Professional Documents
Culture Documents
We will start off examining the waveguide properties of a slab of dielectric shown in Fig. 1.1.
x
n1
z
d n2
n1
½
n2 , |x| < d/2
n(x) = (1.1)
n1 , else
We will initial look at the light traveling in the slab as a propagating ray. Even though this is not technically
accurate, it provides some intuitive feel for what is going on. Figure 1.2 shows that if the propagation angle
is greater than the critical angle then the ray will bounce off of the surface and will be conned to the core
region. Therefore, the propagation is conned to be
µ ¶
−1 n2
θ1 > θc = sin . (1.2)
n1
In order to maintain that the propagation angle is greater than the critical angle, the entrance angle into the
optical ber must be less than θa .
sin θa = n2 sin (90 − θ1 ) (1.3)
θ1>θc
cladding n1
Since θ1 > θc
n=1.0
n1
θ1=θc
θa 90−θc n2
n1
In addition to requiring the propagation angle to be greater than the critical angle, there are also only a
descrete set of propagaton angles that remain in phase as illustrated in Fig. 1.4. These allowable propagation
angles are called the modes of the waveguide.
In this ray optics analysis the The particular modes of a waveguide can be characterized by their propagation
angle. The mode can be thought of as a plane wave that is either traveling upwards or downwards in the
waveguide. The resulting plane waves are given by
The mode is essentially a standing wave pattern in the x-direction and a traveling wave in the z -direction as
given by
n2 d
θθ
n1
Figure 1.4: The rays must remain in phase after multiple reections.
β = ko n2 sin θ1 . (1.12)
If you divide the propagation angle by the free-space wavevector you get the effective index of the mode as
given by
β
nef f ≡ . (1.17)
ko
Now that we have a qualitative understanding of waveguide modes, we want to calculate the exact values
of the supported mode, which we will characterize by the propagation constant βm and the transverse mode
eld Em (x).
We start with Maxwell's equations in the sinusoidal steady state.
∇ × H = jω²E (1.21)
∇ × ∇ × E = −jωµ∇ × H (1.22)
2
= −jωµ(jω²E) = ω µ²E (1.23)
so that
∇(∇ · E) − ∇2 E = ω 2 µ²E (1.25)
¡ ¢
From Gauss' law we get ∇ · D = 0 since ρv = 0. Since D = ²E we get ∇ · ²E = 0. If ² is independent
¡ ¢
of position then we can pull it outside of the spatial derivatives resulting in ² ∇ · E = 0 and thus
∇ · E = 0. (1.26)
Plugging Eq. 1.26 into Eq. 1.25 and rearranging results in the Homogeneous Wave Equation given by
∇2 E + ω 2 µ²E = 0 (1.27)
Since the waveguide is homogeneous along the z axis, solutions to the wave equation can be taken as
Plugging the general eld solutions into the wave equation (Eq. 1.27) results in
∂2 ∂2
E + E + ko2 n2i E = 0 (1.32)
∂x2 ∂z 2
∂2
E + (−jβ)2 + ko2 n2i E = 0 (1.33)
∂x2
∂2 ¡ 2 2 2
¢
E + k o ni − β E=0 (1.34)
∂x2
where ni is either n1 or n2 depending on which region we are dening the eld in.
For the elds in the core region (|x| < d/2) ni = n2 and the solution is given by
or
where
q
h= ko2 n22 − β 2 (1.37)
For the elds in the cladding region (|x| > d/2) ni = n1 and the solution is given by
where
q
g = ko2 n21 − β 2 . (1.39)
However, since β > ko n1 the argument of the square root is actually negative resulting in
where
q
q= β 2 − ko2 n21 . (1.41)
d
A sin hx + B cos hx |x| < 2
d
Em (x) = C exp(−qx) x> 2 (1.42)
D exp(qx) x < − d2
The unknowns are A, B , C , D, q , and h. The solution of the unknows requires applying the boundary
conditions. Since the boundary conditions depend on the vector quantities, we will break up the mode
into two orthogonal polarization cases. The directions of both the electric and magnetic elds need to be
perpendicular to the rays shown in Fig. 1.4.
One possible solution is to have the electric eld in the ŷ -direction. In this case the electric eld is per-
pedicular to the direction of power ow (z -direction). This case is called Transverse Electric (TE). For
TE-polarization the magnetic eld has both x and z components.
The other case is when the magnetic eld is in the ŷ -direction. In this case the magnetic eld is per-
pedicular to the direction of power ow (z -direction). This case is called Transverse Magnetic (TM). For
TM-polarization the magnetic eld has both x and z
∇×E
H= (1.44)
−jωµ
resulting in
j ∂Ey
Hz (x) = . (1.45)
ωµ ∂x
The boundary conditions are that the tangential components of both E and H are equal across a boundary.
The continuity of the tangential components of the magnetic magnetic eld essentially becomes continuity
of the derivative of the electric eld across the boundary resulting in
µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶
1 1 1
hA cos hd − hB sin hd = −qC exp − qd (1.48)
2 2 2
at x = d/2 and
µ ¶ µ ¶ µ ¶
1 1 1
hA cos hd + hB sin hd = qD exp − qd (1.49)
2 2 2
at x = −d/2.
These four equations can be combined to produce
µ ¶ µ ¶
1 1
2A sin hd = (C − D) exp − qd (1.50)
2 2
µ ¶ µ ¶
1 1
2hA cos hd = −q (C − D) exp − qd (1.51)
2 2
µ ¶ µ ¶
1 1
2B cos hd = (C + D) exp − qd (1.52)
2 2
µ ¶ µ ¶
1 1
2hB sin hd = q (C + D) exp − qd (1.53)
2 2
There are now four unknowns (A or B , C , h, and q ). The rst term (A or B ) can be thought of as the
amplitude of the mode. Let call this term Eo . The last two terms (h and q ) are both related to β so they are
actually only one unknown. Let's combine these two together as given by
¡ 2 2 ¢ ¡ ¢
h2 + q 2 = ko n2 − β 2 + β 2 − ko2 n21 − β 2 (1.56)
and C is just the continutity of the electric eld at the boundary. Putting all of this together we get
d
E1 e½−qx−jβz ¾ x> 2
sin hx
E0 e−jβz |x| ≤ d
Ey = ½ cos
¾ hx (1.58)
−
E1 e+qx−jβz x < − d2
+
where
µ ¶ ½ ¾
qd sin hd
2
E1 exp − = Eo (1.59)
2 cos hd
2
µ ¶½ ¾
qd sin hd
2
E1 = Eo exp . (1.60)
2 cos hd
2
Since the argument of the tan and cot is in terms of hd/2 we will plot the term qd/2 along the x-axis and
hd/2 along the y -axis. The rst equations becomes
µ ¶2 µ ¶2
hd qd 1 ¡ ¢
+ = 2
(ko n2 d)2 − (ko n1 d)2 (1.63)
2 2 2
³ π ´2 ¡ ¢
= d n22 − n21 ≡ V 2 (1.64)
λ
¡ ¢
h2 + q 2 = ko2 n22 − n21 ⇒ x2 + y 2 = V 2 (1.71)
µ ¶
hd
h tan =q ⇒ x tan (x) = y (1.72)
2
µ ¶
hd
−h cot =q ⇒ −x cot (x) = y (1.73)
2
The zero crossing of the tan are 0, π, ...mπ and the zeros of the cot are π2 , π2 , 3π π
2 , ... 2 (1 + 2m).
1.3.2 TM Modes
We can repeat the whole process for TM modes. In this case, we have
j ∂
Ex (x, z, t) = Hy (1.75)
ωµ ∂z
j ∂
Ez (x, z, t) = − Hy (1.76)
ωµ ∂x
and
d
A sin hx + B cos hx |x| < 2
Hm (x) = C exp(−qx) x > d2 (1.77)
D exp(qx) x < − d2
µ ¶
1 n2
h tan hd = 22 q (1.78)
2 n1
µ ¶
1 n2
h cot hd = − 22 q (1.79)
2 n1
What are the physical meanings of h, q , and β ? If we look back at the ray optics treatment, then β is the
z -component of the wave, h is the x-component, and q species the rate at which the eld decays with
distance away from the core.
β ≡ kz (1.80)
h ≡ kx (1.81)
q≡α (1.82)
How many modes exist in a dielectric waveguide that has the following parameters? index of refraction of
the coren1 = 1.6, index of refraction of the cladding n2 = 1.5, wavelength λ = 1.0µm, waveguide core
thickness 2d = 10µm.
y = x tan x (1.86)
y = −x cot x (1.87)
¡ ¢
x + y = (ko d)2 n21 − n22
2 2
(1.88)
q
2π 10
r = n21 − n22 (1.89)
1.0 2
r = 17.5µm (1.90)
π 3π 5π
The equation x tan x is equal to zero when x = 0π , 2π , 3π , ... mπ and is equal to ∞ when x = 2, 2 , 2 ,
π
...
2 + mπ .
π 3π 5π π
The equation −x cot x is equal to zero when x = 2 , 2 , 2 , ... 2 + mπ and is equal to ∞ when x = π , 2π ,
3π , ... mπ . And when x = 0 −x cot x = −1.
In practice most slab waveguides are asymmetric. An asymmetric slab waveguide is given by
n1 , x<0
n(x) = n2 , −t < x < 0 (1.94)
n3 , x < −t
Sometimes rather than using n1 , n2 , and n3 these indices are labeled as cover index nc , waveguide index nw ,
and substrate index ns . If we assume that n1 < n3 < n2 then the range for β is given by ko n3 < β < ko n2 .
The process used to calculate the mode eld prole is similar to the process describe above except that the
boundary conditions will be different at the top and bottom boundary.
i ∂Hy β
Ex (x, z, t) = = hm (x)ej(ωt−βz) (1.102)
ωµ ∂z ωµ
j ∂Hy
Ez (x, z, t) = − ² (1.103)
ω ∂x
where
n22
q̄ ≡ q (1.105)
n21
n2
p̄ ≡ 22 p (1.106)
n3
The mode condition equation is given by
h(p̄ + q̄)
tan(ht) = (1.107)
h2 − p̄q̄
A slab waveguide only connes light in one dimension. In practive it is necessary to conne light in both di-
rections. Exact analytic treatment of rectangular dielectric waveguides is not possible for arbitrary structures.
These type of waveguides can be analyzed using numerical techniques. There are also several approximate
analytical approaches. One of the simplest approaches is the effective index theory.
Figure 1.5 shows a ridge waveguide. The three regions of the ridge waveguide (I, II, I) are treated as slab
waveguides resulting in three different effective indices (nef f,I , nef f,II , and nef f,I ). Referring to Fig. 1.5
nef f,I is calculated by solving for the mode of a slab waveguide with a thickness of d and for nef f,II the
waveguide thickness is t. The ridge waveguide effective index is then calculated by treating the effective
indices as the cover, waveguide, and substrate indices with the waveguide thickness being the ridge width a.
n1
t
n2 d
a
n3
I II I
y=-a/2 y=a/2
Example: Consider a ridge waveguide made of GaAs (n = 3.5) waveguiding layer on an AlGaAs (n = 3.2)
substrate. The thicknesses are t = 0.4λ, d = 0.25λ, and a = 0.5λ.