You are on page 1of 1

incidence of out-of-hospital death from shunt failure?” That Commentary by Michael H.

Hart, MS, MD, FAAP


they observed no out-of-hospital deaths among their Pediatric Gastroenterology, Carilion Roanoke Community Hospital, Roanoke, VA
meningomyelocele patients over a 12-year period is notable.5 We are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of
Did the availability of current, baseline surveillance imaging nitric oxide (NO) as a mediator of both physiologic and path-
expedite the evaluation of subsequent, symptomatic ologic responses. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides and lipotei-
episodes of CSF shunt failure? The authors, all pediatricians, choic acids stimulate inducible NO synthase which, in turn,
did not consider this qualitative and distinctly neurosurgical results in increased plasma and urinary NO concentrations.1,2
perspective. Did the aggressive treatment of asymptomatic NO levels appear to correlate with host response to infection,
shunt failure reduce comorbidity from syringomyelia? as well as improved clinical outcome in one study of children
Syringomyelia is prevalent among patients with infected with falciparum malaria.1,3,4 Overproduction of NO
meningomyelocele and is often asymptomatic, but it can appears to play an important role in the pathogenesis of
progress unpredictably to cause scoliosis and other neuro- acute and chronic inflammation. One of the above authors
logical disabilities. Effective shunt treatment of hydro- has previously shown that plasma and urinary nitrate con-
cephalus may minimize the risk of symptomatic progres- centrations are elevated in infectious diarrhea.5 Further-
sion of syringomyelia.6 more, previous studies have shown that plasma nitrate is
The conclusion of this report—that surveillance CT scan- elevated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) when com-
ning is neither medically beneficial nor cost-effective—may pared to control patients;6 however, bacterial and viral infec-
be true, but a randomized, controlled trial that considers a tions resulted in even higher elevated plasma and urinary
more complete range of potential benefits is needed to con- nitrate levels than IBD or controls. Plasma and urinary nitrate
struct an evidence-based pathway for clinical management. levels are dependent on renal function and dietary nitrogen
intake during the infectious process, which may account for
References some of the observed variability seen in the patients with
1. Fernell E, et al. Acta Paediatr. 1998;87:392-396. infectious diarrhea in this study. If validated with larger num-
2. Bondurant CP, et al. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;23:254-258.
bers of patients, this technique could provide a rapid and
3. Piatt JH, et al. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1993;19:233-241.
4. Drake JM, et al. Neurosurgery. 1998;43:294-303. potentially sensitive and specific method for distinguishing
5. Iskandar BJ, et al. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1998;28:173-176. infectious from non-infectious causes of diarrhea, perhaps
6. La Marca F, et al. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997;26:57-67. within minutes after being performed. Unfortunately, this
technique does not appear to differentiate bacterial from
viral causes of gastroenteritis. It may well be that the deter-
mination of urinary nitrate concentration is as useful as
plasma nitrate concentration; however, future studies are
necessary to examine this question.
GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION

Plasma Nitrate May Be Editors’ Note


There seems to be lots of movement when it comes to

a Marker for Infectious identifying new serologic, urinary, and fecal markers for clas-
sifying the nature of diarrhea in children. Two months ago

Diarrhea (see AAP Grand Rounds, November 2001;6:52-53), we learned


that fecal calprotectin may help to differentiate the diarrhea
seen in inflammatory bowel disease from other etiologies.
Source: Charmandari E, Meadows N, Patel M, et al. Plasma Now we read that plasma and urinary nitrate levels may be
nitrate concentrations in children with infectious and non- useful in determining whether or not the diarrhea is infec-
infectious diarrhea. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2001;32:423- tious. These are only pilot studies and, therefore, we need to
427. follow future runs of these tests to learn their sensitivity,
specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and cost-

T
hese authors from the Royal London School of Medi- effectiveness.
cine studied plasma nitrate levels in 3 groups of
patients: those with acute infectious gastroenteritis References
(14); those with non-infectious diarrhea (13); and healthy 1. Anstey NM, et al. J Exp Med. 1996;184:557-567.
controls (14). The investigators theorized that patients with 2. Evans TG, et al. J Immunol. 1993;151:907-915.
infectious diarrhea might have higher levels of plasma nitrate 3. Nicholson S, et al. J Exp Med. 1996;183:2293-2302.
4. MacMicking JD, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5243-
concentrations than those with non-infectious diarrhea or
4248.
controls. Their data indicate that children with infectious 5. Dykhuizen RS, et al. J Infect. 1995;31:73-75.
diarrhea had significantly higher (P<.0003) plasma nitrate 6. Dykhuizen RS, et al. Gut. 1996;39:393-395.
levels than those children with non-infectious diarrhea and
controls. This preliminary study did not include a sufficient
number of patients to establish an upper limit of normal
“cut-off” value for plasma nitrate concentration since the
range in infectious diarrhea was fairly large.

18 AAP Grand Rounds

You might also like