You are on page 1of 3

N199

Nursing Research Overview


VM Manila
November 15, 2010
RESEARCH  “A systematic search for knowledge about issues of
 A systematic inquiry that uses disciplined methods to importance to nursing”
answer questions or solve problems. (Polit and Beck,  “A study of the problems in practice relating to effects”
2004)  “It is a systematic inquiry that validates and refines
 Ultimate goal: develop, refine, expand the body of existing knowledge and generates new knowledge that
knowledge directly and indirectly influences nursing practice. “

NURSING RESEARCH Diagram for Nursing Research (Manila, 2010)


 The nurse and the significance of research
 Nursing Research defined Existing New NURSING
 Paradigms and Methods in research Knowledge Knowledge PROFESSION
 Purposes of Nursing Research
 Challenges of Nursing Research
Systematic -education
Why should nurses do research?: The nurse and the Inquiry -administration
significance of research -informatics
 Professionalism - PRACTICE
o Explain and understand phenomena Validation
o Describe characteristics of a particular nursing
situation Refinement
o Inform clinical decision
 Accountability
o Provide basis for actions
Paradigms and Methods in Research
o Prevent undesired outcomes
Assumptions
o Produce positive patient-care outcomes
 Ontologic – nature of phenomena
 Social Relevance
 Epistologic – relationship of investigator  investigated
o Cost-effective care
 Axiologic - values implicated
o Benefit not only patients but also other
stakeholders  Methodologic – how phenomena occurs

“ 85% of health care practice has not been scientifically Two Alternative Paradigms
validated “ – Millenson, 1997
QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE
Sources of Evidence for Nursing Practice
 Traditions POSITIVIST NATURALISTIC
 Colleagues
o Authority
o Borrowing
o Role Modeling Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Designs
 Clinical experience
o Intuitions Quantitative Qualitative
o Trial and Error Generalizability Individual
o Logical Reasoning Empirical Evidence Experiences
 Inductive Systematic Progressive
 Deductive Field Control
 Assembled Information Objective Subjectively valued
 Disciplined Research One reality Multiple Realities
Reduction, control, Discovery, description,
Nursing Research Defined
prediction understanding
 “It is a systematic inquiry designed to develop knowledge
Measurable
about issues of importance to the nursing profession,
Mechanistic Organismic
including nursing practice, education, administration, and
Parts equal to whole Whole is greater than parts
informatics.”
Report statistical analyses Repirt rich narative
 “A systematic study of problems in patient care”
Researcher separate Researched part of research
process

Page 1 of 3
N199
Nursing Research Overview
VM Manila
November 15, 2010
Subjects Participants predict that a woman aged 40 years is at
Context free Context dependent higher risk of bearing a child with Down’s
syndrome than a woman aged 25 years. The
Purposes of Nursing Research incidence of Down’s may be partially
 Identification and Description controlled by educating women about the
Identification risks.
o “What is this phenomenon?”
o “What is its name?” Challenges in Nursing Research
o Example: Dewar (2003) 1. Conceptual
 in-depth study in Canada to determine 2. Financial
how individuals were able to live with 3. Administrative
catastrophic illnesses and injuries. 4. Practical
 She called one of the strategies they 5. Clinical
used boosting – people’s efforts to 6. Methodologic
improve their self-esteem, which o Measurement
helped o Control
Description
o “How prevalent is the phenomenon?” Methodologic Challenges – Measurement Problems
o “What is the characteristics of the  Quantitative: Validity & Reliability
phenomenon?”  Qualitative: Trustworthiness
o “What are the dimensions of the
phenomenon?” Methodologic Problems – Control Problems
o “What variations exist?”  Holding extraneous variables constant
o Example: Bohachick, Taylor, Sereika, Reeder,  Reducing Bias
and Anton (2002)
 Conducted a study to describe ETHICS IN RESEARCH
quantitative changes in psychological
well- being and psychological resources The Nuremberg Code
6 months after a heart transplantation 1. Voluntary consent of the human subject
 Exploration 2. Experiment results should be for the good of society
o “What factors are related to the phenomenon?” 3. Experiment on humans should be based on animal
o “What is really happening?” experimentation
o Example: Reynolds and Neidig (2002): 4. Experiment should avoid unnecessary physical and
 studied the incidence and severity of mental suffering/injury
nausea accompanying combinative 5. Experiment should not be done if it will cause
antiretroviral therapies among HIV- death/disability
infected patients, and explored 6. Risk must not exceed humanitarian importance of
patterns of nausea in relation to research
patient characteristics. 7. Proper preparations & adequate facilities
 Explanation 8. Experiment done only by qualified persons
o Systematic relationships, associations, causation 9. Subjects must be free to end participation
o “How does the phenomenon work?” 10. Scientist must be prepared to terminate the experiment
o Example (McGinley, 2004): at any stage, if needed
 undertook a study designed to explain
women’s use of hormone replacement Declaration of Helsinki
therapy on the basis of their health  Developed by the World Medical Association (WMA),
beliefs and views about menopause. adopted 1964, amended 6 times (1975, 1983, 1989,
1996, 2000, 2008)
 Prediction and Control  Expanded the 10 Nuremberg principles
o “Will the intervention alter the phenomenon?”  Basic text for international guidelines such as CIOMS,
o “How can we alter the prevalence of the EHO Guidelines for GCP for trials, ICH Tripartite
phenomenon?”
o Example: Belmont Report
 Research showed that the incidence of  Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of
Down syndrome in infants increases with Human Subjects of Research (April 18, 1979)
the age of the mother. Therefore, we can  articulated 3 primary ethical principles:

Page 2 of 3
N199
Nursing Research Overview
VM Manila
November 15, 2010
o Beneficence
o Respect for persons/human dignity Institutional Review Board (IRB)
o Justice  IRB conducts ethical review of all studies involving
human subjects
Principle of Beneficence  In cases where the study involves only minimal risk an
 Freedom from harm including physical, psychological and expedited review maybe done (done by only one
economic harm member of IRB)
 Freedom from psychological harm can be observed by:
o Carefully phrasing questions REFERENCES
o Debriefing sessions- permit participants to ask  Burns, N. and Grove, S.K. (2007). Understanding Nursing
questions or air complaints after data are Research: Building an Evidence-Based practice (4th ed.).
collected St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Saunders.
 Obligation to maximize benefits and minimize harm  Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (2006). Essentials of nursing
research: methods, appraisal, and utilization (6th ed.).
Beneficence: Risk-Benefit Ratio Philadephia, PA: Lippincott
 May want to consider how comfortable s/he would feel if  Schiller, Rosemary (2010). Nursing Research Definitions.
it were family members participating in the study www39.homepage.villanova.edu.
 Risks are commensurate with the benefit  Tejero, Lourdes (2009). Nursing Research Overview.
 The selection of a significant topic is the first step in Lecture slides for Nursing Research, N199 SY 2009-2010.
ensuring that the research is ethical

Principle of Respect for Human Dignity Where do you search for Research Topics?
 Right to self-determination  Your own thoughts, observations and experiences
 Participants have the right to ask questions or to refuse  Review of literature
to give information  Theories/ concepts e.g. role theory, the sick role, the
 Participants have the right to terminate their nurse’s role, the interaction between the patient’s role
participation and the nurse’s role
 Right to full- disclosure  Testing assessment and intervention strategies

Respect for Human Dignity: Freedom from Exploitation UPCN research priorities
 Should not place participants at a disadvantage or expose  Nursing information system
them to situations for which they have not been  Human resource supply and demand
prepared  Health promotion
 Assurance that data gathered will not be used against  Elderly care
participants  Chronically- ill clients
 The researcher should not exploit the nurse-patient  MDGs
bond; participants must understand that the nurse is the
researcher Criteria for Selecting a Research Topic
 Relevance and significance
Vulnerable Groups for Research
 Avoidance of duplication
 Children
 Feasibility- personnel, time, equipment, money,
 Mentally/emotionally disabled persons
availability of study participants
 Physically disabled persons
 Political Acceptability
 Prisoners
 Ethical acceptability
 Hospitalized persons (may feel pressured to participate)
 Capability of researcher
 Pregnant women

Principle of Justice
 The right to fair treatment before, during and after
participation in the study
 The right to privacy
 Informed consent
 Informed consent must be documented
 Prospective participants must have ample time to review
the consent form

Page 3 of 3

You might also like