Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Jiajian Hu BA and MLIS (2000) The Impact of Productivity and Quality of CJK
Cataloging–A Brief Comparison Between CJK 2nd Edition and 3rd Edition, Cataloging & Classification
Quarterly, 29:4, 87-90, DOI: 10.1300/J104v29n04_07
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the
“Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our
agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the
accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views
of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon
and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis
shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses,
damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in
connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial
or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or
distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and
use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
REPORT ON OPERATIONS
ABSTRACT. This report compares the features of the 2nd and 3rd
editions of OCLC’s CJK cataloging as implemented at the Chicago
Public Library. The 3rd edition is faster for cataloging than the 2nd
edition. Alternatively, the 2nd edition has other benefits including sta-
bility. Perspectives such as the quality of CJK cataloging between the
2nd and the 3rd edition are discussed also. [Article copies available for a fee
from The Haworth Document Delivery Service: 1-800-342-9678. E-mail address:
<getinfo@haworthpressinc.com> Website: <http://www.HaworthPress.com>]
Jiajian Hu, BA, MLIS, is Cataloging Librarian II, Catalog Division, the Chicago
Public Library, Chicago, IL (E-mail: jhu@chipublib.org).
The author wishes to acknowledge Mrs. Sheryl Nichin-Keith and Mr. Richard
Stewart for reviewing and revising this article.
Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, Vol. 29(4) 2000
E 2000 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved. 87
88 CATALOGING & CLASSIFICATION QUARTERLY
batch access with online and off-line processing. Users can do their
CJK cataloging with a smooth interface.
Catalogers using the 2nd CJK edition might have some headaches
in losing saved files for review because of its 14-day save expiration
term. In contrast, in the 3rd edition, the local file save function will
track the record by local record number. There is no 14-day save
expiration term in the local file save function. No longer having to
worry about losing the saved file is a considerable benefit. Also,
records in local files are searchable in various ways by coding status
(by local record number, title, name, date/time added to the file, etc.).
Another important feature of the 3rd generation software is its
enhanced function in Pinyin support. Users are given options to file
Downloaded by [University of Tennessee At Martin] at 18:39 07 October 2014