Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GRASPS:
Museums throughout the Philippines have served as living entities where material remains and objects, created
and crafted by humans as they developed themselves into better creatures, are preserved for the current and
future generations to see how the world evolved from scratch to a progressive one.
Local museums pose the same quality as the national ones when it comes to the preservation of such. They
store many remains found on the land and from the individuals within the local jurisdiction. But arts are not
only concentrated in museums, they can be seen elsewhere. Contemporary Arts are projected around
establishments, parks, and even on street walls. It is also performed at night gigs through spoken poetry,
dancing, and singing. These kinds of arts are not formally introduced or even promoted. No infographics are
found on these art pieces.
For ARTS:
As an art critic, you are tasked to give an infographic or feedback on an art performance or any visual art. You
will collect at least three art pieces through either taking photos or video recording. You will present them in
the class and write critiques about them at the same time. It should be handwritten when submitted.
The basis of grading the Performance Task for ARTS is through the quality of the art critiques with the following standards
met:
4 3 2 1
Description Makes a complete Makes a detailed Makes a detailed Descriptions are not
(20%) and detailed description of most description of detailed or
description of the of the subject some of the complete.
subject matter matter and/or subject matter
and/or elements elements seen in a and/or elements
seen in a work. work. seen in a work.
Interpretation Forms a Student identifies Student can relate Student finds it
(30%) somewhat the literal meaning how the work difficult to interpret
reasonable of the work. makes him/her feel the meaning of the
hypothesis about personally. work.
the symbolic or
metaphorical
meaning and is
able to support
this with evidence
from the work.
Evaluation Uses multiple Uses 1-2 criteria to Tries to use Evaluates work as
(20%) criteria to judge judge the artwork aesthetic criteria to good or bad based
the artwork, such judge artwork, but on personal taste.
as composition, does not apply the
expression, criteria accurately.
creativity, design,
communication of
ideas.
Analysis of Student The student The student The student
Artwork demonstrates demonstrates demonstrates demonstrates very
(30%) understanding of some awareness of satisfactory little awareness of
design elements basic design awareness of the basic design
through the use of elements and was design elements elements and made
correct art able to describe, and briefly no effort to
terminology and discuss, and described, describe, discuss,
was able to clearly interpret artwork. discussed, and and interpret
describe, discuss, interpreted artwork.
and interpret artwork.
artwork.
1 2 3 4
Creativity & Value- The Infographic shows The Infographic The Infographic The presentation shows
Added Content (40%) little creativity in shows little shows average excellent creativity in
design. No personal creativity in creativity in design. There is an
touch or style. design. There is design. There are effective blend of
little sign of imaginative and personal style and
personal touch or personal touches technical knowledge.
style. throughout the
work.
Infographic Elements Shows little knowledge Shows skillful Shows skillful use Shows mastery and
(30%) in use of Infographic knowledge of of Infographic extensive use of
Elements in the Infographic Element in the Infographic Element in the
project. Elements in the project. project.
project.
Layout Principles Shows little knowledge Shows skillful Shows skillful use Shows mastery in
(30%) in utilization of Layout knowledge in utilization of utilization of Layout
Principles in the utilization of Layout Principles Principles in the project.
project. Layout Principles in the project.
in the project.
Group # Members: HUMSS 106 SLS
1 DAVAD, JUNNEL O.
ALCACHUPAS, VAHN YURI J.
DOTAROT, PHOENIX MICHAEL A.
BARUC, ALYSSA JOYCE D.
2 ASOTIGUE, KEINNETH ARGIN M.
GRANADOS, TRISHA MAE S.
PUNO, MICHAEL LAWRENCE F.
SEBUA, IAN ZANDRO D.
3 RAMIREZ, CHARLES EDGAR DAVID J.
ALONTO, AMEENA ALYANNA A.
QUIJANO, BLESSE MILLEN P.
PANGO, NUROL-AINAH P.
4 ACTUB, MICHAEL Y.
TAPUYAO, CHARLES MICHAEL B.
WIDMAIER, VIKTOR EMMANUEL S.
QUIJANO, CHRISTIAN THOMAS L.
5 MILO, SAMANTHA ELIZABETH S.
UY, JO NICOLE D.
SOLARTA, JOHN HENRY D.
6 ZABATE, KHRYS ZAMAIGNE B.
MAMA, HANNA SHAHAREEN S.
MIANO, ELIJAH REGINALD C.
7 BABAN, MAY XENIA YONNE ZARA D.
MA-AMOR, SHANIA AZISA P.
LUZON, ISABELA P.