Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module :
5
Gas separation
Dr. Sirshendu De
Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur
e-mail: sde@che.iitkgp.ernet.in
Keywords:
Separation processes, membranes, electric field assisted separation, liquid
membrane, cloud point extraction, electrophoretic separation, supercritical fluid
extraction
Gas Separation
In case of gas separation by membranes, high pressure feed gas is supplied to one
side of the membrane and permeate comes out normal to the membrane to the low
pressure side. Due of high diffusivity in gases, concentration gradient in the gas phase
normal to the membrane surface is small. So, gas film resistance is neglected compared to
membrane is uniform whether gas stream flows parallel to the surface or not.
There are various types of gas separation processes depending upon the flow
characterizations. Since the permeate comes normal to the flow direction of the feed, this
is known as simple cross flow (Fig. 5.1a). If there is complete mixing of the feed and
mixing (Fig. 5.1b). If feed and permeate are in the same direction, then the flow is
cocurrent flow (Fig. 5.1c). If they are in opposite direction, then it is counter current flow
(Fig. 5.1d).
Permeate
Reject
Feed
Fig. 5.1a: Cross Flow
Permeat
Feed Reject
Permeate
Feed Reject
Fig. 5.1c:Co-current
Permeate
PF
PFR
Feed Reject
In the following section, the working principles and calculations involved in complete
mixing mode are considered. This case is like a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR).
qp = θqf
Pl, yp
Low pressure
Fig. 5.2: Schematic of a complete mixing configuration with the process conditions
In the above figure, q f is total feed flow rate (in m3 /s) ; q0is outlet reject flow (m3 /s) ;
qp
q p is outlet permeate flow (m3 /s) ; θ is fraction of feed permeate = .
qf
q f = q0 + q p (5.1)
Rate of diffusion/ permeation of species A (in a binary mixture of A and B) is given as,
q A q p y p ⎛ PA' ⎞
= = ⎜ ⎟ ( Ph x0 − Pl y p ) (5.2)
Am Am ⎝ t ⎠
⎛ cm3 .cm ⎞
where, PA' is permeability of A in membrane ⎜ 2 ⎟ ; q A is the flow rate of A in
⎝ s.cm .cmHg ⎠
permeate; Am is the membrane area; t is the membrane thickness; Ph is feed side total
qB q p (1 − y p ) PB' ⎡
= = Ph (1 − x0 ) − Pl (1 − y p ) ⎤⎦ (5.3)
Am Am t ⎣
obtained.
⎡ ⎛ Pl ⎞ ⎤
α ∗ ⎢ x0 − ⎜
⎟ yp ⎥
yp ⎣ ⎝ Ph ⎠ ⎦
= (5.4)
1− yp ⎛P⎞
(1 − x0 ) − ⎜ l ⎟ (1 − y p )
⎝ Ph ⎠
PA'
Where, α = '∗
PB
q f x f = q0 x0 + q p y p (5.5)
q0 x0 q p y p
xf = + (5.6)
qf qf
qp q0
Defining, =θ; and = 1 − θ , the above equation is written as,
qf qf
x f = (1 − θ ) x0 + θ y p (5.7)
The above equation is re-organized to estimate the feed mole fraction or that in the
permeate.
x f −θ yp x f − x0 (1 − θ )
x0 = or yp = (5.8)
1−θ θ
qp yp ⎛ P' ⎞
= ⎜ A ⎟ ( Ph x0 − Pl y p )
Am ⎝ t ⎠
θ q f yp
Am = (5.9)
⎛P ⎞'
⎜ ⎟ ( Ph x0 − Pl y p )
A
⎝ t ⎠
Pl
There are 7 variables, namely, x f , x0 , y p ,θ , α ∗ , , Am . 4 of them are generally
Ph
independent.
Pl
Case 1: x f , x0 , α ∗ , are given and y p , θ , Am need to be determined.
Ph
⎛ P⎞
y p = y p ⎜ x0 , α ∗ , l ⎟ (5.10)
⎝ Ph ⎠
It is a quadratic equation. We can solve for yp. θ is calculated from Eq. (5.8)
x f −θ yp
x0 =
1−θ
Pl
Case 2: x f , θ , α ∗ , are given and y p , x0 , Am to be calculated
Ph
⎡ ⎛P⎞ ⎤
( )
x f ⎢1 + α ∗ − 1 ⎜ l ⎟ (1 − x f ) ⎥
⎝ Ph ⎠
= ⎣ ⎦ (5.11)
α (1 − x f ) + x f
∗
So, a feed component xf cannot be stripped lower than x0m even with an infinitely large
membrane area for a completely mixed system. To do this cascade may be used.
Permeat
qp = θqf
Low
Pl y, dq pressure
q, x q – dq
qf, xf Ph x -dx
Reject
Feed in high
x0, q0 = (1-θ)qf
pressure dAm
Plug Flow
Longitudinal velocity in high pressure or reject stream is high. So that gas is in plug flow
and flows parallel to membrane. Low pressure side, permeate stream is almost pulled into
that composition varies as length. Over a different membrane area dAm at any point, local
Component A balance:
PA'
− ydq = [ Ph x − Pl y ] dAm (5.12)
t
Component B balance:
PB'
− (1 − y ) dq = ⎡ Ph (1 − x ) − Pl (1 − y ) ⎤⎦ dAm (5.13)
t ⎣
⎡ ⎛ Pl ⎞ ⎤
α ∗ ⎢x − ⎜ ⎟ y⎥
y ⎣ ⎝ Ph ⎠ ⎦
= (5.14)
1− y ⎛P⎞
(1 − x ) − ⎜ l ⎟ (1 − y )
⎝ Ph ⎠
Analytical solution:
R
⎛ E⎞
( ∗
)
1 − θ (1 − x ) ⎜ u f − D ⎟
=
S
⎛ uf −α∗ + F ⎞ ⎛ uf − F ⎞
T
⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎜ (5.15)
(1 − x f ) ⎜⎜ u − E ⎟⎟ ⎝ u − α ∗
+ F ⎠ ⎝ u−F ⎠
⎟
⎝ D ⎠
q x
Where, θ ∗ = 1 − , i= ; u = − Di + D 2i 2 + 2 Ei + F 2 ;
qf 1− x
(
⎡ 1 − α ∗ Pl) ⎤ α∗ ⎡ P ⎤
D = 0.5 ⎢
⎢⎣ Ph
+α∗⎥;
⎥⎦
E=
2
− DF ; ( )
F = −0.5 ⎢ 1 − α ∗ l − 1⎥
Ph ⎦
⎣
1 α ∗ ( D − 1) + F 1
R= ; S= ; T=
2D −1 ⎛α∗ ⎞ E
( 2 D − 1) ⎜ −F⎟ 1− D −
F
⎝ 2 ⎠
xf
uf =value of u at i = i f = .
1− xf
Composition of exit:
yp= mole fraction at the exit of permeate is estimated by overall material balance
tq f
if
(1 − θ ) (1 − x )
∗
Am =
Ph PB' ∫ ⎡ 1 P⎛ 1 ⎞⎤
di (5.16)
i0
( fi − i ) ⎢ − l ⎜ ⎟⎥
⎣1 + i Ph ⎝ 1 + fi ⎠⎦
q’f, yp yi = 0
qf, xf q0, x0
q’, y yi = 0
q, x q0, x0
Am Am = 0
The schematic of the counter current flow model is presented in Fig. 6.4 and the small
q = q0 + q ' (5.17)
Overall A balance:
qx = q0 x0 + q ' y (5.18)
dq, y
q, x (q - dq)
dAm
(x - dx)
qx = ( q − dq )( x − dx ) + ydq
ydq = d ( qx ) (5.20)
PA'
− ydq = [ Ph x − Pl y ] dAm (5.21)
t
PB'
− (1 − y ) dq = ⎡ Ph (1 − x ) − Pl (1 − y ) ⎤⎦ dAm (5.22)
t ⎣
⎛P ⎞
x −⎜ l ⎟y
y ⎛P ⎞ '
⎝ Ph ⎠
=⎜ ⎟ A
(5.23)
1− y ⎝ P ⎠ '
⎛P ⎞
(1 − x ) − ⎜ l
B
⎟ (1 − y )
⎝ Ph ⎠
qx = q0 x0 + ( q − q0 ) y (5.24)
q0 = q
( x − y) (5.25)
( x0 − y )
Bu using this equation substitute q in equation (5.21) then we get,
⎡ ( x − y) ⎤
d ⎢ q0 0 ⎥
⎣ ( x − y ) ⎦ PA'
−y = [ Ph x − Pl y ]
dAm t
⎡x − y⎤
d⎢ 0
x − y ⎥⎦ PA'
− yq0 ⎣ = [ Ph x − Pl y ]
dAm t
⎡ dy dx ⎤ PA'
q0 y ⎢( x − x0 ) + ( x0 − y ) ⎥ = ( x − y )( xPh − yPl ) (5.26)
⎣ dAm dAm ⎦ t
y x − ry
= α∗ (5.27)
1− y (1 − x ) − r (1 − y )
Pl
Where, r = . The above equation is simplified as,
Ph
y (1 − x) − r ( y − y 2 ) = α ∗ (1 − y )( x − ry ) (5.28)
dy ⎡ y + α ∗ (1 − y ) ⎤ dx
=⎢ ⎥
dAm ⎣ (1 − x) − r (1 − 2 y ) + α (1 − y )r + α ( x − ry ) ⎦ dAm
∗ ∗
dx
=β (5.29)
dAm
⎛ PA' ⎞
⎜ ⎟ ( x − y )( xPh − yPl )
dx
= ⎝ t ⎠ (5.30)
dAm q0 y ⎡⎣( x0 − x ) − β ( x, y )( x0 − y ) ⎤⎦
dy
Similarly, the expression of can be derived.
dAm
q f = q0 + q 'p = q0 + θ q f
q0 = (1 − θ ) q f (5.31)
q f x f = q0 x0 + q 'p y p
x f − (1 − θ ) x0
yp = (5.32)
θ
(i) Guess x0
(iv) Iterate.
Solved Problems
q f = 104 cm3 ( STP ) / s and feed composition of A, xf =0.5; The desired composition of
the reject is x0 = 0.25. The membrane thickness, t = 3*10-3 cm; Ph= feed side pressure =
mixing model, calculate permeate concentration, yp, fraction permeated θ and membrane
Solution:
x f , x0 , α * , Pl / Ph are given
y p , θ , Am are to be determined
−b + b 2 − 4ac
From Eq.(), yp =
2a
Where,
Ph P
a = 1 − α *; b = (1 − x0 ) − 1 + α * h x0 + α *
Pl Pl
Ph
c = −α * x0
Pl
p A' 60 ×10−10
α* = = = 10
pB' 6 ×10−10
a = 1 − α * = 1 − 10 = −9
Ph P
b= (1 − x0 ) − 1 + α * h x0 + α *
Pl Pl
80 80
= (1 − 0.25) − 1 + 10 × × 0.25 + 10
20 20
= 22
Ph ⎛ 80 ⎞
c = −α * x0 = −10 ⎜ ⎟ ( 0.25 ) = −10
Pl ⎝ 20 ⎠
−b + b 2 − 4ac
yp = = 0.604
2a
x f −θ yp
x0 =
1−θ
0.5 − θ × 0.604
0.25 =
1−θ
θ = 0.706
θ q f yp 0.706 × 104 × 0.604
Am = =
( p / t)(P x
'
− Pl y p ) ⎛ 60 × 10−10 ⎞
−3 ⎟ (
A h 0
⎜ 80 × 0.25 − 20 × 0.604 )
⎝ 3.0 × 10 ⎠
Am = 2.7 × 108 cm 2
2) It is desired to find the membrane area required to separate air using a membrane 3*10-3
permeability ratio of oxygen to nitrogen. Feed rate, q f = 2 × 106 cm3 ( STP) / s and fraction
Solution:
xf = 0.21 (mole fraction of oxygen in air)
Pl Pl P P
a1 = θ + − θ − α *θ − α * l + α * l θ
Ph Ph Ph Ph
20 20 20 20
= 0.2 + − × 0.2 − 10 × 0.2 − 10 × + 10 × × 0.2
200 200 200 200
= 0.2 + 0.1 − 0.02 − 2 − 1 + 0.2
= −2.52
Pl Pl P P
b1 = 1 − θ − x f − + θ + α *θ + α * l − α * l θ + α * x f
Ph Ph Ph Ph
20 20 20 20
= 1 − 0.2 − 0.21 − + × 0.2 + 10 × 0.2 + 10 × − 10 × × 0.2 + 10 × 0.21
200 200 200 200
= 1 − 0.2 − 0.21 − 0.1 + 0.02 + 2 + 1 − 0.2 + 2.1
= 5.41
c1 = −α * x f = −10 × 0.21 = −2.1
yp = =
2a 2 × ( −2.52 )
= 0.509
x f −θ yp 0.21 − 0.2 × 0.509
x0 = = = 0.135
1−θ 1 − 0.2
θ q f yp
Am =
( p / t)(P x
'
A h 0 − Pl y p )
References: