Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2005/2006
ABDURAHMAN M M OWAG
I certify that I have read this thesis and that in my opinion it is fully adequate in scope
and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Masters in Engineering.
(Electrical - Electronics & Telecommunications)
Signature : ……………………………
Date : …………………………………
Multiband Antenna for GSM and 3G Mobile System
ABDURAHMAN M M OWAG
May 2006
I declare that this entitled” Multiband Antenna for GSM and 3G Mobile System”
is a result of my own work except as clearly cited in the references
Signature: ………………………..……
Date: …………………………………..
To my beloved parents, beloved brothers and sisters, and all of my
family members…….
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the name of ALLAH, the most Gracious, the Most Merciful for
giving me the determination and will to complete this study.
.
I deeply appreciate the inspirations and guideline that I have
received from my supervisor Professor Dr. Tharek Bin. Abdul Rahman
for his advice, guidance, support and encouragement.
Finally, I would also like to thank all of my family for their moral
support on me, my parents, my brothers and my sisters who give me a
real love, prayer and support.
Abstract
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 introduction 1
1.2 Historical review 2
1.2.1 Mobile communication 3
1.2.2 The Wireless Revolution 3
1.3 Problem background 3
1.4 Objectives and Methodology of the project 5
1.5 Organization of the project 6
2.1 Introduction 8
2.2 The Evolution of Mobile Telephone Systems 8
2.3 Background and History 9
2.4 GSM (Global System mobile) 10
2.5 UMTS(Universal Mobile Telecommunications 11
System)
2.6 3G (Third Generation )- Mobile Evolution 12
2.7 Different Design available on literature 13
2.7.1 Design of a Multiband Internal Antenna for 13
Third Generation Mobile Phone Handsets
2.7.2 Multiband Folded Planar Monopole Antenna 14
for Mobile Handset
3.1 Introduction 20
3.2 Monopole Antennas 20
3.3 Planer Antennas 23
3.3.1 Microstrip Patch Antennas 23
3.3.2 Planar Inverted-F Antenna 26
3.4 Dielectric Resonator Antennas 28
3.5 Optimum Design of Compact Antenna For 31
Mobile Communications
3.6 Slot Antennas 32
41
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
5
6 52
CONCLUSION&FUTURE WORK
6.1 Conclusion 52
6.2 Future work 53
References 54
List of Figures
A15 The dialog for the 1st feed object with all parameters 72
filled in
A16 The dialog for the 2nd feed object with all parameters 72
filled in
A23 The Pattern dialog box for the display on Pattern View 79
List of Table
Table Title Page
1.1 Frequency Bands for a few Wireless Applications 4
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
The sizes and weights of mobile handsets have rapidly been reduced due to
the development of modern integrated circuit technology and the requirements of
the users. Conventional monopole-like antennas have remained relatively large
compared to the handset itself. Thus, built-in antennas are becoming very promising
candidates for applications in mobile handsets.
Most built-in antennas currently used in mobile phones are based on planar
inverted-F antennas (PIFAs) [1]. In addition, since the antenna is inside the phone it
is not prone to breakage or damage, which is commonly encountered with the so-
called external stub-type antenna. Currently mobile phones with small internal
antennas are already in the market.
Traditionally most mobile phones and handset haven been equipped with the
monopole antenna .monopole antenna are very simple in design and construction and
are well suited to mobile communication application. The most ¼ monopole
antenna is the wipe antenna, which can operate at range of frequencies and deal with
most environmental conditions better than other monopole antennas.
Multiband wireless phone has become popular recently because they permit
people to use the same phone in multi network that have different frequencies. Table
1.1 lists a few useful wireless applications and their operating frequencies. Systems
that require multiband operation require antenna that resonate at the specific
frequencies. This only adds complexity to the antenna design problem.
The sizes and weights of mobile handsets have rapidly been reduced due to
the development of modern integrated circuit technology and the requirements of
the users.
But they have remained relatively large compared to the handset itself, and
they have lack of shielding mechanisms, to direct any radiating waves away from
user’s body which causes potential harm to the user’s health and causes cancers.
The fundamental aim of this thesis is to design a multi band antenna suitable
for telephone handset. By using suitable antenna, the space demand of the antenna
as part of a telephone handset can be minimized, thus reducing the obtrusiveness of
the handset’s appearance. This design has these primary objectives
Select and design an efficient, low profile and realizable antenna capable of
operating at a number of frequencies bands (900MHz, 1800 MHz, 1900 MHz and
2000MHz) antenna for GSM and the third generation (3G) mobile system.
Chapter one includes the introduction part of the project, the problem
background with the objectives, methodology and the implementation plan of this
project.
Chapter five includes the result and the discussion of the simulation in terms
of return Loss, effects of the additional strip position and its size, effects of the
ground plane size, the three-dimensional far field patterns, the two-dimensional far
field patterns and the antenna gain.
2.1 Introduction
The literature review shows some descriptions of the low profile antenna
especially about the multiband frequencies that they can operate at. GSM900,
DCS1800, PCS1900, and UMTS2000.It also study the performance of them in terms
of input impedance, field patterns and gain. A number of papers explaining the
different types of multiband antennas for multiple frequencies are presented here.
The idea of cell-based mobile radio service was formulated in the United
States at Bell Labs in the early 1970s. However, the Nordic countries were the first
to introduce cellular services for commercial use with the introduction of the Nordic
Mobile Telephone (NMT) in 1981.
Cellular systems began in the United States with the release of the advanced
mobile phone service (AMPS) system in 1983. The AMPS standard was adopted by
Asia, Latin America, and Oceanic countries, creating the largest potential market in
the world for cellular.
In the early 1980s, most mobile telephone systems were analog rather than
digital, like today's newer systems. One challenge facing analog systems was the
inability to handle the growing capacity needs in a cost-efficient manner. As a result,
digital technology was welcomed. The advantages of digital systems over analog
systems include ease of signaling, lower levels of interference, integration of
transmission and switching, and increased ability to meet capacity demands.
Different mobile systems are classified according to their generation:
i. First generation (1G); Analog systems with basic speech service.
Examples: NMT (Scandinavia and Finland), TACS (Great Britain),
and AMPS (North America).
iv. Third generation (3G); Further improved data services (higher bit
rates, streaming services e.g. video).
Examples: WCDMA.
v. Fourth generation (4G); Unclear what it will look like, and if it will
come. Common guesses are: even higher bit rates, ad-hoc systems,
multi-hop (peer-to-peer).
GSM stands for Global System for Mobiles. This is a world-wide standard
for digital cellular telephony, or as most people know them Digital Mobile
Telephones. GSM was created by the Europeans, and originally meant "Group
Special Mobile", but this didn't translate well, so the now common more globally
appealing name was adopted. GSM is a published standard by ETSI, and has now
enjoys widespread implementation in Europe, Asia, and increasingly America.
Throughout the evolution of cellular telecommunications, various systems
have been developed without the benefit of standardized specifications. This
presented many problems directly related to compatibility, especially with the
development of digital radio technology. The GSM standard is intended to address
these problems.
This in turn provides the opportunity for operators to build on the brand-
based relationships they already enjoy with their customers - and drive new revenue
opportunities by encouraging additional traffic, stimulating new usage patterns and
strengthening customer loyalty.
For customers already enjoying voice and data services via 2G and 2.5G,
UMTS/WCDMA delivers even more of what they like doing already faster, more
efficiently and with new possibilities. For many of the 1.2 billion customers of
second generation networks, UMTS is Third Generation mobile.
This paper [4] presents a novel triple-band antenna that consists of a driven
meander-line element and two parasitic coupled elements. The geometrical
configuration, size, and proximity of the driven and parasitic elements help
materialize the desired multiband operation. The complete antenna assembly is
internal to the handset. The antenna can be tuned to operate either in the 824–894
MHz, 880–960 MHz, and 1850–1990 MHz bands or in the 824–894 MHz, 880–960
MHz, and 1710–1880 MHz bands.
The concept described in the paper can also be used to achieve other triple or
multiband operations. The size of the antenna is 50 mm by 10 mm by 6 mm (3 cm )
or less. The analysis of the antenna is conducted using a full-wave method of
moments (MoM) software package called IE3D. The present analysis of the antenna
does not contain the effect of the user’s head and hand on the antenna impedance and
pattern characteristics.
This paper[5] present a multiband handset antenna that can afford multiband
applications in the mobile systems, including GSM (880–960 MHz), DCS (1720–
1880 MHz), PCS (1850–1990 MHz), UMTS (1920 2170 MHz), and ISM bands
(2400–2484 MHz).
The planar monopole antenna can be constructed into different shapes such
as circle, square, trapezoidal, or pentagonal. Among these shapes, the square planar
monopole is favorable for its consistent radiation pattern over the operation
bandwidth. However, it has a large ground plane size and antenna height (larger
than one tenth of the lowest operating frequency), which make it unsuitable for using
in mobile phones. Recently, the antenna is integrated with the ground plane of the
circuit board of the mobile phone. However, the proposed configuration, with a
shorted rectangular patch, covers only about 10% of the operation bandwidth.
This paper [6] proposes a novel planar monopole antenna design with a very
low profile antenna (height less than 0.04 times the operating wavelength in the free
space) (the total antenna height is only 12 mm for operating at the 900-MHz band).
The proposed antenna, 12 mm in height and 30 mm in width has been constructed,
and the obtained bandwidths cover the 900-MHz band global system for mobile
communication (GSM), 1800-MHz-band digital communication system (DCS),
1900-MHz-band personal communication system (PCS), and 2050-MHz-band
universal mobile telecommunication system (UMTS).
The antenna presented in this paper [7] combines several techniques applied
simultaneously which are necessary to reduce the size of these antennas while
maintaining good Multiband/wideband performance. The main resonator is a dual-
band PIFA antenna tuned to operate at center frequencies of 935 MHz and 1930
MHz. The introduction of a slot into this element allows a frequency decrease of
its fundamental resonance while the use of an end positioned capacitive load allows
its higher order modes to be decreased in frequency.
The antenna presented in this paper [8] is based on the quad-band structure,
and another technique is applied here to achieve the tuning of its higher order
resonances in the WLAN band.
The resulting structure is a well matched antenna in the GSM and the 2 GHz
bands. Three quarter wavelength type, parasitic shorted patches are then added to
widen these bandwidths. Each one is connected to the ground plane by metallic
strips and located near the main patch in order to be efficiently electromagnetically
coupled. A meticulous simulated parametric study was conducted on each patch by
independently changing their physical parameters in order to identify and control
their higher-order modes around 5 GHz. It was found that the tuning and matching
process of the resonances of all the parasitics led to only small modifications.
This paper [9] introduces a new internal antenna for Multiband cell phones
comprise a U-shaped elongated flat conductor featuring a closed meandered slot, a
ground and a feed leg.
A dual-band PIFA component, when coupled with the handset circuit board,
exhibits one resonance in the low cellular band 900 MHz, and one in the high band
1800 MHz. The FICA exhibits two resonances in those bands, plus an additional
resonant mode that can be typically tuned to extend the higher cellular band
coverage
This paper [11] presents a novel compact six-band internal antenna for
mobile handsets covering the GSM900, GPS1570, DCS1800, PCS1900,
WCDMA2000, and ISM2450 bands. The proposed antenna consists of two layer
patches and a folded stub. The two patches share a common shorting strip, while the
folded stub is not grounded. The antenna was realized within a volume of 36*17*8
mm3.
This paper [12] introduces the concept of the intelligent quadrifilar helix
antenna (I-QHA) as an antenna for handled mobile terminals. The potential
advantages of using the I-QHA in both terrestrial and satellite mobile
communications are presented. The I-QHA may be used as a multiband or
multimode antenna, allowing a handset to operate in different frequencies bands and
in both terrestrial and satellite communications environment. The adaptive matching
component of the I-QHA not only matches the antenna for different frequency bands,
hut counters the detuning effects caused by the user.
Finally, diversity gain improvements to up to 14dB in heavily shadowed
environments, achieved by implementing diversity technique on element of the I-
QHA, are demonstrated.
2.8 Summary
The analysis and designs of multiband internal antennas for the application of
mobile handset are presented. It has been demonstrated that the antennas can operate
either in the GSM 900/GSM1800 MHz/ UMTS2000 MHz/ bands. In addition, those
antennas have the advantages of compact antenna size, low cost, simple structure,
and multiband operation, the proposed antenna has omnidirectional radiation for all
operating bands. These performances suggest that the designs are not only suitable
for present-day wireless communication, but also future- generation mobile
communication system.
CHAPTER 3
3.1 Introduction
The helix with a smaller radius for 1800MHz operation is placed inside the
helix with a larger radius for 900MHz operation. The second design uses two
different pitches, the global system for mobile communication (GSM; 880-960
MHz) and the digital communication system (DCS; 17 10-1880 MHz) for mobile
phone [17] [18]. Although the antenna height of these dual-frequency designs has
been greatly reduced in comparison with that of a straight monopole, they are still
larger than the wavelength of the lowest operating frequency. It is impossible to
integrate such monopole antennas with the mobile units.
3.3 Planar Antennas
(1)
Where c is the speed of light, L is the patch length of the rectangular microstrip
antenna, and is the relative permittivity of the grounded dielectric substrate.
From equation (1), it is found that the radiating patch of the microstrip
However, with the use a dielectric substrate with larger permittivity and
overall size reduction at a fixed operating frequency, the impedance bandwidth of a
microstrip antenna is usually decreased. Figure.3.5 shows the effect of substrate
thickness on impedance bandwidth and efficiency for two values of dielectric
constants [24]. While the bandwidth increases monotonically with thickness, a
decrease in the value increases the bandwidth.
Figure.3.4: Configurations of a rectangular patch antenna with (a) a shorting wall,
(b) a shorting plate or partial shorting wall, and (c) a shorting pin.
Figure.3.5: Effect of substrate thickness on impedance bandwidth and efficiency for
two dielectric constants.
DRAs also have the advantage of easy, simple, and flexible excitation
through the use of a coaxial probe, a microstrip line, an aperture-coupling, or a
coplanar waveguide (CPW) [29][33-37] as shown in Figure.3.10. The microstrip,
aperture-coupling, and coplanar waveguide potentially help the integration of DRAs
with microwave integrated circuits (MICs).
order of where is the free space wavelength. When operating in the 5.2
GHz wireless local area network (WLAN) band, the antenna has a low profile of
only 1.9 mm and occupies a small area of 10 x 10 mm2, with the use of a DR
element having a of 90.5 [38]. The drawbacks, when a high DR element is
used, are a great increase in the Q-factor and a consequent reduction in bandwidth,
with the resonance becoming very sensitive to temperature change.
So far, the typical antennas which are used and developed for mobile
communications have been reviewed. These antennas are still being successfully
applied to present-day mobile units. Further optimized designs, however, are
required in order to satisfy future mobile communications design. The development
of the user’s mobility requirements makes it necessary to extend the operation of a
terminal to cover two or more standards. The typical antennas are compared to find
the optimum design of compact antennas for mobile communications as shown in
Table 3.1.
For the optimized designs, a small size, lightweight, low profile, integration,
and robustness, which are almost common standards, must be fulfilled. In addition,
material and assembling costs must be kept as low as possible. Moreover, multi-
and/or broad- bandwidths that implement different combinations of frequency bands,
omni-directional radiation patterns, and circular polarization must be required to
improve the antenna performance.
The preferred optimum design, therefore, has to have small radiating patches
with multiple resonances, covering different bands, be easily adapted to the shape of
the handset, and be integrated within the back cover or suitable for microwave
integrated circuits (MICs). Using this optimum design, the terminal becomes more
robust, as there are no external radiating elements that could easily break off, and the
cost of the antennas can be reduced.
The slot antenna, which has been investigated since at least the 1940s [36], is
comprised of a narrow slit in a ground plane as shown in Figure.3.11. Slot antennas
are the dual of the microstrip antennas [48]. This means that the slot antennas have
low profile, easier construction, low cost, lightweight, and robustness like the
microstrip antennas. The microstrip antennas normally exhibit unidirectional
radiation pattern and a narrow bandwidth, whereas the slot antennas produce
bidirectional and unidirectional radiation patterns with larger bandwidth.
Though, with modification, the slot antenna can adopt various excitation
schemes, such as waveguide, CPW, coaxial, slotline or microstrip line, the slot
antennas are usually fed by microstrip lines or by coplanar waveguides (CPW5)
[49][50]. The advantage of the CPW-feed is that the metal layer of both the feed line
and the radiator is on the same side of the substrate. This eliminates the need for via
holes for ground connection, potentially lowers the fabrication costs and offers easy
integration with monolithic microwave integrated circuits. A combination of
microstrip lines and slots offer an additional degree of freedom in the design of slot
antennas. These antennas can also be produced with desired polarization, and they
are less sensitive to manufacturing tolerances than are microstrip antennas [50].
However, the slot antenna has large input impedance, nearly 500 ohm, where
the resonant half-wavelength slot antenna is desirable for its compact size. This
matching problem can be solved by using an offset microstrip feed or the folded-slot
antenna. The use of additional slots can reduce the radiation resistance, while the
overall length of the antenna remains approximately a half-wavelength [49-51]. The
CPW version of the folded slot antenna has been investigated extensively [52-54].
This antenna requires no input matching and has a broad radiation pattern, which
makes it an inexpensive, compact, and a good candidate for wireless communication
systems.
Another problem is that slot antennas have limited bandwidth, which is the
reason why this type of antenna receives less attention from researchers. A few
attempts have been made to increase the bandwidth of CPW-fed slot antennas,
including the use of a bow-tie slot [55] [56] or shortening the upper slot [57]. In [58],
a square slot antenna by using a CPW feed with widened tuning stub presented a
large bandwidth of 60%.
As well as the reasons describe before proposed antenna [64] was chosen as
the basis because of its ability to facilitate multiband operations. The cellular system
currently operate at a number of frequency bands (such900 MHz, 1800MHz
and2.0GHz), thus there being a demand for antenna that can operate at multiple
bands. As mobile phones are becoming smaller with time, it is not feasible for
separate antenna element to be used to facilitate multiband operations as shown in
Figure.4.1.
The proposed new antenna in this work is shown in Figure. 4.1 The new
radiating strip as an additional resonator is directly connected to the feed strip and
positioned at a plane perpendicular to the ground plane and the original folded patch.
The new antenna also comprises a folded radiating patch in the first layer, a ground
plane in the second layer, a supporting foam in-between a short-circuited strip, a feed
strip, and a stub extended from the folded patch.
The patch is connected to the ground plane via a vertical short-circuited strip
and is fed via a feed strip connected to a 50- transmission line etched on the back of
the ground plane. At the first layer, the long bent portion of the antenna is tuned to
have a relatively low-band resonance frequency such as 900 MHz and the short part
of the antenna is tuned to have a high-band resonance frequency such as 1800 MHz.
The stub extended from the long bent portion is to finely tune the resonance at the
low band.
Compared to the designs in [65], [66], the size of the newly proposed antenna can be
reduced by an order of 20%, which is desirable since the size of mobile phones is
becoming smaller according to consumer preferences. The new additional strip is
like a PIFA antenna and is tuned to have a second high resonance frequency, such as
2100 MHz. The new quad-band antenna was developed within the limits of a 36*
16* 8 mm3 area as shown in Figure. 4.2.
4.3 Simulation
With a suitable antenna chosen for further development, the next step is to
verify the operation of the antenna at the prescribed frequencies in term of input
impedance (Return loss) and field patterns.
To achieve this, an antenna design software package, called Zeland
FIDELITY, has been selected to develop and to simulate this antenna. Zeland
FIDELITY is based on a finite-difference time domain (FTDT) which is based on
full-wave electromagnetic simulator.
Some types of models with a given technique will excel, and other type of
models with the same technique would have difficulty performing rapidly and
accurately. FDTD is a very versatile modeling technique. FDTD is a time domain
technique, and when a time domain pulse (Gaussian pulse) is used as the souse pulse,
then a wide frequency range is solved with only one simulation.
4.6 Summary
In this chapter, the new design has been proposed in that a new metal strip as an
additional resonator is directly connected with a feed strip and positioned at a plane
perpendicular to a ground plane. With the new design scheme, a multi-band antenna
for covering GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900, and UMTS2000 bands for use in
mobile handsets have been carried out. Compared with the parasitic form, the size of
the proposed antennas can be reduced by an order of 20%. Moreover, the
impedance matching for each band becomes easy. The new multi -band antennas
have been developed within the limits of a 36* 16* 8 mm3 area.
The antenna has also been analyzed using the FDTD technique
CHAPTER 5
The simulated result (with out plastic cover )according to -10 dB are 70MHz
(890-960MHz) at the lower band and1100MHZ (1800-2900MHz)at the upper band
respectively so the antenna has the capacity to cover GSM900, GSM 1800 , GSM
1900 , UMTS 2000 ,and Bluetooth 2450 bands as shown in Figure .5.1 .
For small PIFA-like antennas, the finite ground plane can be considered as a
radiator. Therefore, it is necessary to study the effects of the ground plane size on
the impedance characteristics of the new antenna. With regard to our design, it is
observed that the ground plane length has a large effect on the upper band with the
length varying from 60 to 100 mm, while the lower band almost keeps unchanged.
It can be seen that the additional strip position and its width mainly affect the
impedance matching of the upper band. The matching will become decreased when
the additional strip bottom approaches very near to the ground plane as high
capacitance may be introduced in this case. The bandwidths of the lower band
almost keep constant with the additional strip position and its size varying.
Figure.5.2: Simulated 3-D radiation pattern for the proposed Antenna at (a) 0.9GHz
(b) 1.8 GHz (c) 2 GHz (d) 2.4 GHz
There was a very slight drop in the electric field strength in direction of the
two ends of the antenna. The far field performance of the antenna at 0.9 GHz was
very satisfactory, while the radiation pattern of the antenna operated at the resonant
frequency of 1.8GHz and 2GHz.were also omni directional.
While the three-dimensional field patterns indicated the electric field strength
coverage of the antenna from all directions around the antenna, it must be considered
that an antenna used for mobile applications can not be guaranteed to be positioned
in a particular orientation. With mobile application, the antenna is expected to
operate in cluttered mobile environments where signal polarization is frequently
randomized by reflections. Therefore, the performance of antennas in terms of both
polarizations (i.e. the E-phi and E-theta polarization) was considered.
5.5.1. GSM 9OO MHz
The horizontal polarization is the dominant one with uniform variation at all
direction which is between -32 to -35dB. The vertical polarizations is the dominant
one with uniform variation angle between 0 to +180 which is between - 44 to -53dB,
and the other dominant one with uniform variation between 0 to -180which is
between -54 to -70dB
5.5.2. GSM 18OO MHz
The horizontal polarization is the dominant one with uniform variation at all
direction which is between 0 to -5dB. The vertical polarizations is the dominant one
with uniform variation angle between 0 to +180 which is between -14 to -18dB ,
and the other dominant one with uniform variation between 0 to -180which is
between - 20 to -22dB
The horizontal polarization is the dominant one with uniform variation at all
direction which is between 0 to -5dB. The vertical polarizations is the dominant one
with uniform variation angle between 0 to +180 which is between -14 to -18dB ,
and the other dominant one with uniform variation between 0 to -180which is
between - 20 to -22dB
5.5.4. UMTS 2000 MHz
The horizontal polarization is the dominant one with uniform variation at all
direction which is between 0 to -5dB. The vertical polarizations is the dominant one
with uniform variation angle at all direction which is between -13 to -20 dB.
5.5.5. ISM2450 MHz
The horizontal polarization is the dominant one with uniform variation angle
at all direction which is between 0 to -5dB. The vertical polarization is the dominant
one with uniform variation at all direction which is between -12 to -16 dB.
From the result it appeared that, antenna operating at the first resonant
frequency, the resulting far-field patterns in the horizontal plane were as expected
from a typical micro strip antenna. The E-phi polarization and E-theta polarization
are omni-directional.
For the case where the antenna was simulated at the upper resonant
frequencies, the results were quite varied in quality. The planar antenna at the
second resonant frequency lost one of the nulls from the E-theta polarization but had
a degraded E-phi polarization. However, when the planar antenna was operating at
the third frequency. Both the polarization. Though almost identical to the case for
the second resonant frequency, were slightly degraded. Therefore, it can be
concluded that dual polarization performance of the planar antenna improves as the
resonant frequency is increased . Overall; however, the results were quite
impressive and indicated that the planar antenna is well suited to mobile applications.
Figure.5.8: The peak antenna gain of 900 ,1800,1900,2000and 2400 MHz bands
From the above graph its seen that the beak antenna gain is varying between
3.3dBi to 3.1 for 900, 1800, 1900, 2000and 2400 MHz bands.
5.7 Summary
With the new design, a multi-band antenna for covering GSM900, GSM1800,
GSM1900, UMTS2000, and ISM2450 bands have been carried out. The results are
very encouraging. The simulated return loss is smaller than -10dB in the desired
frequency band. The radiation patterns are therefore expected to be those of omni-
directional in cases. The gains of antenna remain stable over each band with a
variation of 3 dBi in the worst case.
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION&FUTURE WORK
6.1 Conclusion
The small size of today’s handsets is a big challenge for the antenna design.
The antenna should be as small as possible, but on the other side, a maximum of
antenna performance is demanded. The miniaturisation leads not only to a smaller
volume available for the antenna but rises also the interaction between the antenna,
the casing of the handset and the user. New antenna concepts are necessary,
combining small volume with good performance in the user vicinity.
Another aspect of antenna design is the integration of the antenna in the plastic
casing of the handset. Today different concepts are used on the market to fulfill the
necessary requirements.
Currently mobile phones with small internal antennas are already in the
market. Designing an internal antenna for a mobile phone is difficult especially when
dual or multiband operation is required. Although obtaining dual-frequency
resonance is straightforward, satisfying the bandwidth requirement for the respective
communication bands is difficult. Further complications arise when the antenna has
to operate in close proximity to objects like shielding cans, screws, battery, and
various other metallic objects.
As it mentioned earlier, the proposed antenna was chosen to form the basis of
this thesis .The proposed antenna as presented by Guo and Chia [2], meets the
antenna design requirements. The antenna is multiband design and is much simpler
to tune to the correct resonant frequencies .The proposed antenna possess the
qualities that make it more favorable antenna for mobile communication ,such as a
small and compact ,fully self-matching ,capable of dual polarization in all directions
as well as simple to fabricate.
The future work is to fabricate the prototype of the simulated antenna. Test
the prototype in real time and measure the performance of the antenna in terms of
return loss and radiation pattern, then compare simulated and measured result .
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[1] K. Fujimoto and J. R. James, Eds., Mobile Antenna Systems Handbook, 2nd ed.
Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2001.
[2] Z. Ying, “Multi frequency-band antenna,”, PCT application WO01/91 233, May
2001.
[4] Ali, M.; Hayes, G.J.; Huan-Sheng Hwang; Sadler, R.A.” Design of a multiband
internal antenna for third generation mobile phone handsets” Antennas and
Propagation, IEEE Transactions on Volume 51, Issue 7, July 2003 Page(s)
[5] Shun-Yun Lin;” Multiband folded planar monopole antenna for mobile handset”
Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions on Volume 52, Issue 7, July 2004
Page(s)
[6] Kin-Lu Wong; Gwo-Yun Lee; Tzung-Wern Chiou;” A low-profile planar
monopole antenna for multiband operation of mobile handsets” Antennas and
Propagation, IEEE Transactions on Volume 51, Issue 1, Jan. 2003 Page(s)
[7] Ciais, P.; Staraj, R.; Kossiavas, G.; Luxey, C.;” Design of an internal quad-band
antenna for mobile phones” Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, IEEE
[see also IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters] Volume 14, Issue 4, April
2004 Page(s)
[8] Ciais, P.; Staraj, R.; Kossiavas, G.; Luxey, C.;” Compact internal multiband
antenna for mobile phone and WLAN standards” Electronics Letters Volume
40, Issue 15, 22 July 2004 Page(s)
[9] Di Nallo, C.; Faraone, A.;” Multiband internal antenna for mobile phones”
Electronics LettersVolume 41, Issue 9, 28 April 2005 Page(s)
[10] Yarasi, S.; Kadambi, G.R.; Hebron, T.;” Conformal shaped PIFAs for mobile
communication applications” Antennas and Propagation Society International
Symposium, 2003. IEEEVolume 3, 22-27 June 2003 Page(s)
[11] Yong-Xin Guo; Hwee Siang Tan;” New compact six-band internal antenna”
Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters Volume 3, Issue 1, 2004 Page(s)
[12] Leach, S.M.; Agius, A.A.; Saunders, S.R.” Intelligent quadrifilar helix
antenna”;Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation, IEE Proceedings -Volume
147, Issue 3, June 2000 Page(s):219 - 223
[16] K. Fujimoto and J. R. James, Mobile Antenna System Handbook, 2nd ed.,
Boston: Artech House, 2001.
[18] K. L. Wong, Planar Antennas for Wireless Communications, New Jersey: John
Wiley & Sons, 2003.
[20] K. L. Wong, Compact and Broadband Microstrip Antennas, New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 2002.
[21] C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theoiy: Analysis and Design, 2’ ed., New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 1997.
[23] R. Waterhouse, “Small microstrip patch antenna,” Electron. Lett., vol. 31, pp.
604-605, April 13, 1995.
[27] S. Tarvas and A. Isohatala, “An internal dual-band mobile phone antenna,” in
2000 IEEE Antennas Propagat. Soc. mt. Symp. Dig., pp. 266-269.
[41] Y. X. Guo and K. M. Luk, “On the Improving Coupling Between Coplanar
Waveguide and Low-Permittivity Dielectric Resonator Antenna,” in 2002 IEEE
Antennas Propagat. Soc. mt. Symp. Dig., pp. 486-489.
[60] F. Le Bolzer and A. Louzir, “Multi-Band Annular Slot Antenna for WLAN
Applications,” in 2001 lEE ll Int. Conf Antennas Propagat., pp. 529-532.
In this chapter, we will discuss how to use the Zeland FIDILTY for modeling
the antenna structure and then simulation and post processing setups:
Step 1: Use paper to draw the cross-section first for the desired structure, for this
particular thesis the structure is defined in chapter 4. We have to define its
dimensions in x,y and z axis and also need to decide the range of the
simulation space.
Step 2: Run ZWF (or ZFidelity Workshop.exe).we will have a blank window.
Select new in the file menu. ZWF will prompt you for the Length Unit.
Step 3: Select “mm” for unit and select OK to continue. Then ZWF will prompt you
for Dielectric Parameters as shown in Figure A.1
Step 4: Click at the Insert button at the upper right location of the dialog box. It’s
the button next to the cross button. No. 1dielectric is created with default
parameter values .the parameters are displayed in the edit fields.
Step 5: Select OK to continue. Then, ZWF will prompt you for Meshing Parameter
as shown in Figure A.2
Step 6: Change the following parameters: the Highest Frequency (GH) =10; The
Center Frequency (GH) =7; The Cutoff Frequency (GH) =3.
Step7: Select OK to continue. Then, ZWF will prompt for Layout and Grid
Parameters as shown in Figure A.3
Step 8: Select the New button on the X-grid list box. Enter (Start=-5, End=40 and
step=0.5)
Step 9: Repeat step 8 for the New button on Y-grid & Z-grid list box. Enter (Start=-
5, End=40 and step=0.5) and Start=-5, End=40 and step=0.5) respectively
Figure.A.2: The dialog for Meshing Parameters
Steps 11: Select the Change button for the Minimum Z Boundary and change it to
1st Order Mur or FMUR. Select the Change button for the Maximum Z
Boundary and change it to FMUR. Select the Finish button.
Step 12: Click the lift mouse button at the Object List Window (the lower left
window) to focus on it. Then, type the Insert button on your keyboard .ZWF
will prompt you for a selection of the objects.
Step 13: Select the Rectangular Cylinder object and select OK.
Step 15: Repeat step 13, for the parameters shown in Figure A.5, A.6, A.7, A8, A.9,
A.10 A.11, A.12 and A.13
Figure.A.4: The1st object in the list
Step 17 Select the Wire object in the Object List window. Then, enter the parameters
shown in Figure A.15
Figure.A.15: The dialog for the 1st feed object with all parameters filled in
Step 18: Repeat step 17, for the parameters shown in Figure A.16
Figure .A.16: The dialog for the 2nd feed object with all parameters filled in
Step19 Select View Parameters in View menu. Change the Elevation Angle from
120 to 60 degree and the Azimuth Angle from30 to -60degrees. Select OK to
continue. Scroll the 3D View window vertically to make the bottom portion
of the structure visible. The 3D view display should look like Figure A.17
Step 20: Define the output for Far-Field radiation pattern, select Output Definition in
Parameters menu.
Step21: Select the New button at the top right, select the Far Field. Then, a dialog
will come up as shown in Figure A.18
Setp22: Type” Start Freq=0.9, End Freq=2.4 and Number of Freq = 25” in the fields.
Select OK to continue.
Step 24: Select Simulation Setup in Pre-Process. Enter the parameters shown in
Figure A.19
Step 25: Select OK to invoke the FIDELITY for an FDTD simulation. Then, close
the ZWF in File menu. The fidelity simulator is true window NT application.
We make it the DOS style because we want to have the batch file simulation
capability discussed above. For this structure, fidelity will take about 5
minutes to finish the simulation. The simulation converged in 5412 time
steps as shown in Figure A.20
Step 26:Re-run the ZWF to get the empty window. Open the file that has been saved.
Step 27: ZWF will warn you that the opened file is associated with a simulation
setup. Select OK to continue
Step 28: Select the Find S-Parameters in Post-Process menu on ZFW main menu.
The setup for Parameter Extraction dialog comes up as shown in Figure A.21
Step 29: Change the normalization to “Normalized to Port Impedance. Type “Start
Freq=0.9, End Freq=5.5 and Number of Freq = 900” in the fields. Then, hit
enter.
Step 30: Select OK to continue. ZWF does not have the S-parameters display
capability. We need to run the MODUA simulator for it. By the default, the
MODUA simulator will be invoked automatically to display the result.
Step 31: Select Define Display Graph in the Control menu of MODUA. Select the
“dB and Phase of S-Parameters”. Select OK to continue. Select dB[s(1,1)]”
and OK to continue.
Step 32: Select Save S-Parameters in File menu of MODUA. Select OK to confirm
the default file name
Figure.A.21: The dialog for S-Parameter extraction object in the list
Step 33: Open the ZWF file that has been saved. Select Radiation Pattern in Post
Processing menu. It will be informed that the radiation pattern is saved into
(pat. File).
Step34: The (pat. File) can be opened by the Patten View program for display of
radiation patterns.
Step 35: Run the Patterns View. Move the mouse to the list box window. Click
right mouse button. A pop up menu will come up. Select Add Pattern.
Step 36: Select the pat file that has been saved in step20. Select Open. Then, the
(pat. file) will be added into the list as shown in Figure A.22
Figure.A.22: The window of Patten View
Step 37: Select 2D Pattern in Display menu. Then, a dialog box will come up for
the display parameters as shown in Figure A.23
Figure.A.23: The Pattern dialog box for the display on Pattern View
Step 38: Select Plot Style as “Polar Plot”, the Scale Style as”dBi (Directivity)”.
Check E-Theta and E-Phi in the list box for f=0.9 GHz, Phi=0 .Select OK to
continue. The radiation pattern will display for f= 0.9GHz
Step 39: Repeat step 38, for f=1.8, 1.9,2 and 2.4GHz