the
residentially zoned property.
A Massage Establishment use is permitted in the C-1 (Limited Commercial) zoning district
with the approval of a Special Use Permit. A Massage Establishment is defined by Title
19 as, “A facility which is occupied and used for the purpose of practicing massage
therapy as defined in LVMC Chapter 6.52. This use does not include the “accessory
massage,” as defined in this Title.” The proposed use meets the definition as the applicant
intends to operate a Massage Studio at the subject site.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]
The Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements for this use include:
1. The use shall comply with all applicable requirements of LVMC Title 6.
A condition of approval has been added requiring compliance with all applicable LVMC
Title 6 requirements.
2. The use must be located on a secondary thoroughfare or larger.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the property is adjacent to North
Hualapai Way, a 96-foot Primary Arterial as indicated in the Master Plan of Streets
and Highways.
3. The use may not be located within 400 feet of any church/house of worship, school,
City park, individual care center licensed for more than 12 children, or any parcel
zoned for residential use.
The proposed use does not meet this requirement as the applicant has requested a
Waiver to allow a zero-foot distance separation from residentially zoned property.
Staff supports the request, as there is no direct access between the subject site and
the residentially zoned property.
4. The use may not be located within 1000 feet of any other massage establishment.
The proposed use meets this requirement, as the subject site is not located within
1,000 feet of another massage establishment.
5. The hours of operation shall be limited to the period between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00
p.m., unless further limited by the City Council on a case-by-case basis.
The proposed use meets this requirement as stated in the applicant’s justification letter
that the business would operate between 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.
While the applicant has requested a distance separation Waiver from residentially zoned
property, staff supports the request as the subject site is a developing shopping center
designed to accommodate a variety of land uses, including the proposed Massage
Establishment use. Staff finds the proposed use to be compatible with the surrounding
land uses; therefore, staff recommends approval with conditions.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]
1. The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses, and with future surrounding
land uses as projected by the General Plan.
The proposed land use can be conducted in a manner that is harmonious and
compatible with existing surrounding land uses. Staff supports the requested
distance separation Waiver from a residentially-zoned property as there is no direct
access to the residentially zoned property from the subject site.
proposed.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and intensity of the proposed
Massage Establishment use, as it is located within an existing shopping center
which is designed to provide a variety of services for the surrounding area.

The subject site is accessed by Hualapai Way, a Primary Arterial, and Deer Springs
Way, a Major Collector, as defined by the Master Plan of Streets and Highways,
and are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed use.
inconsistent with or compromise the public health, safety, and welfare or the
overall objectives of the General Plan.
The approval of the Special Use Permit would be subject to Conditions of Approval
and regular inspections conducted by the Business Licensing Division of the
Planning Department to ensure the public health, safety, and welfare are not
compromised.
The applicant has requested a Waiver to allow a zero-foot distance separation from
residentially zoned property to the east where 400 feet is required. Staff supports
the request due to the lack of direct access between the two properties.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]

The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-12215) 207.83 acres
generally located north of Centennial Parkway between Shaumber Road and
02/07/07
Fort Apache Road. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The annexation became effective 02/16/07.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-20465) from R
(Rural Density Residential) to PCD (Planned Community Development) on
23.30 acres south of Deer Springs Way, east of Hualapai Way. The Planning
Commission and staff recommended denial.
[PCD (Planned Community Development) General Plan designation] to PD
(Planned Development) on 23.62 acres south of Deer Springs Way, east of
Hualapai Way, which included the Providence Square Master Development
Plan and Design Standards. The Planning Commission recommended
06/06/07 approval; staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-25759) U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located east of Hualapai Way, south
of Deer Springs Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval. The approval expired 04/16/11.
The City Council approved a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-25760) for
a proposed 205,000 square-foot commercial development on 23.62 acres at
the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The Planning
Commission recommended approval; staff recommended denial. The
approval expired 04/16/12.
The Clark County Planning Commission approved a Vacation (VS-1067-07)
to vacate and abandon a portion of Echelon Point Drive between Hualapai
way and Eula Street, and a portion of Eula Street located between Echelon
Point Drive and Clark County 215. Clark County staff recommended approval.
The Clark County Planning Commission approved a Special Use Permit (UC-
10/18/07
1065-07) for four Wireless Communication Facilities (Monopalms) on the north
side of Clark County 215, approximately 360 feet east of Hualapai Way. The
approval was subject to reduction to two wireless communication monopines,
one at 80 feet in height and the other at 85 feet. Clark County staff recommended
approval.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-28087) U.S.
Government Patent Easements east of Hualapai Way, south of Deer Springs
08/06/08
Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval. The
approval expired 08/07/11.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]

PCD (Planned Community Development) to ML (Medium Low Density
Residential) on 7.97 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 960 feet east of Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-49494) from PD (Planned
Development) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on 7.97 acres on the
south side of Deer Springs Way, approximately 960 feet east of Hualapai Way.
The Planning Commission recommended approval; staff recommended
denial.
PCD (Planned Community Development) to ML (Medium Low Density
03/18/15 Residential) on 10.42 acres on the south side of Deer Springs Way,
approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai Way. Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-58154) from PD (Planned
Development) to R-CL (Single Family Compact-Lot) on 10.42 acres on the
05/20/15
The Planning Commission approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-60834) U.S.
Government Patent Easements generally located south of Deer Springs Way,
10/13/15
east of Hualapai Way. An Order of Relinquishment of Interest was recorded
05/03/16.
The City Council approved a General Plan Amendment (GPA-60635) from ML
(Medium Low Density Residential) to SC (Service Commercial) [amended
from the original request of GC (General Commercial)] on 10.42 acres on the
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the SC designation;
staff recommended denial.
11/18/15
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-60636) from R-CL (Single
Family Compact-Lot) to C-1 (Service Commercial) [amended from the original
request of C-2 (General Commercial)] on 10.42 acres on the south side of
Deer Springs Way, approximately 285 feet east of Hualapai Way. The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the C-1 designation; staff
recommended denial.
The Clark County Board of County Commissioners approved an Extension of
Time (ET-0084-15) of an approved Special Use Permit (UC-1065-07) for two
12/02/15
wireless communication monopines on the north side of Clark County 215,
approximately 360 feet east of Hualapai Way. The approval expires 10/18/17.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]

The City Council approved a request for a General Plan Amendment (GPA-
64811) from PCD (Planned Community Development) to SC (Service
Commercial) on 4.27 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The City Council approved a request for a Rezoning (ZON-64812) from PD
(Planned Development) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 4.27 acres at the
09/07/16
southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The Planning
The City Council approved a request for a Tentative Map (TMP-64814) for a
two-lot commercial subdivision on 14.27 acres at the southeast corner of Deer
Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a Petition to Annex (ANX-65816) 0.36 acres on the
11/16/16 north side of Clark County 215, approximately 380 feet east of Hualapai Way.
Staff recommended approval. The Annexation became effective 11/23/16.
The City Council approved a Rezoning (ZON-67938) from R-E (Residence
Estates) to C-1 (Limited Commercial) on 0.36 acres on the north side of Clark
County 215, approximately 360 feet east of Hualapai Way. The Planning
The City Council approved a request for a Variance (VAR-66443) to allow a 15-
foot rear yard setback where 20 feet is required on 9.63 acres at the southeast
corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission
recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP-66444) for
a Car Wash, Full Service at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission recommended approval; staff
02/15/17
recommended denial.
a 4,000 square-foot Liquor Establishment (Tavern) use with a Waiver to allow a
339-foot distance separation from a school where 1,500 feet is required at the
Commission recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
a Beer/Wine/Cooler Off-Sale Establishment use with a Waiver to allow a 339-
foot distance separation from a school where 400 feet is required at the
Commission recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]

The City Council approved a request for a Site Development Plan Review (SDR-
66447) for a proposed 98,359 square-foot Shopping Center with Waivers to
allow buildings to not be oriented to the corner and street frontage where such
is required, to allow a six-foot perimeter landscape buffer along a portion of the
south property line where 15 feet is required, to allow a zero-foot landscape
buffer along a portion of the east property line where eight feet is required and
to allow a car wash bay to face public right-of-way where such is not allowed on
9.63 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and Hualapai Way. The
Planning Commission recommended approval; staff recommended denial.
The City Council approved a Petition to Vacate (VAC-67939) a portion of Inyo
Avenue generally located south of Deer Springs Way, east of Hualapai Way.
The City Council approved a Tentative Map (TMP-67940) for a two-lot
03/15/17
commercial subdivision on 14.63 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs
Way and Hualapai Way. The application was amended to a one-lot commercial
subdivision on 9.63 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and
Hualapai Way. The Planning Commission and staff recommended approval.
The Planning Commission approved a Major Site Development Plan Review
(SDR-70252) for a a Major Amendment of an approved Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-66447) for site modifications to an approved 98,359 square-foot
shopping center with a waiver to allow the service area to be located at the front
of the property where required to be located at a rear, side or internal property
06/13/17
location on 9.63 acres at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and
Hualapai Way. Staff recommended denial.
The Planning Commission approved a Master Sign Plan (MSP-70249) for an
approved 98,359 square-foot shopping center at the southeast corner of Deer
Springs Way and Hualapai Way. Staff recommended approval.
The Department of Planning approved a Conditional Use Verification (CUV-
06/28/17 71112) for an 85-foot tall Wireless Communication Facility, Stealth Design at
6680 North Hualapai Way.
The Department of Planning approved an administrative Site Development Plan
Review (SDR-72965) for a proposed shared drive aisle addition at the northeast
04/25/18
corner of the subject site at the southeast corner of Deer Springs Way and
Hualapai Way.
The Department of Planning approved a Conditional Use Verification (CUV-
02/11/19 75768) for a grocery store with alcohol at the southeast corner of Deer Springs
Way and Hualapai Way.
A business license enforcement case (BLE584330) was opened for an
03/19/19
unlicensed rental kiosk inside a grocery. The case is open as of 04/04/19.
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]


A business license (P67-00033) was issued for package liquor at 6730 North
02/21/19
Hualapai Way. The license is active as of 04/09/19.
A business license (G67-01057) was issued for a retail grocery store with
02/21/19 pharmacy and beer/wine/cooler off-sale at 6730 North Hualapai Way. The
license is active as of 04/09/19.
A business license (P67-00035) was issued for restricted gaming at 6730
03/05/19
North Hualapai Way. The license is active as of 04/09/19.
A business license application (G67-02166) was processed for consumer to
03/21/19 consumer money transfer at 6730 North Hualapai Way. The license has not
been issued as of 04/06/19.
02/28/19
submittal requirements were discussed for a Special Use Permit.
Field Check
Staff conducted a routine field check of the site and observed a well-
03/13/19
maintained shopping center with no trash, debris or graffiti.

Site Area
Net Acres 5.46
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]
Surrounding Existing Land Use Planned or Special Existing Zoning

Property Per Title 19.12 Land Use Designation District
Subject SC (Service C-1 (Limited
Undeveloped
Property Commercial) Commercial)
R (Rural Density R-E (Residence
Undeveloped
North Residential) Estates)
R-E (Rural Estates
RL (Residential Low) –
Residential) – Clark
Clark County
County
South CC 215 Beltway ROW (Right-of-Way) ROW (Right-of-Way)
East Undeveloped
PCD (Planned
PD (Planned
West Undeveloped Community
Development)
Development)

Special Purpose and Overlay Districts Compliance
No Applicable Special Purpose or Overlay Districts N/A
Trails (Beltway Trail) N/A
N/A
Assessment)

Street Governing
Classification of Street Width with Street
Name Document
Hualapai Planned Streets and
Way Highways
Deer
Planned Streets and
Springs Major Collector 85 Y
Highways
Way
JAB
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933]
Pursuant to SDR-72965, the following parking standards apply:

Parking Requirement
Gross Floor
Parking Parking
Use Area or # of
Units Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
capped capped
Shopping 1 space / 250 SF
97,415 SF 390
Center GFA
Waivers
Recommendation
A 400-Foot minimum distance To allow a zero-foot distance
separation from a residentially separation from a residentially Approval
zoned property. zoned property.
JAB
PRJ-75933
03/04/19
PRJ-75933
03/04/19
PRJ-75933
03/04/19
SUP-75949 [PRJ-75933] - SPECIAL USE PERMIT - APPLICANT: THAI HEALING SOLUTIONS SPA - OWNER: DEER
SPRINGS VILLAGE, LLC
6720 NORTH HUALAPAI WAY, SUITE #180
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
03/13/19
PRJ-75933
03/04/19
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
SDR-75970 - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER:
TORAH LEARNING CENTER, INC - For possible action on a request for a Site Development Plan
Review FOR A PROPOSED TWO-STORY, 5,675 SQUARE-FOOT CLASSROOM BUILDING
ADDITION TO AN EXISTING HOUSE OF WORSHIP on 0.60 acres at 9590 West Sahara Avenue
(APN 163-06-816-024), C-1 (Limited Commercial) Zone, Ward 2 (Vacant) [PRJ-75914]. Staff

RECOMMENDATION:
4. Photo(s)
6. Action Letter for Z-139-88
7. Action Letter for Z-139-88(22)
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: TORAH LEARNING CENTER, INC
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
SDR-75970 Staff recommends APPROVAL, subject to conditions:
** NOTIFICATION **
NOTICES MAILED 321
PROTESTS 0
APPROVALS 0
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]
Conditions Page One
** CONDITIONS **
Planning
1. Conformance to the Conditions of Approval for Rezoning (Z-0139-88) shall be

herein.

landscaping shall not impede visibility of any traffic control device.
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]
Conditions Page Two
Public Works
9. An update to the previously approved Drainage Plan and Technical Drainage Study
must be submitted to and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
submittal of any construction drawings or the issuance of any building or grading
permits, whichever may occur first. Provide and improve all drainageways
recommended in the approved drainage study update.
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request for a two-story, 5,675 building addition for an existing House of Worship
in a shopping center at 9590 West Sahara Avenue.
ISSUES
 On 02/15/89, the City Council approved Zone Change-Related to Master

Development Plan (Z-0139-88). Condition #3 states that all future plot plans and
building elevations related to this Master Development Plan must be approved by the
Planning Commission and City Council. Staff recommends approval of this request.
ANALYSIS
The proposed building addition is for a preschool at an existing House of Worship. In the
justification letter stamped 03/05/19, the applicant notes that the preschool will “benefit
the surrounding community” and “will improve the lives of the many children and families
who will be able to use the facility.” The subject site is zoned C-1 (Limited Commercial)
and is part of the Village Square Shopping Center. Per Title 19.12.070, a preschool is a
land use allowed as part of a House of Worship. However, when the Shopping Center
was originally approved by the City Council on 02/15/89, a condition was added that
required all subsequent site development plan reviews and building elevations be
reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council.
The House of Worship is in the extreme northwest corner of the Shopping Center, behind
a medical office and next to the West Sahara Public Library. The existing building is at
the rear of the parcel with a landscaped parking lot in front. According to the site plan
stamped 03/05/19, the proposed two-story building will be in the front where the parking
lot is currently located. The proposed building will require 23 additional parking spaces,
and will eliminate six current parking spaces. Nevertheless, the entire Shopping Center
shares parking spaces throughout. If this proposed building addition is approved, the
Village Center Shopping Center will still have 238 more parking spaces than required.
The applicant will reorient and maximize the remaining parking spaces on the parcel, and
will provide landscaped parking islands and an internal pedestrian walkway.
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]
The submitted building elevations show a two-story, 5,675 square-foot structure with
classrooms and restroom facilities on both levels. There is an attached, covered
playground screened by a six-foot wall. The architectural character meets the design
guidelines for a commercial development. There is coherent design and color between
the proposed structure, the existing House of Worship, and the other existing buildings in
the shopping center. The structure provides an aesthetically-minded façade articulation,
massing, orientation and visual interest. The materials consist of stucco and metal
paneling in shades that compliment a desert environment. The landscaping consists of
drought tolerant species according to the Southern Nevada Regional Planning Coalition
Regional Plant List and Title 19 Development Standards.
The proposed 5,975 square-foot building contributes to an attractive, integrated

environment consistent with the intent of commercial development and the adjacent
neighborhoods. Staff finds the proposed development meets the requirements of the Title
19 Development Standards and recommends approval of this Site Development Plan
Review.

The proposed development is designed to have direct access to, and be compatible with,
the layout and landscape design of the existing shopping center and other development
along the Sahara Avenue corridor.
The proposed development is consistent with the density and intensity of use in the
General Plan, and is consistent with Title 19.12.

The proposed site access and circulation patterns do not negatively impact adjacent
roadways or neighborhood traffic.
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]
The landscape species are consistent with the previously approved planting list
submitted as part of the original landscape plan. The building and landscape materials
are appropriate for the area and the City.
5. Building elevations, design characteristics and other architectural and aesthetic

features are not unsightly, undesirable, or obnoxious in appearance; create an
orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment; and are harmonious and
compatible with development in the area;
The design characteristics and building elevations blend with the existing structure and
will create an orderly and aesthetically pleasing environment.
6. Appropriate measures are taken to secure and protect the public health, safety
and general welfare.
The proposed building is subject to building permit review and regular inspections
during construction protecting the public health, safety and general welfare.

The City Council approved an Annexation (A-0018-80) of a parcel of land
generally bounded by Sahara Avenue on the south, Hualapai Way on the
12/22/80 west, Ducharme Avenue on the north and Durango Drive on the east,
containing approximately 2,246 acres of land. Planning Commission and staff
The City Council approved a Rezoning (Z-0139-88) application for the
reclassification of property from N-U (Non Urban) under Resolution of Intent
to R-PD4 (Residential Planned Development - 4 Units Per Acre), P-R
(Professional Office and Parking), C-1 (Limited Commercial), and C-V (Civic),
02/15/89 to R-PD7 (Residential Planned Development- 7 Units Per Acre), R-3 (Medium
Density Residence), and C-1 (Limited Commercial) for property generally
located on the west side of Fort Apache Road, between Sahara Avenue and
Charleston Boulevard. The Planning Commission and staff recommended
approval.
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]


A building permit (#22890) was issued for a shell building at 9580 West Sahara
05/03/99
Ave. A final inspection and certificate of completion were approved 09/24/01.
A building permit (#7419) was issued for a shell building at 9590 West Sahara
07/26/99
Ave. A final inspection and certificate of completion were approved 08/28/01.
A building permit (#99016231) was issued for a shell building at 9570 West
08/13/99 Sahara Ave. A final inspection and certificate of completion were approved
05/25/00.
Staff conducted a pre-application meeting where the submittal requirements
02/28/19
for a Site Development Plan Review were discussed.
Field Check
Staff conducted a site visit and noted a well maintained house of worship and
03/13/19
parking lot without debris or graffiti.

Site Area
Net Acres 0.60
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]
Existing Land
Surrounding Planned or Special
Use Per Title Existing Zoning District
Property Land Use Designation
19.12
Subject SC (Service
Shopping Center C-1 (Limited Commercial)
M (Medium Density R-3 (Medium Density
North Multi-Family
R-PD20 (Residential
M (Medium Density
South Multi-Family Planned Development –
Residential)
20 Units per Acre)
SC (Service
East Shopping Center C-1 (Limited Commercial)
Commercial)
Government
West PF (Public Facilities) C-V (Civic)
Facility (Library)

Peccole Ranch Y
Sahara West Walkable Community Plan Y
Trails N/A
Assessment)
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]
Pursuant to Title 19.08 the following standards apply:

Min. Setbacks
 Rear 20 Feet 18 Feet Y*
Min. Distance Between Buildings 6 Feet 15 Feet Y
Max. Lot Coverage 50% % 31 % Y
Max. Building Height N/A 32 Feet Y
Screened, Gated, Screened,
Trash Enclosure Y
w/ a Roof or Trellis Gated, Roof
*Setbacks approved by Rezoning (Z-0139-88).

Ratio Trees
Buffer Trees:
 North Existing
 South Internal Lot Line
 East Internal Lot Line
Parking Area
Spaces, plus 1 tree at end 4 Trees 4 Trees Y
Trees
of each row of spaces
Min. Zone Width
 North Existing 18 Feet Y
 South Internal Lot Line
 East Internal Lot Line
Wall Height 6-8 Feet Adjacent to Residential 6 Feet Y
JAB
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914]

Street
Classification of Governing Document Street Width with Street
Name
Sahara Master Plan of Streets
Avenue and Highways
Parking Requirement
Gross Floor Parking Parking
Use
Area or # of Parking Ratio Handi- Handi-
Regular Regular
Units capped capped
Shopping
432,442 SF 1 space / 250 SF 1,730
Center
Proposed 5,675 SF 1 space / 250 SF 23
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED 1,752 1,990 87 Y
Regular and Handicap Spaces Required 1,725 27 1,903 87 Y
JAB
ОŐİֱՙㄦɱ‫ں‬ㅡ
ОՁ77ए
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬77Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7 Ɔ●╗ǲ77●Ќ@ḶŐҜA╗●ḶЌฌ
ΎḶЌ●ЌḚ̬ฌ
bֱ‫ ں‬7ֱ7Ձħこħ‫֭ש‬₡7bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴкฌ
AОЌ̬ฌ
ОŴผ㌱֭к7Ќਙ㈠7‫ ں‬″̶ֱｘ″ֱฎ‫ ں‬″ֱｘธㅡฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬77″7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴккฌ ОՁ bḶҜҜǲŐb●AՁ7AŐǲA7̬ฌ
‫ש‬ਙ77Ő֭こŴħ่7 77ए
″㈠ｘƥฌ ОŴผ㌱֭к̬7 ӧAऑऑผਙゥħこŴ‫֭ש‬ⓒ7‫ש‬ਙ7⇡֭7Ћ֭ผħ⑾ħ֭₡ỏฌ
77‫ں‬
ｘ ธ㈠ Ќ֭‫ש‬7Aผ֭Ŵ̬7 ธ″ⓒธㅡธ7⎯⑾ฌ ｘ㈠″ｘธ Ŵ㌱ฌ
‫ں‬ƥ Ќ֭ʉ77Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Aผ֭Ŵ̬ฌ ㄦⓒ″ՙㄦ7‫⑾⎯ف‬ฌ
7 ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ƥ‫ف‬7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Aผ֭Ŵ̬ฌ ՙⓒㄦՙㄦ7‫⑾⎯ف‬ฌ
Ќ֭ʉ77″7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴккฌ Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7Aผ֭Ŵ̬ฌ ‫̶ ں‬ⓒธㄦｘ7‫⑾⎯ف‬ฌ
ǲ่㌱кਙ⎯ħ่‫ف‬77ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡7 ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭ฌ
@AŐ̬7 ӧ‫̶ ں‬ⓒธㄦｘ7‫⑾⎯ف‬ỏฌ ｘ㈠ㄦｘㄦฌ
ÛŴк+ʉŴੂ⎯7 ÛŴк+ʉŴੂ⎯ฌ
bਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴ‫̬֭ف‬7 ӧฎⓒ‫ ں ں‬ՙ7‫⑾⎯ف‬ỏ7 ｘ㈠̶ｘɱฌ
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭ฌ
bֱ‫ ں‬7ֱ7Ձħこħ‫֭ש‬₡ฌ
bֱЋ7ֱ7bħ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱77Ｃħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ฌ bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴкฌ
ฌ
ЌＣ
ӧՁħ⇡ผŴผੂỏฌ Ｃħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ฌ
ḶⓈ
ฎƥ
ОŴผ+ħ่‫ف‬77Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ฌ
ḚŐ
ӧĠਙ‫֭ש‬кỏฌ
Aù
ОՁ
Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡̬7 ӧƆγŴผ֭₡77ОŴผ+ħ่‫゜ف‬A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ɔγਙऑऑħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ỏฌ
ㅡｘ₡㈠7एฌ
ŐŴ
Ɔγਙऑऑħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ̬7 ‫ ں‬7ऑ֭ผ7ธㄦｘ7⎯⑾7 ㅡ̶ธⓒㅡㅡธ7゜7ธㄦｘ7ए‫ ں‬ⓒՙ̶ｘฌ
Ќ֭ʉ7Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫̬ف‬7 ‫ ں‬7ऑ֭ผ7ธㄦｘ7⎯⑾ฌ ㄦⓒ″ՙㄦ7゜7ธㄦｘ7ए7 ธ̶ฌ
Ќ֭ʉฌ ╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк̬7 ӧƆγਙऑऑħ่‫ف‬77b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ો7Ќ֭ʉ77Աк₡‫ف‬ỏ7 ‫ ں‬ⓒՙㄦ̶ฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
ОՁ77ए77‫ ں‬ㅡ̶㈠ㄦƥฌ
Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7 Оผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡̬7 ӧƆγŴผ֭₡77ОŴผ+ħ่‫゜ف‬A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯7ʉħ‫ש‬γ7Ɔγਙऑऑħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ỏฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬77b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ7ƆऑŴ㌱֭⎯77Оผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡̬7 ‫ ں‬ⓒɱɱ″ฌ
ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴк+ʉŴੂฌ
ƆऑŴ㌱֭⎯77Ձਙ⎯‫ש‬77ऑ֭ผ77Ќ֭ʉ77Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫̬ف‬7 ֱ″ฌ
ӧธ‫ ں‬7ОŴผ㌱֭к7ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ƥ‫ف‬77Оผ+‫ف‬77ֱ7‫ ں‬ㄦ7ОŴผ㌱֭к77Ќ֭ʉ77Оผ+‫ف‬ฌ
Ќ֭ʉ77″7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴккฌ ƆγŴผ֭₡77Ｃผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂฌ
╗ਙ‫ש‬Ŵк̬7 ӧƆγਙऑऑħ่‫ف‬7b่֭‫֭ש‬ผỏ7 ‫ ں‬ⓒɱɱｘฌ
ฌ
ǲ่㌱кਙ⎯ħ่‫ف‬77ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡ฌ
ЌＣ
ОŴผ+ħ่‫ف‬7ŐŴ‫ש‬ħਙ̬ฌ ㅡ㈠″ｘ77ऑ֭ผ7‫ ں‬ｘｘｘ7 ‫ ں‬7ऑ֭ผ7ธ‫ ں‬ՙฌ
ḶⓈ
ḚŐ
bਙ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ֭₡ฌ
Aù
Ġ゜b7Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭₡̬7 ӧ╗γħ⎯77ОŴผ㌱֭кỏฌ
ƥ
ОՁ
ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡7 ‫ֱ ں‬ธㄦ77ƆऑŴ㌱֭⎯77ए77‫ ں‬7Ġb7ƆऑŴ㌱֭⎯ฌ ‫ں‬ฌ
ㅡ
Оผਙ‫ﭨ‬ħ₡֭₡̬ฌ ธฌ
ฌ㈠ｘ
ɱ
О
″ฌ
‫ ں‬ธ Ձ77ए
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7 ħผਙ่7こਙ—่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ฌ
‫ف‬ผŴ่₡7‫ש֭ש‬ਙ่7₡ผฌ
֭к,γਙผ่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
㌱่֭‫่่֭ש‬ħŴк7ऑ,ʉੂฌ
Ő
Ќ֭ʉ77ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬77Ɔħ₡֭ʉŴк+ฌ
ए
Ŵ่่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ Ќ㈠7ՁAƆฌ
ㄦ
ธ
ƥ
кਙ่֭7こ‫่ש‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ЋǲḚAƆฌ
㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
ɱƥ7 Őए
Ŵк֭ゥŴ่₡֭ผฌ
ธ ㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ฎ ㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ƥฌ
‫ ں‬ฎƥฌ
⎯こਙ,֭7ผŴ่㌱γ7ผ₡ฌ ㌱Ŵผ֭ੂ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
кŴ,֭7こ֭Ŵ₡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
ɱฌ Ɔ—ここ֭ผкħ่ฌ
Ŵऑ֭
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7 Оʉੂ7 ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ ⇡ਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ผ₡ฌ
㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ ㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ
₡⎯㌱
Ɔ‫ש‬Ŵ่₡Ŵผ₡7 @ħผ֭7╗—ผ่ħ่‫ف‬7ŐŴ₡ħ—⎯ฌ ⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
Ŵੂ ฌ
₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่ฌ ՁAƆฌ ₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่7ผ₡ฌ
⎯ऑผħ่‫ف‬7こ‫่ש‬ฌ
ՁŴ่
⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ ЋǲḚAƆ7 ⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ
ㄦƥฌ ɱƥ7 ㄦƥฌ ㄦƥ7 ɱƥ7 ฎƥ7 ɱƥฌ ㄦƥฌ ‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵฌ ‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ
″ｘफฌ
к+ʉ
″ｘफฌ
‫ ں‬ｘฎफ ″ｘफ7 ″ｘफ ‫ ں‬ｘฎफ7 ɱ″फ7 ‫ ں‬ｘฎफฌ
A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭77Őਙ—‫֭ש‬7 Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7 ●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦ7 ⎯—่⎯֭‫ש‬7ผ₡ฌ
ʉŴผこ7⎯ऑผħ่‫⎯ف‬ฌ
ʉħ่₡こħккฌ
77ÛŴ
ऑ֭⇡⇡к֭ฌ
Աк—֭7ＣħŴこਙ่₡7Ġʉੂฌ
⎯ħк‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴ₡ਙฌ ผħ₡‫֭ف‬7ऑ,ʉੂฌ
‫ ں‬ฎƥฌ
‫ ں‬ฎƥฌ
ธ‫ ں‬″फฌ
ธ‫ ں‬″फฌ
γਙผħ▷ਙ่ฌ
㌱Ŵ㌱‫⎯—ש‬ฌ
ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬
ḚЋ7О,ʉੂฌ
⎯‫ש‬Ŵผฌ
̶ƥ7
̶ƥ7
A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭77777Őਙ—‫֭ש‬ฌ ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ ⇡ผ—่֭ผฌ ĠǲЌＣǲŐƆḶЌฌ
A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭7ƆऑŴ㌱֭ฌ ЋŴ่7A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭ฌ ƆγŴผ֭₡77Ｃผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂฌ
A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭7Ｃħこ่֭⎯ħਙ่⎯7Ŵผ֭7Ҝħ่ħこ—こ⎯ฌ
╗ੂऑħ㌱Ŵк7ОŴผ+ħ่‫ف‬7ƆऑŴ㌱֭⎯7
ОՁ77ए77‫ ں‬ธｘ㈠ｘƥฌ
Ћħ㌱ħ่ħ‫ੂש‬7ҜŴऑฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ ں‬फ7ए7‫ ں‬ｘƥฌ

Ќਙผ‫ש‬γฌ
ｘ7
ｘ ‫ ں‬ｘฌ
ｘ ธｘ7 ㅡｘฌ
b7 bਙऑੂผħ‫ف‬γ‫ש‬7ธｘ‫ں‬ɱⓒ7ǲ่‫ﭨ‬ħผਙ่こ่֭‫ש‬Ŵк7Ｃ֭⎯ħ‫่ف‬7Ḛผਙ—ऑⓒ7ՁՁb7ֱ7ㅡㄦｘ7&ผ֭こਙ่‫ש‬7Ɔ‫ש‬ⓒ7Ɔ‫֭ש‬7ธ̶̶ⓒ7ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋฌ
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬7Ќਙ㈠̬7ɱ‫ں‬
㈾ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠̬ ɱ‫ ں‬ฎｘฎ‫ں‬7
ฎｘฎ‫ں‬ ҜŴผ㌱γ77ㅡⓒ7ธｘ‫ ں‬ɱฌ
Ɔħ‫֭ש‬77ОкŴ่77ֱ77Ќ֭ʉ77Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
╗ਙผŴγ77Ձ֭Ŵผ่ħ่‫ف‬ฌ ùਙ—่‫ف‬77●⎯ผŴ֭к77Оผ֭⎯㌱γਙਙкฌ
b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ77●่㌱㈠7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵฌ
Ő̶ֱ7ֱ7Ձħこħ‫֭ש‬₡ฌ
Ҝ—к‫ש‬ħऑк֭77Ő֭⎯ħ₡่֭㌱֭ฌ
ӧAऑŴผ‫ש‬こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ỏ ฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌ7ֱ7फＣफ7
ОՁ77ए77‫ ں‬″ธ㈠̶ƥฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬77ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡ฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌֱफbफฌ
ОՁ77ए77ㄦ‫ ں‬㈠ｘƥฌ
ОՁ77ए77ฎｘ㈠ｘƥฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬77Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌֱफԱफฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬77″7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴккฌ ОՁ
‫ש‬ਙ77Ő֭こŴħ่7 77ए
″㈠ｘƥฌ
77‫ں‬
ｘ ธ㈠
‫ں‬ƥ
ฌ
Ќ֭ʉ77″7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴккฌ
ǲ่㌱кਙ⎯ħ่‫ف‬77ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡7 ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭ฌ
ÛŴк-ʉŴੂ⎯7 ÛŴк-ʉŴੂ⎯ฌ
ǲՁǲЋA╗●ḶЌֱफAफ7
bֱЋ7ֱ7bħ‫ﭨ‬ħ㌱77Ｃħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ฌ bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴкฌ
ฌ
ЌＣ
Ｃħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ฌ
Ⓢ
ӧՁħ⇡ผŴผੂỏฌ
ŐḶ
ฎƥ
ӧĠਙ‫֭ש‬кỏฌ
ùḚ
ՁA
О
ㅡｘ₡㈠7एฌ
ŐŴ
Ќ֭ʉฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴк-ʉŴੂฌ
Ќ֭ʉ77″7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴккฌ ƆγŴผ֭₡77Ｃผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂฌ
ǲ่㌱кਙ⎯ħ่‫ف‬77ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡ฌ
Ｃฌ
ⓈЌḶ
ḚŐ
Aù
ОՁ
ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡7 ħผਙ่7こਙ—่‫ש‬Ŵħ่ฌ
ㅡƥ
‫ف‬ผŴ่₡7‫ש֭ש‬ਙ่7₡ผฌ
֭к,γਙผ่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
㌱่֭‫่่֭ש‬ħŴк7ऑ,ʉੂฌ
ɱ ㈠ｘ
ฌ
Ŵ่่7ผਙŴ₡ฌ Ќ㈠7ՁAƆฌ
О
кਙ่֭7こ‫่ש‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ЋǲḚAƆฌ
㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ ㌱ผŴħ‫ف‬7ผਙŴ₡ฌ
″7 Ŵк֭ゥŴ่₡֭ผฌ
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7 ㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ㌱γ֭ੂ่่֭֭7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
⎯こਙ,֭7ผŴ่㌱γ7ผ₡ฌ ㌱Ŵผ֭ੂ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
Ќ֭ʉ77ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬77Ɔħ₡֭ʉŴк-7 кŴ,֭7こ֭Ŵ₡7⇡к‫ﭨ‬₡ฌ
&ՁḶḶŐ7ОՁAЌ7 Ɔ—ここ֭ผкħ่ฌ
Оʉੂ7 ⓈƆ7ɱㄦฌ ⇡ਙ่Ŵ่▷Ŵ7ผ₡ฌ
㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ ㌱γŴผк֭⎯‫ש‬ਙ่ฌ
ฌ
ɱ7 ⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ ⎯ŴγŴผŴ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่ฌ ՁAƆฌ ₡֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ħ่่7ผ₡ฌ
㌱Ŵऑ֭
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭ฌ ⎯ऑผħ่‫ف‬7こ‫่ש‬ฌ
⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ ЋǲḚAƆ7 ⑾кŴこħ่‫ف‬ਙ7ผ₡ฌ
₡⎯
ƆbAՁǲ7̬ฌ
Ŵੂฌ
‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵฌ ‫ש‬ผਙऑħ㌱Ŵ่Ŵ7Ŵ‫֭ﭨ‬ฌ
ՁŴ่
γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ γŴ㌱ħ่֭₡Ŵฌ
⎯—่⎯֭‫ש‬7ผ₡ฌ
к-ʉ
Ɔħ‫֭ש‬7 ●ֱธ‫ں‬ㄦ7
A㌱㌱֭⎯⎯ħ⇡к֭77Őਙ—‫֭ש‬7 ʉŴผこ7⎯ऑผħ่‫⎯ف‬ฌ
ʉħ่₡こħккฌ
7ÛŴ
ऑ֭⇡⇡к֭ฌ
Աк—֭7ＣħŴこਙ่₡7Ġʉੂฌ
⎯ħк‫֭ﭨ‬ผŴ₡ਙฌ ผħ₡‫֭ف‬7ऑ,ʉੂฌ
ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬7
γਙผħ▷ਙ่ฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬ฌ ㌱Ŵ㌱‫⎯—ש‬ฌ
ḚЋ7О,ʉੂฌ
ƆγŴผ֭₡77Ｃผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ʉŴੂฌ ⎯‫ש‬Ŵผฌ
⇡ผ—่֭ผฌ ĠǲЌＣǲŐƆḶЌฌ
Ћħ㌱ħ่ħ‫ੂש‬7ҜŴऑฌ
bਙここ֭ผ㌱ħŴк77Ｃħ⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬ฌ
ӧḶ⑾⑾ħ㌱֭ỏฌ
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ ں‬फ7ए7‫ ں‬″ƥฌ
ｘ7
ｘ ‫ں‬″
″7 ̶ธ7 ″ㅡฌ
㈾ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠̬ ɱ‫ ں‬ฎｘฎ‫ں‬7
Ɔħ‫֭ש‬77ОкŴ่77ֱ77ОŴผ㌱֭кฌ
b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ77●่㌱㈠7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵฌ
Оผਙ㈾֭㌱‫ש‬ฌ
Ɔ7ḚผŴ่₡7bŴ่ੂਙ่ฌ
Û7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬㈠ฌ
ਙผ‫ש‬7AऑŴ㌱γ֭7Ő₡㈠ฌ
⊕7bḶОùŐ●ḚĠ╗7ธｘ‫ں‬ՙⓒ7ǲЌЋ●ŐḶЌҜǲЌ╗AՁ7ＣǲƆ●ḚЌ7ḚŐḶⓈОⓒ7ՁՁbฌ
╗Ġ●Ɔ7ОՁAЌ7●Ɔ7bḶЌbǲО╗ⓈAՁ7●Ќ7ЌA╗ⓈŐǲ7AЌＣ7ЌḶ7ḚⓈAŐAЌ╗ǲǲ7Ḷ7●╗Ɔ7AbbⓈŐAbù7●ҜОՁ●ǲＣ㈠7╗Ġǲฌ
ḶÛЌǲŐ゜AŐbĠ●╗ǲb╗7ŐǲƆǲŐЋǲƆ7╗Ġǲ7Ő●ḚĠ╗7╗Ḷ7ҜAìǲ7ＣǲƆ●ḚЌ7ҜḶＣ●●bA╗●ḶЌƆ7Û●╗ĠḶⓈ╗7ЌḶ╗●bǲ㈠7AՁՁ7bḶՁḶŐƆⓒฌ
Ｃ●ҜǲЌƆ●ḶЌƆⓒ7Ɔ●ΎǲƆⓒ7AЌＣ7AŐbĠ●╗ǲb╗ⓈŐAՁ7ǲA╗ⓈŐǲƆ7AŐǲ7bḶЌbǲО╗ⓈAՁ7AЌＣ7ƆⓈԱİǲb╗7╗Ḷ7bĠAЌḚǲ㈠7 ОŐḶİǲb╗7ЌḶ̬ɱ‫ں‬
ОŐḶİ ǲb╗ ЌḶ̬ɱ ฎｘฎ‫ ں‬7777777ｘ‫゜ ں‬ธɱ゜‫ ں‬ɱฌ
Aผ֭Ŵ7ҜŴऑฌ
ùਙ—่‫ف‬7●⎯ผŴ֭к7Aħ⎯γฌ
ɱㄦɱｘ7Û7ƆŴγŴผŴ7A‫֭ﭨ‬㈠ฌ
ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7ЌЋ7ฎɱ‫ ں ں‬ՙฌ
╗Őǲǲ7゜ ОՁAЌ╗7ƆbĠǲＣⓈՁǲฌ
ƆùҜ7 Ợ╗ù7 Ɔ●Ύǲ7 ƆОAb●ЌḚ7 bḶҜҜḶЌ7ЌAҜǲ7 ԱḶ╗AЌ●bAՁ7ЌAҜǲฌ
ОՁ77ए
ЋŴผħ֭⎯ⓒฌ
ธㅡफ7⇡ਙゥฌ 8ผŴゥħ่—⎯7Ћ֭к—‫ש‬ħ่Ŵฌ
ǲゥħ⎯‫ש‬ħ่‫ف‬77Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬7 ՙฌ Ɔ֭֭7Ɔ֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱ ฌ
ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡ฌ Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ฌ
ŐŴੂʉਙਙ₡7A⎯γฌ फŐŴੂʉਙਙ₡फฌ
ЋŴผħ֭⎯ⓒฌ
ธㅡफ7⇡ਙゥฌ Ɔ֭֭7Ɔ֭‫⇡ש‬Ŵ㌱ ฌ Ûγħ‫֭ש‬77╗γਙผ่77A㌱Ŵ㌱ħŴ7
ㅡฌ A㌱Ŵ㌱ħŴ7bਙ่⎯‫ש‬ผħ㌱‫ש‬Ŵฌ
ԱŴкк֭₡7ִ7Ա—ผкŴऑऑ֭₡ฌ Ő֭‫—׀‬ħผ֭こ่֭‫⎯ש‬ฌ
ЋŴผħਙ—⎯7Ɔγผ—⇡⎯ฌ Աħ‫ف‬7ƆŴ‫⇡֭ف‬ผ—⎯γฌ Aผ‫֭ש‬こħ⎯ħħŴ7╗ผħ₡่֭‫ש‬Ŵ‫ש‬Ŵฌ
ОՁ
77ए ฎฎฌ Ɔħ▷֭7ЋŴผħ֭⎯ฌ Ќ゜A7 Оħ่ 78Ŵħผੂ7Ｃ—⎯‫֭ש‬ผฌ bŴккħŴ่₡ผŴ7ǲผħਙऑγੂккŴฌ
77‫ں‬ ㄦ7‫ف‬Ŵк㈠7こħ่㈠ฌ Ɔʉ֭֭‫ש‬7Աผਙਙこฌ bੂ‫ש‬ħ⎯—⎯7ƆऑŴ㌱γħŴ่—⎯ฌ
ｘＣ֭⎯֭ผ‫ש‬7ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭ฌ
″㈠ｘƥ7 Ќ゜A7 Ќ゜Aฌ
Ќ゜A ӧ㌱ਙこ⇡ħ่Ŵ‫ש‬ħਙ่7ਙ⑾ฌ
ผħ‫֭ﭨ‬ผ7ผਙ㌱ ⎯7Ŵ่₡7‫ف‬ผŴ‫֭ﭨ‬кỏฌ
ธ㈠
‫ں‬ƥ
ฌ Ќ゜A7 Ќ゜Aฌ bਙ่㌱ผ֭‫֭ש‬ฌ
Ɔħ₡֭ʉŴк ฌ
ՁAЌＣƆbAО●ЌḚ7ЌḶ╗ǲƆ̬ฌ
‫ ں‬㈠ฌ ǲṲbǲО╗78ḶŐ7Ɔ●ЌḚՁǲ78AҜ●Ձù7ŐǲƆ●ＣǲЌ╗●AՁ7ＣǲЋǲՁḶОҜǲЌ╗ⓒ7AՁՁ7ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲＣ7ОՁAЌ╗Ɔ7ƆĠAՁՁฌ
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7
Ḷ87ҜA╗ǲŐ●AՁƆ7ƆǲՁǲb╗ǲＣ78ŐḶҜ7╗Ġǲ7ОՁAЌ╗7Ձ●Ɔ╗7●Ќ7╗Ġǲ7ƆḶⓈ╗ĠǲŐЌ7ЌǲЋAＣA7ŐǲḚ●ḶЌAՁฌ
‬߰␀ৰৰӰৰ˰⒋☀ⓙ␀߰Ӱ࿰Ӱⓙৰᧀ໰⒋෰ð˰Ӱⓙৰ␀߰⒋‬߰␀ৰ࿰⒋߰Ӱ໰࿰ༀ⒋ðᏰ☀ð‬࿰⒋࿰ϰ␀࿰⒋␀߰߰⒋☀␀☀࿰ჰ໰ༀ⒋␀ৰ✀⒋␀ৰৰჰ␀߰ฌ
ÛŴк ʉŴੂ⎯ฌ AЌＣ7ОǲŐǲЌЌ●AՁ78ՁḶÛǲŐƆ7AŐǲ7ОǲŐҜ●╗╗ǲＣ㈠77AЌù7ОՁAЌ╗7Ձ●Ɔ╗ǲＣ7ḶЌ7╗Ġǲ7ЌǲЋAＣA7Ɔ╗A╗ǲฌ
✀ð‬␀෰࿰ðৰ࿰⒋ⓙ⒋␀˰෰Ӱ☀ჰ߰࿰ჰ෰ðᧀ໰⒋ৰⓙᏰӰⓙჰ໰⒋ðð✀⒋߰Ӱ໰࿰⒋␀໰⒋໰ϰⓙৰ⒋Ӱৰ⒋ৰ␀☀⒋໰ð☀࿰Ӱⓙৰ⒋ ฌ
ฎƥ ฌ
●Ɔ7ǲṲОŐǲƆƆՁù7ОŐḶĠ●Ա●╗ǲＣ㈠ฌ
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭7 ธ㈠7 AՁՁ7ОՁAЌ╗●ЌḚ7AŐǲAƆ7╗Ḷ7Աǲ7ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ7Û●╗Ġ7ＣǲbḶҜОḶƆǲＣ7ḚŐAЌ●╗ǲ7ḚŐḶⓈЌＣbḶЋǲŐฌ
ㅡｘ₡㈠7ए
ŐŴ
ֱ7AＣḶԱǲ7ŐǲＣ7AЌＣ゜ḶŐ7ҜḶİAЋǲ7ḚḶՁＣ7●Ќ7bḶՁḶŐ7ֱ7ธफ7ＣǲǲО7AЌＣ7Ɔ●Ύǲ7╗Ḷ7Աǲ7̶゜ㅡफฌ
ƆbŐǲǲЌǲＣ7ḶЋǲŐ7″Ҝ●Ձ7Ћ●ƆỢⓈǲǲЌ78ḶŐ7ÛǲǲＣ7ОŐḶ╗ǲb╗●ḶЌ㈠ฌ
ЌＣ
ḶⓈ
̶7 ＣǲƆǲŐ╗7ՁAЌＣƆbAОǲ7AŐǲAƆ7╗Ḷ7Աǲ7ОŐḶЋ●ＣǲＣ7Û●╗Ġ7ŐḶbì7ḚŐḶⓈЌＣbḶЋǲŐ7ֱ
ḚŐ
Aù
″फ7ＣǲǲО7AЌＣ7Ɔ●Ύǲ7╗Ḷ7Աǲ7ЋAŐù●ЌḚ78ŐḶҜ7‫ ں‬फ7bŐⓈƆĠǲＣ7ḚŐAЋǲՁ7╗Ḷ7‫ ں‬ธफ7Ő●ЋǲŐ7ŐḶbìƆ7ֱ
ОՁ
ḶЋǲŐ7″7Ҝ●Ձ7Ћ●ƆỢⓈǲǲЌ78ḶŐ7ÛǲǲＣ7ОŐḶ╗ǲb╗●ḶЌ㈠ฌ
ㅡ㈠7 ՁAЌＣƆbAОǲ7ОՁAЌ7ƆĠḶÛЌ7●Ɔ7ОⓈŐǲՁù7bḶЌbǲО╗ⓈAՁⓒ78●ЌAՁ7ОՁAЌƆ7Û●ՁՁ7Աǲ7ОŐǲОAŐǲＣฌ
Աù7A7Ձ●bǲЌƆǲＣ7ＣǲƆ●ḚЌ゜ԱⓈ●ՁＣ7bḶЌ╗ŐAb╗ḶŐ7╗Ḷ7ƆA╗●Ɔ8ù7ՁAƆ7ЋǲḚAƆ7ŐǲỢⓈ●ŐǲҜǲЌ╗Ɔฌ
ƥฌ
Ќ֭ʉฌ 8ḶŐ7ՁAЌＣƆbAОǲ7AЌＣ7●ŐŐ●ḚA╗●ḶЌ㈠ฌ
кฌ
फฌ
ธｘ
ħ㌱Ŵ ゥ㈠
Ա—ħк₡ħ่‫ف‬ฌ
╗ੂऑ㈠ⓒ77ҜŴ
ฎ ƥֱ‫ں‬
ਙ ㈠㌱
ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴк ʉŴੂฌ
‫ں‬ธ
ฌ
ЌＣ
ḶⓈ
ḚŐ
Aù
ƥ
ОՁ
ОкŴੂ‫ف‬ผਙ—่₡ฌ
ㅡ
ฌ㈠ｘ
ɱ
О
ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬77ÛŴк ʉŴੂฌ
ฌ
Ŵऑ֭
₡⎯㌱
Ŵੂ ฌ
ՁŴ่
к ʉ
77ÛŴ
ㄦ7⑾‫ש‬
Ɔ㌱Ŵк̬֭7‫ ں‬फ7ए7‫ ں‬ｘƥฌ

ｘ7
ｘ ‫ ں‬ｘ7
ｘ ธｘ7 ㅡｘฌ
㈾ ֭㌱‫ ש‬Ќਙ㈠̬ ɱ‫ ں‬ฎｘฎ‫ں‬7
ՁŴ่₡⎯㌱Ŵऑ֭77ОкŴ่ฌ
b่֭‫֭ש‬ผ77●่㌱㈠7 ՁŴ⎯7Ћ֭‫ف‬Ŵ⎯ⓒ7Ќ֭‫ﭨ‬Ŵ₡Ŵฌ
Աฌ Ｃ7 b7 A7 b7 Ա7 Ｃ7 Aฌ
Աฌ Ｃ7 b7 A7 A7 b7 Ｃฌ Աฌ
7
A㈠777ƆĠǲŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ 7Ա㈠77 7ƆĠǲŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ b㈠77ƆĠǲŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ Ձ
Ｃ㈠777Ҝǲ╗AՁ7ОAЌǲՁฌ
ƆÛ7ɱ‫ ں‬″″7ＣŐ●╗7Ḷ7Ҝ●Ɔ╗ฌ ƆÛ7ՙ″ɱ″7╗ḶAƆ╗ǲＣ7О●Ќǲ7ЌⓈ╗ฌ ƆÛ7″ɱｘฎ7ⓈЌ7ùǲՁՁḶÛ ฌ
Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶฌ Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶฌ Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶฌ
ｘ̶゜‫ں‬ฎ゜‫ں‬ɱ
7A㈠777ƆĠǲŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ 7Ա㈠777ƆĠǲŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ b㈠77ƆĠǲŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ Ｃ㈠777ƆĠǲŐÛ●Ќ7Û●ՁՁ●AҜƆฌ

ƆÛ7ɱ‫ ں‬″ㄦ7ḚḶƆƆAҜǲŐ7Ћǲ●Ձฌ ƆÛ7″‫ ں‬ธ‫ ں‬ÛĠḶՁǲ7ÛĠǲA╗ฌ ƆÛ7″ㄦ‫ ں‬ㄦ7Ձǲ●ƆⓈŐǲ7ԱՁⓈǲฌ ƆÛ7″ｘธ″7Ő●ЋǲŐ7ŐḶⓈḚǲฌ
Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶฌ Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶฌ Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶฌ Ɔ╗ⓈbbḶฌ
SDR-75970 [PRJ-75914] - SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW - APPLICANT/OWNER: TORAH LEARNING CENTER,
INC
WARD 3 (COFFIN)
03/13/19
INC
WARD 3 (COFFIN)
03/13/19
INC
WARD 3 (COFFIN)
03/13/19
INC
WARD 3 (COFFIN)
03/13/19
February 12, 2019
City of Las Vegas

Department of Planning
333 N. Rancho Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89106
To Whom It May Concern:
With respect to the Preschool Project and its owner Torah Learning Center Inc, located at 9590
W. Sahara Ave. Please accept this Letter of Justification.
The intended use of the 9590 W. Sahara site is for an addition of a Preschool to the existing
Young Israel Aish synagogue. Young Israel has been open since 2001 and providing worship
and learning to the community for the past 18 years. With their continued membership and
family’s growth, there is a profound interest in providing the services of a Preschool at their
location.
This site is zoned C-1 – Limited Commercial District and the proposed Preschool (part of
House of Worship) is a permitted use, with a Special Use Permit. All off-sites are existing, and
the parcel is currently a part of the Village Square Shopping Center accessed by internal drives
with three drive-way on Sahara Blvd and four on Ft. Apache.
The Preschool will utilize a new two-story building sharing an entry courtyard with the existing
building. The site is currently surrounded by C-1 uses on the east and south, Sahara Public
library on the west and a multi-family apartment complex to the north. There are existing
agreements with the two adjacent businesses for shared parking and access to each other’s
parcels. Hours of operation will generally be between the hours of seven a.m. and six p.m. and
anticipate the hiring of ten-twelve employees.
The Preschool will improve the lives of the many children and families who will be able to use
the facility along so near their House of Worship. The project will also be a nice addition to and
benefit for the surrounding community of the City of Las Veags.
Thank you for your consideration to approve the required Reviews and Permits necessary to
start on this Project.
Respectfully,
//signature
Rabbi Wyne
Torah Learning Center Inc.
9590 W. Sahara Ave.
Las Vegas, NV 89117
PRJ-75914
03/05/19
PRJ-75914
03/05/19
PRJ-75914
03/05/19
PRJ-75914
03/05/19
PRJ-75914
03/05/19
SDR 75970
Torah Learning Center, Inc.
9590 W Sahara Avenue

Proposed 5.41 thousand square foot addition to an existing 6.375 thousand square foot religious institution.
RATE/#

Friday Peak Hour SYNAGOGUE [1000 SF] 5.41 2.92 16
Saturday Peak Hour 3.87 21
RATE/#
Existing Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

RATE/#
Total Use DESCRIPTION #UNIT UNIT TOTAL

Sahara Avenue
PM Peak Hour 1169
Grand Canyon Drive

PM Peak Hour 275

Adjacent street ADT
Capacity
Sahara Avenue 53,445
Grand Canyon Drive 16,380
On weekdays (Fridays), this project will add approximately 197 trips per day on Sahara Ave. and Grand Canyon Dr.
Currently, Sahara is at about 27 percent of capacity and Grand Canyon is at about 18 percent of capacity. With this project,
Sahara is expected to be at about 28 percent of capacity and Grand Canyon to be at about 20 percent of capacity.
On Saturdays, this project is expected to add about 21 trips in the peak hour, or about one every three minutes.
Based on Peak Hour use, this development will add into the area about 16 additional cars, or about one every four minutes.
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE

SUBJECT:
TXT-76115- TEXT AMENDMENT - PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS
VEGAS - For possible action on a request to amend LVMC Title 19.12 Permissible Uses to add
Minimum Special Use Permit requirements to the Multi-Family Residential use, and to provide for
other related matters. Staff recommends APPROVAL.
THIS ITEM WILL BE FORWARDED TO CITY COUNCIL IN ORDINANCE FORM
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Proposed Amendments and Staff Report
TXT-76115

ITEM DESCRIPTION: APPLICANT/OWNER: CITY OF LAS VEGAS
CASE REQUIRED FOR

RECOMMENDATION
NUMBER APPROVAL
TXT-76115 Staff recommends APPROVAL.
** NOTIFICATION **
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED N/A
NOTICES MAILED News Paper Notification Only
APPROVALS 0
PROTESTS 0
SG
TXT-76115
Proposed Amendment Page One
** PROPOSED AMENDMENTS **
1. Title 19.12.070 is hereby amended by amending the “Multi-Family Residential”

use to add Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:
Multi-Family Residential
Minimum Special Use Permit Requirements:

*1. This use is permitted only in conjunction with an approved Mixed-Use
development.
SG
TXT-76115
** STAFF REPORT **
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This is a request to amend LVMC Title 19.12 Permissible Uses to amend the Multi-Family
Residential use to add a non-waivable Minimum Special Use Permit Requirement that
will permit the use in commercial zones only in conjunction with a Mixed-Use
development.
ANALYSIS
The Multi-Family Residential use is defined as “a structure used or designed as a residence

for three or more families or households living independently of each other.” In 2012, LVMC
Title 19.12 was amended to allow multi-family residential units conditionally as part of a
mixed-use development in commercial zoning districts where previously the use had been
allowed only in certain residential zoning districts. This was done with the intent to allow
greater flexibility for development of traditional mixed-use, ground floor commercial with
residential units above primarily in (but not limited to) the downtown area. But by allowing
the use conditionally, it opened the door to allowing multi-family development as a stand-
alone use in commercial districts via approval of a Special Use Permit. This amendment
would close that loophole and restrict multi-family development in commercial zoning
districts as part of a mixed-use development only.
FINDINGS
This amendment will eliminate the ability to approve Multi-Family Residential

development as a stand-alone use in commercial zoning districts by amending the Multi-
Family Residential use to add a non-waivable Special Use Permit requirement to allow
the use in commercial zoning districts only when developed as part of a mixed-use
development.
SG
AGENDA SUMMARY PAGE
SUBJECT:
CITIZENS PARTICIPATION: PUBLIC COMMENT DURING THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA
MUST BE LIMITED TO MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION. NO SUBJECT MAY BE ACTED UPON BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
UNLESS THAT SUBJECT IS ON THE AGENDA AND IS SCHEDULED FOR ACTION. IF YOU
WISH TO BE HEARD, COME TO THE PODIUM AND GIVE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
THE AMOUNT OF DISCUSSION ON ANY SINGLE SUBJECT, AS WELL AS THE AMOUNT
OF TIME ANY SINGLE SPEAKER IS ALLOWED, MAY BE LIMITED

04.23.19 PC Final Agenda Packet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

04.23.19 PC Final Agenda Packet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mayor Carolyn G.

Goodman (At-Large) Commissioner Sam Cherry, Chair

Planning Commission Agenda

April 23, 2019

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RULES OF CONDUCT:

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION

DEPARTMENT: Planning CONSENT

May go to City Council on: 06/05/2019

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

CASE REQUIRED FOR

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED N/A

NOTICES MAILED N/A

4. All development is subject to the conditions of City Departments and State

6. Construct off-site improvements on Fremont Street as shown on the approved

Site Location, General Plan and Zoning Designations

Related Relevant City Actions by Planning, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Most Recent Change of Ownership

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

Details of Application Request

Existing Land Planned or Special

Existing Land Planned or Special

Private Club, CT (Commercial

Master and Neighborhood Plan Areas Compliance

Pursuant to Title 19.08, the following standards apply:

Functional Actual Compliance

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0

City Council Meeting 0 City Council Meeting 0

AGENDA MEMO - PLANNING

CASE REQUIRED FOR

NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS NOTIFIED 4

NOTICES MAILED 18 - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938

PROTESTS 0 - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938

APPROVALS 0 - GPA-75937 and ZON-75938

1. The density and intensity of the proposed General Plan Amendment is

2. The zoning designations allowed by the proposed amendment will be

The zoning districts supported by the proposed ML (Medium Low Density

3. There are adequate transportation, recreation, utility, and other facilities to

4. The proposed amendment conforms to other applicable adopted plans and

In order to approve a Rezoning application, pursuant to Title 19.16.090(L), the Planning

1. The proposal conforms to the General Plan.

4. Street or highway facilities providing access to the property are or will be

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Related Relevant City Actions by P&D, Fire, Bldg., etc.

Most Recent Change of Ownership

Related Building Permits/Business Licenses

Details of Application Request

Master Plan Areas Compliance

Existing Zoning Permitted Density Units Allowed

Las Vegas Valley Water District (LVVWD):

February 18, 2019

Peter Lowenstein, AICP

of the applications is warranted for a number of reasons, including:

handling the traffic generated by the Project.

pit/excavation facility (to the southwest).

west of the Site.

Lenny Badger PRJ-75900

DEPARTMENT: Planning DISCUSSION

PROTESTS RECEIVED BEFORE: APPROVALS RECEIVED BEFORE:

Planning Commission Mtg. 0 Planning Commission Mtg. 0