12 views

Uploaded by National Forum

This case study is a part of the MiddleStart resources of the Mathematics Improvement Toolkit. This case study provides a glimpse into a classroom, and an opportunity to explore how classroom instructional questioning can affect the rigor of a mathematical task for middle-grades students.

- Case Study Sample I-Elementary School
- ipg for act 2
- EDUC 122 Classroom Management Plan
- syllubus
- Adhd
- Syllabus PreAlgebra
- class expectations note 2014 2015
- welcome letter syllabus
- 2017 8th ela syllabus
- Homework Survey PDF
- educ-310 tech-integrated lesson plan
- honors physics syllabus f-18
- mumphrey syllabus
- 2014-2015 syllabus
- msp paper 3
- social studies 9 syllabus
- my wish proposal 2
- worldhistorysyllabus
- ClassExpectSpan1year.doc
- whittier elementary school newsletter april 2015

You are on page 1of 4

middlestart

This mini-case provides an introduction to the use of cases as a reflective professional development tool, and is not intended

for sustained use. This also uses student work examples to explore understandings and misconceptions around fractions,

percents, and decimals.

David Orcutt is one of two 7th grade mathematics teachers in the lone junior high school for this

district. The district serves students from a largely rural agricultural and recreational area which

includes two villages. The school is a 7-8 school in a small school building next to the district’s

high school. In fact, a number of teachers are on the faculty of both schools to provide appropriate

coverage for topic areas. David has four classes among his other duties as the 7th grade advisor

and a track coach.

In his three years of teaching, he has learned that students coming in from the two K-6 schools in

the district (as well as a small but growing migrant labor population that is becoming a more

permanent fixture in the area) often have varying skills and understanding in mathematics. To

understand each of the student’s abilities and conceptions about basic topics, he has devised a

two week introduction to his course which addresses a different topic from the grade 4-6

standards each day or two, and uses this to establish norms for classroom participation, work

expectations, etc. The following sample of classroom interaction starts by asking students to take

out the homework task from the previous day, which was really a pre-assessment of sorts to

understand student knowledge of decimals, percents, and fractions.

CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES

David starts class by greeting all students at the door as they come in, and has a problem on the

board, which he reminds students to get a paper out and copy the problem down after they have

taken their homework out from the previous day. Meanwhile, he checks attendance and missing

assignments from the previous day, and then begins wandering through the aisles to see what

students are doing with the problems on the board, and whether they have their homework out.

He quickly scans the homework for each student, noting whether they have all twenty problems

done, and whether they have them numbered, the problem written down, and the answer

underlined for each. Most do, which results in him writing a “10” on the top of the page, but a

couple did not finish, receiving 5 and 7 points respectively, and three others had 3 points deducted

from these for not organizing their work properly. For these, David underlined a few of the answers

they had in their work that were not already underlined, and had jotted down the words “show your

steps” on some of these papers. While doing this, he marked on a copy of a grade sheet the

points for the homework assignment for each student.

Following this fairly quick review (which took four minutes from the time he started moving around

the room), he told the students they would review the answers of the homework. He circled the

room as he called out problem numbers, and would look around the room to see who was looking

at him (or not) and would call out the names of students to state what their answer was. Once one

student gave the answer, he would call on two other students and ask if they came up with the

same answer as the original student, or if they had something different. At every problem in which

all students agreed on the answer, he would quickly ask if any other answers were out there, and

unless a quick response came, he would say “correct” and repeat the problem number and

answer and move on. When students disagreed, he would quickly survey students in the room to

see which of the stated answers other students got, or, what other answers people came up with,

and unless it seemed that one was an outlier, would note that problem number of the whiteboard,

so that the class could go through it after checking homework. Six of the problems were noted on

the board, and he they asked, problem by problem, if there were any volunteers to go to the board

and do the problem. Two of the problems had no volunteers, so he asked one student what

answer they got for the problem, then asked if anyone had a different answer, and had both (or

more if several different answers arose) go up to the board to write their explanation or procedures

for the problem.

One of the two problems that had contested answers was the following:

Emma was asked to order the following numbers from smallest to largest: .43, 8%, and .7

Emma’s order was: .7, 8%, .43

Is she correct? Why or why not?

Two students wrote their answers on the board initially as shown below.

Student D: No because .43 is just about half and .7 is almost full and 8% is like 8 1s. .43 .7 8%

DO: “So, what do we think everyone. We have two answers here. What do we think?”

H: “Well, sort of right. Emma didn’t get the right answer, but [D] didn’t get it right either.”

DO: “[F], what you you think? You said Emma got the right answer. Explain what you said.”

F: “Well, the numbers get larger, um, in Emma’s order, and, um, the dots and percents are the

same cause you can change from dots to percents and so I, um put them in order, and so, um, 7

is smallest, then 8, then 43.”

H: “But they aren’t the same. Dots are two places different.”

DO: “[D], what do you think? You said Emma wasn’t right, just like [H], but she said you weren’t

either. What do you think?”

D: “I was just trying to see what they are close to, and .43 is close to .5, which is a half. .7 is

bigger. It is nearly a whole thing, and definitely more than half. The percents don’t have the

decimals, so I thought 8% is like 8 whole things. But I think [H] is kinda right, um, ‘cause you have

to do move the dot two places.”

DO: “Let’s see what someone else says. [G], how about you? What did you say?”

G: “I said Emma was wrong. It should be 8%, .43, .7 in that order because I put them all in

percents.”

DO: “Aha. There we go. You put them all in percents. All in the same units. That is exactly what

we want to do when we have decimals and percents together is put them in the same units. [H], is

that what you meant? Is that what you did?”

H: “Yeah, I made them all the same, but I didn’t do percents. I changed percents to fractions, so

they were all some part of 100.”

DO: “Excellent. There we go. We want to change them all to the same, and the best way is to

change them to fractions. Since we have percents, we should change them to parts of 100. That

is what percents really are. They are parts of 100. So, when you have all of your test right, for

instance, you have 100%. You get everything out of 100. So, how do we want to change these to

fractions of 100?”

C: (called on after raising hand) “If it is one place. like .7 was, that is 7 out of 10, because the first

place is tenths. Then hundredths. so we could add a zero to the end of that, because .7 is the

same as .70, and that is seventy out of a hundred.”

DO: “Great. That’s exactly it. Are we okay? Can we move on?”

No responses, so they go on to the next question. Shortly thereafter, David moves through the

other answers, and to the boardwork task. This task is written on the board already. It was

modified by David from a task he had seen in a workshop focusing on differentiation, which was

addressing visual learners. The original task from the workshop is below.

Shade 10 of the small squares in the rectangle shown below. Using the diagram, explain how to determine

each of the following: a) the percent area that is shaded, b) the decimal part of the area that is shaded, and

c) the fractional part of the area that is shaded.

Shade 10 of the boxes in the rectangle shown below (same rectangle). Find the percent area that is shaded.

David says that, in the interest of time, he is going to go through it, and asks students to watch.

He shades in 10 of the rectangles, picking them at random, and shading individual rectangles.

DO: “So, it really doesn’t matter which ones I pick, it will be the same. What I really care about is

how many total ones we have. [A], how many total boxes are there?”

A: “40”

A: “I counted ten across, and there are four rows, so it was four times ten.”

DO: “Exactly... or you could count everyone of them if you didn’t figure that out. So, what next

(looking at A)?”

A: “Well, it is a quarter. There are 10 out of 40, and if we write that as a fraction (DO pauses A with

a hand gesture and writes this on the board as the fraction 10/40, and then motions for him to

proceed)... so yeah, that’s it. And then you can cross out the zeros, cause 10 out of 40 is like 1

out of 4, and that’s a quarter. And a quarter is always 25%.”

DO: “Exactly. Does everyone see that? Once [A] got it to a fraction, he could easily change it to a

percent. If it was a fraction you didn’t know already, like... suppose we had 12 shaded boxes

instead? You could make it 12 out of 40, and then cross multiply to figure out the number out of

100 (as he draws on the board ‘12/40 = n/100’ and then proceeds to write, ’12 x 100 = n x 40’),

and so in this case you could multiple 12 and 100...[A], what is that?”

DO: “and divide that by 40 and we would get 30. Thirty percent... if it was twelve out of 100.” Do

you all see that?

The class seems to agree quietly, and David moves on to the next part of class...

- Case Study Sample I-Elementary SchoolUploaded byNorsiah Shukeri
- ipg for act 2Uploaded byapi-291180188
- EDUC 122 Classroom Management PlanUploaded byChelsea Coop
- syllubusUploaded byapi-298980694
- AdhdUploaded bydr.faramroze
- Syllabus PreAlgebraUploaded bywcsjhall
- class expectations note 2014 2015Uploaded byapi-266077382
- welcome letter syllabusUploaded byapi-281499206
- 2017 8th ela syllabusUploaded byapi-370303991
- Homework Survey PDFUploaded bysamjshah
- educ-310 tech-integrated lesson planUploaded byapi-393464195
- honors physics syllabus f-18Uploaded byapi-122068691
- mumphrey syllabusUploaded byapi-291287741
- 2014-2015 syllabusUploaded byapi-236043687
- msp paper 3Uploaded byapi-383897639
- social studies 9 syllabusUploaded byapi-328809137
- my wish proposal 2Uploaded byapi-456817519
- worldhistorysyllabusUploaded byapi-251890498
- ClassExpectSpan1year.docUploaded bywyttap
- whittier elementary school newsletter april 2015Uploaded byapi-278578531
- first day syllabusUploaded byapi-326557333
- campbells syllabus personal finance 2016 17Uploaded byapi-340349563
- m e s s curriculumUploaded byapi-308245690
- parents nigh2014Uploaded byapi-232983424
- Encuadre English 5 Ago-dic 10Uploaded byBatistaAndriassi
- Math 1B SyllabusUploaded byjmlynczyk
- chemUploaded byjose_dino10005190
- student survey analysis paperUploaded byapi-241875093
- syllabusUploaded byapi-259398839
- sample behavior contractUploaded byandreavonb

- Math for ELL Students Facilitator Guide AppendixUploaded byNational Forum
- Webinar Handout - Collaboration and Co-Teaching in the Math ClassroomUploaded byNational Forum
- Webinar Handout - Developing Student Understanding in MathematicsUploaded byNational Forum
- Math for ELL Students Workshop 1 Participant HandoutsUploaded byNational Forum
- EF Student BookletUploaded byNational Forum
- Intro Math Understanding ModuleUploaded byNational Forum
- Math for ELL Students Workshop 1 Facilitators' GuideUploaded byNational Forum
- Math for ELL Students Workshop 2 HandoutsUploaded byNational Forum
- 09.09.09 Facilitator's Guide to Turning Points ToolUploaded byNational Forum
- Math for ELL Students Workshop 2 Facilitator's GuideUploaded byNational Forum
- Language in Math Facilitator GuideUploaded byNational Forum

- Senarai Nilai Taraf BI (Mac 2018)Uploaded bydanielwwcheong8981
- Sing to the Dawn - TextUploaded byZatil Akmar
- districtUploaded byapi-279666965
- 622 client report packet reading 1Uploaded byapi-356205235
- study of the effect of achievement motivation among birth ordersUploaded byapi-302419940
- sasha sproge siestaUploaded byapi-263381597
- Assessing Speaking IELTSUploaded bySam Kadado
- creativeproject-diane 1Uploaded byapi-315960073
- Introduction to Teaching English_Hadfield.pdfUploaded byCeltaEssentials
- Reflections on the Alternative Learning SystemUploaded byMARCIANO A. PAROY JR.
- Write an account of experience on Teacher.docxUploaded byanniedream
- STUDY OF THE DROPOUT LEVEL OF PRIMARY STUDENTS IN UTTARAKHAND REGIONUploaded byAnonymous CwJeBCAXp
- assessment philosophyUploaded byapi-295843914
- Essentials of CommunicationUploaded byAparajita Roy
- EventsUploaded byLance Malvar Pasico
- 21 CLD 170316Uploaded byMichelle Horn
- Affton School District Directory 2013-14Uploaded bytimesnewspapers
- XI Part 3 Asam Basa EnglishUploaded byZakiyah
- 141. Who is Dr Shirley McCune?Uploaded byCazzac111
- lesson plan secondary 1Uploaded byapi-263117400
- Lesson Plan 2013Uploaded bychinyang21
- Materials for starting a schoolUploaded byJk McCrea
- expectations packetUploaded byapi-294397535
- 1db89fa9-3d46-40b5-95fd-2d5c689c2b9dUploaded byAlex Morales
- SOE Programme GuideUploaded byYeong Leong Lim
- EMC LessonplanUploaded byRyan Williams
- shannon m daly official resumeUploaded byapi-252900805
- lesson plan april 7Uploaded byapi-354285005
- Brighter Grammar Volume 1Uploaded byahmed1581973
- michelle jingco letter of recUploaded byapi-201346341