The increasing dominance of private capital in the past 25 years has not had the anticipated impact on poverty alleviation. The resurgent left has mostly resorted to repackagings of historically low impact formulations such as, hybrid PPPs, selective re--nationalisations to cite a few. But these approaches are not only unlikely to bridge the growing chasm, but will not excite the owners / managers of capital.
Original Description:
Original Title
The Social Enterprise and the Developmental State - The SE Space
The increasing dominance of private capital in the past 25 years has not had the anticipated impact on poverty alleviation. The resurgent left has mostly resorted to repackagings of historically low impact formulations such as, hybrid PPPs, selective re--nationalisations to cite a few. But these approaches are not only unlikely to bridge the growing chasm, but will not excite the owners / managers of capital.
The increasing dominance of private capital in the past 25 years has not had the anticipated impact on poverty alleviation. The resurgent left has mostly resorted to repackagings of historically low impact formulations such as, hybrid PPPs, selective re--nationalisations to cite a few. But these approaches are not only unlikely to bridge the growing chasm, but will not excite the owners / managers of capital.
Social
Enterprise
and
the
Developmental
State
(1):
the emergence of the Social Enterprise
…….mobilising
capital
for
transformative
social
impact……
The
increasing
dominance
of
private
capital
in
the
past
25
years
has
not
had
the
anticipated
impact
on
poverty
alleviation.
One
of
the
consequences
of
the
prevailing
‘Washington
Consensus’,
is
the
mismatch
between
needs
and
investment
in
social
infrastructure.
Not
having
benefitted
from
the
postWW2
Marshall
Plan-‐type
social
spending
bonanza,
this
discrepancy
is
greatest
in
newly
emerging
economies.
The
resulting
widening
of
socio-‐economic
disparities
represent
the
most
persistent
danger
to
overall
socio-‐political
cohesion,
particularly
in
the
context
of
South
Africa’s
still
fragile
political
dispensation.
This
leads
to
an
increase
in
both
the
perceived
and
real
risks
of
doing
business
in
jurisdictions
such
as
SA.
Indeed,
unless
we
can
devise
and
promptly
implement
approaches
that
reverse
these
increasingly
embedded
social
dysfunctions,
the
risk
related
returns
to
traditional
investors
will
be
significantly
undermined.
Thus
it
is
in
the
interest
of
all,
especially
traditional
capital,
to
support
solutions
that
promise
sustainable,
even
unconventional,
social
solutions.
And
while
neo-‐liberal
recipes
are
increasingly
critiqued,
the
resurgent
left
has
mostly
resorted
to
repackagings
of
historically
low
impact
formulations
such
as,
hybrid
PPPs,
selective
re-‐ nationalisations
to
cite
a
few.
Based
on
their
historical
track
records,
these
approaches
are
not
only
unlikely
to
bridge
the
growing
chasm,
but
will
not
excite
the
owners/managers
of
capital.
On
the
other
hand,
over
the
past
two
decades
there
has
been
a
rising
flood
of
non-‐sovereign
capital
into
the
developmental
space,
currently
USD10-‐20bn
per
annum
by
some
estimates.
Increasingly
these
flows
are
directed
by
individuals
such
as
Gates
who
bring
a
recent
history
of
operational
management
of
private
companies.
Thus,
not
only
do
the
challenges
require
sustainable
socially-‐biased
models,
but
capital
providers
are
more
likely
to
respond
to
approaches
that
credibly
promise
longterm,
replicable
solutions.
It
is
in
this
context
that
a
space,
Social
Entrepreneurialism,
is
coalescing
to
foster
and
replicate
high
Social
Value
Add
enterprises
–
those
whose
raison
d’etre
is
provide
social
goods
and
services
to
the
poor.
The
distinguishing
element
of
this
economic
genre
is
the
primacy
of
its
social
outcomes
in
the
context
of
operational
effectiveness,
financially
sustainability
and
entity
replicability.
This
contrasts
the
incidental
accrual
of
CSI-‐type
social
benefits
of
traditional
corporates.
NGOs
and
Civil
Society
entities
generally
have
a
primary
focus
on
social
value
outcomes
but
either
don’t,
or
are
unable
to,
place
this
in
a
framework
of
sustainability
and
replicability.
As
the
State
is
increasingly
proscribed
by
policy
choice
or
conditional
relationships
from
providing
key
aspects
of
social
infrastructure
necessary
to
underpin
stable
socio-‐economic
development
and
the
markets
are
not
persuaded
by
the
lower
financial
returns
available,
Social
Entrepreneurship
represents
a
complementary
and
necessary
economic
formulation,
in
the
arsenal
of
the
modern
developmental
state.
This
device
has
required
a
new
resource
underpinning
-‐
it
is
into
this
space
that
Social
Private
Equity
has
emerged.