You are on page 1of 31

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:


Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING


Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Applied Quality
Services Knowledge and knowledge of
Pedagogy content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge
across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5%
of 7 of 6 of 5
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using
Services of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading
schievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different
Services Knowledge and of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Pedagogy strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical
develop critical and creative and creative and creative
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality
Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom
Services Environment classroom
management management management
and Diversity of structure to
strategies that strategies that strategies that
Learners engage learners,
engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
individually or in
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
groups, in
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
discovery and Efficiency
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
hands-on lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
activities within a by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
range of physical 1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
learning acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
environments. Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher
Services learner behavior management management management
constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4


of the given of the given of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2
4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied
Services Environment differentiated, differentiated differentiated differentiated
and Diversity of developmentally teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
Learners appropriate to address learner to address learner to address learner
learning diversity as shown diversity as shown diversity as shown
experiences to in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated
experiences. 7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and
Services and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented
implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
meet curriculum
requirements and
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
varied teaching
7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally
contexts.
sequenced sequenced sequenced
teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process as learning process as learning process as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other given of the other given of the other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in
discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted
7.5%

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2


least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services developed, used varied used varied used varied
organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to
learning address learning address learning address learning
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5
goals.

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied


varied teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources, learning resources, learning resources,
including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
Services and Reporting selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used
organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic,
used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and
formative and summative summative summative
summative assessment assessment assessment
assessment strategies strategies strategies
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied


varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and
progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner
achievement progress and progress and progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV


were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally
Services and Reporting ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and
clearly the clear communication of clear
learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs,
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders,
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as
shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a


combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV


were distributed were distributed were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters

Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services various related performed various performed various performed various
works/activities related related related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF
below 1.499 Poor Ratee R
MENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

ING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION


Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
evidence was
Showed knowledge shown
of content and its
integration within
and across subject
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4
Submitted any 1 of No acceptable
the given MOV evidence was
shown

Facilitated using No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


different teaching evidence was
strategies that shown
promote reading
writing and/or
numeracy skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
learner-centered evidence was
lessons as shown
evidently shown in
any of the other
given MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Used different No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
teaching strategies evidence was
that develop critical shown
and creative
thinking skills
and/or other HOTS
as shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


as evidenced by evidence was
any of the other shown
given MOV

No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


Used classroom evidence was
management shown
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/tasks as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4
Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV

Applied teacher No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


management evidence was
strategies of learner shown
behavior that
promote positive
and non-violent
discipline as shown
in MOV submitted
with a rating of 4

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the given strategies evidence was
as observed in only shown
1 lesson
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Applied No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
differentiated evidence was
teaching strategies shown
to address learner
diversity as shown
in MOV 1 with a
rating of 4

Submitted any 1 No acceptable


differentiated evidence was
teaching strategy in shown
only 1 lesson as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the
acceptable MOV

Planned and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


implemented evidence was
developmentally shown
sequenced
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
developmentally evidence was
sequenced shown
teaching and
learning process as
evidently shown in
any 1 of the given
MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely participated No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
in LAC/FGD/ evidence was
meeting to discuss shown
teacher/learner
feedback to enrich
instruction as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Participated in 1 No acceptable
LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was
as evidently shown shown
in any 1 of the
given MOV

Developed and No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


used varied evidence was
teaching and shown
learning resources,
including ICT, to
address learning
goals as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 4

Submitted any No acceptable


teaching and evidence was
learning resource, shown
including ICT, as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Designed, selected, No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
organized and used evidence was
diagnostic, shown
formative and
summative
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 4

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely monitored No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


and evaluated evidence was
learner progress shown
and achievement
using learner
attainment data as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
acceptable MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable


was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown
Performance Indicators
Rating
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results Ave Score
(2) (1) Q E T
Rarely showed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
prompt and clear evidence was
communication of shown
the learners’ needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including parents/
guardians as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the given MOV evidence was
shown

Submitted MOV No acceptable


was completed in evidence was
only 1 quarter shown

Rarely performed No acceptable #DIV/0! #DIV/0!


various related evidence was
work/activities that shown
contribute to the
teaching learning
process as shown
in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPC
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numerical


KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 0
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 0
Objective 3 7.5% 0
Objective 4 7.5% 0
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 0
Objective 6 7.5% 0
Objective 7 7.5% 0
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 0
Objective 9 7.5% 0
Objective 10 7.5% 0
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 0
Objective 12 7.5% 0
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 0

NAME OF THE RATEE NAME OF RATER


Ratee Rater
EVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
ient Teacher)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Final Rating #DIV/0!
Adjectival Rating #DIV/0!

NAME OF RATER NAME OF APPROVING AUTHORITY


Rater Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IP

Name of Employee: JOVY YU SALINAS Name of Rater:


Position: MASTER TEACHER 2 Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LEYTE Date of Review:
Rating Period:

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING

Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality Modeled effective Modeled effective Modeled effective
Services Knowledge and applications of content applications of applications of applications of
Pedagogy knowledge within and content knowledge content knowledge content knowledge
across curriculum within and across within and across within and across
teaching areas. curriculum teaching curriculum teaching curriculum teaching
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
of 8 of 7 of 6

7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 from colleagues 1 from colleagues
any 1 of the other and supported by and supported by
MOV given any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
MOV given MOV given

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality Conducted, Conducted and Conducted action
Services colleagues in the completed and completed action research with
conduct and application disseminated action research with colleagues
of research to enrich research with colleagues
knowledge of content colleagues
and pedagogy.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 of Submitted any 2
7.5%
of the given MOV the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness Presented the Completed the Conducted the
research report research report research report
within the rating within the rating within the rating
period period period
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and Quality Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
Services Knowledge and applied effective effective teaching effective teaching effective teaching
Pedagogy teaching strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to
promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and promote critical and
creative thinking, as well creative thinking, as creative thinking, as creative thinking, as
as other higher-order well as other well as other well as other
thinking skills. higher-order higher-order higher-order
thinking skills as thinking skills as thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted 4 or Submitted 3 Submitted 2


more lessons as lessons as lessons as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV
given given given

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with Quality Modeled and Modeled and Modeled and
Services Environment and colleagues to model and shared effective shared effective shared effective
Diversity of share effective classroom classroom classroom
Learners techniques in the management management management
management of strategies that strategies that strategies that
classroom structure to engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners, activities/ tasks activities/ tasks activities/ tasks
individually or in groups, done in different done in different done in different
in meaningful physical learning physical learning physical learning
exploration, discovery environments as environments as environments as
and hands-on activities shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
within a range of with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
physical learning
environments.environm
ents. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality Exhibited effective Exhibited effective Exhibited effective
Services Environment and and constructive and constructive and constructive and constructive
Diversity of behavior management behavior behavior behavior
Learners skills by applying management skills management skills management skills
positive and non-violent by applying positive by applying positive by applying positive
discipline to ensure and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
learning-focused discipline to ensure discipline to ensure discipline to ensure
environments. learning-focused learning-focused learning-focused
environments environments environments
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6

Efficiency Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of Applied at least 7 of


the given strategies the given strategies the given strategies
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2
least 4 lessons lessons lessons

Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Quality Worked with Worked with Worked with
Services colleagues to share colleagues at least colleagues in the colleagues but no
differentiated, in the department or evidence of sharing
developmentally district/cluster level grade level to share with others
appropriate to share lesson lesson
opportunities to address
Efficiency Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 1
learners’ differences in 7.5%
lesson as evidently lesson as evidently lesson as evidently
gender, needs,
shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
strengths, interests and
and supported by and supported by and supported by
experiences.
any acceptable any acceptable any acceptable
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and
Services Planning applied effective applied effective applied effective applied effective
strategies in the strategies showing strategies showing strategies showing
planning and developmentally- developmentally- developmentally-
management of sequenced sequenced sequenced
developmentally teaching and teaching and teaching and
sequenced teaching learning process as learning process as learning process as
and learning processes shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
to meet curriculum with a rating of 8 with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6
requirements and varied 7.5%
teaching contexts. Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 2-3 Submitted 1 lesson
lessons as lessons as as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV shown in MOV 1
1 and 2 and 1 and 2 and and/or 2 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with Quality Consistently Frequently led Occasionally led
Services Planning colleagues, teacher and participated in collaborative collaborative
learner feedback to LACs/FGDs/meetin reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
plan, facilitate and gs to discuss and learner and learner
enrich teaching practice. teacher/learner feedback as feedback as
feedback to enrich evidenced by the evidenced by the
instruction as MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
submitted

7.5% Efficiency Submitted 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


collaborative collaborative collaborative
reviews of teacher reviews of teacher reviews of teacher
and learner and learner and learner
feedback as feedback as feedback as
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided Quality Consistently Frequently advised Occasionally
Services colleagues in the advised colleagues colleagues in the advised colleagues
selection, organization, in the selection, selection, in the selection,
development and use of organization, organization, organization,
appropriate teaching development and development and development and
and learning resources, appropriate use of appropriate use of appropriate use of
including ICT, to teaching and teaching and teaching and
address specific learning resources learning resources learning resources
learning goals. as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5% MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2


teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning resources learning resources learning resources
as evidenced by at as evidenced by at as evidenced by at
least 1 of the least 1 of the least 1 of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively with reviewed reviewed reviewed
colleagues to review the collaboratively collaboratively collaboratively
design, selection, assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools
organization and use of with colleagues as with colleagues as with colleagues as
a range of effective shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
diagnostic, formative submitted submitted submitted
and summative 7.5%
assessment strategies Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2
consistent with assessment tools assessment tools assessment tools
curriculum as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
requirements. in any of the in any of the in any of the
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3)
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services and Reporting collaboratively collaborated with collaborated with collaborated with
monitoring and colleagues in the colleagues in the colleagues in the
evaluation strategies of interpretation of interpretation of interpretation of
attainment data to assessment data assessment data assessment data
support learner as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
7.5%
progress and MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
achievement.
Efficiency Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2
different types of of the same kind of of the same kind of
MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the Quality Consistently Frequently applied Occasionally
Services effective communication applied skills in the skills in the applied skills in the
of learner needs, effective effective effective
progress and communication of communication of communication of
achievement to key learner needs and learner needs and learner needs and
stakeholders, including progress to progress to progress to
parents/guardians. parents/ guardians parents/ guardians parents/ guardians
7.5% as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 3 Submitted any 2


of the acceptable MOV MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally
Services related works/activities performed special performed special performed special
that contribute to the tasks and/or tasks and/or tasks and/or
teaching-learning assignments as assignments as assignments as
process. shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV
10% submitted submitted submitted
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted only 3 Submitted only 2
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES


RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory JOVY YU SALINAS ELEA
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAM
below 1.499 Poor Ratee
ITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

ELEANOR E. CAGARA
SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL IV

G PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
(2) (1)
Modeled effective No acceptable
applications of evidence was
content knowledge shown
within and across
curriculum teaching
areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating
of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


as evidenced by evidence was
MOV 1 from shown
colleagues and
supported by any 1
of the other MOV
given

Proposedaction No acceptable
research with evidence was
colleagues shown

Submitted any 1 No acceptable


MOV evidence was
shown
Proposed the No acceptable
research report evidence was
within the rating shown
period
Performance Indicators
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
(2) (1)
Demonstrated No acceptable
effective teaching evidence was
strategies to shown
promote critical and
creative thinking, as
well as other
higher-order
thinking skills as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


as evidently shown evidence was
in MOV 1 and shown
supported by any of
the other MOV
given

Modeled and No acceptable


shared effective evidence was
classroom shown
management
strategies that
engage learners in
activities/ tasks
done in different
physical learning
environments as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


supported by any of evidence was
the acceptable shown
MOV
Performance Indicators
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
(2) (1)
Exhibited effective No acceptable
and constructive evidence was
behavior shown
management skills
by applying positive
and non-violent
discipline to ensure
learning-focused
environments
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Applied any of the No acceptable


given strategies as evidence was
observed in only 1 shown
lesson

Worked with No acceptable


colleagues but no evidence was
evidence of sharing shown
with others

Submitted at least 1 No acceptable


lesson, as evidence was
evidenced by either shown
MOV 2 or 3 but no
evidence of sharing
with others

Developed and No acceptable


applied effective evidence was
strategies showing shown
developmentally-
sequenced
teaching and
learning process as
shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 5

Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable


as evidenced by evidence was
any 1 of the shown
acceptable MOV
Performance Indicators
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
(2) (1)
Rarely led No acceptable
collaborative evidence was
reviews of teacher shown
and learner
feedback as
evidenced by the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
collaborative review evidence was
of teacher and shown
learner feedback as
evidently shown in
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely advised No acceptable


colleagues in the evidence was
selection, shown
organization,
development and
appropriate use of
teaching and
learning resources
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
teaching and evidence was
learning resource shown
as evidenced by
any of the
acceptable MOV

Rarely reviewed No acceptable


collaboratively evidence was
assessment tools shown
with colleagues as
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted 1 No acceptable
assessment tool as evidence was
evidently shown in shown
any of the
acceptable MOV
Performance Indicators
Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
(2) (1)
Rarely collaborated No acceptable
with colleagues in evidence was
the interpretation of shown
assessment data
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the MOV evidence was
shown

Rarely applied skills No acceptable


in the effective evidence was
communication of shown
learner needs and
progress to
parents/ guardians
as shown in the
MOV submitted

Submitted any 1
MOV

Rarely performed No acceptable


special tasks and/or evidence was
assignments as shown
shown in the MOV
submitted

Submitted any 1 of No acceptable


the acceptable evidence was
MOV shown

RATING FOR OVER-ALL


ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ELEANOR E. CAGARA EDGAR Y. TENASAS


NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
Rater Approving Authority
(IPCRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

ELEANOR E. CAGARA
SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL IV

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
5 4 4.500 0.337

3 3 3.000 0.225
Ave Score
Q E T
5 5 5.000 0.375

5 5 5.000 0.375
Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
5 4 4.500 0.337

4 5 4.500 0.337

4 4 4.000 0.3
Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
5 4 4.500 0.337

5 5 5.000 0.375

4 4 4.000 0.300
Rating
Ave Score
Q E T
4 4 4 0.3

5 5 5.000 0.375

5 5 5.000 0.500

Very Satisfactory 4.473

EDGAR Y. TENASAS
NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
Approving Authority
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IP
Master Teacher I-IV (Highly Proficient Teache

Name of Employee: JOVY YU SALINAS


Position: MASTER TEACHER II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: LEYTE
Rating Period:

Weight per Weight per Numeric


KRA Objectives
KRA Objective Q
Objective 1 7.5% 5
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 3
Objective 3 7.5% 5
Objective 4 7.5% 5
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 5
Objective 6 7.5% 4
Objective 7 7.5% 4
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 5
Objective 9 7.5% 5
Objective 10 7.5% 4
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 4
Objective 12 7.5% 5
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5

JOVY YU SALINAS ELEANOR E. CAGARA


Ratee Rater
REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
y Proficient Teacher)

Name of Rater: ELEANOR E. CAGARA


Position: SECONDARY SCHOOL PRINCIPAL IV
Date of Review:

Numerical Ratings
Score
E T Ave
4 4.500 0.337
3 0 3.000 0.225
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.375
4 4.500 0.337
5 4.500 0.337
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.500 0.337
5 5.000 0.375
4 4.000 0.300
4 4.000 0.300
5 5.000 0.375
5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating 4.473
Adjectival Rating Very Satisfactory

EANOR E. CAGARA EDGAR Y. TENASAS


Rater Approving Authority

You might also like