CALCULATION OBSERVATIONS

 FORMATTING OF REPORT IS NOT PROPERLY DONE (DOCUMENTS ARE IN SI UNITS AS

PER SPECIFICATIONS)
 ALLOWABLE STRESS VALUES OF MATERIAL TAKEN FROM IMPERIAL DATABASE,
SHALL BE TAKE FROM METRIC DATABASE
 MDMT VALUES TAKEN DOESN’T MATCH WITH ENGG. DRAWING
 NOZZLE DESIGNED ON DESIGN PRE. + STATIC HEAD IN PLACE OF MAWP + STATIC
HEAD TO NOZZLE
 OPERATING LIQUID STATIC HEAD DOESN’T CONSIDERED IN WELD NECK BODY
FLANGES
 OPERATING LIQUID SP. GRAVITY TAKEN AS 1 IN ALL TAGS
 JOINT EFFICIENCY TAKEN WRONG (EX., 1 TAKEN IN PLACE OF 0.85 IN CHECKED TAGS)
 RF PAD NOT PROVIDED TO ANY NOZZLE ABOVE 2”
 SADDLE DIMENSIONS TAKEN IN CALCULATION DOESN’T MATCH WITH SADDLE
STANDARDS, ALSO DISTANCE BETWEEN SADDLES NOT MATCH WITH ENGG.
DRAWING
 SOME DATA IN WIND AND SEISMIC CALCULATION TAKEN WRONG
 WELD NECK FLANGE RIGIDITY CALCULATION NOT DONE
 AS PER TQ, NOZZLE SIZE 2” AND BELOW SHALL BE TAKEN LWN BUT IN CALCULATION
WN FLANGE MENTION.
 EXTERNAL PRESSURE GIVEN AS FV IN ENGG. DRAWING NOT TAKEN IN CALCULATION
 CS MATERIAL FOR PRESSURE PARTS USED SHALL BE NORMALIZED AS PER SPEC. NOT
TAKEN CARE
 PROJECTIONS OF THE NOZZLES DOES NOT MATCHING WITH ENGG. DRAWING
 LOAD OF PASS PARTITION GASKET NOT CONSIDERED
 GASKET m FACTOR TAKEN AS 2.5 IN PLACE OF 3
 BOLT LOAD NOT TRANSFERRED TO EXTENTED TYPE TUBESHEET
 UNTUBE LANE AREA OF TUBESHEET NOT ENTERED
 BOLT THREAD USED IN GIRTH FLANGE IS NOT AS PER TQ
 ANCHOR BOLT ALLOWABLE MISMATCH, TEMA THREAD ANCHOR BOLT USED IN
PLACE OF ISO METRIC
 WEIGHT OF BAFFLES / PASS PARITION / TIE ROD WEIGHT NOT TAKEN
 INSULATION NOT MODELLED
 CALCULATION OF TUBE TO TUBESHEET JOINT IS NOT PROPERLY DONE
 CALCULATION OF STRESSES IN SADDLE DURING TUBE BUNDLE REMOVAL NOT DONE
(APPLICABLE TO BUNDLE REMOVAL TAGS ONLY)
 WRC CALCULATION NOT DONE
 OPERATING LIQUID IN TUBES IS NOT TAKEN IN SOME TAGS
  CALCULATION FOR STRESSES IN THE VESSEL ELEMENTS FOR SHOP HYDROTEST
(UNCORRODED) NOT DONE
 LIFTING AND TRANSPORTATION CALCULATION NOT DONE

DRAWING OBSERVATIONS
 IT SEEMS THAT DRAWINGS ARE DIRECTLY EXTRACTED FROM SOME 3D SOFTWARE,
NOT DRAWN IN AUTOCAD SOFTWARE
 WELDING DETAILS SIZE IS BIGGER THAN EXCHANGER SIZE IN GA
 DRAWINGS ARE NOT DRAWN IN PARTICULAR SCALE, IT SHOULD BE IN SCALE
 SIDE VIEWS ARE NOT MARKED
 TEXT SIZE, HEIGHT ETC. SHOULD BE UNIFORM
 DIMENSIONING TECHNIQUE NOT MAINTAINED
 TUBE DATA NOT SHOWN
 INLET DISTANCE FOR 1ST BAFFLE AND SUCSEEDING PITCH NOT SHOWN
 NO. OF PASSES NOT SHOWN IN SIDE VIEW
 SETTING PLAN NOT SHOWN
 ALL BAFFLES ARE NOT SHOWN IN GA
 BOLT HOLES SHALL STRADDLE TO CENTRELINE OF THE PARTICULAR NOZZLE
 SIZE 0F THE PDF FILES IS TOO LARGE
 GASKET NOT SHOWN BETWEEN GIRTH FLANGE AND TUBESHEETS
 WELD OVERLAY NOT SHOWN