Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Availability Based Tariff (ABT) is a frequency based pricing mechanism applicable in India for unscheduled
electric power transactions. The ABT falls under electricity market mechanisms to charge and regulate power to
achieve short term and long term network stability as well as incentives and dis-incentives to grid participants
against deviations in committed supplies as the case may be.[1]
Introduction [edit]
ABT Mechanism in Electricity sector in India is adopted since the year 2000 and in a few other countries for pricing
bulk power across various stakeholders. ABT concerns itself with the tariff structure for bulk power and is aimed at
bringing about more responsibility and accountability in power generation and consumption through a scheme of
incentives and disincentives. As per the notification, ABT was initially made applicable to only central generating
stations having more than one SEB/State/Union Territory as its beneficiary. Through this scheme, the Central
Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) looks forward to improve the quality of power and curtail the following
disruptive trends in power sector:
Unacceptably rapid and high frequency deviations (from 50 Hz) causing damage and disruption to
large scale industrial consumers
Frequent grid disturbances resulting in generators tripping, power outages and power grid
disintegration.
The ABT scheme has now been expanded to cover the Intrastate systems as well. [2] The power generation or grid
capacity has increased substantially in last fifteen years particularly after the Electricity Act 2003 by introduction of
competition and unbundling of vertically integrated utilities (SEBs) into separate entities in charge ofelectricity
generation, electricity transmission, and electricity distribution. Deregulation and competition has facilitated
participation of private sector on large scale in electricity generation, transmission and distribution. Of late, Indian
electricity sector is transforming from perennial deficit to surplus electricity availability.[3] The volume of purchased
electricity that could not be transmitted to the buyers due to transmission lines congestion is only 0.3% of the total
electricity consumed in the financial year 2013-14. [4] It means that the actual power deficit in India is less than 1%
excluding under priced electricity demand. ABT/DSM mechanism needs improvements to address the requirements
of all stake holders (including final electricity consumers) for encouraging least cost electricity generation / tariff
based on demand verses availability in the grid. [5][6] There is a need of well represented Electric Reliability
Organization to involve all the grid participants for framing guidelines for power system operation and accreditation
which is presently looked after by the CEA
Scheduling [edit]
Each day of 24 hrs starting from 00.00 hours be divided into 96 time blocks of 15 minutes each.
Each generating station is to make advance declaration of its capacity for generation in terms of
MWh delivery ex-bus for each time block of the next day. In addition, the total ex-bus MWh which can actually be
delivered during the day will also be declared in case of hydro stations. These shall constitute the basis of
generation scheduling.
While declaring the capability, the generator should ensure that the capability during peak hours is
not less than that during other hours.
The Scheduling as referred to above should be in accordance with the operating procedures in
force.
Based on the above declaration, the Regional Load Dispatch Centre(RLDC) shall communicate to
the various beneficiaries their respective shares of the available capability.
After the beneficiaries give their requisition for power based on the generation schedules, the
RLDC shall prepare the generation schedules and drawal schedules for each time block after taking into account
technical limitations and transmission constraints.
The schedule of actual generation shall be quantified on ex-bus basis, whereas for beneficiaries,
scheduled drawals shall be quantified at their respective receiving points.
For calculating the drawal schedule for beneficiaries, the transmission losses shall be apportioned
in proportion to their drawals.
In case of any forced outage of a unit, or in case of any transmission bottleneck, RLDC will revise
the schedules. The revised schedules will become effective from the 4th time block, counting the time block in
which the revision is advised by the generator, to be the 1st one.
It is also permissible for the generators and the beneficiaries to revise their schedules during a
day, but any such revisions shall be effective only from the 6th time block reckoned in the manner as already
stated.
ABT features [edit]
ABT brings about enhanced grid discipline
Requires special meters, remote metering with open protocols and communication mechanisms to
read meters timely
Interface options to various stakeholders in the ABT mechanism on line to enable effective
implementation and benefits to all* Capability of power producers to be able to control their cost of production as
well as flexibility in operations
An idealized representation of the four kinds of reserve power and the time intervals after an unexpected failure that they are in
use.[12]
As per DSM / UI procedure, the incentives and penalty to the grid participants are charged based
on the average grid frequency in a time block of 15 minutes duration. [13][14] During a time block, it is normal that
frequency goes above rated 50 Hz frequency and comes down below rated frequency as the number of frequency
excursions above 50 Hz are more than 100 in a day.[15] Thus the average frequency in a time block remains close to
the 50 Hz without giving much benefit in the applicable UI tariff for a Discom who is consuming the surplus power
available in the grid or a generators with valid scheduling who is reducing the generation when frequency is above
50 Hz. Similarly, the generators and Discoms who are not adhering to grid discipline are not penalised with UI tariff
in excess of normal tariff when average grid frequency in a time block is used for fixing UI/DSM charges. Each time
block is further needs to be separated into two parts for application of UI charges. One for the duration the
frequency is more than 50 Hz whose average frequency is considered for fixing UI/ DSM charges to consume the
excess power in the grid or reduce excess power generation. Another for the duration the frequency is less than
50 Hz whose average frequency is considered for fixing UI/DSM charges to reduce over drawl and encourage
additional power generation.
Whenever distribution feeders from a substation are switched on after a break down or scheduled
power cut, it should be done only when grid frequency is above 50 Hz such that it does not lead to steep drop in the
frequency . The total numbers of feeders switching on, in a day are substantial at national level to cause load (≥
500 MW) increase on the grid to cause wide fluctuations.
The incentives and disincentives are prefixed (annually/periodically) by the electricity regulator
(CERC) for the variation in the grid frequency which may not reflect the actual situation temporally and spatially on
day-to-day basis. There is a need to decide the electricity tariff by the grid participants (generators, discoms,
transcos & final consumers) on day-to-day basis for achieving further fine tuning. [5]
The ABT mechanism aims to maintain grid frequency at 50 Hz but does not permit the grid
participants to decide the optimum frequency within the permitted frequency band (say 49.20 to 50.80 Hz) on day-
to-day basis.[5][16] This is required not to impose additional load shedding/power cuts when frequency is within the
safe variation limits.[14]
Every state is conducting independently load management to avoid overdrawal from other states
by using mix of generation sources (ex: hydro power or peaking power plants) to adhere to their power drawal
commitments on 15 minutes period basis in ABT mechanism. Thus hydro power stations are ending up to cater
base load instead of peak load in non-monsoon months also (ex: Kerala, Karnataka, Telangana, HP, J&K,
Uttarakhand, etc.).[20] TSO is responsible to ensure the provision of reserves (including spinning reserve for base
load power plants by operating in frequency follow mode with upper & lower generation caps) that will allow for
sudden contingencies by determining the optimal combination of generating stations and reserve providers for each
grid trading period. The available hydro power stations in a region/grid should be used to cater peaking load only at
regional/national level. Using hydro power stations to cater peak load, would improve the peaking load capability of
a regional/national grid and maintain safe grid frequency and network stability. The 24 hours duration of a day
should be divided in to four parts only (i.e. day time peak load period, day time off peak load period, night time peak
load period and night time off peak load period) instead of 96 number 15 minutes periods for commercially settling
the power transactions to cater better to the peak load requirements within the safe frequency range.
Many gas turbine power stations are not operating due to perennial natural gas shortage.
Recently, many DG sets (large & medium sizes) are also idling throughout the year due to better availability of
[21]
grid power.[22] Alternatively, these power generation units can be put to use for grid reserve service either with
liquid / gas fuels when there is unexpected tripping of operating power plants (five nos of 660 MW stations in a
short duration) or tripping of a high voltage transmission line to prevent the grid operation below safe limit. [23][24] This
would also allow all the available transmission lines at their full capacity in service without the need to maintain n+1
reserve capacity for meeting any break down and thus accruing savings in high voltage transmission losses. [25] The
unified national grid stability can also be enhanced further by converting the existing back to back HVDC links in to
HVAC links bypassing the existing converter stations. These are Chandrapur back to back HVDC converter
station, Vizag back to back HVDC converter station, Sasaram back to back HVDC converter station, Vindhyachal
back to back HVDC converter station and HVDC Sileru–Barsoor link. The yearly cost of ensuring grid safety would
be less than 2 paisa per Kwh for the total electricity generation in India.