Republic of the Philippines

SOUTHERN LUZONSTATEUNIVERSITY
JUDGE GUILLERMO ELEAZAR
Tagkawayan, Quezon

COLLEGE OF FISHERIES

VISION STATEMENT: A 21st century state university producing a student-centered learning

experience, preparing students in their chosen profession, creating and disseminating knowledge in the
service of the communities, the nation and the world.

MISSION STATEMENT : The university is committed to prepare its students for a rapidly changing
world by providing a quality education. It shall also increase the knowledge base through research;
convert new intellectual property into economic development; and provide expertise and innovative
solutions to business, governments, and others who seek assistance.

CORE VALUES:

Go God Loving
S Service oriented
L Leadership by Example
U Undiminished Commitment to Peace and Environment Advocacy

COLLEGE OF FISHERIES GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

1. Provide quality education in fisheries and aquatic resources of international standards, thereby
producing world-class manpower.
2. Conduct researches in fisheries and aquatic sciences that are responsive to rational and people’s
needs and dynamics environment.
3. Engage in extension services through technology transfer or consortia with government and non-
government organizations underscoring rational and sustainable development of fishery of fishery
and aquatic resources in the region.
4. Establish linkages with other institutions to monitor local needs with research and development
agencies to keep abreast with scientific advances and industry to match manpower needs.

Program Educational Objectives Goals and Objective

Bachelor of Science in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1 2 3 4
Globally competitive graduates in the areas of
1 sustainable aquaculture, capture fisheries, post-harvest    
and aquatic resources and ecology.
Fisheries professionals imbued with high level of
2    
integrity, nationalism and ethical standards.
3 Leaders in their profession and respective communities.    
Professionals with knowledge, skills and positive
4 attitudes in fisheries research, resource management,    
instruction, extension, production and marketing.

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 1
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 COURSE SYLLABUS

1. COURSE CODE : FSH 12

2. COURSE TITLE : FISHERIES LAWS, POLICIES AND

INSTITUTION

3. COURSE DESCRIPTION : This course tackles the laws, policies and orders
affecting fisheries with emphasis on the provisions
of RA 10654.
.

4. PRE-REQUISITE : none

5. CO-REQUISITE : none

6. CREDIT/ CLASS SCHEDULE : 3 units (3 units lecture)

7. Program Outcome (PO) and Relationship to Program Educational Objectives (POE)

The minimum standards for the BS in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences program are expressed in
the following minimum set of learning outcomes:

Program Outcomes Program Educational

The graduate of the BS in Fisheries program Objectives
should have developed the ability to: 1 2 3 4
articulate and discuss the latest developments in the
a    
specific field of practice;
effectively communicate orally and in writing using both
b    
English and Filipino;
work effectively and independently in multi-disciplinary
c    
and multi-cultural teams;
act in recognition of professional, social, and ethical
d    
responsibilities;
preserve and promote “Filipino historical and cultural
e    
heritage” (based on RA 7722);
generate and share knowledge relevant to specific fields in
f    
the study of agriculture education;
formulate and implement agricultural development plans
g    
and programs;
develop, operate and manage aquaculture production
h    
systems;
utilize fisheries resources using innovative fishing
i    
methods which are responsible and sustainable;
apply post-harvest practices that are compliant to
j    
international standards for food safety and quality; and,
manage and protect the integrity and quality of aquatic
k    
ecosystems and resources.

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 2
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 8. Course Outcomes (CO) and Relationship to Program Outcomes (PO)

Course Objectives (CO) Program Outcomes (PO)

After completion of the course,
the students will be able to: PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO PO
a b c d e f g h i j k
Appreciate and recognize the
importance of the attainment of the
CO
01
vision, mission, core values and goals P P I D D I D
and objectives of SLSU and College of
Fisheries
Enumerate laws and legal issuances that
CO
02
may be cited and referred to during P P P P P P P P P P
prosecution
CO
03
Discuss the provisions of RA 10654 P P P P P P P P P P P

Be acquainted with the different

Fisheries Administrative Orders as
CO
04
promulgated by BFAR and other Joint P P P P P P P P
Memorandum, Orders, circulars and
national ordinances affecting fisheries
Discuss the details of each prohibited
CO act as applied in real-life situations,
05
P P I P D
providing tips and reminders where
needed
Provide the “what” and “how” of cases
that law enforcers and prosecutors can
CO
06
file with different government bodies to P P I P D
further discourage offenders from
repeating their violations
Familiarize with the provisions and
policies of Tagkawayan Municipal
CO
07
Fisheries Ordinance and other P P I P D
ordinances affecting the management of
Ragay Gulf.

Recognize the roles and effort of

CO concerned government agencies in the
08
P P P D P D D
implementation of fishery laws and
management of aquatic environment

Legend: I – Introduced P – Practiced D - Demonstrated

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 3
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 9a. Learning Plan - Lecture

Intended Learning Outcomes Teaching

Instructional Assessment Time
CO Topic Learning
Knowledge Skills Attitudes Resources Tools Frame
Activities
Recite the Classroom Lecture Recitation
CO Express the Awareness, Laptop,
SLSU Policies with class Student 1 hour
01 SLSU VMGO Patience projector
VMGO discussion Handbook

Legal Bases

a. The 1987
Philippine
Laptop,
Constitution
Lecture projector
b. National Laws
with class
c. International
List and discussion Copy of Laws,
Treaties and
identify the Distinguish AO,
CO Awareness Agreements Recitation
role of legal each role of Case Study Ordinances 7 hours
02 Patience d. Executive Quiz
bases in legal bases Analysis
Orders
fisheries News Clippings
e.Administrative
Film
Orders
Showing Video
f. Supreme Court
Clippings
Issuances
g. Ordinances of
Local
Government
Units
Lecture
RA 10654 Laptop,
With Class
Distinguish projector
Discussion
the a. Provisions
Identify the Awareness Recitation
CO importance of b. Salient Copy of RA
salient features Patience Case Study Quiz 8 hours
03 RA 10654 in features 10654
of RA 1065 Diligence Analysis
fisheries c. Implementing
management Rules and Video
Film
Regulations Clippings
Showing

Preliminary Examination
Distinguish
the
Identify the
importance of Lecture Laptop, Recitation
provisions of Fisheries
fisheries with class projector Quiz
fisheries Awareness Administrative
CO administrativ discussion
administrative Patience Orders, 8 hours
04 e orders, Compilation of Submission of
orders, Diligence Ordinances
ordinances Case Study FAO, Circulars Compilation
ordinances and And Circulars
and circulars Analysis and Ordinances
circulars
in fisheries
management
Prohibited Acts
And Penalties
Laptop,
Classifies the Lecture Recitation
projector
Lists the prohibited a. Based on with class Quiz
elements and acts Fishing Method discussion
News Clippings
penalties of according to Awareness Employed
CO each the nature of Patience b. Based on Case Study Submission of
Copy / 8 hours
05 prohibited act the offense or Diligence Location of Analysis Reflection
compilation of
as prescribed the resource Perseverance Fishery Activity Paper and
Laws,
by the relevant violated for c. Based on Film / Case Study
Ordinances,
laws easy Resource Video Analysis
Circulars and
reference Exploited 40 Showing
Memorandums
d. Other
Prohibited/Regul

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 4
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 ated Activities
f. Other Laws
Prohibiting/
Regulating
Activities in
Coastal Areas

Midterm Examination
Lecture
with class
discussion

Case Study
Provide law
Administrative Analysis Recitation
enforcers Laptop,
Remedies Quiz
Define with a venue Awareness projector
Interview
CO administrative for obtaining Patience
a. General with Bantay Individual and 6 hours
06 remedies for appropriate Diligence
Procedure Dagay / Group
violators remedies for Perseverance Interview
b. Specific Rules MFARMC, Reports
coastal law Guide
and Procedures Law
violations
Enforcers,
Police
Officers,
Coast
Guards, etc.
Recitation
Be informed of Quiz
the provisions
Lecture
of the Individual and
Enumerate with class
Tagkawayan Group
the provisions discussion Laptop,
Municipal Awareness Tagkawayan Reports
stated in projector
CO Fishery Patience Municipal
Tagkawayan Case Study 6 hours
07 Ordinances Diligence Fishery Copy of
Municipal Analysis Interview
and other Persistence Ordinances Tagkawayan
Fisheries Guide
ordinances Municipal
Ordinances Field
affecting Fishery
Interview
Ragay Gulf Ordinance s.
Management 1998

Lecture
with class
Government Laptop,
Identify the Recognize discussion Recitation
Agencies and projector
role of the role of Quiz
Awareness Fishery Law
different different Case Study
CO Patience Enforcement Interview
government government Analysis Individual and 6 hours
08 Diligence Guide
agencies in agencies in Group
Persistence a. National
fisheries laws fisheries laws Interview Reports
Government Field Guide
enforcement enforcement with
b. Local Interview
Government
Government
Agencies

Final Examination

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 5
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 10. Major Course Outputs (MCO)

As evidence of attaining the above course outcomes, students are required to do and submit the following
during the indicated dates of term. The rubrics for these outputs are provided.

Course
Performance
Required Outputs Outcomes it Due Date
Target
represents
90% of the students
MCO1 Student Handbook in the class will CO 1 TBA
pass
90% of the students
MCO 2 Field Interview Report in the class will Various COs TBA
pass
90% of the students
MCO 3 Group Report Presentation in the class will Various COs TBA
pass
90% of the students
Individual Report / Reflection
MCO 4 in the class will Various COs TBA
Paper
pass
90% of the students
MCO 5 Case Study Analysis in the class will Various COs TBA
pass
90% of the students
MCO 6 Copy of RA 10654 with IRR in the class will CO 3 TBA
pass
90% of the students
MCO 7 Compilation of FAO in the class will CO 4 TBA
pass
90% of the students
Copy of Tagkawayan Municipal
MCO 8 in the class will CO 7 TBA
Fishery Ordinance
pass

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 6
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 Rubrics for Assessment to be used for Different MCOs

Rubric for Group Oral Reporting

3 - MEETS 2 - APPROACHES 1 - NEEDS

CRITERIA 4 - EXCELLENT
The group worked very
well with each other and
the presentation was
Teamwork
shared equally among the
group members.
EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS IMPROVEMENT
Group communicated
relatively well with a Group did not work
The group worked well with
few lapses in the well together. There
each other and communicated
presentation; some were obvious
well. Some members
students dominated the miscommunications
participated slightly more than
presentation and and lapses in the
others.
others did not presentation.
participate much.

The report is very clearly
stated; the topic is
narrowed sufficiently; the
specific audience has
Focus
clearly been taken into
account when delivering
the speech
The report is clear or clearly
implicit; it is implied that the
specific audience has been
considered when delivering
the speech
The report is unclear; The topic and report
the topic is only are unclear; no
partially limited; the apparent attempt has
specific audience has been made to limit
been partially the topic; the specific
considered when audience has not been
delivering the speech considered

The speech has a clear

introduction that catches
The introduction and
the audience’s attention No attempt has been
The introduction and conclusion may be
effectively and is made to compose an
conclusion are clear and ineffective and not
connected to the whole; effective introduction
somewhat related to the related to the whole;
Organization effective transitions recap or conclusion; there
whole; some transitions are the logical plan must
each main point; the is no logical plan to
used be inferred, as no
conclusion effectively the speech
transitions are used
summarizes the speech
and is related to the whole

All main points begin Main points contain

with a clear topic
sentence; all main and
supporting points are
supported by specific and
Development highly effective
examples/evidence; the
main and supporting
points all relate to each
other
Most main points begin with a
clear topic sentence; Most
main and supporting
points include specific
evidence/examples; most main
and supporting points relate to
each other
Some main points
no topic sentences;
have stated or implied
main points are not
topic sentences; some
supported by specific
main points are
examples/evidence;
supported by specific
little or no supporting
evidence/examples;
material is used; main
some main and
and supporting points
supporting points
do not relate to each
relate to each other
other

Language is memorable;
language is well-chosen;
tone is appropriate.
Visuals and/or
Style interactions with audience
are clear, engaging, and
fully support the
presentation.
Language is not
Language is not
memorable or is
memorable; language
Most language is somewhat confusing; language
usage is at times
memorable; language usage is usage is often
inaccurate; tone is at
correct; tone is usually inaccurate; tone is
times inappropriate.
inappropriate or
Visuals and/or
Appropriate. Visuals and/or distracting. Visuals
interactions with
interactions with audience are and/or interactions
audience are
mostly clear, engaging, and with audience are not
somewhat clear,
support the presentation. clear, engaging, or
engaging, and support
supporting of the
the presentation.
presentation.

Eye contact is effectively
established with the
audience; gestures and
Delivery
verbal cues are used to
reinforce particularly
important ideas; no
Eye contact with the audience
is somewhat established;
gestures and verbal cues are
sometimes used to reinforce
particularly important ideas;
several vocalized pauses are
Eye contact with the No eye contact is
audience is hardly made with the
established; gestures audience; gestures
and verbal cues are and verbal cues are
seldom used to not used to reinforce
reinforce particularly particularly important

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 7
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 excessive use of vocalized
pauses (e.g., “ah”, “um”);
student is very articulate.
Adheres to time
limit/requirement.
Outside sources are
incorporated logically,
insightfully, and
References
elegantly; sources are
documented accurately
Rubric for Group Activity / Recitation
Criteria Apprentice
Decision One person dominates
Making decision- making.
Students frequently
interrupt and/or put down
Social the views of others.
Interaction Students do not ask
questions or clarification.
Students do not contribute in
any positive way to the
Contribution group work.
Students exhibit on-task
On Task behavior inconsistently
Behavior
With assistance, students
Group Structure have difficulty sequencing
and Functioning steps. Task is not
completed on time.
Course Title Date Date
Effective Revised
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno
FISHERIES LAWS, August August
POLICIES AND 2018 2018
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
used; student is somewhat
articulate. Adheres to time
limit/requirement.
Source material is
incorporated logically and
adequately; sources are
documented accurately for the
most part
Basic
Some students contribute to
decision-making.
Students pay attention to
the group discussion. Some
students ask questions and
build on others comments.
Some students contribute
positively to the group work.
Students exhibit on-task
behavior some of the time.
With assistance, students
are able to sequence steps.
Rush to complete task.
Division of tasks and
responsibilities if inefficient
and wastes time.
Prepared by Checked by:
Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D.
Instructor I Program Chairman,
Fisheries
important ideas; ideas; vocalized
vocalized pauses are pauses are used in
used frequently; abundance and
student is not very distract from the
articulate overall message
Source material is Source material is
incorporated but never incorporated or
sometimes incorporated
inappropriately or inappropriately or
unclearly; sources are unclearly;
only occasionally documentation is
documented accurately inaccurate
Learned Exemplary
Most students Students contribute
contribute to decision- to decision-making.
making.
Students respect and
Body and/or verbal
encourage the views
responses indicate
of others. Students
active listening .Most
ask questions or
students ask questions
clarification.
and build on others
Students build on
comments.
others comments.
Most students Students consistently
contribute positively to contribute in a
the group work. positive way to the
group work.
Most students exhibit Students exhibit on-
on-task behavior most task behavior
of the time. consistently.
Students complete a
Students complete a clear and logical
sequence of steps. sequence of steps.
Complete task on time. Complete task with
The leader assigns form and reflection
responsibilities and and revision.
tasks. Members volunteer
to take
responsibilities and
roles.
Approved by:
Page 8
Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
Assistant Director, 14
Academic Affairs
 Rubric for Reflection Paper

Dimension Sophisticated Competent Needs Work

Position and exceptions, if any,
are clearly stated. Organization
Introduction
of the argument is completely and
clearly outlined and implemented.
Position is vague. Organization of
Position is clearly stated.
Organization of argument is clear in argument is missing, vague, or not
consistently maintained.
parts or only partially described and
mostly implemented

Research selected is highly Research selected is not relevant to

Research is relevant to the argument
relevant to the argument, is the argument or is vague and
and is mostly accurate and complete –
presented accurately and incomplete – components are
there are some unclear components or
completely – the method, results, missing or inaccurate or unclear.
some minor errors in the method,
and implications are all presented Theory is not relevant or only
results or implications. Theory is
Research accurately; Theory is relevant, relevant for some aspects; theory is
relevant and accurately described,
accurately described and all not clearly articulated and/or has
some components may not be present
relevant components are incorrect or incomplete components.
or are unclear. Connection to theory is
included; relationship between Relationship between theory and
mostly clear and complete, or has
research and theory is clearly research is unclear or inaccurate,
some minor errors.
articulated and accurate. major errors in the logic are present.

Conclusion may not be clear and the

Conclusion is clearly stated and
connections to the research and
Conclusions
position are clear and relevant.
The underlying logic is explicit.
Conclusion is clearly stated and
connections to research and position
are mostly clear, some aspects may
not be connected or minor errors in
logic are present.
connections to the research are
incorrect or unclear or just a
repetition of the findings without
explanation. Underlying logic has
major flaws; connection to position
is not clear.

Paper is poorly organized and

Paper is coherently organized and
the logic is easy to follow. There
are no spelling or grammatical
Writing
errors and terminology is clearly
defined. Writing is clear and
concise and persuasive.
Paper is generally well organized and
difficult to read – does not flow
most of the argument is easy to
logically from one part to another.
follow. There are only a few minor
There are several spelling and/or
spelling or grammatical errors, or
grammatical errors; technical terms
terms are not clearly defined. Writing
may not be defined or are poorly
is mostly clear but may lack
defined. Writing lacks clarity and
conciseness.
conciseness.

Rubric for Case Study Analysis

Below Approaching Exceeds

At Standard
Standard Standard Standard
Clear explanation of key strategic issues Shows little Shows some Shows adequate Shows superior
• The problems, scope, and seriousness was understanding understanding knowledge of knowledge of
clearly identified in the discussions. of the issues, of the issues, the issues, key the issues, key
• There was a well focused diagnosis of key problems, key problems, problems, and problems, and
strategic issues and key problems that and the and the the company’s the company’s
demonstrated a good grasp of the company’s company’s present situation present situation
company’s present situation and strategic present situation present situation and strategic and strategic
issues. and strategic and strategic issues. issues.
• Effective Executive Summary issues. issues. Executive Effective
• Did not waste space summarizing Executive Executive summary Executive
information already found in the case. summary summary adequate Summary
missing or inadequate
poorly
constructed

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 9
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 Valid arguments; analysis of financial Critical issues Critical issues Critical issues Critical issues
performance with relevant supportive detail and key and key and key and key
 Logically organized, key points, key problems that problems that problems that problems that
arguments, and important criteria for supported the supported the supported the supported the
evaluating business strategies were easily Case Analysis Case Analysis Case Analysis Case Analysis
identified were poorly were not clearly were partially were clearly
 Critical issues and key problems that
identified, identified, identified, identified,
supported the Case Analysis were
identified and clearly analyzed and analyzed, and analyzed, and analyzed, and analyzed, and
supported. supported. supported. supported. supported.

Appropriate analysis, evaluation, synthesis Analysis of key Analysis of key Analysis of key Analysis of key
for the specific industry identified change drivers change drivers change drivers change drivers
 There was complete data on which to base and the and the and the and the
a thorough analysis underlying the underlying the underlying the underlying the
 Key change drivers underlying the issues issues issues were not issues were issues were
were identified. inadequate. identified. partially clearly
 Synthesis, analysis, and evaluations were identified identified
clearly presented and supported in a literate
and effective manner.
Conclusions and recommendations are Effective Effective Effective Effective
congruent with strategic analysis recommendatio recommendatio recommendatio recommendatio
 Specific recommendations and/or plans of ns and/or plans ns and/or plans ns and/or plans ns, solutions,
action provided. of action not of action of action were and/or plans of
 Specific data or facts were referred to when provided. inadequate. partially action were
necessary to support the analysis and Specific data or Specific data or provided. provided.
conclusions.
facts necessary facts were not Specific data or Specific data or
 Recommendations and conclusions were
presented and supported in a literate and to support the referred when facts were facts were
effective manner. analysis and necessary to occasionally referred when
conclusions was support the referred when necessary to
not provided. analysis and necessary to support the
conclusions. support the analysis and
analysis and conclusions.
conclusions.
Proper organization, professional writing, Key points were Key points were Key points were Key points were
and logical flow of analysis. APA formatting poorly not identified partially clearly
 Logically organized, key points, key identified and and supported identified and identified and
arguments, and important criteria for supported with with a well supported with supported with
evaluating the business logic easily a well thought thought out a well thought a well thought
identified. out rationale rationale based out rationale out rationale
 Key points were supported with a well
based on on applying based on based on
thought out rationale based on applying
specific concepts or analytical frameworks applying specific applying applying
to the data provided in the case. specific concepts or specific specific
 Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, 3rd concepts or analytical concepts or concepts or
person objective view, professional writing, analytical frameworks to analytical analytical
and syntax. frameworks to the data frameworks to frameworks to
the data provided in the the data the data
provided in the case. provided in the provided in the
case. Grammar, case. case.
Grammar, spelling, Adequate Excellent
spelling, punctuation, grammar, grammar,
punctuation, professional spelling, spelling,
professional writing, and punctuation, punctuation,
writing, and syntax needs professional professional
syntax needs improvement writing, and writing, and
significant syntax syntax
improvement

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 10
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 11. Contribution of the Course to meeting the Professional Component

Fisheries Topics : 90%

General Education Component : 10%
12. Textbook

Environmental Legal Assistance Center. 2017. Mending Nets: A Handbook on the

Prosecution of Fishery and Coastal Law Violations, Third ed. The Environmental Legal
Assistance Center, Cebu City, Philippines. p. 308

13. Course Evaluation

The minimum requirement of lecture and laboratory for a passing grade of 60% of the total
scores from the following:

LECTURE

Major Examination 30%

Quizzes 15%
Recitation / Participation 15%
Performance Outcomes / Project 40%
Attendance 5%
100%

Aside from academic deficiency, other grounds for a failing grade are:
a. Grave misconduct and/ or cheating during examination
b. Unexcused absences of more than 20% of required number of meetings per term
c. Failing academic standing and failure to take the final exam.
Classroom Decorum

a. Students are required to wear identification card and observe proper dress code at all
times.
b. Turn off or put in silent mode all cellular phones during class hours.
c. Maintain cleanliness and orderliness of the room at all times.
d. Come on class on time.

14. Suggested References

A Bernas, Joaquin G., S.J. (1996) The 1987 Philippine Constitution. (1996 edition). Manila:
Rex Book Store.

B Nolledo, Jose N. (1992) The Local Government Code of 1991: Annotated. (1992 edition).
Mandaluyong City: National Bookstore.

DENR, DA and DILG. (2001) Philippine Coastal Management Guidebook No. 8: Coastal
C
Law Enforcement. Cebu City: Coastal Resource Management Project of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources.
Sangguniang Bayan ng Tagkawayan (2018). Tagkawayan Municipal Ordinance series of
D
1998 .

E BFAR IV – A (2016) Fisheries Administrative Orders compilation 2011 – 2016. Reproduced

by BFAR Region IV - A

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 11
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 15. Course Materials Made Available

a. Samples of homework sets from the students

b. Samples of Quizzes and major exam from students
c. End-of-course assessment report by the students and the faculty
d. Research works and projects assigned to the students
e. PowerPoint Presentation and slide shows.
f. Rubrics for class participation and recitation
g. Copy of RA 10654, fisheries administrative orders, etc.
h. Case Study Analyses
i. Samples of assignments
j. Reflection papers, field interviews
k. Compilation of different legal bases for fisheries law enforcement

16. Classroom Policies

1. No cellular phones or music are allowed in class.

2. Making unnecessary noise during lecture is strictly prohibited.
3. No answering or doing of assignments or projects is permitted during lecture periods.
4. Food and beverages are not permitted in the classroom. This include plate lunches,
drinks, candy, etc., whether opened or not.
5. Latecomers will not be admitted after 10 minutes.
6. Those wearing incomplete / improper uniform will not be admitted in class.
7. Going to rest rooms will not be allowed during quizzes or any other form of academic
examinations.
8. The main assignment is to keep up with the reading. You should come to class prepared
to intelligently discuss the materials assigned each meeting. Because a significant portion
of the course will be presented by lecture, regular attendance is strongly advised.
9. Late work will be accepted up to three days beyond due date with 10% grade deduction.
Deadlines and penalties will be waived only for special circumstances.
10. All written submissions must be in your own words and syntax unless you are quoting
and properly credit the source.
11. Please keep a copy of all your work until the end of the semester as insurance against lost
by you or me.

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 12
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 Major Examination

There will be (3) major examinations, to wit: preliminary, midterm, finals, within the
semester. If you are going to miss a major exam, it is your responsibility to alert your instructor
prior to the exam schedule. A comprehensive examination on all the topics that have been
discussed during the semester may be given during the final examination.

Quizzes

There will be quizzes for every end topic. Quizzes will relate to current and previous
topics. A quiz maybe given at any time during any class period – immediately after a lecture, at
the beginning or end of class, etc.

Recitation / Classroom Participation

Students may be called to explain or give his opinion on the subject matter of discussion.
The manner of choosing the student who will recite will be done randomly. They may also be
asked to participate in group dynamics and will be graded according to their participation.

Projects

A project would be required from the students from time to time. It may be a group or
individual project, depending on the difficulty of the task. Project shall consist of but not limited
to submission of term papers, critical analyses of issues or case studies.

Attendance

Absences for which a medical or court excuse is provided noted by the university’s
Guidance counsellor will be recorded but not figure in the attendance grade. Likewise, one
absence for which advance notice is given by phone or in person will not be figure in the
attendance grade. It is also provided in the university’s manual that the instructor has the option
to admit or not a students who is late for more than 10 minutes.
Also, anyone has more than (3) consecutive absences will received a failing grade for the
course as provided in the university’s students manual.
A student who drops the course after the midterm examinations will receive a grade of
5.0 (failed)
Dropping of subjects must be done before the midterm examination and will only be
effective if all the required formalities for dropping a subject have been complied with your
recorded grades will be available for your review at any convenient time.

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 13
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2
 17. Consultation Hours

Your class instructor is available for consultation every MONDAY TO THURSDAY from 9:00
– 10:30 AM. You can reach him personally or through email at
iamjofrenmoreno22@gmail.com. Those students that will seek consultation beyond the
prescribe hours of consultation will not be entertained. Consultation matters should concern only
with academic matters e.g. failing grades, projects and course requirements, lecture topics and
nothing beyond personal.

Course Title Date Date Prepared by Checked by: Approved by:

Effective Revised Page 14
FSH 12 Jofren R. Moreno Zaldy O. Luna, Ph. D. Imelda A. Tangalin, Ph. D. of
FISHERIES LAWS, August August Instructor I Program Chairman, Assistant Director, 14
POLICIES AND 2018 2018 Fisheries Academic Affairs
INSTITUTION
AA-INS-1.02 F2, Rev.2