Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROGRAM
Prepared by:
JASMINE V. LAGUADOR
Elementary School Principal I
1
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
I. INTRODUCTION
In line with DepEd Order 31, s. 2012 entitled Policy Guidelines of the Implementaion of
curriculum to suit the school vision and mission. Schools are challenged to implement the
guidelines creatively and innovatively without compromising the learners‟ total development.
Science education aims to develop scientific literacy among students that will prepare
them to be participative citizens who are able to make judgments and decisions regarding
understanding of practical everyday problems of students that affect their lives and those
around them. DepEd Order no. 8, s. 2016 clearly stated how learners will be assessed in
Science with 40% in written work, 40% in Performance Tasks and only 20% in Quarterly
Assessment. Performance and Written Works have higher weight than Quarterly Tests meaning
the subject focused more on learners‟ performances and product-outputs through projects,
simulations, demonstrations, experiments and other activities that give opportunity for them to
. Based on the data from the School Improvement Plan (SIP) of Paaralang Elementarya
ng Lucban - 5, Science MPS got the lowest MPS for the last three years. Its MPS on SY 2014 –
2015 was 35.12%, 49.76% on SY 2015 – 2016 and 55.57% on SY 2016-2017so the researcher
implemented SHARE IT Science (Skillful Hands-on Activities, Relays, Experimentation and ICT
Integration in Teaching Science). The main goal of this intervention program was to improve the
She gathered data in Science quarterly to see if there‟s an improvement after its
implementation. She hoped that SHARE IT Science Intervention Program could be an effective
2
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
The main purpose of the study was to improve the Science MPS of Paaralang
Implementation. In order to achieve the desired end, SHARE IT Intervention Program was
implementation?
implementation?
implementation?
5. What is the implication of the findings of this action research for the improvement of
Hypothesis
Ho: There is no significant difference between the results of Science MPS of PEL -5
3
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
This chapter presents the written studies derived from various DepEd Orders and local
reading materials published. The information and data presented were of prime importance to
the study undertaken about the improvement of the Science MPS of of Paaralang Elementarya
ng lucban - 5 in Lucban District, Lucban , Quezon through SHARE IT Science (Skillful Hands-on
Related Literatures
Carl Sagan stated that “Science is a way of thinking more than it is a body of
knowledge”. It helps the learners judge on something, explore things and decide on how to
overcome the challenges they face every day. Teaching science subject need a variety of
strategies for the children to learn practical skills rather than memorize a lot of facts and
information.
Teachers are the key important players in curriculum implementation. They are the most
important factor for the realization of DepEd vision, mission and core values. Yet, there were
factors to be considered why the Mean Percentage Score of Science become low. In the News
Release last June 8, 2012, the Teachers‟ Dignity Coalition (TDC) reported that teachers rated
instructional materials for Grade 1 and Grade 7. The implementation of the new curriculum was
not a good start due to shortages in teachers, seats, classrooms, toilets and other facilities.
Gradually as the years went on, these shortages were given appropriate actions by DepEd. This
Science teachers have the ability to influence each child‟s life and experiences in a very
profound way. Teacher find ways and means to increase the MPS in Science but scarcity on
laboratories and science equipment became a big factor. There is a theory that people get
4
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
better service if there were rewards attached to better performance. But in teaching, this is not
real because there are factors other than the teacher that affect academic outcomes. One is the
Klahr and Nigam (2004) found out that students taught through direct instruction were
more likely to become experts in designing scientific experiments than those taught through
discovery learning. Teachers must teach the learners an experimental design process before
they conduct an experiment when studying science concepts. Through this, children can explore
and manipulate things which develop among them the skills in decision-making and making
judgments. Experience is the best teacher. Using a variety of teaching strategies that fit for a
every children‟s ability can be affective and can produce high quality instruction.
Related Studies
In the research conducted by Horizon Research Inc. (2003), designing high quality
lessons helps inform teachers about effective teaching. The report concluded that students
need to be engaged with important science ideas and concepts. Teaching strategy used by the
teacher didn‟t matter according to them. What matter is children‟s involvement and engagement
towards the subject matter. Teacher must provide investigation and demonstration which greatly
among them. This means that students must create mental models that connect their learning
experiences to science concepts. This helps them to apply the concepts in real life situations.
Joe Padre posted on his blog an unpublished study by Stephen L Walter and Kain
Gpdfrey Chuo that multiple factors affect education. According to them, teacher quality is a very
important factor. Mastery of the subject matter on the teacher‟s part and the strategies they use
in teaching matter most. The research pointed out that children need the authoritative voice of
teachers, the listening skills, the quality how they deal with children, and character building that
5
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
children‟s acquisition of control of variable strategies. Direct instruction is the most effective
science teaching strategy which includes exploration and explanation of science concepts.
Teachers need to understand how students learn. They must know and assess their prior
knowledge so that they can design the appropriate strategy for their learners.
However, teacher‟s quality and the strategy they use in teaching are not only the factor
affecting science MPS. Enough supply of textbooks, learner‟s materials, teaching guides,
equipment, facilities and parents‟ support are factors too. Therefore, there‟s a need to
implement an intervention program to address these issues. SHARE IT Science (Skillful Hands-
could help improve the MPS of Science. This program suggested that teachers must refrain
from too much lectures and memorization of science facts. They must teach science concepts
through hands-on activities, games or relays, doing experiments and integrate ICT in teaching
Theoretical Framework
study. In terms of legal basis, this study can answer to Deped orders issued by the department.
DepEd Order no. 31 s. 2012, Deped Order 8, s 2016 and DepEd Order 36, s 2016 on K to 12
implementation, assessment and policy on awards were disseminated during the program
implementation. The aim of science education was discussed and in assessment, Science
differs from the other subjects wherein performance task and written work have greater weight
than quarterly examination. Guidelines and rubrics were stated in DepEd order on how to be
There are theories that teacher quality and teaching strategies are the most important
factors in teaching Science. Albert Einstein stated,” Bear in mind that the wonderful things you
6
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
learn in your schools are the work of many generations, produced by enthusiastic effort and
infinite labor in every country of the world. All this is put into your hands as your inheritance in
order that you may receive it, honor, it, add to it, and one day faithfully hand it to your children.
Thus we mortals achieve in the permanent things which we create in common.” This may apply
to science teachers producing productive learners who soon will be useful citizens contributing
Conceptual Framework
Integration in Teaching Science) was strictly implemented to improve the Science MPS of
Paaralang Elementaarya ng Lucban - 5. Activities set in this program became the means to
determine if there would be an improvement in Science MPS the said school after its
framework of the study. The model consists of three (3) frames is shown in Figure 1.
The first frame presents the INPUT consisting of the activities implemented in SHARE IT
The second frame is the PROCESS component indicating the stages of implementing
the intervention program: 1) Planning Stage: Meet and orient the Science teachers with the TA
Provider Team, know the needs of teachers and plan to improve Science MPS; 2) Preparation
Stage: Set and plan activities to be conducted in SHARE IT Science intervention program; 3)
Implementation Stage: Conduct the activities agreed by Science teachers and TA Provider
Team; 4) Monitoring & Evaluation Stage: Assess the improvement of Science MPS after
The third frame of the model is the OUTPUT component indicating the outcome which is
7
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
Implementation
PROCESS
Stages of SHARE IT Science
INPUT OUTPUT
Intervention Program
Implementation
SHARE IT Science
Intervention Program Planning & Preparation
Improved
Activities stated in the Strict Implementation
Science MPS
intervention program Quarterly Test Results of PEL – 5 at
Quarterly Test analysys the end of
Results in Science SLAC/SMEPA March
III. Methodology
This part includes the research design, research locale, research population and
treatment of data.
Research Design
that it involved description, analysis, and interpretation of data on prevailing conditions of the
subjects. It described the quarterly performance of the school‟s MPS in science before and after
SHARE IT Science Intervention Program Implementation. Its main purpose was to know the
progress of the school‟s science MPS in every grading period on SY 2017 – 2018.
Research Locale
The researcher gathered her data in the PEL - 5 quarterly consolidated periodic test
results. Specifically, the research locale was Paaralang Elementarya ng Lucban - 5, Lucban
8
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
Research Sample
The sample of the research are Grades 3 to 6 learners composed of three hundred
twelve (312) pupils since Science subject is being taught in Grades 3,4, 5 and 6 only.
Research Instrument
The instrument used in the study was the data of quarterly consolidated periodic test
the improvement of PEL -5 Science MPS before and after SHARE IT Science (Skillful Hands-on
Program implementation. The intervention program had set series of activities, time frame,
Table 1
Table 1 shows the Science MPS of PEL - 5 in the first semester from June to October,
2017 before SHARE IT Science implementation. The average Science MPS of PEL - 5 during
the first and second quarter was 55.38%. Therefore, the baseline data was 55.38%.
Data Gathering Procedure
The consolidated data on Science MPS were gathered quarterly by the School Head.
The data were analyzed and interpreted during the School Learning Action Cell (SLAC). The
9
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
Data of test results in PEL - 5 were treated statistically. To determine the average
Science MPS, the English Mean Percentage Scores (MPS) from Grades 3 to 6 were computed
using the formula: Average = x1+x2+x3+ x4 ÷ N
where: = x = MPS of Grade Level N= Number of Grade Level
To know if there is significant difference between the Science MPS before and after
SHARE IT Science Intervention Program implementation, the dependent T-test was computed
using the formula:
This study deals with the improvement of Science MPS of Paaralang Elementarya ng
and ICT Integration in Teaching Science) Intervention Program implementation. The primary
data were gathered from the school‟s consolidated periodic test results in SY 2017 – 2018.
Data gathered were consolidated and analyzed. Results are shown in this section. There
10
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
Table 2
SCIENCE MPS of PAARALANG ELEMENTARYA NG LUCBAN - 5
AFTERE SHARE IT Science Implementation
2017 to March, 2018 after SHARE IT Science implementation. The average Science MPS of
PEL - 5 during the third and fourth quarter was 63.94%. This implies that there is an
Table 3
SCIENCE MPS OF PAARALANG ELEMENTARYA NG LUCBAN - 5 BEFORE AND AFTER
SHARE IT Science Implementation
SCIENCE MPS SCIENCE MPS
IMPROVEMENT
Before SHARE IT Science After SHARE IT Science
(Increase)
Implementation Implementation
PEL - 5
MPS MPS
Difference= +
(FIRST- SECOND GRADING) THIRD - FOURTH GRADING
55.38% 63.94% +8.56/15.46 %
Table 3 shows the actual Science MPS of PEL - 5 before and after SHARE IT Science
since the average before the program implementation is 55.38% while the average after the
11
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
V. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
This part provides a synthesis of the study based on the data gathered from the school‟s
consolidated periodic test results in SY 2017 – 2018. This research focused on the improvement
through SHARE IT Science (Skillful Hands-on Activities, Relays, Experimentation and ICT
1. What is the school‟s average MPS in Science before SHARE IT Science implementation?
2. What is the school‟s average MPS in Science after SHARE IT Science implementation?
implementation?
5. What is the implication of the findings of this action research for the improvement of
To achieve the objectives of this study, the researcher conducted activities stated in
SHARE IT Science and was strictly implemented in PEL - 5. The activities focused on the
school‟s Science MPS improvement. The data of the school‟s consolidated periodic test results
from first grading to fourth grading SY 2017 - 2018 were computed, analyzed, and interpreted.
Summary of Findings
After an analysis of the data gathered, the study revealed the following:
55.38%
63.94%
12
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
4. The t-test result at .05 level of significant difference was -0.99 so there‟s a significant
5. The program became effective due to the strict implementation of SHARE IT Science
activities.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the findings of this study, the following conclusions are derived.
2. The Science MPS of PEL – 5 had increased by 15.46% after SHARE IT Science
implementation. This shows that through this program, the school‟s performance in
Science improved.
3. Since the result was lower than 0.05 level of significant difference, the null hypothesis
was rejected.
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings and conclusions derived from the study, the following
1. The researcher must share her intervention program to other schools experiencing a
3. The researcher must conduct the same research next school year to prove SHARE IT
13
ACTION RESEARCH IN PEL - 5
DepEd K to 12: Teaching Math and Science (August 6, 2012) retrieved from
https://www.philippinesbasiceducation.us/2012/08/deped-k-to-12-teaching-math-and-
DepEd Orders no. 31, s. 2012, DO no. 8, s. 2015 and DO no. 36, s. 2016 retrieved from
Holly Heard et.al. (November, 2017) American Educational research Journal. „Do Teachers
Horizon Research Inc. (2003). Look Inside the Classroom. Retrieved from www.horizon-
Klahr, David and Nigam, Milena (December 15, 2004). Education week Article. “NSTA Reports
Direct Instruction: Is It the Most Effective Science Teaching Strategy?” Retrieved from
http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=50045
On Salary Hike and Performance Bonuses for Public School Teachers (November 29, 2017)
Teachers‟ Dignity Coalition (June 8, 2012). Government‟s K-12 Program Gets A “B” From
Walter, Stephen L. and Chuo, Godfrey Kain. Kom Experimental Mother Tongue Education Pilot
Project (2012) retrieved from https:// www.philippinesbasiceducation.us/ last October 30, 2017
14