Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10
In this chapter we contemplate ‘what if?’ What will happen when we no longer
need to communicate by writing? What will happen when materials can repair
themselves? What will happen when we have control of our own health? What
are the social implications?
10.1 INTRODUCTION
If we believe the prophets of nanotechnology then we are reaching a
period when we will be able to build any detailed object completely at
the atomic level, consistent with the laws of chemistry and physics.
Since we can now see atoms it may well be that much of the brilliant
predictive thought that composes the basis of chemistry and physics is
now redundant. Feynman said [1]: ‘The problems of chemistry and
biology can be greatly helped if our ability to see what we are doing,
and to do things on an atomic level, is ultimately developed — a devel-
opment which I think cannot be avoided.’
Drexler [2] has provided the extrapolations required to make us
think and, in his own way, has revitalised the enabling disciplines of
physics and chemistry to provide the excitement that must have been
generated by the discoveries of the nineteenth century and in the first
half of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, it takes vision to see what
the new science will create. The last chapter dealt with the likely. Here
we will try to step out further into the future. History can help
because, as we began this book with the challenges of humankind, we
know these same challenges will continue. Stone Age humans were
concerned with the same endeavours as modern humans. That is,
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 251
I N TO T H E R E A L M S O F I M A G I N AT I O N • 251
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 252
252 • N A N OT E C H N O L O G Y
might report that ‘There are an estimated 300 000 flu viruses about
to approach your left nostril; it’s time you ate your daily anti-ageing
pill. Also, please email your oven — it is trying to cook your dinner’.
10.3 MANUFACTURING
The assemblers that Drexler talked about no longer seem far-fetched.
Nanofabrication is difficult. As discussed in Chapters 2, 3 and 6, there
are three possible methods. In the first method lithography may be
used. As discussed in Chapter 8, ultraviolet methods are standard but
typical ‘best practice’ microelectronics are made by a printing process
called electron beam lithography, which resembles conventional litho-
graphy but relies on the wavelength of the electron rather than UV
radiation. One method of achieving smaller manipulations will be
through nanolithography, based on the same masking principles but
using something with a shorter wavelength than the electron. That is,
the material you do not want coated or changed is protected by mask-
ing and then the mask is removed. This method appears to be the eas-
iest to achieve, but it is also the most cumbersome. The technique
involves deposition of a whole range of layers, like a club sandwich, and
then selectively removing parts of each layer so that the desired land-
scape is achieved. Ultimately we need a beam of particles that can cut
the substrate atom-by-atom to design objects.
The second method involves scanning probe microscopy and may
be used with or without masking techniques. It allows structures to be
deposited through apertures within the cantilever tip of the scanning
tunnelling microscope. Some examples of how this can be done using
dip pen technology were presented in Chapter 3. The future will
involve predefined plans for deposition of the sample using computer
control and the spraying of atoms into structures as if they were sticky
ping-pong balls being blown from an air gun. Complex patterns, such
as rings and intersecting lines, are readily produced. With this method,
the material composition of the as-deposited line can be varied, allow-
ing for the formation of junctions within a single layer. Two-dimen-
sional structures can be fabricated with different material
compositions. The sample will be moved underneath a cantilever by
actuators using a pre-programmed sequence of two-dimensional later-
al movements. To date, line widths of 70 nm with gaps of 40 nm have
been produced by this method but atomic lines are also possible and
whole books could be written in atoms if they are arranged as letters of
the alphabet on a surface. Indeed, Feynman’s original paper has already
been reproduced. Using the letters of the alphabet is unlikely to be a
practical way of storing information, although sequencing atoms like
DNA bases or as consonants is a very sensible way of writing. Crossed
wires have been produced with shadow mask writing and, through
optimisation of translation speed and/or deposition rates, it will be fur-
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 253
I N TO T H E R E A L M S O F I M A G I N AT I O N • 253
ther possible to tailor the shapes, widths and thicknesses of the deposit-
ed lines. Initial experiments with C60 have produced nanometre-scale
patterning of fullerenes. With an array of such apertures on a single
cantilever, it is possible to deposit hundreds or possibly more identi-
cally spaced and aligned structures simultaneously. By using a shutter
system for the incoming material beam and multiple sources of mater-
ial, whole swathes of multi-layer devices can be fabricated. Many of the
synthetic mimics may be applied. We could coat the surface with a layer
of rotaxane switches and use them for counting. This scheme has con-
siderable potential to revolutionise the rapid fabrication and testing of
prototype nanoelectronics. In short, the dip pen technology discussed
in Chapter 2 has only just started to be explored. Using fullerenes,
(Chapter 4) we are in effect writing a dotted line of full stops, but we
should be able to write with a lot of other shapes.
The third technology involves biological material. This was dis-
cussed in Chapter 6. A phospholipid membrane is a very useful bind-
ing surface on which structures can be built. In a particular
application, enzymes, receptors and other biological material may be
assembled in a different or the same way as they are in nature. Indeed,
other biological material may be used to connect these circuits and to
act as a building platform for the molecular mimics described in
Chapter 5.
A real problem, however, is the wear factor. Single atoms are easily
removed from surfaces by friction, evaporation and contact. One
approach is to attach structures to metal surfaces by means of chemical
covalent bonds, as described in Chapter 5. Gold is a good surface,
although for nanoelectronics it must be masked because it is conduc-
tive. However, as noted before, encapsulating metal atoms in fullerenes
and polymerising the carbon cages into a rigid framework — thus trap-
ping the metal atoms in place — makes sense. It seems that nanoelec-
tronics may not be far off.
ACTIVE MATERIALS AND SWARMS [5–8]
The concept of nanoassemblers of materials — whether they be opti-
cal, electronic or for building purposes — can still be considered only
imaginative thinking. This area includes the concepts of active materi-
als and swarms. Even though they are currently only figments of our
imagination, they should not be dismissed lightly. As discussed in
Chapter 9, active materials are materials that repair themselves. To
make active materials, a material might be filled with nanoscale sensors,
computers, and actuators so that it can probe its environment, com-
pute a response, and act. Although this document is concerned with
relatively simple artificial systems, living tissue may be thought of as an
active material. Living tissue is filled with protein machines that give
living tissue its properties (such as adaptability, growth and self-repair).
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 254
254 • N A N OT E C H N O L O G Y
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 255
I N TO T H E R E A L M S O F I M A G I N AT I O N • 255
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 256
256 • N A N OT E C H N O L O G Y
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 257
I N TO T H E R E A L M S O F I M A G I N AT I O N • 257
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 258
258 • N A N OT E C H N O L O G Y
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 259
I N TO T H E R E A L M S O F I M A G I N AT I O N • 259
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 260
260 • N A N OT E C H N O L O G Y
or devise a method by which it can evolve. That is, grey goo would
have to be capable of its own evolution to be a threat. All this sounds
more and more like a new life form — a new race of intelligent beings.
Maybe that is our destiny: to hand over to a new intelligent life form,
which may keep a few of us in some utopian zoo, perhaps a garden of
Eden (again?). This brings us to the ultimate question of religion.
Who is God for these new intelligent life forms — us or the real God?
Will they be atheists and believe they came from the evolution of nan-
otechnology?
The real problems of nanotechnology are similar to those in all
forms of science. It is important to understand and use what we have
created safely. There is nothing wrong with nanotechnology, but we
should not use it for warfare or against the service of humankind in
other ways. Over the centuries, the acquisition of new knowledge, such
as the discovery that the Earth revolves around the sun, or the
Darwinian theory of evolution, has challenged current religious teach-
ing. Yet it has not destroyed religion and it never will.
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 261
I N TO T H E R E A L M S O F I M A G I N AT I O N • 261
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 262
262 • N A N OT E C H N O L O G Y
tram went as fast as the speed of light, the light from the clock would
not change, because new light would be unable to reach the tram. The
clock would permanently read the same time and time would stand
still. We know also that an electron falling into a nucleus goes so fast
that time also slows down, and we must take this into account in our
calculations. This fourth dimension has yet to be explored and it seems
that nanotechnology will be a route to understanding it. Just as quan-
tum phenomena are necessary to understand nanotechnology, as we
study smaller things in picotechnology, time relativity becomes more
important. Perhaps there are some new rules of physics to be found. If
we make our pico, fento and attomachines go very fast, time will actu-
ally slow down so that in effect they are going slower and eventually
they may be going in reverse. In fact in a pico world the end of this
book may be the beginning. Science fiction yes, but who knows?
10.8 EXERCISES
1 Compare and contrast how a swarm of nanomachines might resemble
an ant colony.
2 Web search quantum mirages, relativity, Einstein, nanomedicine,
respirocyte, nanoecology, social impacts of nanotechnology.
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse
•Nano text 3/12/02 3:59 PM Page 263
I N TO T H E R E A L M S O F I M A G I N AT I O N • 263
10.9 REFERENCES
1 Drexler E (1990) Engines of Creation. Fourth Estate, London.
2 Drexler E (1992) Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and
Computation. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
3 Drexler E, Peterson C & Pergami G (1991) Unbounding the Future.
William Morrow and Company Inc., New York.
4 Drexler E (1992) Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and
Computation. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
5 Storrs Hall J (1996) Utility fog: The stuff that dreams are made of. In BC
Crandall (ed.) Nanotechnology: Molecular Speculations on Global
Abundance. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, USA.
6 Wowk B (1996) Phased array optics. In BC Crandall (ed.)
Nanotechnology: Molecular Speculations on Global Abundance. MIT Press,
Cambridge MA.
7 Joseph Michael, UK Patent ␣94004227.2.
8 Merkle RC (1996) Nanotechnology 7: 210–15.
9 Freitas RA (2000) The Sciences July–August: 26–31.
10 Freitas Jr RA (1999) Nanomedicine, Volume I: Basic Capabilities. Landes
Bioscience, Georgetown TX.
11 Shusterman DJ (1993) Occup. Med. 8: 519–31.
12 Catelas I, Petit A, Marchand R, Zukor DJ, L’Hocine Yahia OL & Huk J.
Bone Joint Surg. Br. 81: 516–21.
© 2002 by Michael Wilson, Kamali Kannangara, Geoff Smith, Michelle Simmons, and Burkhard Raguse