Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prologue 7
Explanatory Memorandum 10
Chapter I. 24
General Provisions
Chapter II. 27
Offences and Penalties
Chapter III. 31
Investigation, Prosecution and Penalties
Chapter IV. 34
Rights of Victims
Chapter V. 36
Reparation
Chapter VI. 37
Public Policy Measures of Prevention
Chapter VII. 38
Final Provisions
Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment, and Eradication of
Violence against Women (Convention of Belém do Pará)
Chapter I 41
Definition and Scope of Application
Chapter II 42
Rights Protected
Chapter III 43
Duties of the States
Chapter IV 45
Inter-American Mechanisms of Protection
Chapter V 46
General Provisions
Acknowledgments 50
Prologue
The violent killing of women has its roots in cultures and traditions that sustain a
patriarchal system that subordinates women to the masculine mandate and is based
in traditionally unequal power relationships. This violence is exacerbated during
emergencies, armed conflicts, natural disasters and other high-risk situations.1 In
this context, the increased attention to the violent killing of women in International
Human Rights law becomes ever more important.
The work of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women its causes
and consequences has been critical for the contextualization of the situation on a global
level. They have called on countries to strengthen their efforts to combat this problem,
including through the global observatory on femicide/feminicide on the violent death
of women, established by the Special Rapporteur Dubravka Šimonovic,2 that enables
identification of the context, causes and consequences of these crimes.
Feminist activism and academia have provided indisputable leadership in the Americas
in the theoretical debate around the characterization of femicide and feminicide as a
crime. It has had a real impact on legislative discourse in the countries of the region,
most especially in Latin America, and led to commitments that have transformed into
recommendations, declarations and legislation.
1 Committee of Experts of the Follow-up Mechanism to the Belém do Pará Convention (MESECVI). (August 15,
2008). Declaration on Femicide, adopted at the Fourth Meeting of the Committee of Experts (CEVI). Available
at: http://www.oas.org/es/mesecvi/docs/DeclaracionFemicidio-EN.pdf
2 Additional information at: Global Knowledge Space to prevent and eliminate the gender-related killing of
women and girls, http://femicide-watch.org/
3 UNODC (2018). Global Study on Homicide. Gender-related killing of women and girls. Available at: https://
www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/global-study-on-homicide.html
7
In 2008, when the Committee of Experts (CEVI) adopted the Declaration on
Femicide,4 that holds that femicide/feminicide constitutes the most serious form
of discrimination and violence against women, eleven (11) countries categorized
femicide as a crime, as defined by the CEVI. At the current date, 18 countries classify
it as a crime, or consider gender-based homicides of women to be aggravated.
Nevertheless, as the study shows, legislative action has not necessarily resulted in a
marked decrease in the number of violent killings of women.5
Further, the depiction of the scale of the problem in numbers and extensive legislation
being developed have not led to the elimination of this behavior, as clear budgetary and
public policy constraints on the prioritization of prevention of violence against women
continue to exist. The Third Hemispheric Report of the MESECVI6 points out that not a
single one of the countries in the region appropriated above 1% of their annual spending
budget to policies focused on prevention of violence against women.
We see this same gap between the existence of laws that criminalize this behavior
and the punishment of those responsible for the crimes. Impunity in these cases
is due to, among other things, limited access of women to justice, as well as
gender bias during legal, police and prosecutorial procedures, which can be easily
recognized in the number of cases prosecuted.7 For examples, during the Third
Round of Evaluation, the largest omission in the information reported by the States,
including by those with relevant legislation, was with respect to the legal decisions
sanctioning attackers and awarding reparations to victims. In this specific case,
not one State reported the existence of compensatory judgments or measures
providing financial relief to survivors of violence or their heirs.
These elements have played a defining role in the work of the Follow-up Mechanism
4 Declaration on Femicide, op.cit.
5 According to the study, the numbers increased from 2012 – 2017.
6 Follow-up Mechanism to the Belém do Pará Convention (MESECVI), Third Hemispheric Report on the
Implementation of the Belém do Pará Convention, 2017. Available at: http://www.oas.org/es/mesecvi/docs/
TercerInformeHemisferico-EN.pdf
7 Declaration on Femicide, op.cit.
8
to the Belém do Para Convention (MESECVI) and especially for the Committee of
Experts, who have continued to point out that the public policies and resources
aimed at combating violence against women must include a human rights, gender
and diversity perspective that aligns with the international obligations derived from
the Convention.
We hope this Model Law will be of use to the States, whether in drafting new
legislation or in amending already existing laws. It is clear that the simple enactment
of legislation will not solve the problem of violence against women on its own, as it
is a result of the unequal power relationship between men and women that exists
in our countries. However, without laws that specifically address the violent killing
of women, that we know takes place simply because the victims are women, we
cannot begin to eliminate the problem.
For all the reasons above, the Inter-American Model Law to Prevent, Punish and
Eradicate the Violent Death of Women (Femicide-Feminicide) seeks to provide an
integrated overview of the issue and serve as a tool for States and other parties
interested in the defense of women’s rights, to enjoy the highest standard of
protection and interpretation currently available to guarantee and demand the
rights established in the Belém do Pará Convention.
9
Explanatory Memorandum
The Belem do Pará Convention is the first international treaty to enshrine the right of
women to live a life free from violence, in both the public and private spheres and to
be valued and educated free from gender stereotyped behavior and social and cultural
practices based on the concept that they are inferior or subordinate to men. Article 7
of the Convention establishes that States, as the protectors and guarantors of human
rights, are obligated to act with all due diligence to prevent, investigate, punish and
ensure restitution for all forms of violence against women. This responsibility extends,
among other things, to enacting whatever necessary criminal, civil and administrative
regulations within their national legislation to prevent, punish and eradicate violence
against women.
The purpose of this Model Law, when enacted, is to prevent, punish and eradicate
the gender-based murder of women, femicide/feminicide, whether committed by a
partner or ex-partner, any individual or group of individuals with whom the women
had or may have had an interpersonal relationship, or agents of the government.
10
Declaration on Femicide made the following recommendations:10
a. “Violent emotion” should not be used to mitigate the responsibility of those who
commit femicide.
b. Strengthen protection for the human rights and freedoms of women in existing
legislation.
c. Include the issue of violence against women in policies that address citizens’ security.
e. Punish government officials who fail to act with all due diligence.
The CEVI recognizes femicide as the most extreme and irreversible expression
of violence and discrimination against women. It stands in violent opposition to
all declared rights and guarantees of human rights established in both national
and international legislation. It is a dehumanizing act of hate that, over time, has
consolidated the male hegemonic vision over women as an object of transgression
and weakness; it is a configuration of the dominating system of patriarchal power.11
The MESECVI Declaration on Femicide states: “In Latin America and the Caribbean,
femicide represents the most serious manifestation of discrimination and violence
against women. The high rates of violence, limited or no access to justice, the
impunity that prevails in cases of violence against women, and the persistence of
10 Declaration on Femicide. Committee of Experts of the Follow-Up Mechanism to the BELÉM DO PARÁ
CONVENTION (MESECVI). August 15, 2008. Available at: https://www.oas.org/en/mesecvi/docs/
declaracionfemicidio-en.pdf
11 Third Hemispheric Report on the Implementation of the BELÉM DO PARÁ CONVENTION (MESECVI). Paragraph
111, Available at: http://www.oas.org/en/mesecvi/docs/TercerInformeHemisferico-EN.pdf
11
discriminatory socio-cultural patterns, among other causes, result in an increase in
the number of deaths.”12
Femicide was originally defined by Russell14 as, “the misogynistic killing of women
by men”. She later amended her definition to “the killing of females by males
because they are female” to include all forms of sexist killing (because of misogyny,
because of a sense of having the right to do so, because of a sense of superiority or
the assumption of ownership over women).
The MESECVI defines femicide as, “the violent killing of women because of gender,
whether it occurs within the family, domestic unit or any interpersonal relationship,
within the community, by any individual, or when committed or tolerated by the
12
State or its agents, either by act or omission.”17
The former United National Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its
causes and consequences, Rashida Manjoo, refers in her Report to the conceptual
evolution of the terms and notes that the term femicide has been used since the
beginning of the 19th century to describe the homicide of women as an alternative
to the term “homicide,” which is gender neutral and does not reflect the reality of
the systematic inequality, oppression and violence suffered by women.18
The Committee of the CEDAW makes the following recommendation: “Ensure that
all forms of gender-based violence against women in all spheres, which amount
to a violation of their physical, sexual, or psychological integrity, are criminalized
and introduce, without delay, or strengthen legal sanctions commensurate with the
gravity of the offence as well as civil remedies”.21 It additionally recommends the
following: adoption of legislative measures of prevention that address the underlying
17 MESECVI/OAS (2008), ob. cit.
18 United Nations General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 20th session. Report of the Special Rapporteur
on violence against women, its causes and consequences, Rashida Manjoo, May 23rd 2012. Document A/
HRC/20/16. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Women/A.HRC.20.16_En.pdf
19 Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW, General Recommendation
No.19. Violence against women, 1992.
20 Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW, General Recommendation
No .35 on gender-based violence against women, updating General Recommendation No. 19. 2017) In
reference to violence that causes the death of women, the Committee provides this example among other:
‘gender-based killings include intentional homicides, “honor” killings, and forced suicide.” See the report on
the investigation on Mexico; the report on the investigation on Canada (CEDAW/C/OP.8/CAN/1); as well as the
final observations of the Committee on the periodic reports submitted by the following States Parties: Chile
(CEDAW/C/CHL/CO/5-6 y Corr.1); Finland (CEDAW/C/FIN/CO/7); Guatemala (CEDAW/C/GUA/CO/7); Honduras
(CEDAW/C/HND/Q/7- 8); Iraq (CEDAW/C/IRQ/CO/4-6); Mexico (CEDAW/C/MEX/CO/7-8); Namibia (CEDAW/C/
NAM/Q/4-5); Pakistan (CEDAW/C/PAK/CO/4); South Africa (CEDAW/C/ZAF/CO/4); Turkey (CEDAW/C/TUR/
CO/7); and the United Republic of Tanzania (CEDAW/C/TZA/CO/7-8), among others
21 Committee on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW, General Recommendation
No .35 on gender-based violence against women, updating General Recommendation No. 19. 2017), Paragraph
29. Available at: https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CEDAW/Shared Documents/1_Global/CEDAW_C_
GC_35_8267_E.pdf
13
causes of gender-based violence against women, and its most extreme expression,
femicide/feminicide; the approval and implementation of effective preventative
measures; guaranteed access to justice for victims and their family members; the
fair, impartial, timely and rapid use of criminal justice for the prosecution of those
responsible; and the granting of effective reparations to the victim and survivors,
while encouraging the autonomy of women and their full participation, while taking
into account the specific situation of the women impacted by the interrelated forms
of discrimination.22
Consequently, the bodies comprising the Inter-American System for the Protection
of Human Rights of the Organization of American States (OAS) as well as the human
rights bodies of the United Nations, recommend States amend their regulatory
framework to appropriately address the violent deaths of women, femicide/
feminicide and its corresponding punishment.
From a political and legal perspective, classification of the violent deaths of women
as femicide/feminicide grants visibility into the ultimate expression of gender-
based violence and places it within a hierarchy that allows its consideration as an
issue to be addressed. In addition, the conceptualization of gender-based based
violence facilitates raising awareness of the consequences of the unequal power
relationships between men and women in society, and allows the recording and
comparative and statistical analysis of the issue.
The victim and her family have the right to be treated with respect and to have their
14
dignity protected; and they should be treated appropriately as their circumstances
require. A crime has been committed against the woman and the retelling of the victim’s
story or that of her family members in the search for information should in no way be
influenced by a gender bias,24 that justifies the violence suffered by the victim.
The Court also ruled on reparations, finding that they must be comprehensive and
“be designed to change the situation, so that their effect is not only of restitution
but also of rectification,” And, “in this regard, the reestablishment of the same
structural context of violence and discrimination is not acceptable.”27
with the principles and norms of the treaties and conventions they have ratified. In
Latin America, the majority of countries have introduced the concept of femicide/
feminicide into their national legislation, following the recommendations of the
CEVI, to enact laws or approve reforms to criminal codes that classify the killing
of a woman, because she is a woman, as a crime. Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile,
Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua,
Panama, Paraguay, Peru, the Dominican Republic, Venezuela and Uruguay have all
24 Gender bias is defined as, “the erroneous concept of equality or differences between men and women, based
on their nature, behaviour or thinking which can result in unequal treatment in health services, including
the investigation, as discriminatory conduct by one sex against the other.” Ariño, M.D., Tomás, C., Eguiluz,
M., Samitier, M.L., Oliveros, T., Yago, T. … & Magallón, R. (2011). In Spanish, Se puede evaluar perspective de
género en los proyectos de investigación? Gaceta Sanitaria, 25, 146-150.
25 ob.cit. Paragraph 258
26 Idem. Paragraph 283
27 Ob.cit. paragraph 450. See Footnote 7
15
used the term femicide or feminicide when classifying it as a separate crime, or
have designated it as an aggravating factor in homicide.
For the Committee, it is clear that, Caribbean countries have approved laws for
the prevention and punishment for violence in a domestic context and in some
cases, have also criminalized certain acts of violence against women, particularly
ones with a sexual component. The concept of femicide/feminicide, however, has
not yet been classified as a crime independent from homicide.
The term “femicide” has not yet been commonly adopted in the Caribbean, even
though it has been used anecdotally in the print media. This highlights the fact that
in Caribbean countries, the murder of women is more frequently associated with
physical violence occurring in intimate and domestic relationships, as are the rapes
committed in public spaces by third parties that clearly can be identified as femicides.
The challenges associated with the application of the concept remain for those
countries where the concept has been included in internal regulation, and where
there remain serious obstacles that impede women from effective access to justice,
truth and reparations.
International human rights monitoring bodies point out the persistence of gaps
between formally declared rights and the effective Access to justice for women
throughout the region, which is clearly demonstrated by the incessantly increasing
number of cases and multiple examples of impunity.
The purpose of the proposed model law is to provide a blueprint of the highest
possible standards of protection of women for those countries that intend to
classify, if they have not already done so, the violent deaths of women as a crime,
and for those that have, but have not realized the intended results in terms of
access to justice. A more detailed and broad understanding of the phenomenon of
femicide itself and of the factors that underlie the gender-based violent deaths of
women, in different contexts, is necessary. This information is frequently lost within
the general data on homicides, which impedes the development of adequate
preventive measures against femicide and contributes to the perpetuation of the
historic discrimination against women.
This law seeks to incorporate the principles, content, and objectives of the Belem
do Pará Convention into national legislation, adapting them to the needs of each
State regardless of their legal tradition. The law establishes specific provisions that
16
compel compliance with the States’ duty to act with strict diligence, arming them
with more effective measures for the prevention, investigation, and punishment of
femicide/feminicide, as well as achieving effective access to justice for the victims,
survivors, and family members, and providing protection from femicidal violence
and reparation for damages suffered.
CHAPTER V. Reparation
CHAPTER I includes the objectives, guiding principles, and the scope of the
application of the law, in addition to definitions of certain key terms. To this effect,
international standards were particularly applied with respect to intersectionality
and non-discrimination; the duty to act with strict, comprehensive and effective
due diligence; the centrality of the rights of the victim and family members; the best
interests of the children and adolescents; autonomy of the women; pro persona
principle and progressivity of rights.
It should be understood that, throughout the text of the Law, when we express the
desire to guarantee the rights of women, we are also referring to adolescents, girls,
and older adult women, with the intention of providing them a life free from violence
17
and stereotyped behavior patterns, in conformance with international human
rights obligations. Through the criminal classification and punishment of femicide/
feminicide, the Law intends to strengthen the multisectoral acts of prevention,
protection, treatment, investigation, prosecution, judgment, effective punishment,
compliance with the law and comprehensive reparation to the women, adolescents
and girl children victims of violence and their family members.
This chapter also addresses the principles related to the best interests and evolutive
capacities of children and adolescents, including those children who may have been
indirect victims of femicide, and which refers to their ability to receive information
about violence and its consequences and their rights, their ability to make informed
decisions and participate autonomously as their age and stage of development allow.
In addition, the Law recognizes that in many cases, other circumstances which
could contribute to social and economic inequalities are related to gender, and can
disproportionately increase the risk of violence among women and girl children,
present additional obstacles not only to preventive and care services, but also to
justice and reparation. We should also pay attention to the structural changes to
gender that are having an impact on the inequality between men and women and
that could result in their possible victimization by men or other persons.
In any case, this chapter will attempt to ensure that among the principles that guide
this law, the means to ensure effective and full compliance with the obligations
undertaken by the State are implemented within a reasonable timeframe and that
in no case, shall the full enjoyment of rights be diminished to any degree, or any
rights obtained, reduced.
18
killing of women, including: omission of therapeutic abortion,28 femicide suicide
by induction or aid, obstruction of access to justice, and other aggravating factors
when committed against women.
Since determining the subjective factors that comprise the intent of the attacker
poses a complicated challenge for agents of the criminal justice system in terms of
standards of proof, the Committee has undertaken to establish the objective acts
that should be considered to determine the existence of gender-based motives,
from an intersectional perspective, as well as the social context, the community
of the victim and the perpetrator, including their cultural and religious beliefs, and
thereby eliminate the need to determine the state of mind or any individual motive
(mens rea) on the part of the attacker.
Accessory penalties for the aforementioned crime have also been introduced,
including the temporary suspension of custody of any children under the suspect’s
28 In conformance with: United Nations General Assembly, 20th regular session of the Human Rights
Council, 2012. Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences,
Rashida Manjoo, document A/HRC/20/16, paragraph 16. The killings can be active or direct, with defined
perpetrators, but they can also be passive or indirect … The indirect category includes: deaths due to
poorly conducted or clandestine abortions; maternal mortality; deaths from harmful practices; deaths
linked to human trafficking, drug dealing, organized crime and gang-related activities; the death of girls or
women from simple neglect, through starvation or ill-treatment; and deliberate acts or omissions by the State.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, Recommendation No. 35, paragraph 14.
“Gender-based violence affects women throughout their life cycle and accordingly references to women in
this document include girls. This violence takes multiple forms, including acts or omissions intended or likely to
cause or result in death.” Paragraph 18. “Violations of women’s sexual and reproductive health and rights, such
as forced sterilizations, forced abortion, forced pregnancy, criminalisation of abortion, denial or delay of safe
abortion and post-abortion care, forced continuation of pregnancy, abuse and mistreatment of women and girls
seeking sexual and reproductive health information, goods and services, are forms of gender-based violence that,
depending on the circumstances, may amount to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.”
19
responsibility during the investigation of the crime of femicide, with temporary
guardianship to be awarded according to the best interests of the minor child.
Similarly, among the responsibilities of the investigating body that have been
provided in detail, including ensuring the immediate launch of an exhaustive search
and investigation of missing women, the investigation of all violent deaths of women
as possible femicides, the context and prior incidents of violence committed against
the woman or women must be considered.
Agents of the criminal justice system must act with complete independence,
resolving issues with impartiality, based on the facts of the case and within the
law, with no undue, direct or indirect, restrictions or outside influence, incentives,
pressure, threats or interventions from any sector or for any reason. Silence, a lack
of resistance, or the victim’s sexual history prior to or post the event, must not be
interpreted as acceptance or consent for any behavior. The principle of evidentiary
amplitude will be applied, providing credibility to the victim’s or family member’s
statement and/or testimony.
All actions related to the investigation and prosecution must be conducted with
all due diligence; ex officio, in a timely manner, exhaustively, within a reasonable
timeframe, without delay and with guaranteed effectiveness, in accordance with
20
human rights standards. The duty to investigate is undertaken by those persons
responsible for the investigative processes and the administration of justice as a
legal obligation and not just a simple formality, predetermined as futile from the
outset. Investigations will be conducted using all available legal resources and will
exhaustively pursue all possible lines of inquiry; as such, those responsible must
focus on the determination of the stated and legal truth. This obligation must
include the investigation and sanction of anyone obstructing the investigation
either by action, omission or negligence, as identified in Article 11 of the previous
chapter as “obstruction of access to justice”.
Access to justice for victims and family members occurs when the investigation is
conducted free from stereotypes and prejudices based on inferiority or subjugation
associated with gender roles or the behavior or sexual conduct of women. In
particular, the intersectional forms of discrimination that can aggravate the negative
aspects of women’s lives must be especially considered. The investigation must be
conducted with an intersectional and differentiated perspective, and the authorities
must acknowledge and respond to the various ways gender intersects with other
factors, contributing to discrimination and the creation of the unique conditions
and experiences that make up oppression and privilege.29
The intervention of the criminal justice system should never cause an increase in
the harm suffered by both the victim and her family members. Rather, the system
should provide prioritized treatment for the physical and psychological health of
the indirect victims, safeguard the confidentiality of their identity, particular with
respect to children and adolescents, and guarantee their safety for the duration of
the investigation and criminal trial.
From the moment the crime is committed, survivors and their family members
have the right to emergency medical and psychological treatment, as well as legal
assistance provided by a qualified attorney, free of charge.
29 Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, General Recommendation No. 28, Disabled
Women, CEDAW/C/GC/28, December 2019, paragraph 18
21
The Chapter also establishes other measures of protection for survivors and family
members. The State is obligated to provide physical or psychological protection
upon request of the victim or when the crime requires it, using all applicable
protective and precautionary measures. They also have the right to the truth,
justice and comprehensive reparations through accessible, appropriate, adequate,
rapid and effective resources and procedures. They have the right to be informed
of their rights under national legislation, of the progress of the investigation and
the criminal trial. They have the right to avail themselves of the necessary legal
remedies against decisions that negatively impact their interests, not only during
the investigation, but also during the criminal trial, including filing objections pro se
or via their representative, against omissions or negligence committed by personnel
of the criminal justice system in the performance of their investigative duties, as
defined in the national legislation of the State Party.
Similarly, this Law introduces the creation of a “Reparations Fund” to cover the
most urgent reparations for damages to the victims and family members such
as healthcare costs, housing, and food, among other things, independent of the
results of the criminal proceedings and establishes the responsibility of the State to
ensure the care of the victim’s dependents, regardless of the parental relationship
between the perpetrator and the dependents.
22
data on femicides and the other with the genetic information related to missing
women) and an observatory of legal resolutions.
The observatory will only review public versions of the legal decisions, which do
not include personal data that could be used for the purposes of identification.
This will provide protection, safeguard the anonymity of the information and
avoid the identification of the persons involved.
c. Educate the general public to prevent violence against women and femicides/
feminicides, its causes and consequences, with an emphasis on changing
stereotyped behavior patterns and developing communication free from
discrimination and denigrating stereotypes. It is also important that the media
operate according to a code of ethics in those cases where gender perspective
must be adjusted.
23
Chapter I.
General Provisions
a. Equality and non-discrimination against women on the basis of gender, age, socio-
economic and cultural status, racial or ethnic origin, sexual orientation, gender
identity, political opinion, national origin, or other such categories according to
article 9 of the Belem do Para Convention;
c. Centrality of victims’ rights: all the actions according to this law will prioritize the
protection of the human rights of victims and their families;
d. Best interest of the child: In cases where there is potential conflict of interest,
their best interests should be given the recognition and respect of the rights
inherent in their status as human beings;
f. Principle pro persona: Norms that enshrine human rights will be enacted and
interpreted extensively, while those that restrict or limit these rights will be
mitigated, taking into account the social context for the effective protection of
all women;
24
g. Progressivity of human rights and prohibition of regression: Policies, norms and
actions for the recognition and protection of women’s human rights should be
oriented towards effectively fulfilling the obligations assumed by the State.
ARTICLE 3. DEFINITIONS
c. Victim: A victim is any woman or group of women who suffer or have suffered
damage, or are in imminent danger of suffering damage, whether physical,
psychological, emotional, economic, patrimonial or substantial impairment of
their fundamental rights, as a result of femicidal actions or omissions. The term
“victim” will also include the immediate family, dependents of the direct victim
and persons who have suffered damage when intervening to provide assistance
to victims in danger or to prevent victimization. A person will be considered a
victim regardless of whether the aggressor has been identified, apprehended,
tried or convicted and with no regard for the family relationship that may exist
between the aggressor and the victim;
d. Aggressor: any man who commits the crime of femicide/feminicide or any other
crime or act of gender-based violence due to the fact that they are women.
f. Crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes: those classified
as such under the Rome Statute and the Elements of Crime of the International
Criminal Court;
25
g. Action with Due Diligence: Involves the effective application of this law and
international human rights instruments, including prevention policies and
actions, comprehensive reparation, reinforced state protection, investigations,
effective judicial processes and guarantees of non-repetition to ensure the
integrity and the life of girls and women.
a. Within the family or domestic unit or within any other interpersonal relationship,
whether or not the aggressor shares or has shared the same residence with the
woman;
b. In any place or area of the community and committed by any men known or
unknown to the victim;
26
Chapter II.
Offences and Penalties
Any man who kills or participates in the killing of a woman under any of the following
circumstances or with any of the objectives or reasons mentioned below, will be
criminally liable for the offence of femicide/feminicide if:
a. Has or has had a relationship with the woman, with or without cohabitation, or
has tried to establish or reestablish an interpersonal relationship with her;
c. Has previously exercised one or more acts of violence including any form of
sexual violence even if they have not been reported previously in public or
private sphere;
27
j. The woman victim is located in the line of fire of a man when trying to kill another
woman;
ARTICLE 6. PENALTIES
Whoever prevents an abortion from being performed in case of risk of life of the
mother, and this causes her death, will be punished with the penalty provided for
the crime of femicide/feminicide.
b. That it was committed against a woman who for any reason is imprisoned;
e. That the aggressor has taken advantage of any of the relationships of trust,
kinship, authority or other unequal power relationships with the victim;
f. That the offence is committed in the presence of older and/or younger relatives
of the victim or any person under eighteen years old;
28
g. That the woman deprived of life present signs of violence such as hanging,
strangulation, suffocation, drowning and immersion and/or injuries caused by
sharp objects, substances and fires, or blunt objects;
h. That the act occurs following any form of sexual violence against the woman,
such as inflicting injuries and/or mutilation on the genital or breast organs or
any physical signs, some form of humiliation or contempt of the woman’s body,
the incineration of the body or the dismemberment of the woman’s body, or
when the woman’s body is deposited or thrown in latrines, septic tanks, garbage
dumps, clandestine graves, or similar places.
Any man who induces or compels a woman to commit suicide or assists her to
do so, will be subject to the penalty enacted for the inducement or collaboration
to commit femicide/feminicide increased by one third to one half, in any of the
following circumstances:
a. That suicide is preceded by any form of gender violence by the aggressor against
the victim;
The conviction for the preceding offenses (articles 5, 8 and 9), consummated or
attempted, entails:
a. The loss ipso jure of all inheritance rights that the offender may have in respect
of the victim’s property;
b. The loss of parental rights of the children, whether or not they are children of
the victim.
29
is determined in the criminal process. The custodial rights will be temporarily
exercised by the appropriate person according to the best interests of the children.
All preparatory acts and any conspiracy to comit the above offences will be
punishable by a penalty of one third to one half of the penalty which applies to the
offence or such other penalty.
30
Chapter III.
Investigation, Prosecution and Penalties
The investigation and prosecution of crimes foreseen in this Law should be guided
by the following principles:
b. Nondiscrimination;
c. Due diligence;
d. Human dignity;
e. No Revictimization;
f. Gender Perspective;
g. Qualification of personnel;
i. Due process;
j. Cultural relevance;
The offence of femicide/feminicide and the criminal action are shall not be subject
to a period of limitation.
30 For the investigation and prosecution of crimes foreseen in this Law, The Committee of Experts recommends
implementing the Model Protocol for the investigation of gender-related killings of women in Latin America
(femicide/feminicide) from the UN Human Rights Office. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/
Issues/Women/WRGS/ProtocoloLatinoamericanoDeInvestigacion.pdf
31
ARTICLE 16. PROCEDURAL RESTRICTIONS
a. Ensure the immediate and exhaustive search and identification of the victim or
their remains in cases of disappearance;
c. Inquire about the background of violence of the aggressor, even if there were
no previous complaints;
d. Assess the context in which the offence was committed and the extent to which
32
the offence could be regarded as gender-based and therefore a femicide/
feminicide;
e. Adopt measures to eliminate the de facto and de jure obstacles that produce
impunity in cases of femicide/femicide;
f. Adopt the other measures provided in the Latin American Model Protocol for
the investigation of gender-related killings of women (femicide/feminicide).
33
Chapter IV.
Rights of Victims
Women victims of gender-based violence and their families have the right to an early
assessment of the risk of femicide/femicide by a multidisciplinary and specialized
team; to immediate access to justice and to the maximum measures of prevention
and protection against violence, including the use of electronic devices that allow
the monitoring and control of the offender, for as long as it is deemed necessary; as
well as the preservation of their own patrimonial assets and family members.
a. Universal access to justice, including free and specialized legal aid, throughout
the territory of the country, urban or rural, which can be provided directly or
through agreements with specialized private institutions, when requested;
c. Be informed of their rights; have their opinions, needs, interests and concerns
heard by the Court and to collaborate and participate fully in all instances;
e. That foreign women and migrants and their dependents, are not deported as
a result of making the complaint even if they were in an irregular migration
situation.
34
ARTICLE 21. PROCEDURAL LEGITIMACY
The institutions of defense of women’s rights, public and private, should have legal
standing to act as a party in favour of the victim and their relatives, in criminal
proceedings, protection and reparation before the femicide/feminicide and other
crimes foreseen in this Law.
35
Chapter V.
Reparation
Establishment of the Reparation Fund for victims and their families of femicide/
feminicide and other offences foreseen in this Law, with State and international and
national cooperation funds and relevant national entities, which will be administered
by the national machinery for women’s advancement. This fund will pay for the
most urgent measures to repair the damage to victims and their families, such as
health services, housing, food, among other benefits, regardless of the outcome of
the criminal case.
Without prejudice to the responsibility of the offender, the State must ensure the
sustenance of the dependents of the victim of femicide/feminicide and of those
who assume the care of them, including persons with disabilities, or seniors. It
must include comprehensive care, which guarantees psycho-social services and a
monthly benefit or monetary subsidy that ensures housing, food, education and
health.
36
Chapter VI.
Public Policy Measures of Prevention
States must:
31 The Committee of experts of the MESECVI excludes the death penalty from its provisions.
37
or subordination of women and the promotion of women’s Human Rights in
private and public spheres;
Chapter VII.
Final Provision
38
Inter-American Convention on
the Prevention, Punishment, and
Eradication of Violence against
Women
(Convention of Belém do Pará)
PREAMBLE
RECOGNIZING that full respect for human rights has been enshrined in the
American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man and the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights, and reaffirmed in other international and regional instruments;
CONCERNED that violence against women is an offense against human dignity and
a manifestation of the historically unequal power relations between women and
men;
CONVINCED that the elimination of violence against women is essential for their
individual and social development and their full and equal participation in all walks
of life; and
40
Chapter I.
Definition and scope of application
ARTICLE 1
For the purposes of this Convention, violence against women shall be understood
as any act or conduct, based on gender, which causes death or physical, sexual or
psychological harm or suffering to women, whether in the public or the private
sphere. Article 23. Responsibility of the offender in reparation
ARTICLE 2
a. that occurs within the family or domestic unit or within any other
interpersonal relationship, whether or not the perpetrator shares or has
shared the same residence with the woman, including, among others, rape,
battery and sexual abuse;
41
Chapter II.
Rights Protected
ARTICLE 3
Every woman has the right to be free from violence in both the public and private
spheres.
ARTICLE 4
Every woman has the right to the recognition, enjoyment, exercise and protection
of all human rights and freedoms embodied in regional and international human
rights instruments. These rights include, among others:
b. The right to have her physical, mental and moral integrity respected;
e. The right to have the inherent dignity of her person respected and her family
protected;
f. The right to equal protection before the law and of the law;
g. The right to simple and prompt recourse to a competent court for protection
against acts that violate her rights;
i. The right of freedom to profess her religion and beliefs within the law; and
j. The right to have equal access to the public service of her country and to
take part in the conduct of public affairs, including decision-making.
42
ARTICLE 5
Every woman is entitled to the free and full exercise of her civil, political, economic,
social and cultural rights, and may rely on the full protection of those rights as
embodied in regional and international instruments on human rights. The States
Parties recognize that violence against women prevents and nullifies the exercise
of these rights.
ARTICLE 6
The right of every woman to be free from violence includes, among others:
Chapter III.
Duties of State
ARTICLE 7
The States Parties condemn all forms of violence against women and agree to
pursue, by all appropriate means and without delay, policies to prevent, punish and
eradicate such violence and undertake to:
a. refrain from engaging in any act or practice of violence against women and
to ensure that their authorities, officials, personnel, agents, and institutions
act in conformity with this obligation;
b. apply due diligence to prevent, investigate and impose penalties for violence
against women;
c. include in their domestic legislation penal, civil, administrative and any other
type of provisions that may be needed to prevent, punish and eradicate
43
violence against women and to adopt appropriate administrative measures
where necessary;
f. establish fair and effective legal procedures for women who have been
subjected to violence which include, among others, protective measures, a
timely hearing and effective access to such procedures;
ARTICLE 8
44
as other personnel responsible for implementing policies for the prevention,
punishment and eradication of violence against women;
ARTICLE 9
With respect to the adoption of the measures in this Chapter, the States Parties
shall take special account of the vulnerability of women to violence by reason of
among others, their race or ethnic background or their status as migrants, refugees
or displaced persons. Similar consideration shall be given to women subjected to
violence while pregnant or who are disabled, of minor age, elderly, socio-economically
disadvantaged, affected by armed conflict or deprived of their freedom.
Chapter IV.
Inter-american mechanisms of protection
ARTICLE 10
In order to protect the right of every woman to be free from violence, the States
Parties shall include in their national reports to the Inter-American Commission of
Women information on measures adopted to prevent and prohibit violence against
women, and to assist women affected by violence, as well as on any difficulties they
observe in applying those measures, and the factors that contribute to violence
against women.
45
ARTICLE 11
The States Parties to this Convention and the Inter-American Commission of Women
may request of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights advisory opinions on the
interpretation of this Convention
ARTICLE 12
Chapter V.
General Provisions
ARTICLE 13
ARTICLE 14
46
ARTICLE 15
This Convention is open to signature by all the member States of the Organization
of American States.
ARTICLE 16
ARTICLE 17
This Convention is open to accession by any other state. Instruments of accession shall
be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States.
ARTICLE 18
Any State may, at the time of approval, signature, ratification, or accession, make
reservations to this Convention provided that such reservations are:
a. not incompatible with the object and purpose of the Convention, and
ARTICLE 19
Any State Party may submit to the General Assembly, through the Inter-American
Commission of Women, proposals for the amendment of this Convention.
Amendments shall enter into force for the states ratifying them on the date
when two-thirds of the States Parties to this Convention have deposited their
respective instruments of ratification. With respect to the other States Parties,
the amendments shall enter into force on the dates on which they deposit their
respective instruments of ratification.
ARTICLE 20
If a State Party has two or more territorial units in which the matters dealt with
in this Convention are governed by different systems of law, it may, at the time of
signature, ratification or accession, declare that this Convention shall extend to all
its territorial units or to only one or more of them.
47
Such a declaration may be amended at any time by subsequent declarations, which
shall expressly specify the territorial unit or units to which this Convention applies.
Such subsequent declarations shall be transmitted to the General Secretariat of the
Organization of American States, and shall enter into force thirty days after the date
of their receipt.
ARTICLE 21
This Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after the date of deposit
of the second instrument of ratification. For each State that ratifies or accedes to
the Convention after the second instrument of ratification is deposited, it shall enter
into force thirty days after the date on which that State deposited its instrument of
ratification or accession.
ARTICLE 22
The Secretary General shall inform all member states of the Organization of
American States of the entry into force of this Convention.
ARTICLE 23
The Secretary General of the Organization of American States shall present an annual
report to the member states of the Organization on the status of this Convention,
including the signatures, deposits of instruments of ratification and accession, and
declarations, and any reservations that may have been presented by the States
Parties, accompanied by a report thereon if needed.
ARTICLE 24
This Convention shall remain in force indefinitely, but any of the States Parties may
denounce it by depositing an instrument to that effect with the General Secretariat
of the Organization of American States. One year after the date of deposit of the
instrument of denunciation, this Convention shall cease to be in effect for the
denouncing State but shall remain in force for the remaining States Parties.
ARTICLE 25
The original instrument of this Convention, the English, French, Portuguese and
Spanish texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the General
Secretariat of the Organization of American States, which shall send a certified
copy to the Secretariat of the United Nations for registration and publication in
accordance with the provisions of Article 102 of the United Nations Charter.
48
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned Plenipotentiaries, being duly authorized
thereto by their respective governments, have signed this Convention, which
shall be called the Inter-American Convention on the Prevention, Punishment and
Eradication of Violence against Women ~Convention of Belém do Pará..
DONE IN THE CITY OF BELEN DO PARA, BRAZIL, the ninth of June in the year one
thousand nine hundred ninety-four.
49
Acknowledgments
The authors of the investigation for this Model Law were Diana González-Perrett,
President of the Committee of Experts of the MESECVI 2015-2017; Barbara Bailey,
Expert of the CEVI from Jamaica, and Alicia Deus, Project Consultant.
The work was coordinated by the Technical Secretariat of the Follow-up Mechanism
of the Belém do Pará Convention, thanks to the support of the Executive Secretariat
of the CIM and the UN Women Office for Latin America and the Caribbean. The
following specialists participated in the discussion on this law:
.. Lara Blanco, UN Women Regional Deputy Director for the Americas and the Caribbean
50
.. Kathleen Taylor, Violence against Women Policy Specialist, UN Women Regional
Office for the Americas and the Caribbean
.. Miriam Roache, Expert of the CEVI, St. Vincent and the Grenadines
51
.. Mercedes Hernández, Director of the Association of Women of Guatemala
.. Patsilí Toledo, Attorney and expert member of the Antigona Research Group at
the Autonomous University of Barcelona
.. Sagrario Osiris Pérez, United Nations Develop Programme (UNDP) and The Latin
American and Caribbean Committee for the Defense of Women’s Rights
.. Natalia Gherardi, Executive Director of the Latin-American Team for Justice and
Gender (ELA), Argentina
Contribution were also received from the countries of Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica,
and Mexico, and from several inter-governmental organizations, including: Pan
American Health Organization (PAHO/WHO) and the Human Rights and Gender
Team, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) in Mexico
The Model Law was approved at the XV Meeting of the Committee of Experts of the
MESECVI, held December 3, 4, and 5, 2018 in Washington, DC
52
54