Professional Documents
Culture Documents
& 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0954-3007/06 $30.00
www.nature.com/ejcn
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Alcohol drinking and risk of small for gestational age
birth
F Chiaffarino1, F Parazzini1,2, L Chatenoud1, E Ricci2, F Sandretti2, S Cipriani1, D Caserta3 and
L Fedele2
1
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’, Milano, Italy; 2II Clinica Ostetrico Ginecologica, Università di Milano, Milano, Italy
and 3Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologiche, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
Objective: To assess if alcohol drinking is a risk factor for small for gestational age (SGA) birth.
Methods: Case–control study. Cases were 555 women (mean age 31 years, range 16–43) who delivered SGA babies at the
Clinica Luigi Mangiagalli and the Obstetric and Gynecology Clinic of the University of Verona. The controls were 1966 women
(mean age 31 years, range 14–43) who gave birth at term (X37 weeks of gestation) to healthy infants of normal weight at the
hospitals where cases had been identified.
Results: No increase in the risk of SGA birth was observed in women drinking one or two drinks/day in pregnancy, but three or
more per day increased the risk: odds ratios (OR) were 3.2 (1.7–6.2) for X3 drinks during the first trimester, 2.7 (1.4–5.3) during
the second and 2.9 (1.5–5.7) during the third.
Conclusions: The study shows an increased risk of SGA births in mothers who drink X3 units/day of alcohol in pregnancy.
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2006) 60, 1062–1066. doi:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602419; published online 22 February 2006
Age (years)
o25 60 (10.8) 180 (9.2)
25–29 176 (31.7) 637 (32.4)
30–34 207 (37.3) 767 (39.0)
X35 112 (20.2) 382 (19.4)
Education (years)
o6 24 (4.3) 53 (2.7) 1b
7–13 415 (74.8) 1439 (73.2) 0.8 (0.4–1.4)
414 116 (20.9) 473 (24.1) 0.7 (0.4–1.4)
Marital status
Married 541 (97.5) 1934 (98.4) 1b
Unmarried 14 (2.5) 32 (1.6) 1.2 (0.6–2.4)
Parity
0 404 (72.8) 1103 (56.1) 1b
1 118 (21.3) 693 (35.3) 0.4 (0.3–0.5)
X2 33 (6.0) 170 (8.7) 0.4 (0.2–0.6)
Hypertension in pregnancy
No 435 (78.4) 1863 (94.8) 1b
Yes 120 (21.6) 103 (5.2) 5.1 (3.8–6.9)
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index (kg/m2); CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratios adjusted in turn for education, parity and smoking during the third trimester
of pregnancy, gestational hypertension, history of SGA birth; SGA, small for gestational age.
a
In some cases, the sum does not add up to the total because of some missing values.
b
Reference category.
c
Parous women only.
1.2), 1.2 (95% CI 0.8–1.8) and 2.9 (95% CI 1.4–6.1) for Information on alcohol drinking was retrospectively
women drinking one, two, and three or more portions of collected after delivery. The assessment of alcohol consump-
alcohol a day in the third trimester of pregnancy (data not tion was based on self-reporting, so some underestimates
shown). More in general, the interest of this analysis was to could have occurred. However, in Italy, alcohol consumption
define the effect of alcohol consumption on the risk of SGA is socially accepted and recommendations to avoid alcohol
birth in comparison with normal pregnancies, and the in pregnancy have not received widespread attention and are
inclusion in the control group of women with adverse not routinely advocated by gynecologists. Good reporting of
pregnancy outcomes (i.e. preterm birth) potentially related alcohol intake at post partum interview by women deliver-
to alcohol drinking might spuriously affect the potential ing normal or low birth weight infant has been documented
relation between alcohol and SGA. (Delgado-Rodriguez et al., 1995).
1 2 X3
Alcohol drinking before conception (Units/day)
0 303 (54.6) 1132 (57.6) 1b
0.5 60 (10.8) 245 (12.5) 0.9 (0.7–1.3) Maternal age (years)
1 97 (17.5) 333 (16.9) 1.1 (0.8–1.5) p30 0.9 (0.6–1.5) 1.7 (0.9–3.0) 2.1 (0.8–5.2)
2 69 (12.4) 207 (10.5) 1.2 (0.9–1.7) X31 0.8 (0.6–1.3) 0.8 (0.4–1.3) 5.1 (1.8–14.5)
X3c 26 (4.7) 49 (2.5) 1.7 (1.0–2.9)
Education (years)
First trimester p11 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 1.5 (0.8–2.8) 3.0 (1.0–8.5)
0 366 (66.0) 1345 (68.4) 1b X12 0.9 (0.6–1.4) 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 3.0 (1.2–7.4)
0.5 63 (11.4) 187 (9.5) 1.1 (0.8–1.6)
1 65 (11.7) 281 (14.3) 0.9 (0.6–1.2) Parity
2 38 (6.9) 131 (6.7) 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 0 0.8 (0.6–1.2) 1.1 (0.7–1.9) 2.1 (0.9–5.1)
X3c 23 (4.1) 22 (1.1) 3.2 (1.7–6.2) X1 1.0 (0.6–1.6) 1.0 (0.5–1.9) 4.3 (1.5–12.1)
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratios adjusted in turn for
education, parity and smoking during the third trimester of pregnancy, birth weight approximately 150 g less than those whose
gestational hypertension, history of SGA birth; SGA, small for gestational age. mothers abstained during pregnancy. No effect was seen in
a
In some cases, the sum does not add up to the total because of some missing infants born to women who drank weekly in early preg-
values.
b
Reference category.
nancy, less than weekly or not at all (Passaro et al., 1996).
c
Women drinking 10 Units/day or more: two cases of SGA and four controls. Shu et al. (1995) found that alcohol consumption in the
d
Women drinking 10 Units/day or more: one case of SGA and two controls. first trimester (average four drinks per week) was associated
with a 155 g reduction in fetal weight, even after adjustment
for number of cigarettes smoked. In a recent US survey of
Other sources of bias, including selection or confounding women who delivered a live infant (Whitehead and
factors, are unlikely to have produced marked effects, Lipscomb, 2003), SGA births were more common among
especially considering that cases and controls were inter- moderate (4–13 drinks/week) and heavy (14 or more drinks/
viewed in the same institution and that participation was week) drinkers during the last 3 months than non-drinkers.
practically complete. Further, the findings were largely Smoking and drinking three or more drinks/day during the
consistent when the analysis was run separately for cases third trimester have a marked effect on SGA birth. Some
and controls collected in the two hospitals or by different other studies showed an association between alcohol intake
interviewers or when the models included terms for center and smoking, and the effect of smoking on birth weight was
and interviewers (data not shown). Finally, the questionnaire independent of but additive with the effect of alcohol. In a
was satisfactorily reproducible (D’Avanzo et al., 1997). Californian study on 1233 women, moderate drinkers (X3
We did not analyze information on nutritional status, but drinks/week) who also smoked more than half a pack/day
inclusion of BMI in the model did not change the estimated had a greater weight decrement than was expected on the
OR (data not shown). basis of additivity of effects (Windham et al., 1995). In a
Our study suggests that there is no risk of SGA birth when population-based case–control study in New York on 701
one or two drinks a day are taken, and that there is, at most, cases of SGA birth, smoking increased the risk of SGA birth,
an effect at higher levels. These findings are in general which was even greater for heavy alcohol consumption
agreement with other studies, but some differences in the (Yang et al., 2001).
study design and in the definitions of alcohol consumption The biological mechanism through which alcohol drink-
make the results difficult to compare. ing affects fetal growth is not completely understood.
In a British cohort study, infant born to women who Alcohol or its metabolites may affect fetal development by
reported three or more drinks daily had an adjusted mean causing hypoxia, impairing cell proliferation or affecting