Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 1
Auto component sales will increase almost fourfold by 2020
50
+10% 125
+16% 2W
44 $113
CV
1
13
40 100 PV
9 4
6 Tractors
2 Construction
21
30 75
Aftermarket
All vehicles
21
20 18 50
0.5 32
3
0.8 $30
4
10 25 47
14
26
0 0
Notes: 2W is two-wheeler vehicles; CV is commercial vehicles; PV is passenger vehicles. Due to rounding figures may not add up exactly to total.
Source: A.T. Kearney analysis
+13% 8.7
Mini
1.2 Compact
0.1 Midsize
0.8 Executive
1.9
1.2
0.1
2011 2020e
Notes: MPV is multipurpose vehicles; UV is utility vehicles. Due to rounding figures may not add up exactly to total.
Source: A.T. Kearney analysis
Passenger vehicles
India is projected to produce 8.7 million passenger vehicles per year by 2020, with the
majority—5.2 million—expected to be compact cars (see figure 2). This will make India the
world’s compact-car hub (see figure 3 on page 5). Indians prefer compact cars primarily
because they are less expensive and taxes are lower. Many auto industry giants—Toyota,
Honda, Ford, GM, Volkswagen, and Renault-Nissan—have built or are building state-of-the-art
facilities in India to manufacture compact cars. For most manufacturers, establishing a global
presence in an industry or segment requires the following:
India’s Auto Component Suppliers: New Frontiers in Growth 4
Figure 3
India’s production level of compact cars easily outpaces other developing countries
0 20 40 60 80 100
Compact
India 42 19 8 32
Mini
Midsize
Thailand 46 22 32
Others
2 1
Indonesia 10 87
Brazil 10 60 12 18
China 6 8 35 51
Figure 4
Too few Indian auto component players do business globally
Suppliers
(%)
100
100
80
64
60
40
22
20
11
0
3
While the global automakers may want to develop local suppliers because of the cost
advantage, it is often too difficult to do so. Instead, most automakers are establishing
state-of-the-art global plants to attract their global suppliers to India.
At the same time, the largest automakers are moving toward fewer global platforms to
manage complexity (see figure 5). Volkswagen is adopting a modular strategy, planning
to perform more than 90 percent of production on three platforms by 2020. Ford plans
to have just nine core platforms by 2013, and GM will have just 14 platforms by 2018, down
from a high of 30. In all, 12 global automakers are expected to reduce their platforms from 223
in 2010 to 154 by 2020. This translates into the production of many more vehicles per platform.
Still, the global automakers contend that their ultimate goal is to develop Indian suppliers that
can meet global requirements and eventually move up the value chain into more complex
assemblies. Both GM and Ford are making efforts to achieve this goal. GM’s Supplier Footprint
Optimization team works with Indian suppliers to improve their capabilities and has already
developed 25 percent of its Indian supplier base for its global operations. And for the first time,
Ford developed Indian suppliers to build its block-and-head castings for its Figo product range.
Improve product development capabilities. As India becomes the global hub for small
vehicles, design and development is expected to shift there. Sensing an opportunity, global
tier 1 suppliers that entered India in the past few years are becoming increasingly confident
in their ability to pull off complex activities. Many are either scaling up their R&D facilities in
India or setting up R&D facilities for the first time. For example, Continental, Bosch Chassis
Systems, Faurecia, and Tenneco have established R&D centers in India that not only adapt
global designs for Indian conditions, but also focus on new product development.
Figure 5
Leading OEMs are reducing the number of global platforms
Volkswagen Three platforms by 2020 MQB platform (Jetta, Golf, Polo, Fabia,
among others)
The learning curve for Indian component suppliers is likely to be steep and may require
technology licensing or small-scale acquisitions to bridge the gaps. Many auto component
suppliers in developing markets are ramping up their acquisitions to gain access to more
technology across categories. For example, Dynamatic Technologies acquired German
component maker Eisenwerke Erla to improve its design and development capabilities in
producing complex ferrous castings for engines and turbochargers. Similarly, chassis maker
Wonder Auto Technology acquired airbag manufacturer Jinheng to improve its performance
in safety systems.
• Disseminate. Allow agility to filter down the value chain to tier 1 and tier 3 suppliers.
These segments will likely remain dominated by Indian manufacturers for at least a few more
years, which means opportunities will arise for suppliers to become strategic partners in two
areas: technology and support. Manufacturers are constantly seeking differentiation from
competitors and the ability to provide cost-effective technology for consumers. To this latter
point, one Indian manufacturer started a group called Local Partnerships for Smart
Technologies to introduce affordable technologies in India.
Suppliers will succeed by taking a mid- and long-term view—first to understand what will
competitively differentiate their automaker customers and then to become a strategic partner
in bringing the required technologies to the table. Rapid growth and numerous new vehicle
launches will require support from strategic suppliers. For example, one two-wheeler
manufacturer has about 20 strategic suppliers that cater to almost 80 percent of its requirements;
these suppliers focus on product development and the creation of flexible manufacturing
strategies to support the launch and ramp-up phase. In return, the suppliers acquire
a substantial share of the business. The manufacturer credits this strategy for its position
as an innovation leader in the two-wheel vehicle segment.
Becoming a strategic partner usually means being indispensable to the manufacturer and
having strong account management skills. Both attributes are evident in an advanced account
development process and active selling time, as are market intelligence and the ability to manage
internal stakeholders during the bidding process and through all stages of product development.
Authors
The authors wish to thank Arunav Tripathi and Tamanna Padhi for their valuable contributions to this paper.
For more information, permission to reprint or translate this work, and all other correspondence,
please email: insight@atkearney.com.
The signature of our namesake and founder, Andrew Thomas Kearney, on the cover of this
document represents our pledge to live the values he instilled in our firm and uphold his
commitment to ensuring “essential rightness” in all that we do.