Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(1) The resolution professional shall issue an (1) The resolution professional shall publish
invitation, including evaluation matrix, to the brief particulars of the invitation for
prospective resolution applicants in expression of interest in Form G of the
accordance with clause (h) of sub-section (2) Schedule at the earliest, not later than
of section 25, to submit resolution plans at seventy-fifth day from the insolvency
least thirty days before the last date of commencement date, from interested and
submission of resolution plans. eligible prospective resolution applicants to
submit resolution plans.
(2) Where the invitation does not contain the (2) The resolution professional shall publish
evaluation matrix, the resolution professional Form G-
shall issue, with the approval of the (i) in one English and one regional
committee, the evaluation matrix to the language newspaper with wide
prospective resolution applicants at least circulation at the location of the
fifteen days before the last date for registered office and principal
submission of resolution plans. office, if any, of the corporate
debtor and any other location where
in the opinion of the resolution
professional, the corporate debtor
conducts material business
operations;
(ii) on the website, if any, of the
corporate debtor;
(iii) on the website, if any,
designated by the Board for the
purpose; and
(iv) In any other manner as may be
decided by the committee.
(4) The timelines specified under this (4) The detailed invitation referred to in sub-
regulation shall not apply to an ongoing regulation (3) shall-
corporate insolvency resolution process- (a) specify the criteria for
(a) where a period of less than thirty- prospective resolution applicants, as
seven days is left for submission of approved by the committee in
resolution plans under sub-regulation accordance with clause (h) of sub-
(1); section (2) of section 25;
(b) Where a period of less than (b) state the ineligibility norms
eighteen days is left for submission of under section 29A to the extent
resolution plans under sub-regulation applicable for prospective resolution
(2). applicants;
(c) provide such basic information
about the corporate debtor as may
be required by a prospective
resolution applicant for expression
of interest; and
(d) Not require payment of any fee
or any non-refundable deposit for
submission of expression of interest.
(5) The resolution professional shall publish (5) A prospective resolution applicant, who
brief particulars of the invitation in Form G meets the requirements of the invitation for
of the Schedule: expression of interest, may submit expression
(a) on the website, if any, of the of interest within the time specified in the
corporate debtor; and invitation under clause (b) of sub-regulation
(b) On the website, if any, designated (3).
by the Board for the purpose.
Reading of Regulation 36A along with section 240(1) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016
As per Section 240(1), it has empowered IBBI to make to make rules and regulations for the
purpose of the insolvency proceedings but such enactment should be in compliance with IBC and
it should not over power or defect the purpose of the enactment of IBC.
By introducing, regulation 36A of IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Person)
Regulation, 2016 it has defeated the intent of IBC as invitation for interest to the assets of the
corporate debtor are invited even prior to resolution plan is implemented.
Such implementation is in negation to the salient feature which was highlighted by the Supreme
Court in Innoventive Industries Ltd. V. ICICI Bank Ltd. that speed is the essence of the IBC.
Also, it was held in the case of Punjab National Bank v. Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd. that
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) does not permit the division of the process i.e. by first
inviting application in the nature of ‘expression of interest’ and later on to file resolution plans.
Such process defeats the intention and motive of IBC as it has been enacted for speedy disposal of
the insolvency cases and in the most of the cases under the IBC, the number of the resolution
applicants is not more than 10 and it is not required to have such method wherein division has
been created in the resolution process by first accepting applications for the assets of the corporate
debtor(s) and later on, filing resolution plan.
Hence NCLT, New Delhi held that regulation 36A is ultra-vires of the Section 240(1) of IBC,
2016 and directed IBBI to frame regulation according to competence and source of the power as
given to it under IBC.
Application was filed under Sec 12(2) to extend the time period for CIRP by further period of 90
days.
The said application was supported by a resolution passed by CoC in 4th meeting held on 7th
August, 2018. The reason for the extension sorted was because two to three potential resolution
applicants after obtaining access to data room need sufficient amount of time to carry out their due
diligence and arrive at an appropriate price for the assets of the corporate debtor and also there
was a strike of transporters due to which supplies of key raw material was delayed and potential
resolution applicant wanted to visit operational plant.
Hence, application was made to extend last date of submission of resolution plan from 10th
August, 2018 to 31st August, 2018.
The said proposal had been placed before CoC and it had been passed by 96.99% votes by the
Committee of Creditors (CoC). Also, CoC has empowered RP to file the said application.
Expression of interest was invited on 4th July, 2018 and last date to submit interest was to be
decided as 18th June, 2018 without even inviting any resolution plan. Such action lead to the
negation of the Supreme Court judgement passed in Innoventive Industries Ltd. V. ICICI Bank
Ltd. and hence, NCLT, New Delhi held that regulation 36-A is ultra-vires of Section 240(1) of the
IBC, 2016.