Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/266484981
Article
CITATIONS READS
0 160
3 authors, including:
Emad Yousif
Al-Nahrain University
243 PUBLICATIONS 1,815 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Emad Yousif on 10 March 2016.
ABSTRACT
This work was made to study the photochemistry of riboflavin and the kinetics of riboflavin
degradation after exposure to UV-Vis light phosphate buffer solution at different pH interval (2-10)
with the same concentration (5×10-5M ) was studied by the of UV-Vis spectrophotoscopy analyses, it
showed that degradation increase as pH increase from pH (2-7)where the lumichrome a
photoderivative forms in the acidic medium. a maximum degradation occurs at neutral pH (7). Then
it began to decrease from pH (7-10). Where the lumiflavine (a photoderivative occurs at basic media)
formed. We also calculated the quantum yield of this decomposition and found that an increasing
occur from pH (2-7) (1.902×10-4-6.020×10-4) then a decrease occur from pH (7-10) (6.020×10-4-
1.266×10-4) as well as the reactivity ratio.
absorbance were measured at max and (Rd) was calculated for riboflavin at each
recorded. Distilled water solvent was pH using the following equation18
used as a reference in order to study the Rd = Kd × [concentration of riboflavin]
kinetic of photodecay of the riboflavin at
different pH. The absorbance at infinite
time (A) was measured after the solution 2.8 Decomposition Quantum yields (Qd)
was irradiated for at least (more than 24 After measuring the absorbance of
hours). The specific rate constant of the riboflavin at each pH. A knowledge of the
decomposition of the riboflavin (Kd) was incident light intensity (determined by
determined by the following first order actinometry using the method of Hatchard
equation 18 and Packer (19) and the extinction
ln(a- x) ln a - Kd (1) coefficient of the compound enable the
Where quantum input (Iabs) to be calculated.
a Concentration of riboflavin before The quantum yield of
irradiation. photodecomposition (Qd) is defined by:
x Concentration of riboflavin after t
time of irradiation.
t Time of irradiation of riboflavin solution. Rate of photodecomposition
A0 Absorbance of riboflavin before Qd = __________________________
irradiation. Quantum input
At Absorbance of riboflavin after For riboflavin at each pH using the
irradiation time. following equation (3)20
ε = Molar extension coefficient
a (A0 - A ) / ε, x (A0 - At) / ε, a - x Qd=Kd×[conc.] / Iabs (3)
(At - A) / ε .
By substitution of a and a - x in equation The reactivity ratio (Rr) (K2/K-1) was also
(1) and rearrangement calculated for riboflavin at each pH using
ln(At-A)ln(A0-A)-Kd t (2) the following equation20
Rr=Qd/1-Qd (4)
Thus a plot of ln |At - A| versus irradiation
time (t) gives a line with a slope equal to
Kd (S-1). The rate of photodecomposition
(g) (h)
Fig. 2: Photodegreadation spectra of (5 × 10-)5 M riboflavin at different pH after
exposure for (1= 0hr, 2=0.5hr, 3=1 hr, 4=1.5 hr, 5=2hr, 6=2.5 hr, 7=3 hr, 8=3.5 hr). where
a) represents pH2, b) pH3 c) pH4 d) pH6 e)pH7 f)pH8 g)pH9 h) pH10
The natural logarithm of each value was taken. To convert the negative values of the
resulting logarithm, three was added to each.
Irradia
tion (At - In 3+In In 3+In 3+In
At At (At -A∞) At (At -A∞) In(At-A∞)
time(s A∞) (At-A∞) (At-A∞) (At-A∞) (At-A∞) (At-A∞)
ec.)
0 0.573 0.578 -0.548 1.451 0.62 0.61 -0.494 1.505 0.582 0.57 -0.562 1.437
1800 0.549 0.499 -0.695 1.304 0.547 0.537 -0.621 1.378 0.495 0.483 -0.727 1.272
3600 0.524 0.438 -0.825 1.174 0.473 0.463 -0.770 1.229 0.446 0.434 -0.834 1.165
5400 0. 502 0.376 -0.978 1.021 0.415 0.405 -0.903 1.096 0.394 0.382 -0.962 1.037
7200 0.477 0.332 -1.102 0.897 0.342 0.332 -1.102 0.897 0.356 0.344 -1.067 0.932
9000 0.454 0.283 -1.262 0.737 0.299 0.289 -1.241 0.758 0.321 0.309 -1.174 0.825
10800 0.431 0.252 -1.378 0.621 0.256 0.246 -1.402 0.597 0.280 0.268 -1.316 0.683
12600 0.418 0.229 -1.474 0.525 0.221 0.211 -1.555 0.444 0.250 0.238 -1.435 0.564
A∞ = Absorbance at infinite time = A∞ = Absorbance at infinite time = 0.01 A∞ = Absorbance at infinite time = 0.012
0.013 PH=7 PH=8
PH=6
These values were then plotted against experiments. The photolysis of riboflavin
irradiation time, as shown in Table (2). during the irradiation at 445±1 nm was
The slopes of these plots represent the followed by the change in the vitamin
inverse photodecomposition rate constant concentration spectrophotometrically. In
(Kd) of riboflavin at each pH. order to determine the
photodecomposition rate of riboflavin from
Kinetic of the photodecomposition this change, it was found that the value of
reactions using UV-VISIBLE (At -A) decreased exponentially with
spectrophotemetric measurements irradiation time corresponding to the first
The change in the UV-VISIBLE order vitamin decomposition and was
absorptions spectra during irradiation consistent with first order reaction.
were monitored through the photolysis
(5)
(6)
The straight lines are consistent with the photodecomposition were calculated
first order riboflavin decomposition (Rate Kd [Concentration of riboflavin])
processes. Therefore, from the slopes of and the quantum yield of this process is
these straight lines, the values of specific deduced. The following kinetic
rate constants (Kd) were evaluated. Using equilibrium18 might be followed for the
the value of (Kd), the rate of reactions in equation (5) and equation (6).
(7)
Where Iabs is absorbed intensity radiation. respectively. These values were used in
I0 of water was calculated and found to be the calculation of the quantum yield
equal to 1.3891× 10-5 E in.l-1.S-1.18 according to equation (8):
Since the rate of excited state decomposition can be expressed as in equation (7) is:
Assuming that the [RF]* excited state concentration is fixed, then (9)
(10)
The value of excited state concentration, [RF]*, in equation (10) is substituted in equation (7),
one can get
(11)
(12)
The value of quantum yield of photodecomposition (Qd) can then be given by equation (13):
(13)
Or
(14)
By rearranging equation (13) and equation (14), we can obtain equation (15) for the value of
reactivity ratio (K2 / K-1).
(15)
Equation (15) was used to calculate the HCl with the buffer component (HPO4-2,
reactivity ratio of the photodecomposition H2PO4-1) that would make the medium to
of riboflavin at different pH. These values be more acidic (H3PO4) and increase the
are listed in Table (2).The results of Table rate of the degradation. While for the
(2) for the reactivity ratio indicated that photodegradation of riboflavin in the basic
these values began to increase from pH medium it may be due to the presence of
(2.00-7.00) then decreased from pH (7.00- KOH and that would make salty medium
10.00) it may be due to the lack of and cause the decrease in the rate of
riboflavin-phosphate divalent ions complex photodegredation rate. The presence of
break down preferring photoreduction CH3- group in riboflavin basic derivatives
reaction than the photoaddition reaction may also be responsible for the decrease
21
. it is also may be due to the presence of in its photodegradation rate.
From the results shown in Table (2), one 10. Wittmer D and Haney Jr WG.
could notice that Kd and Qd values were Journal of Pharmaceutical
dependent on the presence of CH3- group Sciences. 1974;63(4):588–590.
in the compound. The 11. Ashoor Erich GJ, Monte WC and
photodecomposition decreased as the Welty J. Journal of Food Science.
CH3- group existed in the compound. 1983;48(1):92–94.
12. Anna Gliszczyn´ska-S´wigło and
Anna Koziołowa. Journal of
REFERENCES
Chromatography.2000;881:285–
1. Shari Lieberman and Nancy
297.
Bruning. The Real Vitamin and
13. Diaz M, Luiz M, Bertolotti SG,
Mineral Book”, NY: Avery Group,
Miskoshi S and Garcia NA. Can J
2nd edition. USA, 1990.
Chem. 2004;82:1752-1759.
2. Schmidt H, Brown EB, Schwaller B
14. Tomás Perez-Ruiz, Carmen
and Eilers. J Biophys J. 2003a;
Martínez-Lozano, Virginia Tomás
84(4):2599–2608.
and Otilia Val.
3. Carr DO and Metzler DE. Biochim
Analyst. 1994;119:1199-1203.
Biophys Acta. 1970;205:63- 71.
15. Aberásturia. Can J Chem. 2002;
4. Schachman HK. Method Enzymol.
82:1752-1759.
1975;4(32):99-103.
16. Zhenghua S and Lin W. Analyst.
5. Ahmad I and Rapson HD. J Pharm
2001;126:1393-1398.
Biomed Anal.1990; 8:217-223.
17. Zhang H, Jinsheng Z, Houting L,
6. Ahmad. J Phys Chem.
Huaisheng W, Renmin Liu and
2012A;116(4): 1199–1207.
Jifeng Liu. Int. J. Electrochem Sci.
7. Kenji Sato, Hiroyasu Taguchi,
2010;,52:95 – 301.
Tomoko Maeda, Hironori Minami,
18. Maki S Yousif E and Salman E.
Yuji Asada, Watanabe Y and
Photolysis of Tris (ethylxanthato)
Yoshikawa K. J Invest Dermatol.
Chromium (III) complexes in
1995;105:608–612.
DMSO”, Germany:LAP LAMBERT
8. Tread well, Schuman Jorns and
Academic publishing, 2011.
Ahmad. 1975;2004a
19. Hatchard CG and Parker CA. proc
9. Nelson NL and Cox MM.
Roy Soc A. 1956;235:518.
Lehninger Principles of
20. Al-Lamee KG. Thesis Baghdad
Biochemistry, 3rd edition New York:
univ. Baghdad.1976.
Worth Publisher. 2000;1150.
21. Aliwi S and Abduallah S. polm
Interat. 1995;35:375-380.