You are on page 1of 3

Population

No Y N U
1. Is the study population representative of all users, actual and Y
eligible, who might be included in the study?
2. Are inclusion and exclusion criteria definitively defined? Y
3. Is the sample size large enough for sufficiently precise estimates? Y
4. Is the response rate large enough for sufficiently precise estimates? Y
5. Is the choice of population bias-free? N
6. If a comperative study :
Were participants rendomized into groups? Y
Were the groups comparable at baseline? Y
If groups were not comparable at baseline, was incomparability
addressed by the authors in the analysis?
7. Was informed consent obtained? Y

Yes :7

No :1

U :0

Y/N : 7/8 X 100 = 87,5 % (VALID)

Data Collection
No Y N U
1. Are data collectoin methods clearly described? Y
2. If a face-to-face survay, were intra-observer and intra-observer bias N
reduced?
3. Is the data collection instrument validated? Y
4. Is based on regularly collected statistics, are the statistics free from Y
subjectivity?
5. Does the study measure the outcome at a time appropriate for Y
capturing the intervention’s effect?
6. Is the instrument included in the publication? Y
7. Are questoins posed clearly enough to be able to elicit precise Y
answers?
8. Were those involved in data collection not involved in delivering a N
service to the target population?

Yes :6

No :2

U :0

Y/N : 6/8 X 100 = 75 % (VALID)


Study Design
No Y N U
1. Is the study type/methodology utilized appropriate Y
2. Is there face validity?
3. Is the research methodology clearly stated at alevel of dertail that Y
would allow its replication?
4. Was ethics approval obtained? Y
5. Are the outcomes clearly stated? Y
6. Are the outcomes clearly discussed in relation to the data Y
collection?
Yes :5

No :0

U :0

Y/N : 5/5 X 100 = 100% (VALID)

Results
No Y N U
1. Are all the results clearly outlined? Y
2. Are confounding variables accounted for? Y
3. Do the conclusions accurately reflect the analysis? Y
4. Is subset analysis a minor, rather than a major, focus of the article? Y
5. Are suggestions provided for further areas to research? Y

Yes :5

No :0

U :0

Y/N : 5/5 X 100 = 100 % (VALID)

HASIL AKHIR
POPULATION + DATA COLLECTION + STUDY DESIGN + RESULT

YES : 7 + 6 + 5 + 5 =24

NO :1+2=3

JUMLAH AKHIR : 24/27 X 100 = 88,89 % (VALID)


TUGAS CRITICAL APPRAISAL
RHINOVIRUS WHEEZING ILLNESS AND GENERIC
RISK OF CHILDHOOD-ONSET ASTHMA

SARA ASHARI
G1A113047

PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN DOKTER


FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN DAN ILMU
PENDIDIKAN

UNIVERSITAS JAMBI

You might also like