PROCESS SIMULATION (HYSYS)
Name of students:
Topic
1 Choice and sequence of equipment
2 Separation process efficiency
3 Fluid flow principle
4 Choice of Simulation Fluid Packages
6 Overall report and Printed Output
Overall Performance
REMARK: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Panel : ………………………………………………………………………….
Unacceptable (0-
1)
Illogical choice of equipment. Logical choice of equipment and used of major equipment were carried
Illogical sequence of
equipment proposed
The final product does not
meet the product purity.
Significant amount of
products were found in waste
streams. The desired product
purity was not mentioned in
the text.
The fluid flow principles were drop is not accurate along the
not considered for the plant. process. No justification was given
No ∆P along the pipeline and
unit operation
Ideal Gas equation was
chosen only, for the whole
range of Pressure system
The report was cluttered and
difficult to follow. Readable somehow the story line can be
PFD was submitted with no
worksheet or Worksheet was workbook were submitted. Many
submitted withour
proper/readable PFD.
Unacceptable
Group No:
Marginal Acceptable Exceptional Full
Points Marks
(2 - 3) (4 - 5) (6) Marks
Description of the process and the
Description of the process and the used of major equipment were carried
out. The choice of equipment used in
justified in report. Illogical out. The choice of equipment used in plant was justified. Equipment used 6 0
sequence of equipment proposed plant was justified. Equipment used was placed in PFD in logical manner.
was placed in logical manner. The sequence was justified in the
report.
The final product meets the The final product meets the desired
desired product purity. Significant product purity. No products were
The final product meets the desired
amount of products were found in found in waste streams. The
product purity. No products were found 7 0
waste streams. The desired simulation results (product purity)
in waste streams.
product purity was vaugely were clearly explained and compared
mentioned in the text. with literature data.
Correct fluid flow principles were
Minor faulty in the pressure drop along applied to the simulation across
More than half of the pressure
the process lines. Justification was equipment and streams. Justification
given on the choice of pressures was given on the choice of pressures
selected for the streams and selected for stream and equipment, 7 0
on the choice of pressures
equipment. with cited literature reference for
selected for streams and
major equipment.
equipment.
Activity coefficient model was used for
Only Equation of states was used to
simulation of liquid system. Equation
simulate both gas and liquid system.
Ideal Gas equation was chosen of states was used to simulate gas
The choice of fluid package was
for pressure < 10 bar. No system. eg.:NRTL-PR. The choice of 5 0
justified
justification was given. fluid packages were justified
Readable and PFD and workbook
The report was cluttered but
Readable and PFD and workbook were were submitted. Complete information
submitted. Many missing information for assessment were submitted such
followed. Incomplete PFD and
such as P, T, V/F, component mass as P, T, V/F, mass flow, component 15 0
fraction. The report was presented in mass fraction. The report was clearly
missing information such as P, T,
logical sequence. written and presented in logical
V/F, component mass fraction.
sequence.
Marginal Acceptable Exceptional 0 40 0.00
Signature:…………………….. Date:……………………..