PROPOSAL TEKNIS

INDONESIA JAMBI II MOUTH COAL – FIRED POWER PLANT 2 X 350

MW AND SUPPORTING PROCEJTS LASER RADAR TOPOGRAPHIC
MAP MEASURMENT TECHNOCAL SERVICE

PT. PEMBANGKITAN PERKASA DAYA

oleh:
 TABLE OF CONTENT

TABLE OF CONTENT ................................................................................................... I

LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... II
INTRODUCTION ......................................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.
1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of Work................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Work Methodology .......................................................................................... 2
1.3.1 Preparations and Desk Studies............................................................... 2
1.3.2 Observation Benchmark and Control Point .............................................. 2
1.3.3 Topographic Survey ............................................................................... 3
1.3.3.1 Traversing Suvey.....................................................................4
1.3.3.2 Leveling Survey .......................................................................4
1.3.3.3 Detailed Survey .......................................................................5
1.3.4 UAV Photogrammetry ............................................................................ 6
1.4 Deliverables ................................................................................................... 8
1.4.1 BM Description ...................................................................................... 8
1.4.2 Topographical Data ............................................................................... 9
1.4.3 Topographic Survey Drawing ................................................................. 9
1.4.4 UAV Photogrammetry .......................................................................... 11
1.5 Estimated Work Schedule ............................................................................. 12
1.6 Cost Estimate ............................................................................................... 14
1.7 Project Execution.......................................................................................... 17
1.7.1 Project Organization ............................................................................ 17
1.7.2 Project Team ....................................................................................... 17
1.7.3 List of Key Personnel ........................................................................... 18
1.8 Term and Conditions..................................................................................... 19

Table of Content i
 LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 Equipment of Differential GPS series Trimble 5700 ............................................................ 2

Figure 2 Illustration of send and receive data from DGPS to the satelite ........................................... 3
Figure 3 Typical of Control Point Installation ................................................................................... 3
Figure 4 Equipment of Total Station Series Leica TCR 705 Reflectors.............................................. 3
Figure 5 Example of the traverse methode of surveying .................................................................. 4
Figure 6 Illustration of the leveling method of surveying .................................................................. 5
Figure 7 Equipment of Leica Splinter 100M Digital Autolevel ............................................................ 5
Figure 8 Sample of Topography Mapping Survey .......................................................................... 6
Figure 10Example of BM Description .............................................................................................. 8
Figure 11 Example of Data Calculation and Correction ..................................................................... 9
Figure 12 Example of Topographical Mapping ............................................................................... 10
Figure 13 Example of Cross Section.............................................................................................. 10
Figure 14 Example of Photogrammetry UAV................................................................................. 11
Figure 15 Project Organization .................................................................................................... 17

List of Figures ii
INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

It is understood that PT Pembangkitan Perkasa Daya wishes to commission a survey in providing

sufficient information to support of Topographical Survey.

We "PT. Artama Interconsultindo (ARTAMA) are pleased to present the following proposal and
associated schedule of costs for the requested scope of works.

The scope of work for the proposed survey and study is referenced to RFP together with
recommendations based on our experience in typically projects as well as industry acceptable standards
related to projects of this nature. This scope of work will further depend on and relate to, the
preferences and priorities of the design engineers/Client.

The methodology presented in this document is purely indicative of client's requirements and should
not be considered to be complete in detail. Upon notification of award of works ARTAMA will undertake
to prepare a comprehensive discussion with client.

1.2 Scope of Work

The objective of-the survey is to perform:

1. The Laser-radar topography of the area between the Jambi-II power plant and the NEW AUR
DURI substation in Jambi City is divided into three parts, with a total area of about 2,847
hectares (500 meters wide). And checking the existing data.

2. Plant area and water intake: It includes laser-radar topography of the area of the pumping
house, the water pipeline (length of about 15 km, width of 300 m), and the main plant area of
the power plant, with a total area of about 842.6 hectares.

3. Ash field area: a total of about 31 hectares of laser-radar map topography.

Evaluate the data by established methodology in accordance with industry accepted standards and in
turn utilize the results to provide sufficient information for the detailed design. During the works
ARTAMA will provide the services of qualified and experienced personnel to ensure the successful
completion of the field services along with the necessary post processing and the associated
extrapolation of data, final reports and drawings.
Collected data, field records and project logs will be made available to the Client for inspection and
counter signature during the progress of the project and this information and data, in raw and processed
form will be submitted to the Client as part of the final report, if required. All equipment and measuring
devices will be calibrated before mobilization, or on site, and sufficient spare parts, recording charts,
consumables and tools will be made available

Technical Proposal 1
1.3 Work Methodology
The methods and procedures set out in this section of the proposal reflect on ARTAMA's understanding
of the Client's requirements. If awarded the project works and there are any misunderstandings related
to these requirements ARTAMA will make the necessary alterations to the proposed scope of work and
associated schedule of costs prior to signing a mutually agreed on contract of works.

1.3.1 Preparations and Desk Studies

In our considered opinion it will be necessary to carry out a pre-project desk study and office
preparations will include the following items.

1. Study of available topographic maps covering the designated area and compiling of data and
information on Bakosurtanal Reference (SRGI 2013) Benchmark Existing of the proposed
survey area corridor. A review of Public Domain and proprietary information will be acquired

2. Preparation and calibration of survey equipment, miscellaneous gear and materials to support
field activities.

1.3.2 Observation Benchmark and Control Point

The method of observation benchmark and control points are as follows:

1. To do observation BM for DGPS. the area that will be based on the initial study with existing
sources of elevation data from ASTER satellite imagery. Based on the TOR we have biding
horizontal and vertical reference to the Bakosurtanal Benchmark.

2. Providing the Trimble GPS survey equipment 5700 1 set, stationery, communication
equipment, transportation, etc. for the "team" to make observations of point coordinates on BM
and CP.

Figure 1 Equipment of Differential GPS series Trimble 5700

3. Coordinating and managing the plan and CP BM observations at the survey area in which the
coordinates are known with the following activities:

a. Looking for the nearest location to vertical control points and horizontal control points
obtained from BM Bakosurtanal description.

Technical Proposal 2
 b. GPS team will take the initial data for the binding of a reference point in the project site
to the accuracy of geodetic control points in order-1. The picture below is an illustration
of the observation point BM geodetic control points:

Figure 2 Illustration of send and receive data from DGPS to the satelite

4. BM (bench mark) which will be in the form of pairs of poles PVC 4 "in the cast and filled with
rocks so it would be very sturdy as illustrated in the figure below specifications

Figure 3 Typical of Control Point Installation

1.3.3 Topographic Survey

Topographic survey using a measuring instrument Leica TCR 705 Reflectors Total Station to the
accuracy of 5mm +2 ppm x D with a maximum target distance 2700m. Here's a picture Leica TCR 705
Reflectors Total Station instrument:

Figure 4 Equipment of Total Station Series Leica TCR 705 Reflectors

Technical Proposal 3
1.3.3.1 Traversing Suvey
Traversing survey will be conducted after installation and observations stakes BM completed. This was
first performed at this stage, to make a help point on staking out the centerline of the road design and
cross section. with an interval of 100 meters to 200 meters along the lines of survey plans. Traversing
survey by measuring the traverse points to the existing fixed point and traverse route is covering the
surveyed area in the form of a closed loop. Measurement of traverse angles was carried out in two
series observation to ensure the accuracy of 2". The angular disclosure is not larger than the maximum
of 20" VN, where N is the number of total traverse points. Distance tolerance at the maximum of 10"
VD, where D is the number of total distance. The vertical angle reading was carried out in one series
observation to ensure the accuracy of 40". The accuracy of the azimuth is 40" and the tolerable accuracy
is 1/10.000. Tachimetric method was used in detail for the topographic survey, where the planimetry
and height of the instrument station are determined by traversing the differences of lengths and height.
The measurement by tachimetric method used Ray and Voorstraal method in accordance to the
Topography condition.

Figure 5 Example of the traverse methode of surveying

1.3.3.2 Leveling Survey

Leveling survey was measured by the methode of leveling extends as follows:

• Line waterpasing measurements through all stakes polygon

• Leveling measuring instrument used automatic level

• Implementation waterpasing measurements carried go-back.

• The difference between the height difference measurement resukt go to the high number of
different return measurement results in each section below 8 mm.

Technical Proposal 4
 Figure 6 Illustration of the leveling method of surveying

Leveling within this survey using a measuring instrument Leica Splinter 100M Digital Autolevel to the
accuracy 2.0mm. Here’s a picture Leica Splinter 100M Digital Autolevel instrument:

Figure 7 Equipment of Leica Splinter 100M Digital Autolevel

1.3.3.3 Detailed Survey

Detailed survey will be done by the method of trigonometry, a position outside lane cross section. to
provide elevation values on an empty spot. This is very important for the accuracy of the data Contour
for the benefit of the detailed engineering design and cut-fill balance. The trigonometric method will be
used for measuring all topographic details entire the survey area, in which the elevations, directions
and distances of each detail will be measured and referenced to the previously established minor
horizontal and vertical control stations. The instruments used will be an Eletronic Total Station. The
details of current conditions relating to buildings, roads, tracks, vegetation, agricultural areas, fence
lines and any water courses or wetlands will be set out on the drawings provided. Such contour maps
will also contain any reference points or monuments, True north and the grid system adopted, the nature
of the terrain and features identified, The high water demarcation line.

Technical Proposal 5
 Figure 8 Sample of Topography Mapping Survey

1.3.4 UAV Photogrammetry

The Photogrammetry provides very fast information together with 24 megapixel resolution photography.
An example of output from the UAV Photogrammetry is shown below:

The photography allow the exact position of the area of interest to be, such as reference for Topographic
Survey and minimising social disruption (as features on the ground can be seen accurately in the
photography).

The following is the proposed general scope of work:

1. ARTAMA will install the UAV equipment on near site location. The typical setup is shown below:

Technical Proposal 6
2. Acquire UAV Photogrammetry data and high resolution digital colour imagery covering the
project block as shown in the above drawing. The total area of required survey amounts to be
processed.
3. Process and supply high resolution geo-referenced RGB digital orthophoto images for an area
of interest. The orthophoto images would be supplied in the same 100 m x 100 m tiles as the
GeoTIFF file format. The UAV Photogrammetry data and the digital colour imagery will be
captured simultaneously; however there may be times when conditions, such as low light,
heavy shadow etc., do not favour the capture of imagery. The balance of the unprocessed
imagery will be archived for processing at a later stage if and when required.
4. All data to be supplied in UTM coordinates using Indonesian National Datum (DGN95) which
is effectively the same as the WGS84 GPS satellite datum (SRGI 2013 Bakosurtanal). Vertical
datum will be geoidal height generated from the EGM08 spheroid / geoid separation model
adjusted to whatever vertical datum is being used on the project.
5. The following flight parameters will be utilized for the data capture.
• Flying Height - 100m to 500 above ground
• Capture speed - 20 knots
• Photo resolution - 24 Megapixel
• Photo half angle - 20°
• Horizontal Accuracy - Approximately 10 - 50 cm

Technical Proposal 7
1.4 Deliverables

The results of the field survey measurements and operations, together with all data gathered and
extrapolated, will be the subject of a comprehensive report and associated drawings.

Information presented in the report and drawings will include, but not necessarily be limited to the
following items.

1.4.1 BM Description

- Reference Point observation analyse and processing data as Adjusted WGS84 coordinate values
on A4 paper size.
- Reference point observation documentation and description on A4 paper size.

Figure 9Example of BM Description

Technical Proposal 8
1.4.2 Topographical Data

- Horizontal and Vertical Control Data Calculation (polygon survey).

- Boundary Point and Bollard Data.

- Data in Excel sheet contains Raw Data (Point Code, Horizontal Angle, Vertical Angle, Slope
Distance, Height of Target, and Height of Instrument) and coordinate values (X, Y, Z)

Figure 10 Example of Data Calculation and Correction

1.4.3 Topographic Survey Drawing

- Topographic Survey Drawing with scale 1 : 1000.
- Point survey; contour line interval 0.5 m.
- Topographical Survey Maps of Underpass Area, Flyover Area, Bridge Area, Relocation of
Existing Road area.
- Cross Section of Existing Surface overlay with Road Design.
- Longitudinal Profile of Existing Surface overlay with Road Design.
- Topographical Survey and Mapping documentation on A3 paper size, 3 sets.

Technical Proposal 9
Figure 11 Example of Topographical Mapping

Figure 12 Example of Cross Section

Technical Proposal 10
1.4.4 UAV Photogrammetry

The following will constitute the standard deliverables for the project.

- DXF and DGN 2 dimensional of detail situation (land use existing, building/ house, existing
infrastructure, etc.). These files will be delivered in the same 100 m x 100 m tiles.

- Supply ortho-rectified and reo-referenced RGB color digital mosaic images over the surveyed
area. The image will have a ground pixel size of 15 cm and will be delivered as digital ECW
and TIFF files in the same 100 m x 100 m tiles data. The UAV photogrammetry data and the
digital color imagery will be captured simultaneously.

- Short report covering details of data capture, survey datum, achieved accuracy (comparison
with the Photogrammetry photo and the measured ground points), GPS control stations, and
output results.

Figure 13 Example of Photogrammetry UAV

Technical Proposal 11
 1.5 Estimated Work Schedule

We should be able to carry out this work based on the estimated schedule provided as below:
Table 1 Plan Schedule Of Topographical Survey

Plan Work Schedule

Item Day
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Orientation & Reconciliation
Topographical Survey
Installation New BM
Observation BM & Processing
Polygon/ Traversing Survey
Levelling
Cross-Section & Long Section
Detailed Survey
Topographical Survey Report
Aerial Mapping
Installtion and Observation GCP
Aerial Mapping Acquistion
Aerial Mapping Reporting

Table 2 Plan Schedule Of Soil Investigation

Plan Work Schedule

Item Item Detail Total Item Target Survey Day
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Coordination with Contractor
Orientation & Reconciliation Stage 1, Check Borehole 14 BH, 14 DCP, 14 BS 2 day
Location, Indicate Point BH

SPT interval 2m, Sampling 2

14 Borehole with total
Geotechnical Drilling depth per hole, Corebox, 1 BH @ 3 day
depth 10 meter per hole
UDS, Logging Desc

3 Location per
DCP Test Field CBR Test 14 location of DCP test
day

Max 2 meter from Ground 14 Bulk sample area with 3 Location per
Bulk Sampling
Level max 5 kg per location day

- Specific gravity
- Particle size analysis
- Atterberg Limits
- Triaxial Consolidated & 2 sample per hole (2x14
1 sample per
Laboratory Test Unconsolidated Test BH) with total 28 sample
day
- Direct Shear Test for test at lab
- Consolidation Test
- Unconfined Compression
Test
- Maps of Soil Investigation- 1 Copy of Draft Report
analysis of slope stability - Stage 2, 1 Copy of Draft
Design Analysis & Reporting
Logging of Borehole - Report Stage 3, 4 copy of
Settlement Final Report

Technical Proposal 12
1.6 Cost Estimate

We have provided a cost estimate detailed as below:

CONTRACT AGREEMENT

DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT OF UNIT COST
VOLUME TOTAL COST ( Rp )
UNITS ( Rp )

2 3 4 5 6

I PERSONNEL COST
A EXPERT
1 Team Leader /Expert of Geodesy 1 Org x 3 Bln 3.00 OB 18,750,000 56,250,000
2 Expert of Geodesy 1 Org x 3 Bln 3.00 OB 18,750,000 56,250,000

Sub Total I A 112,500,000

B TENAGA PENDUKUNG
1 Assistant Leader/ KTPA 2 Org x 3 Bln 6.00 OB 11,250,000 67,500,000
2 Assistant to Geodesy Expert 2 Org x 3 Bln 6.00 OB 11,250,000 67,500,000
3 Surveyor 10 Org x 3 Bln 30.00 OB 11,250,000 337,500,000
4 Ass Surveyor 10 Org 3 Bln 30.00 OB 225,000,000
x 7,500,000
5 CAD Operator 5 Org x 3 Bln 15.00 OB 11,250,000 168,750,000
6 Enumerator 30 Org x 90 hr 2,700.00 OH 150,000 405,000,000
Sub Total I B 1,271,250,000

Total Personnel Costs 1,383,750,000

Technical Proposal 14
 CONTRACT AGREEMENT

DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT OF UNIT COST
VOLUME TOTAL COST ( Rp )
UNITS ( Rp )

II NON-PERSONNEL COSTS
A SURVEY COST
1 GPS Geodetic 4 Set x 30 hr 120.00 OH 3,750,000 450,000,000
2 Levelling 5 Set x 90 hr 450.00 OH 375,000 168,750,000
3 Total Station 10 Set x 90 hr 900.00 OH 2,500,000 2,250,000,000
4 Documentation 1 Ls 1.00 Ls 11,250,000 11,250,000
5 Patok Survey+Form Survey 1 Ls 1.00 Ls 18,750,000 18,750,000
6 Secondary Data Collection 1 Ls 1.00 Ls 11,250,000 11,250,000
Sub Total II B 2,910,000,000
B OPERATIONAL & OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1 Personal Computer 10 Unit x 3 bulan 30.00 UB 1,500,000 45,000,000
2 Note Book 5 Unit x 3 bulan 15.00 UB 1,500,000 22,500,000
3 Printer A3 2 Unit x 3 bulan 6.00 UB 1,500,000 9,000,000
4 Printer A4 2 Unit x 3 bulan 6.00 UB 1,500,000 9,000,000
5 Drone 1 Unit x 3 bulan 3.00 UB 11,250,000 33,750,000
Sub Total II C 119,250,000
C STATIONARY & CONSUMABLES
1 Pembelian Kertas Untuk Dokumen 1 Ls 1.00 Ls 7,500,000 7,500,000
2 Pembelian Kertas Cetak Gambar 1 Ls 1.00 Ls 7,500,000 7,500,000
3 Consumables 1 Ls 1.00 Ls 7,500,000 7,500,000
Sub Total II D 22,500,000
D ACCOMODATION & TRANSPORTATION

Technical Proposal 15
 CONTRACT AGREEMENT

DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT OF UNIT COST
VOLUME TOTAL COST ( Rp )
UNITS ( Rp )

1 Housing 1 Unit x 3 bulan 3.00 UB 18,750,000 56,250,000

2 Rent a Car for Operations 5 Unit x 3 bulan 15.00 UB 18,750,000 281,250,000
3 Rent Motorcycle 5 Unit x 3 bulan 15.00 UB 3,750,000 56,250,000
4 House Operating Cost ( Elecricity, Water , etc ) 1 Unit x 3 bulan 3.00 UB 3,750,000 11,250,000
5 Operating Cost & Vehicle Maintenance 1 Unit x 3 bulan 3.00 UB 3,750,000 11,250,000
6 Communication Costs 1 Org x 3 bulan 3.00 OB 3,750,000 11,250,000
Sub Total II E 427,500,000
E REPORTING COSTS
1 Pleminary Report + CD 5 Set 5 Set 1,500,000 7,500,000
2 Laporan Antara + CD 5 Set 5 Set 1,500,000 7,500,000
3 Draft Final Report + CD 5 Set 5 Set 1,500,000 7,500,000
4 Final Report + CD 5 Set 5 Set 1,500,000 7,500,000
5 Supporting Report (Analysis) + CD 5 Set 5 Set 1,500,000 7,500,000
Sub Total II F1 37,500,000

Total Non-Personnel Costs 3,516,750,000

Total Personnel Costs + Total Non-Personnel Costs 4,900,500,000

VAT 10% 490,050,000
TOTAL 5,390,550,000

Technical Proposal 16
1.7 Project Execution

1.7.1 Project Organization

ARTAMA’s organization Project structure proposed for this Project as shiwn in the figure below:

Figure 14 Project Organization

1.7.2 Project Team

To perform Topographic Survey, ARTAMA’s providing qualified and experienced staff consisting of:
a. Project Director
b. Project Manager.
c. Geodetic Engineer ; 1 Persons.
d. Topography Surveyor; 3 Persons.
e. Ass. Surveyor ; 3 Persons.
f. DGPS Surveyor ; 3 Persons
g. CAD/ GIS Operator ; 1 Persons.
h. UAV Operator ; 2 Persons.
i. Project Administration
j. Local Helper, Driver, Logistic.

Technical Proposal 17
1.7.3 List of Key Personnel

We propose that the core work for this project is managed and carried out by the following key
personnel:

Project Director; Agus Lukmanulhakim, ST; Agus is a registered geodetic survey with BSK (LPJK)
Indonesia and has worked in a very hands-on role in Indonesia for around 7 years on topography
survey. Agus has been involved with around 10 survey of topography projects in Indonesia including
Soil Investigation and concept of road design for four of these.

Project Manager; Ceceng, ST; Amin is geodetic engineer and he has experience around 5 years who
would provide technical review to the project. This review would be ongoing during the work period,
would be relied upon to adjust the scope based on findings from initial work, and would include technical
review during data of topography analyses and of final reporting.

Geodetic Engineer; Indra Festian Koswara, ST; Indra is a geodetic engineer educated in STT YPKP
with experience in civil engineering from 2010 years topographical project in Indonesia. He would
managing works of topography on field and field supervisors.

Technical Proposal 18
1.8 Term and Conditions

• The validity of this quotation and its associated schedule of costs expire (30 days after the date
of submission). Any extension thereof will require a written request to ARTAMA and the
subsequent confirmation of approval by ARTAMA.

• ARTAMA will ensure the Survey Team and Equipment available within 7 (seven) days after
receiving Contract Agreement. The availability of our Survey team and equipment is subject to
our commitment to other clients.

• The required permits and other clearance are the responsibility of the Client.

• The cost of arranging clearances is the responsibility of the Client.

• The required permits and other clearance are the responsibility of the Client.

• Payment System :

a. Term 1 : 50 % paid before mobilization of personnel and equipment.

b. Term 2 : 30 % paid after demobilization team and equipment.

c. Term 3 : 20 % payable upon submission of the final report.

• Payment shall be made within seven (7) days of invoice date.

• The price offered is not include Value Added Tax (VAT 10 %) and are inclusive of Income Tax
(Pph 23 2%) and is valid one month from the date issued proposal.

• The quoted rates are exclusive of Third Party Liabilities insurance.

• One (1) copy of the preliminary report will be submitted for the Client's approval. Approval of
the preliminary report, with any alterations or corrections required by the Client. shall be
forwarded to ARTAMA within seven (7) days of receipt of the preliminary report.

• ARTAMA will submit four (2) copies of the final report within seven (7) days of receipt of the
Client's comments.

• ARTAMA reserve the right to change the method or equipment that is to be used, as long as
all substitutions meet with the Client's requirements, or the project specifications.

• In the event of delay in completion of the work caused by circumstances that force (force
major) or from other parties (licensing and security problems) then a late charge shall be
applied with the delays on the surveys ;

Technical Proposal 19