Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sophia Cabrera
Senior English Period 3
Ms. Figueroa
2 November 2018
Enforcement of The Death Penalty
The death penalty isn’t being enforced as much as it should be, and more people as the
generation grows find it unreasonable and unorthodox. Laws must be enforced for the safety of
the state. When laws are broken, anarchy follows. The death penalty should be applied in very
narrow circumstances for the most gruesome of crimes. In my personal opinion, the death
penalty is not out to seek revenge, but to save other people’s lives who could be in danger of the
murderer. However, others think that the death penalty is horrifyingly wrong in tremendous
ways. It can be determined that the death penalty serves justice and no justice. I believe it serves
an excruciating amount of justice due to the obstruction of crime rates increasing double the
number every year in the United States. Imposing, having extended investigation on a trial, and
confirming the jury are unbiased, will ensure the true justice of the death penalty.
For stronger use of the death penalty and making sure the suspect is indeed the individual
who should be held responsible for execution, extending a long-term investigation for the crime
will eliminate any wrongful executions but enforce the penalty on the correct individual.
Recognition of the decrement of crime rates were shown through studies, “Studies of the death
penalty have reached various conclusions about its effectiveness in deterring crime”
(www.procon.org). In other words, in the early 1980’s, the death penalty decreased the number of
murderers which proves that the murderer might think again before committing his/her next
crime. Also, many murderers tend to kill more than once, for example Albert Fish who has at
least 100 victims. If the death penalty was enforced sooner, a good amount of that 100 wouldn’t
Furthermore, Albert Fish is a substantial example for the encouragement of the death
penalty. From Top 10 Most Deserved Executions “, Some crimes are so horrendous and
inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties up to and including life sentences or even
death” (Mathew McCane). Albert Fish was a serial killer and a child molester who was even
found guilty for cannibalization of five of his victims. He was only proven guilty for five victims
but claimed the other 95 had similar fate. If the death penalty doesn’t justify this horrific crime, I
don’t know what will. Laws like the death penalty should be enforced for the safety of many
Understanding that innocent lives that are put at risk when some who serve the death
penalty actually aren’t guilty should be recognized. This does not mean to eliminate the death
penalty but to have strict policies that go more in depth of the crime before the suspect is
sentenced the death penalty. Because such violent crimes, the death penalty sets equality. Just
like Eleanor Roosevelt once wrote, “Justice cannot be for one side alone, but must be for both”.
However, there are some inadequate experiences with people that served the death
penalty that was unjustified. The Death Penalty around the World article states, “Authoritarian
regimes across the world use the death penalty as a torture tool to silence those who dare to
oppose them” (www.reprieve.org). This means that many people were punished because of
homosexuality, adultery, and blasphemy. This is not justice. People have human rights as an
individual and this was unjustified. Crimes like Albert Fish was justified because of the horror
and terror he left his victims family members and the pain the victim went through. From the
article To Murder Victims’ Families, Executing Killers is Justice, a victim’s family member
wrote, “This isn’t even about revenge, revenge would be going out and killing one of the
murderer’s family members, the death penalty isn’t revenge. It’s the law” (Vicki Romano).
Cabrera 3
Some will argue that the death penalty serves no justice because of race and where the
individual is from. According to the OADP article, “Those who kill whites are more likely to be
sentenced to die than those who kill African Americans.” (https://oadp.org). This is due to racial
profiling, race has always been an issue and will also continue being an issue for the death
penalty unless going in depth of the jury comes to play in and making sure each and every jury
member isn’t biased. This will exclude the racial theories on who is more likely to receive the
death sentence. After, this law will be enforced to the precise individual.
All in all, the death penalty is the law, follow and obey the law or suffer the
consequences. Due to Albert Fish’s heavy number of murderers, including how inhumane they
were, he was executed in the electric chair for justice. Now there will be no more victims in
addition to his murderers. Enforcing the laws for the safety of the state should be normally
Work Cited
Cabrera 4
McCane, Mathew, and Kristen Whitney. “States Debate Death Penalty Issues: Ongoing
Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty. Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death
Studies of the Death Penalty Have Reached Various Conclusions about Its Effectiveness in
The Death Penalty around the World. Reprieve US, New York, NY 10163, 2018,
reprieve.org/death-penalty/death-penalty-around-world/.