Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ON
CASE ANALYSIS
CASE NO. _1_
In the Title of
“Mrs. Fields cookies”________
Submitted to
Presented by
____ASIFALI SAIYED_____
M.B.A. (10-12) Semester – I ID NO:.10MBA094
December 2010
DECLARTATION
This case is talking about the Mrs. Fields cookies business. Mrs. Field after
getting marriage with randy fields started cookie business with the borrowing of
$ 50000 in august 1977 and she got good response in California so she decided
to expand her business and open second store in san Francisco in 1980. there
were 14 stores in 1981.
Initially fields got very difficulty for getting financial support but afterwards they
easily got from the public. Revenue of Mrs. Fields business increasing year by
year. She believed that more managing people less to managing key business
process. So she staffed store clerks, store manager and district and regional
manager. And all the executive had to provide daily reports to their to their
executives. There was an 100% lobour turnover in the cookies business. All
employees getting good salary and sometime also bonus if they meet their sales
quotas. Mr. fields use policy of promote from within which placed on loyalty.
Controllers have to provide daily reports to the aggregate level. In MIS system of
the fields business most of the employees were depend on a technology, so they
could lose their creativity. Randy believed in keeping small group of people for
working who can take quick decision. Mrs. Fields cookies stores typically divided
in to 2 areas. Field using the strategy of mixing information. It tells manager
answers how many cookies to baked per hours and what the projected sales per
hour was. The manager would enter the types of cookies to be made on that day
and the system would respond with the number of batches to mix and when to
mix them. Managers communicating through email.
In April 1987, randy reduce the subsidiaries administrative staff from 53 to 3 and
left 2 people in operation and 1 in R&D. Debbie was involved with designing the
new combinations stores. And planned to have existing senior managers work in
them. For a moth or two, in order to become familiar with their operation. Randy
viewed as record revenues were reported by the press as a record losses in
1988.
TABLE_OF_CONTENTS
Preface
Declaration
Executive Summary
3. Case Analysis
• Identify Problem
• Establish Problem
• Define Objectives
• Generate Alternatives
• Evaluate alternatives
• Prioritize Alternatives
4. Comments
ABOUT THE CASE
Probable Dimensions
• Mrs. Fields started business in august 1977 and got good response. Their
objective was not to make money, the point was to bake great cookies
and sacrifiese for that principle.
• Mrs. Field open second store in San Francisco in more than year passed
of first store. And others in northern California in 1980.
• By 1981, company had 14 stores.
• The field tried to attract shopping malls manager at 1982 trade show in
Las Vegas.
• The international expansion of mrs. Fields business came in 1982 in
Japan, Hong Kong and Australia.
• Mrs. Fields cookies came in 14 verities which followed by Brownies,
muffins, ice candies and ice cream in 1988. 80% of Mrs. Fields outlets
were in malls.
• Mrs. Field delegate authority for growing the business.
• They did not believe in giving franchise.
• In 1987 randy announced the future growth would be funded by cash flow
and debt. not by further public offering.
• At the year end 1987, field introduce store staffs.
• The average no. of stores under the supervisor of a district sales manager
decreased from 5.3 to 4.2 in 1987.
• In 1987, randy reduced the subsidiary administrative staff.
• In April 1987, mrs. Fields company acquire 119 stores of French bakery
and La Petite Boulangerie.
• In the year 1988, Company expanded its portfolio by entering into Candies
and Ice Cream segment.
CASE ANALYSIS
• The owners believed that less people and small group of people can make
quick decisions. But the same thing can nto be applied when she want to
expand her business the span of control is limited under the owner. If size
of the firm increases the flat structure is less effective.
Initially they believe in providing quality goods but afterwards they believe in
profit motive. They have to stay on their initial objective. MIS system providing
so many information, it also create a problem. Most of the employees are
depended on technology, which reduces their creativity. They should have to
go for franchisee.