Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. What is the level of measurement for each of the following variables?. Please give a
reason for your answer.
(10 marks)
a. Student IQ ratings
b. Distance students travel to class
c. The jersey number of a sorority soccer team
d. Grade in the examination
e. Number of hours students study per week
2. The following is the percent change in net income from last year to this year for a sampel
of 12 companies in Denver.
(6 marks)
5 1 -10 -6 5 12 7 8 2 6 -1 11
3. Specify the appropriate statistical test for the following statement. Give a reason for your
answer.
a) Researcher want to determine whether the mean score for math exam are
different between boys and girls.
b) Lecturer want to know whether there is a difference in mean score for math exam
based on three different methods of teaching.
c) Researcher want to know the relationship between the number of hours reading
book and students' performance in mathematics test.
(9 marks)
(a) A researcher want to know the attitude of adults and youth on the proposed increase
in bus fare. A random sample of 65 passengers was surveyed. The table below
shows the results of chi-square test based on three opinions either Agree, Against,
and Neutral.
attitude
1
Test Statistics
attitude
Chi-Square 14.000a
df 2
Asymp. Sig. .001
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have
expected frequencies less
than 5. The minimum
expected cell frequency is
22.3.
(b) Researcher randomly assigns 15 students to each of two groups (low-stress and high-
stress). When students in both group arrive for their appointments, they are told in 10
minutes conversation between students. The percent of time that each student talks
during the 10-minute period is recorded. The table below shows the results of
independent sample t-test for the percent of time that students talk related to level of
stress (low-stress versus high-stress).
Group Statistics
stress N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Percent Time Talking Low Stress 15 45.20 24.969 6.447
High Stress 15 22.07 27.136 7.006
2
Based on the output table above,
(a) A researcher believes that individuals that are more physically active are better able to
cope with stress in the workplace. To test this theory, the researcher recruited 31
subjects and measured how many minutes of physical activity they performed per
week and their ability to cope with workplace stress. The subjects were categorised
into four groups based on the number of minutes of physical activity they performed:
namely, "sedentary", "low", "moderate" and "high" physical activity groups. These
groups (levels of physical activity) formed an independent variable called group. The
ability to cope with workplace stress was assessed as the average score of a series of
Likert items on a questionnaire, which allowed an overall 'coping with workplace stress'
score to be calculated; higher scores indicating a greater ability to cope with
workplace-related stress. This dependent variable was called stress_coping.
The table below shows the result of the one-way ANOVA analysis for the
stress_coping different for different levels of group; namely, "sedentary", "low",
"moderate" and "high" physical activity groups.
Descriptives
Coping with workplace stress score
3
ANOVA
Coping with workplace stress score
(4 marks)
iii. Make a decision and interpret the result.
(8 marks)
Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Coping with workplace stress score
LSD
Mean Difference 95% Confidence Interval
(I) Physical Activity Level (J) Physical Activity Level Std. Error Sig.
(I-J) Lower Bound Upper Bound
Sedentary Low -1.72762* .70650 .021 -3.1772 -.2780
Moderate -2.97153* .72557 .000 -4.4603 -1.4828
High -3.35409* .74936 .000 -4.8916 -1.8165
Low Sedentary 1.72762* .70650 .021 .2780 3.1772
Moderate -1.24391 .68121 .049 -2.6416 .1538
High -1.62647* .70650 .029 -3.0761 -.1768
Moderate Sedentary 2.97153* .72557 .000 1.4828 4.4603
Low 1.24391 .68121 .049 -.1538 2.6416
High -.38256 .72557 .602 -1.8713 1.1062
High Sedentary 3.35409* .74936 .000 1.8165 4.8916
Low 1.62647* .70650 .029 .1768 3.0761
Moderate .38256 .72557 .602 -1.1062 1.8713
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
iv. Based on the Post Hoc Test above, explain mean differences between the four
groups.
(6 marks)
4
QUESTION FOUR (21 MARKS)
(a) The table below shows the results of Pearson correlation analysis, which determined
the correlation coefficient between years of education (educ) and income (in
thousand).
Correlations
educ income
N 10 10
income Pearson Correlation .974** 1
N 10 10
(ii) Explain the results of the correlation analysis between the years of schooling (educ)
and income (income).
(4 marks)
(b) The table below shows the output of multiple regression analysis to identify the
influence of independent variables, namely jumlah jam menonton TV, dan jumlah jam
membaca (study) dalam seminggu terhadap pembolehubah bersandar, iaitu
pencapaian dalam ujian statistic(stat_marks).
Model Summary
Change Statistics
Adjusted R Std. Error of the R Square Sig. F
Model R R Square Square Estimate Change F Change df1 df2 Change
1 .817a .668 .654 15.23524 .668 48.219 2 48 .000
a. Predictors: (Constant), TV, Study
ANOVAa
Total 33525.647 50
5
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Based on the output in the table above, answer the following questions: